In Vitro In Vivo Extrapolation and its Applications in Predicting PK Population Variability
by user
Comments
Transcript
In Vitro In Vivo Extrapolation and its Applications in Predicting PK Population Variability
In Vitro In Vivo Extrapolation and its Applications in Predicting PK Population Variability Alice Ke, PhD Consultant & Scientific Advisor Simcyp Limited Outline • Clearance concept • In Vitro In Vivo Extrapolation (IVIVE) • Linking PBPK and IVIVE, accounting for variability • Transporters • Industry/Regulators views • Future prospects © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. Well-stirred liver model James R. Gillette, Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1971 Commentary: A physiological approach to hepatic clearance Wilkinson and Shand , CPT, 1975 Pang and Rowland, JPK Biopharm 1977 fB,Out = Unbound drug in venous blood / Whole emergent blood concentration • Unbound concentration of drug in blood cells equates to the unbound concentration in plasma. • Emergent venous blood is in equilibrium with that in the liver. Rowland, Benet and Graham, JPK Biopharm 1973 © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. Yang et al., DMD, 2007 In Vitro - In Vivo Extrapolation (IVIVE) Mechanistic Models Scaling factors in vitro CLuint In vitro CLuint In vitro system in vivo CLuint CLuint per g Liver Scaling Factor (MPGGL, HPGL) © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. Liver weight CLuint per Liver Accuracy of IVIVE approaches for human CL or CLint System AFE Ref HLM 2.3 Obach DMD 27, 1350, 1999 HLM 6.2 Ito, Pharm Res, 22, 103, 2005 HLM 2.3 Stringer, Xeno, 38, 1313, 2008 HLM 2.2 Ring, J Pharm Sci, 100, 490, 2011 HLM 5 Hallifax, Pharm Res, 27, 2150, 2010 HLM 2 Jones, Clin Pk, 50, 311, 2011 Heps 2.4 De Buck DMD, 35, 1766, 2007 Heps 5.2 Stringer, Xeno, 38, 1313, 2008 Heps 5 Heps 7.6 Hallifax 2011 Naritomi DMD 31, 580, 2003 Heps Recombinant CYP 1.53 PT 2.15 WS Stringer DMD, 37,1025, 2009 Generally many literature studies shows under-prediction from in vitro systems. Can be corrected using an empirical scaling factor. Need to understand for your in vitro system if this is necessary. © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. IVIVE predictions – Improvements over years • Non-specific binding (Obach, DMD, 1999, Riley et al., DMD, 2005) • Recombinant CYPs and ISEF values (Galetin et al., DMD, 2004; Proctor et al. Xenobiotica, 2004) • In vitro modelling to account for hepatic uptake (Soars et al., DMD, 2007) • Adding BSA and HAS-FAS to HLM (Rowland et al., DMD, 2008) • Accounting for the difference in drug ionization in extracellular and intracellular tissue water (Berezhkovskiy, J Pharm Sci, 2011) • Integrating uptake, metabolism, biliary excretion, and sinusoidal efflux (Umehara and Camenisch, Pharm Res, 2012) • Incorporating ionisation and protein binding (Poulin et al., J Pharm Sci, 2012) © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. Gut wall metabolism ‘Qgut’ , a minimal model Fg = ' Q gut ' ' Q gut '+ fu gut .CLu int −gut ' Q gut ' = CL perm ⋅ Q villi CL perm + Q villi Predicted Fg 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Observed Fg Gertz et al., DMD, 2010 Yang et al., CDM, 2007 © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. Special populations Systems Data Drug Data Trial Design Age Weight Tissue Volumes Tissue Composition Cardiac Output Tissue Blood Flows [Plasma Protein] MW LogP pKa Protein binding BP ratio In vitro Metabolism Permeability Solubility Dose Administration route Frequency Co-administered drugs Populations Mechanistic IVIVE linked PBPK models Prediction of drug PK (PD) in population of interest Jamei et al., DMPK, 2009, Rostami-Hodjegan, CPT, 2012 © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. Demographic Features of Healthy and Disease Populations Frequency Randomly Generated HV Disease Age Defined by real data © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. Age Distribution in Target Population 6000 Addicts 4500 Frequency 3000 1500 0 800 CVD 600 400 200 0 Age Category © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. MALE FEMALE The Complexity of Covariate Effects as Applied to CL Renal Function Ethnicity Plasma Proteins & Haematocrit Disease Serum Creatinine Age (Distribution in Population) Height Body Surface Area Weight Liver Volume Cardiac Output MPPGL HPGL Cardiac Index Liver Weight Intrinsic Clearance © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. Converting CLuint to CLH (1.407 +0.0158×age - 0.00038×age2 + 0.0000024×age3) MPPGL= 10 CLuint = CLuint. MPPGL.Liver Weight (whole liver) Liver Weight = Liver Volume × Liver Density Liver Volume = 0.722.BSA 1.176 (L/m2) 0.00718×Ht 0.725×Wt 0.425 f (age)+x © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. Converting CLuint to CLH CLuint = CLuint×MPPGL×Liver Weight fuB = QH×fuB×CLuint CLH = QH + fuB ×CLuint QH = %CO fu CB/Cp CB/Cp = (E:P)×HC + (1- HC) CO=f (age, BSA) HC=f (age)+f (sex) 0.00718×Ht 0.725×Wt 0.425 f (age)+x © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. Revised in vivo ontogeny functions for CYP1A2 and 3A4 (Leong et al., CPT 2012; 91: 926-931) 1.8 1.4 1.2 1 in vitro 0.8 In vivo v14.1 0.6 0.4 CYP3A4 ontogeny 1 Relative expression 1.6 Relative expression 1.2 CYP1A2 ontogeny 0.8 0.6 In vitro 0.4 In vivo v14.1 0.2 0.2 0 0 0 5 10 15 Age (y) 20 25 0 5 © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. 10 15 Age (y) 20 25 Fraction of Adult Value UGT Ontogeny 1.2 1 0.8 UGT1A1 0.6 UGT1A4 0.4 UGT1A6 UGT1A9 0.2 UGT2B7 Strassburg et al 2002 Burchell et al 1989 Onishi et al 1997 Leakey et al 1987 Coughtrie et al 1988 Miyagi and Collier 2007 Zaya et al 2006 Pacifici et al 1990 Pacifici et al 1982 Choonara et al 1989 0 0 5 10 15 20 Age (y) Leiden Collaboration – Top down vs bottom up ontogeny for UGT2B7 - Morphine - Zidovudine © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. UGT2B7 ontogeny ‘Top down’ vs ‘Bottom up’ Clearance (L/h) Glucuronidation clearance (L/h) Top down Bodyweight (kg) Bodyweight (kg) Bottom up • Take home message is that pattern of ontogeny appears to be reasonable except for early neonates • But under-prediction of CL across age band with morphine. © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. Maturation of Renal Clearance 150 100 921 subjects 50 923 subjects y = 87.674x - 14.497 R 2 = 0.9988 0 0 0.5 1 BSA (m2) 1.5 1760 subjects 2 63 subjects 160 Rhodin et al 2009 140 Rhodin, De Cock , Hayton (ml/min) Johnson et al 2006 140 De Cock et al 2014 120 GFR (ml/min) GFR (ml/min) Johnson et al 2006 Rubin et al 1949 Hayton 2000 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 5 10 Age (yr) 15 De Cock Rhodin 120 Hayton 100 Line of unity 80 60 40 20 0 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 Johnson (ml/min) © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. 120 140 Maturation of Biliary Clearance Appears to be Rapid Azithromycin Ceftriaxone Digoxin Buprenorphine Johnson et al Drug Metab Dispos. 2016 © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. Variation in Protein Binding (fu) 1.4 50 1.2 40 1 AAG (g/L) Albumin (g/L) AAG g/L = Alb = 1.1287Ln(Age) + 33.746 60 30 20 0.887 × Age D 0.38 8.89 0.38 + Age D 0.33 0.8 0.6 0.4 10 0.2 0 0 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 0.1 1 100 1000 10000 100000 Age (days) Age (days) fu = 10 1 [P] 1+ KD [P] KD = Dissociation Constant KD = 1 [P] = Serum Protein Concentration −1 fu 1 fu = In absence of changes [P ] ( 1 − fu pop * ) in dynamics of binding: 1+ × [ ] P fu pop * pop * *pop is the population under investigation i.e paediatric © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. Developing and testing a Geriatric population 1 Male - 66 to 96 y Height (males 66 to 96 y) In house testing 200 0.8 180 160 0.6 140 Height (cm) Elderly : Young CL ratio 1.2 Obs 0.4 Pred 0.2 120 100 y = 0.0012x2 - 0.4357x + 196.38 R² = 0.0475 80 60 0 40 20 0 50 75 100 Age (years) CYPs Parkinson et al 2004 Liver weight (Male) 2500 y = 478573x-1.346 Liver weight (g) 2000 1500 Clinical Simulated 1000 Power (Simulated) 500 0 60 400 70 Albumin (g/L) 60 50 40 Simulated 30 Veering Verbeeck 20 Kidney weight (g) Albumin (males) 70 Kidney weight (Female) 300 200 Power (Simulation) 0 70 80 90 100 y = 6566.4x-0.792 R² = 1 Simulation 100 10 60 90 Clinical Campion 0 80 Age (y) 60 70 Age (y) © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. 80 Age (y) 90 100 100 Scaling from in vitro: drug data vs systems data Liver In vitro data Jmax/Km or CLuint T CLuint, T per g Liver HHEP In vitro CLuint, T SF 1: REF/RAFHHEP CLuint, T per Liver Intestine SF 2: HPGL SF 3: Liver Weight Caco-2, MDCK- II, LLC-PK1 etc. Jmax/Km or CLuint T CLuint, T In Jejunum I Kidney In vitro data Jmax/Km or CLuint T PTC In vitro CLuint, T SF 1: REF/RAFPTC Brain In vitro data Jmax/Km or CLuint T SF 1: REF/RAFJejunum I CLuint, T per Kidney Replacement / Additional Organ SF 2: PTCPGK H-BMv In vitro CLuint, T SF 1: REF/RAFH-BMv CLuint, T per g Kidney Scaling via the Permeability and Surface area product SF 3: Kidney Weight CLuint, T per g Brain SF 2: H-BMvPGB CLuint, T per Brain @ BBB Jmax/Km or CLuint T CLu, T per whole organ User needs to scale to whole organ! SF 3: Brain Weight © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. SF: Scaling Factor Translating in vitro effective concentrations to concentrations at the site of action • Mechanistic, multi-compartmental tissue models (brain, kidney, liver, lung and intestine) are available • Enable more reliable estimates of intracellular tissue concentrations © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. 22 Modelling in vitro assays – a must to do! 2 Compartment Model Active Uptake Incubation Medium Volume CLint · Km · [S]EC(t) Km + [S]EC(t) Intracellular Volume CLPD· [S]EC(t) [S]IC Free [S]EC fucell CLPD · [S]IC(t) Baker et al., Xenobiotica, 2007; Soars et al., Mol Phar, 2009; Poirier et al., Mol Pharm , 2009; Menochet et al., J Pharm Exp Ther, 2012 5 Compartment Model - Transwell Heikkinen et al., 2010 Mol Pharmaceutics Korzekwa et al., 2012 DMD © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. PBPK Impact on 19 US Drug Labels in Last 2 Years Olysio (Simerprevir) Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) Edurant (Rilpivirine) Imbruvia (Ibrutinib) Opsumit (Macitentan) Hepatitis C Thrombosis & Embolism HIV infection Lymphoma and Leukemia Pulmonary Hypertension Zykadia (Ceritinbi) Odozmzo (Sonidegib) Farydak (Panobinostat) Revatio (Sildenafil) Bosulif (Bosutinib) Lung Cancer Basal Cell Carcinoma Multiple myeloma Pulmonary Hypertension Myelogenous Leukemia Lynparza (Olaparib) Movantik (Naloxegol) Tagrisso (Osimertinib) Iclusig (Ponatinib) Cerdelga (Eliglustat) Advanced Ovarian Cancer Opioid Induced Constipation Metastatic NSCLC Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Gaucher Disease Jevtana (Cabazitaxel) Cotellic (Cobimetinib) Lenvima (Lenvatinib) Aristada (Aripiprazolel) Prostate Cancer Metastatic Melanoma Thyroid cancer © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. Schizophrenia Quantitative IVIVE of Tissue Toxicity Supported by European Commission 7th FP Predict-IV Grant Hamon et al., Toxicology in Vitro, 2015 © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. 25 Summary • In a systems pharmacology paradigm, the bottom-up approach to modeling and simulation of the ADME processes of a chemical, is a valuable tool in integrating available prior information and improving decision making. • Improvement in the in vitro systems which can act as surrogates for in vivo reactions relevant to ADME • Advances in the understanding of the extrapolation factors • Advances in the development of mechanistic models of the human body • Facilitate predicting PK characteristics in a wide range of healthy or disease populations accounting for age, sex, ethnicity, genetic, etc variability • Moving towards PBPK coupling with systems biology models to predict toxicity endpoints/biomarkers and their associated variability from in vitro data © Copyright 2013 Certara, L.P. All rights reserved. 26