...

The 1981 Articles Nlost

by user

on
Category: Documents
29

views

Report

Comments

Transcript

The 1981 Articles Nlost
Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol:6, p.373-383, 1983
The
Number
Current Contents, #46, p.5-15, November 14, 1983
1981 Articles Nlost Cited
in 1981 and 1982.
2. Physical Sciences
46
November
ThM is the latest in a series of essays in
which we examine papers that become
highly cited shortly after publication.
Presumably, papers which have an immediate impact upon the research community, as indicated by rapid citation,
point to “where the action is” in science.
In this essay, we list those 1981 papers in
the physical sciences which were among
the most cited in 1981 and 1982. Recently, we published the comparable list for
the life sciences. I
Table 1 presents the 101 papers in thk
study. They are listed alphabetically by
first author, rather than by number of
citations. The purpose of this arrangement is to inhibit invidious comparisons
among papers on the basis of citation
frequency. Of course, these papers are
not necessarily
the “best” research.
Many seminal papers not listed here will
eventually be highly cited. However, the
evidence is clear from earlier studies that
most of the papers we do detect by thk
“early warning system” prove to be classics. And they persist as core papers in
the research fronts they help to identify
in the first place.
Most of the 4,000,000 papers and
books cited in Science Citation Index@
(SCP ) each year receive one or two citations over a two-year period. However,
the papers in Table 1 received an average of 41 citations: eight in 1981, and 33
in 1982. The most-cited paper received
92 citations, while the least cited received 30.
As with the 1981 life sciences papers, 1
we have chosen not to group these pa-
14,1983
pers under traditional disciplinary subject headings.
Such headings are at
times arbitrary, and always subjective.
Instead, we used the same automatic
class~lcation
scheme which helps us
identify thousands
of research
fronts
each year by processing SCI. Briefly, a
research front is a group of current papers which cite a smaller group of objectively determined core papers identified
by a single-link, co-citation
clustering
routine.
I have described
co-citation
clustering previously.z
research
Last year, we introduced
fronts as a new way of searching our index to Scient~ic Reviews m (Z.SR‘“).s
Eighty-three
of the papers in Table 1
have already been incorporated
into the
core literature of ISR research fronts.
Table 2 lists the names and numbers of
research
fronts
which
are
those
represented by at least two papers in this
study. The numbers
of the relevant
research fronts in Table 2 follow the
author addresses in Table 1.
Four of the papers identfiled as core
papers in ZSR research fronts are also
core papers for research fronts in 1S1/
GeoSciTech ‘M, our onliie data base
covering the earth sciences. Of these,
three appear in research front #81-0986,
“Observation of plasma waves near Saturn.” The other paper appears in research front #81-0803, “Electrostatic
shocks and auroral particle
acceleration. ”
An additional four papers in Table 1
cite into one or more of the cores of various research fronts, including one pa373
Tafda 1: The 1981 physical sciences articles most cited in 1981-1982. The authors’ addresses follow each citation. Code
numbers indicate the ISR ‘n research front specialties for which these are core papers. Code numbers with a . indicate the
ISllGeoSciTech
m research front specialties for which these are con papers. Code numbers with one asterisk indicate
!SI/Compu Math * research front specialties for which these are citing papers. Code numbers with two astcrkks indicate
LSI/Geo.SciTech
research front specialties
for which these are citing papers. A = number of citations received,
1981.
B= number of citations received,
1982. C= lotal number of citations received.
1981-1982.
ABC
Bfbfiogmphlc
7
30
5
34
8
32
II
66
0
32
17
21
6
51
2
49
12
40
II
20
6
27
12
45
13
31
t6
23
10
23
17
18
37
Data
Abruna H D, Denisevich P, Umana M, Meyer T J & Murray R W. Rectffyfms Jnterf.ces usfng two.
faycr fffms of electmchemknlly
polytnerkzed vfmyfpyrftflne and vhylbfpyrfdhe
complexes of mtherd.
~m ●nd koa on electrodes. 1 Amer Chem. Soc 103:1-5, 198t. Univ. North Carolina. Kcnan Labs.
Chem., Chapel Hill, NC. 83-0169
39 Alexander S, Bentasconi J, Schneider W R & Orbach R, EKclfatJoa dynamics fmrandom one.dfmen.
skmrd systems. Rev. Mod. Phy$ 53:175-98, 1981. Hebrew Unit., Racah InsL Phys., Jerusalem, Israel;
Brown Boveri Res. Ctr., Baden, Switzerland; Univ Catifomia, Dcpt. Phys.. Los Angeles, CA.
40 A“drieux A, Jerome D & Bechgaard K, Sptn-demd
w.ve ~ronnd state h the one.dkmerIsJomd con.
ductor lTMTSF12PF6t rnJcroscopk ●vJdence from ‘+7 Se and 15S NMR experfmemts. I, Phys. Lett.
42: LE7-W, 1981. Uni\. Psris-Sud, Lab. Phys, Sofids, Orsay, France: Uni\. Copenhagen. H.C. Orsted
lnst.. Copenhagen,
Denmark. 83-0558
77 Barber M, Bordoli R S, S.dgwick R D & Tyler A N. Fast atom bombardmerit 01 mtkk (F. A.B.)t m new
loo aoume lor mass spectmmemy. 1. Chem. Sot. Chem Commun
7:325-7, 1981. Univ. Manchester
Inst. Sci. Tecbnol.,
Dcpt. Chem., Manchester,
UK. 83-0764
32 Barber M, Bordoli R S, Sedgwick R D & Tyler A N. Fast atom bombardment al soJkk man km
source fmman spectrmnetry. Nature 293:270-5, 1981, Univ. Manchester Inst. Sci Technol., Dept.
Cbcm., Manchester,
UK. 83-0768
2-9 Bebck C, Haggerfy J, Izen J M, Longuemai-c C, Loomis W A, Pipkin F M, RohlJ J, Tanenbaum W,
Wilson R, SadoJf A J, Bridges D L, Chadwick K, Ganci P, Kagan H. Kass R, Lobkowicz F,
Melissinos A, Olsen S L, Poling R, Rcnenfeld C, Rucinski G, Tbomdikc E H, Warren G, Bcchis D,
Mueller J J, Potter D, Sannes F, Skubic P, Stone R, Brody A, Chen A, GoJdberg M, Honvitz N,
Kandaswamy J, Kooy H, Lariccia P, Moneti G C, Alam M S, Csorna S E, Panvim R S, Po.cher J S,
Andrews D, Berkelman K, Cabenda R, Cassel D G, DeW ire J W, Ehrtich R, Ferguson T, Gen!ile T,
GiJcbriese M G D. Gittkman B, Ha-till D L, Hemp
D, Herzlinger M, Kreinick D L, MLstry N B,
Nordberg E, Percbonok R, Plunketl R, Shinsky K A, Siemann R H, Sil,erman A, Stein PC, Stone S,
Tdman R, Tbonemann H G & Weber D. Evfdence for new-flavor productkm at the Y 14S). Phys
Rev. .LelI. 46:84-7, 1981. Harvard Univ.. Cambridge, MA: Ithaca Coil., Comet] Univ., Ithaca: Lc
Moyne Coil. and Syracuse Univ., Syracuse; Univ. Rochester. Rochester,
NY: Rutgers Univ., New
Brunswick, NJ: Vanderbilt Uni>,, Nashville, TN. 83-0563
57 Bech8aard K, Camciro K, Olsen M, Rasmussen F B & Jacobsen C S. Zero-pressure orgmtk mperccm.
ductcm dI. (te~metiylte~~kmtikakdum)-percMomte
[ITMTSF)2CI04].
Phys. Rev Leff
6852-5,
1981. Univ. Copenhagen,
H C. Omled Inst., Copenhagen: Tech. Univ. Denmark, Phys,
Lab. 111, Lyngby, Denmark. 83-0558
5 I Becbgaard K, Cameiro K, Rasmussen F B, OIXn M, Rindorf G, Jacobsen C S, Pedcrsen H J &
Scott J C. Superconductlvky
Jman organk solid. Symftesk, structure, and conductJvtty of bh
(temme~yltetiwle~fulvahnmtit
perchforale, ITMTSF12CJ041.
Amer. C’hem. S...
103:244&2,
1981. Univ, Copcnbagcn,
H C. Orsted Inst., Copenhagen; Tech. Univ. Denmark, Chmn. Lab. B &
Phys. Lab. JIL Lyngby, Denmark; Cornell Univ., Lab. Atom, Solid State Pbys., I!hoca, NY. 83.05.%
52 Bhanot G & Rcbbi C. SU12) atrfng tenskm. gbtebdJ mass arid fmerqnark potemfaf by Mom. Carfo
coittpufatlons. Nucl. Phyf. B IW469-82,
1981. Brcek haven Nat]. Lab,, Upton, NY; CERN, Geneva.
Switzerland. 83-0330
31 Blote H W J, Nightingale M P & Derrida B. Letter to dftor. (CrftJCElexponents of two.dfntersd.mml
PotfI and bond percoklk.n models.) f. Phys. A—Mafh. Gen. 14: L45-9, 1981. Dclft Univ. Tccbnol.,
Lab. Phys. Deff!, the Netherlands: Sacky Nucl. Res. Ctr. ICENS ), Sew. Thcor. Phys., Gif-sur-Yvette,
France. 83-0376
33 Bohm M C & Gleiter R. A CNDO/lNDO
mofecufar orbltnf lorrtdkm
for tke ekmenfa H to Br.
OMory. Theor. Chim. Acfa 59:127-51, 1981. Univ. Heidelberg, Jnst. Org. Chem
Heidelberg,
FRG.
831117
57 Bohr A & Mottekon B R. Om the rofe of tbe A reaomance fn tbe efkcffve spfmdepatdent
momenm of
mtcfei. Phy$ Lerr. B 103: IO-2, 1981 NieJs Bohr Jnst.; NOR DJTA, Copenhagen,
Demnark. 83-0504
44 Borgarello E, Kiwi J, Pelizzetti E, Vista M & Gratzel M, Pbotocftemlcal cfeavage of water by
p!mtocatalysfs. Nature 289: t 58-60, 1981. Swiss Fed. Ins!. Technol.,
Inst. Chem Phys., Lausanne,
Switzcrk.d;
Oniv. Torino, Inst. Anal. Chcm., Torino; SIBIT, Cm. Rcs., Spinctta Marengo, Ilaly.
83-075-4
39 Broadfoot A L, Sandel B R, Shemansky D E. Holberg J B, Smith G R. Strobcl D F, McConnell J C,
Kumar S, Hunten D M, Atreya S K, Donahue T M. Moos H W, Bertaux J 1, Bkmont J E, Pompbrey
R B & Linick S. Extreme nlfnvlofel observmfons from Voyager I encounter with Safum. Science
212:206- I 1, 1981. Univ. S. California, Earth Space Sci. Inst., Los Angcfes, CA; Naval Res. Lab.,
Wasbi@ on,
DC; York Univ.. Ontmio, Canada: Univ. Arizona, Tucson, AZ, Univ. Michigan, Am
Arbor, MJ: Johns Hopkins Oniv.. Baltimore, MD: CNRS, Serv. Aeronom..
Verrieres k Buisson.
France, Cafif. Inst. Tecbnol., Jet Propulsion Lab., Pasadena. CA. 83-1234; ● R1.0986
33 Caldcira A O & Leggett A 1. Imffu@nce of dbsfpatfon on quantum tutme!fne Im macro+copfc systems.
Phyt. Rev. Lett. 46:2t 1-4.1981. Uni\. Sussex, Sch. Moth. Phys. Sci.. Sussex. UK.
35 Chadwick K, Ganci P, Kagan H, Kass R, Lobkowicz F, Mclissinos A C, Olsen S 1, Pofin8 R,
Rosenfeld C, Rucinski G, Thomdike E H, Mueller J J, Pelter D, Sannes F. Skubic P, Stone R, Brody
A, Chen A. Goldberg M. Horwitz N, Kandaswamy J. Kwy H. Lariccia P. Moneti G C, Alam M S.
374
Bffdkogmpfdc
ABC
9
23
32
11
21
32
0
72
72
O
34
34
3
50
53
o
31
31
13
27
40
11
20
3I
7
34
41
3
38
41
9
24
33
6
25
31
2
29
31
3
27
30
7
36
43
10
26
34
I
29
30
9
31
40
O
36
36
14
18
32
6
32
38
16
46
62
Data
Csoma S E, Panvini R S, Poucher J S, Andrews D. Berkefman K. Cabenda R, Cassel D G, DeW ire
J W, Ehrfich R, Ferguson T, Gentile T, Gilchriese M G D, Gittelman B, Ha-till D L, Herrup D,
Het-zlinger M, Kreinick D L, Mistry N B, Nordberg E, Perchonok R, Plunkett R, Shmsky K A.
Siemann R H, Silverman A, Stein PC. Stone S, Talman R, Thonenmm
H G, Weber D, Bebck C,
Haggerty 1. Izcn J M, Longuemare C, Lnomis W A, Mackay W W. PIpkin F M. Rohlf J, Tanenbaum
W, WIkon R, Sadoff A J & Bridges D L. Decay of b. ffavored hadrona to sfngk.muon
and dbnuoit
ffual states. Phys. Rev. bff. 46:88-91.1981.
Univ. Rochester,
Rochester: SyTacuse Univ.; Lc Moyne
COU., Symcusc; Comeff Univ.: Jthaca COIL. Ithaca, NY; Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, NJ; Vanderbdt Univ.. Nashvifk, TN; Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA. 83-0563
Chanowitz M. Have we seen o-r Jknt gfuebsff? Phy$. Rev. ,kt.
46:981-4, 1981. Univ. Caliiomia.
Lawrence Berkeley hb.,
Berkeley. CA. 8S-1521
Coppersmith S N. Fisher D S, Halperin B J, Lee P A & Brinkman W F, Dkdocatfon$ md dm commen.
surate-fucommensumte
transkfom JB two dbnensfons. Phyr. Rev. Letr, 46:549-5.2, 1981, Bell Labs.,
Murray HifL NJ; Harvard Univ., Dept. Phys., Cambridge, MA. 83-0726
Dimopoufos S & Georgi H. Sofffy broken snparaymmefry WI-3SU6). iVuc/. Phys. B 193: IW-62, 1981.
Stanford Univ.. Inst. Theor, Phys., Stanford: Univ. California, Jnst. Theor. Phys., Santa Barbara,
CA; Univ. Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI: Harward Univ., Lyman Lab. Phys., Cambridge, MA. W5
Dimopoulos S & Raby S, Supercolor. A’uc/. Phys. B 192:353-64, 1981. Stanford Univ., Inst. Theor.
Phys, & SLAC. Stanford; Univ. Cafiiomia. Inst. Tfmor. Phys., Santa Barbara, CA: Univ. Michigan,
Dept. Phys., Ann Arbor, ML 83-0885
Dine M, Fiscfder W & Srednicki M. A sfmpk SOIUUOII10 fke strong CP probkm wkb a harmless
nxfon. Phys. Lett. B 104:199-202, 1981. Inst. AiJv. Study; Princeton Univ.. J. Henry Labs., Princeton,
NJ; Univ. Pennsylvania,
Dept. Phys., Philadelphia, PA. 83-C!d98
Dine M. F~cfder W & Srednicki M. Supersymmemfc
tecbnfcolor. Nut/. Pkys. B 189:575-93, 1981. Imt.
Ad., Study; Princeton Univ., J. Hemy Labs., Princeton, NJ: Univ. Pennsylvania, Dept. Phys.,
Philadelphia, PA. 83-0885
pmdcles.
Rev. Mod. Phys. J53:1-41, !981.
Dolgov A D & Zeldovich Ya B. Cosmology ●nd elementary
Acad. Sci. USSR, Inst. Thor.
Exp. Phys, & Inst, AppL Math., Moscow, USSR.
Donoghue J F, Johnson K & Li B A. LCIWmass gluebafb b the meson spectrum. Phy$. LetI. B
99:416-20, 1981. Univ. Massachusetts,
Dept. Phys. Astmn.. Amherst; Mass. inst. Technol., Ctr.
Theor. Phys., Cambridge, MA; StanJord Univ., SLAC, Stanford. CA: Chinese Acad. Sci., Inst. High
Energy Phys., Peking, People’s Rep. China. 83-1521
Dowries D, Genzel R. Becklin E E & Wynn-Williams C G. Onfffow of mmfer kmthe KL Nebufm tbe
role of 1Rc2. Aswophys
J 244:869-83, 1981. Jnst. Radio Astron. Miffimetr.. Grenoble. France;
Harvard-Smithsonian
Ctr. Astrophys., Cambridge, MA; Univ. Hawaii, Inst. Astron. & Infrared
Telescope
Facility, Honolulu, HJ. 83-0875
Dresselhaus M S & Dresselhaus G. lntercsfaffon
compoantk of gmpfdte. Advan. Phys. 30:139-326.
1981. Mass. Inst. Technol.,
Dept. Elec. Eng. Comput. Sci.. Ctr. Mat, Sci. Eng. & Francis BWer Na[l.
Magnet Lab.. Cambridge, MA, ““81-1408; ““81-0799: ““81-0553: ‘“81-2469: ‘-81-3141
Dmmmond T J. Morkoc H & Cho A Y. Dependence of ekcmo.
mc.bfflty om spmid sepamff.n of
ekcmons d
donom h AIXGS,.XASIG8AS
beterost?uctures.
J. APPf phys. 52:1 ~6,
1981. Univ.
Illinois, Dept. Elec. Eng. & Coord. Sci. Lab., Urbana, IL. 83-1860
Dutta N K & Nelson R J. Temperature dependence
of threshold of lPGaAsP/lnP
doubJehetermfmcmre
ksem and Anger mcombfnaffmv
Appl. Phy.. Lett 38:407-9.1981.
Bell Labs.. Murray
Hifl, NJ. 83-0184
Dziewonski A M & Anderson D L. Pmffmfmmy reference Emtb model. PfIyJ. Earth flanef. lntetiors
25:297-356.1981.
Harvard Univ., DerIt. GeoL Sci., Cambridge. MA: Calif, Inst. TechnoL, Seismol.
Lab., Pasadena, CA. 83-1921
Engels J. Karsch F, Satz H & Mcmtvay I. Hfgh temperature SU(2) gkon matter em the M&e.
Phy&
LeIf. If 101:89-94, 1981. Univ. Bielefeld. Dept. Them. Phys,, Bielefeld: Univ. Hamburg, Inst. Theor.
Phys., Hamburg, FRG. 83-IX333
Fork R L, Greene B I & Shank C V. Genernffmt 01 optfcsd pofsea dwter
tkrm 0.1 p$ec by cofffdks
puke mode Jockfng. Appl. Phyr. Letf. 38:671-2.1981.
Bell Labs., Holmdel. NJ.
Frishman Y, Schwimmer A, Banks T & Yankielowicz
S. Tlte axksl anomafy and tbe bound-stile specfrum h conffufug Iheorkt. iVuc( Phys. B 177:157-71, 1981. Weizmann Inst. Sci., Dept. Phys.,
Rehovot; Tel Aviv Univ., Dept. Phys. AsIron., Tel Aviv, Israel. 83-0335
Gabay M & Toulouse G. Coexistence
of spfn-glass and ferromagnefk
orderfngs. Phys. Rev. Le(f.
47:201-4, 1981. Unit, Paris-Sud. Lab. Pbys. Sofids, Orsay: Ecok Nonnak Super., Lab. Pbys., Paris.
France. 83-0863
Genml R, Reid M J, Moran J M & Dowries D. Proper modoma and dkifmwea of H20 maser $ourcec. L
Ike outflow JmOrJOn-KL. Astmphy$.
/. 244:884-902, 1981. Hnrvard-Smithsonian
Ctr. Astrophys..
Cambridm. MA: Inst. Radio AsIron, Miflimetr., Grenoble, France; Max Plmtck Inst. Radim.stron..
Bonn. F~G. 83-0S75
Gibbs H M. Hopf F A, Kaplan D L & Shoemaker R L. Observation of cfum kmopdcd bfsfabffffy.
Phy$. Rev. Left. 46:474-7, 1981. Univ. Arimna. Opt. Sci, Ctr., Tucson, AZ. 83-2213
Gomey D J, Cfarke A, Croky D, Fennel] J, Luhmann J & Mizem P. Tke dbfrkhnffon of fon km
SN2
conks below 8000 km. 1. Geophys. Res. 86:83-9, 198(. Aerospace Corp.. Space Sci. fab., Los
Angeles. CA. 83-1086; ● 81 -OSQ3
Greenberg O W & Sucher J. A qnaatum stmcmredymmtdc
modef of qumks, Ieptons. weak vecmr
bosoms and Hfggs meson% Phys. bit.
B 99:339-43, 1981. Univ. Maryland, Ctr. Thee.r. Phys., College
Park, MD. 83-0035
Gross D J, Pkarski R D & Yaffe L G. QCD and fnsfantom mt Jfnke temperamre.
RPY. Mod. Phys.
53:43-80, 1981. Princeton Univ., Dept. Phys., Princeton, NJ: Yale Univ., J.W, Gibbs Labs., New
Hnven. CT. 83-0030
375
BfhlioF.mPhic
ABC
7
24
31
12
80
9’2
6
2E
34
5
25
30
I
29
30
10
42
52
15
32
47
20
17
37
32724
10
26
36
7
31
38
4
30
34
53136
17
55
72
6
29
35
17
35
52
7
80
87
9
37
46
23.s3s
4
27
31
19
14
33
15
22
37
5
26
31
7
26
33
Data
Gnmer G, Zawadowski A & Chaikin P M. Nonfkear conductivity and ❑okse due to charge.demity.
wave depfnfdns b NbSeY Phy$, Rev. .Leu. 46:511-5, 1981, Univ. California. Dept. Phy$,, Los
Angeies, CA. 83-0775
Guth A H, Imffaffonmy universe: a pmsfble mludon 10 the botkoii and Sfamess problems.
PA.Ys Rev. D—Part. Fie/ds 23:347-56, 1981. Stanford Univ., SLAC, Stanford, CA. 83-0U29
phase fnmkfan
In the SU5
G.th A H & Weinberg E J Cmmologkal
comeqaences
of ● ffnt-.rder
grand !udffed model. PIIYJ Rev. D—Porf Fields 23:876-85, 1981. Mass. Inst. Technol., Ctr. Tleor
Phys., Cambridge, MA; Stanford Univ., SLAC, Stanford, CA, Columbia Univ., Dept. Phys., New
York, NY, 83-0329
Haffiday I G & Schwimmer A. The phase structure of SU(M/ZIM
fatffce %ange fbeorks.
Ph y.. Letf B 101:327-31, 1981. hnpcrial COO. Sci. Technol., Blacken Lab.. London. UK. 83-OOW
Harnber H & Parki G. NumerJcA e~tfmates of bmfronfc masses k! ● pure SU(3) gauge theory. Phys,
Rev. Leu 47:t792-5, 1981. Bmokhaven Nod Lab., Dept. Phys,, Upmn, NY; Natf Inst. Nucl. Pbys.,
Frascfdi, and Inst. Phys., Facull, Eng., Rome, Italy. 834X332
Ha”cl R, Conrath B, Flasar F M, Kunde V, Maguire W, Pearl 1, Pirraglia J, SamucJso. R, Heratb L,
Allison M, Cruiksbnnk D, Gautier D, Giernsch P. Hom L, Koppany R, Ponnamperuma
C. l~fmred
ohservaftom of fhe SafnrnkmI system from Voyager 1. Science 2i2192-2W
t 981. Gcddard SprIcc
Flight Ctr., Green beJt, MD; Rice Univ., Houston, TX; Univ. Hawaii, Honolulu, HI; Paris Obscr%..
Meudon, France: Cornell Univ., Ifhaca, NY; Calif. Inst. TechnoJ., let Propulsion Lab Pasadena,
CA; Univ. Maryland. College Pork. MD. 83-1234
Harari H & Sciberg N. A dymamicaf theory for the r+.!bon modeJ. Phys. Leff. B 98269-73,
198i.
Weizrmmn Inst Sci., Dept, NwA, Phys., Rehovot, Israel. 83-CK135
Has.mfratz A, Hasenfratz E & Hasenfratz P. Genemffzed rougbenfng tmmiffon md Its effect o. the
stig
tendon. Nuci. Phys. B 1S0:353-67, 1981. Eotvos Lorand Uno.: Eotvos Lorand Geophys. Inst. .
Budapest, HungaW; CERN, Geneva. Switzerland. 82-0319
Hauser H, Pascher 1, Pearson R H & Sundell S. P?eletred conformation ad moiecufar packfn,q of
phospbatkdyletbenafamfne
and phaspbaffdyichof fne. Biochim. Bmphys. Acm 6x3:2 I-51, t98 [. Swiss
Fed. Inst. Technol., Lab. Bimhem.,
Zurich, Switzerland: LJniv. Gotetmg,
Facult. Med., Goteborg,
Sweden: Mcd, Fdn. Buffalo and Roswell Park Mere. lnst., Biophys, Dept., Buffalo, NY. 83-1524
Herrmann W A, Pfank J. Riedcl D. Ziegler M L, Weidenhammer
K, Guggolz E & Balbach B.
Trnnsidoct.metal
methyfene compfexes. 14. Reactions of m efecfron-rkh
dfmeb+flacyclopmprme
with
pmfk ddst synfhesfs and X-my crystal structures of novel rhodfum-metfiyl ●nd .methylkdyne compfexes. 1. Amer. Chem. Soc 103:63.75, 1981. Univ. Regensburg, Inst. Chem., Regensburg: Univ,
Heidelberg, Inst. Inorg. Chem., Heidelberg,
FRG. 83-J 103
●tmosphmfc phenomem msc-dated with tbe Soudiem
Horel J D & Wallace J M. Pfamctmy.scait
Oicffkfion. Mon. Weather Rev 109813-29, 1981, Uni*. Washington, Dept. Atmosph. SCI., Seattle,
WA. 83-1054
Jacobsen C S, Tanner D B & Bechgaard K. Dfmensfmudkfy crossover III the orgaidc superconductor
#ernme&ylte-=ie-IuJva
le- bexdfumophosphate
[ (TMTSF)2PF~l. Phys Rev. Leit 46:1142.5.
1’481. Tech. Univ. Denmark, Phys. Lab., Lyngby; Uni\. Copenhagen, H.C. Orsted Inst., Dept. Gcn.
Org. Chem,, Copenhagen,
Denmark; Ohio State Univ., Dept. Phys., Columbus, OH. 83-0558
Kaiyanas.ndaram
K, Borgarcllo E & Gratzel M. Vf.dbJe fight induced water cfemmge Jo CdS
dbparafon$ loaded wfth Pt imf R.02,
hole scavenging by RU02. He+. Chim. AcuJ 64362-6, 1981.
Swiss Fed. Inst. Technol.,
Inst. Chem. Phys., L.nusanne, Switzerland. 83-0755
Kim J E, Langacker P, Levine M & Williams H H. A fheoretkcd md cxpedmentai
revkw of tbe weak
xeufraJ current: n determination of lm sfmcfure ●nd Ifmlfa on devfaffons from the minimal SU121[. X
U(II ekctroweak
theory. Rev. Mod Phy$ 53.21 1-S2, 1981. Uni*. Pennsylvania, Dept, Phys.,
PhiladcJphia. PA,
Kinzel W & Yeomans J M. Dfrected percofmfon: a fkke-ske
renormaffsation group ●pproach. J Phys
A—Mafh. Gen 14: L163-8, 1981. Julich NucJ. Res. Ctr., Julicb, FRG, Cornell Univ., Baker Lab.,
Jthaca, NY. 83-i254
Kuti J, Polonyi J & Sziachanyi K. Monfe Csrfo study of SU121 gau8e theory m ffnlte tempemf me.
Phvs Ltw B 98: 19%204, 1981. Central Res. fnst. Phys., Budapest, Hungary. 83-0030
Langackcr P. Grand unified theories mid proton decay. Ph.v.v Rep —R.~; $-cl Ph.w LCW 72 18S-~5.
1981. Stanford Uni*., SLAC, Stanford, CA and Unit. Pcnnsyl\ania,
Dep!, Phys., Philadelphia, PA.
LaR ue G S, Phillips J D & Fairbank W M. Ohsewaffon of fractional charge of (f /3)e on matter. Phys.
Rev Lett 46:%7-70, 1981, Stanford [l”iv
Stanford, CA, 83.1824
Lawrence J M, Rkeborough P S & Parks R D. Vaknce fluctumkmt pbenom+ ma. Rep Progr. Phys
44:1-84, 198i, Univ. California, Phys, Dept., frvine, CA; Polytecb
fnst. New York, Phys. Dept.,
BrookJyn, NY. 83-04J2
Love W G & Francy M A. Effecdve nucleon-nucleon
interaction for scattering al intermedkte
energka. Phys Re ,,. C—Nut/. Phy$. 24:1073-94. 1981, U.i!. Georgia, Dept. Phys. AsIron., Athens,
GA and Los Akmos Nad Lab.. Los Alamos, NM; LJnit. Minnesota, Dept. Phys,, Minneapolis, MN.
Luscher M, M.nster G & Weis7. P. How thkk SK chromo-ekctrk
flux tubes? N.cl Phys 8180 (- 12,
198[. German Electron-Accelerator
(DESY): [lni~. Hamburg, fnst. Theor. Phys., Hamburg, FRG,
8243319
Marcimo W J & Sirlin A. Precke SU(SI predktforu for sfn2t2wexP, mw and mr Phys Rev Leff
46:163-6. 1981, Northwestern [Jniv.. DcDt. Phvs. Astron.. Evanston, IL: New York U.,,.,
Devt.
Pbys., New York, NY. 83-0576
‘
Mnrtin A. A afmuhaneous fit of bb, cc, N (k pain) and crn-spectm. Ph.v Left. Jf lfXISl 1-4. 19KI
CERN, Genma, Switzerland. 83-0586
Masamunc S, Choy W, Kcrdcsky F A J & Jmpcriali B Stereoselectlvc sldol condensatfom. Use of
Dept. Chem.
chfrnf boron ●nofntea. J Amer Chem So. 103:1 Wd-K. 1’481. Y.fam Inst. Tcchno.,
Cambridge, MA. 83-1995
376
ABC
I
31
32
6
31
37
!4
39
53
10
30
40
10
26
36
5
42
47
‘9
25
34
15
28
43
19
21
40
1
31
32
7
28
35
4
33
37
2
29
31
3
29
32
0
32
32
{2
24
36
Matteucci M D & Caruthers M H. Syntbes& of deoxyolfgmmckot fdea
on ● polymer support. J A me.
Chem. Sot. 103:3185-91, 1981. Univ. Colorado, Dept. Chem
Boulder, CO.
Maze[s E P, Goknet$kii S V, Aptekar’ R L, Gur’yan Yu A & If’inskil V N CYCIOIIOII●nd mudfdfaffon
Ifnes kmy.my bursts. NaI.re 290.378-82, 1981. Acad. Sci. USSR, A.F. Ioffc Phys. Tech. Inst.,
Leningrad, 11SSR. 83-1483
McLerran L D & S*e[itsky B. A Monte Cmfo study of SU(21 Ymtg-Mffh theory -t ffnite tempemture.
Phy$. .b?lf. E 98:195-8, 1981. Stanford Univ., SLAC. Stanford, CA. 834XL3fJ
Mohapatra R N & Senjanmic
G. Neuwko masses ●wf mixfngs fn gauge models with spontaneous
p.tfty vioktfcm. Phy.t k+, 1)—Port Ftelds 23.165-80, 1981. c(INY.
City COIL, New York, NY;
Fermi Natl. Accekralor
Lab., Ba(avia, IL and Univ. Maryland, Dept. Phys., College Park, MD.
834883
Morrow hf. Jochemsen R, Berbnsky A J & Hardy W N. Zero.fkld hyperffne resonance of S1OM{C
hydrogen for O.lJJ<T< I K: ibe bfndfng energy of H om Ilqtdd 4He. Phys. Rev bu.
4619$-8, 1981.
Uni\. Brit. Columbia, Dept Phys., Vancou$er, Canada. 83-2860
Mortensen K, Tomkiewic7
Y, Sch”lt7 T D & Engler E M. Aritilerromagnetk
orderfng in the orgrmk
conductor ba.v.tetimethyltetmsele~
fulvnkne-hexafluorophospb1e
I(TMTSF)~-PF~l. Ph,vs. Rev Left
46.1234-7, 1981. IBM, T.J. Watson Res. Ctr., York! own Heights, NY. 83-0558
Mulder C A M, van Duyne\eldt
A J & Mydosh J A. Susceptlbfflty 01 die C. MMapfn-gfasw frequency
and field dependence.
Phys. Rev B—Condense-d
kfarler 23:1384-’46, 1981, Rijks Univ., Kamcrlingh
Onnes Lab , Leidcn. the Netherlands. 83-0S63
Nadascn A, Schwandt P, Singh P P, Jacobs W W, Bather A D, Debe$cc P T. Kaitchuck M D &
Meek J T. EJastk scattering of 80-1S4 MeV protons and the protom-nuckns optksl potentfal.
Phys. Rev. C—NW(
Phys 23:1023-43, 1981, Indiana Uni%., Cyclotron Facdit y, SLloommgton, IN.
Ness N F, Acuna M H, Lepping R P, Connemey J E P, Behannon K W, Burlaga L F & Neubauer
F M Magae!k ffefd studks by Voyager 1: preffmktary resufra st Saturn. Science 212:211-7. 1981.
NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr., Lab. Extraterrestrial Phys., Greenhel[,
MD; Tech. L1niv.,
Braunschweig,
FRG. 83-1234; ●8J-CFJ86
●s ● probe of
Olive K A, Schramm D N, Slelgman G, Turner M S & Yang 1, Bfg-ba~ nucleeaynthesb
cosmo fogy and partkk physks. Asmophys. J. 246557-M,
1981. Uni*. Chicago. Astron. Astrophys.
Ctr., Chicago, IL, Franklin 1.s[.. Bartol Res. Fdn Newark, DE. 83-0334
Perdcw J P & Zunger A Self. tntemcdon comecdon to density-hmcdonrd
approxtmaffom for mamy ekctron systems. Ph.vs. Re P ff-Condensed
Matter 23:5048-79
1981. T.kne
llni~.. DcPt. phys..
New Orleans, LA: Solar Energy Res. Inst., Golden and [Ini,. Color~do, Dept. Phys., Boulder, CO.
Polyakm A M. Quantum geometry of bosonk strfngs. Ph.w Leu B 103. 2fJ7-10. J981 Acad. SC,.
IISSR. L.D, Landau Jnst. Theor. Phys., Moscow. uSSR. 83-3045
Prangc R E. Quantized Hsff reak.tamce and the measurement of #he ftme-suucfure constant. Phy.r R.,,
B—Condensed
Mauer 23.4 S02-5. 198J. (Iniv. Marvland. DeDt. Phvs. Astron. & C1r. Tbeor. Phvs..
College Park, MD. 83-054 I
Rizzo T G & Se”janovic G. C.m there be low Jnternmdfate -.ss scsks k gmnd mdfkd theories? Phys
Rev Left. 46:131S-7, 1981. Brookhaven Natl. Lab., Dept. Phys.. Llplon. NY. 83-0883
Rizzo T G & Senjanovic G. Grand umffkatfon and parfty rewomtio.” at low energks. Phenomena fogy.
Phys Rev. D—Par/. field, 24:704-18, 1981. Br.mkha\en
Natl. Lab., Dep!. Phys., Upton. NY. 83-0843
Rossiter B E. Kaisuki T & Sharpless K B. Asymmetrk
epoxfdadon provides shortest routes to four
cidral epoxy nJcohok whkb are key fmtermedktm
kmsymbeak of methymycfm
erythromycfn.
kuk.mtrkne C-1, .IUJ dhpmfme.
J Amer. Chetn Xoc 103:4M-$, 1981. Stanford Univ.. Dept. Chem.,
Stanford, CA. 8.Y2637
Rothman L S. AFGL afmospherfc absorption lb. pmamctem compfktfon:
19S0 version. Appl Opf
20:791-5.1981.
USAF, Op(. Phys. Div.. Hanscom AFB, MA.
Sakai N. Nammfness b supersymmetrkc GUTS. Z. Phys. C—Par Fm(d I I: 153-7.1981. Tohoku LJni~..
Dept. Phys., Sendai. Japan. 83-0885
Savage B D & de Boer K S. Ultmvlokt absorption by Jnterwelfar gas ●t Jmge dhfances from die
mfactk nkne. A$(mnh w J 2434NJ-84, 198 [. Uni}. Wisconsin. Was.h hum Obscrv., Madison, WI.
~3-2298 .
Scalapino D J & Sugar R L. Mefbad for performhtg Monte Carfo cakukfkons for systems with
fermfcma. Ph vs. Rev Letr 46:519-21, t98J. Univ. Cafifomia, Inst. Theor. Phvs., Santa Barbara. CA.
.%bramm D N“& Steigman G Relfc nemrkms mnl the densliy of fhe umiverse.”A sfrophys
J 243:1-7.
1981. Univ. Chicago, Enrico Fermi Inst. and Dcpts. Astron. & Phys.. Chicago. IL: Frank fin inst..
Bartol Res. Fdn., Newark, DE. 83-J 132
Siegbahn P E M, Almlof J, Heiberg A & Roos B O. The complete actfve space SCF (CASSCFI method
fn n Newton-Raphson
Iormufatf.m with applkstk.n to the HNO mofecule. J Chem Ph.vs. 74:2384-96.
1981. Univ. Stockholm,
Inst. Theor. Phys., Stockholm: Lund Univ
Chcm. C1r Phys. Chem. 2.
Lund, Sweden; Unit, Oslo, Dept. Chem,, Oslo, Norway. 83-1761
Smith B A, %Jerblom L, Beebe R, Boyce J. Briggs G, Bunker A, Collins S A, Hansen C 1. Johnson
TV, Mitchell J L, Terrik R J, Cam M, Cook A F, Cuzzi J, Pollack J B, Danielson G E. Ingersoll A.
Da*ies M E, Hunt G E, Masursky H, Shoemaker E. Morrison D, Owen T, Sagan C. Ve,erka J.
Strom R & Suomi V E. Encounter wkb Wurn: Voyager 1 kaagfmg acknce resuJ:s. Science
212: f63-9J, 1981. Uni\. Arizona, Dept. Planet. Sci. & Lunar Planet. Lab.. Tucson: US Geol. Survey.
Flagstaff, AZ; New Mexico State Univ., Dept. Asmon., Las Cruces, NM; NASA Headquarters,
Wmhingtcm, DC: Harvard. Smithsonian C[r, Astrophy s., Cambridge, MA; LIS Geol. Sumey, Menlo
Park, CA: NASA ?Ames Res. Ctr., Moffett Field: Calif. Inst. Technol., Di\. Geol. PJanet. Sci. and
Jet Propulsion Lab., Pasadena: Rand Carp. Santa Monica. CA; Univ. CoIl. London, London. LIK:
Univ. Hawaii, Inst. Astron., Honol.J.,
HI: SUNY, Dept. Earth Space Sci Stony Brook: Cornell
Univ
Ithaca, NY; Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI. 83-1234
.
II
19
30
0
39
39
9
29
38
14
17
31
16
25
41
10
28
38
23
57
Ml
.
377
.
Bfbllogmphlc
ABC
4
26
30
12
21
33
I
33
34
11
31
42
21’
41
62
9
29
38
4
43
47
8
32
40
14
17
3!
03434
7
27
34
3
43
46
13
23
36
Data
Surnum D J & Vickernmn J C. F.st atom bos!dmdment
cfuadrupo!e mass spectr.mnetry. J Chem. S.C
Chem. Commun
7:324-5, 1981. Univ. Manchester Inst. Sci. TechnoL, Dept. Chem., Manchester,
[JK .834763
Sw+menburg B N, Bennett K, Bignami G F, B.ccheri
R, Caravco P, Hermsen W, Kanbach G, Llchtl
G G, Masnou J L, Mayer-Hassclwander
H A, Paul J A, Sacco B, Scarsi L & Wills R D. Second Cf3.$
B catalos of Jdgh-eneriqy gamma-ray sources. A$mophys
J 243: L69-73, 1981. Huygens Lab
Cosm .-Ray Working Group. Lcidcn: Eur. Space Agency. ESTEC. Noordwijk, the Netherlands; CNR,
Jnsf Cosm. Phys. Data, Milano; Univ. Palermo, inst. Phys.. Palermo. JtIIly: Max Planck Inst Phys.
Astrophys., Munich, Inst. Extraterrew’ial
Phys., Garching by Munich, FRG: %clay N“cl Res. Cm
(CENS). Sew. Electron Phys.. Gif-sur. Yvette, France. ‘“81-2789; ““81-0565
Thor.p N, Rindorf G. Soling H & Bechgaard K. The structure of Di(2.3,6.7.teframe
fhyl. t,4,S,8.tefn.
sefermfulvalenfmnl
hemdfuoropho$pfude,
(TMTSF12 PF6, the ffnt supercondtmtfng organfc ml[d.
Acts Crystallogr
ff-Struct
XC,. 37:1236-40, 1981. Tech. Univ. Denmark, Chem. Dept., Lynghy,
Ilniv Copenhagen,
H.C. Omted Inst., Dept. Gen. Organ. Chem., Copenhagen,
Denmark 83-05M
Tyler G L, Esfdcman V R, Anderson J D, Levy G S, Linda[ G F, Wocd G E & Croft T A. RM16J
sclesce Jnvestfsadons of the Satin-a system with Voyager 1 I prelfmfnm’y restdts. Sctence 212:201-6,
198(. Stanford LJniv,, Ctr. Radar Astrcm., Stanford, Calif. Inst. Technol., Jet Propulsion Lab.,
Pasadem; SRI Ind., Radio Phys, Lab,, Me”lo Park, CA, 83-1234
Vaiarm G S, Cassinelli J P, Fahbimm G, Giacconi R, Golub L, G.arenstein P, Haisch B M, Harnden
F R, J.ahnscm H M, Li”sky J L, Maxso. C W, Mewe R Rosncr R, Seward F, Topka K & Zwam C,
Resufw from M extemlve Einstein atelhir survey. Asrrophys. J. 245163-82,
1981. HmvardSmithsonian Clr. Astrophys,, Cambridge. MA: Astron. Observ. PaJermo, Palermo, Italy, llniv.
Wiscomin,
Washburn Observ., Madkon, WJ: Lockheed Palo Alto Res, La b., Palo Afto, CA; Llni,.
Colorado & Nad. Bureau Stand Joint Inst. Lab. Astrophys. (JILAI, Boulder, CO: Astron. lnst.,
lJtrecht, the Netherlands, 82-1691
Vm den Dries L, Va” Haesendonck
C, Bruymseraedc Y & Deutscbcr G. Two-d ftswztdonal Iocaflzatlon
In fbh copper Ufms. Phys Rev Letr. 46:565-8, 1981. Umv. f-tuven, Vaste Stof-Phys. Magnet Lab.,
Leuven, Belgium; Tel Aviv Univ., Dept. Phys. AsIron., Tel Aviv, Israel. 83-0157
m“ Nieuwe”huizm
P, SIIpsrgmvhy. Phys Rep..-Rev
Sect Phys Lerf, 68:189-398, 1981. SUNY, [ml
Thcor Phys., Stony Brook, NY “W-1432; “SCk1434; “80-1433: “80.0281: ‘L?4-0106
Vliege”tharl J F G, van Halbeek H & Dorland L. Tbc .#fsnHflty
of SW-MHZ Jdgh.rmofud.m
1 H.NMR spectroscopy for the sfrncture determhmdon of carbohydrates dertved from Elycopmtefn$.
Pure App/ Chem 53:45-77.1981.
State Univ. Utrecht, Dept. Bic-Organ, Chem,, Utrecht, the
Netherlands.
Warwick J W, Pearce J B, J?vam D R, Cam T D, .%hmuble J J, AJexander J K, Kaiser M L, Desch
M D, Pederscn M, Lecacheux A, Daigne G, Boischot A & Barrow C H. PJauetary mI!!o astronomy
obsewadom
fmm Voyager f -r
%aturm. Science 212:239-43, 1981. Radiophys. Inc., Boulder, CO,
LJniv, Florida, Dcpt, Asiro”., Gainesville,
FL: Goddard Space Flighl Ctr., Lab, Extmdcrrestrial Phys.,
Greenbek,
MD: Observ. Paris, .%cf Astrophys. Meudon, Meudon, France. 83-J 234; ●8 I-0786
Williams D H, Bradley C, Bojes.m G, Smdikam S & Taylor L C E. Fast rdom bomkmdmeni mass
1 A mer Chem Sot.
spectrometryf ● ftowerfuf teckzdqxe for the study of poJsr molecdea
103: S7fX)-4, 1981. Univ. Chem. Lab., Cambridge; Kratos Ltd., Manchester,
IJK, 83.0768
Wilson R C, Gulkis S, Je,nssen M, Hudson H S & Chapman G A. Observadoas 01 $ofar lrradtance
varfehfffty. Science 211 :7C0-2, 1981. Cafif. Inst. Technol.,
Jet Propulsion Lab., Pasadena; Unit.
Catifomia, Ctr. Astrophys. Space Sci., .%. Diego: Calif. State Univ., SaII Fernando Observ.,
Northridge, CA.
Wise M B, Gcorgi H & Glashow S L. SU(51 ad the hwbfbfe axkm. Phys. Re,. .Lell. 47:402-4, 1981.
Harvard Umv., Lyman Lab, Phys.; MJT, Ctr. Theor, Phys,, Cambridge, MA. 83.0898
Wit ten E. Commefogkal cmiseq”emces of a U@ Hfggs bmsoa. Nucl Phy. B [77:477-SS, 1981, Harvard
U.i\.,
LymntI Lab. Phys., Cambridge, MA. 83-0329
PhYs L.,,
B 105:267-7I. 1981. f.11. Ctr
Witten E. Mast Jdemrchfar IS s.pemymmwtrfc
Thcor. Phys,, Trieste, Italy, 83-0885
WNten E. Dynmnfcaf bmaktmg of wqt.eraymmetry. Nut{ Phy. B 185:5 [3-54, 1981. Prince Ion Uni,., J,
Henry Labs., Princeton, NJ. 83-0S85
Zamorani G. Henry J P, Maccacaro T. Tananbaum H, Soltam A. Avni Y. Licbcrt J, Stocke J.
Strittmatter P A. Weynmnn R J, Smith M G & Cc.ndon J J, X-ray sfud&M of qtmsam with the Einstein
abservstory.
[L A$frophys
J, 245:357.74, 1981. Harvard-Smithsmian
Ctr. Astrophy s., Cambridge,
MA; Copernicus AsIron. Ctr.. Warsaw, Poland: Weizmann Jnst. Sci., Rehovot, Israel: (hi,,
Arwona,
S1eward Obser,., Tucson, AZ; Royal Observ,, Edinbmgh, UK, Nml, Radm Astrcm. Observ,,
Charlottesville.
and Virginia Polytcch. Inst. State Llm>.. Dept. Phys Blacksb.rg,
VA. “”8 1.0469,
“.81-3355: ““81-1463: ““81-1826; ““8[-2955
tkdes.
0
3030
0
87
87
13
40
53
per found in a search of ISI/Compu Math@, our online data base covering
the mathematical
and computer
sciences. That leaves just 14 papers in this
study which are neither core nor citing
papers in any ISI@ research front. Most
of these will undoubtedly become core
papers unless they are a “flash in the
pan.” In any case, they alone can help
you identify the literature for the unique
research fronts they identify. Just use
SCK in the straightiorward
manner you
always did.
Twelve
papers
are single author
works. Thirty papers list two authors, 20
have three, 16 have four, and eight have
378
Tabfa 2t The 1982 and 1983 ISR TMresearch
sciences
papers
1981 most-cited
core
fronts
as core
documents.
physical
sciences
papers
research
front.
documents
in each
which
A = research
front
included
contain
number.
in the core
at least two of the 198 I most-cited
B=
of each
research
research
front
name.
front.
B
A
Roughening transitions and crossover phenomena in lattice gauge theories
Phase transitions in the early universe and the inflationary universe scenario
834N335
Composite
83-0558
Organic
83-0%3
Upsilon
83-0768
Fast
Dynamic
other
83-1521
aspects
and
of lattice
gauge
electroweak
superconductors;
6
models
properties
number
of
of
23
339
theories
gauge
total
CD
82-0319
83-0329
83-0030
83-0863
83-0875
83-0883
83-0885
83-0898
83-1234
D=
physical
C = number
of tetramethyl-tetraselenafulvalene-2X
and
35
3
37
6
21
superconductors
physics and B-meson
atom
bombardment
and
26
decay
secondary
ion mass spectrometty
of involatile
biomolecules
Phase diagram andphase transitions for Ising spin glasses
Ma~outflow
from the Orion molecular-cloud andother star fomationre@ons
Weak neutral bosonsin gauge models andgrand unified theories
Supersymmetric grsndunified
theor’ies
Theoretical and experimental aspects of axions
Voyager 1 and Voyager 20bservationsof
Satumand T1tanand analysis. of rings
of Saturn, magrretosphere and atmosphere
Decay patterns andother aspects ofpseudoscalar
gIuebaUs
five authors. Onehas six authors, three
have seven authors, and two have eight.
One paper each lists 12, 13, and 14
authors,
while three papers have 16
authors. Onepaper
each lists27 and66
authors.
The paper with the most
authors has 67. Thk is not unusual for
physics. In our study of the most-cited
physical sciences papers of 1980,4 one
paper had 86 authors.
Most such papers involve experiments
with huge particle accelerators. Whale it
is true that an enormous collaborative
effort is involved in these experiments, it
is hard to believe that so many individuals merit full authorship,
In the
past, I have called for reforms in thk
areas Most contributors should receive
credit in an acknowledgment.
Current
practices only pollute the bibliographic
archives.
Ninety-two authors have more than
one paper listed in Table 1. C. S. Jacobsen, G. Senjanovi6, and E. Witten each
have three papers. K. Bechgaard has
five papers in Table 1.
The papers in this study were published in 30 journals, listed in Table 3.
Just six journals published more than 60
percent of the papers. They are: Phy.rical Review Letters (19 papers), Physics
Letters B (12), Nuc/earPhysics B (9), As-
379
4
16
2
2
3
6
2
69
24
17
10
16
15
26
trophysical Journal (8), Journal of the
Amen”can Chemicai Society (7), and Science (7). These journals consistently
publish a high proportion
of papers in
these studies. In fact, Physical Review
Letters has topped our list each year
since we began thk series by examining
the most-cited physical science papers
of 1976!6 This also reflects the need for
rapid communication
in a field where
preprints are common.
The authors in this study are affiliated
with 118 institutions in 18 countries. Table 4 lists these institutions in descending
order by the number of times they appear in Table 1. Sixty-three are located
in the US, about the same as in our study
of the 1980 papers. This represents a signtilcant increase over the US totals for
19787 and 19798 which were 44 and 48,
respectively. However, the actual number of papers in these studies produced
by US institutions has been declining in
recent years. For example, authors from
US institutions produced 88 papers in
our study of 1979 articles. For 1980 this
dropped to 73 and for 1981 it is 67
papers. By the way, it is an important
commentary on the international role of
American and other scientific journals
to see that three papers from the USSR
are inchrded in this study.
Table 3: The Xl journals represented on the list of
the 101 1981 physical sciences papers most cited
in 1981-1982. The numbers in parentheses are the
impact factors for the journals. ( 1981 impact factor equals the number of citations received by
1979-1980 articles in a journal divided by the
number of articles published by the journal during the same period. I Data were taken from the
1981 JCI? ‘n. The figures a~ the right indicate the
number of papers from each journal which appears on the list.
China, Poland, and the USSR each have
one. Incidentally, the People’s Republic
of China was also represented by one institution in our look at the most-cited
physics papers of 1979.s Perhaps the appearance of an institution from there in
the present study is a harbinger of things
to come.
Haward University was listed 12 times
on Table 1, more than any other institution. Stanford University was represented 11 times. The University of California
was represented nine times, while CERN
was represented only three. In our 1978
study, CERN was represented 19 times.
Table 5 lists the national affiliations of
authors in this study. As I mentioned
earlier, 67 of the 101 papers in thk study
had authors from the US. Seventeen of
these were coauthored
with scientists
from Canada, Denmark, France, FRG,
Israel, Italy, the Netherlands,
People’s
Republic of China, Poland, Sweden,
Switzerland, and the UK. Without exception,
the papers were written in
English.
The list of research fronts in Table 2
provides a good indication of some of
the hot subjects of current interest to
physical scientists. In fact, four research
fronts are represented by six core papers
listed here.
Six papers are core to research front
#83-0030, “Dynamic aspects of lattice
Interactions
between
gauge theories.”
subatomic
particles are described
in
terms of gauge theories. Five of the highly cited papers in this research front apply so-called “Monte Carlo methods, ” a
statistical technique,
to the study of
“strong force” interactions,
The strong
force, one of the four fundamental
forces of nature, is what holds the nucleus of an atom together.
The list includes six papers in research
front #83-0558, “Organic superconductors.” Superconductors
are substances
which, when cooled to extremely low
temperatures,
lose virtually all resistance to the flow of electricity. All six of
Number
“f
Journal
Phys. Ref. Lett. (6.06)
Phys. Lett. B (3.82)
Nucl. Phys. B (4.25)
Astrophys. J. (4.04)
J. Amer. Chem, Sot. (4.26)
Science (6.24)
Phys. Rev. D—Part. Fields (2.94)
Rev. Mod, Phys. ( 16.23)
Nature (7. 19)
Phys. Rev. B—Condensed Matter (2.94)
AppL Phys. Lett. (3.15)
J. Chem. Sot, Chem. Commun. (2.17)
J. Phys. A—Math. Gen. (1 .86)
Phys. Rep. —Rev. Sect, Phys. Lett.
(6.68)
Phys. Re~, C—NUCI. Phys. (2.23)
Acts Crystallogr. B—Struct. Sci. ( .96)
Advan, Phys. (8.71)
APP1. Opt. (1.57)
Biochim. Biophys. Acts (2.64)
Helv. Chim. Acts (1.84)
J. Appl, Phys, (1.67)
J. Chem. Phys. (3.03)
J. Geophys. Res. (2.76)
J. Phys. Lett. (2.04)
Mon. Weather Rev. (1.42)
Phys, Earth Planet. Interiors ( 1,06)
Pure Appl. Chem. (1 .88)
Rep, Progr. Phys. (4.82)
Theor. Chlm. Acts (2.08)
Z, Phys. C—Par. f%ld,(2.13)
Pa~Lrs
19
12
9
8
7
7
4
4
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
I
Of the remaining institutions in Table
4, eight each arelocated
in the Federal
Republic of Germany (FRG) and Italy.
Six each are located in France and the
UK. Five of the institutions are located
in the Netherlands, while Denmark, Israel, Sweden,
and Switzerland
each
have three. It should be noted, however,
that the CERN facility, although located
in Switzerland, is actually operated by a
consortium
of 12 European
nations.
Canada and Hungary each have two institutions in this study, and Belgium, Japan, Norway, the People’s Republic of
380
.,
.-–.
...–
umv. mxnewer. n
.,”
Tabk 41 The institutional affiliations of the authors on tbc
Iist, Institutions
are fisted in descendin~
order of the
number of times they appear in Table 1.Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA1
Stanford Univ.. CA2
Univ. California, CA
Santa Barbara
Berkeky3
Los Angeles
Irvine
San Diego
California inst. Technol.,
Pasadena. CA
Mas.sachusetts Inst. Technol., Cambridge, MA
Come[[Lfniv,.
[thaca, NY
Univ. Copenhagen,
Denmark
H.C. Orsted Inst.
Nick Bohr Inst.
NASA
Goddard Suace Flight Ctr
Oreen~elt,
Mb
Ames Res. Ctr., Moffett Fkld, CA
NASA Headquarters,
Washington, DC
Tech. Univ. Denmark. Lyngby, Denmark
Univ. Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Univ. Maryland, College Park, MD
Acad. Sci. USSR
A.F. Ioffe Phys. Tech. Inst., Leningrad
Inst. Appl. Math., Moscow
inst. Theor. Exp. Phys,, Moscow
L.D. Landau Inst. Theor. Phys., Moscow
Brookhaven Nat). Lab., Upton. NY
Princeton Univ., NJ
Univ. Chicago, IL
Univ. Hawaii. Honolulu, H1
Univ. Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA
Bell Latmratories, NJ
Murray Hill
Holmdel
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
Max Planck Soc., FRG
Inst. Extraterrestrial
Phys..
Garching by Munich
Inst. Phys. Astrophys.,
Munich
Inst. Rad]oastron.,
Bonn
Swiss Fed. Inst. Technol,,
Switzerland
Lausanne
Zurich
Univ. Colorado, CO
Boulder
Joint Jnst. Lab. Astrophys.. Boulder4
Univ. Manchester
Inst. Sci. Tech., UK
Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Weizmarm fret. Sci.. Rehovc.t, Jwacl
Eotvos Lorand Univ., Budapest, H.ngary
Franklin Inst., Bartol Rcs. Fdn., Newark, DE
Jnst. Advan Study, Princeton, NJ
Jnst. Radio Astron. Millimerr., Grenoble, France
Ithaca CoIl. NY
LeMoyme ColL, Syracuse. NY
Paris Observatory, Meudon, France
Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, NJ
Sacky Nucl. Res, Ctr. ICENS), Gif-s.ur-Yvette,
France
State Univ. Utrecht, the Netherlands
SLJNY, Stony Brook, NY
Syracuse Univ., NY
Tel Aviv Univ.. Israel
Univ. Hamburg, FRG
Univ.Heidelberg,
FRG
Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL
Univ. London, UK
Jmperial Coil. Sci. Technol.
Uni$. ColL London
Univ. Paris-Sud (XI), Orsay, France
12
II
9
3
2
2
1
J
7
7
6
6
5
1
5
3
1
1
5
5
5
4
1
1
J
1
4
4
4
4
4
3
2
1
3
3
1
J
1
3
2
i
3
2
1
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
J
J
2
381
2
2
I
uSGeoJ.
hrVCY
Ffagstaff, AZ
Menlo Park, CA
Vanderbilt Univ., Nashviffe, TN
Aerospace Corp., Los Angeles. CA
Brown Boveri Res. Ctr,, Baden, Switzerland
Cafif. State Univ., Northridge, CA
Chinese Acad. Sci., Peking.
People’s Republic of China
CNR, Inst. Cosm. Phys. Data, Mifano, Judy
CNRS, Serv. Aeronom.,
Verricres leBuisson.
France
CoJumbin Lfniv., New York. NY
CUNY, New York. NY
Delft Univ. Technof.,
the Netherlands
Ecok Normale Superhre.
Paris, France
Eur. Space Agency. Noordwijk, the Netherknds
Fermi Natl. Accekrator
Lab., Batatia. IL
German Electron-Accelerator
(DESY),
Hamburg, FRG
Hebrew Univ., JerusaJem, Jsrael
Hungarian Acad. Sci., Central Res, Inst. Phys..
Budapest, Hungary
Huygens Lab., Leiden, the Netherlands
IBM, Thomas J. Watscm Res. Ctr.,
Yorktown Heights. NY
Jndi-ana LJniv., Bloomington.
JN
Intl. Ctr. Theor. Phys., Trieste. ltafy
Inst. &Observ.
Astron., Palermo, Italy
Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore. MD
Julich Nucl. Res. Ctr., FRG
Kratos Lid., Manchester.
UK
Leiden State Univ., the Netberknds
Lockheed Missiles&
Space Co., Palo Alto, CA
Lund Univ., Sweden
Med. Fdn. Buffalo Inc., NY
Natl. Jnst. Nucl. Phys., Frawati, Italy
Natl. Radio AsIron. Observ., Charlottesville,
VA
New Mexico State Univ,. Las Cruxes, NM
New York State Dept. Hlth., Roswell Park Mere.
Jnst., Buffalo, NY
New York Univ., New York, NY
NORDITA,
Copenhagen.
Denmark
Northwcstem
Univ., Evanston, IL
Ohio State Univ.. Columbus, OH
Polish Acad. Sci., Copcmicus
A$tron. Ctr.,
Warsaw. PoJand
Polytech. Inst. New York. Brooklyn. NY
Radiophys. Inc., Boulder, CO
Rand Corp., Santa Monica. CA
Rice Univ., Houston, TX
Science and Engineering Council, Royaf Observ.
Edinburgh. UK
SJJJ2T, Spinetta Marengo, Jtaly
Solar Energy Res. Inst., Golden, CO
SRI Jntl., Menlo Park, CA
Tech. Univ., Braunschweig,
FRG
Tohoku Univ., Sendai, Japan
Tulane Univ., New Orleans, LA
Univ. Bickfeld,
FRG
Univ. Brit. Columbia, Vancouver,
Canada
Univ. Cambridge, UK
Univ. Florida.Gainesville,
FL
Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA
Univ. Goteborg. Sweden
Univ. Leuven, Belgium
Univ. Massachusetts,
Amherst, MA
Univ. Minnesota. Minneapolis,
MN
Univ. North Carofiia, Chapel Hifl, NC
Umv. Oslo,
Norway
Umv. PaJermo, Italy
Univ. Regensburg,
FRG
Univ. Rome, Jtaly
Univ. S. California, Los Angeles, CA
Univ. Stockholm.
Sweden
1
I
2
1
I
I
I
I
J
1
1
1
J
1
J
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
J
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
1
J
1
J
I
1
1
I
1
1
f
1
1
I
1
I
J
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
1
Univ. sussex, UK
Univ. Torino, Itmly
UniV. Washington, Seattle, WA
USAF, Hansom AFB, MA
USN, Naval Res. Lab., WashingIon,
Virginia Polytech. [nst. State Univ.,
Blacksburg, VA
Yak Univ., New Haven, CT
York Univ., Ontario. Canada
1.
2.
3.
4.
1
1
I
1
1
1
DC
for attaining
the long sought after
“unified field theory,” which would explain the four fundamental forces of nature in terms of a single theoretical
framework. This research front includes
the second most-cited paper, a single
author work by E. Witten, Princeton
University, New Jersey. Witten’s paper
was cited 87 times during the two-year
period. A check of the 1983 SCI shows
that it continues to be heavily cited.
Research front #83- 1234, “Voyager 1
and Voyager 2 observations
of Saturn
and Titan and analysis of rings of Saturn,
magnetosphere
and atmosphere,”
contains six papers in thk study as core documents. Papers reporting observations
of the Voyager space probes have appeared in these studies before. This research front contains the third mostcited paper in thk study, that by B.A.
Smith, University of Arizona, Tucson,
and colleagues. The paper reports on a
number of observations
of the planet
Saturn, its rings, and moons. It was cited
80 times during 1981-1982.
The most-cited paper in this study, a
single author work by A .H. Guth, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, California, received 92 citations during the twoyear period, It is one of the core papers
in research frent #83-0029, “Phase transitions in the early universe and the inflationary universe scenario. ” Guth’s paper
advances a proposition
regarding the
temperature
of the universe early in its
hktory, and discusses its implications for
the so-called “big bang” theory of creation. It has already been cited 43 times
in the first six months of 1983.
Tied for the second most-cited paper
in this study is a lengthy review by P.
Langacker,
University of Pennsylvania
and Stanford Linear Accelerator
Center, of various unified field theories. It
was published in Physics Reports-Revie w Section of Physics Letters, which is
published by the North-Holland Publishing Co. The paper received 87 citations
in 1981-1982.
I
I
Includes Harvard-Smithsonian
Ctr. for Astrophysics
Includes Stanford Linear Accelerator
Ctr. (SLAC)
Includes Lm Alamos Nat]. Lab,, NM
Operated jointly with (he Natl. Bureau of Standards,
Washington, DC
Tsblc 5: National affiliations of the authors of the 1981
physical sciences papers most cited in 1981.1982, in order
of the total number of papers on which each nation’s au.
thors appeared (column A) B= number of papers coauthored with scientists from other countries. C = nationality of coauthors,
Coamry
us
A
B
67
17
France
98
FRG
84
UK
Switzerland
B2
’75
Denmark
Israel
b3
53
Italy
54
the Netherlands
USSR
Canada
HunBary
Sweden
Belgium
Japan
Norway
People’s
Republic of
China
Poland
5
30
21
21
22
II
3
c
Canada, Denmark, France,
FRG, Israel, Italv, the
Netherlands,
People’s Repubfic
ot China, Poland, Sweden,
Switzerland & UK
Canada. Denmark, FRG. Italy.
the Netherlands & US
France, Italy, the Netherlands
& us
Ismel, Poland & US
Hungary, Israel, Italy, Sweden
& us
France & US
Belgium, Poland, Switzerland,
UK & US
France, FRG, the Netherhmds,
Switzerland & US
France, FRG, Italy & US
Fmnce & US
Switzerland
Norway, Switzerland
Israel
& US
10
II
II
us
II
Israel, UK&US
Sweden
the papers describe organic compounds
which can be transformed
into superconductors.
K. Bechgaard,
University
of Copenhagen,
Denmark, appears on
five of the papers in thk group: twice as a
first author, and three times as a secondary author.
Six papers in Table 1 are core documents for research front #83-0885, “Supersymmetric
grand unfiled theones.”
“Supersymmetry”
is the label given to
one of several theoretical
approaches
382
The fourth most-cited paper in Table
1 describes a new method developed by
M. Barber and colleagues, University of
Manchester
Institute
of Science and
Technology, England. The method improves the results of mass spectronomy
performed on nongaseous substances. It
received 77 citations during the two-year
period.
This concludes our study of the mostcited physical sciences papers of 1981.
This series will continue next year when
we identify the most-cited
papers of
1982. Remember that we treated chem-
istry separately in a study of the 1980
papers.g We will continue to do so for
1981, although several chemistry papers
were cited frequently enough to meet
the threshold for this study.
*****
My thanks to John Dale and Tom
Di Juliafor their help in the prepamtion
@l@l
1s1
of this essay.
REFERENCES
1. Garffekf E. The 1981 articles most cited in 1981 and 1982, 1. Lie sciences.
Current Corrtent$ (38):5-15, 19 September 1983.
2--------------- ABCS of cluster mapping. Parts 1 & 2. Most active fields in the fiie and physical sciences in
1978, Essays o/an in~orrnation
fcientist.
Phtiadelphia:
1S1 Press, 1981. Vol. 4. p. 634-49.
(Reptinted from: Current Contents (40):5-12, 6 October 1980 and (41):5-12, 13 October 1980.)
3. ------------- ISI’S “new” Index fo Scierrt~ic Reviews (LSR): spplying research front specialty searching
to the retrievsl of the re%ew literature. Essays of an information scientist, Philadelphia: 1S1 Press,
1983. Vol. 5. p. 695-702. (Reprinted from: Cuwent Corrtent$ (39):5-12, 27 September 1982.)
4. -------------- The 19843articles most cited in 1980 and 1981.2. Physical sciences.
Current Contents (20):5-16, 16 May 1983.
5. -------------- More on the ethics of scient~lc publication: abuses of authorship attribution snd citation
amnesis undermine the rewsrd system of science. Essayf of an in~oimation
scienti$f.
Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1983. Vol. 5. p. 621-6.
(Reprinted from: Current Contents (XJ):5-1O, 26 July 1982.)
6. -------------- The 1976 articles most cited in 1976 snd 1977.2, physical sciences. ,%ays of an
information scientist. Phdadelphia: 1S1 Press, 1981. Vol. 4. p. 115-26.
(Reprinted from Current Contents (17):5-16, 23 April 1979.)
7. -------------- 1978 articles most cited in 1978 and 1979. 1. Physicsf sciences. Emys of an information
fcientisf. Pfdladelpfds: 1S1 Press, 1981. Vol. 4. p. 674-85.
(Reprinted from: Current Contents (46):5-16, 17 November 1980.)
8-------------- . The 1979 articles most cited from 1979 to 1981.2. Physical sciences. .Essays of an
information scienti$t. Phfladelphis: 1S1 Press, 1983. Vol. 5. p. 63442.
(Reprinted from: Current Conterm (32):5-13,9 August 1982.)
9. ------------- The 1980 chemistry articles most cited in 19801982.
Current Conterm (35): S-15, 29 August 1983.
383
Fly UP