Comments
Transcript
Budget 2012 What it means for you KPMG Commentary
Budget 2012 What it means for you KPMG Commentary March 2012 Contents Our view 1 Economic Implications 3 Business Implications 4 Public Sector Implications 6 Tax Policy Development 8 Corporate Tax 12 Indirect Tax 21 Employee Issues 29 Personal Tax 37 © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Our view The Chancellor of the Exchequer proclaimed that this reforming budget was to reward work, to enable Britain to earn its way in the world, and to back aspiration and business. But did the tax changes meet those aims? Chris Morgan Head of Tax Policy The main tax change for large business announced at the Budget was the reduction of corporation tax to 24% with effect from 1 April 2012, with further reductions planned bringing the rate down to 22% from 1 April 2014. The 24% rate will bring the UK, effectively, to 15th in the EU league table of corporation tax rates – there is still some way to go before the UK has such a low rate as countries like Ireland. This rate reduction will be welcomed by business, enabling a greater proportion of their profits to be reinvested to enable their companies to grow. The Chancellor also confirmed the details of the modernised controlled foreign companies (CFC) régime with a new gateway test to simplify the administration. This will enable British companies to invest overseas, whilst HMRC will maintain a close watch on multinational companies to prevent them diverting profits away from the UK. The introduction from 1 April 2013 of a special tax system for Patents, with an eventual tax rate of 10% on patent linked profits, and also an above the line research and development tax credit will help high tech businesses, both profit making and start ups. Other specific business areas which will have focused tax assistance, from 1 April 2013, will be the video gaming and the high quality television production companies. Business will also gain from a successful integration of the operation of income tax and the national insurance scheme. The Government has also announced changes to the enterprise management incentive scheme (EMI) to double an individual’s maximum limit to £250,000. There are also proposals to improve the position of capital gains entrepreneurs’ relief (10% tax rate) for individuals with EMI options. Smaller business with turnovers of less than £77,000 will gain from the proposed cash basis for computing income tax profits with effect from 1 April 2013. However, one big cloud on the horizon is the proposed introduction of a general anti avoidance rule (GAAR) aimed at preventing highly aggressive tax avoidance. Time will tell whether such a GAAR will impede business transactions, as the current intention is for no specific clearance mechanism to be available. This could well put the UK at a disadvantage © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 1 compared with other jurisdictions which have a tax clearance system alongside their GAAR. The main headlines from this Budget will be on the personal tax side with a reduction from 6 April 2013 of the 50% top income tax rate to 45%. The delay between the announcement and the implementation of this measure is going to create significant incentives for individuals to delay income receipts until after 6 April 2013. In addition, the restrictions on income tax reliefs also coming into effect from 6 April 2013 will bring forward claims before this date. The Government has estimated that the immediate loss of tax revenue in 2012/13 as a result of these timing effects will be £2,400 million, although this will be recovered over the next two years. This creates a significant cash flow impact to the Government’s finances as a result of early notice of these changes. Whilst charities may well have a bumper year of gifts coming up this may not be good news for them in the future. The changes to stamp duty land tax on £2 million properties acquired by companies, and the proposals for annual tax charges on such companies from 1 April 2013 will significantly affect how these expensive properties are held, but there will be some time to change structures. Whether it will affect the housing market in Kensington and Chelsea, where the majority of these properties are located, is another question. The largest tax give away as part of this Budget is the increase in personal allowances from 6 April 2013 to £9,205, bringing a significant number of taxpayers out of income tax. In contrast, the largest tax take comes from the freezing of the additional personal allowances given to pensioners with effect from 6 April 2013. This is a direct shift in taxation from the retired to the working population. So did the Chancellor meet his aims? In the main yes. The big disappointment though was there was no mention of specific tax reliefs given for infrastructure projects, which we have asked for in the past and could have facilitated the development of the much needed modernised backbone that Britain requires. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 2 Economic Implications After November’s savage downgrading of the UK’s economic and financial prospects, the Office for Budget Responsibility found scope for a minor upward tweak to growth and downward tweak to borrowing projections. But its latest forecasts still make grim reading. The downturn is already worse than the 1930s slump, when it took four years for GDP to return to its pre-recession peak. This time round, four years on output is still 4% down. And the OBR expects the recovery to remain sluggish. Growth of less than 1% is forecast for this year and, although accelerating thereafter, output will not fully recover until sometime in 2014. Andrew Smith Chief Economist Government borrowing was revised down marginally, and no further measures were deemed necessary to meet the fiscal targets of, first, current budget balance within (a rolling) five year time-frame and, second, net debt peaking as a percentage of GDP by 2015-16. But the targets are tight and left no room for a net giveaway. The accelerated increase in the personal allowance at the bottom end of the income scale, reduction in the 50p rate at the top and further fall in corporation tax rates were paid for by a combination of additional spending cuts, higher stamp duty on top end properties and tightening up on reliefs and allowances. This allowed the Chancellor to describe the Budget as ‘neutral’. However, there is still a £100 billion hole in the public finances to be filled and the fiscal stance will continue to tighten progressively in each of the next five years. But broadly flat output over the last 18 months – and last autumn’s extension of spending cuts for a further two years into 2016/17 to compensate for the consequent revenue shortfall – hardly suggests that the policy of ‘expansionary fiscal contraction’ is working as hoped. And the real test is yet to come. The bulk of the planned tax increases may already be in place but there is a mountain of public spending cuts to come. The big question is whether private demand will expand to fill the gap. Experience so far is not terribly encouraging as exports have yet to take off and many businesses prefer to hoard cash rather than invest. The Chancellor must be hoping that a recovery in our major export markets, and a return to consumption growth as falling inflation boosts personal incomes, sparks the long-awaited investment boom. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 3 Business Implications Malcolm Edge, UK Head of National Markets, comments on the impact on UK Business of the announcements made by the Chancellor in his Budget today: Businesses in the UK would have wanted to have seen three things from the announcement today, how to improve competitiveness, how to declutter legislation and how to stimulate growth, and the Chancellor has gone some way to making sure that he achieved all three. Malcolm Edge Head of UK National Markets Lowering the corporate tax rate by an extra 1% to 24%, improving broadband speeds in ten key cities and increasing apprenticeships all help to make the UK a more competitive place to be based, while relaxing planning laws and the simplification of the tax regime for small businesses so that they pay tax on a cash basis, will help to simplify their life. It is growth however that is the number one issue and there were some helpful measures around credit easing, relaxation of employment laws, enterprise loans for young entrepreneurs and key reliefs for the film, animation and games sector. Also positive is the confirmation of an Above the Line (‘ATL’) Credit for qualifying Research & Development expenditure for large companies, as outlined in the Autumn Statement, with the rate of the ATL credit set at at least 9.1% before tax, and loss making companies able to claim a payable credit. This has been lobbied for by UK business and is a really positive move for UK competiveness. The ATC will hopefully result in a migration of R&D expenditure to the UK, with the consequential impact on jobs and wealth creation. Developing new markets both in the UK and overseas is vital and expanding the amount available under the UK Export Finance Scheme is absolutely essential, particularly to the SME community. However take up rates currently are just so low that more will need to be done to give SMEs the confidence to look at export markets, and to make sure they know how to access the finance available. UK Trade and Investment has done a lot, but there is a lot more that needs to be done here. Britain has to export if we are going to stay competitive on the world stage, so these measures are a step in the right direction. To help the business community to grow it is vital that the ‘feel in people’s pockets’ is there and the new personal tax rate changes should help to lift the mood and encourage consumers to start spending again. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 4 The Chancellor tried to give something to everyone today, with lots of promises of transport investment particularly in the North West of England and an extension of the enterprise zones (and enhanced capital allowances in some), as well as lots planned for London. Much of what was said today, however, has been on the horizon for a while, and people will need to see the promises turned into action; but many businesses will feel that the horizon is that much closer. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 5 Public Sector Implications For public sector organisations and employees, this was a budget which contained few surprises. There has been little change in the economic outlook and no-one expected to see any change in the government’s deficit reduction strategy. The Chancellor’s message is ‘more of the same’: more belt tightening, more pay restraint, further cuts to services that are deemed to be low priority and increasing pressure to improve productivity in order to make the available cash go further. Alan Downey Head of Public Sector There are signs that the more confident and reform-minded public sector leaders are stepping up their efforts to find innovative ways to reduce cost while preserving the quality of key services. In recent weeks we have seen the Prison Service enter into a partnership with a private company (the MITIE Group) to bid for nine prison management contracts, and two police forces (West Midlands and Surrey) contemplate the outsourcing of services which could include some front-line operations. These may well be a sign of things to come. There are also signs that financial pressure is beginning to produce real stresses and strains, particularly in public sector organisations that have exhausted their reserves and are struggling to compete in the markets that have been created in health, education and elsewhere. It is rare for a public sector body to go to the wall, but we should expect to see more mergers and acquisitions: failing organisations will be taken over by other public sector bodies with a better track record, and we may well see more deals on the lines of the takeover of Hinchingbrooke hospital by the Circle Partnership, which is part-owned by its employees and backed by private capital. What is interesting is the emergence of new forms of public-private partnership. Rather than straight privatisation or outsourcing to the private sector, we are seeing the development of more sophisticated joint ventures which combine private sector funding and commercial know-how with employee engagement and ownership. One significant feature of the Budget announcement, which was widely trailed, is the move towards regional pay for public sector employees. The Chancellor announced that government departments will have the option to move to regional pay structures for civil servants when the current pay freeze ends. Although this will attract criticism from the public sector unions, we should remember that local public sector pay markets already © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 6 exist for a limited number of public sector jobs. There is some evidence that where the public sector has reduced the gap between its pay bill and the private sector equivalent, it has been possible to retain public sector jobs that would otherwise have been lost. It is also plausible to predict that a faster move to localised public sector pay rates could help the private and third sectors compete more successfully to deliver public services. In its White Paper ‘Open Public Services’ published last July, the government indicated its commitment to ‘opening up public sector monopolies…to competition’. We may well find that the primary impact of this Budget, as far as the public sector is concerned, is to speed up that process of competition and diversification. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 7 Tax Policy Development The big announcement from a policy point of view, was, as expected, that the Government intends to go ahead with the introduction of a General AntiAvoidance Rule (GAAR) for tax. Protecting tax revenues by tackling artificial avoidance is – as shown by other Budget announcements – clearly a priority for the Government. However, while the overall aims of a GAAR are clear, it can be difficult to apply in practice. Chris Morgan Head of Tax Policy If it is limited to stopping transactions with no business purpose, the GAAR should be relatively easy to apply. The difficulty arises where it also affects commercial transactions which are perceived to include unacceptable tax driven steps. We think it is important that any GAAR has a clearance system, which can give pre-approval to (for example) business structures, and that this is currently a serious omission from the proposals. Overall the UK has become much more attractive to corporates thanks to the declining corporate tax rate and changes to the way in which profits earned overseas are taxed. A GAAR with no system for agreeing whether a business structure is agreeable to the tax authorities prior to implementation would mean that corporates would face significant uncertainty and would be a backwards step. The GAAR could also pose uncertainty for top earners. With the 50% rate of Income Tax set to fall in 2013, there would be a financial advantage in accepting bonuses and other payments in later tax years – but would this be considered inappropriate tax planning under the terms and conditions of a GAAR? © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 8 Measures featured in this Tax Policy Development Commentary Page Proposed introduction of a General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) Other Budget Measures that relate to Tax Policy Development issues Finance Bill 2013 10 11 © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 9 Proposed introduction of a General AntiAvoidance Rule (GAAR) Finance Bill 2013 The Government has today announced that it will introduce a GAAR, and will consult with a view to bringing forward legislation in Finance Bill 2013. The Government will consult on: new draft legislation which will be based on the recommendations of the Aaronson Report; establishment of the Advisory Panel; and the development of full explanatory guidance. The consultation will be issued in summer 2012. The announcement to consult is in line with our expectations: at the time of the publication of Graham Aaronson QC’s report (November 2011), the Government advised that they would consider and respond fully at Budget 2012. Given the complexity of the matter and the difficulties of appropriate drafting, it is not unexpected that the Government’s response today is limited to a headline statement of intentions. It is intended that the GAAR will apply to income tax, corporation tax, capital gains tax, petroleum revenue tax and national insurance contributions – and announced today, SDLT. VAT will be excluded from the scope of the GAAR. We welcomed the basic principles outlined by Mr Aaronson which make it clear that the GAAR is aimed at artificial tax planning while allowing ‘responsible tax planning’. If introduced effectively it should mean that tax planning which is an integral part of commercial arrangements is not affected, and should reduce the need for more targeted anti-avoidance rules. However, what has become clear from the debate in the five months since the report’s publication is that clarity is needed and there are many aspects of the proposals which will need detailed and considered attention. The key aspect is undoubtedly how the ‘reasonable tax planning’ safeguard will apply. Other significant areas of debate have been the need for certainty (such as a clearance procedure), the impact on the UK’s competitiveness and how the GAAR should be drafted to apply only to those transactions that it properly should. We have been an active member of these discussions and fully support these concerns. KPMG will respond fully to the consultation once it is published. We welcome your views, and in particular how it would apply to real life transactions. Contacts: Chris Morgan +44 (0)20 7694 1714 [email protected] Sarah Beeraje +44 (0)20 7694 4705 sarah.beeraje @kpmg.co.uk © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 10 Other Budget Measures that relate to Tax Policy Development issues The following other measures were also announced or confirmed in the Budget. Where a measure has been previously announced, we have only included it here where a change has been made. A list of previously announced measures which will be included in Finance Bill 2012 unchanged can be found in section 1.69 of the HMRC document Overview of Tax Legislation and Rates (OOTLAR). Further information on each of the measures listed here can be found in the OOTLAR – we have included the relevant section and Annex numbers for ease of reference. OOTLAR ref Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Schemes – extension of hallmarks 1.66 Tax Agents – dishonest conduct 1.68 Simplification of regulatory penalties 2.62 Withdrawing a notice to file a self-assessment tax return 2.63 Information powers for US FATCA purposes 2.65 Criminal investigations 2.66 © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 11 Corporate Tax There was only one main surprise for businesses in today’s Budget as most of the corporate tax measures announced were as expected. The main headline has been a further 1% decrease in the main corporation tax rate to 24% in April with a knock-on effect in future years so that the rate will eventually reduce to 22% in 2014. The imminent reduction to 24% takes the UK from joint 18th highest in the EU to 15th and also puts the UK below the global average rate of around 24.5%. This further reduction will be widely welcomed by companies with larger profits, although it will have no impact on smaller businesses with profits below £300,000. Banks will also not benefit from the reduction as the Bank Levy rate has been increased, the fourth successive increase in the rate. Jane McCormick Head of Corporate Tax Although not aimed purely at corporates, today’s announcement that the Government intends to go ahead with the introduction of a General AntiAvoidance Rule or ‘GAAR’ will be of great interest to business. We do not yet have any details, just an intention to proceed and consult based on the recommendations of the Aaronson Report. If introduced effectively a GAAR should mean that tax planning which is an integral part of commercial arrangements is not affected, and should reduce the need for more targeted anti-avoidance rules. However, clarity is needed on many areas and business will be asking for certainty, perhaps in the form of a clearance system. Many businesses will welcome the Chancellor’s confirmation of his intention to introduce an Above the Line (ATL) Credit for qualifying Research & Development expenditure for large companies and, in particular, that the rate of the ATL credit will be at least 9.1% before tax. The Chancellor also confirmed the details of a more modern and competitive controlled foreign companies (CFC) regime with a new gateway test to simplify the administration, as well as the introduction of the new Patent Box with its beneficial 10% corporation tax rate from 1 April 2013, albeit with some less welcome restrictions for small claims which will add complexity for some businesses. Specific industry sectors affected by the Budget announcements include the life insurance industry where there is wholesale change of the corporate tax regime. Unfortunately, despite extensive consultation over the past two years, there remain significant areas where the draft provisions appear flawed or their meaning is less than clear. Another sector affected is the oil industry which will be relieved, after the shock announcements in last year’s Budget, that the oil tax measures announced today are generally positive. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 12 Measures featured in this Corporate Tax Commentary Page Further reduction in main rate of corporation tax Finance Bill 2012 Finance Bill 2013 14 Increase in the bank levy rate Finance Bill 2012 14 Controlled foreign companies Finance Bill 2012 15 Patent Box Finance Bill 2012 15 Above the Line Research & Development Credit for Large Companies Finance Bill 2013 16 Corporation tax reliefs for the creative sector Finance Bill 2013 17 A number of changes announced in respect of capital allowances Finance Bill 2012 Finance Bill 2013 17 New corporate tax regime for life insurers Finance Bill 2012 18 Oil tax measures Finance Bill 2012 Finance Bill 2013 19 Other Budget Measures that relate to Corporate Tax issues 20 © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 13 Further reduction in main rate of corporation tax Finance Bill 2012 Finance Bill 2013 It has been announced that the main rate of corporation tax will now fall by 2% on 1 April 2012, to 24%. The Finance Bill 2011 had previously included a provision for a 1% reduction to 25%. This 2% reduction will be included in Finance Bill 2012 along with the next planned annual reduction of 1% to 23% on 1 April 2013. A further 1% reduction to 22% at 1 April 2014 will be legislated in Finance Bill 2013. The small profits rate of tax will remain at 20% for the financial year commencing 1 April 2012. Corporation tax rates for ring fence profits (those arising from oil extraction and oil rights in the UK and the UK continental shelf) will remain at 30% and 19% respectively. This further reduction in the main companies rate will be welcomed by companies with larger profits, although it will have no impact on smaller businesses with profits below £300,000. Companies will need to consider the tax accounting implications of the rate changes: ■ The incremental rate reduction from 25% to 24% from 1 April 2012 will be substantively enacted before 31 March 2012 on the basis that, as set out in the Budget resolutions, this rate change is given statutory effect under the Provisional Collection of Taxes Act 1968 before 31 March 2012. This is consistent with the incremental rate reduction from 27% to 26% that was announced in the 2011 Budget. ■ The proposed rate reduction from 24% to 23% to apply from 1 April 2013 will NOT be substantively enacted for IFRS and UK GAAP purposes until Finance Act 2012 passes through the House of Commons. ■ For US GAAP purposes the incremental rate reduction from 25% to 24% and the proposed rate reduction from 24% to 23% will NOT be enacted until Finance Act 2012 receives Royal Assent. Contacts: Increase in the bank levy rate Finance Bill 2012 Stephen Hemmings +44 (0)20 73114071 [email protected] Mark Couch [email protected] +44 (0)12 12323640 The Chancellor has also announced changes to the rate of the bank levy which is charged on a bank’s chargeable equity and liabilities. The rate applied to short term liabilities will be increased from 0.088% to 0.105% from 1 January 2013, whilst the reduced rate for long term equity and liabilities will increase from 0.044% to 0.0525%. Although it is stated that the rate changes are in part aimed to ensure that banks do not benefit from the additional reduction in corporate tax rates, it is more likely that revenues from the first full year of the Bank Levy have fallen short of expectation. The change is expected to generate £450 million of additional annual revenue but the expected total revenues generated by the Bank Levy remain at £2.5 billion per annum. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 14 This is the fourth successive increase in the rate of the Bank Levy and such uncertainty will be a concern for banks operating in the UK. Contacts: Andrew Seagren Controlled foreign companies Finance Bill 2012 +44 (0)20 73116184 [email protected] It has been confirmed that the new controlled foreign companies (CFC) rules, to be introduced in Finance Bill 2012, will apply to accounting periods of CFCs beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The introduction of what is a more modern and competitive CFC regime should enhance the UK’s position as a holding location for multinational businesses. The new rules will focus on the artificial diversion of profits from the UK, using ‘gateway’ provisions to specifically define those profits which are caught. Where a CFC’s profits fall within the gateway provisions and are not otherwise excluded by the entry conditions, safe harbours and exemptions, they will be apportioned to the UK and taxed on any UK resident company with a 25% assessable interest in the CFC. The CFC charge will be reduced by a credit for any foreign tax attributable to the apportioned profits and by the offset of relevant UK reliefs. The new regime will also include a favourable finance company exemption, which will normally result in 75% of the profits from overseas intra-group financing being exempt (producing an effective UK tax rate on such profits of 5.5% from 2014), although full exemption will be available in certain circumstances. Contacts: Patent Box Finance Bill 2012 Michael Bird +44 (0)20 76941717 [email protected] Alastair Munro +44 (0)20 73114786 [email protected] Profits generated by qualifying patent interests will be taxed at 10%. The objective of the regime is to encourage innovative businesses to invest in the UK and to locate high value jobs and activity associated with the development, manufacture and exploitation of patents in the UK. The regime will take effect from 1 April 2013. Benefits will be phased in over the first five years (i.e. 60% of the Patent Box benefit will be available in 2013/14 increasing to 100% by 2017/18). We understand from announcements today in the Overview of Tax Legislation and Rates document (section 1.21) that the legislation will be updated so that it explicitly states that worldwide income from qualifying patent interests will qualify. Additionally, the Government has stated that it will provide some clarity regarding the heads of expenditure which have to be marked up in Stage 2 (routine profits element) of the patent box calculation. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 15 Also announced were changes to the small claims safe harbour. The draft legislation released in December 2011 extended this to all companies. The change limits the safe harbour to companies making profits with residual profits of no more than £3 million. This denies large companies the option of using a simplified patent box claim methodology which avoids the need to determine an arm’s length return on marketing assets. It is useful to note that patent box will also benefit UK businesses which currently shelter UK taxable profits through use of brought forward losses, group relief or other reliefs. Making use of patent box will, for these companies, enable losses or reliefs to be used more efficiently (as the mechanics of the rules exclude an amount of profits from the tax charge) while at the same time preserving a nil taxpaying position in the UK. With just over 12 months until the regime comes in to force, we would urge businesses holding patent interests to act now and assess what patent box could mean for them. Contacts: Above the Line Research & Development Credit for Large Companies Finance Bill 2013 Jonathan Bridges +44 (0)20 76943846 [email protected] Andrew Hickman +44 (0)20 76944478 [email protected] As previously announced, the Government is to bring in an above the line (ATL) credit for large companies incurring expenditure on qualifying Research and Development (R&D). This is intended to make the credit more visible in order to boost its incentive effect. The essence of such a credit is that it is convertible to cash in some way without depending on the status of the company’s tax computations. Previously the benefit of the R&D tax credit for large companies was derived in the form of an increased deduction from taxable profits, which produced no immediate benefit to a company that was in a loss making position. By making the credit receivable in a cash form instead, loss making companies will see an immediate benefit from the R&D incentive. The measure is also likely to be of interest to internationally owned companies carrying out R&D in the UK which may previously have been put off claiming UK R&D tax relief by the knock-on effects to their double tax relief computations. It has been confirmed that the rate will be set at a level of at least 9.1% of qualifying expenditure before tax, effectively confirming there will be no fall in the value of the relief compared to the current regime. The detailed rules and the specific rates of the credit remain to be established and the Government will shortly commence a consultation on these points. This consultation will lead to new legislation to be included in the 2013 Finance Bill. The Chancellor has indicated previously that the credit will be introduced from April 2013. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 16 It is anticipated that the ATL credit for large companies will run in parallel with the existing R&D tax credit regime for small or medium enterprises and the more generous benefits available under this regime will not be reduced. Contacts: Corporation tax reliefs for the creative sector Finance Bill 2013 Gavin Bate +44 (0)20 76941191 [email protected] David Woodward +44 (0)20 76944171 [email protected] The Government has announced its intention to introduce corporation tax reliefs for the production of culturally British video games, television animation programmes and high-end television productions. Precise details of the reliefs have not yet been released. Consultation on the design will take place over the summer. Legislation will be in Finance Bill 2013 and will take effect from 1 April 2013, subject to State aid approval. This is a welcome announcement which will provide a boost to the UK’s creative industries. It forms part of the Government’s ambition to make the UK the technology hub of Europe. Contacts: Lucy Parry A number of changes announced in respect of capital allowances Finance Bill 2012 Finance Bill 2013 +44 (0)20 7311 2006 [email protected] The following measures will be included in Finance Bill 2012: ■ The extension of the Business Premises Renovation Allowance relief until April 2017 for the renovation, conversion or restoration of business property in disadvantaged areas; ■ A new statutory mechanism for claiming plant and machinery allowances on the acquisition of existing fixtures (fixed plant and machinery); ■ The limitation of 100% First Year Allowances for plant and machinery on which payments are received in respect of Feed-inTariffs and Renewable Heat Incentives. Solar panels will attract relief at 8% per annum reducing balance; ■ The availability of 100% allowances on plant and machinery in the designated enterprise zones at Royal Docks – London, Irvine, Nigg, Dundee and Deeside (North Wales); and ■ A widening of the capital allowances anti-avoidance rules in respect of plant and machinery included in Chapter 17 of the Capital Allowances Act 2001. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 17 The following measures will be included in Finance Bill 2013: ■ The extension of 100% First Year Allowances for gas refuelling equipment until 31 March 2015; ■ A reduction in the C02 thresholds for business cars. 100% First Year Allowances will be eligible for cars with 95g/km threshold or less. 18% writing down allowances will be due for cars with a threshold greater than 95g/km but not in excess of 130g/km. 8% writing down allowances will be due on cars with C02 emissions in excess of 130g/km. The associated lease rental charge will be similarly changed. These changes come into effect from April 2013; and ■ An extension to the First Year tax credit for loss making companies until March 2018 in respect of energy and water efficient plant and machinery qualifying for a 100% First Year Allowance. Contacts: New corporate tax regime for life insurers Finance Bill 2012 David Woodward +44 (0)20 76944171 [email protected] Harinder Soor +44 (0)20 73112729 [email protected] There are to be wholesale changes to the corporate tax regime for life insurance companies, with effect from 1 January 2013. The changes ought to simplify the taxation of life insurance companies by bringing their taxation more in line with other companies and aligning it more closely with the commercial realities of life insurance business. Despite extensive consultation over the past two years, there remain significant areas where the draft provisions appear flawed or their meaning is less than clear. Today saw the publication of revised antiavoidance provisions covering the transition. This is now better targeted and has a start date of 21 March 2012. Also welcome is that HMRC now has the power to give clearance to a taxpayer that they will not apply the provision in appropriate circumstances. The legislation governing the new regime will form part of Finance Bill 2012, to be issued on 29 March 2012, hopefully along with the associated regulations. Contacts: Laura Kochanski +44 (0)117 905 4640 [email protected] Rob Lant +44 (0)20 7311 1853 [email protected] © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 18 Oil tax measures Finance Bill 2012 Finance Bill 2013 Decommissioning certainty The Chancellor announced the intention to guarantee the expected tax relief on decommissioning expenditure in the UK and UK Continental Shelf (UKCS): ■ Finance Bill 2013 will give the Government authority to sign contracts to provide decommissioning certainty; and ■ The Government will consult further on the form and details of the contracts in the coming months (we expect this to be through payments where full tax relief is not achieved). The industry will consider this announcement positive and if implemented should release tied up capital to be deployed in UKCS investments. Field allowance Field allowances have been used to encourage marginal investments by reducing the Supplementary Charge to Corporation Tax (SCT) which is currently 32%. The following broadening of the regime has been announced: ■ Introducing a new deep water allowance of up to £3 billion (targeted at the West of Shetland area); ■ Increasing the existing small field allowance to up to £150 million; and ■ Introducing the power for HMRC to introduce new field allowances in respect of existing fields to support brown field developments. This can be seen as the Chancellor accepting that many investments were rendered uneconomic by the 12% tax rate increase announced in Budget 2011. Trigger price A ministerial statement was released on Budget Day which set out how the Government intends to operate the fair fuel stabiliser and more particularly the trigger price for the reduction in SCT. The statement says that the trigger price will be set at $75 as indicated in Budget 2011 however it does not establish the potential rate reduction that would occur when the trigger price is met. This statement does not provide certainty to the industry. Contacts: Andrew Lister +44 (0)20 76943751 [email protected] Claire Angell +44(0)20 76943327 [email protected] © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 19 Other Budget Measures that relate to Corporate Tax issues The following other measures were also announced or confirmed in the Budget. Where a measure has been previously announced, we have only included it here where a change has been made. A list of previously announced measures which will be included in Finance Bill 2012 unchanged can be found in section 1.69 of the HMRC document Overview of Tax Legislation and Rates (OOTLAR). Further information on each of the measures listed here can be found in the OOTLAR – we have included the relevant section and Annex numbers for ease of reference. OOTLAR ref Tax treatment of regulatory capital 1.26 Grouping rules – change to equity rules 1.27 Tax transparent fund – introduction from summer 1.28 Community amateur sports clubs – entitlement to Gift Aid 1.17 Community amateur sports clubs – in-year repayment of Gift Aid 1.18 Tax credits for expenditure on environmentally beneficial plant or machinery 2.31 Lease premium relief 2.33 Foreign currency assets and corporate chargeable gains 2.36 Corporation tax – NHS bodies 2.37 REITs 2.39 Loan relationships – debt buybacks 1.54 Corporate investors in authorised investment funds 1.55 Sale of lessor companies 1.62 Plant or machinery leasing 1.63 Site restoration payments 1.65 Manufactured payments 2.59 Review of the taxation of unauthorised unit trusts 2.60 Enhanced capital allowances for energy saving technologies 1.33 Employer asset – backed pension contributions 1.16 Claims equalisation reserves 1.30 © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 20 Indirect Tax On the whole there was little in this Budget that had not already been pre-announced. The imminent introduction of the cost sharing exemption and the abolition of the Low Value Consignment Relief for imports from the Channel Islands have been widely discussed already. The usual inflationary increase in annual VAT registration and deregistration limits from £73,000 to £77,000 and £71,000 to £75,000 respectively will apply from April 2012. Gary Harley Head of Indirect Tax The surprise announcement was the consultation on VAT anomalies and loopholes aimed at levelling the playing field where similar supplies have been taxed differently, in sectors such as hot food, self storage and sports drinks. It will be interesting to see the responses to this consultation. These changes are planned for October 2012. There was also an announcement about a proposal to move to taxing offshore betting companies where their customers are located, from the end of 2014 (though this date may change), again presumably to level the playing field between UK and non-UK suppliers targeting the same customer base. The proposed removal of the zero rate relief for approved alterations to certain protected buildings, (for supplies made on or after 1 October 2012, but subject to some transitional rules), designed to remove the VAT incentive to alter non commercial listed buildings rather than repair them, will no doubt cause some consternation to the owners of these buildings. The proposed removal of the reduced rate relief for energy saving materials in charitable buildings in the 2013 Finance Bill seems baffling at first sight, since it will discourage ‘green’ expenditure by charities and will mean charitable buildings are in a worse position than dwellings and residential properties when it comes to the VAT cost of making these buildings more energy efficient. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 21 Measures featured in this Indirect Tax Commentary Page VAT: Addressing Borderline Anomalies Finance Bill 2012 (anti-forestalling) Secondary Legislation 23 VAT: Grouping extra-statutory concession Finance Bill 2012 23 VAT: liability of Freight Transport Services performed wholly outside the EU Future Finance Bill 24 VAT: Charitable buildings Finance Bill 2013 24 Remote gambling Future Finance Bill 24 Machine Games Duty Finance Bill 2012 25 Climate Change Levy: Carbon Price support rates Finance Bill 2012 Future Finance Bill 25 Consultation on simplification of the Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) Future Finance Bill 26 Other Budget Measures that relate to Indirect Tax issues 27 © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 22 VAT: Addressing Borderline Anomalies Finance Bill 2012 (anti-forestalling) Secondary Legislation Budget 2012 announced a consultation (closing on 4 May 2012) on proposed legislation aimed at ensuring that similar products are taxed consistently. The consultation also covers proposed changes aimed at closing loopholes. Put simply the intention underpinning this series of measures is the levelling of the ‘playing field’ in a number of areas. The result should be to ensure that similar products (within the areas listed below) will be taxed in the same way: ■ Catering – Hot Take Away Food and ‘Premises’; ■ Sports Nutrition Drinks; and ■ Self Storage. The proposal to close loopholes (and thereby prevent avoidance) envisages VAT being applied to the following activities: ■ Hairdressers’ Chair Rentals; ■ Holiday Caravans; and ■ Approved Alterations to Listed Buildings. Contacts: VAT: Grouping extra-statutory concession Finance Bill 2012 Chris Fyles +44 (0)20 73112674 [email protected] Peter Crush +44 (0)20 73113105 [email protected] This measure gives statutory effect to the concession concerning the value of an anti-avoidance tax charge required within UK VAT groups. This is currently extra-statutory concession 3.2.2 and is being legislated following the post Wilkinson review of concessions. The new legislation allows the valuation of the reverse charges to be capped on the cost of services purchased by group members established overseas. HMRC may direct an open market value, where the value of any bought in supply is less than its open market value. The measure will have effect from Royal Assent. HMRC will maintain the current extra-statutory concession until the legislation comes into force so there will be no impact on businesses. Contacts: Chris Fyles +44 (0)20 73112674 [email protected] Richard Iferenta +44 (0)20 7311 2837 [email protected] © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 23 VAT: liability of Freight Transport Services performed wholly outside the EU Future Finance Bill HMRC have announced their intention to formalise temporary arrangements originally introduced by Revenue & Customs Brief 13/10, whereby supplies of freight transport and related services taking place wholly outside the EU are not liable to UK VAT when performed for UK businesses and charities. The temporary arrangements were originally introduced to address the scenario which arose with effect from 1 January 2010, whereby business to business (B2B) supplies of freight transport and associated services became subject to the new B2B general rule for place of supply of services – where the business customer belongs – regardless of the place of physical performance. This meant that where the customer was in the UK, the place of supply was in the UK even if the supply physically took place wholly outside the EU. HMRC recognised that this change had a real impact on taxpayers and produced an unintended anomaly in the treatment of supplies wholly enjoyed outside the EU, which could also be taxed locally in the place of performance. The announcement confirms HMRC’s decision to give these temporary arrangements permanent effect. Contacts: VAT: Charitable buildings Finance Bill 2013 John Feltham +44 (0)20 76944882 [email protected] Gordon Randall +44 (0)20 73112601 [email protected] It has been announced that the Government will withdraw charitable buildings from the scope of the VAT reduced rate for the supply and installation of energy-saving materials. Few details have been released about this measure. At first glance there seems little reason for removing this relief from charitable buildings as it will simply increase the VAT cost for charities looking to reduce their energy bills and be green by making their buildings energy efficient and so could discourage such expenditure. The relief remains for dwellings and residential buildings. Contacts: Remote gambling Future Finance Bill Rob Hopes +44 (0)161 2464290 [email protected] Anant Suchak +44 (0)20 73113493 [email protected] The Government will introduce a place of consumption based taxation regime for remote gambling. The announcement was expected and follows the review of remote gambling taxation announced in September 2011. Under the revised taxation regime, operators will pay tax on gambling profits generated from customers in the UK regardless of where the supplier is based. A consultation on detailed design characteristics is expected shortly. It is proposed that the 15% rate which applies to Remote Gaming Duty will apply. The © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 24 measure is planned to be introduced in December 2014, although the implementation date will be kept under review. Affected businesses will need to consider the impact of the changes in terms of their current structure and other indirect taxes such as VAT. Contacts: Machine Games Duty Finance Bill 2012 Gary Harley +44 (0)20 73112783 [email protected] Mike Camburn +44 (0)20 76948686 [email protected] The Machine Games Duty (MGD) rates have been announced for its introduction in February 2013. There will be two rates of MGD. The lower 5% rate will apply to machines with minimum stakes of 10 pence and maximum cash prizes of £8, and the standard 20% rate will apply to all other dutiable machines. Skills with Prizes machines have been included and as expected there is no scope to net off irrecoverable VAT. MGD replaces Amusement Machine Licence Duty and takings from machines subject to MGD will become exempt from VAT meaning that a number of operators will not be able to reclaim VAT on related expenditure. There will be winners and losers as businesses move to the new regime. Affected businesses will need to calculate the overall financial impact which will depend on the mix of machine types and the efficiency of their partial exemption method. Contacts: Climate Change Levy: Carbon Price support rates Finance Bill 2012 Future Finance Bill Mike Camburn +44 (0)20 76948686 [email protected] Paul Stewart +44 (0)161 2464917 [email protected] The Government has announced it will set 2014–15 carbon price support rates equivalent to £9.55 per tonne of carbon dioxide. This is a significant increase from the previously announced 2014–15 rate of £7.28 per tonne of carbon dioxide. This is likely to have a significant impact on the cost of electricity generated from fossil fuels. The Government has also announced it will introduce a number of additional legislative provisions with effect from 1 April 2013 (Finance Bill 2012), including: ■ amendments to the treatment of solid fuels, including that coal slurry will not be taxed; ■ fossil fuels used to generate heat in good quality combined heat and power (CHP) plants will not be liable to the carbon price support rates, subject to State aid approval; © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 25 ■ the introduction of a generating capacity threshold of two megawatts before electricity generators will be liable to the carbon price support rates of CCL; and ■ all generators will be required to self-account. Contacts: Consultation on simplification of the Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) Future Finance Bill Barbara Bell +44 (0)151 4735193 [email protected] Neil Smith +44 (0)20 73115417 [email protected] The Government will be consulting on the Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) energy efficiency scheme to reduce administrative burdens on business. Simplification proposals are already expected imminently from the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) and the information we’ve seen indicates that significant savings can be achieved from a revised version of the CRC. Should significant savings not be deliverable, the Government has announced that it may consider replacing CRC revenues with an alternative environmental tax, although details of any new tax have not yet been released. Whilst many have proposed tax increases (such as raising the climate change levy) and these would be far simpler than the CRC, the introduction of a tax alone would be unlikely to deliver on all aspects of the CRC: namely the reputational drivers and focus on energy usage that are core to the scheme at present. To deliver the same objectives as the CRC, any new tax would need to incorporate similar reporting requirements. Any reporting requirements would create an administrative burden on business and would need to be carefully designed to ensure that any replacement actually reduces administrative costs compared to the CRC. We support the reduction of the administrative burden on business but also recognise the need for a level playing field on carbon legislation which helps the Government meet its climate change obligations. Contacts: Barbara Bell +44 (0)151 4735193 [email protected] Neil Smith +44 (0)20 73115417 [email protected] © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 26 Other Budget Measures that relate to Indirect Tax issues The following other measures were also announced or confirmed in the Budget. Where a measure has been previously announced, we have only included it here where a change has been made. A list of previously announced measures which will be included in Finance Bill 2012 unchanged can be found in section 1.69 of the HMRC document Overview of Tax Legislation and Rates (OOTLAR). Further information on each of the measures listed here can be found in the OOTLAR – we have included the relevant section and Annex numbers for ease of reference. OOTLAR ref Tobacco and alcohol duty ■ Alcohol duty rates 1.34 ■ Black beer – repeal of relief A111 ■ Alcohol fraud 2.42 ■ Tobacco duty rates ■ Herbal smoking products 1.35 and A67 2.43 Gaming duties ■ Combined bingo 2.41 Transport related duties ■ Air Passenger Duty – devolution of rate to Northern Ireland 1.38 ■ Red diesel in private pleasure craft 1.39 ■ Vehicle excise duty rates 1.40 ■ Aviation tax – rates 2.44 ■ Vehicle excise duty administration 2.45 Environmental taxes ■ Climate change levy rates ■ Climate change levy – removal of the exemption for indirect supplies of combined heat and power electricity ■ Rates of landfill tax 1.44 ■ Landfill tax – applicability to Scottish landfill sites 1.45 ■ Landfill Communities Fund 1.46 ■ Aggregates levy rates 2.46 1.42 1.43 and A81 © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 27 VAT ■ VAT – changes to registration and deregistration thresholds 1.48 ■ VAT – revalorisation of fuel scale charges 1.49 ■ VAT relief for European Research Infrastructure Consortia 1.50 ■ VAT – zero-rate for adapted motor vehicles and boats for wheelchair users 2.48 ■ VAT – fuel scale charges 2.49 ■ VAT – refunds for NHS bodies 2.50 ■ VAT – invoicing rules 2.51 ■ VAT – Universal Credit consequential changes 2.52 ■ VAT – exemption for education providers 2.53 ■ VAT treatment of small cable-based transport 2.55 Stamp Duty Land Tax ■ Stamp Duty Land Tax – leases simplification 2.57 ■ SDLT – sub-sales rules 1.59 Administration ■ Customs and excise modernisation 2.67 © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 28 Employee Issues It is with much relief from an Employment taxes viewpoint that today’s Budget did not contain too many significant new measures, particularly as employers are already wrestling with a large number of changes and consultations, such as Real Time Information, the Statutory Residence Test, the integration of the operation of Income Tax and National Insurance together with the complication of introducing auto enrolment into pension schemes. Mike Linter Head of Employee Issues The key measure from today’s Budget is the change in the additional rate of tax from 50% to 45% which is due to take effect from 6 April 2013. The Government acknowledges that there is likely to be a behavioural response to this announcement, resulting in individuals delaying receipt of bonuses etc. which would under normal circumstances have been paid during the tax year 2012/13 until a date post 6 April 2013 – effectively taking advantage of a 5% tax saving. The Government’s own figures suggest a potential loss to the Exchequer of £2.4 billion during 2012/13 as a result of this change of behaviour, but this reverses in the subsequent two years. We are pleased to note that the limit of investment into the Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) scheme will more than double to £250,000 and that Entrepreneurs’ Relief will be extended to gains on shares acquired through EMI. Both measures should have a positive impact on the growth of the economy. The changes to the taxation of company cars continue to encourage the take up of more environmentally friendly and efficient cars with lower CO2 emissions, rewarding such drivers with lower benefit in kind charges. As widely anticipated, further to the review carried out by Graham Aaronson QC in 2011 into the feasibility of a UK general anti-avoidance rule, the Government today confirmed that it will consult in the summer on the introduction of a General Anti-Abuse Rule (GAAR). In the same vein, it was also announced that they intend to introduce a package of measures to tackle avoidance through the use of personal service companies. We would like to think that once the GAAR is introduced it will enable the Government to simplify the UK tax law by removing some of the current complicated anti-avoidance legislation. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 29 Measures featured in this Employee Issues Commentary Page Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) plans Statutory instrument in 2012 or later Finance Bill 2013 31 Employee share plans Finance Bill 2013 31 Statutory Residence Test, ordinary residence and SP 1/09 Finance Bill 2013 32 Personal Service companies and IR35 the anti-avoidance intermediaries legislation set out at Chapter 8, Part 2 of Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 32 Qualifying Registered Overseas Pension Scheme Finance Bill 2012 Finance Bill 2013 33 Car and Fuel Benefit Charge and allowances Finance Bill 2012 Future Bills 34 Tax Agreement between the UK and Switzerland Finance Bill 2012 35 Other Budget Measures that relate to Employee Issues 36 © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 30 Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) plans Statutory instrument in 2012 or later Finance Bill 2013 The EMI plan limit is to increase to £250,000 and shares acquired on exercise of an EMI option will count for entrepreneurs’ relief (ER) purposes. These are positive changes. The EMI plan is an employee share option plan specifically designed for smaller trading companies with fewer than 250 employees and gross assets of not more than £30 million. It offers potentially significant tax and national insurance contribution savings for both the employee and the employer. Each employee can hold unexercised EMI options over shares worth up to £120,000. This limit is to increase to £250,000. The change is to be introduced via a statutory instrument as soon as EU State aid approval can be obtained. ER can reduce the rate of capital gains tax (CGT) on eligible gains to 10%. ER will be extended to gains on shares acquired on the exercise of EMI options. Little detail is given at this stage but we assume the way this will work is that in determining whether the ER requirement to hold at least 5% of the ordinary share capital and voting rights in an eligible company for at least 12 months prior to sale is met, shares under EMI options will be counted from the date of grant of the option rather than only counting from the date of exercise (similar to the old provision for EMI options and CGT taper relief up until 2008). Subject to State aid approval, the legislation on ER will be introduced in Finance Act 2013 and will take effect for EMI share options exercised on or after 6 April 2012. The Government will also consult on ways to extend access to EMI for academics who are employed by a qualifying company. Legislation will be in Finance Bill 2013 to take effect from 6 April 2013. Contacts: Employee share plans Finance Bill 2013 Richard Rolls +44 (0)20 7311 2912 [email protected] Alison Hughes +44 (0)20 7311 2626 [email protected] On 6 March 2012 the Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) published a report on tax advantaged employee share plans. The Government will consult shortly on how to take the OTS proposals forward, with a view to introducing legislation in Finance Bill 2013. Aside from the changes to the Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) plan (on which see above) no other specific changes to employee share plans have been announced at this stage. It was also announced in the 2012 Budget that HM Treasury will conduct an internal review to examine the role of employee ownership in supporting growth and examine options to remove tax and other barriers. This review will also consider the findings of the work on employee ownership being led by Norman Lamb, due to report in the summer 2012, and will conclude ahead of Autumn Statement 2012. Contacts: Richard Rolls +44 (0)20 7311 2912 [email protected] Alison Hughes +44 (0)20 7311 2626 [email protected] © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 31 Statutory Residence Test, ordinary residence and SP 1/09 Finance Bill 2013 The Chancellor confirmed the Government’s intention to introduce a Statutory Residence Test for UK tax purposes with effect from 6 April 2013. The responses to the consultation on Statutory Residence and a further consultation on draft legislation will be published within the next few weeks. The Chancellor today, however, confirmed that the concept of ordinary residence for tax purposes will be abolished from 6 April 2013 but ‘overseas workday relief’ will be retained and put on a statutory footing. This statutory footing will include the administrative easement known as SP 01/09. SP1/09 allows Resident but Not Ordinarily Resident employees who elect for the remittance basis, and have their earnings for non-UK duties only taxed in the UK if remitted to the United Kingdom, to calculate the amounts remitted on an annual rather than transaction by transaction basis. This situation where an employee’s earnings for non-UK duties are not taxed in the UK because they are not remitted is commonly known as ‘Overseas Workday Relief.’ It Is not clear how the relief will be incorporated into the legislation nor whether it will be caught by the new restriction on reliefs to 25% of earnings. For details of this restriction please refer to Cap on unlimited tax relief in the Personal Tax Section on page 40. Again, we expect further details on the inclusion of SP1/09 in the legislation to also be published within the next few weeks. Contacts: Personal Service companies and IR35 the anti-avoidance intermediaries legislation set out at Chapter 8, Part 2 of Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 Marc Burrows +44 (0)20 76945930 [email protected] Steve Wade +44 (0)20 73112220 [email protected] The Government has confirmed that following on from the response to the Office of Tax Simplification’s review of IR35 in March 2012, this legislation will be retained. The Government’s consideration of the various options confirmed that the IR35 legislation is required to safeguard the tax revenue to the exchequer and tackle cases of avoidance via personal service companies, where they are used to disguise employment. The aim of the measures is to focus specifically on those arrangements deemed high risk. However, measures are also going to be introduced to address ongoing concerns over the complexity of the legislation and to further engender understanding. The new measures will include: ■ Bolstering compliance teams – reviews will be restricted to ‘high risk’ cases which will be undertaken by specialist teams; and ■ Further clarity and guidance from HMRC, including in respect of: cases deemed to be outside the scope of IR35, having a helpline manned by specialist staff and greater pre-transaction certainty. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 32 The effectiveness of the above measures will be gauged via an IR35 Forum. Furthermore, and no doubt following on from a number of recent high profile cases, it has been announced that there will be a consultation in respect of requiring an engaging organisation to deduct PAYE/NIC at source where office holders e.g. company directors or controlling persons are integral to the running of an organisation by which they are engaged. Following the consultation, any further details in respect of this measure will be outlined in Finance Bill 2013. Contacts: Qualifying Registered Overseas Pension Scheme Finance Bill 2012 Finance Bill 2013 Jayne Vaughan +44 (0)20 76941381 [email protected] Anne-Marie Robinson +44 (0) 121 3352726 [email protected] The Government has confirmed its clampdown on tax avoidance by using transfers to overseas pension schemes (QROPS). The policy intention behind the QROPS regime is that an individual who leaves the UK and transfers their pension savings should be in broadly the same position as someone who remains in the UK with their pension savings. But once someone has been non-resident for five complete tax years there is no longer any requirement to inform HMRC when benefits are paid, so in some quarters QROPS have been marketed as a way of paying amounts or enabling the payment of amounts that are not allowed under UK rules (in particular 100% lump sums) once the UK tax rules no longer apply. To counter this, regulations have been published which introduce: ■ new conditions that a pension scheme must meet to be a QROPS – broadly, tax reliefs and tax exemptions on the contribution, build up and receipt of benefits must apply equally to non-resident and resident scheme members (regardless of when any resident member actually became resident); ■ new information and reporting requirements extending the time scale during which the QROPS must report payments to HMRC to ten years from the point of transfer; and ■ shorter reporting time limits – UK registered schemes will have to report transfers to a QROPS within 60 days. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 33 The new regime will apply to applications for transfers to QROPS (and applications for QROPS status) from 6 April 2012. The Government also announced in the Budget that where the country or territory in which a QROPS is established makes legislation or otherwise creates or uses a pension scheme to provide tax advantages that are not intended to be available under the QROPS rules, the Government will act so that the relevant types of pension scheme in those countries or territories will be excluded from being QROPS. These measures will be included in Finance Bill 2013. Contacts: Simon Mayho +44 (0)20 7311 317 Andrew Scrimshaw +44 (0)20 7311 3102 Car and Fuel Benefit Charge and allowances Finance Bill 2012 Future Bills [email protected] [email protected] The appropriate percentage of list price subject to tax will increase by 1% for cars emitting more than 75g/km of carbon dioxide, to a maximum of 35% in 2014-15, and by 2%, to a maximum of 37% in both 2015-16 and 2016-17. The five-year exemption for zero carbon and ultra low carbon emission vehicles will come to an end as legislated in Finance Act 2010. The appropriate percentage for zero emission and low carbon vehicles will be 13% from April 2015 and will increase by 2% in 2016-17. The Government will remove the 3% diesel supplement differential so that diesel cars will be subject to the same level of tax as petrol cars from April 2016. The Fuel Benefit Charge multiplier for cars will increase from £18,800 to £20,200 from 6 April 2012, and will increase by 2% above the RPI in 2013-14. The Government commits to pre-announcing the Fuel Benefit Charge multiplier one year ahead. The Government will exclude certain security enhancements from being treated as accessories for the purpose of calculating the cash equivalent of the benefit on company cars made available for private use. These security enhancement changes take effect retrospectively from 6 April 2011. Changes have also been made to the capital allowances on company cars – further details can be found in the corporate tax section of this commentary. Contacts: David Chandler +44 (0)20 76945819 [email protected] Harvey Perkins +44 (0)20 76945820 [email protected] © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 34 Tax Agreement between the UK and Switzerland Finance Bill 2012 On 20 March 2012 the UK and Switzerland signed a Protocol to the original Tax Agreement between the two countries. There are four main points included in this protocol. Firstly, it allows for a one off charge to be applied to accounts that are held by UK resident individuals in Switzerland unless permission is given by the individual to disclose the existence of the account to HMRC. The accounts can be held either directly or indirectly. Where the levy is applied to assets held in Switzerland, no further liability to UK tax will arise. Secondly, there is clarification of the relationship between the Agreement and the EU Savings Agreement (EUSA) with Switzerland. Where a relevant person has suffered withholding tax under the EUSA the agreement now provides for an additional 13% 'tax finality payment' to settle all UK tax liabilities chargeable on those interest payments. This achieves the same effect as the 48% withholding tax levied under the original terms of the Agreement. Thirdly, a new Inheritance Tax (IHT) levy is introduced which applies on the death of a relevant person. The levy is 40% of the relevant assets at the date of death. This levy will not apply if the personal representatives authorise the Swiss bank to disclose the account details to the UK. It will also not apply if it can be certified that the deceased person was not domiciled within the UK and was not considered as deemed domiciled for IHT purposes in the UK. Finally, increased levels of information exchange between HMRC and the Swiss tax authorities are provided for within the protocol. Contacts: Brent Copsey +44 (0)20 73112836 [email protected] Steve Wade +44 (0)20 73112220 [email protected] © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 35 Other Budget Measures that relate to Employee Issues The following other measures were also announced or confirmed in the Budget. Where a measure has been previously announced, we have only included it here where a change has been made. A list of previously announced measures which will be included in Finance Bill 2012 unchanged can be found in section 1.69 of the HMRC document Overview of Tax Legislation and Rates (OOTLAR). Further information on each of the measures listed here can be found in the OOTLAR –we have included the relevant section and Annex numbers for ease of reference. OOTLAR ref Car and van fuel benefit charge 2012/13 and 2013/14 1.14 Pensions tax relief 2.13 Pensions tax – abolition of contracting out 2.14 Income tax and NIC reform 2.24 PAYE late payment and filing penalties 2.64 © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 36 Personal Tax This was a well trailed Budget from the Private Client perspective. There was the welcome increase in the Income Tax Personal Allowance for the 2013/14 tax year to £9,205, not far off the Government’s stated target of £10,000. However, for the elderly this was largely neutralised – or worse – by the unexpected abolition of the Age Related Personal Allowance from 2013/14 for those not yet 65, and the freezing of the allowance for those who are. Then there was the leaked reduction in the highest rate of Income Tax from 50% to 45% from 2013/14. It seems likely that taxpayers may wish to delay income receipts until after 5 April 2013, if they are able. David Kilshaw Chairman Private Client In contrast to the reduction in the top rate of Income Tax, there was a focus on increasing the take from other taxes, with a number of new measures aimed at raising more revenue from the wealthy. The new higher 7% SDLT rate on properties costing more than £2 million will have a significant effect, particularly in London. Also, the UK will now copy many other countries in taxing the gains realised by non-residents on UK property disposals. However, this will (at least initially) not apply to individuals, and will apply only to gains realised on residential property. And child benefit will now bring a reduced benefit for those with income of over £50,000. It will be taken back through the tax system at increasing rates, and those with incomes of over £60,000 will have to pay back the entire amount. The first steps were also taken to limiting the amount of tax reliefs such as charitable gifts, losses, and loan interest. From 2013/14 the total relief will be limited to £50,000, or 25% of the individual’s income, whichever the greater. The war on tax avoidance continues. It was no surprise that the headline measure was the new SDLT rate of 15% for residential properties acquired for more than £2 million by certain ‘non-natural’ persons (i.e. – not individuals). This will apply immediately. It is also planned to introduce an annual charge for properties owned by these non-natural persons, but only from 2013. The Chancellor made it clear that attempts to circumvent the new rules would be blocked retroactively. There will be obvious concerns that bona fide property investors will be hard hit. Other welcome measures included a proposal to increase the IHT threshold from £55,000 for gifts from a domiciled to a non-domiciled spouse (or civil partner); and for the non-domiciled spouse to elect to be treated as domiciled – thus allowing full IHT exemption. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 37 Many previously announced measures remained unaltered, such as the limits for tax-favoured investments in Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) shares (£1 million from 6 April 2012) and Venture Capital Trusts (VCT) shares (£200,000 from 6 April 2012), and the IHT threshold (remaining at £325,000). George Osborne has a thankless task in these tough times. Those who have to pay more tax shout much louder than those who pay less! Measures featured in this Personal Tax Commentary Page Personal tax rates and allowances Finance Bill 2012 Finance Bill 2013 39 Cap on unlimited tax relief Finance Bill 2013 40 New 7% SDLT rate for residential property purchases over £2 million Finance Bill 2012 40 15% rate of SDLT for property held in SPVs plus an annual charge Finance Bill 2012 41 SDLT anti-avoidance Finance Bill 2012 41 Capital gains tax and non-residents Finance Bill 2013 42 Reform of the taxation of non-UK domiciled individuals Finance Bill 2012 Finance Bill 2013 42 A new basis for calculating tax for small businesses and simplification measures Finance Bill 2013 43 Restriction on permitted premiums to certain savings plans Other Budget Measures that relate to Personal Tax issues Finance Bill 2012 Finance Bill 2013 44 45 © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 38 Personal tax rates and allowances Finance Bill 2012 Finance Bill 2013 The additional rate of income tax will be reduced from 50% to 45% from April 2013 (the equivalent rate for dividends will be 37.5%). The basic and higher income tax rates for 2013/14 will remain at their 2012/13 levels of 20% and 40% respectively. The Government expects that the cost of the rate reduction will be very small or nil which reflects the HMRC report and its conclusions that the effect of the 50% rate in 2010/11 on total tax revenues was probably negative. The HMRC report observed that large amounts of income were moved before the introduction of the 50% rate and they have assumed a similar pattern in reverse for a reduction in the rate. The basic rate limit will be reduced from £34,370 in 2012/13 to £32,245 in 2013/14 to limit the benefit to higher rate taxpayers of the personal allowance increase to below that of a basic rate taxpayer. The tax free personal allowance for individuals under 65 years old will increase by £630 to £8,105 in 2012/13. There will be a further increase in the personal allowance of £1,100 in April 2013 to £9,205 as part of the Government’s commitment to increase the personal allowance to £10,000. Existing age related personal allowances for individuals above 65 years old will be frozen from 6 April 2013 at their 2012/13 levels until they align with the general personal allowance. From 6 April 2013, age related allowances will no longer be available except for those born on or before 5 April 1948. The capital gains tax exempt amount for 2012/13 is frozen at the 2011/12 level of £10,600. The IHT nil rate band is frozen at the current level of £325,000 until 5 April 2015 after which point it will change in line with the Consumer Price Index. Class 1 primary National Insurance Contributions (NICs) payable by employees will remain at 12% on income between £7,592 and £42,475 line with the higher rate threshold. A rate of 2% applies on income above £42,474. Class 2 NICs increase to £2.65 per week and Class 4 NICs are payable at a rate of 9% on earnings between £7,605 and £42,475 in line with the higher rate threshold. A rate of 2% applies on income above £42,474. Contacts: Daniel Crowther +44(0)20 7694 5971 [email protected] Katy Shaw +44(0)20 7311 3750 [email protected] © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 39 Cap on unlimited tax relief Finance Bill 2013 Some reliefs from income tax such as Gift Aid are at present unlimited in the amount that can be claimed. However, from 6 April 2013 a cap on such income tax reliefs is proposed. The cap will apply a restriction of such reliefs to the higher of £50,000 in reliefs or 25% of income. Tax reliefs to be capped will include but are not restricted to: qualifying loan interest relief, gift aid and charitable donations of land and shares and loss relief against income. There are already restrictions on loss relief for investment in partnerships, in certain circumstances, so this cap should not apply to those affected by existing restrictions. Reliefs not capped would include EIS, VCT and pension relief. There is very limited information available on this measure and until the draft legislation is published (which is expected to be later this year) it will be difficult to comment on the full impact. The target taxpayer group is also unclear. Charities will be concerned that this measure and the proposed reduction in the additional tax rate to 45% from 6 April 2013 might result in an unwelcome reduction in charitable donations. Contacts: New 7% SDLT rate for residential property purchases over £2 million Finance Bill 2012 Daniel Crowther +44(0)20 7694 5971 [email protected] Eugenia Campbell +44(0)207 311 3651 [email protected] In line with recent heavy speculation, the top stamp duty land tax (SDLT) rate for purchases of residential property over £2 million by individuals will increase from 5% to 7% from 22 March 2012. Although referred to in much of the media as a ‘mansion’ tax, the increase is not limited to high value homes. It can also apply to single or linked purchases of up to five residential properties by individuals where the aggregate price paid exceeds £2 million. Acquisitions of commercial property together with acquisitions by individuals of six or more residential properties remain unaffected by these changes, with a top SDLT rate of 4%. Contacts: Fiona Cole +44 (0)121 232 3073 [email protected] Simon Yeo +44 (0)20 73116581 [email protected] © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 40 15% rate of SDLT for property held in SPVs plus an annual charge Finance Bill 2012 A punitive rate of 15% stamp duty land tax (SDLT) has been introduced with immediate effect from Budget Day for transfers of residential property worth individually more than £2 million into companies, unit trusts (or other collective investment schemes) and partnerships with a corporate member (SPVs). It does not matter if the SPV is a UK or offshore entity. There is a significant exclusion for partnerships or companies that have carried on a property development business for at least two years and have acquired the property for the sole purpose of development and resale (i.e. not for letting out). For the purposes of the 15% charge, six or more units of residential property are not treated as commercial property so transfers of large portfolios of high value residential property will be hit by the 15% charge. In addition to the above, it has been announced that from April 2013 an annual charge will be imposed based on the value of each property held in an SPV that is not a developer. The rates start at £15,000 per annum rising to £140,000 per annum for each property with a value greater than £20 million. Whether or not this tax will be collected as SDLT and the details of how this will work are not yet known. This measure is George Osborne’s promised ‘ton of bricks’ on homes held through SPVs. What is surprising is that he had previously said it would be confined to property which is the owner’s home and this measure goes far beyond that; he is also attacking genuine property investment vehicles. High end residential property funds face the 15% on acquisition of property portfolios, the annual charge on top of that, plus, potentially capital gains tax for resident and non-resident investors alike. Contacts: SDLT antiavoidance Finance Bill 2012 Simon Yeo +44 (0)20 73116581 [email protected] Fiona Cole +44 (0)121 232 3073 [email protected] The stamp duty land tax (SDLT) legislation has been amended to block certain schemes that sought to avoid SDLT by using the subsale rules in combination with the grant or assignment of an option. The amendment makes it clear that where a purchaser acquires property and simultaneously grants or assigns an option, the grant or assignment of the option does not trigger the sub-sale rules. Consequently ‘sub-sale relief’ is not available on the initial purchase. The amendment has effect for transactions with an effective date on or after 21 March 2012. It is unsurprising that further action has been taken to block SDLT schemes. The measures are technical and specifically targeted and therefore should not impact on the general application of the SDLT rules or make them more complex. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 41 Contacts: Capital gains tax and non residents Finance Bill 2013 Neil Whitworth +44 (0)161 246 4276 [email protected] Gordon Keenay +44 (0)20 7311 1775 [email protected] As part of a group of measures introduced to tackle tax avoidance through ‘enveloping residential properties’, the Government intend to extend the Capital Gains Tax (CGT) regime. Gains made on disposals of UK residential property (including shares or interests in such property) by non-UK resident non natural persons will be subject to CGT. HMRC intend to consult on the detail of the measure, in conjunction with the proposed Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) annual charge for residential properties worth more than £2 million. It is, therefore, expected to come into force from April 2013. For the purposes of this charge ‘non-natural persons’ will include companies, collective investment schemes (including unit trusts) and partnerships in which a non-natural person is a partner. Individuals and most trusts appear not be caught, and there will be exclusions from the charge for property developers and corporate trustees in certain circumstances. Whether this exemption will extend to employee benefit trusts (EBTs) is not yet certain and is likely to be considered during the consultation, though typically they would have a corporate trustee. One of the features of the existing capital gains regime is that tax is generally chargeable only on gains made by UK resident individuals or companies. The Government’s intention to tax certain non-residents on capital gains made on UK residential property is therefore a significant change. However, it would bring UK tax legislation more into line with the tax treatment of immovable property in many other countries and in the UK tax treaties. Contacts: Reform of the taxation of nonUK domiciled individuals Finance Bill 2012 Greg Limb +44 (0)20 76945401 [email protected] Daniel Crowther +44 (0)20 76945971 [email protected] The following changes to the taxation of UK resident non-UK domiciled individuals (non-doms) who claim the remittance basis have been confirmed in the Budget and will be included in the Finance Bill 2012: ■ Allowing non-doms to remit foreign income or capital gains to the UK for the purpose of commercial investment in qualifying UK companies without immediate tax charges; ■ Increasing the existing £30,000 annual Remittance Basis Charge to £50,000 for non-doms who have been UK resident for 12 or more of the 14 tax years preceding the year of claim. (The £30,000 charge will be retained for those who have been resident for at least seven of the preceding nine years); and © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 42 Finance Bill 2013 ■ Simplifying the existing remittance basis rules in respect of nominated income and the taxation of assets remitted to the UK to be sold. These new rules will take effect from 6 April 2012. We are expecting to see revised legislation on 29 March 2012 in Finance Bill 2012 which will provide further clarification about how the exemption from tax when investing foreign income/gains in qualifying UK companies will work. No further details were made available in the Budget. The Government also announced that it would consult on legislation to take effect from 6 April 2013 to increase the IHT exempt amount that a UK domiciled individual can transfer to their non-UK domiciled spouse or civil partner. Currently the amount is £55,000 and has not been increased since 1983. It is also proposed to allow such a non-UK domiciled spouse to elect to be treated as deemed domiciled in the UK for IHT and so have an unlimited spouse exemption. The new commercial investment exemption is a positive measure that should encourage UK investment and it is hoped that investments in partnerships will be included in due course. Contacts: A new basis for calculating tax for small businesses and simplification measures Finance Bill 2013 Rob Luty +44 (0) 161 246 4683 [email protected] Daniel Crowther +44 (0) 207 694 5971 [email protected] The Government plan to introduce a simpler system for calculating tax for small unincorporated businesses and to introduce simpler arrangements for certain business expenses. In line with the Office for Tax Simplification’s recommendations, the Government proposes that such businesses should have the option to calculate their taxable profits on a cash receipts and payments basis, as opposed to following the same accounting rules that large companies use. A consultation will take place before introducing any changes in April 2013 which will include details of the scheme including extending eligibility to business with turnover up to the VAT registration threshold of £77,000. The Government will also consult on standardising business expenses, by allowing a fixed amount to be claimed rather than recording actual amounts which can require detailed record keeping. For example, standard mileage rates for business use of a car and standard amounts for significant business use of home could be introduced. The Government will also consult over summer 2012 on introducing a disincorporation relief. This will benefit smaller businesses which incorporated previously but may now no longer want to be incorporated and/or benefit from the simpler cash basis of taxation which is proposed. © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 43 We welcome these proposals to simplify the tax system for small businesses which should make it easier and quicker for business owners to calculate their tax and provide them with more certainty over the correct calculation of their tax liabilities. Contacts: Restriction on permitted premiums to certain savings plans Finance Bill 2012 Finance Bill 2013 Daniel Crowther +44 (0) 207 694 5971 [email protected] Katy Shaw +44(0)20 7311 3750 [email protected] For qualifying policies taken out on or after 6 April 2013, premiums will be restricted to £3,600 per year across all policies that are beneficially owned by an individual. Complex transitional provisions are to be introduced which will apply to certain policies started before 6 April 2013, by effectively applying the £3,600 annual premium cap from 6 April 2013. This will limit the tax advantages (i.e. no liability to high or additional rate tax) which investors can currently obtain by investment in qualifying policies. Whilst this change may well be a surprise to the industry, it fits within the Government’s objective of limiting tax advantages for wealthy individuals, and closes down the use of qualifying policies by such individuals to obtain tax favoured returns. Initial reaction may well be that the limit is very low, particularly given the perceived abuse this anti-avoidance measure is targeted at. However, the level of the limit will effectively block such individuals from investing significant sums in so called Maximum Investment Plans (MIPs). Contacts: Carol Newham +44 (0)117 905 4627 [email protected] Daniel Crowther +44 (0) 207 694 5971 [email protected] © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 44 Other Budget Measures that relate to Personal Tax issues The following other measures were also announced or confirmed in the Budget. Where a measure has been previously announced, we have only included it here where a change has been made. A list of previously announced measures which will be included in Finance Bill 2012 unchanged can be found in section 1.69 of the HMRC document Overview of Tax Legislation and Rates (OOTLAR). Further information on each of the measures listed here can be found in the OOTLAR –we have included the relevant section and Annex numbers for ease of reference. OOTLAR ref Income Tax ■ Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme 1.7 ■ Enterprise Investment Scheme and Venture Capital Trusts – simplification and better focus 1.8 ■ Enterprise Investment Scheme and Venture Capital Trusts – increases to rates 1.9 ■ Resettlement payments paid to MPs 1.15 ■ Exemption from UK taxation for non-resident athletes performing at the 2014 Glasgow Commonwealth Games 2.10 ■ Expenses of members of devolved administrations 2.11 ■ Income tax rules on interest 2.19 ■ Transfer of assets abroad and gains on assets held by foreign companies 2.17 ■ Post-cessation trade relief and post-cessation property relief 1.56 ■ Property business loss relief 1.57 ■ Income tax – corporate settlor-interested trusts 1.61 ■ Life insurance – income tax avoidance 1.64 Capital Gains Tax ■ Heritage management funds 2.20 Inheritance Tax ■ Inheritance tax – periodic charges on trusts 2.21 ■ Inheritance tax – offshore trusts 1.60 Benefits ■ Child Benefit income tax charge 1.12 ■ Personal Independence Payment – tax reliefs 2.23 © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 45 Pensions ■ Bridging pensions 2.15 Other ■ Community Investment Tax Relief 2.22 © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 46 www.kpmg.com © 2012 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. The KPMG name, logo and “cutting through complexity” are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”).