Comments
Description
Transcript
10. UNIVERSITY REGION
10. UNIVERSITY REGION This chapter represents the activities to be performed by the MDOT University Region in fulfillment of the Permit requirements. Each region has its own chapter within this Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) containing the required activities it will perform as described in the SWMP Activities (Section 3.7). Included in this chapter is an outline of the proposed procedures described in the activities that will be incorporated into MDOT roadway projects, a map of the University Region facilities (Figure 10-1), contact and address information (Table 10-1), a table containing the activities the University Region will implement (Table 10-2), and the Phase II IDEP Investigation Maps for the University Region (Figures 10-2 through 10-8). Each SWMP activity is represented in Table 10-2 with a checkmark next to the applicable activities. Each activity is also indicated as a statewide or an urbanized area requirement per the Permit. The facility map is included to indicate locations where pollution prevention measures are taken. Contact information is provided on the MDOT employees in managerial positions for each Region/Transportation Service Center (TSC). The Phase II IDEP Investigation Maps were developed as part of the Illicit Discharge Elimination Program (IDEP). The maps indicate MDOT roadways that cross impaired waterbodies within urbanized areas. Impaired waterbodies refer to those waterbodies listed on the MDEQ 2004 305(b) and 303(d) Impaired Waterbodies List. Additionally, a CD-ROM containing outfall maps representing the location of each outfall investigated during the Phase I program is available upon request from MDOT. During the NPDES Phase I storm water program, approximately 366 outfalls were investigated throughout the six permitted cities as part of the IDEP. The six permitted cities included Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids, Flint, Sterling Heights, Warren and Livonia, with Ann Arbor being the only permitted city within the University Region. MDOT conducted 45 outfall investigations within the City of Ann Arbor. The following outline of proposed SWMP procedures shows the order in which individual activities, as described in Chapter 3, are followed within the scope of a typical MDOT roadway project. Once these procedures are developed, they will be incorporated into MDOT projects on a case-by-case basis depending on the scope and needs of the project. 1. Early coordination with MDEQ or other regulatory agencies will be sought during the initial design of selected projects (MDEQ Early Coordination Workgroup and Activity C4). 2. Consideration will be given to transportation-related areas of concern as identified by Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) with storm water quality control programs. Best management practices (BMPs) to address areas of concern will be incorporated into MDOT roadway projects to the maximum extent practicable (MEP) (Activity C-2). 3. Permanent BMPs (post-construction) will be selected based on MDOT BMP selection criteria (Activities C-3 and C-6) with consideration given to MDEQ or other regulatory MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-1 April 2005 agency input (Activity C-4) to the MEP. BMP selection will also be based on approved BMPs in the MDOT Drainage Manual and any Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements (BMP Design and Maintenance Workgroup) (Activity C-5). 4. Maintenance requirements will be developed for new permanent BMPs (BMP Design and Maintenance Workgroup and Activity C-1). 5. Permanent BMPs will be properly installed and maintained following BMP selection (Activities C-6 and C-1). 6. Construction activities will be conducted under MDOT’s approved Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control (SESC) Plan and the State of Michigan’s Permit by Rule. 7. The outfall labeling procedure will be implemented if new outfalls are planned. The consultant conducting outfall mapping will be notified that new outfalls are in place (Outfall Labeling Workgroup and Activity C-10). 8. Newly discovered outfalls will be identified and mapped (Outfall Mapping Workgroup and Activity I-5). 9. New flow control structures in urbanized areas will be reviewed and assessed for water quality benefits gained based on calculated pollutant removal rates (Activity C-11). 10. SWMP activities will be tracked and documented (Activity A-1). Examples include tracking the number of outfalls labeled and tracking maintenance activities through the Maintenance Activity Reporting System (MARS) (Program Assessment and Reporting Workgroup). For specific roadway projects scheduled to be completed in the University Region, refer to MDOT’s 2005-2009 Five Year Transportation Program. The 2005-2009 Five Year Transportation Program is a report highlighting Michigan’s plan for preserving and improving its transportation network. The report describes the planned projects for each MDOT region. A link to the report is available on the MDOT Storm Water Management Web site. The 2005-2009 Five Year Transportation Program is currently underway and will limit the ability to implement new procedures not yet adopted by MDOT. Therefore, new procedures will be incorporated as they are adopted. MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-2 April 2005 Figure 10-1 University Region Facilities Map MDOT Facilities University Region N SHIAWASSEE 21 B.R. 127 CLINTON Grand Ledge M 43 69 100 50 Potterville 69 79 Charlotte 69 B.R. 96 Woodbury 127 DeWitt 96 71 69 East Lan sing Okem os 43 M Williamston M Lansing 496 96 52 INGHAM 188 78 50 99 14 B.R. 94 Grass Lake Ann Arbor 52 B.R. 94 17 WASHTENAW 50 127 12 23 275 124 Carleton 12 50 HILLSDALE 75 50 125 M Adrian 34 34 MONROE 223 125 LENAWEE 99 24 Dundee 52 223 49 23 94 JACKSON 49 99 Northfield Church 106 B.R. 94 Brighton 36 Jackson 60 59 Lake Chemung M 106 94 Sandstone B.R. 96 52 127 50 99 LIVINGSTON Howell 36 EATON Fenton 96 M Mason 50 B.R. 69 69 69 H 99 M 52 127 196 23 52 Monroe 75 Lake Erie 24 Legend State Routes 75 B.R. 94 Created by MDOT December 2004 MDOT Phase II SWMP M Maintenance Garage Counties Rest Area Interstate Routes TSC Interstate Routes (Abbreviation B.R. Business Routes) Region Offices 34 State Routes Welcome Center 223 U.S. Routes H MDOT headquarters Page 10-3 April 2005 Table 10-1 University Region Contact Information University Region Office Region Engineer: Mark Chaput Region Storm Water Coordinator: Bob Batt Brighton TSC Manager: Steve Bower 10321 E. Grand River, STE. 500 Brighton, MI 48116 Jackson TSC Manager: Dee Parker 2750 N. Elm Rd. Jackson, MI 49201-6802 Lansing TSC Manager: Paul Steinman 1019 Trowbridge Road E. Lansing, MI 48823 Tecumseh Construction Office Manager: Hal Zweng For storm water-related concerns at the rest areas, the following individual should be contacted: Region Storm Water Coordinator: Bob Batt Lansing Rest Area 810 US-127 NB Okemos Rest Area 811 I-96 WB, Mile Marker 111 Howell Rest Area 812 I-96 EB, Mile Marker 135 Lake Chemung Rest Area 813 I-96 WB, Mile Marker 141 Northfield Church Rest Area 814 US-23 SB, Mile Marker 48 Ann Arbor Rest Area 817 I-94 EB, Mile Marker 168 Grass Lake Rest Area 818 I-94 WB, Mile Marker 149 MDOT Phase II SWMP 4701 W. Michigan Ave Jackson, MI 49201 Phone: 517-750-0401 FAX:517-750-4397 Phone: 810-227-4681 FAX: 810-227-7929 Phone: 517-780-7540 FAX: 517-780-5454 Phone: 517-324-2260 FAX: 517-324-0294 Phone: 517-423-4858 FAX: 517-423-6014 Phone: 517-750-0401 FAX:517-750-4397 Ingham County North bound on US-127, 1 mile south of I-96 and US127 interchange. Ingham County West bound on I-96, 1 mile east of Okemos Road Exit. Livingston County East bound on I-96, 2 miles east of Exit 133. Livingston County Washtenaw County South bound on US-23, 2 miles south of Exit 49. Washtenaw County East bound on I-94, 0.5 mile east of Baker Road Exit. Jackson County West bound on I-94, 0.5 mile west of Exit 150. Page 10-4 April 2005 Sandstone Rest Area 819 I-94 EB, Mile Marker 135 Jackson Rest Area 820 US-127 SB Dundee Welcome Center 822 US-23 NB, Mile Marker 7 Monroe Welcome Center 823 I-75 NB, Mile Marker 10 Grand Ledge Rest Area 825 I-96 EB, Mile Marker 87 Carleton Rest Area 826 I-275 SB, Mile Marker 5 Potterville Rest Area 829 I-69 NB, Mile Marker 68 Woodbury Rest Area 830 I-69 WB, Mile Marker 101 DeWitt Rest Area 831 US-27 SB MDOT Phase II SWMP Jackson County East bound on I-94, 1 mile west of Exit 136. Jackson County South bound on US-127, 1 mile south of Berry Road Exit. Monroe County North bound on US-23, 1.5 miles south of Exit 9. Monroe County Clinton County East bound on I-96, 1 mile east of Exit 86, Grand Ledge Exit. Monroe County Eaton County North bound on I-69, 1 mile north of Exit 66, Potterville. Shiawassee County West bound on I-69, 3 miles east of Exit 98. Clinton County Page 10-5 April 2005 Table 10-2 University Region Activity Requirements Activity # E-1: Maintain and Use Lansing Information Center E-2: Publish Articles in MDOT Publications E-3: Provide Information on Watershed Stewardship on the MDOT Public Web site E-4: Provide Education Materials Along with Tap-in/Discharge Permit Applications E-5: Notify and Invite Public to Review and Comment on the Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) E-6: Determine Partnership Potential with MDEQ Statewide Public Education Program T-1: Present Applicable Training Modules to the Job-Related Public T-2: Certify MDOT's Staff for Pesticide/Fertilizer Application T-3: Train Staff Responsible for Administering Part 91 and those having Decision Making Authority for SESC Development or Review, Inspections, or Enforcement; and Storm Water Operators as Required under Part 31 T-4: Survey MDOT Staff on Storm Water Knowledge I-1: Submit and Implement Mapping Schedule for Outfalls I-2: Perform Inventory and Dry Weather Screening on Outfalls I-3: Receiving and Notifying MDEQ of Illicit Discharges and Actions Taken I-4: Report Updates and Changes to Legal Authority Status I-5: Map Known Outfalls (statewide) C-1: Maintenance Requirements for MDOT Permanent BMPs C-2: Identify and Coordinate with MPOs Having Storm Water Quality Control Programs C-3: Procedure to Select, Apply, and Maintain Permanent BMPs for Storm Water Management Activities (Post-Const.) C-4: Procedure to Work with MDEQ for Early Coordination on Initial Design Projects C-5: Review Projects with Storm Water Discharges to Water Bodies with a Promulgated Total Maximum Daily Load C-6: Implement Procedures to Select, Apply, and Maintain Permanent BMPs for Storm Water Management Activities (Post-Const.) C-7: Internal Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Protocol for Construction Storm Water Control C-8: Periodically Update Drainage Manual C-9: Documentation and Tracking of Road Maintenance Activities C-10: Procedure for Outfall Labeling C-11: Review Flow Control Structures C-12: Audit the Pollution Incident Prevention Plan (PIPP) Requirements A-1: Program Assessment and Reporting Statewide (S) or Implemented Urbanized in this Area (UA) Region √ S* S* S* S √ S* √ S* S S* √ √ S* S* UA* UA* √ √ √ √ S S* S* S √ S √ S √ S* √ S* √ S √ S* S* S UA* UA S S √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ * Indicates initial activity implementation is performed by others but Region will be affected. MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-6 April 2005 Figure 10-2 Ann Arbor Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations £ ¤ Washtenaw County Huro n Riv § ¦ ¨ § ¦ ¨ Wayne County 14 275 QR er 153 QR § ¥ Metro Region 14 _ ^ 94 QR 23 1 £ ¤ RIVER ROUGE Fowle r 23 94 _ ^^ _ _^ ^ _ 3 Ann Arbor UA 5 § ¦ ¨ 94 _ ^ QR ` _ BR 12 17 _ ^ FORD § ¦ ¨ _ _^ _^ ^ 94 LAKE BELLEVILLE LAKE int Pa Cr £ ¤ k ee University Region Drain Sa lin O:\032609T\03\Project\Phase II Maps 11-16-04 e Ri ve r 12 £ ¤ 23 Legend _ ^ Impaired Waterbodies County Lines Waterbodies MDOT Regions MDOT Road IDEP Field Investigation Locations MDOT Phase II SWMP Urbanized Area Other UA -MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database (Oct 2004). -Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library. -Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data. -Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies Miles 0 1 Designer: NKT Date: 3-28-05 2 3 4 . Page 10-7 April 2005 Figure 10-3 Detroit Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations ^^ _ _ r Cre £ ¤ 24 £ ¤ Q R Q R 24 Q R 53 150 n to in Cl Q R ^^ _ _ ^ ^^ _ ^ _ _^ __ ¦ ^_ QR QR ¨ _ § ^ R _^ _ Q ^ § ¦ ¨ § ¦ ¨ _^ ^ _ ^ _ _^ ^ Q R _^ _ ^ _^ _^ _ § ¦ ¨ R Q RQ Q R _ ^ _ ^ _ ^ ¦ QR ¨ Q R ^_^_^_ § § ¦ ¨ _ Q ^ R ^_^_^_^_^_^_ § ¦ ¨ _ ^ _ ^ _^ _^ _^ ^ _ ` ^_ _ ¤ ^_ § ¦ £ ¨ _ ^ § ¦ ^_^_^_^_ QR ¨ ` ^_^_^_ _ 59 r ve La ke Ke nt 696 10 375 O:\032609T\03\Project\Phase II Maps 11-16-04 Wayne County Legend _ ^ Waters of the State Counties MDOT Phase II SWMP 85 275 Washtenaw County MDOT Regions 24 Detroit River 94 Impaired Waterbodies 75 Ecorse River 12 23 94 8 39 153 £ ¤ Lake St. Clair 102 96 14 University Region 154 3 1 5 IDEP Field Investigation Locations Q R 97 Metro Region MDOT Roads 59 75 Detroit UA 96 £ ¤ _ ^ Ri £ ¤ 23 12 94 iver Oakland County Livingston County § ¦ ¨ Macomb County St. Clair River 15 Sal tR Q R Bay Region Dee Shiawassee County ek Genesee County Detroit UA Other UA 24 -MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database (Oct 2004). -Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library. -Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data. -Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies. 0 4 Designer: NKT Date: 3-28-05 8 Miles 12 . Page 10-8 April 2005 Figure 10-4 Jackson Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations £ ¤ 127 Jackson County QR PORTAGE RIVER _ ^ 50 ne Sandsto Creek £ ¤ 127 § ¦ ¨ QR 106 § ¦ ¨ £ ¤ 94 127 94 § ¥ 94 127 Jackson UA £ ¤ BR 127 QR VANDERCOOK LAKE O:\032609T\03\Project\Phase II Maps 11-16-04 University Region Legend _ ^ Urbanized Area Waterbodies MDOT Regions MDOT Roads IDEP Field Investigation Locations MDOT Phase II SWMP GRAND RIVER QR 50 60 County Lines Gilletts Lake £ ¤ 94 Impaired Waterbodies § ¥ Other UA Center Lake QR 50 £ ¤ 127 -MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database (Oct 2004). -Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library. -Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data. -Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies. Miles 0 1 Designer: NKT Date: 3-28-05 2 3 . Page 10-9 April 2005 Figure 10-5 Lansing Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations Clinton County Ionia County Shiawassee County Looking Glass River £ ¤§ ¦ ¨ § ¦ ¨ 27 96 Grand Region 69 § ¥ Q R _ ^ 43 N GRA Q R 100 § ¦ ¨ ER D RIV _ ^ 69 _ ^ £ ¤ § ¦ ¨ 27 69 Lansing UA 96 43 § ¦ ¨ 496 § ¥ 96 § ¦ ¨ 96 99 nd Ri 69 Q R 43 § ¦ ¨ Red Cedar River 496 § ¦ ¨ _ ^ ve r 96 £ ¤ Ingham County 127 RE K EE C MUD CR University Region _ R ^ ^ Q _ K REE O:\032609T\03\Project\Phase II Maps 11-16-04 § ¥ MO CA SY Gr a § ¦ ¨ 127 _ ^^ _ ^^ _ _ Q R 99 Q R 69 £ ¤ Q R ^_^_ 69 Eaton County § ¦ ¨ 36 Legend _ ^ Impaired Waterbodies County Lines Waterbodies MDOT Regions MDOT Roads IDEP Field Investigation Locations MDOT Phase II SWMP Urbanized Area Other UA -MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database (Oct 2004). -Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library. -Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data. -Rivers with upper case label are impaired waterbodies 0 1 Designer: NKT Date: 2-17-05 2 3 Miles 4 . Page 10-10 April 2005 Figure 10-6 Monroe Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations ¦ ¨ £ ¤ § 275 24 University Region _ ^ Ma so n RIV ER R AIS IN _^ ^ __ _^ ^ _^ Ru n Q R 125 Sto ny _ ^ Cr § ¦ ¨ 75 ee k SA ND Y CR EE K Q R 50 Monroe UA £ ¤ 24 § ¦ ¨ 75 Lake Erie O:\032609T\03\Project\Phase II Maps 11-16-04 Monroe County Legend _ ^ Impaired Waterbodies County Lines Waterbodies MDOT Regions MDOT Roads IDEP Field Investigation Locations MDOT Phase II SWMP Urbanzied Area Other UA -MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database (Oct 2004). -Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library. -Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data. -Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies 0 Designer: NKT Date: 3-28-05 1 Miles 2 . Page 10-11 April 2005 Figure 10-7 South Lyon Howell-Brighton Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations Livingston County 59 R EE ASS AW SHI _ ^ § ¦ ¨ La ke 96 Ch Oakland County em un g £ ¤ 23 Red Cedar River R IVE § ¦ ¨ Brighton UA re e k Howell Th o UALa mps ke on 96 Ma nn C ^ __ ^ _ ^ Q R nt Ke r Hu EY C REE K 36 96 vis Da eL _ ^ Waterbodies County Lines MDOT Roads IDEP Field Investigation Locations MDOT Phase II SWMP Urbanized Area Other UA ek C re South Lyon UA Metro Region Whitmore Lake Legend MDOT Regions § ¦ ¨ r ve Washtenaw County Impaired Waterbodies 96 23 Po rtag O:\032609T\03\Project\Phase II Maps 11-16-04 Ri § ¦ ¨ £ ¤ Q R _ ^ ake HON on ke La -MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database (Oct 2004). -Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library. -Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data. -Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies University Region Miles 0 1 Designer: NKT Date: 3-28-05 2 3 4 . Page 10-12 April 2005 Figure 10-8 Toledo Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations £ ¤ University Region Monroe County 23 Bay Creek C ay lfw Ha k re e Q R 2 Q R §¨¦ 75 125 £ ¤ Toledo UA Sp rin gb ro O:\032609T\03\Project\Phase II Maps 11-16-04 Ha lfw ay C 24 Ind ia ok nC ree k re e k Ohio Legend Impaired Waterbodies County Lines Waterbodies MDOT Regions MDOT Roads Urbanized Area Other UA No IDEP Investigations in Toledo UA MDOT Phase II SWMP -MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database (Oct 2004). -Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library. -Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data. -Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies. 0 Designer: NKT Date: 3-28-05 1 Miles 2 . Page 10-13 April 2005 THIS PAGE BLANK MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-14 April 2005