10. UNIVERSITY REGION

10. UNIVERSITY REGION
This chapter represents the activities to be performed by the MDOT University Region in
fulfillment of the Permit requirements. Each region has its own chapter within this Storm Water
Management Plan (SWMP) containing the required activities it will perform as described in the
SWMP Activities (Section 3.7).
Included in this chapter is an outline of the proposed procedures described in the activities that
will be incorporated into MDOT roadway projects, a map of the University Region facilities
(Figure 10-1), contact and address information (Table 10-1), a table containing the activities the
University Region will implement (Table 10-2), and the Phase II IDEP Investigation Maps for
the University Region (Figures 10-2 through 10-8). Each SWMP activity is represented in Table
10-2 with a checkmark next to the applicable activities. Each activity is also indicated as a
statewide or an urbanized area requirement per the Permit.
The facility map is included to indicate locations where pollution prevention measures are taken.
Contact information is provided on the MDOT employees in managerial positions for each
Region/Transportation Service Center (TSC). The Phase II IDEP Investigation Maps were
developed as part of the Illicit Discharge Elimination Program (IDEP). The maps indicate
MDOT roadways that cross impaired waterbodies within urbanized areas. Impaired waterbodies
refer to those waterbodies listed on the MDEQ 2004 305(b) and 303(d) Impaired Waterbodies
List.
Additionally, a CD-ROM containing outfall maps representing the location of each outfall
investigated during the Phase I program is available upon request from MDOT. During the
NPDES Phase I storm water program, approximately 366 outfalls were investigated throughout
the six permitted cities as part of the IDEP. The six permitted cities included Ann Arbor, Grand
Rapids, Flint, Sterling Heights, Warren and Livonia, with Ann Arbor being the only permitted
city within the University Region. MDOT conducted 45 outfall investigations within the City of
Ann Arbor.
The following outline of proposed SWMP procedures shows the order in which individual
activities, as described in Chapter 3, are followed within the scope of a typical MDOT roadway
project. Once these procedures are developed, they will be incorporated into MDOT projects on
a case-by-case basis depending on the scope and needs of the project.
1. Early coordination with MDEQ or other regulatory agencies will be sought during the
initial design of selected projects (MDEQ Early Coordination Workgroup and Activity C4).
2. Consideration will be given to transportation-related areas of concern as identified by
Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) with storm water quality control programs.
Best management practices (BMPs) to address areas of concern will be incorporated into
MDOT roadway projects to the maximum extent practicable (MEP) (Activity C-2).
3. Permanent BMPs (post-construction) will be selected based on MDOT BMP selection
criteria (Activities C-3 and C-6) with consideration given to MDEQ or other regulatory
MDOT Phase II SWMP
Page 10-1
April 2005
agency input (Activity C-4) to the MEP. BMP selection will also be based on approved
BMPs in the MDOT Drainage Manual and any Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
requirements (BMP Design and Maintenance Workgroup) (Activity C-5).
4. Maintenance requirements will be developed for new permanent BMPs (BMP Design
and Maintenance Workgroup and Activity C-1).
5. Permanent BMPs will be properly installed and maintained following BMP selection
(Activities C-6 and C-1).
6. Construction activities will be conducted under MDOT’s approved Soil Erosion and
Sedimentation Control (SESC) Plan and the State of Michigan’s Permit by Rule.
7. The outfall labeling procedure will be implemented if new outfalls are planned. The
consultant conducting outfall mapping will be notified that new outfalls are in place
(Outfall Labeling Workgroup and Activity C-10).
8. Newly discovered outfalls will be identified and mapped (Outfall Mapping Workgroup
and Activity I-5).
9. New flow control structures in urbanized areas will be reviewed and assessed for water
quality benefits gained based on calculated pollutant removal rates (Activity C-11).
10. SWMP activities will be tracked and documented (Activity A-1). Examples include
tracking the number of outfalls labeled and tracking maintenance activities through the
Maintenance Activity Reporting System (MARS) (Program Assessment and Reporting
Workgroup).
For specific roadway projects scheduled to be completed in the University Region, refer to
MDOT’s 2005-2009 Five Year Transportation Program.
The 2005-2009 Five Year
Transportation Program is a report highlighting Michigan’s plan for preserving and improving its
transportation network. The report describes the planned projects for each MDOT region. A
link to the report is available on the MDOT Storm Water Management Web site. The 2005-2009
Five Year Transportation Program is currently underway and will limit the ability to implement
new procedures not yet adopted by MDOT. Therefore, new procedures will be incorporated as
they are adopted.
MDOT Phase II SWMP
Page 10-2
April 2005
Figure 10-1 University Region Facilities Map
MDOT Facilities
University Region
N
SHIAWASSEE
21
B.R.
127
CLINTON
Grand Ledge
M
43
69
100
50
Potterville 69
79
Charlotte
69
B.R.
96
Woodbury
127
DeWitt
96
71
69
East Lan sing
Okem os
43 M Williamston
M
Lansing 496
96
52
INGHAM
188
78
50
99
14
B.R.
94
Grass
Lake
Ann
Arbor
52
B.R.
94
17
WASHTENAW
50
127
12
23
275
124
Carleton
12
50
HILLSDALE
75
50
125
M Adrian
34
34
MONROE
223
125
LENAWEE
99
24
Dundee
52
223
49
23
94
JACKSON
49 99
Northfield
Church
106
B.R.
94
Brighton
36
Jackson
60
59
Lake
Chemung M
106
94
Sandstone
B.R.
96
52
127
50
99
LIVINGSTON
Howell
36
EATON
Fenton
96
M Mason
50
B.R.
69
69
69
H
99
M
52
127
196
23
52
Monroe
75
Lake Erie
24
Legend
State Routes
75
B.R.
94
Created by MDOT
December 2004
MDOT Phase II SWMP
M
Maintenance Garage
Counties
Rest Area
Interstate Routes
TSC
Interstate Routes
(Abbreviation B.R. Business Routes)
Region Offices
34
State Routes
Welcome Center
223
U.S. Routes
H
MDOT headquarters
Page 10-3
April 2005
Table 10-1 University Region Contact Information
University Region Office
Region Engineer: Mark Chaput
Region Storm Water Coordinator: Bob Batt
Brighton TSC
Manager: Steve Bower
10321 E. Grand River, STE. 500
Brighton, MI 48116
Jackson TSC
Manager: Dee Parker
2750 N. Elm Rd.
Jackson, MI 49201-6802
Lansing TSC
Manager: Paul Steinman
1019 Trowbridge Road
E. Lansing, MI 48823
Tecumseh Construction Office
Manager: Hal Zweng
For storm water-related concerns at the rest areas, the
following individual should be contacted:
Region Storm Water Coordinator: Bob Batt
Lansing Rest Area 810
US-127 NB
Okemos Rest Area 811
I-96 WB, Mile Marker 111
Howell Rest Area 812
I-96 EB, Mile Marker 135
Lake Chemung Rest Area 813
I-96 WB, Mile Marker 141
Northfield Church Rest Area 814
US-23 SB, Mile Marker 48
Ann Arbor Rest Area 817
I-94 EB, Mile Marker 168
Grass Lake Rest Area 818
I-94 WB, Mile Marker 149
MDOT Phase II SWMP
4701 W. Michigan Ave
Jackson, MI 49201
Phone: 517-750-0401
FAX:517-750-4397
Phone: 810-227-4681
FAX: 810-227-7929
Phone: 517-780-7540
FAX: 517-780-5454
Phone: 517-324-2260
FAX: 517-324-0294
Phone: 517-423-4858
FAX: 517-423-6014
Phone: 517-750-0401
FAX:517-750-4397
Ingham County
North bound on US-127, 1
mile south of I-96 and US127 interchange.
Ingham County
West bound on I-96, 1 mile
east of Okemos Road Exit.
Livingston County
East bound on I-96, 2 miles
east of Exit 133.
Livingston County
Washtenaw County
South bound on US-23, 2
miles south of Exit 49.
Washtenaw County
East bound on I-94, 0.5 mile
east of Baker Road Exit.
Jackson County
West bound on I-94, 0.5
mile west of Exit 150.
Page 10-4
April 2005
Sandstone Rest Area 819
I-94 EB, Mile Marker 135
Jackson Rest Area 820
US-127 SB
Dundee Welcome Center 822
US-23 NB, Mile Marker 7
Monroe Welcome Center 823
I-75 NB, Mile Marker 10
Grand Ledge Rest Area 825
I-96 EB, Mile Marker 87
Carleton Rest Area 826
I-275 SB, Mile Marker 5
Potterville Rest Area 829
I-69 NB, Mile Marker 68
Woodbury Rest Area 830
I-69 WB, Mile Marker 101
DeWitt Rest Area 831
US-27 SB
MDOT Phase II SWMP
Jackson County
East bound on I-94, 1 mile
west of Exit 136.
Jackson County
South bound on US-127, 1
mile south of Berry Road
Exit.
Monroe County
North bound on US-23, 1.5
miles south of Exit 9.
Monroe County
Clinton County
East bound on I-96, 1 mile
east of Exit 86, Grand Ledge
Exit.
Monroe County
Eaton County
North bound on I-69, 1 mile
north of Exit 66, Potterville.
Shiawassee County
West bound on I-69, 3 miles
east of Exit 98.
Clinton County
Page 10-5
April 2005
Table 10-2 University Region Activity Requirements
Activity #
E-1: Maintain and Use Lansing Information Center
E-2: Publish Articles in MDOT Publications
E-3: Provide Information on Watershed Stewardship on the MDOT Public Web
site
E-4: Provide Education Materials Along with Tap-in/Discharge Permit
Applications
E-5: Notify and Invite Public to Review and Comment on the Storm Water
Management Plan (SWMP)
E-6: Determine Partnership Potential with MDEQ Statewide Public Education
Program
T-1: Present Applicable Training Modules to the Job-Related Public
T-2: Certify MDOT's Staff for Pesticide/Fertilizer Application
T-3: Train Staff Responsible for Administering Part 91 and those having
Decision Making Authority for SESC Development or Review, Inspections, or
Enforcement; and Storm Water Operators as Required under Part 31
T-4: Survey MDOT Staff on Storm Water Knowledge
I-1: Submit and Implement Mapping Schedule for Outfalls
I-2: Perform Inventory and Dry Weather Screening on Outfalls
I-3: Receiving and Notifying MDEQ of Illicit Discharges and Actions Taken
I-4: Report Updates and Changes to Legal Authority Status
I-5: Map Known Outfalls (statewide)
C-1: Maintenance Requirements for MDOT Permanent BMPs
C-2: Identify and Coordinate with MPOs Having Storm Water Quality Control
Programs
C-3: Procedure to Select, Apply, and Maintain Permanent BMPs for Storm
Water Management Activities (Post-Const.)
C-4: Procedure to Work with MDEQ for Early Coordination on Initial Design
Projects
C-5: Review Projects with Storm Water Discharges to Water Bodies with a
Promulgated Total Maximum Daily Load
C-6: Implement Procedures to Select, Apply, and Maintain Permanent BMPs
for Storm Water Management Activities (Post-Const.)
C-7: Internal Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Protocol for
Construction Storm Water Control
C-8: Periodically Update Drainage Manual
C-9: Documentation and Tracking of Road Maintenance Activities
C-10: Procedure for Outfall Labeling
C-11: Review Flow Control Structures
C-12: Audit the Pollution Incident Prevention Plan (PIPP) Requirements
A-1: Program Assessment and Reporting
Statewide
(S) or
Implemented
Urbanized
in this
Area (UA)
Region
√
S*
S*
S*
S
√
S*
√
S*
S
S*
√
√
S*
S*
UA*
UA*
√
√
√
√
S
S*
S*
S
√
S
√
S
√
S*
√
S*
√
S
√
S*
S*
S
UA*
UA
S
S
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
* Indicates initial activity implementation is performed by others but Region will be affected.
MDOT Phase II SWMP
Page 10-6
April 2005
Figure 10-2 Ann Arbor Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations
£
¤
Washtenaw County
Huro
n Riv
§
¦
¨
§
¦
¨
Wayne County
14
275
QR
er
153
QR
§
¥
Metro Region
14
_
^
94
QR
23
1
£
¤
RIVER ROUGE
Fowle
r
23
94
_
^^
_
_^
^
_
3
Ann Arbor UA
5
§
¦
¨
94
_
^
QR
`
_
BR
12
17
_
^
FORD
§
¦
¨
_
_^
_^
^
94
LAKE
BELLEVILLE LAKE
int
Pa
Cr
£
¤
k
ee
University Region
Drain
Sa
lin
O:\032609T\03\Project\Phase II Maps 11-16-04
e
Ri
ve
r
12
£
¤
23
Legend
_
^
Impaired Waterbodies
County Lines
Waterbodies
MDOT Regions
MDOT Road
IDEP Field Investigation Locations
MDOT Phase II SWMP
Urbanized Area
Other UA
-MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic
Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database
(Oct 2004).
-Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for
Geographic Information Library.
-Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data.
-Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies
Miles
0
1
Designer: NKT
Date: 3-28-05
2
3
4
.
Page 10-7
April 2005
Figure 10-3 Detroit Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations
^^
_
_
r Cre
£
¤
24
£
¤
Q
R
Q
R
24
Q
R
53
150
n
to
in
Cl
Q
R
^^
_
_ ^
^^
_
^
_
_^
__
¦ ^_ QR QR
¨
_ §
^
R _^
_ Q
^
§
¦
¨
§
¦
¨
_^
^
_
^
_
_^
^
Q
R
_^
_ ^
_^
_^
_
§
¦
¨
R
Q
RQ
Q
R
_
^
_
^
_
^
¦ QR
¨
Q
R ^_^_^_ §
§
¦
¨
_ Q
^
R ^_^_^_^_^_^_ §
¦
¨
_
^
_
^
_^
_^
_^
^
_
` ^_
_
¤ ^_
§
¦ £
¨
_
^
§
¦ ^_^_^_^_ QR
¨
` ^_^_^_
_
59
r
ve
La
ke
Ke
nt
696
10
375
O:\032609T\03\Project\Phase II Maps 11-16-04
Wayne County
Legend
_
^
Waters of the State
Counties
MDOT Phase II SWMP
85
275
Washtenaw County
MDOT Regions
24
Detroit River
94
Impaired Waterbodies
75
Ecorse River
12
23
94
8
39
153
£
¤
Lake St. Clair
102
96
14
University Region
154
3
1
5
IDEP Field Investigation Locations
Q
R
97
Metro Region
MDOT Roads
59
75
Detroit UA
96
£
¤
_
^
Ri
£
¤
23
12
94
iver
Oakland County
Livingston County
§
¦
¨
Macomb County
St. Clair River
15
Sal
tR
Q
R
Bay Region
Dee
Shiawassee
County
ek
Genesee County
Detroit UA
Other UA
24
-MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic
Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database
(Oct 2004).
-Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for
Geographic Information Library.
-Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data.
-Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies.
0
4
Designer: NKT
Date: 3-28-05
8
Miles
12
.
Page 10-8
April 2005
Figure 10-4 Jackson Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations
£
¤
127
Jackson County
QR
PORTAGE RIVER
_
^
50
ne
Sandsto
Creek
£
¤
127
§
¦
¨
QR
106
§
¦
¨
£
¤
94
127
94
§
¥
94
127
Jackson UA
£
¤
BR
127
QR
VANDERCOOK
LAKE
O:\032609T\03\Project\Phase II Maps 11-16-04
University Region
Legend
_
^
Urbanized Area
Waterbodies
MDOT Regions
MDOT Roads
IDEP Field Investigation Locations
MDOT Phase II SWMP
GRAND RIVER
QR
50
60
County Lines
Gilletts Lake
£
¤
94
Impaired Waterbodies
§
¥
Other UA
Center Lake
QR
50
£
¤
127
-MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic
Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database
(Oct 2004).
-Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for
Geographic Information Library.
-Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data.
-Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies.
Miles
0
1
Designer: NKT
Date: 3-28-05
2
3
.
Page 10-9
April 2005
Figure 10-5 Lansing Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations
Clinton County
Ionia
County
Shiawassee County
Looking Glass River
£
¤§
¦
¨
§
¦
¨
27
96
Grand
Region
69
§
¥
Q
R
_
^
43
N
GRA
Q
R
100
§
¦
¨
ER
D RIV
_
^
69
_
^
£
¤
§
¦
¨
27
69
Lansing UA
96
43
§
¦
¨
496
§
¥
96
§
¦
¨
96
99
nd
Ri
69
Q
R
43
§
¦
¨
Red Cedar River
496
§
¦
¨
_
^
ve
r
96
£
¤
Ingham County
127
RE
K
EE
C
MUD
CR
University Region
_ R
^
^ Q
_
K
REE
O:\032609T\03\Project\Phase II Maps 11-16-04
§
¥
MO
CA
SY
Gr
a
§
¦
¨
127
_
^^
_
^^
_
_
Q
R
99
Q
R
69
£
¤
Q
R ^_^_
69
Eaton County
§
¦
¨
36
Legend
_
^
Impaired Waterbodies
County Lines
Waterbodies
MDOT Regions
MDOT Roads
IDEP Field Investigation Locations
MDOT Phase II SWMP
Urbanized Area
Other UA
-MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic
Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database
(Oct 2004).
-Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for
Geographic Information Library.
-Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data.
-Rivers with upper case label are impaired waterbodies
0
1
Designer: NKT
Date: 2-17-05
2
3
Miles
4
.
Page 10-10
April 2005
Figure 10-6 Monroe Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations
¦
¨
£
¤ §
275
24
University Region
_
^
Ma
so
n
RIV
ER
R
AIS
IN
_^
^
__
_^
^
_^
Ru
n
Q
R
125
Sto
ny
_
^
Cr
§
¦
¨
75
ee
k
SA
ND
Y
CR
EE
K
Q
R
50
Monroe UA
£
¤
24
§
¦
¨
75
Lake Erie
O:\032609T\03\Project\Phase II Maps 11-16-04
Monroe County
Legend
_
^
Impaired Waterbodies
County Lines
Waterbodies
MDOT Regions
MDOT Roads
IDEP Field Investigation Locations
MDOT Phase II SWMP
Urbanzied Area
Other UA
-MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic
Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database
(Oct 2004).
-Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for
Geographic Information Library.
-Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data.
-Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies
0
Designer: NKT
Date: 3-28-05
1
Miles
2
.
Page 10-11
April 2005
Figure 10-7 South Lyon Howell-Brighton Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations
Livingston County
59
R
EE
ASS
AW
SHI
_
^
§
¦
¨
La
ke
96
Ch
Oakland County
em
un
g
£
¤
23
Red Cedar River
R
IVE
§
¦
¨
Brighton UA
re e
k
Howell
Th
o
UALa mps
ke on
96
Ma
nn
C
^
__
^
_
^
Q
R
nt
Ke
r
Hu
EY C
REE
K
36
96
vis
Da
eL
_
^
Waterbodies
County Lines
MDOT Roads
IDEP Field Investigation Locations
MDOT Phase II SWMP
Urbanized Area
Other UA
ek
C re
South Lyon UA
Metro Region
Whitmore
Lake
Legend
MDOT Regions
§
¦
¨
r
ve
Washtenaw County
Impaired Waterbodies
96
23
Po
rtag
O:\032609T\03\Project\Phase II Maps 11-16-04
Ri
§
¦
¨
£
¤
Q
R
_
^
ake
HON
on
ke
La
-MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic
Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database
(Oct 2004).
-Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for
Geographic Information Library.
-Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data.
-Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies
University Region
Miles
0
1
Designer: NKT
Date: 3-28-05
2
3
4
.
Page 10-12
April 2005
Figure 10-8 Toledo Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations
£
¤
University Region
Monroe County
23
Bay Creek
C
ay
lfw
Ha
k
re e
Q
R
2
Q
R
§¨¦
75
125
£
¤
Toledo UA
Sp
rin
gb
ro
O:\032609T\03\Project\Phase II Maps 11-16-04
Ha
lfw
ay
C
24
Ind
ia
ok
nC
ree
k
re e
k
Ohio
Legend
Impaired Waterbodies
County Lines
Waterbodies
MDOT Regions
MDOT Roads
Urbanized Area
Other UA
No IDEP Investigations in Toledo UA
MDOT Phase II SWMP
-MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic
Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database
(Oct 2004).
-Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for
Geographic Information Library.
-Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data.
-Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies.
0
Designer: NKT
Date: 3-28-05
1
Miles
2
.
Page 10-13
April 2005
THIS PAGE BLANK
MDOT Phase II SWMP
Page 10-14
April 2005