Postharvest Technology: 1/6/2016 Introduction to systems analysis
by user
Comments
Transcript
Postharvest Technology: 1/6/2016 Introduction to systems analysis
1/6/2016 Postharvest Technology: Introduction to systems analysis Postharvest Losses of Foods of Plant Origin (A.Kader) 33% of Marketed Produce worldwide Steven A. Sargent Professor and Extension Postharvest Physiologist Horticultural Sciences Department University of Florida Gainesville Why Study Postharvest Quality? Estimated Postharvest Losses (%) of Fresh Produce (A. Kader) World hunger: 24,000 people die each day – Mostly children = 100 Boeing 747 planes crashing each day Extent of food losses: – Grains (non-perishable): rice – 10 to 37% – Fresh Produce (perishable): US – average 12%; 23% through consumer level World – 25 to 75% Developed countries Locations Range Mean Developing countries Range Mean From production to retail sites 2-23 12 5-50 25 At retail, foodservice, and consumer sites 5-30 20 2-20 10 Cumulative total 7-53 32 7-70 32 (Sources: Grolleaud, undated; Kader 2005) Postharvest Losses of Foods of Plant Origin (A. Kader) Quantitative Qualitative – Loss of acceptability by consumers – Loss of caloric and nutritive value – Loss of edibility From: Roberta Cook, cited by Kader 1 1/6/2016 Postharvest Losses The Goal of Postharvest Technology: Minimize Losses in Postharvest Quality by Retarding Senescence and Decay Worker removing unsalable produce at a supermarket: 6 to 9% loss (“shrink”) Floating Market: Ratchaburi, Thailand Produce Market: Beijing Major reasons to discard the selected fruits and vegetables by the produce department (A. Kader) Reason Expired date Bruises, smashed fruit/vegetables Juice exudation, leaky fruit Browning, discoloration Decay Overripe Cuts, punctures or cracks Pitting, chilling injury Water-soaking of the tissues (transparent appearance) Excessive softness Shriveling, wilting, saggy, flaccid Dryness of steams, leaves, crown Loss of gloss, dull color Defective package Slimy leaves Berry easily detached from stems (grape) (%) 24.9 15.1 14.9 13.7 8.8 5.9 4.1 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.2 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.1 NUNES, M.C.N., J.P. Emond, M. Rauth, S. Dea, and K.V. Chau. 2009. Environmental conditions encountered during typical consumer retail display affect fruit and vegetable quality and waste. Postharv. Biol. Technol. 51:232-241. Fresh Produce Reaches Global Markets Postharvest losses are cumulative 2 1/6/2016 New Local Growth Markets Consumers around the nation are increasingly looking for locally grown produce Perceived as fresher Supports local growers and businesses – Farmers markets – Restaurants – Supermarkets Florida is the major U.S. producer of fresh fruits and vegetables during the winter months. State promotional campaigns help Florida growers. Florida Census of Agriculture, 2012 Recent Trends In U.S. Produce Marketing Specialty Crops Produce department is the showcase Greater variety Highest profits >$80 billion in total sales 3 1/6/2016 Convenience- microwavable potatoes Greater variety...what is this??? Dragon fruit (pitaya) Fresh-cut fruits & vegetables Fresh baby corn for export (Thailand to Japan) -Convenience: cross-merchandising Value-added products 4 1/6/2016 Trends in Foodborne Illness in the U.S., 1996-2010 (www.cdc.gov) Gift package – in China • Unsafe foods cause an estimated 48 million illnesses, 128,000 hospitalizations and 3,000 deaths each year in the United States. • Although people from all walks of life can develop foodborne illness, those who are most at risk include the elderly, young children, pregnant women and their fetuses, and the immunocompromised. Fresh-cut fruits - Convenience - >$10 billion & vegetables Causes of Illness from food (2003-2008) -Food safety & security: “Triple-washed” 5 1/6/2016 Figure 1. Relative rates of laboratory-confirmed infections with Campylobacter, E. coli O157, Listeria, Salmonella, and Vibrio, compared with 1996--1998 rates, by year --- Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, United States, 1996-2010 Multistate Outbreak of Listeriosis Linked to Whole Cantaloupes from Jensen Farms, Colorado: 2011 Multi-state outbreak 147 illnesses 33 deaths Preventable So... how do we minimize postharvest losses?? Quality Maintenance during Harvest & Handling Three primary concerns: Minimize mechanical injury during harvest & handling Cool rapidly after harvest Minimize risk for cross-contamination with human pathogens Food Safety Information Centers for Disease Control & Prevention: Intro to Systems Analysis – www.cdc.gov Food & Drug Administration: Food Safety: – www.fda.gov Unloading apples in Brazil 6 1/6/2016 Quality maintenance requires diligence at all steps during handling 2. For each component, define the subcomponents Component 1 Harvest, transport, packing, shipping Subcomp 1 Minimize mechanical injuries Subcomp 2 Subcomp 3 Maintain proper temperature management What makes up each subcomponent? HOS 5330 on supermarket visit Systems Analysis For example, one component might be defined as: Four steps are involved: 1. Identify the overall system Harvest – Beginning to end 2. & 3. Identify/analyze the individual components (options) – e.g., harvest, transport, pack, cool Manual vs. Machine? Field Pack vs. P-house? Container Type? 4. Synthesize the components into a workable plan Each subcomponent is also defined. Ask: What, where, why, how? 1. Define the system (overall operation) HARVEST (1) Field Pack Transport PACKINGHOUSE (2) Overall Operation Component 1 Component 2 What are the components? Component 3 Grading & Packing Operations Palletizing In this example, there are 3 components containing several subcomponents. Cooling SHIPPING (3) 7 1/6/2016 Before analyzing postharvest operations... In Summary... Determine requirements for the crop – – – Storage temperature and relative humidity Appropriate cooling method(s) Appropriate packing/shipping containers Postharvest losses are significant, but they can be significantly reduced Systems Analysis is a proven method that can be employed to understand complex harvest and postharvest operations Once understood, an action plan can be developed to change and/or modify the current system Class of ‘08 3. Analyze the components Component 1 Subcomp 1 Subcomp 2 Subcomp 3 Component 2 Subcomp 1 Subcomp 2 Subcomp 3 Component 3 Subcomp 1 Subcomp 2 Subcomp 3 How are the components and subcomponents inter-related? 4. Synthesize the system Component 1 Subcomp 1 Subcomp 2 Subcomp 3 Component 2 Subcomp 1 Subcomp 2 Subcomp 3 Component 3 Subcomp 1 Subcomp 2 Subcomp 3 What are the strengths and weaknesses of each? What improvements be made? 8