Rape Prevention Through Bystander Education at a Northeastern State University, 2002-2004

U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
National Institute of Justice
ICPSR 4367
Rape Prevention Through
Bystander Education at a
Northeastern State University,
2002-2004
Victoria L. Banyard
University of New Hampshire
Elizabethe G. Plante
University of New Hampshire
Mary M. Moynihan
University of New Hampshire
Post-Test Data Codebook
National Institute of Justice
Data Resources Program
P.O. Box 1248
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106
www.icpsr.umich.edu
Terms of Use
The terms of use for this study can be found at:
http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/cocoon/ICPSR/TERMS/4367.xml
Codebook Notes
1. ICPSR recoded blanks in numeric variables to -9 and labeled them
“Blank”.
2. Users should be aware that this data collection may contain
undocumented codes. These codes were not labeled by the principal
investigator or ICPSR.
3. This codebook includes two data collection instruments. One data
collection instrument was used for the treatment groups, while the other
data collection instrument was used for the control group.
- Study 04367 -
Codebook for ICPSR 04367
Rape Prevention Through Bystander Education at a Northeastern State University,
2002-2004
Dataset 2: Post Test Data
ID
POST - STUDY ID NUMBER
Location:
1-4 (width: 4; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1001.00
3139.00
2106.47
-
809.35
GROUP
POST - EXPERIMENTAL GROUP
Location:
5-5 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Control
2
3
Frequency
%
Valid %
110
30.3 %
30.3%
X1
129
35.5 %
35.5%
X3
124
34.2 %
34.2%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
3.00
2.04
2.00
0.80
SEX
POST - PARTICIPANT SEX
Location:
6-6 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Male
2
Female
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
159
43.8 %
47.5%
176
48.5 %
52.5%
28
7.7 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
335
28
1.00
2.00
1.53
2.00
0.50
NEWCLASS
POST-COURSE SEX ASSAULT/RAPE LAST SURVEY
Location:
7-7 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
-1-
- Study 04367 Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
No
1
Yes
Frequency
%
Valid %
326
89.8 %
89.8%
37
10.2 %
10.2%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
1.00
0.10
0.00
0.30
NEWPROG
POST-PRGM SEX ASSAULT/RAPE LAST SURVEY
Location:
8-8 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
No
1
Yes
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
334
92.0 %
92.5%
27
7.4 %
7.5%
2
0.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
361
2
0.00
1.00
0.07
0.00
0.26
POSTSOC1
POST - SENSE OF COMMUNITY SCALE 1
Location:
9-9 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
0.3 %
0.3%
Slightly
24
6.6 %
6.6%
3
Moderately
86
23.7 %
23.7%
4
Mostly
193
53.2 %
53.2%
5
A great deal
59
16.3 %
16.3%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.79
4.00
0.80
POSTSOC2
POST - SENSE OF COMMUNITY SCALE 2
Location:
10-10 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all important
1
0.3 %
0.3%
2
Slightly
10
2.8 %
2.8%
3
Moderately
33
9.1 %
9.1%
-2-
- Study 04367 Value
Label
4
Fairly
5
Very important
Frequency
%
Valid %
151
41.6 %
41.6%
168
46.3 %
46.3%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.31
4.00
0.77
POSTSOC3
POST - SENSE OF COMMUNITY SCALE 3
Location:
11-11 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all important
0
0.0 %
-
2
Slightly
8
2.2 %
2.2%
3
Moderately
34
9.4 %
9.4%
4
Fairly
118
32.5 %
32.5%
5
Very important
203
55.9 %
55.9%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
2.00
5.00
4.42
5.00
0.75
POSTSLB1
POST - SELF-EFFICACY SCALE 1
Location:
12-12 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Disagree completely
0
0.0 %
-
2
Disagree a lot
2
0.6 %
0.6%
3
Disagree a little
15
4.1 %
4.2%
4
Agree a little
79
21.8 %
22.0%
5
Agree a lot
173
47.7 %
48.2%
6
Agree completely
90
24.8 %
25.1%
9 (M)
Blank
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
2.00
6.00
4.93
5.00
0.83
POSTSLB2
POST - SELF-EFFICACY SCALE 2
Location:
13-13 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
-3-
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Disagree completely
0
0.0 %
-
2
Disagree a lot
0
0.0 %
-
3
Disagree a little
3
0.8 %
0.8%
4
Agree a little
57
15.7 %
15.9%
5
Agree a lot
167
46.0 %
46.5%
6
Agree completely
132
36.4 %
36.8%
9 (M)
Blank
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
3.00
6.00
5.19
5.00
0.72
POSTSLB3
POST - SELF-EFFICACY SCALE 3
Location:
14-14 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Disagree completely
0
0.0 %
-
2
Disagree a lot
4
1.1 %
1.1%
3
Disagree a little
19
5.2 %
5.3%
4
Agree a little
91
25.1 %
25.3%
5
Agree a lot
122
33.6 %
34.0%
6
Agree completely
123
33.9 %
34.3%
9 (M)
Blank
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
2.00
6.00
4.95
5.00
0.95
POSTSLB4
POST - SELF-EFFICACY SCALE 4
Location:
15-15 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Disagree completely
0
0.0 %
-
2
Disagree a lot
0
0.0 %
-
3
Disagree a little
10
2.8 %
2.8%
4
Agree a little
60
16.5 %
16.8%
5
Agree a lot
133
36.6 %
37.2%
6
Agree completely
155
42.7 %
43.3%
9 (M)
Blank
5
1.4 %
-
-4-
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
358
5
3.00
6.00
5.21
5.00
0.82
POSTSLB5
POST - SELF-EFFICACY SCALE 5
Location:
16-16 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Disagree completely
0
0.0 %
-
2
Disagree a lot
2
0.6 %
0.6%
3
Disagree a little
9
2.5 %
2.5%
4
Agree a little
71
19.6 %
19.8%
5
Agree a lot
141
38.8 %
39.4%
6
Agree completely
135
37.2 %
37.7%
9 (M)
Blank
5
1.4 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
358
5
2.00
6.00
5.11
5.00
0.85
POSTSLB6
POST - SELF-EFFICACY SCALE 6
Location:
17-17 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Disagree completely
0
0.0 %
-
2
Disagree a lot
3
0.8 %
0.8%
3
Disagree a little
12
3.3 %
3.4%
4
Agree a little
54
14.9 %
15.1%
5
Agree a lot
145
39.9 %
40.5%
6
Agree completely
144
39.7 %
40.2%
9 (M)
Blank
5
1.4 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
358
5
2.00
6.00
5.16
5.00
0.86
POSTSLB7
POST - SELF-EFFICACY SCALE 7
Location:
18-18 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
-5-
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Disagree completely
0
0.0 %
-
2
Disagree a lot
2
0.6 %
0.6%
3
Disagree a little
12
3.3 %
3.3%
4
Agree a little
63
17.4 %
17.5%
5
Agree a lot
143
39.4 %
39.8%
6
Agree completely
139
38.3 %
38.7%
9 (M)
Blank
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
2.00
6.00
5.13
5.00
0.86
POSTSLB8
POST - SELF-EFFICACY SCALE 8
Location:
19-19 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Disagree completely
0
0.0 %
-
2
Disagree a lot
2
0.6 %
0.6%
3
Disagree a little
7
1.9 %
1.9%
4
Agree a little
56
15.4 %
15.6%
5
Agree a lot
142
39.1 %
39.6%
6
Agree completely
152
41.9 %
42.3%
9 (M)
Blank
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
2.00
6.00
5.21
5.00
0.82
POSTSLB9
POST - SELF-EFFICACY SCALE 9
Location:
20-20 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Disagree completely
2
0.6 %
0.6%
2
Disagree a lot
5
1.4 %
1.4%
3
Disagree a little
16
4.4 %
4.5%
4
Agree a little
88
24.2 %
24.5%
5
Agree a lot
114
31.4 %
31.8%
6
Agree completely
134
36.9 %
37.3%
9 (M)
Blank
4
1.1 %
-
-6-
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
1.00
6.00
4.97
5.00
1.01
POSTRTC1
POST - READINESS TO CHANGE SCALE 1
Location:
21-21 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree/not at all true
74
20.4 %
20.6%
2
Disagree
114
31.4 %
31.8%
3
Neutral
116
32.0 %
32.3%
4
Agree
54
14.9 %
15.0%
5
Strongly agree/very much true
1
0.3 %
0.3%
9 (M)
Blank
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
1.00
5.00
2.43
2.00
0.99
POSTRTC2
POST - READINESS TO CHANGE SCALE 2
Location:
22-22 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree/not at all true
88
24.2 %
24.5%
2
Disagree
136
37.5 %
37.9%
3
Neutral
90
24.8 %
25.1%
4
Agree
39
10.7 %
10.9%
5
Strongly agree/very much true
6
1.7 %
1.7%
9 (M)
Blank
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
1.00
5.00
2.27
2.00
1.00
POSTRTC3
POST - READINESS TO CHANGE SCALE 3
Location:
23-23 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
1
Strongly disagree/not at all true
-7-
136
%
Valid %
37.5 %
37.9%
- Study 04367 Value
Label
2
Disagree
3
Frequency
%
Valid %
137
37.7 %
38.2%
Neutral
65
17.9 %
18.1%
4
Agree
20
5.5 %
5.6%
5
Strongly agree/very much true
1
0.3 %
0.3%
9 (M)
Blank
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
1.00
5.00
1.92
2.00
0.90
POSTRTC4
POST - READINESS TO CHANGE SCALE 4
Location:
24-24 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree/not at all true
33
9.1 %
9.2%
2
Disagree
79
21.8 %
22.0%
3
Neutral
123
33.9 %
34.3%
4
Agree
96
26.4 %
26.7%
5
Strongly agree/very much true
28
7.7 %
7.8%
9 (M)
Blank
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
1.00
5.00
3.02
3.00
1.08
POSTRTC5
POST - READINESS TO CHANGE SCALE 5
Location:
25-25 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
POSTRTC6
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree/not at all true
29
8.0 %
8.1%
2
Disagree
61
16.8 %
17.0%
3
Neutral
134
36.9 %
37.3%
4
Agree
98
27.0 %
27.3%
5
Strongly agree/very much true
37
10.2 %
10.3%
9 (M)
Blank
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
1.00
5.00
3.15
3.00
1.08
POST - READINESS TO CHANGE SCALE 6
-8-
- Study 04367 Location:
26-26 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree/not at all true
41
11.3 %
11.5%
2
Disagree
75
20.7 %
21.0%
3
Neutral
109
30.0 %
30.5%
4
Agree
94
25.9 %
26.3%
5
Strongly agree/very much true
38
10.5 %
10.6%
9 (M)
Blank
6
1.7 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
357
6
1.00
5.00
3.04
3.00
1.17
POSTRTC7
POST - READINESS TO CHANGE SCALE 7
Location:
27-27 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree/not at all true
150
41.3 %
41.9%
2
Disagree
36
9.9 %
10.1%
3
Neutral
21
5.8 %
5.9%
4
Agree
32
8.8 %
8.9%
5
Strongly agree/very much true
119
32.8 %
33.2%
9 (M)
Blank
5
1.4 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
358
5
1.00
5.00
2.82
2.00
1.78
POSTRTC8
POST - READINESS TO CHANGE SCALE 8
Location:
28-28 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree/not at all true
214
59.0 %
59.6%
2
Disagree
77
21.2 %
21.4%
3
Neutral
37
10.2 %
10.3%
4
Agree
18
5.0 %
5.0%
5
Strongly agree/very much true
13
3.6 %
3.6%
-9-
- Study 04367 Value
Label
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
4
%
Valid %
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
1.00
5.00
1.72
1.00
1.07
POSTRTC9
POST - READINESS TO CHANGE SCALE 9
Location:
29-29 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree/not at all true
203
55.9 %
56.5%
2
Disagree
61
16.8 %
17.0%
3
Neutral
25
6.9 %
7.0%
4
Agree
36
9.9 %
10.0%
5
Strongly agree/very much true
34
9.4 %
9.5%
9 (M)
Blank
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
1.00
5.00
1.99
1.00
1.38
POSTKN1A
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 1A
Location:
30-30 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
326
89.8 %
91.3%
31
8.5 %
8.7%
6
1.7 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
357
6
0.00
1.00
0.09
0.00
0.28
POSTKN1B
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 1B
Location:
31-31 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
Frequency
- 10 -
%
Valid %
131
36.1 %
36.7%
226
62.3 %
63.3%
- Study 04367 Value
Label
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
6
%
Valid %
1.7 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
357
6
0.00
1.00
0.63
1.00
0.48
POSTKN1C
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 1C
Location:
32-32 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
164
45.2 %
45.9%
193
53.2 %
54.1%
6
1.7 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
357
6
0.00
1.00
0.54
1.00
0.50
POSTKN1D
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 1D
Location:
33-33 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
290
79.9 %
81.2%
67
18.5 %
18.8%
6
1.7 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
357
6
0.00
1.00
0.19
0.00
0.39
POSTK1DK
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 1DK
Location:
34-34 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
0
Don't know not indicated
1
Don't know
9 (M)
Blank
- 11 -
%
Valid %
333
91.7 %
93.5%
23
6.3 %
6.5%
7
1.9 %
-
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
356
7
0.00
1.00
0.06
0.00
0.25
POSTKN2
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 2
Location:
35-35 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
Valid %
247
68.0 %
68.8%
112
30.9 %
31.2%
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
0.00
1.00
0.31
0.00
0.46
POSTK2DK
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 2DK
Location:
36-36 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
0
Don't know not indicated
1
Don't know
9 (M)
Blank
%
Valid %
158
43.5 %
44.0%
201
55.4 %
56.0%
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
0.00
1.00
0.56
1.00
0.50
POSTKN3
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 3
Location:
37-37 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
POSTK3DK
%
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
171
47.1 %
47.6%
188
51.8 %
52.4%
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
0.00
1.00
0.52
1.00
0.50
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 3DK
- 12 -
- Study 04367 Location:
38-38 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
0
Don't know not indicated
1
Don't know
9 (M)
Blank
%
Valid %
226
62.3 %
63.0%
133
36.6 %
37.0%
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
0.00
1.00
0.37
0.00
0.48
POSTKN4
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 4
Location:
39-39 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
298
82.1 %
83.2%
60
16.5 %
16.8%
5
1.4 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
358
5
0.00
1.00
0.17
0.00
0.37
POSTK4DK
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 4DK
Location:
40-40 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
0
Don't know not indicated
1
Don't know
9 (M)
Blank
%
Valid %
140
38.6 %
39.1%
218
60.1 %
60.9%
5
1.4 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
358
5
0.00
1.00
0.61
1.00
0.49
POSTKN5A
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 5A
Location:
41-41 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
- 13 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
107
29.5 %
29.6%
255
70.2 %
70.4%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
1.00
0.70
1.00
0.46
POSTKN5B
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 5B
Location:
42-42 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
146
40.2 %
40.3%
216
59.5 %
59.7%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
1.00
0.60
1.00
0.49
POSTKN5C
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 5C
Location:
43-43 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
97
26.7 %
26.8%
265
73.0 %
73.2%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
1.00
0.73
1.00
0.44
POSTKN5D
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 5D
Location:
44-44 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
- 14 -
%
Valid %
49
13.5 %
13.5%
313
86.2 %
86.5%
1
0.3 %
-
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
1.00
0.86
1.00
0.34
POSTKN5E
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 5E
Location:
45-45 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
46
12.7 %
12.7%
316
87.1 %
87.3%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
1.00
0.87
1.00
0.33
POSTKN5F
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 5F
Location:
46-46 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
51
14.0 %
14.1%
311
85.7 %
85.9%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
1.00
0.86
1.00
0.35
POSTKN5G
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 5G
Location:
47-47 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
93
25.6 %
25.7%
269
74.1 %
74.3%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
1.00
0.74
1.00
0.44
- 15 -
- Study 04367 POSTKN5H
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 5H
Location:
48-48 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
69
19.0 %
19.1%
293
80.7 %
80.9%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
1.00
0.81
1.00
0.39
POSTKN5I
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 5I
Location:
49-49 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
147
40.5 %
40.6%
215
59.2 %
59.4%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
1.00
0.59
1.00
0.49
POSTKN5J
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 5J
Location:
50-50 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
7
1.9 %
1.9%
355
97.8 %
98.1%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
1.00
0.98
1.00
0.14
POSTKN5K
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 5K
Location:
51-51 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
- 16 -
- Study 04367 Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
99
27.3 %
27.3%
263
72.5 %
72.7%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
1.00
0.73
1.00
0.45
POSTKN5L
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 5L
Location:
52-52 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
95
26.2 %
26.2%
267
73.6 %
73.8%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
1.00
0.74
1.00
0.44
POSTKN5M
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 5M
Location:
53-53 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
116
32.0 %
32.0%
246
67.8 %
68.0%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
1.00
0.68
1.00
0.47
POSTKN5N
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 5N
Location:
54-54 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
Frequency
- 17 -
%
Valid %
7
1.9 %
1.9%
355
97.8 %
98.1%
- Study 04367 Value
Label
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
1
%
Valid %
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
1.00
0.98
1.00
0.14
POSTK5DK
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 5DK
Location:
55-55 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
Don't know not indicated
350
96.4 %
98.3%
1
Don't know
6
1.7 %
1.7%
9 (M)
Blank
7
1.9 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
356
7
0.00
1.00
0.02
0.00
0.13
POSTKN6
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 6
Location:
56-56 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
186
51.2 %
51.7%
174
47.9 %
48.3%
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
0.00
1.00
0.48
0.00
0.50
POSTK6DK
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 6DK
Location:
57-57 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
0
Don't know not indicated
1
Don't know
9 (M)
Blank
- 18 -
%
Valid %
256
70.5 %
71.1%
104
28.7 %
28.9%
3
0.8 %
-
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
0.00
1.00
0.29
0.00
0.45
POSTKN7A
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 7A
Location:
58-58 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
Frequency
%
Valid %
268
73.8 %
73.8%
95
26.2 %
26.2%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
1.00
0.26
0.00
0.44
POSTKN7B
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 7B
Location:
59-59 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
Frequency
%
Valid %
288
79.3 %
79.3%
75
20.7 %
20.7%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
1.00
0.21
0.00
0.41
POSTKN7C
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 7C
Location:
60-60 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
Frequency
%
Valid %
267
73.6 %
73.6%
96
26.4 %
26.4%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
1.00
0.26
0.00
0.44
POSTKN7D
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 7D
Location:
61-61 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
Frequency
286
- 19 -
%
Valid %
78.8 %
78.8%
- Study 04367 Value
Label
1
Correct
Frequency
77
%
Valid %
21.2 %
21.2%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
1.00
0.21
0.00
0.41
POSTKN7E
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 7E
Location:
62-62 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
Frequency
%
Valid %
194
53.4 %
53.4%
169
46.6 %
46.6%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
1.00
0.47
0.00
0.50
POSTKN7F
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 7F
Location:
63-63 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
Frequency
%
Valid %
200
55.1 %
55.1%
163
44.9 %
44.9%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
1.00
0.45
0.00
0.50
POSTKN7G
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 7G
Location:
64-64 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
Frequency
%
Valid %
178
49.0 %
49.0%
185
51.0 %
51.0%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
1.00
0.51
1.00
0.50
POSTKN7H
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 7H
Location:
65-65 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
- 20 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
Frequency
%
Valid %
179
49.3 %
49.3%
184
50.7 %
50.7%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
1.00
0.51
1.00
0.50
POSTKN7I
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 7I
Location:
66-66 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
Frequency
%
Valid %
311
85.7 %
85.7%
52
14.3 %
14.3%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
1.00
0.14
0.00
0.35
POSTKN7J
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 7J
Location:
67-67 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
Frequency
%
Valid %
173
47.7 %
47.7%
190
52.3 %
52.3%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
1.00
0.52
1.00
0.50
POSTKN7K
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 7K
Location:
68-68 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
Frequency
%
Valid %
175
48.2 %
48.2%
188
51.8 %
51.8%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
1.00
0.52
1.00
0.50
POSTKN7L
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 7L
Location:
69-69 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
- 21 -
- Study 04367 Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
Frequency
%
Valid %
167
46.0 %
46.0%
196
54.0 %
54.0%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
1.00
0.54
1.00
0.50
POSTK7DK
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 7DK
Location:
70-70 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
0
Don't know not indicated
1
Don't know
%
Valid %
203
55.9 %
55.9%
160
44.1 %
44.1%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
1.00
0.44
0.00
0.50
POSTKN8
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 8
Location:
71-71 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
Frequency
%
Valid %
165
45.5 %
45.5%
198
54.5 %
54.5%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
1.00
0.55
1.00
0.50
POSTK8DK
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 8DK
Location:
72-72 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
0
Don't know not indicated
1
Don't know
%
Valid %
217
59.8 %
59.8%
146
40.2 %
40.2%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
1.00
0.40
0.00
0.49
POSTKN9
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 9
Location:
73-74 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
- 22 -
- Study 04367 Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
Zero responses listed
29
8.0 %
8.0%
1
-
23
6.3 %
6.4%
2
-
64
17.6 %
17.7%
3
-
118
32.5 %
32.6%
4
-
70
19.3 %
19.3%
5
-
45
12.4 %
12.4%
6
-
6
1.7 %
1.7%
7
-
4
1.1 %
1.1%
8
-
2
0.6 %
0.6%
9
-
1
0.3 %
0.3%
99 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
9.00
3.04
3.00
1.55
POSTK9DK
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 9DK
Location:
75-75 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
0
Don't know not indicated
1
Don't know
9 (M)
Blank
%
Valid %
332
91.5 %
92.2%
28
7.7 %
7.8%
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
0.00
1.00
0.08
0.00
0.27
POSTK10A
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 10A
Location:
76-76 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
- 23 -
%
Valid %
311
85.7 %
86.4%
49
13.5 %
13.6%
3
0.8 %
-
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
0.00
1.00
0.14
0.00
0.34
POSTK10B
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 10B
Location:
77-77 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
Valid %
291
80.2 %
80.8%
69
19.0 %
19.2%
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
0.00
1.00
0.19
0.00
0.39
POSTK10C
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 10C
Location:
78-78 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
334
92.0 %
92.8%
26
7.2 %
7.2%
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
0.00
1.00
0.07
0.00
0.26
POSTK10D
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 10D
Location:
79-79 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
POSTK10E
%
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
349
96.1 %
96.9%
11
3.0 %
3.1%
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
0.00
1.00
0.03
0.00
0.17
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 10E
- 24 -
- Study 04367 Location:
80-80 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
272
74.9 %
75.6%
88
24.2 %
24.4%
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
0.00
1.00
0.24
0.00
0.43
POSTK10F
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 10F
Location:
81-81 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
326
89.8 %
90.6%
34
9.4 %
9.4%
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
0.00
1.00
0.09
0.00
0.29
POSTK10G
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 10G
Location:
82-82 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
276
76.0 %
76.5%
85
23.4 %
23.5%
2
0.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
361
2
0.00
1.00
0.24
0.00
0.42
POSTK10H
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 10H
Location:
83-83 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
- 25 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
0
Incorrect
1
Correct
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
215
59.2 %
59.4%
147
40.5 %
40.6%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
1.00
0.41
0.00
0.49
PSTK10DK
POST - KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE 10DK
Location:
84-84 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
0
Don't know not indicated
1
Don't know
9 (M)
Blank
%
Valid %
306
84.3 %
85.5%
52
14.3 %
14.5%
5
1.4 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
358
5
0.00
1.00
0.15
0.00
0.35
POSTIR1
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 1
Location:
85-85 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
199
54.8 %
54.8%
2
Strongly disagree
76
20.9 %
20.9%
3
Disagree
21
5.8 %
5.8%
4
Neutral
28
7.7 %
7.7%
5
Agree
26
7.2 %
7.2%
6
Strongly agree
6
1.7 %
1.7%
7
Completely agree
7
1.9 %
1.9%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
7.00
2.04
1.00
1.52
POSTIR2
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 2
Location:
86-86 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
- 26 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
273
75.2 %
75.4%
2
Strongly disagree
57
15.7 %
15.7%
3
Disagree
18
5.0 %
5.0%
4
Neutral
11
3.0 %
3.0%
5
Agree
1
0.3 %
0.3%
6
Strongly agree
1
0.3 %
0.3%
7
Completely agree
1
0.3 %
0.3%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
7.00
1.39
1.00
0.83
POSTIR3
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 3
Location:
87-87 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
298
82.1 %
82.1%
2
Strongly disagree
37
10.2 %
10.2%
3
Disagree
14
3.9 %
3.9%
4
Neutral
8
2.2 %
2.2%
5
Agree
3
0.8 %
0.8%
6
Strongly agree
2
0.6 %
0.6%
7
Completely agree
1
0.3 %
0.3%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
7.00
1.32
1.00
0.85
POSTIR4
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 4
Location:
88-88 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
324
89.3 %
89.5%
2
Strongly disagree
26
7.2 %
7.2%
3
Disagree
4
1.1 %
1.1%
4
Neutral
5
1.4 %
1.4%
5
Agree
0
0.0 %
-
6
Strongly agree
0
0.0 %
-
7
Completely agree
3
0.8 %
0.8%
- 27 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
1
Valid %
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
7.00
1.19
1.00
0.71
POSTIR5
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 5
Location:
89-89 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
23
6.3 %
6.4%
2
Strongly disagree
21
5.8 %
5.8%
3
Disagree
46
12.7 %
12.8%
4
Neutral
95
26.2 %
26.4%
5
Agree
64
17.6 %
17.8%
6
Strongly agree
61
16.8 %
16.9%
7
Completely agree
50
13.8 %
13.9%
9 (M)
Blank
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
1.00
7.00
4.50
4.00
1.67
POSTIR6
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 6
Location:
90-90 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
POSTIR7
%
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
299
82.4 %
82.6%
2
Strongly disagree
38
10.5 %
10.5%
3
Disagree
14
3.9 %
3.9%
4
Neutral
7
1.9 %
1.9%
5
Agree
3
0.8 %
0.8%
6
Strongly agree
1
0.3 %
0.3%
7
Completely agree
0
0.0 %
-
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
6.00
1.29
1.00
0.74
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 7
- 28 -
- Study 04367 Location:
91-91 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
295
81.3 %
81.5%
2
Strongly disagree
52
14.3 %
14.4%
3
Disagree
9
2.5 %
2.5%
4
Neutral
2
0.6 %
0.6%
5
Agree
1
0.3 %
0.3%
6
Strongly agree
0
0.0 %
-
7
Completely agree
3
0.8 %
0.8%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
7.00
1.27
1.00
0.75
POSTIR8
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 8
Location:
92-92 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
178
49.0 %
49.4%
2
Strongly disagree
72
19.8 %
20.0%
3
Disagree
53
14.6 %
14.7%
4
Neutral
25
6.9 %
6.9%
5
Agree
18
5.0 %
5.0%
6
Strongly agree
9
2.5 %
2.5%
7
Completely agree
5
1.4 %
1.4%
9 (M)
Blank
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
1.00
7.00
2.11
2.00
1.45
POSTIR9
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 9
Location:
93-93 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
1
Completely disagree
2
Strongly disagree
- 29 -
%
Valid %
8
2.2 %
2.2%
4
1.1 %
1.1%
- Study 04367 Value
Label
3
Disagree
4
Frequency
%
Valid %
6
1.7 %
1.7%
Neutral
20
5.5 %
5.5%
5
Agree
37
10.2 %
10.2%
6
Strongly agree
57
15.7 %
15.7%
7
Completely agree
231
63.6 %
63.6%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
7.00
6.22
7.00
1.34
POSTIR10
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 10
Location:
94-94 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
222
61.2 %
61.7%
2
Strongly disagree
75
20.7 %
20.8%
3
Disagree
30
8.3 %
8.3%
4
Neutral
18
5.0 %
5.0%
5
Agree
11
3.0 %
3.1%
6
Strongly agree
2
0.6 %
0.6%
7
Completely agree
2
0.6 %
0.6%
9 (M)
Blank
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
1.00
7.00
1.71
1.00
1.15
POSTIR11
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 11
Location:
95-95 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
334
92.0 %
92.0%
2
Strongly disagree
25
6.9 %
6.9%
3
Disagree
3
0.8 %
0.8%
4
Neutral
0
0.0 %
-
5
Agree
0
0.0 %
-
6
Strongly agree
1
0.3 %
0.3%
7
Completely agree
0
0.0 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
6.00
1.10
1.00
0.40
- 30 -
- Study 04367 POSTIR12
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 12
Location:
96-96 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
313
86.2 %
86.2%
2
Strongly disagree
31
8.5 %
8.5%
3
Disagree
7
1.9 %
1.9%
4
Neutral
5
1.4 %
1.4%
5
Agree
2
0.6 %
0.6%
6
Strongly agree
3
0.8 %
0.8%
7
Completely agree
2
0.6 %
0.6%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
7.00
1.26
1.00
0.84
POSTIR13
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 13
Location:
97-97 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
287
79.1 %
79.3%
2
Strongly disagree
40
11.0 %
11.0%
3
Disagree
14
3.9 %
3.9%
4
Neutral
13
3.6 %
3.6%
5
Agree
6
1.7 %
1.7%
6
Strongly agree
0
0.0 %
-
7
Completely agree
2
0.6 %
0.6%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
7.00
1.40
1.00
0.95
POSTIR14
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 14
Location:
98-98 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
1
Completely disagree
2
Strongly disagree
- 31 -
%
Valid %
217
59.8 %
59.9%
79
21.8 %
21.8%
- Study 04367 Value
Label
3
Disagree
4
Frequency
%
Valid %
28
7.7 %
7.7%
Neutral
25
6.9 %
6.9%
5
Agree
8
2.2 %
2.2%
6
Strongly agree
4
1.1 %
1.1%
7
Completely agree
1
0.3 %
0.3%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
7.00
1.74
1.00
1.16
POSTIR15
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 15
Location:
99-99 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
27
7.4 %
7.4%
2
Strongly disagree
9
2.5 %
2.5%
3
Disagree
16
4.4 %
4.4%
4
Neutral
79
21.8 %
21.8%
5
Agree
52
14.3 %
14.3%
6
Strongly agree
81
22.3 %
22.3%
7
Completely agree
99
27.3 %
27.3%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
7.00
5.09
5.00
1.77
POSTIR16
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 16
Location:
100-100 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
288
79.3 %
79.3%
2
Strongly disagree
42
11.6 %
11.6%
3
Disagree
18
5.0 %
5.0%
4
Neutral
9
2.5 %
2.5%
5
Agree
6
1.7 %
1.7%
6
Strongly agree
0
0.0 %
-
7
Completely agree
0
0.0 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
1.36
1.00
0.82
- 32 -
- Study 04367 POSTIR17
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 17
Location:
101-101 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
229
63.1 %
63.1%
2
Strongly disagree
59
16.3 %
16.3%
3
Disagree
29
8.0 %
8.0%
4
Neutral
29
8.0 %
8.0%
5
Agree
17
4.7 %
4.7%
6
Strongly agree
0
0.0 %
-
7
Completely agree
0
0.0 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
1.75
1.00
1.18
POSTIR18
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 18
Location:
102-102 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
97
26.7 %
26.9%
2
Strongly disagree
66
18.2 %
18.3%
3
Disagree
53
14.6 %
14.7%
4
Neutral
74
20.4 %
20.5%
5
Agree
49
13.5 %
13.6%
6
Strongly agree
15
4.1 %
4.2%
7
Completely agree
7
1.9 %
1.9%
9 (M)
Blank
2
0.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
361
2
1.00
7.00
2.96
3.00
1.64
POSTIR19
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 19
Location:
103-103 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
1
Completely disagree
2
Strongly disagree
- 33 -
%
Valid %
206
56.7 %
56.9%
80
22.0 %
22.1%
- Study 04367 Value
Label
3
Disagree
4
Frequency
%
Valid %
30
8.3 %
8.3%
Neutral
26
7.2 %
7.2%
5
Agree
9
2.5 %
2.5%
6
Strongly agree
7
1.9 %
1.9%
7
Completely agree
4
1.1 %
1.1%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
7.00
1.86
1.00
1.32
POSTIR20
POST - RAPE MYTH ACCEPTANCE SCALE 20
Location:
104-104 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Completely disagree
150
41.3 %
41.4%
2
Strongly disagree
56
15.4 %
15.5%
3
Disagree
28
7.7 %
7.7%
4
Neutral
63
17.4 %
17.4%
5
Agree
37
10.2 %
10.2%
6
Strongly agree
18
5.0 %
5.0%
7
Completely agree
10
2.8 %
2.8%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
7.00
2.65
2.00
1.78
POSTDR1
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 1
Location:
105-105 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
60
16.5 %
16.6%
Agree
99
27.3 %
27.3%
3
Neutral
139
38.3 %
38.4%
4
Disagree
45
12.4 %
12.4%
5
Strongly disagree
19
5.2 %
5.2%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
- 34 -
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
2.62
3.00
1.06
POSTDR2
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 2
Location:
106-106 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
12
3.3 %
3.3%
Agree
42
11.6 %
11.6%
3
Neutral
79
21.8 %
21.8%
4
Disagree
101
27.8 %
27.9%
5
Strongly disagree
128
35.3 %
35.4%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
3.80
4.00
1.14
POSTDR3
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 3
Location:
107-107 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
12
3.3 %
3.3%
Agree
42
11.6 %
11.6%
3
Neutral
150
41.3 %
41.6%
4
Disagree
93
25.6 %
25.8%
5
Strongly disagree
64
17.6 %
17.7%
9 (M)
Blank
2
0.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
361
2
1.00
5.00
3.43
3.00
1.02
POSTDR4
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 4
Location:
108-108 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
Frequency
11
- 35 -
%
Valid %
3.0 %
3.0%
- Study 04367 Value
Label
2
Agree
3
Neutral
4
Frequency
%
Valid %
15
4.1 %
4.2%
47
12.9 %
13.0%
Disagree
105
28.9 %
29.1%
5
Strongly disagree
183
50.4 %
50.7%
9 (M)
Blank
2
0.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
361
2
1.00
5.00
4.20
5.00
1.02
POSTDR5
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 5
Location:
109-109 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
13
3.6 %
3.6%
Agree
15
4.1 %
4.2%
3
Neutral
24
6.6 %
6.6%
4
Disagree
88
24.2 %
24.4%
5
Strongly disagree
221
60.9 %
61.2%
9 (M)
Blank
2
0.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
361
2
1.00
5.00
4.35
5.00
1.02
POSTDR6
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 6
Location:
110-110 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
POSTDR7
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
12
3.3 %
3.3%
Agree
22
6.1 %
6.1%
3
Neutral
34
9.4 %
9.5%
4
Disagree
86
23.7 %
24.0%
5
Strongly disagree
205
56.5 %
57.1%
9 (M)
Blank
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
1.00
5.00
4.25
5.00
1.07
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 7
- 36 -
- Study 04367 Location:
111-111 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
20
5.5 %
5.5%
Agree
4
1.1 %
1.1%
3
Neutral
11
3.0 %
3.0%
4
Disagree
36
9.9 %
9.9%
5
Strongly disagree
291
80.2 %
80.4%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
4.59
5.00
1.02
POSTDR8
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 8
Location:
112-112 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
22
6.1 %
6.1%
Agree
53
14.6 %
14.7%
3
Neutral
72
19.8 %
20.0%
4
Disagree
67
18.5 %
18.6%
5
Strongly disagree
146
40.2 %
40.6%
9 (M)
Blank
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
1.00
5.00
3.73
4.00
1.29
POSTDR9
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 9
Location:
113-113 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
200
55.1 %
55.2%
Agree
71
19.6 %
19.6%
3
Neutral
43
11.8 %
11.9%
4
Disagree
27
7.4 %
7.5%
5
Strongly disagree
21
5.8 %
5.8%
- 37 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
1
%
Valid %
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
1.89
1.00
1.22
POSTDR10
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 10
Location:
114-114 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
161
44.4 %
45.0%
Agree
84
23.1 %
23.5%
3
Neutral
42
11.6 %
11.7%
4
Disagree
27
7.4 %
7.5%
5
Strongly disagree
44
12.1 %
12.3%
9 (M)
Blank
5
1.4 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
358
5
1.00
5.00
2.19
2.00
1.39
POSTDR11
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 11
Location:
115-115 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
27
7.4 %
7.5%
Agree
37
10.2 %
10.3%
3
Neutral
80
22.0 %
22.2%
4
Disagree
71
19.6 %
19.7%
5
Strongly disagree
145
39.9 %
40.3%
9 (M)
Blank
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
1.00
5.00
3.75
4.00
1.29
POSTDR12
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 12
Location:
116-116 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
- 38 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
16
4.4 %
4.4%
Agree
6
1.7 %
1.7%
3
Neutral
8
2.2 %
2.2%
4
Disagree
37
10.2 %
10.3%
5
Strongly disagree
293
80.7 %
81.4%
9 (M)
Blank
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
1.00
5.00
4.62
5.00
0.96
POSTDR13
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 13
Location:
117-117 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
20
5.5 %
5.5%
Agree
5
1.4 %
1.4%
3
Neutral
3
0.8 %
0.8%
4
Disagree
29
8.0 %
8.0%
5
Strongly disagree
305
84.0 %
84.3%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
4.64
5.00
1.00
POSTDR14
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 14
Location:
118-118 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
13
3.6 %
3.6%
Agree
20
5.5 %
5.5%
3
Neutral
43
11.8 %
11.9%
4
Disagree
69
19.0 %
19.1%
5
Strongly disagree
216
59.5 %
59.8%
9 (M)
Blank
2
0.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
361
2
1.00
5.00
4.26
5.00
1.09
- 39 -
- Study 04367 POSTDR15
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 15
Location:
119-119 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
14
3.9 %
3.9%
Agree
23
6.3 %
6.4%
3
Neutral
52
14.3 %
14.4%
4
Disagree
79
21.8 %
21.9%
5
Strongly disagree
192
52.9 %
53.3%
9 (M)
Blank
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
1.00
5.00
4.14
5.00
1.13
POSTDR16
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 16
Location:
120-120 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
18
5.0 %
5.0%
Agree
5
1.4 %
1.4%
3
Neutral
15
4.1 %
4.1%
4
Disagree
49
13.5 %
13.5%
5
Strongly disagree
275
75.8 %
76.0%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
4.54
5.00
1.01
POSTDR17
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 17
Location:
121-121 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
25
6.9 %
6.9%
Agree
65
17.9 %
18.0%
3
Neutral
79
21.8 %
21.8%
4
Disagree
67
18.5 %
18.5%
- 40 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
5
Strongly disagree
9 (M)
Blank
%
Valid %
126
34.7 %
34.8%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
3.56
4.00
1.31
POSTDR18
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 18
Location:
122-122 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
22
6.1 %
6.1%
Agree
60
16.5 %
16.7%
3
Neutral
127
35.0 %
35.4%
4
Disagree
48
13.2 %
13.4%
5
Strongly disagree
102
28.1 %
28.4%
9 (M)
Blank
4
1.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
359
4
1.00
5.00
3.41
3.00
1.23
POSTDR19
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 19
Location:
123-123 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
17
4.7 %
4.7%
Agree
8
2.2 %
2.2%
3
Neutral
11
3.0 %
3.1%
4
Disagree
54
14.9 %
15.0%
5
Strongly disagree
270
74.4 %
75.0%
9 (M)
Blank
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
1.00
5.00
4.53
5.00
1.01
POSTDR20
POST - DATE RAPE ATTITUDE SCALE 20
Location:
124-124 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
- 41 -
- Study 04367 Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Strongly agree
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
16
4.4 %
4.4%
Agree
31
8.5 %
8.6%
3
Neutral
37
10.2 %
10.2%
4
Disagree
78
21.5 %
21.6%
5
Strongly disagree
199
54.8 %
55.1%
9 (M)
Blank
2
0.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
361
2
1.00
5.00
4.14
5.00
1.17
POSTV1A1
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 1A1
Location:
125-125 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Not at all
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
0.3 %
0.3%
-
2
0.6 %
0.6%
3
-
11
3.0 %
3.0%
4
-
33
9.1 %
9.1%
5
-
49
13.5 %
13.5%
6
-
76
20.9 %
21.0%
7
Very much
190
52.3 %
52.5%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
7.00
6.08
7.00
1.21
POSTV1A2
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 1A2
Location:
126-126 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Not at all
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
4
1.1 %
1.1%
-
18
5.0 %
5.0%
3
-
27
7.4 %
7.5%
4
-
60
16.5 %
16.6%
5
-
54
14.9 %
14.9%
6
-
76
20.9 %
21.0%
- 42 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
7
Very much
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
%
Valid %
123
33.9 %
34.0%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
7.00
5.38
6.00
1.59
POSTV1B
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 1B
Location:
127-128 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
257
70.8 %
92.1%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
4
1.1 %
1.4%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.4%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.4%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.1%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.1%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
8
2.2 %
2.9%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
84
23.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
279
84
0.00
10.00
0.51
0.00
1.96
POSTV1C
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 1C
Location:
129-130 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
6
1.7 %
2.1%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
140
38.6 %
49.0%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
66
18.2 %
23.1%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
23
6.3 %
8.0%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
19
5.2 %
6.6%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
11
3.0 %
3.8%
- 43 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
13
3.6 %
4.5%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
5
1.4 %
1.7%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
77
21.2 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
286
77
0.00
9.00
2.13
1.00
1.69
POSTV1D
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 1D
Location:
131-132 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
8
2.2 %
2.7%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
72
19.8 %
24.7%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
127
35.0 %
43.6%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
34
9.4 %
11.7%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
16
4.4 %
5.5%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
15
4.1 %
5.2%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
12
3.3 %
4.1%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
4
1.1 %
1.4%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
72
19.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
291
72
0.00
9.00
2.38
2.00
1.56
POSTV1E
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 1E
Location:
133-134 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
Frequency
58
- 44 -
%
Valid %
16.0 %
20.3%
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
17
4.7 %
5.9%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
14
3.9 %
4.9%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
31
8.5 %
10.8%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
30
8.3 %
10.5%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
30
8.3 %
10.5%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
29
8.0 %
10.1%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
58
16.0 %
20.3%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
18
5.0 %
6.3%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
77
21.2 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
286
77
0.00
9.00
3.99
4.00
2.75
POSTV1F
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 1F
Location:
135-136 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
18
5.0 %
6.2%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
18
5.0 %
6.2%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
25
6.9 %
8.6%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
109
30.0 %
37.5%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
56
15.4 %
19.2%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
29
8.0 %
10.0%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
21
5.8 %
7.2%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
12
3.3 %
4.1%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
72
19.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
291
72
0.00
9.00
3.43
3.00
1.71
POSTV1G
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 1G
Location:
137-138 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
- 45 -
- Study 04367 Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
23
6.3 %
8.2%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
35
9.6 %
12.4%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
19
5.2 %
6.7%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
32
8.8 %
11.3%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
63
17.4 %
22.3%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
50
13.8 %
17.7%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
32
8.8 %
11.3%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
19
5.2 %
6.7%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
9
2.5 %
3.2%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
81
22.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
282
81
0.00
8.00
3.79
4.00
2.13
POSTV1H
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 1H
Location:
139-140 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
26
7.2 %
8.9%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
11
3.0 %
3.8%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
33
9.1 %
11.3%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
41
11.3 %
14.1%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
49
13.5 %
16.8%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
61
16.8 %
21.0%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
46
12.7 %
15.8%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
19
5.2 %
6.5%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
5
1.4 %
1.7%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
72
19.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
291
72
0.00
8.00
3.95
4.00
2.02
- 46 -
- Study 04367 POSTV1I
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 1I
Location:
141-142 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
31
8.5 %
10.9%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.4%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
9
2.5 %
3.2%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
15
4.1 %
5.3%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
44
12.1 %
15.5%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
56
15.4 %
19.7%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
73
20.1 %
25.7%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
48
13.2 %
16.9%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
6
1.7 %
2.1%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.4%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
79
21.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
284
79
0.00
9.00
4.76
5.00
2.14
POSTV1J
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 1J
Location:
143-144 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
98
27.0 %
34.6%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
4
1.1 %
1.4%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
5
1.4 %
1.8%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
17
4.7 %
6.0%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
23
6.3 %
8.1%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
39
10.7 %
13.8%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
93
25.6 %
32.9%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
- 47 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
99 (M)
Blank
Frequency
80
%
Valid %
22.0 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
283
80
0.00
9.00
4.55
6.00
3.53
POSTV1K
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 1K
Location:
145-146 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
256
70.5 %
92.8%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.4%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.4%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.4%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
10
2.8 %
3.6%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
5
1.4 %
1.8%
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
87
24.0 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
276
87
0.00
10.00
0.61
0.00
2.26
POSTV1L
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 1L
Location:
147-148 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
59
16.3 %
95.2%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
1.6%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
1.6%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
- 48 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
1.6%
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
301
82.9 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
62
301
0.00
10.00
0.23
0.00
1.32
POSTV2A
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 2A
Location:
149-149 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Not at all
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
0.3 %
0.3%
-
3
0.8 %
0.9%
3
-
5
1.4 %
1.5%
4
-
29
8.0 %
8.5%
5
-
75
20.7 %
21.9%
6
-
95
26.2 %
27.7%
7
Very much
135
37.2 %
39.4%
9 (M)
Blank
20
5.5 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
343
20
1.00
7.00
5.91
6.00
1.14
POSTV2B
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 2B
Location:
150-151 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
241
66.4 %
85.8%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
20
5.5 %
7.1%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.1%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.4%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.4%
- 49 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.4%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.1%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
7
1.9 %
2.5%
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
12
Ranked 12th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
82
22.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
281
82
0.00
10.00
0.58
0.00
2.00
POSTV2C
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 2C
Location:
152-153 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
41
11.3 %
14.1%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
86
23.7 %
29.6%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
36
9.9 %
12.4%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
32
8.8 %
11.0%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
28
7.7 %
9.6%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
24
6.6 %
8.2%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
16
4.4 %
5.5%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
20
5.5 %
6.9%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
5
1.4 %
1.7%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.0%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
12
Ranked 12th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
72
19.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
291
72
0.00
9.00
2.71
2.00
2.31
POSTV2D
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 2D
Location:
154-155 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
- 50 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
97
26.7 %
33.6%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
19
5.2 %
6.6%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
23
6.3 %
8.0%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
18
5.0 %
6.2%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
20
5.5 %
6.9%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
26
7.2 %
9.0%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
32
8.8 %
11.1%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
26
7.2 %
9.0%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
17
4.7 %
5.9%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
9
2.5 %
3.1%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
12
Ranked 12th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
74
20.4 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
289
74
0.00
10.00
3.25
3.00
3.02
POSTV2E
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 2E
Location:
156-157 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
66
18.2 %
22.4%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
9
2.5 %
3.1%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
52
14.3 %
17.7%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
36
9.9 %
12.2%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
33
9.1 %
11.2%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
29
8.0 %
9.9%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
35
9.6 %
11.9%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
20
5.5 %
6.8%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
11
3.0 %
3.7%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
12
Ranked 12th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
69
19.0 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
294
69
0.00
10.00
3.28
3.00
2.51
- 51 -
- Study 04367 POSTV2F
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 2F
Location:
158-159 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
36
9.9 %
12.4%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
41
11.3 %
14.1%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
41
11.3 %
14.1%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
67
18.5 %
23.0%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
50
13.8 %
17.2%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
23
6.3 %
7.9%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
20
5.5 %
6.9%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
9
2.5 %
3.1%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
4
1.1 %
1.4%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
12
Ranked 12th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
72
19.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
291
72
0.00
8.00
2.93
3.00
1.94
POSTV2G
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 2G
Location:
160-161 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
152
41.9 %
54.3%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
15
4.1 %
5.4%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
11
3.0 %
3.9%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
14
3.9 %
5.0%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
16
4.4 %
5.7%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
16
4.4 %
5.7%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
10
2.8 %
3.6%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
10
2.8 %
3.6%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
15
4.1 %
5.4%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
19
5.2 %
6.8%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
- 52 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
12
Ranked 12th for what participant would do
99 (M)
Blank
%
Valid %
0
0.0 %
-
83
22.9 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
280
83
0.00
10.00
2.37
0.00
3.18
POSTV2H
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 2H
Location:
162-163 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
87
24.0 %
30.2%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
31
8.5 %
10.8%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
39
10.7 %
13.5%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
40
11.0 %
13.9%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
34
9.4 %
11.8%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
26
7.2 %
9.0%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
14
3.9 %
4.9%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
7
1.9 %
2.4%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
6
1.7 %
2.1%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.0%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
12
Ranked 12th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
75
20.7 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
288
75
0.00
10.00
2.48
2.00
2.32
POSTV2I
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 2I
Location:
164-165 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
90
24.8 %
31.4%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
43
11.8 %
15.0%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
35
9.6 %
12.2%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
23
6.3 %
8.0%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
29
8.0 %
10.1%
- 53 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
24
6.6 %
8.4%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
16
4.4 %
5.6%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
17
4.7 %
5.9%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
6
1.7 %
2.1%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.0%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
12
Ranked 12th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
76
20.9 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
287
76
0.00
10.00
2.50
2.00
2.50
POSTV2J
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 2J
Location:
166-167 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
50
13.8 %
17.3%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
23
6.3 %
8.0%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
30
8.3 %
10.4%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
24
6.6 %
8.3%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
33
9.1 %
11.4%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
47
12.9 %
16.3%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
30
8.3 %
10.4%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
25
6.9 %
8.7%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
21
5.8 %
7.3%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
5
1.4 %
1.7%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
12
Ranked 12th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
74
20.4 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
289
74
0.00
10.00
3.81
4.00
2.65
POSTV2K
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 2K
Location:
168-169 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
- 54 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
168
46.3 %
58.5%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
15
4.1 %
5.2%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
19
5.2 %
6.6%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
16
4.4 %
5.6%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
10
2.8 %
3.5%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
10
2.8 %
3.5%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
10
2.8 %
3.5%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
6
1.7 %
2.1%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
14
3.9 %
4.9%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
18
5.0 %
6.3%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
12
Ranked 12th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
76
20.9 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
287
76
0.00
10.00
2.01
0.00
3.01
POSTV2L
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 2L
Location:
170-171 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
245
67.5 %
87.8%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
5
1.4 %
1.8%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.4%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.4%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
5
1.4 %
1.8%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
8
2.2 %
2.9%
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
4
1.1 %
1.4%
12
Ranked 12th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
84
23.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
279
84
0.00
11.00
0.86
0.00
2.60
- 55 -
- Study 04367 POSTV2M
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 1M
Location:
172-173 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
58
16.0 %
92.1%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
4
1.1 %
6.3%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
1.6%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
12
Ranked 12th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
300
82.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
63
300
0.00
2.00
0.10
0.00
0.35
POSTV3A
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 3A
Location:
174-174 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Not at all
4
Frequency
%
Valid %
2
0.6 %
0.6%
-
5
1.4 %
1.4%
5
-
23
6.3 %
6.6%
6
-
45
12.4 %
12.9%
7
Very much
273
75.2 %
78.4%
9 (M)
Blank
15
4.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
348
15
1.00
7.00
6.66
7.00
0.79
POSTV3B
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 3B
Location:
175-176 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
- 56 -
- Study 04367 Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
274
75.5 %
93.8%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
5
1.4 %
1.7%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.0%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
5
1.4 %
1.7%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
71
19.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
292
71
0.00
9.00
0.29
0.00
1.39
POSTV3C
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 3C
Location:
177-178 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
POSTV3D
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
95
26.2 %
31.9%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
9
2.5 %
3.0%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
9
2.5 %
3.0%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
19
5.2 %
6.4%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
50
13.8 %
16.8%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
65
17.9 %
21.8%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
47
12.9 %
15.8%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
4
1.1 %
1.3%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
65
17.9 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
298
65
0.00
7.00
3.08
4.00
2.39
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 3D
- 57 -
- Study 04367 Location:
179-180 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
16
4.4 %
5.2%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
119
32.8 %
38.9%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
41
11.3 %
13.4%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
44
12.1 %
14.4%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
55
15.2 %
18.0%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
27
7.4 %
8.8%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
57
15.7 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
306
57
0.00
9.00
2.34
2.00
1.58
POSTV3E
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 3E
Location:
181-182 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
20
5.5 %
6.6%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
92
25.3 %
30.5%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
104
28.7 %
34.4%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
58
16.0 %
19.2%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
21
5.8 %
7.0%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
6
1.7 %
2.0%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
61
16.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
302
61
0.00
6.00
1.97
2.00
1.13
- 58 -
- Study 04367 POSTV3F
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 3F
Location:
183-184 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
18
5.0 %
6.0%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
33
9.1 %
11.0%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
101
27.8 %
33.6%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
104
28.7 %
34.6%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
30
8.3 %
10.0%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
14
3.9 %
4.7%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
62
17.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
301
62
0.00
6.00
2.47
2.00
1.16
POSTV3G
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 3G
Location:
185-186 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
56
15.4 %
18.6%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
33
9.1 %
11.0%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
23
6.3 %
7.6%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
39
10.7 %
13.0%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
73
20.1 %
24.3%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
51
14.0 %
16.9%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
24
6.6 %
8.0%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
62
17.1 %
-
- 59 -
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
301
62
0.00
8.00
3.00
3.00
1.99
POSTV3H
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 3H
Location:
187-188 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
266
73.3 %
89.9%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.0%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
5
1.4 %
1.7%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
13
3.6 %
4.4%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.0%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
67
18.5 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
296
67
0.00
9.00
0.61
0.00
1.91
POSTV3I
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 3I
Location:
189-190 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
156
43.0 %
52.3%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
12
3.3 %
4.0%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
23
6.3 %
7.7%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
20
5.5 %
6.7%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
40
11.0 %
13.4%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
24
6.6 %
8.1%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
21
5.8 %
7.0%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
- 60 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
99 (M)
Blank
Frequency
65
%
Valid %
17.9 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
298
65
0.00
8.00
1.81
0.00
2.19
POSTV3J
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 3J
Location:
191-192 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
262
72.2 %
90.7%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
9
2.5 %
3.1%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
7
1.9 %
2.4%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.0%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
74
20.4 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
289
74
0.00
9.00
0.61
0.00
2.01
POSTV3K
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 3K
Location:
193-194 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
66
18.2 %
95.7%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
1.4%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
1.4%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
1.4%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
- 61 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
294
81.0 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
69
294
0.00
5.00
0.12
0.00
0.65
POSTV4A
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 4A
Location:
195-195 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Not at all
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
8
2.2 %
2.3%
-
42
11.6 %
12.1%
3
-
37
10.2 %
10.7%
4
-
60
16.5 %
17.3%
5
-
101
27.8 %
29.2%
6
-
57
15.7 %
16.5%
7
Very much
41
11.3 %
11.8%
9 (M)
Blank
17
4.7 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
346
17
1.00
7.00
4.56
5.00
1.59
POSTV4B
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 4B
Location:
196-197 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
254
70.0 %
89.1%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
11
3.0 %
3.9%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
5
1.4 %
1.8%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.4%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.1%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
5
1.4 %
1.8%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
- 62 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
99 (M)
Blank
%
Valid %
0
0.0 %
-
78
21.5 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
285
78
0.00
8.00
0.38
0.00
1.38
POSTV4C
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 4C
Location:
198-199 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
195
53.7 %
64.8%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
6
1.7 %
2.0%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.0%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
7
1.9 %
2.3%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
28
7.7 %
9.3%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
33
9.1 %
11.0%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
28
7.7 %
9.3%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
62
17.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
301
62
0.00
7.00
1.61
0.00
2.33
POSTV4D
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 4D
Location:
200-201 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
35
9.6 %
11.4%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
118
32.5 %
38.6%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
84
23.1 %
27.5%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
49
13.5 %
16.0%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
12
3.3 %
3.9%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
6
1.7 %
2.0%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
- 63 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
99 (M)
Blank
%
Valid %
0
0.0 %
-
0
0.0 %
-
57
15.7 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
306
57
0.00
7.00
1.72
1.50
1.19
POSTV4E
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 4E
Location:
202-203 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
181
49.9 %
59.9%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
9
2.5 %
3.0%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
18
5.0 %
6.0%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
38
10.5 %
12.6%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
33
9.1 %
10.9%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
18
5.0 %
6.0%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
4
1.1 %
1.3%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
61
16.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
302
61
0.00
7.00
1.74
0.00
2.28
POSTV4F
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 4F
Location:
204-205 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
29
8.0 %
9.5%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
150
41.3 %
49.0%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
98
27.0 %
32.0%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
19
5.2 %
6.2%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
5
1.4 %
1.6%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
4
1.1 %
1.3%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
- 64 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
57
15.7 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
306
57
0.00
6.00
1.47
1.00
0.94
POSTV4G
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 4G
Location:
206-207 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
99
27.3 %
32.5%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
12
3.3 %
3.9%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
63
17.4 %
20.7%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
89
24.5 %
29.2%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
35
9.6 %
11.5%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
6
1.7 %
2.0%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
58
16.0 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
305
58
0.00
7.00
1.91
2.00
1.53
POSTV4H
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 4H
Location:
208-209 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
143
39.4 %
47.7%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
12
3.3 %
4.0%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
22
6.1 %
7.3%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
52
14.3 %
17.3%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
48
13.2 %
16.0%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
9
2.5 %
3.0%
- 65 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
12
3.3 %
4.0%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
63
17.4 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
300
63
0.00
8.00
1.79
1.00
1.96
POSTV4I
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 4I
Location:
210-211 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
274
75.5 %
93.8%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.0%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
5
1.4 %
1.7%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
4
1.1 %
1.4%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
71
19.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
292
71
0.00
8.00
0.37
0.00
1.50
POSTV4J
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 4J
Location:
212-213 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
73
20.1 %
93.6%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
2.6%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
1.3%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
2.6%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
- 66 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
285
78.5 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
78
285
0.00
3.00
0.13
0.00
0.54
POSTV5A
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 5A
Location:
214-214 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Not at all
3
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
0.0 %
-
-
3
0.8 %
0.9%
4
-
12
3.3 %
3.5%
5
-
47
12.9 %
13.5%
6
-
95
26.2 %
27.4%
7
Very much
190
52.3 %
54.8%
9 (M)
Blank
16
4.4 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
347
16
3.00
7.00
6.32
7.00
0.89
POSTV5B
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 5B
Location:
215-216 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
270
74.4 %
94.7%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.1%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.4%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
- 67 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.1%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
4
1.1 %
1.4%
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
78
21.5 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
285
78
0.00
10.00
0.34
0.00
1.66
POSTV5C
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 5C
Location:
217-218 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
96
26.4 %
33.1%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
4
1.1 %
1.4%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
11
3.0 %
3.8%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
26
7.2 %
9.0%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
28
7.7 %
9.7%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
40
11.0 %
13.8%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
36
9.9 %
12.4%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
28
7.7 %
9.7%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
21
5.8 %
7.2%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
73
20.1 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
290
73
0.00
8.00
3.43
4.00
2.83
POSTV5D
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 5D
Location:
219-220 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
76
20.9 %
26.0%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
11
3.0 %
3.8%
- 68 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
24
6.6 %
8.2%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
41
11.3 %
14.0%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
51
14.0 %
17.5%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
50
13.8 %
17.1%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
31
8.5 %
10.6%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
6
1.7 %
2.1%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
71
19.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
292
71
0.00
8.00
3.70
4.00
2.56
POSTV5E
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 5E
Location:
221-222 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
94
25.9 %
32.1%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
40
11.0 %
13.7%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
29
8.0 %
9.9%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
37
10.2 %
12.6%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
28
7.7 %
9.6%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
19
5.2 %
6.5%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
15
4.1 %
5.1%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
22
6.1 %
7.5%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
9
2.5 %
3.1%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
70
19.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
293
70
0.00
8.00
2.50
2.00
2.47
POSTV5F
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 5F
Location:
223-224 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
- 69 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
102
28.1 %
35.1%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.0%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
10
2.8 %
3.4%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
31
8.5 %
10.7%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
54
14.9 %
18.6%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
51
14.0 %
17.5%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
27
7.4 %
9.3%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
13
3.6 %
4.5%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
72
19.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
291
72
0.00
8.00
3.54
4.00
2.82
POSTV5G
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 5G
Location:
225-226 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
POSTV5H
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
22
6.1 %
7.6%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
110
30.3 %
37.8%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
76
20.9 %
26.1%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
42
11.6 %
14.4%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
21
5.8 %
7.2%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
9
2.5 %
3.1%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
4
1.1 %
1.4%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
6
1.7 %
2.1%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
72
19.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
291
72
0.00
8.00
2.03
2.00
1.50
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 5H
- 70 -
- Study 04367 Location:
227-228 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
119
32.8 %
40.9%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
52
14.3 %
17.9%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
41
11.3 %
14.1%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
38
10.5 %
13.1%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
25
6.9 %
8.6%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
7
1.9 %
2.4%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
4
1.1 %
1.4%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
2
0.6 %
0.7%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.0%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
72
19.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
291
72
0.00
8.00
1.53
1.00
1.75
POSTV5I
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 5I
Location:
229-230 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
38
10.5 %
13.1%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
64
17.6 %
22.0%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
93
25.6 %
32.0%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
54
14.9 %
18.6%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
23
6.3 %
7.9%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
7
1.9 %
2.4%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
6
1.7 %
2.1%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
5
1.4 %
1.7%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.3%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
72
19.8 %
-
- 71 -
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
291
72
0.00
8.00
2.12
2.00
1.53
POSTV5J
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 5J
Location:
231-232 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
98
27.0 %
34.1%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
24
6.6 %
8.4%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
25
6.9 %
8.7%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
33
9.1 %
11.5%
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
40
11.0 %
13.9%
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
20
5.5 %
7.0%
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
7
1.9 %
2.4%
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
12
3.3 %
4.2%
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
25
6.9 %
8.7%
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
3
0.8 %
1.0%
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
76
20.9 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
287
76
0.00
9.00
2.74
2.00
2.70
POSTV5K
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 5K
Location:
233-234 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
257
70.8 %
94.8%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.4%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
0.4%
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
8
2.2 %
3.0%
- 72 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
99 (M)
Blank
%
Valid %
4
1.1 %
1.5%
0
0.0 %
-
92
25.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
271
92
0.00
10.00
0.42
0.00
1.93
POSTV5L
POST - VIGNETTES SCALE 5L
Location:
235-236 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
99
Value
Label
0
Would not do
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
60
16.5 %
98.4%
Ranked 1st for what participant would do
1
0.3 %
1.6%
2
Ranked 2nd for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
3
Ranked 3rd for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
4
Ranked 4th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
5
Ranked 5th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
6
Ranked 6th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
7
Ranked 7th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
8
Ranked 8th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
9
Ranked 9th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
10
Ranked 10th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
11
Ranked 11th for what participant would do
0
0.0 %
-
99 (M)
Blank
302
83.2 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
61
302
0.00
1.00
0.02
0.00
0.13
POSTBB1
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 1
Location:
237-237 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
10
2.8 %
2.8%
Slightly unlikely
34
9.4 %
9.4%
3
Not likely or unlikely
52
14.3 %
14.3%
4
Slightly likely
129
35.5 %
35.5%
5
Extremely likely
138
38.0 %
38.0%
- 73 -
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.97
4.00
1.07
POSTBB2
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 2
Location:
238-238 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
38
10.5 %
10.5%
2
Slightly unlikely
75
20.7 %
20.7%
3
Not likely or unlikely
118
32.5 %
32.5%
4
Slightly likely
89
24.5 %
24.5%
5
Extremely likely
43
11.8 %
11.8%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.07
3.00
1.16
POSTBB3
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 3
Location:
239-239 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
5
1.4 %
1.4%
Slightly unlikely
16
4.4 %
4.4%
3
Not likely or unlikely
54
14.9 %
14.9%
4
Slightly likely
139
38.3 %
38.3%
5
Extremely likely
149
41.0 %
41.0%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.13
4.00
0.92
POSTBB4
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 4
Location:
240-242 (width: 3; decimal: 1)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9.0
Value
Label
1.0
Not at all likely
2.0
Frequency
%
Valid %
10
2.8 %
2.8%
Slightly unlikely
23
6.3 %
6.4%
3.0
Not likely or unlikely
64
17.6 %
17.7%
4.0
Slightly likely
135
37.2 %
37.3%
4.5
-
1
0.3 %
0.3%
- 74 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
5.0
Extremely likely
9.0 (M)
Blank
%
Valid %
129
35.5 %
35.6%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
3.97
4.00
1.02
POSTBB5
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 5
Location:
243-243 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
8
2.2 %
2.2%
Slightly unlikely
15
4.1 %
4.1%
3
Not likely or unlikely
45
12.4 %
12.4%
4
Slightly likely
117
32.2 %
32.2%
5
Extremely likely
178
49.0 %
49.0%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.22
4.00
0.97
POSTBB6
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 6
Location:
244-244 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
2
0.6 %
0.6%
2
Slightly unlikely
3
0.8 %
0.8%
3
Not likely or unlikely
13
3.6 %
3.7%
4
Slightly likely
69
19.0 %
19.4%
5
Extremely likely
268
73.8 %
75.5%
9 (M)
Blank
8
2.2 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
355
8
1.00
5.00
4.68
5.00
0.64
POSTBB7
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 7
Location:
245-245 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
Frequency
1
- 75 -
%
Valid %
0.3 %
0.3%
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
2
Slightly unlikely
9
2.5 %
2.5%
3
Not likely or unlikely
41
11.3 %
11.3%
4
Slightly likely
104
28.7 %
28.7%
5
Extremely likely
208
57.3 %
57.3%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.40
5.00
0.81
POSTBB8
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 8
Location:
246-246 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
7
1.9 %
1.9%
Slightly unlikely
22
6.1 %
6.1%
3
Not likely or unlikely
57
15.7 %
15.7%
4
Slightly likely
121
33.3 %
33.3%
5
Extremely likely
156
43.0 %
43.0%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.09
4.00
1.00
POSTBB9
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 9
Location:
247-247 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
4
1.1 %
1.1%
2
Slightly unlikely
6
1.7 %
1.7%
3
Not likely or unlikely
32
8.8 %
8.8%
4
Slightly likely
110
30.3 %
30.3%
5
Extremely likely
211
58.1 %
58.1%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.43
5.00
0.81
POSTBB10
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 10
Location:
248-248 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
- 76 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
10
2.8 %
2.8%
Slightly unlikely
41
11.3 %
11.4%
3
Not likely or unlikely
89
24.5 %
24.7%
4
Slightly likely
102
28.1 %
28.3%
5
Extremely likely
119
32.8 %
33.0%
9 (M)
Blank
2
0.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
361
2
1.00
5.00
3.77
4.00
1.11
POSTBB11
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 11
Location:
249-249 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
0
0.0 %
-
2
Slightly unlikely
2
0.6 %
0.6%
3
Not likely or unlikely
10
2.8 %
2.8%
4
Slightly likely
51
14.0 %
14.2%
5
Extremely likely
297
81.8 %
82.5%
9 (M)
Blank
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
2.00
5.00
4.79
5.00
0.51
POSTBB12
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 12
Location:
250-250 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
5
1.4 %
1.4%
Slightly unlikely
28
7.7 %
7.8%
3
Not likely or unlikely
59
16.3 %
16.3%
4
Slightly likely
123
33.9 %
34.1%
5
Extremely likely
146
40.2 %
40.4%
9 (M)
Blank
2
0.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
361
2
1.00
5.00
4.04
4.00
1.00
- 77 -
- Study 04367 POSTBB13
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 13
Location:
251-251 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
14
3.9 %
3.9%
Slightly unlikely
27
7.4 %
7.4%
3
Not likely or unlikely
81
22.3 %
22.3%
4
Slightly likely
119
32.8 %
32.8%
5
Extremely likely
122
33.6 %
33.6%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.85
4.00
1.09
POSTBB14
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 14
Location:
252-252 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
14
3.9 %
3.9%
Slightly unlikely
18
5.0 %
5.0%
3
Not likely or unlikely
51
14.0 %
14.0%
4
Slightly likely
102
28.1 %
28.1%
5
Extremely likely
178
49.0 %
49.0%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.13
4.00
1.08
POSTBB15
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 15
Location:
253-253 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
4
1.1 %
1.1%
2
Slightly unlikely
4
1.1 %
1.1%
3
Not likely or unlikely
42
11.6 %
11.6%
4
Slightly likely
129
35.5 %
35.7%
5
Extremely likely
182
50.1 %
50.4%
9 (M)
Blank
2
0.6 %
-
- 78 -
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
361
2
1.00
5.00
4.33
5.00
0.81
POSTBB16
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 16
Location:
254-254 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
19
5.2 %
5.2%
Slightly unlikely
41
11.3 %
11.3%
3
Not likely or unlikely
72
19.8 %
19.8%
4
Slightly likely
89
24.5 %
24.5%
5
Extremely likely
142
39.1 %
39.1%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.81
4.00
1.22
POSTBB17
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 17
Location:
255-255 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
5
1.4 %
1.4%
2
Slightly unlikely
8
2.2 %
2.2%
3
Not likely or unlikely
26
7.2 %
7.2%
4
Slightly likely
107
29.5 %
29.5%
5
Extremely likely
217
59.8 %
59.8%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.44
5.00
0.83
POSTBB18
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 18
Location:
256-256 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
3
0.8 %
0.8%
2
Slightly unlikely
4
1.1 %
1.1%
3
Not likely or unlikely
26
7.2 %
7.2%
4
Slightly likely
85
23.4 %
23.4%
5
Extremely likely
245
67.5 %
67.5%
- 79 -
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.56
5.00
0.75
POSTBB19
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 19
Location:
257-257 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
2
0.6 %
0.6%
2
Slightly unlikely
9
2.5 %
2.5%
3
Not likely or unlikely
30
8.3 %
8.3%
4
Slightly likely
101
27.8 %
27.9%
5
Extremely likely
220
60.6 %
60.8%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
4.46
5.00
0.79
POSTBB20
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 20
Location:
258-258 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
3
0.8 %
0.8%
2
Slightly unlikely
4
1.1 %
1.1%
3
Not likely or unlikely
11
3.0 %
3.0%
4
Slightly likely
60
16.5 %
16.6%
5
Extremely likely
284
78.2 %
78.5%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
4.71
5.00
0.66
POSTBB21
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 21
Location:
259-259 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
1
Not at all likely
2
Slightly unlikely
- 80 -
%
Valid %
5
1.4 %
1.4%
9
2.5 %
2.5%
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
3
Not likely or unlikely
4
Slightly likely
5
Extremely likely
%
Valid %
27
7.4 %
7.4%
66
18.2 %
18.2%
256
70.5 %
70.5%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.54
5.00
0.84
POSTBB22
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 22
Location:
260-260 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
0.0 %
-
Slightly unlikely
1
0.3 %
0.3%
3
Not likely or unlikely
6
1.7 %
1.7%
4
Slightly likely
59
16.3 %
16.3%
5
Extremely likely
296
81.5 %
81.8%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
2.00
5.00
4.80
5.00
0.46
POSTBB23
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 23
Location:
261-261 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
0
0.0 %
-
2
Slightly unlikely
3
0.8 %
0.8%
3
Not likely or unlikely
36
9.9 %
9.9%
4
Slightly likely
114
31.4 %
31.4%
5
Extremely likely
210
57.9 %
57.9%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
2.00
5.00
4.46
5.00
0.71
POSTBB24
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 24
Location:
262-262 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
- 81 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
6
1.7 %
1.7%
Slightly unlikely
35
9.6 %
9.7%
3
Not likely or unlikely
88
24.2 %
24.4%
4
Slightly likely
103
28.4 %
28.6%
5
Extremely likely
128
35.3 %
35.6%
9 (M)
Blank
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
1.00
5.00
3.87
4.00
1.06
POSTBB25
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 25
Location:
263-263 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
11
3.0 %
3.0%
Slightly unlikely
22
6.1 %
6.1%
3
Not likely or unlikely
52
14.3 %
14.3%
4
Slightly likely
111
30.6 %
30.6%
5
Extremely likely
167
46.0 %
46.0%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.10
4.00
1.05
POSTBB26
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 26
Location:
264-264 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
13
3.6 %
3.6%
Slightly unlikely
37
10.2 %
10.2%
3
Not likely or unlikely
75
20.7 %
20.7%
4
Slightly likely
109
30.0 %
30.0%
5
Extremely likely
129
35.5 %
35.5%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.84
4.00
1.13
POSTBB27
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 27
Location:
265-265 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
- 82 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
32
8.8 %
8.8%
Slightly unlikely
52
14.3 %
14.3%
3
Not likely or unlikely
89
24.5 %
24.5%
4
Slightly likely
89
24.5 %
24.5%
5
Extremely likely
101
27.8 %
27.8%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.48
4.00
1.28
POSTBB28
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 28
Location:
266-266 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
1
0.3 %
0.3%
2
Slightly unlikely
3
0.8 %
0.8%
3
Not likely or unlikely
19
5.2 %
5.2%
4
Slightly likely
87
24.0 %
24.0%
5
Extremely likely
253
69.7 %
69.7%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.62
5.00
0.65
POSTBB29
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 29
Location:
267-267 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
1
0.3 %
0.3%
2
Slightly unlikely
2
0.6 %
0.6%
3
Not likely or unlikely
12
3.3 %
3.3%
4
Slightly likely
70
19.3 %
19.3%
5
Extremely likely
278
76.6 %
76.6%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.71
5.00
0.58
POSTBB30
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 30
Location:
268-268 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
- 83 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
7
1.9 %
1.9%
Slightly unlikely
12
3.3 %
3.3%
3
Not likely or unlikely
40
11.0 %
11.0%
4
Slightly likely
96
26.4 %
26.4%
5
Extremely likely
208
57.3 %
57.3%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.34
5.00
0.94
POSTBB31
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 31
Location:
269-269 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
3
0.8 %
0.8%
2
Slightly unlikely
7
1.9 %
1.9%
3
Not likely or unlikely
31
8.5 %
8.5%
4
Slightly likely
117
32.2 %
32.2%
5
Extremely likely
205
56.5 %
56.5%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.42
5.00
0.79
POSTBB32
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 32
Location:
270-270 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
25
6.9 %
6.9%
Slightly unlikely
30
8.3 %
8.3%
3
Not likely or unlikely
73
20.1 %
20.2%
4
Slightly likely
95
26.2 %
26.2%
5
Extremely likely
139
38.3 %
38.4%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
3.81
4.00
1.23
POSTBB33
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 33
Location:
271-271 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
- 84 -
- Study 04367 Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
25
6.9 %
6.9%
Slightly unlikely
35
9.6 %
9.6%
3
Not likely or unlikely
76
20.9 %
20.9%
4
Slightly likely
107
29.5 %
29.5%
5
Extremely likely
120
33.1 %
33.1%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.72
4.00
1.21
POSTBB34
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 34
Location:
272-272 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
24
6.6 %
6.6%
Slightly unlikely
33
9.1 %
9.1%
3
Not likely or unlikely
77
21.2 %
21.2%
4
Slightly likely
102
28.1 %
28.1%
5
Extremely likely
127
35.0 %
35.0%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.76
4.00
1.21
POSTBB35
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 35
Location:
273-273 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
29
8.0 %
8.0%
Slightly unlikely
45
12.4 %
12.4%
3
Not likely or unlikely
69
19.0 %
19.0%
4
Slightly likely
101
27.8 %
27.8%
5
Extremely likely
119
32.8 %
32.8%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.65
4.00
1.27
POSTBB36
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 36
Location:
274-274 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
- 85 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
7
1.9 %
1.9%
2
Slightly unlikely
8
2.2 %
2.2%
3
Not likely or unlikely
26
7.2 %
7.2%
4
Slightly likely
88
24.2 %
24.2%
5
Extremely likely
234
64.5 %
64.5%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.47
5.00
0.87
POSTBB37
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 37
Location:
275-275 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
6
1.7 %
1.7%
2
Slightly unlikely
8
2.2 %
2.2%
3
Not likely or unlikely
20
5.5 %
5.5%
4
Slightly likely
87
24.0 %
24.0%
5
Extremely likely
242
66.7 %
66.7%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.52
5.00
0.83
POSTBB38
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 38
Location:
276-276 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
8
2.2 %
2.2%
2
Slightly unlikely
8
2.2 %
2.2%
3
Not likely or unlikely
21
5.8 %
5.8%
4
Slightly likely
74
20.4 %
20.5%
5
Extremely likely
250
68.9 %
69.3%
9 (M)
Blank
2
0.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
361
2
1.00
5.00
4.52
5.00
0.88
POSTBB39
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 39
Location:
277-277 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
- 86 -
- Study 04367 Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
12
3.3 %
3.3%
Slightly unlikely
13
3.6 %
3.6%
3
Not likely or unlikely
39
10.7 %
10.8%
4
Slightly likely
94
25.9 %
26.0%
5
Extremely likely
204
56.2 %
56.4%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
4.28
5.00
1.02
POSTBB40
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 40
Location:
278-278 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
36
9.9 %
9.9%
Slightly unlikely
33
9.1 %
9.1%
3
Not likely or unlikely
46
12.7 %
12.7%
4
Slightly likely
78
21.5 %
21.5%
5
Extremely likely
170
46.8 %
46.8%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.86
4.00
1.36
POSTBB41
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 41
Location:
279-279 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
291
80.2 %
80.6%
Slightly unlikely
36
9.9 %
10.0%
3
Not likely or unlikely
10
2.8 %
2.8%
4
Slightly likely
9
2.5 %
2.5%
5
Extremely likely
15
4.1 %
4.2%
9 (M)
Blank
2
0.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
361
2
1.00
5.00
1.40
1.00
0.97
- 87 -
- Study 04367 POSTBB42
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 42
Location:
280-280 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
22
6.1 %
6.1%
Slightly unlikely
45
12.4 %
12.5%
3
Not likely or unlikely
78
21.5 %
21.7%
4
Slightly likely
92
25.3 %
25.6%
5
Extremely likely
123
33.9 %
34.2%
9 (M)
Blank
3
0.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
360
3
1.00
5.00
3.69
4.00
1.23
POSTBB43
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 43
Location:
281-281 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
20
5.5 %
5.6%
Slightly unlikely
20
5.5 %
5.6%
3
Not likely or unlikely
60
16.5 %
16.9%
4
Slightly likely
85
23.4 %
24.0%
5
Extremely likely
169
46.6 %
47.7%
9 (M)
Blank
9
2.5 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
354
9
1.00
5.00
4.03
4.00
1.18
POSTBB44
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 44
Location:
282-282 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
121
33.3 %
33.3%
Slightly unlikely
94
25.9 %
25.9%
3
Not likely or unlikely
85
23.4 %
23.4%
4
Slightly likely
31
8.5 %
8.5%
5
Extremely likely
32
8.8 %
8.8%
- 88 -
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
2.34
2.00
1.26
POSTBB45
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 45
Location:
283-283 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
22
6.1 %
6.1%
Slightly unlikely
39
10.7 %
10.8%
3
Not likely or unlikely
81
22.3 %
22.4%
4
Slightly likely
112
30.9 %
30.9%
5
Extremely likely
108
29.8 %
29.8%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
3.68
4.00
1.18
POSTBB46
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 46
Location:
284-284 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
5
1.4 %
1.4%
Slightly unlikely
17
4.7 %
4.7%
3
Not likely or unlikely
40
11.0 %
11.0%
4
Slightly likely
105
28.9 %
28.9%
5
Extremely likely
196
54.0 %
54.0%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.29
5.00
0.94
POSTBB47
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 47
Location:
285-285 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
1
Not at all likely
2
Slightly unlikely
3
Not likely or unlikely
4
Slightly likely
- 89 -
%
Valid %
2
0.6 %
0.6%
7
1.9 %
1.9%
35
9.6 %
9.6%
121
33.3 %
33.3%
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
5
Extremely likely
198
%
Valid %
54.5 %
54.5%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.39
5.00
0.78
POSTBB48
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 48
Location:
286-286 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
Frequency
%
Valid %
8
2.2 %
2.2%
Slightly unlikely
25
6.9 %
6.9%
3
Not likely or unlikely
78
21.5 %
21.5%
4
Slightly likely
127
35.0 %
35.0%
5
Extremely likely
125
34.4 %
34.4%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.93
4.00
1.02
POSTBB49
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 49
Location:
287-287 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
17
4.7 %
4.7%
2
Slightly unlikely
42
11.6 %
11.6%
3
Not likely or unlikely
101
27.8 %
27.8%
4
Slightly likely
104
28.7 %
28.7%
5
Extremely likely
99
27.3 %
27.3%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.62
4.00
1.14
POSTBB50
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 50
Location:
288-288 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
1
Not at all likely
2
3
Frequency
%
Valid %
268
73.8 %
73.8%
Slightly unlikely
46
12.7 %
12.7%
Not likely or unlikely
20
5.5 %
5.5%
- 90 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
4
Slightly likely
5
Extremely likely
%
Valid %
13
3.6 %
3.6%
16
4.4 %
4.4%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
1.52
1.00
1.05
POSTBB51
POST - BYSTANDER ATTITUDES SCALE 51
Location:
289-289 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all likely
6
1.7 %
1.7%
2
Slightly unlikely
11
3.0 %
3.0%
3
Not likely or unlikely
60
16.5 %
16.5%
4
Slightly likely
102
28.1 %
28.1%
5
Extremely likely
184
50.7 %
50.7%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.23
5.00
0.94
POSTBE1
POST-BANYARD ET AL BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 1
Location:
290-292 (width: 3; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Can't do this
10
Frequency
%
Valid %
6
1.7 %
1.7%
Quite uncertain if I could do this
19
5.2 %
5.2%
50
Moderately certain I could do this
29
8.0 %
8.0%
100
Very certain I could do this
88
24.2 %
24.2%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
100.00
70.88
80.00
28.94
POSTBE2
POST-BANYARD ET AL BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 2
Location:
293-295 (width: 3; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Can't do this
10
50
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
0.0 %
-
Quite uncertain if I could do this
1
0.3 %
0.3%
Moderately certain I could do this
7
1.9 %
1.9%
- 91 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
100
Very certain I could do this
227
%
Valid %
62.5 %
62.5%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
10.00
100.00
92.40
100.00
14.55
POSTBE3
POST-BANYARD ET AL BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 3
Location:
296-298 (width: 3; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
0
Can't do this
10
Quite uncertain if I could do this
50
Moderately certain I could do this
100
Very certain I could do this
%
Valid %
0
0.0 %
-
8
2.2 %
2.2%
23
6.3 %
6.3%
140
38.6 %
38.6%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
10.00
100.00
82.60
90.00
22.56
POSTBE4
POST-BANYARD ET AL BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 4
Location:
299-301 (width: 3; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Can't do this
10
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
0.0 %
-
Quite uncertain if I could do this
0
0.0 %
-
50
Moderately certain I could do this
5
1.4 %
1.4%
100
Very certain I could do this
190
52.3 %
52.3%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
20.00
100.00
91.08
100.00
13.49
POSTBE5
POST-BANYARD ET AL BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 5
Location:
302-304 (width: 3; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
999
Value
Label
0
Can't do this
10
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
0.0 %
-
Quite uncertain if I could do this
1
0.3 %
0.3%
50
Moderately certain I could do this
5
1.4 %
1.4%
100
Very certain I could do this
253
69.7 %
69.9%
999 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
- 92 -
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
10.00
100.00
93.60
100.00
14.12
POSTBE6
POST-BANYARD ET AL BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 6
Location:
305-307 (width: 3; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
Can't do this
1
0.3 %
0.3%
10
Quite uncertain if I could do this
3
0.8 %
0.8%
50
Moderately certain I could do this
29
8.0 %
8.0%
100
Very certain I could do this
98
27.0 %
27.0%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
100.00
78.99
80.00
21.50
POSTBE7
POST-BANYARD ET AL BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 7
Location:
308-310 (width: 3; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Can't do this
10
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
0.0 %
-
Quite uncertain if I could do this
0
0.0 %
-
50
Moderately certain I could do this
2
0.6 %
0.6%
100
Very certain I could do this
260
71.6 %
71.6%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
20.00
100.00
95.72
100.00
9.26
POSTBE8
POST-BANYARD ET AL BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 8
Location:
311-313 (width: 3; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
Can't do this
3
0.8 %
0.8%
10
Quite uncertain if I could do this
6
1.7 %
1.7%
50
Moderately certain I could do this
31
8.5 %
8.5%
100
Very certain I could do this
86
23.7 %
23.7%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
100.00
74.50
80.00
24.86
- 93 -
- Study 04367 POSTBE9
POST-BANYARD ET AL BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 9
Location:
314-316 (width: 3; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
0
Can't do this
10
Quite uncertain if I could do this
50
Moderately certain I could do this
100
Very certain I could do this
%
Valid %
2
0.6 %
0.6%
3
0.8 %
0.8%
17
4.7 %
4.7%
120
33.1 %
33.1%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
100.00
79.72
90.00
23.05
POSTBE10
POST-BANYARD ET AL BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 10
Location:
317-319 (width: 3; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0
Can't do this
10
Frequency
%
Valid %
4
1.1 %
1.1%
Quite uncertain if I could do this
2
0.6 %
0.6%
50
Moderately certain I could do this
2
0.6 %
0.6%
100
Very certain I could do this
248
68.3 %
68.3%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
100.00
92.78
100.00
17.24
POSTBE11
POST-BANYARD ET AL BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 11
Location:
320-322 (width: 3; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
0
Can't do this
10
Quite uncertain if I could do this
50
Moderately certain I could do this
100
Very certain I could do this
%
Valid %
0
0.0 %
-
1
0.3 %
0.3%
10
2.8 %
2.8%
182
50.1 %
50.1%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
10.00
100.00
89.81
100.00
16.06
POSTBE12
POST-BANYARD ET AL BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 12
Location:
323-327 (width: 5; decimal: 1)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
- 94 -
- Study 04367 Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
0.0
Can't do this
10.0
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
0.0 %
-
Quite uncertain if I could do this
1
0.3 %
0.3%
50.0
Moderately certain I could do this
8
2.2 %
2.2%
100.0
Very certain I could do this
143
39.4 %
39.4%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
10.00
100.00
85.96
90.00
18.07
POSTBE13
POST-BANYARD ET AL BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 13
Location:
328-330 (width: 3; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
0
Can't do this
10
Quite uncertain if I could do this
50
Moderately certain I could do this
100
Very certain I could do this
%
Valid %
1
0.3 %
0.3%
0
0.0 %
-
14
3.9 %
3.9%
143
39.4 %
39.4%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
0.00
100.00
83.21
90.00
20.68
POSTBE14
POST-BANYARD ET AL BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 14
Location:
331-333 (width: 3; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
999
Value
Label
Frequency
0
Can't do this
10
Quite uncertain if I could do this
50
Moderately certain I could do this
100
Very certain I could do this
999 (M)
Blank
%
Valid %
3
0.8 %
0.8%
3
0.8 %
0.8%
15
4.1 %
4.1%
183
50.4 %
50.6%
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
0.00
100.00
87.32
100.00
20.01
POSTMVP1
POST - MVP BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 1
Location:
334-334 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
- 95 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree
2
0.6 %
0.6%
2
Disagree
11
3.0 %
3.0%
3
Undecided
50
13.8 %
13.8%
4
Agree
111
30.6 %
30.6%
5
Strongly agree
189
52.1 %
52.1%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.31
5.00
0.86
POSTMVP2
POST - MVP BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 2
Location:
335-335 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree
46
12.7 %
12.7%
2
Disagree
56
15.4 %
15.4%
3
Undecided
43
11.8 %
11.8%
4
Agree
106
29.2 %
29.2%
5
Strongly agree
112
30.9 %
30.9%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.50
4.00
1.39
POSTMVP3
POST - MVP BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 3
Location:
336-336 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree
40
11.0 %
11.0%
2
Disagree
74
20.4 %
20.4%
3
Undecided
124
34.2 %
34.2%
4
Agree
84
23.1 %
23.1%
5
Strongly agree
41
11.3 %
11.3%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.03
3.00
1.15
POSTMVP4
POST - MVP BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 4
Location:
337-337 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
- 96 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree
7
1.9 %
1.9%
2
Disagree
22
6.1 %
6.1%
3
Undecided
71
19.6 %
19.6%
4
Agree
130
35.8 %
35.9%
5
Strongly agree
132
36.4 %
36.5%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
3.99
4.00
0.99
POSTMVP5
POST - MVP BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 5
Location:
338-338 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree
102
28.1 %
28.1%
2
Disagree
89
24.5 %
24.5%
3
Undecided
91
25.1 %
25.1%
4
Agree
55
15.2 %
15.2%
5
Strongly agree
26
7.2 %
7.2%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
2.49
2.00
1.24
POSTMVP6
POST - MVP BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 6
Location:
339-339 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree
87
24.0 %
24.0%
2
Disagree
117
32.2 %
32.3%
3
Undecided
82
22.6 %
22.7%
4
Agree
61
16.8 %
16.9%
5
Strongly agree
15
4.1 %
4.1%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
2.45
2.00
1.15
POSTMVP7
POST - MVP BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 7
Location:
340-340 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
- 97 -
- Study 04367 Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree
13
3.6 %
3.6%
2
Disagree
25
6.9 %
6.9%
3
Undecided
34
9.4 %
9.4%
4
Agree
116
32.0 %
32.0%
5
Strongly agree
174
47.9 %
48.1%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
4.14
4.00
1.08
POSTMVP8
POST - MVP BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 8
Location:
341-341 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree
5
1.4 %
1.4%
2
Disagree
18
5.0 %
5.0%
3
Undecided
67
18.5 %
18.5%
4
Agree
139
38.3 %
38.4%
5
Strongly agree
133
36.6 %
36.7%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
4.04
4.00
0.94
POSTMVP9
POST - MVP BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 9
Location:
342-342 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree
7
1.9 %
1.9%
2
Disagree
19
5.2 %
5.2%
3
Undecided
86
23.7 %
23.8%
4
Agree
134
36.9 %
37.0%
5
Strongly agree
116
32.0 %
32.0%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
- 98 -
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
3.92
4.00
0.97
PSTMVP10
POST - MVP BYSTANDER EFFICACY SCALE 10
Location:
343-343 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Strongly disagree
69
19.0 %
19.0%
2
Disagree
95
26.2 %
26.2%
3
Undecided
88
24.2 %
24.2%
4
Agree
77
21.2 %
21.2%
5
Strongly agree
34
9.4 %
9.4%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
2.76
3.00
1.25
POSTCB1
POST - DECISIONAL BALANCE SCALE 1
Location:
344-344 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all important
4
1.1 %
1.1%
2
Slightly important
7
1.9 %
1.9%
3
Moderately important
54
14.9 %
14.9%
4
Very important
134
36.9 %
36.9%
5
Extremely important
164
45.2 %
45.2%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.23
4.00
0.85
POSTCB2
POST - DECISIONAL BALANCE SCALE 2
Location:
345-345 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all important
4
1.1 %
1.1%
2
Slightly important
5
1.4 %
1.4%
3
Moderately important
33
9.1 %
9.1%
4
Very important
114
31.4 %
31.4%
5
Extremely important
207
57.0 %
57.0%
- 99 -
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.42
5.00
0.80
POSTCB3
POST - DECISIONAL BALANCE SCALE 3
Location:
346-346 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all important
58
16.0 %
16.0%
2
Slightly important
63
17.4 %
17.4%
3
Moderately important
69
19.0 %
19.0%
4
Very important
78
21.5 %
21.5%
5
Extremely important
95
26.2 %
26.2%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.25
3.00
1.42
POSTCB4
POST - DECISIONAL BALANCE SCALE 4
Location:
347-347 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all important
57
15.7 %
15.7%
2
Slightly important
66
18.2 %
18.2%
3
Moderately important
77
21.2 %
21.2%
4
Very important
73
20.1 %
20.1%
5
Extremely important
90
24.8 %
24.8%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.20
3.00
1.40
POSTCB5
POST - DECISIONAL BALANCE SCALE 5
Location:
348-348 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all important
11
3.0 %
3.0%
2
Slightly important
17
4.7 %
4.7%
3
Moderately important
40
11.0 %
11.0%
4
Very important
122
33.6 %
33.6%
5
Extremely important
173
47.7 %
47.7%
- 100 -
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
4.18
4.00
1.01
POSTCB6
POST - DECISIONAL BALANCE SCALE 6
Location:
349-349 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all important
179
49.3 %
49.3%
2
Slightly important
95
26.2 %
26.2%
3
Moderately important
60
16.5 %
16.5%
4
Very important
21
5.8 %
5.8%
5
Extremely important
8
2.2 %
2.2%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
1.85
2.00
1.03
POSTCB7
POST - DECISIONAL BALANCE SCALE 7
Location:
350-350 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all important
89
24.5 %
24.5%
2
Slightly important
109
30.0 %
30.0%
3
Moderately important
95
26.2 %
26.2%
4
Very important
48
13.2 %
13.2%
5
Extremely important
22
6.1 %
6.1%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
2.46
2.00
1.17
POSTCB8
POST - DECISIONAL BALANCE SCALE 8
Location:
351-351 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all important
41
11.3 %
11.3%
2
Slightly important
45
12.4 %
12.4%
3
Moderately important
84
23.1 %
23.1%
4
Very important
86
23.7 %
23.7%
5
Extremely important
107
29.5 %
29.5%
- 101 -
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.48
4.00
1.33
POSTCB9
POST - DECISIONAL BALANCE SCALE 9
Location:
352-352 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all important
38
10.5 %
10.5%
2
Slightly important
67
18.5 %
18.6%
3
Moderately important
110
30.3 %
30.5%
4
Very important
93
25.6 %
25.8%
5
Extremely important
53
14.6 %
14.7%
9 (M)
Blank
2
0.6 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
361
2
1.00
5.00
3.16
3.00
1.20
POSTCB10
POST - DECISIONAL BALANCE SCALE 10
Location:
353-353 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
1
Not at all important
67
18.5 %
18.5%
2
Slightly important
85
23.4 %
23.5%
3
Moderately important
114
31.4 %
31.5%
4
Very important
68
18.7 %
18.8%
5
Extremely important
28
7.7 %
7.7%
9 (M)
Blank
1
0.3 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
362
1
1.00
5.00
2.74
3.00
1.19
POSTCB11
POST - DECISIONAL BALANCE SCALE 11
Location:
354-354 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Value
Label
Frequency
1
Not at all important
2
Slightly important
- 102 -
%
Valid %
40
11.0 %
11.0%
72
19.8 %
19.8%
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
3
Moderately important
113
31.1 %
31.1%
4
Very important
98
27.0 %
27.0%
5
Extremely important
40
11.0 %
11.0%
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
363
0
1.00
5.00
3.07
3.00
1.16
POSTEL1
POST - ELMQ 1
Location:
355-355 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
Not at all important
2
0.6 %
0.7%
1
-
4
1.1 %
1.4%
2
-
12
3.3 %
4.2%
3
-
30
8.3 %
10.6%
4
-
73
20.1 %
25.7%
5
-
84
23.1 %
29.6%
6
Very important
79
21.8 %
27.8%
9 (M)
Blank
79
21.8 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
284
79
0.00
6.00
4.59
5.00
1.26
POSTEL2
POST - ELMQ 2
Location:
356-356 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
Not at all motivated
1
0.3 %
0.3%
1
-
3
0.8 %
1.0%
2
-
7
1.9 %
2.4%
3
-
15
4.1 %
5.2%
4
-
52
14.3 %
18.2%
5
-
90
24.8 %
31.5%
6
Very motivated
118
32.5 %
41.3%
9 (M)
Blank
77
21.2 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
286
77
0.00
6.00
4.99
5.00
1.13
- 103 -
- Study 04367 POSTEL3
POST - ELMQ 3
Location:
357-357 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
Strongly agree
88
24.2 %
30.8%
1
-
41
11.3 %
14.3%
2
-
14
3.9 %
4.9%
3
-
9
2.5 %
3.1%
4
-
31
8.5 %
10.8%
5
-
43
11.8 %
15.0%
6
Strongly disagree
60
16.5 %
21.0%
9 (M)
Blank
77
21.2 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
286
77
0.00
6.00
2.78
2.50
2.44
POSTEL4
POST - ELMQ 4
Location:
358-358 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
0
Too simple
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
7
1.9 %
2.4%
-
17
4.7 %
5.9%
2
-
38
10.5 %
13.3%
3
Just right
216
59.5 %
75.5%
4
-
7
1.9 %
2.4%
5
-
1
0.3 %
0.3%
6
Too difficult
0
0.0 %
-
9 (M)
Blank
77
21.2 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
286
77
0.00
5.00
2.71
3.00
0.74
POSTEL5
POST - ELMQ 5
Location:
359-359 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
- 104 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
Strongly agree
7
1.9 %
2.4%
1
-
8
2.2 %
2.8%
2
-
28
7.7 %
9.8%
3
-
21
5.8 %
7.3%
4
-
22
6.1 %
7.7%
5
-
83
22.9 %
29.0%
6
Strongly disagree
117
32.2 %
40.9%
9 (M)
Blank
77
21.2 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
286
77
0.00
6.00
4.66
5.00
1.62
POSTEL6
POST - ELMQ 6
Location:
360-360 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
Strongly agree
91
25.1 %
31.8%
1
-
70
19.3 %
24.5%
2
-
47
12.9 %
16.4%
3
-
19
5.2 %
6.6%
4
-
22
6.1 %
7.7%
5
-
23
6.3 %
8.0%
6
Strongly disagree
14
3.9 %
4.9%
9 (M)
Blank
77
21.2 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
286
77
0.00
6.00
1.78
1.00
1.83
POSTEL7
POST - ELMQ 7
Location:
361-361 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
Strongly agree
140
38.6 %
49.1%
1
-
74
20.4 %
26.0%
2
-
23
6.3 %
8.1%
3
-
6
1.7 %
2.1%
4
-
8
2.2 %
2.8%
- 105 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
5
-
6
9 (M)
Frequency
%
Valid %
13
3.6 %
4.6%
Strongly disagree
21
5.8 %
7.4%
Blank
78
21.5 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
285
78
0.00
6.00
1.27
1.00
1.85
POSTEL8
POST - ELMQ 8
Location:
362-362 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
Did not try at all
1
0.3 %
0.3%
1
-
2
0.6 %
0.7%
2
-
11
3.0 %
3.8%
3
-
19
5.2 %
6.6%
4
-
50
13.8 %
17.5%
5
-
104
28.7 %
36.4%
6
Tried to a great extent
99
27.3 %
34.6%
9 (M)
Blank
77
21.2 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
286
77
0.00
6.00
4.88
5.00
1.15
POSTEL9
POST - ELMQ 9
Location:
363-363 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
Not at all organized and easy to follow
0
0.0 %
-
1
-
2
0.6 %
0.7%
2
-
8
2.2 %
2.8%
3
-
8
2.2 %
2.8%
4
-
27
7.4 %
9.5%
5
-
94
25.9 %
33.0%
6
Very organized and easy to follow
146
40.2 %
51.2%
9 (M)
Blank
78
21.5 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
285
78
1.00
6.00
5.25
6.00
1.01
- 106 -
- Study 04367 POSTEL10
POST - ELMQ 10
Location:
364-364 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
Not at all difficult
124
34.2 %
43.5%
1
-
74
20.4 %
26.0%
2
-
39
10.7 %
13.7%
3
-
16
4.4 %
5.6%
4
-
21
5.8 %
7.4%
5
-
10
2.8 %
3.5%
6
Very difficult
1
0.3 %
0.4%
9 (M)
Blank
78
21.5 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
285
78
0.00
6.00
1.19
1.00
1.44
POSTEL11
POST - ELMQ 11
Location:
365-365 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
Not at all logical and accurate
0
0.0 %
-
1
-
3
0.8 %
1.1%
2
-
1
0.3 %
0.4%
3
-
5
1.4 %
1.8%
4
-
25
6.9 %
8.8%
5
-
90
24.8 %
31.6%
6
Very logical and accurate
161
44.4 %
56.5%
9 (M)
Blank
78
21.5 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
285
78
1.00
6.00
5.39
6.00
0.88
POSTEL12
POST - ELMQ 12
Location:
366-366 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
- 107 -
- Study 04367 Value
Label
0
Very poor
1
Frequency
%
Valid %
0
0.0 %
-
-
1
0.3 %
0.4%
2
-
2
0.6 %
0.7%
3
-
5
1.4 %
1.8%
4
-
38
10.5 %
13.3%
5
-
96
26.4 %
33.7%
6
Excellent
143
39.4 %
50.2%
9 (M)
Blank
78
21.5 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
285
78
1.00
6.00
5.30
6.00
0.86
VAR00001
VAR00001
Location:
367-367 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
363
%
Valid %
100.0 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
0
363
-
-
-
-
-
VAR00002
VAR00002
Location:
368-368 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
363
%
Valid %
100.0 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
0
363
-
-
-
-
-
VAR00003
VAR00003
Location:
369-369 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
363
- 108 -
%
Valid %
100.0 %
-
- Study 04367 Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
0
363
-
-
-
-
-
VAR00004
VAR00004
Location:
370-370 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
363
%
Valid %
100.0 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
0
363
-
-
-
-
-
VAR00005
VAR00005
Location:
371-371 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
363
%
Valid %
100.0 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
0
363
-
-
-
-
-
VAR00006
VAR00006
Location:
372-372 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type:
numeric (ISO)
Interval:
discrete
Range of Missing Values (M):
9
Value
Label
9 (M)
Blank
Frequency
363
%
Valid %
100.0 %
-
Valid
Invalid
Min
Max
Mean
Median
Stdev
0
363
-
-
-
-
-
- 109 -
- Study 04367 -
- Study 04367 Thank you for your participation. Please read each question carefully and choose your answer
from among the choices given. Please note that different questions will have different answer
choices so please read each carefully. Please remember that there are NO RIGHT OR WRONG
ANSWERS to any of the questions. We are interested in your honest response. Your answers will
be completely anonymous.
Participant code #: ______________
Sex: ________ Race/Ethnicity: __________________________ (G3)
Have any academic courses you are taking discussed sexual assault or rape since the last time you completed
this questionnaire?
1. Yes
0. No
Which one or ones? ____________________________________
Other than the program you have just completed with us, have you attended any programs on sexual assault
or rape since the last time you completed this questionnaire?
1. Yes
0. No
Which one or ones? ____________________________________
Please read each of the following statements and circle the answer that is closest to what is true for
you.
2. Do you feel a sense of community with other people on campus (for example, do you share interests and
concerns with them)?
1
2
3
4
5
not at all
slightly
moderately
mostly
a great deal
3. How important is it to you to feel a sense of community with people on this campus?
1
2
3
4
5
not at all
slightly
moderately
fairly
very important
important
4. Some people care a lot about the kind of campus they live on. For others, the campus is not important. How
important is what the campus is like to you?
1
Not at all
Important
2
slightly
3
moderately
4
fairly
5
very important
If you answered #3 above that it is not important, please explain why not? If it is important to you,
please explain why?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
1
- Study 04367 -
Please answer the following questions about what you think about “violence prevention.” Violence
is when people fight or hurt others on purpose. Violence prevention means keeping violence from
happening or stopping violence before it starts.
Circle only one answer that best describes your response:
1
Disagree
Completely
2
Disagree
A Lot
3
Disagree
A Little
4
Agree
A Little
1. People’s violent behavior can be prevented.
2. There are certain things a person can do
to help prevent violence.
3. I myself can make a difference in helping
to prevent violence.
4. People can be taught to help prevent violence.
2. Doing or saying certain kinds of things can
work to help prevent violence.
6. I can learn to do or say the kinds of things
that help prevent violence.
7. People can learn to become someone who
helps others to avoid violence.
8. Even people who are not involved in a fight
can do things that help prevent violence.
9. Even when I’m not involved and it’s not about me, I can make
a difference in helping to prevent violence.
5
Agree
A Lot
6
Agree
Completely
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Please read each of the following statements and indicate how true each is of you.
1
Strongly disagree
Not at all true
2
3
4
5
Strongly agree
Very much true
2. I don’t think sexual assault is a big problem on campus.
3. I don’t think there is much I can do about sexual assault on campus.
4. There isn’t much need for me to think about sexual assault on campus,
that’s the job of the crisis center.
5. Sometimes I think I should learn more about sexual assault but I haven’t
done so yet.
6. I think I can do something about sexual assault and am planning to find
out what I can do about the problem.
7. I am planning to learn more about the problem of sexual assault on campus.
8. I have recently attended a program about sexual assault.
9. I am actively involved in projects to deal with sexual assault on campus.
10. I have recently taken part in activities or volunteered my time on projects
focused on ending sexual assault on campus.
2
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4
5
1 2 3 4 5
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
1 2 3 4
5
- Study 04367 Please read and answer each of the following questions. If you do not know the answer to a question
please indicate that you do not know. We ask that you do not guess answers if you truly feel you do
not know the answer.
2.
I know I have consent to engage in sexual behavior with my partner if
___ I don't know.
3.
Approximately how many rapes are reported to SHARPP at UNH every year?
b)
c)
d)
e)
Between 15 and 20
Between 30 and 35
Between 50 and 55
I don't know.
4.
Over their lifetime, approximately one in ________ women will experience sexual assault.
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
Four
Seven
Ten
Fourteen
Seventeen
I don't know.
4.
Over their lifetime, approximately one in ________ men will experience sexual assault.
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
Four
Seven
Ten
Fourteen
Seventeen
I don't know.
3
- Study 04367 5.
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
l)
m)
n)
o)
p)
Sexual violence includes: circle as many as you think are correct:
ogling a woman’s breasts
whistling/catcalling at a woman/man passer-by
ogling a man or woman’s crotch area
pinching someone’s behind
slapping someone’s behind
forcing someone to watch pornography
telling someone to fuck off
“flipping” someone the finger
violating boundaries or "safe words"
forcing someone to engage in any unwanted sexual activity
punching someone in the stomach
masturbation in public
calling someone a slut or cunt or pussy
unwanted sexual activity
I don’t know.
6. The most commonly used drug in sexual assault is _______________________.
____ I don't know.
7. According to the UNH Student Code of Conduct, “sexual misconduct includes any sexual activity as
defined by” … circle ALL that are correct:
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
l)
m)
n)
intentional and prolonged staring at a woman’s breasts without seeking permission.
intentional and prolonged staring at a woman’s breasts without receiving permission.
intentional and prolonged staring at another’s crotch without seeking permission.
intentional and prolonged staring at another’s crotch without receiving permission.
intentional touching of another’s sexual or intimate parts without seeking expressed permission.
intentional touching of another’s clothing covering the immediate area of another’s sexual or intimate parts
without seeking expressed permission.
intentional touching of another’s sexual or intimate parts without receiving expressed permission.
intentional touching of another’s clothing covering the immediate area of another’s sexual or intimate parts
without receiving expressed permission.
intentional forcing of another to watch pornography.
sexual activity when a person's ability to give expressed permission is compromised due to mental disability.
sexual activity when a person's ability to give expressed permission is compromised due to physical disability..
sexual activity when a person's ability to give expressed permission is compromised due to due to substance
ingestion.
I don't know.
2. Based on FBI statistics, the percentage of people falsely reporting sexual assault is _______.
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
One half percent, lower than other felony crimes
Two percent, comparable to all felony crimes
Thirty percent, higher than other felony crimes
Sixty percent, most allegations are ultimately found to be false
I don't know.
4
- Study 04367 3. List as many helpful bystander behaviors as you know that could be used in the case of sexual violence:
____ I don't know of any.
4. Research shows that there are several factors that make it more likely that a person will intervene as a
helpful bystander. List as many of these factors that you are aware of.
____ I don't know of any.
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements using the scale:
1
not at all agree
2
3
4
5
2. If a woman is raped while she is drunk, she is at least somewhat responsible for
letting things get out of control.
3. Although most women wouldn’t admit it, they generally find being physically
forced into sex a real “turn-on.”
4. If a woman is willing to “make out” with a guy, then it’s no big deal if he goes
a little further and has sex.
5. Many women secretly desire to be raped.
6. Most rapists are not caught by the police.
7. If a woman doesn’t physically fight back, you can’t really say that is
was rape.
8. Men from nice middle-class homes almost never rape.
9. Rape accusations are often used as a way of getting back at men.
10. All women should have access to self-defense classes.
11. It is usually only women who dress suggestively that are raped.
12. If the rapist doesn’t have a weapon, you really can’t call it a rape.
13. Rape is unlikely to happen in the woman’s own familiar neighborhood.
14. Women tend to exaggerate how much rape affects them.
15. A lot of women lead a man on and then cry rape.
16. It is preferable that a female police officer conduct the questioning when
a woman reports a rape.
17. A woman who “teases” men deserves anything that might happen.
18. When women are raped, it’s often because the way they said “no”
was ambiguous.
5
6
7
very much
agree
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
- Study 04367 19. Men don’t usually intend to force sex on a woman, but sometimes
they get too sexually carried away.
20. A woman who dresses in skimpy clothes should not be surprised if a
man tries to force her to have sex.
21. Rape happens when a man’s sex drive gets out of control.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Please answer the following questions using the following scale to indicate your agreement or disagreement
with each statement:
1
2
3
4
5
strongly agree
agree
neutral
disagree
strongly disagree
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
2.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Males and females should share the expenses of a date.
1 2 3 4 5
I believe that talking about sex destroys the romance of that particular moment.
1 2 3 4 5
Most women enjoy being submissive in sexual relations.
1 2 3 4 5
If a woman dresses in a sexy dress she is asking for sex.
1 2 3 4 5
If a woman asks a man out on a date then she is definitely interested in having sex.
1 2 3 4 5
In the majority of date rapes the victim is promiscuous or has a bad reputation.
1 2 3 4 5
A man is entitled to intercourse if his partner had agreed to but at the last
moment changed her mind.
1 2 3 4 5
Many women pretend they don’t want to have sex because they don’t want to appear “easy.” 1 2 3 4 5
A man can control his behavior no matter how sexually aroused he feels.
1 2 3 4 5
I believe that alcohol and other drugs affect my sexual decision making.
1 2 3 4 5
The degree of a woman’s resistance should be a major factor in determining
if a rape has occurred.
1 2 3 4 5
When a woman says “no” to sex what she really means is “maybe.”
1 2 3 4 5
If a woman lets a man buy her dinner or pay for a movie or drinks, she owes him sex.
1 2 3 4 5
Women provoke rape by their behavior.
1 2 3 4 5
Women often lie about being raped to get back at their dates.
1 2 3 4 5
It is okay to pressure a date to drink alcohol in order to improve one’s chances of getting
one’s date to have sex.
1 2 3 4 5
When a woman asks her date back to her place, I expect that something sexual will take place. 1 2 3 4 5
Date rapists are usually motivated by overwhelming, unfulfilled sexual desire.
1 2 3 4 5
In most cases when a woman was raped she was asking for it.
1 2 3 4 5
When a woman fondles a man’s genitals it means she has consented to sexual intercourse.
1 2 3 4 5
Please read each of the following short vignettes and imagine yourself in the situation depicted.
Then answer the questions that follow about how you would respond if you were in that situation.
2. A friend of yours has accused one of your close male friends of raping them. Some of your other friends
are “badmouthing” the accuser, saying it wasn’t rape and the accuser is promiscuous anyway.
How much do you think that the ACCUSER needs your help?
1
2
3
4
not at all
5
6
7
very much
How much do you think that the ACCUSED needs your help?
1
2
3
4
not at all
5
6
7
very much
6
- Study 04367 Rank order each of the following statements according to how likely you would be to do that behavior. Include all
behaviors whether you would do them immediately or later on in relation to this specific event. Use 1 to indicate the
first choice of what you would do, 2 to indicate your second choice, etc. Be sure to put a number next to each
behavior. Use a “0” to indicate something that you would not do.
__ Do nothing, it’s none of my business.
__ Talk to the friend who said they were a victim about how they are feeling
__ Offer support to the friend who said they were a victim.
__ Call a resident assistant, counselor, friend, coach or someone, who I know is sensitive to this issue, and ask for
her/his assistance or advice.
__ Talk to the friend who says they were a victim about resources that might help like the local crisis or counseling
center.
__ Talk to my other friends. Tell them we shouldn’t pass judgment until we know the facts.
__ Talk to my male friend who was accused and offer him my support.
__ Talk to my male friend who was accused and give him resources and information.
__ Suggest to someone like a residence hall director or my coach that we have an educational program about rape
awareness.
__ It’s not safe for me to do anything.
__ Other: ___________________________________________________________________
3. A man pushes and then slaps a woman at the Student Center. People are upset but don’t do anything.
You do not know either person well.
How much do you think that this woman needs your help?
1
2
3
4
not at all
5
6
7
very much
Rank order each of the following statements according to how likely you would be to do that behavior. Include all
behaviors whether you would do them immediately or later on in relation to this specific event. Use 1 to indicate the
first choice of what you would do, 2 to indicate your second choice, etc. Be sure to put a number next to each
behavior. Use a “0” to indicate something that you would not do.
__ Do nothing, it’s none of my business.
__ Talk to the woman when I get a chance and offer support and express willingness to help.
__ Call a resident assistant, counselor, friend, coach or someone, who I know is sensitive to this issue, and ask for
her/his assistance or advice.
__ Talk to the woman about resources that might help like the local crisis or counseling center or domestic violence
shelter.
__ Try to find some of the woman’s friends to help her or talk to her.
__ Call 911.
__ Talk to the man’s friends to get them to stop him.
__ Get a group of my friends to contain the man while I get the woman away from him.
__ Report the incident to someone like a residence hall director or other university staff.
__ Confront the man by myself to get him to stop.
__ It’s not safe for me to do anything.
__ Other: ___________________________________________________________________
7
- Study 04367 4. Earlier in the evening, you saw a woman at a party who appears to be drunk and hanging all over some
of your friends. A friend tells you that she’s been taken upstairs to a bedroom, where a bunch of people
are having sex with her. Your friend urges you to join them.
How much do you think that this woman needs your help?
1
2
3
4
not at all
5
6
7
very much
Rank order each of the following statements according to how likely you would be to do that behavior. Include all
behaviors whether you would do them immediately or later on in relation to this specific event. Use 1 to indicate the
first choice of what you would do, 2 to indicate your second choice, etc. Be sure to put a number next to each
behavior. Use a “0” to indicate something that you would not do.
__ Do nothing, it’s none of my business.
__ Call a resident assistant, counselor, friend, coach or someone like that , who I know is sensitive to this issue,
and ask for her/his assistance or advice.
__ Explain to my friend that this could be gang rape and they could be getting themselves in serious trouble.
__ Get some people together and rush up to the bedroom to see if the woman is ok and get her out of there.
__ Find some of the woman’s friends and get them to help.
__ Call the campus police.
__ Keep silent, I don’t want to get my friends in trouble.
__ Rush upstairs to do something by myself.
__ It’s not safe for me to do anything now.
__ Other: ___________________________________________________________________
5. It’s Friday night and you’re walking across campus, with a group of friends. As you pass by the Student
Center, you see a beautiful woman. One of your friends makes a comment about the woman’s body and
starts to hassle the woman.
How much do you think that this woman needs your help?
1
2
3
4
not at all
5
6
7
very much
Rank order each of the following statements according to how likely you would be to do that behavior. Include all
behaviors whether you would do them immediately or later on in relation to this specific event. Use 1 to indicate the
first choice of what you would do, 2 to indicate your second choice, etc. Be sure to put a number next to each
behavior. Use a “0” to indicate something that you would not do.
__ Do nothing, it’s none of my business.
__ Later, call a resident assistant, counselor, friend, coach or someone like that, who I know is sensitive to this
issue, and ask for her/his assistance or advice.
__ Try to divert my friend’s attention and make them forget about the woman.
__ Suggest to someone like a resident advisor or coach that we have a program about sexual harassment.
__ Tell my friend to be quiet and mind their own business and then go over to the woman and apologize.
__ Warn everyone in the group that we could get in trouble for harassing the woman.
__ Don’t say anything now but plan to speak with my friend later about their attitudes and behavior toward women.
__ It’s not safe for me to do anything now.
__ Other: ___________________________________________________________________
8
- Study 04367 6. As you enter a residence hall, you see a couple are stumbling down the hallway. A few minutes later you
hear a struggle and someone screaming.
How much do you think that this person needs your help?
1
2
3
4
not at all
5
6
7
very much
Rank order each of the following statements according to how likely you would be to do that behavior. Include all
behaviors whether you would do them immediately or later on in relation to this specific event. Use 1 to indicate the
first choice of what you would do, 2 to indicate your second choice, etc. Be sure to put a number next to each
behavior. Use a “0” to indicate something that you would not do.
__ Do nothing, it’s none of my business.
__ At some point later talk to the person who had been screaming about their feelings.
__ At some point later offer support to the person who had been screaming.
__ Call a resident assistant, counselor, friend, coach or someone, who I know is sensitive to this issue, and ask for
her/his assistance or advice.
__ At some point find the person and talk to them about resources that might help like the local crisis or counseling
center.
__ Contact a residence hall advisor immediately and tell them about the situation and urge them to do something.
__ Knock on the door by myself and ask if everything is okay.
__ Recruit another person, then go to the door where the screaming is coming from and shout “what’s going on in
there!”
__ Call 911.
__ It’s not safe for me to do anything now.
__ Other: ___________________________________________________________________
7. Looking back across the 5 vignettes described above, what things would keep you from helping these
people: the accuser, the slapped woman, the woman at the party, the hassled woman and the person
screaming in the residence hall? You may continue your answer on the last page of the questionnaire.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
9
- Study 04367 Please read the following list of behaviors and check how likely you are to engage in these
behaviors using the following scale:
1
2
3
4
5
not at all likely
extremely likely
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Call 911 and tell the hospital my suspicions if I suspect that my friend has been drugged.
Call 911 if I hear someone yelling and fighting.
Try to get help if I suspect a stranger at a party has been drugged.
Call 911 if I hear someone calling for help.
Go investigate if I am awakened at night by someone calling for help.
Call 911 if my friend needs help.
Talk to the friends of a drunk person to make sure they don’t leave their drunk friend behind
at the party
.
8. If I see someone at a party who has had too much to drink, I ask them if
they need to be walked home so they can go to sleep.
9. If my roommate or friend said that they had an unwanted sexual experience but
they don’t call it “rape” I question them further.
10. Walk a stranger home from a party who has had too much to drink.
11. Walk a friend home from a party who has had too much to drink.
12. If a woman is being shoved or yelled at by a man, I ask her if she needs help.
13. If I hear what sounds like yelling and fighting through my dorm walls I knock
on the door to see if everything is ok.
14. If I hear what sounds like yelling or fighting through my dorm or apartment walls,
I talk with a resident counselor or someone else who can help
15. If I saw a friend grabbing, pushing, or insulting their partner I would confront them.
16. If I saw a friend grabbing, pushing, or insulting their partner I would get help
from other friends or university staff.
17. If I saw a friend taking a very intoxicated person up the stairs to my friend’s room,
I would say something and ask what my friend was doing.
18. If I saw several strangers dragging a passed out woman up to their room,
I would get help and try to intervene.
19. If I hear an acquaintance talking about forcing someone to have sex with them,
I speak up against it and express concern for the person who was forced.
20. Say something to a person whose drink I saw spiked with a drug even if
I didn’t know them.
21. Grab someone else’s cup and pour their drink out if I saw that someone slipped
something into it.
22. Ask a friend who seems upset if they are okay or need help.
23. Ask an acquaintance who seems upset if they are okay or need help.
24. Ask a stranger who seems upset if they are okay or need help.
25. Call a rape crisis center or talk to a resident counselor for help if a
friend told me they were sexually assaulted.
26. Call a rape crisis center or talk to a resident counselor for help if an
acquaintance told me they were sexually assaulted.
27. Call a rape crisis center or talk to a resident counselor for help if a
stranger told me they were sexually assaulted.
28. Approach a friend if I thought they were in an abusive relationship and let
them know that I’m here to help.
29. Let a friend I suspect has been sexually assaulted know that I am
available for help and support.
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1 2
3
1 2
3 4
5
5
5
5
5
5
4 5
5
1 .2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1
2
3
4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4
5
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
5
5
5
5
5
1
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4 5
- Study 04367 30. Share information about sexual assault and violence with my friend.
31. Confront friends who make excuses for abusive behavior by others.
32. Speak up against racist jokes.
33. Speak up against sexist jokes
34. Speak up against homophobic jokes.
35. Speak up against commercials that depict violence against women.
36. Speak up in class if a professor explains that women like to be raped.
37. Speak up if I hear someone say “she deserved to be raped.”
38. Watch my drinks and my friends’ drinks at parties.
39. Make sure I leave the party with the same people I came with.
40. Ask for verbal consent when I am intimate with my partner, even if
we are in a long-term relationship.
41. I won’t stop sexual activity when asked to if I am already sexually aroused.
42. When I hear a sexist comment I indicate my displeasure.
43. I obtain verbal consent before engaging in sexual behavior.
44. If I hear that a teammate, dorm mate, fraternity brother, sorority sister has been
accused of sexual violence, I keep any information I may have to myself.
45. Educate myself about sexual violence and what I can do about it.
46. Call 911 if a stranger needs help.
47. I see a man and his girlfriend whom I know in a heated argument. The man’s fist
is clenched and his partner looks upset. I ask if everything is ok.
48. I see a man talking to a woman at a bar. He is sitting very close to her and by the
look on her face I can see she is uncomfortable. I ask her if she is ok.
49. I see a man and his girlfriend. I don’t know them but the man’s fist is clenched and
his partner looks upset. I ask if everything is ok.
50. I encourage people who say they have had unwanted sexual experiences to keep
quiet so they don’t get others in trouble.
51. If I know information about an incident of sexual violence, I tell authorities what
I know in case it is helpful.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1
1
1
2 3 4 5
2 3 4 5
2 3 4 5
1
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4 5
Please read each of the following behaviors. Indicate in the column Confidence how confident you
are that you could do them. Rate your degree of confidence by recording a number from 0 to 100
using the scale given below:
0
can’t
do
10
20
quite
uncertain
30
40
50
60
moderately
certain
1. Express my discomfort if someone makes a joke about a woman’s body.
2. Express my discomfort if someone says that rape victims are to blame
for being raped.
3. Call for help (i.e. call 911) if I hear someone in my dorm yelling “help.”
4. Talk to a friend who I suspect is in an abusive relationship.
5. Get help and resources for a friend who tells me they have been raped.
6. Ask a stranger who looks very upset at a party if they are
ok or need help.
7. Ask a friend if they need to be walked home from a party.
8. Ask a stranger if they need to be walked home from a party.
11
70
80
90
100
very
certain
Confidence
_____%
_____%
_____%
_____%
_____%
_____%
_____%
_____%
- Study 04367 9. Speak up in class if a professor is providing misinformation about
sexual assault.
10. Criticize a friend who tells me that they had sex with someone who
was passed out or who didn’t give consent.
11. Do something to help a very drunk person who is being
brought upstairs to a bedroom by a group of people at a party.
12. Do something if I see a woman surrounded by a group
of men at a party who looks very uncomfortable.
13. Get help if I hear of an abusive relationship in my dorm or apartment
14. Tell an RA or other campus authority about information I have that
might help in a sexual assault case even if pressured by my peers to
stay silent.
_____%
_____%
_____%
_____%
_____%
_____%
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements using this scale:
1
strongly
disagree
2
disagree
3
undecided
4
agree
5
strongly
agree
1. I can help prevent violence against women in my community.
2. It is intimidating to think about trying to stop a guy from hitting his girlfriend.
3. A group of guys would listen to me if I confronted them about their sexist behavior.
4. I have the skills to help support someone who is in an abusive relationship.
5. The fear of being laughed at would prevent me from telling a group of guys it
was disrespectful to whistle at women.
6. I don’t think I could stop a group of guys who are harassing a woman at a party.
7. I would be comfortable telling my friend to stop calling his girlfriend names.
8. I believe my peers will listen to me if I speak out against sexual violence.
9. I have the confidence to say something to a guy who is acting inappropriately
toward a woman.
10. It would be too hard for me to confront a stranger who was being abusive toward a woman.
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
Each statement represents a thought that might occur to a person who is deciding whether or not to
help someone who is in trouble. Please indicate how important each of these statements would be to
you if you were considering intervening in a situation where you thought someone might be being
hurt or was at risk of being hurt. Please circle the number that best describes how important each
statement would be to you if you were deciding whether or not to intervene.
1
not important
at all
2
slightly
important
3
moderately
important
1. If I intervene regularly, I can prevent someone from being hurt.
2. It is important for all community members to play a role in
keeping everyone safe.
3. Friends will look up to me and admire me if I intervene.
4. I will feel like a leader in my community if I intervene.
5. I like thinking of myself as someone who helps others when I can.
6. Intervening would make my friends angry with me.
12
4
very
important
5
extremely
important
1
2
3
4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
- Study 04367 7. Intervening might cost me friendships.
8. I could get physically hurt by intervening.
9. I could make the wrong decision and intervene when nothing was wrong
and feel embarrassed.
10. People might think I’m too sensitive and am overreacting to the situation.
11. I could get in trouble by making the wrong decision about how to intervene
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
Please answer the following questions about the prevention program you have just attended as part
of this study.
1. How important was the topic of this program to you personally?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
not important
very important
at all
2. How motivated were you to listen to the presentation?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
not motivated
very motivated
at all
3. What the presenters said about this topic held my attention.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
strongly agree
strongly disagree
4. How difficult to understand was the information presented?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
too simple
just
too
right
difficult
5. During the presentation, I was distracted from thinking about the topic.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
strongly agree
strongly disagree
6. There was enough time in the presentation to think about the topic.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
strongly agree
strongly disagree
7. The presenter made good points about the topic.
0
1
2
3
4
5
strongly agree
6
strongly disagree
8. To what extent did you try hard to evaluate the information provided?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
did not try
tried to a great extent
at all
13
- Study 04367 9. To what extent did you find the presentation well organized and easy to follow?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
not at all
very organized and easy
organized and easy to follow
to follow
10. To what extent did you find it difficult to concentrate on the presentation?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
not at all
very difficult
difficult
11. In your estimation, how logical and accurate was the information presented?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
not at all logical
very logical and accurate
and accurate
12. How would you rate the quality of the presenters’ information?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
very poor
excellent
Please answer the following questions about this program. We value your input here so please give
us as much feed back as you can. Thanks
2. What specific information did you receive about these issues that was new or surprising?
3. As a result of this program, I will…
4. Would you recommend this program to others on campus including your friends? Why or why not?
14
- Study 04367 5. Please list the 3 things that you liked best about the program:
2)
3)
4)
6. Please list the 3 things that you would change about the program:
2)
3)
4)
THANK YOU
15
- Study 04367 -
- Study 04367 Thank you for your participation. Please read each question carefully and choose your answer
from among the choices given. Please note that different questions will have different answer
choices so please read each carefully. Please remember that there are NO RIGHT OR WRONG
ANSWERS to any of the questions. We are interested in your honest response. Your answers will
be completely anonymous.
Participant code #: ______________
Sex: ________ Race/Ethnicity: __________________________ (G1)
Have any academic courses you are taking discussed sexual assault or rape since the last time you completed
this questionnaire?
1. Yes
0. No
Which one or ones? ____________________________________
Have you attended any programs on sexual assault or rape since the last time you completed this
questionnaire?
1. Yes
Which one or ones? ____________________________________
0. No
Please read each of the following statements and circle the answer that is closest to what is true for
you.
2. Do you feel a sense of community with other people on campus (for example, do you share interests and
concerns with them)?
1
2
3
4
5
not at all
slightly
moderately
mostly
a great deal
3. How important is it to you to feel a sense of community with people on this campus?
1
2
3
4
5
not at all
slightly
moderately
fairly
very important
important
4. Some people care a lot about the kind of campus they live on. For others, the campus is not important. How
important is what the campus is like to you?
1
Not at all
Important
2
slightly
3
moderately
4
fairly
5
very important
If you answered #3 above that it is not important, please explain why not? If it is important to you,
please explain why?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
1
- Study 04367 Please answer the following questions about what you think about “violence prevention.” Violence
is when people fight or hurt others on purpose. Violence prevention means keeping violence from
happening or stopping violence before it starts.
Circle only one answer that best describes your response:
1
Disagree
Completely
2
Disagree
A Lot
3
Disagree
A Little
4
Agree
A Little
1. People’s violent behavior can be prevented.
2. There are certain things a person can do
to help prevent violence.
3. I myself can make a difference in helping
to prevent violence.
4. People can be taught to help prevent violence.
2. Doing or saying certain kinds of things can
work to help prevent violence.
6. I can learn to do or say the kinds of things
that help prevent violence.
7. People can learn to become someone who
helps others to avoid violence.
8. Even people who are not involved in a fight
can do things that help prevent violence.
9. Even when I’m not involved and it’s not about me, I can make
a difference in helping to prevent violence.
5
Agree
A Lot
6
Agree
Completely
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Please read each of the following statements and indicate how true each is of you.
1
Strongly disagree
Not at all true
2
3
4
5
Strongly agree
Very much true
2. I don’t think sexual assault is a big problem on campus.
3. I don’t think there is much I can do about sexual assault on campus.
4. There isn’t much need for me to think about sexual assault on campus,
that’s the job of the crisis center.
5. Sometimes I think I should learn more about sexual assault but I haven’t
done so yet.
6. I think I can do something about sexual assault and am planning to find
out what I can do about the problem.
7. I am planning to learn more about the problem of sexual assault on campus.
8. I have recently attended a program about sexual assault.
9. I am actively involved in projects to deal with sexual assault on campus.
10. I have recently taken part in activities or volunteered my time on projects
focused on ending sexual assault on campus.
2
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4
5
1 2 3 4 5
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
1 2 3 4
5
- Study 04367 Please read and answer each of the following questions. If you do not know the answer to a question
please indicate that you do not know. We ask that you do not guess answers if you truly feel you do
not know the answer.
2.
I know I have consent to engage in sexual behavior with my partner if
___ I don't know.
3.
Approximately how many rapes are reported to SHARPP at UNH every year?
b)
c)
d)
e)
Between 15 and 20
Between 30 and 35
Between 50 and 55
I don't know.
4.
Over their lifetime, approximately one in ________ women will experience sexual assault.
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
Four
Seven
Ten
Fourteen
Seventeen
I don't know.
4.
Over their lifetime, approximately one in ________ men will experience sexual assault.
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
Four
Seven
Ten
Fourteen
Seventeen
I don't know.
3
- Study 04367 5.
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
l)
m)
n)
o)
p)
Sexual violence includes: circle as many as you think are correct:
ogling a woman’s breasts
whistling/catcalling at a woman/man passer-by
ogling a man or woman’s crotch area
pinching someone’s behind
slapping someone’s behind
forcing someone to watch pornography
telling someone to fuck off
“flipping” someone the finger
violating boundaries or "safe words"
forcing someone to engage in any unwanted sexual activity
punching someone in the stomach
masturbation in public
calling someone a slut or cunt or pussy
unwanted sexual activity
I don’t know.
6. The most commonly used drug in sexual assault is _______________________.
____ I don't know.
7. According to the UNH Student Code of Conduct, “sexual misconduct includes any sexual activity as
defined by” … circle ALL that are correct:
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
l)
m)
n)
intentional and prolonged staring at a woman’s breasts without seeking permission.
intentional and prolonged staring at a woman’s breasts without receiving permission.
intentional and prolonged staring at another’s crotch without seeking permission.
intentional and prolonged staring at another’s crotch without receiving permission.
intentional touching of another’s sexual or intimate parts without seeking expressed permission.
intentional touching of another’s clothing covering the immediate area of another’s sexual or intimate parts
without seeking expressed permission.
intentional touching of another’s sexual or intimate parts without receiving expressed permission.
intentional touching of another’s clothing covering the immediate area of another’s sexual or intimate parts
without receiving expressed permission.
intentional forcing of another to watch pornography.
sexual activity when a person's ability to give expressed permission is compromised due to mental disability.
sexual activity when a person's ability to give expressed permission is compromised due to physical disability..
sexual activity when a person's ability to give expressed permission is compromised due to due to substance
ingestion.
I don't know.
2. Based on FBI statistics, the percentage of people falsely reporting sexual assault is _______.
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
One half percent, lower than other felony crimes
Two percent, comparable to all felony crimes
Thirty percent, higher than other felony crimes
Sixty percent, most allegations are ultimately found to be false
I don't know.
4
- Study 04367 3. List as many helpful bystander behaviors as you know that could be used in the case of sexual violence:
____ I don't know of any.
4. Research shows that there are several factors that make it more likely that a person will intervene as a
helpful bystander. List as many of these factors that you are aware of.
____ I don't know of any.
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements using the scale:
1
not at all agree
2
3
4
5
2. If a woman is raped while she is drunk, she is at least somewhat responsible for
letting things get out of control.
3. Although most women wouldn’t admit it, they generally find being physically
forced into sex a real “turn-on.”
4. If a woman is willing to “make out” with a guy, then it’s no big deal if he goes
a little further and has sex.
5. Many women secretly desire to be raped.
6. Most rapists are not caught by the police.
7. If a woman doesn’t physically fight back, you can’t really say that is
was rape.
8. Men from nice middle-class homes almost never rape.
9. Rape accusations are often used as a way of getting back at men.
10. All women should have access to self-defense classes.
11. It is usually only women who dress suggestively that are raped.
12. If the rapist doesn’t have a weapon, you really can’t call it a rape.
13. Rape is unlikely to happen in the woman’s own familiar neighborhood.
14. Women tend to exaggerate how much rape affects them.
15. A lot of women lead a man on and then cry rape.
16. It is preferable that a female police officer conduct the questioning when
a woman reports a rape.
17. A woman who “teases” men deserves anything that might happen.
18. When women are raped, it’s often because the way they said “no”
was ambiguous.
5
6
7
very much
agree
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
- Study 04367 19. Men don’t usually intend to force sex on a woman, but sometimes
they get too sexually carried away.
20. A woman who dresses in skimpy clothes should not be surprised if a
man tries to force her to have sex.
21. Rape happens when a man’s sex drive gets out of control.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Please answer the following questions using the following scale to indicate your agreement or disagreement
with each statement:
1
2
3
4
5
strongly agree
agree
neutral
disagree
strongly disagree
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
2.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Males and females should share the expenses of a date.
1 2 3 4 5
I believe that talking about sex destroys the romance of that particular moment.
1 2 3 4 5
Most women enjoy being submissive in sexual relations.
1 2 3 4 5
If a woman dresses in a sexy dress she is asking for sex.
1 2 3 4 5
If a woman asks a man out on a date then she is definitely interested in having sex.
1 2 3 4 5
In the majority of date rapes the victim is promiscuous or has a bad reputation.
1 2 3 4 5
A man is entitled to intercourse if his partner had agreed to but at the last
moment changed her mind.
1 2 3 4 5
Many women pretend they don’t want to have sex because they don’t want to appear “easy.” 1 2 3 4 5
A man can control his behavior no matter how sexually aroused he feels.
1 2 3 4 5
I believe that alcohol and other drugs affect my sexual decision making.
1 2 3 4 5
The degree of a woman’s resistance should be a major factor in determining
if a rape has occurred.
1 2 3 4 5
When a woman says “no” to sex what she really means is “maybe.”
1 2 3 4 5
If a woman lets a man buy her dinner or pay for a movie or drinks, she owes him sex.
1 2 3 4 5
Women provoke rape by their behavior.
1 2 3 4 5
Women often lie about being raped to get back at their dates.
1 2 3 4 5
It is okay to pressure a date to drink alcohol in order to improve one’s chances of getting
one’s date to have sex.
1 2 3 4 5
When a woman asks her date back to her place, I expect that something sexual will take place. 1 2 3 4 5
Date rapists are usually motivated by overwhelming, unfulfilled sexual desire.
1 2 3 4 5
In most cases when a woman was raped she was asking for it.
1 2 3 4 5
When a woman fondles a man’s genitals it means she has consented to sexual intercourse.
1 2 3 4 5
Please read each of the following short vignettes and imagine yourself in the situation depicted.
Then answer the questions that follow about how you would respond if you were in that situation.
2. A friend of yours has accused one of your close male friends of raping them. Some of your other friends
are “badmouthing” the accuser, saying it wasn’t rape and the accuser is promiscuous anyway.
How much do you think that the ACCUSER needs your help?
1
2
3
4
not at all
5
6
7
very much
How much do you think that the ACCUSED needs your help?
1
2
3
4
not at all
5
6
7
very much
6
- Study 04367 Rank order each of the following statements according to how likely you would be to do that behavior. Include all
behaviors whether you would do them immediately or later on in relation to this specific event. Use 1 to indicate the
first choice of what you would do, 2 to indicate your second choice, etc. Be sure to put a number next to each
behavior. Use a “0” to indicate something that you would not do.
__ Do nothing, it’s none of my business.
__ Talk to the friend who said they were a victim about how they are feeling
__ Offer support to the friend who said they were a victim.
__ Call a resident assistant, counselor, friend, coach or someone, who I know is sensitive to this issue, and ask for
her/his assistance or advice.
__ Talk to the friend who says they were a victim about resources that might help like the local crisis or counseling
center.
__ Talk to my other friends. Tell them we shouldn’t pass judgment until we know the facts.
__ Talk to my male friend who was accused and offer him my support.
__ Talk to my male friend who was accused and give him resources and information.
__ Suggest to someone like a residence hall director or my coach that we have an educational program about rape
awareness.
__ It’s not safe for me to do anything.
__ Other: ___________________________________________________________________
3. A man pushes and then slaps a woman at the Student Center. People are upset but don’t do anything.
You do not know either person well.
How much do you think that this woman needs your help?
1
2
3
4
not at all
5
6
7
very much
Rank order each of the following statements according to how likely you would be to do that behavior. Include all
behaviors whether you would do them immediately or later on in relation to this specific event. Use 1 to indicate the
first choice of what you would do, 2 to indicate your second choice, etc. Be sure to put a number next to each
behavior. Use a “0” to indicate something that you would not do.
__ Do nothing, it’s none of my business.
__ Talk to the woman when I get a chance and offer support and express willingness to help.
__ Call a resident assistant, counselor, friend, coach or someone, who I know is sensitive to this issue, and ask for
her/his assistance or advice.
__ Talk to the woman about resources that might help like the local crisis or counseling center or domestic violence
shelter.
__ Try to find some of the woman’s friends to help her or talk to her.
__ Call 911.
__ Talk to the man’s friends to get them to stop him.
__ Get a group of my friends to contain the man while I get the woman away from him.
__ Report the incident to someone like a residence hall director or other university staff.
__ Confront the man by myself to get him to stop.
__ It’s not safe for me to do anything.
__ Other: ___________________________________________________________________
7
- Study 04367 4. Earlier in the evening, you saw a woman at a party who appears to be drunk and hanging all over some
of your friends. A friend tells you that she’s been taken upstairs to a bedroom, where a bunch of people
are having sex with her. Your friend urges you to join them.
How much do you think that this woman needs your help?
1
2
3
4
not at all
5
6
7
very much
Rank order each of the following statements according to how likely you would be to do that behavior. Include all
behaviors whether you would do them immediately or later on in relation to this specific event. Use 1 to indicate the
first choice of what you would do, 2 to indicate your second choice, etc. Be sure to put a number next to each
behavior. Use a “0” to indicate something that you would not do.
__ Do nothing, it’s none of my business.
__ Call a resident assistant, counselor, friend, coach or someone like that , who I know is sensitive to this issue,
and ask for her/his assistance or advice.
__ Explain to my friend that this could be gang rape and they could be getting themselves in serious trouble.
__ Get some people together and rush up to the bedroom to see if the woman is ok and get her out of there.
__ Find some of the woman’s friends and get them to help.
__ Call the campus police.
__ Keep silent, I don’t want to get my friends in trouble.
__ Rush upstairs to do something by myself.
__ It’s not safe for me to do anything now.
__ Other: ___________________________________________________________________
5. It’s Friday night and you’re walking across campus, with a group of friends. As you pass by the Student
Center, you see a beautiful woman. One of your friends makes a comment about the woman’s body and
starts to hassle the woman.
How much do you think that this woman needs your help?
1
2
3
4
not at all
5
6
7
very much
Rank order each of the following statements according to how likely you would be to do that behavior. Include all
behaviors whether you would do them immediately or later on in relation to this specific event. Use 1 to indicate the
first choice of what you would do, 2 to indicate your second choice, etc. Be sure to put a number next to each
behavior. Use a “0” to indicate something that you would not do.
__ Do nothing, it’s none of my business.
__ Later, call a resident assistant, counselor, friend, coach or someone like that, who I know is sensitive to this
issue, and ask for her/his assistance or advice.
__ Try to divert my friend’s attention and make them forget about the woman.
__ Suggest to someone like a resident advisor or coach that we have a program about sexual harassment.
__ Tell my friend to be quiet and mind their own business and then go over to the woman and apologize.
__ Warn everyone in the group that we could get in trouble for harassing the woman.
__ Don’t say anything now but plan to speak with my friend later about their attitudes and behavior toward women.
__ It’s not safe for me to do anything now.
__ Other: ___________________________________________________________________
8
- Study 04367 6. As you enter a residence hall, you see a couple are stumbling down the hallway. A few minutes later you
hear a struggle and someone screaming.
How much do you think that this person needs your help?
1
2
3
4
not at all
5
6
7
very much
Rank order each of the following statements according to how likely you would be to do that behavior. Include all
behaviors whether you would do them immediately or later on in relation to this specific event. Use 1 to indicate the
first choice of what you would do, 2 to indicate your second choice, etc. Be sure to put a number next to each
behavior. Use a “0” to indicate something that you would not do.
__ Do nothing, it’s none of my business.
__ At some point later talk to the person who had been screaming about their feelings.
__ At some point later offer support to the person who had been screaming.
__ Call a resident assistant, counselor, friend, coach or someone, who I know is sensitive to this issue, and ask for
her/his assistance or advice.
__ At some point find the person and talk to them about resources that might help like the local crisis or counseling
center.
__ Contact a residence hall advisor immediately and tell them about the situation and urge them to do something.
__ Knock on the door by myself and ask if everything is okay.
__ Recruit another person, then go to the door where the screaming is coming from and shout “what’s going on in
there!”
__ Call 911.
__ It’s not safe for me to do anything now.
__ Other: ___________________________________________________________________
7. Looking back across the 5 vignettes described above, what things would keep you from helping these
people: the accuser, the slapped woman, the woman at the party, the hassled woman and the person
screaming in the residence hall? You may continue your answer on the last page of the questionnaire.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
9
- Study 04367 Please read the following list of behaviors and check how likely you are to engage in these
behaviors using the following scale:
1
2
3
4
5
not at all likely
extremely likely
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Call 911 and tell the hospital my suspicions if I suspect that my friend has been drugged.
Call 911 if I hear someone yelling and fighting.
Try to get help if I suspect a stranger at a party has been drugged.
Call 911 if I hear someone calling for help.
Go investigate if I am awakened at night by someone calling for help.
Call 911 if my friend needs help.
Talk to the friends of a drunk person to make sure they don’t leave their drunk friend behind
at the party
.
8. If I see someone at a party who has had too much to drink, I ask them if
they need to be walked home so they can go to sleep.
9. If my roommate or friend said that they had an unwanted sexual experience but
they don’t call it “rape” I question them further.
10. Walk a stranger home from a party who has had too much to drink.
11. Walk a friend home from a party who has had too much to drink.
12. If a woman is being shoved or yelled at by a man, I ask her if she needs help.
13. If I hear what sounds like yelling and fighting through my dorm walls I knock
on the door to see if everything is ok.
14. If I hear what sounds like yelling or fighting through my dorm or apartment walls,
I talk with a resident counselor or someone else who can help
15. If I saw a friend grabbing, pushing, or insulting their partner I would confront them.
16. If I saw a friend grabbing, pushing, or insulting their partner I would get help
from other friends or university staff.
17. If I saw a friend taking a very intoxicated person up the stairs to my friend’s room,
I would say something and ask what my friend was doing.
18. If I saw several strangers dragging a passed out woman up to their room,
I would get help and try to intervene.
19. If I hear an acquaintance talking about forcing someone to have sex with them,
I speak up against it and express concern for the person who was forced.
20. Say something to a person whose drink I saw spiked with a drug even if
I didn’t know them.
21. Grab someone else’s cup and pour their drink out if I saw that someone slipped
something into it.
22. Ask a friend who seems upset if they are okay or need help.
23. Ask an acquaintance who seems upset if they are okay or need help.
24. Ask a stranger who seems upset if they are okay or need help.
25. Call a rape crisis center or talk to a resident counselor for help if a
friend told me they were sexually assaulted.
26. Call a rape crisis center or talk to a resident counselor for help if an
acquaintance told me they were sexually assaulted.
27. Call a rape crisis center or talk to a resident counselor for help if a
stranger told me they were sexually assaulted.
28. Approach a friend if I thought they were in an abusive relationship and let
them know that I’m here to help.
29. Let a friend I suspect has been sexually assaulted know that I am
available for help and support.
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1 2
3
1 2
3 4
5
5
5
5
5
5
4 5
5
1 .2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1
2
3
4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4
5
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
5
5
5
5
5
1
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4 5
- Study 04367 30. Share information about sexual assault and violence with my friend.
31. Confront friends who make excuses for abusive behavior by others.
32. Speak up against racist jokes.
33. Speak up against sexist jokes
34. Speak up against homophobic jokes.
35. Speak up against commercials that depict violence against women.
36. Speak up in class if a professor explains that women like to be raped.
37. Speak up if I hear someone say “she deserved to be raped.”
38. Watch my drinks and my friends’ drinks at parties.
39. Make sure I leave the party with the same people I came with.
40. Ask for verbal consent when I am intimate with my partner, even if
we are in a long-term relationship.
41. I won’t stop sexual activity when asked to if I am already sexually aroused.
42. When I hear a sexist comment I indicate my displeasure.
43. I obtain verbal consent before engaging in sexual behavior.
44. If I hear that a teammate, dorm mate, fraternity brother, sorority sister has been
accused of sexual violence, I keep any information I may have to myself.
45. Educate myself about sexual violence and what I can do about it.
46. Call 911 if a stranger needs help.
47. I see a man and his girlfriend whom I know in a heated argument. The man’s fist
is clenched and his partner looks upset. I ask if everything is ok.
48. I see a man talking to a woman at a bar. He is sitting very close to her and by the
look on her face I can see she is uncomfortable. I ask her if she is ok.
49. I see a man and his girlfriend. I don’t know them but the man’s fist is clenched and
his partner looks upset. I ask if everything is ok.
50. I encourage people who say they have had unwanted sexual experiences to keep
quiet so they don’t get others in trouble.
51. If I know information about an incident of sexual violence, I tell authorities what
I know in case it is helpful.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1
1
1
2 3 4 5
2 3 4 5
2 3 4 5
1
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4 5
Please read each of the following behaviors. Indicate in the column Confidence how confident you
are that you could do them. Rate your degree of confidence by recording a number from 0 to 100
using the scale given below:
0
can’t
do
10
20
quite
uncertain
30
40
50
60
moderately
certain
1. Express my discomfort if someone makes a joke about a woman’s body.
2. Express my discomfort if someone says that rape victims are to blame
for being raped.
3. Call for help (i.e. call 911) if I hear someone in my dorm yelling “help.”
4. Talk to a friend who I suspect is in an abusive relationship.
5. Get help and resources for a friend who tells me they have been raped.
6. Ask a stranger who looks very upset at a party if they are
ok or need help.
7. Ask a friend if they need to be walked home from a party.
8. Ask a stranger if they need to be walked home from a party.
11
70
80
90
100
very
certain
Confidence
_____%
_____%
_____%
_____%
_____%
_____%
_____%
_____%
- Study 04367 9. Speak up in class if a professor is providing misinformation about
sexual assault.
10. Criticize a friend who tells me that they had sex with someone who
was passed out or who didn’t give consent.
11. Do something to help a very drunk person who is being
brought upstairs to a bedroom by a group of people at a party.
12. Do something if I see a woman surrounded by a group
of men at a party who looks very uncomfortable.
13. Get help if I hear of an abusive relationship in my dorm or apartment
14. Tell an RA or other campus authority about information I have that
might help in a sexual assault case even if pressured by my peers to
stay silent.
_____%
_____%
_____%
_____%
_____%
_____%
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements using this scale:
1
strongly
disagree
2
disagree
3
undecided
4
agree
5
strongly
agree
1. I can help prevent violence against women in my community.
2. It is intimidating to think about trying to stop a guy from hitting his girlfriend.
3. A group of guys would listen to me if I confronted them about their sexist behavior.
4. I have the skills to help support someone who is in an abusive relationship.
5. The fear of being laughed at would prevent me from telling a group of guys it
was disrespectful to whistle at women.
6. I don’t think I could stop a group of guys who are harassing a woman at a party.
7. I would be comfortable telling my friend to stop calling his girlfriend names.
8. I believe my peers will listen to me if I speak out against sexual violence.
9. I have the confidence to say something to a guy who is acting inappropriately
toward a woman.
10. It would be too hard for me to confront a stranger who was being abusive toward a woman.
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
Each statement represents a thought that might occur to a person who is deciding whether or not to
help someone who is in trouble. Please indicate how important each of these statements would be to
you if you were considering intervening in a situation where you thought someone might be being
hurt or was at risk of being hurt. Please circle the number that best describes how important each
statement would be to you if you were deciding whether or not to intervene.
1
not important
at all
2
slightly
important
3
moderately
important
1. If I intervene regularly, I can prevent someone from being hurt.
2. It is important for all community members to play a role in
keeping everyone safe.
3. Friends will look up to me and admire me if I intervene.
4. I will feel like a leader in my community if I intervene.
5. I like thinking of myself as someone who helps others when I can.
6. Intervening would make my friends angry with me.
12
4
very
important
5
extremely
important
1
2
3
4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
- Study 04367 7. Intervening might cost me friendships.
8. I could get physically hurt by intervening.
9. I could make the wrong decision and intervene when nothing was wrong
and feel embarrassed.
10. People might think I’m too sensitive and am overreacting to the situation.
11. I could get in trouble by making the wrong decision about how to intervene
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
Please answer the following questions about the most recent rape prevention program you have
attended. If you have never attended a rape prevention program, please do not answer them but put
an “X” on the line to indicate that you have seen and read these directions. ________________.
1. How important was the topic of this program to you personally?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
not important
very important
at all
2. How motivated were you to listen to the presentation?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
not motivated
very motivated
at all
3. What the presenters said about this topic held my attention.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
strongly agree
strongly disagree
4. How difficult to understand was the information presented?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
too simple
just
too
right
difficult
5. During the presentation, I was distracted from thinking about the topic.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
strongly agree
strongly disagree
6. There was enough time in the presentation to think about the topic.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
strongly agree
strongly disagree
7. The presenter made good points about the topic.
0
1
2
3
4
5
strongly agree
6
strongly disagree
8. To what extent did you try hard to evaluate the information provided?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
did not try
tried to a great extent
at all
13
- Study 04367 9. To what extent did you find the presentation well organized and easy to follow?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
not at all
very organized and easy
organized and easy to follow
to follow
10. To what extent did you find it difficult to concentrate on the presentation?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
not at all
very difficult
difficult
11. In your estimation, how logical and accurate was the information presented?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
not at all logical
very logical and accurate
and accurate
12. How would you rate the quality of the presenters’ information?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
very poor
excellent
THANK YOU
14