3. Design of Structures, Components, Equipment and Systems

3. Design of Structures, Components,
Equipment and Systems
3.5
AP1000 Design Control Document
Missile Protection
General Design Criterion 4 of Appendix A to 10 CFR 50 requires that structures systems and
components important to safety be protected from the effects of missiles. The AP1000 criteria for
protection from postulated missiles provide the capability to safely shut down the reactor and
maintain it in a safe shutdown condition. The AP1000 criteria also protect the integrity of the
reactor coolant system pressure boundary and maintain offsite radiological dose/concentration
levels within the limits defined in 10 CFR 50.34.
Missiles may be generated by pressurized components, rotating machinery, and explosions within
the plant and by tornadoes or transportation accidents external to the plant. Potential missile
hazards are eliminated to the extent practical by minimizing the potential sources of missiles
through proper selection of equipment, and by arrangement of structures and equipment in a
manner to minimize the potential for damage from missiles. Potential missiles due to failures of
nonseismic items are addressed in subsection 3.7.3.13. Heavy load-drop evaluations are described
in subsection 9.1.5.
The following are definitions for missile protection terminology:
Internally Generated Missile – A mass that may be accelerated by energy sources continuously
present on site.
Single Active Failure – Malfunction or loss of a component of electrical or fluid systems. The
failure of an active component of a fluid system is considered to be a loss of component function
as a result of mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, or electrical malfunction, but not the loss of
component structural integrity.
High-Energy System – Fluid systems that, during normal plant conditions, are operated or
maintained pressurized with a maximum operating temperature greater than 200°F and/or a
maximum operating pressure greater than 275 psig, as discussed in subsection 3.6.1.
The following criteria are applied in the identification of missiles and the protection requirements
that must be satisfied:
•
A missile must not damage structures, systems, or components to the extent that could
prevent achieving or maintaining safe shutdown of the plant or result in a significant release
of radioactivity.
•
A single active component failure is assumed in systems used to mitigate the consequences of
the postulated missile and achieve a safe shutdown condition. The single active component
failure is assumed to occur in addition to the postulated missile and any direct consequences
of the missile. When the postulated missile is generated in one of two or more redundant
trains of a dual-purpose safety-related fluid system, which is designed to seismic Category I
standards and is capable of being powered from both onsite and offsite sources, a single
active component failure need not be assumed in the remaining train(s), or associated
supporting trains.
Tier 2 Material
3.5-1
Revision 17
3. Design of Structures, Components,
Equipment and Systems
AP1000 Design Control Document
•
Walls, partitions, and other items that enclose safety-related systems, or separate redundant
trains of safety related equipment, must be constructed so that a postulated missile cannot
damage components required to achieve safe shutdown nor damage components required to
prevent a release of radioactivity producing offsite doses in excess of 10 CFR 50.34 limits.
•
A postulated missile from the reactor coolant system must not cause loss of integrity of the
primary containment, main steam, feedwater, or other loop of the reactor coolant system.
•
A postulated missile from any system other than the reactor coolant system must not cause
loss of integrity of the containment or the reactor coolant system pressure boundary.
•
Other plant accidents or severe natural phenomena are not assumed to occur in conjunction
with a postulated missile (except for tornado).
•
Offsite power is assumed to be unavailable if a trip of the turbine-generator or reactor
protection system is a direct consequence of the postulated missile.
•
Safe shutdown is accomplished using only safety-related systems with a coincident single
active failure, although nonsafety-related systems not affected by the missile are available to
support safe shutdown.
•
Missiles are postulated to occur where the single failure of a retention mechanism can result
in a missile, unless the missile is not considered credible as discussed later. Missiles created
by the independent failures of two retention mechanisms are not postulated.
•
The energy of postulated missiles produced by rotating components is based on a 120 percent
overspeed condition, unless such an overspeed condition is not possible (such as a
synchronous motor).
•
Equipment required for safe shutdown is located in plant areas separate from potential
missile sources wherever practical.
•
Spatial separation may be used to demonstrate protection from missile hazards when it is
shown that the range and trajectory of the generated missile is less than the distance to or is
directed away from the potential target.
The AP1000 passive design minimizes the number of safety-related structures, systems, and
components required for safe shutdown. Systems required for safe shutdown are identified in
Chapter 7. Safety class structures, systems and components, their location, seismic category, and
quality group classifications are given in Section 3.2. General arrangement drawings showing
locations of the structures, systems, and components are given in Section 1.2. The areas required
for safe shutdown, and the major systems and components housed therein that are required to be
protected from internally and externally generated missiles for safe shutdown, are summarized
below:
•
Tier 2 Material
The containment vessel, including the reactor coolant loop, and passive core cooling system
inside containment
3.5-2
Revision 17
3. Design of Structures, Components,
Equipment and Systems
AP1000 Design Control Document
•
The shield building, including the passive containment cooling system
•
Containment penetration areas, including containment isolation valves and Class IE cables
•
The control complex including the main control room, reactor protection system, batteries,
and dc switchgear
•
The spent fuel pit
The AP1000 relies on safety-related systems and equipment to establish and maintain safe
shutdown conditions. There are no nonsafety-related systems or components that require
protection from missiles.
Evaluations are performed to demonstrate that the criteria are satisfied in the event a credible
missile is produced coincident with a single active component failure. These evaluations include
the following:
•
For those potential missiles considered to be credible, a realistic assessment is made of the
postulated missile size and energy, and its potential trajectories.
•
Potentially impacted components associated with systems required to achieve and maintain
safe shutdown are identified.
•
Loss of these potentially impacted components coincident with an assumed single active
component failure is evaluated to determine if sufficient redundancy remains to achieve and
maintain a safe shutdown condition. If these criteria are satisfied, no further protection is
required for the identified missile. If these conditions are not satisfied, additional protective
features are incorporated (for example, plant layout is modified, or barriers are added).
3.5.1
Missile Selection and Description
3.5.1.1
Internally Generated Missiles (Outside Containment)
3.5.1.1.1
Criteria for Missile Prevention
Equipment for the AP1000 is selected to minimize the potential for missiles to be generated.
Missiles are postulated as described in subsection 3.5.1.1.2. The following items are the major
equipment selection considerations with regards to missile prevention:
•
Safety-related rotating equipment is designed so that the surrounding housings would contain
fragments in the event of failure of the rotating parts.
•
Valves that have only a threaded connection between the body and the bonnet are not used in
high-energy systems. ASME Code, Section III valves with removable bonnets should be of
the pressure-seal type or have bolted bonnets.
Tier 2 Material
3.5-3
Revision 17
3. Design of Structures, Components,
Equipment and Systems
3.5.1.1.2
AP1000 Design Control Document
•
Valve stems of valves located in high-energy systems have at least two retention features. In
addition to the stem threads, acceptable features include back seats on the stem or a power
actuator, such as an air or motor operator.
•
Thermowells and other instrument wells, vents, drains, test connections, and other fittings
located in high-energy systems are attached to the piping or pressurized equipment by
welding. The completed joint should have a greater design strength than the parent metal.
Threaded connections in high-energy systems are avoided.
•
High-pressure gas cylinders permanently installed in safety-related areas are constructed to
the criteria of ASME Code, Section III or Section VIII. Portable and temporary cylinders and
cylinders periodically replaced in safety-related areas are constructed and handled in
accordance with applicable Department of Transportation requirements for seamless steel
cylinders.
Missile Selection
3.5.1.1.2.1 Missiles not Considered Credible
This subsection describes internally generated missiles (outside of containment) not considered
credible. Missiles not considered credible include the following:
•
Catastrophic failure of safety-related rotating equipment (such as pumps, fans, and
compressors) leading to the generation of missiles is not considered credible. These
components are designed to preclude having sufficient energy to move the masses of their
rotating parts through the housings in which they are contained. In addition, material
characteristics, inspections, quality control during fabrication and erection, and prudent
operation as applied to the particular component reduce the likelihood of missile generation.
•
Catastrophic failure of nonsafety-related rotating equipment is not considered credible in
situations where measures similar to those just described for safety-related rotating
equipment are applied to them. Protection from nonsafety-related equipment will normally be
provided by separation. In special situations, equipment features may be used to prevent
missile formation.
•
Provisions to preclude generation of missiles due to failure of the turbine generator are
discussed in subsection 3.5.1.3.
•
Missiles originating in non-high-energy fluid systems are not considered credible because
these systems have insufficient stored energy.
•
The valve bonnets of pressure-seal, bonnet-type valves, constructed in accordance with
ASME Code, Section III, are not considered credible missiles. The valve bonnets are
prevented from becoming missiles by the retaining ring, which would have to fail in shear,
and by the yoke capturing the bonnet or reducing bonnet energy. Because of the conservative
design of the retaining ring of these valves, bonnet ejection is unlikely.
Tier 2 Material
3.5-4
Revision 17
3. Design of Structures, Components,
Equipment and Systems
AP1000 Design Control Document
•
The valves of the bolted bonnet design, constructed in accordance with ASME Code,
Section III, are not considered credible missiles. These bolted bonnets are prevented from
becoming missiles by limiting stresses in the bonnet-to-body bolting material according to
ASME Code, Section III requirements, and by designing flanges in accordance with
applicable code requirements. Even if bolt failure would occur, the likelihood of all bolts
experiencing simultaneous complete severance failure is not credible. The widespread use of
valves with bolted bonnets, and the low historical incidence of complete severance failure of
the bonnet, confirm that bolted valve bonnets are not credible missiles. Safety-relief valves in
high energy systems use the bolted bonnet design.
•
Valve stems are not considered as credible missiles if at least one feature (in addition to the
stem threads) is included in their design to prevent ejection. Valve stems with back seats are
prevented from becoming missiles by this feature. In addition, the valve stems of valves with
power actuators, such as air- or motor-operated valves, are effectively restrained by the valve
actuator. Valve stems of rotary motion valves, such as plug valves, ball valves (except singleseat ball valves) and butterfly valves, as well as diaphragm-type valves are not considered as
credible missiles. Because these valves do not have a large reservoir of pressurized fluid
acting on the valve stem, there is little stored energy available to produce a missile.
•
Nuts, bolts, nut and bolt combinations, and nut and stud combinations have only a small
amount of stored energy and thus are not considered as credible missiles.
•
Thermowells and similar fittings attached to piping or pressurized equipment by welding are
not considered as credible missiles where the completed joint has a greater design strength
than the parent metal. Such a design makes missile formation not credible. Threaded
connections are not used to connect instrumentation to high-energy systems or components.
•
Instrumentation such as pressure, level, and flow transmitters and associated piping and
tubing are not considered as credible missiles. The quantity of high energy fluid in these
instruments is limited and will not result in the generation of missiles. The connecting piping
and tubing is made up using welded joints or compression fittings for the tubing. Tubing is
small diameter and has only a small amount of stored energy.
•
ASME Code, Section III vessel ruptures and ruptures of gas storage vessels constructed
without welding using ASME Code, Section VIII criteria are not considered credible due to
the conservative design, material characteristics, inspections, quality control during
fabrication and erection, and prudent operation.
•
Rotating components that operate less than 2 percent of the time are not considered credible
sources of missiles. Components that are excluded by this criterion include motors on valve
operators and pumps in systems that operate infrequently, such as the chemical and volume
control makeup pumps. This exclusion is similar to the exclusion mentioned in
subsection 3.6.1.1, that is, of lines from the high-energy category of lines that have limited
operating time in high energy conditions.
Tier 2 Material
3.5-5
Revision 17
3. Design of Structures, Components,
Equipment and Systems
•
AP1000 Design Control Document
Valves, rotating equipment, vessels, and small fittings not otherwise considered to be credible
missiles due to design features or other considerations are not considered to be a potential
source of missiles when struck by a falling object.
3.5.1.1.2.2 Explosions
Missiles can potentially be generated by a hydrogen explosion. Missiles that could prevent
achieving or maintaining a safe shutdown or result in significant release of radioactivity are
precluded by design of the plant systems that use or generate hydrogen.
•
The battery compartments are ventilated by a system that is designed to preclude the
possibility of hydrogen accumulation. Therefore, a hydrogen explosion in a battery
compartment is not postulated.
•
Hydrogen is supplied from the plant gas storage tank area to the nuclear island. The hydrogen
supply is not located in a compartment that contains safety-related systems or components.
The quantity that could be released in the event of a failure of the hydrogen supply line is
limited to the contents of a single bottle. One hydrogen bottle at a time is connected to the
hydrogen supply line. This quantity would not lead to an explosion even if the full contents
of a single bottle are assumed to remain in the compartment in which it is released. Mixing
within a compartment is achieved by normal convection caused by thermal forces from hot
surfaces and air movement due to operation of HVAC systems. The hydrogen supply line is
not routed through compartments that do not have air movement due to HVAC systems.
•
The storage tank area for plant gases is located sufficiently far from the nuclear island that an
explosion would not result in missiles more energetic than the tornado missiles for which the
nuclear island is designed.
3.5.1.1.2.3 Missiles to be Considered
The following missiles are considered:
•
Nonsafety-related rotating equipment, not excluded above,
•
Pressurized components, not excluded above, located in high-energy systems
•
High pressure gas storage cylinders that may experience a failure of the outlet pipe or valve if
accidentally impacted.
3.5.1.1.2.4 Credible Sources of Internally Generated Missiles (Outside Containment)
The consideration of missile sources outside containment that can adversely affect safety-related
structures, systems or components is limited to a few rotating components inside the auxiliary
building and a few pressurized components in the chemical volume and control system. The
safety-related systems and components needed as described in Section 7.4 to bring the plant to a
safe shutdown are located inside the containment shield building and auxiliary building, both of
which have thick structural concrete exterior walls that provide protection from missiles generated
Tier 2 Material
3.5-6
Revision 17
3. Design of Structures, Components,
Equipment and Systems
AP1000 Design Control Document
in other portions of the plant. Safety-related systems and components located in the auxiliary
building, including the main control room, are protected from missiles generated in other portions
of the auxiliary building by the structural concrete interior walls and floors. Protection against
potential missiles from the turbine-generator is discussed in subsection 3.5.1.3.
Rotating components located inside the auxiliary building that are either safety-related or are
constructed as canned motor pumps would contain fragments from a postulated fracture of the
rotating elements. These are excluded from evaluation as missile sources. Rotating components
used less than 2 percent of the time are also excluded from evaluation as missile sources. This
exclusion of equipment that is used for a limited time is similar to the approach used for the
definition of high-energy systems. Nonsafety-related rotating equipment in compartments
surrounded by structural concrete walls with no safety-related systems or components inside the
compartment is not considered a missile source. Rotating equipment with a housing or an
enclosure that contains the fragments of a postulated impeller failure is not considered a credible
source of missiles. For one or more of these reasons the nonsafety-related rotating equipment
inside the auxiliary building is not considered to be a credible missile source. Nonsafety-related
rotating equipment in compartments with safety-related systems or components that do not
provide other separation features have design requirements for a housing or an enclosure to retain
fragments from postulated failures of rotating elements.
The high-energy system inside the auxiliary building that includes pressurized components in the
high-energy portions that are constructed to standards other than the ASME Code criteria outlined
in subsection 3.5.1.1.1 is the chemical and volume control system. The high-energy portion of this
system inside the auxiliary building that is not constructed to ASME Code criteria outlined in
subsection 3.5.1.1.1 is from the makeup pumps to the containment and system isolation valves.
The nonsafety-related, high-energy portion of this system is not required to be protected from
missiles. The nonsafety-related, high-energy portion of the chemical and volume control system is
not to be considered a missile source. It includes the design features that are outlined above to
exclude components from consideration as missile sources. These considerations include features
such as a pump housing or enclosure that contains fragments of a postulated impeller fracture,
valve design requirements, vessel design requirements, or enclosure requirements. See Table 3.6-1
for a list of the high-energy systems.
Falling objects (i.e. gravitational missiles) heavy enough to generate a secondary missile are
postulated as a result of movement of a heavy load or from a nonseismically designed structure,
system, or component during a seismic event. Movements of heavy loads are controlled to protect
safety-related structures, systems, and components, see subsection 9.1.5. Safety-related structures,
systems, or components are protected from nonseismically designed structures, systems, or
components or the interaction is evaluated. See subsection 3.7.3.13 for additional discussion on
the interaction of other systems with Seismic Category I systems. Valves, rotating equipment,
vessels, and small fittings not otherwise considered to be credible missiles due to design features
or other considerations are not considered to be a potential source of missiles when struck by a
falling object. The outlet pipes and valves for the air storage bottles for the main control room are
constructed to the ASME Code, Section III, requirements and are designed for seismic loads. The
attached pipes and valves are not credible missile sources due to an accidental impact. The air
storage bottles are located within a structural steel frame and are in an area with no activity
Tier 2 Material
3.5-7
Revision 17
3. Design of Structures, Components,
Equipment and Systems
AP1000 Design Control Document
directly above. For the reasons noted above, secondary missiles are not considered credible
missiles.
3.5.1.2
Internally Generated Missiles (Inside Containment)
Selection of equipment for the AP1000 considers provisions to minimize the potential for missiles
to be generated. The considerations previously discussed in subsection 3.5.1.1 are also applicable
to equipment inside the containment.
3.5.1.2.1
Missile Selection
3.5.1.2.1.1 Missiles not Considered Credible
Potential missiles are not considered credible when sufficient energy is not available to produce
the missile, or by design the probability of creating a missile is negligible. The following are not
considered credible sources of internally generated missiles:
•
Reactor coolant pump design requirements are established so that any failure of the rotating
parts would be retained within the casing at specified overspeed conditions. This is discussed
in subsection 5.4.1.3.6.
•
Catastrophic failure of rotating equipment such as pumps, fans, and compressors leading to
the generation of missiles is not considered credible as described previously in
subsection 3.5.1.1.2.
•
Failure of the reactor vessel, steam generators, pressurizer, core makeup tanks, accumulators,
reactor coolant pump castings, passive residual heat exchangers, and piping leading to the
generation of missiles is not considered credible. This is due to the material characteristics,
preservice and inservice inspections, quality control during fabrication, erection and
operation, conservative design, and prudent operation as applied to the particular component.
•
Gross failure of a control rod drive mechanism housing, sufficient to create a missile from a
piece of the housing or to allow a control rod to be ejected rapidly from the core, is not
considered credible. This is because of the same reasons listed above for the reactor vessel
and other components and is based on the following:
Tier 2 Material
–
The control rod drive mechanisms are shop hydrotested to 125 percent of system design
pressure.
–
The housings are hydrotested to 125 percent of system design pressure after they are
installed on the reactor vessel to the head adapters. They are checked again during the
hydrotest of the completed reactor coolant system.
–
The housings are made of Type 304 or 316 stainless steel, which exhibits excellent
notch toughness.
–
Stress levels in the mechanism are not affected by system thermal transients at power or
by thermal movement of the coolant loops.
3.5-8
Revision 17
3. Design of Structures, Components,
Equipment and Systems
•
AP1000 Design Control Document
–
The welds in the pressure boundary of the control rod drive mechanism meet the same
design, procedure, examination, and inspection requirements as the welds on other
ASME Code, Section III, Class 1 components.
–
A nonmechanistic control rod ejection is considered in the safety analyses in Chapter 15
and the design transients in subsection 3.9.1.1. The integrated head package and control
rod drive mechanisms are not designed for the dynamic effects of a missile generated by
a rupture of the control rod housing.
Valves, valve stems, nuts and bolts, and thermowells in high-energy fluid systems and
missiles originating in non-high-energy fluid systems are not considered credible missiles as
discussed previously in subsection 3.5.1.1.1.
3.5.1.2.1.2 Explosions
Missiles can potentially be generated by a hydrogen explosion. Missiles that could prevent
achieving or maintaining a safe shutdown or result in significant release of radioactivity are
precluded by design of the plant systems that use or generate hydrogen.
•
Hydrogen is supplied by the chemical and volume control system inside containment. The
quantity that could be released inside containment in the event of a failure of the hydrogen
supply line is limited to the contents of a single bottle. One bottle at a time is connected to
the hydrogen supply line. This quantity would not lead to an explosion even if the full
contents of a single bottle are assumed to remain in the compartment in which it is released.
Mixing within a compartment is achieved by normal convection caused by thermal forces
from hot surfaces and air movement due to operation of HVAC systems. The hydrogen
supply line is not routed through compartments that do not have air movement due to HVAC
systems.
3.5.1.2.1.3 Missiles to be Considered
The following missiles are considered:
•
Nonsafety related rotating equipment, not excluded above,
•
Pressurized components, not excluded above, located in high-energy systems
3.5.1.2.1.4 Evaluation of Internally Generated Missiles (Inside Containment)
The consideration of credible missile sources inside containment that can adversely affect safetyrelated structures, systems, or components is limited to a few rotating components. The safetyrelated systems and components needed to bring the plant to a safe shutdown are inside the
containment shield building and auxiliary building both of which have thick structural concrete
exterior walls that provide protection from missiles generated in other portions of the plant.
Rotating components inside containment that are either safety-related or are constructed as sealless
pumps would contain fragments from a postulated fracture of the rotating elements and are
excluded from evaluation as missile sources. Rotating components in use less than 2 percent of
Tier 2 Material
3.5-9
Revision 17
3. Design of Structures, Components,
Equipment and Systems
AP1000 Design Control Document
the time are also excluded from evaluation as missile sources. This exclusion of equipment that is
used for a limited time is similar to the approach used for the definition of high-energy systems.
This includes the reactor coolant drain pumps, the containment sump pumps and motors for valve
operators, and mechanical handling equipment. Non-safety-related rotating equipment in
compartments surrounded by structural concrete walls with no safety-related systems or
components inside the compartment is not considered a missile source. Rotating equipment with a
housing or an enclosure that contains the fragments of a postulated impeller failure is not
considered a credible source of missiles. For one or more of these reasons the non-safety-related
rotating equipment inside containment is considered not to be a credible missile source. Nonsafety-related rotating equipment in compartments with safety-related systems or components that
do not provide other separation features has design requirements for a housing or an enclosure to
retain fragments from postulated failures of rotating elements.
The high-energy portions of high-energy systems inside the containment shield building except for
a portion of the chemical and volume control system are constructed to the requirements of the
ASME Code, Section III. The nonsafety-related, high-energy portion of the chemical and volume
control system between the inside containment isolation valves and the outermost reactor coolant
system isolation valves is not required to be protected from missiles and is not to be considered a
missile source. It includes design features outlined above to exclude components from
consideration as missile sources. In addition most of the nonsafety-related portion of the chemical
and volume control system is contained in a compartment located away from safety-related
equipment. See Table 3.6-1 for a list of the high-energy systems.
Falling objects heavy enough to generate a secondary missile are postulated as a result of
movement of a heavy load or from a nonseismically designed structure, system, or component
during a seismic event. Movements of heavy loads are controlled to protect safety-related
structures, systems, and components (see subsection 9.1.5). Design and operational procedures of
the polar crane inside containment precludes dropping a heavy load. Additionally, movements of
heavy loads inside containment occur during shutdown periods when most of the high-energy
systems are depressurized. Valves, rotating equipment, vessels, and small fittings not otherwise
considered to be credible missiles due to design features or other considerations are not considered
to be a potential source of missiles when struck by a falling object. Secondary missiles are not
considered credible. Striking a component with a falling object will not generate a secondary
missile if design of the component precludes generation of missiles due to pressurization of the
component. Safety-related structures, systems, or components are protected from nonseismically
designed structures, systems, or components or the interaction is evaluated. Nonsafety-related
equipment that could fall and damage safety-related equipment during an earthquake is classified
as seismic Category II and is designed and supported to preclude such failure. See
subsection 3.7.3.13 for additional discussion on the interaction of other systems with Seismic
Category I systems. There are no high-pressure gas storage cylinders inside the containment shield
building. For the reasons noted above, secondary missiles are not considered credible missiles.
3.5.1.3
Turbine Missiles
The turbine generator is located north of the nuclear island with its shaft oriented north-south. In
this orientation, the potential for damage from turbine missiles is negligible. Safety-related
structures, systems and components are located outside the high-velocity, low-trajectory missile
Tier 2 Material
3.5-10
Revision 17
3. Design of Structures, Components,
Equipment and Systems
AP1000 Design Control Document
strike zone, as defined by Regulatory Guide 1.115. Thus, postulated low-trajectory missiles cannot
directly strike safety-related areas.
The turbine and rotor design is described in Section 10.2. Protection is provided by the orientation
of the turbine-generator and by the use of robust turbine rotors as described in Section 10.2. The
rotor design, manufacturing, and material specification and the inspections recommended for the
AP1000 provide an acceptably very low probability (see subsection 10.2.2) of missile generation.
Turbine rotor integrity is discussed in subsection 10.2.3. This discussion includes fatigue and
fracture analysis, material selection, and the maintenance program requirements.
The potential for a high-trajectory missile to impact safety-related areas of the AP1000 is less than
10-7. Based on this very low probability, the potential damage from a high-trajectory missile is not
evaluated. The probability of an impact in the safety-related areas is the product of the probability
of missile generation from the turbine; the probability, assuming a turbine failure, that a hightrajectory missile would land within a few hundred feet from the turbine (10-7 per square foot);
and the area of the safety-related area. In the AP1000, the safety-related area is contained within
the containment shield building and the auxiliary building.
3.5.1.4
Missiles Generated by Natural Phenomena
Tornado missiles are defined in accordance with Standard Review Plan, Section 3.5.1.4. The
velocities are adjusted to the maximum wind velocity defined in Section 3.3 of the DCD. The
following missiles are postulated:
3.5.1.5
•
A massive high-kinetic-energy missile, which deforms on impact. It is assumed to be a
4000-pound automobile impacting the structure at normal incidence with a horizontal
velocity of 105 mph or a vertical velocity of 74 mph. This missile is considered at all plant
elevations up to 30 feet above grade.
•
A rigid missile of a size sufficient to test penetration resistance. It is assumed to be a
275 pound, eight inch armor-piercing artillery shell impacting the structure at normal
incidence with a horizontal velocity of 105 mph or a vertical velocity of 74 mph.
•
A small rigid missile of a size sufficient to just pass through any openings in protective
barriers. It is assumed to be a one inch diameter solid steel sphere assumed to impinge upon
barrier openings in the most damaging direction at a velocity of 105 mph.
Missiles Generated by Events Near the Site
As described previously in Section 2.2, the site interface is established to address site specific
missiles as discussed in subsection 3.5.4. The AP1000 missile interface criteria are based on the
tornado missiles described in subsection 3.5.1.4. Additional analyses are required to evaluate other
site specific missiles.
Tier 2 Material
3.5-11
Revision 17
3. Design of Structures, Components,
Equipment and Systems
3.5.1.6
AP1000 Design Control Document
Aircraft Hazards
As described previously in Section 2.2, the site interface is established to address aircraft hazards
as discussed in subsection 3.5.4. The AP1000 missile interface criteria are based on the tornado
missiles described in subsection 3.5.1.4. Additional analyses are required to evaluate other site
specific missiles. Aircraft crash probability, and the effects of this hazard on the plant, is
determined as described in Section 2.2.
3.5.2
Protection from Externally Generated Missiles
Systems required for safe shutdown are protected from the effects of missiles. These systems are
identified in Section 7.4. Protection from external missiles, including those generated by natural
phenomena, is provided by the external walls and roof of the Seismic Category I nuclear island
structures. The external walls and roofs are reinforced concrete. The structural design
requirements for the shield building and auxiliary building are outlined in subsection 3.8.4.
Openings through these walls are evaluated on a case-by-case basis to provide confidence that a
missile passing through the opening would not prevent safe shutdown and would not result in an
offsite release exceeding the limits defined in 10 CFR 50.34. The evaluation of site-specific
hazards for external events that may produce missiles more energetic than tornado missiles is
discussed in subsection 2.2.1.
Evaluation of turbine missiles is provided in subsection 3.5.1.3. Evaluation of tornado missiles is
provided in subsection 3.5.1.4. Conformance with regulatory guide recommendations is provided
in Appendix 1A.
3.5.3
Barrier Design Procedures
Missile barriers and protective structures are designed to withstand and absorb missile impact
loads to prevent damage to safety-related components.
Formulae used for missile penetration calculations into steel or concrete barriers are the Modified
National Defense Research Committee (NDRC) formula for concrete and either the Ballistic
Research Laboratory (BRL) or Stanford formulae for steel.
Concrete (Modified NDRC Formula)
1.8
⎡
⎛ V ⎞ ⎤
x = ⎢ 4 KNWd ⎜
⎟ ⎥
⎝ 1000 d ⎠ ⎦⎥
⎣⎢
0.5
for
x
≤ 2.0
d
for
x
> 2.0
d
1.8
⎛ V ⎞
x = KNW ⎜
⎟
⎝ 1000 d ⎠
+d
where
x
W
Tier 2 Material
= penetration depth, inches
= missile weight, lbs
3.5-12
Revision 17
3. Design of Structures, Components,
Equipment and Systems
AP1000 Design Control Document
d
N
V
= missile diameter, inches
= missile shape factor = 1.0
= impact velocity, feet/sec
K
= experimentally obtained material coefficient for penetration =
180
fc ′
fc′ = concrete compressive strength
Scabbing thickness, t s , and perforation thickness, tp is given by:
x
ts
= 2.12 + 1.36
d
d
⎛x⎞
⎛x⎞
ts
= 7.91 ⎜ ⎟ - 5.06 ⎜ ⎟
d
⎝d⎠
⎝d⎠
for 0.65 ≤
2
for
x
≤ 11.75
d
x
≤ 0.65
d
tp
x
= 1.32 + 1.24
d
d
for 1.35 ≤
tp
x
x
= 3.19 ( ) - 0.718 ( )2
d
d
d
for
x
≤ 13.5
d
x
≤ 13.5
d
Steel (Stanford Formula)
S ⎛
W ⎞
E
⎜⎜16,000 T 2 + 1,500
T ⎟⎟
=
D 46,500 ⎝
Ws ⎠
Where:
E
D
S
T
W
Ws
=
=
=
=
=
=
critical kinetic energy required for perforation, foot pounds
effective missile diameter, inches
ultimate tensile strength of the target (steel plate), pounds per square inch
target plate thickness, inches
length of a square side between rigid supports, inches
length of a standard window, 4 inches
The ultimate tensile strength is directly reduced by the amount of bilateral tension stress already in
the target. The equation is good within the following ranges:
0.1 < T/D < 0.8,
0.002 < T/L < 0.05,
10 < L/D < 50,
5 < W/D <8,
8 < W/T < 100,
70 < V < 400
Tier 2 Material
3.5-13
Revision 17
3. Design of Structures, Components,
Equipment and Systems
AP1000 Design Control Document
Where:
L = missile length, inches
V = impact velocity, feet/second
Steel ( BRL Formula )
tp =
(E k )2.3
672D
Where:
tp
D
Ek
M
=
=
=
=
=
steel plate thickness for threshold of perforation, inches
equivalent missile diameter, inches
missile kinetic energy, foot pounds
M V2/2
mass of the missile, lb-sec2/ft.
In using the Modified NDRC, BRL and Stanford formulae for missile penetration, it is assumed
that the missile impacts normal to the plane of the wall on a minimum impact area and, in the case
of reinforced concrete, does not strike the reinforcing. Due to the conservative nature of these
assumptions, the minimum thickness required for missile shields is taken as the thickness just
perforated.
Structural members designed to resist missile impact are designed for flexural, shear, and buckling
effects using the equivalent static load obtained from the evaluation of structural response. Stress
and strain limits for the equivalent static load comply with applicable codes and Regulatory
Guide 1.142, and the limits on ductility of steel structures as given in subsection 3.5.3.1. The
consequences of scabbing are evaluated if the thickness is less than the minimum thickness to
preclude scabbing.
The thicknesses of the exterior walls above grade and of the roof of the nuclear island are
24 inches and 15 inches, respectively. The roof is constructed using left-in-place metal deck.
These thicknesses exceed the minimum thicknesses for Region II tornado missiles specified in
Standard Review Plan 3.5.3.
3.5.3.1
Ductility Factors for Steel Structures
Ductility factors for the design of steel structures are as follows:
•
•
•
Tier 2 Material
For tension due to flexure, μ< 10.0
For columns with slenderness ratio (L/r) equal to or less than 20, μ< 1.3
For columns with slenderness ratio greater than 20, μ< 1.0
Where: L = effective length of the member
r = the least radius of gyration
3.5-14
Revision 17
3. Design of Structures, Components,
Equipment and Systems
•
3.5.4
AP1000 Design Control Document
For members subjected to tension, μ< .5*(eu/ey)
Where: eu = ultimate strain
ey = yield strain
Combined License Information
The Combined License information requested in this subsection has been partially addressed in
APP-GW-GLR-020 (Reference 1). The information item completion activities required of the
Combined License applicant are defined in APP-GW-GLR-020. These activities include
development of site-specific parameters and verification of bounding conditions, site arrangement,
and building construction. Specifically, the information that the applicant must evaluate is the
following, demonstrating that any exceedances or differences do not compromise the safety of the
plant:
•
Show site parameters for wind and tornado showing that the site satisfies the AP1000 site
interface criteria for the wind and tornado conditions. If there are exceedances, they must be
discussed and shown acceptable.
•
Provide plant-specific site plan and discuss any differences between the plant-specific site
plan and the typical site plan shown in Figure 1.2-2 of Section 1.2.
•
Verify that there are no other structures adjacent to the nuclear island other than: turbine
building, annex building, radwaste building, and passive containment cooling ancillary water
storage tank. If there are, then the effect of these structures on the AP1000 nuclear island
must be discussed.
•
Show that missiles caused by external events separate from the tornado have energies less
than the tornado missile spectrum energies that the AP1000 is designed to withstand. If
missile energy is greater, evaluate and show that it will not compromise the safety of AP1000
safety-related structures and components.
Completion of these activities by the Combined License applicant will complete the information
item.
The following words represent the original Combined License Information item commitment:
The Combined License applicant will demonstrate that the site satisfies the interface
requirements provided in Section 2.2. This requires an evaluation for those external events
that produce missiles that are more energetic than the tornado missiles postulated for design
of the AP1000, or additional analyses of the AP1000 capability to handle the specific hazard.
3.5.5
References
1.
Tier 2 Material
APP-GW-GLR-020, “Wind and Tornado Site Interface Criteria,” Westinghouse Electric
Company LLC.
3.5-15
Revision 17