·~ "-J~ 4

FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF:
AGENDA ITEM NO.:
June 25, 2012
4 (c)
~A RAND CITY COUNCIL
TO:
·~
THROU
"-J~
. ll DA NORRIS, CITY MANAGER
(''AJJ
FROM:
VICKIE HARDIN WOODS, DIRECTOR '1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT:
PETITIONER-INITIATED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY LOCATED AT
2395 DOAKS FERRY ROAD NW (ANNEXATION CASE NO. C-705)
ISSUE
Should the City Council:
1.
Find that Petitioner submitted a valid petition for annexation of the Territory, in
conformance with Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 222.
2.
Determine that Annexation Case No. C-705 satisfies the criteria of Salem Revised
Code (SRC) 165.130(c) and adopt Order No. 2012-07-AX (Attachment A).
3.
Refer this petitioner-initiated annexation to electors of the City of Salem at the
November 6, 2012 election, and, if approved by the voters:
A.
Apply the City of Salem RA (Residential Agriculture) zone to the Territory from
Polk County SR (Suburban Residential); and
B.
Withdraw the Territory from the Salem Suburban Rural Fire Protection District.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1.
Find that Petitioner submitted a valid petition for annexation of the Territory, in
conformance with Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 222.
2.
Determine that Annexation Case No. C-705 satisfies the criteria of Salem Revised
Code (SRC) 165.130(c) and adopt Order No. 2012-07-AX (Attachment A).
3.
Refer this petitioner-initiated annexation to the electors of the City of Salem at the
November 6, 2012 election and, if approved by the voters:
C-705
A.
Apply the City of Salem RA (Residential Agriculture) zone to the Territory from
Polk County SR (Suburban Residential); and
B.
Withdraw the Territory from the Salem Suburban Rural Fire Protection District.
Page 1
June 25, 2012
BACKGROUND
This is a petitioner-initiated annexation of Territory located at 2395 Doaks Ferry Road NW,
for which the Petitioner has filed a valid annexation petition and findings to address
applicable criteria (Attachment B). The Territory is approximately 1.2 acres in size.
The annexation application for Annexation Case No. C-705 was submitted July 28 and 29,
2010 by listing agent Tracy Sturgeon of Coldwell Banker Mt West Real Estate on behalf of
property owner Beneficial Oregon Inc. The property was in foreclosure, and the applicant
requested a voter-exempt health hazard annexation because no domestic water supply
was connected to the existing single family dwelling at that time. On August 2, 2010, City
of Salem Public Works notified the applicant's agent that the Public Works Director had
determined that a voter-approved annexation application would be required in order for the
City to supply water to the dwelling. Beneficial Oregon Inc and Tracy Sturgeon
subsequently submitted a petition and other materials required for a voter-approved
annexation application.
On August 9, 2010, the Public Works Director recommended that City Council allow 2395
Doaks Ferry Road NW to connect to the City's water supply and Council granted the
request. The City provided a water connection to the property on or before August 23,
2010. On September 10, 2010, Polk County recorded a deed conveying the subject
property to GabeR Morrison and Sarah L Morrison. On May 17, 2012, the Morrisons
submitted a petition seeking annexation for the Territory.
Annexation Case No. C-705 has been scheduled for a public hearing before the Salem City
Council for June 25, 2012. Notice of the public hearing was duly mailed to those entitled to
notice at least ten (1 0) days before the hearing in accordance with SRC 165.130(b).
FACTS
1.
AND FINDINGS
The Petitioner has met the annexation, petition, application, information submission,
fee, waiver, and all other requirements for petitioner-initiated annexations including
those found in ORS Chapter 222, SRC Chapter 165, SRC 165.070, SRC 165.080
and SRC 165.090.
Annexations, other than annexations made pursuant to annexation contracts
effective prior to May 16, 2000, and annexations necessitated by failing septic
systems or health hazards, or annexations mandated by state law, are subject to
voter approval (City of Salem Charter, Section 61, and SRC 165.050).
The property owners filed the application for annexation of the subject property at
2395 Doaks Ferry Road NW (Polk County Assessor's Map and Tax Lot Number
073W17AB00400) and staff recommends annexation of adjacent right-of-way of
Doaks Ferry Road NW. The total area of the Territory is approximately 1.2 acres.
The triple majority requirements of ORS 222.170(1) are satisfied because the
petitioner represents 100 percent of the owners of the land to be annexed and owns
100 percent of the land to be annexed, which is 100 percent of the assessed value
of the Territory.
C-705
Page2
June 25, 2012
2.
The Territory is contiguous to the city limits at its north property line, and is located
inside the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB).
3.
The Salem Area Comprehensive Plan (SACP) Map designates the Territory as
"Developing Residential." This designation is implemented in the City through the
RA (Residential Agriculture) zone. The Territory is currently zoned SR (Suburban
Residential) in Polk County. The Territory is developed with a single family dwelling
and accessory buildings.
The zoning and land use for the surrounding area includes:
North:
Salem RS (Single Family Residential) and Polk County SR (Suburban
Residential- single family dwellings
South: Polk County SR (Suburban Residential - single family dwellings
West: Polk County SR (Suburban Residential- single family dwellings
East:
Across Doaks Ferry Road NW, Salern RS (Single Family Residential)single family dwellings
4.
Under SRC 165.100, territory annexed into the City is automatically given the SACP
and zoning designations that are equivalent to the applicable county zoning
designations, unless the petitioner or City Council proposes a new Comprehensive
Plan or zone designation.
The property owners of the Territory have not proposed a new SACP or zone
designation, and unless the City Council proposes different designations pursuant to
SRC 165.1 OO(a)(2), the City equivalent SACP designation of Developing Residential
and RA zone will be applied to the 1.2-acre property.
5.
Public and Private Facilities and Services Comments
A.
The Transportation and Parks Planning Division of the Public Works
Department indicated that no park land is available for park development from
this annexation. The nearest park is approximately 0.3 miles (Attachment C).
B.
The Finance Department submitted comments regarding property tax limits,
rates and other information related to the financial impacts of annexation
(Attachment D).
C.
The Salem Fire Department submitted comments indicating that the response
time to this location is approximately 5.2 to 5.7 minutes depending on road
conditions, traffic, and similar variables. Primary fire protection and EMS
service would be provided from Fire Station No.5 located at 1520 Glen Creek
Road NW. Secondary service would be provided from Fire Station No. 1
located at 370 Trade Street SE.
The Territory is currently within the Salem Suburban Rural Fire Protection
District, which is currently served by the Salem Fire Department. If approved,
the proposed annexation will withdraw the Territory from Salem Suburban
C-705
Page 3
June 25, 2012
Rural Fire Protection District. The Salem Fire Department's Comments are
included as Attachment E.
6.
D.
The Development Services Section of the Public Works Department stated
that the Territory is located inside of the Urban Service Area (USA).
Additional comments regarding these services are provided in Attachment F.
E.
The Salem Police Department reviewed the proposed annexation and
commented they do not anticipate any major impacts to service based on
these annexations.
F.
The Salem-Keizer School District estimates that the proposal will add 4
additional students. Additional comments provided by the School District can
be found in Attachment G.
Neighborhood Association and Citizen Comments
The City notified the West Salem Neighborhood Association (WSNA) of the
proposed annexation, and has not received any comments from the neighborhood or
citizens regarding the annexation.
7.
Fiscal Impact of Annexation
The potential impact of the annexation on the City of Salem's General Fund (Year
2012 dollars) is dependent upon the value and extent of the Territory's ultimate
development, the year in which the cost and revenue is measured, and the level of
City services available at that time.
ECONorthwest's "Fiscal Impact Analysis Relating to City Growth and Annexations"
dated January 18, 2001 provides the model for determining the impact on Salem's
General Fund. This model utilizes the fiscal year 2011-12 adopted budget to
estimate the fiscal impacts of the proposed annexation. The fiscal impact model
created by ECONorthwest estimated the proposed annexation would create an
annual surplus of $736 to the City's General Fund given the current level of service
for park, library and fire facilities. Attachment H contains a detailed summary of the
estimated fiscal impact of annexation.
8.
C-705
Salem Revised Code (SRC) 165.130(c) requires the Council to determine whether
or not the proposed annexation meets the following criteria:
(1)
The proposed land use designations are consistent with the Salem Area
Comprehensive Plan and applicable Statewide Planning Goals;
(2)
The annexation will result in a boundary in which services can be provided in
an orderly, efficient and timely manner;
(3)
The uses and density that will be allowed can be served through the orderly,
efficient and timely extension of key urban facilities and services;
Page4
June 25, 2012
(4)
The public interest would be furthered by the referral of the annexation to the
voters.
Exhibit 3 of Attachment A contains findings demonstrating compliance with these
criteria.
9.
As demonstrated by the Facts and Findings above, and found in Attachment A, the
proposed annexation and fire district withdrawal conform to State law requirements
and the criteria found in SRC 165.130(c). Staff believes the annexation and
rezoning of the Territory are consistent with the public interest, and referral of the
proposed annexation to the electors of the City of Salem is in the best interest of the
public.
For these reasons, staff recommends that the City Council:
1.
Find that Petitioner submitted a valid petition for annexation of the Territory, in
conformance with Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 222.
2.
Determine that Annexation Case No. C-705 satisfies the criteria of Salem
Revised Code (SRC) 165.130(c) and adopt Order No. 2012-07-AX
(Attachment A).
3.
Refer this petitioner-initiated annexation to the electors of the City of Salem at
the November 6, 2012 election and, if approved by the voters:
A.
Apply the City of Salem RA (Residential Agriculture) zone to the
Territory from Polk County SR (Suburban Residential); and
B.
Withdraw the Territory from the Salem Suburban Rural Fire Protection
District.
(};{h • . _.
A _____,__
Gl~~ministrator
Attachments:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
C-705
Order No. 2012-07-AX Adopting the Final Decision and Findings
of Compliance
Annexation Petition and Findings
Public Works Department, Parks Division Comments
Finance Department Comments
Fire Department Comments
Public Works Department, Development Services Section
Comments
Salem-Keizer School District Comments
General Revenue Impacts
Page 5
June 25, 2012
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SALEM, OREGON
IN THE MATTER OF THE
PETITIONER-INITIATED
ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY LOCATED AT
2395 DOAKS FERRY ROAD NW
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER NO. 2012-07-AX
FINAL ORDER ADOPTING THE
FINAL DECISION AND FINDINGS OF
COMPLIANCE WITH SRC CHAPTER 1 65
IN ANNEXATION CASE NO. C-705
Whereas, on June 25, 2012, after due notice was given, the City Council of the City of
Salem held a public hearing to take testimony and evidence on annexation proposal C-705
(the Annexation Proposal), as required by SRC 165.130(a); and
Whereas, after receiving evidence and hearing testimony, and upon consideration of the
Staff Report and Recommendation, and being fully advised, the City Council hereby finds
that the Annexation Proposal complies with SRC 165.130(c); and
Whereas, the City Council has determined that the Petitioner has met the annexation
petition, application, information submission, fee, waiver and all other requirements for
petitioner-initiated annexations including, but not limited to, those found in ORS Chapter
222, SRC Chapter 165, SRC 165.070, SRC 165.080 and SRC 165.090; and
Whereas, the City Council has determined that a triple majority consent petition for
annexation of the Territory (Exhibit 1) has been signed and the triple majority requirements
of ORS 222.170(1) are satisfied because more than half of the owners of land in the
Territory, who also own more than half of the land in the contiguous territory and of real
property therein representing more than half of the assessed value of all real property in the
contiguous territory have consented in writing to the annexation of their land in the territory;
and
Whereas, the City Council hereby finds that the public interest would be furthered by the
referral of the annexation to the voters of the city pursuant to Section 61 of the Salem City
Charter; and
Whereas, the City Council has determined that the Comprehensive Plan designation will
not be changed and the zoning designation will be the equivalent zoning of Residential
Agriculture RA that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan set forth in SRC 165.100
and Table 165-1 of SRC Chapter 165;
Whereas, the City Council hereby finds that withdrawal of the Territory from Salem
Suburban Rural Fire Protection District is in the best interest of the city; and
Whereas, this FINAL ORDER constitutes the final land use decision in the Annexation
Proposal and any appeal hereof must be filed with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals
within 21 days of the date that notice of this decision is mailed to persons with standing to
appeal, as provided in SRC 165.130(e).
ATTACHMENT A
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SALEM, OREGON:
Section 1: Proposed Annexation, Case No. C-705, of the Territory more particularly
described in the attached Exhibit 2, which is incorporated herein by this reference, satisfies
the criteria set forth in SRC 165.130(c) and is hereby approved based on the facts and
findings stated in the attached Exhibit 3, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2: If the proposed annexation is approved by the voters, the Territory shall,
pursuant to SRC 165.100, be designated Developing Residential on the City of Salem
Comprehensive Plan Map and be zoned Salem Residential Agriculture (RA).
Section 3: If the proposed annexation is approved by the voters, the Territory shall be
withdrawn from Salem Suburban Rural Fire Protection District.
Section 4: A measure shall be prepared for Council approval to submit the proposed
annexation of the Territory to the voters of the City of Salem for the November 6, 2012
election.
DATED this _ _ day of _ _ _ _ , 2012.
ATTEST:
City Recorder
City of Salem
Checked by: P. Cole
Annexation C-705
2395 Doaks Ferry Road NW
Legend
D
[2SJ Outside Salem City Limits
Taxlots''
0
Urban Growth Boundary
~ ..... ~City Limits
100
200
fSS3 Historic District
! Schools
400 Feet
N:\CD\Proj\CP\annex2012\Vicinity_Maps\C~705.mxd- 5/23/2012 @ 11:24:23 AM
~
~Parks
QTY~~
(._J ArYOUI\ SERVICE
Community Development Dept.
even
=
lbi=====E=X=HI=BIT=1=====di
2395 Doaks Ferry Road NW
Beginning at the point of intersection of the West Line of County Road No. 7303 (connnonly
known as Doaks Ferry Road NW) and the South Line of that tract ofland described in
that instrument recorded in Document No. 20 I 0-008846, Polk County Records; said
point being in Section 17, Township 7 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian,
Polk County, Oregon; said point being on the now existing City Limits Line; said point
being2046.00 feet East, 356.40 feet North, 1251.10 feet East, 204.52 feet North
68° 42' 00" West from the southwest comer of the C.O. Hosford Donation Land Claim
No. 65 in said Section 17, Township 7 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian,
Polk County, Oregon; and rnnning thence:
North 68° 42' 00" West 354.30 feet along said South Line to the southwest comer of said
DocumentNo.2010-008846;
thence North 32° 24' 00" East 181.07 feet along the West Line said parcel to a point on the South
Line of Gibson Creek Woods as recorded in Volume 9, Page 36, Book ofTownP1ats,
City of Salem, Polk County, Oregon;
thence South 82° 22' 00" East 145.51 feet along the South Line of said Gibson Creek Woods and
the now existing City Limits Line and the North Line of said parcel to the point of
intersection of the West Line of that tract of land described in that instrument recorded in
Document No. 2006-015758, Polk County Records;
thence South 24° 53' 00" West 110.00 feet to the southwest comer of said parcel;
thence South 82° 22' 00" East 200.00 feet along said South Line to a point on said West Line of
Doaks Ferry Road NW; said point also being on the now existing City Limits Line;
thence South 24° 53' 00" West 150.00 feet along said West Line and the now existing City
Limits Line to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
J
~
'======EXHJB=IT2
tfiw_'J
Approved:
March 1, 2012
Annexation No.: C-705
/lnerU
DORNo.:Z4-/Z3B- ZCJ!Z
DORDate:
VLS/DM:G:\Group\clerical\Annexations\C-705.doc
.3/9/20/2
222
220 2183
2163 2143
2386
2385
2484
2454
2141 2131 2121 2111 2093 2083 2073
2241
222
2129 2119
~ Property in
~County
2099 2079
2039
CITY OF SALEM, OREGON
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
2395 DOAKS FERRY ROAD NW
PROPERTY PROPOSED
TO BE ANNEXED
INTO CITY
W.al
CONTAINING 1.20 ACRES
EXHIBIT MAP
CASE NO. C-705
ADJACENT TO WARD 8
TRACT NO.
200
EXHIBIT 3, ORDER NO. 2012-07-AX, FINDINGS:
COMPLIANCE OF ANNEXATION C-705
WITH SRC CHAPTER 165 AND 165.130(c)
1.
The proposed petitioner-initiated annexation of that certain Territory more specifically
described in Exhibit 2, Council Order in Annexation Case No. C-705 (Territory)
conforms to the following criteria found in SRC 165.130(c):
Criterion 1:
The proposed land use designations are consistent with the Salem Area
Comprehensive Plan and applicable Statewide Planning Goals.
Under SRC 165.100, territory annexed to the City is automatically given the Salem Area
Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations that are equivalent to the applicable County
zoning designations, as set forth in SRC Chapter 165, Table 165-1, unless the petition or City
Council proposes a new Comprehensive Plan/zone designation.
The City Council did not propose any new designations, and, therefore, the land use
designations that will be automatically applied from SRC Chapter 165 Table 165-1 to the
Territory are "Developing Residential" on the Salem Area Comprehensive Plan (SACP) Map
and the City of Salem RA (Residential Agriculture) zone district. These land use
designations are consistent with the SACP and applicable Statewide Planning Goals as
demonstrated by the following findings.
A.
Statewide Planning Goals -- Statewide Planning Goals applicable to the proposed
annexation are:
(1)
GOAL10. Housing. Goal10 requires provisions for housing to meet the
needs of residents. The proposed annexation will increase the City's
inventory of buildable lands for residential use. The increased inventory of
land is a positive factor in providing for housing variety and availability. The
location is in close proximity to existing residential development and is
appropriate for such housing. The proposed annexation is consistent with
Goal10.
(2)
GOAL11. Public Facilities and Services. Goal 11 requires a plan or
program for orderly and efficient arrangements of public facilities. The City
adopted a Public Facilities Plan (the Plan) consistent with Goal 11. The City
applies the Plan to development of property within the city to achieve a timely,
orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services in a manner
that supports both existing and planned growth. The Plan is implemented by
the City's adopted master plans, Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), and the
Urban Growth Management Process set forth in SRC Chapter 66. The
Territory is located inside of the Salem Urban Service Area (USA). The
proposed annexation is consistent with Goal 11.
(3)
GOAL12. Transportation. Goal 12 requires a jurisdiction to adopt a
Transportation System Plan (TSP) that provides a safe, convenient and
economic transportation system. The City has adopted a transportation plan
acknowledged by the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and
Development (DLCD) to further this goal. The TSP is applied to the
transportation elements of new development under SRC Chapter 66 and other
provisions of the Salem Area Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code and to
the transportation elements of the City's adopted master plans, the CIP, etc.
as set forth in the discussion of Goal 11 above to provide safe and convenient
Consistency with SRC 165, Annexation C-705
Page 1
II
EXHIBIT 3
II
pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular circulation that is consistent with the TSP
and the requirements of the State Transportation Planning Rule. As described
in the finding for Goal 11 compliance above, and as described in the
discussion of Criterion 3 below, the Territory will comply with Goal12 when
any new development occurs, and will be served by facilities compliant with
Goal 12 to the extent that transportation-related improvements occur under
the City's adopted master plans, the CIP, SRC Chapter 66 and the Zoning
Code. The proposed annexation is consistent with Goal 12.
(4)
GOAL 14. Urbanization. Goal14 mandates provisions for an orderly and
efficient transition from rural to urban land use. The Territory is within the
Salem-Keizer Urban Growth Boundary (UGB), which, by definition, makes this
territory "urbanizable." The incorporation of contiguous areas, including the
Territory, into the overall composition of the city provides order and efficiency
in the provision of municipal facilities and services as well as in the facilitation
of orderly urbanization. This is because the Salem Area Comprehensive Plan
(SACP), Zoning Code and other applicable implementation measures have
been acknowledged as being in compliance with Goal 14 and these measures
will be made applicable to the Territory upon annexation. The applicable
implementation measures are designed to provide order and efficiency in the
provision of facilities and services, and to facilitate orderly urbanization by
uniformly integrating the Territory into the City's municipal facilities and
services system. This integration would provide for a uniform rather than an
isolated, discontinuous, and fragmented system of services provided to areas
not within the Salem city limits. The application of the City's Goal 14
acknowledged Salem Area Comprehensive Plan, Master Plans, and
implementation ordinances to the Territory furthers the conversion of
urbanizable land to urban uses consistent with Goal14 for the reasons cited
above. The proposed annexation is consistent with Goal 14.
In summary, the proposed annexation is consistent with the applicable Statewide
Goals.
B.
Salem Area Comprehensive Plan (SACP) --The SACP goals, policies and intent
statements applicable to the proposed annexation are:
(1)
SACP Chapter II (Definitions and Intent Statements), Section A (Land
Use Map), Subsection 3 (Plan Map Designations), Part a (Residential),
Subpart 3 "Developing Residential," (SACP pages 6-7): The "Developing
Residential" designation applies to most urbanizable lands lying outside the
city limits and Salem Service Districts and unserved by public water and
sewer. Currently, the predominant uses within these areas are agriculture and
residential on acreage parcels.
The future use of these areas is primarily single-family residential with
schools, parks, and churches. The City's RS (Single Family Residential) and
RA (Residential Agriculture) zones implement this Plan map designation by
providing additional land used primarily for residential uses. The Territory to
be annexed has the characteristics of the RA zone with predominantly
residential and/or agricultural use and not currently served by public water
and/or sewer facilities. This is also consistent with the surrounding zoning and
land use of the area. The Territory will be automatically zoned RA
(Residential Agriculture). The proposed annexation is consistent with the
above SACP provision.
(2)
SACP Chapter II (Definitions and Intent Statements), Section A (Land
Consistency with SRC 165, Annexation C-705
Page 2
June 25, 2012
Use Map), Subsection 3 {Plan Map Designations), Part a (Residential),
Subpart 4 {Conversion of Developing Residential or Urbanizable Areas to
Urban Development) {SACP page 7): Urbanizable lands located outside the
city limits must be annexed to the city to receive urban services. Some
reasons for converting urbanizable land to urban land include: (1) providing for
the orderly and economic extension of public facilities and services; (2)
providing adequate land area for a variety of housing types and locations; and
(3) maintaining an adequate supply of serviced or serviceable undeveloped
land to meet the market demand for a variety of uses.
Annexation of the Territory allows for the future extension of public facilities
and services consistent with the Salem Urban Growth Management Program
through the master planning, CIP and SRC Chapter 66 (UGA) processes.
Publicly funded capital improvements will depend on funding availability.
Most new development in newly annexed areas requires developer
responsibility for extending public facilities as part of a common city
infrastructure under an orderly plan for their extension. In addition, annexation
of the Territory with RA (Residential Agriculture) zoning will provide the City
with additional land area that expands the availability of residential land and
locations within the City. The proposed annexation is consistent with the
above SACP provision.
{3)
SACP Chapter IV {Salem Urban Area Goals and Policies), Section A
(Coordination Policies), Subsection 6 {Annexation Coordination) {SACP
page 23): The City must provide an opportunity for the affected county to
comment on proposals for annexation of territory to the City of Salem.
Polk County was notified of the annexation and provided an opportunity to
comment on the annexation. The county did not indicate any objections or
comments. Therefore, the intent of the policy is met. The proposed
annexation is consistent with the above SACP provision.
{4)
SACP Chapter IV {Salem Urban Area Goals and Policies), Section C
{Urban Growth), Subsection 1 {Annexation) {SACP page 26): Marion and
Polk Counties should encourage the orderly annexation to the City of Salem of
land within the Salem Urban Area.
The Territory is located within the Salem Urban Area and is contiguous to the
City limits. Annexation of the Territory allows for the orderly annexation of
urbanizable land to the City of Salem. The proposed annexation is consistent
with this policy.
{5)
SACP Chapter IV {Salem Urban Area Goals and Policies), Section C
{Urban Growth), Subsection 3 {UGB is Urbanizable) {SACP page 26):
Territory is considered available for annexation and development to the extent
that it is urbanizable and located within the UGB.
The Territory is considered urbanizable because it is located within the UGB,
and all needed facilities to support urban development are or can be made
available under the City's existing public facilities plans and urban growth
management program. Therefore, the Territory is considered available for
annexation. The proposed annexation is consistent with the above SACP
provision.
{6)
SACP Chapter IV {Salem Urban Area Goals and Policies), Section D
{Growth Management), Subsection 1 {Development Guided by Growth
Consistency with SRC 165, Annexation C-705
Page 3
June 25, 2012
Management) (SACP page 27): The conversion of urbanizable land shall be
guided by the Growth Management Program (SRC Chapter 66).
SRC Chapter 66 establishes a comprehensive growth management program
for the City of Salem. The Territory would lie within the Salem Urban Area, as
defined by SRC Chapter 66. Conversion of the Territory to urban uses will be
guided by the City's growth management program. The proposed annexation
is consistent with the above SACP provision.
(7)
SACP Chapter IV (Salem Urban Area Goals and Policies), Section D
(Growth Management), Subsection 3 (Programming Development) (SACP
page 27 -28): The City shall provide levels of services to city residents
consistent with community needs as determined by the City Council, within the
financial capability of the City, and subject to relevant legal constraints on
revenues and their applications. Considerations for the programming of
development are: (a) The financial capability of the City to provide certain
facilities and services as authorized through the budgetary process; (b) The
technical requirements of public facility master plans; (c) The need for
sufficient amounts of buildable land to maintain an adequate supply in the
marketplace; and (d) The willingness of the development community to
assume the burden of funding the cost of providing certain facilities.
These criteria are factored into the proposed annexation because the Growth
Management Program imposes an equitable share of public facility costs on
new development by requiring provisions for required facilities by the
developer and/or system development charges in connection with the
provision of required facilities by the City. Therefore, this policy is satisfied.
The proposed annexation is consistent with the above SACP provision.
(8)
SACP Chapter IV (Salem Urban Area Goals and Policies), Section D
(Growth Management), Subsection 7 (Development Requiring Water and
Sewer) (SACP page 28): Development will only be allowed within the City
limits where public sewer and water services are available and other urban
facilities are scheduled pursuant to an adopted Growth Management Program.
The City of Salem adopted a Growth Management Program (SRC Chapter 66)
that applies to the development of the Territory in the future. City services can
be provided to the Territory in the future pursuant to the City's Growth
Management Program. The proposed annexation is consistent with the above
SACP provision.
In summary, the proposed annexation is consistent with the applicable provisions of the
SACP.
Criterion 2:
The annexation will result in a boundary in which services can be
provided in an orderly, efficient and timely manner;
The annexation of unincorporated territory contiguous to the City limits will result in urban
services being provided in a more orderly, efficient and timely manner. Unincorporated
territory adjacent to the City limits prevents the orderly expansion of City services because
gaps are created in the City's infrastructure, and services within those gaps must be provided
by the County, or by the City pursuant to intergovernmental or other agreements. This
results in inefficiencies due to discontinuous and fragmented methods of providing
infrastructure and inefficiencies, as well as additional delays for any development proposal.
The boundary resulting from the proposed annexation will provide a more compact and
efficient urban form for providing urban services, because the services will be integrated into
Gonsistency with SRC 165, Annexation
C~705
Page4
June 25, 2012
the existing City infrastructure that exists adjacent to the property, and potential jurisdictional
conflicts will not exist. The proposed annexation complies with this criterion.
Criterion 3:
The uses and density that will be allowed can be served through the
orderly, efficient and timely extension of key urban facilities and
services;
Comments provided by the various City departments indicate that the Territory in the
proposed annexation may be served through the orderly, efficient and timely extension of key
urban facilities and services as outlined in the City's adopted master plans, CIP and public
works and parks design and construction standards. No improvements to urban facilities and
services are needed at this time to serve the Territory.
If new development is proposed for the Territory, additional urban facilities and services will
be required and will be provided in accordance with the City's adopted master plans, CIP and
Urban Growth Management process as set forth in SRC Chapter 66. The territory proposed
for annexation lies inside the Urban Service Area. Connections to provide adequate public
facilities, including water, sewer, stormwater, transportation, and park services, may be
necessitated by new development. If such faCilities are not provided at public expense under
the City's adopted master plans, the CIP, etc., they will be provided at the developer's
expense at the time of development. The proposed annexation complies with this criterion.
Criterion 4:
The public interest would be furthered by the referral of the annexation
to the voters.
The Petitioner has met the annexation petition, application, information submission, fee,
waiver and all other requirements for petitioner-initiated annexations including, but not limited
to, those found in ORS Chapter 222, SRC Chapter 165, SRC 165.070, SRC 165.080 and
SRC 165.090. A valid triple majority consent petition for annexation of the Territory has been
signed and, thus, there is no need to hold an election in the Territory to be annexed.
Annexations applied for after May 16, 2000, however, require approval of the voters of the
city under Section 61 of the Salem City Charter and SRC 165.050. Therefore, the city is
required to refer this proposed annexation to the voters. The proposed annexation of the
Territory conforms to the Salem Area Comprehensive Plan. Services can be provided
consistent with the city's adopted master plans and Public Works design and construction
standards. The annexation of unincorporated territory contiguous to the city limits will result
in urban services being provided in a more orderly, efficient and timely manner. For these
reasons, the public interest would be furthered by the referral of the proposed annexation of
the Territory to the voters.
2.
The proposed withdrawal of the Territory more specifically described in Exhibit 2
conforms to the following criteria found in SRC 165.140:
When withdrawal from a special service district is not automatic, the City Council shall decide
on withdrawal from those special service districts. These withdrawals shall be made
according to applicable state statutes governing the specific withdrawal.
Upon approval by the voters, the City will withdraw the Territory from Salem Suburban Rural
Fire Protection District and replace those services with service from the City of Salem. The
criterion for a decision to withdraw the Territory from such a district is whether such
withdrawal "is for the best interest of the city," ORS 222.524. No Salem Area Comprehensive
Plan provision or any implementing ordinances apply to the withdrawal decision, and none is
amended in the process of making the decision. In addition, the decision to withdraw territory
and serve the territory with city-supplied urban services rather than district-supplied services
would not produce significant impacts on present or future land uses. Consequently, the
withdrawal decision is not the kind of decision that requires application of land use laws. The
Consistency with SRC 165, Annexation C-705
Page 5
June 25, 2012
statutory "best interest of the City" criterion, therefore, is the sole basis for a withdrawal
decision.
Based upon the record in this case and after due consideration of such evidence, testimony
and objections, if any, the City Council finds it is for the best interest of the City to withdraw
the Territory from Salem Suburban Rural Fire Protection District and to provide the Territory
with city services. The interests of the City would best be served if those who may reside in
the Territory once annexed receive City services without the problems that would result from
the Territory being subject to overlapping jurisdictions that provide urban services. It is for
the best interest of the City for those who may reside in the newly annexed Territory to not
pay both City taxes and an additional assessment to receive services that may readily be
supplied by the City with such additional taxation. It isfor the best interest of the City to not
leave the Territory in Salem Suburban Rural Fire Protection District because that would lead
to a fragmented approach to delivery of public services and unequal tax bases. Withdrawal
of the Territory from the respective districts is for the best interest of the City because it would
promote efficiency, economy and sound management in the provision of urban services for
newly annexed Territory. The Territory should be withdrawn from Salem Suburban Rural Fire
Protection District.
Consistency with SRC 165, Annexation C-705
Page 6
June 25, 2012
Received
MAY 1 7 2012
PERMIT APPLICATION CENTER/CITY HALL
555 LIBERTY STREET SE/ROOM 320
SALEM, OREGON 97301
Community Development
(503) 588-6256
Website: www.citvofsalem.net
ANNEXATION PETITION AND
CONSENT AND WAIVER OF BALLOT MEASURE 37 AND BALLOT MEASURE 49 CLAIMS
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council of the City of Salem, Marion County, State of Oregon
~
C:ro.: · Y\1\ow\ N
Petitioner(s):.
0
i ~Wthe legal owner(s) or contract purchas~r(s)
of the following describe real property (the Territory) comprising approximately
acres, and
located outside of, but contiguous to, the corporate boundaries of the City of Salem:
~
()'l~LU LlJ
Af>QJ400
'
.
I , ·a
. [add legal description or tax lot number]
Petitioner(s) respectfully request(s) that the Territory be annexed to the City of Salem, and by my/our
signature(s) hereon, (does)(do) hereby consent to such annexation, and (does)(do) hereby request that the City
Council take such steps as are necessary to determine whether the Territory should be annexed and to submit
the annexation to the electors of the City of Salem, as required by Salem City Charter, Section 61.
In addition to any other applicable fees and costs, Petitioner(s) hereby agree(s) to pay Petitioner('s)(s') pro rata
share of the cost of placing the annexation measure on the ballot, and of publishing notices and other
information related thereto, any by my/our signatures hereon consent to the imposition of an election cost lien
on the Territory to secure payment of all election costs, should 1/we fail to pay such costs when due, and that
1/we fully understand that the election cost lien will be filed in the City of Salem lien docket, shall have priority
over all other liens, except liens for the payment of taxes levied by any governmental unit, shall bear interest at
the legal rate, and shall remain a lien against the Territory until the election costs are fully paid or the lien
foreclosed, as provided by law.
Petitioner(s) knowingly and willingly waive(s) any and all claims that 1/we might assert against the City of Salem
arising out of, or resulting from, or are in anyway connected to, those certain statewide initiatives commonly
known as Ballot Measure 37 and Ballot Measure 49 or any successors thereto, and that might accrue as a result
of the annexation of the territory into the City of Salem, or the imposition of City of Salem land use regulations
pursuant thereto, whether the claims be past, present or future. Petitloner(s) hereby consent(s) to the imposition
of such land use regulations that are in existence at the time of annexation, and to which the territory becomes
subject as a result of the annexation into the corporate limits of the City of Salem.
Owner(s) or Contract Purchaser(s):
(Owner/Purchaser signatures)
· Golot-='0'ovv\so"-)
--
Address:
::2-~95 12o"'¥.s rl''('\') P,~:>t0L-\,]
aocrs 1:Pa ¥:s re xtq -e.v ruw
Turn over for chief petitioner statement and notarization of signature(s).
I
ATTACHMENT B
~ '/ !· -~- -· ,..... ., ..,,
C:z<hlae
ro
I,
Dyv-\s(,[["\
' Chief Petitioner, upon oath or affirmation, say that I secured
each signature appearing on the foregoing petition, and each name was signed freely, voluntarily, without undue
influence of any nature and under no misrepresentation as to the facts, and I further affirm that, to the best of my
knowledge, the individuals above named constitute more than half of the owners of land in the territory proposed
to be annexed and these owners also own more than half of the land in the territory and own real property in
that territory representing more than ha Lpf the assessed value of all real property In the territory.
.
c
STATE OF OREGON
ss.
COUNTY OF '£oJi,_
dl>C'J---
Signed and sworn to/affirmed before me on,_~~"-----' :!Gil% by
10 11/l
6-rJ.b< 1\ 1'\~
(Name or Names of Persons Signing)
NOTARY
OFFICIAL SEAL
JUDITH L POSTIEA
NOTARY PUBLIC • OReGON
COMMISSION NO, 461 ~40
OREGON
My Commission expires:
(Notary Signature)
'1-S'-Itf
(NOTARY SEAL)
G:\CD\PLANNING\ANNEXATION\Appflcatron Forms\Annexation Petition (revised dba)1.23.doc
Received
JUL 2 8 2010
City of Salem, Oregon
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division
555 Liberty St SE I Room 320
Salem, OR 97301-3513
Re: 2395 DOAKS FERRY ROAD- Health Hazard Annexation
Dear Sir/Madam:
Please find attached our application for the above named property to be annexed into the City of
Salem.
This application is being requested as "Voter Exempt" on the basis of a "Health Hazard" existing
condition that unless resolved may result in an expanded health hazard. Currently there is no
domestic water supply connected to the home. City of Salem's revised code, among other
definitions, defines a health hazard as "lack of domestic water supply". Our documentation
includes concurrence of this interpretation by the Polk County Community Development
Director.
As the property is in foreclosure we define ownership as follows:
Current Owner:
Beneficial Oregon/Pamela Colucci/Asset Manager
1-909-397-3906 or [email protected]
931 Corporate Center Dr.
Pomona, CA 91768
Listing Agent/Local Contact:
Tracy Sturgeon/Coldwell Banker Mt West Real Estate
503-881-1939 or [email protected]
201 Ferry St. Suite 200
Salem, OR 97301
Buyer: Gabe Morrison, working with Marie Hoskins/Prudential Real Estate Professionals
503-559-2929 or [email protected]
Once filing this annexation application our intent is to apply for a City of Salem Water
connection, your help in securing this application is much appreciated.
Sincerely,
Tracy Sturgeon
Coldwell Banker Mt West Real Estate
201 Ferry St. Suite 201
Salem, OR.
97301
rage:
1 01 1
Cecelia Urbani - 2395 Doaks Ferry Rd Water Supply
From:
Barry Buchanan
To:
[email protected]
Date:
Subject:
CC:
8/2/2010 2:47PM
2395 Doaks Ferry Rd Water Supply
Cecelia Urbani; Glenn Davis
Tracy:
I wish to advise you that the P.W. Director has re-reviewed the water supply issue to your property, and at
his discretion has decided to supplied water from the City on a completed "voter approved" annexation application, rather
than "health hazard voter exempt".
From your point of view this will make little difference other than the cost associated with the voter requirements. From the
City's point of view it eliminates the condition of providing special circumstances for the resultant enclave of the property
adjacent to your property.
Cecelia Urbani will contact you with more details in the near future. Glenn Davis is now in control of the staff report and
associated paperwork.
I apologize for any inconvenience this change may make to you and your team.
Kind regards
Barry b.
Barry J. Buchanan, P.E.
Senior Program Manager
City of Salem
Public Works Department
Utilities Planning Sec., Directors Office
555 Liberty St. SE
Salem, OR 97301:3503
Office: 503 588 6211
Cell: 360 901 1564
e-mail: [email protected]
file://C:\Documents and Settings\cdesanti\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C56DA93GWC2ComDevl 0... 8/2/2010
FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF:
AGENDA ITEM NO.:
PUBLIC WORKS FILE NO.:
TO:
·
August 9, 2010
4.3 (e)
~JifOR AND~ COUNCIL
THROUGH':-ciN~IS, CI~NAGER
FROM:
PETER FERNANDEZ, P.E., PUBLie'VI(J31U~l:N:ll~
SUBJECT:
DOMESTIC WATER PROVISION to
ISSUE:
Shall Council allow 2395 Doaks Ferry Road NW to connect to the City of Salem's W1
water supply?
·
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council approve the connection of 2395 Doaks Ferry Road NW
to the W1 water supply system conditioned upon the applicant filing a petition for
annexation to the City.
BACKGROUND:
The property at 2395 Doaks Ferry Road NW has historically been served with domestic
water from Orchard Heights Water Association (OHWA). The OHWA receives water in
bulk supply from the City of Salem; hence, the property has been an indirect customer
of the City of Salem.
Recently, the property had been vacated and placed into receivership. The prior
owners had also failed to pay the water service connection fees for several months.
Consequently, OHWA placed a lien on the property to recover the delinquent dues,
physically removed the service connection, and terminated their OHWA stake holding.
The property is currently in negotiations for sale with a receiver and a third party.
OHWA's by-laws only allow consideration of issuance of new shares once per year at
their annual meeting; this meeting is not until November. OHWA will not consider
reconnecting the service until that time. At this time, the property.is without domestic
water. The receiver wishes to resolve the water supply issue as quickly as practically
possible to enable the property sale to proceed. The third party is aware of the water
issues.
The property is contiguous with, although outside, the City limits, and is inside the
Urban Growth Boundary (UGB).
Domestic Water Provision to 2395 Doaks Ferry Road NW
Council Meeting of August 9, 2010
Page 2
FACTS AND FINDINGS:
1.
City of Salem's Ability to Provide Domestic Water
The City of Salem has two water mains running In Doaks Ferry Road NW in front of the
property from which a water service could be provided. As stated above, the property
has been receiving City of Salem water in the past via the OHWA system. No additional
development is proposed at this time. Therefore, no system development charges will
be due upon connection to the water supply.
Consistent with the provisions of Salem Revised Code 72.220 and the Salem Area
Comprehensive Plan (SACP), City Council has traditionally agreed that such properties
may be provided with City water conditioned upon application or agreement to annex
into the City.
SACP Section IV (C)(5): Sewer or water service will not be extended to any land
for development outside citl{ limits or County service districts. Such areas must
be annexed to the City to receive those services except as may be agreed by the
City and appropriate County; and further;
Section 10 to the City of Salem-Polk County IGA: The City of Salem and Polk
County will refrain from development, creation, or extension of sewer or water
service to those areas lying within the UGB, but outside the incorporated limits of
the City, until such time that such areas are first annexed to the City of Salem,
except where:
a) these service are already being provided; or
b) the City has a legal commitment to provide such services, and only if
such services can be provided in the amount or level required by such
action; or
c) City-owned sewer or water is provided to parcels of five acres or less if
water and sewer services are present on all immediately contiguous
properties or public rights-of-way.
SCR 72.220. Service Beyond Corporate Limits:
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, any person owning property
outside the limits of the city and adjacent to a city water main who desires a
connection thereto may make application to the council for permission to
connect. Such application shall des.cribe the property to be served, the quantity
of water needed and the use to which it will be put, together with such other
information as may be requested by the director of public works. The application
shall be accompanied by a properly executed petition and consent for annexation
to the city of the property des?ribed in the application.
BB/JPffLC:G:\GROUP\D!RECfOR\ANN\COUNC!L 2010\REPORTS 2010\AUGUST 9\2395 DOAKS fERRY WATER ONLY SR V3.DOC
Domestic Water Provision to 2395 Doaks Ferry Road NW
Council Meeting of August 9, 2010
Page 3
(b) The council shall consider the application and may either grant or reject the
same, and if it be granted, the same shall constitute an agreement by the
applicant to abide by all the terms of this section and all the rules, rates, and
regulations prescribed by the council by resolution or otherwise.
2.
Annexation
The receiver/seller of the property has completed an annexation application with the
understanding and approval of the potential buyer. On July 29, 2010 the application
was submitted to the City of Salem.
Robert Chandler, Ph.D, P.E.
Assistant Public Works Director
Attachment:
Map of subject property and surrounding area
Ward 8
August 4, 2010
BB/JPffLC,G:\GROUP\DIRECfOR\ANN\COUNCIL 2010\REPORTS 2010\AUGUST 9\2395 DOAKS FERRY WATER ONLY SR V3.DOC
MEMORANDUM
To:
Pamela Cole, Case Manager
From:
Jim Stewart, Deputy Fire Chief4){ib
Date:
June 4, 2012
Subject:
Annexation C-705, 2395 Doaks Ferry Road NW
The Salem Fire Department response time to this location is estimated at 5.2 to 5. 7 minutes
depending on road conditions, traffic, and similar variables. Primary fire protection and EMS
service. would be provided from Fire Station #5 located at 1520 Glen Creek Road NW.
Secondary service would be provided from Fire Station# 1 located at370 Trade Street SE.
The property is inside the Salem Suburban Rural Fire Protection District, which is currently
served by the Salem Fire Department.
..
ATTACHMENT C
Finance Division
Administrative Services Department
To: City of Salem Planning Division
From: David Lacy, Financial Analyst
Date: May 15, 2012
Subject: Tax Analysis for Annexation C-705
The amount of property tax levied each year against a parcel of real estate is the
product of the parcel's assessed value and its total tax rate. While annexation does not
affect assessed value, annexation can have a significant impact on a parcel's total tax
rate.
The following table shows the expected impact of annexation on the total tax rate of the
parcel in the subject case.
I
555 Liberty Street SE, Room 230, Salem, OR 97301
ATIACHMENTD
503-588-6040
TAX RATE IMPACT OF ANNEXATION
Annexation case
Tax lot
Description
C-705
7317AB400
'
Before Annexation
After Annexation
3219
3201
Tax code area
Government
Polk County
City of Salem
Urban Renewal
Other government
Total government
$
Schools
Salem SO 32J
Chemeketa
Willamette ESO
Total schools
Bonds
Polk County
City of Salem
Salem SO 32J
Chemeketa
Other bonds
Total bonds
1.7160
$
2.2459
3.9619
1.6721
5.5247
0.7844
0.9211
8.9023
125%
4.5210
0.6259
0.2967
5.4436
4.2832
0.5932
0.2813
5.1577
-5%
0.5431
1.9168
0.2544
0.5292
0.9769
1.8411
0.2492
2.7143
3.5964
Other
Local options
UR Special Levy
Total other
Total tax rate
Change
32%
0.3790
0.3790
$
12.1198
Total tax levy =total tax rate x (assessed value /1,000).
Tax rates presented here assume no compression.
Source: County Assessor
Page2 of2
$
18.0354
49%
PUBLIC
CITY~~
<....,.J AT YOUR 5ERVJcg
W 0 R K S
TO:
Pamela Cole, Case Manager
THROUGH:
Keith Keever, Park Superintendent
FROM:
Jan Staszewski, Urban Forester
DATE:
June 4, 2012
SUBJECT:
Annexation of ANXC-705, 2395 Doaks Ferry Rd NW
AMANDA SEQ. NO.: 10-112326-AN
Park Service and Pedestrian Access:
· No City park is impacted by this annexation. No land is available for park development
from this annexation. The lot size is 1.2 acres and the nearest park is Brush College
Park at approximately 0.33 miles and Straub Nature Park at 0.38.
J
~=ATT=ACHMENT=='JE
:C:\USERS\PCOLE\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\XPGRPWISE\ANXC-705.DOC
PUBLIC
CITY~~
<.....J AT YOUR SERVICE
W 0 R K S
TO:
Pamela Cole, Planner II
Community Development Department
FROM:~~(
Glenn Davis, P.E., C.F.M., Chief Development Engineer
Public Works Department
DATE:
June 5, 2012
SUBJECT:
INFRASTRUCTURE AVAILABILITY
ANXC-705 PETITION-INITIATED ANNEXATION (10-112326)
2395 DOAKS FERRY ROAD NW
PURPOSE
Identify availability of public works infrastructure (streets, sanitary sewer, storm
drainage, and water) for a proposed annexation on approximately 1.2 acres and located
at 2395 Doaks Ferry Road NW.
PUBLIC WORKS INFRASTRUCTURE
No public improvements are required for annexation. The following information explains
the condition of existing public infrastructure in the vicinity of the subject property and
potential development requirements.
Urban Growth Area Development Permit
The subject property is located inside the Urban Service Area (USA) and adequate
facilities are available. No UGA permit is required.
Streets
Doaks Ferry Road NW has an approximate 46-foot improvement within a 94-foot-wide
··right-of-way abutting the subject property. This street is designated as a major arterial
street in the Salem TSP. The standard for this street classification is a 68-foot-wide
improvement within a 96-foot-wide right-of-way.
Storm Drainage
1. Existing Conditions
ATTACHMENT F
Code authority references are abbreviated in this document as follows: Sa/em Revised Code (SRC);
Public Works Design Standards (PWDS); Sa/em Transportation System Plan (Salem TSP); and
Stormwater Management Plan (SMP).
';
, ,, ,;:'CCC' i ctC'ec',C'' c i,'i''' CCCC''t'"'' cc'',fc'''"
,,,,,,,,,,,,,c,c,
Lc'','',,'''e''i'cC,,;;!a '''ci?t'\"'"''ccc;,,,;;c,\;,,,c,,',)tiH'ict,,,;,,,'
Pamela Cole, Planner II
June 5, 2012
2
M tJI
a. There is a ditch adjacent to Doaks Ferry Road NW.
Water
1. Existing Conditions
a. The subject property is located in the G-O water service level. The
existing residence is served by a City 1-inch domestic water meter.
b. A 16-inch G-0 public water line is located in Doaks Ferry Road NW.
c. An 18-inch W-2 public water line is located in Doaks Ferry Road NW.
Sanitary Sewer
1. Existing Sewer
a. An 8-inch sewer line is located in Doaks Ferry Road NW.
Prepared by:, Robin Bunse, Administrative Analyst II
cc: File
TLC/JP:G:\GROUP\PUBWKS\PLAN_ACT\PAFINAL12\ANNEX\ANXC 705 DoAKS FERRY (10-112326).DOC
DAVID FHIDENMi\1\EH, M'"""fl"'
FadliHes t1nd Planning Dt!pi'H'Irrwnt
Planninu <:nvJ Properly Services
St\LEM•l\E!ZER
:l6:l0 S!ille Strec.t, [$lci!J. C • Solrm1, Oregon ')73()]
fiiB<l99<l290 • Mnhik: fi03·'l3:1.4727 • FAK c,o:l<J7f,.7847
E-mi:lil: frtdenmn!H..'l'___ davitlifflsall-:elz .k.1 ~2 ,ni',US
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
June 6, 2012
Pamel~ Cole, Associate Planner
Planning Division, City ofSalem
555 Liberty Street SE, Room 305
Sal!lm OR 97301
FAX No. 503"588-6005
RE:
Land Use Activity
Salem Annexation Case No. C-705
SUMMARY OF COMMENTS
School District: Subject property is located in the Salem-Keizer School District
School Assignmet)t: The strbjeot property is served by Brush College Elementary, Straub Middle and
West Salem High Schools
School Capacity: Sufficient school capacity currently exists to serve the assumed housing density of 5
dwelling till its per acre on the l.Z acre site
School Tranportation Services: School transportation services would be available for high school
students Jiving at the subject property location due to a hazardous walk zone designation. School
tr·ansportation services would not be provided for elemetitary and middle school students since the
property is located within the Walk zone for these two schools.
Below is data and the District's comments regarding the proposed land use activity identified above. If
you have questions, please call at (503) 399-3290.
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INFORMATION (GRADES K TO 5)
1. School Name: Brush College fllementary School
Estimated change in student enrollment due to proposed development: 2
3. Current school capacity: 526
·
4. Estimate of school enrollment including new development: 412
5. Ratio of estimated school enrollment to total capacity including new development: 78%.
6, Walk Zone Review: Within walk zone ofE!emen(ary School.
7. Estimate of additional students due to previous ZOlllanduse applications: 18
8. Estimate of additional students due to previous 2012 land use applications: 3
9. Estimated cumulative impactofZOl I-121and lise actions on school capacity: 82% ofcapacity,
z.
MIDDLE SCHOOL INFORMA TJON (GRADES 6 TO 8)
1. School Name: Straub Middle School
2. Estimated change i!J student enrollment due to proposed development: 1
3, Current school c11pacity: 907
4. Estimate of school enrollment including new development: 751
5. Ratio of estimated school enrollment to total capacity including new development: 83%
Facilities nnd Planning Dcpnrtment
Plmming nnd )>ro)lcrty Services
ATTACHMENT G
6.
7.
8.
9.
HIGH
I.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Walk Zone Review: Within walk zone of Middle School.
Estimate of additional students due to previous 2011 land use applications: 27
Estimate of additional students due to previous 2012 land use applications: 9
Estimated cumulative impact of 2011-12 land use actions on school capacity: Approx. 87% of
capacity.
SCHOOL INFORMATION (GRADES 9 TO 12)
School Name: West Salem High School
Estimated change in student enrollment due to proposed development: I
Current school capacity; 1,734
Estimate of school enrollment including new development: 1, 729
Ratio of estimated school enrollment to total capacity including new development: 100%
Walk Zone Review: Eligible for transportation due to hazard ..
Estimate of additional students due to previous 2011 land use applications: 27
Estimate of additional students due to previous 2012 land use applications: 12
Estimated cumulative impact of2011-12 land use actions on school capacity: 101% of capacity.
ESTIMATE SUMMARY (GRADES K TO 12):
1. Total estimated change in student enrollment: 4
2. Total estimated student enrollment over capacity: 0
3. Estimated short-term cost to District for new facilities, beyond current facility capacity, due to
change in student enrollment: $ 0
4. Total estimated additional income to District for new facilities due to change in student
enrollment: $ 0
Developer should provide paved walk route(s) to allow pedestrian access and bicycle access to school(s)
fo·om all residences within the new development and should provide all improvements required by the
City of Salem where new transportation routes are established or existing transportation routes change,
such as school flashers, crosswalks, and signage. As per ORS 195.115, when the walk zone review
indicates "eligible for transportation due to hazard" the District requests thatthe City initiate a planning
process with the District to identifY the barriers and hazards to children walking or bicycling to and from
school, determine if the hazards can be eliminated by physical or policy changes and include the hazard
elimination in the City's planning and budgeting process.
Facilities and Planning Dcpartmcnl
Planning and Property Services
Page 2 of3
Fomt PLN~P006
Revised: 3/27/12
ASSUMPTIONS:
1. When land use request is granted, 6 (assume 5 du/acre) new residence(s) will be. built.
2. Estimates are computed using the St11dent Rate per Dwelling Method described in the District's
Facility Study for years 2001-2020.
3. If current capacity exists at the schools cunently serving the parcel then an estimate qf zero cost,
or no significant impact, is made.
4. If current capacity does not exist at the schools currently serving the parcel then an estimate of
cost for one-time capital improvements is made.
5. Income from the proposed land usc for capital improvement is assumed to be zero since capital
improvement funds come from voter approved bond measures that can be an unpredictable. and
irregular source of income.
6. Income fi·om a State School Facilities grant may be available depending on state ftmdlngo The
grant amount ranges fr01n 0% to 8% of the construction cost. Since the fundit!g is unpredictable,
it has not been itlclu<le<l as income. The cunent 2009-11 biennium facilities grant f\mding for toll
District was $20,802.
·
7. General Fund Budget Amount for the 4011-12 school year is $8,848 per student(ADM), Tlw
State School Fund Revenue for 2011-12 is estimated to be $6,214 per student {ADM). ADM is
"Average daily membership" as defined in ORS 327.006 (3).
Sincerely,
~i~
~er,
~~operty
l'latming
c:
anager
Services
Mike Wolfe, Chief Operations Officer
Jim Jenney, Interim Director of' Facilities and Planning Dept.
Kelly Carlisle, Director of Secondary Education
Mellssa Cole, Director of Secondary Education
Ron Speck, Director of Elementary Education
Meera Kreitzer, Director of Elementary Education
Mike Bednarek, Special Projects Coordinator
Gene Bloom, Risk Management Dept,
Michael Shields, Director of Transportation
Facilities and Planning Department
Plnnning nnd Property Services
Pnge3 of3
Form I,LN·F006
Revised: 3127/12
Lfak"'ln·~----------ANXC-705 2395 Doaks Ferry Rd NW
General Fund (Current Year Dollars)
Percent
Citywide Total
Annexation Area
Increase
EXPENDITURES
Mayor and Council
Municipal Court
City Manager's Office
Personnel
Finance
Legal
General Services
Community Development
Community Services
Library
Police
Fire
Data Management
Non-Departmental
Capital Outlays
Contingencies
Qwest Reserves
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
165,470
1,490,310
2,341,940
1'109,390
2,896,160
1,674,270
800,490
9,410,490
4,597,980
4,367,060
34,594,770
25,657,100
9,080,880
4,165,340
0
2,500,000
0
104,851,650
12
136
161
70
221
116
320
286
739
143
3,705
561
196
114
67
249
0
7,097
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
REVENUES
Beginning Balance
Property Taxes
Franchise Fees
Fees for Services
Other Fees
Licenses and Permits
Rent
Internal Charges
State Shared Revenues
Other Agencies
State and Federal Grants
Fines and Penalties
Interest and Other Revenues
lnterfund Transfer
TOTAL REVENUES
17,280,690
54,805,260
13,775,030
1,486,370
692,000
582,430
916,350
11,613,590
3,695,550
1,794,170
1,433,900
3,442,240
230,140
556,280
112,304,000
0
5,406
722
19
85
0
11
1,033
274
4
97
166
16
0
7,833
na
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%.
Surplus/(Deficit)
736
Source: City of Salem Annexation Mode!
ATTACHMENT H
II
I