KP4 Offshore Mechanical and Corrosion template INSTALLATION & DATE(S) HSE INSPECTOR(S)
by user
Comments
Transcript
KP4 Offshore Mechanical and Corrosion template INSTALLATION & DATE(S) HSE INSPECTOR(S)
KP4 Offshore Mechanical and Corrosion template INSTALLATION & OPERATOR Persons interviewed Page 1 of 5 DATE(S) HSE INSPECTOR(S) Position & Employing Company Ver1 12 May2011 KP4 Offshore Mechanical and Corrosion template Offshore Safety Critical Pressure systems 1. Does the Duty Holder’s offshore inspection programme match those degradation mechanisms identified by the onshore integrity team which are relevant to ageing of pressure systems? 2. Do the offshore staff know what the long term (ageing) corrosion management strategy is for hydrocarbon containing systems? (eg replace carbon steel piping with duplex stainless steel, more use of production chemicals?) 3. What is the status of the anomaly (defect) list for hydrocarbon systems? 4. What is the status of temporary repairs on hydrocarbon containing systems? 5. What are the ICP findings on hydrocarbon containing systems? 6. What is the status of deferrals for hydrocarbon containing systems? 7. What is the status of safety critical backlogs for pressure systems, both corrective & routine? 8. Are there any examples of equipment with outstanding materials that require no maintenance? (Points 3 to 7 to explore the Duty Holder’s KPIs for life-cycle inspection and maintenance programmes) Non compliance / Major failing Isolated failure / Incomplete system In compliance / OK Not tested / No evidence Duty Holder Response: HSE Comments: HSE Action: Page 1 of 5 Ver1 12 May2011 KP4 Offshore Mechanical and Corrosion template Offshore Machinery 1. Does the Duty Holder’s offshore machinery inspection programme match those degradation mechanisms identified by the onshore machinery team which are relevant to ageing? 2. Do the inspections of rotating equipment include inspections of the static part of rotating equipment? 3. What is the status of the ICP findings with respect to safety critical rotating equipment? 4. What is the status of deferral for rotating equipment? 5. What is the status of safety critical backlogs for rotating equipment? ( Points 3 to 5 to explore the Duty Holder’s KPIs for life cycle inspection programmes) NON COMPLIANCE / MAJOR FAILING ISOLATED FAILURE / INCOMPLETE SYSTEM IN COMPLIANCE / OK NOT TESTED / NO EVIDENCE Duty Holder Response: HSE Comments: HSE Action: Page 1 of 5 Ver1 12 May2011 KP4 Offshore Mechanical and Corrosion template Offshore Cranes 1. Does the Duty Holder’s offshore inspection programme for cranes match those degradation mechanisms identified by the onshore integrity team which are relevant to AGEING of cranes? 2. Check the modifications made to the inspection of cranes PMS after FMCEA analysis. 3. What is the status of the ICP findings with respect to Cranes? 4. What is the deferral status for cranes? 5. What is the status of the backlog for cranes, both corrective & routine? (Point 3 to 5 to explore the Duty Holder’s KPIs for life cycle inspection programmes) NON COMPLIANCE / MAJOR FAILING ISOLATED FAILURE / INCOMPLETE SYSTEM IN COMPLIANCE / OK NOT TESTED / NO EVIDENCE Duty Holder Response: HSE Comments: HSE Action: Page 1 of 5 Ver1 12 May2011 KP4 Offshore Mechanical and Corrosion template Offshore Fabric Maintenance 1. Does the Duty Holder’s offshore fabric maintenance inspection programme match the current anticipated end of field life? 2. What is the status of the anomaly (defect) list for gratings, stairwells and hand rails? a. Are any on safety critical escape routes? b. Are the escape routes to sea in a suitable condition as required by the safety case? c. What is their rejection criteria? d. Have corroded gratings and stair treads been impact tested? 3. What is the status of the anomaly (defect list) for windwalls? 4. What are the ICP findings for fabric maintenance, particularly for safety critical elements? 5. Have there been unusual materials related failures or problems (e.g galvanic corrosion of TR window frame screws, early degradation of helideck landing light lens)? Non compliance / Major failing Isolated failure / Incomplete system In compliance / OK Not tested / No evidence Duty Holder Response: HSE Comments: HSE Action: Page 1 of 5 Ver1 12 May2011