The Science behind the Stars ctY Astrophysics by Spencer McClung
by user
Comments
Transcript
The Science behind the Stars ctY Astrophysics by Spencer McClung
The Science behind the Stars CTY Astrophysics by Spencer McClung The planetary nebula designated NGC 2818, which lies in the southern constellation of Pyxis (the Compass), was imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2009. The spectacular structure of the nebula contains the outer layers of a star that were expelled into interstellar space. The glowing gaseous shrouds in the nebula were shed by the central star after it ran out of fuel to sustain the nuclear reactions in its core. 10 imagine Sept/Oct 2014 NASA, ESA, Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA). w O n day three of CTY Astrophysics, we were given a series of images of light from a star and had to determine the mass of its binary companion. For an hour we used two sticks to monitor small changes in the star’s light and then used a very long series of calculations with very big numbers. In the end, we were off by a couple orders of magnitude, but this hands-on exploration of scale and distance gave us a taste of some of the challenges astronomers have been tackling for centuries. After this introduction to spectral analysis, we went on to examine photos of stars taken over a period of six months by the Hubble Space Telescope. We were looking specifically for changes in light of another star: If a star’s brightness decreased, we learned, there was most likely a planet transiting the star and blocking its light. From the amount of light lost, it is possible to determine the approximate size and composition of the planet passing in front of the star. At first glance, the pictures we were analyzing looked the same; but, using computers to calculate differences in light, we found that a planet was orbiting the star. Obviously we couldn’t see the planet, but it was thrilling to learn from the data that it was there. In addition to learning how to calculate the size of celestial objects, we discussed the life cycle of stars, from gaseous nebulas to rapidly spinning neutron stars. The process of stellar evolution that I found most interesting was nuclear fusion, which is essential to the chemical makeup of the universe. To put things simply, four hydrogen atoms under extremely immense pressure and temperature join to form a helium atom. Some of the mass of the hydrogen atoms is released as energy (as Mr. Einstein’s e=mc2 explains) when they form the lighter helium atom. This process repeats itself in the center of stars with three helium atoms combining to form a carbon atom. For the most massive stars, this continues until finally iron is formed. Then the weight is so great that the star collapses in on itself and explodes in a supernova, which is how almost every atom heavier than iron is created. That means that any gold or silver you may be wearing was created in the center of a supermassive explosion billions of times brighter than our Sun. Intense, right? Astrophysics is all about extremes. We dealt with numbers as high as 1030 when calculating masses of supernovas and as low as 10-30 when calculating atomic masses and energies. By figuring out how much energy is released in a single reaction, you can determine the entire energy output of a star. Using these massive numbers, we realized how precise scientists must be. For the moon landing, for example, an extra pound of force could have been catastrophic—yet we were getting answers that were off by multiple orders of magnitude. Although this was acceptable in class (considering the processing power of student calculators versus supercomputers), the class constantly strove for improvements, getting more exact answers every day. It became almost a game to see who could calculate most precisely how many atoms are in our Sun. While I had expected this course to involve calculations and math, I was surprised to delve into topics I had no idea really existed, such as flux. To my class’s dismay, we learned that flux is not the essential part of a time-traveling DeLorean, but the radiation output of a star. We talked about a huge range of topics related to space, from black holes to neutron degeneracy to time travel to Carl Sagan. I learned how to draw conclusions from different data: Just as professional astrophysicists learned everything we know about black holes from the change in stars nearby, we used data to recognize exoplanets and the chemistry of super- To my class’s dismay, we learned that flux is not the essential part of a time-traveling Delorean, but the radiation output of a star. novas. The course gave me a better understanding of our universe and how it works. After taking this course, I started visiting the Astronomy Picture of the Day website, which features a new photograph of astronomy content with a description detailing the science behind it. I’ve always appreciated images of stars, planets, and galaxies. Now, after three weeks of studying, analyzing, observing, measuring, and investigating celestial objects, I’ve come to see these images as not just beautiful pictures, but as representations of beautiful science. n Spencer McClung is a junior at Glenelg Country School in Ellicott City, MD. He runs on the varsity cross country team, runs and throws discus on the varsity track team, and is a member of the robotics team. Spencer is active in scouting and recently went to Philmont Scout Ranch. He was a “nevermore” at CTY Lancaster this summer, where he took Number Theory. imagine 11