The Purpose Improving Operational Efficiency by Focusing Resources on Areas of Safety Significance (10CFR50.69)
by user
Comments
Transcript
The Purpose Improving Operational Efficiency by Focusing Resources on Areas of Safety Significance (10CFR50.69)
Improving Operational Efficiency by Focusing Resources on Areas of Safety Significance (10CFR50.69) Thomas Zachariah Project Manager, Risk Assessment NRC 2016 RIC March 9, 2016 • Bethesda North Marriott 1 The Purpose Provide Flexibility to Reduce Cost and Improve Plant Operations & Safety Margins High Safety Significant Areas Reduce Burden Increase Focus Low Safety Significant Areas This is a Key to the Cost Effectiveness of Nuclear Power 2 Categorization Safety Related Low Risk 50.69 High Risk Non Safety Related RISC 1 RISC 2 Safety Related Non Safety Related High Safety Significance High Safety Significance Safety Related Non Safety Related Low Safety Significance Low Safety Significance RISC 3 RISC 4 RISC = Risk Informed Safety Class 3 1 Categorization Experience Averages for Component Categorization RISC 1 RISC 2 13‐25% of Safety Related SSCs 1‐3% of Non‐Safety Related SSCs 75‐87% of Safety Related SSCs 97‐99% of Non‐Safety Related SSCs RISC 3 RISC 4 Exempted Special Treatment Requirements RISC‐3 Components Can Be Scoped Out of These Safety Related Regulations Local Leak Rate Testing [10 CFR 50 Appendix J] Quality Requirements [10 CFR 50 Appendix B] In‐service Inspection [10 CFR 50.55a(g)] Deficiency Reporting [10 CFR Part 21] Maintenance Rule [10 CFR 50.65] In‐service Testing [10 CFR 50.55a(f)] Environmental Qualification [10 CFR 50.49] Event Reporting [10 CFR 50.55(e)] Seismic Qualification [Portions of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 100] ASME XI repair & replacements, applicable portions, with limitations [10 CFR 50.55a(g)] Applicable Portions of IEEE standards [10 CFR 50.55a(h)] Notification Requirements [10 CFR 50.72, 50.73] 5 Alternate Treatments for RISC‐3 Components Can Be Moved from Special Treatments to Alternate Treatments NRC Special Treatment Requirements (Current) Alternate Treatment Requirements (New) Requirements Defined by NRC Requirements Defined by Licensee with No NRC approval Needs to Provide Assurance – More Rigor Needs to Provide Confidence – Less Rigor Results of SDPs are based on NRC Requirements SDP Results on RISC‐3 Components Should Be Green by Definition Still needs to show that component is capable of meeting safety related function 6 2 The Benefits Alternate Treatment Requirements Reduction in Procurement Costs Reduction of Onsite Surveillances Reduction in Vendor Testing Frequency Increased Flexibility of Addressing Obsolescence Decrease Frequency of Replacing Components Reallocation of Resources Example Benefits Improve Safety and Reduce Operational Cost Improved Equipment Reliability Increased Equipment Availability Reduction in Outage Duration 7 Phased Approach Designed to be Methodical and at the Licensee’s Pace Phase 1: Submittal Phase 2: Categorization Phase 3: Alternate Treatment System 2 System 3 Choose a Program Application to Implement 10 CFR 50.69 for NRC Approval Choose a System Choose to Submit System 1 Maintenance Rule ASME XI repair & replacements Environmental Qualification In‐service Inspection Applicable Portions of IEEE standards Seismic Qualification In‐service Testing Event Reporting System 5 Local Leak Rate Testing Notification Requirements System 6 Deficiency Reporting Quality Requirements System 4 Licensee choice on when to enter each phase and choose the most beneficial path 8 Forming a More Cost Effective Industry Piloted guidance has been established and is continually being improved Nuclear Cost‐Effectiveness Site Specific 50.69 Process Implementation NEI Guidance Categorization EPRI Guidance Alternate Treatment Requirements Industry Experience Increased implementation will identify new applications and make the industry more cost effective as a whole Cost‐Effective Improvements 9 3 Summary Not Implementing 50.69 Leaves Significant Operational Savings on the Table Every Year The Submittal is a Low Risk Investment The road has been paved Implement Everything or Nothing…or anything in‐between The rule was designed to be implemented strategically Much of the work completed Potential for great benefits Your implementation plans should reflect that strategy 10 4