FAIRFAX COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING FOR

FAIRFAX COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION
October 22, 2015
PUBLIC HEARING
FOR
PLANNING DETERMINATION
Pursuant to
Va. Code Sec. 15.2 - 2232
Public Hearing Date: November 5 , 2015 at 8:15 p.m.
Application Number:
2232-Y15-1
Applicant:
Fairfax County Department of Public Works and
Environmental Services
Proposed Use:
Huntington Levee and Stormwater Pump Station
Supervisor District:
Mount Vernon
Subject Property Tax Map IDs: 083-l((14C)parcels 0110A, 0118A, 0127A, 0140A, 0153A,
083-l((l6))parcels 0019A-C, 0020B-C, 0013A-B, 0014B, 083l((01))parcels 0042, 0058, 083-l((27))A
Subject Property Address:
Generally, at 2219 Fairfax Terrace, Alexandria, VA 22303
Area of Subject Properties:
Area of Proposed Facilities:
Approximately 29.34 acres
Approximately 2,850 linear feet for the levee, and
approximately 7,800 square feet for the pump station
Application Accepted:
September 25, 2015
Recommendation:
In accordance with Va. Code Sec. 15.2-2232, as amended, staff
recommends that the Planning Commission find that the proposal
by Fairfax County Department of Public Works and
Environmental Services, as amended, to construct the Huntington
Levee and Stormwater Pump Station, generally located at 2219
Fairfax Terrace, Alexandria, VA 22303, is substantially in
accord with provisions of the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
Page 1
2232-V15-1
FCDPW&ES
PLANNING DETERMINATION
Section 15,2 -2232 of the Code of Virginia
Number: 2232-V15-1
Acreage: N/A
District: Mount Vermin
Tax Map ID Number: B3-1 {{14}) (C) I10A, 118A.
Address: Generally located in
127A, 14QA & 153A; B3-1 {(16)) 13A,. 13B, 14B. ISA,
Huntington Park,
19B, 19C , 20B, 20C; 83-1 {{27}) A; 83-1((01)) 42; 83-1 ((01)) 58
Alexandria, VA- 22303
Planned Use: Public Park
Applicant: Fairfax County' Department of Public
Works and Environmental Services
Proposed Use: Levee far Flood Protection
PREPARED B¥ THE BEWMEW CPPLANNNG.W Z0NIN6
USfNS PAMPAX COUNTY ©IS
FCDPW&ES
APPLICATION
2232-V15-1
Page 2
Attachment A
Proposal:
Applicant:
Subject Property:
Huntington Levee and Stormwater Pump Station
Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services
Generally located at 2219 Fairfax Terrace, Alexandria, YA 22303; Tax maps
083-l((14C)parcels 0110A, 0118A, 0127A, 0140A, 0153A, 083l((16))parcels 0019A-C, 0020B-C, 0013A-B, 0014B, 083-l((01))parcels
0042, 0058, 083-l((27))A
Zoning District:
C-3, PDH-3, R-4, R-8
Existing conditions: The site is currently open space and identified as Huntington Park
Project Justification: The applicant states that the proposed facilities are needed to stop recurring
flooding of numerous homes adjacent to Cameron Run. The proposal is the only reasonable
alternative for flood protection onsite.
Proposed Use: Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services proposes
to construct and operate the Huntington levee and stormwater pump station to mitigate flooding in
the residential areas around Huntington Park.
Facility: See application (Attachment A) for full description; all dimensions are approximate:
• Site - Southeast quadrant of County
• Structure, Compound and Screening - The levee will be a combination of an earthen embankment
and a concrete I-wall that runs 2,850 feet parallel to Cameron Run. The embankment will be
between six and eleven feet high, and the concrete I-wall will be four feet in height on top of the
embankment. The top of the embankment will be 13 feet wide, including an eight foot wide
asphalt trail, for a total width of 43 to 68 feet at the base. Stormwater will drain through a box
culvert to pass under Fenwick Drive on the west side of the site, then will run through an open
channel, parallel to the levee, to the pump station located at the east end of the levee. The
pumping station footprint will be an L-shape 146 feet by 78 feet and 46 feet in height.
Transitional screening will be provided on the entire project site perimeter, while the pump
station will be set back from the residence with a forested buffer.
• Location - The level and pump station will be located on and across 16 parcels that are adjacent to
Cameron Run.
• Access - The trail at the top of the embankment will be accessible to the public, but not for
vehicular traffic. Maintenance access will be granted to vehicles through gated entrances from
Metroview Parkway, Huntington Creek Road, and Vernon Drive.
• Operations - Unmanned unless a large storm is predicted, which at that point the pump station
will be staffed to monitor water elevation; operates 24 hours/day, with pumps activated based on
water level; monthly inspections at the pump station and grass mowing is required.
• Security - Pump station will be surrounded by 8 foot tall vinyl coated chain link fence with
padlocked gate. Levee will have gated access at east and west ends.
Off-Site Impacts: The applicant states that the proposed facility is a passive use and will not have
employees or personnel on site (other than inspection, maintenance, or large storm event), or have
any impacts to traffic. The facility will not generate noise, odors or vibrations. Stormwater pumps
will be submerged and housed in a structure that mimics the adjacent residential dwellings. Site
lighting will occur at the pump station, but will be low output and manually switched on, as needed.
FCDPW&ES
2232-V15-1
Page 3
Alternate locations: No other properties would provide floodplain mitigation. No other locations
on the subject parcels would work because the orientation of the proposed levee is critical to keeping
the water out of the affected homes.
DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING AREA
Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses:
• Subject properties- Public Parks, Office, Residential use (3-4 DU/AC)
• North - Cameron Run
• East - Residential use (20+ DU/AC)
• South - Residential use (8-12 DU/AC)
• West - Office
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROVISIONS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
The subject properties are located in the Area IV, Mount Vemon Planning District, MV1
Huntington Community Planning Sector. The Comprehensive Plan Map identifies the properties
as planned for Public Parks, Office, and Residential use (3-4 DU/AC).
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CITATIONS
An assessment of this proposal for substantial conformance with current land use and design
recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan ("the plan") is guided by the following citations
from the Plan.
Area Plan
Fairfax County Comprehensive Plan, 2013 Edition, Area IV, Mount Vernon Planning District,
Amended through 6-2-2015, Overview, Figure 7, Page 22;
"Mount Vernon Planning District Existing Public Parks, MV1: Huntington"
Fairfax County Comprehensive Plan, 2013 Edition, Area IV, Mount Vernon Planning District,
Amended through 6-2-2015, MV1-Huntington Community Planning Sector, Page 99 Figure 22;
"Huntington Transit Station Area"
Fairfax County Comprehensive Plan, 2013 Edition, Area IV, Mount Vernon Planning District,
Amended through 6-2-2015, MV1-Huntington Community Planning Sector, Page 116:
"Land Units A, B and T (Huntington Conservation Area)
The land use recommendations for the Huntington community seek to preserve the stability of this
residential area, upgrade local community shopping facilities, improve parklands and provide better
pedestrian linkage to the Metro station. The Huntington Conservation Area is comprised of Land Units A,
B and T as shown in Figure 28.
A neighborhood improvement program and the Huntington Conservation Plan were adopted for the
community by the Board of Supervisors in March, 1976. The basic goal of that document is the
conservation and development of a viable and sound residential community in the Huntington
neighborhood. First, the neighborhood improvement program lists a series of public improvement projects
FCDPW&ES
2232-Y15-1
Page 4
that will be necessary to improve the livability of Huntington. Second, the Conservation Plan provides the
legal mechanisms for carrying out the activities of the neighborhood improvement program; it firmly
establishes land use densities for the Conservation Area; and it sets standards for future development and
rehabilitation in the community.
Land Unit A comprises most of the northern portion of the Huntington Conservation Area. The
developed area of duplex residential units is planned for residential use at 8-12 dwelling units per acre.
The undeveloped land along the south side of Cameron Run, north of the rear property line of parcels on
the north side of Arlington Terrace, should be acquired for additional public park use to serve the
residents of the Huntington area. It is suggested that the park be developed with passive and active
recreation facilities "
Fairfax County Comprehensive Plan, 2013 Edition, Area IV, Mount Vernon Planning District,
Amended through 6-2-2015, MV1-Huntington Community Planning Sector, Page 128:
Public Facilities
1. Two activity rooms are planned to be added to the Huntington Community Center located in Sector
MV1 between Arlington Terrace and Farrington Avenue to meet future community needs."
Policy Plan
Fairfax County Comprehensive Plan, Policy Plan, 2013 Edition, Public Facilities, Amended
through 3-4-2014, Countywide Objectives and Policies, Pages 2-4:
"Objective 1:
Locate new facilities to provide convenient service to the greatest number
of people or service consumers and users.
Policy a.
Site facilities appropriately to the area they are intended to serve.
Policy b.
Reduce service area overlap between like facilities, unless overlap is necessary
to correct service deficiencies.
Policy c.
Site facilities in accordance with locational standards that maintain accepted
levels of service while reducing duplication or underutilization.
Policy d.
Ensure that minimum populations or service thresholds are projected to be met
before facility construction is undertaken.
Objective 2:
Policy a.
Construct and maintain facilities in accord with expected levels of
service objectives and fiscal limitations.
Program the establishment of facilities through the county's Capital Improvement
Program. Projects programmed for construction in the CIP should either be 1)
identified in the plan text or on the Plan map in accordance with adopted service
levels; 2) be demonstrated as particularly urgent to meet public health or safety
needs or required service levels; or 3) be supported by a needs analysis reviewed
both by the Offices of Comprehensive Planning and Management and Budget and
supported by the County Executive's recommendation as evidenced by CIP
inclusion.
FCDPW&ES
2232-V15-1
Page 5
Policy b.
Follow adopted public facility standards to identify facility requirements associated
with level of need, appropriate quantity and size, and relationship to population.
Policy c.
Ensure adequate maintenance of existing facilities.
Objective 4:
Mitigate the impact of public facilities on adjacent planned and existing
land uses.
Policy a.
Locate public facilities in areas of compatible land use, if service
efficiency and cost effectiveness can be achieved. Siting facilities in areas of
different land uses is acceptable and at times required, to provide centrally
located public facilities which are critical to the public interest as long as the
integrity of the Comprehensive Plan is not impinged.
Policy b.
Co-locate public facilities whenever appropriate to achieve convenience and
economies of scale, as long as the integrity of the Comprehensive Plan is not
impinged.
Policy c.
Design facilities to promote and enhance the community identity of existing
character.
Policy d.
Ensure that public facilities are properly screened and buffered in order to
mitigate visual impact on adjacent planned development of a different use or
nature.
Policy e.
Ensure that site size and development conforms to all requirements of the
Fairfax County Zoning Ordinance and exceeds site acreage requirements, as
possible, to achieve maximum compatibility with surrounding land uses.
Objective 5:
Acquire sites which are appropriate for the facility's specific purpose. Apply
acceptable criteria when evaluating public facility sites.
Policy a.
Consider accessibility in siting facilities. In general, public facilities should have
access to primary arterial roadways. Exceptions to this locational principle include
facilities with a community pedestrian orientation, such as a neighborhood park or
an elementary school.
Policy b.
Locate facilities on sites which have adequate acreage for short-term needs, but
can also accommodate expansion.
Policy c.
Avoid areas of environmental sensitivity except where site acquisition is in
support of open space.
Policy d.
Evaluate engineering considerations, such as slopes and soils and other factors
pertinent to knowing the extent of the site's development cost.
Policy e.
Locate, as possible, facilities on sites with public water and sewer.
Policy f.
Locate facilities on sites preferably having mature vegetation, capable of
providing a natural buffer and enhancing building design.
Policy g.
Page 6
2232-V15-1
FCDPW&ES
Use the 2232 review process to determine the siting suitability and
appropriateness of facilities in relation with the Comprehensive Plan."
STAFF ANALYSIS: See Attachments B-Kiox detailed discussion.
Fairfax County Department of Planning and Zoning
• Zoning Administration Division - Ordinance Administration Branch
Attachment B
The proposal is a public use and permitted by right, provided all bulk regulations for the zoning
district can be met.
• Planning Division - Historic Preservation
No objections to the proposed facility.
Attachment C
• Planning Division - Environment and Development Review Branch
Attachment D
Staff had a number of issues that have been addressed and resolved by the applicant.
Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services
• Site Development and Inspections Division
Comments noted in Attachment E will be addressed during site plan review.
• Urban Forest Management Division
Staff comments have been addressed by the applicant.
Attachment E
Attachment F
Fairfax County Department of Transportation
• Transportation Planning Section
Attachment G
Staff identified issues with the application that have been resolved. There are no significant traffic
impacts resulting from the proposed use for the site.
Fairfax County Water Authority
• Planning and Engineering Division
No water issues were identified with the proposed facility.
Attachment H
Virginia Department of Transportation
• Comments will be addressed as part of the site plan review process.
Attachment I
Fairfax County Park Authority
• Park Planning Branch
No objection to the proposal.
Attachment J
CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Attachment K
Va. Code Sec. 15.2-2232, as amended, requires the Planning Commission to determine whether the
general location or approximate location, character, and extent of the proposed facility, as amended,
are substantially in accord with the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
FCDPW&ES
2232-V15-1
Page 7
Location
The Huntington levee and pump station are needed to mitigate flooding in the residential areas
around Huntington Park. Cameron Run is the cause of the flooding, and the levee and pump station
need to be located in the area between the residences and adjacent to Cameron Run. From the west
side of the site, stormwater will drain through a box culvert to pass under Fenwick Drive, and then
run through an open channel parallel to the levee until it reaches the pump station and is eventually
discharged back into Cameron Run at a location that has been determined will not impact other
properties. The levee and pump station work collectively to mitigate the recurring flooding of this
area.
The proposed location of the levee and pump station will be within the scope of the Huntington
Conservation Plan. This plan promotes the conservation and development of a residential
community within the Huntington neighborhood. This conforms with Plan guidelines to site facilities
appropriate to the area they are intended to serve. Land acquisition rights required for the levee
project are scheduled to be completed by the end of the 2015 calendar year. This will adhere with
the Comprehensive Plan objective of acquiring sites which are appropriate for the facility's specific
purpose and locating public facilities in areas of compatible land use.
No other alternative site was determined to be a reasonable alternative for flood protection of the
residential area. Erosion and sedimentation controls will be established during construction, and no
adverse impact on air or water quality will occur once the project is completed. Other areas of
environmental sensitivity will be avoided, all in accordance to Plan guidelines.
Character
The Policy Plan states that new structures should consider minimizing visual impacts on the
surrounding area. The proposed site contains large areas of open space. The levee will consist of an
earthen berm approximately ten feet in height with a four foot concrete wall at the top. The levee
will stretch approximately 2,850 linear feet parallel to Cameron Run, with the pump station located
toward the east end of the levee. The pump station will have a footprint 146 feet by 78 feet and 46
feet in height. Transitional landscaping between the residences and the levee and pump station will
provide a buffer and minimize visual impacts of the new facility. Staff believes the facility conforms
to Comprehensive Plan guidelines to ensure that public facilities are properly screened and buffered
in order to mitigate visual impact on adjacent development of a different use or nature.
The earthen levee will have grass growing on the embankments, and the pump station will be
designed to mimic the existing construction materials and forms of the adjacent residential
dwellings. Staff believes that the proposed landscaped transitional screening areas, grassed
embankments of the levee, and design of the pump station helps to minimize the visual impact to the
adjacent properties and maintains the general character of the area. Staff believes the proposal meets
Plan guidelines to minimize adverse impacts through the use of landscaping, screening, and
architectural design.
Extent
The proposed facility consists of a 2,850 linear foot levee and a pump station with a footprint of
approximately 7,800 square feet. The proposal conforms to Zoning Ordinance requirements for this
type of facility. Staff believes that the visual impact of the facility is mitigated by the proposed
landscaping and architectural techniques, as discussed above. The proposed use will not have a
traffic impact as the structure is not open to public vehicular traffic and will be unmanned, except for
FCDPW&ES
2232-Y15-1
Page 8
inspection, maintenance, or large storm events. An eight foot wide asphalt trail at the top of the
embankment will be available for public use and will connect to the existing trail loop located within
Huntington Park.
The proposed gated maintenance accesses to the facilities are from Metroview Parkway toward the
west end of the levee, Mt. Vernon Drive south of the pump station, and Huntington Creek Road
toward the east end of the levee. Staff believes that the proposed facility conforms to Plan guidelines
to construct and maintain facilities in accord with expected levels of service.
The proposed use meets Comprehensive Plan guidelines of not adversely impacting historically
significant landscapes or views, or detracting from any architecturally or historically significant
structure in the area.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff concludes that the subject proposal by the Fairfax County Department of Public Works and
Environmental Services to construct the Huntington Levee and Stormwater Pump Station, generally
located at 2219 Fairfax Terrace, Alexandria, VA 22303, satisfies the criteria of location, character,
and extent as specified in Va. Code Sec 15.2-2232. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning
Commission find the subject Application 2232-V15-1, substantially in accord with provisions of the
adopted Comprehensive Plan.
ATTACHMENT A
4/2015
2232 Review Application
Non-Telecommunications Facility
2232 PUBLIC FACILITY REVIEW
(Non-Telecommunications)
V\T i74z y J
County of Fairfax, Virginia
Application for Determination
Pursuant to
Virginia Code Section 15.2-2232
*** This area to be completed by staff ***
~ \/ji " /
APPLICATION NUMBER
(Please Type or Clearly Print)
PART I: APPLICATION SUMMARY
LOCATION OF PROPOSED USE
Address 2219 Fairfax Terrace
City/Town Alexandria, VA
Zip Code
22303
Place Name (if at county facility) Huntington Park
I
r
\
Tax Map I.D. Number(s)
083-1 f(14C)parcels 0110A, 0118A, 0127A, 0140A, 0153A, 083-1((16))parcels 0019A-C, 0020B-C, 0013A-B, 0014B, 083-1((01))parcels 0042, 0058, 083-1((27))A
Fairfax County Supervisor District Mt. Vernon District
Total Area of Subject Parcel(s)
20 acres
Zoning District MV1-Huntington Community Planning Sector, Mt. Vernon District
APPLICANT(S)
Name (Company or Agency)
Fairfax
County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services
Agent Name Aaron Koch
(Note: Failure to notify County of a change in agent may result in application processing delays)
Agent's Mailing Address 12000 Government Center Parkway, Suite 449
City/Town
Fairf9X
State Virgin'3
Telephone Number (Z5i) 324-5103
E_mail
zip Code 22035
Fax (Z21)
324-4365
[email protected]
Secondary Contact (Must Be Provided) Teresa Lepe
Telephone Number cZ°i)
324-5000
E-mail [email protected]
Page 2 of 6
1/2013
Non-Telecommunications Facility
Total Area of Subject Parcel(s) 20 acres
Zoning District
"
S
Community Planning Sector, Mount Vernon District
MV1
Huntiri
ton
Previous Zoning Approvals for all uses on site (proffered conditions, special permits, special exceptions,
variances, development plans)
NONE
PROPERTY OWNER(s) OF RECORD
0wner Park Authority Fairfax County
Street Address 12055 Government Center PW, Suite 927
City/Town Fairfax
state
Virginia
Zi p Code
22035
Has property owner been contacted about this proposed use? ]*± YES J—L NO
SIGNATURE
The undersigned acknowledges that additional Fairfax County land use review
requirements may be identified during the review of this 2232 Review application and the
fulfillment of such requirements is the responsibility of the applicant. The undersigned also
acknowledges that all Fairfax County Zoning Ordinance requirements pertaining to this
project shall be fulfilled.
In the event a new agent is assigned responsibility for this application, the applicant
agrees to provide a letter to the Department of Planning and Zoning authorizing the
transfer of responsibility for the application and providing all new contact information. In
the event the applicant fails to notify County staff of a change in agent, the application
may be subject to processing delays.
Signature of Applicant or Agent
n;;|1.R
—
December 24, 2014
Submit completed application to:
Chris Caperton, Chief, Facilities Planning Branch
Fairfax County Department of Planning and Zoning
12055 Government Center Parkway, Suite 730
Fairfax, Virginia 22035-5507
(703) 324-1380
2
:
uEjCjEIMJ
The Gordon Building
4501 Daly Drive
Ch antilly, Virginia 20151
JAN 0 8 2015
703-263-1900
(fax)
703-263-0766
Engineers / Landscape Architects / Planners / Surveyors / Security
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING «rZONING
Professionals
PLANNING DIVISION
CJ
Gordon
Statement of Justification - Huntington Levee
A. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE
1. Project description
• This project will consist of a levee and stormwater pump station construction along Cameron
Run in the Huntington Community adjacent to Alexandria, Virginia to mitigate flooding in the
residential areas around Huntington Park.
Area to be served by proposed use
• 160± homes will benefit from this proposed construction.
Maintenance
requirements and frequency
3.
• Annual inspections and grass mowing are required.
4. Propagation maps
• N/A (because of non-telecom property)
B. REQUIREMENT FOR PROPOSED USE
1. Why the new or expanded facility is needed
• This proposed levee is needed to stop recurring flooding of numerous homes adjacent to
Cameron Run.
2. Why the proposed location is the best location for the proposed use
• The levee is adjacent to Cameron Run which is the cause of the residential flooding
3. Why the proposed location and type of facility is the least disruptive alternative
• This solution is the only reasonable alternative for flood protection on site.
ANTICIPATED IMPACTS/MITIGATION
1. Visual
• The proposed levee will consist of an earthen berm generally less than ten feet in height with a
concrete wall approximately four feet in height at the peak for approximately 2,850 linear feet
parallel to Cameron Run. A stormwater pump station will be located at the east end of the
levee. The pump station building will be over 200 feet from the closest dwelling. A meeting
was held with representatives of the community and a mockup of the proposed construction
was shown (See Below).
Engineers
•
Surveyors
•
Land
Planners
•
Landscape
Architects
The Gordon Building
4501 Daly Drive
Chantilly, Virginia 20151
703-263-1900
(fax) 703-263-0766
Engineers / Lendscepe Architects / Planners / Surveyors / Security
Professionals
2. Noise and light
• There are no permanent noise and light impacts associated with the project.
3. Air and water quality
• The project when completed will have no adverse impacts on air or water quality. Erosion and
sedimentation controls will be established during construction. A VSMP permit will be
prepared and maintained on the site.
4. Environmental
• The project is totally within a Fairfax County designated Resource Protection Area. It has
been defined by County Staff as a Water Dependent Use, which is allowable under Chapter
118-2-1 of the County Code.
• A Water Quality Impact Analysis will be prepared as a part of the plan approval process,
reflecting any mitigation of the levee's impacts.
• A Joint Permit Application (JPA) for wetland disturbance will be prepared and submitted to
the Corps of Engineers and a wetland permit will be obtained in accordance with Section 404
of the Clean Water Act.
• Since the wetlands impacted are considered tidal, a hearing will be held before the Fairfax
Wetlands Board to review the application as a part of the JPA.
• There will be less than 7 acres of trees removed for construction of the levee and the storm
storage requirements on the protected side.
5. Transportation
• N/A
6. Mitigation measures as applicable for 1 through 5
• Erosion and sediment controls will be installed to minimize the impact of construction on
Cameron Run
• Additional mitigation will be proposed for the wetlands disturbance as a part of the JPA
submission
D. CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND OTHER STANDARDS
1. Comprehensive Plan policies and guidelines that directly support the proposal
• In the Land Use section of the Mount Vernon Planning District Comprehensive Plan, Land
Unit A (Huntington Conservation Area) seeks to preserve the stability of the residential area.
Built in the late 1940's, the residential units in Land Unit A have slowly been encroached
upon by Cameron Run over the past 60-70 years. Before the Capital Beltway was constructed,
Cameron Run meandered north of the Huntington Conservation Area. After the beltway was
built, Cameron Run began to change course towards the community (See following page for
difference between 1960 and 2014 Fairfax Tax Maps). The levee is necessary to preserve the
character of the existing neighborhood.
Engineers
•
Surveyors
•
Land
Planners
•
Landscape
Architects
The Gordon Building
4501 Daly Drive
Chantiily, Virginia 20151
703-263-1900
(fax) 703-263-0766
Engineers / Landscape Architects / Planners / Surveyors / Security
Professionals
•
In Fairfax County's Area IV Comprehensive Plan, the Environment section on page 16 of the
9-23-2014 Overview states that their goal is to "[minimize] exposure to environmental hazards
including unstable soils, flood impact areas, and pipeline and electrical transmission lines."
2. Relevant standards/criteria supporting the facility and location
• The Huntington Conservation Plan adopted in 1976 by the Board of Supervisors strives for the
conservation and development of a viable and sound residential community in the Huntington
neighborhood. Levee construction is within the scope of this document. Without floodplain
mitigation, the community would suffer.
E. ALTERNATIVE SITES CONSIDERED FOR THIS USE
1. Other properties
• N/A because no other properties would provide floodplain mitigation.
2. Other locations on the subject property
• N/A because the orientation of the proposed levee keeps the water out of the affected homes.
3. Reasons for rejecting each alternative location
• Other levee orientations would not have mitigated flooding.
Engineers
•
Surveyors
•
Land
Planners
•
Landscape
Architects
*5 ARCADIS
SI'S: BINc. Sl
SS™VA a,
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
(60%) SUBMITTAL
DO NOT USE FOR
CONSTRUCTION
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX,
VIRGINIA
HUNTINGTON LEVEE PROJECT
PHASE II
02779040.02LS
DATE
ISSUED FOR
BY_
SITE PLAN - GRADING
- SHEET II
C—026
SCALE; 1" = 25'
SHEET
14
OF
??
5
ABBREVIATIONS
ACOUS
ACT
ADH
ADMIN
ALUM
ANSI
ALT
A
O
B & B
BSMT
BM
BTWN
BITUM
BLK
BO
BOT
BO
BRK
BC
BLOG
CAB
CRT
CIP
CLG
CT
C/S
CLO
COL
CONC
CB
CONSTR
CONT
CJ
CORR
CSK
CU
CLR
DBL
DEMO
DETS
DF
DIA
DIM
DN
DO
DPT
DR
DWL
DWG
EA
E
EWC
ELEC
EL
EMBED
ENGR
EQ
EQUIP
EX
EXP
EJ
EXT
FT
FRP
FWP
FIN
FIN FLR
F1XT
FLR
FD
FDTN
GA
GALV
GEN
GL
GST
GR
GCFFB
GCFFAB
GYP
GW8
HON
HOW
HVAC
HDCT
HT
HORIZ
ACOUSTICAL
ACOUSTICAL CEIUNG TILE
ADHESIVE
ADMINISTRATION
ABOVE FINISH ROOR
ALUMINUM
AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS
INSTITUTE
ALTERNATE
AND
ARCHITECTURAL
AT
BALLED & BURLAPPED
BASEMENT
BEAM
BETWEEN
BITUMINOUS
BLOCK
BOARD
BOTTOM
BOTTOM OF
BRICK
BRICK COURSES
BUILOING
CABINET
CARPET
CAST IN PLACE
CEILING
CERAMIC TILE
CIVIL SANITARY
CLOSET
COLUMN
CONCRETE
CONCRETE BLOCK
CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT
CONSTRUCTION
CONTINUOUS
CONTROL JOINT
CORRIDOR
COUNTERSUNK
CUBIC
CLEAR
DOUBLE
DEMOLITION
DETAILS
DRINKING FOUNTAIN
DIAMETER
DIMENSION
DOWN
DOOR OPENING
DEPTH
DOOR
DOWEL
DRAWING
EACH
EAST
ELECTRIC WATER COOLER
ELECTRICAL
ELEVATION
EMBEDMENT
ENGINEER
EQUAL
EQUIPMENT
EXISTING
EXPANSION
EXPANSION JOINT
EXTERIOR
FEET
FIBER REINFORCED PUST1C
FIBROUS WOOD PANEL
FINISH
FINISH FLOOR
FIRE EXTINGUISHER
FIXTURE
FLOOR
FLOOR ORAIN
FOUNDATION
GAGE
GALVANIZED
GENERAL
GLASS
GLAZED STRUCTURAL TILE
GRADE
GROUND AND CEMENTITIOUS
FILLED FACE CONCRETE BLOCK
GROUND AND CEMENTITIOUS
FILLED FACE - SLOTTED
ACOUSTICAL BLOCK
GYPSUM
GYPSUM WALLBOARD
HARDENER
HARDWARE
HEATING, VENTILATING AND AIR
CONDITIONING
HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE TOPPING
HEIGHT
HIGH POINT
HOLLOW METAL
HORIZONTAL
LEGEND
IN
ID
INSUL
INT
JC
JT
LAB
LAV
LP
MATL
MECH
MTL
MEZZ
MIN
MOD
NEC
NEMA
NFPA
NTS
NO
OC
OPNG
OPP
OPH
OD
OCD
OSO
PNT
PART
P
PL
PLBG
PVC
PVF
POP
PSF
PJ
PT
QUAN
OT
RAD
REF
REINF
REQD
R
RD
RM
RO
SECT
SHTHG
SHT
SMS
SIM
S
SPECS
SQ
SST
STD
STA
STL
STOR
STRUCT
SUSP
SYS
TEMP
TC
THK
TOS
TOPP
TRANS
T
TYP
UL
UON
UNFIN
VERT
VIF
VP
WC
WT
W
w/
W/0
WD
WDT
INCH
INSIDE DIMENSION
INSULATION
INTERIOR
JANITOR'S CLOSET
JOINT
LABORATORY
LAVATORY
LOW POINT
MANUFACTURER
MAXIMUM
METAL
MEZZANINE
MINIMUM
MISCELLANEOUS
MOOUUR
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
NA710NAL ELECTRICAL
MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION
NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION
ASSOCIATION
NORTH
NOT TO SCALE
NUMBER
ON CENTER
OPENING
OPPOSITE
OPPOSITE HAND
OUTSIDE DIAMETER
OVERHEAD COILING DOOR
OVERHEAD SLIDING DOOR
PAINT(ED)
PANEL
PARTITION
PUSTER
PLATE
PLUMBING
POLYVINYL CHLORIDE
POLYVINYL FLUORIDE
PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER
POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT
PREMOIDED JOINT
PRESSURE TREATED
QUANTITY
QUARRY TILE
RADIUS
REFERENCE
RBNFORCING
REQUIRED
RISER
ROOF DRAIN
ROOM
ROUGH OPENING
SECTION
SHEATHING
SHEET
SHEET METAL SCREWS
SIMILAR
SOUTH
SQUARE
STAINLESS STEEL
STANDARD
STATION
STEEL
STORAGE
STRUCTURAL
SUSPENDED
SYSTEM
TEMPORARY
1ERRAZZ0
TERRA COTTA
THICK(NESS)
TOP OF SUB/STEEL
TOPPING
TRANSOM
TREAD
TYPICAL
UNDERWRITER'S LABORATORIES
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
UNFINISHED
VARIES
VERTICAL
VERIFY IN FIELD
VINYL TILE
VISION PANEL
WATER CLOSET
WEIGHT
WEST
WITH
WITHOUT
WOOD
WIDTH
®
W-mf
I
GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL NOTES
BUILDING ELEVATION "WIS SIDE
THE LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS LIST ON THIS SHEET IS A COMPREHENSIVE STANDARD
GUIDE INTENDED FOR GENERAL USE ON ALL PROJECTS. THEREFORE NOT ALL THE
SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS CONTAINED IN THIS UST ARE NECESSARILY USED ON
THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT AND SHOULD BE USED FOR CLARIFICATION ONLY.
ITEMS NOT NOTED ON DRAWINGS SHALL BE CONSIDERED THE SAME AS NOTEO ITEMS
WHICH ARE GRAPHICALLY REPRESENTED IN THE SAME MANNER.
ASTERICK (•) INDICATES VERIFY DIMENSION WITH MANUFACTURER OF EQUIPMENT
SUPPLIED.
FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS.
FOR CONCRETE AND STEEL SIZES AND CONFIGURATIONS SEE 'S' DRAWINGS.
FOR LOCATION OF HVAC EQUIPMENT AND PADS COORDINATE WITH 'H' DRAWINGS.
FOR FLOOR DRAIN LOCATIONS SEE 'P' DRAWINGS.
FOR FINAL GRADING AND BUILDING LOCATION SEE 'C' DRAWINGS.
FOR EXACT LOCATION OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT VENTS COORDINATE WITH 'M'
DRAWINGS.
). COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LOCATION AND SIZE OF RECESSED
ELECTRICAL DEVICES IN WALLS. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS AND
DETAILS.
. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHT FIXTURE TYPES AND LOCATIONS.
!. COORDINATE EXTENT OF DEMOLITION WORK WITH 'D' DRAWINGS,
i. FOR EXTENT OF GRATING AND DETAILS SEE 'S' DRAWINGS.
SHEET REFERENCES
SHEET NUMBER
FOR
FOR
FOR
FOR
FOR
FOR
FOR
FOR
RAILING AND LADDER DETAILS, REFERENCE SHEET A-012.
DOOR SCHEDULE AND DETAILS, REFERENCE SHEETS A-10 AND A—011.
BOLLARD DETAILS, REFERENCE SHEET A-013.
ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE, REFERENCE SHEET A-010.
WALL PARTITION TYPES. REFERENCE SHEET A—.
ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE TYPES, REFERENCE SHEET A—.
SIGNAGE TYPES REFERENCE SHEET A-014.
SIGNAGE SCHEDULES AND NOTES, REFERENCE SHEET A-014.
£ ARCADIS
LEGAL ENTITY:
ARCADIS U.S., INC.
3101 WILSON BLVD., SUITE 550
ARLINGTON. VA 22201
CONSULTANTS
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
(60%) SUBMITTAL
DO NOT USE FOR
CONSTRUCTION
ROOM NUMBER
WINDOW NUMBER SYMBOL
WALL PARTITION TYPE
ELEVATION INDICATION
BRICK MASONRY
•566«<
CONCRETE MASONRY
CONCRETE
GROUT
STEEL
INSULATION
GRATING
BATT INSULATION
STRUCTURAL REINFORCING NOTES
ALL INTERIOR MASONRY WALLS SHALL EXTEND TO UNDERSIDE OF THE ROOF OR SLAB
ABOVE, UON. PROVIDE MASONRY ANCHORS FROM THE TOP COURSE OF ALL INTERIOR
MASONRY WALLS TO THE BEAM OR SLAB ABOVE, UON.
. ALL CAST IN PUCE WEDGE INSERTS SPACED AT 2'-0" OC HORIZONTAL, UON.
. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON DRAWINGS, ALL MASONRY WALLS SHALL BE REINFORCED
WITH A MINIMUM REINFORCING AS FOLLOW;
3.1. EXTERIOR WALLS VERTICAL REINFORCING BARS -|5 9 2'-8" OC. PROVIDE 1-04
HORIZONTAL RBNFORCING BAR FOR EACH 4" OF WALL THICKEST IN EACH BOND
BEAM. LOCATE BOND BEAMS EVERY 10-0" VERTICALLY AND 1 BLOCK COURSE
BELOW THE TOP BLOCK COURSE AT THE UNDERSIDE OF EACH FLOOR AND ROOF
AND AT THE TOP OF PARAPET WALLS.
3.2. INTERIOR WALLS VERTICAL REINFORCING BARS - #4 @ 2'-8" OC. PROVIDE 1-04
HORIZONTAL REINFORCING BAR FOR EACH 4" WALL OF THICKEST IN EACH BOND
BEAM. LOCATE BONO BEAMS EVERY 10-0* VERTICALLY AND 1 BLOCK COURSE
BELOW THE TOP BLOCK COURSE AT THE UNDERSIDE OF EACH FLOOR AND ROOF
AND AT THE TOP OF PARAPET WALLS.
3.3. BOND BEAM HORIZONTAL REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS AT WALL
CORNERS AND INTERSECTIONS.
3.4. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON DRAWINGS, ALL OPENINGS SHALL HAVE A LINTEL AT
THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE OPENINGS REINFORCED WITH A MINIMUM OF 2-04
HORIZONTAL REINFORCING 8ARS AT EACH LINTEL PROVIDE 1-06 VERTICAL
REINFORCING BARS ON EACH SIDE OF WALL OPENINGS. REINFORCEMENT SHALL
EXTEND 50 DIAMETERS BEYOND WALL OPENINGS.
3.5. ALL WALL CELLS WITH VERTICAL REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE GROUTED SOLID FULL
HEIGHT AND WIDTH.
3.6. ALL REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. ALL
HOOKS SHALL BE STANDARD. UP BARS ACCORDING TO STANDARD LAP LENGTHS,
SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS.
3.7. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL VERTICAL RBNFORCING SHALL HAVE MATCHING
DOWELS.
3.3. A VERTICAL REINFORCING BAR SHALL BE PUCED AT ALL WALL CORNERS AND
INTERSECTIONS.
3.9. THE BARS IN HORIZONTAL UP SPLICES SHALL BE ALIGNED VERTICALLY AND TIED.
3.10. FOR TYPICAL MASONRY WALL REINFORCING DETAILS. REFERENCE SHEET A-013.
. WALLS SHOWN WITH ONE WYTHE OF GROUND AND CEMENTITUOUS FILLED-FACE
CONCRETE SLOCK SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH GROUND AND CEMENTITUOUS FILLED-FACE
ON THE EXPOSED SIDE OF THE WALL
. WALLS SHOWN AND OR SPECIFIED WITH TWO WYTHE OF GROUND AND CEMENTITUOUS
FILLED-FACE CONCRETE BLOCK SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH FINISH ON BOTH SIDES OF
THE WALL.
. PROVIDE ALL HUNG CEIUNGS WITH CAST-IN-PLACE CEIUNG SUPPORT ANCHORS.
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX,
VIRGINIA
HUNTINGTON LEVEE PROJECT
PHASE II
02779040.02LS
ISSUED FOR
JUNE 2015
DATE:
PROJECT NO.: 02779040,02LS
FILE NAME:
A-001 ( 2 )
DESIGNED BY: D- MARTINS
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1. INSTALL STAINLESS STEEL DOOR FRAMES AS SHOWN AND SPECIFIED AS THE WORK
PROGRESSES. DO NOT HANG DOORS AND INSTALL FINISH HARDWARE UNTIL ALL WORK
BY ALL CONTRACTORS HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN AN AREA AND THERE IS NO FURTHER
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES OR REQUIRED ENTRY BY ANY CONTRACTOR. DOORS AND
FINISHED HARDWARE INSTALLED AND SUBSEQUENTLY DAMAGED IN ANY WAY FOR ANY
REASON SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPUCED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR AT NO
ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. IMMEDIATELY MEANS FROM THE TIME THE DAMAGE IS
OBSERVED AND REPORTED TO THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR BY CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT TO THE TIME OF REINSTALLATION SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN ONE
MONTH.
2. DOORS FRAMES SHALL BE BOXED OUT IN WOOD TO PREVENT CONSTRUCTION DAMAGE.
3. INSTALL TEMPORARY 3/4" PLYWOOD DOORS AND LOCKS. REMOVE WHEN CONSTRUCTION
ACCESS AND ACTIVITIES ARE FINISHED IN AN AREA AT THE TIME WHEN STAINLESS
STEEL DOORS AND FINISH HARDWARE ARE INSTALLED.
4. PAINTING - COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF PAINTING IN ORDER TO PERFORM WORK
BEFORE INSTALLATION OF WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT
E.
H AND
P.
DRAWN BY:
D- MARTINS
CHECKED BY:
D- CRAWFORD
SHEET TITLE
ARCHITECTURAL
ABBREVIATIONS,
LEGENDS, SYMBOLS &
GENERAL NOTES
A-001
OF
(St ARCADIS
DESIGN DD/ELOPMENT
(60%) SUBMfTTAL
DO NOT USE FOR
CONSTRUCTION
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX,
VIRGINIA
HUNTINGTON LEVEE PROJECT
PHASE II
NORTH ELEVATION
02779040.02LS
RAKES
TRIM BOARD
JUNE 2015
PROJECT NO.: 02779040.02LS
FILE NAME:
A-005 (21
DESIGNED BY: D. MARTINS
DRAWN BY:
R. BRIDGE
CHECKED BY:
P. CRAWFORD
SHEET TITLE
ARCHITECTURAL
STORM WATER PUMP
STATION - ELEVATIONS
SOUTH ELEVATION
1/6" - J—0"
A-005
ft ARCADIS
LEGAL ENTITY:
ARCADIS U.S., INC.
3101 WILSON BLVD., SUITE 550
ARLINGTON. VA 22201
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
(60%) SUBMITTAL
DO NOT USE FOR
CONSTRUCTION
- DOOR AND FRAME
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX,
VIRGINIA
HUNTINGTON LEVEE PROJECT
PHASE II
EAST ELEVATION
02779040.02LS
ISSUED FOR
PROJECT NO.: 02779040.02LS
FILE NAME:
A-006 (2)
DESIGNED ST: D. MARTINS
CHECKED BY:
D. CRAWFORD
ARCHITECTURAL
STORM WATER PUMP
STATION - ELEVATIONS
WEST ELEVATION
1/8* = 1'-0"
A-006
0) ARCADIS
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
(60%) SUBMrTTAL
DO NOT USE FOR
CONSTRUCTION
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX,
VIRGINIA
HUNTINGTON LEVEE PROJECT
PHASE II
Q BUILDING SECTION
02779040.02LS
DATE:
JUNE 2015
PROJECT NO.: 02779040.021
FILE NAME:
A-007 (2)
DESIGNED BY: D. MARTINS
DRAWN BY:
R- BRIDGE
CHECKED BY: 0. CRAWFORD
SHEET TITLE
ARCHITECTURAL
TOP OF CONC V
a 17.00
FINISH FLOOR
STORM WATER PUMP
STATION - BUILDING
SECTIONS
BUILDING SECTION
1/8A—007
SHEET
1
|
2
|
(Si ARCADIS
3
DOOR AND FRAME SCHEDULE
DOOR
BUILDING
NAME
STORM
WATER
PUMP
STATION
SIZE
ROOM # DOOR #
101
101
101
101
101-1
101-2
101-3
101-4
102
102
103
104
105
(2)102-1
102-2
103-1
104-1
105-1
WDT
HT
3'-0" 7'—2"
15'-0" 16'—0"
FRAME
DETAIL
SIZE
THK
MATL
1 3/41 3/4-
15'—0" 16'—0" 1 3/4"
3'—0" 7'—2" 1 3/4"
4'—0" 8'-0" 1 3/4"
3'-0" 7'—2" 1 3/4"
3'-0" 7'-2" 1 3/4"
—
—
GLAZING
TYPE
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
WDT
HT
DPT
3'-4"
15'-0"
7'—4"
6"
3'—4"
4-4"
3'—4"
3-4"
7-4"
8'-4"
7'—4"
7'-4"
6"
6'
6"
SEE SCHEDULE
HEAD JAMB THLD
—
—
—
FIRE
DOOR RATING
MATL TYPE
LABEL
—
NOTES
CONSULTANTS
B/B1
C/C1
C/C1
B/S1
B/B!
B/B1
B/B1
C/C1
8/81
.19>-
'T
D
T
i
T
I
V
R°
RO '
"3'-r;
I
-Is
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
(60%) SUBMITTAL
DO NOT USE FOR
CONSTRUCTION
WINDOW AND LOUVER SCHEDULE
DOOR, WINDOW & LOUVER ELEVATIONS
HEAD JAMB SILL
STORM
WATER
PUMP
STATION
1" INSULATED GLASS
" INSULATED GLASS
2 HOUR FIRE RATING
TEMPERED SAFETY GLASS
TEMPERED SAFETY GLASS
" INSULATED GLASS
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX,
VIRGINIA
HUNTINGTON LEVEE PROJECT
PHASE II
C
02779040.02LS
JUNE 2015
PROJECT NO-: 02779040.02LS
FILE NAME:
A-010 (2)
DESIGNED SY: D. MARTINS
DRAWN BY:
R. BRIDGE
CHECKED BY: D. CRAWFORD
ARCHITECTURAL
STORM WATER PUMP
STATION - FINISH,
DOOR, WINDOW,
LOUVER SCHEDULE
A
A—010
SHEET
OF
2" CAVITY WALL INSULATION"
QT ARCADIS
CONC BLOCK
MASONRY LINTEL FILLED SOLID W/
GROUT W/ 4- #7 R0NF BARS 4:
MIN 8" BEARING EACH SIDE.
FILL TOP 3 COURSES BELOW
LINTEL SOLID W/GROUT
CONC BLOCK-
2" CAVITY WALL INSULATION
3/8" OIA EXPANSION BOLT <8 16"
CEMENT BOARD
CEMENT BOARD SIDING
CEMENT BOARD TRIM
REINF BARS WITH 8"
BEARING EA END
FILL SOUD W/ GROUT
CEMENT BOARO TRIM
CONC MASONRY BOND BEAM
UNTEL W/2 - #5
BARS W/8" BEARING EA END
FILL SOLID W/GROUT
16" HIGH MASONRY LINTEL
W/2-#6 REINF BARS TOP 4:
BOTTOM 4c #4 STIRRUPS © '
OC W/ 8" BEARING EA END
FILL SOLID W/GROUT
CEMENT BOARD SIDING
FILLED SOLID W/ MORTAR6" VERT x 5 1/2" x 3/8" S STL
ANGLE LENGTH = RO + B"
BEARING EACH
BACKER ROD 4c SEALANT
HEAD B
#3 STIRRUPS © 12" OC-
WINDOW AND FRAME-
FILL SOLID W/ GROUT
WINDOW HEAD A
HEAD C1
HEAD A
x-
WINDOW AND FRAME
SOLID SILL BLOCK
SEALANT
2" CAVITY WALL INSULATION
MASONRY LINTEL W/
2 - #6 REINF BARS
WITH 8" BEARING EA END
FOR RO UP TO 4-0'
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
(60%) SUBMfTTAL
DO NOT USE FOR
CONSTRUCTION
BACKER ROD 4c SEALANT
#6 © 16" OC
CONC BLOCK
CEMENT BOARO SIDING
3" x 2" x 3/8" S STL ANGLE
W/ 3/8" DIA S STL ROD
6 LONG W/ 2" LEG © 2'-0" OC
WELDEO TO ANGLE
CEMENT BOARD TRIM
CEMENT BOARD SIDING
CEMENT BOARD TRIM
FINISH FLOOR
2" CAVITY WALL INSUIATION-
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX,
VIRGINIA
THRESHOLD A
CONC MASONRY BOND
LINTEL W/2 - #6 REINF
BARS FILLED SOLID W/
GROUT
HUNTINGTON LEVEE PROJECT
PHASE II
REINF BAR W/ MATCHING DOWELS
3" x 2" x 3/8" S STL
ANGLE W/ 3/3" DIA
S STL ROD 6" LONG W/ 2" LEG
© 2-0" OC WELDEO TO ANGLE
WINDOW SILL A
WINDOW DETAILS
02779040.02LS
SAFETY STOP BELOW ~
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1-0"
)NC BLOCK USE S STL ANCHORS
)E X 7" LONG X 3/16" THICK W/
G 2'-0" OC
LOUVER AND FRAME -
CEMENT BOARD SIDING -
fed
JAMB A1
CONCRETE WALL JUNE 2015
PROJECT NO.:
FILE NAME:
LOUVER HEAD A
A-011 (2)
DESIGNED BY: D. MARTINS
LOUVER SILL A
DRAWN BY:
R. BRIDGE
CHECKED BY: D- CRAWFORO
3" x 2" x 3/8" S STL
ANGLE W/ 3/8" DIA
S STL ROD 6" LONG W/ 2" LEG
Q 2'—0" OC WELDED TO ANGLE
LOUVER SCREEN
LOUVER AND FRAME -
k
CONC WALL—
SHEET TITLE
ARCHITECTURAL
STORM WATER PUMP
STATION - DOOR,
WINDOW, LOUVER
DETAILS
SAFETY STOP BELOW -
DOOR AND FRAME DOOR AND FRAMECONC BLOCKTHRESHOLD-
LOUVER JAMB A
THRESHOLD B
LOUVER SILL B
JAMB A2
LOUVER DETAILS
DOOR DETAILS
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1-0"
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1-0"
THRESHOLD C
I 1/2"
A-011
OARCADIS
LEGAL ENTITY:
ARCADIS U.S., INC.
3101 WILSON BLVD., SUITE 550
S.STL LOCKNUTS.
HAND TIGHT ONLY3/8" OIA S.STL
THRU-BOLT-
1/4" THICK
U-SHAPE S.STL
BENT PLATE
BEVELED AT EDGES
ALT HANDRAIL
-3/8" OIA S.STL
THRU-BOLT
W/ S.STL WASHERS
o SCALfe 1/2," - T—0"
v
SCALE: 1/2" = 1-0"
USE ONLY IN LOCATIONS
WHERE THE DESIGN FOR
THE DISABLED IS NOT REO'D.
LOCATIONS ARE TO BE
APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
SCALE: 1/2" = 1-0"
USE ONLY IN LOCATIONS WHERE THE DESIGN
FOR THE DISABLED IS NOT REQUIRED.
LOCATIONS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE
ENGINEER.
TYPICAL STAIR
END DETAILS
SCALE: 1/2" = 1-0"
-REINFORCING BA
- RAILING POST
STAIR EDGE
! IANORAIL
-RAILING
-LANDING
EDGE j
6" TOE BOARD
-3/8" DIA S.STL
THRU-BOLT
W/ S.STL WASHERS
-REFERENCE RAILING TYPE
FOR MOUNTING DETAILS
ALT STAIR END DETAIL
END DETAIL
TYPICAL
HANDRAIL DETAIL
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
(60%) SUBMITTAL
DO NOT USE FOR
CONSTRUCTION
TYPICAL STAIR
CORNER PLAN
t*
ELEVATION
TOE BOARD =B?FW
AT MINOIUIN •'©INT DETAIL
GENERAL DETAILS
.1
1
COUNTY' OF FAIRFAX,
VIRGINIA
/-RAILING
TYPICAL
CORNER PLAN
SCALE: 1/2' - 1-0*
TYPICAL
RAILING CORNER
SEE DETAILS
—1 LANOING BEYOND-
TYPICAL RAILING TO
RAILING STAIR CORNER
(RAILING CONTINUOUS AROUND CORNER)
(LANDING EDGE AND NOSING EDGE DO NOT ALIGN)
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
ALT STAIR CORNER
SCALE: 1/2" = 1-0"
USE ONLY IN LOCATIONS WHERE THE DESIGN
FOR THE DISABLED IS NOT REQUIRED.
LOCATIONS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE
ENGINEER.
HUNTINGTON LEVEE PROJECT
PHASE II
TYPICAL STRINGER DETAIL
02779040.02LS
REINFORCING BARRAIUNG POSTTOE BOARD-REINFORCING BAR
-RAILING POST
HTOE BOARD
CUSTOM PIPE COLLAR-
,r
REINFORCING BARRAILING POST2 1/2" PIPE St
SOCKET COVER
FXED RAIL
DETAIL
SCALE: 1 1/2" = V-
REMOVABLE
RAIL DETAIL
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1-0"
: 02779040.02LS
FILE NAME:
DESIGNED BY:
CHECKED BY:
-RAILING POST
-REINFORCING BAR
—3/8" DIA S.STL
EXP BOLT
r—HANDRAIL
>NGLE FLANGE
-3/8" DIA S.STL
BOLTS
LADDER TO MEZZANINE ELEVATION
AND SECTION
SCALE: 3/4" = 1-0"
5" X 1/4" SQUARE BASE
FLANGE. ATTACH
W/4— 3/8" DIA.
EXPANSION BOL"
EXP BOLT
TYPICAL WALL
RETURN DETAILS
WALL BRACKET
DETAIL
STRINGER
MOUNT DETAIL
SCALE: 1 1/2* = 1-0"
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1-0"
SCALE: 1 1/2" = I'-O"
LADDER TO HATCH ELEVATION
D. CRAWFORD
ARCHITECTURAL
STORM WATER PUMP
STATION - RAILINGS,
HANDRAILS & LADDERS
BASE CONNECTION
A—012
£ ARCADIS
BULL NOSE CMU
CONT HORIZ
MASONRY
REINFORCING
(TYP)
,R-I-A20/
SECTION
UND1S7URBED SOIL
tutxp±
BOLLARD TYPE 1
SCALE: 3/4" = I'-O"
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
(60%) SUBMITTAL
DO NOT USE FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I- FACE BRICK OPENING
MASONRY CORNER DETAIL
AT BOND BEAM
TYPICAL MASONRY
OPENING DETAIL
THICK STL BASE PLATE
8 - 1 1/15"
HOLES
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX,
VIRGINIA
HUNTINGTON LEVEE PROJECT
PHASE II
0277904Q.02LS
SECTION
PLAN
BOLLARD TYPE 2
SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
| |
ALL OPENINGS
^
gOlDGl^ilDllDit
•
L REINF (TYP)
—FILL REINFORCED CELLS
W/GROUT FULL HEIGHT (TYP)
TYP AT ALL WALL CORNERS
AND INTERSECTIONS
MASONRY INTERSECTION
AT EXPANSION JOINT
DETAIL
m
AA
VERTICAL MASONRY WALL
REINFORCEMENT
MASONRY
INTERSECTION DETAIL
DATE:
PROJECT NO
02779040.02LS
RLE NAME:
DESIGNED B1
D. MARTINS
TYPICAL MASONRY DETAILS
DRAWN BY:
R. BRIDGE
SCALE: 11/2" = 1-0"
CHECKED BY: D. CRAWFORD
SHEET UTIX
ARCHITECTURAL
2'-0" MIN
STORM WATER PUMP
STATION MISCELLANEOUS
DETAILS
' M30N BEAM
'"•—NOT H BLOCK
^BON
i]]> J
viASC)NRY
AT BOND BEAM W/ 2 REINF BARS
MASONRY REINFORCING DETAILS
SCAIF: 1" = 1'-n"
A—013
SHEET
OF
1
2
3
£ ARCADIS
NOTES:
1.
BUILDING NAME^
'AREA DESIGNATION
(EXAMPLE: SCC)
IT EACH LETTER (TIP)
FINAL SIGNAGE WORDING AND QUANTITY OF ALL SIGNS TO BE DETERMINED AFTER AWARD OF
CONTRACT.
2. IN ADDITION TO SIGN DESIGNATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING SIGNS OF EACH
TYPE SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. TEXT AND LOCATION TO BE PROVIDED TO CONTRACTOR AFTER
AWARD OF CONTRACT.
SIGNAGE TYPE
FACILITY NAMES
N 0 P Q
A B C 0 E
I J K
TOTAL # OF EXTRA SIGNS
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
(60%) SUBMITTAL
DO NOT USE FOR
CONSTRUCTION
4. THE SIGNS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ARE A COMPREHENSIVE STANDARD GUIDE INTENDED TO
GRAPHICALLY INDICATE THE APPEARANCE OF THE SIGNS. THIS SHEET IS FOR GENERAL USE ON
THE PROJECT. THEREFORE NOT ALL THE SIGNS CONTAINED ON THIS SHEET ARE NECESSARILY
USED ON THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT AND SHOULD BE USED FOR CLARIFICATION ONLY.
5. PROVIDE ALL PERMANENT DIRECTIONAL/INFORMATIONAL, ROOM NAME. BUILDING NAME, AREA
NAME, ACCESSIBLE AREA, FLOOR NUMBERING. STAIR IDENTIFICATION, FIRE PREVENTION AND
RESTRICTION SIGNS WITH BOTH RAISED TEXT AND BRAILLE TO COMPLY WITH ANSI A117.1, THE
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990, OSHA REGULATIONS, NFPA GUIDELINES, AND THE
CONNECTICUT STATE BUILDING CODE. FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION OF SIGNS WITH PLANT
MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEER.
6. PROVIDE HAZARD RATING SIGNS / RIGHT-TO-KNOW SIGNS, LABELS AND TAGS TO COMPLY WITH
NFPA 704, OSHA 1910.1200, AND OSHA SUBPART Z. FOR PROPER IDENTIFICATION OF ALL THE
CHEMICALS AND MATERIALS PRESENT. THE HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH THESE CHEMICALS AND
MATERIALS, AND WHERE THEY ARE LOCATED. VERIFY EXACT INFORMATION FOR SIGNS AND
LOCATION OF SIGNS IN THE FIELD WITH ENGINEER.
7. PROVIDE ALL ACCIDENT PREVENTION, HEALTH, SAFETY ANO WARNING SIGNS IN COMPUANCE WITH
ANSI Z535.1, ANSI Z535.2. ANSI Z535.3 AND OSHA 1910.44 AND 1910.145.
FIELD VERIFY
EXACT LOCATION OF SIGNS WITH PLANT MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEER. FLOOR DIAGRAM EXIT SIGN
SHALL MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY FIRE MARSHALL.
S.
COORDINATE WITH THE FIRE MARSHALL THE ITEMS REQUIRED TO BE INDICATED AND THEIR
LOCATIONS. THE SIGNS SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE MARSHALL AND THE
ENGINEER PRIOR TO FABRICATION. FIELD VERIFY WHICH SIGNS REQUIRE BEING SUSPENDED, AND
WHAT THEY WILL BE SUSPENDED FROM.
9.
PROVIDE ENGINEER APPROVED MATERIALS AND FASTENERS TO SECURELY ATTACH AND SUSPEND
THESE SIGNS. SUSP. DOUBLE SIDED SIGN - INDICATES SIGNS THAT WILL IN SOME CASES NEED
TO BE SUSPENDED.
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX.
VIRGINIA
HUNTINGTON LEVEE PROJECT
PHASE II
02779040.02LS
10. THOSE THAT ARE SUSPENDED WILL BE A CUSTOM DOUBLE SIOEO SIGN. FIELD VERIFY EXACT
LOCATION. FIELD VERIFY DIRECTION ARROW HEADS SHOULD BE POINTING ON ALL DIRECTIONAL
SIGNS.
13. FOR LOCATION OF EYE WASHES SEE 'P' DRAWINGS.
DATE:
JUNE 2015
PROJECT NO.: 02779040.02LS
15. PROVIDE SIGN M-2 AT ALL EYE WASH STATIONS.
16. PROVIOE SIGN L-1 AT ALL ODOR CONTROL DUCTWORK OVER PASSES OF ROADWAY.
FILE NAME:
A-014 (21
DESIGNED BY: D. MARTINS
DRAWN BY:
R. BRIDGE
CHECKED BY: 0. CRAWFORO
1TL£
ARCHITECTURAL
STORM WATER PUMP
STATION - SIGNAGE
TYPES AND NOTES
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
A-014
ser:ASARANT Spec: AUS-NCSMOD ple:6:\PROJECT\PLAMN\3Oia\PLANS\02O1-L-LP-4O1.OW Scole:T:30 SovecDate:10/1/20l5 TTme:t3:20
Plot Dote: Ale* Sorant; 10/1/2015; 13:20 ; LoywifcU1-'102
Gk ARCADIS
0Gordon
GRAPHICAL SCALE: 1" = 30'
COUNTY PERMIT SET
MOUNT VERNON DISTRICT
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX,
VIRGINIA
HUNTINGTON LEVEE PROJECT
PHASE II
02779040.02LS
NODATE
ISSUED
REVISIONS APPROVED Br OFFICE OF
h ARCADIS U.S.. INC.
DATE:
JULY 2015
PROJECT NO.: 0277904Q.02LS
FILE NAME:
0201-L-LR-401
DESIGNED BY:
CHECKED BY:
TREE PRESERVATION
PLAN - SHEET IV
LR—404
£1ARCAD1S
NARRATIVE & NOTES
CONSTRUCTION STRATEGIES
PRIOR TO ALLOWING ANY VEHICLE OR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT TO ENTER THE
SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET WITH THE PROJECT ARBORIST TO VERIFY THE
LOCATIONS AND THE PROPER INSTALLATION OF THE TREE PROTECTION FENCING
SHOWN ON THE PLAN. THE LIMITS OF THE TREE PRESERVATION AREA WILL BE
CLEARLY MARKED BY THE INSTALLATION OF A TREE PROTECTION FENCE WTTH
SIGNAGE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW.
CONTRACTOR TO RETAIN A LICENSED ARBORIST TO FUNCTION AS PROJECT
ARBORIST AND A TREE CONTRACTOR LICENSED TO PERFORM ALL TREE WORK.
BOTH SHALL BE LICENSE), BONDED, AND INSURED TO WORK IN FAIRFAX COUNTY.
NO VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT OR STORAGE OF MATERIALS. BURN PILES, SPILLAGE, OR
DEBRIS OF ANY KIND WILL BE ALLOWED INSIDE THE TREE PRESERVATION AREA.
EXCESSIVE FOOT TRAFFIC IN TREE PROTECTION AREA SHOULD BE AVOIDED.
ENSURE ALL CONSTRUCTION PERSONNa INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT ARE AWARE
OF THE RESTRICTIONS WITHIN THE TREE PRESERVATION AREA.
AT THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION (ALL EQUIPMENT REMOVED FROM THE
SITE). NOTIFY THE PROJECT ARBORIST AND COUNTY URBAN FORESTER FOR AN
INSPECTION BEFORE REMOVING THE TREE PROTECTION FENCING. AT THAT TIME, AU.
TREES WILL BE INSPECTED AND ANY REPAIRS NEEDED WILL BE STIPULATED BY
THE PROJECT ARBORIST AND/OR COUNTY URBAN FORESTER AND PROMPTLY MADE
BY THE CONTRACTOR.
PLAN MUST
THE PROJECT ARBORIST SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY THE TREE INVENTORY AND
CONDITION ANALYSIS IN THIS PLAN AND NOTIFY GORDON OF ANY DISCREPANCIES
OR TREES THAT DISPLAY POOR FORM, OR HAVE INSECT OR DISEASE PROBLEMS
THAT SHOULD BE REMOVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
THE PROJECT ARBORIST SHALL REVIEW THE PROPOSED TREE PRESERVATION PLAT
AND NOTIFY GORDON OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CHANGES THAT SHOULD BE
MADE TO ENSURE THE PROTECTION OF THE TREES. PARTICULARLY 7H0SE
OFF-SITE THAT MAY BE IMPACTE
1-
TIMING. ALL TREE WORK (TREATMENT/PRUNINC/REMOVAL) MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR
HAND EXCAVATION ZONE ALL WORK AREAS WITHIN A CRZ MARKED ON THE TP PLAN
SHALL BE CONSIDERED AN HAND-EXCAVATION ZONE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE
THE FOLLOWING PRACTICES ARE APPLIED IN HAND EXCAVATION ZONES:
CONSULTANTS
0Gordon
A THE USE OF A SHARPENED SPADE OR SHOVEL
B. PRIOR TO 8ACKFILUNG, ALL HAND-DUG AREAS SHALL 8E INSPECTED BY THE
PROJECT ARBORIST TO ASSESS THE EXTENT OF POSSIBLE ROOT LOSS OR DAMAGE.
C. NO MOTORIZED EQUIPMENT SKA11 BE USED.
D. ALL WORK SHALL BE SUPERVISED BY THE PROJECT ARBORIST.
A. AU. ROOT PRUNING SHALL BE SUPERVISED BY THE PROJECT ARBORIST.
B. UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE PROJECT ARBORIST, ROOT PRUNING SHALL
BE MARKED AND DUG APPROXIMATRY 18-24* IN DEPTH AND 6' WIDTH MAX.
SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT AND METHODS WILL BE SPECIFIED BY THE PROJECT
ARBORIST.
C. ONCE A TRENCH IS OPENED UP. Ail EXPOSED ROOTS WILL BE HAND PRUNED SO
THAT THE CLEAN-CUT ENDS CAN RE-GROW.
D. VERTICAL CUTS SHALL BE MADE WITHIN 2 FEET OF THE UMIT OF THE GRADING OR
EXCAVATION.
E. TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE PLACED 6-12" FROM OUTSIDE THE ROOT
PRUNING TRENCH ON THE CONSTRUCTION SIDE. EROSION AND SEDIMENT FENCING
SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE THE TREE PROTECTION FENCING ON CONSTRUCTION
SIDE. (SEE ILLUSTRATION ON THIS SHEET)
F. PRUNED ROOT ENDS SHOULD BE KEPT MOIST WHILE EXPOSED AND THE COT
PROMPTLY BACKFILLED WITH SOIL AVOIDING ANY VOIDS. SPOIL FROM "THE TRENCH
SHALL NOT BE PLACED BETWEEN THE TRENCH AND THE TREE TRUNK.
G. IF EXCAVATION IS TO BE LEFT OPEN FOR 48 OR MORE HOURS, WRAP ROOTS WITH
BURLAP OR OTHER APPROVED WRAP AND KEEP MOIST AT AU TIMES, UNTIL
BACKFILLED.
H. ANY ROOTS DAMAGED DURING GRADING OR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE EXPOSED TO
SOUND TISSUE AND COT CLEANLY WTTH A SAW AND PROPERLY COVERED WTTH
MOIST SOIL
COUNTY PERMIT SET
TREE PROTECTION
N DEVICES DESCRIBED ON THIS SHEET IN AU.
AREAS MARKED ON THE TREE PRESERVATION (TP) PLAN.
B. EXISTING CKAINUNK FENCING MAY BE USED AS TREE PROTECTION FENCING
ONLY IN AREAS MARKED ON THE TP PLAN. WHERE NO CHAINUNK FENCE
EXISTS. A 4-FOOT HIGH WELDED-WIRE FENCE ON STEEL T-POSTS SHALL BE
INSTALLED PER DETAIL ON THIS SHEET.
C. TREE PROTECTION SIGNAGE SHALL BE ATTACHED TO ALL TREE PROTECTION
FENCING. SIGNAGE SHALL BE LOCATED AT 50' INTERVALS IN CLEARLY VISIBLE
LOCATIONS. AND ATTACHED DIRECTLY TO THE TREE PROTECTION DEVICE, I.E.,
NOT A TREE.
D. TREE PROTECTION DEVICES WILL REMAIN IN PLACE THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION
PHASE AND REMOVED ONLY AFTER APPROVAL OF THE COUNTY URBAN
FORESTER, EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED BELOW:
1) DURING THE LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION, TREE
PROTECTION DEVICES WILL REMAIN IN PLACE
2) FOR ACCESS TO LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN CRITICAL ROOT ZONES (CRZ)
MARKED ON THE TP PLAN. TEMPORARY OPENINGS SHALL BE ESTABUSHED
MI LARGE ENOUGH AND MX WHERE NEEDED FOR ACCESS BY
PERSONNa PLANT MATERIAL. AND HAND EXCAVATION TOOLS.
3) FOR ACCESS TO LANDSCAPE AREAS OUTSIDE CRITICAL ROOT ZONES (CRZ)
MARKED ON THE TP PLAN, TEMPORARY OPENINGS SHALL BE ESTABUSHED
ONLY LARGE ENOUGH AND MX WHERE NEEDED FOR ACCESS BY
PERSONNa PLANT MATERIAL, AND EQUIPMENT.
4) ALL AUTHORIZED LANDSCAPE OPENINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO THE
ORIGINAL TREE PROTECTION INSTALLATION STANDARDS DESCRIBED ABOVE
IMMEDIATELY AFTER LANDSCAPE. WORK IS COMPLETED.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCING SHALL BE PLACED ON THE INSIDE
(TOWARD CONSTRUCTION) FROM THE TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND ANY
ROOT-PRUNING TRENCHES. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS SILT FENCING,
DEBRIS BASINS. AND WATER DIVERSION STRUCTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED TO
PREVENT SILTAT10N AND/OR EROSION WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION AREA.
A. AS DIRECTED BY THE PROJECT ARBORIST, TREAT ANY DISEASE OR INSECT PEST TO
REDUCE THE STRESS ON THE TREES IN THE TREE PRESERVATION AREA.
B. ANY HERBICIDE PLACED UNDER PAVING MATERIALS OR PESTICIDES USED MUST BE
SAFE FOR USE AROUND TREES AND LABELED FOR THAT USE.
C. IF INJURY SHOULD OCCUR TO ANY TREE DURING CONSTRUCTION, IT SHOULD BE
TREATED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE PROJECT
D. TREES BEING PRESERVED SHALL BE WATERED THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION
PROCESS. THIS IS PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT FOR WORK WITHIN THE CRZ,
INCLUDING THE INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS. WATERING SHALL BE IN
QUANTITY AND FREOUENCY TO EOUAL THE AVERAGE DAILY AMOUNT OF RAINFALL
THE APPLICATION SHOULD BE DESIGNED TO WET THE SOIL TO A DEPTH OF 2' TO
3'. SHALLOW, FREQUENT WATERING SHALL BE AVOIDED.
E. AFTER REVIEW OF THE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN AND A SITE INSPECTION BY THE
PROJECT ARBORIST AND THE CONTRACTOR, IT MAY BE REOUIRED FOR THE
CONTRACTOR TO APPLY FERTILIZER, AERATION, OR OTHER TREATMENT OF THE
TREES TO BE SAVED".
A REMOVE ALL INVASIVE VINES GROWING ON TREES AND FROM THE AREA AROUND
THE TREES.
B. MX TREES THAT ARE MARKED ON THE TP PLAN. 4NQ. APPROVED FOR REMOVAL
BY THE COUNTY URBAN FORESTER SHALL BE REMOVED.
C. OFFSITE TREES (TRUNKS LOCATEO OFFSETS) Will MX SE REMOVED WHEN
DEEMED REQUIRED BY THE COUNTY URBAN FORESTER DUE TO HUMAN
HEALTH/SAFETY RISKS AND MX WITH PERMISSION OF THE OWNER. THE
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF TREES NEAR THE
PROPERTY UNE
D. AU TREE REMOVAL SHAU BE BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST AND REMOVED BY HAND
TO MINIMIZE POTENTIAL FOR DAMAGE TO REMAINING TREES AND ROOTS.
E. STUMPS SHAU BE LEFT IN PLACE OR GROUND OUT WTTH SMALL MACHINES
SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR THAT PURPOSE.
F. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE AU TREE REMOVAL DEBRIS IS
WHEN CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC MUST OCCUR IN WE CRZ MARKED ON THE TP
PLAN. R SHALL BE NECESSARY TO APPLY THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURE: COVER
UNDISTURBED SOIL WITH 10-15 INCHES OF WOOD CHIPS AND TOPPED WITH CHAIN
UNK FENCE PULLED TAUGHT AND ANCHORED OR TOPPED WITH 5/8' MIN.
PLYWOOD WITH NON-SKID SURFACE. (SEE ILLUSTRATION ON THIS SHEET)
B. USE EXCAVATED TOPSOIL TO BRING BACKFILL TO FINISHED GRADE. THE
SHALL BE COMPACT AROUND AND ABOVE THE ROOTS TO A MAXIMUM 8C
DENSITY PROCTOR TO ALLOW FOR FUTURE ROOT GROWTH.
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX,
VIRGINIA
ROOT PRUNING
FAIRFAX COUNTY PFM
HUNTINGTON LEVEE PROJECT
PHASE II
NO
ENTRY
02779040.02LS
TREE PRESERVATION
AREA
CALL: 703-324-1770
TO REPORT VIOLATIONS
REVISIONS APPROVED BY C
f: ARCADIS U.S., II
DATE:
JULY 2015
PROJECT NO.: 02779040.01
FILE NAME:
0201-L-LR-
S 12" X 18" ATTACHED TO J' THICK EXTERIOR GRADE MDO PLYWOOD
0 BY THE SIGN SUPPUER). SIGN SHALL HAVE BLAZE ORANGE
ERS, 1" HIGH, WITH THE INSCRIPTION "NO ENTRY - TREE
N AREA," WITH MULTILINGUAL TEXT. ATTACH SIGNAGE TO TREE PROTECTION FENCE AT 50'
SPOIL FROM TRENCHES OR OTHER EXCAVATIONS SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN
THE TREE PROTECTION AREA. EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY. IF REQUIRED
AND IF APPROVED BY THE PROJECT ARBORIST, SOILS MAY BE PLACED ON A RIGID
SURFACE THAT IS ELEVATED ABOVE THE GRADE USING SCRAP LUMBER OR
RAILROAD TIES. THE SCRAP LUMBER OR TIES SHALL BE ORIENTED PARALia TO
THE RADIATING ROOT SYSTEM. THE EXCAVATED SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 48
GRADE CHANGES IN THE CRZ SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING:
A. WHEN GRADE LOWERING (CUT) IS REOUIRED, PRUNE EXPOSED ROOTS U
THAN 2 INCHES WITH A SHARPENED SHOVa OR SPADE.
MOUNT VERNON DISTRICT
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
TREE PROTECTION DEVICES
PLA.TES-12
FAIRFAX COUNTY PFM
TREE PRESERVATION
NOTES AND DETAILS
FOR EQUIPMENT OPERATION
„ , AT EXISTING GRADE
1 Yrrhr
-
VERTICAL MULCHING
N.T.S.
, _ \ FOR FILLING OVER ROOTZONE
. 2 )
N.T.S.
FAIRFAX COUNTY PFM
LR—405
THIS SHEET FOR LANDSCAPE PURPOSES ONLY!!!
ATTACHMENT B
I have reviewed the subject 2232 Review Application for a levee and storm water pump station along
Cameron Run in the Huntington community. The property is zoned R-8 and will be constructed and
maintained by the County's Department of Public Works and Environmental Services. As such it is a
public use and permitted by right, provided all the bulk regulations for the R-8 District can be met.
I trust that this adequately addresses your request. If you have additional questions, please feel to
contact at (703) 324-1312.
Mavis Stanfield
Deputy Zoning Administrator for Appeals
Zoning Administration Division
ATTACHMENT C
County of Fairfax, Virginia
DATE: 27 February 2015
TO:
Harvey Clark, Planner, Facilities Planning Branch
FROM:
Linda Cornish Blank, Historic Preservation Planner
SUBJECT:
2232-V15-1, 2219 Fairfax Turnpike, Tax Map #s 83-l((14C)) 110A, 118A,
127A, 140A, 153A, to construct a levee and stormwater pump station along
Cameron Run in the Huntington community
Planning Location: Fairfax County Comprehensive Plan, 2013 Edition, Area IV, Mount
Vernon Planning District, Amended through 10-28-2014. Overview, pp. 12
and 17; MV-1 Huntington Community Planning Sector, p. 128:
Mount Vemon District, Overview, pp. 12 & 17:
"Heritage Resources
The Mount Vemon Planning District contains both known and potential heritage
resources. A list of those heritage resources included in Fairfax County's Inventory of Historic
Sites is shown on Figure 4, . . . The Inventory is open-ended and continues to grow. . . ."
Large portions of the Mount Vemon Planning District have not been surveyed to
determine the presence or absence of heritage resources. It is important that these areas be
examined before they are developed and appropriate action taken to record, preserve and/or
recover the significant resources."
The county Inventory of Historic Sites includes properties which meet certain eligibility
criteria and are officially designated by the County's History Commission. In addition to historic,
architectural or archaeological significance, property that serves as a focus of community identity
and pride may also be recognized. The benefits of designation include public recognition of the
structure's significance and enhanced support for preservation. ..."
Huntington Community Planning Sector, p. 128:
"Heritage Resources
Any development or ground disturbance in this sector, both on private and public land,
should be preceded by heritage resource studies, and alternatives should be explored for the
avoidance, preservation or recovery of significant heritage resources that are found. In those areas
where significant heritage resources have been recorded, an effort should be made to preserve
them. If preservation is not feasible, then, in accordance with countywide objectives and policies
as cited in the Heritage Resources section of the Policy Plan, the threatened resource should be
thoroughly recorded and in the case of archaeological resources, the artifacts recovered.
Department of Planning and Zoning
Excellence * Innovation * Stewardship
Integrity * Teamwork * Public Service
Planning Division
12055 Government Center Parkway, Suite730
Fairfax, Virginia 22035-5509
Phone 703-324-1380
Fax 703-324-3056
www.fairfaxcounty.gov/dpz/
DEPARTMENT OF
PLANNING
&ZONING
Clark memo
2232-Y15-1
February 27, 2014
Page 2
Heritage Resource Review
Background: The subject parcels are not included within the boundaries of a Fairfax County
Historic Overlay District, are not listed in the Fairfax County Inventory of Historic Sites or the
National Register of Historic Places or documented in the historic structures survey file. Staff
does not believe that the Huntington neighborhood has ever been evaluated for listing in the
county Inventory of Historic Sites. However, the neighborhood appears to potentially meet
eligibility criteria for listing in the Inventory.
Findings and comment:
1. The proposed pump station will be constructed within the neighborhood's viewshed.
Because the Huntington neighborhood appears to potentially meet the eligibility criteria
for listing in the county Inventory of Historic Sites, the station's size, scale, materials and
architectural design should be appropriate to the existing residential neighborhood to
protect the neighborhood character.
2. The materials supphed by the applicant do not provide sufficient or specific information
on the station's scale, materials or architectural design. Without this information, Staff is
unable to determine what the visual effect of the proposed pump station would be on the
potential historic properties of the Huntington neighborhood.
3. Staff is not aware if the applicant has contacted the Virginia Department of Historic
Resources (VDHR) for guidance in determining if review under Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, is necessary. If federal funding,
licensing or permitting is required, review under Section 106 may be necessary.
4. The Huntington Community Center, 5751 Liberty Dr., tax id # 83-1 ((14A)) A has an
interesting history. The developer of the subdivision, Banks and Lee Real Estate Corp.,
agreed to provide a recreation facility with a swimming pool on Huntington Avenue. The
plan never materialized. Residents took it upon themselves to construct a one-room
recreation center on a parcel owned by the county; it included a kitchen and restrooms
with outdoor play equipment and basketball court. In 1978, with funds procured from the
county, HUD and a 1% tax levied on Huntington properties, an addition was built and the
access road widened. In 1982 the building won an architectural design award.
Recommendations:
1. The applicant provide adequate information on the pump station to show its appearance
and its visual relationship to the neighborhood. Including photo simulation views from
within the Huntington neighborhood, elevations with materials labeled and landscape
treatment so it can be determined what the visual effect of the pump station on the
Huntington neighborhood would be, and if that effect would be adverse.
2. The applicant comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,
as amended, as may be necessary. If federal funding, licensing or permitting for the
construction of the levee and pump station is required, this may be considered an
undertaking that requires Section 106 review. Applicant should contact the VDHR for
guidance.
3. The applicant provide to the Department of Planning and Zoning (DPZ), Planning
Division documentation as to whether or not Section 106 review is required in order to be
reviewed and included in the staff report for the application. If Section 106 review is
required, or has been previously completed, the applicant provide a copy of the
completed Section 106 to DPZ, Planning Division in order to be included in the staff
report for the application.
ATTACHMENT D
County of Fairfax, Virginia
DATE: March 4, 2015
TO:
Harvey Clark
Facilities Planning Branch
Planning Division, DPZ
FROM:
Mary Ann Welton
Environment and Development Review Branch
Planning Division, DPZ
SUBJECT:
Environmental Comments for: 2232 -V-15-1
Huntington Levee on Cameron Run
The Huntington Levee Project is currently proposed to have an impact on an approximately 3400
linear foot segment of tidal shoreline along Cameron Run. The levee and the accompanying
proposed stormwater pump station will be located predominately within land area known as
Huntington Park. The site of the proposed levee along Cameron Run is Environmental Quality
Corridor (EQC), as defined by Objective 9 of the Policy Plan of the Comprehensive Plan; Resource
Protection Area (RPA), as defined by the County's Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance
(CBPO); 100 year floodplain, as governed by the County's Zoning Ordinance and tidal wetlands
governed by Chapter 13 of Title 28.2 of the Virginia Code and Chapter 116, Code of Fairfax County,
Virginia ("Wetlands Ordinance").
This proposed project will have impacts on a significant area of land along the tidal shoreline of
Cameron Run. Any project within the Virginia Coastal Zone which has such a significant
environmental impact as this project should demonstrate that alternative flood control options
were considered.
To ensure that the minimum disturbance necessary will occur within the Cameron Run EQC, the
agent for the applicant should provide a justification that this flood control project was assessed
based on the following goals:
• Avoidance of impacts;
• Minimization of impacts; and
• Mitigation and/ or compensation for the loss of environmentally sensitive tidal wetland
stream valley corridor of Cameron Run.
Department of Planning and Zoning
Excellence * Innovation * Stewardship
Integrity * Teamwork * Public Service
Planning Division
12055 Government Center Parkway, Suite730
Fairfax, Virginia 22035-5509
Phone 703-324-1380
Fax 703-324-3056
www.fairfaxcounty.gov/dpz/
DEPARTMENT OF
PLANNING
&ZONING
Harvey Clark
2232-V-l 5-1
Huntington Levee
Page 2
In addition to the above information, staff requests the following additional information:
•
•
•
•
Clear description of the total area affected;
Enlarged plan view drawings and cross-section views of the entire structure and its
dimensions depicted at a measureable scale, i.e., 1 "=30 v or 1 "=50' with the
identification of Mean High Water, Mean Low Water on all view;
Representative cross-sections views depicted at a measurable scale at several segments
along the Cameron Run stream valley;
Measurements to fixed reference points for the entire structure at several locations.
Finally, under "Anticipated Impacts. 4. Environmental." the statement of justification indicates
that a Joint Permit Application (JPA) will be submitted to the Corps of Engineers; however, the
JPA should be submitted to the Virginia Marine Resources Commission (VMRC). VMRC
ensures that all the appropriate reviewing entities including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
will receive this application for review.
N:\2232\HUNTINGTON_CAMERON RUN LEVEEVEnvironmental comments for Huntington Levee.docx
ATTACHMENT E
#3]^ County of Fairfax, Virginia
DATE:
February 20, 2015
TO:
Chris B. Caperton; Chief
Facilities Planning Branch, PD
Department of Planning and Zoning
FROM:
Thakur Dhakal, Engineer IV
Site Code Research and Development Branch, CDCD, LDS,
Department of Public Works and Environmental Services
SUBJECT:
2232 Review Application #2232-V15-l; Tax Map #083-l-14-C-0110A et. ah;
Cameron Run Watershed; Mount Vernon District
We have reviewed the subject application. We offer the following comments.
Grandfathering/Time Limits
The plan would qualify for Grandfathered plan and Stormwater management may be designed
using Article 5 (old criteria) of the Stormwater Management Ordinance (SWMO) and 2011
version of the Public Facilities Manual (PFM).
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance (CBPO)
There is County mapped 1993 Resource Protection Area (RPA) on this site. All of the proposed
development work is located within the limits of RPA. It has been determined that the RPA redelineation is not necessary for the project. The proposed improvement is an allowed use under
CBPO 118-2-1(el. This is a flood protection use and no water quality impact assessment is
necessary.
Water Quality Control
The proposed construction of levee is not exempt from the requirements of SWMO. Water
quality controls are required for this development (SWMO §124-4-2). The total phosphorus load
for this project shall not exceed 0.41 lb/ac/yr as calculated pursuant to §124-4-3. No BMPs or
water quality narrative have been provided on the plan.
Department of Public Works and Environmental Services
Land Development Services, Site Development and Inspections Division
12055 Government Center Parkway, Suite 535
Fairfax, Virginia 22035-5503
Phone 703-324-1720 • TTY 711 • FAX 703-324-8359
Chris B. Caperton
2232-B12-9
Page 2 of 3
Furthermore, every effort shall be made to provide BMP more than that of minimum necessary.
Stormwater Detention
Stormwater detention is required, if not waived (PFM 6-0301). No detention facilities, narratives
or computations are provided on the plan.
Downstream Drainage System
No outfall narrative has been provided. The improvement shall not cause adverse impact on the
upstream/downstream properties.
Floodplain
There are regulated floodplains on the property. Floodplain study is shall be submitted and
approved prior to site plan approval. The limits of 100 year floodplain shall be delineated and
dedicated within a floodplain easement. The proposed levee project shall not raise the floodplain
elevations on neighboring, upstream or downstream properties. The site also contains FEMA
mapped floodplain and any change in floodplain limits shall be coordinated with FEMA. A
FEMA Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR7LOMR) may be necessary.
Downstream Drainage Complaints
There are many drainage complaints on the site, upstream and downstream of the project. More
information on these complaints is available from the Maintenance & Stormwater Management
Division (703-877-2800).
Onsite Major Storm Drainage System and Overland Relief
Overland relief path and narratives shall be provided on plan.
Drainage Diversion
The plan doesn't propose a drainage diversion. However, a major change in the floodplain has
been proposed. A temporary ponding area has been created behind the levee, where
approximately 160 acre of drainage will be diverted. This ponding shall not have adverse impact
on the residential area behind the levee.
Stormwater Planning Comments
This case is located in the Cameron Run Watershed. There are projects, CA9100 and CA9102,
located near the subject site. Please visit
http://www.fairfaxcountv.gov/dpwes/watersheds/publications/cr/ll ca wmp appal ada.pdf
for more details.
Chris B. Caperton
2232-B12-9
Page 3 of 3
Dam Breach
Part of this property is within the dam break inundation zone for the Lake Barcroft The limits of
the dam breach zone shall be depicted on the site plan (LTI 09-10).
Please contact me at 703-324-2992 if you require additional information.
TD/
cc:
Fred Rose, Chief, Watershed Planning & Assessment Branch, SPD, DPWES
Don Demetrius, Chief, Watershed Evaluation Branch, SPD, DPWES
Bijan Sistani, Chief, South Branch, SDID, DPWES
Aaron Koch, Section Manager, BDCD, DPWES
Zoning Application File
ATTACHMENT F
County of Fairfax, Virginia
DATE:
July 31, 2014
TO:
Harvey Clark, Planner
Planning Division, DPZ
FROM:
Jay Banks, Urban Forester II
Forest Conservation Branch, DPWES
SUBJECT:
Huntington Levee, 2232-V15-1
I have reviewed the above referenced 2232 application consisting of a Site Plan and Statement of
Justification stamped as received by the Planning Division, DPZ on January 8, 2015. The
following comments are based on this review, and notes from a 1/22/2015 meeting with staff in
attendance as follows:
Gordon: Scott Peterson, Will Peart and Joe McClellan
Fairfax County Urban Forest Management Division: Jay Banks and Craig Herwig
Fairfax County Building Design and Constmction Division: Aaron Koch and Michael Dreher
1. Comment: The project is considered linear in nature. In accordance with PFM 12-0503.1,
Existing Vegetation Map, Tree Preservation Target Calculations and Narrative, 10-year Tree
Canopy Calculations, Tree Inventory and Condition Analysis, and Tree preservation plan and
narrative are not required. The plan shall address applicable submission requirements of
§12-0504: Site Engineering and Layout Information, and §12-0505: Erosion and Sediment
Control Plan Sheets. At a minimum these plans shall take reasonable steps to maximize the
preservation of existing vegetation by addressing basic tree preservation plan elements and
measures that include: minimizing soil disturbance to only that necessary to construct the
project; providing proposed limits of clearing; providing an accurate tree line; and providing
tree protection devices at the limits of clearing.
Recommendation: Ensure that required plan elements noted above are addressed in the site
plan for the project.
2. Comment: The limits of the site should include the pump station, levee, and associated
infrastructure that are considered part of the proposed drainage system. While the use is not
specifically identified in the Zoning Ordinance, it was agreed that the project best fits the
Light Public Utility use. A Light Public Utility use requires transitional screening type 2 (a
35-foot wide screen) and a minimum barrier of 42-in. high chain link fence. It has been
suggested that the screening yard could be modified to a staggered double row of medium to
Department of Public Works and Environmental Services
Urban Forest Management Division
12055 Government Center Parkway, Suite 518
Fairfax, Virginia 22035-5503
Phone 703-324-1770, TTY: 711, Fax: 703-653-9550
w w w.fairfaxcounty.gov/dpwes
Huntington Levee, 2232-V15-1
February 27, 2015
Page 2 of 2
large evergreen trees along the rear of the adjacent properties. This modification could be
based on Section 13-305, paragraph 14 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Recommendation: If a modification is to be pursued, a transitional screening
waiver/modification should be requested as part of a subsequent Special Exception, or an
application form and letter of request submitted to the Director for review with a landscape
plan showing proposed modified transitional screening.
If there are any questions or further assistance is desired, please contact me at 703-324-1770.
JB/
UFMDID #:
DPZ File
Department of Public Works and Environmental Services
Land Development Services, Environmental and Site Review Division
12055 Government Center Parkway, Suite 535
Fairfax, Virginia 22035-5503
Phone 703-324-1720, TTY: 703-324-1877, Fax: 703-324-8359
www.fairfaxcounty.gov/dpwes
ATTACHMENT G
County of Fairfax, Virginia
DATE: February 27, 2015
TO:
Chris Caperton, Chief
Facilities Planning Branch, DPZ
FROM:
Leonard Wolfenstein, Chief
Transportation Planning Section
Department of Transportation
FILE:
10-5
SUBJECT:
Application for 15.2-2232 determination -2232-V15-1 for the approval of a levee
and storm-water pump station construction along Cameron Run in the Huntington
Community
4/
The Fairfax County Department of Transportation (FCDOT) has reviewed the above 2232
application for a levee and storm-water pump station in the Huntington Community and does not
anticipate any impacts on planned or existing roads. The construction of the levee will not affect
the long term operations of Fairfax Connector or Metrobus in the area.
The application shows a paved road/path being constructed along the top of the levee. The
Fairfax County Trails plan has a recommendation for a Major Paved Trail and a Major Regional
Trail paralleling Cameron Run in the construction area. It is important that the paved road/path
being shown on the plans contributes to the planned network of trails in the area. The memo
received on February 23, 2015 from the department of Public Works and Environmental Services
Building Design Branch commits this paved road/path as a beginning piece of the trail network
in the area, assuring that it will be publicly accessible:
A trail along the top of the levee has been included in the project since the first
conceptual designs were presented in 2009. This approach is consistent with the 2013
edition of the County's Comprehensive Plan and is supported by the community. The trail
varies in width from 6 to 11 feet wide and spans from on the east end of the levee near the
end of Hunting Creek Road to the west end approximately 200feet west ofFenwick
Drive. Currently there is no continued connection on either end of the trail, but in
discussions with DPZ, the plan is for future developments to connect and ultimately have
a continuous trail as depicted in the Comprehensive Plan. The trail is proposed to be
publically accessible and provide a continuous path for bikes and walking along the
majority top of the majority of the 2,800feet long levee.
There is a gated area along the trail as noted on the plans. This gated fence is located at
the pump station, and is intended restrict access to the pump station. The design will be
Fairfax County Department of Transportation
4050 Legato Road, Suite 400
Fairfax, VA 22033-2895
Phone: (703) 877-5600 TTY: 711
Fax: (703) 877 5723
www.fairfaxcounty.gov/fcdot
February 27, 2015
Page 2 of 2
further developed to include a path around the gated pump station to allow continuous public
access along the trail.
With the paved road/path available for public use there appear to be no other significant traffic
impacts resulting from the proposed use for the site. If you have any questions please feel free to
contact Kristin Calkins (tel. 703-877-5710) Kristin.Calldns@fairfax county.gov.
Cc:
Harvey Clark, DPZ
Mike Davis, FCDOT
Karyn Moreland, FCDOT
Kristin Calkins, FCDOT
Bill Harrell, FCDOT
Randy White, FCDOT
Chris Wells, FCDOT
ATTACHMENT H
iffatar
FAIRFAX COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
8560 Arlington Boulevard, Fairfax, Virginia 22031
www.fairfaxwater.org
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
DIVISION
Jamie Bam Hedges, P. E.
Director
(703) 289-6325
Fax (703) 289-6382
February 4, 2015
Mr. Chris B, Caperton
Facilities Planning Branch Chief
Fairfax County Department of Planning & Zoning
12055 Government Center Parkway, Suite 730
Fairfax, Virginia 22035
Re:
Application No. 2232-V-l 5-1
Huntington Levee Project
Tax Map: 83-1
Dear Mr. Caperton:
The following information is submitted in response to your request for a water
service analysis for the above application:
1. The property can be served by Fairfax Water.
2. Adequate domestic water service is available at the site from existing 12-inch,
8-inch and 6-inch water mains located at the property. See the enclosed water
system map.
If you have any questions regarding this information please contact Ross K. Stilling,
P.E., Chief, Site Plan Review at (703) 289-6385.
Sincerely,
Gregory J. Prelewicz, P.E.
Manager, Planning Department
Enclosure
ATTACHMENT I
Virginia Department of Transportation
Project Review & Comment Resolution Form
VDOT Project No.:
NA
Locality Project No.: 400-C40101/SD-000037
UPC No: NA
Location: Fairfax County, City of Alexandria
Description: Huntington Levee Project
Phase: Design Plan Received on 7/20/2015
Design Originator: Michael Baker International
Review Comment
Item
Sheet
No.
Name: George Lu / Pawan Sarang
Discipline: Hydraulics
Date: 8/6/2015
By VDOT Reviewer
1. Requirement
2. Recommendation
3. Clarification
Code
By VDOT PM in Conjunction with Design Originator
A. Agree with Comment (Document Will Be Revised)
B. Comment To Be Evaluated (by Whom)
C. Disagree with Comment (Provide Justification)
G
1
This comment will be addressed as part of the site plan review
process.
G
The VDOT roads (I-495 and Telegraph Rd) will be
negatively impacted by increases in water surface
elevation (WSEL) due to the proposed levee. The
increases in WSEL violate VDOT's design guidance set
forth in VDOT Drainage Manual Section 12.2.1 that
requires zero increase in 100-yrWSEL in FEMA zones
determined by detailed methods or Zone AE. For the
overall project, a maximum increase of 0.22 ft in 100-YR
WSEL is found at Cross Section 1.345, approximately
1900 feet downstream of Telegraph Bridge.
1
This comment will be addressed as part of the site plan review
process.
G
Channel and overbank velocity will increase due to the
proposed levee. Scour analysis is needed to evaluate
impacts to the I-495 roadway and piers adjacent to
Capital Beltway on the left overbank (Section 0.752 to
1.172).
1
This comment will be addressed as part of the site plan review
process.
4.
G
Downstream of the model is extended to Route 1
Interchange and George Washington Bridge that the area
is under backwater effects from Potomac River. The
boundary conditions for the model should consider the
backwater effects from Potomac River.
1
This comment will be addressed as part of the site plan review
process.
5.
G
Please address access to build the proposed levee using
VDOT maintained roadways and evaluate impacts to the
access.
1
This comment will be addressed as part of the site plan review
process.
2.
3.
Form Revised 7-15-2015
Name:
Discipline:
Date:
Name:
Discipline:
Date:
Fairfax County and City of Alexandria floodplain
managers and FEMA will need an opportunity to review
and concur with the subject plan and H&HA analysis.
Please provide evidence of approval from the local
floodplain managers and FEMA.
1.
Final Disposition
Response
Code
By the VDOT PM (for Virginia-Owned
Roadways)
By the Locality PM (for Locality-Owned
Roadways)
Page 1 of 2
Virginia Department of Transportation
Project Review & Comment Resolution Form
VDOT Project No.:
NA
Locality Project No.: 400-C40101/SD-000037
UPC No: NA
Location: Fairfax County, City of Alexandria
Description: Huntington Levee Project
Phase: Design Plan Received on 7/20/2015
Design Originator: Michael Baker International
Review Comment
Item
6.
7.
8.
Sheet
No.
Name: George Lu / Pawan Sarang
Discipline: Hydraulics
Date: 8/6/2015
By VDOT Reviewer
1. Requirement
2. Recommendation
3. Clarification
Name:
Discipline:
Date:
Name:
Discipline:
Date:
Code
By VDOT PM in Conjunction with Design Originator
A. Agree with Comment (Document Will Be Revised)
B. Comment To Be Evaluated (by Whom)
C. Disagree with Comment (Provide Justification)
G
In order for a levee to be accredited by FEMA and shown
on a FIRM as providing protection from the base flood,
appropriate data and documentation demonstrating
compliance with 44 CFR 65.10 need to be provided.
Mandatory information includes freeboard design, closure
designs, embankment protection design, embankment
and foundation stability analyses, settlement analysis,
interior drainage analysis etc. The submitted package
does not include full documentations of designs/analyses
for the proposed levee. In addition, an Operations and
Maintenance (O&M) plans fulfilling the minimum
requirements of 44 CFR 65.10 (C) and 44 CFR 65.10 (D)
are not included in the submission package. The O&M
plans must identify maintenance responsibility and
include the areas where the manning's n-value reduced
from the existing conditions.
1
This comment will be addressed as part of the site plan review
process.
G
The Department will need to know impacts to VDOT
roadway systems or ROW should the levee failure. The
emergency plan should include VDOT systems and
evaluate impacts.
1
This comment will be addressed as part of the site plan review
process.
G
There appears to be accumulation of sedimentations on
downstream of I-495 Bridge. Can some or all of this
accumulation be taken out and perhaps used in
construction for the proposed levee? This may help in
hydraulic performance of the channel.
2
This comment will be addressed as part of the site plan review
process.
Form Revised 7-15-2015
Final Disposition
Response
Code
By the VDOT PM (for Virginia-Owned
Roadways)
By the Locality PM (for Locality-Owned
Roadways)
Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT J
FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK AUTHORITY
M E M O R A N D U M
TO:
Chris B. Caperton, Chief
Facilities Planning Branch, Planning Division, DPZ
Department of Planning and Zoning
FROM:
Sandy Stallman, AICP, Manager £A
Park Planning Branch, PDD
DATE:
March 2, 2015
SUBJECT:
2232-V15-1, DPWES - Huntington Park
Tax Map Number(s): 83-1 ((14C)) 110A; 118A, 127A, 140A, 153A
BACKGROUND
The Park Authority staff has reviewed the 2232 Review Application dated December 24, 2014.
The application proposes a levee with pump station, stormwater pond areas to be constructed
over the entirety of Huntington Park, which is owned by the Fairfax County Park Authority
(FCPA). The Park Authority provides the following comments,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GUIDANCE
The County Comprehensive Plan includes both general and specific guidance regarding parks
and resources. The Policy Plan describes the need to mitigate adverse impacts to park and
recreation facilities resulting from public facility projects (Parks and Recreation, Objective 5,
p.6). Resource protection is addressed in multiple objectives, focusing on protection,
preservation, and sustainability of resources (Parks and Recreation Objectives 2 and 5, p.5-7),
The Mount Vernon Planning District recommendations in the Area IV Plan describe the
importance of heritage resources. Districtwide Plan recommendations specifically state "large
portions of the Mount Vernon Planning District have not been surveyed to determine the
presence or absence of heritage resources. It is important that these areas be examined before
they are developed and appropriate action taken to record, preserve and or recover the significant
resources." (Area IV, Mount Vernon Planning District, Area-Wide Recommendations, Heritage
Resources, pp. 17).
In the MV1 Huntington Planning Sector of the Comprehensive Plan, Huntington Park is
designated as a neighborhood park. The Plan recommends acquiring the Water Authority site
that bisects the park and to revise the master plan and implement accordingly. The Water
Authority site has been acquired and added to the park. A master plan revision was begun but
deferred indefinitely pending resolution of flooding issues in the area.
Barbara Berlin
2232-V15-1, DPWES - Huntington Park
Page 2
In addition, the Comprehensive Plan includes text in Land Unit A of the Huntington Planning
Sector that states:
"The undeveloped land along the south side of Cameron Run north of the rear property
line of parcels along the north side of Arlington Terrace Run, should be acquired for
additional public park to serve the residents of the Huntington area. It is suggested that
the park be developed with passive and active recreation uses."
These properties, located within the RPA and floodplain, have been dedicated to FCPA as
additions to Huntington Park. This dedication included an asphalt trail through the dedicated
parcel to the southeast.
The countywide trails plan depicts a trail parallel to Cameron Run that includes the frontage of
Huntington Park. This planned trail, known as Cameron Run SV trail, will provide connectivity
from Telegraph Road to Richmond Highway and tie into connections to the City of Alexandria.
Finally, text from the Mount Vernon District chapter of the Great Parks, Great Communities
Park Comprehensive Plan echoes recommendations in the Countywide Comprehensive Plan.
Specific district chapter recommendations include adding water access, either for boating or a
boardwalk for nature observation, at Huntington Park in conjunction with flood prevention
facilities.
ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Park Needs:
The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the need for Huntington Park in serving park and recreation
needs in the Huntington area. Using adopted service level standards, staff has identified a need
for all types of parkland and recreational facilities in this area. Existing nearby parks (Belle
Haven, Farrington, Fort Willard, Heritage Hill, Huntington, Jefferson Manor, and Mount Eagle)
meet only a portion of the demand for parkland generated by residential development in the
Huntington Area. In addition to parkland, the recreational facilities in greatest need in this area
include basketball courts, rectangle fields, playgrounds, Softball fields, and trails. The proposed
levee use will eliminate parkland, open space, and a playground, exacerbating park service level
deficiencies. The applicant should seek to replace these facilities or upgrade existing facilities
nearby. Opportunities for park improvements may exist at Farrington and Mount Eagle Parks,
Trails:
An important trail route/connection known as the Cameron Run Stream Valley Trail along
Cameron Run through Huntington Park is shown on the Countywide Trails Plan. The proposed
8' wide access road on top of the levee could provide a publicly accessible trail. Design and
width of this trail should accommodate multi-modal use connections and public access for its
entire length. It will also be important for a trail on the levee to connect to neighborhood streets
and adjacent properties.
Barbara Berlin
2232-V15-1, DPWES - Huntington Park
Page 3
Land Management and Natural Resources Impacts:
Under the proposed use, the majority of the park will become a stormwater management facility.
New park facilities (other than trails) cannot be placed in the flood plain or RPA as per the
Chesapeake Bay Ordinance. It is recommended that the county consider taking ownership of the
parkland impacted by the proposed use for stormwater control or enter into an agreement with
the FCPA to maintain the area in perpetuity.
The entirety of this proposed levee development is located within a Resource Protection Area
(RPA) and flood plain. Currently, park natural resources provide important ecological services
and habitat. The applicant should analyze, demonstrate and mitigate impacts to the ecological
services provided at Huntington Park.
The impoundment "pond areas" behind the proposed levee at Huntington Park would be more
attractive and functional with appropriate wet meadow plantings containing native species, and a
potential boardwalk.
If ownership remains with the Park Authority, any portion of the park that will be impacted by
the development of the levee must be restored to FCPA's specifications. If any required
restoration work cannot be accomplished on site due to space or operational requirements then
off-site restoration at a nearby FCPA property must occur. To mitigate for the loss of ecosystem
services and habitat, FCPA can support mitigation efforts by identifying mitigation sites nearby,
provide native vegetation establishment, and maintenance specifications once a planting plan is
provided for this project.
Regardless of future ownership, FCPA requests that all landscaping to be installed should be of
non-invasive species to protect the environmental health of nearby parkland. Species should also
ideally be native to Fairfax County to provide the greatest ecosystem benefit.
Cultural Resources Impact:
The parcels were subjected to cultural resources review, that indicated that no known site have
been documented. However, the site has a high potential to contain significant archaeological
resources in the undisturbed portions. The Park Authority recommend a Phase I archaeological
survey. If significant sites are found, Phase II archaeological testing is recommended in order to
determine if sites are eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. If sites
are found eligible, avoidance or Phase III archaeological data recovery is recommended.
Since this project requires federal permits under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, it triggers
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, and will require archaeological survey
under guidance from the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR). Staff
recommends consultation with VDHR as soon as possible.
At the completion of any cultural resource studies, the Park Authority requests that the applicant
provide two copies (one hard copy, one digital copy) of the archaeology report as well as field
notes, photographs, and artifacts to the Park Authority's Resource Management Division
(Attention: Liz Crowell) within 30 days of completion of the study. Materials can be sent to
2855 Annandale Road Falls Church, VA 20110 for review and concurrence. For artifact
Barbara Berlin
2232-V15-1, DP WES - Huntington Park
Page 4
catalogues, please include the database in Access ™ format, as well as digital photography,
architectural assessments, including line drawings. If any archaeological, architectural or other
sites are found during cultural resources assessments, the applicant should update files at VDHR,
using the VCRIS system.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
This section summarizes the recommendations included in the preceding analysis section.
•
The County should consider taking ownership of Huntington Park or entering into a
maintenance agreement with FCPA to maintain the levee and detention pond areas
• Include the planned Cameron Run Stream Valley trail within the project, and connect
to adjacent lateral neighborhood streets, and adjacent properties
• Replace impacted park facilities nearby
• Study impacts to ecological services provided by park natural resources and propose
appropriate mitigation
• Conduct a Phase I archaeological study, section 106 review, and further
archaeological work as warranted
• Remove invasive species from the landscape plan; consider using only native
plantings
FCPA Reviewer: Andy Galusha
DPZ Coordinator: Harvey Clark
Copy: Cindy Walsh, Director, Resource Management Division
Liz Crowell, Manager, Cultural Resource Management & Protection Section
Dan Sutherland, Manager, Park Operations Division
Brian Williams, Manager, Land Acquisition & Management Branch
Elizabeth Cronauer, Trail Coordinator, Special Projects Branch
Harvey Clark, DPZ Coordinator
Chron File
File Copy
ATTACHMENT K
§ 15.2-2232. Legal status of plan.
A Whenever a local planning commission recommends a comprehensive plan or part thereof for the locality and such plan has
been approved and adopted by the governing body, it shall control the general or epproximate location, character- and extentrot
each feature shown on the plan. Thereafter, unless a feature is already shown on the adopted master plan or part- thereof or is
deemed sounder subsection D, no street or connection to an existing street, park or other public area, public building m'public
structure public utility facility or public.service corporation facility other than a railroad facility or an undergroundnatu g
!5SlStnbaL facility of a public utility as defined in subdivision (b) of § 56ml wto*
"J*
,
service tendtory whether publioly or privately owned, shall be constructed, established or authorized, unless and until the gen
Son Zlo'cationTchaLer, lid extent thereof has been submitted to and approved by
substantially in accord with the adopted comprehensive plan or part thereof, hi connection with any such detennination tfae
commission may, and at the direction of the governing bodyshall, hold a public hsarng, after notice as reqwred by §^^SiFollowing the adoption of the Statewide Transportation Plan by the Commonwealth Tran^ortation Board pursuant tc»f_ 33Jn
23.03 and written notification to the affected local governments, each local government through which one or more of foe
dSinated corridors of statewide significanoe traverses, shall, at aminimum, note such comdor orcomdors on thetransportation
plan map included in its comprehensive plan for information purposes at the next regular update of the transportation to
Prior toTie next regular update of the transportation plan map, the local government shall acknowledge the existence of corridors
of statewide significance within its boundaries,
B. The commission shall communicate its findings to the governing body, indicating its approval or dlsappoval with written
reasons therefor. The governing body may overrule the action of the commission by a vote of a majority of its mmnbraship.
Failure of the commission to act within 60 days Of a submission, unless the time ,s extended by the governing body, shall be
deemed approval. The owner or owners or their agents may appeal Ibe decision of the commission to the^Sov^g^.,"th
10 days after the decision of the commission. The appeal shall be by written petition to the governing body setting rth «>
reasons for the appeal. The appeal shall be heard and determined within 60 days from its filing. A majority vote of the governing
body shall overrule the commission.
C Widening narrowing, extension, enlargement, vacation or change of use of streets or public areas.shall likewise be submitted
for approval,'but paving, repair, reconstruction, improvement, drainage or similar work and nomia) service extensions P«bllc
utilities or public sendee corporations shall not require approval unless such work involves a change m location or extent of a
street or publiq area,
D Anv public area, facility or U3B as set forth in subsection A which is identified wiftiin, but not the entire subjeot of, a
s u b m i s s i o n u n d e r e i t h e r § 1 S . 2 - 2 2 5 S f o r s u b d i v i s i o n o r s u b d i v i s i o n A8 o f § 1 5 . 2 - 2 2 ? 6 f o r d e v e l o p m e n t s ; b o t h m a y b e d t o e d a
feature already shown on the adopted master plan, and, therefore, excepted from the requirement for subimttel to and WWiil by
the commission or the governing body; provided, that the governinghody has by ordinance or resolution defined stwdards
governing the construction, establishment or authorization of such public area, facility or use or has approved itfhrough
acceptance of a proffermade pursuant to § X5|2:2303.
E Approval and fending of a publio telecommunications facility on or before July 1,2012, by the Virginia Public Broadcasting
12 « dm et seq.) of Chapter 24 ofTitle 2.2 or after July 1,2012, by the-Board ofEducation
^-mniBTrt to 8 22 1-20.1 shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of this section and local zoning onbnances with respectto
toftfif«^c4tL
of television and radio towers and structures not necessary to house elcctrenio appamtos. The
exemption provided for in this subsection shall not apply to facilities existing or approved by the Virginia Public
Telecommunications Board prior to July1, 1990. The Board of Education shall notify the governing body of the locality m
advance of any meeting where approval of any such facility shall be acted upon.
F On any application for a telecommunications facility, the commission's decision shall comply with the requirements of the
Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, .Failure of the commission to act on my such application:^^XnrnvaTof the
facility under subsection A submitted on or after July 1, 1998, within 90 days of such submission shall be toed
approva of the
application by the commission unless the governing body has authonzed an extension of time for consecration
bS agreed to an extension of time, The governing hody may extend the time required for action by the local oommissmn by no
more than 60 additional days. If the commission has not acted bn the application 1yy the end of the extension, or by the end of
such longer period as may be agreed to by the applicant, the application Is deemed approved by the commission.
IPode 1950 85 15-909 15-923 15-964.10; 1958, o. 389; 1960, c. 567; 1962, c. 4 7, § 15,1-456; 1964, c. 528; 1966, o, 596;
1968 J^1975, c641; 1976, c. 2Tl ', 1978, o, 584; 1982, o, 39; 1987, c. 312; 1989, c. 532; 1990, e, 633; 1997, ce. 582, 858;
1o, 683; 2007, o. 801.; Z0°9> °0' SIS, ®2l 2012, cc, 803, 835.)
•