2004 Freshman/Sophomore Survey Analysis, Assessment & Accreditation

Analysis, Assessment &
Accreditation
2004
Freshman/Sophomore Survey
May 2004
2004 FRESHMAN/SOPHOMORE STUDENT SURVEY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Each year, the Office of Analysis, Assessment, and Accreditation conducts a survey of freshman and
sophomore students to determine their attitudes and perceptions regarding the initial phase of their USU
experiences. In addition to some general questions, the focus of this year’s survey was on general
education courses, advising, and student computer use. The heavier emphasis on advising resulted from
requests by ASUSU, the Office of Advising and Transition Services, and a request from university
administration to study advising at USU.
The survey was administered in a random sample of classes with high proportions of freshmen and
sophomores, and completed surveys were obtained from 1249 students. Demographics of the survey
respondents mirrored those of the general population of freshmen and sophomore students at USU in
terms of gender, ethnicity, and citizenship. About two-thirds of the respondents were 18-20 years old,
50.9% were female, and 5.8% were minorities. Among the important findings of the survey are the
following:
Overall Perceptions of USU
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
About 85% of the respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with the overall quality of their
educations. Only 2% indicated dissatisfaction.
87% rated the teaching ability of the faculty as good or very good.
When asked what they would tell their friends about USU, 81% indicated they would say USU is
great or at least say mostly positive things. Only 2% made negative comments.
General Education
ƒ
ƒ
About two-thirds of the respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with their general education
courses. About 10% said they were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied.
When asked how well they felt University Studies Courses had prepared them, about 90% said
well or very well.
Advising
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
The USU Major Requirement Sheets were the single most important source of information for a
majority of respondents for academic planning - even more important than advisors.
Almost two-thirds of the respondents had met with their advisor once or not at all during the last
school year.
13% said they were dissatisfied with their advisors, and 15% said that, overall, they were
dissatisfied with USU’s advising system.
Computer Facilities and Usage
ƒ
ƒ
A little over two-thirds of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they had not waited long
for a computer in the open access computer laboratories and more than 84% said they were
satisfied with the labs.
Almost 95% of the respondents said they had access to a privately-owned computer during the
school year and, over two-thirds indicated that they used these computers most or all of the time
for their school work.
2003-2004 Survey Comparison
ƒ
Most of the differences seen between the two years were differences among colleges rather than
many drastic differences in total responses. Appendix B presents these comparisons in graph
form.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
SURVEY OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................ 1
SURVEY ADMINISTRATION........................................................................................................................ 1
RESPONDENT CHARACTERISTICS .......................................................................................................... 3
FINDINGS: OVERALL PERCEPTIONS OF USU......................................................................................... 4
FINDINGS: GENERAL EDUCATION COURSES ........................................................................................ 6
FINDINGS: ADVISING.................................................................................................................................. 8
FINDINGS: COMPUTER FACILITIES AND USAGE.................................................................................. 11
SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................................. 13
APPENDIX A: SURVEY INSTRUMENT ....................................................................................................A-1
APPENDIX B: FRESHMAN/SOPHOMORE SURVEY RESULTS: 2003 vs 2004.....................................B-1
APPENDIX C: FREQUENCY TABLES..................................................................................................... C-1
APPENDIX D: CROSS-TABULATIONS ................................................................................................... D-1
APPENDIX E: WHAT THE USU ADVISING SYSTEM IS DOING WELL..................................................E-1
APPENDIX F: HOW THE USU ADVISING SYSTEM CAN BE IMPROVED .............................................F-1
2004 FRESHMAN/SOPHOMORE STUDENT SURVEY
Office of Analysis, Assessment, and Accreditation
May, 2004
SURVEY OBJECTIVES
As part of Utah State University’s undergraduate assessment program, opinions of three groups of
students and former students are surveyed----freshman/sophomores, those applying for graduation, and
alumni. The freshman/sophomore survey captures the initial perspectives of students early in their
university experiences. Surveying prospective graduates allows evaluation of how opinions have
changed during the undergraduate years. The alumni survey is useful in seeing how attitudes and
opinions evolve after students have had time to establish themselves in their careers.
Although the three surveys are most insightful when used in conjunction with one another, this report
focuses on results of the 2004 Freshman/Sophomore Student Survey. The primary objectives are to
assess the attitudes of freshmen and sophomore students with respect to:
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Overall perceptions of USU
General Education Courses
Advising
Computer Facilities and Usage
SURVEY ADMINISTRATION
Development of the Survey Instrument. Meetings were held with faculty, staff, and students to
determine the appropriate scope and content of the survey instrument. In addition, nationally-normed
instruments were reviewed, advising association guidelines were evaluated, and web sites of other
universities were searched to determine what was being done elsewhere.
A draft survey instrument was submitted for review by academic advisors on the USU campus for their
comments and then pilot-tested on students, who were later given the opportunity to voice their
comments
and concerns. The final version of the survey instrument is included as Appendix A.
Sample Selection and Survey Administration. A list of all Spring 2004 USU classes with at least 50%
freshman and sophomore students was obtained. From this list, a random sample of courses was
selected to be surveyed. After the courses were chosen, demographic characteristics of the freshman
and sophomore students in the courses were compared to characteristics of all USU freshman and
sophomore students. It was determined that the sample was representative of the general population of
freshmen and sophomore students in terms of gender, ethnicity, and citizenship.
The survey was administered during class time. All the students in each class were asked to fill out the
questionnaire, even though some were not freshmen or sophomores. The reason for having everyone
complete the task was that previous experience determined that if any students were allowed to leave,
many of those in the target sample also left.
1
Data Analysis. Because all students in each class were asked to complete the survey, it was necessary
to sort out freshman and sophomores. This was accomplished using the student’s identification number
and a survey question that asked the student to report the number of credit hours she/he had completed.
Registration lists indicated that a total of 2,076 freshman and sophomore students were in the courses
where the survey was administered. Because attendance is often less than 100% during any given class
period, all the targeted students did not fill out the survey. A total of 1,249 completed survey forms were
obtained and these are the basis for the results found in this report. Nearly 50% of the respondents were
freshmen and nearly 47% were sophomores. The remaining respondents did not indicate credit hours so
we could not account for their specific class rank.
RESPONDENT CHARACTERISTICS
Table 1 shows demographic and other characteristics of the survey respondents. In general, these
characteristics mirrored those of the general population of USU freshman and sophomore students in
terms of gender, ethnicity, and citizenship. In considering the college breakdowns shown in the table, it is
important to note that a substantial portion of the respondents (248) did not identify a college, indicating
“Other”. These respondents were in General Registration or were more uncertain about what they really
wanted to study. The numbers of respondents by college follow:
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
HASS
Natural Resources
Science
Other
64
97
253
189
157
38
163
248
About two-thirds of the respondents were between the ages of 18 and 20. Overall, there were a few more
women than men, but there was substantial variation among colleges. About 9% of the respondents said
they were married, but in the college of Natural Resources 24% said they were married. Almost 6% of
the respondents classified themselves as minorities. One-third of the respondents were living in USU
housing.
More than 50% of the respondents came from Utah, while less than 2% were international students.
Nearly 40% indicated that they were working at least half-time while going to school.
2
TABLE 1. RESPONDENT CHARACTERISTICS
AG
BUS
EDUC
ENG
Age
18-20 years old
21-25 years old
69.4%
27.4%
51.1%
44.7%
82.9%
13.8%
58.6%
39.8%
69.5% 50.0%
26.5% 39.5%
58.6%
38.2%
65.3%
30.2%
66.2%
30.2%
Gender
Female
Male
66.1%
33.9%
30.5%
69.5%
86.2%
13.8%
10.1%
89.9%
61.8% 37.8%
38.2% 62.2%
40.6%
59.4%
53.0%
47.0%
50.9%
49.1%
Married
6.5%
10.5%
9.3%
9.5%
9.9% 24.3%
8.1%
7.3%
9.3%
Minority
3.4%
9.7%
4.8%
5.6%
4.1%
7.8%
8.3%
5.2%
5.8%
21.0%
58.1%
28.4%
51.6%
28.5%
55.7%
31.6%
47.6%
31.1% 37.8%
50.3% 40.5%
32.7%
45.3%
34.6%
51.6%
31.0%
50.8%
17.7%
3.2%
18.9%
1.1%
15.0%
0.8%
19.3%
1.6%
16.6% 16.2%
2.0% 5.4%
19.5%
2.5%
13.4%
0.4%
16.7%
1.5%
40.3%
24.2%
35.6%
39.9%
37.7% 31.6%
22.6%
31.7%
33.2%
33.9%
0.0%
12.9%
30.6%
22.6%
47.9%
8.5%
10.6%
17.0%
16.0%
39.0%
6.1%
6.9%
27.2%
20.7%
47.9%
6.9%
9.6%
18.1%
17.6%
43.0%
7.4%
9.4%
22.1%
18.1%
36.7%
3.2%
6.3%
31.0%
22.8%
43.9%
8.2%
7.8%
24.6%
15.6%
42.4%
6.2%
8.5%
24.4%
18.6%
Geographic Origin
Cache Valley
Utah, not Cache
Valley
U.S., not Utah
Outside the U.S.
Living in USU
Housing
Working
Not Working
Full-time
Three-fourths time
Half-time
One-fourth time
HASS
NR
48.6%
2.7%
10.8%
24.3%
13.5%
SCI OTHER TOTAL
NOTE: Percentages are based on those responding to each question.
3
FINDINGS: OVERALL PERCEPTIONS OF USU
Several questions in the survey were included to determine the general perceptions students had of USU.
Results are shown in Table 2. When asked how they felt about the overall quality of their education, 22%
of the total respondents said they were very satisfied and nearly 63% said they were satisfied, a total of
nearly 85% for the two categories. Only 2% indicated they were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied.
In evaluating the helpfulness of faculty, 69% indicated they were very satisfied or satisfied, while 73%
rated the faculty as good or very good in taking a personal interest in students. The faculty scored well
on teaching ability with 87% of the respondents rating teaching as good or very good. Three-quarters of
the respondents felt they were treated fairly at USU.
The respondents were asked what they would tell their friends about Utah State University. The five
choices were: (1) It’s great, come here, (2) Mostly positive things, (3) Nothing much, either positive or
negative, (4) Mostly negative things, and (5) It’s not great, don’t come here. Only 2% selected (4) or (5),
while over 81% said USU was great or at least mostly positive things about the university.
These questions imply the students were satisfied with their USU experience thus far. It should be kept in
mind however, that these respondents were the ones who remained at the university for 2-4 semesters.
It does not take into account the views of non-returning students, although previous research suggests
that those students who drop out tend to do so for personal, financial, or family reasons, not
dissatisfaction with the university.
4
TABLE 2. OVERALL PERCEPTIONS OF USU
AG
BUS
EDUC
ENG
HASS
NR
SCI
OTHER
TOTAL
Overall Quality of Education
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
32.7%
50.9%
12.7%
1.8%
1.8%
18.1%
54.2%
22.9%
4.8%
0.0%
31.5%
61.3%
6.8%
0.4%
0.0%
22.0%
64.3%
12.1%
1.1%
0.5%
23.9%
63.8%
10.9%
0.7%
0.7%
20.0%
62.9%
14.3%
0.0%
2.9%
14.7%
66.7%
16.0%
2.7%
0.0%
14.6%
65.6%
17.5%
1.9%
0.5%
22.0%
62.7%
13.3%
1.6%
0.5%
Helpfulness of Faculty
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
28.3%
49.1%
20.8%
1.9%
0.0%
21.4%
48.8%
25.0%
4.8%
0.0%
28.8%
47.2%
20.6%
3.0%
0.4%
15.0%
52.2%
25.0%
7.2%
0.6%
26.5%
41.2%
27.2%
3.7%
1.5%
31.4%
40.0%
25.7%
2.9%
0.0%
16.8%
45.0%
26.8%
8.7%
2.7%
16.4%
49.3%
27.9%
4.5%
2.0%
21.7%
47.3%
24.9%
4.9%
1.1%
Personal Interest of Faculty
in Students
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
No Opinion
20.7%
50.0%
20.7%
3.4%
5.2%
34.9%
41.9%
15.1%
4.7%
3.5%
31.6%
44.7%
16.0%
3.8%
3.8%
31.9%
37.4%
23.6%
4.4%
2.7%
38.7%
35.2%
18.3%
2.1%
5.6%
22.9%
60.0%
11.4%
0.0%
5.7%
27.7%
43.2%
18.2%
6.8%
4.1%
23.7%
48.4%
14.9%
6.0%
7.0%
29.9%
43.3%
17.7%
4.4%
4.6%
Teaching Ability of Faculty
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
No Opinion
37.9%
41.4%
8.6%
3.4%
8.6%
36.8%
49.4%
9.2%
2.3%
2.3%
48.5%
40.9%
5.9%
1.3%
3.4%
44.8%
43.7%
8.7%
0.5%
2.2%
48.6%
39.4%
4.9%
2.1%
4.9%
45.7%
40.0%
8.6%
0.0%
5.7%
45.0%
44.3%
6.7%
1.3%
2.7%
34.3%
49.1%
8.3%
1.4%
6.9%
43.1%
43.9%
7.3%
4.1%
4.2%
Degree to Which the Student
Felt Treated Fairly
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
36.4%
47.3%
16.4%
0.0%
0.0%
21.4%
54.8%
23.8%
0.0%
0.0%
35.9%
47.9%
14.5%
1.3%
0.4%
17.7%
52.5%
26.0%
3.9%
0.0%
30.7%
45.3%
18.2%
2.9%
2.9%
31.4%
45.7%
20.0%
2.9%
0.0%
20.7%
48.7%
22.7%
6.0%
2.0%
20.9%
54.7%
21.4%
3.0%
0.0%
26.0%
50.1%
20.3%
2.8%
0.7%
45.2%
38.7%
14.5%
35.5%
41.9%
16.1%
55.5%
33.2%
9.7%
40.1%
43.9%
15.5%
45.3%
35.8%
15.5%
31.6%
42.1%
26.3%
43.0%
36.1%
20.3%
39.5%
35.8%
22.6%
43.9%
37.4%
16.8%
1.6%
0.0%
5.4%
1.1%
1.6%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
2.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
1.2%
0.8%
1.4%
0.5%
What Would You Tell Your
Friends About USU?
Great, come here to school
Mostly positive things
Nothing much, positive
or negative
Mostly negative things
Not great, don't come here
NOTE: Percentages are based on those responding to each question.
5
FINDINGS: GENERAL EDUCATION COURSES
Most freshman and sophomore students spend much of their time in general education courses. These
courses are designed to enhance their communication, quantitative, and computer literacy skills and to
give them needed background in humanities and in the social, life, and physical sciences. As such, the
students were asked how well University Studies Courses (i.e., general education) prepared them in the
areas listed above. As shown in Table 3, very well responses ranged from 25.4% in Communication to
39.6% in Humanities and Arts. “Well + very well” tended to be about 90% in all seven areas. It should be
noted that if respondents took some but did not take all of their general education at USU, they could
mark these items “Not at USU” or “Not Applicable”. These responses were not included in Table 3 in
order to reflect only the views of those who had taken some or all of their general education courses at
USU.
When asked about the overall quality of University Studies/General Education courses, nearly 66% of the
respondents said they were satisfied or very satisfied, while about 10% expressed dissatisfaction. These
results suggest that there is general satisfaction with University Studies courses. It should be noted
however, that there is a need to gather more information about how students perceive general education
at USU since the questions asked in this survey only asked for broad general satisfaction levels and how
well the students perceived they were prepared in the seven general education domains.
6
TABLE 3. GENERAL EDUCATION COURSES
(Students who have taken USU general education courses)
AG
BUS
EDUC
ENG
HASS
NR
SCI
OTHER
TOTAL
26.0%
38.0%
24.0%
10.0%
2.0%
12.8%
56.4%
19.2%
11.5%
0.0%
15.6%
55.5%
21.6%
6.0%
1.4%
11.4%
48.7%
32.3%
5.7%
1.9%
11.8%
50.4%
22.8%
11.0%
3.9%
6.5%
48.4%
25.8%
16.1%
3.2%
9.4%
54.7%
25.9%
7.9%
2.2%
13.1%
54.0%
24.7%
6.1%
2.0%
13.1%
52.4%
24.7%
7.8%
2.0%
COMMUNICATION
Very well
Well
Poorly
Very poorly
28.1%
53.1%
12.5%
6.3%
23.6%
69.1%
7.3%
0.0%
29.8%
64.6%
5.0%
0.6%
23.8%
63.9%
9.0%
3.3%
29.8%
60.6%
7.5%
2.1%
25.0%
55.0%
20.0%
0.0%
17.8%
67.3%
11.9%
3.0%
24.6%
70.2%
5.2%
0.0%
25.4%
65.0%
7.9%
1.7%
QUANTITATIVE SKILLS
Very well
Well
Poorly
Very poorly
29.7%
54.1%
10.8%
5.4%
26.8%
67.9%
5.3%
0.0%
26.7%
60.5%
9.6%
3.2%
31.3%
60.3%
6.1%
2.3%
19.8%
65.9%
8.8%
5.5%
24.0%
52.0%
20.0%
4.0%
37.1%
55.2%
4.8%
2.9%
23.7%
63.0%
10.4%
2.9%
27.7%
60.8%
8.4%
3.1%
COMPUTER LITERACY
Very well
Well
Poorly
Very poorly
27.0%
59.5%
10.8%
2.7%
35.1%
56.1%
7.0%
1.8%
34.5%
58.2%
5.5%
1.8%
30.8%
57.1%
9.8%
2.3%
33.7%
59.2%
5.1%
2.0%
33.3%
38.1%
23.8%
4.8%
30.5%
56.8%
9.5%
3.2%
29.6%
62.0%
6.3%
2.1%
32.0%
58.0%
7.7%
2.3%
HUMANITIES AND ARTS
Very well
Well
Poorly
Very poorly
41.0%
48.7%
7.7%
2.6%
30.3%
62.1%
7.6%
0.0%
46.4%
45.8%
7.3%
0.5%
30.3%
55.9%
9.0%
4.8%
54.6%
42.6%
0.9%
1.9%
50.0%
42.3%
0.0%
7.7%
33.7%
54.6%
9.2%
2.5%
36.4%
53.4%
7.4%
2.8%
39.6%
51.1%
6.9%
2.4%
SOCIAL SCIENCES
Very well
Well
Poorly
Very poorly
27.5%
60.0%
10.0%
2.5%
28.6%
63.5%
7.9%
0.0%
35.0%
57.4%
7.6%
0.0%
28.3%
60.1%
7.2%
4.4%
29.7%
62.2%
7.2%
0.9%
42.3%
42.3%
15.4%
0.0%
29.7%
62.2%
4.5%
3.6%
28.1%
61.0%
9.1%
1.8%
30.5%
59.9%
7.8%
1.8%
LIFE SCIENCE
Very well
Well
Poorly
Very poorly
36.1%
55.6%
2.8%
5.5%
24.6%
66.6%
5.8%
3.0%
30.1%
60.7%
6.9%
2.3%
26.1%
58.5%
10.0%
5.4%
24.1%
61.1%
13.0%
1.8%
50.0%
45.0%
5.0%
0.0%
39.5%
55.5%
2.5%
2.5%
29.4%
61.3%
8.1%
1.2%
30.2%
59.6%
7.5%
2.7%
PHYSICAL SCIENCES
Very well
Well
Poorly
Very poorly
29.4%
58.8%
8.8%
3.0%
29.4%
55.9%
8.8%
5.9%
33.3%
58.9%
7.8%
0.0%
31.5%
61.4%
3.9%
3.2%
23.8%
64.3%
10.9%
1.0%
34.8%
60.9%
4.3%
0.0%
40.0%
53.6%
4.6%
1.8%
30.2%
59.8%
7.5%
2.5%
31.7%
59.2%
7.1%
2.0%
OVERALL QUALITY OF UNIVERSITY
STUDIES/GENERAL EDUCATION
COURSES
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
HOW WELL HAVE UNIVERSITY
STUDIES COURSE PREPARED
YOU IN THE AREAS OF:
Note: Percentages are based on those responding to each question.
7
FINDINGS: ADVISING
The survey included a long list of questions about advising at USU, but only those listed in Table 4 are
considered here. When asked about their major source of information for academic planning, nearly 40%
of the respondents said the Major Requirement Sheets, with advisors second at 31%. This is not
surprising since 24% of the respondents had never met with an advisor during the year, and another 39%
had only met with an advisor once. The most frequently mentioned reason for not meeting more often
was that respondents felt they had obtained the needed information from their advisors on the first visit. It
should be noted that 18% of the respondents did not know who their advisors were.
Nearly 87% of the respondents said that the average duration of appointments with an advisor was
twenty minutes or less and 40% said ten minutes or less. Respondents seemed somewhat discontented
with the frequency of their advisor contacts since 60% would have preferred to visit with their advisors
more often. Nearly 27% of the respondents said they would like to meet with their advisors at least
monthly, but 67% preferred no more than once every two months or less.
A little over half of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that their advisors were readily available for
consultation. Three-fourths of the respondents said their advisors were friendly and 62% said their
advisors did not make them feel rushed during meetings. About 68% said their advisor gave them correct
and understandable information and were prepared for appointments with appropriate transcripts and
degree requirement analyses.
When asked to respond to the statement, “Overall, I am satisfied with my advisor,” nearly 68% agreed or
strongly agreed while nearly 14% disagreed or strongly disagreed. In a similar statement about USU’s
advising system in general, 60% of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied
but nearly 15% disagreed or strongly disagreed. Taken together, the questions on advising suggest that
students are not particularly dissatisfied with advising at USU, but neither do they see it as especially
necessary or helpful.
8
TABLE 4. ADVISING
AG
BUS
EDUC
ENG
HASS
NR
SCI
OTHER
TOTAL
Major Source of Information for
Academic Planning
Advisor
Other faculty/staff
USU Catalog
USU Major Requirements Sheets
Other Students
Other
44.8%
5.2%
3.4%
41.4%
5.2%
0.0%
34.9%
3.6%
16.9%
32.5%
9.6%
2.4%
48.2%
2.6%
7.9%
31.6%
7.0%
2.6%
41.4%
2.3%
8.0%
42.0%
2.9%
3.4%
13.6%
10.6%
6.8%
59.8%
3.8%
5.3%
31.4%
14.3%
11.4%
34.3%
2.9%
5.7%
17.9%
6.0%
14.2%
47.0%
11.2%
3.7%
16.9%
4.1%
30.8%
30.8%
9.9%
7.6%
31.4%
4.9%
13.1%
39.7%
6.9%
4.0%
Number of Times Met with Advisor
During the Past School Year
Zero
One
Two
Three
Four or more
15.5%
25.9%
36.2%
12.1%
10.3%
16.9%
50.6%
1.3%
6.0%
7.2%
16.7%
37.9%
25.1%
14.1%
6.2%
18.5%
38.7%
27.2%
12.7%
2.9%
32.8%
42.7%
12.2%
9.9%
2.4%
20.0%
14.3%
31.4%
17.1%
17.2%
32.8%
42.5%
15.7%
2.3%
6.7%
32.9%
43.1%
16.8%
4.2%
3.0%
24.0%
39.7%
21.5%
9.4%
5.4%
If there were no obstacles I would visit
my advisor more frequently
Yes
No
57.4%
42.6%
64.0%
36.0%
60.1%
39.9%
57.5%
42.5%
61.1%
38.9%
69.4%
30.6%
63.0%
37.0%
59.9%
40.1%
60.6%
39.4%
Number of Times Would Like to
Have Met with Advisor
Weekly
Every other week
Monthly
Every couple of months
Once per semester
Once a year
Never
5.2%
1.7%
31.0%
20.7%
37.9%
1.7%
1.7%
1.2%
6.0%
33.3%
17.9%
35.7%
3.6%
2.4%
1.3%
4.4%
31.0%
26.1%
35.4%
0.9%
0.9%
0.0%
4.6%
21.3%
22.4%
42.0%
6.3%
3.4%
4.5%
6.8%
24.8%
19.5%
33.1%
3.8%
7.5%
0.0%
2.8%
41.7%
22.2%
30.6%
0.0%
2.8%
3.0%
3.0%
29.1%
17.9%
37.3%
5.2%
4.5%
1.2%
3.5%
19.4%
22.9%
40.0%
5.9%
7.1%
1.9%
4.3%
26.9%
21.9%
37.2%
3.8%
3.9%
Average Length of Advising
Appointments
1-10 minutes
11-20 minutes
21-30 minutes
More than 30 minutes
36.4%
49.1%
14.5%
0.0%
37.0%
52.1%
6.8%
4.1%
32.4%
51.4%
13.8%
2.4%
43.4%
49.1%
6.9%
0.6%
47.3%
42.9%
8.0%
1.8%
27.3%
51.5%
18.2%
3.0%
49.2%
38.1%
9.3%
3.4%
40.2%
43.2%
13.6%
3.0%
40.0%
46.9%
10.9%
2.2%
26.7%
43.3%
6.7%
11.7%
50.0%
8.3%
13.2%
46.3%
8.3%
14.6%
53.4%
11.7%
21.5%
30.1%
14.0%
7.1%
50.0%
21.4%
13.9%
36.1%
18.5%
17.7%
27.2%
13.6%
16.0%
39.6%
12.6%
10.0%
13.3%
21.7%
5.0%
20.7%
5.8%
5.8%
9.7%
16.1%
5.4%
21.4%
0.0%
13.9%
9.3%
28.6%
4.1%
18.0%
6.7%
0.0%
3.3%
5.8%
4.9%
12.9%
0.0%
8.3%
8.8%
7.1%
30.4%
51.8%
16.1%
1.8%
0.0%
14.1%
36.6%
35.2%
12.7%
1.4%
27.2%
36.1%
26.3%
6.6%
3.8%
8.5%
26.1%
39.4%
21.2%
4.8%
21.6%
28.8%
34.2%
13.5%
1.8%
21.9%
50.0%
21.9%
3.1%
3.1%
13.7%
31.6%
32.5%
14.5%
7.7%
12.7%
32.2%
35.6%
11.9%
7.6%
18.2%
33.8%
31.7%
12.0%
4.3%
Reasons Why Student Did Not Meet
With Advisor More than Once
Not necessary
Got information on first visit
Got information from another
source
Did not know who advisor was
Advisor kept the student
informed
Advisor was not helpful on first
visit
Advisor Was Readily Available for
Consultation
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
9
AG
BUS
EDUC
ENG
HASS
NR
SCI
OTHER
TOTAL
69.6%
25.0%
5.4%
0.0%
0.0%
33.3%
51.4%
13.9%
1.4%
0.0%
51.2%
31.3%
11.8%
2.8%
2.8%
34.2%
38.2%
26.7%
7.3%
3.6%
50.0%
30.9%
12.7%
3.7%
2.7%
54.5%
30.3%
9.1%
0.0%
6.1%
31.6%
36.8%
18.8%
8.5%
4.3%
34.5%
40.3%
13.4%
4.2%
7.6%
41.0%
35.7%
15.5%
4.3%
3.5%
My Advisor Does Not Make Me Feel Rushed
During Our Meetings
Strongly agree
42.9%
Agree
44.6%
Neutral
7.1%
Disagree
1.8%
Strongly disagree
3.6%
19.7%
38.0%
31.0%
9.9%
1.4%
32.2%
40.9%
16.3%
6.3%
4.3%
13.7%
29.2%
26.7%
24.2%
6.2%
24.3%
43.9%
22.4%
4.7%
4.7%
33.3%
45.5%
15.2%
0.0%
6.1%
19.0%
36.2%
24.2%
10.3%
10.3%
18.3%
39.1%
24.3%
8.7%
9.6%
23.9%
38.4%
21.7%
10.0%
6.0%
My Advisor Gives Me Correct Information on
Services/Programs
Strongly agree
35.8%
Agree
43.4%
Neutral
15.1%
Disagree
3.8%
Strongly disagree
1.9%
16.7%
43.9%
36.4%
3.0%
0.0%
32.3%
43.9%
19.8%
3.5%
0.5%
18.6%
52.3%
21.2%
4.6%
3.3%
21.5%
49.5%
20.4%
4.3%
4.3%
20.7%
44.9%
27.6%
3.4%
3.4%
20.9%
39.1%
30.0%
5.5%
4.5%
14.3%
35.2%
34.3%
5.7%
10.5%
23.1%
44.4%
24.7%
4.3%
3.5%
My Advisor Gives Me Advice in a StraightForward and Understandable Manner
Strongly agree
35.2%
Agree
48.1%
Neutral
11.1%
Disagree
3.7%
Strongly disagree
1.9%
20.3%
39.1%
36.2%
3.0%
1.4%
32.5%
45.0%
19.5%
2.0%
1.0%
26.6%
48.7%
19.0%
4.4%
1.3%
22.2%
44.4%
25.3%
5.1%
3.0%
36.7%
36.7%
20.0%
6.6%
0.0%
23.8%
42.2%
22.0%
9.2%
2.8%
18.0%
41.5%
26.1%
5.4%
9.0%
26.4%
44.2%
22.2%
4.6%
2.7%
My Advisor is Prepared for Appointments
With Appropriate Transcripts & Degree
Requirement Analyses
Strongly agree
36.4%
Agree
41.8%
Neutral
18.2%
Disagree
1.8%
Strongly disagree
1.8%
25.4%
49.3%
19.7%
4.2%
1.4%
36.9%
38.9%
19.4%
1.9%
2.9%
30.2%
46.3%
20.4%
1.2%
1.9%
22.0%
43.1%
20.2%
5.5%
9.2%
25.0%
28.1%
31.2%
9.4%
6.3%
16.8%
30.1%
38.0%
7.1%
8.0%
18.9%
42.4%
24.3%
6.3%
8.1%
27.3%
40.7%
23.2%
4.0%
4.8%
Overall I Am Satisfied With My Advisor
Strongly agree
53.7%
Agree
29.6%
Neutral
11.1%
Disagree
1.9%
Strongly disagree
3.7%
18.8%
40.6%
34.8%
2.9%
2.9%
48.0%
28.2%
13.8%
5.0%
5.0%
21.1%
42.2%
19.3%
10.6%
6.8%
30.5%
41.9%
13.3%
5.7%
8.6%
38.7%
35.5%
19.4%
3.2%
3.2%
18.9%
38.8%
22.5%
11.7%
8.1%
16.8%
42.1%
22.4%
7.5%
11.2%
30.5%
37.1%
18.8%
6.9%
6.7%
Overall I Am Satisfied with the Advising
System at USU
Strongly agree
42.6%
Agree
38.9%
Neutral
13.0%
Disagree
1.8%
Strongly disagree
3.7%
16.2%
42.6%
32.4%
5.9%
2.9%
32.8%
39.7%
20.1%
4.9%
2.5%
12.3%
41.1%
27.6%
14.1%
4.9%
20.4%
37.0%
25.0%
7.4%
10.2%
25.0%
43.8%
15.6%
12.5%
3.1%
10.0%
35.8%
30.3%
15.6%
8.2%
10.0%
40.9%
30.0%
8.2%
10.9%
20.4%
39.6%
25.1%
9.0%
5.9%
Advisor is Friendly Toward Me
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
NOTE: Percentages are based on those responding to each question.
10
FINDINGS: COMPUTER FACILITIES AND USAGE
One focus of the study was to solicit student opinions about open access computer laboratories at USU.
Overall, respondents seemed to be generally satisfied with the labs. As shown in Table 5, a little over
two-thirds of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they did not have to wait long for a
computer. A similar proportion said that lab consultants provided them with the help they needed. A little
over 82% of the respondents reported overall satisfaction with the open access labs. When asked
whether they received a good value for their computer fee, satisfaction dropped off with 57% agreeing or
strongly agreeing. Responses from those marking “Not Applicable” were removed from Table 5 in order
to reflect only the views of those respondents who had experience with the USU computer labs.
Several questions focused on whether students had access to privately-owned computers while they
were attending USU. An overwhelming majority, nearly 95%, said they had access to one or more
privately-owned computers. Over two-thirds of the respondents who had access used them most or all of
the time to do their school work. This data suggests that in planning expansions to open access
computer laboratories, the availability of privately-owned computers should be considered.
11
TABLE 5. COMPUTER FACILITIES AND USAGE
AG
BUS
EDUC
ENG
HASS
NR
SCI
OTHER
TOTAL
I Don't Wait Long for an
Available Computer in the Lab
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strong disagree
26.8%
48.2%
17.9%
7.1%
0.0%
29.4%
40.0%
20.0%
10.6%
0.0%
29.3%
41.9%
15.8%
8.8%
4.2%
29.7%
43.0%
21.8%
4.3%
1.2%
22.6%
39.5%
27.4%
9.7%
0.8%
25.0%
37.5%
21.9%
9.4%
6.3%
20.3%
42.7%
23.9%
8.0%
5.1%
22.5%
45.1%
22.5%
9.4%
0.5%
25.7%
42.6%
21.3%
8.3%
2.1%
Lab Consultant Provides Me The
Help I Need
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strong disagree
26.9%
42.3%
23.1%
1.9%
5.8%
21.7%
44.6%
25.3%
8.4%
0.0%
26.8%
41.8%
22.5%
7.0%
1.9%
25.1%
40.9%
32.7%
1.3%
0.0%
16.8%
47.9%
27.8%
6.7%
0.8%
22.6%
35.5%
32.3%
6.4%
3.2%
17.1%
40.3%
32.6%
7.7%
2.3%
18.0%
45.6%
31.1%
5.3%
0.0%
21.7%
43.0%
28.4%
5.7%
1.2%
Overall, I Am Satisfied with
the Open Access Labs
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strong disagree
35.2%
48.1%
13.0%
3.7%
0.0%
31.8%
56.5%
8.2%
3.5%
0.0%
38.2%
47.5%
12.0%
1.8%
0.5%
35.9%
51.5%
9.6%
3.0%
0.0%
32.3%
50.8%
16.1%
0.8%
0.0%
18.8%
50.0%
25.0%
6.2%
0.0%
26.6%
53.9%
13.7%
3.6%
2.2%
31.5%
52.6%
14.5%
1.4%
0.0%
32.9%
51.3%
13.0%
2.4%
0.4%
I Received Good Value for My
Computer Fee
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strong disagree
30.2%
39.6%
17.0%
11.3%
1.9%
20.3%
34.5%
34.5%
8.3%
2.4%
25.4%
37.7%
28.2%
6.4%
2.3%
20.2%
41.1%
24.3%
9.2%
5.2%
20.1%
38.8%
26.1%
9.0%
6.0%
12.1%
33.3%
36.4%
12.1%
6.1%
15.9%
31.2%
33.3%
10.9%
8.7%
17.0%
35.8%
32.1%
9.6%
5.5%
20.3%
36.9%
29.0%
9.0%
4.8%
Number of Privately Owned
Computers the Student Had
Access to During the Year
None
One
Two
Three or more
3.4%
49.2%
30.5%
16.9%
6.7%
36.0%
32.6%
24.7%
3.8%
43.1%
29.3%
23.8%
4.4%
46.4%
35.5%
13.7%
10.3%
39.7%
29.5%
20.5%
5.6%
50.0%
22.2%
22.2%
6.5%
42.2%
27.9%
23.4%
3.4%
45.4%
31.1%
20.2%
5.2%
43.5%
30.6%
20.6%
For Students Who Had Access,
How Often Did They Use the
Privately Owned Computer(s)
Never
Sometimes
Most of the time
All of the time
0.0%
33.9%
41.1%
25.0%
3.8%
26.6%
45.6%
24.1%
0.9%
25.2%
37.2%
36.7%
3.6%
33.7%
39.6%
23.1%
1.6%
28.7%
40.2%
29.5%
8.6%
37.1%
22.9%
31.4%
1.4%
30.4%
37.7%
30.4%
2.3%
37.5%
40.8%
29.4%
2.2%
29.2%
39.1%
29.5%
NOTE: Percentages are based on those responding to each question.
12
SUMMARY
Based on this survey data it appears that lower division respondents have positive perceptions of USU.
They also appeared to be generally satisfied with University Studies courses and open access computer
labs.
Even though the advising items did not elicit a high proportion of negative responses, there are
indications that improvements are needed in advising at USU. Students met with their advisors
infrequently and almost 20% did not know who their advisor was. They did feel however, that they were
getting adequate information to plan their academic programs. Other data (i.e. retention rates, and time
to graduation) might suggest that these perceptions are not totally consistent.
The raw data for all items in this study appear as appendices on the Web Site for Analysis, Assessment,
and Accreditation. The appendices include all frequency tables and cross-tabulations (by colleges). This
report and all raw data can be accessed at: http://aaa.usu.edu/FactsFigures/surveys.asp
13
Appendix A
Survey Instrument
Freshman/Sophomore Student Survey
To better meet the needs of students, we ask that you take a few minutes to complete this survey. Your opinions are
welcomed and appreciated. Please return this survey to the monitor. Respond to each item by using the alternatives
listed. Responses are only reported in general terms. Just fill in the "O" that is applicable and please fill in each item dark
and completely. We appreciate your help.
1. Student ID numbers are needed to relate these and other university data
for purposes of university-level assessment. In order to maintain data
integrity we request that you enter this unique number (Not mandatory).
-
Please Indicate the year you filled out
this questionnaire.
-
2. What is your college and major? (If you have a double/dual major indicate both colleges
and major. Be sure to mark the appropriate college " " as well as your major.)
Agriculture
Agribusiness
Agricultural Economics
Agricultural Education
Agricultural Machinery Tech
Agricultural Systems Tech
Animal Science
Applied Economics
Bioveterinary Science
Biometeorology
Crop Science
Dairy Science
Ecology
Economics
Enviro Soil/Water Science
Family & Consumer Sciences Ed.
Food Microbiology & Safety
Horticulture
International Agribusiness
Nutrition and Food Sciences
Ornamental Horticulture
Plant Science
Soil Science
Toxicology
Education
Communicative Disorders & Deaf Ed
Early Childhood Education
Education
Elementary Education
Family & Consumer Sciences
Family & Human Development
Health Education Specialist
Health, Physical Ed & Rec
Information Technology
Instructional Technology
Parks and Recreation
Physical Education
Psychology
Rehabilitation Counseling
Secondary Education
Special Education
VoTech Dairy Herdsman
Business
Accounting
Apparel and Textiles
Business
Business Administration
Business Education
BIS
BISE
Community Economic Development
Education
Economics
Finance
Human Resource Mgt
Information Technology
Management
Marketing
Marketing Education
Master of Business Administration
Office Systems Support
Production Management
Social Sciences
Engineering
Aeronautics
Aerospace Engineering
Biological Engineering
Biological & Agricultural Engineering
Civil & Environmental Engineering
Civil Engineering
Computer Engineering
Drafting
Electrical Engineering
Environmental Engineering
Industrial Teacher Education
Industrial Technology
Information Technology
Irrigation Engineering
IT (Aero Technology)
IT (Electronics/Computer Tech)
IT (Flight Tech)
IT (Welding Engineering Tech)
Manufacturing Engineering
Humanities, Arts &
Social Sciences
Science
Natural Resources
Other
American Studies
Anthropology
Art
Asian Studies
Communication
English
French
German
History
Interior Design
International Relations
Journalism
Landscape Architecture
Liberal Arts and Sciences
Music
Music Therapy
Philosophy
Political Science
Prelaw
Second Language Teaching
Social Sciences
Social Work
Sociology
Spanish
Theatre Arts
Town and Regional Planning
Biology
Biochemistry
Chemistry
Chemistry Teaching
Comp Teach -- Biological Science
Comp Teach -- Earth Science
Comp Teach -- Math/CS/Stat
Comp Teach -- Physical Sci (Chem)
Comp Teach -- Physical Sci (Physics)
Computer Science
Ecology
Geology
Industrial Mathematics
Information Technology
Liberal Arts and Sciences
Mathematics
Mathematics Education
Mathematical Sciences
Physics
Physics Teaching
Public Health
Statistics
Toxicology
Ecology
General Registration
Environmental Studies
Interdisciplinary Studies
Fisheries Biology
International Studies
Fisheries and Wildlife
Undeclared
Forestry
Other
Geography
Natural Resources
Rangeland Resources
Range Science
Rec Resources Mgt
Watershed Science
Wildlife Biology
1660321245
Mechanical Engineering
A-1
Demographics:
3. What is your cumulative GPA?
4.0 - 3.6
3.5 - 3.1
3.0 - 2.6
2.5 - 2.0
4. What is the degree you are
working toward? And what is the
highest degree you are planning
to attain in the future?
Working
Toward
Highest
Desired
Certificate
Associate
Bachelors
Masters
Doctorate
5. Gender:
Female
Male
6. Citizenship:
US
Other
7. Ethnicity (Only answer
if you are a US citizen):
American Indian or Alaskan Native
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
White, Non-hispanic
Black, Non-hispanic
Other, unspecified
8. Marital Status:
Single
Married
Divorced
Widowed
Separated
9. How many dependents
do you have?
Zero
1
2
3
4
5+
14. About how many semester
credit hours have you
completed so far?
0 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
10. Your age (in years):
15. What is your employment status?
18 - 20
21 - 25
26 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
60 +
Employed full-time
Employed part-time
Unemployed
16. Typically, how much time do
you work while attending USU?
11. Where do you live when
NOT attending USU?
Cache Valley
Utah, outside Cache Valley
Outside Utah in US
Outside the USA
None
1/4 time
1/2 time
3/4 time
Full-time
17. If you are working, during what
part of the day do you normally
work?
Mornings
Afternoons
12. Where do you live while
attending USU?
Campus Housing
Fraternity/Sorority
Off-campus apartment
Off-campus house
With parents
With extended family
13. How long have you been
attending USU (in years)?
Evenings
Graveyard
18. What do you tell your friends
about Utah State University?
<1
1
2
3
4
5
6+
It's great; come here to school
Mostly positive things
Nothing much, positive or negative
Mostly negative things
It's not great; don't come here to school
Advising:
19. From the insert provided, write down the four 21. If the name of your academic advisor is
digit code of the academic advisor that you
not on the insert please provide his/her
are evaluating in the following questions:
name
20. How many semesters has
this person been assigned
as your advisor?
1
2
3
4
semester
semesters
semesters
semesters
5+ semesters
22. If you have never met with your advisor
or only met with him/her once indicate
the reason(s), (mark all that apply):
Did not think it was necessary
Got the information I wanted/
needed on the first visit
Got the information I wanted /
needed from another source
Did not know who my advisor was
My advisor kept me informed
through e-mail or other sources
Did not get information I wanted/
needed so did not return
A-2
23. If there were no obstacles I would
visit my advisor more frequently
Yes
No
24. How many times have you
formally changed your major?
Never
1 time
2 times
3 times
4+ times
25. In an ideal system I could make
an appointment to meet my
advisor
1 hour in advance
1 day in advance
1 week in advance
8521321248
26. If there were no obstacles I would
visit with my advisor:
28. How often did you meet with your 29. From where do you obtain the major source
advisor this past school year?
of information to plan your academic
program? (Choose only one)
Weekly
Each semester
Never
6 times
Advisor
1 time
7 times
Every other week
Once a year
Other faculty/staff
2 times
8 times
Monthly
Never
USU General Catalog
3
times
9
times
Major requirement sheets
Every couple of months
4 times
27. What is the averge length of your
advising appointments?
10+ times
5 times
1-10 minutes
11-20 minutes
21-30 minutes
30 or more minutes
Other students
Other
30. What is the USU advising system doing well?
31. How might the advising system be improved?
Agreement...
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of the
following statements about the advisor whose code (or name) you
wrote above.
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
My Advisor:
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Is friendly toward me
54. Refers me to resources pertinent to my
Demonstrates interest in my welfare
educational goals (internship, study abroad,
Is readily available for consultation
honors program, and learning assistance
Is easy to get an appointment with
programs)
Does not make me feel rushed during our
55. Encourages me to participate in experiences
meetings
which lead to my intellectual growth
Is prepared for appointments with appropriate 56. Helps me select appropriate courses and other
transcripts and degree requirement analyses
educational experiences
Communicates his/her advice effectively
57. Interprets institutional requirements so that they
Listens well to my concerns
are understandable to me
Understands my need for advice
58. Gives me correct information on
Helps me clarify career and life goals
services/programs
Refers me to resources that help me clarify
59. Is well informed about changes in academic
career and life goals
requirements and keeps me informed of
Helps me understand my interests and abilities
pertinent changes
Helps me evaluate my interests and abilities 60. Gives me advice in a straight forward
Keeps my interests and abilities in mind when
understandable manner
helping me choose courses/programs
61. Tells me why she/he offers particular advice
Helps me develop my decision making skills 62. Encourages me to participate in extracurricular
Helps me with realistic self-appraisal
activities
Helps me develop suitable educational
63. Appears to be well trained
goals/plans
64. Interactions with my advisor are positive
Helps me evaluate my progress toward my
65. I don't have to wait long between scheduling and
established educational goals/plans
seeing my advisor
Helps me make academic/career decisions
66. Overall I am satisfied with the advising system at
Helps me to successfully manage my time
USU
Helps me overcome educational problems
67. Overall I am satisfied with the advising system in
and skill deficiencies
my college/department
Refers me to resources that can help me
68. Overall I am satisfied with my advisor
overcome educational problems and skill
deficiencies
9588321242
A-3
Preparation: In part, higher education is meant to prepare
you in a number of general educational domains; how well do
you feel the University Studies Program has prepared you in the
following domains: (If you took most or all of your general
education courses at another institution mark "Not at USU," or
if you were not required to take the general education courses
in your major, mark "Not Applicable".
During appointment(s) with your advisor,
which of the following topics have you
discussed? (Mark all that apply).
Indicate your satisfaction with the
discussion.
Satisfaction
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
Not at USU
Very Well
Well
Poorly
Very Poorly
Courses for the semester
Degree requirements
Major requirements
Minor requirements
General Education requirements
Selecting or changing your major
Transfer credit
Registration procedures (drop/add, closed courses)
Academic probation
Career choice
Internships
Research with faculty
How to get the most out of your educational
experience at USU
Study skills
Concerns about a specific course
Concerns about a specific faculty member
Application to graduate/professional schools
Personal problems
Credit by examination (CLEP)
Advanced Placement (AP) courses
Work study/on-campus employment
Job placement after graduation
Withdrawing from USU
Not Applicable
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
Communication
Numeracy
Computer Literacy
Humanities and Art
Social Science
Life Science
Physical Science
What is your impression of USU in the following areas?
No Opinion
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
109.
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
To what extent are you satisfied with the following?
92. Overall quality of education
93. Overall quality of the program in your major
94. Variety of courses in your major
95. Challenge of courses in your major
96. Accessibility of faculty
97. Helpfulness of faculty
98. The degree to which you were treated fairly
If you are taking or have taken most or all of your General Education at
USU, indicate your satisfaction with the following:
99. Overall quality of University Studies/General Education
courses
100. Variety of courses in University Studies/General
education
101. Challenge of courses in University Studies/General
education
Your USU Computer Fee helps to fund: the
operation of eleven open access computer
Strongly Agree
labs, your email account at cc.usu.edu,
Agree
Neutral
internet access via modem or dorm_ip,
Disagree
maintenance/ replacement of the
Strongly Disagree
registration server, and assistive
Not Applicable
technology support. Indicate the
extent to which you agree or disagree with each
of the following statements:
116. The open access labs had the software I needed
117. Lab consultants provided the help I needed
118. I didn't wait long for an available computer in the lab
119. Overall, I was satisfied with the open access labs
120. Overall, I was satisfied with my USU email account
121. Overall, I was satisfied with the USU modem access
122. Overall, I was satisfied with the dorm internet access
123. I received good value for my Computer fee
Undergraduate programs
Your major department
Teaching ability of faculty
Personal interest of faculty in students
Quality of students
Research activities
Public relations
124. I use the internet address webmail.usu.edu to read my USU
email:
Never
Sometimes
Most of the time
All of the time
125. Indicate the number of privately owned computers you had
regular access to during the past year.
None
2 computers
1 computer
3+ computers
126. If you answered 1 - 3+ computers above, how often did you
use this (these) privately owned computer(s) to do your
school work?
Never
Sometimes
Most of the time
All of the time
127. I had regular access during the past year to a USU
computer, not in an open access lab. (e.g., lab for students
in a course or in a major).
Yes
No
128. If you answered yes to the above question, how often did you
use this computer to do your school work?
Never
Sometimes
Most of the time
All of the time
8579321241
A-4
Appendix B
Freshman/Sophomore Survey Results: 2003 vs 2004
Freshman/Sophomore Survey Results: 2003 vs 2004
Graph 1. Age
Graph 2. Gender
70%
60%
60%
50%
50%
40%
40%
TOTAL 2003
30%
TOTAL 2004
TOTAL 2003
30%
TOTAL 2004
20%
20%
10%
10%
0%
0%
18-20 years old
21-25 years old
Male
Female
Graph 4. Ethnicity
Graph 3. Marital Status
10%
10%
9%
9%
8%
8%
7%
7%
6%
6%
TOTAL 2003
5%
4%
TOTAL 2003
5%
TOTAL 2004
TOTAL 2004
4%
3%
3%
2%
2%
1%
1%
0%
0%
Minority
Married
B-1
Freshman/Sophomore Survey Results: 2003 vs 2004
Graph 5. Geographic Origin
Graph 6. Residence While Attending School
60%
40%
50%
30%
40%
TOTAL 2003
30%
TOTAL 2003
20%
TOTAL 2004
TOTAL 2004
20%
10%
10%
0%
Cache Valley
Utah, not
Cache Valley
U.S., not
Utah
0%
Outside the
U.S.
Living in USU Housing
Graph 7. Amount of Time Students Worked
Graph 8. Overall Quality of Education
70%
45%
40%
60%
35%
50%
30%
25%
TOTAL 2003
40%
TOTAL 2003
20%
TOTAL 2004
30%
TOTAL 2004
15%
20%
10%
10%
5%
0%
0%
Not
Working
Full-time
Threefourths time
Half-time
Onefourth time
Very
Satisfied
B-2
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very
Dissatisfied
Freshman/Sophomore Survey Results: 2003 vs 2004
Graph 9. Helpfulness of Faculty
Graph 10. Personal Interest of Faculty in Students
50%
50%
45%
45%
40%
40%
35%
35%
30%
30%
TOTAL 2003
25%
20%
TOTAL 2003
25%
TOTAL 2004
TOTAL 2004
20%
15%
15%
10%
10%
5%
5%
0%
0%
Very
Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very
Good
Very
Dissatisfied
Graph 11. Teaching Ability of Faculty
Good
Fair
Poor
No
Opinion
Graph 12. Degree to Which Students Felt Treated Fairly
50%
60%
45%
50%
40%
35%
40%
30%
TOTAL 2003
25%
20%
TOTAL 2003
30%
TOTAL 2004
TOTAL 2004
20%
15%
10%
10%
5%
0%
0%
Very
Good
Good
Fair
Poor
No
Opinion
Very
Satisfied
B-3
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very
Dissatisfied
Freshman/Sophomore Survey Results: 2003 vs 2004
Graph 14. Overall Quality of General Education Courses
Graph 13. What Students Tell Their Friends About USU
50%
60%
45%
50%
40%
35%
40%
30%
TOTAL 2003
25%
TOTAL 2003
30%
TOTAL 2004
20%
15%
TOTAL 2004
20%
10%
10%
5%
0%
Great,
come here to
school
Mostly
Nothing
Mostly
positive things much, positive negative things
or negative
0%
Not great,
don't come
here
Very
Satisfied
Graph 15. General Education Preparation: Communication
70%
60%
60%
50%
50%
30%
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very
Dissatisfied
Graph 16. General Education Preparation: Quantitative Skills
70%
40%
Satisfied
TOTAL 2003
40%
TOTAL 2004
30%
20%
20%
10%
10%
0%
TOTAL 2003
TOTAL 2004
0%
Very Well
Well
Poorly
Very Poorly
Very Well
B-4
Well
Poorly
Very Poorly
Freshman/Sophomore Survey Results: 2003 vs 2004
Graph 17. General Education Preparation: Computer Literacy
Graph 18. General Education Preparation: Humanities and Arts
70%
60%
60%
50%
50%
40%
40%
TOTAL 2003
30%
TOTAL 2003
30%
TOTAL 2004
TOTAL 2004
20%
20%
10%
10%
0%
0%
Very Well
Well
Poorly
Very Poorly
Very Well
Graph 19. General Education Preparation: Social Sciences
70%
60%
60%
50%
50%
Very Poorly
40%
TOTAL 2003
TOTAL 2004
30%
Poorly
Graph 20. General Education Preparation: Life Sciences
70%
40%
Well
TOTAL 2003
TOTAL 2004
30%
20%
20%
10%
10%
0%
0%
Very Well
Well
Poorly
Very Well
Very Poorly
B-5
Well
Poorly
Very Poorly
Freshman/Sophomore Survey Results: 2003 vs 2004
Graph 21. General Education Preparation: Physical Sciences
Graph 22. Major Source of Information for
Academic Planning
70%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
30%
Advisor
20%
TOTAL 2004
10%
0%
Very Well
Well
Poorly
Very Poorly
Graph 23. Number of Times Student Met with Advisor During The
Past School Year
Other
TOTQL 2004
TOTAL 2003
Other
Students
TOTAL 2003
Major
Requirements
Sheets
40%
USU
Catalog
50%
Other
faculty/staff
60%
Graph 24. Would Visit with Advisor More If There
Were No Obstacles
45%
70%
40%
60%
35%
50%
30%
25%
TOTAL 2003
20%
TOTAL 2004
15%
40%
TOTAL 2003
30%
TOTAL 2004
20%
10%
5%
10%
0%
Zero
One
Two
Three
0%
Four or
more
Yes
B-6
No
Freshman/Sophomore Survey Results: 2003 vs 2004
Graph 25. Number of Times I Would Like To Have Met with
Advisor
Graph 26. Average Length of Advising Appointments
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
45%
40%
TOTAL 2003
35%
TOTAL 2004
30%
TOTAL 2003
25%
TOTAL 2004
20%
a
ar
ye
em
5%
0%
t
es
s
th
on
er
m
of
k
ee
w
le
up
co
rs
pe
10%
r
e
nc
e
nc
e
ev
N
O
O
y
er
r
he
ot
ly
th
on
Ev
M
y
er
y
kl
ee
Ev
W
15%
1-10 minutes
Graph 27. Reason Why Students Did Not Meet With Advisor More
Than Once
11-20
minutes
21-30
minutes
More than 30
minutes
Graph 28. My Advisor Was Readily Available for Consultation
40%
45%
35%
40%
30%
35%
30%
25%
25%
TOTAL 2003
20%
TOTAL 2004
TOTAL 2003
20%
15%
15%
10%
10%
5%
5%
TOTAL 2004
0%
Don't
Not
Got info
Got info
necessary on first visit from other know who
advisor is
source
Advisor
kept me
informed
0%
Advisor
was not
helpful
Strongly
Agree
B-7
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Freshman/Sophomore Survey Results: 2003 vs 2004
Graph 29. My Advisor Is Friendly Toward Me
Graph 30. My Advisor Does Not Make Me Feel Rushed During Our
Meetings
45%
45%
40%
40%
35%
35%
30%
30%
25%
TOTAL 2003
20%
TOTAL 2004
25%
TOTAL 2003
20%
TOTAL 2004
15%
15%
10%
10%
5%
5%
0%
0%
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly
Agree
Graph 31. My Advisor Gives Me Correct Information on
Services/Programs
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Neutral
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
TOTAL 2004
Agree
Neutral
Graph 32. My Advisor Gives Me Advice In a Straight Forward and
Understandable Manner
TOTAL 2003
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Strongly
Disagree
TOTAL 2003
TOTAL 2004
Strongly
Agree
B-8
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Freshman/Sophomore Survey Results: 2003 vs 2004
Graph 33. My Advisor is Prepared for Appointments With
Appropriate Transcripts & Degree Requirement Analyses
Graph 34. Overall I Am Satisfied With My Advisor
40%
45%
35%
40%
30%
35%
25%
30%
25%
TOTAL 2003
20%
TOTAL 2004
TOTAL 2003
20%
TOTAL 2004
15%
15%
10%
10%
5%
5%
0%
0%
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Graph 36. I Don't Wait Long for an Available Computer
in the Lab
Graph 35. Overall I Am Satisfied With The Advising
System At USU
45%
45%
40%
40%
35%
35%
30%
30%
25%
TOTAL 2003
25%
TOTAL 2003
20%
TOTAL 2004
20%
TOTAL 2004
15%
15%
10%
10%
5%
5%
0%
0%
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
Agree
Strongly
Disagree
B-9
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strong
Disagree
Freshman/Sophomore Survey Results: 2003 vs 2004
Graph 37. Lab Consultant Provides Me The Help Needed
Graph 38. Overall, I Am Satisfied With The
Open Access Labs
50%
60%
45%
40%
50%
35%
40%
30%
TOTAL 2003
25%
TOTAL 2003
30%
TOTAL 2004
20%
TOTAL 2004
20%
15%
10%
10%
5%
0%
0%
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strong
Disagree
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strong
Disagree
Graph 40. Number of Privately Owned Computers The Student
Had Access To During The Year
Graph 39. I Received Good Value For My Computer Fee
40%
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
35%
30%
25%
TOTAL 2003
20%
TOTAL 2004
15%
10%
5%
0%
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strong
Disagree
TOTAL 2003
TOTAL 2004
None
B - 10
One
Two
Three or
more
Freshman/Sophomore Survey Results: 2003 vs 2004
Graph 41. For Students Who Had Access, How Often Did They
Use The Privately Owned Computers For School Work
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
TOTAL 2003
20%
TOTAL 2004
15%
10%
5%
0%
Never
Sometimes
Most of the
time
All of the
time
B - 11
Appendix C
Frequency Tables
Appendix C - Frequency Tables
Table 1. College
Valid
Missing
Total
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Missing
Frequency
64
97
253
189
Percent
5.1
7.8
20.3
15.1
Valid Percent
5.3
8.0
20.9
15.6
Cumulative
Percent
5.3
13.3
34.2
49.9
157
12.6
13.0
62.9
38
163
248
1209
40
1249
3.0
13.1
19.9
96.8
3.2
100.0
3.1
13.5
20.5
100.0
66.0
79.5
100.0
Table 2. Agriculture
Valid
Agribusiness
Agricultural Education
Agricultural Systems Tech
Animal Science
Bioveterinary Science
Crop Science
Family & Consumer
Sciences Education
Horticulture
Nutrition and Food
Sciences
Ornamental Horticulture
VoTech Dairy Herdsman
Total
Frequency
1184
4
1
1
8
15
1
Percent
94.8
.3
.1
.1
.6
1.2
.1
Valid Percent
94.8
.3
.1
.1
.6
1.2
.1
Cumulative
Percent
94.8
95.1
95.2
95.3
95.9
97.1
97.2
4
.3
.3
97.5
2
.2
.2
97.7
24
1.9
1.9
99.6
3
2
1249
.2
.2
100.0
.2
.2
100.0
99.8
100.0
C-1
Table 3. Business
Valid
Accounting
BIS
Business
Business Administration
Economics
Finance
Human Resource Mgt
Management
Marketing
Master of Business
Administration
Social Sciences
Total
Frequency
1155
19
5
13
18
7
8
2
7
13
Percent
92.5
1.5
.4
1.0
1.4
.6
.6
.2
.6
1.0
Valid Percent
92.5
1.5
.4
1.0
1.4
.6
.6
.2
.6
1.0
Cumulative
Percent
92.5
94.0
94.4
95.4
96.9
97.4
98.1
98.2
98.8
99.8
1
.1
.1
99.9
1
1249
.1
100.0
.1
100.0
100.0
Table 4. Education
Valid
Communicative Disorders
Early Childhood Education
Education
Elementary Education
Family & Human
Development
Family and Consumer
Sciences
Health Education
Specialist
Health, Physical Ed & Rec
Parks and Recreation
Physical Education
Psychology
Rehabilitation
Secondary Education
Special Education
Total
Frequency
995
39
29
4
71
Percent
79.7
3.1
2.3
.3
5.7
Valid Percent
79.7
3.1
2.3
.3
5.7
Cumulative
Percent
79.7
82.8
85.1
85.4
91.1
17
1.4
1.4
92.5
7
.6
.6
93.0
4
.3
.3
93.4
8
3
8
23
1
19
21
1249
.6
.2
.6
1.8
.1
1.5
1.7
100.0
.6
.2
.6
1.8
.1
1.5
1.7
100.0
94.0
94.2
94.9
96.7
96.8
98.3
100.0
C-2
Table 5. Engineering
Valid
Aerospace
Biological Engineering
Civil & Environmental
Engineering
Civil ENgineering
Computer Engineering
Drafting
Electrical Engineering
Environmental
Engineering
Industrial Teacher
Educaiton
Information Technology
IT (Aero Technology)
IT (Flight Tech)
IT (Industrial Technology)
IT (Welding Engineering
Tech)
Manufacturing
Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Total
Frequency
1056
42
12
Percent
84.5
3.4
1.0
Valid Percent
84.5
3.4
1.0
Cumulative
Percent
84.5
87.9
88.9
2
.2
.2
89.0
32
8
3
11
2.6
.6
.2
.9
2.6
.6
.2
.9
91.6
92.2
92.5
93.4
1
.1
.1
93.4
1
.1
.1
93.5
1
1
7
1
.1
.1
.6
.1
.1
.1
.6
.1
93.6
93.7
94.2
94.3
2
.2
.2
94.5
1
.1
.1
94.6
68
1249
5.4
100.0
5.4
100.0
100.0
Percent
86.8
.3
1.3
1.1
.1
.1
1.0
.9
.3
1.4
1.4
.3
1.4
.2
.9
.2
.1
1.3
.2
.3
.2
100.0
Valid Percent
86.8
.3
1.3
1.1
.1
.1
1.0
.9
.3
1.4
1.4
.3
1.4
.2
.9
.2
.1
1.3
.2
.3
.2
100.0
Table 6. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Valid
Anthropology
Art
English
French
German
History
Interior Design
International Relations
Journalism
Landscape Architecture
Liberal Arts and Sciences
Music
Music Therapy
Political Science
Pre-law
Social Science
Social Work
Sociology
Spanish
Theatre Arts
Total
Frequency
1084
4
16
14
1
1
13
11
4
18
18
4
18
3
11
3
1
16
2
4
3
1249
C-3
Cumulative
Percent
86.8
87.1
88.4
89.5
89.6
89.7
90.7
91.6
91.9
93.4
94.8
95.1
96.6
96.8
97.7
97.9
98.0
99.3
99.4
99.8
100.0
Table 7. Natural Resources
Valid
Ecology
Environmental Studies
Fisheries and Wildlife
Fisheries Biology
Forestry
Geography
Natural Resources
Rangeland Resources
Rec Resources Mgt
Wildlife Biology
Total
Cumulative
Percent
97.0
97.1
97.5
97.8
98.0
98.2
98.5
98.6
99.0
99.1
100.0
Frequency
1212
1
5
4
2
3
3
1
5
2
11
1249
Percent
97.0
.1
.4
.3
.2
.2
.2
.1
.4
.2
.9
100.0
Valid Percent
97.0
.1
.4
.3
.2
.2
.2
.1
.4
.2
.9
100.0
Frequency
1073
10
96
13
3
Percent
85.9
.8
7.7
1.0
.2
Valid Percent
85.9
.8
7.7
1.0
.2
Cumulative
Percent
85.9
86.7
94.4
95.4
95.7
1
.1
.1
95.8
1
.1
.1
95.8
15
1
4
9
2
20
1
1249
1.2
.1
.3
.7
.2
1.6
.1
100.0
1.2
.1
.3
.7
.2
1.6
.1
100.0
97.0
97.1
97.4
98.2
98.3
99.9
100.0
Table 8. Science
Valid
Biochemistry
Biology
Chemistry
Composite
Composite Teaching
Earth Science
Composite Teaching
Math/CS/Stat
Computer Science
Geology
Mathematics
Mathematics Education
Physics
Public Health
Statistics
Total
Table 9. Other
Valid
General Registration
International Studies
Other
Undeclared
Total
Frequency
979
14
7
34
215
1249
Percent
78.4
1.1
.6
2.7
17.2
100.0
Valid Percent
78.4
1.1
.6
2.7
17.2
100.0
C-4
Cumulative
Percent
78.4
79.5
80.1
82.8
100.0
Table 10. Cumulative GPA
Valid
Missing
Total
4.0 - 3.6
3.5 - 3.1
3.0 - 2.6
2.5 - 2.0
Total
System
Frequency
379
425
286
92
1182
67
1249
Percent
30.3
34.0
22.9
7.4
94.6
5.4
100.0
Valid Percent
32.1
36.0
24.2
7.8
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
32.1
68.0
92.2
100.0
Table 11. Degree student is working toward
Valid
Missing
Total
Certificate
Associate
Bachelors
Masters
Doctorate
Total
System
Frequency
33
121
935
65
17
1171
78
1249
Percent
2.6
9.7
74.9
5.2
1.4
93.8
6.2
100.0
Valid Percent
2.8
10.3
79.8
5.6
1.5
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
2.8
13.2
93.0
98.5
100.0
Table 12. Highest degree student is working toward
Valid
Missing
Total
Certificate
Associate
Bachelors
Masters
Doctorate
Total
System
Frequency
2
13
292
554
255
1116
133
1249
Percent
.2
1.0
23.4
44.4
20.4
89.4
10.6
100.0
Valid Percent
.2
1.2
26.2
49.6
22.8
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
.2
1.3
27.5
77.2
100.0
Table 13. Gender
Valid
Missing
Total
Female
Male
Total
System
Frequency
618
589
1207
42
1249
Percent
49.5
47.2
96.6
3.4
100.0
Valid Percent
51.2
48.8
100.0
C-5
Cumulative
Percent
51.2
100.0
Table 14. Citizenship
Valid
Missing
Total
US
Other
Total
System
Frequency
1170
27
1197
52
1249
Percent
93.7
2.2
95.8
4.2
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
97.7
100.0
Valid Percent
97.7
2.3
100.0
Table 15. Ethnicity
Frequency
Valid
Missing
Total
American Indian or
Alaskan Native
Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
White, Non-hispanic
Black, Non-hispanic
Other, unspecified
Total
System
Percent
Valid Percent
11
.9
.9
.9
20
20
1115
2
15
1183
66
1249
1.6
1.6
89.3
.2
1.2
94.7
5.3
100.0
1.7
1.7
94.3
.2
1.3
100.0
2.6
4.3
98.6
98.7
100.0
Table 16. Marital Status
Valid
Missing
Total
Single
Married
Divorced
Widowed
Separated
Total
System
Frequency
1081
112
11
1
2
1207
42
1249
Percent
86.5
9.0
.9
.1
.2
96.6
3.4
100.0
Valid Percent
89.6
9.3
.9
.1
.2
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
89.6
98.8
99.8
99.8
100.0
Table 17. Number of Dependents
Valid
Missing
Total
Zero
1
2
3
4
5+
Total
System
Frequency
1062
67
40
8
3
5
1185
64
1249
Cumulative
Percent
Percent
85.0
5.4
3.2
.6
.2
.4
94.9
5.1
100.0
Valid Percent
89.6
5.7
3.4
.7
.3
.4
100.0
C-6
Cumulative
Percent
89.6
95.3
98.6
99.3
99.6
100.0
Table 18. Age
Valid
Missing
Total
18 - 20
21 - 25
26 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
Total
System
Frequency
793
362
30
10
3
1198
51
1249
Percent
63.5
29.0
2.4
.8
.2
95.9
4.1
100.0
Valid Percent
66.2
30.2
2.5
.8
.3
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
66.2
96.4
98.9
99.7
100.0
Table 19. Students place of residence when not attending USU
Valid
Missing
Total
Cache Valley
Utah, outside
Cache Valley
Outside Utah in US
Outside the USA
Total
System
Frequency
372
Percent
29.8
Valid Percent
30.9
Cumulative
Percent
30.9
611
48.9
50.8
81.8
201
18
1202
47
1249
16.1
1.4
96.2
3.8
100.0
16.7
1.5
100.0
98.5
100.0
Table 20. Students place of residence while attending USU
Valid
Missing
Total
Campus Housing
Fraternity/Sorority
Off-campus apartment
Off-campus house
With parents
With extended family
Total
System
Frequency
401
5
465
118
187
29
1205
44
1249
Percent
32.1
.4
37.2
9.4
15.0
2.3
96.5
3.5
100.0
Percent
66.4
11.7
15.5
2.1
.3
.2
.2
96.4
3.6
100.0
Valid Percent
68.9
12.1
16.1
2.2
.3
.2
.2
100.0
Valid Percent
33.3
.4
38.6
9.8
15.5
2.4
100.0
Table 21. Length of Attendance
Valid
Missing
Total
<1
1
2
3
4
5
6+
Total
System
Frequency
829
146
194
26
4
3
2
1204
45
1249
C-7
Cumulative
Percent
68.9
81.0
97.1
99.3
99.6
99.8
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
33.3
33.7
72.3
82.1
97.6
100.0
Table 22. Credit hours completed
Valid
Missing
Total
0 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
Total
System
Frequency
617
544
39
1200
49
1249
Percent
49.4
43.6
3.1
96.1
3.9
100.0
Valid Percent
51.4
45.3
3.3
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
51.4
96.8
100.0
Table 23. Employment status
Valid
Missing
Total
Employed full-time
Employed part-time
Unemployed
Total
System
Frequency
78
577
546
1201
48
1249
Percent
6.2
46.2
43.7
96.2
3.8
100.0
Valid Percent
6.5
48.0
45.5
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
6.5
54.5
100.0
Table 24. Amount of time working while attending USU
Valid
Missing
Total
None
1/4 time
1/2 time
3/4 time
Full-time
Total
System
Frequency
506
221
293
103
74
1197
52
1249
Percent
40.5
17.7
23.5
8.2
5.9
95.8
4.2
100.0
Valid Percent
42.3
18.5
24.5
8.6
6.2
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
42.3
60.7
85.2
93.8
100.0
Table 25. Part of the day worked while attending USU
Valid
Missing
Total
Mornings
Afternoons
Evenings
Graveyard
Total
System
Frequency
96
297
305
18
716
533
1249
Percent
7.7
23.8
24.4
1.4
57.3
42.7
100.0
Valid Percent
13.4
41.5
42.6
2.5
100.0
C-8
Cumulative
Percent
13.4
54.9
97.5
100.0
Table 26. What do you tell your friends about USU?
Frequency
Valid
Missing
Total
It's great; come here
to school
Mostly positive things
Nothing much,
positive or negative
Mostly negative things
It's not great; don't
come here to school
Total
System
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
522
41.8
43.7
43.7
449
35.9
37.6
81.3
201
16.1
16.8
98.1
17
1.4
1.4
99.5
6
.5
.5
100.0
1195
54
1249
95.7
4.3
100.0
100.0
Table 27. How many semesters has this person been your advisor?
Valid
Missing
Total
1 Semester
2 Semesters
3 Semesters
4 Semesters
5+ Semesters
Total
System
Frequency
402
368
37
60
16
883
366
1249
Percent
32.2
29.5
3.0
4.8
1.3
70.7
29.3
100.0
Valid Percent
45.5
41.7
4.2
6.8
1.8
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
45.5
87.2
91.4
98.2
100.0
Table 28. Reason you never met with your adivosr or only met once
Frequency
Valid
Missing
Total
Did not think it was
necessary
Got the information I
wanted/
Got the information I
wanted /
Did not know who my
advisor was
My advisor kept me
informed
Did not get
information I wanted/
Total
System
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
111
8.9
16.1
16.1
274
21.9
39.7
55.8
87
7.0
12.6
68.4
123
9.8
17.8
86.2
45
3.6
6.5
92.8
50
4.0
7.2
100.0
690
559
1249
55.2
44.8
100.0
100.0
C-9
Table 29. If there were no obstacles would you meet more with your advisor?
Valid
Missing
Total
Yes
No
Total
System
Frequency
598
381
979
270
1249
Percent
47.9
30.5
78.4
21.6
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
61.1
100.0
Valid Percent
61.1
38.9
100.0
Table 30. Number of times you formally changed your major
Valid
Missing
Total
Never
1 time
2 times
3 times
4+ times
Total
System
Frequency
771
221
26
4
2
1024
225
1249
Percent
61.7
17.7
2.1
.3
.2
82.0
18.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
75.3
96.9
99.4
99.8
100.0
Valid Percent
75.3
21.6
2.5
.4
.2
100.0
Table 31. In an ideal system I could make an appointment to meet with my advisor:
Valid
Missing
Total
1 hour in advance
1 day in advance
1 week in advance
Total
System
Frequency
288
550
171
1009
240
1249
Percent
23.1
44.0
13.7
80.8
19.2
100.0
Valid Percent
28.5
54.5
16.9
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
28.5
83.1
100.0
Table 32. If there were no obstacles I would visit with my advisor:
Valid
Missing
Total
Weekly
Every other week
Monthly
Every couple of months
Each semester
Once a year
Never
Total
System
Frequency
19
46
278
225
385
39
40
1032
217
1249
Percent
1.5
3.7
22.3
18.0
30.8
3.1
3.2
82.6
17.4
100.0
C - 10
Valid Percent
1.8
4.5
26.9
21.8
37.3
3.8
3.9
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
1.8
6.3
33.2
55.0
92.3
96.1
100.0
Table 33. Average length of advising appointments
Valid
Missing
Total
1 - 10 minutes
11 - 20 minutes
21 - 30 minutes
30 or more minutes
Total
System
Frequency
363
425
99
21
908
341
1249
Percent
29.1
34.0
7.9
1.7
72.7
27.3
100.0
Valid Percent
40.0
46.8
10.9
2.3
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
40.0
86.8
97.7
100.0
Table 34. Number of times you met with your advisor in the past school year:
Valid
Missing
Total
Never
1 time
2 times
3 times
4 times
5 times
6 times
7 times
8 times
10+ times
Total
System
Frequency
249
407
219
96
33
10
4
1
2
4
1025
224
1249
Percent
19.9
32.6
17.5
7.7
2.6
.8
.3
.1
.2
.3
82.1
17.9
100.0
Valid Percent
24.3
39.7
21.4
9.4
3.2
1.0
.4
.1
.2
.4
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
24.3
64.0
85.4
94.7
98.0
98.9
99.3
99.4
99.6
100.0
Table 35. Major source of information to plan your academic program:
Valid
Missing
Total
Advisor
Other faculty/staff
USU General Catalog
Major requirement sheets
Other students
Other
Total
System
Frequency
324
51
135
407
72
44
1033
216
1249
Percent
25.9
4.1
10.8
32.6
5.8
3.5
82.7
17.3
100.0
C - 11
Valid Percent
31.4
4.9
13.1
39.4
7.0
4.3
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
31.4
36.3
49.4
88.8
95.7
100.0
Table 36. Other sources of academic planning
Valid
Advisors at other
universities
Another advisor
Athletic advisor
Athletic Advisor
Brother
Career planning psy
course
Dental Hygiene Schools
Family
family and parents
former USU students
Heart
I dont have a good
academic pl
I figured it out myself
I just decided my major
Internet
Marcia Roberts
Me
Mom
Mom and siblings
My brohter
My sister
Neighbor
None
On my own
Parent spoke to advisor
Parents
Parents and friends
ROTC
Schools list of pre req
self search
Sister
SOAR
Student Athletic Advisors
Website
Wife
Total
Frequency
1208
Percent
96.7
Valid Percent
96.7
Cumulative
Percent
96.7
1
.1
.1
96.8
1
1
1
1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
96.9
97.0
97.0
97.1
1
.1
.1
97.2
1
2
1
1
1
.1
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.2
.1
.1
.1
97.3
97.4
97.5
97.6
97.7
1
.1
.1
97.8
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1249
.1
.1
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.2
.2
.1
.1
.1
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
100.0
.1
.1
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.2
.2
.1
.1
.1
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
100.0
97.8
97.9
98.2
98.2
98.3
98.4
98.5
98.6
98.6
98.7
98.8
98.9
99.0
99.1
99.3
99.4
99.4
99.5
99.7
99.8
99.8
99.9
100.0
C - 12
Table 37. My advisor is friendly toward me.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
366
323
138
39
32
5
903
346
1249
Percent
29.3
25.9
11.0
3.1
2.6
.4
72.3
27.7
100.0
Valid Percent
40.5
35.8
15.3
4.3
3.5
.6
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
40.5
76.3
91.6
95.9
99.4
100.0
Tabel 38. My advisor demonstrates interest in my welfare.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
251
336
216
58
36
6
903
346
1249
Percent
20.1
26.9
17.3
4.6
2.9
.5
72.3
27.7
100.0
Valid Percent
27.8
37.2
23.9
6.4
4.0
.7
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
27.8
65.0
88.9
95.3
99.3
100.0
Table 39. My advisor is readily available for consultation.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
162
305
284
108
39
5
903
346
1249
Percent
13.0
24.4
22.7
8.6
3.1
.4
72.3
27.7
100.0
Valid Percent
17.9
33.8
31.5
12.0
4.3
.6
100.0
C - 13
Cumulative
Percent
17.9
51.7
83.2
95.1
99.4
100.0
Table 40. My advisor is easy to get an appointment with.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
154
310
274
100
51
9
898
351
1249
Percent
12.3
24.8
21.9
8.0
4.1
.7
71.9
28.1
100.0
Valid Percent
17.1
34.5
30.5
11.1
5.7
1.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
17.1
51.7
82.2
93.3
99.0
100.0
Table 41. My advisor does not make me feel rushed during our meetings.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
209
342
190
88
53
11
893
356
1249
Percent
16.7
27.4
15.2
7.0
4.2
.9
71.5
28.5
100.0
Valid Percent
23.4
38.3
21.3
9.9
5.9
1.2
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
23.4
61.7
83.0
92.8
98.8
100.0
Table 42. My advisor is prepared for appointments with appropriate transcripts and degree requirement analyses.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
239
357
201
34
43
15
889
360
1249
Percent
19.1
28.6
16.1
2.7
3.4
1.2
71.2
28.8
100.0
Valid Percent
26.9
40.2
22.6
3.8
4.8
1.7
100.0
C - 14
Cumulative
Percent
26.9
67.0
89.7
93.5
98.3
100.0
Table 43. My advisor communicates advice effectively.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
262
396
156
36
35
8
893
356
1249
Percent
21.0
31.7
12.5
2.9
2.8
.6
71.5
28.5
100.0
Valid Percent
29.3
44.3
17.5
4.0
3.9
.9
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
29.3
73.7
91.2
95.2
99.1
100.0
Table 44. My advisor listens well to my concerns.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
222
384
191
41
46
6
890
359
1249
Percent
17.8
30.7
15.3
3.3
3.7
.5
71.3
28.7
100.0
Valid Percent
24.9
43.1
21.5
4.6
5.2
.7
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
24.9
68.1
89.6
94.2
99.3
100.0
Table 45. My advisor understands my need for advice.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
217
377
198
47
43
7
889
360
1249
Percent
17.4
30.2
15.9
3.8
3.4
.6
71.2
28.8
100.0
Valid Percent
24.4
42.4
22.3
5.3
4.8
.8
100.0
C - 15
Cumulative
Percent
24.4
66.8
89.1
94.4
99.2
100.0
Table 46. My advisor helps me clarity career and life goals.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
149
295
294
80
51
10
879
370
1249
Percent
11.9
23.6
23.5
6.4
4.1
.8
70.4
29.6
100.0
Valid Percent
17.0
33.6
33.4
9.1
5.8
1.1
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
17.0
50.5
84.0
93.1
98.9
100.0
Table 47. My advisor refers me to resources that help me clarify career and life goals.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
134
262
314
106
51
13
880
369
1249
Percent
10.7
21.0
25.1
8.5
4.1
1.0
70.5
29.5
100.0
Valid Percent
15.2
29.8
35.7
12.0
5.8
1.5
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
15.2
45.0
80.7
92.7
98.5
100.0
Table 48. My advisor helps me understand my interests and abilities.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
103
238
348
119
66
10
884
365
1249
Percent
8.2
19.1
27.9
9.5
5.3
.8
70.8
29.2
100.0
Valid Percent
11.7
26.9
39.4
13.5
7.5
1.1
100.0
C - 16
Cumulative
Percent
11.7
38.6
77.9
91.4
98.9
100.0
Table 49. My advisor helps me evaluate my interests and abilities.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
112
216
353
112
70
10
873
376
1249
Percent
9.0
17.3
28.3
9.0
5.6
.8
69.9
30.1
100.0
Valid Percent
12.8
24.7
40.4
12.8
8.0
1.1
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
12.8
37.6
78.0
90.8
98.9
100.0
Table 50. My advisor keeps my interests and abilities in mind when helping me choose courses/programs.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
141
288
288
86
61
9
873
376
1249
Percent
11.3
23.1
23.1
6.9
4.9
.7
69.9
30.1
100.0
Valid Percent
16.2
33.0
33.0
9.9
7.0
1.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
16.2
49.1
82.1
92.0
99.0
100.0
Table 51. My advisor helps me develop my decision making skills.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
100
235
370
98
62
13
878
371
1249
Percent
8.0
18.8
29.6
7.8
5.0
1.0
70.3
29.7
100.0
Valid Percent
11.4
26.8
42.1
11.2
7.1
1.5
100.0
C - 17
Cumulative
Percent
11.4
38.2
80.3
91.5
98.5
100.0
Table 52. My advisor helps me with realistic self-appraisal.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
95
229
381
86
69
13
873
376
1249
Percent
7.6
18.3
30.5
6.9
5.5
1.0
69.9
30.1
100.0
Valid Percent
10.9
26.2
43.6
9.9
7.9
1.5
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
10.9
37.1
80.8
90.6
98.5
100.0
Table 53. My advisor helps me develop suitable educational goals/plans.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
171
356
242
56
46
9
880
369
1249
Percent
13.7
28.5
19.4
4.5
3.7
.7
70.5
29.5
100.0
Valid Percent
19.4
40.5
27.5
6.4
5.2
1.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
19.4
59.9
87.4
93.8
99.0
100.0
Table 54. My advisor helps me evaluate my progress toward my established educational goals/plans.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
163
339
273
46
48
12
881
368
1249
Percent
13.1
27.1
21.9
3.7
3.8
1.0
70.5
29.5
100.0
Valid Percent
18.5
38.5
31.0
5.2
5.4
1.4
100.0
C - 18
Cumulative
Percent
18.5
57.0
88.0
93.2
98.6
100.0
Table 55. My advisor helps me make academic/career decisions.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
157
358
244
63
42
14
878
371
1249
Percent
12.6
28.7
19.5
5.0
3.4
1.1
70.3
29.7
100.0
Valid Percent
17.9
40.8
27.8
7.2
4.8
1.6
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
17.9
58.7
86.4
93.6
98.4
100.0
Table 56. My advisor helps me to successfully manage my time.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
92
202
363
123
72
19
871
378
1249
Percent
7.4
16.2
29.1
9.8
5.8
1.5
69.7
30.3
100.0
Valid Percent
10.6
23.2
41.7
14.1
8.3
2.2
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
10.6
33.8
75.4
89.6
97.8
100.0
Table 57. My advisor helps me overcome educational problems and skill deficiencies.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
82
185
379
103
91
24
864
385
1249
Percent
6.6
14.8
30.3
8.2
7.3
1.9
69.2
30.8
100.0
Valid Percent
9.5
21.4
43.9
11.9
10.5
2.8
100.0
C - 19
Cumulative
Percent
9.5
30.9
74.8
86.7
97.2
100.0
Table 58. My advisor refers me to resources that can help me overcome educational proglems and skill deficiencies.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
96
185
366
98
94
25
864
385
1249
Percent
7.7
14.8
29.3
7.8
7.5
2.0
69.2
30.8
100.0
Valid Percent
11.1
21.4
42.4
11.3
10.9
2.9
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
11.1
32.5
74.9
86.2
97.1
100.0
Table 59. My advisor refers me to resources pertinent to my educational goals
(internship, study abroad, honors program, and learning assistance programs).
Valid
Missing
Total
Not Applicable
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
System
Frequency
114
40
120
283
204
124
885
364
1249
Percent
9.1
3.2
9.6
22.7
16.3
9.9
70.9
29.1
100.0
Valid Percent
12.9
4.5
13.6
32.0
23.1
14.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
12.9
17.4
31.0
62.9
86.0
100.0
Table 60. My advisor encourages me to participate in experiences which lead to my intellectual growth.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not Applicable
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
System
Frequency
98
33
98
305
228
128
890
359
1249
Percent
7.8
2.6
7.8
24.4
18.3
10.2
71.3
28.7
100.0
Valid Percent
11.0
3.7
11.0
34.3
25.6
14.4
100.0
C - 20
Cumulative
Percent
11.0
14.7
25.7
60.0
85.6
100.0
Table 61. My advisor helps me select appropriate courses and other educational experiences.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not Applicable
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
System
Frequency
56
32
40
165
371
222
886
363
1249
Percent
4.5
2.6
3.2
13.2
29.7
17.8
70.9
29.1
100.0
Valid Percent
6.3
3.6
4.5
18.6
41.9
25.1
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
6.3
9.9
14.4
33.1
74.9
100.0
Table 62. My advisor interprets institutional requirements so that they are understandable to me.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not Applicable
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
System
Frequency
66
24
48
194
350
201
883
366
1249
Percent
5.3
1.9
3.8
15.5
28.0
16.1
70.7
29.3
100.0
Valid Percent
7.5
2.7
5.4
22.0
39.6
22.8
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
7.5
10.2
15.6
37.6
77.2
100.0
Table 63. My advisor gives me correct information on services/programs.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not Applicable
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
System
Frequency
71
29
35
200
366
189
890
359
1249
Percent
5.7
2.3
2.8
16.0
29.3
15.1
71.3
28.7
100.0
Valid Percent
8.0
3.3
3.9
22.5
41.1
21.2
100.0
C - 21
Cumulative
Percent
8.0
11.2
15.2
37.6
78.8
100.0
Table 64. My advisor is well informed about changes in academic requirements and
keeps me informed of pertinent changes.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not Applicable
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
System
Frequency
81
34
63
215
291
203
887
362
1249
Percent
6.5
2.7
5.0
17.2
23.3
16.3
71.0
29.0
100.0
Valid Percent
9.1
3.8
7.1
24.2
32.8
22.9
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
9.1
13.0
20.1
44.3
77.1
100.0
Table 65. My advisor gives me advice in a straight forward understandable manner.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not Applicable
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
System
Frequency
50
22
39
185
375
223
894
355
1249
Percent
4.0
1.8
3.1
14.8
30.0
17.9
71.6
28.4
100.0
Valid Percent
5.6
2.5
4.4
20.7
41.9
24.9
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
5.6
8.1
12.4
33.1
75.1
100.0
Table 66. My advisor tells me why she/he offers particular advice.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not Applicable
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
System
Frequency
73
32
72
270
297
144
888
361
1249
Percent
5.8
2.6
5.8
21.6
23.8
11.5
71.1
28.9
100.0
Valid Percent
8.2
3.6
8.1
30.4
33.4
16.2
100.0
C - 22
Cumulative
Percent
8.2
11.8
19.9
50.3
83.8
100.0
Table 67. My advisor encourages me to participate in extracurricular activities.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not Applicable
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
System
Frequency
96
45
127
316
185
110
879
370
1249
Percent
7.7
3.6
10.2
25.3
14.8
8.8
70.4
29.6
100.0
Valid Percent
10.9
5.1
14.4
35.9
21.0
12.5
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
10.9
16.0
30.5
66.4
87.5
100.0
Table 68. My advisor appears to be well trained.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not Applicable
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
System
Frequency
36
25
36
146
344
305
892
357
1249
Percent
2.9
2.0
2.9
11.7
27.5
24.4
71.4
28.6
100.0
Valid Percent
4.0
2.8
4.0
16.4
38.6
34.2
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
4.0
6.8
10.9
27.2
65.8
100.0
Table 69. Interactions with my advisor are positive.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not Applicable
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
System
Frequency
42
41
38
155
313
292
881
368
1249
Percent
3.4
3.3
3.0
12.4
25.1
23.4
70.5
29.5
100.0
Valid Percent
4.8
4.7
4.3
17.6
35.5
33.1
100.0
C - 23
Cumulative
Percent
4.8
9.4
13.7
31.3
66.9
100.0
Table 70. I don't have to wait long between scheduling and seeing my advisor.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not Applicable
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
System
Frequency
67
56
88
222
269
180
882
367
1249
Percent
5.4
4.5
7.0
17.8
21.5
14.4
70.6
29.4
100.0
Valid Percent
7.6
6.3
10.0
25.2
30.5
20.4
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
7.6
13.9
23.9
49.1
79.6
100.0
Table 71. Overall I am satisfied with the advising system at USU.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not Applicable
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
System
Frequency
35
50
77
214
347
174
897
352
1249
Percent
2.8
4.0
6.2
17.1
27.8
13.9
71.8
28.2
100.0
Valid Percent
3.9
5.6
8.6
23.9
38.7
19.4
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
3.9
9.5
18.1
41.9
80.6
100.0
Table 72. Overall I am satisfied with the advising system in my college/department.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not Applicable
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
System
Frequency
56
49
76
193
310
208
892
357
1249
Percent
4.5
3.9
6.1
15.5
24.8
16.7
71.4
28.6
100.0
Valid Percent
6.3
5.5
8.5
21.6
34.8
23.3
100.0
C - 24
Cumulative
Percent
6.3
11.8
20.3
41.9
76.7
100.0
Table 73. Overall I am satisfied with my advisor.
Valid
Missing
Total
Frequency
37
57
58
160
321
258
891
358
1249
Not Applicable
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
System
Percent
3.0
4.6
4.6
12.8
25.7
20.7
71.3
28.7
100.0
Valid Percent
4.2
6.4
6.5
18.0
36.0
29.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
4.2
10.5
17.1
35.0
71.0
100.0
Table 74. Courses for the semester.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
310
351
109
38
12
820
429
1249
Percent
24.8
28.1
8.7
3.0
1.0
65.7
34.3
100.0
Valid Percent
37.8
42.8
13.3
4.6
1.5
100.0
Frequency
264
362
131
19
10
786
463
1249
Percent
21.1
29.0
10.5
1.5
.8
62.9
37.1
100.0
Valid Percent
33.6
46.1
16.7
2.4
1.3
100.0
Frequency
279
355
123
17
13
787
462
1249
Percent
22.3
28.4
9.8
1.4
1.0
63.0
37.0
100.0
Valid Percent
35.5
45.1
15.6
2.2
1.7
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
37.8
80.6
93.9
98.5
100.0
Table 75. Degree requirements.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Cumulative
Percent
33.6
79.6
96.3
98.7
100.0
Table 76. Major requirments.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
C - 25
Cumulative
Percent
35.5
80.6
96.2
98.3
100.0
Table 77. Minor requirements.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
123
173
267
49
22
634
615
1249
Percent
9.8
13.9
21.4
3.9
1.8
50.8
49.2
100.0
Valid Percent
19.4
27.3
42.1
7.7
3.5
100.0
Percent
19.1
26.5
13.5
3.2
1.0
63.3
36.7
100.0
Valid Percent
30.3
41.9
21.3
5.1
1.5
100.0
Frequency
122
158
267
53
22
622
627
1249
Percent
9.8
12.7
21.4
4.2
1.8
49.8
50.2
100.0
Valid Percent
19.6
25.4
42.9
8.5
3.5
100.0
Frequency
120
153
272
38
30
613
636
1249
Percent
9.6
12.2
21.8
3.0
2.4
49.1
50.9
100.0
Valid Percent
19.6
25.0
44.4
6.2
4.9
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
19.4
46.7
88.8
96.5
100.0
Table 78. General Education requirements.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
239
331
168
40
12
790
459
1249
Cumulative
Percent
30.3
72.2
93.4
98.5
100.0
Table 79. Selecting or changing your major.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Cumulative
Percent
19.6
45.0
87.9
96.5
100.0
Table 80. Transfer credit.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
C - 26
Cumulative
Percent
19.6
44.5
88.9
95.1
100.0
Table 81. Registration procedures (drop/add, closed courses).
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
136
220
213
40
19
628
621
1249
Percent
10.9
17.6
17.1
3.2
1.5
50.3
49.7
100.0
Valid Percent
21.7
35.0
33.9
6.4
3.0
100.0
Frequency
42
87
298
35
29
491
758
1249
Percent
3.4
7.0
23.9
2.8
2.3
39.3
60.7
100.0
Valid Percent
8.6
17.7
60.7
7.1
5.9
100.0
Frequency
110
180
237
45
21
593
656
1249
Percent
8.8
14.4
19.0
3.6
1.7
47.5
52.5
100.0
Valid Percent
18.5
30.4
40.0
7.6
3.5
100.0
Frequency
59
96
270
61
35
521
728
1249
Percent
4.7
7.7
21.6
4.9
2.8
41.7
58.3
100.0
Valid Percent
11.3
18.4
51.8
11.7
6.7
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
21.7
56.7
90.6
97.0
100.0
Table 82. Academic probation.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Cumulative
Percent
8.6
26.3
87.0
94.1
100.0
Table 83. Career choice.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Cumulative
Percent
18.5
48.9
88.9
96.5
100.0
Table 84. Internships.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
C - 27
Cumulative
Percent
11.3
29.8
81.6
93.3
100.0
Table 85. Research with faculty.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
36
75
283
58
31
483
766
1249
Percent
2.9
6.0
22.7
4.6
2.5
38.7
61.3
100.0
Valid Percent
7.5
15.5
58.6
12.0
6.4
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
7.5
23.0
81.6
93.6
100.0
Table 86. How to get the most out of your educational experience at USU.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
84
154
219
61
27
545
704
1249
Percent
6.7
12.3
17.5
4.9
2.2
43.6
56.4
100.0
Valid Percent
15.4
28.3
40.2
11.2
5.0
100.0
Frequency
43
97
277
58
25
500
749
1249
Percent
3.4
7.8
22.2
4.6
2.0
40.0
60.0
100.0
Valid Percent
8.6
19.4
55.4
11.6
5.0
100.0
Percent
10.2
17.1
16.4
3.8
1.8
49.3
50.7
100.0
Valid Percent
20.6
34.7
33.3
7.8
3.6
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
15.4
43.7
83.9
95.0
100.0
Table 87. Study skills.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Cumulative
Percent
8.6
28.0
83.4
95.0
100.0
Tabel 88. Concerns about a specific course.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
127
214
205
48
22
616
633
1249
C - 28
Cumulative
Percent
20.6
55.4
88.6
96.4
100.0
Table 89. Concerns about a specific faculty member.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
35
74
297
34
30
470
779
1249
Percent
2.8
5.9
23.8
2.7
2.4
37.6
62.4
100.0
Valid Percent
7.4
15.7
63.2
7.2
6.4
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
7.4
23.2
86.4
93.6
100.0
Table 90. Application to graduate/professional schools.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
45
73
289
41
27
475
774
1249
Percent
3.6
5.8
23.1
3.3
2.2
38.0
62.0
100.0
Valid Percent
9.5
15.4
60.8
8.6
5.7
100.0
Frequency
31
77
278
41
36
463
786
1249
Percent
2.5
6.2
22.3
3.3
2.9
37.1
62.9
100.0
Valid Percent
6.7
16.6
60.0
8.9
7.8
100.0
Percent
3.4
7.0
21.6
4.0
2.5
38.5
61.5
100.0
Valid Percent
8.7
18.3
56.1
10.4
6.4
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
9.5
24.8
85.7
94.3
100.0
Table 91. Personal problems.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Cumulative
Percent
6.7
23.3
83.4
92.2
100.0
Table 92. Credit by examination (CLEP).
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
42
88
270
50
31
481
768
1249
C - 29
Cumulative
Percent
8.7
27.0
83.2
93.6
100.0
Table 93. Advanced Placement (AP) courses.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
80
141
252
42
23
538
711
1249
Percent
6.4
11.3
20.2
3.4
1.8
43.1
56.9
100.0
Valid Percent
14.9
26.2
46.8
7.8
4.3
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
14.9
41.1
87.9
95.7
100.0
Table 94. Work study/on-campus employment.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
33
67
277
45
35
457
792
1249
Percent
2.6
5.4
22.2
3.6
2.8
36.6
63.4
100.0
Valid Percent
7.2
14.7
60.6
9.8
7.7
100.0
Percent
3.9
6.4
21.1
3.9
2.3
37.6
62.4
100.0
Valid Percent
10.4
17.0
56.0
10.4
6.2
100.0
Percent
2.1
3.8
24.8
2.1
2.9
35.6
64.4
100.0
Valid Percent
5.8
10.6
69.7
5.8
8.1
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
7.2
21.9
82.5
92.3
100.0
Table 95. Job placement after graduation.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
49
80
263
49
29
470
779
1249
Cumulative
Percent
10.4
27.4
83.4
93.8
100.0
Table 96. Withdrawing from USU.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
26
47
310
26
36
445
804
1249
C - 30
Cumulative
Percent
5.8
16.4
86.1
91.9
100.0
Table 97. Overall quality of education.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
247
693
148
18
5
1111
138
1249
Percent
19.8
55.5
11.8
1.4
.4
89.0
11.0
100.0
Valid Percent
22.2
62.4
13.3
1.6
.5
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
22.2
84.6
97.9
99.5
100.0
Table 98. Overall quality of the program in you major.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
265
505
252
36
14
1072
177
1249
Percent
21.2
40.4
20.2
2.9
1.1
85.8
14.2
100.0
Valid Percent
24.7
47.1
23.5
3.4
1.3
100.0
Percent
18.4
36.9
25.4
3.9
.9
85.5
14.5
100.0
Valid Percent
21.5
43.2
29.7
4.6
1.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
24.7
71.8
95.3
98.7
100.0
Table 99. Variety of courses in your major.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
230
461
317
49
11
1068
181
1249
Cumulative
Percent
21.5
64.7
94.4
99.0
100.0
Table 100. Challenge of courses in your major.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
249
517
271
19
9
1065
184
1249
Percent
19.9
41.4
21.7
1.5
.7
85.3
14.7
100.0
Valid Percent
23.4
48.5
25.4
1.8
.8
100.0
C - 31
Cumulative
Percent
23.4
71.9
97.4
99.2
100.0
Table 101. Accessibility of faculty.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
209
498
295
72
14
1088
161
1249
Percent
16.7
39.9
23.6
5.8
1.1
87.1
12.9
100.0
Valid Percent
19.2
45.8
27.1
6.6
1.3
100.0
Percent
19.3
41.2
21.7
4.3
1.0
87.4
12.6
100.0
Valid Percent
22.1
47.1
24.8
4.9
1.1
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
19.2
65.0
92.1
98.7
100.0
Table 102. Helpfulness of faculty.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
241
514
271
54
12
1092
157
1249
Cumulative
Percent
22.1
69.1
94.0
98.9
100.0
Table 103. The degree to which you were treated fairly.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
291
546
222
31
8
1098
151
1249
Percent
23.3
43.7
17.8
2.5
.6
87.9
12.1
100.0
Valid Percent
26.5
49.7
20.2
2.8
.7
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
26.5
76.2
96.4
99.3
100.0
Table 104. Overall quality of University Studies/General Education courses.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
137
531
249
80
20
1017
232
1249
Percent
11.0
42.5
19.9
6.4
1.6
81.4
18.6
100.0
Valid Percent
13.5
52.2
24.5
7.9
2.0
100.0
C - 32
Cumulative
Percent
13.5
65.7
90.2
98.0
100.0
Table 105. Variety of courses in University Studies/General Education.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
154
456
298
87
18
1013
236
1249
Percent
12.3
36.5
23.9
7.0
1.4
81.1
18.9
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
15.2
60.2
89.6
98.2
100.0
Valid Percent
15.2
45.0
29.4
8.6
1.8
100.0
Table 106. Challenge of courses in University Studies/General Education.
Valid
Missing
Total
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
System
Frequency
157
507
273
56
18
1011
238
1249
Percent
12.6
40.6
21.9
4.5
1.4
80.9
19.1
100.0
Valid Percent
15.5
50.1
27.0
5.5
1.8
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
15.5
65.7
92.7
98.2
100.0
Table 107. Communication.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not at USU
Very Well
Well
Poorly
Very Poorly
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
115
190
476
57
12
243
1093
156
1249
Percent
9.2
15.2
38.1
4.6
1.0
19.5
87.5
12.5
100.0
Valid Percent
10.5
17.4
43.5
5.2
1.1
22.2
100.0
Frequency
115
209
458
64
23
223
1092
157
1249
Percent
9.2
16.7
36.7
5.1
1.8
17.9
87.4
12.6
100.0
Valid Percent
10.5
19.1
41.9
5.9
2.1
20.4
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
10.5
27.9
71.5
76.7
77.8
100.0
Table 108. Numeracy.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not at USU
Very Well
Well
Poorly
Very Poorly
Not Applicable
Total
System
C - 33
Cumulative
Percent
10.5
29.7
71.6
77.5
79.6
100.0
Table 109. Computer Literacy.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not at USU
Very Well
Well
Poorly
Very Poorly
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
129
245
442
59
17
204
1096
153
1249
Percent
10.3
19.6
35.4
4.7
1.4
16.3
87.8
12.2
100.0
Valid Percent
11.8
22.4
40.3
5.4
1.6
18.6
100.0
Frequency
108
354
453
60
22
109
1106
143
1249
Percent
8.6
28.3
36.3
4.8
1.8
8.7
88.6
11.4
100.0
Valid Percent
9.8
32.0
41.0
5.4
2.0
9.9
100.0
Frequency
123
262
509
67
15
119
1095
154
1249
Percent
9.8
21.0
40.8
5.4
1.2
9.5
87.7
12.3
100.0
Valid Percent
11.2
23.9
46.5
6.1
1.4
10.9
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
11.8
34.1
74.5
79.8
81.4
100.0
Table 110. Humanities and Art.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not at USU
Very Well
Well
Poorly
Very Poorly
Not Applicable
Total
System
Cumulative
Percent
9.8
41.8
82.7
88.2
90.1
100.0
Tble 111. Social Science.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not at USU
Very Well
Well
Poorly
Very Poorly
Not Applicable
Total
System
C - 34
Cumulative
Percent
11.2
35.2
81.6
87.8
89.1
100.0
Table 112. Life Science.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not at USU
Very Well
Well
Poorly
Very Poorly
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
109
251
499
61
22
158
1100
149
1249
Percent
8.7
20.1
40.0
4.9
1.8
12.7
88.1
11.9
100.0
Valid Percent
9.9
22.8
45.4
5.5
2.0
14.4
100.0
Frequency
116
259
488
57
16
162
1098
151
1249
Percent
9.3
20.7
39.1
4.6
1.3
13.0
87.9
12.1
100.0
Valid Percent
10.6
23.6
44.4
5.2
1.5
14.8
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
9.9
32.7
78.1
83.6
85.6
100.0
Table 113. Physical Science.
Valid
Missing
Total
Not at USU
Very Well
Well
Poorly
Very Poorly
Not Applicable
Total
System
Cumulative
Percent
10.6
34.2
78.6
83.8
85.2
100.0
Table 114. Undergraduate programs.
Valid
Missing
Total
No Opinion
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
System
Frequency
116
399
547
60
5
1127
122
1249
Percent
9.3
31.9
43.8
4.8
.4
90.2
9.8
100.0
Valid Percent
10.3
35.4
48.5
5.3
.4
100.0
Percent
11.8
43.9
27.6
4.7
1.6
89.7
10.3
100.0
Valid Percent
13.2
48.9
30.8
5.3
1.8
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
10.3
45.7
94.2
99.6
100.0
Table 115. Your major department.
Valid
Missing
Total
No Opinion
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
System
Frequency
148
548
345
59
20
1120
129
1249
C - 35
Cumulative
Percent
13.2
62.1
92.9
98.2
100.0
Table 116. Teaching ability of faculty.
Valid
Missing
Total
No Opinion
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
System
Frequency
47
490
496
82
16
1131
118
1249
Percent
3.8
39.2
39.7
6.6
1.3
90.6
9.4
100.0
Valid Percent
4.2
43.3
43.9
7.3
1.4
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
4.2
47.5
91.3
98.6
100.0
Table 117. Personal interest of faculty in students.
Valid
Missing
Total
No Opinion
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
System
Frequency
54
337
489
198
49
1127
122
1249
Percent
4.3
27.0
39.2
15.9
3.9
90.2
9.8
100.0
Valid Percent
4.8
29.9
43.4
17.6
4.3
100.0
Percent
5.7
28.7
46.9
8.2
.9
90.3
9.7
100.0
Valid Percent
6.3
31.7
52.0
9.0
1.0
100.0
Percent
18.3
21.6
36.4
11.7
1.5
89.6
10.4
100.0
Valid Percent
20.5
24.1
40.7
13.0
1.7
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
4.8
34.7
78.1
95.7
100.0
Table 118. Quality of students.
Valid
Missing
Total
No Opinion
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
System
Frequency
71
358
586
102
11
1128
121
1249
Cumulative
Percent
6.3
38.0
90.0
99.0
100.0
Table 119. Research activities.
Valid
Missing
Total
No Opinion
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
System
Frequency
229
270
455
146
19
1119
130
1249
C - 36
Cumulative
Percent
20.5
44.6
85.3
98.3
100.0
Table 120. Public relations.
Valid
Missing
Total
No Opinion
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
System
Frequency
206
274
508
107
25
1120
129
1249
Percent
16.5
21.9
40.7
8.6
2.0
89.7
10.3
100.0
Valid Percent
18.4
24.5
45.4
9.6
2.2
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
18.4
42.9
88.2
97.8
100.0
Table 121. The open access labs had the softward I needed.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
394
467
130
39
4
81
1115
134
1249
Percent
31.5
37.4
10.4
3.1
.3
6.5
89.3
10.7
100.0
Valid Percent
35.3
41.9
11.7
3.5
.4
7.3
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
35.3
77.2
88.9
92.4
92.7
100.0
Table 122. Lab consultants provided the help I needed.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
218
439
286
57
13
98
1111
138
1249
Percent
17.5
35.1
22.9
4.6
1.0
7.8
89.0
11.0
100.0
Valid Percent
19.6
39.5
25.7
5.1
1.2
8.8
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
19.6
59.1
84.9
90.0
91.2
100.0
Table 123. I didn't wait long for an available computer in the lab.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
270
447
221
88
23
65
1114
135
1249
Percent
21.6
35.8
17.7
7.0
1.8
5.2
89.2
10.8
100.0
Valid Percent
24.2
40.1
19.8
7.9
2.1
5.8
100.0
C - 37
Cumulative
Percent
24.2
64.4
84.2
92.1
94.2
100.0
Table 124. Overall, I was satisfied with the open access labs.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
346
542
135
25
4
57
1109
140
1249
Percent
27.7
43.4
10.8
2.0
.3
4.6
88.8
11.2
100.0
Valid Percent
31.2
48.9
12.2
2.3
.4
5.1
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
31.2
80.1
92.2
94.5
94.9
100.0
Table 125. Overall, I was satisfied with my USU email account.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
209
408
203
170
99
27
1116
133
1249
Percent
16.7
32.7
16.3
13.6
7.9
2.2
89.4
10.6
100.0
Valid Percent
18.7
36.6
18.2
15.2
8.9
2.4
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
18.7
55.3
73.5
88.7
97.6
100.0
Table 126. Overall, I was satisfied with the USU modem access.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
210
388
234
99
39
134
1104
145
1249
Percent
16.8
31.1
18.7
7.9
3.1
10.7
88.4
11.6
100.0
Valid Percent
19.0
35.1
21.2
9.0
3.5
12.1
100.0
C - 38
Cumulative
Percent
19.0
54.2
75.4
84.3
87.9
100.0
Table 127. Overall, I was satisfied with the dorm internet access.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
150
229
182
61
26
417
1065
184
1249
Percent
12.0
18.3
14.6
4.9
2.1
33.4
85.3
14.7
100.0
Valid Percent
14.1
21.5
17.1
5.7
2.4
39.2
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
14.1
35.6
52.7
58.4
60.8
100.0
Table 128. I received good value for my Comuter fee.
Valid
Missing
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Total
System
Frequency
217
401
311
95
51
35
1110
139
1249
Percent
17.4
32.1
24.9
7.6
4.1
2.8
88.9
11.1
100.0
Valid Percent
19.5
36.1
28.0
8.6
4.6
3.2
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
19.5
55.7
83.7
92.3
96.8
100.0
Table 129. I use the internet address webmail.usu.edu to read my USU email:
Valid
Missing
Total
Never
Sometimes
Most of the time
All of the time
Total
System
Frequency
103
191
274
605
1173
76
1249
Percent
8.2
15.3
21.9
48.4
93.9
6.1
100.0
Valid Percent
8.8
16.3
23.4
51.6
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
8.8
25.1
48.4
100.0
Table 130. Indicate the number of privately owned computers you had regular access to during the past school year.
Valid
Missing
Total
None
1 computer
2 computers
3+ computers
Total
System
Frequency
60
510
361
238
1169
80
1249
Percent
4.8
40.8
28.9
19.1
93.6
6.4
100.0
Valid Percent
5.1
43.6
30.9
20.4
100.0
C - 39
Cumulative
Percent
5.1
48.8
79.6
100.0
Table 131. If you answered 1- 3+ computers above, how often did you use this
(these) privately owned computer(s) to do your school work?
Valid
Missing
Total
Never
Sometimes
Most of the time
All of the time
Total
System
Frequency
23
308
411
317
1059
190
1249
Percent
1.8
24.7
32.9
25.4
84.8
15.2
100.0
Valid Percent
2.2
29.1
38.8
29.9
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
2.2
31.3
70.1
100.0
Table 132. I had regular access during the past year to a USU computer, not
in an open access lab. (e.g., lab for students in a course or in a major).
Valid
Missing
Total
Yes
No
Total
System
Frequency
489
662
1151
98
1249
Percent
39.2
53.0
92.2
7.8
100.0
Valid Percent
42.5
57.5
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
42.5
100.0
Table 133. If you answered yes to the above question, how often did you use this computer to do your school work?
Valid
Missing
Total
Never
Sometimes
Most of the time
All of the time
Total
System
Frequency
91
262
131
41
525
724
1249
Percent
7.3
21.0
10.5
3.3
42.0
58.0
100.0
Valid Percent
17.3
49.9
25.0
7.8
100.0
C - 40
Cumulative
Percent
17.3
67.2
92.2
100.0
Appendix D
Cross-Tabulations
Appendix D: Cross-tabulations
Table 1. Cumulative GPA - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
4.0 - 3.6
20
33.3%
1.7%
.2
29
30.9%
2.5%
-.2
81
33.1%
7.0%
.3
52
28.3%
4.5%
-.9
49
33.8%
4.2%
.4
9
24.3%
.8%
-.8
66
41.8%
5.7%
2.2
67
27.8%
5.8%
-1.2
373
32.0%
32.0%
cumgpa
3.5 - 3.1
3.0 - 2.6
20
13
33.3%
21.7%
1.7%
1.1%
-.3
-.4
32
23
34.0%
24.5%
2.7%
2.0%
-.3
.0
92
55
37.6%
22.4%
7.9%
4.7%
.4
-.6
83
38
45.1%
20.7%
7.1%
3.3%
2.1
-1.0
48
35
33.1%
24.1%
4.1%
3.0%
-.6
.0
12
14
32.4%
37.8%
1.0%
1.2%
-.4
1.7
48
33
30.4%
20.9%
4.1%
2.8%
-1.2
-.9
83
72
34.4%
29.9%
7.1%
6.2%
-.4
1.8
418
283
35.9%
24.3%
35.9%
24.3%
D-1
2.5 - 2.0
7
11.7%
.6%
1.1
10
10.6%
.9%
1.0
17
6.9%
1.5%
-.4
11
6.0%
.9%
-.9
13
9.0%
1.1%
.5
2
5.4%
.2%
-.5
11
7.0%
.9%
-.3
19
7.9%
1.6%
.1
90
7.7%
7.7%
Total
60
100.0%
5.2%
94
100.0%
8.1%
245
100.0%
21.0%
184
100.0%
15.8%
145
100.0%
12.5%
37
100.0%
3.2%
158
100.0%
13.6%
241
100.0%
20.7%
1164
100.0%
100.0%
Table 2. Degree your are working toward - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Certificate
4
6.6%
.3%
1.7
4
4.4%
.3%
.9
7
2.9%
.6%
.0
2
1.1%
.2%
-1.4
2
1.4%
.2%
-1.1
1
2.8%
.1%
.0
3
1.9%
.3%
-.7
10
4.2%
.9%
1.2
33
2.9%
2.9%
Associate
8
13.1%
.7%
.7
9
9.9%
.8%
-.2
19
7.9%
1.6%
-1.2
10
5.3%
.9%
-2.1
10
6.9%
.9%
-1.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.9
15
9.6%
1.3%
-.3
49
20.8%
4.2%
4.9
120
10.4%
10.4%
worktowa
Bachelors
44
72.1%
3.8%
-.7
69
75.8%
6.0%
-.4
198
82.2%
17.2%
.4
163
87.2%
14.1%
1.1
126
86.9%
10.9%
1.0
33
91.7%
2.9%
.8
128
82.1%
11.1%
.3
159
67.4%
13.8%
-2.1
920
79.8%
79.8%
D-2
Masters
3
4.9%
.3%
-.2
7
7.7%
.6%
.9
16
6.6%
1.4%
.8
12
6.4%
1.0%
.6
5
3.4%
.4%
-1.0
2
5.6%
.2%
.0
5
3.2%
.4%
-1.2
13
5.5%
1.1%
.0
63
5.5%
5.5%
Doctorate
2
3.3%
.2%
1.2
2
2.2%
.2%
.6
1
.4%
.1%
-1.4
0
.0%
.0%
-1.7
2
1.4%
.2%
-.1
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
5
3.2%
.4%
1.8
5
2.1%
.4%
.8
17
1.5%
1.5%
Total
61
100.0%
5.3%
91
100.0%
7.9%
241
100.0%
20.9%
187
100.0%
16.2%
145
100.0%
12.6%
36
100.0%
3.1%
156
100.0%
13.5%
236
100.0%
20.5%
1153
100.0%
100.0%
Table 3. Highest degree planned - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Certificate
0
.0%
.0%
-.3
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
1
.7%
.1%
1.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.2
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
1
.5%
.1%
.9
2
.2%
.2%
Associate
3
5.3%
.3%
2.8
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
1
.4%
.1%
-1.0
0
.0%
.0%
-1.5
1
.7%
.1%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
2
1.4%
.2%
.2
6
2.7%
.5%
2.1
13
1.2%
1.2%
Highdegr
Bachelors
12
21.1%
1.1%
-.7
20
22.5%
1.8%
-.7
81
35.2%
7.4%
2.7
25
14.0%
2.3%
-3.2
38
26.6%
3.5%
.1
8
25.0%
.7%
-.1
28
18.9%
2.5%
-1.7
75
33.9%
6.8%
2.3
287
26.1%
26.1%
D-3
Masters
21
36.8%
1.9%
-1.4
57
64.0%
5.2%
1.9
118
51.3%
10.7%
.4
112
62.6%
10.2%
2.5
69
48.3%
6.3%
-.2
21
65.6%
1.9%
1.3
46
31.1%
4.2%
-3.2
101
45.7%
9.2%
-.8
545
49.6%
49.6%
Doctorate
21
36.8%
1.9%
2.2
12
13.5%
1.1%
-1.9
30
13.0%
2.7%
-3.1
42
23.5%
3.8%
.1
34
23.8%
3.1%
.2
3
9.4%
.3%
-1.6
72
48.6%
6.6%
6.5
38
17.2%
3.5%
-1.8
252
22.9%
22.9%
Total
57
100.0%
5.2%
89
100.0%
8.1%
230
100.0%
20.9%
179
100.0%
16.3%
143
100.0%
13.0%
32
100.0%
2.9%
148
100.0%
13.5%
221
100.0%
20.1%
1099
100.0%
100.0%
Table 4. Gender - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Gender
Female
41
66.1%
3.5%
1.7
29
30.5%
2.4%
-2.8
212
86.2%
17.8%
7.7
19
10.1%
1.6%
-7.9
94
61.8%
7.9%
1.9
14
37.8%
1.2%
-1.1
65
40.6%
5.5%
-1.8
131
53.0%
11.0%
.5
605
50.9%
50.9%
Male
Total
21
33.9%
1.8%
-1.7
66
69.5%
5.6%
2.8
34
13.8%
2.9%
-7.9
170
89.9%
14.3%
8.0
58
38.2%
4.9%
-1.9
23
62.2%
1.9%
1.1
95
59.4%
8.0%
1.9
116
47.0%
9.8%
-.5
583
49.1%
49.1%
D-4
62
100.0%
5.2%
95
100.0%
8.0%
246
100.0%
20.7%
189
100.0%
15.9%
152
100.0%
12.8%
37
100.0%
3.1%
160
100.0%
13.5%
247
100.0%
20.8%
1188
100.0%
100.0%
Table 5. Citizenship - Crosstabulation by college.
citizen
US
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
60
96.8%
5.1%
-.1
92
96.8%
7.8%
-.1
241
99.2%
20.5%
.2
180
96.3%
15.3%
-.2
148
97.4%
12.6%
.0
36
97.3%
3.1%
.0
154
96.9%
13.1%
-.1
240
98.8%
20.4%
.2
1151
97.7%
97.7%
Other
Total
2
3.2%
.2%
.5
3
3.2%
.3%
.6
2
.8%
.2%
-1.5
7
3.7%
.6%
1.3
4
2.6%
.3%
.3
1
2.7%
.1%
.2
5
3.1%
.4%
.7
3
1.2%
.3%
-1.1
27
2.3%
2.3%
D-5
62
100.0%
5.3%
95
100.0%
8.1%
243
100.0%
20.6%
187
100.0%
15.9%
152
100.0%
12.9%
37
100.0%
3.1%
159
100.0%
13.5%
243
100.0%
20.6%
1178
100.0%
100.0%
Table 6. Ethnicity - Crosstabulation by college.
Ethnic
American
Indian or
Alaskan
Native
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
3
1.2%
.3%
.4
4
2.2%
.3%
1.8
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
1
2.6%
.1%
1.1
2
1.3%
.2%
.4
1
.4%
.1%
-.9
11
.9%
.9%
Hispanic
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
3
3.2%
.3%
1.1
5
2.0%
.4%
.4
2
1.1%
.2%
-.6
3
2.0%
.3%
.3
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
3
1.9%
.3%
.2
4
1.6%
.3%
-.1
20
1.7%
1.7%
D-6
Asian or
Pacific
Islander
2
3.4%
.2%
1.0
5
5.4%
.4%
2.7
2
.8%
.2%
-1.1
3
1.7%
.3%
-.1
1
.7%
.1%
-1.0
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
3
1.9%
.3%
.2
4
1.6%
.3%
-.1
20
1.7%
1.7%
White,
Non-hispanic
57
96.6%
4.9%
.2
84
90.3%
7.2%
-.4
234
95.1%
20.1%
.2
170
94.4%
14.6%
.0
142
95.9%
12.2%
.2
35
92.1%
3.0%
-.1
143
91.7%
12.3%
-.3
232
94.7%
19.9%
.1
1097
94.2%
94.2%
Black,
Non-hispanic
0
.0%
.0%
-.3
1
1.1%
.1%
2.1
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
1
2.6%
.1%
3.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
2
.2%
.2%
Other,
unspecified
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
2
.8%
.2%
-.7
1
.6%
.1%
-.9
2
1.4%
.2%
.1
1
2.6%
.1%
.7
5
3.2%
.4%
2.1
4
1.6%
.3%
.5
15
1.3%
1.3%
Total
59
100.0%
5.1%
93
100.0%
8.0%
246
100.0%
21.1%
180
100.0%
15.5%
148
100.0%
12.7%
38
100.0%
3.3%
156
100.0%
13.4%
245
100.0%
21.0%
1165
100.0%
100.0%
Table 7. Marital Status - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Single
57
91.9%
4.8%
.2
84
88.4%
7.1%
-.1
222
89.9%
18.7%
.0
170
89.9%
14.3%
.0
133
87.5%
11.2%
-.3
28
75.7%
2.4%
-.9
145
90.6%
12.2%
.1
226
91.9%
19.0%
.4
1065
89.6%
89.6%
Married
4
6.5%
.3%
-.7
10
10.5%
.8%
.4
23
9.3%
1.9%
.0
18
9.5%
1.5%
.1
15
9.9%
1.3%
.2
9
24.3%
.8%
3.0
13
8.1%
1.1%
-.5
18
7.3%
1.5%
-1.0
110
9.3%
9.3%
maritals
Divorced
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
1
1.1%
.1%
.2
0
.0%
.0%
-1.4
1
.5%
.1%
-.5
4
2.6%
.3%
2.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
2
1.3%
.2%
.6
2
.8%
.2%
.0
10
.8%
.8%
D-7
Widowed
1
1.6%
.1%
4.1
0
.0%
.0%
-.3
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.2
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
1
.1%
.1%
Separated
0
.0%
.0%
-.3
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
2
.8%
.2%
2.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.2
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
2
.2%
.2%
Total
62
100.0%
5.2%
95
100.0%
8.0%
247
100.0%
20.8%
189
100.0%
15.9%
152
100.0%
12.8%
37
100.0%
3.1%
160
100.0%
13.5%
246
100.0%
20.7%
1188
100.0%
100.0%
Table 8. Number of dependents - Crosstabulation by college.
depend
Zero
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
56
91.8%
4.8%
.2
88
93.6%
7.5%
.4
215
88.8%
18.4%
-.1
166
88.8%
14.2%
-.1
131
89.1%
11.2%
-.1
29
78.4%
2.5%
-.7
143
91.1%
12.3%
.2
216
89.6%
18.5%
.0
1044
89.5%
89.5%
1
2
2
3.3%
.2%
-.8
3
3.2%
.3%
-1.0
12
5.0%
1.0%
-.5
11
5.9%
.9%
.1
10
6.8%
.9%
.5
5
13.5%
.4%
2.0
7
4.5%
.6%
-.7
17
7.1%
1.5%
.8
67
5.7%
5.7%
D-8
3
4.9%
.3%
.7
3
3.2%
.3%
-.1
8
3.3%
.7%
.0
10
5.3%
.9%
1.5
3
2.0%
.3%
-.9
2
5.4%
.2%
.7
4
2.5%
.3%
-.5
6
2.5%
.5%
-.7
39
3.3%
3.3%
3
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
3
1.2%
.3%
1.0
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
1
.7%
.1%
.0
1
2.7%
.1%
1.5
2
1.3%
.2%
.9
1
.4%
.1%
-.5
8
.7%
.7%
4
5+
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
2
.8%
.2%
1.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.3
1
.6%
.1%
.9
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
3
.3%
.3%
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
2
.8%
.2%
.9
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
2
1.4%
.2%
1.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
1
.4%
.1%
.0
5
.4%
.4%
Total
61
100.0%
5.2%
94
100.0%
8.1%
242
100.0%
20.8%
187
100.0%
16.0%
147
100.0%
12.6%
37
100.0%
3.2%
157
100.0%
13.5%
241
100.0%
20.7%
1166
100.0%
100.0%
Table 9. Age - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
18 - 20
43
69.4%
3.6%
.3
48
51.1%
4.1%
-1.8
204
82.9%
17.3%
3.2
109
58.6%
9.2%
-1.3
105
69.5%
8.9%
.5
19
50.0%
1.6%
-1.2
92
58.6%
7.8%
-1.2
160
65.3%
13.6%
-.2
780
66.2%
66.2%
21 - 25
17
27.4%
1.4%
-.4
42
44.7%
3.6%
2.6
34
13.8%
2.9%
-4.7
74
39.8%
6.3%
2.4
40
26.5%
3.4%
-.8
15
39.5%
1.3%
1.0
60
38.2%
5.1%
1.8
74
30.2%
6.3%
.0
356
30.2%
30.2%
age
26 - 30
D-9
2
3.2%
.2%
.3
3
3.2%
.3%
.4
3
1.2%
.3%
-1.3
3
1.6%
.3%
-.8
5
3.3%
.4%
.6
3
7.9%
.3%
2.1
5
3.2%
.4%
.5
6
2.4%
.5%
-.1
30
2.5%
2.5%
31 - 40
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
4
1.6%
.3%
1.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
1
2.6%
.1%
1.2
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
5
2.0%
.4%
2.0
10
.8%
.8%
41 - 50
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
1
1.1%
.1%
1.6
1
.4%
.1%
.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
1
.7%
.1%
1.0
0
.0%
.0%
-.3
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
3
.3%
.3%
Total
62
100.0%
5.3%
94
100.0%
8.0%
246
100.0%
20.9%
186
100.0%
15.8%
151
100.0%
12.8%
38
100.0%
3.2%
157
100.0%
13.3%
245
100.0%
20.8%
1179
100.0%
100.0%
Table 10. Residence when not attending USU - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Cache Valley
13
21.0%
1.1%
-1.4
27
28.4%
2.3%
-.5
70
28.5%
5.9%
-.7
59
31.6%
5.0%
.1
47
31.1%
4.0%
.0
14
37.8%
1.2%
.7
52
32.7%
4.4%
.4
85
34.6%
7.2%
1.0
367
31.0%
31.0%
livenusu
Utah, outside
Outside
Cache Valley
Utah in US
36
11
58.1%
17.7%
3.0%
.9%
.8
.2
49
18
51.6%
18.9%
4.1%
1.5%
.1
.5
137
37
55.7%
15.0%
11.6%
3.1%
1.1
-.6
89
36
47.6%
19.3%
7.5%
3.0%
-.6
.9
76
25
50.3%
16.6%
6.4%
2.1%
-.1
.0
15
6
40.5%
16.2%
1.3%
.5%
-.9
-.1
72
31
45.3%
19.5%
6.1%
2.6%
-1.0
.9
127
33
51.6%
13.4%
10.7%
2.8%
.2
-1.2
601
197
50.8%
16.7%
50.8%
16.7%
D - 10
Outside
the USA
2
3.2%
.2%
1.1
1
1.1%
.1%
-.4
2
.8%
.2%
-.9
3
1.6%
.3%
.1
3
2.0%
.3%
.5
2
5.4%
.2%
1.9
4
2.5%
.3%
1.0
1
.4%
.1%
-1.4
18
1.5%
1.5%
Total
62
100.0%
5.2%
95
100.0%
8.0%
246
100.0%
20.8%
187
100.0%
15.8%
151
100.0%
12.8%
37
100.0%
3.1%
159
100.0%
13.4%
246
100.0%
20.8%
1183
100.0%
100.0%
Table 11. Residence while attending USU - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Campus
Housing
25
40.3%
2.1%
1.0
23
24.2%
1.9%
-1.5
88
35.6%
7.4%
.7
75
39.9%
6.3%
1.6
57
37.7%
4.8%
1.0
12
31.6%
1.0%
-.2
36
22.6%
3.0%
-2.3
78
31.7%
6.6%
-.4
394
33.2%
33.2%
Fraternity/
Sorority
1
1.6%
.1%
1.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
1
.7%
.1%
.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
2
1.3%
.2%
1.6
1
.4%
.1%
.0
5
.4%
.4%
Off-campus
apartment
23
37.1%
1.9%
-.2
46
48.4%
3.9%
1.6
101
40.9%
8.5%
.6
63
33.5%
5.3%
-1.1
53
35.1%
4.5%
-.7
16
42.1%
1.3%
.4
64
40.3%
5.4%
.3
91
37.0%
7.7%
-.4
457
38.5%
38.5%
D - 11
liveusu
Off-campus
house
6
9.7%
.5%
.0
12
12.6%
1.0%
.9
26
10.5%
2.2%
.4
14
7.4%
1.2%
-1.0
12
7.9%
1.0%
-.7
6
15.8%
.5%
1.2
19
11.9%
1.6%
.9
20
8.1%
1.7%
-.8
115
9.7%
9.7%
With parents
7
11.3%
.6%
-.9
13
13.7%
1.1%
-.5
22
8.9%
1.9%
-2.7
26
13.8%
2.2%
-.6
24
15.9%
2.0%
.1
4
10.5%
.3%
-.8
37
23.3%
3.1%
2.4
53
21.5%
4.5%
2.3
186
15.7%
15.7%
With extended
family
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
1
1.1%
.1%
-.9
10
4.0%
.8%
1.6
10
5.3%
.8%
2.5
4
2.6%
.3%
.2
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
1
.6%
.1%
-1.5
3
1.2%
.3%
-1.2
29
2.4%
2.4%
Total
62
100.0%
5.2%
95
100.0%
8.0%
247
100.0%
20.8%
188
100.0%
15.9%
151
100.0%
12.7%
38
100.0%
3.2%
159
100.0%
13.4%
246
100.0%
20.7%
1186
100.0%
100.0%
Table 12. Length of attendance - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
<1
1
2
43
69.4%
3.6%
.0
68
71.6%
5.7%
.3
187
75.4%
15.8%
1.2
117
62.2%
9.9%
-1.1
102
68.0%
8.6%
-.2
20
54.1%
1.7%
-1.1
105
66.0%
8.9%
-.5
177
72.0%
14.9%
.5
819
69.1%
69.1%
4
6.5%
.3%
-1.2
9
9.5%
.8%
-.7
23
9.3%
1.9%
-1.2
34
18.1%
2.9%
2.5
16
10.7%
1.4%
-.4
8
21.6%
.7%
1.7
11
6.9%
.9%
-1.8
35
14.2%
3.0%
1.1
140
11.8%
11.8%
10
16.1%
.8%
.0
15
15.8%
1.3%
-.1
34
13.7%
2.9%
-.9
32
17.0%
2.7%
.3
27
18.0%
2.3%
.6
8
21.6%
.7%
.8
39
24.5%
3.3%
2.6
26
10.6%
2.2%
-2.2
191
16.1%
16.1%
D - 12
lengattd
3
4
6.5%
.3%
2.3
3
3.2%
.3%
.6
3
1.2%
.3%
-1.0
3
1.6%
.3%
-.6
3
2.0%
.3%
-.2
1
2.7%
.1%
.2
3
1.9%
.3%
-.3
6
2.4%
.5%
.3
26
2.2%
2.2%
4
5
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
1
.4%
.1%
.2
1
.5%
.1%
.5
1
.7%
.1%
.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
1
.4%
.1%
.2
4
.3%
.3%
1
1.6%
.1%
2.1
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
1
.5%
.1%
.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.3
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
1
.4%
.1%
.5
3
.3%
.3%
6+
0
.0%
.0%
-.3
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
1
.7%
.1%
1.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.2
1
.6%
.1%
1.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
2
.2%
.2%
Total
62
100.0%
5.2%
95
100.0%
8.0%
248
100.0%
20.9%
188
100.0%
15.9%
150
100.0%
12.7%
37
100.0%
3.1%
159
100.0%
13.4%
246
100.0%
20.8%
1185
100.0%
100.0%
Table 13. Credit hours completed so far - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
0 - 30
32
51.6%
2.7%
.0
51
54.3%
4.3%
.4
137
55.5%
11.6%
.9
74
39.8%
6.3%
-2.2
80
53.3%
6.8%
.3
19
50.0%
1.6%
-.1
53
33.3%
4.5%
-3.2
160
65.3%
13.5%
3.1
606
51.3%
51.3%
chours
31 - 60
27
43.5%
2.3%
-.2
41
43.6%
3.5%
-.3
103
41.7%
8.7%
-.9
109
58.6%
9.2%
2.7
64
42.7%
5.4%
-.5
18
47.4%
1.5%
.2
96
60.4%
8.1%
2.8
79
32.2%
6.7%
-3.1
537
45.5%
45.5%
61 - 90
D - 13
3
4.8%
.3%
.7
2
2.1%
.2%
-.6
7
2.8%
.6%
-.3
3
1.6%
.3%
-1.2
6
4.0%
.5%
.5
1
2.6%
.1%
-.2
10
6.3%
.8%
2.2
6
2.4%
.5%
-.7
38
3.2%
3.2%
Total
62
100.0%
5.2%
94
100.0%
8.0%
247
100.0%
20.9%
186
100.0%
15.7%
150
100.0%
12.7%
38
100.0%
3.2%
159
100.0%
13.5%
245
100.0%
20.7%
1181
100.0%
100.0%
Table 14. Employment status - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Employed
full-time
1
1.6%
.1%
-1.5
9
9.6%
.8%
1.2
10
4.1%
.8%
-1.5
14
7.5%
1.2%
.6
12
8.0%
1.0%
.8
4
10.5%
.3%
1.0
6
3.8%
.5%
-1.3
20
8.1%
1.7%
1.1
76
6.4%
6.4%
employst
Employed
part-time
38
61.3%
3.2%
1.5
37
39.4%
3.1%
-1.2
133
54.1%
11.3%
1.4
76
40.6%
6.4%
-1.5
74
49.3%
6.3%
.2
17
44.7%
1.4%
-.3
89
56.0%
7.5%
1.4
104
42.3%
8.8%
-1.3
568
48.1%
48.1%
D - 14
Unemployed
23
37.1%
1.9%
-1.0
48
51.1%
4.1%
.8
103
41.9%
8.7%
-.8
97
51.9%
8.2%
1.3
64
42.7%
5.4%
-.5
17
44.7%
1.4%
-.1
64
40.3%
5.4%
-1.0
122
49.6%
10.3%
.9
538
45.5%
45.5%
Total
62
100.0%
5.2%
94
100.0%
8.0%
246
100.0%
20.8%
187
100.0%
15.8%
150
100.0%
12.7%
38
100.0%
3.2%
159
100.0%
13.5%
246
100.0%
20.8%
1182
100.0%
100.0%
Table 15. Amount of time worked while attending USU - Crosstabulation by college.
None
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
21
33.9%
1.8%
-1.0
45
47.9%
3.8%
.8
96
39.0%
8.1%
-.8
90
47.9%
7.6%
1.2
64
43.0%
5.4%
.1
18
48.6%
1.5%
.6
58
36.7%
4.9%
-1.1
107
43.9%
9.1%
.4
499
42.4%
42.4%
1/4 time
14
22.6%
1.2%
.7
15
16.0%
1.3%
-.6
51
20.7%
4.3%
.8
33
17.6%
2.8%
-.3
27
18.1%
2.3%
-.1
5
13.5%
.4%
-.7
36
22.8%
3.1%
1.2
38
15.6%
3.2%
-1.1
219
18.6%
18.6%
amtwork
1/2 time
19
30.6%
1.6%
1.0
16
17.0%
1.4%
-1.4
67
27.2%
5.7%
.9
34
18.1%
2.9%
-1.7
33
22.1%
2.8%
-.5
9
24.3%
.8%
.0
49
31.0%
4.2%
1.7
60
24.6%
5.1%
.1
287
24.4%
24.4%
D - 15
3/4 time
8
12.9%
.7%
1.2
10
10.6%
.8%
.7
17
6.9%
1.4%
-.8
18
9.6%
1.5%
.5
14
9.4%
1.2%
.4
4
10.8%
.3%
.5
10
6.3%
.8%
-.9
19
7.8%
1.6%
-.4
100
8.5%
8.5%
Full-time
0
.0%
.0%
-2.0
8
8.5%
.7%
.9
15
6.1%
1.3%
-.1
13
6.9%
1.1%
.4
11
7.4%
.9%
.6
1
2.7%
.1%
-.9
5
3.2%
.4%
-1.5
20
8.2%
1.7%
1.3
73
6.2%
6.2%
Total
62
100.0%
5.3%
94
100.0%
8.0%
246
100.0%
20.9%
188
100.0%
16.0%
149
100.0%
12.6%
37
100.0%
3.1%
158
100.0%
13.4%
244
100.0%
20.7%
1178
100.0%
100.0%
Table 16. Part of the day in which you worked - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Mornings
3
7.1%
.4%
-1.1
10
19.6%
1.4%
1.2
24
16.0%
3.4%
.8
11
10.9%
1.6%
-.7
12
13.5%
1.7%
.0
1
4.3%
.1%
-1.2
14
13.2%
2.0%
-.1
20
14.2%
2.8%
.2
95
13.5%
13.5%
worktime
Afternoons
Evenings
22
17
52.4%
40.5%
3.1%
2.4%
1.1
-.2
18
22
35.3%
43.1%
2.6%
3.1%
-.6
.0
70
55
46.7%
36.7%
10.0%
7.8%
1.1
-1.2
33
50
32.7%
49.5%
4.7%
7.1%
-1.3
1.0
27
47
30.3%
52.8%
3.8%
6.7%
-1.6
1.4
13
7
56.5%
30.4%
1.8%
1.0%
1.2
-.9
43
49
40.6%
46.2%
6.1%
7.0%
-.1
.5
63
55
44.7%
39.0%
9.0%
7.8%
.7
-.7
289
302
41.1%
43.0%
41.1%
43.0%
D - 16
Graveyard
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
1
2.0%
.1%
-.2
1
.7%
.1%
-1.4
7
6.9%
1.0%
2.9
3
3.4%
.4%
.6
2
8.7%
.3%
1.9
0
.0%
.0%
-1.6
3
2.1%
.4%
-.2
17
2.4%
2.4%
Total
42
100.0%
6.0%
51
100.0%
7.3%
150
100.0%
21.3%
101
100.0%
14.4%
89
100.0%
12.7%
23
100.0%
3.3%
106
100.0%
15.1%
141
100.0%
20.1%
703
100.0%
100.0%
Table 17. What do you tell your friends about USU? - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
It's great;
come here
to school
28
45.2%
2.4%
.2
33
35.5%
2.8%
-1.2
137
55.5%
11.6%
2.7
75
40.1%
6.4%
-.8
67
45.3%
5.7%
.3
12
31.6%
1.0%
-1.1
68
43.0%
5.8%
-.2
96
39.5%
8.2%
-1.0
516
43.9%
43.9%
Mostly
positive
things
24
38.7%
2.0%
.2
39
41.9%
3.3%
.7
82
33.2%
7.0%
-1.1
82
43.9%
7.0%
1.4
53
35.8%
4.5%
-.3
16
42.1%
1.4%
.5
57
36.1%
4.8%
-.3
87
35.8%
7.4%
-.4
440
37.4%
37.4%
tellausu
Nothing
much,
positive or
negative
9
14.5%
.8%
-.4
15
16.1%
1.3%
-.1
24
9.7%
2.0%
-2.7
29
15.5%
2.5%
-.4
23
15.5%
2.0%
-.4
10
26.3%
.9%
1.4
32
20.3%
2.7%
1.1
55
22.6%
4.7%
2.2
197
16.8%
16.8%
D - 17
Mostly
negative
things
1
1.6%
.1%
.1
5
5.4%
.4%
3.2
4
1.6%
.3%
.2
1
.5%
.1%
-1.0
3
2.0%
.3%
.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-1.5
3
1.2%
.3%
-.3
17
1.4%
1.4%
It's not great;
don't come
here to school
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
1
1.1%
.1%
.8
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
2
1.4%
.2%
1.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
1
.6%
.1%
.2
2
.8%
.2%
.7
6
.5%
.5%
Total
62
100.0%
5.3%
93
100.0%
7.9%
247
100.0%
21.0%
187
100.0%
15.9%
148
100.0%
12.6%
38
100.0%
3.2%
158
100.0%
13.4%
243
100.0%
20.7%
1176
100.0%
100.0%
Table 18. How many semesters has this person been assigned as your advisor? - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
1 Semester
20
35.1%
2.3%
-1.1
38
59.4%
4.4%
1.7
97
46.4%
11.2%
.3
43
25.1%
5.0%
-3.9
61
53.0%
7.0%
1.3
15
46.9%
1.7%
.1
52
43.0%
6.0%
-.4
66
66.7%
7.6%
3.2
392
45.2%
45.2%
2 Semesters
29
50.9%
3.3%
1.0
20
31.3%
2.3%
-1.3
86
41.1%
9.9%
-.2
96
56.1%
11.1%
2.9
45
39.1%
5.2%
-.5
12
37.5%
1.4%
-.4
48
39.7%
5.5%
-.4
28
28.3%
3.2%
-2.1
364
41.9%
41.9%
D - 18
assigadv
3 Semesters
2
3.5%
.2%
-.3
1
1.6%
.1%
-1.0
8
3.8%
.9%
-.3
15
8.8%
1.7%
2.9
4
3.5%
.5%
-.4
1
3.1%
.1%
-.3
5
4.1%
.6%
-.1
1
1.0%
.1%
-1.6
37
4.3%
4.3%
4 Semesters
3
5.3%
.3%
-.4
3
4.7%
.3%
-.6
13
6.2%
1.5%
-.3
14
8.2%
1.6%
.7
5
4.3%
.6%
-1.0
3
9.4%
.3%
.6
15
12.4%
1.7%
2.4
3
3.0%
.3%
-1.4
59
6.8%
6.8%
5+ Semesters
3
5.3%
.3%
1.9
2
3.1%
.2%
.8
5
2.4%
.6%
.6
3
1.8%
.3%
-.1
0
.0%
.0%
-1.5
1
3.1%
.1%
.5
1
.8%
.1%
-.8
1
1.0%
.1%
-.6
16
1.8%
1.8%
Total
57
100.0%
6.6%
64
100.0%
7.4%
209
100.0%
24.1%
171
100.0%
19.7%
115
100.0%
13.2%
32
100.0%
3.7%
121
100.0%
13.9%
99
100.0%
11.4%
868
100.0%
100.0%
Table 19. If you have never met with your advisor or only met with him/her once indicate the reason(s) - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Did not
think it was
necessary
8
26.7%
1.2%
1.5
7
11.7%
1.0%
-.8
16
13.2%
2.4%
-.8
15
14.6%
2.2%
-.4
20
21.5%
3.0%
1.3
1
7.1%
.1%
-.8
15
13.9%
2.2%
-.5
26
17.7%
3.8%
.5
108
16.0%
16.0%
Got the
information I
wanted/
13
43.3%
1.9%
.3
30
50.0%
4.4%
1.3
56
46.3%
8.3%
1.2
55
53.4%
8.1%
2.2
28
30.1%
4.1%
-1.5
7
50.0%
1.0%
.6
39
36.1%
5.8%
-.6
40
27.2%
5.9%
-2.4
268
39.6%
39.6%
D - 19
nevermet
Got the
information I
wanted /
2
6.7%
.3%
-.9
5
8.3%
.7%
-.9
10
8.3%
1.5%
-1.3
12
11.7%
1.8%
-.3
13
14.0%
1.9%
.4
3
21.4%
.4%
.9
20
18.5%
3.0%
1.7
20
13.6%
3.0%
.4
85
12.6%
12.6%
Did not know
who my
advisor was
3
10.0%
.4%
-1.0
13
21.7%
1.9%
.7
25
20.7%
3.7%
.7
6
5.8%
.9%
-2.9
15
16.1%
2.2%
-.4
3
21.4%
.4%
.3
15
13.9%
2.2%
-1.0
42
28.6%
6.2%
3.0
122
18.0%
18.0%
My advisor
kept me
informed
4
13.3%
.6%
1.4
3
5.0%
.4%
-.5
7
5.8%
1.0%
-.4
10
9.7%
1.5%
1.2
5
5.4%
.7%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
10
9.3%
1.5%
1.0
6
4.1%
.9%
-1.2
45
6.7%
6.7%
Table 19. If you have never met with your advisor or only met with him/her once indicate the reason(s) - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
nevermet
Did not get
information I
wanted/
0
.0%
.0%
-1.5
2
3.3%
.3%
-1.1
7
5.8%
1.0%
-.5
5
4.9%
.7%
-.9
12
12.9%
1.8%
2.1
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
9
8.3%
1.3%
.5
13
8.8%
1.9%
.8
48
7.1%
7.1%
Total
30
100.0%
4.4%
60
100.0%
8.9%
121
100.0%
17.9%
103
100.0%
15.2%
93
100.0%
13.8%
14
100.0%
2.1%
108
100.0%
16.0%
147
100.0%
21.7%
676
100.0%
100.0%
D - 20
Table 20. If there were no obstacles I would visit my advisor more frequently - Crosstabulation by college.
visitmor
Yes
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
31
57.4%
3.2%
-.3
48
64.0%
5.0%
.4
128
60.1%
13.3%
-.1
96
57.5%
10.0%
-.5
77
61.1%
8.0%
.1
25
69.4%
2.6%
.7
80
63.0%
8.3%
.3
97
59.9%
10.1%
-.1
582
60.6%
60.6%
No
Total
23
42.6%
2.4%
.4
27
36.0%
2.8%
-.5
85
39.9%
8.9%
.1
71
42.5%
7.4%
.6
49
38.9%
5.1%
-.1
11
30.6%
1.1%
-.8
47
37.0%
4.9%
-.4
65
40.1%
6.8%
.2
378
39.4%
39.4%
54
100.0%
5.6%
D - 21
75
100.0%
7.8%
213
100.0%
22.2%
167
100.0%
17.4%
126
100.0%
13.1%
36
100.0%
3.8%
127
100.0%
13.2%
162
100.0%
16.9%
960
100.0%
100.0%
Table 21. How many times have you formally changed your major? - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Never
38
65.5%
3.8%
-.9
55
68.8%
5.5%
-.7
162
72.0%
16.1%
-.6
149
84.7%
14.8%
1.4
96
71.1%
9.6%
-.6
23
63.9%
2.3%
-.8
99
75.0%
9.9%
-.1
137
84.0%
13.6%
1.3
759
75.5%
75.5%
1 time
19
32.8%
1.9%
1.9
19
23.8%
1.9%
.5
55
24.4%
5.5%
1.0
21
11.9%
2.1%
-2.7
35
25.9%
3.5%
1.2
11
30.6%
1.1%
1.2
32
24.2%
3.2%
.7
22
13.5%
2.2%
-2.2
214
21.3%
21.3%
changmaj
2 times
1
1.7%
.1%
-.4
6
7.5%
.6%
2.7
7
3.1%
.7%
.5
4
2.3%
.4%
-.3
3
2.2%
.3%
-.3
2
5.6%
.2%
1.1
1
.8%
.1%
-1.3
2
1.2%
.2%
-1.1
26
2.6%
2.6%
D - 22
3 times
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
1
.4%
.1%
.1
2
1.1%
.2%
1.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
1
.6%
.1%
.4
4
.4%
.4%
4+ times
0
.0%
.0%
-.3
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
1
.7%
.1%
1.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.3
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
1
.6%
.1%
1.2
2
.2%
.2%
Total
58
100.0%
5.8%
80
100.0%
8.0%
225
100.0%
22.4%
176
100.0%
17.5%
135
100.0%
13.4%
36
100.0%
3.6%
132
100.0%
13.1%
163
100.0%
16.2%
1005
100.0%
100.0%
Table 22. In an ideal system I could make an appointment to meet my advisor: - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
1 hour in
advance
14
24.1%
1.4%
-.6
23
29.5%
2.3%
.2
68
30.8%
6.9%
.6
51
29.0%
5.2%
.1
34
26.2%
3.4%
-.5
5
14.7%
.5%
-1.5
37
27.6%
3.7%
-.2
50
31.4%
5.1%
.7
282
28.5%
28.5%
makeappt
1 day in
advance
36
62.1%
3.6%
.8
45
57.7%
4.5%
.4
127
57.5%
12.8%
.6
96
54.5%
9.7%
.0
71
54.6%
7.2%
.0
21
61.8%
2.1%
.6
71
53.0%
7.2%
-.2
72
45.3%
7.3%
-1.6
539
54.4%
54.4%
1 week in
advance
8
13.8%
.8%
-.6
10
12.8%
1.0%
-.9
26
11.8%
2.6%
-1.9
29
16.5%
2.9%
-.2
25
19.2%
2.5%
.6
8
23.5%
.8%
.9
26
19.4%
2.6%
.7
37
23.3%
3.7%
1.9
169
17.1%
17.1%
D - 23
Total
58
100.0%
5.9%
78
100.0%
7.9%
221
100.0%
22.3%
176
100.0%
17.8%
130
100.0%
13.1%
34
100.0%
3.4%
134
100.0%
13.5%
159
100.0%
16.1%
990
100.0%
100.0%
Table 23. If there were no obstacles I would visit with my advisor: - Crosstabulation by college.
Weekly
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
3
5.2%
.3%
1.8
1
1.2%
.1%
-.5
3
1.3%
.3%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-1.8
6
4.5%
.6%
2.2
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
4
3.0%
.4%
.9
2
1.2%
.2%
-.7
19
1.9%
1.9%
Every other
week
1
1.7%
.1%
-1.0
5
6.0%
.5%
.7
10
4.4%
1.0%
.1
8
4.6%
.8%
.2
9
6.8%
.9%
1.3
1
2.8%
.1%
-.4
4
3.0%
.4%
-.8
6
3.5%
.6%
-.5
44
4.3%
4.3%
D - 24
visitwhen
Every couple
of months
Monthly
18
12
31.0%
20.7%
1.8%
1.2%
.6
-.2
28
15
33.3%
17.9%
2.8%
1.5%
1.1
-.8
70
59
31.0%
26.1%
6.9%
5.8%
1.2
1.4
37
39
21.3%
22.4%
3.6%
3.8%
-1.4
.2
33
26
24.8%
19.5%
3.3%
2.6%
-.5
-.6
15
8
41.7%
22.2%
1.5%
.8%
1.7
.0
39
24
29.1%
17.9%
3.8%
2.4%
.5
-1.0
33
39
19.4%
22.9%
3.3%
3.8%
-1.9
.3
273
222
26.9%
21.9%
26.9%
21.9%
Each
semester
22
37.9%
2.2%
.1
30
35.7%
3.0%
-.2
80
35.4%
7.9%
-.5
73
42.0%
7.2%
1.0
44
33.1%
4.3%
-.8
11
30.6%
1.1%
-.7
50
37.3%
4.9%
.0
68
40.0%
6.7%
.6
378
37.2%
37.2%
Once a year
1
1.7%
.1%
-.8
3
3.6%
.3%
-.1
2
.9%
.2%
-2.3
11
6.3%
1.1%
1.7
5
3.8%
.5%
.0
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
7
5.2%
.7%
.8
10
5.9%
1.0%
1.4
39
3.8%
3.8%
Table 23. If there were no obstacles I would visit with my advisor: - Crosstabulation by college.
visitwhen
Never
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
1
1.7%
.1%
-.9
2
2.4%
.2%
-.7
2
.9%
.2%
-2.3
6
3.4%
.6%
-.3
10
7.5%
1.0%
2.1
1
2.8%
.1%
-.4
6
4.5%
.6%
.3
12
7.1%
1.2%
2.0
40
3.9%
3.9%
Total
58
100.0%
5.7%
84
100.0%
8.3%
226
100.0%
22.3%
174
100.0%
17.1%
133
100.0%
13.1%
36
100.0%
3.5%
134
100.0%
13.2%
170
100.0%
16.7%
1015
100.0%
100.0%
D - 25
Table 24. What is the average length of your advising appointments? - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
1 - 10
minutes
20
36.4%
2.2%
-.4
27
37.0%
3.0%
-.4
68
32.4%
7.6%
-1.8
69
43.4%
7.7%
.7
53
47.3%
5.9%
1.2
9
27.3%
1.0%
-1.2
58
49.2%
6.5%
1.6
53
40.2%
5.9%
.0
357
40.0%
40.0%
lengappt
11 - 20
21 - 30
minutes
minutes
27
8
49.1%
14.5%
3.0%
.9%
.2
.8
38
5
52.1%
6.8%
4.3%
.6%
.6
-1.0
108
29
51.4%
13.8%
12.1%
3.3%
1.0
1.3
78
11
49.1%
6.9%
8.7%
1.2%
.4
-1.5
48
9
42.9%
8.0%
5.4%
1.0%
-.6
-.9
17
6
51.5%
18.2%
1.9%
.7%
.4
1.3
45
11
38.1%
9.3%
5.0%
1.2%
-1.4
-.5
57
18
43.2%
13.6%
6.4%
2.0%
-.6
1.0
418
97
46.9%
10.9%
46.9%
10.9%
D - 26
30 or more
minutes
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
3
4.1%
.3%
1.1
5
2.4%
.6%
.1
1
.6%
.1%
-1.4
2
1.8%
.2%
-.3
1
3.0%
.1%
.3
4
3.4%
.4%
.8
4
3.0%
.4%
.6
20
2.2%
2.2%
Total
55
100.0%
6.2%
73
100.0%
8.2%
210
100.0%
23.5%
159
100.0%
17.8%
112
100.0%
12.6%
33
100.0%
3.7%
118
100.0%
13.2%
132
100.0%
14.8%
892
100.0%
100.0%
Table 25. How often did you need with your advisor this past school year? - Crosstabulation by college.
Never
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
9
15.5%
.9%
-1.3
14
16.9%
1.4%
-1.3
38
16.7%
3.8%
-2.2
32
18.5%
3.2%
-1.5
43
32.8%
4.3%
2.1
7
20.0%
.7%
-.5
44
32.8%
4.4%
2.1
55
32.9%
5.5%
2.4
242
24.0%
24.0%
1 time
15
25.9%
1.5%
-1.7
42
50.6%
4.2%
1.6
86
37.9%
8.5%
-.4
67
38.7%
6.6%
-.2
56
42.7%
5.6%
.6
5
14.3%
.5%
-2.4
57
42.5%
5.7%
.5
72
43.1%
7.1%
.7
400
39.7%
39.7%
2 times
21
36.2%
2.1%
2.4
16
19.3%
1.6%
-.4
57
25.1%
5.7%
1.2
47
27.2%
4.7%
1.6
16
12.2%
1.6%
-2.3
11
31.4%
1.1%
1.3
21
15.7%
2.1%
-1.5
28
16.8%
2.8%
-1.3
217
21.5%
21.5%
D - 27
timesmet
3 times
4 times
7
3
12.1%
5.2%
.7%
.3%
.7
.8
5
4
6.0%
4.8%
.5%
.4%
-1.0
.8
32
9
14.1%
4.0%
3.2%
.9%
2.3
.6
22
4
12.7%
2.3%
2.2%
.4%
1.4
-.7
13
2
9.9%
1.5%
1.3%
.2%
.2
-1.1
6
2
17.1%
5.7%
.6%
.2%
1.5
.8
3
7
2.2%
5.2%
.3%
.7%
-2.7
1.2
7
2
4.2%
1.2%
.7%
.2%
-2.2
-1.5
95
33
9.4%
3.3%
9.4%
3.3%
5 times
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
3
1.3%
.3%
.5
1
.6%
.1%
-.5
1
.8%
.1%
-.3
3
8.6%
.3%
4.5
1
.7%
.1%
-.3
1
.6%
.1%
-.5
10
1.0%
1.0%
6 times
1
1.7%
.1%
1.6
1
1.2%
.1%
1.2
1
.4%
.1%
.1
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
1
.7%
.1%
.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
4
.4%
.4%
7 times
0
.0%
.0%
-.2
0
.0%
.0%
-.3
1
.4%
.1%
1.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.2
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
1
.1%
.1%
Table 25. How often did you need with your advisor this past school year? - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
timesmet
8 times
10+ times
1
1
1.7%
1.7%
.1%
.1%
2.6
1.6
1
0
1.2%
.0%
.1%
.0%
2.1
-.6
0
0
.0%
.0%
.0%
.0%
-.7
-.9
0
0
.0%
.0%
.0%
.0%
-.6
-.8
0
0
.0%
.0%
.0%
.0%
-.5
-.7
0
1
.0%
2.9%
.0%
.1%
-.3
2.3
0
0
.0%
.0%
.0%
.0%
-.5
-.7
0
2
.0%
1.2%
.0%
.2%
-.6
1.6
2
4
.2%
.4%
.2%
.4%
D - 28
Total
58
100.0%
5.8%
83
100.0%
8.2%
227
100.0%
22.5%
173
100.0%
17.2%
131
100.0%
13.0%
35
100.0%
3.5%
134
100.0%
13.3%
167
100.0%
16.6%
1008
100.0%
100.0%
Table 26. From where do you obtain the major source of information to plan your academic program? - Crosstabulation by college.
sourcinf
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Advisor
26
44.8%
2.6%
1.8
29
34.9%
2.9%
.6
110
48.2%
10.8%
4.5
72
41.4%
7.1%
2.3
18
13.6%
1.8%
-3.6
11
31.4%
1.1%
.0
24
17.9%
2.4%
-2.8
29
16.9%
2.9%
-3.4
319
31.4%
31.4%
Other
faculty/staff
3
5.2%
.3%
.1
3
3.6%
.3%
-.5
6
2.6%
.6%
-1.6
4
2.3%
.4%
-1.6
14
10.6%
1.4%
2.9
5
14.3%
.5%
2.5
8
6.0%
.8%
.5
7
4.1%
.7%
-.5
50
4.9%
4.9%
D - 29
USU General
Catalog
2
3.4%
.2%
-2.0
14
16.9%
1.4%
1.0
18
7.9%
1.8%
-2.2
14
8.0%
1.4%
-1.8
9
6.8%
.9%
-2.0
4
11.4%
.4%
-.3
19
14.2%
1.9%
.3
53
30.8%
5.2%
6.4
133
13.1%
13.1%
Major
requirement
sheets
24
41.4%
2.4%
.2
27
32.5%
2.7%
-1.0
72
31.6%
7.1%
-1.9
73
42.0%
7.2%
.5
79
59.8%
7.8%
3.7
12
34.3%
1.2%
-.5
63
47.0%
6.2%
1.4
53
30.8%
5.2%
-1.8
403
39.7%
39.7%
Other
students
3
5.2%
.3%
-.5
8
9.6%
.8%
1.0
16
7.0%
1.6%
.1
5
2.9%
.5%
-2.0
5
3.8%
.5%
-1.4
1
2.9%
.1%
-.9
15
11.2%
1.5%
1.9
17
9.9%
1.7%
1.5
70
6.9%
6.9%
Other
0
.0%
.0%
-1.5
2
2.4%
.2%
-.7
6
2.6%
.6%
-1.1
6
3.4%
.6%
-.4
7
5.3%
.7%
.7
2
5.7%
.2%
.5
5
3.7%
.5%
-.2
13
7.6%
1.3%
2.3
41
4.0%
4.0%
Total
58
100.0%
5.7%
83
100.0%
8.2%
228
100.0%
22.4%
174
100.0%
17.1%
132
100.0%
13.0%
35
100.0%
3.4%
134
100.0%
13.2%
172
100.0%
16.9%
1016
100.0%
100.0%
Table 27. My advisor is friendly toward me - Crosstabulation by college.
advfrien
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts and
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
39
69.6%
4.4%
3.4
24
33.3%
2.7%
-1.0
108
51.2%
12.2%
2.4
40
24.1%
4.5%
-3.4
55
49.5%
6.2%
1.4
18
54.5%
2.0%
1.2
37
31.4%
4.2%
-1.6
41
33.9%
4.6%
-1.2
362
40.8%
40.8%
Agree
14
25.0%
1.6%
-1.3
37
51.4%
4.2%
2.3
66
31.3%
7.4%
-1.0
63
38.0%
7.1%
.5
34
30.6%
3.8%
-.9
10
30.3%
1.1%
-.5
43
36.4%
4.8%
.2
48
39.7%
5.4%
.8
315
35.5%
35.5%
Neutral
D - 30
3
5.4%
.3%
-1.9
10
13.9%
1.1%
-.3
25
11.8%
2.8%
-1.3
44
26.5%
5.0%
3.6
14
12.6%
1.6%
-.8
3
9.1%
.3%
-.9
22
18.6%
2.5%
.9
16
13.2%
1.8%
-.6
137
15.4%
15.4%
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-1.5
1
1.4%
.1%
-1.2
6
2.8%
.7%
-1.0
12
7.2%
1.4%
1.8
4
3.6%
.5%
-.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
10
8.5%
1.1%
2.2
5
4.1%
.6%
-.1
38
4.3%
4.3%
Strongly
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-1.4
0
.0%
.0%
-1.6
6
2.8%
.7%
-.5
6
3.6%
.7%
.1
3
2.7%
.3%
-.4
2
6.1%
.2%
.8
5
4.2%
.6%
.4
9
7.4%
1.0%
2.3
31
3.5%
3.5%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
1
.6%
.1%
.1
1
.9%
.1%
.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
1
.8%
.1%
.4
2
1.7%
.2%
1.6
5
.6%
.6%
Total
56
100.0%
6.3%
72
100.0%
8.1%
211
100.0%
23.8%
166
100.0%
18.7%
111
100.0%
12.5%
33
100.0%
3.7%
118
100.0%
13.3%
121
100.0%
13.6%
888
100.0%
100.0%
Table 28. My advisor demonstrates interest in my welfare - Crosstabulation by college.
advinter
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
30
53.6%
3.4%
3.6
14
19.7%
1.6%
-1.3
71
33.6%
8.0%
1.6
31
18.7%
3.5%
-2.3
38
34.2%
4.3%
1.3
15
45.5%
1.7%
1.9
28
23.7%
3.2%
-.9
21
17.2%
2.4%
-2.2
248
27.9%
27.9%
Agree
19
33.9%
2.1%
-.4
34
47.9%
3.8%
1.5
84
39.8%
9.5%
.7
62
37.3%
7.0%
.1
40
36.0%
4.5%
-.1
10
30.3%
1.1%
-.6
35
29.7%
3.9%
-1.3
43
35.2%
4.8%
-.3
327
36.8%
36.8%
Neutral
D - 31
5
8.9%
.6%
-2.3
19
26.8%
2.1%
.4
37
17.5%
4.2%
-2.0
49
29.5%
5.5%
1.4
23
20.7%
2.6%
-.7
5
15.2%
.6%
-1.1
40
33.9%
4.5%
2.1
37
30.3%
4.2%
1.4
215
24.2%
24.2%
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
-.8
4
5.6%
.5%
-.3
13
6.2%
1.5%
-.1
16
9.6%
1.8%
1.6
6
5.4%
.7%
-.4
1
3.0%
.1%
-.8
7
5.9%
.8%
-.2
8
6.6%
.9%
.1
57
6.4%
6.4%
Strongly
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-1.5
0
.0%
.0%
-1.7
6
2.8%
.7%
-.8
7
4.2%
.8%
.2
3
2.7%
.3%
-.7
2
6.1%
.2%
.6
7
5.9%
.8%
1.1
10
8.2%
1.1%
2.4
35
3.9%
3.9%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
1
.6%
.1%
-.1
1
.9%
.1%
.3
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
1
.8%
.1%
.2
3
2.5%
.3%
2.4
6
.7%
.7%
Total
56
100.0%
6.3%
71
100.0%
8.0%
211
100.0%
23.8%
166
100.0%
18.7%
111
100.0%
12.5%
33
100.0%
3.7%
118
100.0%
13.3%
122
100.0%
13.7%
888
100.0%
100.0%
Table 29. My advisor is readily available for consultation - Crosstabulation by college.
advavail
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
17
30.4%
1.9%
2.1
10
14.1%
1.1%
-.8
58
27.1%
6.5%
3.1
14
8.5%
1.6%
-2.9
24
21.6%
2.7%
.9
7
21.9%
.8%
.5
16
13.6%
1.8%
-1.2
15
12.4%
1.7%
-1.5
161
18.1%
18.1%
Agree
29
51.8%
3.3%
2.4
26
36.6%
2.9%
.4
77
36.0%
8.7%
.6
43
26.1%
4.8%
-1.7
32
28.8%
3.6%
-.9
16
50.0%
1.8%
1.6
37
31.4%
4.2%
-.4
38
31.4%
4.3%
-.4
298
33.6%
33.6%
Neutral
D - 32
9
16.1%
1.0%
-2.1
25
35.2%
2.8%
.6
56
26.2%
6.3%
-1.4
65
39.4%
7.3%
1.8
38
34.2%
4.3%
.5
7
21.9%
.8%
-1.0
38
32.2%
4.3%
.1
42
34.7%
4.7%
.6
280
31.5%
31.5%
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-2.2
9
12.7%
1.0%
.2
14
6.5%
1.6%
-2.3
35
21.2%
3.9%
3.4
15
13.5%
1.7%
.5
1
3.1%
.1%
-1.4
17
14.4%
1.9%
.8
14
11.6%
1.6%
-.1
106
11.9%
11.9%
Strongly
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-1.5
1
1.4%
.1%
-1.2
8
3.7%
.9%
-.4
8
4.8%
.9%
.4
2
1.8%
.2%
-1.3
1
3.1%
.1%
-.3
9
7.6%
1.0%
1.8
9
7.4%
1.0%
1.7
38
4.3%
4.3%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
1
.5%
.1%
-.2
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
1
.8%
.1%
.4
3
2.5%
.3%
2.8
5
.6%
.6%
Total
56
100.0%
6.3%
71
100.0%
8.0%
214
100.0%
24.1%
165
100.0%
18.6%
111
100.0%
12.5%
32
100.0%
3.6%
118
100.0%
13.3%
121
100.0%
13.6%
888
100.0%
100.0%
Table 30. My advisor is easy to get an appointment with - Crosstabulation by college.
advappt
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
17
30.4%
1.9%
2.4
10
13.9%
1.1%
-.7
59
28.1%
6.7%
3.8
12
7.3%
1.4%
-3.1
16
14.3%
1.8%
-.7
9
27.3%
1.0%
1.4
15
12.9%
1.7%
-1.1
14
11.8%
1.6%
-1.4
152
17.2%
17.2%
Agree
27
48.2%
3.1%
1.8
26
36.1%
2.9%
.2
88
41.9%
10.0%
1.8
44
26.7%
5.0%
-1.7
38
33.9%
4.3%
-.1
15
45.5%
1.7%
1.1
32
27.6%
3.6%
-1.3
34
28.6%
3.9%
-1.1
304
34.4%
34.4%
Neutral
D - 33
9
16.1%
1.0%
-2.0
25
34.7%
2.8%
.7
37
17.6%
4.2%
-3.4
66
40.0%
7.5%
2.2
40
35.7%
4.5%
1.0
6
18.2%
.7%
-1.3
43
37.1%
4.9%
1.3
43
36.1%
4.9%
1.1
269
30.5%
30.5%
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
-1.7
10
13.9%
1.1%
.7
17
8.1%
1.9%
-1.3
31
18.8%
3.5%
2.9
11
9.8%
1.2%
-.4
2
6.1%
.2%
-.9
14
12.1%
1.6%
.3
12
10.1%
1.4%
-.4
99
11.2%
11.2%
Strongly
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.2
1
1.4%
.1%
-1.5
7
3.3%
.8%
-1.4
12
7.3%
1.4%
.9
5
4.5%
.6%
-.5
1
3.0%
.1%
-.6
11
9.5%
1.2%
1.7
12
10.1%
1.4%
2.0
50
5.7%
5.7%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
2
1.0%
.2%
-.1
0
.0%
.0%
-1.3
2
1.8%
.2%
.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
1
.9%
.1%
-.2
4
3.4%
.5%
2.5
9
1.0%
1.0%
Total
56
100.0%
6.3%
72
100.0%
8.2%
210
100.0%
23.8%
165
100.0%
18.7%
112
100.0%
12.7%
33
100.0%
3.7%
116
100.0%
13.1%
119
100.0%
13.5%
883
100.0%
100.0%
Table 31. My advisor does not make me feel rushed during our meetings - Crosstabulation by college.
advrush
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
24
42.9%
2.7%
3.0
14
19.7%
1.6%
-.7
67
31.9%
7.6%
2.5
22
13.4%
2.5%
-2.7
26
24.3%
3.0%
.2
11
33.3%
1.3%
1.2
22
18.8%
2.5%
-1.1
21
17.5%
2.4%
-1.4
207
23.6%
23.6%
Agree
25
44.6%
2.8%
.8
27
38.0%
3.1%
.0
85
40.5%
9.7%
.6
47
28.7%
5.4%
-1.9
47
43.9%
5.4%
1.0
15
45.5%
1.7%
.7
42
35.9%
4.8%
-.4
45
37.5%
5.1%
-.1
333
37.9%
37.9%
Neutral
D - 34
4
7.1%
.5%
-2.3
22
31.0%
2.5%
1.7
34
16.2%
3.9%
-1.6
43
26.2%
4.9%
1.3
24
22.4%
2.7%
.2
5
15.2%
.6%
-.8
28
23.9%
3.2%
.6
28
23.3%
3.2%
.5
188
21.4%
21.4%
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.9
7
9.9%
.8%
.0
13
6.2%
1.5%
-1.7
39
23.8%
4.4%
5.6
5
4.7%
.6%
-1.7
0
.0%
.0%
-1.8
12
10.3%
1.4%
.1
10
8.3%
1.1%
-.5
87
9.9%
9.9%
Strongly
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
-.7
1
1.4%
.1%
-1.6
9
4.3%
1.0%
-1.0
10
6.1%
1.1%
.1
5
4.7%
.6%
-.5
2
6.1%
.2%
.0
12
10.3%
1.4%
1.9
11
9.2%
1.3%
1.5
52
5.9%
5.9%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
2
1.0%
.2%
-.4
3
1.8%
.3%
.7
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
1
.9%
.1%
-.4
5
4.2%
.6%
2.9
11
1.3%
1.3%
Total
56
100.0%
6.4%
71
100.0%
8.1%
210
100.0%
23.9%
164
100.0%
18.7%
107
100.0%
12.2%
33
100.0%
3.8%
117
100.0%
13.3%
120
100.0%
13.7%
878
100.0%
100.0%
Table 32. My advisor is prepared for appointments with appropriate transcripts and degree requirement analyses - Crosstabulation by college.
advprep
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
20
36.4%
2.3%
1.4
18
25.4%
2.1%
-.2
76
36.5%
8.7%
2.7
49
29.9%
5.6%
.7
24
21.8%
2.7%
-1.0
8
24.2%
.9%
-.3
19
16.5%
2.2%
-2.1
21
17.8%
2.4%
-1.9
235
26.9%
26.9%
Agree
23
41.8%
2.6%
.2
35
49.3%
4.0%
1.2
80
38.5%
9.2%
-.4
75
45.7%
8.6%
1.2
47
42.7%
5.4%
.4
9
27.3%
1.0%
-1.2
34
29.6%
3.9%
-1.8
47
39.8%
5.4%
.0
350
40.0%
40.0%
Neutral
10
18.2%
1.1%
-.7
14
19.7%
1.6%
-.5
40
19.2%
4.6%
-1.1
33
20.1%
3.8%
-.7
22
20.0%
2.5%
-.6
10
30.3%
1.1%
.9
43
37.4%
4.9%
3.3
27
22.9%
3.1%
.0
199
22.8%
22.8%
D - 35
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-.8
3
4.2%
.3%
.1
4
1.9%
.5%
-1.4
2
1.2%
.2%
-1.7
6
5.5%
.7%
.8
3
9.1%
.3%
1.5
8
7.0%
.9%
1.7
7
5.9%
.8%
1.1
34
3.9%
3.9%
Strongly
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.0
1
1.4%
.1%
-1.3
6
2.9%
.7%
-1.2
3
1.8%
.3%
-1.7
10
9.1%
1.1%
2.1
2
6.1%
.2%
.4
9
7.8%
1.0%
1.6
9
7.6%
1.0%
1.5
41
4.7%
4.7%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
2
1.0%
.2%
-.8
2
1.2%
.2%
-.5
1
.9%
.1%
-.6
1
3.0%
.1%
.6
2
1.7%
.2%
.0
7
5.9%
.8%
3.5
15
1.7%
1.7%
Total
55
100.0%
6.3%
71
100.0%
8.1%
208
100.0%
23.8%
164
100.0%
18.8%
110
100.0%
12.6%
33
100.0%
3.8%
115
100.0%
13.2%
118
100.0%
13.5%
874
100.0%
100.0%
Table 33. My advisor communicates his/her advice effectively - Crosstabulation by college.
advcomm
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
25
45.5%
2.8%
2.2
16
22.5%
1.8%
-1.0
79
37.8%
9.0%
2.3
40
24.4%
4.6%
-1.2
34
30.9%
3.9%
.3
9
27.3%
1.0%
-.2
29
25.0%
3.3%
-.9
25
20.8%
2.8%
-1.7
257
29.3%
29.3%
Agree
23
41.8%
2.6%
-.3
36
50.7%
4.1%
.8
81
38.8%
9.2%
-1.2
89
54.3%
10.1%
1.9
50
45.5%
5.7%
.2
15
45.5%
1.7%
.1
39
33.6%
4.4%
-1.7
55
45.8%
6.3%
.3
388
44.2%
44.2%
Neutral
D - 36
7
12.7%
.8%
-.9
18
25.4%
2.1%
1.5
32
15.3%
3.6%
-.8
27
16.5%
3.1%
-.4
13
11.8%
1.5%
-1.5
6
18.2%
.7%
.1
36
31.0%
4.1%
3.4
17
14.2%
1.9%
-.9
156
17.8%
17.8%
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-1.5
1
1.4%
.1%
-1.1
9
4.3%
1.0%
.1
4
2.4%
.5%
-1.1
6
5.5%
.7%
.7
1
3.0%
.1%
-.3
5
4.3%
.6%
.1
10
8.3%
1.1%
2.3
36
4.1%
4.1%
Strongly
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-1.4
0
.0%
.0%
-1.6
8
3.8%
.9%
.1
3
1.8%
.3%
-1.3
6
5.5%
.7%
.9
2
6.1%
.2%
.7
5
4.3%
.6%
.3
9
7.5%
1.0%
2.1
33
3.8%
3.8%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-1.4
1
.6%
.1%
-.4
1
.9%
.1%
.0
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
2
1.7%
.2%
.9
4
3.3%
.5%
2.8
8
.9%
.9%
Total
55
100.0%
6.3%
71
100.0%
8.1%
209
100.0%
23.8%
164
100.0%
18.7%
110
100.0%
12.5%
33
100.0%
3.8%
116
100.0%
13.2%
120
100.0%
13.7%
878
100.0%
100.0%
Table 34. My advisor listens well to my concerns - Crosstabulation by college.
advliste
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
29
51.8%
3.3%
4.0
15
21.1%
1.7%
-.6
70
33.8%
8.0%
2.6
22
13.5%
2.5%
-2.9
31
28.4%
3.5%
.7
11
34.4%
1.3%
1.1
20
17.2%
2.3%
-1.7
20
16.5%
2.3%
-1.8
218
24.9%
24.9%
Agree
20
35.7%
2.3%
-.8
36
50.7%
4.1%
1.0
83
40.1%
9.5%
-.6
68
41.7%
7.8%
-.2
50
45.9%
5.7%
.5
15
46.9%
1.7%
.3
48
41.4%
5.5%
-.2
55
45.5%
6.3%
.4
375
42.9%
42.9%
Neutral
D - 37
6
10.7%
.7%
-1.8
18
25.4%
2.1%
.7
37
17.9%
4.2%
-1.2
56
34.4%
6.4%
3.5
18
16.5%
2.1%
-1.2
4
12.5%
.5%
-1.1
29
25.0%
3.3%
.8
22
18.2%
2.5%
-.8
190
21.7%
21.7%
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.0
2
2.8%
.2%
-.7
7
3.4%
.8%
-.8
8
4.9%
.9%
.2
4
3.7%
.5%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
9
7.8%
1.0%
1.6
9
7.4%
1.0%
1.5
40
4.6%
4.6%
Strongly
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-1.7
0
.0%
.0%
-1.9
10
4.8%
1.1%
-.3
8
4.9%
.9%
-.2
6
5.5%
.7%
.1
2
6.3%
.2%
.2
8
6.9%
.9%
.8
12
9.9%
1.4%
2.2
46
5.3%
5.3%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
1
.6%
.1%
-.1
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
2
1.7%
.2%
1.4
3
2.5%
.3%
2.4
6
.7%
.7%
Total
56
100.0%
6.4%
71
100.0%
8.1%
207
100.0%
23.7%
163
100.0%
18.6%
109
100.0%
12.5%
32
100.0%
3.7%
116
100.0%
13.3%
121
100.0%
13.8%
875
100.0%
100.0%
Table 35. My advisor understands my need for advice - Crosstabulation by college.
advunder
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
26
47.3%
3.0%
3.4
15
21.1%
1.7%
-.6
64
30.8%
7.3%
1.8
28
17.3%
3.2%
-1.9
30
27.3%
3.4%
.6
10
30.3%
1.1%
.7
19
16.5%
2.2%
-1.7
23
19.2%
2.6%
-1.2
215
24.6%
24.6%
Agree
20
36.4%
2.3%
-.7
32
45.1%
3.7%
.4
96
46.2%
11.0%
.9
72
44.4%
8.2%
.5
47
42.7%
5.4%
.1
16
48.5%
1.8%
.6
41
35.7%
4.7%
-1.1
44
36.7%
5.0%
-.9
368
42.1%
42.1%
Neutral
D - 38
8
14.5%
.9%
-1.2
20
28.2%
2.3%
1.0
31
14.9%
3.5%
-2.3
44
27.2%
5.0%
1.3
19
17.3%
2.2%
-1.1
5
15.2%
.6%
-.9
40
34.8%
4.6%
2.8
29
24.2%
3.3%
.4
196
22.4%
22.4%
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.1
4
5.6%
.5%
.1
8
3.8%
.9%
-.9
9
5.6%
1.0%
.2
9
8.2%
1.0%
1.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.3
5
4.3%
.6%
-.4
10
8.3%
1.1%
1.5
46
5.3%
5.3%
Strongly
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-1.6
0
.0%
.0%
-1.8
8
3.8%
.9%
-.6
7
4.3%
.8%
-.3
5
4.5%
.6%
-.1
2
6.1%
.2%
.3
9
7.8%
1.0%
1.5
11
9.2%
1.3%
2.2
42
4.8%
4.8%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
1
.5%
.1%
-.5
2
1.2%
.2%
.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
1
.9%
.1%
.1
3
2.5%
.3%
2.1
7
.8%
.8%
Total
55
100.0%
6.3%
71
100.0%
8.1%
208
100.0%
23.8%
162
100.0%
18.5%
110
100.0%
12.6%
33
100.0%
3.8%
115
100.0%
13.2%
120
100.0%
13.7%
874
100.0%
100.0%
Table 36. My advisor helps me clarify career and life goals - Crosstabulation by college.
advcgoal
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
17
31.5%
2.0%
2.5
12
16.9%
1.4%
.0
48
23.3%
5.6%
2.1
15
9.4%
1.7%
-2.3
21
19.6%
2.4%
.6
9
28.1%
1.0%
1.5
15
12.9%
1.7%
-1.1
11
9.2%
1.3%
-2.1
148
17.1%
17.1%
Agree
21
38.9%
2.4%
.8
23
32.4%
2.7%
-.1
87
42.2%
10.1%
2.3
42
26.4%
4.9%
-1.4
37
34.6%
4.3%
.3
9
28.1%
1.0%
-.5
33
28.4%
3.8%
-.8
32
26.9%
3.7%
-1.1
284
32.9%
32.9%
Neutral
12
22.2%
1.4%
-1.5
27
38.0%
3.1%
.6
53
25.7%
6.1%
-2.0
70
44.0%
8.1%
2.2
37
34.6%
4.3%
.1
9
28.1%
1.0%
-.6
43
37.1%
5.0%
.6
43
36.1%
5.0%
.4
294
34.0%
34.0%
D - 39
Disagree
2
3.7%
.2%
-1.3
7
9.9%
.8%
.2
8
3.9%
.9%
-2.5
22
13.8%
2.5%
2.0
6
5.6%
.7%
-1.2
3
9.4%
.3%
.1
12
10.3%
1.4%
.5
18
15.1%
2.1%
2.2
78
9.0%
9.0%
Strongly
Disagree
2
3.7%
.2%
-.6
2
2.8%
.2%
-1.0
8
3.9%
.9%
-1.1
9
5.7%
1.0%
-.1
6
5.6%
.7%
-.1
2
6.3%
.2%
.1
10
8.6%
1.2%
1.3
11
9.2%
1.3%
1.6
50
5.8%
5.8%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
2
1.0%
.2%
-.2
1
.6%
.1%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
3
2.6%
.3%
1.4
4
3.4%
.5%
2.2
10
1.2%
1.2%
Total
54
100.0%
6.3%
71
100.0%
8.2%
206
100.0%
23.8%
159
100.0%
18.4%
107
100.0%
12.4%
32
100.0%
3.7%
116
100.0%
13.4%
119
100.0%
13.8%
864
100.0%
100.0%
Table 37. My advisor refers me to resources that help me clarify career and life goals - Crosstabulation by college.
advrgoal
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
17
30.9%
2.0%
2.9
9
12.9%
1.0%
-.5
36
17.6%
4.2%
.8
16
10.0%
1.8%
-1.7
16
14.8%
1.8%
-.1
10
31.3%
1.2%
2.3
13
11.3%
1.5%
-1.1
16
13.3%
1.8%
-.6
133
15.4%
15.4%
Agree
21
38.2%
2.4%
1.2
19
27.1%
2.2%
-.3
64
31.2%
7.4%
.5
35
21.9%
4.0%
-1.7
31
28.7%
3.6%
-.1
6
18.8%
.7%
-1.1
35
30.4%
4.0%
.2
42
35.0%
4.9%
1.2
253
29.2%
29.2%
Neutral
12
21.8%
1.4%
-1.7
32
45.7%
3.7%
1.4
74
36.1%
8.6%
.0
70
43.8%
8.1%
1.6
45
41.7%
5.2%
1.0
13
40.6%
1.5%
.4
39
33.9%
4.5%
-.4
26
21.7%
3.0%
-2.6
311
36.0%
36.0%
D - 40
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
-1.8
7
10.0%
.8%
-.5
19
9.3%
2.2%
-1.1
28
17.5%
3.2%
2.0
10
9.3%
1.2%
-.8
1
3.1%
.1%
-1.5
17
14.8%
2.0%
.9
20
16.7%
2.3%
1.5
104
12.0%
12.0%
Strongly
Disagree
3
5.5%
.3%
-.1
3
4.3%
.3%
-.6
10
4.9%
1.2%
-.6
10
6.3%
1.2%
.2
5
4.6%
.6%
-.5
2
6.3%
.2%
.1
8
7.0%
.9%
.5
10
8.3%
1.2%
1.1
51
5.9%
5.9%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
2
1.0%
.2%
-.6
1
.6%
.1%
-.9
1
.9%
.1%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
3
2.6%
.3%
1.0
6
5.0%
.7%
3.1
13
1.5%
1.5%
Total
55
100.0%
6.4%
70
100.0%
8.1%
205
100.0%
23.7%
160
100.0%
18.5%
108
100.0%
12.5%
32
100.0%
3.7%
115
100.0%
13.3%
120
100.0%
13.9%
865
100.0%
100.0%
Table 38. My advisor Helps me understand my interests and abilities - Crosstabulation by college.
advhelps
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
14
25.5%
1.6%
2.9
9
12.9%
1.0%
.2
32
15.5%
3.7%
1.5
10
6.2%
1.2%
-2.1
14
13.0%
1.6%
.3
5
15.6%
.6%
.6
8
6.9%
.9%
-1.6
11
9.2%
1.3%
-.9
103
11.9%
11.9%
Agree
16
29.1%
1.8%
.4
17
24.3%
2.0%
-.3
61
29.5%
7.0%
.9
31
19.3%
3.6%
-1.8
33
30.6%
3.8%
.9
9
28.1%
1.0%
.2
29
25.0%
3.3%
-.3
33
27.5%
3.8%
.2
229
26.4%
26.4%
Neutral
22
40.0%
2.5%
.1
29
41.4%
3.3%
.3
79
38.2%
9.1%
-.3
76
47.2%
8.7%
1.6
43
39.8%
4.9%
.1
14
43.8%
1.6%
.4
45
38.8%
5.2%
-.1
35
29.2%
4.0%
-1.8
343
39.5%
39.5%
D - 41
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-2.7
12
17.1%
1.4%
.8
21
10.1%
2.4%
-1.4
30
18.6%
3.5%
1.7
11
10.2%
1.3%
-1.0
2
6.3%
.2%
-1.1
22
19.0%
2.5%
1.5
21
17.5%
2.4%
1.1
119
13.7%
13.7%
Strongly
Disagree
3
5.5%
.3%
-.5
3
4.3%
.3%
-1.0
12
5.8%
1.4%
-.9
14
8.7%
1.6%
.6
6
5.6%
.7%
-.7
2
6.3%
.2%
-.3
10
8.6%
1.2%
.4
15
12.5%
1.7%
2.0
65
7.5%
7.5%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
2
1.0%
.2%
-.2
0
.0%
.0%
-1.4
1
.9%
.1%
-.2
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
2
1.7%
.2%
.6
5
4.2%
.6%
3.1
10
1.2%
1.2%
Total
55
100.0%
6.3%
70
100.0%
8.1%
207
100.0%
23.8%
161
100.0%
18.5%
108
100.0%
12.4%
32
100.0%
3.7%
116
100.0%
13.3%
120
100.0%
13.8%
869
100.0%
100.0%
Table 39. My advisor helps me evaluate my interests and abilities - Crosstabulation by college.
adveval
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
16
28.6%
1.9%
3.3
8
11.4%
.9%
-.4
35
17.0%
4.1%
1.6
13
8.3%
1.5%
-1.6
13
12.7%
1.5%
-.1
6
18.8%
.7%
.9
8
6.9%
.9%
-1.8
12
10.0%
1.4%
-.9
111
12.9%
12.9%
Agree
15
26.8%
1.7%
.4
11
15.7%
1.3%
-1.5
61
29.6%
7.1%
1.5
33
21.2%
3.8%
-.8
29
28.4%
3.4%
.8
8
25.0%
.9%
.1
23
19.8%
2.7%
-1.0
29
24.2%
3.4%
.0
209
24.4%
24.4%
Neutral
21
37.5%
2.4%
-.4
38
54.3%
4.4%
1.8
74
35.9%
8.6%
-1.1
72
46.2%
8.4%
1.0
42
41.2%
4.9%
.1
13
40.6%
1.5%
.0
52
44.8%
6.1%
.7
38
31.7%
4.4%
-1.6
350
40.8%
40.8%
D - 42
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-2.3
10
14.3%
1.2%
.4
20
9.7%
2.3%
-1.2
24
15.4%
2.8%
.9
13
12.7%
1.5%
.0
3
9.4%
.3%
-.5
21
18.1%
2.4%
1.6
17
14.2%
2.0%
.4
109
12.7%
12.7%
Strongly
Disagree
3
5.4%
.3%
-.7
3
4.3%
.3%
-1.1
15
7.3%
1.7%
-.4
14
9.0%
1.6%
.4
5
4.9%
.6%
-1.1
2
6.3%
.2%
-.4
10
8.6%
1.2%
.2
17
14.2%
2.0%
2.4
69
8.0%
8.0%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
1
.5%
.1%
-.9
0
.0%
.0%
-1.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
2
1.7%
.2%
.6
7
5.8%
.8%
4.7
10
1.2%
1.2%
Total
56
100.0%
6.5%
70
100.0%
8.2%
206
100.0%
24.0%
156
100.0%
18.2%
102
100.0%
11.9%
32
100.0%
3.7%
116
100.0%
13.5%
120
100.0%
14.0%
858
100.0%
100.0%
Table 40. My advisor keeps my interests and abilities in mind when helping me choose courses/programs - Crosstabulation by college.
advchoos
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
17
30.9%
2.0%
2.7
9
12.9%
1.0%
-.7
45
21.6%
5.2%
2.0
14
9.0%
1.6%
-2.2
19
18.1%
2.2%
.5
8
25.0%
.9%
1.2
13
11.4%
1.5%
-1.3
14
11.7%
1.6%
-1.2
139
16.2%
16.2%
Agree
21
38.2%
2.4%
.7
21
30.0%
2.4%
-.4
80
38.5%
9.3%
1.4
41
26.5%
4.8%
-1.4
36
34.3%
4.2%
.2
8
25.0%
.9%
-.8
30
26.3%
3.5%
-1.2
46
38.3%
5.4%
1.0
283
32.9%
32.9%
Neutral
14
25.5%
1.6%
-1.0
30
42.9%
3.5%
1.4
56
26.9%
6.5%
-1.5
65
41.9%
7.6%
2.0
41
39.0%
4.8%
1.1
12
37.5%
1.4%
.4
38
33.3%
4.4%
.1
27
22.5%
3.1%
-2.0
283
32.9%
32.9%
D - 43
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.9
7
10.0%
.8%
.0
15
7.2%
1.7%
-1.2
25
16.1%
2.9%
2.5
3
2.9%
.3%
-2.3
2
6.3%
.2%
-.7
18
15.8%
2.1%
2.0
14
11.7%
1.6%
.6
85
9.9%
9.9%
Strongly
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
-.9
3
4.3%
.3%
-.9
11
5.3%
1.3%
-.9
10
6.5%
1.2%
-.3
6
5.7%
.7%
-.5
2
6.3%
.2%
-.2
13
11.4%
1.5%
1.8
13
10.8%
1.5%
1.6
60
7.0%
7.0%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
1
.5%
.1%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-1.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
2
1.8%
.2%
.7
6
5.0%
.7%
4.2
9
1.0%
1.0%
Total
55
100.0%
6.4%
70
100.0%
8.1%
208
100.0%
24.2%
155
100.0%
18.0%
105
100.0%
12.2%
32
100.0%
3.7%
114
100.0%
13.3%
120
100.0%
14.0%
859
100.0%
100.0%
Table 41. My advisor helps me develop my decision making skills - Crosstabulation by college.
advdecis
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
11
19.6%
1.3%
1.8
8
11.4%
.9%
.0
31
15.0%
3.6%
1.5
13
8.3%
1.5%
-1.2
14
13.2%
1.6%
.5
6
18.8%
.7%
1.2
6
5.2%
.7%
-2.0
10
8.3%
1.2%
-1.0
99
11.5%
11.5%
Agree
23
41.1%
2.7%
2.1
14
20.0%
1.6%
-1.1
61
29.6%
7.1%
.9
29
18.5%
3.4%
-2.0
33
31.1%
3.8%
.9
8
25.0%
.9%
-.2
29
25.2%
3.4%
-.3
32
26.4%
3.7%
.0
229
26.5%
26.5%
Neutral
19
33.9%
2.2%
-1.0
40
57.1%
4.6%
1.9
84
40.8%
9.7%
-.4
77
49.0%
8.9%
1.3
42
39.6%
4.9%
-.4
14
43.8%
1.6%
.1
47
40.9%
5.4%
-.3
43
35.5%
5.0%
-1.2
366
42.4%
42.4%
D - 44
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-2.1
8
11.4%
.9%
.1
13
6.3%
1.5%
-2.0
26
16.6%
3.0%
2.1
8
7.5%
.9%
-1.1
2
6.3%
.2%
-.8
21
18.3%
2.4%
2.3
16
13.2%
1.9%
.7
95
11.0%
11.0%
Strongly
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
-1.0
0
.0%
.0%
-2.2
15
7.3%
1.7%
.1
11
7.0%
1.3%
.0
8
7.5%
.9%
.2
2
6.3%
.2%
-.2
9
7.8%
1.0%
.3
14
11.6%
1.6%
1.9
61
7.1%
7.1%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
2
1.0%
.2%
-.6
1
.6%
.1%
-.9
1
.9%
.1%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
3
2.6%
.3%
1.0
6
5.0%
.7%
3.1
13
1.5%
1.5%
Total
56
100.0%
6.5%
70
100.0%
8.1%
206
100.0%
23.9%
157
100.0%
18.2%
106
100.0%
12.3%
32
100.0%
3.7%
115
100.0%
13.3%
121
100.0%
14.0%
863
100.0%
100.0%
Table 42. My advisor helps me with realistic self-appraisal - Crosstabulation by college.
advselfa
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
13
23.2%
1.5%
2.8
8
11.4%
.9%
.1
28
13.7%
3.3%
1.2
9
5.7%
1.0%
-2.0
14
13.6%
1.6%
.8
6
18.8%
.7%
1.3
7
6.0%
.8%
-1.6
9
7.6%
1.0%
-1.1
94
11.0%
11.0%
Agree
19
33.9%
2.2%
1.2
19
27.1%
2.2%
.2
63
30.7%
7.3%
1.4
31
19.7%
3.6%
-1.5
31
30.1%
3.6%
.8
6
18.8%
.7%
-.8
27
23.3%
3.1%
-.6
26
21.8%
3.0%
-.9
222
25.9%
25.9%
Neutral
19
33.9%
2.2%
-1.1
34
48.6%
4.0%
.6
82
40.0%
9.6%
-.8
80
51.0%
9.3%
1.4
45
43.7%
5.2%
.0
16
50.0%
1.9%
.5
52
44.8%
6.1%
.2
48
40.3%
5.6%
-.6
376
43.8%
43.8%
D - 45
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.9
7
10.0%
.8%
.0
15
7.3%
1.7%
-1.2
23
14.6%
2.7%
1.9
7
6.8%
.8%
-1.0
2
6.3%
.2%
-.7
16
13.8%
1.9%
1.3
14
11.8%
1.6%
.6
85
9.9%
9.9%
Strongly
Disagree
4
7.1%
.5%
-.2
2
2.9%
.2%
-1.5
16
7.8%
1.9%
-.1
13
8.3%
1.5%
.2
6
5.8%
.7%
-.8
2
6.3%
.2%
-.3
9
7.8%
1.0%
-.1
16
13.4%
1.9%
2.1
68
7.9%
7.9%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
1
.5%
.1%
-1.2
1
.6%
.1%
-.9
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
5
4.3%
.6%
2.4
6
5.0%
.7%
3.1
13
1.5%
1.5%
Total
56
100.0%
6.5%
70
100.0%
8.2%
205
100.0%
23.9%
157
100.0%
18.3%
103
100.0%
12.0%
32
100.0%
3.7%
116
100.0%
13.5%
119
100.0%
13.9%
858
100.0%
100.0%
Table 43. My advisor helps me develop suitable educational goals/plans - Crosstabulation by college.
advdevg
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
16
28.6%
1.8%
1.5
9
12.9%
1.0%
-1.3
63
30.6%
7.3%
3.6
25
15.5%
2.9%
-1.2
21
19.6%
2.4%
.0
9
28.1%
1.0%
1.1
12
10.5%
1.4%
-2.2
14
11.8%
1.6%
-1.9
169
19.5%
19.5%
Agree
28
50.0%
3.2%
1.2
28
40.0%
3.2%
.0
89
43.2%
10.3%
.7
65
40.4%
7.5%
.1
38
35.5%
4.4%
-.8
15
46.9%
1.7%
.6
46
40.4%
5.3%
.0
38
31.9%
4.4%
-1.4
347
40.1%
40.1%
Neutral
12
21.4%
1.4%
-.9
26
37.1%
3.0%
1.5
32
15.5%
3.7%
-3.3
56
34.8%
6.5%
1.7
37
34.6%
4.3%
1.4
4
12.5%
.5%
-1.6
35
30.7%
4.0%
.6
37
31.1%
4.3%
.7
239
27.6%
27.6%
D - 46
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-1.9
6
8.6%
.7%
.7
10
4.9%
1.2%
-.9
7
4.3%
.8%
-1.1
4
3.7%
.5%
-1.1
2
6.3%
.2%
.0
12
10.5%
1.4%
1.7
15
12.6%
1.7%
2.6
56
6.5%
6.5%
Strongly
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-1.7
1
1.4%
.1%
-1.4
12
5.8%
1.4%
.4
7
4.3%
.8%
-.5
6
5.6%
.7%
.2
2
6.3%
.2%
.3
7
6.1%
.8%
.4
10
8.4%
1.2%
1.5
45
5.2%
5.2%
Not
Applicable
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
0
.0%
.0%
-1.5
1
.6%
.1%
-.5
1
.9%
.1%
-.1
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
2
1.8%
.2%
.7
5
4.2%
.6%
3.4
9
1.0%
1.0%
Total
56
100.0%
6.5%
70
100.0%
8.1%
206
100.0%
23.8%
161
100.0%
18.6%
107
100.0%
12.4%
32
100.0%
3.7%
114
100.0%
13.2%
119
100.0%
13.8%
865
100.0%
100.0%
Table 44. My advisor helps me evaulate my progress toward my established educational goals/plans - Crosstabulation by college.
advevalp
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
21
38.2%
2.4%
3.3
11
15.7%
1.3%
-.6
58
27.9%
6.7%
3.1
24
15.0%
2.8%
-1.1
21
19.8%
2.4%
.3
7
21.9%
.8%
.4
8
7.0%
.9%
-2.9
12
10.0%
1.4%
-2.2
162
18.7%
18.7%
Agree
22
40.0%
2.5%
.2
30
42.9%
3.5%
.6
82
39.4%
9.5%
.3
66
41.3%
7.6%
.6
40
37.7%
4.6%
-.1
13
40.6%
1.5%
.2
37
32.2%
4.3%
-1.1
42
35.0%
4.8%
-.6
332
38.3%
38.3%
Neutral
D - 47
9
16.4%
1.0%
-1.9
23
32.9%
2.7%
.3
46
22.1%
5.3%
-2.3
58
36.3%
6.7%
1.2
34
32.1%
3.9%
.2
10
31.3%
1.2%
.0
48
41.7%
5.5%
2.1
39
32.5%
4.5%
.3
267
30.8%
30.8%
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-1.7
4
5.7%
.5%
.1
12
5.8%
1.4%
.3
7
4.4%
.8%
-.5
5
4.7%
.6%
-.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.3
9
7.8%
1.0%
1.2
9
7.5%
1.0%
1.0
46
5.3%
5.3%
Strongly
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
-.6
2
2.9%
.2%
-.9
10
4.8%
1.2%
-.4
4
2.5%
.5%
-1.6
5
4.7%
.6%
-.3
2
6.3%
.2%
.2
9
7.8%
1.0%
1.1
13
10.8%
1.5%
2.5
47
5.4%
5.4%
Not
Applicable
1
1.8%
.1%
.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
0
.0%
.0%
-1.7
1
.6%
.1%
-.8
1
.9%
.1%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
4
3.5%
.5%
1.9
5
4.2%
.6%
2.6
12
1.4%
1.4%
Total
55
100.0%
6.4%
70
100.0%
8.1%
208
100.0%
24.0%
160
100.0%
18.5%
106
100.0%
12.2%
32
100.0%
3.7%
115
100.0%
13.3%
120
100.0%
13.9%
866
100.0%
100.0%
Table 45. My advisor helps me make academic/career decisions - Crosstabulation by college.
advacad
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
18
32.7%
2.1%
2.6
9
12.9%
1.0%
-1.0
57
27.7%
6.6%
3.3
22
13.7%
2.5%
-1.3
16
15.2%
1.9%
-.7
7
21.9%
.8%
.5
13
11.3%
1.5%
-1.7
13
10.9%
1.5%
-1.8
155
18.0%
18.0%
Agree
28
50.9%
3.2%
1.2
29
41.4%
3.4%
.1
84
40.8%
9.7%
.1
71
44.1%
8.2%
.7
42
40.0%
4.9%
-.1
12
37.5%
1.4%
-.3
37
32.2%
4.3%
-1.4
46
38.7%
5.3%
-.3
349
40.4%
40.4%
Neutral
D - 48
8
14.5%
.9%
-1.9
24
34.3%
2.8%
1.0
42
20.4%
4.9%
-2.0
48
29.8%
5.6%
.5
35
33.3%
4.1%
1.0
10
31.3%
1.2%
.4
46
40.0%
5.3%
2.5
28
23.5%
3.2%
-.9
241
27.9%
27.9%
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-2.0
7
10.0%
.8%
.9
11
5.3%
1.3%
-1.0
12
7.5%
1.4%
.1
6
5.7%
.7%
-.6
1
3.1%
.1%
-.9
11
9.6%
1.3%
1.0
14
11.8%
1.6%
1.9
62
7.2%
7.2%
Strongly
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-1.6
1
1.4%
.1%
-1.3
9
4.4%
1.0%
-.3
7
4.3%
.8%
-.3
5
4.8%
.6%
.0
2
6.3%
.2%
.4
6
5.2%
.7%
.2
12
10.1%
1.4%
2.6
42
4.9%
4.9%
Not
Applicable
1
1.8%
.1%
.1
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
3
1.5%
.3%
-.2
1
.6%
.1%
-1.0
1
1.0%
.1%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
2
1.7%
.2%
.1
6
5.0%
.7%
2.9
14
1.6%
1.6%
Total
55
100.0%
6.4%
70
100.0%
8.1%
206
100.0%
23.9%
161
100.0%
18.7%
105
100.0%
12.2%
32
100.0%
3.7%
115
100.0%
13.3%
119
100.0%
13.8%
863
100.0%
100.0%
Table 46. My advisor helps me to successfully manage my time - Crosstabulation by college.
advmgtim
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
12
21.8%
1.4%
2.6
8
11.4%
.9%
.2
25
12.1%
2.9%
.7
14
8.9%
1.6%
-.6
12
11.7%
1.4%
.4
5
15.6%
.6%
.9
4
3.5%
.5%
-2.3
10
8.4%
1.2%
-.7
90
10.5%
10.5%
Agree
16
29.1%
1.9%
.9
13
18.6%
1.5%
-.8
56
27.2%
6.5%
1.3
30
19.1%
3.5%
-1.0
27
26.2%
3.2%
.7
8
25.0%
.9%
.2
19
16.5%
2.2%
-1.4
28
23.5%
3.3%
.1
197
23.0%
23.0%
Neutral
17
30.9%
2.0%
-1.2
37
52.9%
4.3%
1.4
89
43.2%
10.4%
.3
76
48.4%
8.9%
1.3
42
40.8%
4.9%
-.2
14
43.8%
1.6%
.2
44
38.3%
5.1%
-.6
39
32.8%
4.6%
-1.5
358
41.8%
41.8%
D - 49
Disagree
3
5.5%
.4%
-1.7
10
14.3%
1.2%
.0
18
8.7%
2.1%
-2.1
24
15.3%
2.8%
.4
13
12.6%
1.5%
-.4
3
9.4%
.4%
-.7
30
26.1%
3.5%
3.4
20
16.8%
2.3%
.8
121
14.1%
14.1%
Strongly
Disagree
5
9.1%
.6%
.2
2
2.9%
.2%
-1.6
16
7.8%
1.9%
-.3
11
7.0%
1.3%
-.6
8
7.8%
.9%
-.2
2
6.3%
.2%
-.4
12
10.4%
1.4%
.8
16
13.4%
1.9%
1.9
72
8.4%
8.4%
Not
Applicable
2
3.6%
.2%
.7
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
2
1.0%
.2%
-1.2
2
1.3%
.2%
-.8
1
1.0%
.1%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
6
5.2%
.7%
2.2
6
5.0%
.7%
2.1
19
2.2%
2.2%
Total
55
100.0%
6.4%
70
100.0%
8.2%
206
100.0%
24.0%
157
100.0%
18.3%
103
100.0%
12.0%
32
100.0%
3.7%
115
100.0%
13.4%
119
100.0%
13.9%
857
100.0%
100.0%
Table 47. My advisor helps me overcome educational proglems and skill deficiencies - Crosstabulation by college.
advedprob
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
12
21.4%
1.4%
2.8
7
10.1%
.8%
.1
23
11.2%
2.7%
.7
10
6.4%
1.2%
-1.3
13
12.7%
1.5%
1.0
5
15.6%
.6%
1.1
3
2.7%
.4%
-2.4
9
7.8%
1.1%
-.7
82
9.7%
9.7%
Agree
14
25.0%
1.6%
.6
14
20.3%
1.6%
-.2
54
26.3%
6.4%
1.6
24
15.4%
2.8%
-1.6
25
24.5%
2.9%
.7
5
15.6%
.6%
-.7
21
18.6%
2.5%
-.6
23
19.8%
2.7%
-.3
180
21.2%
21.2%
Neutral
18
32.1%
2.1%
-1.3
36
52.2%
4.2%
1.1
85
41.5%
10.0%
-.5
75
48.1%
8.8%
.8
44
43.1%
5.2%
-.1
16
50.0%
1.9%
.5
54
47.8%
6.4%
.7
43
37.1%
5.1%
-1.1
371
43.7%
43.7%
D - 50
Disagree
3
5.4%
.4%
-1.4
8
11.6%
.9%
-.1
18
8.8%
2.1%
-1.3
27
17.3%
3.2%
2.0
11
10.8%
1.3%
-.3
3
9.4%
.4%
-.4
18
15.9%
2.1%
1.2
13
11.2%
1.5%
-.2
101
11.9%
11.9%
Strongly
Disagree
7
12.5%
.8%
.4
4
5.8%
.5%
-1.2
19
9.3%
2.2%
-.6
18
11.5%
2.1%
.3
7
6.9%
.8%
-1.2
3
9.4%
.4%
-.2
12
10.6%
1.4%
.0
21
18.1%
2.5%
2.4
91
10.7%
10.7%
Not
Applicable
2
3.6%
.2%
.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.4
6
2.9%
.7%
.1
2
1.3%
.2%
-1.1
2
2.0%
.2%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
5
4.4%
.6%
1.0
7
6.0%
.8%
2.1
24
2.8%
2.8%
Total
56
100.0%
6.6%
69
100.0%
8.1%
205
100.0%
24.1%
156
100.0%
18.4%
102
100.0%
12.0%
32
100.0%
3.8%
113
100.0%
13.3%
116
100.0%
13.7%
849
100.0%
100.0%
Table 48. My advisor refers me to resources that can help me overcome educational problems and skill deficiencies - Crosstabulation by college.
adveprob
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
12
21.8%
1.4%
2.3
9
12.9%
1.1%
.4
25
12.4%
2.9%
.5
12
7.6%
1.4%
-1.4
15
14.4%
1.8%
.9
6
18.8%
.7%
1.3
5
4.4%
.6%
-2.2
12
10.3%
1.4%
-.3
96
11.3%
11.3%
Agree
14
25.5%
1.6%
.6
11
15.7%
1.3%
-1.0
50
24.8%
5.9%
1.0
24
15.3%
2.8%
-1.7
24
23.1%
2.8%
.4
9
28.1%
1.1%
.8
25
22.1%
2.9%
.2
25
21.4%
2.9%
.0
182
21.4%
21.4%
Neutral
15
27.3%
1.8%
-1.7
39
55.7%
4.6%
1.8
85
42.1%
10.0%
.0
80
51.0%
9.4%
1.7
45
43.3%
5.3%
.2
9
28.1%
1.1%
-1.2
49
43.4%
5.8%
.2
36
30.8%
4.2%
-1.9
358
42.1%
42.1%
D - 51
Disagree
4
7.3%
.5%
-.9
8
11.4%
.9%
.1
15
7.4%
1.8%
-1.6
20
12.7%
2.4%
.6
11
10.6%
1.3%
-.2
4
12.5%
.5%
.2
18
15.9%
2.1%
1.5
15
12.8%
1.8%
.5
95
11.2%
11.2%
Strongly
Disagree
8
14.5%
.9%
.8
2
2.9%
.2%
-2.1
24
11.9%
2.8%
.4
19
12.1%
2.2%
.4
7
6.7%
.8%
-1.3
4
12.5%
.5%
.2
11
9.7%
1.3%
-.4
19
16.2%
2.2%
1.7
94
11.1%
11.1%
Not
Applicable
2
3.6%
.2%
.3
1
1.4%
.1%
-.7
3
1.5%
.4%
-1.2
2
1.3%
.2%
-1.2
2
1.9%
.2%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
5
4.4%
.6%
.9
10
8.5%
1.2%
3.5
25
2.9%
2.9%
Total
55
100.0%
6.5%
70
100.0%
8.2%
202
100.0%
23.8%
157
100.0%
18.5%
104
100.0%
12.2%
32
100.0%
3.8%
113
100.0%
13.3%
117
100.0%
13.8%
850
100.0%
100.0%
Table 49. My advisor refers me to resources pertinent to my educational goals (internship, study abroad, honors program, and leaning
assistance programs) - Crosstabulation by college.
advresou
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not
Applicable
6
10.9%
.7%
-.4
8
11.6%
.9%
-.3
27
13.0%
3.1%
.0
21
12.8%
2.4%
-.1
13
12.1%
1.5%
-.2
3
9.4%
.3%
-.6
11
9.7%
1.3%
-1.0
24
19.7%
2.8%
2.0
113
13.0%
13.0%
Strongly
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.0
1
1.4%
.1%
-1.2
6
2.9%
.7%
-1.2
6
3.7%
.7%
-.6
5
4.7%
.6%
.0
1
3.1%
.1%
-.4
8
7.1%
.9%
1.2
12
9.8%
1.4%
2.7
40
4.6%
4.6%
D - 52
Disagree
3
5.5%
.3%
-1.6
14
20.3%
1.6%
1.5
25
12.0%
2.9%
-.6
31
18.9%
3.6%
1.9
14
13.1%
1.6%
-.1
3
9.4%
.3%
-.6
16
14.2%
1.8%
.2
12
9.8%
1.4%
-1.1
118
13.6%
13.6%
Neutral
12
21.8%
1.4%
-1.3
21
30.4%
2.4%
-.2
69
33.2%
7.9%
.3
66
40.2%
7.6%
1.8
32
29.9%
3.7%
-.4
6
18.8%
.7%
-1.3
36
31.9%
4.1%
.0
37
30.3%
4.3%
-.3
279
32.1%
32.1%
Agree
16
29.1%
1.8%
1.0
15
21.7%
1.7%
-.2
45
21.6%
5.2%
-.3
28
17.1%
3.2%
-1.5
28
26.2%
3.2%
.8
12
37.5%
1.4%
1.8
27
23.9%
3.1%
.3
26
21.3%
3.0%
-.3
197
22.6%
22.6%
Strongly
Agree
17
30.9%
2.0%
3.3
10
14.5%
1.1%
.1
36
17.3%
4.1%
1.2
12
7.3%
1.4%
-2.3
15
14.0%
1.7%
.0
7
21.9%
.8%
1.2
15
13.3%
1.7%
-.2
11
9.0%
1.3%
-1.5
123
14.1%
14.1%
Total
55
100.0%
6.3%
69
100.0%
7.9%
208
100.0%
23.9%
164
100.0%
18.9%
107
100.0%
12.3%
32
100.0%
3.7%
113
100.0%
13.0%
122
100.0%
14.0%
870
100.0%
100.0%
Table 50. My advisor encourage me to participate in experiences which lead to my intellectual growth - Crosstabulation by college.
advintelg
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not
Applicable
5
9.1%
.6%
-.4
4
5.6%
.5%
-1.4
19
9.1%
2.2%
-.8
24
14.6%
2.7%
1.4
10
9.2%
1.1%
-.6
2
6.3%
.2%
-.8
11
9.6%
1.3%
-.5
22
18.2%
2.5%
2.3
97
11.1%
11.1%
Strongly
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-.7
1
1.4%
.1%
-1.0
5
2.4%
.6%
-1.0
5
3.0%
.6%
-.5
5
4.6%
.6%
.4
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
5
4.3%
.6%
.3
11
9.1%
1.3%
3.0
33
3.8%
3.8%
D - 53
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-2.0
9
12.7%
1.0%
.4
23
11.1%
2.6%
.0
28
17.1%
3.2%
2.4
8
7.3%
.9%
-1.1
3
9.4%
.3%
-.3
11
9.6%
1.3%
-.5
13
10.7%
1.5%
-.1
96
11.0%
11.0%
Neutral
11
20.0%
1.3%
-1.8
36
50.7%
4.1%
2.3
69
33.2%
7.9%
-.3
64
39.0%
7.3%
1.0
36
33.0%
4.1%
-.3
8
25.0%
.9%
-.9
41
35.7%
4.7%
.2
37
30.6%
4.2%
-.7
302
34.5%
34.5%
Agree
20
36.4%
2.3%
1.6
12
16.9%
1.4%
-1.4
53
25.5%
6.1%
.0
37
22.6%
4.2%
-.7
29
26.6%
3.3%
.3
10
31.3%
1.1%
.7
32
27.8%
3.7%
.5
29
24.0%
3.3%
-.3
222
25.4%
25.4%
Strongly
Agree
17
30.9%
1.9%
3.3
9
12.7%
1.0%
-.4
39
18.8%
4.5%
1.7
6
3.7%
.7%
-3.6
21
19.3%
2.4%
1.4
9
28.1%
1.0%
2.1
15
13.0%
1.7%
-.4
9
7.4%
1.0%
-2.0
125
14.3%
14.3%
Total
55
100.0%
6.3%
71
100.0%
8.1%
208
100.0%
23.8%
164
100.0%
18.7%
109
100.0%
12.5%
32
100.0%
3.7%
115
100.0%
13.1%
121
100.0%
13.8%
875
100.0%
100.0%
Table 51. My advisor helps me select appropriate courses and other educational experiences - Crosstabulation by college.
advscour
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not
Applicable
2
3.6%
.2%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-2.1
7
3.4%
.8%
-1.7
10
6.1%
1.1%
-.1
8
7.4%
.9%
.5
2
6.3%
.2%
.0
9
7.8%
1.0%
.6
17
14.2%
2.0%
3.4
55
6.3%
6.3%
Strongly
Disagree
3
5.5%
.3%
.7
0
.0%
.0%
-1.6
4
1.9%
.5%
-1.3
4
2.5%
.5%
-.8
3
2.8%
.3%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
6
5.2%
.7%
.9
12
10.0%
1.4%
3.6
32
3.7%
3.7%
D - 54
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-1.6
2
2.9%
.2%
-.6
8
3.8%
.9%
-.4
9
5.5%
1.0%
.6
5
4.6%
.6%
.1
2
6.3%
.2%
.5
4
3.5%
.5%
-.5
9
7.5%
1.0%
1.6
39
4.5%
4.5%
Neutral
6
10.9%
.7%
-1.3
15
21.4%
1.7%
.6
25
12.0%
2.9%
-2.2
33
20.2%
3.8%
.5
24
22.2%
2.8%
.9
6
18.8%
.7%
.0
26
22.6%
3.0%
1.0
26
21.7%
3.0%
.8
161
18.5%
18.5%
Agree
21
38.2%
2.4%
-.4
40
57.1%
4.6%
2.0
89
42.8%
10.2%
.2
71
43.6%
8.2%
.3
49
45.4%
5.6%
.6
12
37.5%
1.4%
-.4
45
39.1%
5.2%
-.5
38
31.7%
4.4%
-1.7
365
41.9%
41.9%
Strongly
Agree
23
41.8%
2.6%
2.5
13
18.6%
1.5%
-1.1
75
36.1%
8.6%
3.1
36
22.1%
4.1%
-.8
19
17.6%
2.2%
-1.6
10
31.3%
1.1%
.7
25
21.7%
2.9%
-.7
18
15.0%
2.1%
-2.2
219
25.1%
25.1%
Total
55
100.0%
6.3%
70
100.0%
8.0%
208
100.0%
23.9%
163
100.0%
18.7%
108
100.0%
12.4%
32
100.0%
3.7%
115
100.0%
13.2%
120
100.0%
13.8%
871
100.0%
100.0%
Table 52. My advisor interprets institutional requirements so that they are understandable to me - Crosstabulation by college.
advireq
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not
Applicable
2
3.6%
.2%
-1.0
0
.0%
.0%
-2.3
8
3.9%
.9%
-1.9
14
8.5%
1.6%
.5
10
9.3%
1.2%
.7
4
12.5%
.5%
1.0
11
9.6%
1.3%
.8
16
13.4%
1.8%
2.4
65
7.5%
7.5%
Strongly
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-.4
1
1.4%
.1%
-.7
2
1.0%
.2%
-1.6
6
3.7%
.7%
.7
3
2.8%
.3%
.0
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
3
2.6%
.3%
-.1
8
6.7%
.9%
2.6
24
2.8%
2.8%
D - 55
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
-.6
3
4.3%
.3%
-.4
8
3.9%
.9%
-1.0
8
4.9%
.9%
-.3
6
5.6%
.7%
.1
2
6.3%
.2%
.2
7
6.1%
.8%
.3
11
9.2%
1.3%
1.8
47
5.4%
5.4%
Neutral
8
14.5%
.9%
-1.2
28
40.6%
3.2%
3.2
32
15.5%
3.7%
-2.1
34
20.7%
3.9%
-.4
27
25.2%
3.1%
.7
4
12.5%
.5%
-1.2
38
33.0%
4.4%
2.5
22
18.5%
2.5%
-.9
193
22.2%
22.2%
Agree
21
38.2%
2.4%
-.1
23
33.3%
2.6%
-.8
87
42.0%
10.0%
.6
72
43.9%
8.3%
.9
42
39.3%
4.8%
.0
14
43.8%
1.6%
.4
37
32.2%
4.3%
-1.2
45
37.8%
5.2%
-.3
341
39.3%
39.3%
Strongly
Agree
21
38.2%
2.4%
2.4
14
20.3%
1.6%
-.4
70
33.8%
8.1%
3.3
30
18.3%
3.5%
-1.2
19
17.8%
2.2%
-1.1
8
25.0%
.9%
.3
19
16.5%
2.2%
-1.4
17
14.3%
2.0%
-1.9
198
22.8%
22.8%
Total
55
100.0%
6.3%
69
100.0%
7.9%
207
100.0%
23.8%
164
100.0%
18.9%
107
100.0%
12.3%
32
100.0%
3.7%
115
100.0%
13.2%
119
100.0%
13.7%
868
100.0%
100.0%
Table 53. My advisor gives me correct information on services/programs - Crosstabulation by college.
advcinfo
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not
Applicable
2
3.6%
.2%
-1.1
3
4.3%
.3%
-1.1
10
4.8%
1.1%
-1.6
14
8.5%
1.6%
.2
15
13.9%
1.7%
2.2
3
9.4%
.3%
.3
7
6.0%
.8%
-.8
16
13.2%
1.8%
2.0
70
8.0%
8.0%
Strongly
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-1.5
1
.5%
.1%
-2.2
5
3.0%
.6%
-.1
4
3.7%
.5%
.3
1
3.1%
.1%
.0
5
4.3%
.6%
.6
11
9.1%
1.3%
3.6
28
3.2%
3.2%
D - 56
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
-.1
2
2.9%
.2%
-.5
7
3.4%
.8%
-.5
7
4.2%
.8%
.2
4
3.7%
.5%
-.2
1
3.1%
.1%
-.2
6
5.1%
.7%
.6
6
5.0%
.7%
.5
35
4.0%
4.0%
Neutral
8
14.5%
.9%
-1.3
24
34.8%
2.7%
2.1
39
18.8%
4.5%
-1.2
32
19.4%
3.7%
-.9
19
17.6%
2.2%
-1.1
8
25.0%
.9%
.3
33
28.2%
3.8%
1.2
36
29.8%
4.1%
1.6
199
22.7%
22.7%
Agree
23
41.8%
2.6%
.1
29
42.0%
3.3%
.2
87
41.8%
9.9%
.2
79
47.9%
9.0%
1.4
46
42.6%
5.3%
.3
13
40.6%
1.5%
.0
43
36.8%
4.9%
-.7
37
30.6%
4.2%
-1.8
357
40.8%
40.8%
Strongly
Agree
19
34.5%
2.2%
2.1
11
15.9%
1.3%
-1.0
64
30.8%
7.3%
3.0
28
17.0%
3.2%
-1.2
20
18.5%
2.3%
-.6
6
18.8%
.7%
-.3
23
19.7%
2.6%
-.4
15
12.4%
1.7%
-2.1
186
21.3%
21.3%
Total
55
100.0%
6.3%
69
100.0%
7.9%
208
100.0%
23.8%
165
100.0%
18.9%
108
100.0%
12.3%
32
100.0%
3.7%
117
100.0%
13.4%
121
100.0%
13.8%
875
100.0%
100.0%
Table 54. My advisor is well informed about changes in academic requirements and keeps me informed of pertinent changes - Crosstabulation by college.
advinfor
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not
Applicable
2
3.6%
.2%
-1.3
1
1.5%
.1%
-2.1
14
6.8%
1.6%
-1.0
16
9.6%
1.8%
.3
11
10.1%
1.3%
.4
3
9.4%
.3%
.1
9
7.8%
1.0%
-.4
22
18.3%
2.5%
3.4
78
8.9%
8.9%
Strongly
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-1.6
4
1.9%
.5%
-1.4
6
3.6%
.7%
-.1
5
4.6%
.6%
.4
3
9.4%
.3%
1.6
5
4.3%
.6%
.3
9
7.5%
1.0%
2.1
33
3.8%
3.8%
D - 57
Disagree
4
7.3%
.5%
.0
10
14.7%
1.1%
2.3
13
6.3%
1.5%
-.5
10
6.0%
1.1%
-.6
5
4.6%
.6%
-1.0
1
3.1%
.1%
-.9
7
6.0%
.8%
-.5
13
10.8%
1.5%
1.5
63
7.2%
7.2%
Neutral
7
12.7%
.8%
-1.7
21
30.9%
2.4%
1.1
49
23.8%
5.6%
-.1
33
19.9%
3.8%
-1.1
31
28.4%
3.6%
.9
7
21.9%
.8%
-.3
35
30.2%
4.0%
1.3
28
23.3%
3.2%
-.2
211
24.2%
24.2%
Agree
17
30.9%
1.9%
-.2
23
33.8%
2.6%
.1
72
35.0%
8.3%
.5
64
38.6%
7.3%
1.3
33
30.3%
3.8%
-.5
8
25.0%
.9%
-.8
36
31.0%
4.1%
-.3
33
27.5%
3.8%
-1.0
286
32.8%
32.8%
Strongly
Agree
24
43.6%
2.8%
3.2
13
19.1%
1.5%
-.7
54
26.2%
6.2%
.9
37
22.3%
4.2%
-.2
24
22.0%
2.8%
-.2
10
31.3%
1.1%
1.0
24
20.7%
2.8%
-.5
15
12.5%
1.7%
-2.4
201
23.1%
23.1%
Total
55
100.0%
6.3%
68
100.0%
7.8%
206
100.0%
23.6%
166
100.0%
19.0%
109
100.0%
12.5%
32
100.0%
3.7%
116
100.0%
13.3%
120
100.0%
13.8%
872
100.0%
100.0%
Table 55. My advisor gives me advice in a straight forward understandable manner - Crosstabulation by college.
advadvic
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not
Applicable
2
3.6%
.2%
-.6
1
1.4%
.1%
-1.5
8
3.8%
.9%
-1.1
8
4.8%
.9%
-.4
10
9.2%
1.1%
1.6
2
6.3%
.2%
.2
6
5.2%
.7%
-.2
12
9.8%
1.4%
2.0
49
5.6%
5.6%
Strongly
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-.3
1
1.4%
.1%
-.6
2
1.0%
.2%
-1.4
2
1.2%
.2%
-1.1
3
2.8%
.3%
.2
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
3
2.6%
.3%
.1
10
8.1%
1.1%
3.9
22
2.5%
2.5%
D - 58
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
-.3
2
2.9%
.2%
-.6
4
1.9%
.5%
-1.7
7
4.2%
.8%
-.1
5
4.6%
.6%
.1
2
6.3%
.2%
.5
10
8.7%
1.1%
2.3
6
4.9%
.7%
.3
38
4.3%
4.3%
Neutral
6
10.7%
.7%
-1.7
25
35.7%
2.8%
2.7
39
18.8%
4.4%
-.7
30
18.1%
3.4%
-.8
25
22.9%
2.8%
.5
6
18.8%
.7%
-.3
24
20.9%
2.7%
.0
29
23.6%
3.3%
.6
184
20.9%
20.9%
Agree
26
46.4%
3.0%
.5
27
38.6%
3.1%
-.4
90
43.3%
10.2%
.3
77
46.4%
8.8%
.9
44
40.4%
5.0%
-.2
11
34.4%
1.3%
-.6
46
40.0%
5.2%
-.3
46
37.4%
5.2%
-.7
367
41.8%
41.8%
Strongly
Agree
19
33.9%
2.2%
1.4
14
20.0%
1.6%
-.8
65
31.3%
7.4%
1.8
42
25.3%
4.8%
.1
22
20.2%
2.5%
-1.0
11
34.4%
1.3%
1.1
26
22.6%
3.0%
-.5
20
16.3%
2.3%
-1.9
219
24.9%
24.9%
Total
56
100.0%
6.4%
70
100.0%
8.0%
208
100.0%
23.7%
166
100.0%
18.9%
109
100.0%
12.4%
32
100.0%
3.6%
115
100.0%
13.1%
123
100.0%
14.0%
879
100.0%
100.0%
Table 56. My advisor tells me why she/her offers particular advice - Crosstabulation by college.
advtells
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not
Applicable
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.7
1
1.4%
.1%
-2.0
18
8.6%
2.1%
.2
13
7.9%
1.5%
-.2
9
8.3%
1.0%
.0
4
12.5%
.5%
.8
9
7.8%
1.0%
-.2
17
14.4%
1.9%
2.3
72
8.2%
8.2%
Strongly
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
.0
2
2.9%
.2%
-.4
5
2.4%
.6%
-1.0
4
2.4%
.5%
-.8
4
3.7%
.5%
.0
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
4
3.5%
.5%
-.1
11
9.3%
1.3%
3.2
32
3.7%
3.7%
D - 59
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.6
7
10.0%
.8%
.5
17
8.1%
1.9%
.0
14
8.5%
1.6%
.2
8
7.3%
.9%
-.3
2
6.3%
.2%
-.4
13
11.3%
1.5%
1.2
9
7.6%
1.0%
-.2
71
8.1%
8.1%
Neutral
12
21.8%
1.4%
-1.2
32
45.7%
3.7%
2.3
58
27.8%
6.6%
-.7
52
31.5%
6.0%
.2
31
28.4%
3.6%
-.4
8
25.0%
.9%
-.6
44
38.3%
5.0%
1.5
29
24.6%
3.3%
-1.2
266
30.5%
30.5%
Agree
22
40.0%
2.5%
.9
21
30.0%
2.4%
-.5
67
32.1%
7.7%
-.3
62
37.6%
7.1%
.9
38
34.9%
4.4%
.3
13
40.6%
1.5%
.7
27
23.5%
3.1%
-1.8
41
34.7%
4.7%
.3
291
33.3%
33.3%
Strongly
Agree
17
30.9%
1.9%
2.7
7
10.0%
.8%
-1.3
44
21.1%
5.0%
1.8
20
12.1%
2.3%
-1.3
19
17.4%
2.2%
.3
5
15.6%
.6%
-.1
18
15.7%
2.1%
-.1
11
9.3%
1.3%
-1.8
141
16.2%
16.2%
Total
55
100.0%
6.3%
70
100.0%
8.0%
209
100.0%
23.9%
165
100.0%
18.9%
109
100.0%
12.5%
32
100.0%
3.7%
115
100.0%
13.2%
118
100.0%
13.5%
873
100.0%
100.0%
Table 57. My advisor encourages me to participate in extracurricular activities - Crosstabulation by college.
advextra
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not
Applicable
5
9.3%
.6%
-.4
3
4.5%
.3%
-1.6
19
9.2%
2.2%
-.7
23
14.0%
2.7%
1.2
9
8.3%
1.0%
-.8
2
6.5%
.2%
-.7
11
9.6%
1.3%
-.4
22
18.5%
2.5%
2.5
94
10.9%
10.9%
Strongly
Disagree
1
1.9%
.1%
-1.1
2
3.0%
.2%
-.8
7
3.4%
.8%
-1.2
9
5.5%
1.0%
.2
4
3.7%
.5%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-1.3
9
7.9%
1.0%
1.3
13
10.9%
1.5%
2.7
45
5.2%
5.2%
D - 60
Disagree
4
7.4%
.5%
-1.4
8
11.9%
.9%
-.5
35
16.9%
4.1%
.9
32
19.5%
3.7%
1.7
12
11.1%
1.4%
-.9
2
6.5%
.2%
-1.2
16
14.0%
1.9%
-.1
16
13.4%
1.9%
-.3
125
14.5%
14.5%
Neutral
15
27.8%
1.7%
-1.0
33
49.3%
3.8%
1.8
79
38.2%
9.1%
.5
66
40.2%
7.6%
.9
41
38.0%
4.7%
.3
10
32.3%
1.2%
-.4
37
32.5%
4.3%
-.7
32
26.9%
3.7%
-1.7
313
36.2%
36.2%
Agree
15
27.8%
1.7%
1.1
13
19.4%
1.5%
-.2
39
18.8%
4.5%
-.6
24
14.6%
2.8%
-1.7
25
23.1%
2.9%
.6
9
29.0%
1.0%
1.0
29
25.4%
3.4%
1.1
25
21.0%
2.9%
.1
179
20.7%
20.7%
Strongly
Agree
14
25.9%
1.6%
2.8
8
11.9%
.9%
-.1
28
13.5%
3.2%
.4
10
6.1%
1.2%
-2.3
17
15.7%
2.0%
1.0
8
25.8%
.9%
2.1
12
10.5%
1.4%
-.6
11
9.2%
1.3%
-1.0
108
12.5%
12.5%
Total
54
100.0%
6.3%
67
100.0%
7.8%
207
100.0%
24.0%
164
100.0%
19.0%
108
100.0%
12.5%
31
100.0%
3.6%
114
100.0%
13.2%
119
100.0%
13.8%
864
100.0%
100.0%
Table 58. My advisor appears to be well trained - Crosstabulation by college.
advtrain
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not
Applicable
1
1.8%
.1%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-1.7
5
2.4%
.6%
-1.1
5
3.0%
.6%
-.6
6
5.5%
.7%
.8
2
6.1%
.2%
.6
5
4.3%
.6%
.2
11
9.1%
1.3%
2.8
35
4.0%
4.0%
Strongly
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
.3
2
2.8%
.2%
.0
4
1.9%
.5%
-.8
1
.6%
.1%
-1.7
4
3.6%
.5%
.5
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
3
2.6%
.3%
-.2
9
7.4%
1.0%
3.0
25
2.9%
2.9%
D - 61
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
-.1
1
1.4%
.1%
-1.1
3
1.4%
.3%
-1.8
4
2.4%
.5%
-1.0
8
7.3%
.9%
1.7
1
3.0%
.1%
-.3
9
7.8%
1.0%
2.1
7
5.8%
.8%
1.0
35
4.0%
4.0%
Neutral
5
9.1%
.6%
-1.4
12
16.9%
1.4%
.1
26
12.5%
3.0%
-1.4
19
11.6%
2.2%
-1.6
24
21.8%
2.7%
1.4
6
18.2%
.7%
.2
28
24.3%
3.2%
2.1
25
20.7%
2.9%
1.1
145
16.5%
16.5%
Agree
22
40.0%
2.5%
.2
38
53.5%
4.3%
2.0
74
35.6%
8.4%
-.7
76
46.3%
8.7%
1.6
29
26.4%
3.3%
-2.1
13
39.4%
1.5%
.1
39
33.9%
4.4%
-.8
47
38.8%
5.4%
.1
338
38.5%
38.5%
Strongly
Agree
23
41.8%
2.6%
1.0
18
25.4%
2.1%
-1.3
96
46.2%
10.9%
3.0
59
36.0%
6.7%
.4
39
35.5%
4.4%
.2
11
33.3%
1.3%
-.1
31
27.0%
3.5%
-1.3
22
18.2%
2.5%
-3.0
299
34.1%
34.1%
Total
55
100.0%
6.3%
71
100.0%
8.1%
208
100.0%
23.7%
164
100.0%
18.7%
110
100.0%
12.5%
33
100.0%
3.8%
115
100.0%
13.1%
121
100.0%
13.8%
877
100.0%
100.0%
Table 59. Interactions with my advisor are positive - Crosstabulation by college.
advpost
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not
Applicable
1
1.9%
.1%
-1.0
1
1.5%
.1%
-1.2
4
1.9%
.5%
-1.8
9
5.5%
1.0%
.4
6
5.5%
.7%
.3
2
6.3%
.2%
.4
6
5.3%
.7%
.3
12
10.2%
1.4%
2.7
41
4.7%
4.7%
Strongly
Disagree
3
5.6%
.3%
.3
1
1.5%
.1%
-1.2
6
2.9%
.7%
-1.2
8
4.9%
.9%
.1
9
8.2%
1.0%
1.7
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
6
5.3%
.7%
.3
8
6.8%
.9%
1.0
41
4.7%
4.7%
D - 62
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-1.5
2
2.9%
.2%
-.5
10
4.9%
1.2%
.4
8
4.9%
.9%
.4
3
2.7%
.3%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
8
7.0%
.9%
1.4
6
5.1%
.7%
.4
37
4.3%
4.3%
Neutral
3
5.6%
.3%
-2.1
12
17.6%
1.4%
.0
24
11.7%
2.8%
-2.1
39
23.8%
4.5%
1.8
21
19.1%
2.4%
.3
6
18.8%
.7%
.1
24
21.1%
2.8%
.8
25
21.2%
2.9%
.9
154
17.8%
17.8%
Agree
20
37.0%
2.3%
.2
34
50.0%
3.9%
2.1
66
32.0%
7.6%
-.8
60
36.6%
6.9%
.3
34
30.9%
3.9%
-.8
11
34.4%
1.3%
-.1
40
35.1%
4.6%
.0
40
33.9%
4.6%
-.2
305
35.2%
35.2%
Strongly
Agree
27
50.0%
3.1%
2.1
18
26.5%
2.1%
-1.0
96
46.6%
11.1%
3.3
40
24.4%
4.6%
-2.0
37
33.6%
4.3%
.1
13
40.6%
1.5%
.7
30
26.3%
3.5%
-1.3
27
22.9%
3.1%
-2.0
288
33.3%
33.3%
Total
54
100.0%
6.2%
68
100.0%
7.9%
206
100.0%
23.8%
164
100.0%
18.9%
110
100.0%
12.7%
32
100.0%
3.7%
114
100.0%
13.2%
118
100.0%
13.6%
866
100.0%
100.0%
Table 60. I don't have to wait long between scheduling and seeing my advisor - Crosstabulation by college.
advnowt
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not
Applicable
3
5.4%
.3%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-2.3
12
5.8%
1.4%
-1.0
13
7.9%
1.5%
.1
9
8.3%
1.0%
.2
2
6.3%
.2%
-.3
13
11.7%
1.5%
1.6
14
11.9%
1.6%
1.7
66
7.6%
7.6%
Strongly
Disagree
4
7.1%
.5%
.2
2
2.9%
.2%
-1.2
9
4.3%
1.0%
-1.2
21
12.8%
2.4%
3.2
8
7.3%
.9%
.4
0
.0%
.0%
-1.4
5
4.5%
.6%
-.8
7
5.9%
.8%
-.2
56
6.5%
6.5%
D - 63
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.9
8
11.6%
.9%
.4
7
3.4%
.8%
-3.0
32
19.5%
3.7%
3.9
8
7.3%
.9%
-.9
1
3.1%
.1%
-1.2
12
10.8%
1.4%
.3
17
14.4%
2.0%
1.5
86
9.9%
9.9%
Neutral
7
12.5%
.8%
-1.9
25
36.2%
2.9%
1.8
36
17.3%
4.2%
-2.3
50
30.5%
5.8%
1.3
32
29.4%
3.7%
.9
8
25.0%
.9%
.0
33
29.7%
3.8%
.9
28
23.7%
3.2%
-.3
219
25.3%
25.3%
Agree
21
37.5%
2.4%
1.0
24
34.8%
2.8%
.7
71
34.1%
8.2%
1.1
36
22.0%
4.2%
-1.9
34
31.2%
3.9%
.2
11
34.4%
1.3%
.4
27
24.3%
3.1%
-1.1
37
31.4%
4.3%
.2
261
30.1%
30.1%
Strongly
Agree
20
35.7%
2.3%
2.5
10
14.5%
1.2%
-1.1
73
35.1%
8.4%
4.6
12
7.3%
1.4%
-3.8
18
16.5%
2.1%
-.9
10
31.3%
1.2%
1.3
21
18.9%
2.4%
-.4
15
12.7%
1.7%
-1.9
179
20.6%
20.6%
Total
56
100.0%
6.5%
69
100.0%
8.0%
208
100.0%
24.0%
164
100.0%
18.9%
109
100.0%
12.6%
32
100.0%
3.7%
111
100.0%
12.8%
118
100.0%
13.6%
867
100.0%
100.0%
Table 61. Overall I am satisfied with the advising system at USU - Crosstabulation by college.
advsusu
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not
Applicable
1
1.8%
.1%
-.8
1
1.4%
.1%
-1.0
7
3.3%
.8%
-.4
3
1.8%
.3%
-1.3
4
3.6%
.5%
-.2
1
3.0%
.1%
-.2
6
5.2%
.7%
.7
11
9.1%
1.2%
2.9
34
3.9%
3.9%
Strongly
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
-.6
2
2.9%
.2%
-1.0
5
2.4%
.6%
-2.0
8
4.8%
.9%
-.5
11
9.8%
1.2%
1.8
1
3.0%
.1%
-.6
9
7.8%
1.0%
1.0
12
9.9%
1.4%
2.0
50
5.7%
5.7%
D - 64
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.7
4
5.8%
.5%
-.8
10
4.7%
1.1%
-1.9
23
13.9%
2.6%
2.3
8
7.1%
.9%
-.5
4
12.1%
.5%
.7
17
14.8%
1.9%
2.3
9
7.4%
1.0%
-.4
76
8.6%
8.6%
Neutral
7
12.7%
.8%
-1.7
22
31.9%
2.5%
1.3
41
19.4%
4.6%
-1.4
45
27.1%
5.1%
.8
27
24.1%
3.1%
.0
5
15.2%
.6%
-1.1
33
28.7%
3.7%
1.0
33
27.3%
3.7%
.7
213
24.1%
24.1%
Agree
21
38.2%
2.4%
.0
29
42.0%
3.3%
.5
81
38.4%
9.2%
.1
67
40.4%
7.6%
.5
40
35.7%
4.5%
-.4
14
42.4%
1.6%
.4
39
33.9%
4.4%
-.7
45
37.2%
5.1%
-.2
336
38.1%
38.1%
Strongly
Agree
23
41.8%
2.6%
3.7
11
15.9%
1.2%
-.7
67
31.8%
7.6%
4.0
20
12.0%
2.3%
-2.2
22
19.6%
2.5%
.0
8
24.2%
.9%
.6
11
9.6%
1.2%
-2.4
11
9.1%
1.2%
-2.6
173
19.6%
19.6%
Total
55
100.0%
6.2%
69
100.0%
7.8%
211
100.0%
23.9%
166
100.0%
18.8%
112
100.0%
12.7%
33
100.0%
3.7%
115
100.0%
13.0%
121
100.0%
13.7%
882
100.0%
100.0%
Table 62. Overall I am satisfied with the advising system in my college/department - Crosstabulation by college.
advsdept
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not
Applicable
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.3
1
1.4%
.1%
-1.6
6
2.9%
.7%
-2.0
3
1.8%
.3%
-2.3
8
7.2%
.9%
.4
1
3.0%
.1%
-.7
6
5.2%
.7%
-.5
29
24.2%
3.3%
7.8
55
6.3%
6.3%
Strongly
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
-.6
2
2.9%
.2%
-.9
4
1.9%
.5%
-2.2
11
6.7%
1.3%
.7
9
8.1%
1.0%
1.2
1
3.0%
.1%
-.6
7
6.1%
.8%
.3
12
10.0%
1.4%
2.1
48
5.5%
5.5%
D - 65
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.7
4
5.8%
.5%
-.8
11
5.3%
1.3%
-1.7
24
14.5%
2.7%
2.6
8
7.2%
.9%
-.5
4
12.1%
.5%
.7
16
13.9%
1.8%
1.9
8
6.7%
.9%
-.7
76
8.7%
8.7%
Neutral
6
10.9%
.7%
-1.7
25
36.2%
2.9%
2.5
32
15.3%
3.6%
-2.0
42
25.5%
4.8%
1.0
24
21.6%
2.7%
-.1
4
12.1%
.5%
-1.2
29
25.2%
3.3%
.8
30
25.0%
3.4%
.7
192
21.9%
21.9%
Agree
20
36.4%
2.3%
.3
24
34.8%
2.7%
.1
72
34.4%
8.2%
.1
57
34.5%
6.5%
.1
40
36.0%
4.6%
.4
12
36.4%
1.4%
.2
42
36.5%
4.8%
.4
32
26.7%
3.6%
-1.4
299
34.1%
34.1%
Strongly
Agree
25
45.5%
2.9%
3.3
13
18.8%
1.5%
-.8
84
40.2%
9.6%
4.9
28
17.0%
3.2%
-1.8
22
19.8%
2.5%
-.8
11
33.3%
1.3%
1.2
15
13.0%
1.7%
-2.3
9
7.5%
1.0%
-3.6
207
23.6%
23.6%
Total
55
100.0%
6.3%
69
100.0%
7.9%
209
100.0%
23.8%
165
100.0%
18.8%
111
100.0%
12.7%
33
100.0%
3.8%
115
100.0%
13.1%
120
100.0%
13.7%
877
100.0%
100.0%
Table 63. Overall I am satisfied with my advisor - Crosstabulation by college.
advsatis
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not
Applicable
1
1.8%
.1%
-.8
1
1.4%
.1%
-1.1
6
2.9%
.7%
-.9
5
3.0%
.6%
-.7
5
4.5%
.6%
.2
1
3.1%
.1%
-.3
4
3.5%
.5%
-.3
13
10.8%
1.5%
3.6
36
4.1%
4.1%
Strongly
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
-.8
2
2.9%
.2%
-1.2
10
4.8%
1.1%
-.9
11
6.6%
1.3%
.1
9
8.2%
1.0%
.7
1
3.1%
.1%
-.7
9
7.8%
1.0%
.6
12
10.0%
1.4%
1.6
56
6.4%
6.4%
D - 66
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.4
2
2.9%
.2%
-1.2
10
4.8%
1.1%
-1.0
17
10.2%
1.9%
1.8
6
5.5%
.7%
-.5
1
3.1%
.1%
-.8
13
11.3%
1.5%
2.0
8
6.7%
.9%
.0
58
6.6%
6.6%
Neutral
6
10.9%
.7%
-1.2
24
34.3%
2.7%
3.2
28
13.5%
3.2%
-1.6
31
18.7%
3.5%
.2
14
12.7%
1.6%
-1.3
6
18.8%
.7%
.1
25
21.7%
2.9%
.9
24
20.0%
2.7%
.5
158
18.0%
18.0%
Agree
16
29.1%
1.8%
-.8
28
40.0%
3.2%
.6
57
27.4%
6.5%
-2.0
68
41.0%
7.8%
1.2
44
40.0%
5.0%
.8
11
34.4%
1.3%
-.1
43
37.4%
4.9%
.3
45
37.5%
5.1%
.3
312
35.6%
35.6%
Strongly
Agree
29
52.7%
3.3%
3.2
13
18.6%
1.5%
-1.6
97
46.6%
11.1%
4.6
34
20.5%
3.9%
-2.1
32
29.1%
3.7%
.0
12
37.5%
1.4%
.9
21
18.3%
2.4%
-2.2
18
15.0%
2.1%
-2.9
256
29.2%
29.2%
Total
55
100.0%
6.3%
70
100.0%
8.0%
208
100.0%
23.7%
166
100.0%
18.9%
110
100.0%
12.6%
32
100.0%
3.7%
115
100.0%
13.1%
120
100.0%
13.7%
876
100.0%
100.0%
Table 64. Courses for the semester - Crosstabulation by college.
topcours
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
23
45.1%
2.9%
.8
25
39.1%
3.1%
.2
100
51.3%
12.5%
3.1
62
38.8%
7.8%
.2
27
27.6%
3.4%
-1.6
7
25.9%
.9%
-1.0
26
26.3%
3.3%
-1.9
32
30.5%
4.0%
-1.2
302
37.8%
37.8%
Satisfied
24
47.1%
3.0%
.5
29
45.3%
3.6%
.3
70
35.9%
8.8%
-1.5
75
46.9%
9.4%
.8
48
49.0%
6.0%
.9
16
59.3%
2.0%
1.3
38
38.4%
4.8%
-.7
43
41.0%
5.4%
-.3
343
42.9%
42.9%
D - 67
Neutral
2
3.9%
.3%
-1.8
9
14.1%
1.1%
.2
15
7.7%
1.9%
-2.1
20
12.5%
2.5%
-.2
12
12.2%
1.5%
-.2
4
14.8%
.5%
.2
26
26.3%
3.3%
3.6
17
16.2%
2.1%
.9
105
13.1%
13.1%
Dissatisfied
1
2.0%
.1%
-.9
1
1.6%
.1%
-1.1
9
4.6%
1.1%
.0
3
1.9%
.4%
-1.6
6
6.1%
.8%
.7
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
7
7.1%
.9%
1.1
10
9.5%
1.3%
2.3
37
4.6%
4.6%
Very
Dissatisfied
1
2.0%
.1%
.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
1
.5%
.1%
-1.1
0
.0%
.0%
-1.6
5
5.1%
.6%
2.9
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
2
2.0%
.3%
.4
3
2.9%
.4%
1.1
12
1.5%
1.5%
Total
51
100.0%
6.4%
64
100.0%
8.0%
195
100.0%
24.4%
160
100.0%
20.0%
98
100.0%
12.3%
27
100.0%
3.4%
99
100.0%
12.4%
105
100.0%
13.1%
799
100.0%
100.0%
Table 65. Degree requirements - Crosstabulation by college.
topdegre
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
23
46.9%
3.0%
1.6
19
30.6%
2.5%
-.4
96
50.3%
12.5%
4.0
49
32.7%
6.4%
-.2
25
27.5%
3.3%
-1.0
6
21.4%
.8%
-1.1
23
23.2%
3.0%
-1.8
16
16.7%
2.1%
-2.9
257
33.6%
33.6%
Satisfied
22
44.9%
2.9%
-.1
30
48.4%
3.9%
.3
72
37.7%
9.4%
-1.7
79
52.7%
10.3%
1.2
44
48.4%
5.7%
.3
16
57.1%
2.1%
.9
50
50.5%
6.5%
.6
40
41.7%
5.2%
-.6
353
46.1%
46.1%
D - 68
Neutral
4
8.2%
.5%
-1.4
9
14.5%
1.2%
-.4
19
9.9%
2.5%
-2.3
21
14.0%
2.7%
-.8
16
17.6%
2.1%
.2
6
21.4%
.8%
.6
20
20.2%
2.6%
.9
32
33.3%
4.2%
4.0
127
16.6%
16.6%
Dissatisfied
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
4
6.5%
.5%
2.0
1
.5%
.1%
-1.7
1
.7%
.1%
-1.4
3
3.3%
.4%
.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
5
5.1%
.7%
1.6
5
5.2%
.7%
1.7
19
2.5%
2.5%
Very
Dissatisfied
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
3
1.6%
.4%
.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.4
3
3.3%
.4%
1.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
1
1.0%
.1%
-.3
3
3.1%
.4%
1.6
10
1.3%
1.3%
Total
49
100.0%
6.4%
62
100.0%
8.1%
191
100.0%
24.9%
150
100.0%
19.6%
91
100.0%
11.9%
28
100.0%
3.7%
99
100.0%
12.9%
96
100.0%
12.5%
766
100.0%
100.0%
Table 66. Major requirements - Crosstabulation by college.
topmajor
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
28
56.0%
3.7%
2.4
18
29.5%
2.3%
-.8
102
52.8%
13.3%
4.1
50
32.7%
6.5%
-.6
28
30.1%
3.7%
-.9
9
34.6%
1.2%
-.1
22
22.2%
2.9%
-2.2
15
16.3%
2.0%
-3.1
272
35.5%
35.5%
Satisfied
17
34.0%
2.2%
-1.2
26
42.6%
3.4%
-.3
75
38.9%
9.8%
-1.3
85
55.6%
11.1%
1.9
45
48.4%
5.9%
.5
11
42.3%
1.4%
-.2
52
52.5%
6.8%
1.1
36
39.1%
4.7%
-.9
347
45.2%
45.2%
D - 69
Neutral
4
8.0%
.5%
-1.3
11
18.0%
1.4%
.5
13
6.7%
1.7%
-3.1
17
11.1%
2.2%
-1.3
14
15.1%
1.8%
-.1
6
23.1%
.8%
1.0
19
19.2%
2.5%
1.0
34
37.0%
4.4%
5.3
118
15.4%
15.4%
Dissatisfied
1
2.0%
.1%
-.1
5
8.2%
.7%
3.1
0
.0%
.0%
-2.1
1
.7%
.1%
-1.3
2
2.2%
.3%
.0
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
5
5.1%
.7%
1.9
3
3.3%
.4%
.7
17
2.2%
2.2%
Very
Dissatisfied
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
1
1.6%
.1%
.0
3
1.6%
.4%
-.1
0
.0%
.0%
-1.6
4
4.3%
.5%
1.9
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
1
1.0%
.1%
-.5
4
4.3%
.5%
2.0
13
1.7%
1.7%
Total
50
100.0%
6.5%
61
100.0%
8.0%
193
100.0%
25.2%
153
100.0%
19.9%
93
100.0%
12.1%
26
100.0%
3.4%
99
100.0%
12.9%
92
100.0%
12.0%
767
100.0%
100.0%
Table 67. Minor requirements - Crosstabulation by college.
topminor
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
10
25.0%
1.6%
.8
7
14.3%
1.1%
-.8
59
36.4%
9.6%
4.8
13
11.2%
2.1%
-2.1
10
13.3%
1.6%
-1.2
4
20.0%
.6%
.0
8
11.3%
1.3%
-1.6
10
12.0%
1.6%
-1.6
121
19.6%
19.6%
Satisfied
12
30.0%
1.9%
.3
14
28.6%
2.3%
.2
50
30.9%
8.1%
.8
23
19.8%
3.7%
-1.6
24
32.0%
3.9%
.8
9
45.0%
1.5%
1.5
13
18.3%
2.1%
-1.5
24
28.9%
3.9%
.3
169
27.4%
27.4%
D - 70
Neutral
12
30.0%
1.9%
-1.1
17
34.7%
2.8%
-.7
40
24.7%
6.5%
-3.3
68
58.6%
11.0%
2.9
33
44.0%
5.4%
.3
7
35.0%
1.1%
-.5
39
54.9%
6.3%
1.7
40
48.2%
6.5%
.9
256
41.6%
41.6%
Dissatisfied
5
12.5%
.8%
1.1
7
14.3%
1.1%
1.6
8
4.9%
1.3%
-1.3
6
5.2%
1.0%
-1.0
6
8.0%
1.0%
.1
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
8
11.3%
1.3%
1.0
8
9.6%
1.3%
.6
48
7.8%
7.8%
Very
Dissatisfied
1
2.5%
.2%
-.4
4
8.2%
.6%
1.7
5
3.1%
.8%
-.3
6
5.2%
1.0%
.9
2
2.7%
.3%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
3
4.2%
.5%
.3
1
1.2%
.2%
-1.1
22
3.6%
3.6%
Total
40
100.0%
6.5%
49
100.0%
8.0%
162
100.0%
26.3%
116
100.0%
18.8%
75
100.0%
12.2%
20
100.0%
3.2%
71
100.0%
11.5%
83
100.0%
13.5%
616
100.0%
100.0%
Table 68. General Education requirements - Crosstabulation by college.
topgened
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
22
44.0%
2.9%
1.8
20
31.7%
2.6%
.2
84
44.4%
10.9%
3.5
36
23.7%
4.7%
-1.5
22
23.9%
2.9%
-1.1
7
25.9%
.9%
-.4
11
11.7%
1.4%
-3.3
31
30.1%
4.0%
.0
233
30.3%
30.3%
Satisfied
22
44.0%
2.9%
.2
27
42.9%
3.5%
.1
75
39.7%
9.7%
-.5
73
48.0%
9.5%
1.1
34
37.0%
4.4%
-.8
13
48.1%
1.7%
.5
42
44.7%
5.5%
.4
38
36.9%
4.9%
-.8
324
42.1%
42.1%
D - 71
Neutral
5
10.0%
.6%
-1.7
16
25.4%
2.1%
.8
20
10.6%
2.6%
-3.1
36
23.7%
4.7%
.7
24
26.1%
3.1%
1.1
5
18.5%
.6%
-.3
30
31.9%
3.9%
2.3
25
24.3%
3.2%
.7
161
20.9%
20.9%
Dissatisfied
1
2.0%
.1%
-1.0
0
.0%
.0%
-1.8
7
3.7%
.9%
-.9
6
3.9%
.8%
-.7
6
6.5%
.8%
.6
2
7.4%
.3%
.5
10
10.6%
1.3%
2.3
8
7.8%
1.0%
1.1
40
5.2%
5.2%
Very
Dissatisfied
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
3
1.6%
.4%
.0
1
.7%
.1%
-.9
6
6.5%
.8%
3.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
1
1.1%
.1%
-.4
1
1.0%
.1%
-.5
12
1.6%
1.6%
Total
50
100.0%
6.5%
63
100.0%
8.2%
189
100.0%
24.5%
152
100.0%
19.7%
92
100.0%
11.9%
27
100.0%
3.5%
94
100.0%
12.2%
103
100.0%
13.4%
770
100.0%
100.0%
Table 69. Selecting or changing your major - Crosstabulation by college.
topchange
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
15
36.6%
2.5%
2.5
9
17.6%
1.5%
-.3
41
28.1%
6.8%
2.3
12
11.1%
2.0%
-2.0
12
15.8%
2.0%
-.7
5
23.8%
.8%
.4
10
13.5%
1.7%
-1.2
14
15.9%
2.3%
-.8
118
19.5%
19.5%
Satisfied
12
29.3%
2.0%
.4
16
31.4%
2.6%
.8
41
28.1%
6.8%
.5
24
22.2%
4.0%
-.8
22
28.9%
3.6%
.5
7
33.3%
1.2%
.7
18
24.3%
3.0%
-.3
17
19.3%
2.8%
-1.2
157
26.0%
26.0%
D - 72
Neutral
12
29.3%
2.0%
-1.3
19
37.3%
3.1%
-.6
51
34.9%
8.4%
-1.4
59
54.6%
9.8%
1.9
33
43.4%
5.5%
.1
8
38.1%
1.3%
-.3
32
43.2%
5.3%
.1
43
48.9%
7.1%
.9
257
42.5%
42.5%
Dissatisfied
1
2.4%
.2%
-1.3
4
7.8%
.7%
-.1
8
5.5%
1.3%
-1.2
9
8.3%
1.5%
.0
5
6.6%
.8%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-1.3
11
14.9%
1.8%
1.9
13
14.8%
2.1%
2.0
51
8.4%
8.4%
Very
Dissatisfied
1
2.4%
.2%
-.4
3
5.9%
.5%
.8
5
3.4%
.8%
-.1
4
3.7%
.7%
.0
4
5.3%
.7%
.7
1
4.8%
.2%
.3
3
4.1%
.5%
.2
1
1.1%
.2%
-1.2
22
3.6%
3.6%
Total
41
100.0%
6.8%
51
100.0%
8.4%
146
100.0%
24.1%
108
100.0%
17.9%
76
100.0%
12.6%
21
100.0%
3.5%
74
100.0%
12.2%
88
100.0%
14.5%
605
100.0%
100.0%
Table 70. Transfer credit - Crosstabulation by college.
toptrans
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
11
32.4%
1.9%
1.7
10
20.4%
1.7%
.2
36
24.8%
6.1%
1.5
20
17.7%
3.4%
-.4
13
16.3%
2.2%
-.6
2
11.8%
.3%
-.7
7
9.7%
1.2%
-1.9
16
19.0%
2.7%
-.1
115
19.4%
19.4%
Satisfied
10
29.4%
1.7%
.5
9
18.4%
1.5%
-1.0
45
31.0%
7.6%
1.4
25
22.1%
4.2%
-.7
20
25.0%
3.4%
.0
5
29.4%
.8%
.3
15
20.8%
2.5%
-.7
21
25.0%
3.5%
.0
150
25.3%
25.3%
D - 73
Neutral
11
32.4%
1.9%
-1.0
23
46.9%
3.9%
.3
48
33.1%
8.1%
-2.0
56
49.6%
9.4%
.9
38
47.5%
6.4%
.5
8
47.1%
1.3%
.2
39
54.2%
6.6%
1.3
39
46.4%
6.6%
.3
262
44.1%
44.1%
Dissatisfied
1
2.9%
.2%
-.8
5
10.2%
.8%
1.1
7
4.8%
1.2%
-.7
8
7.1%
1.3%
.4
4
5.0%
.7%
-.4
1
5.9%
.2%
-.1
8
11.1%
1.3%
1.7
3
3.6%
.5%
-1.0
37
6.2%
6.2%
Very
Dissatisfied
1
2.9%
.2%
-.5
2
4.1%
.3%
-.3
9
6.2%
1.5%
.6
4
3.5%
.7%
-.7
5
6.3%
.8%
.5
1
5.9%
.2%
.2
3
4.2%
.5%
-.3
5
6.0%
.8%
.4
30
5.1%
5.1%
Total
34
100.0%
5.7%
49
100.0%
8.2%
145
100.0%
24.4%
113
100.0%
19.0%
80
100.0%
13.5%
17
100.0%
2.9%
72
100.0%
12.1%
84
100.0%
14.1%
594
100.0%
100.0%
Table 71. Registration procedures (drop/add, closed courses) - Crosstabulation by college.
topregis
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
7
18.4%
1.1%
-.4
11
22.9%
1.8%
.2
46
32.6%
7.6%
2.8
23
18.5%
3.8%
-.7
16
20.0%
2.6%
-.3
3
16.7%
.5%
-.4
12
15.8%
2.0%
-1.1
13
15.5%
2.1%
-1.2
131
21.5%
21.5%
Satisfied
18
47.4%
3.0%
1.3
16
33.3%
2.6%
-.2
49
34.8%
8.0%
.0
46
37.1%
7.6%
.4
28
35.0%
4.6%
.0
9
50.0%
1.5%
1.1
19
25.0%
3.1%
-1.5
28
33.3%
4.6%
-.3
213
35.0%
35.0%
D - 74
Neutral
10
26.3%
1.6%
-.8
16
33.3%
2.6%
-.1
36
25.5%
5.9%
-1.7
38
30.6%
6.2%
-.6
28
35.0%
4.6%
.2
6
33.3%
1.0%
.0
37
48.7%
6.1%
2.2
35
41.7%
5.7%
1.2
206
33.8%
33.8%
Dissatisfied
2
5.3%
.3%
-.3
4
8.3%
.7%
.5
6
4.3%
1.0%
-1.1
10
8.1%
1.6%
.7
6
7.5%
1.0%
.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
6
7.9%
1.0%
.5
6
7.1%
1.0%
.2
40
6.6%
6.6%
Very
Dissatisfied
1
2.6%
.2%
-.2
1
2.1%
.2%
-.4
4
2.8%
.7%
-.2
7
5.6%
1.1%
1.6
2
2.5%
.3%
-.3
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
2
2.6%
.3%
-.2
2
2.4%
.3%
-.4
19
3.1%
3.1%
Total
38
100.0%
6.2%
48
100.0%
7.9%
141
100.0%
23.2%
124
100.0%
20.4%
80
100.0%
13.1%
18
100.0%
3.0%
76
100.0%
12.5%
84
100.0%
13.8%
609
100.0%
100.0%
Table 72. Academic probation - Crosstabulation by college.
topprob
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
5
17.2%
1.1%
1.6
3
7.3%
.6%
-.2
8
7.7%
1.7%
-.3
8
8.3%
1.7%
.0
5
7.7%
1.1%
-.2
2
12.5%
.4%
.6
3
5.6%
.6%
-.7
6
8.7%
1.3%
.1
40
8.4%
8.4%
Satisfied
12
41.4%
2.5%
3.0
8
19.5%
1.7%
.3
17
16.3%
3.6%
-.3
12
12.5%
2.5%
-1.2
13
20.0%
2.7%
.4
5
31.3%
1.1%
1.3
4
7.4%
.8%
-1.8
13
18.8%
2.7%
.2
84
17.7%
17.7%
D - 75
Neutral
8
27.6%
1.7%
-2.3
26
63.4%
5.5%
.2
65
62.5%
13.7%
.3
64
66.7%
13.5%
.8
39
60.0%
8.2%
-.1
9
56.3%
1.9%
-.2
35
64.8%
7.4%
.4
41
59.4%
8.6%
-.1
287
60.5%
60.5%
Dissatisfied
2
6.9%
.4%
-.1
2
4.9%
.4%
-.6
6
5.8%
1.3%
-.6
7
7.3%
1.5%
.0
6
9.2%
1.3%
.5
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
6
11.1%
1.3%
1.0
6
8.7%
1.3%
.4
35
7.4%
7.4%
Very
Dissatisfied
2
6.9%
.4%
.2
2
4.9%
.4%
-.3
8
7.7%
1.7%
.7
5
5.2%
1.1%
-.3
2
3.1%
.4%
-.9
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
6
11.1%
1.3%
1.6
3
4.3%
.6%
-.5
28
5.9%
5.9%
Total
29
100.0%
6.1%
41
100.0%
8.6%
104
100.0%
21.9%
96
100.0%
20.3%
65
100.0%
13.7%
16
100.0%
3.4%
54
100.0%
11.4%
69
100.0%
14.6%
474
100.0%
100.0%
Table 73. Career choice - Crosstabulation by college.
topcaree
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
12
28.6%
2.1%
1.5
8
16.7%
1.4%
-.3
29
22.7%
5.0%
1.1
16
14.7%
2.8%
-.9
18
24.0%
3.1%
1.1
7
33.3%
1.2%
1.6
10
13.3%
1.7%
-1.0
6
7.7%
1.0%
-2.2
106
18.4%
18.4%
Satisfied
21
50.0%
3.6%
2.2
11
22.9%
1.9%
-1.0
46
35.9%
8.0%
1.0
24
22.0%
4.2%
-1.7
23
30.7%
4.0%
-.1
7
33.3%
1.2%
.2
24
32.0%
4.2%
.1
23
29.5%
4.0%
-.3
179
31.1%
31.1%
D - 76
Neutral
6
14.3%
1.0%
-2.6
23
47.9%
4.0%
.9
39
30.5%
6.8%
-1.6
54
49.5%
9.4%
1.7
28
37.3%
4.9%
-.3
6
28.6%
1.0%
-.8
32
42.7%
5.6%
.4
39
50.0%
6.8%
1.5
227
39.4%
39.4%
Dissatisfied
3
7.1%
.5%
-.1
4
8.3%
.7%
.2
10
7.8%
1.7%
.1
8
7.3%
1.4%
-.1
3
4.0%
.5%
-1.1
1
4.8%
.2%
-.5
7
9.3%
1.2%
.5
8
10.3%
1.4%
.8
44
7.6%
7.6%
Very
Dissatisfied
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
2
4.2%
.3%
.3
4
3.1%
.7%
-.2
7
6.4%
1.2%
1.7
3
4.0%
.5%
.2
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
2
2.7%
.3%
-.4
2
2.6%
.3%
-.4
20
3.5%
3.5%
Total
42
100.0%
7.3%
48
100.0%
8.3%
128
100.0%
22.2%
109
100.0%
18.9%
75
100.0%
13.0%
21
100.0%
3.6%
75
100.0%
13.0%
78
100.0%
13.5%
576
100.0%
100.0%
Table 74. Internships - Crosstabulation by college.
topintern
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
11
28.2%
2.2%
3.1
4
10.3%
.8%
-.2
16
14.4%
3.2%
1.0
8
8.2%
1.6%
-.9
4
5.8%
.8%
-1.4
7
31.8%
1.4%
2.9
3
5.0%
.6%
-1.4
4
5.9%
.8%
-1.3
57
11.3%
11.3%
Satisfied
18
46.2%
3.6%
4.0
6
15.4%
1.2%
-.5
21
18.9%
4.2%
.1
8
8.2%
1.6%
-2.4
14
20.3%
2.8%
.3
7
31.8%
1.4%
1.4
10
16.7%
2.0%
-.3
10
14.7%
2.0%
-.7
94
18.6%
18.6%
D - 77
Neutral
7
17.9%
1.4%
-2.9
18
46.2%
3.6%
-.5
57
51.4%
11.3%
.0
56
57.7%
11.1%
.9
43
62.3%
8.5%
1.3
5
22.7%
1.0%
-1.9
34
56.7%
6.7%
.6
40
58.8%
7.9%
.8
260
51.5%
51.5%
Dissatisfied
3
7.7%
.6%
-.8
8
20.5%
1.6%
1.6
12
10.8%
2.4%
-.3
13
13.4%
2.6%
.4
5
7.2%
1.0%
-1.1
2
9.1%
.4%
-.4
8
13.3%
1.6%
.3
9
13.2%
1.8%
.3
60
11.9%
11.9%
Very
Dissatisfied
0
.0%
.0%
-1.6
3
7.7%
.6%
.2
5
4.5%
1.0%
-.9
12
12.4%
2.4%
2.1
3
4.3%
.6%
-.8
1
4.5%
.2%
-.4
5
8.3%
1.0%
.5
5
7.4%
1.0%
.2
34
6.7%
6.7%
Total
39
100.0%
7.7%
39
100.0%
7.7%
111
100.0%
22.0%
97
100.0%
19.2%
69
100.0%
13.7%
22
100.0%
4.4%
60
100.0%
11.9%
68
100.0%
13.5%
505
100.0%
100.0%
Table 75. Research with faculty - Crosstabulation by college.
toprsch
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
8
25.8%
1.7%
3.8
4
10.8%
.9%
.8
7
6.7%
1.5%
-.2
5
5.3%
1.1%
-.7
2
3.3%
.4%
-1.1
2
14.3%
.4%
1.0
3
5.1%
.6%
-.6
3
4.4%
.6%
-.9
34
7.3%
7.3%
Satisfied
10
32.3%
2.1%
2.3
4
10.8%
.9%
-.8
18
17.1%
3.8%
.3
8
8.5%
1.7%
-1.8
10
16.7%
2.1%
.2
2
14.3%
.4%
-.1
11
18.6%
2.4%
.5
11
16.2%
2.4%
.1
74
15.8%
15.8%
D - 78
Neutral
9
29.0%
1.9%
-2.1
19
51.4%
4.1%
-.5
62
59.0%
13.2%
.1
60
63.8%
12.8%
.7
41
68.3%
8.8%
1.0
8
57.1%
1.7%
.0
32
54.2%
6.8%
-.4
41
60.3%
8.8%
.2
272
58.1%
58.1%
Dissatisfied
1
3.2%
.2%
-1.4
8
21.6%
1.7%
1.6
12
11.4%
2.6%
-.2
12
12.8%
2.6%
.2
5
8.3%
1.1%
-.9
1
7.1%
.2%
-.5
8
13.6%
1.7%
.3
10
14.7%
2.1%
.6
57
12.2%
12.2%
Very
Dissatisfied
3
9.7%
.6%
.7
2
5.4%
.4%
-.3
6
5.7%
1.3%
-.4
9
9.6%
1.9%
1.1
2
3.3%
.4%
-1.0
1
7.1%
.2%
.1
5
8.5%
1.1%
.6
3
4.4%
.6%
-.7
31
6.6%
6.6%
Total
31
100.0%
6.6%
37
100.0%
7.9%
105
100.0%
22.4%
94
100.0%
20.1%
60
100.0%
12.8%
14
100.0%
3.0%
59
100.0%
12.6%
68
100.0%
14.5%
468
100.0%
100.0%
Table 76. How to get the most out of your educaitonal experience at USU - Crosstabulation by college.
toprduc
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
13
36.1%
2.5%
3.1
5
12.5%
.9%
-.5
25
20.2%
4.7%
1.3
10
9.8%
1.9%
-1.5
14
19.7%
2.6%
.9
3
17.6%
.6%
.2
3
4.7%
.6%
-2.2
9
11.8%
1.7%
-.8
82
15.5%
15.5%
Satisfied
15
41.7%
2.8%
1.5
8
20.0%
1.5%
-1.0
43
34.7%
8.1%
1.3
21
20.6%
4.0%
-1.5
22
31.0%
4.2%
.4
5
29.4%
.9%
.1
18
28.1%
3.4%
.0
18
23.7%
3.4%
-.8
150
28.3%
28.3%
D - 79
Neutral
5
13.9%
.9%
-2.5
18
45.0%
3.4%
.5
41
33.1%
7.7%
-1.3
51
50.0%
9.6%
1.5
25
35.2%
4.7%
-.7
6
35.3%
1.1%
-.3
31
48.4%
5.8%
1.0
37
48.7%
7.0%
1.1
214
40.4%
40.4%
Dissatisfied
2
5.6%
.4%
-1.0
8
20.0%
1.5%
1.7
11
8.9%
2.1%
-.7
11
10.8%
2.1%
.0
8
11.3%
1.5%
.1
1
5.9%
.2%
-.6
8
12.5%
1.5%
.4
9
11.8%
1.7%
.2
58
10.9%
10.9%
Very
Dissatisfied
1
2.8%
.2%
-.6
1
2.5%
.2%
-.7
4
3.2%
.8%
-.8
9
8.8%
1.7%
1.8
2
2.8%
.4%
-.8
2
11.8%
.4%
1.3
4
6.3%
.8%
.5
3
3.9%
.6%
-.4
26
4.9%
4.9%
Total
36
100.0%
6.8%
40
100.0%
7.5%
124
100.0%
23.4%
102
100.0%
19.2%
71
100.0%
13.4%
17
100.0%
3.2%
64
100.0%
12.1%
76
100.0%
14.3%
530
100.0%
100.0%
Table 77. Study skills - Crosstabulationby college.
topstudy
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
6
18.8%
1.2%
1.9
2
5.0%
.4%
-.8
11
10.5%
2.3%
.6
5
5.1%
1.0%
-1.2
6
9.1%
1.2%
.1
1
7.1%
.2%
-.2
2
3.6%
.4%
-1.3
9
12.0%
1.9%
1.0
42
8.7%
8.7%
Satisfied
6
18.8%
1.2%
-.1
4
10.0%
.8%
-1.3
30
28.6%
6.2%
2.1
19
19.4%
3.9%
.0
13
19.7%
2.7%
.1
4
28.6%
.8%
.8
7
12.7%
1.4%
-1.1
11
14.7%
2.3%
-.9
94
19.4%
19.4%
D - 80
Neutral
13
40.6%
2.7%
-1.1
25
62.5%
5.2%
.6
52
49.5%
10.7%
-.8
55
56.1%
11.3%
.1
40
60.6%
8.2%
.6
7
50.0%
1.4%
-.3
34
61.8%
7.0%
.6
43
57.3%
8.9%
.2
269
55.5%
55.5%
Dissatisfied
4
12.5%
.8%
.2
8
20.0%
1.6%
1.6
10
9.5%
2.1%
-.6
12
12.2%
2.5%
.3
3
4.5%
.6%
-1.6
1
7.1%
.2%
-.5
7
12.7%
1.4%
.3
10
13.3%
2.1%
.5
55
11.3%
11.3%
Very
Dissatisfied
3
9.4%
.6%
1.1
1
2.5%
.2%
-.7
2
1.9%
.4%
-1.5
7
7.1%
1.4%
.9
4
6.1%
.8%
.3
1
7.1%
.2%
.3
5
9.1%
1.0%
1.3
2
2.7%
.4%
-.9
25
5.2%
5.2%
Total
32
100.0%
6.6%
40
100.0%
8.2%
105
100.0%
21.6%
98
100.0%
20.2%
66
100.0%
13.6%
14
100.0%
2.9%
55
100.0%
11.3%
75
100.0%
15.5%
485
100.0%
100.0%
Table 78. Concerns about a specific course - Crosstabulation by college.
topspecc
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
14
32.6%
2.3%
1.7
5
11.4%
.8%
-1.4
40
28.6%
6.7%
2.0
20
16.7%
3.3%
-1.0
14
18.2%
2.3%
-.5
5
25.0%
.8%
.4
8
11.6%
1.3%
-1.7
19
21.8%
3.2%
.2
125
20.8%
20.8%
Satisfied
20
46.5%
3.3%
1.3
10
22.7%
1.7%
-1.4
57
40.7%
9.5%
1.1
37
30.8%
6.2%
-.8
30
39.0%
5.0%
.6
9
45.0%
1.5%
.8
22
31.9%
3.7%
-.4
25
28.7%
4.2%
-1.0
210
35.0%
35.0%
D - 81
Neutral
7
16.3%
1.2%
-1.9
22
50.0%
3.7%
1.9
31
22.1%
5.2%
-2.3
49
40.8%
8.2%
1.5
27
35.1%
4.5%
.3
4
20.0%
.7%
-1.0
31
44.9%
5.2%
1.7
28
32.2%
4.7%
-.2
199
33.2%
33.2%
Dissatisfied
1
2.3%
.2%
-1.2
6
13.6%
1.0%
1.5
8
5.7%
1.3%
-.8
9
7.5%
1.5%
.0
4
5.2%
.7%
-.7
2
10.0%
.3%
.4
3
4.3%
.5%
-1.0
12
13.8%
2.0%
2.1
45
7.5%
7.5%
Very
Dissatisfied
1
2.3%
.2%
-.4
1
2.3%
.2%
-.4
4
2.9%
.7%
-.4
5
4.2%
.8%
.4
2
2.6%
.3%
-.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
5
7.2%
.8%
1.7
3
3.4%
.5%
.0
21
3.5%
3.5%
Total
43
100.0%
7.2%
44
100.0%
7.3%
140
100.0%
23.3%
120
100.0%
20.0%
77
100.0%
12.8%
20
100.0%
3.3%
69
100.0%
11.5%
87
100.0%
14.5%
600
100.0%
100.0%
Table 79. Concerns about a specific faculty member - Crosstabulation by college.
topspcf
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
5
16.7%
1.1%
1.8
4
10.5%
.9%
.7
8
8.2%
1.8%
.3
6
6.3%
1.3%
-.4
3
4.9%
.7%
-.7
1
6.7%
.2%
-.1
1
1.9%
.2%
-1.5
6
9.1%
1.3%
.5
34
7.5%
7.5%
Satisfied
8
26.7%
1.8%
1.4
4
10.5%
.9%
-.9
16
16.5%
3.5%
.1
14
14.7%
3.1%
-.4
11
18.0%
2.4%
.3
5
33.3%
1.1%
1.6
6
11.3%
1.3%
-.9
10
15.2%
2.2%
-.2
74
16.3%
16.3%
D - 82
Neutral
11
36.7%
2.4%
-1.8
22
57.9%
4.8%
-.4
62
63.9%
13.6%
.1
64
67.4%
14.1%
.6
41
67.2%
9.0%
.4
8
53.3%
1.8%
-.5
37
69.8%
8.1%
.6
41
62.1%
9.0%
-.1
286
62.9%
62.9%
Dissatisfied
3
10.0%
.7%
.6
4
10.5%
.9%
.8
4
4.1%
.9%
-1.1
6
6.3%
1.3%
-.3
4
6.6%
.9%
-.1
1
6.7%
.2%
-.1
4
7.5%
.9%
.1
6
9.1%
1.3%
.6
32
7.0%
7.0%
Very
Dissatisfied
3
10.0%
.7%
.8
4
10.5%
.9%
1.0
7
7.2%
1.5%
.3
5
5.3%
1.1%
-.4
2
3.3%
.4%
-1.0
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
5
9.4%
1.1%
.9
3
4.5%
.7%
-.6
29
6.4%
6.4%
Total
30
100.0%
6.6%
38
100.0%
8.4%
97
100.0%
21.3%
95
100.0%
20.9%
61
100.0%
13.4%
15
100.0%
3.3%
53
100.0%
11.6%
66
100.0%
14.5%
455
100.0%
100.0%
Table 80. Application to graduate/professional schools - Crosstabulation by college.
topappli
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
6
20.0%
1.3%
1.9
4
10.3%
.9%
.2
14
13.3%
3.0%
1.3
4
4.3%
.9%
-1.6
1
1.7%
.2%
-1.9
1
7.1%
.2%
-.3
8
13.8%
1.7%
1.1
5
7.9%
1.1%
-.4
43
9.3%
9.3%
Satisfied
8
26.7%
1.7%
1.5
9
23.1%
2.0%
1.2
15
14.3%
3.3%
-.4
11
11.8%
2.4%
-.9
9
15.5%
2.0%
.0
4
28.6%
.9%
1.2
10
17.2%
2.2%
.3
6
9.5%
1.3%
-1.2
72
15.7%
15.7%
D - 83
Neutral
12
40.0%
2.6%
-1.5
21
53.8%
4.6%
-.5
65
61.9%
14.1%
.2
62
66.7%
13.5%
.7
40
69.0%
8.7%
.8
8
57.1%
1.7%
-.2
30
51.7%
6.5%
-.9
41
65.1%
8.9%
.5
279
60.7%
60.7%
Dissatisfied
3
10.0%
.7%
.2
4
10.3%
.9%
.3
4
3.8%
.9%
-1.7
10
10.8%
2.2%
.7
6
10.3%
1.3%
.4
1
7.1%
.2%
-.2
4
6.9%
.9%
-.5
8
12.7%
1.7%
1.1
40
8.7%
8.7%
Very
Dissatisfied
1
3.3%
.2%
-.5
1
2.6%
.2%
-.8
7
6.7%
1.5%
.4
6
6.5%
1.3%
.3
2
3.4%
.4%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
6
10.3%
1.3%
1.5
3
4.8%
.7%
-.3
26
5.7%
5.7%
Total
30
100.0%
6.5%
39
100.0%
8.5%
105
100.0%
22.8%
93
100.0%
20.2%
58
100.0%
12.6%
14
100.0%
3.0%
58
100.0%
12.6%
63
100.0%
13.7%
460
100.0%
100.0%
Table 81. Personal problems - Crosstabulation by college.
topprobs
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
4
12.5%
.9%
1.2
1
2.9%
.2%
-.9
7
6.9%
1.6%
.0
6
6.7%
1.3%
-.1
5
8.2%
1.1%
.4
3
18.8%
.7%
1.8
1
2.0%
.2%
-1.3
4
6.3%
.9%
-.2
31
6.9%
6.9%
Satisfied
10
31.3%
2.2%
2.0
4
11.4%
.9%
-.8
20
19.6%
4.5%
.7
11
12.4%
2.5%
-1.0
11
18.0%
2.5%
.2
4
25.0%
.9%
.8
4
8.2%
.9%
-1.5
11
17.2%
2.5%
.1
75
16.7%
16.7%
D - 84
Neutral
12
37.5%
2.7%
-1.6
23
65.7%
5.1%
.5
60
58.8%
13.4%
-.1
61
68.5%
13.6%
1.1
37
60.7%
8.3%
.1
8
50.0%
1.8%
-.5
31
63.3%
6.9%
.3
36
56.3%
8.0%
-.4
268
59.8%
59.8%
Dissatisfied
4
12.5%
.9%
.7
2
5.7%
.4%
-.6
7
6.9%
1.6%
-.6
4
4.5%
.9%
-1.3
6
9.8%
1.3%
.3
1
6.3%
.2%
-.3
8
16.3%
1.8%
1.8
7
10.9%
1.6%
.6
39
8.7%
8.7%
Very
Dissatisfied
2
6.3%
.4%
-.3
5
14.3%
1.1%
1.4
8
7.8%
1.8%
.0
7
7.9%
1.6%
.0
2
3.3%
.4%
-1.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
5
10.2%
1.1%
.6
6
9.4%
1.3%
.4
35
7.8%
7.8%
Total
32
100.0%
7.1%
35
100.0%
7.8%
102
100.0%
22.8%
89
100.0%
19.9%
61
100.0%
13.6%
16
100.0%
3.6%
49
100.0%
10.9%
64
100.0%
14.3%
448
100.0%
100.0%
Table 82. Credit by examination (CLEP) - Crosstabulation by college.
topclep
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
6
19.4%
1.3%
2.0
3
8.6%
.6%
.0
12
11.4%
2.6%
.9
7
7.0%
1.5%
-.6
5
7.7%
1.1%
-.3
2
14.3%
.4%
.7
2
3.8%
.4%
-1.2
4
6.3%
.9%
-.7
41
8.8%
8.8%
Satisfied
8
25.8%
1.7%
1.0
4
11.4%
.9%
-.9
22
21.0%
4.7%
.7
20
20.0%
4.3%
.4
11
16.9%
2.4%
-.2
3
21.4%
.6%
.3
7
13.5%
1.5%
-.8
10
15.6%
2.1%
-.5
85
18.2%
18.2%
D - 85
Neutral
12
38.7%
2.6%
-1.3
20
57.1%
4.3%
.1
59
56.2%
12.7%
.0
60
60.0%
12.9%
.5
39
60.0%
8.4%
.4
7
50.0%
1.5%
-.3
28
53.8%
6.0%
-.2
37
57.8%
7.9%
.2
262
56.2%
56.2%
Dissatisfied
1
3.2%
.2%
-1.2
5
14.3%
1.1%
.7
8
7.6%
1.7%
-.9
8
8.0%
1.7%
-.7
8
12.3%
1.7%
.5
1
7.1%
.2%
-.4
7
13.5%
1.5%
.7
10
15.6%
2.1%
1.3
48
10.3%
10.3%
Very
Dissatisfied
4
12.9%
.9%
1.4
3
8.6%
.6%
.5
4
3.8%
.9%
-1.1
5
5.0%
1.1%
-.6
2
3.1%
.4%
-1.1
1
7.1%
.2%
.1
8
15.4%
1.7%
2.5
3
4.7%
.6%
-.6
30
6.4%
6.4%
Total
31
100.0%
6.7%
35
100.0%
7.5%
105
100.0%
22.5%
100
100.0%
21.5%
65
100.0%
13.9%
14
100.0%
3.0%
52
100.0%
11.2%
64
100.0%
13.7%
466
100.0%
100.0%
Table 83. Advanced Placement (AP) courses - Crosstabulation by college.
topap
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
5
14.7%
1.0%
.0
2
5.6%
.4%
-1.5
29
24.0%
5.5%
2.6
16
14.3%
3.1%
-.2
9
13.2%
1.7%
-.4
2
14.3%
.4%
-.1
7
10.9%
1.3%
-.8
8
10.8%
1.5%
-.9
78
14.9%
14.9%
Satisfied
13
38.2%
2.5%
1.3
9
25.0%
1.7%
-.2
26
21.5%
5.0%
-1.1
35
31.3%
6.7%
1.0
10
14.7%
1.9%
-1.9
3
21.4%
.6%
-.4
23
35.9%
4.4%
1.5
20
27.0%
3.8%
.1
139
26.6%
26.6%
D - 86
Neutral
14
41.2%
2.7%
-.4
18
50.0%
3.4%
.3
51
42.1%
9.8%
-.7
49
43.8%
9.4%
-.4
43
63.2%
8.2%
2.1
8
57.1%
1.5%
.6
24
37.5%
4.6%
-1.0
35
47.3%
6.7%
.1
242
46.3%
46.3%
Dissatisfied
1
2.9%
.2%
-1.0
3
8.3%
.6%
.1
10
8.3%
1.9%
.2
7
6.3%
1.3%
-.6
4
5.9%
.8%
-.6
1
7.1%
.2%
-.1
6
9.4%
1.1%
.4
9
12.2%
1.7%
1.3
41
7.8%
7.8%
Very
Dissatisfied
1
2.9%
.2%
-.4
4
11.1%
.8%
1.9
5
4.1%
1.0%
-.1
5
4.5%
1.0%
.0
2
2.9%
.4%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
4
6.3%
.8%
.7
2
2.7%
.4%
-.7
23
4.4%
4.4%
Total
34
100.0%
6.5%
36
100.0%
6.9%
121
100.0%
23.1%
112
100.0%
21.4%
68
100.0%
13.0%
14
100.0%
2.7%
64
100.0%
12.2%
74
100.0%
14.1%
523
100.0%
100.0%
Table 84. Work study/on-campus employment - Crosstabulation by college.
topwork
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
5
15.6%
1.1%
1.8
2
5.3%
.5%
-.4
10
9.5%
2.3%
1.0
4
4.6%
.9%
-.9
3
5.3%
.7%
-.5
2
14.3%
.5%
1.0
1
2.2%
.2%
-1.2
4
6.3%
.9%
-.2
31
7.0%
7.0%
Satisfied
10
31.3%
2.3%
2.5
6
15.8%
1.4%
.2
20
19.0%
4.5%
1.2
6
6.9%
1.4%
-1.9
6
10.5%
1.4%
-.8
3
21.4%
.7%
.7
5
11.1%
1.1%
-.6
8
12.5%
1.8%
-.4
64
14.5%
14.5%
D - 87
Neutral
13
40.6%
2.9%
-1.5
21
55.3%
4.8%
-.4
59
56.2%
13.3%
-.6
60
69.0%
13.6%
1.0
41
71.9%
9.3%
1.1
7
50.0%
1.6%
-.5
30
66.7%
6.8%
.5
38
59.4%
8.6%
-.2
269
60.9%
60.9%
Dissatisfied
2
6.3%
.5%
-.7
5
13.2%
1.1%
.6
10
9.5%
2.3%
-.1
8
9.2%
1.8%
-.2
4
7.0%
.9%
-.7
2
14.3%
.5%
.5
4
8.9%
.9%
-.2
9
14.1%
2.0%
1.0
44
10.0%
10.0%
Very
Dissatisfied
2
6.3%
.5%
-.3
4
10.5%
.9%
.6
6
5.7%
1.4%
-.7
9
10.3%
2.0%
.9
3
5.3%
.7%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
5
11.1%
1.1%
.8
5
7.8%
1.1%
.0
34
7.7%
7.7%
Total
32
100.0%
7.2%
38
100.0%
8.6%
105
100.0%
23.8%
87
100.0%
19.7%
57
100.0%
12.9%
14
100.0%
3.2%
45
100.0%
10.2%
64
100.0%
14.5%
442
100.0%
100.0%
Table 85. Job placement after graduation - Crosstabulation by college.
topjob
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
5
16.1%
1.1%
1.1
4
11.1%
.9%
.2
16
15.0%
3.5%
1.6
8
8.6%
1.8%
-.5
3
5.0%
.7%
-1.2
3
18.8%
.7%
1.1
1
2.0%
.2%
-1.8
6
9.5%
1.3%
-.1
46
10.1%
10.1%
Satisfied
10
32.3%
2.2%
2.1
4
11.1%
.9%
-.8
23
21.5%
5.1%
1.1
12
12.9%
2.6%
-.9
10
16.7%
2.2%
.0
4
25.0%
.9%
.8
6
12.2%
1.3%
-.8
8
12.7%
1.8%
-.8
77
16.9%
16.9%
D - 88
Neutral
10
32.3%
2.2%
-1.8
20
55.6%
4.4%
.0
53
49.5%
11.6%
-.9
58
62.4%
12.7%
.8
40
66.7%
8.8%
1.1
7
43.8%
1.5%
-.7
33
67.3%
7.3%
1.1
34
54.0%
7.5%
-.2
255
56.0%
56.0%
Dissatisfied
5
16.1%
1.1%
1.0
5
13.9%
1.1%
.6
9
8.4%
2.0%
-.7
7
7.5%
1.5%
-.9
5
8.3%
1.1%
-.5
2
12.5%
.4%
.2
4
8.2%
.9%
-.5
11
17.5%
2.4%
1.7
48
10.5%
10.5%
Very
Dissatisfied
1
3.2%
.2%
-.7
3
8.3%
.7%
.5
6
5.6%
1.3%
-.3
8
8.6%
1.8%
.9
2
3.3%
.4%
-.9
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
5
10.2%
1.1%
1.1
4
6.3%
.9%
.0
29
6.4%
6.4%
Total
31
100.0%
6.8%
36
100.0%
7.9%
107
100.0%
23.5%
93
100.0%
20.4%
60
100.0%
13.2%
16
100.0%
3.5%
49
100.0%
10.8%
63
100.0%
13.8%
455
100.0%
100.0%
Table 86. Withdrawing from USU - Crosstabulation by college.
topwithd
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
6
20.0%
1.4%
3.1
2
5.7%
.5%
-.1
8
8.0%
1.9%
.8
3
3.4%
.7%
-1.0
2
3.5%
.5%
-.8
1
7.7%
.2%
.2
2
4.2%
.5%
-.5
2
3.3%
.5%
-.9
26
6.0%
6.0%
Satisfied
6
20.0%
1.4%
1.6
5
14.3%
1.2%
.6
13
13.0%
3.0%
.7
7
8.0%
1.6%
-.8
4
7.0%
.9%
-.8
3
23.1%
.7%
1.4
4
8.3%
.9%
-.5
4
6.7%
.9%
-1.0
46
10.7%
10.7%
D - 89
Neutral
13
43.3%
3.0%
-1.7
20
57.1%
4.7%
-.9
66
66.0%
15.3%
-.4
68
78.2%
15.8%
1.0
47
82.5%
10.9%
1.2
8
61.5%
1.9%
-.3
31
64.6%
7.2%
-.4
45
75.0%
10.5%
.5
298
69.3%
69.3%
Dissatisfied
3
10.0%
.7%
1.0
3
8.6%
.7%
.7
5
5.0%
1.2%
-.3
3
3.4%
.7%
-.9
2
3.5%
.5%
-.7
1
7.7%
.2%
.3
3
6.3%
.7%
.1
5
8.3%
1.2%
.8
25
5.8%
5.8%
Very
Dissatisfied
2
6.7%
.5%
-.3
5
14.3%
1.2%
1.3
8
8.0%
1.9%
.0
6
6.9%
1.4%
-.4
2
3.5%
.5%
-1.2
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
8
16.7%
1.9%
2.1
4
6.7%
.9%
-.4
35
8.1%
8.1%
Total
30
100.0%
7.0%
35
100.0%
8.1%
100
100.0%
23.3%
87
100.0%
20.2%
57
100.0%
13.3%
13
100.0%
3.0%
48
100.0%
11.2%
60
100.0%
14.0%
430
100.0%
100.0%
Table 87. Overall quality of education - Crosstabulation by college.
overaledu
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
18
32.7%
1.7%
1.7
15
18.1%
1.4%
-.8
74
31.5%
6.8%
3.1
40
22.0%
3.7%
.0
33
23.9%
3.0%
.5
7
20.0%
.6%
-.3
22
14.7%
2.0%
-1.9
31
14.6%
2.8%
-2.3
240
22.0%
22.0%
Satisfied
28
50.9%
2.6%
-1.1
45
54.2%
4.1%
-1.0
144
61.3%
13.2%
-.3
117
64.3%
10.7%
.3
88
63.8%
8.1%
.2
22
62.9%
2.0%
.0
100
66.7%
9.2%
.6
139
65.6%
12.8%
.5
683
62.7%
62.7%
D - 90
Neutral
7
12.7%
.6%
-.1
19
22.9%
1.7%
2.4
16
6.8%
1.5%
-2.7
22
12.1%
2.0%
-.4
15
10.9%
1.4%
-.8
5
14.3%
.5%
.2
24
16.0%
2.2%
.9
37
17.5%
3.4%
1.7
145
13.3%
13.3%
Dissatisfied
1
1.8%
.1%
.2
4
4.8%
.4%
2.4
1
.4%
.1%
-1.4
2
1.1%
.2%
-.5
1
.7%
.1%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
4
2.7%
.4%
1.1
4
1.9%
.4%
.4
17
1.6%
1.6%
Very
Dissatisfied
1
1.8%
.1%
1.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
1
.5%
.1%
.2
1
.7%
.1%
.5
1
2.9%
.1%
2.1
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
1
.5%
.1%
.0
5
.5%
.5%
Total
55
100.0%
5.0%
83
100.0%
7.6%
235
100.0%
21.6%
182
100.0%
16.7%
138
100.0%
12.7%
35
100.0%
3.2%
150
100.0%
13.8%
212
100.0%
19.4%
1090
100.0%
100.0%
Table 88. Overall quality of the program in your major - Crosstabulation by college.
overmajo
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
22
40.0%
2.1%
2.3
13
15.9%
1.2%
-1.6
94
40.2%
8.9%
4.9
45
24.7%
4.3%
.1
38
27.7%
3.6%
.8
12
34.3%
1.1%
1.2
19
12.8%
1.8%
-2.9
14
7.9%
1.3%
-4.5
257
24.4%
24.4%
Satisfied
22
40.0%
2.1%
-.8
45
54.9%
4.3%
1.0
105
44.9%
10.0%
-.6
101
55.5%
9.6%
1.6
73
53.3%
6.9%
1.0
16
45.7%
1.5%
-.2
85
57.0%
8.1%
1.7
53
29.8%
5.0%
-3.4
500
47.5%
47.5%
D - 91
Neutral
8
14.5%
.8%
-1.4
19
23.2%
1.8%
.0
30
12.8%
2.9%
-3.3
30
16.5%
2.9%
-1.9
20
14.6%
1.9%
-2.1
4
11.4%
.4%
-1.5
31
20.8%
2.9%
-.7
104
58.4%
9.9%
9.7
246
23.4%
23.4%
Dissatisfied
3
5.5%
.3%
.9
4
4.9%
.4%
.8
3
1.3%
.3%
-1.7
6
3.3%
.6%
.0
3
2.2%
.3%
-.7
2
5.7%
.2%
.8
10
6.7%
1.0%
2.3
4
2.2%
.4%
-.8
35
3.3%
3.3%
Very
Dissatisfied
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
1
1.2%
.1%
-.1
2
.9%
.2%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-1.6
3
2.2%
.3%
.9
1
2.9%
.1%
.8
4
2.7%
.4%
1.4
3
1.7%
.3%
.4
14
1.3%
1.3%
Total
55
100.0%
5.2%
82
100.0%
7.8%
234
100.0%
22.2%
182
100.0%
17.3%
137
100.0%
13.0%
35
100.0%
3.3%
149
100.0%
14.2%
178
100.0%
16.9%
1052
100.0%
100.0%
Table 89. Vareity of courses in your major - Crosstabulation by college.
varcours
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
17
30.9%
1.6%
1.5
12
14.6%
1.1%
-1.3
77
33.0%
7.3%
3.9
33
18.4%
3.1%
-.8
31
22.5%
3.0%
.3
12
34.3%
1.1%
1.7
20
13.4%
1.9%
-2.1
21
11.9%
2.0%
-2.7
223
21.3%
21.3%
Satisfied
22
40.0%
2.1%
-.4
40
48.8%
3.8%
.8
110
47.2%
10.5%
.9
80
44.7%
7.6%
.3
68
49.3%
6.5%
1.1
16
45.7%
1.5%
.2
73
49.0%
7.0%
1.1
45
25.4%
4.3%
-3.6
454
43.3%
43.3%
D - 92
Neutral
13
23.6%
1.2%
-.8
28
34.1%
2.7%
.7
40
17.2%
3.8%
-3.5
57
31.8%
5.4%
.5
26
18.8%
2.5%
-2.4
5
14.3%
.5%
-1.7
40
26.8%
3.8%
-.7
103
58.2%
9.8%
6.9
312
29.8%
29.8%
Dissatisfied
3
5.5%
.3%
.3
2
2.4%
.2%
-.9
6
2.6%
.6%
-1.5
8
4.5%
.8%
-.1
11
8.0%
1.0%
1.8
1
2.9%
.1%
-.5
14
9.4%
1.3%
2.7
4
2.3%
.4%
-1.5
49
4.7%
4.7%
Very
Dissatisfied
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
0
.0%
.0%
-1.5
1
.6%
.1%
-.5
2
1.4%
.2%
.6
1
2.9%
.1%
1.2
2
1.3%
.2%
.5
4
2.3%
.4%
1.8
10
1.0%
1.0%
Total
55
100.0%
5.2%
82
100.0%
7.8%
233
100.0%
22.2%
179
100.0%
17.1%
138
100.0%
13.2%
35
100.0%
3.3%
149
100.0%
14.2%
177
100.0%
16.9%
1048
100.0%
100.0%
Table 90. Challenge of courses in your major - Crosstabulation by college.
challmaj
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
20
37.0%
1.9%
2.1
13
15.9%
1.2%
-1.4
74
31.8%
7.1%
2.7
50
27.8%
4.8%
1.3
29
21.2%
2.8%
-.5
4
11.4%
.4%
-1.5
32
21.5%
3.1%
-.4
21
12.0%
2.0%
-3.1
243
23.3%
23.3%
Satisfied
24
44.4%
2.3%
-.4
43
52.4%
4.1%
.5
118
50.6%
11.3%
.4
89
49.4%
8.5%
.1
74
54.0%
7.1%
.9
24
68.6%
2.3%
1.7
73
49.0%
7.0%
.0
64
36.6%
6.1%
-2.3
509
48.7%
48.7%
D - 93
Neutral
7
13.0%
.7%
-1.8
25
30.5%
2.4%
.9
36
15.5%
3.4%
-3.0
39
21.7%
3.7%
-1.0
33
24.1%
3.2%
-.3
5
14.3%
.5%
-1.3
34
22.8%
3.3%
-.6
86
49.1%
8.2%
6.2
265
25.4%
25.4%
Dissatisfied
2
3.7%
.2%
1.0
1
1.2%
.1%
-.4
5
2.1%
.5%
.4
2
1.1%
.2%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-1.6
2
5.7%
.2%
1.7
6
4.0%
.6%
2.0
1
.6%
.1%
-1.2
19
1.8%
1.8%
Very
Dissatisfied
1
1.9%
.1%
.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-1.4
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
1
.7%
.1%
-.2
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
4
2.7%
.4%
2.4
3
1.7%
.3%
1.2
9
.9%
.9%
Total
54
100.0%
5.2%
82
100.0%
7.8%
233
100.0%
22.3%
180
100.0%
17.2%
137
100.0%
13.1%
35
100.0%
3.3%
149
100.0%
14.3%
175
100.0%
16.7%
1045
100.0%
100.0%
Table 91. Accessiblity of faculty - Crosstabulation by college.
accesfac
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
12
21.8%
1.1%
.5
17
20.0%
1.6%
.3
53
22.8%
5.0%
1.4
31
17.2%
2.9%
-.5
29
21.5%
2.7%
.7
10
29.4%
.9%
1.4
22
14.8%
2.1%
-1.1
27
13.6%
2.5%
-1.7
201
18.8%
18.8%
Satisfied
27
49.1%
2.5%
.3
38
44.7%
3.6%
-.2
112
48.3%
10.5%
.5
76
42.2%
7.1%
-.8
63
46.7%
5.9%
.1
13
38.2%
1.2%
-.7
68
45.6%
6.4%
-.1
95
48.0%
8.9%
.4
492
46.1%
46.1%
D - 94
Neutral
12
21.8%
1.1%
-.8
25
29.4%
2.3%
.4
54
23.3%
5.1%
-1.1
57
31.7%
5.3%
1.2
29
21.5%
2.7%
-1.3
8
23.5%
.7%
-.4
44
29.5%
4.1%
.6
61
30.8%
5.7%
1.0
290
27.2%
27.2%
Dissatisfied
4
7.3%
.4%
.2
4
4.7%
.4%
-.7
12
5.2%
1.1%
-.9
14
7.8%
1.3%
.6
10
7.4%
.9%
.3
3
8.8%
.3%
.5
13
8.7%
1.2%
1.0
11
5.6%
1.0%
-.6
71
6.6%
6.6%
Very
Dissatisfied
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
1
1.2%
.1%
-.1
1
.4%
.1%
-1.2
2
1.1%
.2%
-.2
4
3.0%
.4%
1.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
2
1.3%
.2%
.0
4
2.0%
.4%
.9
14
1.3%
1.3%
Total
55
100.0%
5.1%
85
100.0%
8.0%
232
100.0%
21.7%
180
100.0%
16.9%
135
100.0%
12.6%
34
100.0%
3.2%
149
100.0%
14.0%
198
100.0%
18.5%
1068
100.0%
100.0%
Table 92. Helpfulness of faculty - Crosstabulation by college.
helpfac
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
15
28.3%
1.4%
1.0
18
21.4%
1.7%
.0
67
28.8%
6.3%
2.3
27
15.0%
2.5%
-1.9
36
26.5%
3.4%
1.2
11
31.4%
1.0%
1.2
25
16.8%
2.3%
-1.3
33
16.4%
3.1%
-1.6
232
21.7%
21.7%
Satisfied
26
49.1%
2.4%
.2
41
48.8%
3.8%
.2
110
47.2%
10.3%
.0
94
52.2%
8.8%
1.0
56
41.2%
5.2%
-1.0
14
40.0%
1.3%
-.6
67
45.0%
6.3%
-.4
99
49.3%
9.2%
.4
507
47.3%
47.3%
D - 95
Neutral
11
20.8%
1.0%
-.6
21
25.0%
2.0%
.0
48
20.6%
4.5%
-1.3
45
25.0%
4.2%
.0
37
27.2%
3.5%
.5
9
25.7%
.8%
.1
40
26.8%
3.7%
.5
56
27.9%
5.2%
.8
267
24.9%
24.9%
Dissatisfied
1
1.9%
.1%
-1.0
4
4.8%
.4%
-.1
7
3.0%
.7%
-1.3
13
7.2%
1.2%
1.4
5
3.7%
.5%
-.7
1
2.9%
.1%
-.6
13
8.7%
1.2%
2.1
9
4.5%
.8%
-.3
53
4.9%
4.9%
Very
Dissatisfied
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
1
.4%
.1%
-1.0
1
.6%
.1%
-.7
2
1.5%
.2%
.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
4
2.7%
.4%
1.8
4
2.0%
.4%
1.2
12
1.1%
1.1%
Total
53
100.0%
4.9%
84
100.0%
7.8%
233
100.0%
21.8%
180
100.0%
16.8%
136
100.0%
12.7%
35
100.0%
3.3%
149
100.0%
13.9%
201
100.0%
18.8%
1071
100.0%
100.0%
Table 93. The degree to which your were treated fairly - Crosstabulation by college.
treatedf
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
20
36.4%
1.9%
1.5
18
21.4%
1.7%
-.8
84
35.9%
7.8%
3.0
32
17.7%
3.0%
-2.2
42
30.7%
3.9%
1.1
11
31.4%
1.0%
.6
31
20.7%
2.9%
-1.3
42
20.9%
3.9%
-1.4
280
26.0%
26.0%
Satisfied
26
47.3%
2.4%
-.3
46
54.8%
4.3%
.6
112
47.9%
10.4%
-.5
95
52.5%
8.8%
.4
62
45.3%
5.8%
-.8
16
45.7%
1.5%
-.4
73
48.7%
6.8%
-.3
110
54.7%
10.2%
.9
540
50.1%
50.1%
D - 96
Neutral
9
16.4%
.8%
-.7
20
23.8%
1.9%
.7
34
14.5%
3.2%
-2.0
47
26.0%
4.4%
1.7
25
18.2%
2.3%
-.5
7
20.0%
.6%
.0
34
22.7%
3.2%
.6
43
21.4%
4.0%
.3
219
20.3%
20.3%
Dissatisfied
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
0
.0%
.0%
-1.5
3
1.3%
.3%
-1.4
7
3.9%
.6%
.9
4
2.9%
.4%
.1
1
2.9%
.1%
.0
9
6.0%
.8%
2.4
6
3.0%
.6%
.2
30
2.8%
2.8%
Very
Dissatisfied
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
1
.4%
.1%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
4
2.9%
.4%
3.0
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
3
2.0%
.3%
1.8
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
8
.7%
.7%
Total
55
100.0%
5.1%
84
100.0%
7.8%
234
100.0%
21.7%
181
100.0%
16.8%
137
100.0%
12.7%
35
100.0%
3.2%
150
100.0%
13.9%
201
100.0%
18.7%
1077
100.0%
100.0%
Table 94. Overall quality of University Studies/General Educaiton courses - Crosstabulation by college.
qualgene
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
13
26.0%
1.3%
2.5
10
12.8%
1.0%
-.1
34
15.6%
3.4%
1.0
18
11.4%
1.8%
-.6
15
11.8%
1.5%
-.4
2
6.5%
.2%
-1.0
13
9.4%
1.3%
-1.2
26
13.1%
2.6%
.0
131
13.1%
13.1%
Satisfied
19
38.0%
1.9%
-1.4
44
56.4%
4.4%
.5
121
55.5%
12.1%
.6
77
48.7%
7.7%
-.6
64
50.4%
6.4%
-.3
15
48.4%
1.5%
-.3
76
54.7%
7.6%
.4
107
54.0%
10.7%
.3
523
52.4%
52.4%
D - 97
Neutral
12
24.0%
1.2%
-.1
15
19.2%
1.5%
-1.0
47
21.6%
4.7%
-.9
51
32.3%
5.1%
1.9
29
22.8%
2.9%
-.4
8
25.8%
.8%
.1
36
25.9%
3.6%
.3
49
24.7%
4.9%
.0
247
24.7%
24.7%
Dissatisfied
5
10.0%
.5%
.6
9
11.5%
.9%
1.2
13
6.0%
1.3%
-1.0
9
5.7%
.9%
-.9
14
11.0%
1.4%
1.3
5
16.1%
.5%
1.7
11
7.9%
1.1%
.0
12
6.1%
1.2%
-.9
78
7.8%
7.8%
Very
Dissatisfied
1
2.0%
.1%
.0
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
3
1.4%
.3%
-.7
3
1.9%
.3%
-.1
5
3.9%
.5%
1.5
1
3.2%
.1%
.5
3
2.2%
.3%
.1
4
2.0%
.4%
.0
20
2.0%
2.0%
Total
50
100.0%
5.0%
78
100.0%
7.8%
218
100.0%
21.8%
158
100.0%
15.8%
127
100.0%
12.7%
31
100.0%
3.1%
139
100.0%
13.9%
198
100.0%
19.8%
999
100.0%
100.0%
Table 95. Variety of courses in University Studies/General Education - Crosstabulation by college.
vargened
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
12
24.0%
1.2%
1.7
11
14.3%
1.1%
-.1
34
15.7%
3.4%
.3
23
14.7%
2.3%
.0
20
15.6%
2.0%
.2
2
6.5%
.2%
-1.2
14
10.1%
1.4%
-1.5
32
16.2%
3.2%
.5
148
14.9%
14.9%
Satisfied
18
36.0%
1.8%
-.9
37
48.1%
3.7%
.4
110
50.9%
11.1%
1.3
62
39.7%
6.2%
-1.0
48
37.5%
4.8%
-1.3
13
41.9%
1.3%
-.2
70
50.4%
7.0%
1.0
89
44.9%
8.9%
.0
447
44.9%
44.9%
D - 98
Neutral
11
22.0%
1.1%
-1.0
25
32.5%
2.5%
.4
56
25.9%
5.6%
-1.0
48
30.8%
4.8%
.2
41
32.0%
4.1%
.5
11
35.5%
1.1%
.6
38
27.3%
3.8%
-.5
66
33.3%
6.6%
.9
296
29.7%
29.7%
Dissatisfied
7
14.0%
.7%
1.3
4
5.2%
.4%
-1.0
13
6.0%
1.3%
-1.3
20
12.8%
2.0%
1.8
15
11.7%
1.5%
1.2
4
12.9%
.4%
.8
15
10.8%
1.5%
.9
8
4.0%
.8%
-2.2
86
8.6%
8.6%
Very
Dissatisfied
2
4.0%
.2%
1.2
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
3
1.4%
.3%
-.5
3
1.9%
.3%
.1
4
3.1%
.4%
1.1
1
3.2%
.1%
.6
2
1.4%
.2%
-.3
3
1.5%
.3%
-.3
18
1.8%
1.8%
Total
50
100.0%
5.0%
77
100.0%
7.7%
216
100.0%
21.7%
156
100.0%
15.7%
128
100.0%
12.9%
31
100.0%
3.1%
139
100.0%
14.0%
198
100.0%
19.9%
995
100.0%
100.0%
Table 96. Challenge of courses in University Studies/General Education - Crosstabulation by college.
challgen
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Very Satisfied
12
24.0%
1.2%
1.5
10
13.0%
1.0%
-.6
42
19.5%
4.2%
1.5
20
12.7%
2.0%
-.9
20
15.6%
2.0%
.0
4
12.9%
.4%
-.4
16
11.5%
1.6%
-1.2
30
15.4%
3.0%
.0
154
15.5%
15.5%
Satisfied
17
34.0%
1.7%
-1.6
38
49.4%
3.8%
-.1
114
53.0%
11.5%
.6
78
49.4%
7.9%
-.1
60
46.9%
6.0%
-.5
14
45.2%
1.4%
-.4
71
51.1%
7.2%
.2
104
53.3%
10.5%
.7
496
49.9%
49.9%
D - 99
Neutral
16
32.0%
1.6%
.7
21
27.3%
2.1%
.0
44
20.5%
4.4%
-1.9
50
31.6%
5.0%
1.1
41
32.0%
4.1%
1.1
11
35.5%
1.1%
.9
39
28.1%
3.9%
.2
48
24.6%
4.8%
-.7
270
27.2%
27.2%
Dissatisfied
4
8.0%
.4%
.7
8
10.4%
.8%
1.8
13
6.0%
1.3%
.3
7
4.4%
.7%
-.6
3
2.3%
.3%
-1.5
2
6.5%
.2%
.2
9
6.5%
.9%
.5
9
4.6%
.9%
-.5
55
5.5%
5.5%
Very
Dissatisfied
1
2.0%
.1%
.1
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
2
.9%
.2%
-1.0
3
1.9%
.3%
.1
4
3.1%
.4%
1.1
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
4
2.9%
.4%
.9
4
2.1%
.4%
.2
18
1.8%
1.8%
Total
50
100.0%
5.0%
77
100.0%
7.8%
215
100.0%
21.7%
158
100.0%
15.9%
128
100.0%
12.9%
31
100.0%
3.1%
139
100.0%
14.0%
195
100.0%
19.6%
993
100.0%
100.0%
Table 97. Communication - Crosstabulation by college.
prepcomm
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not at USU
3
5.7%
.3%
-1.1
10
12.0%
.9%
.4
25
11.0%
2.3%
.2
18
10.1%
1.7%
-.1
17
12.1%
1.6%
.6
4
11.8%
.4%
.2
13
9.0%
1.2%
-.5
22
10.5%
2.1%
.0
112
10.5%
10.5%
Very Well
9
17.0%
.8%
.0
13
15.7%
1.2%
-.3
48
21.1%
4.5%
1.4
29
16.3%
2.7%
-.3
28
20.0%
2.6%
.8
5
14.7%
.5%
-.3
18
12.5%
1.7%
-1.3
33
15.7%
3.1%
-.5
183
17.1%
17.1%
D - 100
Well
17
32.1%
1.6%
-1.3
38
45.8%
3.6%
.3
104
45.6%
9.7%
.5
78
43.8%
7.3%
.0
57
40.7%
5.3%
-.5
11
32.4%
1.0%
-1.0
68
47.2%
6.4%
.6
94
44.8%
8.8%
.2
467
43.6%
43.6%
Poorly
4
7.5%
.4%
.7
4
4.8%
.4%
-.2
8
3.5%
.7%
-1.2
11
6.2%
1.0%
.5
7
5.0%
.7%
-.2
4
11.8%
.4%
1.6
12
8.3%
1.1%
1.6
7
3.3%
.7%
-1.3
57
5.3%
5.3%
Very Poorly
2
3.8%
.2%
1.8
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
1
.4%
.1%
-1.0
4
2.2%
.4%
1.4
2
1.4%
.2%
.3
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
3
2.1%
.3%
1.1
0
.0%
.0%
-1.5
12
1.1%
1.1%
Not
Applicable
18
34.0%
1.7%
1.8
18
21.7%
1.7%
-.1
42
18.4%
3.9%
-1.3
38
21.3%
3.6%
-.3
29
20.7%
2.7%
-.4
10
29.4%
.9%
.9
30
20.8%
2.8%
-.4
54
25.7%
5.0%
1.0
239
22.3%
22.3%
Total
53
100.0%
5.0%
83
100.0%
7.8%
228
100.0%
21.3%
178
100.0%
16.6%
140
100.0%
13.1%
34
100.0%
3.2%
144
100.0%
13.5%
210
100.0%
19.6%
1070
100.0%
100.0%
Table 98. Numeracy - Crosstabulation by college.
prepnume
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not at USU
5
9.4%
.5%
-.3
12
14.5%
1.1%
1.1
27
11.7%
2.5%
.5
18
10.2%
1.7%
-.2
13
9.3%
1.2%
-.5
4
11.8%
.4%
.2
11
7.7%
1.0%
-1.1
23
11.0%
2.2%
.2
113
10.6%
10.6%
Very Well
11
20.8%
1.0%
.3
15
18.1%
1.4%
-.2
42
18.3%
3.9%
-.3
41
23.2%
3.8%
1.2
18
12.9%
1.7%
-1.7
6
17.6%
.6%
-.2
39
27.3%
3.6%
2.2
32
15.3%
3.0%
-1.2
204
19.1%
19.1%
D - 101
Well
20
37.7%
1.9%
-.5
38
45.8%
3.6%
.5
95
41.3%
8.9%
-.1
79
44.6%
7.4%
.6
60
42.9%
5.6%
.2
13
38.2%
1.2%
-.3
58
40.6%
5.4%
-.2
85
40.7%
8.0%
-.3
448
41.9%
41.9%
Poorly
4
7.5%
.4%
.5
3
3.6%
.3%
-.8
15
6.5%
1.4%
.5
8
4.5%
.7%
-.7
8
5.7%
.7%
.0
5
14.7%
.5%
2.2
5
3.5%
.5%
-1.1
14
6.7%
1.3%
.5
62
5.8%
5.8%
Very Poorly
2
3.8%
.2%
.8
0
.0%
.0%
-1.3
5
2.2%
.5%
.0
3
1.7%
.3%
-.4
5
3.6%
.5%
1.1
1
2.9%
.1%
.3
3
2.1%
.3%
.0
4
1.9%
.4%
-.2
23
2.2%
2.2%
Not
Applicable
11
20.8%
1.0%
.0
15
18.1%
1.4%
-.5
46
20.0%
4.3%
-.2
28
15.8%
2.6%
-1.4
36
25.7%
3.4%
1.4
5
14.7%
.5%
-.7
27
18.9%
2.5%
-.4
51
24.4%
4.8%
1.3
219
20.5%
20.5%
Total
53
100.0%
5.0%
83
100.0%
7.8%
230
100.0%
21.5%
177
100.0%
16.6%
140
100.0%
13.1%
34
100.0%
3.2%
143
100.0%
13.4%
209
100.0%
19.6%
1069
100.0%
100.0%
Table 99. Computer Literacy - Crosstabulation by college.
prepcomp
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not at USU
5
9.3%
.5%
-.5
10
11.8%
.9%
.0
27
11.8%
2.5%
.1
19
10.7%
1.8%
-.4
17
12.0%
1.6%
.1
7
20.6%
.7%
1.5
18
12.6%
1.7%
.3
22
10.5%
2.1%
-.5
125
11.6%
11.6%
Very Well
10
18.5%
.9%
-.6
20
23.5%
1.9%
.2
57
25.0%
5.3%
.9
41
23.2%
3.8%
.3
33
23.2%
3.1%
.2
7
20.6%
.7%
-.2
29
20.3%
2.7%
-.5
42
20.0%
3.9%
-.7
239
22.3%
22.3%
D - 102
Well
22
40.7%
2.1%
.0
32
37.6%
3.0%
-.4
96
42.1%
8.9%
.4
76
42.9%
7.1%
.5
58
40.8%
5.4%
.1
8
23.5%
.7%
-1.6
54
37.8%
5.0%
-.5
88
41.9%
8.2%
.3
434
40.4%
40.4%
Poorly
4
7.4%
.4%
.6
4
4.7%
.4%
-.3
9
3.9%
.8%
-.9
13
7.3%
1.2%
1.1
5
3.5%
.5%
-1.0
5
14.7%
.5%
2.3
9
6.3%
.8%
.5
9
4.3%
.8%
-.7
58
5.4%
5.4%
Very Poorly
1
1.9%
.1%
.2
1
1.2%
.1%
-.3
3
1.3%
.3%
-.3
3
1.7%
.3%
.1
2
1.4%
.2%
-.2
1
2.9%
.1%
.6
3
2.1%
.3%
.5
3
1.4%
.3%
-.2
17
1.6%
1.6%
Not
Applicable
12
22.2%
1.1%
.6
18
21.2%
1.7%
.5
36
15.8%
3.4%
-1.0
25
14.1%
2.3%
-1.4
27
19.0%
2.5%
.1
6
17.6%
.6%
-.1
30
21.0%
2.8%
.6
46
21.9%
4.3%
1.1
200
18.6%
18.6%
Total
54
100.0%
5.0%
85
100.0%
7.9%
228
100.0%
21.2%
177
100.0%
16.5%
142
100.0%
13.2%
34
100.0%
3.2%
143
100.0%
13.3%
210
100.0%
19.6%
1073
100.0%
100.0%
Table 100. Humanities and Art - Crosstabulation by college.
prephuma
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not at USU
6
11.5%
.6%
.4
8
9.3%
.7%
-.1
25
10.8%
2.3%
.5
15
8.4%
1.4%
-.5
19
13.3%
1.8%
1.4
4
12.1%
.4%
.4
11
7.6%
1.0%
-.8
17
7.9%
1.6%
-.8
105
9.7%
9.7%
Very Well
16
30.8%
1.5%
-.1
20
23.3%
1.8%
-1.4
89
38.4%
8.2%
1.8
44
24.7%
4.1%
-1.7
59
41.3%
5.4%
2.0
13
39.4%
1.2%
.8
40
27.6%
3.7%
-.9
64
29.9%
5.9%
-.5
345
31.9%
31.9%
D - 103
Well
19
36.5%
1.8%
-.5
41
47.7%
3.8%
1.0
88
37.9%
8.1%
-.8
81
45.5%
7.5%
.9
46
32.2%
4.2%
-1.7
11
33.3%
1.0%
-.7
65
44.8%
6.0%
.7
94
43.9%
8.7%
.6
445
41.1%
41.1%
Poorly
3
5.8%
.3%
.1
5
5.8%
.5%
.1
14
6.0%
1.3%
.3
13
7.3%
1.2%
1.0
1
.7%
.1%
-2.5
0
.0%
.0%
-1.4
11
7.6%
1.0%
1.0
13
6.1%
1.2%
.3
60
5.5%
5.5%
Very Poorly
1
1.9%
.1%
.0
0
.0%
.0%
-1.3
1
.4%
.1%
-1.6
7
3.9%
.6%
1.9
2
1.4%
.2%
-.5
2
6.1%
.2%
1.7
3
2.1%
.3%
.1
5
2.3%
.5%
.4
21
1.9%
1.9%
Not
Applicable
7
13.5%
.6%
.8
12
14.0%
1.1%
1.2
15
6.5%
1.4%
-1.7
18
10.1%
1.7%
.1
16
11.2%
1.5%
.5
3
9.1%
.3%
-.1
15
10.3%
1.4%
.2
21
9.8%
1.9%
.0
107
9.9%
9.9%
Total
52
100.0%
4.8%
86
100.0%
7.9%
232
100.0%
21.4%
178
100.0%
16.4%
143
100.0%
13.2%
33
100.0%
3.0%
145
100.0%
13.4%
214
100.0%
19.8%
1083
100.0%
100.0%
Table 101. Social Science - Crosstabulation by college.
prepsocs
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not at USU
3
5.7%
.3%
-1.2
10
11.9%
.9%
.2
27
11.8%
2.5%
.3
20
11.4%
1.9%
.1
18
12.8%
1.7%
.6
5
14.7%
.5%
.6
15
10.3%
1.4%
-.3
22
10.5%
2.1%
-.3
120
11.2%
11.2%
Very Well
11
20.8%
1.0%
-.5
18
21.4%
1.7%
-.4
64
27.9%
6.0%
1.3
39
22.2%
3.6%
-.4
33
23.4%
3.1%
-.1
11
32.4%
1.0%
1.0
33
22.8%
3.1%
-.3
46
21.9%
4.3%
-.6
255
23.8%
23.8%
D - 104
Well
24
45.3%
2.2%
-.2
40
47.6%
3.7%
.1
105
45.9%
9.8%
-.2
83
47.2%
7.7%
.1
69
48.9%
6.4%
.4
11
32.4%
1.0%
-1.2
69
47.6%
6.4%
.1
100
47.6%
9.3%
.2
501
46.7%
46.7%
Poorly
4
7.5%
.4%
.4
5
6.0%
.5%
.0
14
6.1%
1.3%
.0
10
5.7%
.9%
-.2
8
5.7%
.7%
-.2
4
11.8%
.4%
1.4
5
3.4%
.5%
-1.3
15
7.1%
1.4%
.6
65
6.1%
6.1%
Very Poorly
1
1.9%
.1%
.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
0
.0%
.0%
-1.8
6
3.4%
.6%
2.3
1
.7%
.1%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
4
2.8%
.4%
1.4
3
1.4%
.3%
.0
15
1.4%
1.4%
Not
Applicable
10
18.9%
.9%
1.8
11
13.1%
1.0%
.6
19
8.3%
1.8%
-1.2
18
10.2%
1.7%
-.2
12
8.5%
1.1%
-.8
3
8.8%
.3%
-.4
19
13.1%
1.8%
.8
24
11.4%
2.2%
.3
116
10.8%
10.8%
Total
53
100.0%
4.9%
84
100.0%
7.8%
229
100.0%
21.4%
176
100.0%
16.4%
141
100.0%
13.2%
34
100.0%
3.2%
145
100.0%
13.5%
210
100.0%
19.6%
1072
100.0%
100.0%
Table 102. Life Science - Crosstabulation by college.
preplfsc
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not at USU
5
9.4%
.5%
-.1
6
7.1%
.6%
-.8
28
12.2%
2.6%
1.1
18
10.1%
1.7%
.1
11
7.7%
1.0%
-.8
9
26.5%
.8%
3.1
13
9.0%
1.2%
-.3
16
7.7%
1.5%
-1.0
106
9.8%
9.8%
Very Well
13
24.5%
1.2%
.3
17
20.0%
1.6%
-.5
52
22.6%
4.8%
-.1
34
19.0%
3.2%
-1.1
26
18.3%
2.4%
-1.1
10
29.4%
.9%
.8
47
32.4%
4.4%
2.4
47
22.5%
4.4%
-.1
246
22.8%
22.8%
D - 105
Well
20
37.7%
1.9%
-.8
46
54.1%
4.3%
1.2
105
45.7%
9.7%
.1
76
42.5%
7.1%
-.5
66
46.5%
6.1%
.2
9
26.5%
.8%
-1.6
66
45.5%
6.1%
.1
98
46.9%
9.1%
.4
486
45.1%
45.1%
Poorly
1
1.9%
.1%
-1.2
4
4.7%
.4%
-.4
12
5.2%
1.1%
-.3
13
7.3%
1.2%
.9
14
9.9%
1.3%
2.1
1
2.9%
.1%
-.7
3
2.1%
.3%
-1.8
13
6.2%
1.2%
.3
61
5.7%
5.7%
Very Poorly
2
3.8%
.2%
.9
2
2.4%
.2%
.2
4
1.7%
.4%
-.3
7
3.9%
.6%
1.7
2
1.4%
.2%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
3
2.1%
.3%
.0
2
1.0%
.2%
-1.1
22
2.0%
2.0%
Not
Applicable
12
22.6%
1.1%
1.6
10
11.8%
.9%
-.7
29
12.6%
2.7%
-.7
31
17.3%
2.9%
1.0
23
16.2%
2.1%
.5
5
14.7%
.5%
.0
13
9.0%
1.2%
-1.7
33
15.8%
3.1%
.5
156
14.5%
14.5%
Total
53
100.0%
4.9%
85
100.0%
7.9%
230
100.0%
21.4%
179
100.0%
16.6%
142
100.0%
13.2%
34
100.0%
3.2%
145
100.0%
13.5%
209
100.0%
19.4%
1077
100.0%
100.0%
Table 103. Physical Science - Crosstabulation by college.
prepphys
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Not at USU
4
7.5%
.4%
-.7
7
8.3%
.7%
-.6
23
10.0%
2.1%
-.2
19
10.7%
1.8%
.1
16
11.3%
1.5%
.3
7
20.6%
.7%
1.8
19
13.1%
1.8%
1.0
18
8.6%
1.7%
-.9
113
10.5%
10.5%
Very Well
10
18.9%
.9%
-.7
20
23.8%
1.9%
.0
60
26.1%
5.6%
.8
40
22.6%
3.7%
-.3
24
16.9%
2.2%
-1.6
8
23.5%
.7%
.0
44
30.3%
4.1%
1.7
48
22.9%
4.5%
-.2
254
23.6%
23.6%
D - 106
Well
20
37.7%
1.9%
-.7
38
45.2%
3.5%
.1
106
46.1%
9.9%
.4
78
44.1%
7.3%
.0
65
45.8%
6.0%
.3
14
41.2%
1.3%
-.3
59
40.7%
5.5%
-.6
95
45.2%
8.8%
.2
475
44.2%
44.2%
Poorly
3
5.7%
.3%
.1
6
7.1%
.6%
.7
14
6.1%
1.3%
.5
5
2.8%
.5%
-1.4
11
7.7%
1.0%
1.3
1
2.9%
.1%
-.6
5
3.4%
.5%
-1.0
12
5.7%
1.1%
.3
57
5.3%
5.3%
Very Poorly
1
1.9%
.1%
.2
4
4.8%
.4%
2.5
0
.0%
.0%
-1.9
4
2.3%
.4%
.8
1
.7%
.1%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
2
1.4%
.2%
-.1
4
1.9%
.4%
.5
16
1.5%
1.5%
Not
Applicable
15
28.3%
1.4%
2.5
9
10.7%
.8%
-1.0
27
11.7%
2.5%
-1.2
31
17.5%
2.9%
.9
25
17.6%
2.3%
.8
4
11.8%
.4%
-.5
16
11.0%
1.5%
-1.2
33
15.7%
3.1%
.3
160
14.9%
14.9%
Total
53
100.0%
4.9%
84
100.0%
7.8%
230
100.0%
21.4%
177
100.0%
16.5%
142
100.0%
13.2%
34
100.0%
3.2%
145
100.0%
13.5%
210
100.0%
19.5%
1075
100.0%
100.0%
Table 104. Undergraduate programs - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
No Opinion
7
12.3%
.6%
.5
6
6.8%
.5%
-1.0
21
8.9%
1.9%
-.7
11
6.0%
1.0%
-1.8
11
7.8%
1.0%
-.9
4
11.8%
.4%
.3
7
4.7%
.6%
-2.1
47
21.7%
4.3%
5.2
114
10.3%
10.3%
Very Good
23
40.4%
2.1%
.6
25
28.4%
2.3%
-1.1
94
40.0%
8.5%
1.2
85
46.4%
7.7%
2.5
53
37.6%
4.8%
.5
15
44.1%
1.4%
.9
47
31.8%
4.3%
-.7
47
21.7%
4.3%
-3.4
389
35.3%
35.3%
impugpgs
Good
23
40.4%
2.1%
-.9
48
54.5%
4.4%
.8
109
46.4%
9.9%
-.5
79
43.2%
7.2%
-1.1
70
49.6%
6.3%
.2
12
35.3%
1.1%
-1.1
84
56.8%
7.6%
1.4
111
51.2%
10.1%
.5
536
48.6%
48.6%
D - 107
Fair
2
3.5%
.2%
-.6
9
10.2%
.8%
2.0
10
4.3%
.9%
-.7
8
4.4%
.7%
-.6
7
5.0%
.6%
-.2
3
8.8%
.3%
.9
9
6.1%
.8%
.4
11
5.1%
1.0%
-.2
59
5.3%
5.3%
Poor
2
3.5%
.2%
3.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
1
.4%
.1%
-.1
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.4
1
.7%
.1%
.4
1
.5%
.1%
.0
5
.5%
.5%
Total
57
100.0%
5.2%
88
100.0%
8.0%
235
100.0%
21.3%
183
100.0%
16.6%
141
100.0%
12.8%
34
100.0%
3.1%
148
100.0%
13.4%
217
100.0%
19.7%
1103
100.0%
100.0%
Table 105. Your major department - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
No Opinion
4
6.9%
.4%
-1.3
6
6.8%
.5%
-1.6
17
7.2%
1.6%
-2.5
9
4.9%
.8%
-3.1
7
4.9%
.6%
-2.7
3
8.6%
.3%
-.7
6
4.0%
.5%
-3.1
92
45.1%
8.4%
12.6
144
13.1%
13.1%
Very Good
37
63.8%
3.4%
1.6
40
45.5%
3.6%
-.5
144
61.0%
13.1%
2.7
114
62.0%
10.4%
2.6
78
54.9%
7.1%
1.0
20
57.1%
1.8%
.7
69
46.3%
6.3%
-.4
33
16.2%
3.0%
-6.7
535
48.8%
48.8%
impmdept
Good
13
22.4%
1.2%
-1.2
34
38.6%
3.1%
1.3
67
28.4%
6.1%
-.7
53
28.8%
4.8%
-.5
49
34.5%
4.5%
.8
10
28.6%
.9%
-.2
59
39.6%
5.4%
1.9
53
26.0%
4.8%
-1.2
338
30.8%
30.8%
D - 108
Fair
3
5.2%
.3%
-.1
7
8.0%
.6%
1.0
8
3.4%
.7%
-1.3
8
4.3%
.7%
-.6
5
3.5%
.5%
-1.0
0
.0%
.0%
-1.4
9
6.0%
.8%
.3
19
9.3%
1.7%
2.4
59
5.4%
5.4%
Poor
1
1.7%
.1%
-.1
1
1.1%
.1%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-2.1
0
.0%
.0%
-1.8
3
2.1%
.3%
.3
2
5.7%
.2%
1.7
6
4.0%
.5%
2.0
7
3.4%
.6%
1.7
20
1.8%
1.8%
Total
58
100.0%
5.3%
88
100.0%
8.0%
236
100.0%
21.5%
184
100.0%
16.8%
142
100.0%
13.0%
35
100.0%
3.2%
149
100.0%
13.6%
204
100.0%
18.6%
1096
100.0%
100.0%
Table 106. Teaching ability of faculty - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
No Opinion
5
8.6%
.5%
1.6
2
2.3%
.2%
-.9
8
3.4%
.7%
-.7
4
2.2%
.4%
-1.4
7
4.9%
.6%
.4
2
5.7%
.2%
.4
4
2.7%
.4%
-.9
15
6.9%
1.4%
1.9
47
4.2%
4.2%
Very Good
22
37.9%
2.0%
-.6
32
36.8%
2.9%
-.9
115
48.5%
10.4%
1.3
82
44.8%
7.4%
.4
69
48.6%
6.2%
1.0
16
45.7%
1.4%
.2
67
45.0%
6.1%
.3
74
34.3%
6.7%
-2.0
477
43.1%
43.1%
impteach
Good
24
41.4%
2.2%
-.3
43
49.4%
3.9%
.8
97
40.9%
8.8%
-.7
80
43.7%
7.2%
.0
56
39.4%
5.1%
-.8
14
40.0%
1.3%
-.3
66
44.3%
6.0%
.1
106
49.1%
9.6%
1.1
486
43.9%
43.9%
D - 109
Fair
5
8.6%
.5%
.4
8
9.2%
.7%
.6
14
5.9%
1.3%
-.8
16
8.7%
1.4%
.7
7
4.9%
.6%
-1.1
3
8.6%
.3%
.3
10
6.7%
.9%
-.3
18
8.3%
1.6%
.6
81
7.3%
7.3%
Poor
2
3.4%
.2%
1.3
2
2.3%
.2%
.7
3
1.3%
.3%
-.2
1
.5%
.1%
-1.0
3
2.1%
.3%
.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
2
1.3%
.2%
-.1
3
1.4%
.3%
-.1
16
1.4%
1.4%
Total
58
100.0%
5.2%
87
100.0%
7.9%
237
100.0%
21.4%
183
100.0%
16.5%
142
100.0%
12.8%
35
100.0%
3.2%
149
100.0%
13.5%
216
100.0%
19.5%
1107
100.0%
100.0%
Table 107. Personal interest of faculty in students - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
No Opinion
3
5.2%
.3%
.2
3
3.5%
.3%
-.5
9
3.8%
.8%
-.6
5
2.7%
.5%
-1.2
8
5.6%
.7%
.6
2
5.7%
.2%
.3
6
4.1%
.5%
-.3
15
7.0%
1.4%
1.6
51
4.6%
4.6%
Very Good
12
20.7%
1.1%
-1.3
30
34.9%
2.7%
.8
75
31.6%
6.8%
.5
58
31.9%
5.3%
.5
55
38.7%
5.0%
1.9
8
22.9%
.7%
-.8
41
27.7%
3.7%
-.5
51
23.7%
4.6%
-1.7
330
29.9%
29.9%
impfacul
Good
29
50.0%
2.6%
.8
36
41.9%
3.3%
-.2
106
44.7%
9.6%
.3
68
37.4%
6.2%
-1.2
50
35.2%
4.5%
-1.5
21
60.0%
1.9%
1.5
64
43.2%
5.8%
.0
104
48.4%
9.4%
1.1
478
43.3%
43.3%
D - 110
Fair
12
20.7%
1.1%
.5
13
15.1%
1.2%
-.6
38
16.0%
3.4%
-.6
43
23.6%
3.9%
1.9
26
18.3%
2.4%
.2
4
11.4%
.4%
-.9
27
18.2%
2.4%
.2
32
14.9%
2.9%
-1.0
195
17.7%
17.7%
Poor
2
3.4%
.2%
-.4
4
4.7%
.4%
.1
9
3.8%
.8%
-.5
8
4.4%
.7%
.0
3
2.1%
.3%
-1.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
10
6.8%
.9%
1.3
13
6.0%
1.2%
1.1
49
4.4%
4.4%
Total
58
100.0%
5.3%
86
100.0%
7.8%
237
100.0%
21.5%
182
100.0%
16.5%
142
100.0%
12.9%
35
100.0%
3.2%
148
100.0%
13.4%
215
100.0%
19.5%
1103
100.0%
100.0%
Table 108. Qaulity of students - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
No Opinion
5
8.8%
.5%
.7
6
7.0%
.5%
.2
13
5.5%
1.2%
-.5
6
3.3%
.5%
-1.6
11
7.7%
1.0%
.7
4
11.4%
.4%
1.2
4
2.7%
.4%
-1.8
21
9.7%
1.9%
2.0
70
6.3%
6.3%
Very Good
23
40.4%
2.1%
1.2
25
29.1%
2.3%
-.4
73
30.8%
6.6%
-.2
56
30.6%
5.1%
-.2
48
33.8%
4.3%
.5
10
28.6%
.9%
-.3
52
35.1%
4.7%
.8
61
28.2%
5.5%
-.9
348
31.5%
31.5%
impqstud
Good
23
40.4%
2.1%
-1.2
42
48.8%
3.8%
-.4
130
54.9%
11.8%
.6
98
53.6%
8.9%
.2
70
49.3%
6.3%
-.5
20
57.1%
1.8%
.4
73
49.3%
6.6%
-.5
121
56.0%
11.0%
.8
577
52.3%
52.3%
D - 111
Fair
5
8.8%
.5%
.0
13
15.1%
1.2%
1.9
18
7.6%
1.6%
-.7
21
11.5%
1.9%
1.2
10
7.0%
.9%
-.7
1
2.9%
.1%
-1.2
17
11.5%
1.5%
1.1
13
6.0%
1.2%
-1.4
98
8.9%
8.9%
Poor
1
1.8%
.1%
.6
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
3
1.3%
.3%
.4
2
1.1%
.2%
.1
3
2.1%
.3%
1.3
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
2
1.4%
.2%
.4
0
.0%
.0%
-1.5
11
1.0%
1.0%
Total
57
100.0%
5.2%
86
100.0%
7.8%
237
100.0%
21.5%
183
100.0%
16.6%
142
100.0%
12.9%
35
100.0%
3.2%
148
100.0%
13.4%
216
100.0%
19.6%
1104
100.0%
100.0%
Table 109. Research activities - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
No Opinion
6
10.5%
.5%
-1.6
18
21.2%
1.6%
.2
54
22.9%
4.9%
.9
33
18.2%
3.0%
-.6
26
18.4%
2.4%
-.5
5
14.3%
.5%
-.8
25
16.9%
2.3%
-.9
54
25.5%
4.9%
1.7
221
20.2%
20.2%
Very Good
21
36.8%
1.9%
2.0
21
24.7%
1.9%
.1
54
22.9%
4.9%
-.4
43
23.8%
3.9%
-.1
37
26.2%
3.4%
.5
13
37.1%
1.2%
1.6
39
26.4%
3.6%
.6
36
17.0%
3.3%
-2.1
264
24.1%
24.1%
impresea
Good
21
36.8%
1.9%
-.5
32
37.6%
2.9%
-.5
97
41.1%
8.9%
.1
67
37.0%
6.1%
-.8
61
43.3%
5.6%
.5
11
31.4%
1.0%
-.9
63
42.6%
5.8%
.3
95
44.8%
8.7%
.9
447
40.8%
40.8%
D - 112
Fair
6
10.5%
.5%
-.5
14
16.5%
1.3%
.8
28
11.9%
2.6%
-.5
33
18.2%
3.0%
1.9
16
11.3%
1.5%
-.6
5
14.3%
.5%
.2
19
12.8%
1.7%
-.1
23
10.8%
2.1%
-.9
144
13.2%
13.2%
Poor
3
5.3%
.3%
2.0
0
.0%
.0%
-1.2
3
1.3%
.3%
-.5
5
2.8%
.5%
1.0
1
.7%
.1%
-.9
1
2.9%
.1%
.5
2
1.4%
.2%
-.4
4
1.9%
.4%
.2
19
1.7%
1.7%
Total
57
100.0%
5.2%
85
100.0%
7.8%
236
100.0%
21.6%
181
100.0%
16.5%
141
100.0%
12.9%
35
100.0%
3.2%
148
100.0%
13.5%
212
100.0%
19.4%
1095
100.0%
100.0%
Table 110. Public relations - Crosstabulation by college.
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
No Opinion
11
19.3%
1.0%
.2
14
16.3%
1.3%
-.5
47
19.8%
4.3%
.5
28
15.3%
2.6%
-1.0
17
12.1%
1.6%
-1.7
9
25.7%
.8%
1.0
23
15.5%
2.1%
-.8
53
25.2%
4.8%
2.3
202
18.4%
18.4%
Very Good
16
28.1%
1.5%
.6
23
26.7%
2.1%
.5
60
25.3%
5.5%
.4
37
20.2%
3.4%
-1.1
39
27.9%
3.6%
.9
8
22.9%
.7%
-.1
39
26.4%
3.6%
.6
42
20.0%
3.8%
-1.2
264
24.1%
24.1%
impprela
Good
23
40.4%
2.1%
-.6
37
43.0%
3.4%
-.4
107
45.1%
9.8%
-.1
92
50.3%
8.4%
.9
68
48.6%
6.2%
.5
12
34.3%
1.1%
-1.0
66
44.6%
6.0%
-.2
96
45.7%
8.8%
.0
501
45.7%
45.7%
D - 113
Fair
3
5.3%
.3%
-1.0
11
12.8%
1.0%
1.0
19
8.0%
1.7%
-.7
23
12.6%
2.1%
1.4
15
10.7%
1.4%
.5
5
14.3%
.5%
.9
16
10.8%
1.5%
.5
12
5.7%
1.1%
-1.8
104
9.5%
9.5%
Poor
4
7.0%
.4%
2.4
1
1.2%
.1%
-.7
4
1.7%
.4%
-.6
3
1.6%
.3%
-.6
1
.7%
.1%
-1.2
1
2.9%
.1%
.2
4
2.7%
.4%
.3
7
3.3%
.6%
1.0
25
2.3%
2.3%
Total
57
100.0%
5.2%
86
100.0%
7.8%
237
100.0%
21.6%
183
100.0%
16.7%
140
100.0%
12.8%
35
100.0%
3.2%
148
100.0%
13.5%
210
100.0%
19.2%
1096
100.0%
100.0%
Table 111. The open access labs had the software I needed - Crosstabulation by college.
softneed
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
24
41.4%
2.2%
.8
35
39.8%
3.2%
.7
90
39.3%
8.2%
1.0
67
37.9%
6.1%
.6
40
29.2%
3.7%
-1.2
8
25.0%
.7%
-1.0
44
31.0%
4.0%
-.9
78
34.1%
7.1%
-.3
386
35.3%
35.3%
Agree
26
44.8%
2.4%
.4
31
35.2%
2.8%
-.9
86
37.6%
7.9%
-1.0
76
42.9%
7.0%
.2
61
44.5%
5.6%
.5
18
56.3%
1.6%
1.3
67
47.2%
6.1%
1.0
91
39.7%
8.3%
-.5
456
41.8%
41.8%
Neutral
D - 114
5
8.6%
.5%
-.7
13
14.8%
1.2%
.8
23
10.0%
2.1%
-.7
15
8.5%
1.4%
-1.3
15
10.9%
1.4%
-.3
5
15.6%
.5%
.6
18
12.7%
1.6%
.3
34
14.8%
3.1%
1.4
128
11.7%
11.7%
Disagree
1
1.7%
.1%
-.7
6
6.8%
.5%
1.6
10
4.4%
.9%
.6
8
4.5%
.7%
.7
1
.7%
.1%
-1.8
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
3
2.1%
.3%
-.9
10
4.4%
.9%
.6
39
3.6%
3.6%
Strongly
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
1
.4%
.1%
.2
1
.6%
.1%
.4
1
.7%
.1%
.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.3
1
.7%
.1%
.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
4
.4%
.4%
Not
Applicable
2
3.4%
.2%
-1.1
3
3.4%
.3%
-1.3
19
8.3%
1.7%
.6
10
5.6%
.9%
-.8
19
13.9%
1.7%
2.9
1
3.1%
.1%
-.9
9
6.3%
.8%
-.4
16
7.0%
1.5%
-.1
79
7.2%
7.2%
Total
58
100.0%
5.3%
88
100.0%
8.1%
229
100.0%
21.0%
177
100.0%
16.2%
137
100.0%
12.5%
32
100.0%
2.9%
142
100.0%
13.0%
229
100.0%
21.0%
1092
100.0%
100.0%
Table 112. Lab consultants provided the help I needed - Crosstabulation by college.
helpneed
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
14
25.0%
1.3%
.9
18
20.5%
1.7%
.1
57
25.0%
5.2%
1.8
40
22.7%
3.7%
.9
20
14.6%
1.8%
-1.4
7
21.9%
.6%
.3
22
15.4%
2.0%
-1.2
37
16.2%
3.4%
-1.2
215
19.8%
19.8%
Agree
22
39.3%
2.0%
.0
37
42.0%
3.4%
.4
89
39.0%
8.2%
-.1
65
36.9%
6.0%
-.5
57
41.6%
5.2%
.4
11
34.4%
1.0%
-.4
52
36.4%
4.8%
-.6
94
41.2%
8.6%
.5
427
39.2%
39.2%
Neutral
12
21.4%
1.1%
-.7
21
23.9%
1.9%
-.4
48
21.1%
4.4%
-1.4
52
29.5%
4.8%
.9
33
24.1%
3.0%
-.4
10
31.3%
.9%
.6
42
29.4%
3.9%
.8
64
28.1%
5.9%
.6
282
25.9%
25.9%
D - 115
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.1
7
8.0%
.6%
1.2
15
6.6%
1.4%
1.0
2
1.1%
.2%
-2.3
8
5.8%
.7%
.4
2
6.3%
.2%
.3
10
7.0%
.9%
1.0
11
4.8%
1.0%
-.2
56
5.1%
5.1%
Strongly
Disagree
3
5.4%
.3%
3.0
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
4
1.8%
.4%
.9
0
.0%
.0%
-1.4
1
.7%
.1%
-.4
1
3.1%
.1%
1.1
3
2.1%
.3%
1.1
0
.0%
.0%
-1.6
12
1.1%
1.1%
Not
Applicable
4
7.1%
.4%
-.4
5
5.7%
.5%
-1.0
15
6.6%
1.4%
-1.1
17
9.7%
1.6%
.4
18
13.1%
1.7%
1.7
1
3.1%
.1%
-1.1
14
9.8%
1.3%
.4
22
9.6%
2.0%
.4
96
8.8%
8.8%
Total
56
100.0%
5.1%
88
100.0%
8.1%
228
100.0%
21.0%
176
100.0%
16.2%
137
100.0%
12.6%
32
100.0%
2.9%
143
100.0%
13.1%
228
100.0%
21.0%
1088
100.0%
100.0%
Table 113. I didn't wait long for an available computer in the lab - Crosstabulation by college.
waitcomp
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
15
25.9%
1.4%
.3
25
28.4%
2.3%
.8
63
27.5%
5.8%
1.0
49
27.8%
4.5%
1.0
28
20.6%
2.6%
-.9
8
25.0%
.7%
.1
28
19.6%
2.6%
-1.1
48
21.0%
4.4%
-1.0
264
24.2%
24.2%
Agree
27
46.6%
2.5%
.8
34
38.6%
3.1%
-.2
90
39.3%
8.2%
-.2
71
40.3%
6.5%
.0
49
36.0%
4.5%
-.8
12
37.5%
1.1%
-.2
59
41.3%
5.4%
.2
96
41.9%
8.8%
.4
438
40.1%
40.1%
Neutral
10
17.2%
.9%
-.5
17
19.3%
1.6%
-.2
34
14.8%
3.1%
-1.8
36
20.5%
3.3%
.1
34
25.0%
3.1%
1.3
7
21.9%
.6%
.2
33
23.1%
3.0%
.8
48
21.0%
4.4%
.3
219
20.1%
20.1%
D - 116
Disagree
4
6.9%
.4%
-.2
9
10.2%
.8%
.8
19
8.3%
1.7%
.3
7
4.0%
.6%
-1.8
12
8.8%
1.1%
.4
3
9.4%
.3%
.3
11
7.7%
1.0%
.0
20
8.7%
1.8%
.5
85
7.8%
7.8%
Strongly
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
0
.0%
.0%
-1.3
9
3.9%
.8%
2.0
2
1.1%
.2%
-.8
1
.7%
.1%
-1.1
2
6.3%
.2%
1.7
7
4.9%
.6%
2.4
1
.4%
.1%
-1.7
22
2.0%
2.0%
Not
Applicable
2
3.4%
.2%
-.7
3
3.4%
.3%
-.9
14
6.1%
1.3%
.2
11
6.3%
1.0%
.3
12
8.8%
1.1%
1.5
0
.0%
.0%
-1.4
5
3.5%
.5%
-1.1
16
7.0%
1.5%
.8
63
5.8%
5.8%
Total
58
100.0%
5.3%
88
100.0%
8.1%
229
100.0%
21.0%
176
100.0%
16.1%
136
100.0%
12.5%
32
100.0%
2.9%
143
100.0%
13.1%
229
100.0%
21.0%
1091
100.0%
100.0%
Table 114. Overall, I was satisfied with the open access labs - Crosstabulation by college.
satislab
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
19
33.9%
1.7%
.4
27
30.7%
2.5%
-.1
83
36.2%
7.6%
1.4
60
34.3%
5.5%
.7
40
29.4%
3.7%
-.4
6
18.8%
.6%
-1.3
37
26.1%
3.4%
-1.1
67
29.4%
6.2%
-.5
339
31.2%
31.2%
Agree
26
46.4%
2.4%
-.2
48
54.5%
4.4%
.8
103
45.0%
9.5%
-.8
86
49.1%
7.9%
.1
63
46.3%
5.8%
-.4
16
50.0%
1.5%
.1
75
52.8%
6.9%
.7
112
49.1%
10.3%
.1
529
48.7%
48.7%
Neutral
D - 117
7
12.5%
.6%
.0
7
8.0%
.6%
-1.2
26
11.4%
2.4%
-.4
16
9.1%
1.5%
-1.2
20
14.7%
1.8%
.8
8
25.0%
.7%
2.0
19
13.4%
1.7%
.4
31
13.6%
2.9%
.5
134
12.3%
12.3%
Disagree
2
3.6%
.2%
.6
3
3.4%
.3%
.7
4
1.7%
.4%
-.6
5
2.9%
.5%
.5
1
.7%
.1%
-1.2
2
6.3%
.2%
1.5
5
3.5%
.5%
1.0
3
1.3%
.3%
-1.0
25
2.3%
2.3%
Strongly
Disagree
0
.0%
.0%
-.5
0
.0%
.0%
-.6
1
.4%
.1%
.2
0
.0%
.0%
-.8
0
.0%
.0%
-.7
0
.0%
.0%
-.3
3
2.1%
.3%
3.4
0
.0%
.0%
-.9
4
.4%
.4%
Not
Applicable
2
3.6%
.2%
-.5
3
3.4%
.3%
-.7
12
5.2%
1.1%
.1
8
4.6%
.7%
-.3
12
8.8%
1.1%
1.9
0
.0%
.0%
-1.3
3
2.1%
.3%
-1.6
15
6.6%
1.4%
1.0
55
5.1%
5.1%
Total
56
100.0%
5.2%
88
100.0%
8.1%
229
100.0%
21.1%
175
100.0%
16.1%
136
100.0%
12.5%
32
100.0%
2.9%
142
100.0%
13.1%
228
100.0%
21.0%
1086
100.0%
100.0%
Table 115. Overall, I was satisfied with my USU email account - Crosstabulation by college.
satisemail
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
13
22.4%
1.2%
.6
16
18.2%
1.5%
-.2
59
25.8%
5.4%
2.3
39
22.0%
3.6%
.9
23
16.9%
2.1%
-.6
3
9.4%
.3%
-1.3
19
13.4%
1.7%
-1.5
36
15.6%
3.3%
-1.2
208
19.0%
19.0%
Agree
19
32.8%
1.7%
-.5
29
33.0%
2.7%
-.5
82
35.8%
7.5%
-.1
63
35.6%
5.8%
-.2
58
42.6%
5.3%
1.2
8
25.0%
.7%
-1.1
46
32.4%
4.2%
-.8
92
39.8%
8.4%
.9
397
36.3%
36.3%
Neutral
15
25.9%
1.4%
1.4
18
20.5%
1.6%
.5
37
16.2%
3.4%
-.7
30
16.9%
2.7%
-.4
18
13.2%
1.6%
-1.3
8
25.0%
.7%
.9
24
16.9%
2.2%
-.3
48
20.8%
4.4%
1.0
198
18.1%
18.1%
D - 118
Disagree
7
12.1%
.6%
-.6
17
19.3%
1.6%
1.0
29
12.7%
2.7%
-.9
29
16.4%
2.7%
.5
20
14.7%
1.8%
-.1
3
9.4%
.3%
-.8
30
21.1%
2.7%
1.9
29
12.6%
2.7%
-1.0
164
15.0%
15.0%
Strongly
Disagree
3
5.2%
.3%
-1.0
6
6.8%
.5%
-.7
15
6.6%
1.4%
-1.3
14
7.9%
1.3%
-.5
13
9.6%
1.2%
.2
9
28.1%
.8%
3.6
21
14.8%
1.9%
2.3
18
7.8%
1.6%
-.6
99
9.1%
9.1%
Not
Applicable
1
1.7%
.1%
-.4
2
2.3%
.2%
-.1
7
3.1%
.6%
.6
2
1.1%
.2%
-1.1
4
2.9%
.4%
.3
1
3.1%
.1%
.2
2
1.4%
.2%
-.8
8
3.5%
.7%
1.0
27
2.5%
2.5%
Total
58
100.0%
5.3%
88
100.0%
8.1%
229
100.0%
21.0%
177
100.0%
16.2%
136
100.0%
12.4%
32
100.0%
2.9%
142
100.0%
13.0%
231
100.0%
21.1%
1093
100.0%
100.0%
Table 116. Overall, I was satisfied with the USU modem access - Crosstabulation by college.
satismodem
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
12
22.2%
1.1%
.5
18
20.7%
1.7%
.3
55
24.1%
5.1%
1.8
36
20.3%
3.3%
.4
19
14.0%
1.8%
-1.4
4
12.1%
.4%
-.9
27
19.1%
2.5%
.0
35
15.6%
3.2%
-1.2
206
19.1%
19.1%
Agree
18
33.3%
1.7%
-.2
35
40.2%
3.2%
.8
80
35.1%
7.4%
.0
59
33.3%
5.5%
-.4
49
36.0%
4.5%
.2
11
33.3%
1.0%
-.2
46
32.6%
4.3%
-.5
80
35.6%
7.4%
.1
378
35.0%
35.0%
Neutral
12
22.2%
1.1%
.2
15
17.2%
1.4%
-.8
44
19.3%
4.1%
-.6
28
15.8%
2.6%
-1.6
37
27.2%
3.4%
1.5
10
30.3%
.9%
1.1
29
20.6%
2.7%
-.2
54
24.0%
5.0%
.9
229
21.2%
21.2%
D - 119
Disagree
4
7.4%
.4%
-.4
9
10.3%
.8%
.4
21
9.2%
1.9%
.1
19
10.7%
1.8%
.8
7
5.1%
.6%
-1.5
3
9.1%
.3%
.0
12
8.5%
1.1%
-.2
22
9.8%
2.0%
.4
97
9.0%
9.0%
Strongly
Disagree
2
3.7%
.2%
.0
3
3.4%
.3%
-.1
4
1.8%
.4%
-1.5
6
3.4%
.6%
-.2
4
2.9%
.4%
-.4
3
9.1%
.3%
1.7
9
6.4%
.8%
1.7
8
3.6%
.7%
.0
39
3.6%
3.6%
Not
Applicable
6
11.1%
.6%
-.2
7
8.0%
.6%
-1.1
24
10.5%
2.2%
-.7
29
16.4%
2.7%
1.6
20
14.7%
1.9%
.8
2
6.1%
.2%
-1.0
18
12.8%
1.7%
.2
26
11.6%
2.4%
-.3
132
12.2%
12.2%
Total
54
100.0%
5.0%
87
100.0%
8.0%
228
100.0%
21.1%
177
100.0%
16.4%
136
100.0%
12.6%
33
100.0%
3.1%
141
100.0%
13.0%
225
100.0%
20.8%
1081
100.0%
100.0%
Table 117. Overall, I was satisfied with the dorm internet access - Crosstabulation by college.
satisinternet
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
11
19.3%
1.1%
1.0
12
14.6%
1.1%
.1
40
18.4%
3.8%
1.7
22
13.0%
2.1%
-.4
16
12.0%
1.5%
-.7
3
10.0%
.3%
-.6
17
12.4%
1.6%
-.5
27
12.3%
2.6%
-.7
148
14.2%
14.2%
Agree
16
28.1%
1.5%
1.1
19
23.2%
1.8%
.4
44
20.3%
4.2%
-.3
41
24.3%
3.9%
.8
35
26.3%
3.3%
1.2
7
23.3%
.7%
.2
23
16.8%
2.2%
-1.2
38
17.3%
3.6%
-1.3
223
21.3%
21.3%
Neutral
D - 120
7
12.3%
.7%
-.8
16
19.5%
1.5%
.6
29
13.4%
2.8%
-1.2
29
17.2%
2.8%
.1
21
15.8%
2.0%
-.3
8
26.7%
.8%
1.3
21
15.3%
2.0%
-.4
45
20.5%
4.3%
1.3
176
16.8%
16.8%
Disagree
3
5.3%
.3%
-.2
6
7.3%
.6%
.6
17
7.8%
1.6%
1.3
9
5.3%
.9%
-.2
5
3.8%
.5%
-1.0
1
3.3%
.1%
-.6
6
4.4%
.6%
-.7
13
5.9%
1.2%
.1
60
5.7%
5.7%
Strongly
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-.3
0
.0%
.0%
-1.4
5
2.3%
.5%
-.1
5
3.0%
.5%
.5
1
.8%
.1%
-1.2
1
3.3%
.1%
.3
8
5.8%
.8%
2.6
4
1.8%
.4%
-.6
25
2.4%
2.4%
Not
Applicable
19
33.3%
1.8%
-.7
29
35.4%
2.8%
-.6
82
37.8%
7.8%
-.4
63
37.3%
6.0%
-.5
55
41.4%
5.3%
.3
10
33.3%
1.0%
-.5
62
45.3%
5.9%
1.1
93
42.3%
8.9%
.6
413
39.5%
39.5%
Total
57
100.0%
5.5%
82
100.0%
7.8%
217
100.0%
20.8%
169
100.0%
16.2%
133
100.0%
12.7%
30
100.0%
2.9%
137
100.0%
13.1%
220
100.0%
21.1%
1045
100.0%
100.0%
Table 118. I received good value for my Computer fee - Crosstabulation by college.
goodvalu
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Strongly
Agree
16
28.1%
1.5%
1.4
17
19.3%
1.6%
-.1
56
24.6%
5.2%
1.7
35
19.9%
3.2%
.1
27
19.7%
2.5%
.0
4
12.1%
.4%
-1.0
22
15.6%
2.0%
-1.1
37
16.3%
3.4%
-1.2
214
19.7%
19.7%
Agree
21
36.8%
1.9%
.1
29
33.0%
2.7%
-.4
83
36.4%
7.6%
.2
71
40.3%
6.5%
1.0
52
38.0%
4.8%
.4
11
33.3%
1.0%
-.2
43
30.5%
4.0%
-1.0
78
34.4%
7.2%
-.3
388
35.7%
35.7%
Neutral
D - 121
9
15.8%
.8%
-1.7
29
33.0%
2.7%
.9
62
27.2%
5.7%
-.2
42
23.9%
3.9%
-1.1
35
25.5%
3.2%
-.6
12
36.4%
1.1%
.9
46
32.6%
4.2%
1.0
70
30.8%
6.4%
.8
305
28.1%
28.1%
Disagree
6
10.5%
.6%
.5
7
8.0%
.6%
-.2
14
6.1%
1.3%
-1.3
16
9.1%
1.5%
.2
12
8.8%
1.1%
.0
4
12.1%
.4%
.7
15
10.6%
1.4%
.8
21
9.3%
1.9%
.3
95
8.7%
8.7%
Strongly
Disagree
1
1.8%
.1%
-1.0
2
2.3%
.2%
-1.0
5
2.2%
.5%
-1.7
9
5.1%
.8%
.3
8
5.8%
.7%
.6
2
6.1%
.2%
.4
12
8.5%
1.1%
2.1
12
5.3%
1.1%
.4
51
4.7%
4.7%
Not
Applicable
4
7.0%
.4%
1.7
4
4.5%
.4%
.8
8
3.5%
.7%
.3
3
1.7%
.3%
-1.1
3
2.2%
.3%
-.6
0
.0%
.0%
-1.0
3
2.1%
.3%
-.7
9
4.0%
.8%
.7
34
3.1%
3.1%
Total
57
100.0%
5.2%
88
100.0%
8.1%
228
100.0%
21.0%
176
100.0%
16.2%
137
100.0%
12.6%
33
100.0%
3.0%
141
100.0%
13.0%
227
100.0%
20.9%
1087
100.0%
100.0%
Table 119. I use the internet address webmail.usu.edu to read my USU email - Crosstabulation by college.
Never
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
2
3.4%
.2%
-1.4
7
7.9%
.6%
-.3
18
7.4%
1.6%
-.7
10
5.4%
.9%
-1.5
21
14.4%
1.8%
2.3
4
11.1%
.3%
.5
11
7.1%
1.0%
-.7
27
11.3%
2.4%
1.4
100
8.7%
8.7%
webedu
Most of
the time
Sometimes
9
16
15.3%
27.1%
.8%
1.4%
-.2
.6
16
25
18.0%
28.1%
1.4%
2.2%
.4
.9
35
53
14.5%
21.9%
3.0%
4.6%
-.8
-.4
42
48
22.8%
26.1%
3.7%
4.2%
2.1
.8
24
29
16.4%
19.9%
2.1%
2.5%
.0
-.9
3
5
8.3%
13.9%
.3%
.4%
-1.2
-1.2
24
38
15.6%
24.7%
2.1%
3.3%
-.3
.4
36
53
15.1%
22.3%
3.1%
4.6%
-.5
-.3
189
267
16.5%
23.3%
16.5%
23.3%
D - 122
All of the time
32
54.2%
2.8%
.3
41
46.1%
3.6%
-.7
136
56.2%
11.8%
1.0
84
45.7%
7.3%
-1.1
72
49.3%
6.3%
-.4
24
66.7%
2.1%
1.3
81
52.6%
7.1%
.2
122
51.3%
10.6%
-.1
592
51.6%
51.6%
Total
59
100.0%
5.1%
89
100.0%
7.8%
242
100.0%
21.1%
184
100.0%
16.0%
146
100.0%
12.7%
36
100.0%
3.1%
154
100.0%
13.4%
238
100.0%
20.7%
1148
100.0%
100.0%
Table 120. Indicate the number of privately owned computers you had regular access to during the past year - Crosstabulation by college.
None
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
2
3.4%
.2%
-.6
6
6.7%
.5%
.6
9
3.8%
.8%
-1.0
8
4.4%
.7%
-.5
15
10.3%
1.3%
2.7
2
5.6%
.2%
.1
10
6.5%
.9%
.7
8
3.4%
.7%
-1.3
60
5.2%
5.2%
compown
1 computer
2 computers
29
18
49.2%
30.5%
2.5%
1.6%
.7
.0
32
29
36.0%
32.6%
2.8%
2.5%
-1.1
.3
103
70
43.1%
29.3%
9.0%
6.1%
-.1
-.4
85
65
46.4%
35.5%
7.4%
5.7%
.6
1.2
58
43
39.7%
29.5%
5.1%
3.8%
-.7
-.2
18
8
50.0%
22.2%
1.6%
.7%
.6
-.9
65
43
42.2%
27.9%
5.7%
3.8%
-.2
-.6
108
74
45.4%
31.1%
9.4%
6.5%
.4
.1
498
350
43.5%
30.6%
43.5%
30.6%
D - 123
3+ computers
10
16.9%
.9%
-.6
22
24.7%
1.9%
.8
57
23.8%
5.0%
1.1
25
13.7%
2.2%
-2.1
30
20.5%
2.6%
.0
8
22.2%
.7%
.2
36
23.4%
3.1%
.8
48
20.2%
4.2%
-.2
236
20.6%
20.6%
Total
59
100.0%
5.2%
89
100.0%
7.8%
239
100.0%
20.9%
183
100.0%
16.0%
146
100.0%
12.8%
36
100.0%
3.1%
154
100.0%
13.5%
238
100.0%
20.8%
1144
100.0%
100.0%
Table 121. If you answered 1 - 3+ above, how often did you use this (these) privarelty owned compuer(s) to do your school work? - Crosstabulation by college.
Never
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
0
.0%
.0%
-1.1
3
3.8%
.3%
.9
2
.9%
.2%
-1.3
6
3.6%
.6%
1.2
2
1.6%
.2%
-.4
3
8.6%
.3%
2.5
2
1.4%
.2%
-.6
5
2.3%
.5%
.1
23
2.2%
2.2%
useownc
Most of
the time
Sometimes
19
23
33.9%
41.1%
1.8%
2.2%
.7
.2
21
36
26.6%
45.6%
2.0%
3.5%
-.4
.9
55
81
25.2%
37.2%
5.3%
7.8%
-1.1
-.5
57
67
33.7%
39.6%
5.5%
6.5%
1.1
.1
35
49
28.7%
40.2%
3.4%
4.7%
-.1
.2
13
8
37.1%
22.9%
1.3%
.8%
.9
-1.5
42
52
30.4%
37.7%
4.1%
5.0%
.3
-.3
60
89
27.5%
40.8%
5.8%
8.6%
-.5
.4
302
405
29.2%
39.1%
29.2%
39.1%
D - 124
All of the time
14
25.0%
1.4%
-.6
19
24.1%
1.8%
-.9
80
36.7%
7.7%
2.0
39
23.1%
3.8%
-1.5
36
29.5%
3.5%
.0
11
31.4%
1.1%
.2
42
30.4%
4.1%
.2
64
29.4%
6.2%
.0
305
29.5%
29.5%
Total
56
100.0%
5.4%
79
100.0%
7.6%
218
100.0%
21.1%
169
100.0%
16.3%
122
100.0%
11.8%
35
100.0%
3.4%
138
100.0%
13.3%
218
100.0%
21.1%
1035
100.0%
100.0%
Table 122. I had regular access during the past year to a USU computer, not in an open
access lab. (e.g. lab for students in a course or in a major) - Crosstabulation by college.
usucomp
Yes
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
27
46.6%
2.4%
.5
36
40.4%
3.2%
-.3
98
42.1%
8.7%
-.1
88
48.9%
7.8%
1.3
59
41.0%
5.2%
-.3
22
61.1%
2.0%
1.7
57
37.7%
5.1%
-.9
93
39.4%
8.3%
-.7
480
42.6%
42.6%
No
Total
31
53.4%
2.8%
-.4
53
59.6%
4.7%
.3
135
57.9%
12.0%
.1
92
51.1%
8.2%
-1.1
85
59.0%
7.5%
.3
14
38.9%
1.2%
-1.5
94
62.3%
8.3%
.8
143
60.6%
12.7%
.6
647
57.4%
57.4%
58
100.0%
5.1%
89
100.0%
7.9%
233
100.0%
20.7%
180
100.0%
16.0%
144
100.0%
12.8%
36
100.0%
3.2%
151
100.0%
13.4%
236
100.0%
20.9%
1127
100.0%
100.0%
D - 125
Table 123. If you answered yes to the above question, how often did you use this computer to do your school work? - Crosstabulation by college.
Never
College
Agriculture
Business
Education
Engineering
Humanities, Arts ans
Social Sciences
Natural Resources
Science
Other
Total
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
Std. Residual
Count
% within College
% of Total
5
16.7%
1.0%
.0
8
19.0%
1.6%
.3
18
17.1%
3.5%
.0
14
14.9%
2.7%
-.5
10
16.1%
1.9%
-.2
4
16.7%
.8%
.0
7
12.3%
1.4%
-.9
21
21.2%
4.1%
1.0
87
17.0%
17.0%
useusuc
Most of
the time
Sometimes
14
8
46.7%
26.7%
2.7%
1.6%
-.3
.2
16
14
38.1%
33.3%
3.1%
2.7%
-1.1
1.1
59
24
56.2%
22.9%
11.5%
4.7%
.9
-.5
48
26
51.1%
27.7%
9.4%
5.1%
.1
.5
32
15
51.6%
24.2%
6.2%
2.9%
.1
-.1
9
6
37.5%
25.0%
1.8%
1.2%
-.9
.0
27
18
47.4%
31.6%
5.3%
3.5%
-.3
1.0
53
18
53.5%
18.2%
10.3%
3.5%
.5
-1.4
258
129
50.3%
25.1%
50.3%
25.1%
D - 126
All of the time
3
10.0%
.6%
.5
4
9.5%
.8%
.5
4
3.8%
.8%
-1.4
6
6.4%
1.2%
-.4
5
8.1%
1.0%
.1
5
20.8%
1.0%
2.4
5
8.8%
1.0%
.3
7
7.1%
1.4%
-.2
39
7.6%
7.6%
Total
30
100.0%
5.8%
42
100.0%
8.2%
105
100.0%
20.5%
94
100.0%
18.3%
62
100.0%
12.1%
24
100.0%
4.7%
57
100.0%
11.1%
99
100.0%
19.3%
513
100.0%
100.0%
Appendix E
What The USU Advising System Is Doing Well
What the USU advising system does well. 654 responses
(Advisor's name) is not an average representation of the advisors. Most of the others I have worked with are considerate and
Able to support many students.
Absolutely everything! I love everything about them!
Advising people on how to get their education.
Advising.
Advisor are helpful.
Advisors help with course selection okay.
Advisors know what classes best fir the students needs.
Advisors know what they're doing with class schedules.
Advisors that I have worked with in the past have been very informative (department advisors).
Always a person you can go talk to when you need. They have always been available and helpful.
Always there, can easily make an appointment.
Andy Anderson is doing well. He got me informed and on an email list. He also gave me a list of classes I need to take for
my major. He helped a lot.
Andy is awesome!
Answers my questions.
Appointments are easy to make and advisors are willing to help.
Appointments are quick and straight to the point.
Assigning advisors and requiring new students to meet with them.
Availability, knowledge, flexibility.
Availability.
Available
Available and willing to help.
Being accessible to students.
Being available to students.
Being available.
Being great with kids and talking everything out until the things are taken care of.
Being prompt in meetings.
Being there for people.
Being very efficient during crunch times like beginning of the semester.
Brian does a very good job with all the athletes.
Building expansion.
By having advisors, making them available to see and being able to contact them by phone or email.
Caring about students.
Choosing good advisors.
Concise paperwork that describes courses needed to complete major.
Courteous, helpful, and friendly.
Darcie helped me register for classes and keeps me updated with info for my major.
Darcie is awesome. She is always very helpful and I can always get in touch via email or in person when I need to.
Don't know but she did good with my schedule.
Don't know enough to comment.
Don't know, haven't used it all that much yet to be able to tell.
Don't know. Don't really use them.
Don't know. Have never had a pleasant experience.
Don't know. I only met my advisor once.
Don't need to call ahead to make an appointment.
Don't really know.
Easy to get an appointment.
Easy to meet with advisors. It isn't difficult to make an appointment.
Easy to set up an appointment; knows requirements, what I need for academic goals to be reached.
E-1
What the USU advising system does well. 654 responses
Eating.
Eled department is always there if you need to go over questions.
Email notifications.
Emails of major requirement changes helped with planning academic year. Major requirement very helpful as a way for
Encouraging us to meet with them keeping in contact through email.
Everyone I've talked with has been very helpful and they seem interested in my welfare.
Everything as far as I am concerned.
Everything in my case.
Everything that I know of.
Everything they do, they do well.
Everything.
Everything. I love my advisor. She is extremely helpful. Darcie is the best!
Everything. It's an award winning department.
Everything. They evaluated my transfer credits and helped me choose good classes.
Finding people who know all of the information about the majors.
Fitting as many students in as possible.
Friendly and courteous, willing to help.
Friendly, welcoming attitude. Goes out of their way to help.
Friendly.
Getting everyone taken care of.
Getting me a list of pre-reqs.
Getting me informed and keeping me afloat.
Getting student through program.
Getting students into necessary classes.
Getting students into the classes they need.
Getting to know and help the students.
Getting you into classes.
Gives info about the major.
Gives me a detailed schedule in what classes I should be taking to graduate.
Gives me a good idea of what I need to take and when.
Gives specific advice, sends you to the correct person.
Gives you the information you need.
Giving advice.
Giving an array of class selections.
Giving choices on majors related to my field.
Giving good advice, letting students know what classes they need to take.
Giving good info, keeping students on the right track.
Giving help to students that need it.
Giving help to students who need career advice as well as a detailed schedule.
Giving info about required classes.
Giving students information and helping decide what to do with their major.
Giving students their required classes, credits, and an outline of what to take and when.
Giving suggestions, helping to schedule classes, friendly, listen well.
Giving the info needed to graduate on time.
Giving the information I need.
Giving the students the benefits of the doubt.
Giving time to students.
Go through the book.
Good advice to students and are understanding.
Good at helping me know what I should be doing.
E-2
What the USU advising system does well. 654 responses
Good at helping me map out my future semesters.
Good knowledge of class and course requirements.
Good knowledge of when to take courses and courses required.
Good major requirement sheets.
Good overall experience.
Good question.
Good sense of humor.
Good understanding of what needs to be done to achieve desired goals.
Great information given, questions answered.
Has information for us.
Have students employed in the offices because they know exactly what is going on and they are going through or recently
Haven't been here long enough to decide.
Haven't used the system yet.
Having advisors be happy to help students with their class planning. I never felt pressured.
Having advisors there.
Having an advisor that knows the program.
Having an advisor.
Having major requirement sheets.
Having sign up sheets for appointments, especially around registration time. I can get in contact with my counselor via
Having the information available online.
Having the option of being there. Also, sending out on webmail announcements.
He spent as much time as I needed to feel comfortable about changing my major.
He took the time to meet with me and answer all my questions.
Help me get enrolled. Give me the right classes to take.
Help me know what I need in order to graduate. Lead me to classes that will help me choose my major.
Help me see what classes I need.
Help students with academic program.
Help you know which classes to take.
Helped me pick the classes I needed fast.
Helped me register for classes.
Helped me sign up for my classes.
Helped me to figure out the kind of classes I needed to take. Also what steps needed to be taken to apply to the program.
Helping a lot of students quickly.
Helping if I call on them for help.
Helping in working out the courses I've taken and need to complete.
Helping know what classes are needed.
Helping me become familiar with the classes I need to take to graduate on time.
Helping me get into classes I need and choosing which classes I need to take.
Helping me get into classes that I couldn't otherwise without their help.
Helping me know what I need to do to proceed.
Helping me to know what classes I need to take to help me graduate and inform me of the requirements.
Helping me to know what classes to take.
Helping me with my schedule and class decisions.
Helping out with my questions.
Helping out.
Helping students and answering questions.
Helping students as much as they can to graduate within 4-5 years.
Helping students decide what classes to take.
Helping students determining what they need to be doing in order to graduate.
Helping students fulfill requirements.
E-3
What the USU advising system does well. 654 responses
Helping students get started.
Helping students out as much as possible.
Helping students plan out their future in education wisely.
Helping students sign up for the classes they need and when to take them.
Helping students who already know what they want to do.
Helping the student body.
Helping the students plan what courses to take when and keeping them informed about what they need to do.
Helping those who ask for help.
Helping to graduate students on time.
Helping to solve problems.
Helping us get through our majors as quick as possible with our personal schedule.
Helping us out when we need it.
Helping us plan our four years.
Helping with which classes to take to fulfil your major.
Helping you plan for the future. Take appropriate classes. Help you with internships.
Helps me in the right direction, tells me what to do.
Helps me know the classes I have taken and still need to take for my major.
Helps students to make informed decisions, information about future careers, etc.
Hiding.
Hiring great peer advisors.
I'm an international student, so this is my first time here. I can't say as much as you want about the subject.
I'm currently undeclared but I met with one of the undeclared advisors in the TSC's third floor and she was extremely helpful.
I'm not sure about the system as a whole, but Jim does a very good job caring about what the students need and working to
I'm not sure. My advisor hasn't been too helpful so I went to others.
I'm not too familiar with it yet, so I don't know.
I'm not very familiar with it.
I'm sure they are doing lots of things well.
I'm well informed on the steps to take an classes to take.
I've heard good things. I just need to take advantage of using my advisor for information.
I've never gone in, I'm undeclared.
I've never needed to meet with my advisor, but I know that I am able to whenever I need to.
I've only talked to her at SOAR. This was very helpful. She also emails me lots of information and volunteer opportunities.
I've only talked to Sally in HASS and Dr. Lancy but they are very approachable, provided me with a lot of information but let
I am sure that they do a lot of things well but I am not informed in the process.
I could contact her when I was home in KY and she told me what classes to take the next four years.
I couldn't tell you. I don't see too many things it does too well.
I did speak to one lady, just in the general advising dept (long silver hair and glasses). She was very helpful. I really
I don't care.
I don't know my advisor except my theatre advisors. They keep me posted weekly.
I don't know what that is.
I don't know, I've never used it.
I don't know, I've only been here for this semester and I'm only taking generals.
I don't know, I don't use it enough.
I don't know.
I don't know. I have only met with her once. She was semi-helpful. I guess it wasn't enough time to actually tell.
I don't know. I know nothing about them. Therefore, I can't answer.
I don't know. I went to my advisor and she did nothing for me. She was actually kind of rude.
I don't really know because I have no one else to compare them to, but my advisor is great.
I don't really know. Darcie is really helpful.
I feel my advisor is very helpful and willing to help.
E-4
What the USU advising system does well. 654 responses
I feel that the honors department as helped me a lot.
I feel they are doing a good job but I feel I should make more appointments.
I get a lot of email but not much applies to me.
I guess they help us to choose the right classes.
I have a language major and met with pre-med advisor to know which classes one needed and it helped.
I have had a great advisor who is willing to work me into her schedule if I have a problem or need to see her.
I have heard from other people that their questions get answered and the advisors really help to keep students on track for
I have neve gone. I am basically just doing my gen eds right now. I have only been going for 1 and 1/2 semesters.
I have never met with my advisor. We have only communicated through email.
I have no problem.
I have not yet gone into see my advisor.
I have only gone once and it was a positive experience.
I have only gone once, but the appointment went well and my advisor was very helpful and knowledgable.
I have only met with her once I found out what I needed got a plan and went on my way. It was fast and painless.
I haven't been here long enough to give an objective opinion.
I haven't gone much. I didn't find it very helpful.
I haven't really used it yet.
I haven't seen much good from the advising system yet. Keep trying.
I haven't switched my major yet, but this advisor helped a lot, much more than my psychology advisor. Planning schedules.
I haven't used it.
I haven't used it. I don't know.
I know exactly what classes I am supposed to take through the major requirement sheets.
I know exactly what classes I need to take in the next four years.
I know who my advisor is.
I like how each person is assigned an advisor. My advisor has gone over a four year plan with me to help me stay on track.
I like how everything is easy to find out, phone numbers, schedules, etc.
I like how she has a four year plan of exactly what I need to take and when it is offered.
I like how there is one specific person assigned to me. I like that I was able to find out who my advisor was at SOAR. I have
a kind advisor who knows what she is talking about.
I like how they make you meet with an advisor for SOAR. I think that is good.
I like that HASS is available for students who need general information.
I love the education college advisors. They're great help!
I love the sheets, they are very helpful in seeing the plan.
I met with an undeclared advisor and she worked with me well. I din't feel comfortable with (advisor's name).
I never have used it so I don't know.
I only went once to general advisor. I am not sure what they are doing well.
I really don't know. I've only ever met my advisor once and that was for about five minutes.
I really enjoy being able to reach my advisor easily. So pretty much, I like the accessibility.
I really like my advisor, she knows what she is talking about. I just need to get an appointment.
I really like my advisor, so I guess employing good people.
I recieved a lot of info but I only went once before the school year actually started.
I set up several appointments for an advisor's help but was never fit in. I was very disappointed.
I think advisors are nice because they help you stay on track.
I think it is nice that it isn't hard to find both general advisors as well as advisor specific to your department.
I think that they make the advisors feel like they are available. I like being informed via email on events I might be interested
I think the advisors are friendly and helpful. They try hard and care about my success.
I think the idea of advising is a good one. I think that it could be helpful.
I think they're avaialable pretty much whenever needed. They are encouraging.
I think they ahve a system set up well with email and assigning advisors, but in my case I felt really lost at the beginning to
I think they are doing a good job, I guess I just didn't go as often so I don't know.
E-5
What the USU advising system does well. 654 responses
I think they help us lay out the road map and help us feel secure in what we are working toward.
I was impressed when I went back the second time that my advisors remember about me (my hobbies, etc.)
I was informed of my advisor and though she was doing this for the first time, she was well informed for the most part. She
I went into the PolySci advising office and some other advisor helped me and answered my questions.
I went to my psychology advisor but then switched majors, but my psychology advisor informed me well.
I wouldn't know.
If and when I found the right advisor, my life was a whole lot easier. Dr. Lancy is sincere in his time with students, as I would
hope the majority of advisors are.
If you have a good advisor they really try to help.
In one visit, Dee Child was able to establish what classes I have had, need to have, and what goals to accomplish. He was
proficient, friendly, and comfortable to meet with.
In the HASS walkin times, very informative, comfortable to go to, very helpful.
Information is easy to obtain from advisor.
Informative nice people.
Informing me and answering all my questions.
Informing students.
Interdepartment knowledge.
Is available and willing to work with me and any of my needs.
It's going well by being well prepared to assist students. I have also worked with the honors advisors and am very satisified
It's good that every student has an advisor and can meet with them.
It's great that every students has an advisor ro talk to.
It's there if you need it.
It depends on the advisor. My past advisor was focused on me and my needs. She did what was needed with a happy
It does well in letting us know what classes we have to take and when is best to take them.
It gives me some direction in where to go.
It gives students good direction.
It has a knowledgable start.
It helps know which classes to take.
It helps me know what I need to be completing. Also it lets me know positive and negative consequences for my classes I
It is very helpful to have an advisor who knows exactly what courses I need to take for my major and when I need to take
It sucks. I'm from out of state and nobody has claimed me. I've went to see three different people in Poly Sci.
Jana Kay is very personal and expresses genuine concern.
Jana Kay keeps English majors informed on pertomemt information via email.
Jill was very helpful to make sure I got the classes I needed, but would also be of interest to me and my major and she
recommended certain teachers.
John is more of a friend than an advisor.
Just being helpful and supportive, wanting to help me get the best.
Kathy Bayn is excellent. She has a proposed schedule set out and helps guide what classes are good to take at the same
Kathy Bayn was able to tell me exactly which courses to take year by year.
Kathy is very helpful and knowledgable about the classes and the requirements for a field of study.
Kay is helping me a lot with study abroad. (Minor in Spanish.)
Keeping catalog and requirements handy and up to date.
Keeping in contact with students.
Keeping in contact.
Keeping me informed of what I need to do to get where I want to be.
Keeping me informed of what I need to graduate.
Keeping me updated on what classes will count towards my goal. Helping me to with knowing what classes I don't need too.
Keeping students informed about what classes they need to be taking.
Keeping you informed.
Know the best way to get around problems like not having a prerequisite yet.
E-6
What the USU advising system does well. 654 responses
Know what they are talking about and have transcripts prepared.
Knowing what classes I can/need to take.
Knowing who your advisor is.
Laying out all the classes you need to graduate. Requirements are obvious and clear.
Let me know what I needed to do.
Lets me know what I need to work towards. I am able to see my advisor when needed. She guides me through courses.
Letting me know my advisor and how to get a hold of her.
Letting me know what classes I need to take to meet my requirements.
Letting me know what classes to take.
Letting me know what I need to finish my degree successfully.
Letting me know which classes to take for the following semester.
Letting students know that they are there, and that we can and should use them as resources.
Letting us have the option to speak with someone if we need the help.
Letting us know that advisors are available and they're friendly.
Letting you know what you get to do.
Letting you know what you need to get done.
Lisa is great to me! Every time I had a problem she was quick to email me back. The response time is excellent.
Lots of advising available.
Lots of good information.
Lots of one-on-one work. Each advisor knows the majority by name, so they student feels comfortable with the advisor.
Make easy to know requirements for program.
Making advisors accessible.
Making advisors readily available.
Making it easier to know what we need to take, i.e. major sheets.
Making sure most (not all) students have all things in order before graduation.
Making sure that people who need to meet with their advisor can do so at an available time.
Making time for every student. Helping students make the best decisions.
Maureen is not actually my advisor, but she's the best so I visit her.
Mine is helping me out accurately teaching me things I need to know with plenty of time.
Most advisors really do care about our achievements. They try to help us get better grades.
Most of the staff is well informed. Most of them.
Most people at least know who their advisor is.
Music department does really well. Mike (Professor Christiansen) knows all the ins and outs when advising the guitar
My advising experiences have been mostly good.
My advisor always responds to my emails within 1 day.
My advisor emails me quite frequently and I really appreciate that. It wasn't confusing to find my advisor.
My advisor gives sufficient information about my major.
My advisor has always been willing to help me, especially at class registration time.
My advisor has helped me to know what classes to take and when. I feel loved by my advisor.
My advisor is always available for me to meet with him and I can usually see him right away. He's very helpful wtih
My advisor is available for meetings and has information readily available to help me get all of the calsses I need for my
My advisor is concerned about me and helps me in any way she can.
My advisor is helpful in directing me to where I need to go in regards to my school objective.
My advisor is really on the ball and does a great job. I can't speak for the others.
My advisor is very helpful and willing to do things to help me. He is very nice and friendly and remembers who I am and is
My advisor is very helpful in trying to show me the fast track.
My advisor seems updated in new policies.
My advisor was available when I had a question in person or by email. It was nice and convenient.
My advisor was extremely helpful. Not only did she tell me the classes to take for that semester, but she planned all my
My advisor was good.
E-7
What the USU advising system does well. 654 responses
My advisor was so helpful in planning out my four year plan. She knew all of the material really well so we got it done fast
My advisor was supportive of interests outside my major/college. Very enthusiastic for my educational future.
My advisor was very friendly and helpful.
My advisor was very helpful, respectful, and easy to work with.
My advisor works well with me. Best of all he knows the classes you need to take. He gives opinion, that is good, because
My advisors are well prepared with information and requirement sheets to help guide me and they know a good eal about a
huge number of courses.
My classes were all plotted out for me for my specific major.
My major is all planned out and it helped me so much in knowing what classes to take and how to graduate in my major.
My major is nursing so I am covered by biology until I am accepted. Maybe an actual nursing advisor for interested students
My sister goes all the time and says that they help her to understand her options.
Nazih Al-Rashid was awesome to talk to and always available.
Never met with one.
Never used it. I don't know.
No idea.
No, why do you have professors who are too busy anyway trying to be advisors too?
Not bothering me with email or phone calls.
Not knowledgable enough to answer.
Not much.
Not much. They don't even know I exist because they have never ever contacted me, even for important schedule issues.
Not sure, never gone.
Nothing.
Nothing. I've never really been helped by my advisor and people I know say he sucks.
Offering good advice and a variety of career choices.
On the Quad it is easy to learn who your advisor is.
One on one time, availability of advisors.
Organization.
Organized, helpful.
Organizing my schedule for me, showing me the "way."
Organizing my time here at USU.
Overall doing really well.
Overall good.
Peer advisors at HASS office are where I go to get classes organized.
Planning the schedule.
Posting visiting hours, also being able to email advisors.
Pretty much everything.
Pretty well.
Printing up major requirement sheets.
Provides detailed information.
Provides good information.
Providing ample information on major requirements.
Providing information.
Providing major requirement sheets so it is easy for us to keep track of where we are and where we need to be without
having to try and get appointments all the time to do so.
Providing students with an advisor to go to if they need to. Major requirement sheets.
Providing students with simple and easy to read requirement sheets.
Providing times to meet with students.
Put me on track with courses I needed and accepted credit for transfer courses I had taken.
Put schedule together.
Putting in the holes.
E-8
What the USU advising system does well. 654 responses
Putting together your year plans to help organize your future plans.
Quick responses to my email and providing the information required.
Really keeping me informed and working with my schedule, trying to understand my needs.
Requirement sheets.
Responding to our emails and phone calls quickly.
Sally acted really interested in me as an advisor and guided me well through the process.
Scheduling appointments quickly.
Serving students, being available.
Setting my schedule up where it needs to be and helping me know what classes to take for my major.
Setting up appointments.
SHe gets me involved with things pertaining to my major.
She helped me figure out what classes to take and when.
She helped me get started for my first semester and gave me advice for classes to take and when to take them.
She helped me know what to register for.
She helps me out, that's all I need.
She is good about caring that I do good.
She is helpful in deciding courses.
She is very knowledgable and tries to help me understand how the systems work.
She knows what she's doing and what I need to take.
She knows what she's doing.
She let me know what i needed to do to get mymajor so then I can choose what direction I want to go in life.
She seems to keep really good tabs on what you're doing and tries to help solve problems.
She was nice and helpful.
Showing concern for academic success.
Showing us exactly what needs to happen for us to graduate in 4 years.
Showing what to do.
Some seem to go the extra mile.
Stuff.
Surveys.
Susie Maughan is outstanding. she may be atypical.
Susie was friendly and seemed interested, helpful, and knowledgable. She made me feel comfortable about going to her in
Taking the time to meet with students.
Talking and telling what we should be taking.
Teachers are advisors.
Telling and showing people what it takes to complete your major. Also, what is expected from you.
Telling me the classes I need to take in order to get my degree.
Telling me the classes I need to take to graduate in four years.
Telling people the information they need to know.
Telling us what we need to do and what classes to take.
Telling you what classes to take. Preparing schedule. Giving advice on what to do.
Telling you what classes you need to take to copmlete your degree. They know the information if you can ever get in to see
Tells me what classes to take for my major.
The advising system help me figure out how to get my credits and how to do it without stressing.
The advising system is doing well at being knowledgable for the students.
The advising system works very well to help plan your schedules when you can get in to talk to them.
The advisor is very well informed and is easy to make an appointment with. She genuinely cares about me and my needs.
The advisor tried to help me by doing one thing which is not her job, actually.
The advisors are always willing to help out as much as they can.
The advisors are generally helpful once you finally are able to meet with one.
The advisors are helping and friendly, they are willing to work with you.
E-9
What the USU advising system does well. 654 responses
The advisors are really helpful. Always answer emails.
The advisors are very well informed.
The advisors are well informed and know what they're doing and how to best help me. Also very friendly.
The advisors do seem to wait to assist the students in their class setup and success.
The advisors generally know what they are talking about.
The advisors know how to help you no matter what your question is.
The advisors know what they're doing. I never worked with (advisor's name), but with another one and he was very helpful.
The advisors seem happy to help.
The advisors we do have know what they need to know, and if they don't they know who to ask.
The advisors work your schedule and classes around what you want to do or take. Advisors help us know all of our options.
The education advisors are great! I met with a grad student to plan my 4 years and that was so helpful.
The Faculty seems friendly.
The good advisors actually advise students.
The guy I had was interested in how I was doing despite how many people he advised.
The information being given out is good and valuable, worth following.
The information is there.
The major requirement sheets are very helpful.
The office was helpful in making an appointment with my business advisor, and Kathy Bayn answered some questions of
The opportunity of having an advisor.
The peer advisors are great--they are honest and humble.
The person I talked to at the Junction for undeclared students was good at helping me figure out how many credits I had and
what AP credits I had that could be used, etc.
The planning sheets we fill out help so much!
The service and efficiency to resolve students questions on the academic careers.
There are always ways to find someone, if not your advisor, to talk to. List online, in TSC, everywhere.
There are good plans for students to map their classes so they know what they need for their major.
There are many staff members to help.
There are two aspects to getting information. One is the runaround and misinformation. Two is informed guidance to proper
resource. Both are available. You just have to find the right person.
There if you need them.
There is evidence USU wants us to succeed.
There is more information available and good explanations of material exist.
They're available.
They're dealing with dumb students who frequently change majors.
They're not doing anything wrong.
They advise.
They always pass me on to some one else.
They answer the questions and concerns that I have.
They answered every question that I needed. I could call and they answered my questions that way.
They are a huge help. I get all of my questions answered.
They are able to help me know what I need to do to accomplish my goals.
They are advising.
They are always positive and willing to help out.
They are doing well at helping to choose classes required for my major.
They are friendly and so willing to help.
They are helpful and they are about how well I do it seems.
They are helpful and willing to accomodate me.
They are helpful.
They are keeping me focused and informed on the courses that I need to take to achieve my educational goal.
They are making it so you can understand your major and requirements.
E - 10
What the USU advising system does well. 654 responses
They are ready and willing to help students.
They are really kind and well prepared.
They are there to answer you questions even if they call you back like a day later.
They are usually available for scheduling times.
They are very friendly and positive about their programs.
They are very helpful and informative.
They are very helpful.
They are very well informed and helpful when they can be met.
They are very willing to help and answer questions.
They are well informed and know how to help with any problem
They are willing to help when you ask for it.
They are willing to help.
They check to make sure I am taking classes in proper order.
They communicate well with students and they reply mail as soon as possible. Sometimes in less than 1 hour, that is great.
They did a really good job of telling what courses I need to take and in what order to take them.
They do a good job encouraging students to meet with advisors.
They do a good job making all the requirements very clear.
They get to the point and help you get what you need.
They have each major well planned as far as schedule of curriculum completion.
They have kind, caring people.
They have our schedule printed out exactly how we need to take the courses.
They have specific advisors for students who know their major.
They have the four year plans laid out very well for my major and know what they are talking about.
They have the four year program all planned out for you to receive your bachelors degree.
They help people who are seeking the help.
They help pick which classes to take and answer any questions.
They help plan classes and schedules to get you on the track for intended major.
They help plan out my classes so I can graduate.
They help to get us on track for school.
They help with planning some classes.
They help you go through your major requirements and what you need to have in order to graduate.
They help you know how to fulfil requirements so you can make the most of your time at USU.
They helped me determine which courses to take in order to get me to graduation more quickly.
They helped me register and solve problems with registering for classes.
They keep most course information and major info updated online.
They keep/direct students on the right path.
They know everything about your major and help to plan a schedule that works for me personally.
They know how to get you graduated in the shortest time.
They know many of the answers to my questions.
They know their stuff it seems.
They know their stuff when you talk to them.
They know what classes to take and how to organize them in each semester to keep the students classes well balanced.
They know what I need to do to get my degree ASAP.
They know what they are talking about and are trying very hard to make yourcollege experience positive and help you to
They make it available and not too hard to schedule.
They make it easy to know what classes to take for your major and help plan your college career.
They offer good advice that students can use.
They reply to emails quickly.
They seem to be genuinely concerned with the students.
They seem very professional.
E - 11
What the USU advising system does well. 654 responses
They somewhat help out with picking classes and getting me on the right foot. She helped a lot with me on academic
They take time to talk and help you.
They tell you what you need to know.
They will advise the students and tell them what and how to do it.
They work well with getting you in to see an advisor at your convenience and normally respond fairly quickly to emails and
Trying to help everyone who wants the help.
Trying to help students.
Unknown.
Usually available, efficient and prepared.
Very friendly and helpful. I enjoy meeting with Susie because I feel like she really cares a lot. She's very knowledgable.
Very helpful in choosing classes.
Very helpful once you get an appointment with them.
Very helpful, willing to help and answer questions.
Very informative on the classes I should be taking to graduate on time.
Very knowledgable about paths to take through school.
Very knowledgable and informative.
Very nice and friendly.
Very personable.
Very personal and nice.
Wasting my time!
Well I feel they are available and can answer most questions.
Well informed knowledgable advisors.
Well trailed and very knowledgable.
Well, I am always able to contact my advisor and that's always good.
When I do get to see them they know what I need to do.
When I do have a question they can tell me exactly who to ask so I get the right answer.
When I do visit they are helpful and I have feeling better about things.
When I finally went in again, I received help that was informative, personable, and encouraging.
When I went they changed my major quickly and it was fairly painless.
When meeting with a student I found my advisor to be very friendly and enthusiastic to help me.
When you actually talk to them, they give excellent advise on getting your achieved goal.
When you can get into them, the advisors seem to want to help you in the directions you need.
Whenever I go, Kathy helps me to get the schedule I need in order to progress in my major.
Yes, everything I wish to accomplish when I visit is accomplished.
Yes, they are. I think it could be better though.
You have plans of what needs to be done and when in order to get a degree.
You seem to be doing fine to me.
Total
E - 12
Appendix F
How The USU Advising System Can Be Improved
How might the advising system be improved? 724 responses
(Advisor's name) could treat the students who come to her a lot better. She makes me feel dumb when I speak with her so
I'm afraid to ask questions.
(Advisor's name) was so rude and discouraging that I changed my major. My appt. was just a complete mess I nearly broke
into tears. More personable advisors would be greatly appreciated.
Actually seeing the advisor. I went to make an appointment to get help figuring out my schedule and when I told the
secretary what it was for, she said to go to a peer advisor instead. She acted as if my schedule didn't matter and the peer
Advise more.
Advising for pre med students via Andy Anderson could be a little more informative. I felt perhaps enough advice or career
planning was not offered, as it seemed the student isn't taken seriously enough at the beginning.
Advising needs to be able to work to meet individual students needs. My advisor didn't ask about my career goals, goals
about when I'm graduating, goals about furthering my education, etc.
Advisor more accessible. I know that my advisor is so busy with class that to get a hold of him I really need to be in his
Advisor need more time with each student. You need more advisors! Kathy does a great job, she just has too many
Advisors checking or asking if they can help.
Advisors could email us to say Hi, I'm your advisor.
Advisors for other majors could be easier to contact.
Advisors more abailable to students and more concerned with students welfare. Every time I've gone to see an advisor, I get
the idea that I'm bothering them for asking for some advice.
Advisors more willing to meet with students. Have advisors act like they actually care. Not to have them assign you what
classes to take, but allow a little choice.
Advisors need not assume that we understand what classes we need to take. A list of classes needed from freshman to
senior year is tremendously helpful to a first generation college student.
Advisors should know more about what classes students need for major.
Advsior calls or emails student specifically to see if they would like to meet.
An online advising system.
Answer questions correctly instead of making something up off the top of their head. Be more careful to make sure students
are aware of prerequisite requirements.
As a freshman new to USU I wanted to talk to my advisor before my semester started, but the school changed advisors on
me and it was hard to get a hold of someone until a few weeks into the semester when I already had my classes going and it
Assign an advisor at student orientation. I was only told the department (HASS) my advisor would be in.
Assign one when going to the first semester, contact student. Many don't know they have such an option.
Be able to make appointments more easily, have advisor show interest and be willing to help and discuss issues. Answer
questions instead of referring me to printouts and websites. Secretary could also be less hostile.
Be able to make appointments sooner, maybe a day in advance.
Be available more. She was way hard to have an appointment with. I haven't visisted much, but I haven't heard too many
Be more accessibe.
Be more available.
Be more available. Also to advertise it more to students.
Be more friendly towards all the stuents, not just certain ones.
Be more motivative and a willingness to help and not criticize on how many times you change your major. To be more
Be more understanding of personal circumstances (i.e. one cannot graduate in 4 years while working and supporting
oneself). Be more flexible when laying out class schedules.
Be more user friendly. Have the advisor contact students via email to let them know where and when we can reach them.
Be more willing to help. That is their job and they act like you are putting them out if you ask one question.
Be specific. Help freshmen understand the requirements better. It is too confusing right now.
Be sure the advisor knows what to tell the student.
Be willing to take the time to solve all the problems I have....
Being able to get in and not wait an hour plus.
Being able to get into the classes your advisor tells you to can be somewhat impossible and then you're stuck in a rut.
Being able to have more appointments readily available instead of just a sign up sheet.
F-1
How might the advising system be improved? 724 responses
Being an out of state student, I don't feel that my advisor made anything clear to me over email. Also, she was very rude in
her responses when I didn't understand something. She seemed to talk to me like I was stupid.
Being in the HASS advising center I hate that I am never able to see the same advisor. I have gone to the advising office
several (4-7) times and never seen the same advisor. I feel like one person tells me one thing and someone else tells me
Being more friendly and less imtimidating.
Being more informative.
Better access to advising, whether it be more advisors or a way to schedule appointments easier.
Better advisor to student ratios.
Better explanation of requirements.
Better inform student when the optimum time would be to take certain courses. Inform student more about depth or breadth
Better inform students as to who their advisor is.
Better inform students.
Better information to students of options.
Better knowledge of who to direct us to for specific questions and concerns.
Better scheduling, more advisors, more time for students to get more in depth knowledge.
Better updates on home pages.
By not wasting my class time with surveys. I payed for class and to learn what my instructor had to teach, not to fill out
surveys and miss out on valuable information.
By scheduling a large amount of time for students of all standings credit wise.
By somehow contacting us and letting us know that she is there. Also, giving us a time when she can be found.
Can't say from my own experience. I just wish I could meet with my advisor more often to keep up on things like newly
available opportunities and activities.
Care about the students instead of treating them like a number. I talked to her on the phone while transfering. She told me
the call number of the classes to take and then said she was busy and had to go. She later sent me a major requirement
Care more about the students asking questions.
Check up on students maybe once in the semester to be sure that they still know what they need to be doing.
Circulate students through more efficiently.
Contact students to check up on them. For the 1st year and a half I was nervous to talk to my advisor and so I tried to do it
on my own, because of my stupidness I took 5 extra classes that I didn't need.
Contact their students.
Could be a little more personal, although I understand that would be complicated.
Darcie does great. Not any problems.
Ditto.
Do more online advising.
Don't advise people to take two classes in the same semester if they are at the same time.
Don't know.
Don't shun me.
During SOAR on Connections, encourage people to find an advisor. I have never met with one before.
During the busiest time to meet an advisor at the end of the semester and beginning, it is hard to make an appointment when
Easier access. They are always so busy around registration.
Easier to contact/find. More time to schedule appointments.
Easier to meet with advisors.
Email me when it's time to sign up for next semester's classes, updating where I should be.
Email more--But that's my fault also. Call them in just to see how they're doing. Random people.
Email students information more often.
Emailing each individual student to let them know who their advisor is at the beginning of each semester, especially transfer
Encourage students to meet with an advisor so everyone can benefit from the great service.
Encourage students, guide them to get to the graduate or medical school.
Everyone could see any advisor even if not particularly in the same field.
Everyone thinks they can do it better...until they are the ones to do it.
Faster appointments.
F-2
How might the advising system be improved? 724 responses
First I have to explain that I am evaluating my first advisor. I just very recently decided to switch majors and have not met
with that advisor yet. So I am evaluating the only advisor I have met with.
Focus meeting with description of course relevant information.
Focus more on student than anything else.
For me it has been great and he has been available whenever I have need to talk. It's been great.
For them to take the initiative to contact their students.
From my experience professors advising are very unhelpful. They make you feel unimportant and a waste of their time, as if
they are forced to talk to you. I wish I could talk to real advisors who specialize in counseling like at other universities.
General advisors for students interested in USU but who are not accepted. And general advisors who can help with
undecided students who are not affiliated with a college and therefore would have more time.
Get an advisor that really cares for the students and shows this.
Get better.
Get competent advisors.
Get more advisors.
Get more advisors? I really have no idea.
Get more than one advisor for the entire engineering program.
Get people who actually care!
Get rid of the idea of "holds" to register. It can be difficult to coordinate a meeting and/or get in touch with the advisor,
making it more difficult to get in to the classes I need.
Get someone who's not so lazy or else find a way to get someone who gives a damn.
Get to know student situation more to be able to better give suggestions and direction.
Getting more advisors.
Give a better idea of the courses and their material, how much work they entail and better estimations of whether I (or
anyone else) would do well in that class.
Give them more time to work wtih students. Make advising more important.
Give us more advising on how best to achieve our goals, help with classes, especially ones we are struggling with, etc.
HASS Advisors and counselors could be easier to meet with, more accessible.
Have a meet with your advsior week, send emails to students telling them who their advisors are.
Have a more general list of departments and what each major is. Just listing the title of the major doesn't help me decide if it
Have a Russian major so I don't have to transfer to a different school.
Have a set schedule for everyone to come in once a semester. But I do feel it is the student's responsibility, so it has been
more my problem than theirs.
Have advisors be more knowledgable about university programs.
Have advisors contact you to let you know who they are (simple email).
Have advisors give detailed information, not just basic "yes/no" to student questions.
Have advisors meet with their students once in a big meeting at the beginning of the semester so they know the advisor by
Have an appointment set up semesterly with student.
Have an mandatory set meeting with each freshman/new student so they know who their advisor is.
Have easier access to information.
Have it more personalized. I feel as if they are just trying to get me out and help the next person.
Have maybe advisors that are similar to high school counselors as well. Sometimes new students just need to go
somewhere for help and have someone that has the time to help them.
Have more advisors and encourage more appointments more often with students.
Have more advisors and make them more accessible.
Have more advisors for every college, be available more often.
Have more advisors so each students can receive more special attention.
Have more contact checking up and making sure goals are met.
Have more hours available during the first and last couple of weeks each semester.
Have more people to help around registration.
Have more than one advisor for the engineering department. It is a huge department at USU and at the beginning of each
semester it is impossible to get an appointment when you have the time.
F-3
How might the advising system be improved? 724 responses
Have nice people who are more willing to help out lost and confused freshmen
Have nicer people. They are rude on the phone and in person.
Have not met with advisor.
Have other students who have been through the program and the classes available to talk to and ask advice.
Have people in their office during the day.
Have the advisor explain why the classes we are taking are necessary for the major. That way we know if this is the right
major before we enroll in the class and have to drop.
Have the advisors be aware of the out of state residency rules. I almost would have had to start my residency over had I
Have the advisors know what they are talking about, it's their job.
Have them know more about the Depth and Breadth courses and other generals so it's not as much of a guessing game
when it comes to classes outside of my major that are required by the University.
Have them triple check to see you have taken class needed to graduate and not pop it up in the last semester.
Having more advisors to make the student-advisor relationship more personal.
Help me decide. Don't act like I'm wasting your time. You're suposed to know a lot about the major I'm in. Help me
understand my options. Also, let me talk to advisors in majors I'm interested in.
Help students find jobs related to studies.
Help students to know what kind of questions they should ask.
Help students who are undeclared to find what they want. Maybe provide programs so students can learn about different
fields before declaring a major.
Help those without a USU major that love USU but will eventually transfer.
Help us better understand our options. Sometimes I feel like they give us a list of options, indicate which option we "should"
choose, and expect us to choose it without fully understanding our options. Better personal skills. Make us feel important.
Help with schedule more.
Hire or train advisors what to do and know. Don't hire someone crabby!
I'd like to be able to get in just a little easier to see my advisor.
I've been to a few advisors this year and most of the time I've had postive experiences. However, a couple of times I left an
appointment with questions that the advisor should have been able to answer.
I've emailed couselors and never was written back. I'm an undeclared major. It would be more helpful to have open
counseling for undeclared majors to better explore USU options. I'm not sure what resources are available here at USU.
I've never met my advisor or talked to her. She sent me an email once.
I've never met with an advisor and my major is still undecided, so I left all these blank. Sorry.
I am going into Graphic Design, but I've never been able to figure out where I need to go, or who my advisor is. I just use a
major requirement sheet to know what classes to take.
I am never able to get in touch with my advisor, so anything to help that would be good.
I am satisfied wtih my advising experience.
I am undeclared so I have not seem my advisor.
I came here not understanding anything and I feel that no one is helping me enough. I need someone to tell me what
I can't think of anything.
I didn't even really know we were supposed to have an advisor. It would be soemthing useful to me now that I know.
I didn't realize it was important to counsel with an advisor often, so I have little experience from which to offer suggestions.
Keep up the good work and thanks for helping us do the same!
I do not feel that I have participated enough in the advising system to offer a well informed opinion.
I don't have enough experience to say.
I don't know how to get in contact with my advisor. Actually, a bio peer advisor messed me up a bit and I had to fix it after
I don't know if they do this or not, but the advisors could have some time available for undeclared students like me to make
an appointment so I can talk to someone in the know so I can pick a major. (Or is that just office hours?)
I don't know who my advisor is for my major (radiology technology) because there isn't a radio technology program here. I'm
just doing pre-requisites here, so I would like to know who I can talk to.
I don't know why I need to see an advisor. I talk to one about general requirements, but for my major I know what classes I
I don't know, have not worked wtih emough. Only based on one visit.
I don't know, it is pretty effective.
F-4
How might the advising system be improved? 724 responses
I don't know.
I don't really have an advisor for my undeclared major yet so I'm hoping as soon as I get accepted to a school, I'll look up my
I don't really know who my advisor is and am not really encouraged to meet with him/her.
I don't see any need for improvement.
I don't think they could.
I dont know how to find out who my advisor is. They could make things a little more clear.
I felt a little rushed at my meeting. She gave her opinion well, but I didn't really understand why she was directing me the
way she was. I felt like I was asking dumb questions.
I felt like she was in a hurry and wanted to get me on my way as quick as possible. They should make us feel like we are the
most important thing at the moment. Maybe market themselves more.
I felt that the one time I went she didn't help. She seemed to feel bothered that I was there. I probably will never go back.
I find it very difficult to get an appointment with my advisor so a lot of the time I don't bother. I think the advising system is
understaffed. Also, I think advisors should offer more counseling to students to help them be sure they have chosen the r
I found the HASS advisors very helpful, but the art department was very unfriendly at SOAR and really made things uninviting
I had a hard time finding the advising center in the new engineering building. She got on me about being so behind in
school, which I already know and am working on it. That is my only complaint.
I had a lot of problems registering this semester. When I went to see my advisor she didn't even bother with me. I also felt
she wasn't completely honest with me. Having someone available during school breaks would be good.
I have a hard time finding the time to see my advisor even though I would like to, but I'm not sure how to set up appointments
and often don't know when I will be available until a few days before.
I have actually seen two advisors. The first one seemed to try to manipulate my choice of classes. The second, the one I
chose for this survey, was of considerable help. Both did their jobs, but the second one actually seemed to care about me
I have been trying to change my major to undecided for a lont time. I had a slight interest in mathematics and put taht down
on one paper because somebody told me to, and I have regretted it ever since. I want my major undecided. Not any fault of
I have had an advisor in the past who, when I went to get assistance with planning my schedule, did not pay any attention to
me. Just before I met with him he was chatting and having a great time with some upperclassmen, but when I walked in he
I have never really seen my advisor. I don't know who they are. I have been placed with different assistants.
I have never used it so I don't know.
I have no ideas.
I have no suggestions right now.
I haven't actually ever spoken with my advisor in person. So I wouldn't know how to improve it.
I haven't been enough to tell.
I haven't been involved enough to have any complaints/suggestions.
I haven't been there enough to really criticize it.
I haven't had any problems.
I haven't had really any advising and am not sure I understand all I am to do.
I know it is our responsibility to find our advisor but I think when we are accepted into the University we should be informed of
who our advisor is to make things a little easier for Freshmen.
I know that it's probably not that easy, but maybe they could try and contact us more. I have a million other things going on
and it's hard to find the time.
I know that my advisor is pretty busy, but it might be helpful to me if he contacted me for a mid-semester check up.
I know that some friends have had trouble with their advisors, getting an appointment, responding to emails, offering
personal assistance, having the advisor get to know them.
I need to get in touch with an advisor.
I really could not say because like I said, I have not used them.
I really couldn't say.
I really don't have any complaints. I remember at the first of this year I wasn't sure where to even find my advisor but once I
I see no need for improvement based on my experience.
I should go.
I talked to my advisor once at the beginning of the year. I asked about changing my math class to a p/f and he looked at me
like I didn't know what I was talking about. I have since sought advice only from other advisors in my college.
F-5
How might the advising system be improved? 724 responses
I tend to feel I am a burder to my advisor.
I think advisors should email their students and let them know who they are and make students feel like advisors are
interested in what they are doing.
I think all incoming freshmen should be contacted by an advisor first so they feel that there is someone they can go to for
help and second so they can plan their courses and get an idea of where they are going.
I think having peer advisors helps a lot. They can usually answer most of my questions and if not then they'll ask the advisor.
That way it saves the advisor time. There is usually more than one as well to accomodate everyone in their time schedules.
I think if the advising system would help you directly and answer specific questions instead of generalizing things, it would
I think it's fine.
I think it's great.
I think it's just fine.
I think it is great but we can always improve the little things like becoming more organized or something.
I think it is great. Every advisor that I have seen has been helpful.
I think it is how it is.
I think it would be great if the advisors would try to contact the students. Whenever I met with my advisor I have had to
I think it would be nice to be required to meet with an advisor every couple of months to check on progress and ask any
I think my advisor is great once I found out how to finally get a hold of her. My finace often complains about her elementary
education advisor. She tells me that her advisor isn't very helpful and is rude to her. That could be improved.
I think students don't realize that their advisors are there to help them. The advisors will generally take the time to listen
I think that as a freshman, I felt like I was on my own. That's kind of good, but it is also kind of scary. My advisor has never
once contacted me first to let me know about things in the college.
I think that they need to be more interested in the students. They told me that I had to take a class, which I did not. I wasted
my time taking the class that I didn't have to take.
I think that they need to spend more time. When I went she hurried right through it and then sent me out.
I think the advising system is doing a great job. I'd like to discuss the quality and work ethic of teachers at USU. They are
the people that will assist me the most, combined with my desire to learn.
I think the advising system should let students know of more academic, scholarship, etc. opportunities.
I think the advisors could actually CARE about the students. They see so many students that they don't know them and don't
care about them. I feel they just want to shove advice down your throat to get you out of their office.
I think the advisors have too many students. They can't put the time in to each one that is deserved. I'm not sure that they
know all that much about what they tell us.
I thought my advisor did a great job clearing up all of my questions but I have heard others say that they would like their
advisor to be a little more helpful.
I tried to email my advisor and apply to the prorgam and she never got back to me
I tried to meet with an advisor, and all I could get was some student who didn't know much about anything.
I was handed a paper and told to take these classes. The feeling I feel is that I am unimportant and should figure my
I was on time for my appointment, even early, and it seemed the whole time I was there he just wanted to get me out. It
wasn't the best experience. I got the impression I should just figure it out all on my own.
I was sort of intimidated by the amount of information I had to hack through to get to the good stuff.
I was unsure about my major and it would have been helpful to talk to someone who knows a lot about many different
majors, not just the specific major.
I went to two different advisors and they gave me different answers to the same question. I didn't know what to believe.
I wish my major requirement sheet would be updated because I know there are errors/changes and it makes it confusing.
I wish that I would have an appointment with my advisor every other month to be updated.
I wish that rather than trying to get me to stay in that major they would help me explore my options.
I would appreciate more time with my advisor.
I would come in for an appointment, but I'd find out I needed to make an appointment in order to see an advisor. That really
bugged me. If I need to see an advisor, it's most likely important and the student's time is valuable also.
I would just make sure that people feel welcome to talk to you about the concerns they have and to be well educated in the
I would like a general plan of future classes that I need to take, with specifics (Maybe there is one, but I haven't seen it or
even been told about it.) Maybe a personalized plan.
F-6
How might the advising system be improved? 724 responses
I would like better advice on if my choice of major will work for me.
I would like the advisors to at least be competent and care about my educational future! I had an incredibly negative
experience and have not been back since. I was recommended terrible and wrong courses and was rushed out of the office.
I would like to be better informed of the need for an advisor and how often I need to see him/her. I don't really feel like I know
that much about the process.
I would say that peer advisros need to be given more information and understand things better.
I would suggest that advisors be more informed about the graduation guarantee program and be more willing to help
students get in that program when their major fits.
If a student needs to change a major, tell them the steps that are required to do that.
If advisors have specific date of students, it'll be better. I mean the date at where people, who be longed to the college, work
If it wasn't such a hassle to get an appointment.
If the advisors are not busy like right now, then it would be better.
If the advisors were more available it would be better.
If the student is looking to take a class, help them get in.
If they could give therapy sessions too.
If we were able to talk to the advisors when we need to.
In general I hear a lot of complaints about their advisors, but Dee Child is great. So as for being reachable, returning emails,
etc. he does a great job.
In my department they are great, but I feel like it is cramming me in their schedule and it is usually quick. I want them to help
advise me, not just when I need to know what classes to take.
Inform students what the advising system is about.
Inform us better because right now I find it too confusing to go to.
Information and directio are very difficult to find!
Informing students who their advisor is and if they should really go and meet with them.
It's fine how it is.
It's good!
It's great--no improvement. Well, maybe hand out candy when students are waiting in line.
It's hard to find info of where one can go who is undeclared and if you do find out, it is very difficult to get in. More advertising
It's hard to get an appointment, and almost intimidating. I feel nervous when going to talk to someone.
It's impossible to get through to who you want. They keep transfering your calls all over campus.
It's just fine.
It's not really easy to get in there.
It always seems like advisors are too busy to meet and in a hurry.
It can't.
It is crap that nowadays you have to be labled to get any kind of help. It is lame and just another way for the school to
squeeze that much more money out of their students tests and stuff.q
It is difficult finding out the specific advisors for each degree offered. The idea of an "unbrella advisor" who is given the job to
advise for many degrees is inefficient in my mind.
It is really hard to make an appointment when it is urgent. Need more advisors for this many students.
It seemed to me that there wasn't any orgnization between the secretaries and advisors. I never received answers that I
needed. In my last schools I was able to walk in and talk to an advisor but here I was given the run around so much that I
It takes a while to get an appointment and when I did get one I had to wait 20 minutes past the time.
It took a little while for him to email me back.
It was about a forty minute wait in order to meet with her and any of her associates.
It would be better if I was able to meet with her more on a one to one basis, like if my advisor had less students to worry
It would be better if it was mroe convenient to see them.
It would be nice if it were easier to get appointments with the advisors.
It would be nice if my advisor were available more.
It would be nice if when a new student was assigned to an advisor they would be persoanlly contacted by the advisor with an
introduction and invitation to meet sometime.
It would be really nice to know the advisors hours.
F-7
How might the advising system be improved? 724 responses
It would help to meet with my actual advisor instead of a peer advisor to get to know my advisor better to make my
Just about everything needs to be improved.
Kathy is always busy and I usually have to wait at least an hour after my scheduled appointment to meet with her. I don't
have time to wait around for her and base my day on her schedule of running late. Also, the advisors try to get you through
Kathy is hard to get in to see. More advisors?
Kathy is very busy so she spends so much time in the office. I think the school of Engineering needs more than 2 advisors. I
think one should be added to ease the two advisors the burden.
Keep in better contact with students and update them on potential jobs, internships, volunteer or other opportunities to gain
more experience in the field.
Keep in touch more often through email.
Keep to your schedule. Plan ahead for busy season. I had to wait an hour and fifteen minutes past appointment time to
finally get in. I missed a class.
Keep us updated by email etc.
Keeping this kind of feedbacks and apply much often.
Know how to direct honors students that need help correlating honors class assignments with their school.
Know more specifics about the major.
Knowing who your advisor is, and meeting with them.
Last time I went to meet with her she wasn't there and I had to meet with someone different. He wasn't as attentive and
concerned about what classes I would excell in. I ended up dropping one class and am struggling in another.
Learn how to keep track of all your students and inform them. I'm not talking about babying them, just inform them right and
well. My advisor told me the wrong classes to take. Waste of my time! Waste of my money!
Less adversarial to non-traditional students.
Less biased towards attending USU and more thought about student.
Less hassle getting in.
Less time to wait for an appointment.
Let me know how to get into classes so I can next year on my own.
Let people know who their advisors are through mail or online after they know their majors.
Let people know who their advisors are.
Let students know how to contact their advisor and what the need for one is.
Let the freshmen know who they have and how to get a hold of them.
Let the student be in control of his or her decisions about school work load. Be more oriented at getting students to solve
Let the students get copies of all of the forms the advisors use to evaluate the students progress.
Let us know directly how to set up appointments. I don't even know who my advisor is.
Let us know more about our options. The past 2 semester I've been taking unenjoyable classes because they were on the
major requirement sheet. I had no idea that these specific classes were just recommended and not required.
Let us know what's going on and who they are.
Letting students know where they can reach their advisor.
Letting students know who their advisor is would be the first big step.
Letting the student know if they are taking the classes needed for their major or if they need to take more or less credits for
Longer meeting times.
Longer office hours.
Make advising more well known. I don't know much about it at all.
Make advisor more accessible and kinder and patient--gives you advice.
Make advisors easier to get contact with.
Make advisors easier to get into or at least get a hold of. Make sure students know who their advisor is.
Make advisors more available, especially for students who are undeclared. Let students know what is available to them and
what service advisors offer. Get more advisors in large colleges.
Make calls to new students and troubled students to answer questions or set up appointments. Be on the offensive seeking
way sot help, not waiting for people to come to them.
Make it easier and faster to get appointments to see them.
Make it easier for students to get appointments.
F-8
How might the advising system be improved? 724 responses
Make it easier to find your advisor.
Make it easier to get a hold of.
Make it easier to know who one's advisor is and an easier way to contact them and make appointments.
Make it easier to know who your advisor is.
Make it easier to make an appointment, drop ins, etc.
Make it easier to meet with all sorts of advisors. Make them easily approachable.
Make it easier to meet with her. You have to sign up as soon as the sheet comes out or you are out of luck to see her. The
sheet sometimes fills up within a few hours.
Make it easier to see my advisor.
Make it more known how to know who your advisor is.
Make it possible to see advisors. I went to get appointments more than once and they would never make them. When you
can get in to see them they are usually helpful.
Make meeting with counselors more publisized. Encourage students to do it more.
Make monthly or frequent meetings to keep in better contact.
Make more time to contact the students and check on them.
Make scheduling easier.
Make sure the advisors are available more often.
Make sure those participating in spring semester SOAR have access to their academic advisor.
Make the academic advisors more approachable, and let us know what they are for and who they are.
Make the advisors easier to contact.
Make them easier to get a hold of.
Making it a requirement that student must meet with advisor every semester.
Making sure that athletics are elligible to play with credits they have.
Making them more accessible or even have some sort of newsletter or something to keep me informed.
Maybe a little bit more time.
Maybe check up on how their students are doing through email or something. I think my advisor was awesome.
Maybe contact me when It ry to reach them.
Maybe have some sub-advisors that can answer the less serious questions. Like if I was wondering how to get into a
Maybe having more advisors in each college.
Maybe people don't like their advisors. Maybe make it easier for people to change advisors.
Maybe refer better for those who need info on professions in optometry.
Maybe they could help me.
Maybe to actually let me meeet with my advisor. It's not his fault. I emailed him and he told me to come in and get an
appointment, but they wouldn't give me one.
Maybe try to meet wtih the students, rather than the students come to them. Or even by keeping in touch.
Meet more often.
More accessible.
More advisors for bigger programs.
More advisors over Engineering. Pass student thoughts on to scheduling and other departments.
More advisors per capita.
More advisors so the wait is not so long; most times when you try and get in to see an advisor it takes a substantial amount
of time and you have to block out a good part of time that could be used otherwise.
More advisors so we can have more times to meet with them.
More advisors so we don't have to wait so long.
More advisors, longer appointments.
More advisors.
More availability for walk ins.
More availability.
More available for drop ins and 2 minute questions.
More connection with career information.
F-9
How might the advising system be improved? 724 responses
More contact with the students.
More coordination between departments and areas.
More easily accessible at short notice.
More easily accessible info about major.
More encouragement. I felt like I was belittled because I hadn't taken certain courses before changing my major. It was a
big jump for me to change majors and I expected support, not to be harassed and criticized.
More flexible schedule is needed.
More frequent contact between advisors and students.
More friendly and keep their scheduled appointments.
More help for those who are undeclared.
More help. Answer questions better. (But I was really well prepared so....)
More individualized.
More information on availability of advisors. If an advisor needs to do their own work, a scheduling of visiting hours might be
More information on the majors to give the student a general idea of what he/she is getting into.
More information on times and places of advising.
More information on who your advisor is and how to get a hold of them.
More information.
More informative on who my advisor is. I've only met with them once.
More informative; better scheduling time.
More intimate knowledge of where I am in standing and what I need to do. I need advising from the English Department to
More knowledge of careers in the field of study.
More opportunities for appointments.
More opportunities to meet with your advisor. I feel like she could really help me if she had the time.
More opportunities, less hassle.
More personal.
More seating in the waiting room, chairs that are a bit more comfortable.
More time available to get in touch with.
More time for appointments.
More time for instructors to advise. Mine is Dept. Head also so it is very difficult to get an appointment.
More time to talk with them. Have them show more care and concern.
More welcome environment.
Most advisors don't help the students as much as mine did. Many people have to do their schedules completely on their
own, which often results in having to go extra semesters.
Most of the stuff down below, advisor and I never talk about.
Mutual Respect!! Find advisors that have experience in the field that they are advising students in. Maybe a mentor
program where upper division students advise freshmen?
My advisor is hard to catch sometimes.
My advisor is so busy that he is almost never available. When I meet wtih him I'm scared to take up too much time. It would
be so much more beneficial to have an advisor who only advises, who is always there and who I feel comfortable talking to.
My advisor is the best.
My advisor only comes in once a week. However, someone in the education program said they will put me with an education
department advisor so right now I don't know why my advisor is.
My advisor sent me an email with instructions on what classes I needed to take. It was a ridiculous amount! She was snooty
and condescending to me so I never went back. Her email was overwhelming and hard to understand. The classes were
My advisor told me that I could figure out how to plan my next four years in my major by myself and he would sign it. But I
didn't know how to do it all by myself.
My advisor was kind of rude and made me feel stupid when I asked him questions. He also told me to take trigonometry
when I don't need to and should just take calculus.
My advisor was switched on me without me knowing. The information to get a hold of my advisor is not readily available.
My advisor will not talk to you unless her peer advisors don't know the answers to my questions. I don't want to talk to them.
My advisors for undeclared students.
F - 10
How might the advising system be improved? 724 responses
My advisors send me too many emails!
My advvisor is great about getting back to me, but I know that some are not very good.
My anatomy teacher knows more about the nursing program and is more helpful. I've talked with (name) on the phone and
she is always short to me and I'm treated like a waste of her time. I asked if I could come in and meet with her and she said
My boyfriend's advisor was pretty jerky to him. He was trying to get him out of the office as fast as possible. Also, I wish I
had known earlier that advisors exist and how much they can help.
My counselor actually needs to help me and advise me rather than just sit there.
My expeience with the SOAR advising was awful, but I don't really know anything about what it is usually like. I don't knokw
much about how to set up an appointment or find out who my advisor is, so maybe the advisement could be improved.
My first majors advisor did not know many of the requirements that could be waived. Wouldn't let me take classes I wanted
Need to communicate with other dept. more.
No comment.
No suggestions.
No suggestions. They're great as far as I've experienced.
No ways.
Not all advisors know how to advise.
Not have such a long wait to see an advisor at beginning of the semester.
Not have such a long wait to see them at the beginning of the semester.
Not sure, haven't been too often.
Nothing at the time.
Nothing I can think of, everyone should stop complaining. You all do great.
Nothing much.
Nothing.
Nothing. Advisors are doing a great job!
Only met once.
Peer advisors need more training and to know what they're talking about.
Perhaps more done could be made available for students so there isn't a wait.
Please make a seperate bubble in all things for engaged people. I am neither single nor married.
Probably just being more willing to help. I talked to my advisor and she was quite rude and didn't give me any incentive to
want to pursue my career in nursing. Wanted me in and out. Very rushed.
Provide more information about future jobs, summer jobs, fun classes. More advisors should be better so it's easier to
Providing recent information. I was told that I couldn't take a class when in reality I could have.
Put everything I need on one easy to understand paper for me.
Quicker sign up and more advisors.
Reaching out more, trying to get to know the students instead of just getting them into classes etc.
Regularly keep contact with students in regards to what would most benefit each student in their decisions.
Require all entering students to be advised before they register!
Satisfied so far.
Schedule appointments with every student each semester. Email them to let them know the advisors care about how the
Scheduling is a nightmare. I realize that there are many kids in this place but getting to the advisor is hard.
Seems good to me.
Send a letter via mail telling who advisor is.
Send emails letting me know of opportunities to help me get started with my career (internships, etc.).
Sending out emails letting you know who your advisor is and whta they can help you with would be great.
Set classes up better so that underclassmen can get into the classes that are requiremed a little easier.
Set up a system where you meet with an advisor at a regular time, maybe once every semester to check up, make sure
classes are good, make sure requirements are being fulfilled, etc.
She helped me with everytyhing I needed in one visit! I don't think SHE could do things any better.
Shrug.
Simply having the students know more about it and the good things about it.
F - 11
How might the advising system be improved? 724 responses
So many people I don't know hard to talk to an advisor. I don't know how to change that.
Some students don't know who their advisor is.
Sometimes I felt like I couldn't get an appointment when I needed. However, I think with better planning and since I know
how to do it effectively now, it may not present such a problem.
Sometimes I just want to know what I need for my general education. I don't want to be taking all of these psychology
classes if I'm going to change my major. My advisor hasn't really made it clear of the GE classes I need.
Sometimes it's hard to find contact information. Feels uncomfortable. Make it more user-freidnly.
Sometimes my advisors haven't had the info I need. Maybe they could be more informed on policies and methods for doing
Sometimes we have to wait for a long time. I hope they can be on time.
Stop giving out surveys when we paid for lectures.
Stop giving people the wrap around. Example: go here, there, here, there, here, then see me!
Students need to be informed about it, know which advisor to go to and when.
Take more time to talk to students.
Take student input a little more seriously. If an advisor does not work, get rid of the advisor.
Talk to when ever I need them.
Tell me exactly what I should take and how much time it will take to complete the courses.
Tell more people about the benefits of an advisor. Get an advisor to help Freshmen determine where they want to major.
Tell students more about how to get in contact with their advisor and how to find who their advisor is.
Tell us to come in.
Telling kids the classes they need to take and not try to weed anyone out. Down to earth.
The advising system is doing quite well. I have had difficulties getting into see my advisor at times. If the opportunity arose
to visit other advisors in the program I would take that opportunity.
The advisors for undeclared students need to have information about a variety of majors so that you know what you can work
towards, and which classes feed into which majors. I saw a student advisor once and it was no help.
The classes and order listed on the major requirement sheet is too heavy a burden in order to finish in the 8 semester
The front desk! Everyone I talk to that has an advisor in HASS hates the front desk people, they're rude and incredibly
uninformative! When you try to pop in and see advisors they are obstacles even though you might have emailed your
The man I spoke with was very rude. He was the office in BNR 101. He told me I was too stupid to accomplish my major.
The office hours of the advisors should be more separated and longer during the first two weeks of the semesters.
The printed information is not good enough to understand clearly.
The times that I went to make an appointment they were very full. I think there should be more advisors and make it so we
can make appointments easier.
The Undeclared advisors are really hard to meet with. Maybe get more of them?
There aren't enough advisors! Students are treated almost like cattle at this university, we get branded, tagged and sent
There is only ONE advisor for ALL engineering undergrads!
There needs to be a larger advising staff for the engineering dept. 1 person running it all makes life much harder on them
and that transfers to the experience that the students have.
There was a little confusion with what AP credits and concurrent enrollment counted. I felt like my advisor should know.
They already do a great job.
They are doing a great job.
They are not very nice and seem like I'm just a number. My appointments always start 15 minutes late because they allow
"adults" time to walk in when I've made an appointment. Don't seem to care about what I think about work load, etc.
They are too mechanical, not enough personal time and not very sympathetic towards individual needs.
They could give GOOD advice.
They could inform me via email who my advisor is.
They could make their presence known a little more. Actually have an advisor directly for undeclared students instead of
sending the students to HASS.
They don't seem to really know what they are doing and they don't have very many open hours. Wait is long to get in.
They may already do this, but I think they should contact each student at least once a semester.
They might follow up with us about a month after we've seen them for the first time and see what we are thinking.
They need to know what's going on.
F - 12
How might the advising system be improved? 724 responses
They need to know where to find all answers too your questions. Often times they send you here or there, and you can't find
This school sucks and is worthless. Bunch of Mormons that haven't helped me at all. I had to pick my own classes, who
knows if they are right. I'm transfering. Screw this Mormon Hell Hole.
Time. It takes so much time to get in to see anyone.
Try to make students feel like they can do something. Don't make them feel it is impossible such as I felt with Susan at
SOAR so I wont' return and might reconsider nursing.
Try to make sure that students know who their advisor is.
We could have more advisors, and the advisors we have should be full time, so they are more readily available.
Well, I've never met with my assigned advisor. I've met with another in my major, so I can't really answer the rest of these
Well, I know with my advisor, she is not here often and is very busy. I also don't really understand the whole program. She
is amazing, but just very busy.
When attending SOAR they shuffled me around from one advisor to another which lead me to not having an actual advisor
When I did the SOAR program I was left feeling that there wasn't much the advising system could do for undecided majors.
When I told her that I wanted to be a Chiropractor she tried to steer me in a different direction and kind of looked down on
When I was a freshman I had no idea what to do or who my advisor was. It would be helpful to inform students so they didn't
have to figure out on their own.
When I went I felt like she wanted to hurry and not want to talk. My questions didn't seem to get answered. I think she was
When I went I had an appointment for 2:30 and did not get in until 3:00. If they didn't have an opening until 3:00 I wish they
would have told me because I had places to be at 3:00.
Working with advisors before I had declared a major was extremely frustrating. I needed help and information of who I
should see to choose a major. They were rude to me and would not get me an appointment.
You need more advisors.
F - 13