Booms and Banking Crises F. Boissay, F. Collard and F. Smets
by user
Comments
Transcript
Booms and Banking Crises F. Boissay, F. Collard and F. Smets
Booms and Banking Crises F. Boissay, F. Collard and F. Smets Macro Financial Modeling Conference Boston, 12 October 2013 Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 1 / 38 () Disclaimer The views expressed in this presentation are our own and do not necessarily re‡ect those of the European Central Bank or the Eurosystem Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 2 / 38 () Motivation/Objective Better understand the dynamics of …nancial and real business cycles A few features are common to …nancial recessions (i.e. recessions concomitant with banking crises): Fact #1: They are rare events Fact #2: They are deeper and last longer Fact #3: Unlike other types of recessions, …nancial recessions follow credit booms Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 3 / 38 () Motivation/Objective Financial recession statistics Recessions Financial Other Severe 2.36 8.93 4.05 4.05 2.32*** -6.84*** 1.65 -3.75 2.46*** -9.28*** 1.25 -0.89 4.56*** 0.01 1.33 0.40 -3.59* -1.24 -1.69 -2.44 Frequency (%) Duration (years) Magnitude (%) Mild Credit Boom % credit growth 2 years before peak (a) Credit Crunch % credit growth 2 years after peak (a) Source: Schularik et al. (2011), data for 14 OECD countries, 1870-2008. Crises de…ned as in Laeven and Valencia (2008); *,**,***: the di¤erence is statistically signi…cant at 10%, 5%, 1%; (a) HP–…ltered credit. Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 4 / 38 () Motivation/Objective In most DSGE models …nancial recessions are big negative shocks ampli…ed Can explain Facts #1 & #2 Cannot explain Key Fact #3 Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises crises are not random MFM October 2013 Conference 5 / 38 () Our Framework Textbook stochastic optimal growth model (RBC) Heterogenous banks with intermediation and storage technologies Interbank market subject to MH and AI A banking crisis is an interbank market freeze Spill–over and feedback e¤ects between the interbank market, the retail corporate loan market, and the real economy Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 6 / 38 () Main Results 1 Normal times feature productivity–driven business cycles with a small …nancial accelerator; a crisis every 42 years. Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 7 / 38 () Main Results 1 Normal times feature productivity–driven business cycles with a small …nancial accelerator; a crisis every 42 years. 2 The typical banking crisis follows an unusually long sequence of small, positive, transitory productivity shocks — No need for a large negative …nancial shock Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 7 / 38 () Main Results 1 Normal times feature productivity–driven business cycles with a small …nancial accelerator; a crisis every 42 years. 2 The typical banking crisis follows an unusually long sequence of small, positive, transitory productivity shocks — No need for a large negative …nancial shock 3 High productivity generates a credit boom and a ballooning banking sector Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 7 / 38 () Main Results 1 Normal times feature productivity–driven business cycles with a small …nancial accelerator; a crisis every 42 years. 2 The typical banking crisis follows an unusually long sequence of small, positive, transitory productivity shocks — No need for a large negative …nancial shock 3 High productivity generates a credit boom and a ballooning banking sector 4 As productivity gains peter out, excess savings arise ("saving glut") and interest rates fall; counterparty fears rise in the interbank market, which may lead to a freeze and banking crisis Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 7 / 38 () Main Results 1 Normal times feature productivity–driven business cycles with a small …nancial accelerator; a crisis every 42 years. 2 The typical banking crisis follows an unusually long sequence of small, positive, transitory productivity shocks — No need for a large negative …nancial shock 3 High productivity generates a credit boom and a ballooning banking sector 4 As productivity gains peter out, excess savings arise ("saving glut") and interest rates fall; counterparty fears rise in the interbank market, which may lead to a freeze and banking crisis 5 The subsequent …nancial recession is deep and long because of a credit crunch; credit–to–GDP ratio predicts …nancial recessions Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 7 / 38 () Related literature Kiyotaki-Moore (1997), Bernanke-Gertler-Gilchrist (1999), Christiano-Motto-Rostagno (2013), Gertler-Kiyotaki (2009), Gertler-Karadi (2010): 6= Full equilibrium non-linearities, such as sudden bank runs Bianchi (2009), Bianchi-Mendoza (2010): 6= Endogenous interest rates play a key role Brunnermeier-Sannikov (2012), He-Krishnamurthy (2012): 6= Typical crisis follows a rare, long sequence of positive TFP shocks 6= Typical crisis identi…ed as a bank run, not as a binding borrowing constraint Gertler-Kiyotaki (2012) 6= Bank run is market based and rationally expected Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 8 / 38 () Model setup Overview Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 9 / 38 () Representative Household and Firm Firm: maxfkt ,ht g π t = F (kt , ht ; zt ) + (1 δ)kt Rt kt wt ht Household: max fat +τ +1 ,ct +τ ,h t +τ g∞ τ =0 Et ∞ ∑ β τ u ( c t + τ , ht + τ ) τ =0 subject to budget constraint ct + at +1 = rt at + wt ht + π t + χt Notice that rt 6 Rt (spread) and kt 6 at (credit crunch) Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 10 / 38 () The Banking Sector Banks are atomistic, competitive, and price takers Continuum of heterogeneous 1–period banks p, with cdf µ(p ) over (0, 1) Bank p’s net return per unit of corporate loan is pRt It is bene…cial to relocate funds, but relocation is impaired due to: Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 11 / 38 () The Banking Sector Banks are atomistic, competitive, and price takers Continuum of heterogeneous 1–period banks p, with cdf µ(p ) over (0, 1) Bank p’s net return per unit of corporate loan is pRt It is bene…cial to relocate funds, but relocation is impaired due to: Asymmetric information: p is private information Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 11 / 38 () The Banking Sector Banks are atomistic, competitive, and price takers Continuum of heterogeneous 1–period banks p, with cdf µ(p ) over (0, 1) Bank p’s net return per unit of corporate loan is pRt It is bene…cial to relocate funds, but relocation is impaired due to: Asymmetric information: p is private information Moral hazard: bank p may borrow φt and walk away ("diversion") Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 11 / 38 () The Banking Sector Bank p has 4 options: 1. Lend to other banks on the interbank market =) ρt 2. Store goods =) γ 3. Raise funds φt from interbank market and lend to …rm =) pRt (1 + φt ) ρt φt 4. Raise funds φt from interbank market and walk away =) γ (1 + θφt ) Incentives to divert depend on the corporate loan rate: the lower Rt , the higher these incentives, and the more counterparty fears on the interbank market Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 12 / 38 () The Borrowing Bank’s Problem Borrowing bank p solves: max rt (p ) φt PC : IC : pRt (1 + φt ) pRt (1 + φt ) ρt φt ρt φt > ρt γ (1 + θφt ) 6 ρt Pro…ts are fully distributed to household: rt Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises ) p > p t ρt /Rt ) φt = (ρt γ)/θγ R1 0 rt (p ) dµ (p ) MFM October 2013 Conference 13 / 38 () Interbank Market Equilibrium Interbank market clearing condition Supply (+) z }| { µ (p t ) with p t Boissay - Collard - Smets = z Demand bends backward (+ or (1 | µ (p )) {z t } "extensive margin" ( ) }| ρt /Rt and φt = (ρt Booms and Banking Crises ) φt |{z} { "intensive margin" (+) γ)/θγ MFM October 2013 Conference 14 / 38 () Interbank Market Equilibrium The interbank market freezes when the retail corporate loan rate is below a threshold Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 15 / 38 () Interbank Market Equilibrium The interbank market freezes when the retail corporate loan rate is below a threshold Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 16 / 38 () Interbank Market Equilibrium The interbank market freezes when the retail corporate loan rate is below a threshold Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 17 / 38 () Absorption Capacity and Market Freeze Proposition (Interbank loan market freeze): The interbank loan market is at work if and only if at 6 at fk 1 (R + δ 1; zt ), and freezes otherwise. The interbank market improves e¢ ciency but freezes when Rt < R In general equilibrium, Rt is driven by savings (at ) and technology (zt ). Hence the interbank market freezes when at > a(zt ) Threshold a(zt ) is the banking sector’s "absorption capacity" Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 18 / 38 () Quantitative Analysis Calibration Calibration of the real side is standard Financial sector (γ, θ, µ(.)) is calibrated so that: Crisis probability is 2.3% Average interest rate spread is 1.7% Average corporate loan rate of 4.4% The model is solved numerically by a collocation method Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 19 / 38 () Quantitative Analysis Optimal savings rule: exogenous versus endogenous crises Variety of crises: shock–driven (S) and credit boom–driven (U) History suggests that credit–boom driven crises prevail Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 20 / 38 () Quantitative Analysis Typical path to crisis Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 21 / 38 () Quantitative Analysis Typical path to crisis Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 22 / 38 () Quantitative Analysis Typical path to crisis Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 23 / 38 () Quantitative Analysis Intuition 1 At the beginning, a positive shock brings TFP above its mean Credit demand rises. Return on savings goes up. The household accumulates assets for consumption smoothing 2 TFP goes down back to mean but remains above it for a long time Credit demand decreases, while the household keeps on accumulating savings; interest rates go down 3 As the probability of a crisis increases, the household maintains savings to hedge against a more likely loss of revenue, which works to reduce interest rates and to raise the likelihood of a crisis even further — saving glut externality 4 A crisis breaks out as the corporate loan Rt rate crosses threshold R Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 24 / 38 () Quantitative Assessment Financial recession statistics Financial Frequency (%) Recessions Other Severe Mild 2.35 8.94 3.76 3.76 2.08 -12.60 1.39 -4.98 2.22 -11.32 1.04 -3.28 % credit growth 2 years before peak (a) 3.81 0.11 2.33 0.06 Credit Crunch % credit growth 2 years after peak (a ) -5.09 0.09 -2.97 0.02 Duration (years) Magnitude (%) Credit Boom (a) HP–…ltered credit. Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 25 / 38 () Welfare %-Loss in permanent consumption Financial frictions FBA – DEA De…cient institutions FBA – CEA Externalities CEA – DEA Fin. under-development DEA – NIM 2.20 1.53 0.61 4.61 FBA: Fist Best Allocation; DEA: Decentralized Equilibrium Allocation CEA: Constrained E¢ cient Allocation; NIM: No Interbank Market Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 26 / 38 () Concluding Remarks Develop a simple quantitative macro-model with banking crises, where crises are not caused by large, negative, …nancial shocks but rather by long sequences of small, positive, productivity shocks Credit booms are conducive to crises Highlight the role of consumption smoothing and saving glut externalities From a policy making perspective: Framework for both crisis management and crisis prevention DSGE-based probability of a crisis Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 27 / 38 () THANK YOU Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 28 / 38 () Return on Deposits and Corporate Loan Supply Return on deposits: rt = 8 R 1 dµ(p ) > > < Rt p t p 1 µ(p t ) , if an equilibrium with trade exists > > : Rt γ Rt γ Rt µ + Corporate loan supply kts = Boissay - Collard - Smets R1 γ Rt p dµ (p ) , otherwise. 8 > < at , if an equilibrium with trade exists > : 1 µ γ Rt at , otherwise Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 29 / 38 () Interest Rates Endogenous and exogenous sources of instability Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 30 / 38 () Optimal Decision Rules Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 31 / 38 () Quantitative Analysis Two counter–factual experiments Typical paths to crisis without smoothing or externality Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 32 / 38 () Quantitative Assessment Dynamics of output and credit gaps around recessions Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 33 / 38 () Quantitative Assessment Dynamics of output and credit gaps around recessions Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 34 / 38 () Crisis Prediction Type–I and Type–II errors Model Probability (benchmark) (1) z a — — 0.03 0.00 0.55 0.00 Type-I errors (%) Type-II errors (%) N. warnings 31.43 4.85 30,215 100.00 0.00 0 N. crises N. obs (simul.) 11,739 468,769 11,739 468,769 R2 F-Test Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises Probability regressions (2) (3) (4) Logit (5) (a, z ) K /Y K /Y 0.69 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.38 0.00 72.50 4.11 22,020 56.87 5.55 30,439 36.79 4.92 29,911 35.97 5.16 31,089 11,739 468,769 11,739 468,769 11,739 468,769 11,739 468,769 MFM October 2013 Conference 35 / 38 () Sensitivity Analysis Financial recession statistics Baseline Frequency (%) Duration (years) Magnitude (%) Boissay - Collard - Smets 2.35 2.08 -12.60 σ ν θ λ 10 0.25 0.15 20 σz 0.025 ρz 0.70 Altern. TFP 4.74 1.75 -10.61 3.45 2.31 -16.33 5.87 1.72 -9.29 5.73 1.84 -12.05 4.56 2.09 -15.40 4.34 2.22 -17.82 2.32 1.99 -10.86 Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 36 / 38 () Endogenous Cycles Two deterministic versions of the model (constant TFP) Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 37 / 38 () Model With Both TFP and Financial Shocks Typical path to crisis Boissay - Collard - Smets Booms and Banking Crises MFM October 2013 Conference 38 / 38 ()