2012 Homeland Security Grant Program Michigan State Police Emergency Management and

2012 Homeland Security
Grant Program
Michigan State Police
Emergency Management and
Homeland Security Division
Mr. Sam Jonker-Burke
Mr. Mike Curtis
April 29, 2013
Overview
• FY 2012 HSGP Priorities
• FY 2012 HSGP Guidance
• Emergency Management and Homeland
Security (EMHSD) Grant Process
• Questions
FY 2012 Priorities
Priority One:
• Implementation of PPD-8 and the
Whole Community Approach to
Security and Emergency Management
FY 2012 Priorities (cont.)
Priority Two:
• Building and Sustaining Law
Enforcement Terrorism Prevention
Capabilities
FY 2012 Priorities (cont.)
Priority Three:
• Maturation and Enhancement of State
and Major Urban Area Fusion Centers
2012 Guidance
• No longer discrete grant programs:
○ Citizen Corps Program (CCP)
○ Metropolitan Medical Response System
(MMRS)
• Most activities and costs are allowable
and encouraged under the FY 2012
HSGP
• Describe how expenditures support
maintenance and sustainment of current
core capabilities
2012 Guidance (cont.)
Organization - Typing of Equipment and Training
•
State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) and Urban Area
Security Initiative (UASI) provide funding for equipment,
training, and exercises for the prevention of, protection
against, response to, and recovery from terrorism related
events.
•
A well executed mission requires carefully managed
resources (personnel, teams, facilities, equipment, and/or
supplies) from the Whole Community to meet incident needs.
•
Utilization of standardized resource management concepts
such as typing, inventorying, organizing, and tracking will
facilitate the dispatch, deployment, and recovery of resources
before, during, and after an incident.
2012 Guidance (cont.)
Organization - Typing of Equipment and Training
• Measurement Method:
○ Percentage of total equipment purchased using a typed
resource under the National Incident Management System
(NIMS) in support of developing or maintaining core capability
○ Percentage of all personnel trained in a given capability to
support a reported number of defined resource typed teams
(e.g., Technical search and rescue equipment for urban
search and rescue must be identified for use in the
development of a NIMS defined Urban Search and Rescue
(USAR) team or to outfit technical rescue specialists as typed
single resources)
○ Percentage of defined types of resources and core
capabilities built utilizing grant funds
2012 Guidance (cont.)
Organization - Typing of Equipment and Training
• Reporting Requirements:
○ Report what equipment was purchased, and identify what
typed capability it supports as part of the reporting
requirements
○ Report the total number of people trained in a given capability
to support a reported number of defined resource typed teams
(e.g., 63 responders were trained in structural collapse to
support 23 Type 2 USAR Teams)
○ Report the total number of a defined type of resource and
core capabilities built utilizing the resources of this grant as
part of the reporting requirements.
2012 Guidance (cont.)
Sustaining Capabilities:
• In this time of limited resources, HSGP grantees
should ensure that grant funding is utilized to sustain
core capabilities within the National Preparedness
Goal (NPG) that were funded by past HSGP funding
cycles to include training of personnel and lifecycle
replacement of equipment.
• Grantees must ensure that the capabilities are
deployable outside of their community to support
regional and national efforts. All capabilities being
built or sustained must have a clear linkage to one or
more core capabilities in the NPG.
2012 Guidance (cont.)
Sustaining Capabilities:
• Measurement Method:
○ Percentage of proposed funding on a project by project basis
which supports the sustainment of the NPG’s core capabilities
• Reporting Requirements:
○ As part of programmatic monitoring, grantees will be required
to describe how expenditures first support maintenance and
sustainment of current NPG core capabilities within reporting
2012 Guidance (cont.)
Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Activities
(LETPA)
• Per the 9/11 Act, States are required to ensure that at
least 25 percent (25%) of SHSP appropriated funds
and 25 percent (25%) of UASI appropriated funds are
dedicated towards law enforcement terrorism
prevention-oriented planning, organization, training,
exercise, and equipment activities (LETPA)
• Actual dollar amount is listed in the grant agreements
2012 Guidance (cont.)
• Use of SHSP and UASI funds must be
consistent with, and supportive of
implementation of the State Homeland
Security Strategy. Linkages between
specific projects undertaken with SHSP
and UASI funds, and strategic goals and
objectives will be highlighted throughout
regular required reporting mechanisms,
including the Biannual Strategy
Implementation Reports (BSIR).
2012 Guidance (cont.)
• Activities implemented under SHSP and UASI
must support terrorism preparedness by
building or enhancing capabilities that relate to
the prevention of, protection from, response to,
and recovery from terrorism in order to be
considered eligible.
• However, many capabilities which support
terrorism preparedness simultaneously
support preparedness for other hazards.
Grantees must demonstrate this dual-use
quality for any activities implemented
under this program that are not explicitly
focused on terrorism preparedness.
2012 Guidance (cont.)
Performance Period end date:
May 31, 2014
Reimbursement must be received:
June 30, 2014
FY 2012 Regional
Investment Projects
• Six (6) investments were developed
using Goals and Objectives from the
State and Regional Homeland Security
Strategies
• Investment Projects start on page 26 of
the FY 2012 Michigan Supplemental
Guidance
Investment Project Review
(page 27 of Michigan Supplemental Guidance)
Each Investment Project includes:
• Header with corresponding title / state
investment #
• Core Capabilities supported by the Investment
Project are identified (Note: best supported;
i.e. list is not necessarily exhaustive)
• Investment description summary
• Investment Project (IP) Description /
Implementation Activities
Environmental and Historic
Preservation (EHP) Review
• Any activities that have been initiated
without the necessary EHP review
and approval will result in a noncompliance finding and will not be
eligible for Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) funding
EHP Review (cont.)
• When required, including, but not limited
to:
○ Interior / Exterior Installations
○ Installing new structures
○ Ground disturbance
• Timeline:
○ 2-3 Months for most interior installations
○ 2-3 Months for most installations on existing
structures
○ 2-12 Months (or longer) for new structures or
ground disturbance
EMHSD Process
• The Project Justification (PJ) and
Allowable Cost Justification (ACJ) forms
have been combined
• The new form is called the Alignment
and Allowability Form
• ***Note: AAF is required for all costs
starting with Grant Year 2011***
EMHSD Process (cont.)
Submit to: [email protected]
MSP/EMHSD Tracking Number:
Part I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1.A Subgrantee Name:
1.B Project Title:
1.C Region:
1.D Regional Fiduciary:
2.A Subgrantee Point of Contact:
2.B Subgrantee E-Mail Address:
2.C Subgrantee Phone Number:
YES
NO
1.E Date Sent:
1.F Category:
2.D Project Lead (If applicable):
2.E Project Lead E-Mail Adress:
2.F Project Lead Phone Number:
EMHSD Process (cont.)
Part II - ALIGNMENT REVIEW
3.A Grant Year:
3.C Investment Title:
3.D Investment Alignment:
3.B Grant Program:
FOCUS NARRATIVE ON THE INVESTMENT LANGUAGE THAT
ILLUSTRATES THE CONNECTION/ALIGNMENT
3.E Regional Homeland Security Strategy (RHSS) Goal:
3.F Regional Homeland Security Strategy (RHSS) Objective:
3.G Core Capability 1:
3.H Core Capability 2:
JOB AID: rkb.us  other content  core capabilities
EMHSD Process (cont.)
Part III - ALLOWABILITY REVIEW
4.A Solution Area:
4.B AEL Number:
4.C Detailed Description of Costs:
SPECIFIC NARRATIVE IS RECOMMENDED
4.D Quantity:
4.E Unit Cost:
4.G Detailed Narrative of Intended Use / Outcome:
4.F Total Cost:
23
EMHSD Process (cont.)
4.J Training Requests
Is Training a FEMA-approved Course?
FEMA-approved Course Name:
Date of Course:
***Complete This Section For All Training Requests***
YES
NO
Sponsoring Jurisdiction:
Training Discipline:
If Not a FEMA-approved Course, Complete the Information Below
If Not a FEMA-approved Course, Provide Course Name:
How many times that you are aware of has this course been delivered in Michigan ?
Level of Training:
Training Provider:
Company Name:
Point of Contact:
Address:
Phone:
E-Mail:
EMHSD Process (cont.)
JOB AID: rkb.us  other content  NIMS Resource Types
Part IV - REIMBURSEMENT REPORTING
5.A - Equipment & Training Reporting
Equipment or Training
*** Required for ALL Equipment and Training Reimbursements***
NIMS Typed Discipline or State/Local
Discipline/Community of Interest
Supported
State/Local Typed Resource Supported
(If applicable)
Typed Equipment Purchased
NIMS Typed Resource Supported
COMMENTS:
# of
Personnel # of Typed
NIMS Typed
Trained for Teams
Number
NIMS Typed Trained
Teams
EMHSD Process (cont.)
5.B - Project Activity Reporting
*** Required for ALL Solution Areas***
Amount Expended:
Completed Activities:
MUST match the reimbursement
request documents
Please recognize that the goal is to track all of the
attributes included on the AAF by the actual amount spent
QUESTIONS?
Contact Information
Mr. Sam Jonker-Burke
[email protected]
(517) 333-4195
Mr. Mike Curtis
[email protected]
(517) 333-5039
Ms. Renee Tober
[email protected]
(517) 333-5030