No Child Left Behind Colorado State Report Card 2009-2010

by user

on 15 сентября 2016

Category: Documents

>> Downloads: 2

views

Report

Comments

Description

Download No Child Left Behind Colorado State Report Card 2009-2010

Transcript

No Child Left Behind Colorado State Report Card 2009-2010

No Child Left Behind
Colorado State Report Card 2009-2010
Office of Federal Program Administration
1560 Broadway, Suite 1450
Denver, Colorado 80202
Table of Contents
Introduction
Section 1: Assessment Data
Colorado Student Assessment Program (CSAP) Data
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Data
3
4
39
Section 2: State Accountability Data
About AYP
Colorado State AYP Results
Colorado 2008 Graduation Rate Data
41
42
52
Section 4: School Accountability Data
School AYP Results
School Improvement Results
64
68
Section 3: District Accountability Data
District AYP Results
NCLB Program Improvement
Section 5: Highly Qualified Teacher Data
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
54
55
75
2
Introduction
The Colorado Department of Education (CDE) is pleased to present to its constituents the 2010 No Child Left Behind Report Card. This
report card details the progress Colorado and its districts and schools are making toward the goals of the federal No Child Left Behind
(NCLB) Act. The intent of the NCLB Report Card is to inform parents, teachers, the general public, key policy-makers and other decision
makers about the status of education in Colorado in relation to NCLB goals. Specifically, the report includes:





Assessment Data- the results of the reading and math state content assessments (CSAP, CSAPA and Spanish Lectura)
Accountability Data- the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for the state
Improvement status of Title I districts and schools in the state
Graduation Rate Data
Information about teacher qualifications and percentages of classes taught by Highly Qualified teachers
Parents, school/district staff and the general public can also easily access individual school and district performance data on CDE’s web
portal SchoolView at http://www.schoolview.org/.
Some highlights from this year’s report include:




Colorado students performed higher than the national average on the NAEP assessment in grades four and eight in reading.
The state saw gains from 2009 to 2010 in the percent of districts that made AYP. In 2010, 48 percent of districts in Colorado made
AYP (up from 46% in 2009). Seventy-eight percent of districts made at least 90 percent of their targets (same as 2009)
Eighty-five Colorado school districts have been identified for Program Improvement or Corrective Action.
Five Title I schools have made AYP for two consecutive years and have been removed from the School Improvement list. Another 54
schools on Improvement made AYP for the first time, and will exit Improvement if they make AYP again next year.
If you have questions about an individual school or district, I encourage you to contact the individual school or district office. Additionally, all
districts in the state create an Annual Report to the Public, which contains more information about how the specific district and schools are
succeeding. Thank you for your interest in the education of our state’s students. For more information, please visit our website at
http://www.cde.state.co.us/FedPrograms.
Patrick Chapman
Executive Director
Office of Federal Programs Administration
Colorado Department of Education
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
3
Section 1: Assessment Data
CSAP Data
Every year the state of Colorado administers the Colorado Student Assessment Program (CSAP) to measure the progress students are making
in achieving proficiency in Colorado’s Content Standards. The CSAP assesses third through tenth grade students in reading, writing and
mathematics. Additionally, science content standards are measured in 5th, 8th and 10th grades. The complete reports of CSAP results can be
found at: http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdeassess/documents/csap/csap_summary.html
Students with significant cognitive disabilities (about 1% of the student population) may be eligible to take the CSAP Alternate (CSAPA),
which assesses students on modified state content standards. CSAPA results are included in the reports that follow. CSAPA data can also be
found at: http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdeassess/documents/csapa/csapa_summary.html
The following pages provide an overview of Colorado students’ performance on the 2010 CSAP. The graphs on pages 5 and 6 below
represent the percentage of students scoring advanced, proficient, partially proficient, unsatisfactory, and no score on the Reading and Math
CSAP, while those on page 7 show results for Lectura (a Spanish-language reading test given to qualifying students in 3rd and 4th grades).
Graphs on pages 8 and 9 show the percentages of students scoring novice, developing, emerging, exploring, inconclusive, and no score on
CSAPA. Tests may receive a “No Score” if a student does not take, or does not complete, the test. Pages 10-38 provide trend tables comparing
the performance of disaggregated groups of students from 2009 to 2010.
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
4
2010 CSAP Reading Results
100
80
Percent of Students
64
60
62
61
59
59
63
59
Percent Advanced
57
Percent Proficient
Percent Partially Proficient
Percent Unsatisfactory
40
20
0
23
18
6
11
03
0
3
10
04
1
9
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
18
11
05
13
1
18
06
9
1
9
Grade Level
20
11
07
1
9
23
20
10
08
1
7
4
09
Percent No Score
21
2
9
9
4
10
5
2010 CSAP Math Results
100
Percent of Students
80
Percent Advanced
60
40
20
0
Percent Proficient
41
38
33
29
21
8
03
1
37
28
21
8
04
1
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Percent Partially Proficient
37
25
9
05
25
33
28
25
21
12
1
06
1
Grade Level
23
18
07
1
30 29
25
28 28
19
08
36
14
1
09
2
25
5
31
Percent Unsatisfactory
Percent No Score
3
10
6
2010 Lectura Results
100
90
80
Percent of Students
70
60
50
50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent Advanced
49
23
10
03
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Percent Proficient
27
17
4
0
Grade Level
04
Percent Partially Proficient
Percent Unsatisfactory
Percent No Score
20
0
7
2010 CSAPA Reading
100
Percent of Students
80
60
Percent Novice
Percent Developing
40
20
0
35
20
21
15
4
03
20
4
8
31
18
15
29
7
14
04
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
21
32
05
13
4
31
28
20
19
6
06
Percent Emerging
22
9
5
6
Grade Level
07
24
22
12
7
8
26
17
08
17
23
21
8
25
10
09
13
19
7
26
Percent Exploring
Percent Inconclusive
25
13
12
Percent No Score
5
10
8
2010 CSAPA Math
100
Percent of Students
80
60
Percent Novice
40
20
0
23
24
34
17
87
03
37
22
21
Percent Developing
24
9
5
7
10
04
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
19
15
05
14
5
26
23
19
14
10
06
7
25
22
17
14
14
Grade Level
07
26
7
8
21
29
25
12
08
7
Percent Emerging
37
24
15
11
15
09
7
18
Percent Exploring
Percent Inconclusive
21
13
7
Percent No Score
4
10
9
2009 – 2010 CSAP Reading Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
04
04
Category
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Advanced
% Proficient
7
6
3
3
11
10
3
2
2
2
1
1
8
7
2
2
6
5
1
0
1
1
10
9
6
3
2
1
9
6
66
64
59
55
68
67
58
53
54
51
42
43
67
66
52
49
64
62
36
33
27
30
73
72
59
62
47
53
64
67
% Partially
Proficient
18
18
24
28
15
14
23
25
28
27
31
32
17
17
29
28
19
19
36
36
26
30
13
13
22
23
30
30
17
19
% Unsat.
% No Score
9
11
13
14
6
9
15
19
16
19
25
23
7
9
17
21
10
13
27
30
45
37
4
6
13
10
21
15
9
7
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
10
2009 – 2010 CSAP Reading Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
Category
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Advanced
% Proficient
2
1
2
1
0
1
8
4
2
1
5
3
0
0
1
1
9
5
9
9
5
3
13
15
3
3
2
3
2
2
46
50
44
47
37
34
60
66
42
45
57
59
32
32
21
22
68
73
60
61
51
50
65
62
50
52
48
50
42
41
% Partially
Proficient
29
31
31
34
38
35
21
22
32
35
23
25
35
39
33
29
16
17
19
18
25
26
13
13
26
25
28
27
31
30
% Unsat.
% No Score
22
17
23
17
24
30
10
8
23
19
15
12
33
28
44
47
6
5
12
11
19
20
7
9
20
19
22
19
25
27
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
11
2009 – 2010 CSAP Reading Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
Category
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Advanced
% Proficient
10
11
2
3
8
7
1
0
1
1
13
12
12
13
7
6
19
21
4
6
3
4
3
2
15
16
3
4
10
10
61
62
47
49
58
59
33
37
22
24
67
68
60
59
52
55
62
60
51
53
49
51
42
41
60
60
47
50
59
58
% Partially
Proficient
18
17
29
28
19
20
32
35
28
26
13
13
19
18
28
25
13
12
27
24
30
28
32
34
18
16
31
29
19
20
% Unsat.
% No Score
10
9
22
20
15
14
32
27
49
47
7
6
9
9
13
14
6
7
18
15
18
16
22
23
7
7
18
17
11
11
0
1
0
0
1
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
12
2009 – 2010 CSAP Reading Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
06
06
06
06
06
06
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
Category
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Advanced
% Proficient
1
3
1
1
17
18
9
9
3
4
14
15
3
3
2
3
2
1
11
12
2
3
6
6
1
1
1
1
12
12
32
37
23
27
66
64
59
59
54
50
61
60
47
50
44
47
39
35
60
61
43
45
57
57
26
29
20
20
67
66
% Partially
Proficient
36
33
32
30
12
12
20
20
28
27
15
15
29
27
30
30
32
32
19
18
31
31
21
22
33
34
30
29
15
15
% Unsat.
% No Score
30
26
43
41
5
5
12
11
15
16
9
8
20
18
23
19
26
30
9
8
23
20
14
14
39
35
48
48
6
6
1
2
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
3
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
13
2009 – 2010 CSAP Reading Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2009
2010
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
09
09
09
09
09
09
Category
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Free/Reduced Lunch
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Advanced
% Proficient
7
9
4
4
13
14
2
3
2
1
1
9
11
2
2
2
5
6
0
1
0
1
10
12
3
4
2
1
7
8
57
59
50
55
60
62
45
50
42
39
33
60
62
47
41
46
55
57
23
25
19
19
66
66
64
63
53
52
68
65
% Partially
Proficient
24
20
29
26
18
15
33
29
35
34
37
21
18
31
35
31
26
22
35
39
32
33
18
15
24
23
32
32
17
17
% Unsat.
% No Score
11
10
15
14
8
8
19
17
21
25
28
8
7
18
21
19
13
13
39
35
46
45
6
6
7
7
10
10
7
8
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
3
2
1
2
2
2
4
5
1
2
14
2009 – 2010 CSAP Reading Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2009
2010
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Category
Black
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Free/Reduced Lunch
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Advanced
% Proficient
1
1
1
1
1
4
6
1
1
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
5
6
10
9
4
4
14
15
2
3
2
2
2
2
49
50
45
37
36
67
67
48
44
46
60
59
20
26
20
20
74
72
60
57
52
50
61
57
50
45
46
45
37
37
% Partially
Proficient
34
32
37
41
40
21
19
35
38
37
26
26
41
45
42
41
17
16
21
21
30
27
17
16
30
32
34
32
37
39
% Unsat.
% No Score
11
14
14
20
21
5
5
13
15
14
9
9
34
26
34
34
4
4
7
9
10
13
6
10
13
15
13
16
22
19
4
3
3
2
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
4
3
4
4
2
2
3
4
4
6
2
2
5
5
4
4
3
3
15
2009 – 2010 CSAP Reading Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Category
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
% Advanced
% Proficient
12
12
2
2
7
6
0
1
1
1
13
12
63
60
46
45
57
54
29
31
19
20
66
63
% Advanced
% Proficient
26
33
17
20
40
47
12
15
13
17
13
11
43
38
40
40
40
32
37
36
40
39
35
36
% Partially
Proficient
17
18
34
33
24
24
42
38
35
41
14
15
% Unsat.
% No Score
4
6
13
16
10
12
27
28
39
32
4
6
3
4
3
3
3
4
1
2
6
6
3
4
% Unsat.
% No Score
7
8
13
10
4
5
16
18
13
13
16
16
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2009 - 2010 CSAP Math Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
Category
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Partially
Proficient
23
21
29
29
15
15
34
30
34
31
35
37
16
2009 - 2010 CSAP Math Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
Category
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Advanced
% Proficient
26
31
13
15
27
35
8
7
9
8
34
43
28
29
14
16
43
44
13
14
13
14
12
11
27
27
13
14
28
30
43
39
39
38
43
37
32
32
26
28
45
39
43
41
40
40
39
37
39
38
41
41
37
37
44
42
40
39
41
41
% Partially
Proficient
24
22
35
33
23
20
43
39
34
36
17
14
21
21
30
28
12
13
27
29
30
30
33
32
21
22
31
32
21
20
% Unsat.
% No Score
7
8
13
14
7
8
17
21
30
27
3
4
9
8
16
15
5
5
20
17
16
14
18
19
8
8
15
15
9
9
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
17
2009 - 2010 CSAP Math Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
04
04
04
04
04
04
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
Category
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic) (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic) (not Hispanic)
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Advanced
% Proficient
7
9
6
7
36
37
28
28
17
15
45
45
14
14
13
14
13
12
27
27
12
13
29
30
7
8
5
6
36
36
36
32
25
26
44
43
35
37
31
32
34
33
30
34
32
35
33
30
36
39
32
35
34
36
27
31
19
17
37
39
% Partially
Proficient
36
42
33
33
15
15
25
25
32
36
15
15
32
33
35
36
37
36
26
26
36
37
24
24
41
37
37
32
20
19
% Unsat.
% No Score
20
17
35
33
4
4
11
9
19
16
5
6
24
19
20
15
17
22
10
8
19
15
12
10
24
24
38
44
6
5
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
18
2009 - 2010 CSAP Math Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
07
07
07
07
07
07
Category
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic) (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Advanced
% Proficient
27
25
18
13
46
43
12
12
12
11
11
12
26
24
12
10
28
25
5
8
4
5
35
32
24
21
13
12
41
38
36
37
31
34
34
35
31
32
31
33
30
29
37
38
31
33
34
35
21
24
16
16
38
39
31
28
29
24
31
30
% Partially
Proficient
25
25
30
32
14
15
32
31
34
35
35
33
26
26
35
35
24
25
36
35
30
31
20
20
32
33
36
33
21
22
% Unsat.
% No Score
12
12
21
21
6
7
25
24
22
22
24
25
12
11
22
21
13
14
37
34
49
48
7
7
13
18
21
29
6
9
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
3
0
1
19
2009 - 2010 CSAP Math Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
Category
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic) (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Advanced
% Proficient
9
8
9
8
8
8
23
20
9
7
24
21
4
2
3
4
31
27
19
23
12
12
35
40
6
9
6
9
9
7
23
22
24
21
19
22
32
29
24
20
30
27
15
16
9
10
34
32
31
28
23
25
32
30
23
22
22
22
20
20
% Partially
Proficient
39
38
42
40
38
42
32
34
43
41
31
31
46
38
28
34
27
29
31
28
35
32
24
19
36
33
38
35
34
37
% Unsat.
% No Score
27
31
24
30
34
27
13
16
24
31
14
19
35
44
60
50
8
11
19
19
28
28
9
10
34
35
33
33
37
36
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
20
2009 - 2010 CSAP Math Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
Category
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic) (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Advanced
% Proficient
17
21
7
9
20
25
3
3
3
3
24
29
12
14
5
7
25
28
3
4
3
4
4
3
10
12
3
4
13
15
32
30
22
21
30
27
15
15
8
9
36
32
23
25
17
17
29
28
13
14
13
16
13
11
24
26
12
15
23
25
% Partially
Proficient
32
30
38
35
29
27
40
37
24
26
28
25
29
30
25
29
25
23
26
29
27
31
28
25
30
31
27
30
27
28
% Unsat.
% No Score
18
19
32
34
20
20
40
45
62
60
12
12
35
29
50
42
20
19
55
50
55
46
53
60
34
29
56
49
36
30
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
1
2
2
2
4
5
1
1
3
3
3
2
0
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
21
2009 - 2010 CSAP Math Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
09
09
09
09
09
09
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Category
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic) (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic) (not Hispanic)
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Advanced
% Proficient
2
2
2
1
16
18
5
5
2
2
14
14
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
1
1
7
7
0
1
0
1
7
7
4
7
5
4
29
31
25
25
15
16
35
33
10
11
10
12
9
9
24
24
10
11
26
26
5
5
4
4
32
32
% Partially
Proficient
18
23
16
14
30
30
35
36
35
33
30
31
32
32
32
34
32
30
36
37
32
35
33
34
27
32
16
16
36
37
% Unsat.
% No Score
72
65
73
77
24
19
32
31
44
44
20
21
53
52
53
49
55
57
32
31
53
50
32
31
67
61
74
75
22
21
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
3
4
5
2
2
4
5
3
4
0
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
5
5
2
3
22
2009 – 2010 Lectura Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
Category
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Advanced
%
Proficient
% Partially
Proficient
% Unsat.
% No Score
11
10
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
11
10
10
11
12
12
11
10
11
8
12
15
0
3
6
10
2
51
50
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
52
51
50
51
57
54
51
50
45
47
60
56
24
22
59
48
34
20
23
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
20
23
23
20
17
22
20
23
23
24
24
15
19
28
12
33
27
17
17
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
17
16
17
17
14
12
17
17
20
21
4
15
56
47
24
5
35
0
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
5
1
23
2009 – 2010 Lectura Trend Data
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2010
2009
2009
2010
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3
4
3
2
3
2
2
4
1
5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
49
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
33
48
49
34
40
52
34
48
28
46
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
27
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
28
27
28
27
24
25
27
27
31
30
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
20
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
35
20
21
36
32
21
35
21
39
19
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
24
2009 – 2010 CSAPA Reading Trend Data
Year
Grade
Category
% Novice
%
Developing
%
Emerging
%
Exploring
% Incon.
% No
Score
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
All
6
4
NA
NA
0
5
1
4
4
3
2
1
5
2
4
3
6
5
NA
NA
6
4
9
4
10
8
NA
20
20
NA
NA
13
14
29
14
20
21
14
14
23
20
16
19
19
20
NA
NA
20
20
22
22
22
20
NA
34
35
NA
NA
50
18
30
41
39
37
38
39
37
38
39
35
33
34
NA
NA
34
35
31
35
30
31
NA
18
21
NA
NA
19
41
14
27
17
22
25
28
17
19
21
25
18
23
NA
NA
18
21
17
18
17
18
NA
15
15
NA
NA
13
23
21
12
15
14
17
18
11
15
17
14
17
15
NA
NA
15
15
12
15
16
15
NA
6
4
NA
NA
6
0
4
2
5
3
5
2
6
5
4
4
7
4
NA
NA
6
4
9
5
5
7
NA
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
25
2009 – 2010 CSAPA Reading Trend Data
Year
Grade
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2009
2010
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
05
05
05
05
05
05
Category
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
ELL
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Free/Reduced Lunch
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Novice
%
Developing
%
Emerging
%
Exploring
% Incon.
% No
Score
NA
NA
5
12
8
10
2
7
11
7
7
9
6
9
9
NA
NA
10
8
10
11
15
14
NA
NA
12
29
NA
NA
16
17
28
23
24
17
24
20
20
22
18
22
20
NA
NA
22
20
24
20
30
29
NA
NA
18
18
NA
NA
53
33
30
34
31
38
24
35
35
32
33
34
29
NA
NA
30
31
29
29
18
21
NA
NA
24
18
NA
NA
16
19
16
17
28
21
16
20
19
19
20
17
17
NA
NA
17
18
16
17
22
19
NA
NA
29
24
NA
NA
5
14
16
13
15
13
19
12
16
15
18
14
17
NA
NA
16
15
17
14
9
13
NA
NA
0
6
NA
NA
5
5
3
3
2
3
6
6
4
4
5
4
8
NA
NA
5
7
5
9
5
4
NA
NA
18
6
26
2009 – 2010 CSAPA Reading Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2009
2010
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
Category
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
ELL
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Free/Reduced Lunch
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Novice
%
Developing
%
Emerging
%
Exploring
% Incon.
% No
Score
15
15
14
11
16
11
15
12
15
11
17
13
NA
NA
15
14
15
14
6
6
NA
NA
5
NA
7
7
5
27
38
33
24
26
32
32
32
28
28
29
28
NA
NA
30
29
32
30
30
32
NA
NA
26
NA
27
36
30
18
25
18
31
21
17
18
25
18
22
19
23
NA
NA
18
21
18
20
32
28
NA
NA
11
NA
36
27
34
20
13
22
21
26
24
19
17
25
21
21
20
NA
NA
22
19
21
19
16
20
NA
NA
11
NA
20
18
15
11
8
9
13
6
11
15
11
9
15
8
11
NA
NA
9
12
9
12
10
9
NA
NA
32
NA
9
9
9
9
2
3
3
5
5
2
3
3
3
5
6
NA
NA
5
4
5
6
6
5
NA
NA
16
NA
0
2
6
27
2009 – 2010 CSAPA Reading Trend Data
Year
Grade
2010
2009
2009
2010
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2009
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
Category
ELL
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Free/Reduced Lunch
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
ELL
English Language Learners
Female
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Novice
%
Developing
%
Emerging
%
Exploring
% Incon.
% No
Score
2
4
5
4
6
4
6
6
7
NA
NA
6
6
7
6
8
6
NA
NA
0
0
15
4
7
4
3
8
26
26
25
32
35
28
29
33
32
NA
NA
30
32
31
32
29
31
NA
NA
31
20
18
38
32
37
31
27
43
38
34
29
28
37
32
30
28
NA
NA
32
28
29
27
22
22
NA
NA
13
15
24
16
22
26
24
22
23
9
15
22
18
12
19
16
19
NA
NA
16
20
18
20
24
22
NA
NA
25
30
24
26
24
22
27
25
6
11
12
9
8
13
9
9
8
NA
NA
10
9
7
9
12
12
NA
NA
6
25
18
12
10
11
10
12
4
13
9
5
4
6
6
5
6
NA
NA
6
5
7
5
6
7
NA
NA
25
10
2
4
4
14
6
6
28
2009 – 2010 CSAPA Reading Trend Data
Year
Grade
2010
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
Category
Female
Free/Reduced Lunch
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Novice
%
Developing
%
Emerging
%
Exploring
% Incon.
% No
Score
7
5
6
7
7
6
NA
NA
8
6
8
7
8
8
NA
NA
NA
0
5
9
9
9
3
3
6
7
6
30
36
28
32
30
31
NA
NA
29
31
31
29
20
24
NA
NA
NA
25
30
19
20
26
15
27
22
28
20
22
20
25
21
22
23
NA
NA
22
22
20
25
20
17
NA
NA
NA
10
25
28
23
19
16
17
23
17
21
23
23
27
20
23
22
NA
NA
24
22
22
22
27
26
NA
NA
NA
50
23
23
28
26
40
33
25
26
29
14
12
10
15
12
11
NA
NA
12
12
12
10
17
17
NA
NA
NA
10
14
13
17
15
19
19
16
16
19
5
4
4
6
6
7
NA
NA
6
7
7
7
7
8
NA
NA
NA
5
5
8
5
6
7
5
8
7
5
29
2009 – 2010 CSAPA Reading Trend Data
Year
Grade
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2009
2010
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
Category
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
ELL
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Free/Reduced Lunch
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Novice
%
Developing
%
Emerging
%
Exploring
% Incon.
% No
Score
7
9
9
NA
NA
8
8
10
8
11
10
NA
X
NA
NA
18
5
11
5
6
11
8
13
12
7
11
11
23
18
21
NA
NA
20
24
19
26
19
21
NA
X
NA
NA
25
32
21
24
18
22
23
24
18
21
17
20
19
19
17
NA
NA
20
17
20
14
26
23
NA
X
NA
NA
29
20
24
24
27
22
22
22
27
26
29
24
28
29
27
NA
NA
27
26
27
25
23
25
NA
X
NA
NA
14
27
26
32
35
24
25
27
26
25
23
25
17
18
17
NA
NA
17
17
16
17
13
13
NA
X
NA
NA
8
9
12
16
10
14
13
9
11
16
12
14
6
7
9
NA
NA
7
8
9
10
8
7
NA
X
NA
NA
6
7
7
5
4
7
9
5
6
5
8
6
30
2009 – 2010 CSAPA Reading Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2009
2010
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
09
09
09
09
09
09
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Category
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
ELL
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Free/Reduced Lunch
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Novice
%
Developing
%
Emerging
%
Exploring
% Incon.
% No
Score
NA
NA
11
10
10
13
15
12
NA
NA
6
NA
21
13
12
9
7
14
11
13
15
11
16
12
NA
NA
15
NA
NA
18
21
18
20
20
19
NA
NA
24
NA
23
36
19
17
11
20
19
22
21
16
19
19
NA
NA
19
NA
NA
26
23
25
22
24
26
NA
NA
12
NA
26
26
26
29
21
24
25
25
21
28
24
27
NA
NA
24
NA
NA
23
25
22
24
23
25
NA
NA
29
NA
17
11
27
28
42
24
28
26
28
29
23
23
NA
NA
23
NA
NA
13
13
15
13
11
13
NA
NA
29
NA
4
6
10
17
8
9
12
12
8
13
12
14
NA
NA
11
NA
NA
8
7
9
8
7
5
NA
NA
0
NA
9
9
5
0
10
8
5
2
8
3
6
5
NA
NA
7
31
2009 – 2010 CSAPA Reading Trend Data
Year
Grade
2010
2009
2010
10
10
10
Category
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
% Novice
%
Developing
%
Emerging
%
Exploring
% Incon.
% No
Score
12
15
13
19
18
16
26
26
27
25
22
25
13
13
14
5
6
5
%
Developing
22
24
NA
NA
NA
13
24
34
26
28
23
26
24
27
22
24
21
23
NA
NA
%
Emerging
21
21
NA
NA
NA
17
13
23
20
23
26
26
22
22
24
24
20
20
NA
NA
%
Exploring
16
17
NA
NA
NA
29
17
15
14
13
18
20
14
12
19
17
17
19
NA
NA
2009 – 2010 CSAPA Math Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
Category
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Novice
25
23
NA
NA
NA
25
30
17
25
23
18
20
24
22
21
24
25
23
NA
NA
% Incon.
8
8
NA
NA
NA
13
11
6
8
7
5
9
8
10
8
5
7
7
NA
NA
% No
Score
8
7
NA
NA
NA
4
4
4
7
5
11
4
7
7
6
5
9
8
NA
NA
32
2009 – 2010 CSAPA Math Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
05
05
Category
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Novice
25
23
27
22
12
9
NA
NA
NA
12
3
11
13
9
12
3
11
5
12
8
12
11
NA
NA
12
9
12
9
12
10
%
Developing
22
24
22
24
30
34
NA
NA
NA
41
33
34
32
38
29
45
29
33
32
37
31
34
NA
NA
30
34
30
32
40
37
%
Emerging
21
21
20
19
24
22
NA
NA
NA
24
38
22
27
21
25
22
22
28
25
17
26
18
NA
NA
24
22
21
24
16
19
%
Exploring
16
17
14
16
21
24
NA
NA
NA
12
16
23
16
23
20
26
21
23
16
29
20
24
NA
NA
21
24
24
21
15
15
% Incon.
8
8
7
10
7
5
NA
NA
NA
6
3
5
7
4
7
4
11
5
8
4
5
5
NA
NA
7
5
7
6
11
14
% No
Score
8
7
11
9
6
7
NA
NA
NA
6
7
5
5
4
7
2
6
5
6
6
7
8
NA
NA
6
7
6
8
7
5
33
2009 – 2010 CSAPA Math Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
Category
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Novice
NA
NA
13
19
7
13
13
10
14
12
8
9
15
9
14
10
NA
NA
12
10
11
10
21
26
NA
NA
11
NA
14
26
%
Developing
NA
NA
38
31
45
45
45
42
42
36
40
36
39
35
40
37
NA
NA
40
37
39
36
27
23
NA
NA
11
NA
25
25
%
Emerging
NA
NA
25
6
14
19
11
19
11
22
18
17
14
21
14
21
NA
NA
16
19
16
20
21
19
NA
NA
32
NA
36
19
%
Exploring
NA
NA
13
19
18
13
15
13
13
17
15
16
14
16
15
14
NA
NA
15
15
15
14
14
14
NA
NA
5
NA
13
14
% Incon.
NA
NA
0
13
7
6
11
12
9
13
13
17
14
15
10
12
NA
NA
11
14
11
15
11
10
NA
NA
26
NA
13
11
% No
Score
NA
NA
13
13
9
3
6
4
11
3
6
3
4
4
7
6
NA
NA
7
5
8
5
7
7
NA
NA
16
NA
0
5
34
2009 – 2010 CSAPA Math Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
Category
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Novice
25
30
20
31
16
20
23
28
25
30
NA
NA
21
26
22
25
15
14
NA
NA
18
5
14
12
16
17
15
16
14
9
%
Developing
28
25
38
30
28
24
31
26
26
22
NA
NA
27
23
25
22
23
22
NA
NA
18
15
25
18
25
25
24
35
21
22
%
Emerging
18
17
15
17
22
22
14
14
20
17
NA
NA
21
19
22
22
23
25
NA
NA
6
20
25
39
26
22
24
25
22
23
%
Exploring
13
13
7
16
13
16
14
14
14
13
NA
NA
14
14
14
14
20
17
NA
NA
29
30
16
10
18
17
18
12
22
23
% Incon.
10
9
10
6
11
11
12
9
11
9
NA
NA
11
10
9
11
13
14
NA
NA
12
25
18
18
10
13
8
13
14
15
% No
Score
6
6
11
5
10
7
6
9
4
8
NA
NA
7
7
8
6
7
7
NA
NA
18
5
2
2
5
6
10
14
7
7
35
2009 – 2010 CSAPA Math Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
Category
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Novice
16
15
16
18
NA
NA
15
14
15
14
8
8
NA
NA
NA
19
2
5
7
10
3
6
6
9
9
6
9
8
NA
NA
%
Developing
25
26
25
22
NA
NA
23
22
21
21
20
21
NA
NA
NA
5
17
29
23
22
13
26
24
21
17
25
18
21
NA
NA
%
Emerging
25
21
23
27
NA
NA
23
25
21
27
26
26
NA
NA
NA
19
43
22
30
28
26
35
25
23
28
32
26
28
NA
NA
%
Exploring
20
15
18
14
NA
NA
20
17
21
19
25
25
NA
NA
NA
24
22
24
23
22
29
17
23
26
23
22
26
24
NA
NA
% Incon.
10
16
11
12
NA
NA
13
14
13
11
15
12
NA
NA
NA
24
9
13
14
11
14
15
15
14
16
11
15
10
NA
NA
% No
Score
5
8
6
7
NA
NA
7
7
8
8
7
7
NA
NA
NA
10
7
7
3
7
15
5
7
6
6
4
6
8
NA
NA
36
2009 – 2010 CSAPA Math Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
08
08
08
08
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
10
10
Category
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
All
All
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Novice
8
8
8
9
9
11
NA
NA
NA
NA
10
9
11
13
7
8
6
8
14
10
11
12
NA
NA
9
11
7
12
7
7
%
Developing
20
21
22
19
18
15
NA
NA
NA
NA
17
15
17
18
18
15
22
14
18
12
16
15
NA
NA
18
15
18
16
17
18
%
Emerging
26
26
23
24
29
29
NA
NA
NA
NA
42
41
30
27
28
37
25
30
28
34
31
28
NA
NA
29
29
28
24
33
37
%
Exploring
25
25
25
27
23
24
NA
NA
NA
NA
12
17
23
26
27
27
25
25
21
23
21
24
NA
NA
22
24
25
26
23
21
% Incon.
15
12
15
12
13
15
NA
NA
NA
NA
10
15
12
10
13
12
13
15
13
15
12
14
NA
NA
13
15
12
15
12
13
% No
Score
7
7
7
9
9
7
NA
NA
NA
NA
10
2
7
6
7
7
8
8
6
6
9
7
NA
NA
9
7
11
8
7
4
37
2009 – 2010 CSAPA Math Trend Data
Year
Grade
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
2009
2010
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Category
American Indian/Alaska Native
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Pacific Islander
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black (not Hispanic)
Black (not Hispanic)
Economically Disadvantaged
Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Female
Female
Hispanic
Hispanic
Male
Male
Migrant
Migrant
Students with Disabilities
Students with Disabilities
White (not Hispanic)
White (not Hispanic)
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
% Novice
NA
NA
13
NA
0
8
5
9
4
10
5
6
9
8
9
7
NA
NA
7
7
7
6
%
Developing
NA
NA
6
NA
26
25
17
16
11
17
17
16
15
19
17
19
NA
NA
17
18
17
16
%
Emerging
NA
NA
19
NA
45
48
37
38
37
36
35
40
37
38
32
35
NA
NA
33
37
31
35
%
Exploring
NA
NA
19
NA
17
6
21
23
20
29
25
21
18
24
22
21
NA
NA
23
21
27
22
% Incon.
NA
NA
44
NA
4
6
12
11
17
7
10
13
11
7
14
13
NA
NA
12
13
12
16
% No
Score
NA
NA
0
NA
9
6
8
3
11
2
8
4
9
5
7
5
NA
NA
7
4
7
4
38
NAEP Data
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) is the only nationally representative and continuing assessment of what
America's students know and can do in different subject areas. NAEP selects a sample of Colorado schools to participate each year.
Colorado and its schools selected for NAEP must participate in 4th and 8th grade assessments in reading and mathematics to receive state
and district Title I funding. In 2009, approximately 2,920 Colorado students in 154 public schools participated in grade four and
approximately 2,755 Colorado students in 121 public schools participated in grade eight. Students across the nation participated in the
same assessment for each grade and subject.
The two major goals of the NAEP are to measure student achievement and to report change in performance over time. NAEP provides
results for the nation as a whole and for the states separately. Performance is reported by groups of students (e.g., gender, racial and
ethnic groups) and by participation in special programs (e.g., free and reduced lunch, limited English proficiency). The results are
reported in average scale scores in which the range is zero to 500. The results are also reported in achievement levels defined by the
National Assessment Governing Board.
Each of these assessments/studies is based on a representative sample of the student population of the state and the nation and none are
designed to produce individual district, school or student data. While participation is required to receive Title I funding, no sanctions or
awards are given for performance on the NAEP. However, Colorado’s NAEP results are required to be used as confirmatory evidence for
any trends identified in CSAP results.
In 2009-10, Colorado students performed higher than the national average in grades four and eight in reading. Seventy-two percent of
fourth-grade students and 78 percent of eighth-grade students performed at or above the NAEP Basic level for reading. Nationally, only
66 percent of fourth-grade students and 74 percent of eighth-grade students performed at or above the NAEP Basic level. Basic is defined
by the National Assessment Governing Board as demonstrating “prerequisite knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient
work” at each grade assessed.
Colorado fourth-grade students received an average scale score of 226, and the average scale score for Colorado eighth-grade students
was 266.
More information on the Colorado NAEP is available on the CDE website at
http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdeassess/documents/NAEP/index_naep.html.
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
39
Grade 4 Reading NAEP Results for 2009
Gender
Male
Female
Race/Ethnicity
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
American Indian/Alaska Native
National School Lunch Program
Eligible
Not eligible
Gender
Male
Female
Race/Ethnicity
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander
American Indian/Alaska Native
National School Lunch Program
Eligible
Not eligible
Basic
Proficient
Advanced
69
75
36
44
8
13
51
49
222
229
84
84
46
44
57
50
81
‡
27
18
53
‡
5
3
17
‡
5
29
4
1
213
204
238
‡
67
69
85
‡
23
24
51
‡
84
52
84
51
19
53
14
61
3
15
37
Grade 8 Reading NAEP Results for 2009
61
Average
Score
Grade 4 Math Results for Student Groups in 2009
% of
Average
Basic
Proficient Advanced
Students
Score
% of
Students
236
206
238
70
92
57
24
51
49
244
242
2
3
11
‡
5
29
4
1
225
228
246
‡
11
2
58
12
61
252
38
228
61
252
Grade 8 Math Results for Student Groups in 2009
% of
Average
Basic
Proficient Advanced
Students
Score
Basic
Proficient
Advanced
% of
Students
75
82
28
37
1
3
51
49
262
270
76
75
41
38
11
9
51
49
289
286
61
86
‡
16
43
‡
1
3
‡
28
4
1
250
274
‡
55
86
‡
18
55
‡
2
18
‡
28
4
1
267
301
‡
87
62
63
86
41
15
3
#
16
40
1
3
61
6
34
63
Average
Score
93
9
7
274
250
251
273
87
53
57
86
51
16
19
51
14
1
3
14
61
6
299
263
35
63
# Rounds to zero. ‡ Reporting standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding, and because the "Information not available" category for the National School Lunch
Program, which provides free/reduced-price lunches, and the "Unclassified" category for race/ethnicity are not displayed
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
40
267
298
Section 2: Accountability Data – State-Level
About Adequate Yearly Progress
One of NCLB’s major goals is for all students to be proficient in reading and math by 2014. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is the federal
accountability measure for schools, districts and the state to measure progress towards reaching this goal. CDE sets the guidelines and
targets for determining AYP. NCLB requires CDE to determine if school districts make AYP every year. Districts, in turn, are required to
make AYP determinations for their schools. The state as a whole must also calculate AYP.
CDE uses the Colorado Student Assessment Program (CSAP), Lectura (a Spanish-language reading test given to qualifying students in third
and fourth grades), CSAPA (for students with significant cognitive disabilities) and high school graduation rates to provide districts with AYP
calculations for all schools. More specifically, AYP is met by:
1. Making the 95 percent participation requirement (95 percent of students enrolled in the school must take a state assessment in both
reading and math).
2. Making the math and reading performance targets, or decreasing the number of students scoring unsatisfactory by 10 percent from
the prior year (also known as “Safe Harbor”).
- Colorado includes an additional way for schools and districts to make AYP using longitudinal data, called “Matched Safe Harbor.” In
order to make AYP with Matched Safe Harbor, schools need to show a 10 percent reduction in the number of students scoring
unsatisfactory when looking at students who tested two years in a row. Matched Safe Harbor is allowed only if 95 percent of the
students also tested at that school/district the prior year.
3. Making the “Other Indicator” requirement. For elementary and middle school levels, this was 1.21 percent of students scoring
advanced in reading and math. For high schools, this was a graduation rate of 63 percent or two percentage points above the previous
year.
Districts and schools make AYP only when students as a whole and all disaggregated groups of students (by race, income level, English
language learners and students with disabilities) meet the targets. Performance targets are the same for all disaggregated groups (there
must be 30 or more students in the group before it is accountable). The state also must report scores for male, female, and migrant students.
Schools and school districts must reach performance targets in both reading and math to make AYP overall. If a school district or school does
not reach all targets in both content areas, it has not made AYP.
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
41
Colorado State AYP Results
AYP performance targets measure the year-to-year changes in the percent of students scoring partially proficient and above on the CSAP and
Lectura (or emerging and above on the CSAPA) against an annual target. These targets increase until 2014 when they reach 100 percent. In
Colorado, targets are increased every three years. Targets during the 2009-2010 school year were the same as during the 2008-2009 school
year.
Colorado did not make AYP as a state in 2010. The state was responsible for 153 targets and made 112 of those targets. Colorado used the
safe harbor provision (a 10% reduction in the number of non-proficient students from the previous year) to make an additional 7 targets.
Overall, Colorado made 78 percent of its targets for 2010, down from 80 percent in 2009.
Colorado AYP Targets
Elementary School
Year
2002 2004
2005 2007
2008 –
2010
2011 2013
2014
2010 State AYP Results
Middle School
High School
Reading
Math
Reading
Math
Reading
Math
76.92
75.86
73.61
59.51
79.65
47.00
82.69
81.90
80.21
69.63
84.74
60.25
88.46
89.09
86.81
79.75
89.83
73.50
94.23
94.54
93.41
89.88
94.92
86.75
100
100
100
100
100
20082009
20092010
Total #
of
targets
# of
targets
met
# met
through
safe
harbor
Total #
met
Percent
of
targets
met
153
112
10
122
80%
153
112
7
119
78%
100
The tables below show the specific targets the state was accountable for and the performance on each. The graphs on pages 46-51 provide a
snapshot of Colorado’s AYP performance over the past five years broken down by demographic group. The blue line represents the 20052007 target while the orange line represents the 2008-2010 target.
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
42
2010 State AYP Data -- Elementary Level
Reading/Language Arts
Mathematics
Percent
Tested
Percent Partially
Proficient,
Proficient &
Advanced
Percent
Tested
Percent Partially
Proficient,
Proficient &
Advanced
Advanced
Performance:
Reading
Advanced
Performance:
Mathematics
Goal 95%
Goal 88.46%
Goal 95%
Goal 89.09%
Goal 1.21%
Goal 1.21%
99.33
88.87
99.29
91.52
6.28
30.35
99.29
92.24
99.15
94.91
11.2
47.07
80.38
99.6
Student Group
All Students
American Indian/Alaska Native
99.06
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black
99.34
Hispanic
99.52
White
99.24
English Language Learners
99.52
Economically Disadvantaged
99.43
Students with Disabilities
98.36
Male*
99.27
Female*
99.4
Migrant*
99.88
84.87
81.77
99.2
99.33
94.02
99.14
81.21
99.53
75.76
55.05
86.68
91.27
74.67
99.65
98.44
Missed AYP Target
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
87.36
82.14
85.53
95.6
83.3
85.7
66.4
99.24
91.02
99.77
81.73
99.34
* Male, Female and Migrant Subgroups are required for reporting, but not accountability
Made AYP Target
Other Indicator
92.14
3.09
2.35
1.92
8.78
1.65
1.92
0.92
18.98
15.18
14.42
39.44
13.03
15.08
7.32
5.00
32.01
1.20
9.91
7.70
28.79
Made AYP Target through Safe Harbor or Matched Safe Harbor.
43
2010 State AYP Data -- Middle School Level
Reading/Language Arts
Mathematics
Percent
Tested
Percent Partially
Proficient,
Proficient &
Advanced
Percent
Tested
Percent Partially
Proficient,
Proficient &
Advanced
Advanced
Performance
– Reading
Advanced
Performance
–
Mathematics
Goal 95%
Goal 86.81%
Goal 95%
Goal 79.75%
Goal 1.21%
Goal 1.21%
98.75
89.68
98.82
83.27
10.45
23.11
99.15
92.46
99.12
91.70
17.86
42.00
71.71
3.01
Student Group
All Students
American Indian/Alaska Native
98.22
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black
98.68
Hispanic
99.02
White
98.62
English Language Learners
99.24
Economically Disadvantaged
98.78
Students with Disabilities
Male*
Migrant*
86.58
83.55
81.12
94.33
75.87
81.7
97.28
55.02
98.86
92.63
98.64
Female*
99.05
86.97
70.93
98.26
98.76
99.16
98.67
99.39
98.88
Missed AYP Target
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
75.28
70.33
10.13
9.12
30.08
71.9
3.07
9.48
69.18
98.92
84.59
99.59
4.77
13.98
14.23
45.00
98.73
5.66
89.77
97.42
* Male, Female and Migrant Subgroups are required for reporting, but not accountability
Made AYP Target
Other Indicator
82.14
62.66
2.28
0.84
9.81
3.42
7.63
24.22
2.70
5.85
13.50
22.12
Made AYP Target through Safe Harbor or Matched Safe Harbor
44
2010 State AYP Data -- High School Level
Reading/Language Arts
Student Group
Percent Tested
Percent Partially
Proficient,
Proficient &
Advanced
Goal 95%
All Students
American Indian/Alaska Native
Black
Percent Tested
Graduation
Rate
Goal 89.83%
Goal 95%
Goal 73.50%
Goal 59.5%
97.04
91.29
97.27
69.10
74.6
98.31
91.70
98.26
80.78
95.88
Hispanic
97.09
White
97.11
English Language Learners
97.80
Economically Disadvantaged
96.44
Students with Disabilities
94.31
Male*
96.97
Female*
97.12
Migrant*
97.26
88.91
85.41
84.53
94.96
79.03
84.41
61.58
88.78
94.06
75.67
* Male, Female and Migrant Subgroups are required for reporting, but not accountability
Made AYP Target
Missed AYP Target
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Other Indicator
Percent Partially
Proficient,
Proficient &
Advanced
94.71
Asian/Pacific Islander
Mathematics
95.05
96.14
97.33
97.34
97.87
96.80
94.95
97.25
97.29
97.70
57.04
55.90
48.55
64.30
49.73
79.14
45.36
50.98
27.27
69.01
69.42
40.19
Made AYP Target through Safe Harbor or Matched Safe Harbor
85.70
57.80
82.30
54.40
62.50
66.50
71.40
78.00
58.90
45
2006 - 2010 State AYP Data
Elementary Reading
100
90
80
Percent PP and above
70
2010
60
2009
2008
50
2007
40
2006
2006-2007 Targets
30
2009-2010 Targets
20
10
0
All
American
Indian
Asian
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Black
Hispanic
White
ELL
FRM
IEP
Female
Male
Migrant
46
2006 - 2010 State AYP Data
Elementary Math
100
90
80
Percent PP and Above
70
2010
60
2009
2008
50
2007
40
2006
2006-2007 Targets
30
2009-2010 Targets
20
10
0
All
American
Indian
Asian
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Black
Hispanic
White
ELL
FRM
IEP
Female
Male
Migrant
47
2006 - 2010 State AYP Data
Middle School Reading
100
90
80
Percent PP and Above
70
2010
60
2009
2008
50
2007
40
2006
2006-2007 Targets
30
2009-2010 Targets
20
10
0
All
American
Indian
Asian
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Black
Hispanic
White
ELL
FRM
IEP
Female
Male
Migrant
48
2006 - 2010 State AYP Data
Middle School Math
100
90
80
Percent PP and Above
70
2010
60
2009
2008
50
2007
40
2006
2006-2007 Targets
30
2009-2010 Targets
20
10
0
All
American
Indian
Asian
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Black
Hispanic
White
ELL
FRM
IEP
Female
Male
Migrant
49
2006 - 2010 State AYP Data
High School Reading
100
90
80
Percent PP and above
70
2010
60
2009
2008
50
2007
40
2006
2006-2007 Targets
30
2009-2010 Targets
20
10
0
All
American
Indian
Asian
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Black
Hispanic
White
ELL
FRM
IEP
Female
Male
Migrant
50
2006 - 2010 State AYP Data
High School Math
100
90
80
Percent PP and Above
70
2010
60
2009
2008
50
2007
40
2006
2006-2007 Targets
30
2009-2010 Targets
20
10
0
All
American
Indian
Asian
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Black
Hispanic
White
ELL
FRM
IEP
Female
Male
Migrant
51
Class of 2009 Graduation Data
The graduation rate for the Class of 2009 was 74.6 percent. This is a 0.7 percentage point increase from the Class of 2008 rate of 73.9
percent and a 0.4 percentage point decrease compared to the Class of 2007 graduation rate of 75 percent. The figure below provides an
overview of graduation rate trends from 2007 to 2009, broken down by disaggregated group.
State Total (all students)
American Indian
Asian
Black
Hispanic
White
Male
Female
Students with
Disabilities
Limited English
Proficient
Economically
Disadvantaged
Migrant
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Class of
2007
Class of
2008
Class of
2009
75.0%
73.9%
74.6%
83.5%
82.8%
85.7%
60.0%
57.8%
40.0%
58.9%
65.4%
57.1%
82.0%
71.5%
78.6%
63.7%
55.4%
63.2%
61.1%
57.5%
64.1%
55.6%
81.6%
70.7%
77.4%
63.0%
52.0%
59.3%
58.0%
55.9%
64.3%
82.3%
71.4%
78.0%
64.3%
53.3%
100.0%
80.0%
20.0%
0.0%
Class of 2007
Class of 2008
Class of 2009
61.2%
58.3%
52
Graduation Rate Q and A
What is the graduation rate? The graduation rate is a cumulative or longitudinal rate which calculates the number of students who actually
graduate as a percent of those who were in membership over a four-year period (i.e., from Grades 9-12) and could have graduated with the
current graduating class.
A graduation rate is reported for each graduating class. The rate is calculated by dividing the number of graduates by the membership base.
The membership base is derived from the number students entering ninth grade four years earlier and adjusted for students who have
transferred into or out of the district during the years covering grades 9 through 12.
The Graduation Rate Calculation
Number of students receiving a regular diploma during the
2008-2009 school year
Number of students finishing 8th grade in 2004-2005 +
Number of transfers in – Number of verified transfers out
What is meant by the "Class of 2009"? The Class of 2009 includes
students who graduated during the 2008-09 academic year. While
most of these graduates are those students who began 9th grade
four years earlier, the graduating class may include students who
completed high school in three years, four years, or longer.
Do all Colorado school districts have the same requirements
for graduation? No. Each local school board defines graduation
requirements for its district. These vary from district to district.
The state considers a graduate to be any student who has met the
graduation requirements of his or her local school district.
Are there students who complete 12 years of school and do not graduate? Yes. Some districts award certificates or other designations
of high school completion or attendance to students who do not meet the standard high school graduation requirements. Also, some
students who do not meet the traditional high school graduation requirements do successfully achieve a general educational development
certificate (GED).
Under what circumstances is a student reported as a transfer? A transfer, for the purposes of the graduation and completer rate, is a
student who can be verified to be attending another school that awards diplomas or a home-based education program. Adequate
documentation of transfer is defined as an official request for academic records from the student’s new school or, for home school, a signed
form from a parent or legal guardian. Students who enroll in a GED preparation program are not reported as transfers.
Additional graduation rate and completer rate data and information can be found at:
http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdereval/rv2009GradLinks.htm.
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
53
Section 3: District Accountability Data
District AYP Results
In 2010, 48 percent of districts in Colorado made AYP (up from 46% in 2009). Seventy-eight percent of districts made at least 90 percent
of their targets (the same as in 2009). As illustrated below, 65 percent of districts made AYP at the elementary level, 62 percent at the
middle school level, and 57 percent of districts made AYP at the high school level.
District AYP Results by Grade Span and Content
Elementary
AYP = 65%
100%
90%
80%
Percent of Districts
70%
60%
71%
75% 77%
75%
50%
64%
61%
40%
Middle
School AYP
= 62%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Made Reading AYP
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Made Math AYP
High School
AYP = 57%
Districts
Making AYP
Overall in
2010 = 48%
Elementary
Middle School
High School
54
NCLB Program Improvement
Consequences are attached to AYP determinations only if a district receives Title I funds. Title I Districts are identified for Program
Improvement if they do not make AYP for two consecutive years at the same grade span (elementary, middle, or high), and in the same
content area (reading or math).
The table below provides an overview of the various levels of Program Improvement along with the requirements associated with each. The
State is responsible for providing technical assistance to districts identified for Improvement and for taking corrective action for those
identified for Corrective Action.
Levels of Improvement
Years Missing
AYP Targets*
District Status
Intervention
0
N/A
N/A
1
Potential**
2
Program Improvement Year 1
(PI1)
4
Corrective Action Year 1
(CA1)
3
5
6
7
Program Improvement Year 2
(PI2)
Corrective Action Year 2
(CA2)
Corrective Action Year 3
(CA3)
Corrective Action Year 4
(CA4)
N/A
Develop and implement Program Improvement (PI) Plan. 10% of Title I funds must go to
Professional Development.
Continue to implement PI plan - amend or update as needed. 10% of Title I funds must
continue to go to PD.
Develop and implement Corrective Action (CA) plan. 10% of Title I funds may be set aside to
support plan.
Continue to implement CA plan - amend or update as needed. 10% of Title I funds may be set
aside to support plan.
Continue to implement CA plan - amend or update as needed. 10% of Title I funds may be set
aside to support plan.
Continue to implement CA plan - amend or update as needed. 10% of Title I funds may be set
aside to support plan.
Corrective Action Year 5
Continue to implement CA plan - amend or update as needed. 10% of Title I funds may be set
(CA5)
aside to support plan.
* In the same content area in the same grade span
** If the district misses AYP in the same content area in the same grade span next year, they will go on program improvement
8
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
55
The figures below show the districts on Improvement by level and content area. Currently, 85 Colorado school districts are on Program
Improvement or Corrective Action. Of those, 27 are on Program Improvement (13 in Year 1, 14 in Year 2) and 58 are on Corrective Action (5
in Year 1, 6 in Year 2, 6 in Year 3, 8 in Year 4, and 33 in Year 5). Of these 85 districts, 34 percent are on Improvement for both reading and
math, 10 percent of districts are on Improvement for math only, and 2 percent for reading only. A complete list of the Improvement status
and AYP results for all Colorado districts is provided on the following pages.
Number of Districts on
Improvement by Level
Districts on Improvement by
Content Area
PI1
PI2
13
97
14
5
CA1
6
6
8
33
CA2
CA4
CA5
Reading Only
10%
CA3
54%
34%
Math Only
Reading and Math
Neither**
Not on
Improvement *
* 1 district is not identified because
it declines funds
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
2%
* 1 district is not identified because it declines funds
** 1 district is identified for missing graduation rate target only
56
Elementary AYP
District Name
Mapleton 1
Adams 12 Five Star Schools
Adams County 14
Brighton 27J
Bennett 29J
Strasburg 31J
Westminster 50
Alamosa RE-11J
Sangre De Cristo RE-22J
Englewood 1
Sheridan 2
Cherry Creek 5
Littleton 6
Deer Trail 26J
Adams-Arapahoe 28J
Byers 32J
Archuleta County 50 JT
Walsh RE-1
Pritchett RE-3
Springfield RE-4
Vilas RE-5
Campo RE-6
Las Animas RE-1
Mc Clave RE-2
St Vrain Valley RE 1J
Boulder Valley RE 2
Buena Vista R-31
Reading
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
Math
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
Middle School
AYP
Reading
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
Math
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
YES
High School AYP
Reading
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
YES
Math
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
YES
Grad
Rate
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
Overall District Improvement Status
Reading
CA4
CA3
CA5
CA4
Math
CA5
CA5
CA5
CA5
Grad
Rate
CA3
CA5
CA4
CA2
CA5
CA5
PI1
PI2
CA
CA4
CA4
CA5
CA5
CA5
CA4
PI2
CA5
CA5
CA5
CA5
CA5
CA5
CA2
CA
CA5
CA5
CA5
CA3
CA4
PI2
Overall
CA5
CA5
CA3
PI1
CA5
CA5
CA5
CA4
CA5
PI1
PI2
PI2
CA
CA5
CA5
57
Elementary AYP
District Name
Salida R-32
Kit Carson R-1
Cheyenne County RE-5
Clear Creek RE-1
North Conejos RE-1J
Sanford 6J
South Conejos RE-10
Centennial R-1
Sierra Grande R-30
Crowley County RE-1-J
Custer County School District C-1
Delta County 50(J)
Denver County 1
Dolores County RE No.2
Douglas County RE 1
Eagle County RE 50
Elizabeth C-1
Kiowa C-2
Big Sandy 100J
Elbert 200
Agate 300
Calhan RJ-1
Harrison 2
Widefield 3
Fountain 8
Colorado Springs 11
Cheyenne Mountain 12
Reading
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
Math
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
Middle School
AYP
Reading
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
Math
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
High School AYP
Reading
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
Math
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Grad
Rate
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
Overall District Improvement Status
Reading
Math
Grad
Rate
Overall
PI1
PI1
PI2
PI2
PI1
CA3
CA5
CA5
CA5
CA5
CA2
CA3
CA4
CA5
CA4
CA
CA5
CA
PI2
CA2
PI2
PI2
CA4
PI1
CA5
CA5
CA2
PI2
CA4
PI2
CA
CA4
58
CA5
CA4
CA3
CA5
CA
Elementary AYP
District Name
Manitou Springs 14
Academy 20
Ellicott 22
Peyton 23 JT
Hanover 28
Lewis-Palmer 38
Falcon 49
Edison 54 JT
Miami/Yoder 60 JT
Canon City RE-1
Fremont RE-2
Cotopaxi RE-3
Roaring Fork RE-1
Garfield RE-2
Garfield 16
Gilpin County RE-1
West Grand 1-JT.
East Grand 2
Gunnison Watershed RE1J
Hinsdale County RE 1
Huerfano RE-1
La Veta RE-2
North Park R-1
Jefferson County R-1
Eads RE-1
Plainview RE-2
Arriba-Flagler C-20
Reading
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Math
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
Middle School
AYP
Reading
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
Math
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
High School AYP
Reading
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
Math
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
Grad
Rate
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
Overall District Improvement Status
Reading
Math
CA
CA2
PI1
CA3
CA3
CA3
CA5
CA3
PI2
PI1
PI1
PI1
CA4
CA3
CA
CA4
PI1
PI1
PI2
CA5
CA4
CA
Grad
Rate
Overall
PI1
PI1
PI2
CA
CA3
PI1
CA5
CA3
CA4
CA5
CA4
CA
PI2
PI1
CA2
CA5
CA2
CA3
CA5
59
Elementary AYP
District Name
Hi-Plains R-23
Stratton R-4
Bethune R-5
Burlington RE-6J
Lake County R-1
Durango 9-R
Bayfield 10 JT-R
Ignacio 11 JT
Poudre R-1
Thompson R-2J
Park (Estes Park) R-3
Trinidad 1
Primero Reorganized 2
Hoehne Reorganized 3
Aguilar Reorganized 6
Branson Reorganized 82
Kim Reorganized 88
Genoa-Hugo C113
Limon RE-4J
Karval RE-23
Valley RE-1
Frenchman RE-3
Buffalo RE-4J
Plateau RE-5
De Beque 49JT
Plateau Valley 50
Mesa County Valley 51
Reading
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
Math
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
Middle School
AYP
Reading
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
Math
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
High School AYP
Reading
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
Math
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
Grad
Rate
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
Overall District Improvement Status
Reading
Math
PI1
CA4
PI1
PI2
CA4
CA4
CA4
CA5
PI2
CA5
CA5
CA4
PI2
CA3
Grad
Rate
Overall
PI2
CA5
CA4
CA5
PI1
CA5
CA5
CA5
PI2
CA3
PI1
PI1
Not identified as district declines funds
CA3
CA3
PI1
CA5
CA5
PI2
PI2
CA5
CA2
CA
CA2
CA5
60
Elementary AYP
District Name
Creede School District
Moffat County RE:No 1
Montezuma-Cortez RE-1
Dolores RE-4A
Mancos RE-6
Montrose County RE-1J
West End RE-2
Brush RE-2(J)
Fort Morgan RE-3
Weldon Valley RE-20(J)
Wiggins RE-50(J)
East Otero R-1
Rocky Ford R-2
Manzanola 3J
Fowler R-4J
Cheraw 31
Swink 33
Ouray R-1
Ridgway R-2
Platte Canyon 1
Park County RE-2
Holyoke RE-1J
Haxtun RE-2J
Aspen 1
Granada RE-1
Lamar RE-2
Holly RE-3
Reading
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
Math
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Middle School
AYP
Reading
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Math
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
High School AYP
Reading
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
Math
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Grad
Rate
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Overall District Improvement Status
Reading
CA2
CA5
CA4
Math
CA2
CA4
CA5
CA5
CA
CA5
CA3
PI1
CA3
CA3
CA2
PI1
Grad
Rate
Overall
CA5
CA2
CA5
PI1
CA5
CA
CA5
CA5
CA3
CA3
CA2
CA2
61
Elementary AYP
District Name
Wiley RE-13 JT
Pueblo City 60
Pueblo County 70
Meeker RE1
Rangely RE-4
Del Norte C-7
Monte Vista C-8
Sargent RE-33J
Hayden RE-1
Steamboat Springs RE-2
South Routt RE 3
Mountain Valley RE 1
Moffat 2
Center 26 JT
Silverton 1
Telluride R-1
Norwood R-2J
Julesburg RE-1
Platte Valley RE-3
Summit RE-1
Cripple Creek-Victor RE-1
Woodland Park RE-2
Akron R-1
Arickaree R-2
Otis R-3
Lone Star 101
Woodlin R-104
Reading
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Math
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
Middle School
AYP
Reading
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
Math
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
High School AYP
Reading
YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Math
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Grad
Rate
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Overall District Improvement Status
Reading
Math
PI1
PI1
PI2
CA
CA2
CA3
CA5
CA5
Grad
Rate
PI2
Overall
CA5
CA5
PI2
CA
PI1
PI1
PI1
PI2
CA5
CA5
PI1
PI1
PI1
CA3
PI1
CA4
PI1
PI1
PI2
CA4
PI1
PI1
62
Elementary AYP
District Name
Weld County RE-1
Eaton RE-2
Keenesburg RE-3(J)
Windsor RE-4
Johnstown-Milliken RE-5J
Greeley 6
Platte Valley RE-7
Weld County S/D RE-8
Ault-Highland RE-9
Briggsdale RE-10
Prairie RE-11
Pawnee RE-12
Yuma 1
Wray RD-2
Idalia RJ-3
Liberty J-4
Charter School Institute
Colorado School For The Deaf/Blind
Mountain Boces
Northwest Colo Boces
Expeditionary Boces
Reading
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
Math
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
Middle School
AYP
Reading
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
Math
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
High School AYP
Reading
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Math
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
Grad
Rate
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
Overall District Improvement Status
Reading
CA4
CA
CA4
CA5
PI1
CA5
PI2
PI2
Math
CA4
PI2
PI1
CA2
CA3
CA5
PI2
CA4
PI1
Grad
Rate
Overall
CA4
PI2
PI1
CA2
CA4
CA5
PI2
CA5
PI2
PI1
PI2
PI1
PI1
PI1
CA2
PI1
CA2
63
Section 4: School Accountability Data
School AYP Results
Sixty-two percent of schools in Colorado made AYP overall in 2010, up from sixty percent in 2009. Seventy-five percent of schools made AYP
targets in reading while only 70 percent made AYP in math. The graph below shows the percent of schools that made all components of AYP.
Most schools made participation and other indicator targets. The reading and math performance targets are the most challenging aspect to
making AYP overall. The figure on the next page displays the various components that go into making AYP overall.
2010 Colorado School AYP Results
100%
95%
94%
90%
79%
80%
Percent of Schools
70%
60%
75%
63%
58%
67%
70%
62%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
Percent of Colorado Schools
Making Targets
0%
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
64
Components of AYP
Schools Making
AYP Participation
= 94%
Schools Making
AYP Performance
= 58%
OR
Safe Harbor
(63%)
OR
Matched
Safe Harbor
(67%)
Schools Making AYP
Overall in 2010 = 62%
Schools Making
Other Indicator =
95%
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
65
Percent of Schools Making Performance Targets by Demographic Group
100%
90%
80%
70%
95%
84%
98%
96%
80%
67%
60%
64%
55%
50%
40%
97%
67%
62%
48%
64%
51%
Reading
33%
30%
Math
20%
11%
10%
0%
All
0%
American
Indian*
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Asian
Black
Hispanic
White
ELL
FRM
13%
IEP
* N of less than 10
66
Percent of Schools Making AYP by Grade Level
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
73%
78%
83%
73%
59%
55%
50%
69%
40%
52%
43%
30%
Made AYP Overall
Made Reading Targets
Made Math Targets
20%
10%
0%
Elementary
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Middle School
High School
67
NCLB School Improvement
Consequences are attached to AYP determinations only for schools that receive Title I funds. A Title I school that does not make AYP for two
consecutive years in the same content area (reading or math) is placed on first year School Improvement. For each subsequent year on
Improvement, schools must meet a series of requirements that bring resources to the school or provide parents with more alternatives. The
district bears the primary responsibility for ensuring that a school in improvement, corrective action or restructuring receives technical
assistance as it develops or revises its school plan and throughout the plan’s implementation. The table below outlines the levels of School
Improvement along with the requirements associated with them.
School Improvement Levels
School Status
Requirements
School Improvement Year 1 (SI1)
Schools must develop School Improvement plans, offer public school choice to their students,
and provide transportation to those schools of choice.
School Improvement Year 2 (SI2)
Corrective Action (CA)
Restructuring, Planning (RP)
Restructuring, Implementation (RI1RI5)
Schools must provide supplemental educational tutoring services (SES) in addition to the
requirements listed above.
Schools must continue to meet requirements listed above. They also must revise their School
Improvement plans. The district must take corrective steps.
Districts must develop plans to restructure the schools.
Schools must implement their restructuring plans.
In 2010, 201 schools have been identified for School Improvement. Of those, 83 schools are in Year 1 of School Improvement, 39 schools are in
Year 2 of School Improvement, 19 schools are on Corrective Action, 13 schools are designated as Restructuring, Planning, and 47 schools are
designated as Restructuring, Implementation. A list of all schools on Improvement is included on pages 70-74.
Five schools showed substantial academic progress in 2010 and have been removed from the list of Schools on Improvement. These five
schools removed from the 2010 Improvement list are listed in the table below. An additional 54 schools on Improvement made AYP for the first
year in 2010 (only 17 schools made similar strides last year). If these schools make AYP again next year, they will be removed from School
Improvement.
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
68
Colorado Schools Removed from Improvement in 2010 - 2011
District Name
School Name
District Name
School Name
Brighton
Centennial School District
Denver
North Elementary School in
Centennial High School in
Wyatt-Edison Charter Middle School
Garfield Re-2
Mapleton
Highland Elementary School in
Adventure Elementary in
Colorado Schools with the Potential to be Removed from Improvement in 2011 - 2012
District Name
School Name
District Name
School Name
Adams County 14
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Boulder Valley Re 2
Boulder Valley Re 2
Boulder Valley Re 2
Canon City Re-1
Cherry Creek 5
Delta County 50(J)
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Hanson Prek-8 School
Altura Elementary School
Sable Elementary School
Laredo Elementary School
Sixth Avenue Elementary School
Columbine Elementary School
Pioneer Bilingual Elementary School
University Hill Elementary School
Skyline Elementary School
Ponderosa Elementary School
Lincoln Elementary School
Columbine Elementary School
Ellis Elementary School
Fairview Elementary School
Godsman Elementary School
Kipp Sunshine Peak Academy
Maxwell Elementary School
Montclair Elementary School
Eagle County Re 50
Falcon 49
Fort Morgan Re-3
Greeley 6
Greeley 6
Harrison 2
Jefferson County R-1
Jefferson County R-1
Jefferson County R-1
Jefferson County R-1
Mesa County Valley 51
Mesa County Valley 51
Montezuma-Cortez Re-1
Montezuma-Cortez Re-1
Platte Valley Re-7
Poudre R-1
Poudre R-1
Roaring Fork Re-1
Avon Elementary School
Horizon Middle School
Columbine Elementary School
Madison Elementary School
Romero Elementary School
Stratton Meadows Elementary School
Pleasant View Elementary School
Slater Elementary School
Lumberg Elementary School
Molholm Elementary School
Clifton Elementary School
Dual Immersion Academy School
Mesa Elementary School
Manaugh Elementary School
Platte Valley Middle School
Tavelli Elementary School
Harris Bilingual Elementary School
Glenwood Springs Elementary School
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
69
Colorado Schools with the Potential to be Removed from Improvement in 2011 - 2012
District Name
School Name
District Name
School Name
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Smith Elementary School
Swansea Elementary School
Archuleta Elementary School
Goldrick Elementary School
Johnson Elementary School
Kaiser Elementary School
Mc Meen Elementary School
Pioneer Charter School
Gilpin K-8 School
Roaring Fork Re-1
South Conejos Re-10
St Vrain Valley Re 1j
St Vrain Valley Re 1j
St Vrain Valley Re 1j
St Vrain Valley Re 1j
Summit Re-1
Weld County S/D Re-8
Westminster 50
Sopris Elementary School
Antonito High School
Columbine Elementary School
Loma Linda Elementary School
Rocky Mountain Elementary School
Spangler Elementary School
Silverthorne Elementary School
Leo William Butler Elementary School
Clara E. Metz Elementary School
2010 - 2011 Colorado Schools On Improvement
District Name
School Name
Adams 12
Adams 12
Adams 12
Adams 12
Adams 12
Adams 12
Adams 12
Adams 12
Adams 12
Adams 12
Adams County 14
Adams County 14
Adams County 14
Coronado Hills Elementary
Federal Heights Elementary
Malley Drive Elementary School
Mc Elwain Elementary School
North Mor Elementary School
North Star Elementary School
Rocky Mountain Elementary
Thornton Elementary School
Niver Creek Middle School
Thornton Middle School
Central Elementary School
Dupont Elementary School
Hanson Prek-8 School
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Overall
Status
SI1
SI1
SI2
RI3
SI1
CA
SI2
RI3
RI3
RI3
SI2
SI1
SI1
District Name
School Name
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Colorado High School
Escuela Tlatelolco School
Florence Crittenton High School
Manual High School
Montbello High School
North High School
Ridge View Academy Charter
West High School
Bruce Randolph School
Cole Arts And Science Academy
Fairmont K-8 School
Gilpin K-8 School
Grant Middle School
70
Overall
Status
SI2
SI2
CA
SI1
RI2
RI2
CA
RI3
RI2
SI1
SI2
SI1
RI1
2010 - 2011 Colorado Schools On Improvement
District Name
School Name
Adams County 14
Adams County 14
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Adams-Arapahoe 28j
Alamosa Re-11j
Ault-Highland Re-9
Boulder Valley Re 2
Boulder Valley Re 2
Boulder Valley Re 2
Boulder Valley Re 2
Boulder Valley Re 2
Canon City Re-1
Center 26 Jt
Cherry Creek 5
Adams City Middle School
Hanson Prek-8 School
Altura Elementary School
Elkhart Elementary School
Fulton Elementary School
Kenton Elementary School
Lansing Elementary School
Laredo Elementary School
Lyn Knoll Elementary School
Paris Elementary School
Park Lane Elementary School
Peoria Elementary School
Sable Elementary School
Sixth Avenue Elementary School
Vaughn Elementary School
Wheeling Elementary School
Aurora West College Preparatory
North Middle School
Evans Elementary School
Highland Elementary School
Columbine Elementary School
Emerald Elementary School
Pioneer Bilingual Elementary
Sanchez Elementary School
University Hill Elementary
Skyline Elementary School
Haskin Elementary School
Cimarron Elementary School
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Overall
Status
RI1
SI1
SI1
CA
SI2
SI2
RI1
CA
RP
CA
SI1
CA
CA
SI1
SI2
RP
RI2
RI1
SI2
SI2
SI2
SI1
SI2
SI1
RP
SI1
SI2
SI1
District Name
School Name
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Eagle County Re 50
Englewood 1
Falcon 49
Florence Re-2
Florence Re-2
Fort Morgan Re-3
Garfield 16
Garfield Re-2
Greeley 6
Greeley 6
Greeley 6
Greeley 6
Gunnison Re1j
Harrison 2
Harrison 2
Ignacio 11 Jt
Jefferson County R-1
Kepner Middle School
Martin Luther King Middle College
Merrill Middle School
Noel Middle School
Northeast Academy Charter
Place Bridge Academy
Prep Assessment Center
Rishel Middle School
Skinner Middle School
Smiley Middle School
Trevista Ece-8 At Horace Mann
Avon Elementary School
Cherrelyn Elementary School
Horizon Middle School
Florence High School
Fremont Middle School
Columbine Elementary School
Bea Underwood Elementary
Wamsley Elementary School
Centennial Elementary School
Jackson Elementary School
Madison Elementary School
Romero Elementary School
Gunnison Elementary School
Monterey Elementary School
Stratton Meadows Elementary
Ignacio Intermediate School
Edgewater Elementary School
Overall
Status
RI5
RI2
SI2
RI2
SI2
SI1
SI1
RI5
RI5
SI1
SI1
CA
SI1
SI1
SI1
SI2
SI1
RP
SI1
SI1
SI2
SI1
CA
SI2
SI1
SI1
SI1
SI1
71
2010 - 2011 Colorado Schools On Improvement
District Name
School Name
Cherry Creek 5
Cherry Creek 5
Cherry Creek 5
Cherry Creek 5
Cherry Creek 5
Colorado School For The
Deaf And Blind
Colorado Springs 11
Colorado Springs 11
Del Norte C-7
Delta County 50(J)
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Holly Hills Elementary School
Independence Elementary School
Meadow Point Elementary
Ponderosa Elementary School
Village East Community Elementary
Colorado School For The Deaf And
Blind
Monroe Elementary School
Rogers Elementary School
Underwood Elementary School
Lincoln Elementary School
Amesse Elementary School
Archuleta Elementary School
Barnum Elementary School
Castro Elementary School
Centennial K-8 School
Charles M. Schenck (Cms)
Community School
Cheltenham Elementary School
Cole Arts And Science Academy
Colfax Elementary School
Columbian Elementary School
Columbine Elementary School
Cowell Elementary School
Doull Elementary School
Eagleton Elementary School
Ellis Elementary School
Fairmont K-8 School
Fairview Elementary School
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Overall
Status
SI2
SI1
SI2
SI1
SI1
District Name
School Name
Jefferson County R-1
Jefferson County R-1
Jefferson County R-1
Jefferson County R-1
Jefferson County R-1
Eiber Elementary School
Foster Elementary School
Lumberg Elementary School
Molholm Elementary School
Pleasant View Elementary
Overall
Status
RP
SI1
SI1
RI1
CA
SI2
SI1
SI1
CA
RI4
SI1
RI3
RI4
RP
Jefferson County R-1
Jefferson County R-1
Jefferson County R-1
Keenesburg Re-3(J)
Las Animas Re-1
Mapleton 1
Mapleton 1
Mapleton 1
Mesa County Valley 51
Swanson Elementary School
O'connell Middle School
Wheat Ridge Middle School
Hudson Elementary School
Las Animas High School
Global Leadership Academy
Meadow Community School
Monterey Community School
Chatfield Elementary School
SI1
RI2
RI2
SI2
SI1
SI1
SI1
SI2
SI2
SI2
RI5
RI3
SI1
RP
RI1
SI1
RI4
RP
RI1
CA
RI3
SI1
Jefferson County R-1
Mesa County Valley 51
Mesa County Valley 51
Mesa County Valley 51
Mesa County Valley 51
Montezuma-Cortez Re-1
Montezuma-Cortez Re-1
Montezuma-Cortez Re-1
Montrose County Re-1j
Montrose County Re-1j
Platte Valley Re-7
Poudre R-1
Poudre R-1
Slater Elementary School
SI1
Clifton Elementary School
Dos Rios Elementary School
Dual Immersion Academy School
Rocky Mountain Elementary
Kemper Elementary School
Manaugh Elementary School
Mesa Elementary School
Johnson Elementary School
Olathe Elementary School
Platte Valley Middle School
Harris Bilingual Elementary
Tavelli Elementary School
SI1
72
SI2
SI1
SI2
RI2
RI2
SI1
SI2
SI2
SI1
SI1
SI1
2010 - 2011 Colorado Schools On Improvement
District Name
School Name
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Ford Elementary School
Garden Place Elementary School
Godsman Elementary School
Goldrick Elementary School
Green Valley Elementary School
Greenwood Elementary School
Gust Elementary School
Harrington Elementary School
Howell K-8 School
Johnson Elementary School
Kaiser Elementary School
Kipp Sunshine Peak Academy
Knapp Elementary School
Marrama Elementary School
Maxwell Elementary School
Mc Glone Elementary School
Mc Meen Elementary School
Montclair Elementary School
Moore K-8 School
Munroe Elementary School
Oakland Elementary School
Pioneer Charter School
Place Bridge Academy
Schmitt Elementary School
Smith Elementary School
Stedman Elementary School
Swansea Elementary School
Trevista Ece-8 At Horace Mann
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Overall
Status
RI5
RI3
RI2
RI3
RP
SI1
RP
RI2
SI1
RP
SI1
SI1
RI4
CA
SI1
CA
SI1
SI2
SI1
RI3
RI1
CA
SI1
SI1
RI2
CA
RI4
SI1
District Name
School Name
Pueblo City 60
Roaring Fork Re-1
Roaring Fork Re-1
Roaring Fork Re-1
Sheridan 2
Sheridan 2
South Conejos Re-10
South Routt Re 3
St Vrain Valley Re 1j
St Vrain Valley Re 1j
St Vrain Valley Re 1j
St Vrain Valley Re 1j
St Vrain Valley Re 1j
St Vrain Valley Re 1j
Summit Re-1
Summit Re-1
Thompson R-2j
Thompson R-2j
Trinidad 1
Valley Re-1
Weld County S/D Re-8
Weld County S/D Re-8
Westminster 50
Westminster 50
Westminster 50
Westminster 50
Westminster 50
Westminster 50
Spann Elementary School
Crystal River Elementary School
Glenwood Springs Elementary
Sopris Elementary School
Fort Logan Elementary School
Sheridan Middle School
Antonito High School
South Routt Elementary School
Columbine Elementary School
Indian Peaks Elementary School
Loma Linda Elementary School
Northridge Elementary School
Rocky Mountain Elementary
Spangler Elementary School
Dillon Valley Elementary School
Silverthorne Elementary School
Monroe Elementary School
Winona Elementary School
Fisher's Peak Elementary School
Campbell Elementary School
Leo William Butler Elementary
Twombly Elementary School
Clara E. Metz Elementary School
Fairview Elementary School
Francis M. Day Elementary School
Harris Park Elementary School
Mesa Elementary School
Sherrelwood Elementary School
Overall
Status
SI1
SI1
SI1
SI1
SI2
RI2
SI1
SI1
SI2
SI1
SI1
SI1
SI1
SI2
SI2
SI1
SI1
CA
SI1
SI1
SI1
RI1
SI1
SI2
RP
SI2
SI2
SI1
73
2010 - 2011 Colorado Schools On Improvement
District Name
School Name
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Denver County 1
Valdez Elementary School
Valverde Elementary School
Whittier K-8 School
Abraham Lincoln High School
Ace Community Challenge Charter
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
Overall
Status
RP
RI2
SI1
RI3
CA
District Name
School Name
Westminster 50
Westminster 50
Westminster 50
Windsor Re-4
Skyline Vista Elementary School
Tennyson Knolls Elementary
Westminster Elementary School
Mountain View Elementary
Overall
Status
RI1
SI1
SI2
SI1
74
Section 5: Highly Qualified Teacher Data
NCLB requires that all teachers of core academic subjects be Highly Qualified (HQ) in their assignment. The core academic subject areas are
defined as English, reading or language arts; mathematics; science; foreign languages; social studies (civics, government, history, geography,
economics); and the arts (visual arts, drama, music). In general, to be considered HQ, teachers must hold at least a bachelor’s degree and have
demonstrated subject knowledge. The table below provides an overview of the most current status of Highly Qualified teachers and classrooms in
Colorado.
Educational Level of Teachers in Colorado
Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
School Type
All Schools in State
Elementary
High Poverty Schools
Low Poverty Schools
All Elementary Schools
Secondary
High Poverty Schools
Low Poverty Schools
All Secondary Schools
Total #
of
Classes
# of
Classes
HQT
% of
Classes
HQT
257,785
255,281
47,350
47,031
99.3
159,142
157,938
99.2
15,527
15,289
98.5
98,643
97,343
98.7
44,014
37,013
43,817
36,735
99.0%
99.6
99.2
# of
Classes
Not HQT
2,504
% of
Classes
Not HQT
1.0%
Professional Qualifications of Teachers in Colorado
# of Teachers
1,204
0.8
% of Teachers
Bachelor
s Degree
Masters
Degree
Ph.D./
Ed. D
24,066
26,079
415
47.46%
51.42%
Certification of Teachers in Colorado
0.82%
Teachers may either hold a professional or initial license
to be HQ in Colorado.
Certification of Teachers in Colorado
1,300
1.3
More information about Colorado’s definition of a Highly Qualified teacher is available
on our website at. http://www.cde.state.co.us/FedPrograms/tii/a_hqt.asp
Districts’ individual percentages of HQ teachers can be found on the District and School
Performance Reports at http://www.cde.state.co.us/FedPrograms/danda/hqtdata.asp
Colorado NCLB Report Card 2009-2010
To meet Highly Qualified requirements, all teachers must
hold, at minimum, a bachelor’s degree. The table below
shows the highest level of education held by Colorado
teachers.
# of Teachers
% of Teachers
Emergency
License
Initial
License
Professional
License
30
6,072
42,580
.06%
12.0%
84.2%
75