UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA ASPER SCHOOL OF BUSINESS DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE
by user
Comments
Transcript
UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA ASPER SCHOOL OF BUSINESS DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE
UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA ASPER SCHOOL OF BUSINESS DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE FIN 3470 – SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE- Fall 2015 Term Instructor: Office: Email: Office Hours: Alok Dua 376 Drake Centre [email protected] T/R 10-11 or by appointment Course Objective The objective of this course is to provide students with an understanding of the concepts required to start, build, finance, and value an entrepreneurial venture. Course Description In this course we will adapt and apply corporate finance tools and techniques in order to plan, operate, finance, and value entrepreneurial ventures. The course will be taught using in class lectures, recommended homework, two take home assignments, a mid-term exam, and a final exam. It is expected that you have a good knowledge of the pre-requisite courses ACC1100 Introductory Financial Accounting and FIN2200 Corporate Finance. Required Textbook Entrepreneurial Finance, 6th edition, Adelman and Marks , pearson 2013 ISBN 13-978-0-13—314051-4. Allocation of marks Class participation Summaries Mid term exam (2*17.55) Presentation Final Examination 10% 5% 35% 5% 45% 100% Participation. (10 % of total marks) Participation is very important. I expect you to be prepared for each and every class and to participate by making a "substantive contribution" in a fair number of classes during the term. In general, a substantive contribution helps push the understanding of the class forward. Examples include, but are not limited to, being involved in a discussion of assigned material, arguing your point of view during a case discussion, asking a relevant question, suggesting an alternate viewpoint, or redirecting our attention to something else in need of discussion. Thus, you do not have to be a top participant in each class, nor do you have to have the "right answer" when you do participate. Please do not hesitate to speak simply because you think your ideas might be challenged; this is the place for such challenges. The participation grade is intended to be a stimulant to discussion, not a deterrent. Although I expect you to attend every class, attendance is not the same as participation. On very rare and exceptional occasions, you may be unprepared for a class and do not wish to be called upon. If so, you should let your instructor know before class (preferably by voicemail or e-mail), but please attend. You do not have to explain why you are unprepared; I will simply expect more from you on other days. I judge participation for each session on a scale of 0 to 4, where 4 indicates a substantive contribution for the day and 0 indicates no contribution. An average contribution, such as building on points made by others, is worth 1. At the end of the course, overall participation will be determined by assigning grades to the best and worst participators and scaling others accordingly. Note: This makes it possible for everyone to do well in participation. Case Summaries: All students are supposed to write a summary of 10 out of 12 cases to be taken up in the class these will have to be submitted prior to the case study discussion in the class. The summary will not exceed 1 page and will preferably be hand written (0.5 marks each). The summaries are a reward for coming prepared for the class and will be helpful in class participation. Mid-Term Exam: There will be two mid-term exam worth 2*17.5 = 35% of your final grade. The exam will contain multiple choice questions. A missed mid-term exam, in absence of medical or compassionate reasons along with required documentation, will result in a grade of zero. If the mid-term is missed for medical or compassionate reasons, and the necessary documentation is provided, the marks will be allocated towards the final exam. Final Exam: There will be one final examination worth 45% of your final grade. The exam may contain multiple choice, short, or long answer questions and/or case/s. A missed final exam will result in a grade of zero, this would have to be taken up with your program office. ( comprehensive) Presentation : It is a group presentation for 12-15 minutes per group. Details will be given in the class. Tentative Course Schedule Date Sep 10 Sep 15 Sep 17 Topic Course Outline Ch 1 Financial and economic concepts (summary 1 on ch1 due ) Ch 8, 9 Time Value of money Sep 22 Sep 24 Sep 29 Ch 8, 9 Time Value of money Ch 10 Capital budgeting Free cash flow to the firm and free cash flow to the equity Oct 1 Ch 2 Financial management and planning Discussion on venture capital (summary 2 on ch2 due ) Ch 5 profit, profitability and break even analysis + Ch 6 Forecasting + ch 2 concepts via the case: Elite personal Training : break even + financial projections ands planning (summary 3 on case due ) Forest city tennis Club ( ch 3 Financial statements; concepts) (summary 4 on ch 3 due ) Private equity at work: Purchasing cake masters (summary 5 on case due ) Mid term 1: Ch 1,2,5,6,8,9,10 GOLFGAMEZ (A+ B): FUNDING A DIGITAL STARTUP (summary 6 on case due ) Cenabel A and (B, case to be read in class) (summary 7 on case due ) Ch 3:, Ch 4 Analysis of financial statements Chang Dental Clinic(summary 8 on case due ) Case: INDUSTRIAL ACCESSORIES LTD. Bankruptcy, equity vs debt financing, valuation) (Summary 9 on the case due) Valuing firms with –ve earnings JOSEPH VIGNEAULT & THE CAPITAL POOL COMPANY PROGRAM (summary 10 on case due ) Ch 7 Working capital Management Ch 11 Personal Finance (summary 11, 12 on Ch 7 and Ch 11 due ) Mid term 2 Ch 3,4,7,11 Oct 6, 8, 13 Oct 15 Oct 20 Oct 22 Oct 27 Oct 29, Nov 3, 5 Nov 10 Nov 12 Nov 17 Nov 19 Nov 24 Nov 26, Dec 1, 3 Dec 8 TBA Presentations Review Final Exam: 3 Hours comprehensive AACSB Assurance of Learning Goals and Objectives. The Asper School of Business is proudly accredited by AACSB. Accreditation requires a process of continuous improvement of the School and our students. Part of “student improvement” is ensuring that students graduate with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed in their careers. To do so, the Asper School has set the learning goals and objectives listed below for the Undergraduate Program. The checked goal(s) and objective(s) will be addressed in this course and done so by means of the items listed next to the checkmark. Goals and Objective in the Undergraduate Program 1 B. C. 3 Determine which quantitative analysis technique is appropriate for solving a specific problem. Use the appropriate quantitative method in a technically correct way to solve a business problem. Analyze quantitative output and arrive at a conclusion. Case discussions Written Communication A. Use correct English grammar and mechanics in their written work. B. Communicate in a coherent and logical manner C. Present ideas in a clear and organized fashion. Written case summaries Written case summaries Written case summaries Ethical Thinking A. B. C. D. 4 Course Item(s) Relevant to these Goals and Objectives Quantitative Reasoning A. 2 Goals and Objectives Addressed in this Course Identify ethical issues in a problem or case situation Identify the stakeholders in the situation. Analyze the consequences of alternatives from an ethical standpoint. Discuss the ethical implications of the decision. Core Business Knowledge Case discussions Case discussions Case discussions Case discussions Academic Integrity It is critical to the reputation of the I. H. Asper School of Business and of our degrees, that everyone associated with our faculty behaves with the highest academic integrity. As the faculty that helps create business and government leaders, we have a special obligation to ensure that our ethical standards are beyond reproach. Any dishonesty in our academic transactions violates this trust. The University of Manitoba Undergraduate Calendar addresses the issue of academic dishonesty under the heading “Plagiarism and Cheating.” Specifically, acts of academic dishonesty include, but are not limited to: using the exact words of a published or unpublished author without quotation marks and without referencing the source of these words duplicating a table, graph or diagram, in whole or in part, without referencing the source paraphrasing the conceptual framework, research design, interpretation, or any other ideas of another person, whether written or verbal (e.g., personal communications, ideas from a verbal presentation) without referencing the source copying the answers of another student in any test, examination, or take-home assignment providing answers to another student in any test, examination, or take-home assignment taking any unauthorized materials into an examination or term test (crib notes) impersonating another student or allowing another person to impersonate oneself for the purpose of submitting academic work or writing any test or examination stealing or mutilating library materials accessing tests prior to the time and date of the sitting changing name or answer(s) on a test after that test has been graded and returned submitting the same paper or portions thereof for more than one assignment, without discussions with the instructors involved. Group Projects and Group Work Many courses in the I. H. Asper School of Business require group projects. Students should be aware that group projects are subject to the same rules regarding academic dishonesty. Because of the unique nature of group projects, all group members should exercise special care to insure that the group project does not violate the policy on Academic Integrity. Should a violation occur, group members are jointly accountable unless the violation can be attributed to a specific individual(s). Some courses, while not requiring group projects, encourage students to work together in groups (or at least do not prohibit it) before submitting individual assignments. Students are encouraged to discuss this issue as it relates to academic integrity with their instructor to avoid violating this policy. In the I. H. Asper School of Business, all suspected cases of academic dishonesty are passed to the Dean’s office in order to ensure consistency of treatment.