Adaptive Traffic Signal Control WVDOH/MPO/FHWA Planning Conference 10/3/2012 Andrew P. Nichols, PhD, PE
by user
Comments
Transcript
Adaptive Traffic Signal Control WVDOH/MPO/FHWA Planning Conference 10/3/2012 Andrew P. Nichols, PhD, PE
Adaptive Traffic Signal Control WVDOH/MPO/FHWA Planning Conference 10/3/2012 Andrew P. Nichols, PhD, PE Rahall Transportation Institute Presentation Overview Traffic Signals 101 What is Adaptive Signal Control? Adaptive Systems in WV Preliminary Evaluation Results Types of Traffic Signal Control Terminology Overview Simulation Field Data Planning for Traffic Signals Types of Traffic Signal Control Basic (Free) Operation Coordinated (Time-of-Day) Operation With or without vehicle/pedestrian detection Commonly used for isolated intersections Green times programmed based on anticipated demand With or without vehicle/pedestrian detection Used in corridor or downtown grid signal systems Cycle, Offset, and Splits are the key parameters that are typically programmed for anticipated demand at different time periods Adaptive Operation Requires vehicle detection Most systems dynamically adjust Cycle, Offset, and Splits based on current or historical demand What is a Phase Split? Each signalized intersection movement is a phase 4-way intersection with left-turn arrows has 8 phases Split Time = Green + Yellow + All Red Movement Phase 66 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 44 1 3 88 5 22 What is a Phase Split? Phase split times are programmed to account for demand Duration can also be shortened with vehicle detection 1 5 2 3 6 7 4 8 Phase 8 Split = G + Y + R What is a Cycle? The total time it takes to serve all phase splits Cycle = Split 1 + Split 2 + Split 3 + Split 4 Cycle = Split 5 + Split 6 + Split 7 + Split 8 1 5 2 3 6 7 4 8 What is an Offset? Programmed for the “mainline” movement at each intersection to provide progression through the system 1 i.e., Offsetting the start of green Consider a Northbound Phase 2 movement only: 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 2 3 4 Time-Space Diagram (NB) 2 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 Space (feet) 3 1 8:00:00 Time (seconds) Time-Space Diagram (Zero Offset) 2 1 Vehicle Trajectory Space (feet) 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 8:00:00 Time (seconds) Time-Space Diagram (w/ offsets) 3 Space (feet) 2 2 2 Offset 2 2 2 Offset 1 1 Vehicle Trajectory 2 2 8:00:00 Time (seconds) Time-Space Diagram (w/ offsets) 3 2 Offset 2 Space (feet) 2 2 2 2 Offset 1 1 2 2 8:00:00 Time (seconds) Coordination Plans Traffic engineers can deploy multiple coordination plans to accommodate different traffic patterns How are these plans derived? Traffic Data Collection Optimization Software Field Tuning This process cannot account for all traffic patterns! Star City Bridge, Morgantown Inbound Traffic on Saturday When to start each Coordination Plan? Saturday 1 Plan 1 Plan 2 Saturday 2 Plan 3 Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3 Oops! Star City Bridge, Morgantown Saturday Traffic Saturday 1 Should offsets provide progression for INBOUND or OUTBOUND traffic? Inbound Outbound Favor Outbound! Saturday 2 Oops! Inbound Outbound What is Adaptive Signal Control? Respond more intelligently to fluctuations in traffic patterns (beyond shortening phase times with vehicle detection) All adaptive systems require vehicle detection Adjust phase split times Adjust cycle length More/less time for a left-turn movements or side streets Longer for congested periods, shorter for off-peak Adjust offsets Accommodate inbound vs. outbound traffic Account for change in traffic speeds due to severe weather Adaptive Signal Control 20+ adaptive control systems on the market <1% of signals nationwide use adaptive technology NONE of the systems are “plug and play” Each system is unique FHWA Every Day Counts Initiative Identified ASC as being significantly underutilized Providing some guidance on how to select a system Developing guidelines on how to evaluate performance Adaptive Systems in WV WVDOH operates traffic signals statewide Adaptive Signal Control Deployments ~1,900 traffic signals ~107 closed loop signal systems (running coordinated timings) (16) Morgantown WV-705 Corridor (In Progress) (5) Teays Valley SR-34 Corridor (Summer 2012) (3) Elkins US-219 Corridor (In Progress) (5) St. Albans US-60 Corridor (In Progress) (8) Morgantown Beechurst/University Corridor (Spring 2013) Rahall Transportation Institute is managing and evaluating the performance of these systems Adaptive Signal Control Evaluation Morgantown WV-705 Corridor Adaptive System: ACS-Lite & Traffic Responsive Hybrid Evaluation Mechanism Intersection Delay & Progression – Simulation using VISSIM Travel Time – Bluetooth & GPS Safety – Eventually crash records Teays Valley SR-34 Corridor Adaptive System: InSync Evaluation Mechanism Travel Time – GPS WV 705 Signalized Intersections ~5.2 miles end-to-end Stopbar detection Advanced detection 16 Mainline Signals WV 705 Traffic Generators New Housing School Commuters Residential Shopping Mall Hospitals WVU Basketball Research Park WVU Football Engineering Campus Shopping Mall Downtown Campus Student Housing CBD School WV 705 Corridor WV 705 System Evaluation with Simulation WV 705 corridor was modeled in VISSIM with traffic signal controller simulators to evaluate: Free operation (no coordination) Basic Coordination Plans (TOD) TOD + Traffic Responsive (TR) TOD + ACS-Lite (ACS) TOD + TR + ACS (Adaptive) Total Delay and Hourly Delay Summarized By System (All intersection movements) By Mainline Movement (705 thru movements) By Minor Movement (Left-turns and side-streets) 3000 2556 2526 All Movements Total Delay (veh-h/h) 2500 2000 500 System Delay is lowest in Free, but major movements suffer 2236 9 9 7 6 7 6 1880 9 9 7 6 7 6 4 3 2 4 3 2 4 3 2 4 3 2 TOD TOD+ACS TR TR+ACS 808 813 820 812 6 9 7 6 9 7 6 9 7 6 9 7 6 4 4 4 4 4 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 Free TOD TOD+ACS TR TR+ACS 1748 1714 1442 1424 9 7 6 9 7 6 4 3 2 4 3 2 TR TR+ACS 1500 1000 2262 9 7 6 4 3 2 0 Free 1200 1021 Major Movements Total Delay (veh-h/h) 1000 800 9 600 7 400 200 0 2000 Minor Movements Total Delay (veh-h/h) 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 9 9 7 6 7 6 9 7 6 4 3 2 4 3 2 4 3 2 Free TOD TOD+ACS 859 800 600 400 200 0 Minor Movements 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 Total Delay (veh-h) Adaptive provides most benefit over TOD during off-peak 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 Major 40 Movements 35 suffer in “free”30 mode Total Delay (veh-h) Major Movements Total Delay (veh-h) All Movements 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 FREE TOD TOD+ACS TR TR+ACS Time of Day 25 20 FREE 15 TOD 10 TOD+ACS 5 TR 0 TR+ACS Time of Day 60 50 40 30 FREE 20 TOD 10 TOD+ACS TR 0 TR+ACS Time of Day Cumulative Total Delay – University & Patteson Cumulative Total Delay (veh-h) Φ1: Westbound Left Φ2: Eastbound Φ3: Northbound Left Φ4: Southbound 40 90 40 40 32 72 32 32 24 54 24 24 16 36 16 16 8 18 8 8 0 0 5:30 10:00 14:00 19:00 0 5:30 Φ5: Eastbound Left 10:00 14:00 19:00 0 5:30 Φ6: Westbound 10:00 14:00 19:00 5:30 Φ7: Southbound Left 90 40 40 32 72 32 32 24 54 24 24 16 36 16 16 8 18 8 8 0 5:30 10:00 14:00 19:00 0 5:30 10:00 14:00 19:00 19:00 0 5:30 10:00 14:00 Time of Day Adaptive Off 14:00 Φ8: Northbound 40 0 10:00 19:00 5:30 10:00 14:00 Left-Turn Delay Decreased by Shifting Available Green Time Adaptive On 28 19:00 Cycle Time Coordination Diagram to Evaluate Offsets GOOD Vehicles arrive after green End of Phase Vehicle Arrivals BAD Vehicles arrive before green Start of Phase Time-of-Day Offset Adjustment Willowdale – Suncrest Town Center ACS-Lite OFF ACS-Lite ON 9000 8000 Cumulative Arrivals on Green 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 3600 7200 10800 14400 18000 21600 25200 28800 Simulation Time 32400 36000 39600 43200 46800 50400 54000 Teays Valley WV-34 System Overview 5 Mainline Signals Northbound - GPS Travel Time Weekday 7AM–11AM Distance Along Corridor (miles) Average (seconds) 35 mph Baseline 66 Before 175 After 110 % Change -37% Travel Time (seconds) Before After Std Dev (seconds) -39 29 -- Northbound - GPS Travel Time Weekday 11AM–2PM Distance Along Corridor (miles) Average (seconds) 35 mph Baseline 66 Before 165 After 98 % Change -41% Travel Time (seconds) Before After Std Dev (seconds) -33 29 -- Northbound - GPS Travel Time Weekday 2PM–6PM Distance Along Corridor (miles) Average (seconds) 35 mph Baseline 66 Before 168 After 100 % Change -40% Travel Time (seconds) Before After Std Dev (seconds) -28 42 -- Planning for Traffic Signals Most of the common planning software packages do not account for basic traffic signal operations, much less adaptive control Difficult to evaluate/predict the performance of an adaptive system to quantify the benefits If there are fluctuating traffic patterns, adaptive might be a good solution If a signal system is being upgraded, often the incremental cost for adaptive is insignificant Contact Information Andrew P. Nichols, PhD, PE Director of ITS Rahall Transportation Institute Marshall University Huntington, WV 304-696-3203 [email protected]