Stakeholder Comment and AESO Replies Matrix Recommendation Paper

Stakeholder Comment and AESO Replies Matrix
Recommendation Paper – Proposal for Battery Facility Technical and
Operating Requirements
October 22, 2013
The AESO is asking market participants and interested parties to participate in the AESO’s consultation regarding the
development of sections 502.13 and 502.14 of the ISO rules, which will create technical and operating requirements for
battery facilities. The AESO is seeking comments from stakeholders on the associated recommendation paper.
Date of Request for Comment:
Period of Consultation:
2013-12-11
2013-10-22
through
Comments From:
Company NameInvenergy LLC
Date
[yyyy/mm/dd]:
2013-12MM-11DD
Contact:
Stakeholder
RepresentativeChris
Orzel
Phone:
+1 312 582 1430
E-mail:
[email protected]
2013-12-11
Recommendation Paper – Executive Summary and Purpose
Do stakeholders have any comments on the Executive Summary and Purpose sections?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Invenergy
Why does the Recommendation exclude
distribution-connected battery facilities
considering interconnecting to high voltage
systems can be cost prohibitive?
Recommendation Paper – Background
AESO Replies
Do stakeholders have any comments on the Background section?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Invenergy
No comment.
AESO Stakeholder Comment and AESO Replies Matrix: 2013-10-22
1
AESO Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Introduction
Do stakeholders agree with the introduction to the Technical Requirements section?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
No comment.
AESO Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Source and Sink Resource
Do stakeholders agree with the proposal to refer to battery facilities as a “source and sink resource”?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
We agree with the language used to refer
to batteries as a “source and sink
resource.” (pg. 6)
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Connection Rule and Operating Rules
Do stakeholders agree with the proposal to develop two separate ISO rules, one relating to battery facility technical requirements for
connection and another for battery facility operating requirements?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
We agree with the requirements.
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Other Rules
Do stakeholders have any comments on the need to review and possibly make incidental amendments to some existing sections of the
ISO rules?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
No comment.
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Applicability and Variances
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed applicability and variances?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
Is the AESO considering IEEE 1547
compliant systems?
AESO Stakeholder Comment and AESO Replies Matrix: 2013-10-22
2
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Maximum Authorized Real Power
Do stakeholders agree with the proposal to make the legal owner responsible for declaring the maximum authorized real power of a
battery facility?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
No comment.
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Operating Voltage Requirements
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed operating voltage requirements?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
No Comment.
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Voltage Ride-Through Requirements
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed voltage ride-through requirements?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
No comment.
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Voltage Regulation
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed voltage regulation requirements?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
No comment.
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Reactive Power Capability
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed reactive power capability requirements?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Further discussion is required. Complying
with this proposal may result in reduction of
real power capacity.
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Transmission System Step-Up Transformer
AESO Stakeholder Comment and AESO Replies Matrix: 2013-10-22
3
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed transmission system step-up transformer requirements?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Further discussion is required, as more
details are needed to explain the level of
mitigation required for blocking the
transmission of harmonic currents.
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Off Nominal Frequency Requirements
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed off nominal frequency requirements?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
No comment.
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Frequency Responsive Control System Requirements
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed frequency responsive control system requirements?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Further discussion is required. This should
not be required of storage systems. BAL002 compliance is the responsibility of the
RRO and BA per the NERC standard.
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Real Power and Ramp Rate Control Requirements
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed real power and ramp rate control requirements?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
No comment.
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Power Quality
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed power quality requirements?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
No comment.
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – WECC Stability Control Requirements
AESO Stakeholder Comment and AESO Replies Matrix: 2013-10-22
4
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed WECC stability control requirements?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
No comment.
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Facilities Synchrophasor Measurement
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed facilities synchrophasor measurement requirements?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Batteries should not have to pay for this as
the transmission operator/grid operator
receives the benefit.
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Facilities Testing Post Connection
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed facilities testing post-connection requirements?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
What sets the precedent for revalidation
every 5 years? Further discussion is
required.
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Other Requirements
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed other requirements?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
No comment.
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Other Comments
Do stakeholders have any other comments on the Recommendation Paper?
Stakeholder
Invenergy
Stakeholder Comment
No comment.
AESO Stakeholder Comment and AESO Replies Matrix: 2013-10-22
5
Replies