-1- F all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S

-1- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = ACCT-2301-80, Instructor Name = Dennis S. Ortiz
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
4
40%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
1
10%
Disagree
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
8
80%
Agree
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Strongly Agree
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
Total
1
10%
10
100%
a. Section = ACCT-2301-80, Instructor Name = Dennis S. Ortiz
-2- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
5
50%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
4
40%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
2
20%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
30%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
2
20%
Disagree
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
3
30%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
4
40%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Disagree
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Total
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
4
40%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Percent
Strongly Agree
10
100%
Strongly Agree
3
30%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Disagree
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
3
30%
10
100%
Total
a. Section = ACCT-2301-80, Instructor Name = Dennis S. Ortiz
-3- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
3
30%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
1
10%
Disagree
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
2
20%
Disagree
1
10%
Total
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
1
10%
Disagree
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
4
40%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
10
100%
Strongly Agree
4
40%
Agree
4
40%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Percent
Strongly Agree
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Total
a. Section = ACCT-2301-80, Instructor Name = Dennis S. Ortiz
-4- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Disagree
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Disagree
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
A
6
60%
B
1
10%
C
2
20%
F
1
10%
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
a. Section = ACCT-2301-80, Instructor Name = Dennis S. Ortiz
-5- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
There were only 2 tests, a
midterm and final, for this
course. This did not
encourage a positive
online experience. More
frequent tests would have
more closely gauged my
progress in this course.
The chapter quizzes were
not adequate and did not
help prepare for the
midterm and final as only
a final grade was given
w/out knowing which
questions or learning
objectives were missed.
The online quizzes and
homework assignments
should have a greater
weight for the time
invested in completing
them. Overall i would not
recommend taking acctg
online to anybody unless
these changes were
made. Also there was not
an adequate review
provided for the midterm
and final to more
successfully prepare.
Professor was extremely
helpful, very easy to
approach and ask any
questions regarding the
material although I did not
like Cengage due to its
lack of helpful tools
Mr. Ortiz is a very
prepared person.
Principles of Accounting
class is a very interesting
class. The only bad thing
is that we do a lot of
homework and quizes
online on the cengage
program, and when we
finish the homework or
quiz, the program does
not tell you why you have
the questions wrong, it
only tells you which one
are wrong, and that is very
inefficient, because since
it is an online course we
do not have teachers or
that can tell us why and
where we have problems
wrong. Also Mr. Ortiz
settle an appointment for
a review and he did not
attend the session.
Percent
1
10%
1
10%
1
10%
a. Section = ACCT-2301-80, Instructor Name = Dennis S.
Ortiz
-6- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I HAD NO PROBLEMS
WITH THE INSTRUCTOR
WHATSOEVER. THE
INSTRUCTOR DID HIS
BEST TO HELP HIS
STUDENTS. I DON'T
RECOMMEND ANYONE
TO TAKE AN ONLINE
COURSE WHO IS A
VISUAL OR AUDIO
LEARNER UNLESS
THEY HAVE
EXPERIENCE WITH
ACCOUNTING. IT WAS
CHALLENGING FOR ME
TO TAKE AN ONLINE
COURSE FOR THIS
SUBJECT ESPECIALLY
WITH LIMITED TIME TO
GET TUTORED.
Everytime i e-mailed him
for a question on an
assignment or something
, he was not very helpful
at all.. I will never take him
again.. He took of the
homework on learning
cengage off and that
would have been an extra
learning tool for me. It
seems like he doesn't
care for his students if
they pass or not. I will
never recommend him to
anyone.
Total
Percent
1
10%
1
10%
5
50%
10
100%
a. Section = ACCT-2301-80, Instructor Name = Dennis S.
Ortiz
-7- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = ACCT-2302-80, Instructor Name = Lauran B. Schmid
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Percent
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Neutral
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Total
a. Section = ACCT-2302-80, Instructor Name = Lauran B.
Schmid
-8- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Agree
Total
a. Section = ACCT-2302-80, Instructor Name = Lauran B.
Schmid
-9- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
A
Total
a. Section = ACCT-2302-80, Instructor Name = Lauran B.
Schmid
-10- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = ACNT-1303-80, Instructor Name = Magdalena Solis
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
1
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
50%
a. Section = ACNT-1303-80, Instructor Name = Magdalena
Solis
-11- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
a. Section = ACNT-1303-80, Instructor Name = Magdalena
Solis
-12- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
A
1
50%
B
1
50%
2
100%
2
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Total
a. Section = ACNT-1303-80, Instructor Name = Magdalena
Solis
-13- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = ALAW-3307-80, Instructor Name = Karen F. Betancourt
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
4
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
5
100%
Total
5
100%
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Total
4
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
a. Section = ALAW-3307-80, Instructor Name = Karen F.
Betancourt
-14- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
80%
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
5
100%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
5
100%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
5
100%
5
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = ALAW-3307-80, Instructor Name = Karen F.
Betancourt
-15- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
5
100%
Total
5
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
5
100%
1
20%
1
20%
3
60%
5
100%
I'm very glad utb offers
online bachelor degrees.
I love Ms Bentancourts
class she is great!
Total
a. Section = ALAW-3307-80, Instructor Name = Karen F. Betancourt
-16- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = ALAW-3307-81, Instructor Name = Karen F. Betancourt
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
3
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
60%
a. Section = ALAW-3307-81, Instructor Name = Karen F.
Betancourt
-17- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Neutral
3
60%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
a. Section = ALAW-3307-81, Instructor Name = Karen F.
Betancourt
-18- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
4
80%
B
1
20%
Comments
This semester is the first
time I have ever
attempted an online
course. Professor
Betancourt has made this
experience much easier
than expected. I was
terrified going into this.
The transition was a
challenge but in the end I
would choose an online
course before a
classroom course. She is
very thorough with
instructions and
expectations. She shows
plenty of examples that
have helped me threw the
course. I wish she was
teaching more courses
(than just one) next
semester, but I will be
signing up for any future
courses she will be
teaching. Tishany
Wheeler
Great class
1
20%
1
20%
3
60%
5
100%
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Total
a. Section = ALAW-3307-81, Instructor Name = Karen F. Betancourt
-19- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = ALAW-3312-80, Instructor Name = Karen F. Betancourt
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
8
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Total
8
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
9
100%
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
89%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
8
100%
Total
a. Section = ALAW-3312-80, Instructor Name = Karen F.
Betancourt
-20- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Strongly Agree
Percent
8
89%
8
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
9
100%
Total
9
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
9
100%
9
100%
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Total
Total
a. Section = ALAW-3312-80, Instructor Name = Karen F.
Betancourt
-21- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
9
100%
Total
9
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
9
100%
1
11%
1
11%
7
78%
9
100%
I like Ms Bentacourts
classes!
Great professor! Takes
careful and realistic
consideration of students
and always informs the
material in the most
comprehensible manner.
Total
a. Section = ALAW-3312-80, Instructor Name = Karen F. Betancourt
-22- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = ALAW-3312-81, Instructor Name = Karen F. Betancourt
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
3
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Neutral
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
a. Section = ALAW-3312-81, Instructor Name = Karen F.
Betancourt
-23- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
75%
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Total
Total
a. Section = ALAW-3312-81, Instructor Name = Karen F.
Betancourt
-24- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
1
25%
3
75%
4
100%
A
This semester is the first
time I have ever
attempted an online
course. Professor
Betancourt has made this
experience much easier
than expected. I was
terrified going into this.
The transition was a
challenge but in the end I
would choose an online
course before a
classroom course. She is
very thorough with
instructions and
expectations. She shows
plenty of examples that
have helped me threw the
course. I wish she was
teaching more courses
(than just one) next
semester, but I will be
signing up for any future
courses she will be
teaching. Tishany
Wheeler
Total
a. Section = ALAW-3312-81, Instructor Name = Karen F. Betancourt
-25- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = APBT-3309-80, Instructor Name = Karen F. Betancourt
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
a. Section = APBT-3309-80, Instructor Name = Karen F.
Betancourt
-26- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
a. Section = APBT-3309-80, Instructor Name = Karen F.
Betancourt
-27- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
7
100%
A
a. Section = APBT-3309-80, Instructor Name = Karen F.
Betancourt
-28- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
This was a great
experienced this was my
third class that I have
taken online. It was very
convienent for me and my
busy schedule that I have.
This semester is the first
time I have ever
attempted an online
course. Professor
Betancourt has made this
experience much easier
than expected. I was
terrified going into this.
The transition was a
challenge but in the end I
would choose an online
course before a
classroom course. She is
very thorough with
instructions and
expectations. She shows
plenty of examples that
have helped me threw the
course. I wish she was
teaching more courses
(than just one) next
semester, but I will be
signing up for any future
courses she will be
teaching. Tishany
Wheeler
It was a great class and
the instructor made the
course very meaningful
Awesome learning
experience!
Total
Percent
1
14%
1
14%
1
14%
1
14%
3
43%
7
100%
a. Section = APBT-3309-80, Instructor Name = Karen F.
Betancourt
-29- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = APBT-3312-80, Instructor Name = Irma S. Jones
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
1
9%
Total
11
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
10
91%
Agree
Agree
1
9%
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
8
73%
Total
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
Agree
2
18%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Total
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
91%
11
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
10
Total
a. Section = APBT-3312-80, Instructor Name = Irma S. Jones
-30- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
7
64%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
4
36%
Total
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
10
100%
8
73%
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
3
27%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
2
18%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
2
18%
Total
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
2
18%
11
100%
8
73%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
Agree
Total
2
18%
10
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
4
36%
11
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
4
36%
11
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Total
Total
Agree
Total
3
27%
11
100%
a. Section = APBT-3312-80, Instructor Name = Irma S. Jones
-31- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
8
73%
Agree
3
27%
11
100%
9
82%
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Strongly Agree
Agree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
3
27%
11
100%
8
73%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Agree
3
27%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
2
18%
Total
Total
11
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
9
82%
B
2
18%
Comments
Very good instructor.
Would answer any
questions and was very
helpful in every situation I
had.
I am very satisfied with
the quality of this course
and with the instructor. I
have already registered to
take classes with this
instructor for the Spring
semester.
I am extremely content
with this course, and
value what I have learned
from it. Dr. Jones is an
excellent professor, and I
do recommend her online
classes to everyone.
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
8
73%
11
100%
Total
a. Section = APBT-3312-80, Instructor Name = Irma S. Jones
-32- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = APBT-3312-81, Instructor Name = Irma S. Jones
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
33%
Agree
3
50%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
2
33%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
2
33%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
2
33%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
2
33%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
2
33%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
2
33%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
2
33%
Total
6
100%
a. Section = APBT-3312-81, Instructor Name = Irma S. Jones
-33- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
2
33%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
3
50%
Total
6
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
2
33%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
2
33%
Total
6
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
a. Section = APBT-3312-81, Instructor Name = Irma S. Jones
-34- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
33%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
2
33%
Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
2
33%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
3
50%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
2
33%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
2
33%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
A
4
67%
B
2
33%
a. Section = APBT-3312-81, Instructor Name = Irma S. Jones
-35- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I was so impressed with
my instructor and the
organization of this online
class! Sometimes these
classes leave me feeling
lost and the instructors
don't really seem to want
to help or understand my
issues but this class was
fun, organized, easy to
comprehend and
informative. The instructor
went above and beyond to
assist me with any
problem I ever had and I
am left feeling that I made
the best possible grade I
could for the class, even if
I were to have attended
classes on campus!
Thank you so much!
Total
Percent
1
17%
5
83%
6
100%
a. Section = APBT-3312-81, Instructor Name = Irma S.
Jones
-36- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = APBT-3322-80, Instructor Name = Angela K. Wolf
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
73%
Agree
3
20%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
2
13%
Agree
Strongly Disagree
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
2
13%
Agree
Neutral
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
2
13%
Agree
Strongly Disagree
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
2
13%
Agree
Disagree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
3
20%
Agree
Disagree
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Percent
11
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
4
27%
Agree
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
Agree
2
13%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
3
20%
14
100%
Agree
Total
a. Section = APBT-3322-80, Instructor Name = Angela K. Wolf
-37- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Percent
Strongly Agree
9
60%
Agree
3
20%
Neutral
3
20%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
4
27%
Agree
Neutral
1
7%
Total
15
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
11
73%
Agree
3
20%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
Agree
3
20%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
Agree
3
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
3
20%
Agree
Strongly Disagree
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
Agree
4
27%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
Agree
2
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
Agree
2
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
14
100%
Total
a. Section = APBT-3322-80, Instructor Name = Angela K. Wolf
-38- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
10
67%
Agree
3
20%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
15
100%
Strongly Agree
9
60%
Agree
3
20%
Neutral
3
20%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
Agree
2
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
Agree
2
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
2
13%
Agree
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
12
80%
3
20%
Total
15
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
12
80%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
15
100%
A
13
87%
B
1
7%
D
1
7%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Agree
a. Section = APBT-3322-80, Instructor Name = Angela K. Wolf
-39- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Very well organized,
would respond to
concerns and assisted
on particular
assignments. I really
enjoyed this online class
with Ms. Wolf. I have never
had Ms. Wolf online
before, but I hope she
continues teaching online
courses. Great job!!!
This instructor was very
disorganized and missed
most of the first month of
class. Because of his
lack of organization I was
only recently informed of
my grade. We have two
weeks left in the
semester and it's
obviously too late to drop
the class so I'm forced to
salvage whatever grade I
can. I'm am not a D
student and in the class
I'll be getting a D. I had no
idea what the activities
were over and every email I sent fell upon deaf
ears because I never got
a response. I'm very
upset with my grade in
this class and with the
way it was taught by the
instructor. If he has too
much on his plate then he
shouldn't be teaching a
class. At one point, he
asked us to return our
first exam scantrons
because his computer
had deleted the
information. This class
was ridiculous as well as
the instructor!
Mrs. Wolf is an
exceptional educator and
I enjoyed her class
immensely. I would not
hesitate to recommend
this class to other
students and would
welcome the opportunity
to take another course
taught by Mrs. Wolf in the
future.
Percent
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
a. Section = APBT-3322-80, Instructor Name = Angela K.
Wolf
-40- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Mrs wolfe has always
been an excellent
instructor. I have had her
for other classes and she
is awesome . Thank you
Mrs wolf for everything you
do for us.. Jackie Cooke
Neece
I found the pace of this
course to be manageable
and the content relevant. I
was very pleased with the
interaction provided by the
instructor. She was
always available to assist
me and provided prompt
feedback to my queries.
Overall I was extremely
satisfied with the course
and with the instruction
provided. I have already
registered to take classes
with this instructor for the
Spring term.
Excellent professor! Mrs.
Wolf is very precise in her
assignments, and was
available to contact for
immediate assistance.
Awesome Class!
Total
Percent
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
8
53%
15
100%
a. Section = APBT-3322-80, Instructor Name = Angela K.
Wolf
-41- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = APBT-3335-80, Instructor Name = Janna L. Arney
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
1
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Neutral
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
3
100%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
2
50%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
25%
a. Section = APBT-3335-80, Instructor Name = Janna L. Arney
-42- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Neutral
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
a. Section = APBT-3335-80, Instructor Name = Janna L. Arney
-43- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Total
3
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
3
75%
C
1
25%
Comments
I really had a wonderful
experience being only
one of the few courses
that I have taken online. I
really encourage others to
participate in online
courses they are really
good in helping us to
accodate what the real
world is today, which is
technology centered.
1
25%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Total
a. Section = APBT-3335-80, Instructor Name = Janna L. Arney
-44- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
3
75%
4
100%
Section = APBT-3335-81, Instructor Name = Janna L. Arney
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Total
Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
3
30%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
4
40%
Agree
5
50%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
10
100%
Strongly Agree
3
30%
Agree
5
50%
Neutral
2
20%
Total
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
50%
Strongly Agree
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
5
50%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
40%
100%
100%
Neutral
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
4
10
5
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
60%
10
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Percent
6
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
4
40%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
10
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
4
40%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
1
10%
Agree
6
60%
Total
Neutral
Total
3
30%
10
100%
a. Section = APBT-3335-81, Instructor Name = Janna L. Arney
-45- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
40%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
Total
3
30%
10
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
4
40%
Agree
4
40%
Neutral
2
20%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
Total
10
100%
Strongly Agree
4
40%
Agree
4
40%
Neutral
2
20%
10
100%
5
50%
Total
Agree
5
50%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
4
40%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
2
20%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Total
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
2
20%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
4
40%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
3
30%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Neutral
2
20%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
2
20%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Neutral
Total
3
30%
10
100%
a. Section = APBT-3335-81, Instructor Name = Janna L. Arney
-46- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
5
50%
Agree
4
40%
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
4
40%
10
100%
6
60%
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
Agree
Total
4
40%
10
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
4
40%
10
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
4
40%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
Total
10
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
5
50%
B
5
50%
Comments
Mrs. Arney is a very great
instructor. I would
recommend this online
class. In this evaluation I
was able to interact easily
with my instructor, but not
my classmates.
1
10%
9
90%
10
100%
Total
a. Section = APBT-3335-81, Instructor Name = Janna L. Arney
-47- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = APBT-4391-80, Instructor Name = Irma S. Jones
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
4
40%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Total
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = APBT-4391-80, Instructor Name = Irma S. Jones
-48- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
7
70%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
2
20%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
2
20%
Disagree
1
10%
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Total
10
100%
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Total
a. Section = APBT-4391-80, Instructor Name = Irma S. Jones
-49- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
5
50%
Agree
4
40%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
2
20%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = APBT-4391-80, Instructor Name = Irma S. Jones
-50- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
7
70%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
10
100%
Strongly Agree
4
40%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
9
100%
A
6
60%
B
3
30%
C
1
10%
a. Section = APBT-4391-80, Instructor Name = Irma S. Jones
-51- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Thank you.
I received a 0 on WSJ#4
because it was
supposedly not a
technology article. Yet I
found the article in the
Wall Street Journal in the
technology section. In the
e-mail she sent me she
requested that I redo the
assignment using an
article she would
consider to be
appropriate, so I did redo
the assignment and emailed it to her. My grade
is still a zero for that
assignment. I feel like I
wasted my time in even
redoing the assignment.
This is the second class
I've taken with this
instructor and both times
I've felt as if the instructor
didn't like me for some
reason, which is absurd,
I've never met her. Its sad
though because I know in
order to complete my
degree I still have another
class I have to take with
her.
Great professor. She is
really informative and
always on task with the
assignments assigned to
the class. However, I
recommend more online
and testing assignments
rather than hands-on
research. Overall, great
work with the organization
of the assignments.
Total
Percent
1
10%
1
10%
1
10%
7
70%
10
100%
a. Section = APBT-4391-80, Instructor Name = Irma S.
Jones
-52- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = BLAW-3337-80, Instructor Name = Thomas M. Blakemore
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
8
50%
Agree
6
38%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
16
100%
Strongly Agree
8
50%
Agree
4
25%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
2
13%
16
100%
Strongly Agree
8
50%
Agree
3
19%
Neutral
3
19%
Disagree
2
13%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
16
100%
Strongly Agree
7
44%
Agree
4
25%
Neutral
4
25%
Disagree
1
6%
16
100%
Strongly Agree
7
44%
Agree
6
38%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Disagree
1
6%
16
100%
Strongly Agree
6
38%
Agree
5
31%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
2
13%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Percent
Strongly Agree
15
100%
Strongly Agree
9
56%
Agree
5
31%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
16
100%
Total
a. Section = BLAW-3337-80, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-53- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
9
56%
Agree
4
25%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
2
13%
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
16
100%
Strongly Agree
9
56%
Agree
5
31%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
16
100%
Strongly Agree
9
56%
Agree
6
38%
Total
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Disagree
1
6%
16
100%
Strongly Agree
8
50%
Agree
6
38%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
16
100%
Strongly Agree
7
44%
Agree
5
31%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
2
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
6%
16
100%
Strongly Agree
7
44%
Agree
5
31%
Neutral
3
19%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Total
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
16
100%
Strongly Agree
8
50%
Agree
3
19%
Neutral
4
25%
Disagree
1
6%
16
100%
Strongly Agree
7
44%
Agree
6
38%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
1
6%
16
100%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = BLAW-3337-80, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-54- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
8
50%
Agree
5
31%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
16
100%
Strongly Agree
7
44%
Agree
7
44%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
16
100%
Strongly Agree
8
50%
Agree
5
31%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
16
100%
Strongly Agree
7
44%
Agree
5
31%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
2
13%
16
100%
Strongly Agree
8
50%
Agree
5
31%
Neutral
2
13%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Disagree
1
6%
16
100%
Strongly Agree
9
56%
Agree
5
31%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
16
100%
Strongly Agree
9
56%
Agree
4
25%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
1
6%
16
100%
Strongly Agree
8
50%
Agree
7
44%
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Disagree
Total
1
6%
16
100%
a. Section = BLAW-3337-80, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-55- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
8
50%
Agree
5
31%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
2
13%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
16
100%
Strongly Agree
7
44%
Agree
6
38%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
1
6%
16
100%
Strongly Agree
9
56%
Agree
6
38%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Disagree
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
6%
Total
16
100%
A
10
63%
B
4
25%
C
1
6%
D
1
6%
a. Section = BLAW-3337-80, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-56- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
lol;;;;;
It's always nice to get a
reply to an email,
especially considering
that the expectations
expressed for the subject
line of an email were
followed exactly. It
bothered me that the
professor did not ever
answer my emails very
much, especially
because they were in
regards to the material in
question, which I was
concerned about learning
correctly.
Having to use the CPR
program to grade other
students work was rather
annoying. It doesn't make
sense that we would have
to do assignments that
require us to grade
other's work.
Great online experience
for a course
Gives way too much
work... guess he thinks
he's the only class we are
taking... then I believe the
CPR is worthless since
there is no need for it and
it is not fair grading at all...
we the students grade
our papers which I
believe the professor
should grade them...
CPR. Everything else in
this course went
smoothly. CPR stressed
me out a little but nothing
I couldn't handle. This
was my first online
course so now that I know
how they function I think I
will take a couple of other
courses online in the
future.
Total
Percent
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
10
63%
16
100%
a. Section = BLAW-3337-80, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-57- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = BLAW-3337-81, Instructor Name = Thomas M. Blakemore
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
9
64%
Agree
4
29%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
7
50%
Agree
5
36%
Disagree
1
7%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
2
14%
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
5
36%
Agree
7
50%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
5
36%
Agree
6
43%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Neutral
3
21%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
5
36%
Agree
5
36%
Neutral
2
14%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
4
29%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Total
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Strongly Agree
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
2
14%
14
100%
Total
a. Section = BLAW-3337-81, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-58- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
11
79%
3
21%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
7
50%
Agree
5
36%
Neutral
2
14%
Agree
Total
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
5
36%
Agree
6
43%
Neutral
3
21%
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
6
43%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
4
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
6
43%
Agree
5
36%
Neutral
2
14%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Total
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
6
43%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
5
36%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
6
43%
Agree
4
29%
Neutral
2
14%
Disagree
1
7%
13
100%
Strongly Agree
7
50%
Agree
6
43%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Percent
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
7
50%
Agree
6
43%
Neutral
Total
1
7%
14
100%
a. Section = BLAW-3337-81, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-59- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
6
43%
Agree
7
50%
Disagree
1
7%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
6
43%
Agree
4
29%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Neutral
4
29%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
5
36%
Agree
5
36%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Neutral
4
29%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
7
50%
Agree
5
36%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Neutral
2
14%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
5
36%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Neutral
1
7%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
13
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
4
29%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
10
71%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
5
36%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
14
100%
A
8
57%
B
4
29%
C
2
14%
a. Section = BLAW-3337-81, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-60- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
The grading in CPR is
unfair. It fails you if you
can't answer the
calibrations part exactly
as CPR has scored them.
Students having a say in
what another student's
grade is is also unfair
because there is no
guarantee he or she will
grade objectively. CPR
should be removed from
the course.
The content of the book is
very interesting, but in my
opinion it is very hard to
learn 35 chapters in one
semester. I have
discovered throughout the
CPR writing Project that I
have not retained many of
the information read.
Thanks, Lorina.
Total
Percent
1
7%
1
7%
12
86%
14
100%
a. Section = BLAW-3337-81, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-61- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = BLAW-3337-89, Instructor Name = Thomas M. Blakemore
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
2
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
a. Section = BLAW-3337-89, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-62- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
67%
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
a. Section = BLAW-3337-89, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-63- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
Total
a. Section = BLAW-3337-89, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-64- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = BLAW-6301-87, Instructor Name = Thomas M. Blakemore
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
7
47%
Agree
7
47%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
15
100%
Strongly Agree
8
53%
Agree
6
40%
Neutral
1
7%
15
100%
Strongly Agree
8
53%
Agree
1
7%
Neutral
3
20%
Disagree
3
20%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
15
100%
Strongly Agree
7
47%
Agree
3
20%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
2
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
15
100%
Strongly Agree
5
33%
Agree
6
40%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
2
13%
15
100%
Strongly Agree
5
33%
Agree
6
40%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
3
20%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Strongly Agree
15
100%
Strongly Agree
8
53%
Agree
5
33%
Neutral
2
13%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
3
20%
15
100%
Agree
Total
a. Section = BLAW-6301-87, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-65- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
9
60%
Agree
5
33%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Neutral
1
7%
15
100%
Strongly Agree
7
47%
Agree
7
47%
Total
Disagree
1
7%
15
100%
Strongly Agree
7
47%
Agree
3
20%
Neutral
4
27%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
15
100%
Strongly Agree
5
33%
Agree
6
40%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
1
7%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
15
100%
Strongly Agree
8
53%
Agree
4
27%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
15
100%
Strongly Agree
5
33%
Agree
6
40%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
15
100%
Strongly Agree
7
47%
Agree
4
27%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Strongly Disagree
Total
2
13%
15
100%
a. Section = BLAW-6301-87, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-66- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
9
60%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
1
7%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
15
100%
Strongly Agree
7
47%
Agree
5
33%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
15
100%
Strongly Agree
8
53%
Agree
6
40%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
15
100%
Strongly Agree
4
27%
Agree
3
20%
Neutral
6
40%
Disagree
1
7%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
15
100%
Strongly Agree
5
33%
Agree
4
27%
Neutral
4
27%
Disagree
1
7%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
15
100%
Strongly Agree
7
47%
Agree
4
27%
Neutral
3
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
Agree
4
27%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
15
100%
Strongly Agree
9
60%
Agree
5
33%
Disagree
1
7%
15
100%
Total
a. Section = BLAW-6301-87, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-67- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
9
60%
Agree
4
27%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
15
100%
Strongly Agree
8
53%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
4
27%
Disagree
1
7%
15
100%
Strongly Agree
9
60%
Agree
4
27%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Neutral
2
13%
15
100%
A
8
53%
B
4
27%
D
3
20%
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
a. Section = BLAW-6301-87, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-68- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
The instructor was not
very approachable when
asking questions via
email. He was sarcastic
and it made it difficult to
ask questions.
Possibly would have
been nice to read some
of his thoughts during the
discussion boards.
overall i really enjoyed the
class- however my only
complaint is that the CPR
assignments account for
a significant amount of
our grades. Because of
the subjective nature of
the CPR assignments, I
dont believe that the
overall grade should be
so dependant upon the
two assignments. Also,
because the weekly
quizes take a significant
amount of time each
week, it would be nice for
that amount of work to be
acknowledged and
weighted more.
In the quizes and exams I
encountered a few times
that in the way the
question was presented,
there was more than one
possible answer
according to the text book;
and when one of the
choices given in the text
book was selected the
answer was marked as
wrong.
Percent
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
a. Section = BLAW-6301-87, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-69- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I would like to select B- for
the professor, but that
isn't an option. I felt the
group project was a
complete waste of time. It
did not contribute at all to
the course. More time had
to be spent formatting,
duplicating, and
shoehorning the scenario
into CPR (which is
another waste of time)
than necessary. CPR
contributed nothing to the
course. The calibrations
required no thought (after
reading the first line, I
answered the questions
and was NEVER wrong),
and the review questions
were not relevant. I don't
see how determining
whether all of the required
parts were present
contributes to learning;
plus, how can I know
whether the scenario was
repeated verbatim since I
only saw my own? The
course felt much more
like an undergraduate
course due to the
voluminous exams.
Instead of asking
somewhere around 1000
questions on the various
assessments, why not do
more application of
principles (aside from the
scenario--find something
that contributes to
learning)?
I think that this course
with or with no teacher
will be the same, we
need to learned our way
and have no reason to
pay what we pay for the
class, the system did
everything and in my
experience was not a
good class to take.
Percent
1
7%
1
7%
a. Section = BLAW-6301-87, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-70- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I had to repeat the course
because the expectations
were not clearly stated the
first time. Even the
second time I took the
course the instructor had
to let the entire class redo
an assignment because
it was not how he
expected. He stated that
only 1 person completed
the assignment correctly.
If only one person
completed it correctly
there was definitely a
miscommunication about
what was expected. This
happened at least 3
times while I was
enrolled in the course.
The instructor is very
sarcastic which is not
proper ettiquette,
especially for an online
course where
connotations can be
taken out of context. His
email messages seem
as if he is mocking my
questions and being
rude. The course content
overall was very helpful,
but I disliked this
instructor very much.
Percent
1
a. Section = BLAW-6301-87, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-71- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
7%
Count
Comments
First of all, I am not a big
fan of online courses, but
I have no other choice as I
live overseas and have a
weird schedule. I enjoyed
this class because of the
subject matter and
because there were
deadlines and quizzes etc
that forces each student
to go online at least once
a week to interact with the
materials. So many
Masters level online
courses at "at your own
pace". Which really seem
code for the instructor
does nothing or next to it.
So I liked the fact that the
instructor has chosen the
current format. This is
only my 3rd Master class
but I have taken many
lower level classes online
and honestly this class
seems more like a lower
level class. Maybe it's just
the format. I can't really
explain it. Don't get me
wrong the class was
great, but it seemed to not
reach the higher plane of
learning. The course
doesn't need to be
harder, just brought up a
notch or 2. A more
involved project the spans
course, or analyze cases
frequently to gain a better
understanding of the
courts.
Excellent challenging
class
Total
Percent
1
7%
1
7%
6
40%
15
100%
a. Section = BLAW-6301-87, Instructor Name = Thomas M.
Blakemore
-72- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = BMGT-1301-80, Instructor Name = Magdalena Solis
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
Percent
5
100%
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Disagree
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Total
a. Section = BMGT-1301-80, Instructor Name = Magdalena Solis
-73- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Disagree
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
a. Section = BMGT-1301-80, Instructor Name = Magdalena Solis
-74- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
A
4
80%
C
1
20%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
a. Section = BMGT-1301-80, Instructor Name = Magdalena
Solis
-75- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
She responded right
away to all my emails.
Several times I had
problems with my internet
connection and my
quizzes or tests will lock
and she will contact me
right away. Thank you Ms.
Solis :)
I strongly support the
course as an online
course. I believe it is the
most effective way for this
subject, as the book is
well organized and fully
detailed for learning
everything we need to
know to succeed the
course. Ms. Solis was
very straightforward with
the due dates for all
assignments;although, it
would have helped if the
chapter assignments and
fill in the blank pages
were in the same link.
These assignments were
both on different links and
caused me to miss the fill
in the blanks for chapter
1. Since it was the first
week of the class, I was
not too familiar with how it
worked. Overall I am very
satisfied with the course
and the online method
that was used.The
syllabus was also very
well set up. I wish that
other courses were set
up in a similar way as this
one.
Total
Percent
1
20%
1
20%
3
60%
5
100%
a. Section = BMGT-1301-80, Instructor Name = Magdalena
Solis
-76- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = BMIS-3303-80, Instructor Name = Qinyu Liao
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
73%
Agree
3
20%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
15
100%
Strongly Agree
9
60%
Agree
4
27%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
Agree
4
27%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
15
100%
Strongly Agree
9
60%
Agree
5
33%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
Agree
3
20%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
15
100%
Strongly Agree
9
60%
Agree
5
33%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Disagree
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
11
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
3
20%
Agree
Disagree
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
Agree
2
13%
Disagree
1
7%
15
100%
Total
a. Section = BMIS-3303-80, Instructor Name = Qinyu Liao
-77- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
11
73%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
Agree
4
27%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
1
7%
15
100%
Strongly Agree
9
60%
Agree
3
20%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Total
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
15
100%
Strongly Agree
9
60%
Agree
4
27%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
Agree
3
20%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
15
100%
Strongly Agree
9
60%
Agree
4
27%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Neutral
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
Percent
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
Agree
3
20%
Neutral
1
7%
14
100%
Total
a. Section = BMIS-3303-80, Instructor Name = Qinyu Liao
-78- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
9
60%
Agree
4
27%
Neutral
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
4
27%
Agree
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
53%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
4
27%
Disagree
1
7%
15
100%
Strongly Agree
6
40%
Agree
3
20%
Neutral
5
33%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
Agree
3
20%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
13
87%
2
13%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
Agree
3
20%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
Agree
2
13%
Disagree
2
13%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
Agree
2
13%
Disagree
1
7%
15
100%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Agree
Total
a. Section = BMIS-3303-80, Instructor Name = Qinyu Liao
-79- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
A
11
73%
B
3
20%
D
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
Taking classes online is
not as fulfilling as an inclass student/teacher
relationship.
Perhaps next time you
might try increasing
contact with your
students.
I think that the outline that
the professor uses to
present the assignments
is very useful and
effective.
I had a great experience
in this class. The
organization of the
teacher was outstanding.
Total
a. Section = BMIS-3303-80, Instructor Name = Qinyu Liao
-80- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
11
73%
15
100%
Section = BMIS-3303-81, Instructor Name = Qinyu Liao
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Total
Agree
Total
Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Disagree
Total
Agree
Total
Agree
Total
Agree
Total
a. Section = BMIS-3303-81, Instructor Name = Qinyu Liao
-81- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Neutral
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Agree
1
100%
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Agree
Total
Neutral
Total
Neutral
Total
Total
My comment would be
that there is a project due
and students dont check
their messages. ive been
sending them messages
to get together and the do
project but no one has
replied.
Total
a. Section = BMIS-3303-81, Instructor Name = Qinyu Liao
-82- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = BMIS-3351-80, Instructor Name = Edith A. Galy
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Agree
4
36%
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
3
27%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
5
45%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
64%
11
Total
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Percent
7
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
Total
1
9%
10
100%
a. Section = BMIS-3351-80, Instructor Name = Edith A. Galy
-83- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
8
73%
Agree
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
3
27%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
2
18%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
2
18%
Total
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Disagree
Total
2
18%
11
100%
a. Section = BMIS-3351-80, Instructor Name = Edith A. Galy
-84- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Neutral
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Percent
Strongly Agree
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
Total
1
9%
11
100%
a. Section = BMIS-3351-80, Instructor Name = Edith A. Galy
-85- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
A
9
82%
C
1
9%
D
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
Very well informed
instructor this course was
very beneficial to me and I
would highly recomend it
to anyone. Jose Galvan
the time given for the
quizzes is very little.
Thank You so much for
your attention this
semester.
Info Systems is a course
that I am taking online.
There are pros and cons
to this course. The class
material is both relevant
and presented in an
organized manner to the
student. The only proble I
had was communication
with the professor. I have
sent emails and the
response is very late.
That should be an
improvement on the
professor's behalf.
Total
a. Section = BMIS-3351-80, Instructor Name = Edith A. Galy
-86- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
7
64%
11
100%
Section = CIST-3310-80, Instructor Name = Katherine T. De La Vega
-87- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
4
36%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
2
18%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
4
36%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Strongly Disagree
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
1
9%
Agree
5
45%
Disagree
3
27%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Total
a. Section = CIST-3310-80, Instructor Name = Katherine T. De La
Vega
-88- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
3
27%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
3
27%
Disagree
2
18%
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
3
27%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
Total
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
Strongly Agree
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
11
100%
Total
a. Section = CIST-3310-80, Instructor Name = Katherine T. De La
Vega
-89- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
3
27%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
3
27%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
4
36%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
Total
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
3
27%
Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Percent
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = CIST-3310-80, Instructor Name = Katherine T. De La
Vega
-90- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
3
27%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
3
27%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
3
27%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
6
55%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
11
100%
A
4
36%
B
3
27%
C
1
9%
D
1
9%
F
2
18%
a. Section = CIST-3310-80, Instructor Name = Katherine T. De La
Vega
-91- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Very poor teaching
method for online
students. She assumes
that we are in class and
not online and working
people.
Mrs. De La Vega's
knowledge and expertise
are excellent, however,
being a 100% online
student proved to be a
little challenging in the
course. Due to technology
failures, online students
missed out on a few
lectures. It's very hard to
hear students' questions
in the classroom; so may
be additional mics could
be placed in the back of
the classroom. It's very
hard to read the writings,
but thankfully we can
rewind and watch it again.
I would never recommend
this instructor due to the
fact that there are many
mistakes during lecture
and you do not feel
comfortable contacting
her with any questions or
concerns.
Percent
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
a. Section = CIST-3310-80, Instructor Name = Katherine T.
De La Vega
-92- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I think relevance is
extremely important as
well as using modern
technology. I understand
the fact that by forcing me
to watch the class lecture
it meets attendance
requirements but having
a Discussion board
meets those
requirements as well. If
the instructor could teach
the material properly than
i would not have to watch
the lecture to understand
the work. Instead she
would rather teach me
something off her own
agenda using a pdf file. I
do not feel it is necessary
to fully understand
Algebra to understand
discrete mathematics as
survey course. If this was
a major’s course I would
understand. But if this
was a majors course it
would be thought by a
math teacher. Math
should be taught by math
teachers. I did the algebra
with the help of the AP
math teachers in our
district. The feedback i
received is that I did the
work wrong. It is
interesting to note that our
teachers do not know
how to teach Algebra.
Percent
1
a. Section = CIST-3310-80, Instructor Name = Katherine T.
De La Vega
-93- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
9%
Count
Comments
Extremely disorganized. I
can not express how
disorganized this course
was, and Ms. De La Vega
did absolutely nothing
different to Distance
Learning/Online students
than she did for the
traditional in class
students. I understand
treating us as equal, but I
am not physically in the
room. By not being there, I
can not see the
chalkboard, hear her on
video when the
microphone battery dies
(repeatedly occurred),
miss in class
announcements due to
no video and no online
announcements. Course
is extremely frustrating
and stressful with no
guidance, and not to
mention very little
teaching. She just read
page by page, word by
word from the book. I paid
for this textbook, and I can
read it. You read straight
out of a book in
kindergarten, not college.
"Tegrity" recordings are
easier to manipulate
when viewing than
"Elluminate". There was
still some sound issues,
but I was able to go back
and repeat what was just
said as I was taking
notes.
Total
Percent
1
9%
1
9%
5
45%
11
100%
a. Section = CIST-3310-80, Instructor Name = Katherine T.
De La Vega
-94- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = CIST-3313-80, Instructor Name = Domingo Molina, III
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Disagree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
3
43%
Total
7
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Disagree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Disagree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
2
29%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
a. Section = CIST-3313-80, Instructor Name = Domingo
Molina, III
-95- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Disagree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
a. Section = CIST-3313-80, Instructor Name = Domingo Molina, III
-96- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
3
43%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
a. Section = CIST-3313-80, Instructor Name = Domingo Molina, III
-97- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
A
3
43%
B
3
43%
C
1
14%
1
14%
1
14%
1
14%
4
57%
7
100%
The instructor is honestly
concerned with all of the
students. He makes sure
that everyone
understands everything
covered. Overall, a great
instructor!
I was confused with the
test at times because
some words were
mispelled that confused
me on what kind of
answer he was expecting
of me. When I would
email him about
questions or concerns he
would take a while to
respond.
I thought the instructor
was outstanding,
however I don't like the
"Live Class" It is not
student friendly, go back
to the tegrity software. I
wasn't to fond of the test
and exams, I thought they
were too difficult to
memorize, especially for
someone who is only
going to use maybe 30
percent of that stuff. I think
the lesson plans and
exams are lost in
translation. I would really
appreciate it if the
university would ease up
on on the exams, making
them difficult by confusing
the student and having
them study 100 percent of
the stuff thats
powerpointed isn't the
right way. Especially if the
student studies the wrong
information. In other
words don't make it too
confusing and ease up
on how you create a test.
Total
a. Section = CIST-3313-80, Instructor Name = Domingo Molina, III
-98- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = CIST-3316-80, Instructor Name = Bari M. Siddique
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
33%
Agree
2
33%
Neutral
1
17%
Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
3
50%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Neutral
2
33%
Strongly Disagree
3
50%
Total
6
100%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
3
50%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Neutral
2
33%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Neutral
2
33%
Strongly Disagree
3
50%
Total
6
100%
Neutral
3
50%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
3
50%
Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
a. Section = CIST-3316-80, Instructor Name = Bari M. Siddique
-99- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Neutral
3
50%
Disagree
2
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Disagree
2
33%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Agree
2
33%
Disagree
2
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Disagree
2
33%
Strongly Disagree
3
50%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
3
50%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Disagree
2
33%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
3
50%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
2
33%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
a. Section = CIST-3316-80, Instructor Name = Bari M. Siddique
-100- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Agree
4
67%
Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Agree
2
33%
Neutral
2
33%
Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Neutral
5
83%
Total
6
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Neutral
5
83%
Total
6
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Neutral
2
33%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Agree
3
50%
Neutral
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
2
33%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Neutral
2
33%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
2
33%
Neutral
2
33%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
a. Section = CIST-3316-80, Instructor Name = Bari M. Siddique
-101- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
2
33%
Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
A
1
17%
B
1
17%
D
1
17%
F
3
50%
The professor did not do
a good job of presenting
the material effectively.
The tests were 'made up'
by him and seemed to
cover material that was
not covered thoroughly
enough in class. I
understand the students
'job' of reviewing the
material in the book
before hand..but when the
professor does not
present anything
meaningful and just goes
over powerpoints and
pre-written code from the
book ..the students don't
learn much. I could have
learned the material more
effectively from the
internet. This course, and
courses like it, should
present real world
situations.. and have the
professor create a
solution. Or the class
should be asked as a
whole to come up with a
solution. "What type of
method should I use to
do this..?" "What
predefined variables can I
use here..?", etc. should
be asked to the students
as a whole. I believe
some students are left
behind in the class
because the professor
believes everyone
understands the material.
...The material should be
covered better.
1
17%
a. Section = CIST-3316-80, Instructor Name = Bari M. Siddique
-102- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
The instructor is quite
knowledgeable about the
subject matter, however, it
would have been nice if
he'd had informed online
students when he posted
recorded sessions of his
face-to-face classes, it
would have been nice to
have actual due dates on
the course schedule and
not assigned so many
problems per chapter
each week (especially
when the assignments
were more complicated
than the examples listed
in the textbook, and it
would have been nice to
be allotted more than just
a 1 day/4 hour specified
time period to take tests. I
feel that if the instructor
has time to do so, he
should take the online
courses EDTC 3320
Instructional Design and
EDTC 3321 Web-based
Computer Training there
at UTB to assist him in
becoming a better online
instructor.
The instructor
demonstrated a complete
lack of concern for the
online students. He made
the comment while being
recorded that the online
students were
complaining about him
going too fast and not
covering the material well.
I do not believe this
instructor should be
teaching online classes.
The classroom students
are doing well in the
class. Having said that,
he might do a great job
teaching students that are
present in the classroom.
He went about 60% of the
course with no
communication or
recordings.
Percent
1
17%
1
17%
a. Section = CIST-3316-80, Instructor Name = Bari M.
Siddique
-103- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Mr. Siddique is very hard
to get a hold of. I would email him, call him and
leave messages and
would receive no
response. He is very
unorganized and is no the
best instructor for online
courses. He gives no
feedback. I have asked
him to let me know what I
have done wrong on tests
and he has failed to give
me any response or
feedback on what I can
do. I have been very
disappointed with him
and this course. I would
not recommend him for
any online course. My
friend who took him
before me said the same
thing, he gives no help if
your taking a online
course. I hope you take
these surveys seriously
because we are paying
for these classes. It
would be a shame to
have everything I am
writing ignored. Thank
you.
Total
Percent
1
17%
2
33%
6
100%
a. Section = CIST-3316-80, Instructor Name = Bari M.
Siddique
-104- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = CIST-3342-80, Instructor Name = Domingo Molina, III
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
2
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
50%
Total
4
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
a. Section = CIST-3342-80, Instructor Name = Domingo
Molina, III
-105- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
a. Section = CIST-3342-80, Instructor Name = Domingo
Molina, III
-106- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Total
4
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
2
50%
B
2
50%
Comments
The ability to view
recorded sessions is
great. It really helped me
understand the material I
read better. However,
sometimes there are still
problems with sound
going off and a lot of time
or material is missed.
Great instructor and
class!
1
25%
1
25%
2
50%
4
100%
Total
a. Section = CIST-3342-80, Instructor Name = Domingo Molina, III
-107- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = CIST-4310-80, Instructor Name = Mahmoud K. Quweider
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Disagree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Disagree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
a. Section = CIST-4310-80, Instructor Name = Mahmoud K.
Quweider
-108- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Disagree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Disagree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
a. Section = CIST-4310-80, Instructor Name = Mahmoud K.
Quweider
-109- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
a. Section = CIST-4310-80, Instructor Name = Mahmoud K.
Quweider
-110- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
A
5
71%
C
1
14%
D
1
14%
1
14%
1
14%
1
14%
4
57%
7
100%
This is one of the best
online classes I have
taken. Communication
and response to emails
are top notch. Thanks for
a very positive experience.
This class was very
interesting, even though i
didnt put my full effort to it
due to complications with
work and personal
matters, I got to say that
Mr. Quweider is an
outstanding professor
with the skills to prepare
someone to use those
skills in the real world, he
makes everybody
understand the content of
the book and has great
communication skills.
Good class and good
instructor!
Total
a. Section = CIST-4310-80, Instructor Name = Mahmoud K. Quweider
-111- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = CIST-4330-80, Instructor Name = Jose A. Poveda
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
1
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
25%
a. Section = CIST-4330-80, Instructor Name = Jose A. Poveda
-112- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Neutral
2
50%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Neutral
2
50%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
a. Section = CIST-4330-80, Instructor Name = Jose A. Poveda
-113- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
1
25%
B
3
75%
Comments
My biggest issue with this
course, is Dr. Poveda had
an assignment about
altering pictures, but he
never specified for us to
turn in the original photo
(s) he provided. He took
off points though for not
sending in the original
photos, and similar
instances like this. If he
wants very specific and
detailed work, his
instructions should say
"to include this" and
similar directions. If you
give very, very vague
directions, you get very
simple work.
Explains everything very
well. Great instructor!
1
25%
1
25%
2
50%
4
100%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Total
a. Section = CIST-4330-80, Instructor Name = Jose A. Poveda
-114- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = COSC-1301-80, Instructor Name = Domingo Molina, III
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
1
14%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
3
43%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
1
14%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
1
14%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
4
57%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Agree
4
57%
Neutral
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
4
57%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
a. Section = COSC-1301-80, Instructor Name = Domingo Molina,
III
-115- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
1
14%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
3
43%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
1
14%
Agree
2
29%
Disagree
3
43%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
1
14%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
a. Section = COSC-1301-80, Instructor Name = Domingo Molina,
III
-116- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
1
14%
Agree
5
71%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
1
14%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Agree
5
71%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
2
29%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
1
14%
Agree
4
57%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
a. Section = COSC-1301-80, Instructor Name = Domingo Molina,
III
-117- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
A
1
14%
B
5
71%
F
1
14%
1
14%
1
14%
1
14%
1
14%
The instructor was very
helpful and always
answered my questions
in a timely manner.
the instructor is great and
i am sure the class is
wonderful, but I don't like
not having the instructor
face to face there when i
have a question. I cannot
always communicate
myself well through an email.
N/A
Instructor would take a
long time to reply to an
email about a test
assignment. Tests were
not on the chapters
assigned. Grade hurt me
GPA
a. Section = COSC-1301-80, Instructor Name = Domingo Molina, III
-118- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I was confused as I
entered the course. I also
found it very difficult to sit
through the videolectures, in which it
seemed as if he was
talking about pointless
banter. It is good in a
classroom setting, but
when you are not there it
is just boring. Not
intending to demean, he
knows the course. He
was a knowledgeable
teacher who answered
his cell phone, which was
a great help to me. Most
of his labs where
engaging. The one time I
met him in person, he
was very kind. In the end, I
wouldn't recommend this
class to a friend, but I
would suggest the nononline version.
I am a first time "online"
student and I say this
course I was not totally
satisfied with because at
times I would be able to
hear the instructor
teaching but not see what
he was talking about
because the screen
would be dark. I knew it
was a problem with either
the camera not being on
or with the live classroom
feature. I would not be
able to communicate with
the instructor at that
specific moment because
I would view class when
already recorded. It would
be nice to make this
course available for the
one hour time rather than
three hours.
Total
Percent
1
14%
1
14%
1
14%
7
100%
a. Section = COSC-1301-80, Instructor Name = Domingo
Molina, III
-119- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = COSC-1301-81, Instructor Name = Katherine T. De La Vega
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = COSC-1301-81, Instructor Name = Katherine T.
De La Vega
-120- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
Total
a. Section = COSC-1301-81, Instructor Name = Katherine T.
De La Vega
-121- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = COSC-1336-80, Instructor Name = Jose A. Poveda
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
3
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Neutral
3
60%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Neutral
2
40%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Neutral
2
40%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Disagree
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Disagree
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
a. Section = COSC-1336-80, Instructor Name = Jose A. Poveda
-122- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
60%
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Disagree
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Disagree
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
1
20%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
2
40%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
a. Section = COSC-1336-80, Instructor Name = Jose A. Poveda
-123- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
20%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
2
40%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
A
2
40%
C
2
40%
D
1
20%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
a. Section = COSC-1336-80, Instructor Name = Jose A. Poveda
-124- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Overall, this online class
experience was a real
struggle. There were
multiple times when I
couldn't tell, from the
recorded or live sessions
what was going on. There
were times when the
instructor would forget to
turn either the video or the
audio on.One session,the
instructor went thru over
an hour of lecture before
he realized he had
forgotten about the
people online and hadn't
turned the audio or video
on, at which point he
turned both on, but we
missed out on over an
hour of lecture.There
were multiple times when
the instructor would write
on the classroom
whiteboard (not the online
whiteboard) and not
realize that the people
online couldn't see what
he was writing. We could
here him talking, but we
could not see the part of
the whiteboard he was
writing on.I had to rely very
heavily on the textbook to
try and fill in missing
lectures.That's what got
me thru, not the instructor.
Instructors have to be
better coached on using
their online tools if they
are to teach online
classes.
It can be hard to
understand him. My main
complaint was about the
"tutor" who never returned
emails. I asked her if I
could meet up with here
when I was having
problems and never got
anything back.. it would
also take around 2 weeks
to get homework results
back. But towards the end
of the semester Dr
Poveda took over for her.
Total
Percent
1
20%
1
20%
3
60%
5
100%
a. Section = COSC-1336-80, Instructor Name = Jose A.
Poveda
-125- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = COSC-4343-80, Instructor Name = Hansheng Lei
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Agree
Percent
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Neutral
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Agree
1
50%
Neutral
1
50%
Total
2
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Disagree
1
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Neutral
1
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Neutral
1
50%
Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Agree
1
50%
Neutral
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Agree
1
50%
Neutral
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Agree
1
50%
1
100%
Neutral
1
50%
Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Total
Agree
Total
Total
a. Section = COSC-4343-80, Instructor Name = Hansheng Lei
-126- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Percent
Agree
1
50%
Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Disagree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Disagree
1
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Agree
1
50%
Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Agree
1
50%
Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Agree
1
50%
Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Agree
1
50%
Neutral
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
a. Section = COSC-4343-80, Instructor Name = Hansheng Lei
-127- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Percent
Agree
1
50%
Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
B
1
50%
C
1
50%
Comments
Dr. Lei did his job well.
except I dislike his
grading for tests. Also the
projects assigned were
too much unnecessary
work. The problem was
that in many online
lectures in Tegrity there
was no sound making it
frustrating and worthless.
Maybe he should try
eluminate. I like
eluminate better because
one can participate
remotely.
Could do better on the
tegrity videos, some
technical issues were
never resolved by the
instructor and online
students could not see
what he was writing on
the board this was really
frustrating. Course
projects were a bit hard
and complex.
Total
1
50%
1
50%
2
100%
a. Section = COSC-4343-80, Instructor Name = Hansheng Lei
-128- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = COSC-5343-80, Instructor Name = Hansheng Lei
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Agree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Neutral
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Total
Neutral
Total
Neutral
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Disagree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = COSC-5343-80, Instructor Name = Hansheng Lei
-129- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Neutral
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Agree
Total
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
a. Section = COSC-5343-80, Instructor Name = Hansheng Lei
-130- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Evaluated fairly, I have no
idea. I am completely
unaware as to what the
rest of the class is doing.
There were many
problems with the audio
recordings (microphone
issues mostly), for the
recorded Tegrity classes.
Classes were posted
promptly, so that's good. I
would have liked to see
more feedback online
from the instructor (i.e.
checking email and blogs
more), than he did. I had
to camp outside of his
office a couple of times
when i procrastinated on
assignments. I would like
to see email reminders
on the dates of online
quizzes (or a larger time
window with which to
complete them), I missed
quizzes because of
different reasons, from
emergencies at work, to
serious injury to myself,
and the third from just
plain forgetfulness. The
teacher is extremely
intelligent and
knowledgeable. It is funny
when you ask him a
dumb question and then
he pauses, and then tries
not to blatantly tell you that
you are a moron. It's great
to have a professor that is
smarter than you, and
knows it.
Total
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
a. Section = COSC-5343-80, Instructor Name = Hansheng
Lei
-131- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = COSCU-1301-80, Instructor Name = Domingo Molina, III
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Disagree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Neutral
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Neutral
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Total
Neutral
Total
Neutral
Total
Neutral
Total
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Disagree
Total
a. Section = COSCU-1301-80, Instructor Name = Domingo
Molina, III
-132- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
F
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
a. Section = COSCU-1301-80, Instructor Name = Domingo
Molina, III
-133- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
The instructor for this
course was extremely
unorganized. Most items
such as tests and labs
seem like they were done
at last minute. Would
highly not recommend
this course with this
professor to anyone. Very
upset with the way this
online course was
managed. Again, very very
unorganized.
Total
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
a. Section = COSCU-1301-80, Instructor Name = Domingo
Molina, III
-134- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = COSCU-1336-80, Instructor Name = Katherine T. De La Vega
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Disagree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Neutral
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Total
Strongly Disagree
Total
Neutral
Total
Neutral
Total
Neutral
Total
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Disagree
Total
a. Section = COSCU-1336-80, Instructor Name = Katherine T. De
La Vega
-135- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Neutral
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Neutral
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
D
1
100%
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Disagree
Total
Strongly Disagree
Total
Total
a. Section = COSCU-1336-80, Instructor Name = Katherine T. De
La Vega
-136- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I didn't understand the
instructor, I thought his
style of programing was
strainious, complex, and
didn't make sense to
compact information. I
don't like the "Live Class"
It is not student friendly,
go back to the tegrity
software. I wasn't to fond
of the test and exams, I
thought they were too
difficult to memorize,
especially for someone
who is only going to use
maybe 30 percent of that
stuff. I think the lesson
plans and exams are lost
in translation. I would
really appreciate it if the
university would ease up
on on the exams, making
them difficult by confusing
the student and having
them study 100 percent of
the stuff thats
powerpointed isn't the
right way. Especially if the
student studies the wrong
information. In other
words don't make it too
confusing and ease up
on how you create a test. I
AM NOT STUDYING TO
BE AN ENGINEER, I AM
STUDYING TO BE A WEB
DESIGNER.
Total
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
a. Section = COSCU-1336-80, Instructor Name = Katherine
T. De La Vega
-137- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = CRIJ-1306-81, Instructor Name = Kevin Buckler
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
7
64%
Agree
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Percent
Strongly Agree
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
Total
1
9%
11
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-1306-81, Instructor Name = Kevin Buckler
-138- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
5
45%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Total
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
3
27%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
Total
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Total
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
Total
1
9%
11
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-1306-81, Instructor Name = Kevin Buckler
-139- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
5
45%
Agree
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
4
36%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
3
27%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
4
36%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Percent
Strongly Agree
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Total
a. Section = CRIJ-1306-81, Instructor Name = Kevin Buckler
-140- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
6
55%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Neutral
3
27%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
3
27%
Disagree
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
11
100%
A
4
36%
B
2
18%
C
2
18%
D
2
18%
F
1
9%
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
a. Section = CRIJ-1306-81, Instructor Name = Kevin Buckler
-141- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Totally complicated.
This class was very
challenging for me , I had
to learn time mangement
for this class. I enjoyed
the way of teaching and
how Mr. Buckler
responded to students
when needed. He was
responsive to are
feedback and all
information made class
well prepared to continue
on. I really look foward to
taking more criminal with
Mr. Buckler.
The subject matter of this
course was interesting to
me. The readings from
the textbook were very
informative and the
discussion board
assisted in obtaining
different point views from
other peers, which were
very helpful. What I did not
enjoy from this course
was the length of the
tegrity videos for each
chapter. They were mind
numbing and a great cure
for insomnia. I felt the
information on these
videos could have been
more detailed and
covered in a shorter time
span; not to mention the
two packs of paper that I
used to print the slides. If
I would have known about
these videos I would not
have taken this course
online. I would have
signed up for the lecture
class. Sincerely, Javier
Ibarra
The only issue I may have
had with this course is
that we had to purchase
two extra books that we
have to read. They were
not expensive at all but its
just an extra expenses
that was not called for.
Another issue would be
that in his lectures he
would have to pause a lot
to make a correction on
the slides. Other than that
Dr. Buckler explained
everything very well.
Percent
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
a. Section = CRIJ-1306-81, Instructor Name = Kevin
Buckler
-142- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Please keep Dr. Buckler
at UTB; he gives the
name quality to the
Criminal Justice
Department at UTB.
Sincerely, Judena M.
Garza, 0052975
I was having some
personal situations at
home. I did however wait
until the end of the
semester to bring it up. I
know it is entirely up to
the instructor to let a
student make up work or
give extra credit. This
instructor however didn't
do either. I just felt as if he
didnt want the extra
bother. I would not refer
him to anyone I knew
wanting to take this
course, anyone at all.
Sometimes, it doesn't
hurt to be understanding.
Total
Percent
1
9%
1
9%
5
45%
11
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-1306-81, Instructor Name = Kevin
Buckler
-143- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = CRIJ-3315-81, Instructor Name = Kevin Buckler
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Disagree
1
10%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
8
80%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Disagree
1
10%
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
4
40%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
2
20%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Neutral
Total
1
10%
10
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-3315-81, Instructor Name = Kevin Buckler
-144- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
5
50%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
1
10%
Disagree
1
10%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Percent
Strongly Agree
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Disagree
1
10%
Total
10
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
4
40%
Total
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
4
40%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
10
100%
Strongly Agree
4
40%
Agree
6
60%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
2
20%
10
100%
Total
a. Section = CRIJ-3315-81, Instructor Name = Kevin Buckler
-145- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
4
40%
Agree
4
40%
Neutral
1
10%
Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
8
80%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
Agree
2
20%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
3
30%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
8
80%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
Agree
Total
2
20%
10
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
3
30%
10
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Disagree
1
10%
Total
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
10
100%
A
8
80%
B
1
10%
C
1
10%
a. Section = CRIJ-3315-81, Instructor Name = Kevin Buckler
-146- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
This was a good teacher
he made sure we had
plenty of time to prepare
for all our workn he gave
all the assignments up
front
My only real complaint
was the grading for the
discussion questions.
We received no feedback
as far as why we received
a particual score. In order
to improve, I would have
prefered to know why I
was deducted points on a
particular discussion
question. I realize it would
take a little extra time to
do this but I feel that I
could have used the
guidance. We were just
issued grades without
knowing why points were
deducted, please
consider providing
feedback in future
classes.
Total
Percent
1
10%
1
10%
8
80%
10
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-3315-81, Instructor Name = Kevin
Buckler
-147- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = CRIJ-3331-81, Instructor Name = Deborah J. Hartley
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
2
7%
Total
29
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
27
93%
Agree
Agree
27
93%
2
7%
Total
29
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
28
97%
1
3%
Total
29
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
28
97%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Agree
Agree
1
3%
Total
29
100%
Strongly Agree
28
97%
1
3%
Total
29
100%
Strongly Agree
28
97%
Agree
Agree
1
3%
Total
29
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
28
97%
1
3%
Total
29
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
28
97%
Agree
Agree
1
3%
Total
29
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
28
97%
1
3%
Total
29
100%
Strongly Agree
28
97%
1
3%
Total
29
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
25
86%
3
10%
Agree
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Total
1
3%
29
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-3331-81, Instructor Name = Deborah J.
Hartley
-148- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Strongly Agree
27
93%
1
3%
Total
28
100%
Strongly Agree
27
93%
Agree
Agree
1
3%
Total
28
100%
Strongly Agree
28
97%
1
3%
Total
29
100%
Strongly Agree
28
97%
Agree
Agree
1
3%
Total
29
100%
Strongly Agree
27
93%
1
3%
Total
28
100%
Strongly Agree
26
90%
Agree
Agree
2
7%
Total
28
100%
Strongly Agree
26
90%
1
3%
Agree
Neutral
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Percent
1
3%
Total
28
100%
Strongly Agree
19
66%
3
10%
Agree
Neutral
6
21%
Total
28
100%
Strongly Agree
21
72%
1
3%
Agree
Neutral
5
17%
Total
27
100%
Strongly Agree
26
90%
Agree
2
7%
Total
28
100%
Strongly Agree
27
93%
2
7%
29
100%
Agree
Total
a. Section = CRIJ-3331-81, Instructor Name = Deborah J.
Hartley
-149- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
Percent
27
93%
1
3%
Total
28
100%
Strongly Agree
25
86%
Agree
Agree
2
7%
Total
27
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
28
97%
1
3%
Total
29
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
28
97%
Agree
Agree
1
3%
Total
29
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
28
97%
B
1
3%
Comments
This was one of the best
online classes I have
taken. The instructor took
the time to comment on
every assignment and
give input. She also
commented on every
discussion question and
gave encouraging
remarks. Very positive
atmosphere. I highly
recommend this class, if
taught by the instructor.
Thank you for a really nice
semester.
This was a great course
with a great instructor,
she was wonderful! The
only problem I had was
with UTB and Firefox.
UTB's inline website
does not seem to like
Firefox, although that is
what we were asked to
use.
THis semester i had
learned new skils with a
game that our instructor
assigned. I enjoy this
game becasue i learned
new skills. Great job to
my instructor.
She's a wonderful teacher
I have enjoy this class
and the past class I've
token with her.
1
3%
1
3%
1
3%
1
3%
a. Section = CRIJ-3331-81, Instructor Name = Deborah J. Hartley
-150- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Miss Hartley is a great
instrutor with lots of
knowledge and makes
the classes very
interesting. I can assure
you will learn something
from her classes as well.
I wouldn't change her for
the world! Thanks Miss H.
you are the best!!!
I was hesitant about
taking an online course,
but this turned out to be a
great experience! Dr.
Hartley explains material
well and always made
herself accessible.
I thoroughly enjoyed this
class. I gained a wealth of
knowledge. The class
was not only informative
but fun. I believe the
content I learned in this
class will help me in my
future career as a
criminal justice
professional. The
instructor was wonderful
and right on top of things.
It was my pleasure to be
in her course.
I really like my class
online. I think the teacher
did an awesome job.
I liked Professor Deborah
too much. She was very
nice and professional.
Dr. Hartley, she is an
awesome instructor and
her way of teaching an
online class is excellent.
Dr. Hartley is an
awesome lady and Great
teacher.
Dr. Hartley is a wonderful
instructor, I've taken two
classes with her now and
i enjoy her teaching
methods. I would highly
recommend other
students to enroll in her
classes . Great Job
again, Dr. Hartley. Take
care and I wish you the
very best in your
professional endeavors.
Happy Holidays !!!
Percent
1
3%
1
3%
1
3%
1
3%
1
3%
1
3%
1
3%
1
3%
a. Section = CRIJ-3331-81, Instructor Name = Deborah J.
Hartley
-151- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Dr. Hartley is a well
knowledge professor;
she was always prepared
and well organized. All
her materials were well
written and well
explained. I very much
enjoyed having her online class.
Dr. Hartley is a very good
professor. Good Job!!!
Dr. Hartley is a great
instructor. She tells us
what is expected ahead of
time and we get it done.
She knows the material
really well and that helps
us understand the
material better.
Total
Percent
1
3%
1
3%
1
3%
14
48%
29
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-3331-81, Instructor Name = Deborah J.
Hartley
-152- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = CRIJ-4312-81, Instructor Name = Steve T. Wilson
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Total
Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
4
36%
Total
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
2
18%
10
100%
6
55%
Total
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
Agree
5
45%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
2
18%
11
100%
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
64%
Strongly Agree
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
7
36%
Disagree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
27%
100%
100%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
3
11
4
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
73%
11
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Percent
8
Total
a. Section = CRIJ-4312-81, Instructor Name = Steve T. Wilson
-153- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
6
55%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
2
18%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
3
27%
Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
5
45%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Total
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
5
45%
Total
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
2
18%
Disagree
3
27%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Neutral
3
27%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
5
45%
Total
Neutral
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
Agree
Total
2
18%
11
100%
7
64%
4
36%
11
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-4312-81, Instructor Name = Steve T. Wilson
-154- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
3
27%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
4
36%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
5
45%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Strongly Agree
Agree
6
55%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
5
45%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
6
55%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Agree
5
45%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
4
36%
Total
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
A
8
73%
B
2
18%
C
1
9%
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
a. Section = CRIJ-4312-81, Instructor Name = Steve T. Wilson
-155- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
This instructor is a little
hard on grading than
others. However he does
provide all the course
material online and
explanations.
The instructor for this
course was fair,
organized and
knowledgable. The low
rankings I gave in this
survey have nothing to do
with the instructor but
more to do with the
communication that I
have had with UTB in
general. As an online
student, I have never had
so much trouble trying to
register for classes as I
have at UTB. For both Fall
2010 and Spring 2011
registration, it was a
nightmare. To make
matters even worse was
that I could get no one
from the Office of
Admissions or the
Registrar's Office to return
a call or email. Thank
God for Dr. Kevin Buckler.
Im not satisfied due to the
reason that I was not able
to do an assignment on
time due to personal
problems. And I emailed
the insturctor to submit
just maybe a couple of
hours late but, he never
responded to me either
yes or no.
I enjoyed the course and
the Professor was very
professional and always
will to work with you. Job
Well Done. Respectfully
SgtMaj. Pereida
Total
Percent
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
7
64%
11
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-4312-81, Instructor Name = Steve T.
Wilson
-156- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = CRIJ-4313-81, Instructor Name = Benjamin T. Brown
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
3
21%
Total
14
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
11
79%
Agree
Agree
11
79%
3
21%
Total
14
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
11
79%
3
21%
Total
14
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
12
86%
Agree
1
7%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
11
79%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Agree
Agree
3
21%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
11
79%
3
21%
Total
14
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
12
86%
2
14%
Total
14
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
12
86%
2
14%
Total
14
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
10
71%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
4
29%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
10
71%
4
29%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
10
71%
Agree
2
14%
Neutral
2
14%
14
100%
Agree
Total
a. Section = CRIJ-4313-81, Instructor Name = Benjamin T.
Brown
-157- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
12
86%
2
14%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
10
71%
Agree
Agree
4
29%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
10
71%
4
29%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
11
79%
Agree
2
14%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
11
79%
3
21%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
12
86%
1
7%
Agree
Agree
Agree
Neutral
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
12
86%
2
14%
Agree
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
5
36%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
4
29%
Neutral
2
14%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Percent
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
2
14%
Neutral
Total
1
7%
12
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-4313-81, Instructor Name = Benjamin T.
Brown
-158- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
11
79%
2
14%
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
11
79%
3
21%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
11
79%
Agree
Agree
3
21%
Total
14
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
11
79%
2
14%
Total
13
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
11
79%
Agree
Agree
3
21%
Total
14
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
11
79%
B
3
21%
Comments
I had absolutely no
problems with the way
this class was presented.
It was easy to follow and
the work was interesting
and challenging The
positive feedback from
the instructor also helped.
good class, learned alot
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
11
79%
14
100%
Best Instructor, answer all
questions on time, kept
us inform, instructions
were clear. He made the
class enjoyable. good job
proffesor.
Total
a. Section = CRIJ-4313-81, Instructor Name = Benjamin T. Brown
-159- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = CRIJ-4341-81, Instructor Name = Deborah J. Hartley
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
1
6%
Total
17
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
15
88%
Agree
Agree
16
94%
1
6%
Total
16
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
16
94%
1
6%
Total
17
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
16
94%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Agree
Agree
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
15
88%
1
6%
Agree
Neutral
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
16
94%
1
6%
Total
17
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
16
94%
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
16
94%
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
16
94%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
16
94%
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
14
82%
Agree
Agree
Total
2
12%
16
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-4341-81, Instructor Name = Deborah J.
Hartley
-160- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Strongly Agree
Percent
16
94%
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
16
94%
Agree
Agree
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
16
94%
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
16
94%
Agree
Agree
1
6%
Total
17
100%
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
16
94%
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
17
100%
Total
17
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
17
100%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
15
88%
2
12%
Total
17
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
15
88%
2
12%
Total
17
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
16
94%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
16
94%
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
16
94%
Agree
Agree
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
16
94%
1
6%
17
100%
Agree
Total
a. Section = CRIJ-4341-81, Instructor Name = Deborah J.
Hartley
-161- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
16
94%
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
16
94%
Agree
Agree
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
A
very understanding, and
cares for her students.
The instructor took made
extra effort to email us
about important
deadlines and updates.
This is the first time any
instructor has done this
for all the courses I've
taken, up to now. I gave
her an overall A because
she showed empathy and
made it clear she enjoys
her job by making the
effort to contact us and
work with us on projects. I
hope I can take another
class with her in the
future - it was a real joy to
have her as my instructor.
The institution would
benefit if it could attract
other instructors like her. I
hope she goes far in her
career with you all.
I thouroughly enjoyed this
class. I think the content
was extremly useful in my
future success as a
criminal justice
professional. The (SHQ)
and the (PSI) were fun
and very informative. The
instructor is always there
when you need her
whether to answer a
question, clear
something up, or
responding back to an email. The instructor was
wonderful at giving
feedback on
assignments and graded
assignments very
promptly. It was a
pleasure being in this
course for the content as
well as the instructor.
1
6%
17
100%
17
100%
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
a. Section = CRIJ-4341-81, Instructor Name = Deborah J. Hartley
-162- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I really liked my class
online. The teacher did an
awesome job.
I really enjoyed this
course this semester.
Professor Hartley
responds to emails in a
timely manner. There
were no issues with the
course or any of its
materials during this
semester.
I didn't like the textbook. It
was a little hard to follow.
I cannot say enough
positive things about this
course or this instructor. I
was really nervous at first
because I have no law
enforcement experience
and I was worried that I
would not be able to do
well in this course but that
was not the case at
because Dr. Hartley
made me personally feel
like I could handle the
course. I have done well
because I followed the
syllabus, read the
required textbook and did
everything that was asked
and though I am not an
expert, I feel like I did
learn a lot from this
course. I wish I could be
enrolled in Dr. Hartley's
class on campus
because even though it
was a very challenging
course it would be great
to meet all of these
wonderful professors in
person and thank them
for making these classes
so great for someone like
me who is an online
student. Thank you very
much, Diana Cowley
Total
Percent
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
10
59%
17
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-4341-81, Instructor Name = Deborah J.
Hartley
-163- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = CRIJ-4363-81, Instructor Name = Susan E. Ritter
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
1
8%
Total
12
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
10
83%
Agree
Agree
11
92%
2
17%
Total
12
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
11
92%
1
8%
12
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
8
67%
Agree
3
25%
Neutral
1
8%
12
100%
8
67%
Agree
Total
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
Agree
4
33%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
9
75%
Agree
2
17%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Disagree
1
8%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
8
67%
Agree
2
17%
Neutral
1
8%
Disagree
1
8%
Total
12
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
12
100%
Total
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
Agree
1
8%
Neutral
2
17%
12
100%
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
9
75%
Agree
2
17%
Neutral
1
8%
12
100%
9
75%
Total
Total
a. Section = CRIJ-4363-81, Instructor Name = Susan E. Ritter
-164- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Percent
Strongly Agree
7
58%
Agree
3
25%
Neutral
1
8%
Disagree
1
8%
Total
12
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
7
58%
Agree
4
33%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Disagree
1
8%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
9
75%
Agree
2
17%
Total
Strongly Disagree
1
8%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
8
67%
Agree
2
17%
Neutral
1
8%
Disagree
1
8%
Total
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
8
67%
Agree
1
8%
Neutral
2
17%
Disagree
1
8%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
8
67%
Agree
3
25%
Disagree
1
8%
Total
12
100%
Strongly Agree
7
58%
Agree
4
33%
Disagree
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
1
8%
Total
12
100%
Strongly Agree
11
92%
1
8%
Agree
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
9
75%
Agree
2
17%
Neutral
1
8%
12
100%
Total
a. Section = CRIJ-4363-81, Instructor Name = Susan E. Ritter
-165- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
9
75%
Agree
2
17%
Neutral
1
8%
Total
12
100%
Strongly Agree
10
83%
2
17%
Total
12
100%
Strongly Agree
11
92%
Agree
Agree
1
8%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
9
75%
Agree
2
17%
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Disagree
1
8%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
9
75%
Agree
1
8%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Neutral
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
1
8%
Total
11
100%
Strongly Agree
10
83%
Agree
1
8%
Neutral
1
8%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
7
58%
Agree
4
33%
Neutral
1
8%
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
12
100%
A
8
67%
B
3
25%
C
1
8%
a. Section = CRIJ-4363-81, Instructor Name = Susan E. Ritter
-166- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I liked this class alot
everything was laid out for
the semester good
teacher!
Good class. Email
response was a little
slow at times and I felt
one assignment was
graded unfairly. I wish the
project had a little more
instruction provided with it
to clear up confusion.
Other than that good
teacher!
Excellent course, I
enjoyed it thoroughly.
Total
Percent
1
8%
1
8%
1
8%
9
75%
12
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-4363-81, Instructor Name = Susan E.
Ritter
-167- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = CRIJ-4370-81, Instructor Name = Noel Otu
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
1
9%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
3
27%
Disagree
3
27%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
3
27%
Disagree
2
18%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
2
18%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
4
36%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
3
27%
Disagree
3
27%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Percent
Strongly Agree
10
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
3
27%
Strongly Disagree
Total
1
9%
11
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-4370-81, Instructor Name = Noel Otu
-168- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
2
18%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
4
36%
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
3
27%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
3
27%
Disagree
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
2
18%
Total
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Total
2
18%
11
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-4370-81, Instructor Name = Noel Otu
-169- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
3
27%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
3
27%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
3
27%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
Total
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
3
27%
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
5
45%
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
2
18%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Percent
Strongly Agree
Neutral
Total
4
36%
10
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-4370-81, Instructor Name = Noel Otu
-170- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
4
36%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
2
18%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
3
27%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
1
9%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
3
27%
Disagree
3
27%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
3
27%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
4
36%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
11
100%
A
1
9%
B
5
45%
C
1
9%
D
2
18%
F
2
18%
a. Section = CRIJ-4370-81, Instructor Name = Noel Otu
-171- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
To many places to look
for assignments: Outline,
Syllabus, Assignments,
etc. Instructions for
assignments were vague
Outline and Syllabus at
one time was from last
semester. Grades were
not inputed in a timely
fashion. I don't believe I
gained anything from this
course. The text books
and assignments were
very biased and too
liberal for my taste. I felt
the textbook was old,
outdated, and not
anything I could learn
from. I am glad this was
on online course and not
a course I would have to
attend on a twice or three
time basis per week.
The instructor for class
4370 from day one he
was not prepared,
assignments due dates
were from a different
semester, we had to
guess when an
assignment was do, until
the class bombarded him
with emails. Even though
he had good examples in
how he wanted the
assignments to be turn
over; the examples did
not match what the
syllabus mentioned, so it
was hard to guess what
format he wanted the
assignments to be turn
over, like the syllabus or
like the samples. He had
3 non graded
assignments (practice
assignments) which we
never return any feed
back until the actual
graded assignments
were do, that is when we
found out if we did them
correctly or not. Super
Slow turning over grades.
Overall I did good in this
class, but it was do to
constant communication
with other classmates.
Further more just to show
his lack of preparation,
we got tested more than
once in the same chapter.
Percent
1
9%
1
9%
a. Section = CRIJ-4370-81, Instructor Name = Noel Otu
-172- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I believe it is alot harder to
take a course with Dr. Otu
online than it is in the
classroom. I would not
recommend this class to
be taken online.
I am a senior and am
graduating in December.
Over the course of my
college career, I have
taken approximately 90%
of my classes online. Of
all the online classes I
have taken, this is the
ONLY one that I was not
able to understand and
follow adequately. I have
never had an instructor
that did not seem to know
what he was doing until
this class. I'm taking 18
hours this semester and
have a solid A in all
classes and severely
struggled in this one.
Over the course of the
semester, I spoke with
several other students in
this class and feel that I'm
not near the only one who
had difficulties following
the syllabus,
understanding the
expectations of the
instructor, or did not have
my questions and
concerns addressed
appropriately. I strongly
recommend a different
instructor for online
learning in the future.
Total
Percent
1
9%
1
9%
7
64%
11
100%
a. Section = CRIJ-4370-81, Instructor Name = Noel Otu
-173- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDCI-6300-62, Instructor Name = Roman Garcia de Alba
-174- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Percent
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
3
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
1
11%
Strongly Disagree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
a. Section = EDCI-6300-62, Instructor Name = Roman Garcia de
Alba
-175- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Percent
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
1
11%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
8
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
8
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
9
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
a. Section = EDCI-6300-62, Instructor Name = Roman Garcia de
Alba
-176- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
A
8
89%
F
1
11%
a. Section = EDCI-6300-62, Instructor Name = Roman Garcia de
Alba
-177- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I really enjoyed ths cousre
online it help me to better
my writting and thinking.
With all the information
that was giving to me I
could have not done it
without the information
that he post on course
doc. I would recommend
this course to my fellow
peers. Thank you, Dr.
Roman Garcia de Alba
Thank you MM
Great class... Full of great
content and overall a
great experience....
By week 5 of the course,
we still had no grades. I
have a screenshot of the
gradebook during week 5,
showing that even though
we completed an
assignment EVERY
WEEK, we were getting
no feedback/grades. At no
time did I ever get a
response on why I
received a a certain
grade. The only feedback
I got during the whole
semester was the
literature review. This
professor did not answer
emails promptly, as it
would take 2 days
sometimes for a
response, & if the
assignment was due
during that time, then it
was no help. There was
no online interaction at
all, all work was posted
and then we submitted
via discussion board. I
have never felt so
disconnected and
disillusioned with a
course. I felt this was a
waste of my time, as I
learned nothing at all. It
would have been nice to
have a conversation with
the instructor, or at least
be told in the beginning
that this course was not
interactive at all. Worse
course I have had yet and
I am almost done.
Total
Percent
1
11%
1
11%
1
11%
6
67%
9
100%
a. Section = EDCI-6300-62, Instructor Name = Roman
Garcia de Alba
-178- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDTC-3310-60, Instructor Name = Juan Chavez, Jr.
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
3
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
60%
Total
5
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
a. Section = EDTC-3310-60, Instructor Name = Juan Chavez,
Jr.
-179- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
a. Section = EDTC-3310-60, Instructor Name = Juan Chavez, Jr.
-180- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
A
3
60%
B
1
20%
C
1
20%
1
20%
1
20%
I really enjoy this class
and found it very
interesting. I feel better
prepared and more
knowledgeable of this
field. I am looking
foreword to having
classes with Dr. Chavez
again.
Course expectations
were clearly stated. Well
organized.
Total
3
60%
5
100%
a. Section = EDTC-3310-60, Instructor Name = Juan Chavez, Jr.
-181- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDTC-3320-60, Instructor Name = Matthew B. Crosslin
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
4
50%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
2
25%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
1
13%
Agree
5
63%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
4
50%
Disagree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
4
50%
Neutral
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
4
50%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
4
50%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
a. Section = EDTC-3320-60, Instructor Name = Matthew B.
Crosslin
-182- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
4
50%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
4
50%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
4
50%
Disagree
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Total
8
100%
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
4
50%
Disagree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Disagree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Strongly Disagree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Disagree
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Disagree
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
a. Section = EDTC-3320-60, Instructor Name = Matthew B.
Crosslin
-183- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Disagree
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
4
50%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
4
50%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
a. Section = EDTC-3320-60, Instructor Name = Matthew B.
Crosslin
-184- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
4
50%
Disagree
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
A
5
63%
B
1
13%
C
1
13%
F
1
13%
1
13%
1
13%
Wouldn't recommend this
course to anyone. He was
not helpful and he never
graded my projects fairly.
He made the projects very
confusing to understand. I
tried reasoning and
asking why he would give
me low grades on
projects and never got a
clear answer. I did exactly
what was on the agenda
and for project 1, I got a B
and project 2 & 3
were C's. I still can't
believe I have a B average
where I know perfectly it
should be an "A".
Very interesting class that
allows us to learn how to
design courses and
instructional material. The
professor has vast
knowledge about
designing and creating
effective instructional
material.
a. Section = EDTC-3320-60, Instructor Name = Matthew B. Crosslin
-185- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
it semed kind of hard
sometimes i would ask
for assistance or ask a
questions and no
respond back. especially
when i let him know that i
needed time and that i
had started the course a
little late due to financial
reasons of not getting the
software. i think that he
needs to be able to
respond back even if its a
yes , no, okay, or
something so that we at
least know that he did get
the email, because
without an answer its
hard to know if he even
got the email. i think that
all of these course should
be in class, not online, for
a bettere one to one help.
I would like to
recommend that projects
1 and 2 be building
blocks to the instructional
design for project 3.
Although doing research
on ADDIE and
Instructional Theories
were enlightening, I just
feel that projects 1 and 2
could have been geared
more creating an
instructional design that
would be built upon more
with each project. Overall,
this is a wonderful class.
Very well-structured and I
will have definitely
improved my skills, my
knowledge, and my
attitudes.
Total
Percent
1
13%
1
13%
4
50%
8
100%
a. Section = EDTC-3320-60, Instructor Name = Matthew B.
Crosslin
-186- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDTC-3321-60, Instructor Name = Mary Ann A. Flores
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Percent
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
a. Section = EDTC-3321-60, Instructor Name = Mary Ann A.
Flores
-187- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
a. Section = EDTC-3321-60, Instructor Name = Mary Ann A.
Flores
-188- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
A
7
88%
B
1
13%
a. Section = EDTC-3321-60, Instructor Name = Mary Ann A.
Flores
-189- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Way to many emails, with
alot of info. Sometime I
wold overlook important
info because there was
so much of it.
Profesor is excellent and
this course has taught
me how to utilize
technology to my
advantage. It showed me
how to create tutorials
and training material with
the use of a computer
and internet.
Due to a great
depression that led me to
medication my professor
did an excellent job in
helping several students
through the luminate
program. Luminate
helped me alot to focus in
my class especially the
details of some of the
projects that were
required. Thank you.
Total
Percent
1
13%
1
13%
1
13%
5
63%
8
100%
a. Section = EDTC-3321-60, Instructor Name = Mary Ann A.
Flores
-190- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDTC-3323-60, Instructor Name = Martin Rodriguez
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
4
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Total
4
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
a. Section = EDTC-3323-60, Instructor Name = Martin
Rodriguez
-191- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
80%
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Total
4
100%
a. Section = EDTC-3323-60, Instructor Name = Martin
Rodriguez
-192- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
4
80%
B
1
20%
Comments
I was well pleased with
the online class. mr.
Rodriguez did a good job
with the class. He help
me understand the
assigments when it was
difficut at times. I
Recommend his class to
other students. thanks for
being a good teacher.
I really enjoy this class
and found it very
interesting. I feel better
prepared and more
knowledgeable of this
field. Unfortunately he
only teaches this one
class, I would have loved
to have him as an
instructor for another
EDTC class. Thank you
Mr. Rodriguez I really
enjoyed your class.
1
20%
1
20%
3
60%
5
100%
Total
a. Section = EDTC-3323-60, Instructor Name = Martin Rodriguez
-193- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDTC-3332-60, Instructor Name = Joseph R. Corbeil
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
5
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
6
100%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
6
100%
Total
6
100%
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
6
100%
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
6
100%
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
a. Section = EDTC-3332-60, Instructor Name = Joseph R.
Corbeil
-194- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
83%
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
Percent
6
100%
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
6
100%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Total
a. Section = EDTC-3332-60, Instructor Name = Joseph R.
Corbeil
-195- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
6
100%
1
17%
1
17%
1
17%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
The Instructor respondent
with positive discussions
and motivation to the
students. He also
mentioned ideas that he
has planned for future
classes. He is a well
prepared instructor.
Outstanding instructor.
I enjoyed being in Dr.
Corbiel class. He has
help me with my project
and help me grown as a
better student. I would like
to thanks you for helping
me make it and
Encouraged to want to go
inter the master program.
thank you God Bless you.
Total
3
50%
6
100%
a. Section = EDTC-3332-60, Instructor Name = Joseph R. Corbeil
-196- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDTC-6320-80, Instructor Name = Janice W. Butler
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
Percent
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
a. Section = EDTC-6320-80, Instructor Name = Janice W.
Butler
-197- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
3
75%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = EDTC-6320-80, Instructor Name = Janice W.
Butler
-198- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
1
25%
1
25%
1
25%
A
We covered quite a bit in
the way of instruction
during Elluminate, but I'd
suggest having more
details in writing about
the big picture....how it all
comes together.
Expectations seemed
unclear to me at times
and I attended all
meetings and read all
course material....this
could just be due to the
course and collaborative
proj undergoing some
changes. Overall,
thoroughly enjoyed the
course and appreciated
the feedback and flexibility
you provided. Thanks!
This was my first
semester with online
courses. I learned alot
and Dr. Butler was always
available and patient with
me being that this was
my first online technology
course. I wiill continue to
take courses with her and
will recommend this
course with other
classmates.
I have always enjoyed Dr.
Butler and her classes.
Excellent
Total
a. Section = EDTC-6320-80, Instructor Name = Janice W. Butler
-199- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
1
25%
4
100%
Section = EDTC-6321-80, Instructor Name = Joseph R. Corbeil
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Total
8
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
a. Section = EDTC-6321-80, Instructor Name = Joseph R. Corbeil
-200- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Percent
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
3
33%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Total
8
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
a. Section = EDTC-6321-80, Instructor Name = Joseph R.
Corbeil
-201- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Percent
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
1
11%
A
7
78%
B
1
11%
This course was one of
my first two at the
institution. I can only hope
that this level of
interaction and instruction
will be the norm.
1
11%
a. Section = EDTC-6321-80, Instructor Name = Joseph R. Corbeil
-202- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
My issue with this course
was that there were not
enough examples for
students to completely
grasp the content. During
the entire course, I felt
that I was constantly trying
to decipher what it was I
was supposed to be
doing. I think that terms
used are vague and it
makes it hard to translate
into what I need to create
within my project. I felt like
the workload was too
much and confusing
because we had
individual project
assignment being
worked on at the same
time as the cooperative
project. Many times my
teammates and I
commented that it was
hard to keep the two
straight, and made it
harder to understand
what information applied
to what project. The
individual project seemed
to too long, as many
times I forgot what my
goals were, etc because
it was broken down into
so many parts, that
contained even more
parts. Sometimes
keeping things global is
better if there is a large
product being created.
Fragmentation can cause
one to lose sight of the
end result. This course
was an example.
Great instructor.
Excellent course. It is
obvious the instructor has
continually refined the
material, project
assignments and
activities as they are
outstanding. Well
organized and
challenging. Wonderful
instructor!!
Percent
1
11%
1
11%
1
11%
a. Section = EDTC-6321-80, Instructor Name = Joseph R.
Corbeil
-203- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Dr. Corbeil is a wonderful
and caring instructor who
really does care for the
well being of his students'
academic success. I
would have him as my
instructor for the entire
degree plan. Thank you
Dr. Corbeil!!
Total
Percent
1
11%
4
44%
9
100%
a. Section = EDTC-6321-80, Instructor Name = Joseph R.
Corbeil
-204- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDTC-6323-80, Instructor Name = Cheng Chang Pan
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
4
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
2
33%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
67%
a. Section = EDTC-6323-80, Instructor Name = Cheng Chang
Pan
-205- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
5
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
a. Section = EDTC-6323-80, Instructor Name = Cheng Chang
Pan
-206- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
5
83%
C
1
17%
Comments
I loved this course. It will
definitely help prepare me
for my future career.
Awesome instructor.
I believe the project in this
class needs to be shrunk
in scope in order to allow
students to concentrate
on the most important
parts. At this point the
project expectations
seem to be too much for
the amount of time in the
semester.
great class.
1
17%
1
17%
1
17%
Total
3
50%
6
100%
a. Section = EDTC-6323-80, Instructor Name = Cheng Chang Pan
-207- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDTC-6325-80, Instructor Name = Joseph R. Corbeil
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
5
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
a. Section = EDTC-6325-80, Instructor Name = Joseph R.
Corbeil
-208- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
71%
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
3
43%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
a. Section = EDTC-6325-80, Instructor Name = Joseph R.
Corbeil
-209- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Total
6
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Total
6
100%
7
100%
1
14%
1
14%
1
14%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
lots of information and
great class.
I especially enjoyed
working in Second Life.
Excellent instructor and
course. Well organized
and obviously refined over
time as there are little to
no apparent
weaknesses. Instructor is
enthusiastic and fair.
Wonderful!
Total
4
57%
7
100%
a. Section = EDTC-6325-80, Instructor Name = Joseph R. Corbeil
-210- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDTC-6329-80, Instructor Name = Janice W. Butler
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
5
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
6
100%
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
6
100%
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
6
100%
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Strongly Agree
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
a. Section = EDTC-6329-80, Instructor Name = Janice W.
Butler
-211- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
83%
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
Percent
6
100%
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
6
100%
Total
6
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
6
100%
Total
6
100%
6
100%
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = EDTC-6329-80, Instructor Name = Janice W.
Butler
-212- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
6
100%
1
17%
A
Excellent transfer of
knowledge. Loved the
course.
Total
a. Section = EDTC-6329-80, Instructor Name = Janice W. Butler
-213- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
5
83%
6
100%
Section = EDTC-6332-80, Instructor Name = Cheng Chang Pan
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
2
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
40%
a. Section = EDTC-6332-80, Instructor Name = Cheng Chang Pan
-214- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
a. Section = EDTC-6332-80, Instructor Name = Cheng Chang
Pan
-215- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
5
100%
1
20%
1
20%
1
20%
2
40%
5
100%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
This was another
excellent course from the
Educational Technology
department!
initial instructions for
project selection need
more clarification
assignments need
clarification - use more
models, examples
Great class!
Total
a. Section = EDTC-6332-80, Instructor Name = Cheng Chang Pan
-216- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDTC-6340-80, Instructor Name = Michael J. Sullivan
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
2
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
50%
Total
4
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
a. Section = EDTC-6340-80, Instructor Name = Michael J.
Sullivan
-217- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
a. Section = EDTC-6340-80, Instructor Name = Michael J.
Sullivan
-218- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
3
75%
B
1
25%
Comments
Dr. Sullivan provided
exceptional examples of
real-world applications of
what we were learning in
class. His sharing of his
real-world experiences
was done with clear
purpose and relevance to
our course. Dr. Sullivan
also challenged us to
always be wary and
skeptical of things that
appeared to be "too good
to be true." His challenge
involved not only things
but ideas and procedures
as well. He encouraged
us to look for what was in
the best interest of our
students as well as what
was best for their longterm learning. He has
really assisted me in
keeping things in
perspective.
1
25%
3
75%
4
100%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Total
a. Section = EDTC-6340-80, Instructor Name = Michael J. Sullivan
-219- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDTC-6341-80, Instructor Name = Janice W. Butler
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Agree
Percent
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Total
Total
4
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
a. Section = EDTC-6341-80, Instructor Name = Janice W.
Butler
-220- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Total
3
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Total
3
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = EDTC-6341-80, Instructor Name = Janice W.
Butler
-221- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
3
75%
B
1
25%
Comments
This class combined with
6329 was a grand
experiment and I think we
all had a good time
exploring how to enhance
lessons.
Dr. Butler is an excellent
instructor and course
facilitator. I think it was the
facilitation part that threw
me a curve. I really had
difficulty in keeping
contact with my group
early on. It took several
sessions to get the kinks
worked out, and I am still
not sure I got all that I
could from the first
section of the course. The
second section provided
better communication
with my group, but the
gaming aspect has been
difficult for me to grasp.
Being older (57) and with
35 years of experience in
various aspects of school
district operations and
classroom teaching, I
think I may be getting a bit
to old and set in my ways.
I do not like to admit it, but
I may be getting too old
for this business.
1
25%
1
25%
2
50%
4
100%
Total
a. Section = EDTC-6341-80, Instructor Name = Janice W. Butler
-222- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDTC-6342-80, Instructor Name = Michael J. Sullivan
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Agree
1
Strongly Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Neutral
1
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Agree
1
50%
Neutral
1
50%
Total
2
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Neutral
1
50%
Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Neutral
1
50%
Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Agree
1
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Neutral
1
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Neutral
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Agree
1
50%
Neutral
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Agree
1
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Agree
1
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
50%
a. Section = EDTC-6342-80, Instructor Name = Michael J. Sullivan
-223- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Agree
1
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Neutral
1
50%
Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Agree
1
50%
Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Agree
1
50%
Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Agree
1
50%
Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Agree
1
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Agree
1
50%
Neutral
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Agree
1
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Neutral
1
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Agree
Total
a. Section = EDTC-6342-80, Instructor Name = Michael J. Sullivan
-224- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Percent
Agree
1
50%
Neutral
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
1
50%
C
1
50%
Comments
I am very satisfied will all
courses I have completed
at UTB thus far, however
this course was the
exception. I felt that
communication was
infrequent and that at
many times, although few
meetings were held- the
online meetings were not
organized.I understand
that the Prof. is well
educated & versed
in the subject matter, but
the quality &
organization of the course
was not satisfactory.
Projects were not clearly
noted or updated on the
blackboard, and dates
were confusing given that
is is the Fall semester
and dates were from
February. Grades on
completed assignments
were also not updated in
a timely manner. In the
end, I would say the
quality did not measureup
to what I had experienced
at UTB in the past.
1
50%
1
50%
2
100%
Total
a. Section = EDTC-6342-80, Instructor Name = Michael J. Sullivan
-225- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDTC-6343-80, Instructor Name = Janice W. Butler
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
2
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
a. Section = EDTC-6343-80, Instructor Name = Janice W.
Butler
-226- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
50%
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
a. Section = EDTC-6343-80, Instructor Name = Janice W.
Butler
-227- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
1
25%
1
25%
2
50%
4
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
I felt prepared and ready
to take the MTT exam. Dr.
Butler is an incredible
teacher.
Dr. Butler presented all
material clearly and in
detail. I have honestly
learned so much since
joining the MTT program. I
plan to continue studying
under her until I finish in
May. I was nervous going
back to school. Now I'm
glad I did. This has been
an incredible experience.
Thank You. Juan Felix
Total
a. Section = EDTC-6343-80, Instructor Name = Janice W. Butler
-228- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDTC-6351-60, Instructor Name = Arnold D. McElroy, Jr.
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
2
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
a. Section = EDTC-6351-60, Instructor Name = Arnold D.
McElroy, Jr.
-229- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
67%
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
a. Section = EDTC-6351-60, Instructor Name = Arnold D.
McElroy, Jr.
-230- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
1
33%
2
67%
3
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
This is a great course. I
love how it went step-bystep through the process
of creating a course in
Flash. It was challenging
yet realistic in its goals,
and I'm amazed at how
much I have learned.
Total
a. Section = EDTC-6351-60, Instructor Name = Arnold D. McElroy, Jr.
-231- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDTC-6358-60, Instructor Name = Cheng Chang Pan
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
a. Section = EDTC-6358-60, Instructor Name = Cheng Chang
Pan
-232- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
a. Section = EDTC-6358-60, Instructor Name = Cheng Chang
Pan
-233- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
1
25%
1
25%
2
50%
4
100%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
Elluminate live
"workshopping" of course
building issues was most
helpful.
course should provide
more training on technical
aspects of video file
types, players, etc.
Total
a. Section = EDTC-6358-60, Instructor Name = Cheng Chang Pan
-234- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDUC-1301-03, Instructor Name = Carmen L. Garcia-Caceres
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
7
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
a. Section = EDUC-1301-03, Instructor Name = Carmen L.
Garcia-Caceres
-235- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
88%
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
4
50%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
a. Section = EDUC-1301-03, Instructor Name = Carmen L.
Garcia-Caceres
-236- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
A
5
63%
B
3
38%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
a. Section = EDUC-1301-03, Instructor Name = Carmen L.
Garcia-Caceres
-237- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
For my first course
towards my degree I
enjoyed this class very
much but what really set
me back from the
beginning was the issue
some of us were having
with the e-book. I missed
out on a lot of extra credit
assignments and class
assignments because of
it. I do thank the professor
for still giving us the
opportunity to turn in
some of the extra credit
work but with my work
schedule/class
schedule/family, I
unfortunately missed out
on that opportunity.
Even though this class
was 100% online I still felt
i had a great connection
communicating with my
instructor. i liked that as
soon as we turned in an
assignment she would
grade our papers ASAP.
Other professors take
about a week to grade
papers and Dr. Casares
took about a day or two at
the most.
as a retuning student I
was so nervous coming
into this online class. but
with guidence and
instruction it was easier.
Total
Percent
1
13%
1
13%
1
13%
5
63%
8
100%
a. Section = EDUC-1301-03, Instructor Name = Carmen L.
Garcia-Caceres
-238- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDUCU-2303-01, Instructor Name = Juan Hinojosa
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
6
46%
Agree
4
31%
Neutral
2
15%
Disagree
1
8%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
13
100%
Strongly Agree
5
38%
Agree
4
31%
Neutral
3
23%
Strongly Disagree
1
8%
13
100%
Strongly Agree
5
38%
Agree
4
31%
Neutral
3
23%
Disagree
1
8%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
13
100%
Strongly Agree
3
23%
Agree
4
31%
Neutral
5
38%
Disagree
1
8%
13
100%
Strongly Agree
4
31%
Agree
3
23%
Neutral
3
23%
Disagree
2
15%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Disagree
1
8%
13
100%
Strongly Agree
3
23%
Agree
5
38%
Neutral
1
8%
Disagree
3
23%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Percent
Strongly Agree
12
100%
Strongly Agree
4
31%
Agree
2
15%
Neutral
3
23%
Disagree
2
15%
Strongly Disagree
Total
2
15%
13
100%
a. Section = EDUCU-2303-01, Instructor Name = Juan Hinojosa
-239- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
5
38%
Agree
5
38%
Neutral
3
23%
13
100%
Strongly Agree
5
38%
Agree
2
15%
Neutral
5
38%
Strongly Disagree
1
8%
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Total
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
13
100%
Strongly Agree
5
38%
Agree
2
15%
Neutral
4
31%
Disagree
1
8%
Strongly Disagree
1
8%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
13
100%
Strongly Agree
5
38%
Agree
5
38%
Neutral
3
23%
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
13
100%
Strongly Agree
3
23%
Agree
5
38%
Neutral
3
23%
Disagree
1
8%
Strongly Disagree
1
8%
13
100%
Strongly Agree
4
31%
Agree
4
31%
Neutral
3
23%
Disagree
2
15%
Total
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Total
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
13
100%
Strongly Agree
4
31%
Agree
3
23%
Neutral
3
23%
Disagree
2
15%
Strongly Disagree
1
8%
13
100%
Total
a. Section = EDUCU-2303-01, Instructor Name = Juan Hinojosa
-240- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
5
38%
Agree
3
23%
Neutral
3
23%
Disagree
2
15%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
13
100%
Strongly Agree
5
38%
Agree
3
23%
Neutral
4
31%
Disagree
1
8%
13
100%
Strongly Agree
6
46%
Agree
3
23%
Neutral
2
15%
Disagree
2
15%
Total
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
13
100%
Strongly Agree
4
31%
Agree
4
31%
Neutral
2
15%
Disagree
2
15%
Strongly Disagree
1
8%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
13
100%
Strongly Agree
3
23%
Agree
4
31%
Neutral
4
31%
Disagree
2
15%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
13
100%
Strongly Agree
3
23%
Agree
4
31%
Neutral
4
31%
Disagree
2
15%
13
100%
Strongly Agree
4
31%
Agree
4
31%
Neutral
2
15%
Disagree
3
23%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Percent
Strongly Agree
13
100%
Strongly Agree
5
38%
Agree
4
31%
Neutral
4
31%
13
100%
Total
a. Section = EDUCU-2303-01, Instructor Name = Juan Hinojosa
-241- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
4
31%
Agree
4
31%
Neutral
3
23%
Disagree
2
15%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
13
100%
Strongly Agree
4
31%
Agree
3
23%
Neutral
2
15%
Disagree
3
23%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
4
31%
Agree
5
38%
Neutral
3
23%
Disagree
1
8%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
13
100%
Strongly Agree
6
46%
Agree
4
31%
Neutral
3
23%
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
13
100%
A
6
46%
B
3
23%
C
3
23%
D
1
8%
1
8%
1
8%
I really enjoyed this class.
I was able to learn new
computer techniques that
I will be able to use in my
classroom.
I believe he should be
more communicative with
his students, respond to
the emails ASAP and
explain more, maybe do
some videos for us
explaining the procedures
A very good teacher
Total
1
8%
10
77%
13
100%
a. Section = EDUCU-2303-01, Instructor Name = Juan Hinojosa
-242- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EDUCU-2303-02, Instructor Name = Juan Hinojosa
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
6
Agree
2
20%
Total
8
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
8
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Total
8
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
1
10%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Neutral
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
30%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Disagree
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
1
10%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
3
30%
Total
8
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
a. Section = EDUCU-2303-02, Instructor Name = Juan Hinojosa
-243- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
60%
Count
Percent
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Total
8
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
3
30%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
1
10%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Total
7
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Neutral
2
20%
Total
8
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Total
8
100%
a. Section = EDUCU-2303-02, Instructor Name = Juan
Hinojosa
-244- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Percent
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
8
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Total
8
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
1
10%
Total
7
100%
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
1
10%
A
7
70%
B
2
20%
First time taking an online
course and loved it. I
enjoyed not having to
rush to find a parking
space, working at home
while cooking dinner and
working on assignments.
I would love to take more
courses like this.
1
10%
Total
9
90%
10
100%
a. Section = EDUCU-2303-02, Instructor Name = Juan Hinojosa
-245- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = ENGL-1301-81, Instructor Name = Farhat M. Iftekharuddin
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
2
25%
Disagree
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
a. Section = ENGL-1301-81, Instructor Name = Farhat M.
Iftekharuddin
-246- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
Percent
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Disagree
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Neutral
3
38%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Neutral
3
38%
Strongly Disagree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
a. Section = ENGL-1301-81, Instructor Name = Farhat M.
Iftekharuddin
-247- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
a. Section = ENGL-1301-81, Instructor Name = Farhat M.
Iftekharuddin
-248- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Neutral
2
25%
Disagree
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
A
4
50%
B
2
25%
C
1
13%
D
1
13%
1
13%
1
13%
6
75%
8
100%
Enjoyed the class and felt
the instructor gave
constructive criticism and
praise tht was helpful in
improving my writng for
the future.
Dr. Farhat absolutely
refused to answer my
questions and became
hostile when I asked. He
does not give any
feedback on
assignments and gives
arbitrary grades with no
comments to back them
up. When I asked him to
tell me how I could
improve my writing he
said "go read a
newspaper". This
instructor does not care
about the course or the
students.
Total
a. Section = ENGL-1301-81, Instructor Name = Farhat M. Iftekharuddin
-249- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = ENGL-1301-82, Instructor Name = Farhat M. Iftekharuddin
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
a. Section = ENGL-1301-82, Instructor Name = Farhat M.
Iftekharuddin
-250- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
2
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
a. Section = ENGL-1301-82, Instructor Name = Farhat M.
Iftekharuddin
-251- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
A
3
75%
F
1
25%
a. Section = ENGL-1301-82, Instructor Name = Farhat M.
Iftekharuddin
-252- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
People like him should
not be employed.This
professor is what UTB
has to offer poor I'm going
to transfer to PAN
America Maybe the
english department
should take a look at him
and evaluated on his
performance which is
poor to say the least. I
when to his office during
is office hours many
times he was not there.
he said in his syllabus
during the course you
would receive e-mail of
him giving instructions for
essays not true. I e-mail
him at least 3 times to
ask questions he never
replied an when i ask him
why my grade was to low
he replied "You Got An F
for the assignment THank
YOu." totally unnecessary
E-mails instead of explain
why he simply put HE
WAS TO BUSY TO BE
DOING THAT. BUSY i
paid for my classes i did
not receive financial aid i
bust my ass for it my
dream is to finish school
but people like him make
you want to quit. i will alert
about this professor
threw many sources like
face-book etc. just check
how many people pass
his class. ps i hope you
read this have a nice day!!
great instructor
Total
Percent
1
25%
1
25%
2
50%
4
100%
a. Section = ENGL-1301-82, Instructor Name = Farhat M.
Iftekharuddin
-253- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = ENGL-1302-81, Instructor Name = Farhat M. Iftekharuddin
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Agree
2
Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Agree
1
33%
Disagree
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Agree
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Agree
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Neutral
2
67%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
2
67%
Total
3
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Neutral
2
67%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Neutral
2
67%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Neutral
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
a. Section = ENGL-1302-81, Instructor Name = Farhat M.
Iftekharuddin
-254- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
67%
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Percent
Neutral
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Neutral
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Agree
1
33%
Disagree
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Agree
1
33%
Disagree
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
a. Section = ENGL-1302-81, Instructor Name = Farhat M.
Iftekharuddin
-255- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Neutral
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
A
1
33%
F
2
67%
a. Section = ENGL-1302-81, Instructor Name = Farhat M.
Iftekharuddin
-256- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
This professor never
answered my emails.
How am I supposed to
know what Im doing
wrong if the professor
declines to communicate
with me. I am very
dissapointed of this
online course and would
never take it again nor
ever recommended to
anyone. This is the worst
online course ever.
Having returned to finish
my Bachelor's degree
after a 20 year break, I
learned some very
important lessons in
reading classic works,
interpreting them, and
writing about them. I
enjoyed the class very
much.
5 assignments for the
whole semester is
ridiculous. I rather have
more assignments that
way I can practice and
know my mistakes. With 5
assignments you can't
learn anything. He
requires too much, I am
not an English major, so
why does he treat us as
such.
Total
Percent
1
33%
1
33%
1
33%
3
100%
a. Section = ENGL-1302-81, Instructor Name = Farhat M.
Iftekharuddin
-257- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = ENGL-3322-31, Instructor Name = Teresa Murden
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
6
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Neutral
3
43%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
86%
a. Section = ENGL-3322-31, Instructor Name = Teresa Murden
-258- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Neutral
3
43%
Total
7
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
3
43%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
a. Section = ENGL-3322-31, Instructor Name = Teresa Murden
-259- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
6
86%
B
1
14%
Comments
Very good professor
although the class is
online, she was always
communicating and
made me feel as if I was
taking a regular class.
The use of Tegrity was
not helpful to me. It was
very difficult to use and
NEVER worked...and
most of the assignment
explanation was on it and
did NOT help me at all.
1
14%
1
14%
5
71%
7
100%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Total
a. Section = ENGL-3322-31, Instructor Name = Teresa Murden
-260- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = EXPL-2301-80, Instructor Name = Francisco Garcia
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = EXPL-2301-80, Instructor Name = Francisco
Garcia
-261- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
2
100%
1
50%
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
Excellent Professor
Total
1
50%
2
100%
a. Section = EXPL-2301-80, Instructor Name = Francisco Garcia
-262- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = HITT-1305-80, Instructor Name = Mary B. Valencia
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
5
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
3
43%
Total
7
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
71%
a. Section = HITT-1305-80, Instructor Name = Mary B. Valencia
-263- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
a. Section = HITT-1305-80, Instructor Name = Mary B. Valencia
-264- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Total
6
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
6
86%
B
1
14%
Comments
Easy Class
1
14%
Total
6
86%
7
100%
a. Section = HITT-1305-80, Instructor Name = Mary B. Valencia
-265- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = HITT-1305-81, Instructor Name = Mary B. Valencia
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
5
Agree
4
44%
Total
9
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
5
56%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
5
56%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
5
56%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
5
56%
Total
9
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
4
44%
Total
9
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
5
56%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
6
67%
Total
9
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
5
56%
Total
9
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
56%
a. Section = HITT-1305-81, Instructor Name = Mary B. Valencia
-266- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
6
67%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
6
67%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
5
56%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
5
56%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
5
56%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
5
56%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
6
67%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
a. Section = HITT-1305-81, Instructor Name = Mary B. Valencia
-267- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
5
56%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
5
56%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
5
56%
Total
9
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
7
78%
B
2
22%
Comments
The evaluation form
should have the course
name and number. I
know that this is the
evaluation for my only
100% Online course but
this is the second time I
complete this evaluation
for this course.
Excellent filler class! I love
online courses because
they give me some
flexibility in my hectic
schedule. Material laid
out for the student; just
have to do the work.
1
11%
1
11%
Total
a. Section = HITT-1305-81, Instructor Name = Mary B. Valencia
-268- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
7
78%
9
100%
Section = HITT-1305-82, Instructor Name = Mary B. Valencia
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = HITT-1305-82, Instructor Name = Mary B. Valencia
-269- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
Total
a. Section = HITT-1305-82, Instructor Name = Mary B. Valencia
-270- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = HITT-3301-01, Instructor Name = Barbara J. Denton
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
3
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
a. Section = HITT-3301-01, Instructor Name = Barbara J.
Denton
-271- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
75%
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Total
3
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
a. Section = HITT-3301-01, Instructor Name = Barbara J.
Denton
-272- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
Total
a. Section = HITT-3301-01, Instructor Name = Barbara J.
Denton
-273- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = HITT-3302-01, Instructor Name = Barbara J. Denton
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
3
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
a. Section = HITT-3302-01, Instructor Name = Barbara J.
Denton
-274- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
75%
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
a. Section = HITT-3302-01, Instructor Name = Barbara J.
Denton
-275- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
Total
a. Section = HITT-3302-01, Instructor Name = Barbara J.
Denton
-276- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = HITT-3304-01, Instructor Name = Constance L. Hayes
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
Percent
3
100%
3
100%
Agree
1
33%
Disagree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Agree
2
67%
Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Disagree
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Agree
2
67%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Agree
3
100%
3
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Total
Total
a. Section = HITT-3304-01, Instructor Name = Constance L.
Hayes
-277- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Agree
1
33%
Disagree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Agree
1
33%
Disagree
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
2
67%
Total
3
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
2
67%
Total
3
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
a. Section = HITT-3304-01, Instructor Name = Constance L.
Hayes
-278- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Agree
2
67%
Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
A
1
33%
B
1
33%
C
1
33%
1
33%
1
33%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
There were three places
to find assignments and
not all three had the
same information/dates
which was extremely
confusing. The instructor
kept last semesters work
on this semesters
discussion boards which
also made things
confusing.
The instructor is very
knowledgeable about the
topic but to a few us
students it was difficult to
understand. I also found
the areas where
assignments were
placed was difficult to
navigate. I had to look in
to many places for the
assignments therefore I
missed work that was
due.
Total
1
33%
3
100%
a. Section = HITT-3304-01, Instructor Name = Constance L. Hayes
-279- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = HLTHU-2320-60, Instructor Name = Christopher M. Ledingham
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
Percent
7
100%
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
7
100%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
3
43%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
3
43%
Total
7
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Total
a. Section = HLTHU-2320-60, Instructor Name = Christopher
M. Ledingham
-280- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Percent
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
a. Section = HLTHU-2320-60, Instructor Name = Christopher
M. Ledingham
-281- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
3
43%
Total
7
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
5
71%
B
2
29%
Comments
Very enjoyable online
class. Professor was very
informative and gave
relevant time to do all
asked assignments and
tests.
1
14%
6
86%
7
100%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Total
a. Section = HLTHU-2320-60, Instructor Name = Christopher M.
Ledingham
-282- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = HPRS-1205-01, Instructor Name = Ana M. Linville
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = HPRS-1205-01, Instructor Name = Ana M. Linville
-283- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
3
100%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
a. Section = HPRS-1205-01, Instructor Name = Ana M. Linville
-284- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I had a good experience
with my first online class.
I even went to see the
instructor on campus and
she was very nice,
helpful, and concerned. I
wish more of the my
classmates would have
answered the book
questions more so I
could respond, but
otherwise it was a class
that fit in my busy
schedule and the
material was interesting. I
liked taking the online
senarios too.
Total
Percent
1
33%
2
67%
3
100%
a. Section = HPRS-1205-01, Instructor Name = Ana M.
Linville
-285- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = HPRS-1205-02, Instructor Name = Ana M. Linville
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
3
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
75%
a. Section = HPRS-1205-02, Instructor Name = Ana M. Linville
-286- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
a. Section = HPRS-1205-02, Instructor Name = Ana M. Linville
-287- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
3
75%
C
1
25%
Comments
The instructor seemed to
have difficulty answering
questions related to quiz
to enlighten my
knowledge to ensure i
was prepared for the
chapter exams and the
final in a timely manner.
Other than that teacher
seemed to be
approachable and
knowledgeable on the
phone during online
conference time.
Great on-line class
1
25%
1
25%
Total
a. Section = HPRS-1205-02, Instructor Name = Ana M. Linville
-288- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
2
50%
4
100%
Section = HPRS-3301-01, Instructor Name = John L. McCabe
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
5
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
3
43%
Total
7
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
5
71%
Total
7
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
3
43%
Total
7
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
a. Section = HPRS-3301-01, Instructor Name = John L.
McCabe
-289- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
71%
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
5
71%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
3
43%
Total
7
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
3
43%
Total
7
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
a. Section = HPRS-3301-01, Instructor Name = John L.
McCabe
-290- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
3
43%
Total
7
100%
7
100%
1
14%
1
14%
5
71%
7
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
Thank you. This course
was very interesting
Although this was my first
online class, it was
interesting and allowed
me to explore a new way
of learning. All in all very
positive and looking
forward to more online
courses.
Total
a. Section = HPRS-3301-01, Instructor Name = John L. McCabe
-291- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = HPRS-3316-01, Instructor Name = Shamina G. Davis
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
Percent
4
80%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
5
100%
Total
5
100%
5
100%
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
5
100%
5
100%
5
100%
5
100%
5
100%
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = HPRS-3316-01, Instructor Name = Shamina G.
Davis
-292- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
5
100%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
5
100%
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Agree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
5
100%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Total
a. Section = HPRS-3316-01, Instructor Name = Shamina G.
Davis
-293- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
5
100%
Total
5
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
5
100%
1
20%
Great Instructor. I enjoyed
this Nutrition class.
Total
4
80%
5
100%
a. Section = HPRS-3316-01, Instructor Name = Shamina G. Davis
-294- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = HPRS-3324-01, Instructor Name = Kim J. Morris-Garcia
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Total
Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
3
27%
1
9%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
10
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
73%
Strongly Agree
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
8
27%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
36%
100%
100%
Strongly Disagree
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
4
11
3
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
64%
11
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Percent
7
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
3
27%
11
100%
Total
a. Section = HPRS-3324-01, Instructor Name = Kim J. MorrisGarcia
-295- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
7
64%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Percent
Strongly Agree
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
11
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Total
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
1
9%
Total
11
100%
Strongly Agree
10
91%
1
9%
Agree
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
2
18%
11
100%
Total
a. Section = HPRS-3324-01, Instructor Name = Kim J. MorrisGarcia
-296- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
7
64%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
3
27%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
3
27%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Disagree
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
9%
Total
11
100%
A
10
91%
F
1
9%
a. Section = HPRS-3324-01, Instructor Name = Kim J. MorrisGarcia
-297- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
This is a great class.
Since I am currently
teaching I can totally
relate to the objectives set
by the instructor. Great
Job!
The instructor has really
made taking online
classes interesting and
fun. Very few instructors
are able to do this.
Thank you for all your
time, help, and
dedication.
Instructor had a well
organized online
development of course.
This class was very
helpful and user friendly.
GREAT ONLINE
COURSE Thank You.
Percent
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
a. Section = HPRS-3324-01, Instructor Name = Kim J.
Morris-Garcia
-298- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Here's the problem:
Although the content of
the course was adequate,
the teacher, not even
once, engaged with the
class. She never
commented, not once, on
the weekly discussion
boards--even when the
some of the class clearly
misunderstood how to
answer the question
posed. There were never,
not once, any grading
rubrics provided--and
keep in mind, this was a
course about teaching. I
never had any idea why I
got a 98% on an
assignment rather than,
say, a 95%. There was
absolutely no guidance,
no feedback, no teaching.
Never. Not even once.
Can you call that
teaching??? What a joke.
No wonder UTB has such
a bad reputation. They
have earned it. I am
forced to keep taking
these courses because
of my degree program but
I am certainly not getting
an education. In terms of
overall online courses
through UTB, I have taken
six in all and only one
instructor was
outstanding. The other
five did as little as
possible to help their
classes. The outstanding
teacher was Connie
Hayes. Give her a raise
Total
Percent
1
9%
6
55%
11
100%
a. Section = HPRS-3324-01, Instructor Name = Kim J.
Morris-Garcia
-299- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = HPRS-4300-01, Instructor Name = Constance L. Hayes
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
Percent
8
89%
8
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
9
100%
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
9
100%
Total
9
100%
9
100%
9
100%
9
100%
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
9
100%
9
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
a. Section = HPRS-4300-01, Instructor Name = Constance L.
Hayes
-300- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Strongly Agree
Percent
9
100%
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Total
8
100%
8
89%
8
100%
Strongly Agree
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
9
100%
Total
9
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
9
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
9
100%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
9
100%
9
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = HPRS-4300-01, Instructor Name = Constance L.
Hayes
-301- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
9
100%
Total
9
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
9
100%
1
11%
1
11%
1
11%
1
11%
5
56%
9
100%
This was my first online
class and I found it very
interesting and well
organized. I thought it was
going to be off the wall
with all sorts of confusion
but the teacher knew what
she was doing and how
to organize everything.
She kept great contact
with me when I had a
question. Overall
awesome class and I
strongly recommend it for
anyone interested in this
course.
I think this is a great
course that offers a lot to
learn about
pharmaceuticals. The
only thing I would try to fix
is that there are various
places where due dates
and assignment
requirements are listed,
and sometimes they do
not coincide, producing a
bit of confusion. The
instructor did make it
clear that we were to go
by what was listed in the
course calendar and so
that is what I did. Overall, I
do think the instructor is a
good professor and that
the class has a lot to offer
(very challenging).
great teacher and course!
i would definately take it
again!
Great class.
Total
a. Section = HPRS-4300-01, Instructor Name = Constance L. Hayes
-302- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = HPRS-4301-01, Instructor Name = John L. McCabe
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
1
Agree
4
80%
Total
5
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
1
20%
Agree
4
80%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
1
20%
Agree
3
60%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
1
20%
Agree
3
60%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
1
20%
Agree
3
60%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
20%
a. Section = HPRS-4301-01, Instructor Name = John L. McCabe
-303- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
20%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
1
20%
Agree
2
40%
Disagree
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
1
20%
Agree
3
60%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
1
20%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
1
20%
Agree
3
60%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
1
20%
Agree
3
60%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Agree
3
60%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
3
60%
Total
5
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
1
20%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
4
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
a. Section = HPRS-4301-01, Instructor Name = John L. McCabe
-304- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
1
20%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
1
20%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
A
4
80%
D
1
20%
a. Section = HPRS-4301-01, Instructor Name = John L. McCabe
-305- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
This was a cookie cutter
class. Direct from the
publisher-the text, the
lecture notes (ha ha-there
was no lecture), and the
quizzes or questions. The
instructor provided no
guidance, no interaction.
The discussion boards
were absurd. Did the
instructor even read
them? Perhaps we were
graded on the word count.
There was no rubric for
grading and no
comments--ever--on the
discussion boards. The
instructor does not
deserve to be paid
because he didn't do
anything. Even the format
was developed by
someone else.
I enjoyed this class.
Thank you.
Total
Percent
1
20%
1
20%
3
60%
5
100%
a. Section = HPRS-4301-01, Instructor Name = John L.
McCabe
-306- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = HPRS-4302-01, Instructor Name = Kim J. Morris-Garcia
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
2
22%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
5
56%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
a. Section = HPRS-4302-01, Instructor Name = Kim J. MorrisGarcia
-307- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
a. Section = HPRS-4302-01, Instructor Name = Kim J. MorrisGarcia
-308- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
3
33%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
9
100%
A
6
67%
B
2
22%
C
1
11%
a. Section = HPRS-4302-01, Instructor Name = Kim J. MorrisGarcia
-309- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
My instrutor was very
helpful throughout the
semester and showed
concern about the quality
and quantity of education I
received. I would gladly
recommend not only this
class but this instructor
as well to everyone.
In the syllabus it stated
that no late work would be
accepted. However in the
first month an
announcement was
posted stating that
everyone needed to get
assignments turned in or
they would not be
accepted- thus late work
was accepted. I emailed
the instructor asking if we
would get an opportunity
at the end of the
semester to submit late
assignments. This was
about 2 weeks ago, and I
still have not heard back.
It does not seem fair to
accept late work at the
begining of the semester
and not the end. If the
policy is NO late work,
then it should be that way
throughout the semester.
Either that or EVERY
student receives the
same opportunities to
submit late work!
Great class.
Total
Percent
1
11%
1
11%
1
11%
6
67%
9
100%
a. Section = HPRS-4302-01, Instructor Name = Kim J.
Morris-Garcia
-310- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = HPRS-4309-01, Instructor Name = Constance L. Hayes
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
Percent
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = HPRS-4309-01, Instructor Name = Constance L.
Hayes
-311- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
Percent
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Total
a. Section = HPRS-4309-01, Instructor Name = Constance L.
Hayes
-312- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = HPRS-4334-01, Instructor Name = Constance L. Hayes
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
6
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
86%
a. Section = HPRS-4334-01, Instructor Name = Constance L.
Hayes
-313- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
a. Section = HPRS-4334-01, Instructor Name = Constance L.
Hayes
-314- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
7
100%
1
14%
1
14%
1
14%
4
57%
7
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
Very helpful and
understanding professor.
I really enjoyed taking her
class online.
I would gladly
recommend this class
and instructor to anyone
because of the time and
effort this instructor has
spent making sure I have
succeeded in this class.
Great class.
Total
a. Section = HPRS-4334-01, Instructor Name = Constance L. Hayes
-315- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = HPRS-4360-01, Instructor Name = John L. McCabe
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = HPRS-4360-01, Instructor Name = John L.
McCabe
-316- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
2
100%
2
100%
2
100%
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
Total
a. Section = HPRS-4360-01, Instructor Name = John L.
McCabe
-317- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = INTL-3392-80, Instructor Name = Kevin Cruthirds
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
59%
Agree
4
24%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
2
12%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
17
100%
Strongly Agree
9
53%
Agree
6
35%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
7
41%
Agree
5
29%
Neutral
2
12%
Disagree
2
12%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Disagree
1
6%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
8
47%
Agree
5
29%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
2
12%
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Disagree
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
10
59%
Agree
3
18%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
Strongly Disagree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Percent
10
2
12%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
10
59%
Agree
3
18%
Neutral
2
12%
Disagree
1
6%
Strongly Disagree
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
11
65%
Agree
4
24%
Neutral
2
12%
17
100%
Total
a. Section = INTL-3392-80, Instructor Name = Kevin Cruthirds
-318- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
6%
Strongly Agree
9
53%
Agree
3
18%
Neutral
3
18%
Disagree
2
12%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
8
47%
Agree
4
24%
Neutral
2
12%
Disagree
2
12%
Strongly Disagree
1
6%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
8
47%
Agree
5
29%
Neutral
3
18%
Disagree
1
6%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
8
47%
Agree
4
24%
Neutral
2
12%
Disagree
2
12%
Strongly Disagree
1
6%
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Total
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
17
100%
Strongly Agree
9
53%
Agree
3
18%
Neutral
3
18%
Disagree
1
6%
Strongly Disagree
1
6%
Total
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
29%
100%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
65%
5
1
Total
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
11
17
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Percent
17
100%
Strongly Agree
9
53%
Agree
5
29%
Disagree
1
6%
Strongly Disagree
Total
2
12%
17
100%
a. Section = INTL-3392-80, Instructor Name = Kevin Cruthirds
-319- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
7
41%
Agree
4
24%
Neutral
4
24%
Strongly Disagree
2
12%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
17
100%
Strongly Agree
8
47%
Agree
4
24%
Neutral
4
24%
Strongly Disagree
1
6%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
7
41%
Agree
6
35%
Neutral
3
18%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
17
100%
Strongly Agree
9
53%
Agree
5
29%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
2
12%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
9
53%
Agree
5
29%
Neutral
3
18%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
17
100%
Strongly Agree
7
41%
Agree
6
35%
Neutral
4
24%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
10
59%
Agree
4
24%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
Strongly Disagree
1
6%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Percent
Strongly Agree
17
100%
Strongly Agree
9
53%
Agree
5
29%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
Total
1
6%
16
100%
a. Section = INTL-3392-80, Instructor Name = Kevin Cruthirds
-320- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
9
53%
Agree
4
24%
Neutral
2
12%
Strongly Disagree
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
11
65%
Agree
2
12%
Neutral
3
18%
Strongly Disagree
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
1
6%
Total
17
100%
Strongly Agree
10
59%
Agree
4
24%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
16
100%
Strongly Agree
9
53%
Agree
4
24%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
Strongly Disagree
2
12%
Total
17
100%
A
11
65%
B
3
18%
C
1
6%
D
2
12%
a. Section = INTL-3392-80, Instructor Name = Kevin Cruthirds
-321- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
This course was
instructed very well. Dr.
Cruthirds did an excellent
job in creating tegrity
courses that helped
support the subject
matter. He was also very
helpful with answering my
questions and providing
support. I did feel though,
that there were way too
many assignments, I felt
burned out by mid-term.
Overall, I felt Dr. Cruthirds
did an excellent job!
The professor has to
comprehend we are an
online class and can not
expect for his online class
to run as his face to face
classes.
The instructor does not
respond to emails or
phone calls promptly. I
am still waiting for a
response since exam
one taken in september
and we are 3 months
later. When he does
provide you with an
answer, it is not
explanatory and very rude.
Great teacher! I enjoyed
your tegrity lectures, they
helped quite a bit. The
best online class I had
during the course of my
studies. Dr. Cruthirds is
well prepared and
organized, his lectures go
straight to the point giving
excellent examples.
Perhaps some
explanation on what we
got wrong on our
homework would help.
Good instructor. However,
I did not like the fact that
he changed the syllabus
in the middle of the
semester.
Total
Percent
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
12
71%
17
100%
a. Section = INTL-3392-80, Instructor Name = Kevin
Cruthirds
-322- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = INTL-3392-81, Instructor Name = Kevin Cruthirds
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
71%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
2
14%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
7
50%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
2
14%
Disagree
2
14%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
6
43%
Agree
4
29%
Neutral
2
14%
Disagree
2
14%
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
5
36%
Agree
5
36%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
2
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
7
50%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
2
14%
Disagree
2
14%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Percent
10
Disagree
Total
1
7%
14
100%
a. Section = INTL-3392-81, Instructor Name = Kevin Cruthirds
-323- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
9
64%
Agree
4
29%
Neutral
1
7%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Neutral
5
36%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
7
50%
Agree
1
7%
Neutral
5
36%
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Total
Disagree
1
7%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
7
50%
Agree
4
29%
Neutral
2
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
7
50%
Agree
2
14%
Neutral
2
14%
Disagree
2
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
1
7%
Neutral
2
14%
Disagree
1
7%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
2
14%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Percent
Strongly Agree
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
1
7%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
2
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
14
100%
Total
a. Section = INTL-3392-81, Instructor Name = Kevin Cruthirds
-324- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
8
57%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
2
14%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
2
14%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
3
21%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
7
50%
Agree
2
14%
Neutral
3
21%
Disagree
1
7%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
14
100%
Strongly Agree
7
50%
Agree
2
14%
Neutral
3
21%
Disagree
1
7%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
1
7%
Neutral
2
14%
Disagree
2
14%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
2
14%
Neutral
3
21%
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
2
14%
Neutral
3
21%
14
100%
Total
a. Section = INTL-3392-81, Instructor Name = Kevin Cruthirds
-325- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
7
50%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
2
14%
Disagree
1
7%
Strongly Disagree
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
10
71%
2
14%
Neutral
Disagree
1
7%
13
100%
Strongly Agree
7
50%
Agree
3
21%
Disagree
2
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
13
100%
A
9
64%
C
3
21%
D
1
7%
F
1
7%
a. Section = INTL-3392-81, Instructor Name = Kevin Cruthirds
-326- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
The instructor is not very
organized in regards to
following the syllabus at
the beggining of the
semester. He should be
more understanding with
his students in regards to
quizzes miss. I mean if a
student miss a quiz or
homework assignment
he should allow only one
make up for the whole
semester for all students.
Professor explained
material very well through
Tegrity.
It was hard when the
deadline schedule was
changed in the middle of
the semester. Some of us
who work and have kids
try to make a
class/homework
schedule that allows us
to help our kids with the
homework and support
them in their extracurricular and work on our
class assignments. It
was a hard adjustment in
the middle of the
semester. The weekly
assignments were great.
They helped us better
understand the material
at hand.
Instructor was very helpful
and knowledgable of the
material covered in this
course. Great Instructor!
Percent
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
a. Section = INTL-3392-81, Instructor Name = Kevin
Cruthirds
-327- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Im taking this course
online because I have a
full time job and a full
time life but I am also a
full time student and
trying to finish my degree
soon. I was upset with the
professor first of all
demanding we watch his
uploads multiple times
and on his schedule. He
also changed the course
syllabus and just when I
had made a schedule to
take quizzes and do
homework he changes
the deadlines to earlier in
the week so it makes it
more difficult for those of
us who are busy with jobs
and family too. I was
greatly dissapointed with
this course and if I could
do it over again I would
take it in a classroom and
with a different professor.
Total
Percent
1
7%
9
64%
14
100%
a. Section = INTL-3392-81, Instructor Name = Kevin
Cruthirds
-328- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = INTL-4361-80, Instructor Name = Hugh M. Shane
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Agree
5
45%
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
4
36%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
3
27%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
5
45%
Neutral
2
18%
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
55%
11
Total
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Percent
6
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
5
45%
Neutral
Total
1
9%
11
100%
a. Section = INTL-4361-80, Instructor Name = Hugh M. Shane
-329- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
5
45%
Agree
4
36%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
2
18%
Total
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
4
36%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
10
100%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = INTL-4361-80, Instructor Name = Hugh M. Shane
-330- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
5
45%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
4
36%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Strongly Agree
Agree
7
64%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
4
36%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Neutral
3
27%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
3
27%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Neutral
3
27%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
4
36%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
5
45%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
5
45%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
5
45%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Percent
Strongly Agree
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
2
18%
11
100%
Total
a. Section = INTL-4361-80, Instructor Name = Hugh M. Shane
-331- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
A
8
73%
B
2
18%
F
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
There should be more
quizzes besides the tests
and case analysis in
order to improve our
grades.
Instructor had very little
interaction with students.
4 exams were given and
a final paper was due. I
felt I was basically
teaching myself by
reading the book and
taking the exams. I was
very disappointed in this
course as most of the
courses I have taken at
UTB, on-line and in class,
have all been exceptional
and have offered excellent
lectures and support from
professors. This course
did not meet the caliber
that I am used to
receiving from this
university.
Total
a. Section = INTL-4361-80, Instructor Name = Hugh M. Shane
-332- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
9
82%
11
100%
Section = INTL-4361-81, Instructor Name = Hugh M. Shane
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
3
20%
Total
15
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Agree
10
67%
4
27%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
Agree
4
27%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
Agree
5
33%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
3
20%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
Agree
Agree
1
7%
Neutral
2
13%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
Agree
4
27%
15
100%
Strongly Agree
9
60%
Agree
4
27%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
15
100%
Strongly Agree
9
60%
Agree
4
27%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
15
100%
Total
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
80%
Agree
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
12
Total
a. Section = INTL-4361-81, Instructor Name = Hugh M. Shane
-333- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
Percent
10
67%
Agree
3
20%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
9
60%
Agree
4
27%
1
7%
Total
15
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
11
73%
3
20%
Neutral
2
13%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
4
27%
Agree
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
Agree
3
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
Agree
3
20%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
6
40%
Agree
6
40%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
Agree
4
27%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
60%
Agree
5
33%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Neutral
Total
1
7%
15
100%
a. Section = INTL-4361-81, Instructor Name = Hugh M. Shane
-334- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
9
60%
Agree
4
27%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
3
20%
Agree
Neutral
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
3
20%
Agree
Neutral
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
4
27%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
Agree
Agree
3
20%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
10
67%
Agree
4
27%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
A
11
73%
B
4
27%
a. Section = INTL-4361-81, Instructor Name = Hugh M. Shane
-335- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
There was not much
interaction. He always
responded timely when I
called or e-mailed. The
book for the course must
be one of the worst books
I have had to use. The
questions for the tests
were from the book but, it
was hard to stay focused
when reading as the book
did not make the material
interesting. More
assignments would be
better so that the grade
won't be dependent on 1
assignment and 3
exams.
The instructor should give
more time on the exams
so students dont have to
be rushing to finish them.
He is a really nice
professor. I enjoyed to
work in the final project.
Total
Percent
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
12
80%
15
100%
a. Section = INTL-4361-81, Instructor Name = Hugh M.
Shane
-336- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = INTL-4371-80, Instructor Name = Clara Downey-Adams
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
1
7%
Total
14
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
12
86%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Agree
Agree
2
14%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
11
79%
2
14%
Agree
Disagree
1
7%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
4
29%
Disagree
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
12
86%
2
14%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
12
86%
Agree
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
Agree
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
93%
Total
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
13
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
4
29%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
11
79%
Agree
2
14%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
10
71%
3
21%
1
7%
Total
14
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
11
79%
3
21%
14
100%
Agree
Neutral
Agree
Total
a. Section = INTL-4371-80, Instructor Name = Clara DowneyAdams
-337- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
8
57%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
2
14%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Percent
Strongly Agree
14
100%
Strongly Agree
7
50%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
Total
2
14%
13
100%
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
5
36%
1
7%
Total
14
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
10
71%
3
21%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
11
79%
Agree
2
14%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
10
71%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
5
36%
Neutral
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
12
86%
2
14%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
10
71%
Agree
2
14%
Neutral
2
14%
14
100%
Agree
Total
a. Section = INTL-4371-80, Instructor Name = Clara DowneyAdams
-338- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
2
14%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
11
79%
3
21%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
12
86%
Agree
Agree
2
14%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
12
86%
2
14%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
11
79%
Agree
Agree
3
21%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
12
86%
1
7%
Agree
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
12
86%
Agree
1
7%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
14
100%
A
12
86%
B
2
14%
a. Section = INTL-4371-80, Instructor Name = Clara DowneyAdams
-339- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
She is a such a kind and
nice professor. She really
takes care of her students
and also keep interesting
the blackboard
discussions.
needs to be more specific
In this class there was
practically no weekly work
other than a discussion
board. I think this is a
great class to take, it is
mainly self-learning. The
professor did not post any
lectures she did in the
regular in-class course.
There are no extra-credit
opportunities in that , and
there are no emails of
deadline reminders for
weekly work ( other online
professers send email
reminders for when the
weekly work opens and
what day/time it closes) I
find these emails
EXTREMELY helpful, yet
this professor did not do
that.
I do not understand why it
is so important to answer
the discussion boards, i
think they are a waste of
time and maybe that is
why we forget to do it in
time.
Total
Percent
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
10
71%
14
100%
a. Section = INTL-4371-80, Instructor Name = Clara
Downey-Adams
-340- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MANA-3361-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D. Hollier, JR
-341- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
11
79%
3
21%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
12
86%
Agree
Agree
2
14%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
5
36%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Neutral
1
7%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
5
36%
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Disagree
1
7%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
2
14%
Neutral
2
14%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Disagree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
12
86%
Agree
2
14%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
5
36%
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Neutral
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
11
79%
3
21%
Agree
Total
14
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
5
36%
Agree
4
29%
Neutral
4
29%
13
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
7
50%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
3
21%
13
100%
Total
Total
a. Section = MANA-3361-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D. Hollier,
JR
-342- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
9
64%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
1
7%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Percent
Strongly Agree
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
4
29%
Neutral
1
7%
Strongly Disagree
Total
1
7%
14
100%
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
5
36%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
7
50%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
3
21%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
1
7%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
4
29%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
6
43%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
5
36%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
4
29%
Neutral
2
14%
14
100%
Total
a. Section = MANA-3361-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D. Hollier,
JR
-343- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
7
50%
Agree
5
36%
Neutral
2
14%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
8
57%
Agree
5
36%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
4
29%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Neutral
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
10
71%
3
21%
Agree
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
5
36%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
14
100%
Strongly Agree
9
64%
Agree
3
21%
Neutral
2
14%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
10
71%
2
14%
Agree
Neutral
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
14%
Total
14
100%
A
10
71%
B
3
21%
D
1
7%
a. Section = MANA-3361-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D. Hollier,
JR
-344- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Too much material
needed to be covered in
such little time. There
were not test reviews for
any of the tests and the
time of the quizes and
tests were too short. One
minute per question was
too difficult for me. I am
not a fast reader, I have to
read the question more
than 1s and all I could
concentrate on was that I
was running out of time.
Also, the reviews for the
quizes (not the tests) did
not cover everything on
the quizes. This course
caused alot of stress for
me and it was very difficult
because of the time and
too much material to
cover and very little help
for quizes and no reviews
at all for tests.
Total
Percent
1
7%
13
93%
14
100%
a. Section = MANA-3361-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D.
Hollier, JR
-345- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MANA-3361-81, Instructor Name = Hugh M. Shane
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Percent
Strongly Agree
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
Total
1
9%
11
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Neutral
2
18%
11
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Total
10
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Neutral
2
18%
Total
9
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Neutral
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Total
a. Section = MANA-3361-81, Instructor Name = Hugh M. Shane
-346- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
6
55%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Neutral
Total
1
9%
11
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
Total
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
2
18%
11
100%
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Total
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
5
45%
11
100%
Total
a. Section = MANA-3361-81, Instructor Name = Hugh M. Shane
-347- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
6
55%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
3
27%
Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
9
82%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
Neutral
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Neutral
2
18%
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
11
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Neutral
2
18%
11
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
11
100%
A
7
64%
B
4
36%
a. Section = MANA-3361-81, Instructor Name = Hugh M. Shane
-348- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
It was a goof course.
However, i think it's a lot
better taking the course
on premises not online
Initially some of the
assignments/exams
were not clearly visible or
communicated. I had to
dig for them. Email
response was slow or
non existent. However, he
was very effective at
communicating course
expectations, and was
very fair in administering
exams, and grades. I
would take another
course with him in a
heartbeat, as a matter of
fact I am searching for
online courses with his
name attached. Overall,
very satisfied with this
instructor and course.
Total
Percent
1
9%
1
9%
9
82%
11
100%
a. Section = MANA-3361-81, Instructor Name = Hugh M.
Shane
-349- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MANA-3362-80, Instructor Name = Jennie S. Johnson
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
2
13%
Total
15
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
12
80%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Agree
13
87%
Agree
1
7%
Neutral
2
13%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
2
13%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
Agree
3
20%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
13
87%
2
13%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
13
87%
Agree
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
13
87%
Agree
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
Agree
Total
15
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
11
73%
2
13%
2
13%
Total
15
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
13
87%
1
7%
Agree
Neutral
Neutral
Disagree
Total
1
7%
15
100%
a. Section = MANA-3362-80, Instructor Name = Jennie S.
Johnson
-350- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
Percent
12
80%
Agree
1
7%
Neutral
1
7%
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
13
87%
1
7%
Neutral
Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
13
87%
2
13%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
Agree
11
73%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
2
13%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
13
87%
Agree
1
7%
Total
14
100%
Strongly Agree
13
87%
2
13%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
13
87%
Agree
Agree
2
13%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
3
20%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
Agree
3
20%
Neutral
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
73%
2
13%
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Total
2
13%
15
100%
a. Section = MANA-3362-80, Instructor Name = Jennie S.
Johnson
-351- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
7%
100%
Strongly Agree
13
87%
1
7%
Agree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
80%
2
13%
Agree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
13
87%
1
7%
Agree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
13
87%
1
7%
Neutral
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
13
87%
Agree
1
7%
Strongly Disagree
1
7%
15
100%
1
7%
A
12
80%
B
1
7%
F
1
7%
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
7%
1
Strongly Disagree
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
87%
1
15
Strongly Disagree
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
13
Total
Strongly Disagree
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
a. Section = MANA-3362-80, Instructor Name = Jennie S. Johnson
-352- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
This was one of the best
online courses i have
taken. This had very good
material that helped me
get through the course.
The material was efficient
for the course and very
helpful.
none
I would like that the
University could have
more professor well
prepared in the her area
like Dr.Jonhson. She is a
excellent professor.
I really enjoy the class I
learn alot from the class
that I could use in my
future career.
great professor...
GREAT JOB!
Total
Percent
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
9
60%
15
100%
a. Section = MANA-3362-80, Instructor Name = Jennie S.
Johnson
-353- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MANA-3362-81, Instructor Name = Jennie S. Johnson
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Percent
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
3
75%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = MANA-3362-81, Instructor Name = Jennie S.
Johnson
-354- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
A
a. Section = MANA-3362-81, Instructor Name = Jennie S.
Johnson
-355- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I certainly learned and
acquired new skills. I
know I will put to use
much of this valuable
information.
Great instructor!
Total
Percent
1
25%
1
25%
2
50%
4
100%
a. Section = MANA-3362-81, Instructor Name = Jennie S.
Johnson
-356- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MANA-4352-80, Instructor Name = Anthony J. Daboub
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Disagree
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Disagree
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Strongly Agree
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
Total
1
10%
10
100%
a. Section = MANA-4352-80, Instructor Name = Anthony J. Daboub
-357- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Percent
Strongly Agree
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
10
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Total
Total
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Total
Total
a. Section = MANA-4352-80, Instructor Name = Anthony J. Daboub
-358- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = MANA-4352-80, Instructor Name = Anthony J. Daboub
-359- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Percent
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
10
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
9
90%
B
1
10%
Comments
It would be best to give
the Discussion Board
grades back quickly to
know if we are doing it
correctly. Also so we can
know what way or how
long you would like the
assignment to be.
Great professor, available
at all times, but more
contact with students
during the course would
help us not only in order
to learn more but to get to
know you. Thanks!
1
10%
1
10%
8
80%
10
100%
Total
a. Section = MANA-4352-80, Instructor Name = Anthony J. Daboub
-360- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MANA-4352-81, Instructor Name = Anthony J. Daboub
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
4
Agree
4
50%
Total
8
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
7
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
4
50%
Total
7
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Disagree
1
13%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
50%
Total
8
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
7
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
7
100%
a. Section = MANA-4352-81, Instructor Name = Anthony J.
Daboub
-361- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Total
6
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
7
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
4
50%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
4
50%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
4
50%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
7
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
a. Section = MANA-4352-81, Instructor Name = Anthony J.
Daboub
-362- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
4
50%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
6
75%
B
2
25%
Comments
There needs to be more
assignments for each
chapter just to better
understand the course
and giving a classroom
environment. Not to grade
but as notes to review for
the test. Overall this class
is straight forward with
the content matter as well
as the instructor.
1
13%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Total
7
88%
8
100%
a. Section = MANA-4352-81, Instructor Name = Anthony J. Daboub
-363- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MANA-4366-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D. Hollier, JR
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Agree
5
45%
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
6
55%
Neutral
1
9%
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
6
55%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
6
55%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
6
55%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
9
82%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
5
45%
Neutral
2
18%
Total
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
6
55%
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
55%
11
Total
Disagree
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Percent
6
11
100%
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
7
64%
Neutral
2
18%
11
100%
Total
a. Section = MANA-4366-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D. Hollier,
JR
-364- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
5
45%
Agree
5
45%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
6
55%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Neutral
Total
2
18%
11
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
8
73%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
Total
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
6
55%
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
3
27%
Agree
6
55%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
7
64%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
6
55%
Neutral
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
Total
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
7
64%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
6
55%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
9
100%
a. Section = MANA-4366-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D. Hollier,
JR
-365- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
5
45%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
11
100%
Strongly Agree
2
18%
Agree
7
64%
Neutral
2
18%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Agree
6
55%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
6
55%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
6
55%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
5
45%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
4
36%
Agree
6
55%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
11
100%
A
7
64%
B
3
27%
C
1
9%
a. Section = MANA-4366-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D. Hollier,
JR
-366- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
This proffesor never once
replied to my emails! I
would never recommend
him to my peers.
N/A
Total
Percent
1
9%
1
9%
9
82%
11
100%
a. Section = MANA-4366-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D.
Hollier, JR
-367- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MANA-6301-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D. Hollier, JR
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
2
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Neutral
2
67%
Total
3
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Neutral
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
67%
a. Section = MANA-6301-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D. Hollier,
JR
-368- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Neutral
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
a. Section = MANA-6301-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D.
Hollier, JR
-369- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
2
67%
C
1
33%
Comments
The time constraint on all
the tests and quizzes is
the main factor on the
grade, is one minute per
question, while the
browser takes 4-8
seconds to load the
answer and it takes me 512 seconds to read and
understand the question,
the final time alloted to
answer a question is
around 40 seconds...
The fast time limits on
quizzes and tests
discourages cheating, but
makes them grueling! An
interesting yet effective
tactic...
i enjoyed this course it
allowed me to view the
business side of nursing
Total
1
33%
1
33%
1
33%
3
100%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
a. Section = MANA-6301-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D. Hollier, JR
-370- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MANA-6360-87, Instructor Name = Kevin Cruthirds
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
3
38%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
4
50%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
4
50%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
4
50%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
4
50%
Neutral
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
4
50%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
2
25%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
a. Section = MANA-6360-87, Instructor Name = Kevin Cruthirds
-371- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
4
50%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
4
50%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
4
50%
Disagree
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
a. Section = MANA-6360-87, Instructor Name = Kevin Cruthirds
-372- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
5
63%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
4
50%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
5
63%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
4
50%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
A
5
63%
B
2
25%
D
1
13%
a. Section = MANA-6360-87, Instructor Name = Kevin Cruthirds
-373- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Would recommend not
quizzingor having
assignemnts pertaining
to more than 2 chapters
at a time.
This was the second
class I have had with this
instructor and I would
recommend him to
anyone.
I would have liked for
more feedback from the
professor. At times it felt
as if the professor was
not present at all. I think a
discussion board where
the professor asks the
class for their
opinions/experiences on
the subject would be
helpful. The quizzes are
good. I would really like to
see the class average for
assignments. There were
times where I wanted to
see how the class did
overall to see if the whole
class did bad on an
assignment or if I was the
only one.
Total
Percent
1
13%
1
13%
1
13%
5
63%
8
100%
a. Section = MANA-6360-87, Instructor Name = Kevin
Cruthirds
-374- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MARK-3371-80, Instructor Name = Russell P. Adams
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
69%
Agree
4
25%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
12
75%
3
19%
Agree
Disagree
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
12
75%
3
19%
Neutral
Strongly Disagree
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
11
69%
3
19%
Agree
Disagree
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
2
13%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
10
63%
Agree
3
19%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
11
69%
Agree
2
13%
Disagree
3
19%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
11
69%
Agree
1
6%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
11
2
13%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
12
75%
Agree
Total
4
25%
16
100%
a. Section = MARK-3371-80, Instructor Name = Russell P. Adams
-375- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
9
56%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
2
13%
Strongly Disagree
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
1
6%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
69%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
2
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
13
81%
Agree
1
6%
Neutral
1
6%
Strongly Disagree
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
11
69%
Agree
3
19%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
12
75%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
10
63%
Agree
4
25%
Neutral
2
13%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
11
69%
Agree
3
19%
Neutral
2
13%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
12
75%
4
25%
16
100%
Agree
Total
a. Section = MARK-3371-80, Instructor Name = Russell P. Adams
-376- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Strongly Agree
12
75%
3
19%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
75%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
1
6%
Agree
Strongly Disagree
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
12
75%
Agree
1
6%
Neutral
2
13%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
10
63%
Agree
5
31%
Neutral
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
11
69%
Agree
3
19%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
12
75%
Agree
3
19%
Neutral
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
11
69%
Agree
3
19%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Percent
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
11
69%
Agree
3
19%
Disagree
1
6%
Strongly Disagree
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
12
75%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
2
13%
16
100%
Total
a. Section = MARK-3371-80, Instructor Name = Russell P. Adams
-377- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
12
75%
3
19%
1
6%
Total
16
100%
A
10
63%
B
5
31%
C
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
13
81%
16
100%
this was the best
instructor experience i
have had in a while. My
overall understanding of
macroeconomics is one
hundred times what i ever
imagined it would be and
this is a direct result of
the instructor.
Fun interactive course! I
learned plenty. Very
informative, fair instructor.
I will be looking for other
courses he will be
instructing.
-Discrepancies in the
course syllabus which did
not match dates on the
assingments due dates
or chapters due made it
confusing to follow -Not
much interaction was
encouraged between
class or instructor -Not all
assignments were
graded in a timely
manner
Total
a. Section = MARK-3371-80, Instructor Name = Russell P. Adams
-378- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MATH-0421-80, Instructor Name = Laura M. Villarreal
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
6
50%
Agree
5
42%
Neutral
1
8%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
6
50%
Agree
5
42%
Neutral
1
8%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
5
42%
Neutral
1
8%
Disagree
1
8%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
5
42%
Neutral
2
17%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
6
50%
Disagree
1
8%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
6
50%
Agree
5
42%
Disagree
1
8%
12
100%
6
50%
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Agree
6
50%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
6
50%
Agree
5
42%
Neutral
1
8%
Total
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Percent
Strongly Agree
12
100%
Strongly Agree
6
50%
Agree
6
50%
12
100%
Total
a. Section = MATH-0421-80, Instructor Name = Laura M.
Villarreal
-379- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
5
42%
Agree
2
17%
Neutral
4
33%
Disagree
1
8%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
4
33%
Neutral
3
25%
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
6
50%
Disagree
1
8%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
5
42%
Neutral
1
8%
Disagree
1
8%
Total
Total
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
6
50%
Agree
4
33%
Neutral
1
8%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
5
42%
Neutral
1
8%
Strongly Disagree
1
8%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Percent
Strongly Agree
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
4
33%
Neutral
3
25%
Total
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
4
33%
Neutral
1
8%
Disagree
2
17%
12
100%
Total
a. Section = MATH-0421-80, Instructor Name = Laura M. Villarreal
-380- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
5
42%
Agree
4
33%
Neutral
2
17%
Strongly Disagree
1
8%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
4
33%
Agree
3
25%
Neutral
3
25%
Disagree
2
17%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
4
33%
Agree
4
33%
Neutral
3
25%
Disagree
1
8%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
5
42%
Neutral
2
17%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
6
50%
Neutral
1
8%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
6
50%
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Disagree
1
8%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
6
50%
Agree
4
33%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Neutral
2
17%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
6
50%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Neutral
1
8%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
5
42%
Neutral
1
8%
Disagree
1
8%
12
100%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = MATH-0421-80, Instructor Name = Laura M. Villarreal
-381- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
A
4
33%
B
7
58%
C
1
8%
Prof. Villarreal is an
excellent instructor. The
course is adequate and
enjoyable. Thank you
1
8%
11
92%
12
100%
Total
a. Section = MATH-0421-80, Instructor Name = Laura M. Villarreal
-382- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MATH-0422-80, Instructor Name = Janice C. Phillipp
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Agree
9
53%
100%
Strongly Agree
9
53%
Agree
6
35%
Neutral
2
12%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
6
35%
Agree
6
35%
Neutral
5
29%
17
100%
4
24%
10
59%
2
12%
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
1
6%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
5
29%
Agree
7
41%
Neutral
4
24%
Strongly Disagree
1
6%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
17
100%
Strongly Agree
6
35%
Agree
7
41%
Neutral
3
18%
16
100%
9
53%
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Agree
8
47%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
7
41%
Agree
7
41%
Neutral
3
18%
Total
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
47%
17
Total
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Percent
8
17
100%
Strongly Agree
4
24%
Agree
6
35%
Neutral
3
18%
Disagree
2
12%
Strongly Disagree
2
12%
17
100%
Total
a. Section = MATH-0422-80, Instructor Name = Janice C. Phillipp
-383- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
2
12%
Agree
6
35%
Neutral
6
35%
Disagree
1
6%
Strongly Disagree
2
12%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
6
35%
Agree
7
41%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Neutral
4
24%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
5
29%
Agree
8
47%
Neutral
2
12%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
Total
1
6%
17
100%
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
5
29%
Agree
8
47%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Neutral
4
24%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
6
35%
Agree
6
35%
Neutral
2
12%
Disagree
1
6%
Strongly Disagree
2
12%
Total
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
17
100%
Strongly Agree
5
29%
Agree
8
47%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
Strongly Disagree
2
12%
17
100%
5
29%
11
65%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
1
6%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
8
47%
Agree
8
47%
Total
Neutral
Total
1
6%
17
100%
a. Section = MATH-0422-80, Instructor Name = Janice C. Phillipp
-384- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
7
41%
Agree
7
41%
Neutral
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
24%
65%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
6
35%
Agree
7
41%
Neutral
4
24%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
7
41%
Agree
7
41%
Neutral
2
12%
Strongly Disagree
1
6%
17
100%
Strongly Agree
6
35%
Agree
6
35%
Neutral
5
29%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
17
100%
Strongly Agree
7
41%
Agree
9
53%
Neutral
1
6%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
17
100%
Strongly Agree
6
35%
Agree
8
47%
Neutral
3
18%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
17
100%
Strongly Agree
8
47%
Agree
6
35%
Neutral
3
18%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
18%
100%
4
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
3
17
11
Agree
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Percent
Strongly Agree
17
100%
Strongly Agree
8
47%
Agree
6
35%
Neutral
3
18%
17
100%
Total
a. Section = MATH-0422-80, Instructor Name = Janice C. Phillipp
-385- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
A
6
35%
B
6
35%
C
4
24%
D
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
very well organized and
prepared. Thank you
One of the reasons
students take online
courses is because they
cannot come to the actual
campus to take another
classroom class. Many of
us already are full time
students and we also
have a full time job. It
would be very helpful if we
could take certain tests
online, due to students
not being able to get off
work to go to campus to
take these certain tests.
Would be helpful for
professor to understand
these type of situations. A
little bit more of
understanding would be
great in these types of
situations.
I had an issue wit this
instructor, I failed two
quizzes while going
through a loss in the
family and she never even
replied to give me another
opportunity.
beneficial for us working
parents. a all around
good course.
Total
13
76%
17
100%
a. Section = MATH-0422-80, Instructor Name = Janice C. Phillipp
-386- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MATH-1314-80, Instructor Name = James A. Hilsenbeck, Jr.
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
5
Agree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
3
43%
Total
7
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
5
71%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
4
57%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
a. Section = MATH-1314-80, Instructor Name = James A.
Hilsenbeck, Jr.
-387- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
71%
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
5
71%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
5
71%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
5
71%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
5
71%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
4
57%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
4
57%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
4
57%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
a. Section = MATH-1314-80, Instructor Name = James A.
Hilsenbeck, Jr.
-388- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
A
4
57%
B
3
43%
7
100%
7
100%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Total
a. Section = MATH-1314-80, Instructor Name = James A.
Hilsenbeck, Jr.
-389- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MATH-1332-80, Instructor Name = Fred W. Warnke
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
3
33%
Disagree
1
11%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
3
33%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
3
33%
Total
9
100%
a. Section = MATH-1332-80, Instructor Name = Fred W. Warnke
-390- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
22%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
4
44%
Disagree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
2
22%
Disagree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
3
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
4
44%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
2
22%
Disagree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
2
22%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
3
33%
Disagree
1
11%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
8
100%
a. Section = MATH-1332-80, Instructor Name = Fred W. Warnke
-391- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
22%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
3
33%
Disagree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
2
22%
Disagree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
3
33%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
2
22%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
3
33%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
2
22%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
4
44%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
33%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
3
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
3
33%
Total
9
100%
a. Section = MATH-1332-80, Instructor Name = Fred W. Warnke
-392- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
22%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
2
22%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
5
56%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
9
100%
A
3
33%
B
4
44%
C
2
22%
1
11%
1
11%
7
78%
9
100%
This course was
advertised as online with
no class meetings, which
was not the case. Should
have been advertised as
online with some class
meetings.
On line tutoring goes only
so far in trying to find
someone to help with the
subject area your working
on. More help was
needed, I felt, in the
tutoring/answering
questions area.
Total
a. Section = MATH-1332-80, Instructor Name = Fred W. Warnke
-393- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MATH-1342-80, Instructor Name = Luis A. Sanchez
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
3
43%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
3
43%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
6
86%
Agree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
3
43%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
1
14%
Disagree
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
a. Section = MATH-1342-80, Instructor Name = Luis A. Sanchez
-394- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Neutral
2
29%
Disagree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
4
57%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
a. Section = MATH-1342-80, Instructor Name = Luis A. Sanchez
-395- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
4
57%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
4
57%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
7
100%
A
3
43%
B
3
43%
C
1
14%
a. Section = MATH-1342-80, Instructor Name = Luis A.
Sanchez
-396- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I don't like the fact that I
have to go to the
university to take the final.
The whole course has
been online, the final
shouldn't have to be on
campus. I took this
course online because I
was told I didn't have to
show up to campus for it.
Total
Percent
1
14%
6
86%
7
100%
a. Section = MATH-1342-80, Instructor Name = Luis A.
Sanchez
-397- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MATH-2412-80, Instructor Name = James A. Hilsenbeck, Jr.
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Total
Neutral
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Neutral
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Neutral
Total
a. Section = MATH-2412-80, Instructor Name = James A.
Hilsenbeck, Jr.
-398- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Total
Total
a. Section = MATH-2412-80, Instructor Name = James A.
Hilsenbeck, Jr.
-399- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MATH-3381-80, Instructor Name = Luis A. Sanchez
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Agree
6
50%
100%
Strongly Agree
4
33%
Agree
5
42%
Neutral
2
17%
1
8%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
3
25%
Agree
7
58%
Neutral
1
8%
Disagree
1
8%
Total
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
4
33%
Agree
2
17%
Neutral
3
25%
Disagree
3
25%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
4
33%
Agree
5
42%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Neutral
3
25%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
6
50%
Agree
3
25%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
50%
12
Total
Strongly Disagree
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Percent
6
Neutral
Total
3
25%
12
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
7
58%
Agree
5
42%
12
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
6
50%
Total
Neutral
1
8%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
3
25%
Agree
2
17%
Neutral
4
33%
Strongly Disagree
3
25%
12
100%
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Total
a. Section = MATH-3381-80, Instructor Name = Luis A. Sanchez
-400- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
3
25%
Agree
2
17%
Neutral
5
42%
Disagree
2
17%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
4
33%
Agree
5
42%
Neutral
1
8%
Disagree
2
17%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
3
25%
Agree
3
25%
Neutral
4
33%
Disagree
2
17%
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Total
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
3
25%
Agree
3
25%
Neutral
4
33%
Disagree
1
8%
Strongly Disagree
1
8%
Total
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
3
25%
Agree
4
33%
Neutral
5
42%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
3
25%
Agree
3
25%
Neutral
1
8%
Disagree
3
25%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Strongly Disagree
2
17%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
3
25%
Agree
5
42%
Neutral
3
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
8%
12
100%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = MATH-3381-80, Instructor Name = Luis A. Sanchez
-401- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
3
25%
Agree
4
33%
Neutral
4
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
8%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
4
33%
Agree
6
50%
Neutral
1
8%
Strongly Disagree
1
8%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
3
25%
Neutral
3
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
8%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
2
17%
Neutral
5
42%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
5
42%
Neutral
2
17%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
5
42%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Neutral
2
17%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
5
42%
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Neutral
2
17%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
6
50%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Neutral
1
8%
12
100%
Strongly Agree
5
42%
Agree
5
42%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Neutral
Total
1
8%
11
100%
a. Section = MATH-3381-80, Instructor Name = Luis A. Sanchez
-402- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
4
33%
Agree
7
58%
Neutral
1
8%
12
100%
A
4
33%
B
5
42%
C
2
17%
D
1
8%
1
8%
1
8%
1
8%
1
8%
1
8%
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
This course should not
be offered online. Neither
should it only include
exams. I totally dislike this
course. It does not
motivate me. I have
learned nothing. :(
Really knows his Material
I think this is a course that
should only be offered in
a traditional classroom
setting.
I believe the professor is
great but only classes are
much harder the lectures.
Great course!
Awesome instructor!
Total
1
8%
6
50%
12
100%
a. Section = MATH-3381-80, Instructor Name = Luis A. Sanchez
-403- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = MATH-5381-80, Instructor Name = Ranis Ibragimov
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
1
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
33%
Total
3
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
a. Section = MATH-5381-80, Instructor Name = Ranis
Ibragimov
-404- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Disagree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
a. Section = MATH-5381-80, Instructor Name = Ranis
Ibragimov
-405- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Total
3
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
1
33%
B
2
67%
Comments
A lot of material to read, a
short of time to study.
1
33%
2
67%
3
100%
Total
a. Section = MATH-5381-80, Instructor Name = Ranis Ibragimov
-406- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = NURS-6322-01, Instructor Name = Nora Montalvo-Liendo
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Agree
3
27%
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Total
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
2
18%
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
4
36%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
73%
11
Total
Disagree
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Percent
8
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
4
36%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
8
73%
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
3
27%
Total
11
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
10
91%
1
9%
Agree
Agree
Total
11
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Total
Disagree
Total
1
9%
11
100%
a. Section = NURS-6322-01, Instructor Name = Nora MontalvoLiendo
-407- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
6
55%
Agree
4
36%
Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Total
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
6
55%
Total
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
4
36%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
2
18%
Total
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
3
27%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
4
36%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Percent
Strongly Agree
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
4
36%
Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Total
a. Section = NURS-6322-01, Instructor Name = Nora MontalvoLiendo
-408- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
3
27%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
10
100%
A
9
82%
B
1
9%
D
1
9%
a. Section = NURS-6322-01, Instructor Name = Nora MontalvoLiendo
-409- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
This is the lowest I have
rated an online course,
but for some strong
reasons. The course
expectations were very
unclear. This should be
rather clear by how the
students struggled with
the assignments. I think
there was a problem with
the fundamental
approach to this
semester. Online
learning has some
inherent weaknesses,
and those weaknesses
need to be compensated
for. Inherently, online
learning as a rule makes
miscommunication a
great possibility, if not the
norm. Students in online
learning are not getting
the benefit of open
spontaneous discussion
that would be achieved in
a classroom setting,
along with active and
open dialogue with the
instructor. Because of
these shortcomings, an
overcompensation
should be interwoven into
any online learning
course to help
compensate for these
disadvantages. One line
instructions on how to do
an assignment is
confusing and completely
unclear. The BSN
program did not suffer
from this. Instructions
were quite clear. More
clarity is needed.
I feel I gained much from
this course.
difficult in getting used for
a 1st timer online student.
thanks
Total
Percent
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
8
73%
11
100%
a. Section = NURS-6322-01, Instructor Name = Nora
Montalvo-Liendo
-410- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = NURS-6323-01, Instructor Name = Eloisa G. Tamez
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Total
6
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
2
33%
Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
2
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
a. Section = NURS-6323-01, Instructor Name = Eloisa G. Tamez
-411- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
33%
Agree
3
50%
Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
2
33%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Neutral
2
33%
Total
6
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
a. Section = NURS-6323-01, Instructor Name = Eloisa G. Tamez
-412- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
A
4
67%
B
1
17%
D
1
17%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
a. Section = NURS-6323-01, Instructor Name = Eloisa G. Tamez
-413- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I appreciated that the
instructor for this course
would give
announcements
explaining the
assignments or updates
to any changes. This
course had a lot of
content that I was not
familiar with and it helps
to have some guidance
and instruction to clarify
the assignments. This
course is a perfect
example of how a didactic
learning environment
such as a classroom
would be better. Although
I appreciate the
opportunity to explore and
self direct my learning,
this kind of course needs
more interaction from the
instructor. Maybe a
scheduled online 1 hour
weekly chat room would
have been nice.
difficult to get use too if
one is not a computer
junkie thanks
Percent
1
17%
1
17%
a. Section = NURS-6323-01, Instructor Name = Eloisa G.
Tamez
-414- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Actually my other
evaluation was meant for
the this course (the other
course was not as
difficult, and overall would
be a "B" for overall rating.)
I found this course very
confusing and difficult. I
feel it is not a good
approach at all to try and
have the "learner" be the
center of the course, for
reasons explained in my
other evaluation (meant
for this one). Online
learning has some
natural disadvantages,
mainly in sparse and
difficult communication.
No classroom benefit is
experienced, and
communication for an
online course is poor at
best. Compensation
must be made for this
weakness. If instructions
are unclear, as they were
in this course, student
anxiety can go through the
roof, and even result in
depression. the BSN
program was quite good
on this matter, and it was
pretty certain if you
followed instructions
carefully, you would
receive a score to match
in the mid or upper 90's, if
not 100. Requirements
and expectations in this
course were very unclear.
Total
Percent
1
17%
3
50%
6
100%
a. Section = NURS-6323-01, Instructor Name = Eloisa G.
Tamez
-415- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = NURS-6323-02, Instructor Name = Eloisa G. Tamez
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
4
57%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
a. Section = NURS-6323-02, Instructor Name = Eloisa G. Tamez
-416- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
4
57%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
4
57%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
a. Section = NURS-6323-02, Instructor Name = Eloisa G. Tamez
-417- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
3
43%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
3
43%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
4
57%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
7
100%
A
5
71%
B
2
29%
a. Section = NURS-6323-02, Instructor Name = Eloisa G. Tamez
-418- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Excellent instructor
Total
Percent
1
14%
6
86%
7
100%
a. Section = NURS-6323-02, Instructor Name =
Eloisa G. Tamez
-419- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = NURS-6354-01, Instructor Name = Nora Montalvo-Liendo
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
1
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
33%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
Total
3
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = NURS-6354-01, Instructor Name = Nora MontalvoLiendo
-420- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
3
100%
3
100%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Total
Total
a. Section = NURS-6354-01, Instructor Name = Nora MontalvoLiendo
-421- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
A
Total
a. Section = NURS-6354-01, Instructor Name = Nora MontalvoLiendo
-422- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = NURS-6362-01, Instructor Name = Ava S. Miller
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
6
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
4
44%
Total
9
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
67%
a. Section = NURS-6362-01, Instructor Name = Ava S. Miller
-423- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
a. Section = NURS-6362-01, Instructor Name = Ava S. Miller
-424- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
7
78%
B
2
22%
Comments
This course was clearly
laid out. I appreciated that
there were no changes to
the syllabus or
assignments throughout
the semester. I did find it
difficult to get started
though. I was not used to
this format of teaching
and self directed learning,
but it became easier as
the class progressed. An
introduction to this kind of
learning with more of an
explanation of the "big"
picture would have been
nice.
More feedback needed on
assignments done
1
11%
1
11%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
a. Section = NURS-6362-01, Instructor Name = Ava S. Miller
-425- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I felt this course was the
best of the three this
semester. It seems the
semester was designed
per one of the theories we
studied about letting the
learner try to guide the
experience. This in my
opinion is not an
appropriate method for
online learning, as
inherently the student is
already at a substantial
disadvantage due to the
limited communications.
Such inherent
disadvantages in the
online forum should be
overcompensated for, as
they were in the BSN
program. One line
instructions are hardly
sufficient to reasonably
figure out how to do an
assignment. I hope this
approach is
reconsidered.
Improvements might
include online chat
sessions scheduled
between staff and
students, online office
hours for dialogue, and
videoconferencing, or
recorded lectures.
Without such features
clarity is lacking. Clarity
needs overemphasis,
and realtime 2 way
communication sessions
would be a great asset for
online learning.
Total
Percent
1
11%
6
67%
9
100%
a. Section = NURS-6362-01, Instructor Name = Ava S. Miller
-426- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = NURS-6382-01, Instructor Name = Eloisa G. Tamez
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
3
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
a. Section = NURS-6382-01, Instructor Name = Eloisa G.
Tamez
-427- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
60%
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Neutral
3
60%
Total
5
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
a. Section = NURS-6382-01, Instructor Name = Eloisa G.
Tamez
-428- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
A
3
60%
B
2
40%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
a. Section = NURS-6382-01, Instructor Name = Eloisa G.
Tamez
-429- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
the overall objectives of
the course were met.
however, a lot of the time i
felt i was on my own to
figure out how or what
was expected of me for
my assignments. I tried to
communicate with the
instructor via blackboard
and it took a long time to
get a response. If i
contacted the instructor
via utb email, she would
respond quicker. a feel as
though not enough
feedback was provided
once our assignments
were submitted, only a
grade would be given. I
think that more interaction
between instructor and
students is needed. I
understand this is a
graduate level course but
expectations from
students cannot be
addressed if
broad/general information
is provided.
Total
Percent
1
20%
4
80%
5
100%
a. Section = NURS-6382-01, Instructor Name = Eloisa G.
Tamez
-430- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = NURS-6383-01, Instructor Name = Constance L. Hayes
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
7
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
5
56%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
78%
a. Section = NURS-6383-01, Instructor Name = Constance L.
Hayes
-431- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
4
44%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
4
44%
Total
9
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
4
44%
Total
9
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
4
44%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
a. Section = NURS-6383-01, Instructor Name = Constance L.
Hayes
-432- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
8
89%
B
1
11%
Comments
Too much info given on
the website. it can be
difficult to get used too.
thanks
The instructive is VERY
POSITIVE and
encourages students to
do well. only one
downfall... grades for
assignments were not
posted in a timely
manner, which i did not
like because i did not
know how i was doing.
even if instructor was not
able to post grades for
whatever reason,
comments on what
needs improvement or
what as being done well
would of been helpful so
that student could have
fixed any problems so
that student could get
better grades. Otherwise
instructor was very
positive
1
11%
1
11%
7
78%
9
100%
Total
a. Section = NURS-6383-01, Instructor Name = Constance L. Hayes
-433- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = NURS-6464-01, Instructor Name = Ava S. Miller
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
2
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
67%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
Total
3
100%
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = NURS-6464-01, Instructor Name = Ava S. Miller
-434- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
3
100%
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = NURS-6464-01, Instructor Name = Ava S. Miller
-435- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
It seemed like I missed
some of the explanation
about the clss project.
I felt Dr. Miller exemplifies
the art of teaching. Her
encouragement and
support to make you
successful is a strength
to hang on when the
going gets rough.
Excellent instructor. Very
timely responses. Great,
user friendly set up.
Learned much from this
course without undue
pressure/stress.
Total
Percent
1
33%
1
33%
1
33%
3
100%
a. Section = NURS-6464-01, Instructor Name = Ava S. Miller
-436- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = NURS-7300-01, Instructor Name = Ava S. Miller
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Agree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Total
Agree
Total
Agree
Total
Neutral
Total
Agree
Total
Neutral
Total
Neutral
Total
Agree
Total
a. Section = NURS-7300-01, Instructor Name = Ava S.
Miller
-437- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Agree
1
100%
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
B
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Agree
Total
Neutral
Total
Agree
Total
Total
Total
a. Section = NURS-7300-01, Instructor Name = Ava S.
Miller
-438- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = PSYC-2314-86, Instructor Name = Deborah K. Huerta
-439- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Percent
13
81%
3
19%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
12
75%
Agree
3
19%
Neutral
1
6%
Total
16
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
13
81%
3
19%
Total
16
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
12
75%
3
19%
Agree
Agree
Agree
Neutral
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
12
75%
3
19%
Agree
Disagree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
13
81%
3
19%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
12
75%
3
19%
Agree
Agree
Neutral
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
14
88%
2
13%
Total
16
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
12
75%
Agree
3
19%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
16
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
14
88%
2
13%
Total
16
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
11
69%
5
31%
16
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Agree
Agree
Agree
Total
a. Section = PSYC-2314-86, Instructor Name = Deborah K.
Huerta
-440- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Percent
11
69%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
2
13%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
69%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
2
13%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
11
69%
Agree
4
25%
Total
15
100%
Strongly Agree
12
75%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
1
6%
Disagree
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
11
69%
4
25%
Agree
Neutral
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
12
75%
Agree
4
25%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
13
81%
3
19%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
13
81%
Agree
2
13%
Neutral
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
11
69%
Agree
4
25%
Neutral
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
13
81%
Agree
Agree
3
19%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
13
81%
3
19%
16
100%
Agree
Total
a. Section = PSYC-2314-86, Instructor Name = Deborah K.
Huerta
-441- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Strongly Agree
Percent
13
81%
3
19%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
13
81%
Agree
Agree
3
19%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
12
75%
3
19%
Agree
Neutral
1
6%
Total
16
100%
Strongly Agree
13
81%
3
19%
Total
16
100%
A
13
81%
B
3
19%
Agree
a. Section = PSYC-2314-86, Instructor Name = Deborah K.
Huerta
-442- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I've never liked onlined
courses because I learn
better in an engaging
atmosphere. Dr. Huerta is
the best online instructor
that I have ever had. Even
though she works you to
death, she challenged
me and encouraged me
all semester long and I
have never even met her.
Hats off to UTB!
Awesome class!
Extraordinary Professor!
I really enjoyed this online
class. I feel like I'm
actually learning
something. The teacher
has set up a structured
class that is easy to
follow
I learned a lot in this
course. I always thought
negatively about on-line
courses but have
changed my mind about
them. I find that with online I learn more than
actually attending the
class. I can truly say that I
READ the WHOLE BOOK.
I think what keeps a
student on their toes is
keeping up with
discussion boards, 2
quizzes a week, and
chapter questions. It was
a great course.
I had no problem asking
questions and getting
quick responses from the
professor. I'm a first time
online class taker, and i
have to say it was a great
experience.
Great Instructor, great
class :) No negative
feedback whatsoever
keep up the online
classes which make it
easier for individuals with
differnt lifestyles
Percent
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
1
6%
a. Section = PSYC-2314-86, Instructor Name = Deborah K.
Huerta
-443- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Dr. Huerta is an excellent
professor, and I greatly
enjoy taking her online as
well as in classroom
courses. Online courses
are so great!! I
recommend all
Psychology majors take
courses with Dr. Huerta, I
have learned so much.
Dr. Huerta has been very
accessible and interactive
despite the course being
100% online. It has been
a pleasure to learn under
her guidance!
Total
Percent
1
6%
1
6%
9
56%
16
100%
a. Section = PSYC-2314-86, Instructor Name = Deborah K.
Huerta
-444- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = PSYC-3313-86, Instructor Name = Deborah K. Huerta
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
3
23%
Total
13
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
Agree
10
77%
11
85%
Agree
1
8%
Neutral
1
8%
Total
13
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
10
77%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Agree
3
23%
13
100%
Strongly Agree
8
62%
Agree
4
31%
Total
Disagree
1
8%
13
100%
Strongly Agree
9
69%
Disagree
3
23%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Disagree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
1
8%
Total
13
100%
Strongly Agree
10
77%
3
23%
Agree
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
13
100%
Strongly Agree
8
62%
Agree
3
23%
Disagree
1
8%
Strongly Disagree
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
1
8%
Total
13
100%
Strongly Agree
11
85%
2
15%
Total
13
100%
Strongly Agree
10
77%
3
23%
Agree
Neutral
Total
13
100%
Strongly Agree
8
62%
Agree
2
15%
Neutral
1
8%
Disagree
1
8%
12
100%
Total
a. Section = PSYC-3313-86, Instructor Name = Deborah K. Huerta
-445- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
8%
1
8%
100%
Strongly Agree
10
77%
Agree
1
8%
Neutral
1
8%
Total
12
100%
Strongly Agree
11
85%
2
15%
Agree
Total
13
100%
Strongly Agree
8
62%
Agree
1
8%
Neutral
3
23%
Disagree
1
8%
Total
13
100%
Strongly Agree
11
85%
Agree
1
8%
Neutral
1
8%
Total
13
100%
Strongly Agree
10
77%
3
23%
Total
13
100%
Strongly Agree
10
77%
2
15%
Agree
Agree
1
8%
Total
13
100%
Strongly Agree
11
85%
2
15%
Agree
13
100%
Strongly Agree
5
38%
Agree
2
15%
Neutral
6
46%
13
100%
Strongly Agree
5
38%
Agree
1
8%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
85%
1
13
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
11
Total
Neutral
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Percent
Neutral
Total
7
54%
13
100%
a. Section = PSYC-3313-86, Instructor Name = Deborah K.
Huerta
-446- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Strongly Agree
Percent
11
85%
2
15%
Total
13
100%
Strongly Agree
11
85%
Agree
1
8%
Neutral
1
8%
Total
13
100%
Strongly Agree
10
77%
Agree
Agree
2
15%
Total
12
100%
Strongly Agree
11
85%
2
15%
Total
13
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
11
85%
2
15%
Total
13
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
10
77%
3
23%
Total
13
100%
A
11
85%
B
2
15%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Agree
Agree
Agree
a. Section = PSYC-3313-86, Instructor Name = Deborah K.
Huerta
-447- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I have found that when
courses allow you to
retake the quiz(without
givig you the correct
answer) it helps the
student to learn more of
the material. It serves as
a challenge to give it
another try until you learn
the material to the full
extent. I felt the quizzez
sometimes did not
evaluate fairly all the
knowledge I had
acquired. Thank you, I feel
the course was very
interesting and the
essays helped to better
understand the material
and focus on a topic.
Great class but the
teacher should answer
emails from students.
Excellent. Great
experience, great
professor, awsome
online course, would do it
all again.
Excellent professor! Even
though it is an online
course I felt as if it was
just as effective.
Dr. huerta is a good
professor. I really enjoyed
her. I just didnt like the
fact that sometimes i
would email her about an
important question and it
would either get
answered extremely late
or not at all. other than
that she was great!!
Percent
1
8%
1
8%
1
8%
1
8%
1
8%
a. Section = PSYC-3313-86, Instructor Name = Deborah K.
Huerta
-448- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Although this was an
online class, I thought
that Dr. Huerta directed
the course in such a way
that I learned a great deal
about psychological
abnormalities. What the
course lacked in an
actual classroom
environment, it certainly
made up for with lots of
work in essay writing. I
have already signed up
for Dr. Huerta's Lifespan
Development course, and
I look forward to next
semester in another one
of her courses. I would
recommend this course
to anyone interested in
psychology.
Total
Percent
1
8%
7
54%
13
100%
a. Section = PSYC-3313-86, Instructor Name = Deborah K.
Huerta
-449- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = RSPT-4215-01, Instructor Name = Alberto Santos
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
3
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
Total
75%
Total
4
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Neutral
2
50%
Disagree
1
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
2
50%
Total
4
100%
a. Section = RSPT-4215-01, Instructor Name = Alberto Santos
-450- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Disagree
1
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Neutral
2
50%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
a. Section = RSPT-4215-01, Instructor Name = Alberto Santos
-451- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Neutral
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
A
2
50%
B
2
50%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
a. Section = RSPT-4215-01, Instructor Name = Alberto Santos
-452- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I would rate an A,
however, there is no
actual exchange of
information or ideas in
the course. I thought I
would like that, but i
actually miss some type
of interaction. Perhaps a
discussion board would
help. Also, one question
asks about
communication with
others in the class. There
is no communication
between classmates, we
do not even know who
they are, or if there are
even otehrs taking the
course.
I would like to see other
other things done in the
course bedsides read,
take a test, read and then
take a test. Maybe
discussions, chats,
homework assignments,
but something to engage
me in between the
exams.
Total
Percent
1
25%
1
25%
2
50%
4
100%
a. Section = RSPT-4215-01, Instructor Name = Alberto
Santos
-453- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPAN-2313-80, Instructor Name = Ana Del Rosario Pena-Oli
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
7
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
9
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
a. Section = SPAN-2313-80, Instructor Name = Ana Del
Rosario Pena-Oli
-454- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
78%
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
4
44%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
a. Section = SPAN-2313-80, Instructor Name = Ana Del
Rosario Pena-Oli
-455- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
8
89%
B
1
11%
Comments
Ms. Ana Pena-Oliva is an
excellent instructor.
1
11%
8
89%
9
100%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Total
a. Section = SPAN-2313-80, Instructor Name = Ana Del Rosario Pena-Oli
-456- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPAN-2313-81, Instructor Name = Miriam S. Vazquez
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Agree
2
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
67%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
2
67%
Total
3
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Agree
1
33%
Disagree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Total
a. Section = SPAN-2313-81, Instructor Name = Miriam S.
Vazquez
-457- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Agree
Percent
3
100%
3
100%
Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Agree
2
67%
Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Total
Agree
Total
a. Section = SPAN-2313-81, Instructor Name = Miriam S.
Vazquez
-458- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
A
2
67%
B
1
33%
3
100%
3
100%
Comments
Total
a. Section = SPAN-2313-81, Instructor Name = Miriam S.
Vazquez
-459- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPAN-2315-80, Instructor Name = Ana Del Rosario Pena-Oli
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
3
27%
11
100%
9
82%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Agree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
3
27%
11
100%
9
82%
Total
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
Agree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
2
18%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
2
18%
11
100%
9
82%
Total
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
Agree
Total
2
18%
11
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
3
27%
11
100%
7
64%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
4
36%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
3
27%
11
100%
Total
Total
a. Section = SPAN-2315-80, Instructor Name = Ana Del
Rosario Pena-Oli
-460- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
4
36%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Total
Total
Agree
4
36%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
4
36%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
4
36%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
4
36%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
8
73%
Total
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Strongly Agree
Agree
3
27%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
5
45%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
5
45%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
5
45%
11
100%
8
73%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Total
3
27%
11
100%
a. Section = SPAN-2315-80, Instructor Name = Ana Del Rosario
Pena-Oli
-461- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
9
82%
Agree
2
18%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
5
45%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
11
100%
A
9
82%
B
2
18%
a. Section = SPAN-2315-80, Instructor Name = Ana Del
Rosario Pena-Oli
-462- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
The 100% online course
is perfect for me. Math is
not an easy subject for
me and with the online
instructional videos I can
watch them over and over
until I understand the
problem or the way to
solve the problem, I love
online Math courses, in
class I would be
embarrassed to ask the
same question over and
over, online I can watch
the instruction as many
times as I need, the Math
XL is great, the instructor
they use is great, she
explains the problems in
a very easy to understand
manner. I hope they keep
using the Math XL, it has
been a tremendous help
in understanding such a
difficult subject for me.
Mrs. Pena is one of the
best Spanish instructors
I've had. She is an great
professor, answers all
your questions and
emails in a timely
manner. I wish ALL online
professors where like
Mrs. Pena.
Loved your class wish I
could of interacted with
you more because you
are truly a excellent
teacher.
Keep in touch through us
with emails and keep us
up to date on when work
and tests were due. Very
friendly when I met her at
the Midterm. The online
calender of events was
set up perfectly and she
stuck to it. Also allowed
us extra opportunites to
make up work. Thanks
miss. Awesome teacher!!
Total
Percent
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
7
64%
11
100%
a. Section = SPAN-2315-80, Instructor Name = Ana Del
Rosario Pena-Oli
-463- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPAN-2317-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E. Rodriguez
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
1
9%
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Neutral
2
18%
Total
11
100%
Strongly Agree
10
91%
Neutral
Total
1
9%
11
100%
a. Section = SPAN-2317-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E.
Rodriguez
-464- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
6
55%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Total
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
1
9%
Disagree
2
18%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Total
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
3
27%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
8
73%
Total
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
Agree
3
27%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = SPAN-2317-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E.
Rodriguez
-465- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
8
73%
Agree
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
2
18%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Neutral
1
9%
Disagree
2
18%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Neutral
1
9%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Strongly Disagree
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
1
9%
Total
11
100%
Strongly Agree
10
91%
1
9%
Agree
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
1
9%
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
9
82%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Agree
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
9
82%
Agree
2
18%
11
100%
Total
Total
a. Section = SPAN-2317-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E.
Rodriguez
-466- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
10
91%
D
1
9%
Comments
This was a great learning
experience. Although our
class was online, our
professor utilized the
technology made
available to include online
students in weekly
lessons via tegrity. I
enjoyed the fact that we
had a professor who is
fluent in Spanish and who
has an abundance of
knowledge of both the
business environment in
Latin America and the
Latin American culture
which he gladly shared
with his students.
the video sessions were
very disrruptive cutting
off/on frequently.
I only saw the instructor
twice, but it seems like if I
did every week. His work
was perfect, everything he
explained on the videos
was understandable and
clearly. His daily
assignments were
revalant to the class
objectives and I learned a
lot. I will recommend the
class to my friends.
I didn't have a problem
with the instructor, but
with the way the class
assignments were
organized. There was no
text book to follow and
several of the lectures
that were associated with
assignments, were not
functioning properly. The
class was difficult to
follow overall.
He was very nice and very
helpful.
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
a. Section = SPAN-2317-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E. Rodriguez
-467- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
great for someone who
likes online courses. it
was my first and although
it was good i really prefer
the classroom
environment. as for the
problems we had with
videos i think we still have
a ways to go before
online courses can flow
easily for students .. still
too many problems with
videos
Great class, very
insightful! The professor
kept in touch, was very
helpful!
Buena clase. Me gusto
mucho la seccion de
videos creo que es una
buena manera de
aprender al tiempo de
uno. Buen profesor
tambien, muestra gran
conocimiento sobre lo
que enseña.
Total
Percent
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
3
27%
11
100%
a. Section = SPAN-2317-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E.
Rodriguez
-468- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPAN-2321-80, Instructor Name = Dania C. Lopez Garcia
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Disagree
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
a. Section = SPAN-2321-80, Instructor Name = Dania C. Lopez
Garcia
-469- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Disagree
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
a. Section = SPAN-2321-80, Instructor Name = Dania C. Lopez
Garcia
-470- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Strongly Disagree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Disagree
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
1
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
A
3
60%
D
1
20%
F
1
20%
1
20%
1
20%
THe fact that there was
not communication online
regarding materials, is
just not right. Student
should be able to contact
each other and with the
instructor when you feel
you are having problems
understanding something
this course does not have
anything like that.
Basically your are on your
own !!!!.
Thank you Dr. LopezGarcia for letting make up
work when my husband
passed away. Keep up
the good work.
Total
3
60%
5
100%
a. Section = SPAN-2321-80, Instructor Name = Dania C. Lopez Garcia
-471- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPAN-2321-81, Instructor Name = Laura P. Robledo
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
2
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Neutral
1
17%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Neutral
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Neutral
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
2
33%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
2
33%
Agree
1
17%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
2
33%
Agree
3
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
a. Section = SPAN-2321-81, Instructor Name = Laura P. Robledo
-472- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Neutral
3
50%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
1
17%
Agree
2
33%
Neutral
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
2
33%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Neutral
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Neutral
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Neutral
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
2
33%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
a. Section = SPAN-2321-81, Instructor Name = Laura P. Robledo
-473- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
2
33%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
2
33%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Neutral
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Neutral
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
1
17%
Disagree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
50%
Agree
1
17%
Strongly Disagree
2
33%
Total
6
100%
a. Section = SPAN-2321-81, Instructor Name = Laura P. Robledo
-474- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
A
4
67%
B
1
17%
F
1
17%
1
17%
1
17%
1
17%
3
50%
6
100%
Way too many
assignments, if I was only
taking this class, then its
okay, but 15-20
assignments is
ridiculous. Found too
many errors in
assignments and
quizzes, such as spelling.
She doesn't give partial
credit for correct answers,
you either get it all right or
a wrong, which is
unacceptable.
it was my first time takin
gan online course, but
everytime i had a
question i had to email
my teacher but like she
was in houston she
would only respond in the
weeknends. which i
undersand but for me my
grades are important
expecially because im in
probation and every point
counts. and in some
problems she wouldnt be
able to answer me evern
thought i knew that i was
right.
I really enjoyed taking this
class online. The
instructor was a great
deal of help when I had
trouble with something.
Total
a. Section = SPAN-2321-81, Instructor Name = Laura P. Robledo
-475- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPAN-2322-80, Instructor Name = Laura P. Robledo
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
5
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
3
38%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
3
38%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
3
38%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
4
50%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
63%
a. Section = SPAN-2322-80, Instructor Name = Laura P. Robledo
-476- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
3
38%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
4
50%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
a. Section = SPAN-2322-80, Instructor Name = Laura P. Robledo
-477- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
2
25%
Disagree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
3
38%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
A
5
63%
B
2
25%
C
1
13%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
a. Section = SPAN-2322-80, Instructor Name = Laura P. Robledo
-478- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Mucha falta de
comunicacion. A el final
quiensabe que paso con
la maestra. Tambien
muchos de los ejercicion
interactivos eran
calificados erroneamente
por el systema.
i rfeally like the course.
The only thing that I had
trouble was with the
exams. They were mainly
on fridays. The time
wassometimeshard for
me becaus i am at work
at those time, so I would
have to get someone to
cover for me in the
afternoon so that I can
take the exam. I really
wish that it would a later
time or to have also the
option of sat. mornings.
Hope that something can
be done.
Total
Percent
1
13%
1
13%
6
75%
8
100%
a. Section = SPAN-2322-80, Instructor Name = Laura P.
Robledo
-479- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPAN-4303-80, Instructor Name = Elena Vega-Sampayo
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Total
Agree
6
55%
45%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
4
36%
2
18%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
1
9%
Total
Neutral
1
9%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
4
36%
11
100%
7
64%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
36%
100%
100%
Neutral
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
4
11
5
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
64%
11
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Percent
7
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Agree
4
36%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
4
36%
Total
Total
11
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
4
36%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
Total
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
3
27%
11
100%
7
64%
Total
Agree
Total
4
36%
11
100%
a. Section = SPAN-4303-80, Instructor Name = Elena VegaSampayo
-480- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
Total
10
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
2
18%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
5
45%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
3
27%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Strongly Disagree
1
9%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
11
100%
Strongly Agree
6
55%
Agree
4
36%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
Total
a. Section = SPAN-4303-80, Instructor Name = Elena VegaSampayo
-481- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Total
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
8
73%
Agree
2
18%
Neutral
1
9%
Total
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
11
100%
Strongly Agree
7
64%
Agree
3
27%
Disagree
1
9%
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
11
100%
A
6
55%
B
4
36%
C
1
9%
a. Section = SPAN-4303-80, Instructor Name = Elena VegaSampayo
-482- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
She is an excellent
instructor with a passion
for what she does. First
time taking an online
course so some things
were a little difficult for
me. I do feel it was a lot of
work for one class, at
time the work was
overwhelming.
Nonetheless, everything
was very interesting.
great teacher.
Es demasiado material
que cubrir; tomando en
cuenta que esta no es la
unica clase que
llevamos.
Although it is a course on
line, the instructor
covered everything with
much detail.
Al matricularme en un
curso en línea esperaba
flexibilidad de horarios lo
cual no hubo mucho. Las
entregas que eran entre
semana eran algo difícil
de completar. Si el
material hubiera sido
puesto los fines de
semana (los foros y las
pruebas) entonces
hubiera alcanzado mayor
organización en lo
personal. Aunque la
lectura a veces era algo
larga, el libro es
excelente pero las fichas
son extensas. Supongo
que pase más tiempo
preparando este curso
que cualquier otro.
Total
Percent
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
6
55%
11
100%
a. Section = SPAN-4303-80, Instructor Name = Elena VegaSampayo
-483- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPAN-4316-80, Instructor Name = Elena Vega-Sampayo
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Total
Agree
5
50%
Agree
4
40%
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
3
30%
2
20%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
5
50%
Agree
4
40%
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Total
Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Total
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
4
40%
Total
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Total
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
60%
Strongly Agree
Disagree
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
6
40%
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
30%
100%
100%
Neutral
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
3
10
4
Total
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
70%
10
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Percent
7
10
100%
Strongly Agree
2
20%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
5
50%
Disagree
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
Total
1
10%
10
100%
a. Section = SPAN-4316-80, Instructor Name = Elena VegaSampayo
-484- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
3
30%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
3
30%
Disagree
1
10%
Total
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
2
20%
Agree
4
40%
Neutral
3
30%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
3
30%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
3
30%
Disagree
1
10%
Total
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Total
10
100%
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
3
30%
Agree
5
50%
Neutral
2
20%
10
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
4
40%
Agree
6
60%
Total
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
4
40%
Agree
4
40%
Neutral
1
10%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
3
30%
Agree
5
50%
Neutral
2
20%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Total
10
100%
Strongly Agree
4
40%
Agree
4
40%
Neutral
2
20%
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
10
100%
Strongly Agree
3
30%
Agree
6
60%
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
Total
a. Section = SPAN-4316-80, Instructor Name = Elena VegaSampayo
-485- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
1
10%
Agree
3
30%
Neutral
5
50%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
10
100%
Strongly Agree
2
20%
Agree
5
50%
Neutral
2
20%
Strongly Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
3
30%
Agree
6
60%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
3
30%
Agree
4
40%
Neutral
1
10%
Disagree
1
10%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
3
30%
Agree
6
60%
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
3
30%
Agree
7
70%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Total
10
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
2
20%
Agree
7
70%
Total
9
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
3
30%
Agree
7
70%
Total
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
10
100%
A
5
50%
B
4
40%
C
1
10%
a. Section = SPAN-4316-80, Instructor Name = Elena VegaSampayo
-486- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
The professor is very
knowledgeable and
knows what she is doing
and is well prepared. My
issue is with the workload
that this course has. It is
too much!!! My opinion of
online is to be more
flexible not to overload
one with so much
assignments, they were
very exagerated and
would have preferred
more quizes than
assignments. Also, there
is alot o errors on the
assignments, right
answers marked wrong,
different words, and when
you lose the quiz u are
unable to go back to it
Professor was always
attentive to our email
questions.
On some assignments
the answers were
counted wrong when they
were clearly spelled
correctly but since the
answer was misspelled it
was counted wrong. You
need to check your
answer sheets against
the students work and
correct the mistakes on
your answer sheets.
Great online course, I
would strongly
recommend this course
to other students.
great on-line class
Total
Percent
1
10%
1
10%
1
10%
1
10%
1
10%
5
50%
10
100%
a. Section = SPAN-4316-80, Instructor Name = Elena VegaSampayo
-487- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPAN-4316-81, Instructor Name = Mercedes O. Torres
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Neutral
2
29%
Total
6
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
6
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
2
29%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
1
14%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
3
43%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
6
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
a. Section = SPAN-4316-81, Instructor Name = Mercedes O.
Torres
-488- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
2
29%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Neutral
3
43%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
6
100%
a. Section = SPAN-4316-81, Instructor Name = Mercedes O.
Torres
-489- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
2
29%
Agree
2
29%
Disagree
1
14%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
71%
Agree
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Disagree
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
57%
Agree
1
14%
Neutral
1
14%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
3
43%
Agree
2
29%
Strongly Disagree
1
14%
Total
6
100%
1
14%
A
3
43%
B
2
29%
D
1
14%
a. Section = SPAN-4316-81, Instructor Name = Mercedes O.
Torres
-490- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
this professor can never
email you back in time
she takes about a day or
two to respond. i think that
she needs to have more
help or something to have
them answered as
quickly as possible. She
might give you chances
but when you really have
a problem and she has
already helped you once
she wont do it again
which i think is unfair
because things do
happen and its not our
fault. i wouldnt
recommend this class
since it was bad
eventhough im passing
but still i dont believe in
having an online class
and having to go to utb to
take tests. which in other
online classes you dont
have to either.
This has probably been
my favorite online course,
i have taken several
before this one. she is
organizd, and i would
hope she would offer
more online classes.
A lot of the course
material needs to be
corrected. The
assignments have many
mistakes causing
repetition of the
assignments for the
students. Overall, it's a
good online course.
Total
Percent
1
14%
1
14%
1
14%
4
57%
7
100%
a. Section = SPAN-4316-81, Instructor Name = Mercedes
O. Torres
-491- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPAN-4334-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E. Rodriguez
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
1
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
a. Section = SPAN-4334-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E.
Rodriguez
-492- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
50%
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
1
50%
Agree
1
50%
Total
2
100%
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
2
100%
2
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Total
a. Section = SPAN-4334-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E.
Rodriguez
-493- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
2
100%
Total
2
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
2
100%
1
50%
1
50%
2
100%
Excellent service, quality
teaching with great
opportunity for learning.
Very satisfied with class
content and professor's
procedures. Highly
recommended
Total
a. Section = SPAN-4334-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E. Rodriguez
-494- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPAN-6331-80, Instructor Name = Olga Torres Hostench
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = SPAN-6331-80, Instructor Name = Olga Torres
Hostench
-495- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
1
100%
Thank you!
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
a. Section = SPAN-6331-80, Instructor Name = Olga Torres
Hostench
-496- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPAN-6340-80, Instructor Name = Nazaret Fresno Canada
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Agree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = SPAN-6340-80, Instructor Name = Nazaret Fresno
Canada
-497- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
1
100%
Era un encanto.
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
a. Section = SPAN-6340-80, Instructor Name = Nazaret Fresno
Canada
-498- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPANU-2313-80, Instructor Name = Ana Del Rosario Pena-Oli
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = SPANU-2313-80, Instructor Name = Ana Del
Rosario Pena-Oli
-499- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
Total
a. Section = SPANU-2313-80, Instructor Name = Ana Del
Rosario Pena-Oli
-500- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPANU-2315-80, Instructor Name = Ana Del Rosario Pena-Oli
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
2
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
a. Section = SPANU-2315-80, Instructor Name = Ana Del
Rosario Pena-Oli
-501- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
67%
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
a. Section = SPANU-2315-80, Instructor Name = Ana Del
Rosario Pena-Oli
-502- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
2
67%
B
1
33%
Comments
Have to say, the calendar
is still messy, but better
than last springs spanish
I online.
1
33%
2
67%
3
100%
Total
a. Section = SPANU-2315-80, Instructor Name = Ana Del Rosario PenaOli
-503- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPANU-2317-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E. Rodriguez
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
Percent
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
2
67%
Total
3
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = SPANU-2317-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E.
Rodriguez
-504- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
1
33%
Agree
1
33%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = SPANU-2317-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E.
Rodriguez
-505- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
Professor Rodriguez
seems to be very
prepared, there was only
one ocasion on which a
video didn't match the
questions assigned.
Other than that this
course was very
comfortable and well
presented.
Total
Percent
3
100%
1
33%
2
67%
3
100%
a. Section = SPANU-2317-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E. Rodriguez
-506- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPANU-2321-80, Instructor Name = Dania C. Lopez Garcia
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Neutral
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Neutral
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Neutral
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Total
Neutral
Total
Disagree
Total
Neutral
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Agree
Total
Neutral
Total
Neutral
Total
a. Section = SPANU-2321-80, Instructor Name = Dania C.
Lopez Garcia
-507- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Neutral
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Neutral
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Strongly Agree
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Neutral
1
100%
Total
1
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Agree
1
100%
1
100%
Neutral
1
100%
Total
1
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
B
1
100%
Strongly Agree
Total
Neutral
Total
Neutral
Total
Total
a. Section = SPANU-2321-80, Instructor Name = Dania C.
Lopez Garcia
-508- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
I DO NOT KNOW IF IT
WAS BECAUSE IT WAS
MY FIRST TIME TAKING
AN ONLINE CLASS OR
BECAUSE THE
TEACHER WAS NOT ALL
THAT CLEAR WITH HER
ASSIGNMENTS.
THROUGHOUT THE
WHOLE SEMESTER I
HAD TROUBLE WITH
THE ASSIGNMENTS AND
SHE ALWAYS TOOK
SOMETIME TO REPLY
OR FIX THE PROBLEM...
BUT OVER ALL SHE WAS
A GOOD TEACHER.
Total
Percent
1
100%
1
100%
a. Section = SPANU-2321-80, Instructor Name = Dania C.
Lopez Garcia
-509- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPED-4386-61, Instructor Name = Mary G. Curtis
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
7
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Disagree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
88%
a. Section = SPED-4386-61, Instructor Name = Mary G. Curtis
-510- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Total
7
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
a. Section = SPED-4386-61, Instructor Name = Mary G. Curtis
-511- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Percent
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Total
7
100%
8
100%
Strongly Agree
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
6
75%
B
2
25%
Comments
The instructor should stay
on track during online
chats.She always goes
off topic about her family
and she should
remember most of us are
taking online courses to
save time...keep the chats
for necessary information.
Everything else in the
class went well.
Outstanding professor!
Learned alot of new
information.
I just didn't agree on the
times we had to get
together for the chats. I
took this online course to
be able to go at my own
pace, but most chats
were at 10 o clock at
night. This was hard, and
very tyring. I think there
should be a better way to
be able to do this, other
than to stay up until 11 at
night.
1
13%
1
13%
1
13%
5
63%
8
100%
Total
a. Section = SPED-4386-61, Instructor Name = Mary G. Curtis
-512- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPED-4386-62, Instructor Name = Mary G. Curtis
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
7
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
4
44%
Agree
4
44%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
3
33%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
a. Section = SPED-4386-62, Instructor Name = Mary G. Curtis
-513- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
78%
Count
Percent
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
4
44%
Total
9
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Neutral
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
1
11%
Strongly Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
2
22%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Neutral
2
22%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
a. Section = SPED-4386-62, Instructor Name = Mary G. Curtis
-514- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
6
67%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
3
33%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Disagree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
2
22%
Total
9
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
5
56%
Agree
3
33%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
A
7
78%
B
1
11%
C
1
11%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
a. Section = SPED-4386-62, Instructor Name = Mary G. Curtis
-515- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
There should be alternate
assignments or
acceptable substitions for
students to acquire
Service Learning hours
other than just Reach out
and Read. While I agree
this is a great way for
students to sharpen their
intrapersonal skills with
children and parents, it is
extremely difficult for ACP
students who already
hold teaching jobs to find
available time to acquire
these hours especially
when ROR is only
available during the hours
of 8am to 5pm on
weekdays and limited
hours on the weekend. As
I'm sure you are aware
those of us who are
educators are not
available during these
times.
Stay on topic during chats
is the only thing I would
change for instructin
Percent
1
11%
1
11%
a. Section = SPED-4386-62, Instructor Name = Mary G.
Curtis
-516- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
One of the advantages of
taking an online course is
being able to complete
assignments within your
own time schedule.
Having to meet each
week at 10:00 o'clock at
night, was a true
inconvenience. If I had
know this would have
been a course
requirement, I would have
taken this course during
the day. Also, contact with
Dr. Curtis was difficult to
say the least. It would
take days, sometimes
weeks to get a response
to an e-mail. I really feel
that since this is an
online class,
communication should
be answered in a more
timely and efficient
manner. Some of the
information that I received
in the course is valuable,
however, much of it has
been taught in many of
my other teaching
classes. Since, I am not a
special ed. major, I'm not
sure I feel this course is a
valuable asset to my
degree plan.
I loved all the past
experiences she shared
with us. :)It made things
seem less abstract.
Enjoyed the Course!
Dr. Curtis has such a
broad knowledge of so
many things and that
makes a great professor.
I learned so much from
her! She is such a great
professor :)
Total
Percent
1
11%
1
11%
1
11%
1
11%
3
33%
9
100%
a. Section = SPED-4386-62, Instructor Name = Mary G.
Curtis
-517- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = SPED-4386-63, Instructor Name = Mary G. Curtis
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Neutral
2
40%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
a. Section = SPED-4386-63, Instructor Name = Mary G. Curtis
-518- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Neutral
3
60%
Total
5
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
Disagree
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
1
20%
Neutral
1
20%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Total
5
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
3
60%
Total
5
100%
a. Section = SPED-4386-63, Instructor Name = Mary G. Curtis
-519- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Agree
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
3
60%
Neutral
2
40%
Total
5
100%
Strongly Agree
4
80%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
5
100%
5
100%
Strongly Agree
2
40%
Agree
2
40%
Neutral
1
20%
Total
5
100%
A
3
60%
B
1
20%
C
1
20%
1
20%
1
20%
Strongly Agree
Total
I was very unhappy with
this course and will not
ever take another online
course again.
great professor would
recommend her anytime
Total
a. Section = SPED-4386-63, Instructor Name = Mary G. Curtis
-520- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
3
60%
5
100%
Section = TECT-3301-80, Instructor Name = Maria E. Valdes-Corbeil
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
8
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
9
100%
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Neutral
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
89%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Total
a. Section = TECT-3301-80, Instructor Name = Maria E.
Valdes-Corbeil
-521- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
Percent
9
100%
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Agree
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
9
100%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
8
89%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
7
78%
Agree
1
11%
Neutral
1
11%
Total
9
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
9
100%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
9
100%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
9
100%
Total
9
100%
Strongly Agree
9
100%
Total
9
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
9
100%
9
100%
Strongly Agree
9
100%
Total
9
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Total
Total
a. Section = TECT-3301-80, Instructor Name = Maria E.
Valdes-Corbeil
-522- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
A
Instructor always
responded to my emails
promptly and was very
professional
I like how easy it was to
get in contact with my
professor. I liked all the
participation in the class
and the discussion
board.
Dr. Corbeil is a great
teacher that supports her
students and makes
herself available at all
times. I have been made
aware of scholarship
thanks to Dr. Corbeil. Dr.
Corbeil provides
feedback on projects, and
allows us to learn
properly and at our own
pace. JA
Total
Percent
9
100%
1
11%
1
11%
1
11%
6
67%
9
100%
a. Section = TECT-3301-80, Instructor Name = Maria E. Valdes-Corbeil
-523- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = TECT-3301-81, Instructor Name = Michelle Solis
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
5
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Disagree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
6
100%
6
100%
6
100%
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
83%
a. Section = TECT-3301-81, Instructor Name = Michelle Solis
-524- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
6
100%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
4
67%
Agree
1
17%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
a. Section = TECT-3301-81, Instructor Name = Michelle Solis
-525- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Agree
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
5
83%
Neutral
1
17%
Total
6
100%
A
4
67%
B
2
33%
6
100%
6
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Total
a. Section = TECT-3301-81, Instructor Name = Michelle Solis
-526- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = TECT-3302-80, Instructor Name = Maria E. Valdes-Corbeil
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
Percent
8
100%
8
100%
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Total
7
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
8
100%
Total
8
100%
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
8
100%
8
100%
8
100%
8
100%
8
100%
8
100%
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = TECT-3302-80, Instructor Name = Maria E.
Valdes-Corbeil
-527- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Strongly Agree
Percent
8
100%
8
100%
Strongly Agree
8
100%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
8
100%
8
100%
Strongly Agree
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
8
100%
Total
8
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Strongly Agree
8
100%
Total
8
100%
8
100%
8
100%
8
100%
8
100%
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
8
100%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
8
100%
8
100%
Strongly Agree
8
100%
Total
8
100%
8
100%
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
Total
a. Section = TECT-3302-80, Instructor Name = Maria E.
-528- F
Valdes-Corbeil
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Outstanding instructor.
I enjoyed taking this
online class. The
instructor was very helpful
I enjoyed having this
instructor for a class. She
was excellent in the way
she handled herself and
the way that she
presented the course
lessons I would
recommend her to any of
my friends.
Excellent professor!!!!!
Excellent instructor.
Feedback was
immediate. Very helpful.
Always available. Good
positive feedback. Would
recommend this
instructor - Excellent
Dr. Corbeil is a great
teacher that supports her
students and makes
herself available at all
times. I have been made
aware of scholarship
thanks to Dr. Corbeil. Dr.
Corbeil provides
feedback on projects, and
allows us to learn
properly and at our own
pace. JA
Total
Percent
1
13%
1
13%
1
13%
1
13%
1
13%
1
13%
2
25%
8
100%
a. Section = TECT-3302-80, Instructor Name = Maria E.
Valdes-Corbeil
-529- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = TECT-3302-81, Instructor Name = Maria E. Valdes-Corbeil
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
5
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Total
7
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
a. Section = TECT-3302-81, Instructor Name = Maria E.
Valdes-Corbeil
-530- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
63%
Count
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Percent
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
5
63%
Agree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
6
75%
Agree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
a. Section = TECT-3302-81, Instructor Name = Maria E.
Valdes-Corbeil
-531- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
7
88%
Agree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
6
75%
B
2
25%
Comments
I find the tabbed calendar
a bit confusing and prefer
a list of dates and
assignments. I also
prefer being able to
continue a discussion
topic, regardless of the
date restrictions.
Dr. Maria Elena Cobeil is
a great instructor and
made the class very
friendly and interesting. I
would recommed this
class to other students.
She is an awesome
teacher.
1
13%
1
13%
6
75%
8
100%
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Total
a. Section = TECT-3302-81, Instructor Name = Maria E. Valdes-Corbeil
-532- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = TECT-3303-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D. Hollier, JR
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Percent
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
3
38%
Strongly Disagree
1
13%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Disagree
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
1
13%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
a. Section = TECT-3303-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D. Hollier,
JR
-533- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Percent
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
4
50%
Total
8
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
1
13%
Agree
3
38%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Total
8
100%
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Agree
4
50%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
2
25%
Agree
2
25%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
a. Section = TECT-3303-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D. Hollier,
JR
-534- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
4
50%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
2
25%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
a. Section = TECT-3303-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D. Hollier,
JR
-535- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Comments
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Neutral
2
25%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
Strongly Agree
3
38%
Agree
1
13%
Neutral
1
13%
Strongly Disagree
3
38%
Total
8
100%
A
3
38%
B
1
13%
C
1
13%
F
3
38%
The instructor showed
very little interest in
actually teaching
anything. There was zero
participation or
involvement from the
instructor throughout the
course. I understand that
this is an online course
and because I am
familiar with such it was
obvious that the students
learned completely on
their own. The course
consisted of quiz after
quiz, timed exams and 1
research project.
Absolutely no
assignments in between
quizzes, no discussions,
no smaller tasks at the
end of each chapter,
nothing. It was quite
obvious that the instructor
took this course for the
extra money and lacked
time to attend to its
students who pay a very
expensive tuition. Telling
ain't Teaching. Thank
you....
1
13%
a. Section = TECT-3303-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D. Hollier, JR
-536- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
On every single quiz and
exam, he marked
questions wrong that
were supposed to be
correct. I had to constantly
e-mail him and prove to
him that my answers
were correct. He'd
eventually give me credit
for the correct answers,
but I never trusted his
exams. I had to second
guess HIS answers
which made studying
extremely difficult and
unfair.
N/A
I would have to rate this
class an F. I had a very
difficult time with this
class. The only thing that I
got out of this class was
reading chapters and
taking quizzes. There was
no instructor involvement
and no student
involvement either.
Several of the quizzes
were marking my correct
answers wrong. I needed
to send the instructor
emails with correct
answers and the page
numbers where they were
located; to please correct
my grades. This was
done several times. Felt
like this teacher is using
technology to get paid
and not showing up to
work. All semester my
companion was the
textbook and blackboard.
Other online classes I
have taken through UTB
involved discussion
questions with other
online students,
integrating new
technologies that were
implemented from
textbook, and learning
strategies and new
softwares.
Total
Percent
1
13%
1
13%
1
13%
4
50%
8
100%
a. Section = TECT-3303-80, Instructor Name = Gerald D.
Hollier, JR
-537- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = TECT-4304-80, Instructor Name = Maria E. Valdes-Corbeil
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
Percent
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
Total
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = TECT-4304-80, Instructor Name = Maria E.
Valdes-Corbeil
-538- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
4
100%
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
a. Section = TECT-4304-80, Instructor Name = Maria E.
Valdes-Corbeil
-539- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Mrs. Corbeil has by far
been the best instructor
for online courses that I
have taken so far. She
has used various
methods to speak to us.
She emails us once a
week at the start of the
week to let us know
whats going on in the
course, where we should
be. She is easy to get a
hold of and responds
quickly to questions. She
gives feedback for each
assignment. I would
recommend any of her
courses to future
students.
I would allow students to
continue discussions
past submission
deadlines. I would also
like the calendar to not be
in the tabbed format,
something more linear or
tabled.
Total
Percent
1
25%
1
25%
2
50%
4
100%
a. Section = TECT-4304-80, Instructor Name = Maria E.
Valdes-Corbeil
-540- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = TRSP-4334-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E. Rodriguez
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Total
Agree
Total
Percent
8
80%
2
20%
10
100%
8
80%
2
20%
10
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
Strongly Agree
8
80%
Agree
2
20%
10
100%
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
8
80%
Total
Agree
2
20%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
8
80%
Agree
2
20%
10
100%
8
80%
Total
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Total
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Strongly Agree
Agree
2
20%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
Disagree
1
10%
10
100%
9
90%
Total
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Total
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Total
1
10%
10
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
9
90%
Agree
1
10%
10
100%
8
80%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
2
20%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
8
80%
Agree
1
10%
Total
Disagree
Total
1
10%
10
100%
a. Section = TRSP-4334-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E.
Rodriguez
-541- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
3
30%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
7
70%
Agree
2
20%
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
8
80%
Agree
1
10%
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
8
80%
Total
Total
Total
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Strongly Agree
Agree
2
20%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
8
80%
Agree
2
20%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
8
80%
Agree
2
20%
10
100%
8
80%
Total
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Total
Total
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
Strongly Agree
Agree
2
20%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
3
30%
Total
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Neutral
1
10%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
6
60%
Agree
2
20%
Total
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Neutral
2
20%
10
100%
Strongly Agree
8
80%
Agree
2
20%
10
100%
9
90%
Total
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
Total
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Total
1
10%
10
100%
a. Section = TRSP-4334-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E.
Rodriguez
-542- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
8
80%
Agree
2
20%
10
100%
8
80%
Total
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Percent
Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
Agree
Total
2
20%
10
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
Strongly Agree
9
90%
Agree
1
10%
10
100%
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
8
80%
Total
Agree
Total
2
20%
10
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
9
90%
B
1
10%
Comments
Great instruction online.
Well prepared!
El Dr. Ignacio es un
excelente profesor que no
sólo posee gran
experiencia y
conocimiento de lo que
hace, sino tiene una gran
calidad humana que no
se encuentra facilmente
en otros profesores. Ha
sido un placer volver a
tenerlo como profesor de
traductología.
1
10%
1
10%
Total
8
80%
10
100%
a. Section = TRSP-4334-80, Instructor Name = Ignacio E. Rodriguez
-543- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = TRSP-6320-80, Instructor Name = Carmen Mangiron
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
Strongly Agree
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Percent
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = TRSP-6320-80, Instructor Name = Carmen
Mangiron
-544- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Percent
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
4
100%
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
a. Section = TRSP-6320-80, Instructor Name = Carmen
Mangiron
-545- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Overall, I am very pleased
with how the course was
conducted. I feel that my
knowledge of the studies
of translation was
broadened due to the
instructor's ability to
convey the material. I
really enjoyed the unit
outlines because it
cleared doubts about the
subject. If I had to chose
something exceptional
about the course, it would
be the unit outlines
because they were handi,
useful and informative. I
would like to take this
oportunity to thank and
congratulate Dra.
Mangirón for her work in
this course. This was an
exceptional semester
because of her work.
Thank you once again
Sincerely, Virginia
Ledesma
I can't say enough good
things about this course
and the instructor. Both
succeeded my
expectations by far. I
learned A LOT. Dr.
Mangiron, besides clearly
being an expert, was
incredibly supportive and
fair in her assessment.
she has taught me a lot
not just in the subject
matter but through the
passion, patience and
commitment that she
transmitted in a very
consistent manner She's
An exemplary teacher and
manages the whole
online experience with
excellence.
Great teacher, she is
incredible.
Total
Percent
1
25%
1
25%
1
25%
1
25%
4
100%
a. Section = TRSP-6320-80, Instructor Name = Carmen
Mangiron
-546- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = TRSP-6322-80, Instructor Name = Mary Phelan
Count
Percent
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
Strongly Agree
2
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
3
75%
Total
4
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Agree
3
75%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
a. Section = TRSP-6322-80, Instructor Name = Mary Phelan
-547- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
50%
Count
Percent
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Neutral
2
50%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
1
25%
Agree
2
50%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
a. Section = TRSP-6322-80, Instructor Name = Mary Phelan
-548- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
2
50%
B
2
50%
Comments
I would love to see
Spanish Translation
courses being offered in
a traditional classroom
setting. I feel there is too
much information to be
discussed, and I don't
necessarily think online
courses facilitate this. I
feel the professor in this
course is a good
instructor, although I don't
necessarily agree on the
way I was graded at
times. The professor
needs more
communication with the
students on "foros," this
is the way the students
are going to learn.
I admire the way Dr.
Phelan is opened and
listens to students
suggestions and follows.
It was a hard class, but I
loved it.
1
25%
1
25%
2
50%
4
100%
Total
a. Section = TRSP-6322-80, Instructor Name = Mary Phelan
-549- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = TRSP-6331-80, Instructor Name = Olga Torres Hostench
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
Strongly Agree
Percent
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Neutral
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
a. Section = TRSP-6331-80, Instructor Name = Olga Torres
Hostench
-550- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
Strongly Agree
Percent
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Disagree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
2
67%
Agree
1
33%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
3
100%
3
100%
Strongly Agree
3
100%
Total
3
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
A
3
100%
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Total
a. Section = TRSP-6331-80, Instructor Name = Olga Torres
Hostench
-551- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
She is a great teacher,
sometimes she would
not give clear instructions,
but once she did, things
were great. Very opened!I
loved the class....
I hate online courses.
They're boring. I want to
sit in a classroom with
other students and the
professor.
Total
Percent
1
33%
1
33%
1
33%
3
100%
a. Section = TRSP-6331-80, Instructor Name = Olga Torres
Hostench
-552- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Section = TRSP-6340-80, Instructor Name = Nazaret Fresno Canada
Count
The syllabus clearly
described the objectives
and requirements for the
course.
The course was well
organized and clearly
presented.
Strongly Agree
Percent
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor graded and
returned tests and
assignments in a timely
fashion.
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Assessments were
relevant to course
objectives.
Students were
encouraged to participate
in online conferencing
and other class
interactivity.
I was able to interact
easily with my
classmates and
instructor.
The course made good
use of mixed media,
graphics, text and other
technologies.
The structure on this
online course compared
favorably wit other
courses I've taken in a
traditional classroom
setting.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
1
25%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor created a
positive climate for
learning in an online
environment.
I am satisfied with the
overall quality of
instruction for this course.
The instructor answered
questions promptly.
The instructor gave
adequate instructions
regarding assignments.
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
Strongly Agree
Total
a. Section = TRSP-6340-80, Instructor Name = Nazaret Fresno
Canada
-553- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
The instructor 's teaching
methods created an
environment that
encouraged online
learning.
The instructor maintained
adequate contact with me
throughout the course.
I would recommend this
online course to other
students.
Percent
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Disagree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
This course significantly
contributed to my
intellectual development,
understanding and
knowledge of the subject
area.
The course was helpful in
developing new skills.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
The course content
loaded in a timely
manner.
I am satisfied with the
assistance I received
from university personnel
when I had difficulties.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Neutral
1
25%
Total
4
100%
I rate the quality of
support I received from
university personnel as
follows:
Strongly Agree
3
75%
Agree
1
25%
Total
4
100%
The instructor effectively
communicates his/her
subject matter to me.
The work assigned in this
class seems relevant and
appropriate.
The instructor clearly
informs me of all course
expectations.
The instructor is well
prepared and organized.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
Strongly Agree
4
100%
Total
4
100%
The instructor
demonstrates a broad
knowledge of course
materials.
The instructor evaluates
me fairly.
Strongly Agree
4
100%
4
100%
Strongly Agree
2
50%
Agree
2
50%
Total
4
100%
4
100%
Overall, how do you rate
this instructor?
Total
Total
A
a. Section = TRSP-6340-80, Instructor Name = Nazaret Fresno
Canada
-554- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness
Count
Comments
Xenia y Nazaret son
excelentes profesoras :) .
This was a wonderful and
interesting course which
could probably taught in
two semester. The
teachers were incredibly
knowledgeable and
supportive.
Online courses just aren't
the same as being in the
classroom.
Total
Percent
1
25%
1
25%
1
25%
1
25%
4
100%
a. Section = TRSP-6340-80, Instructor Name = Nazaret
Fresno Canada
-555- F
all 2010 Instructional Evaluation Report - 100% Online S
ource: Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness