Comments
Description
Transcript
O A
2631 Advances in Environmental Biology, 5(9): 2631-2638, 2011 ISSN 1995-0756 This is a refereed journal and all articles are professionally screened and reviewed ORIGINAL ARTICLE Antagonistic Ability Against Rhizoctonia Solani And Pesticide Tolerance Of Trichoderma Strains Sarojini Chakravarthy K. , Nagamani A., Rahel Ratnakumari Y. and Bramarambha S. Department of Botany, Post Graduate College of Science, Saifabad, Osmania University, Hyderabad-500 004, India. Sarojini Chakravarthy K. , Nagamani A., Rahel Ratnakumari Y. and Bramarambha S.: Antagonistic Ability Against Rhizoctonia Solani And Pesticide Tolerance Of Trichoderma Strains. ABSTRACT Twenty six isolates of Trichoderma spp. were tested in vitro for their tolerance against pesticides and on the antagonistic activity against sheath blight pathogen of rice, Rhizoctonia solani. The growth of all Trichoderma isolates was inhibited by three fungicides tested. Organophosphorus insecticide (monocrotophos) had less inhibitory effect on Trichoderma spp. than chlorinated insecticide (Endosulfan). The botanical pesticide (Azadirachtin) showed least inhibitory effect on the Trichoderma isolates growth. The pyrethroid insecticide (λcyhalothrin) significantly enhanced the growth of all Trichoderma isolates. Among all the isolates, T. reesei (TK) and T. longibrachiatum (M1Ps) were more effective in inhibiting the growth and sclerotial formation of R. solani. Key words: Trichoderma, Rhizoctonia solani, fungicides, insecticides. Introduction The use of fungicides is the best known and popular strategy method in the Integrated Disease Management (IDM) for the management of plant diseases. However, inspite of their efficient means of controlling the plant pathogens and the cost effective nature, the environment and sociological concerns led to the idea of minimizing fungicide usage which coupled with the appearance of new resistant strains of pathogens [12]. Other pesticides also affect the microbial community in natural ecosystem as they build up in the soil [26]. Thus, a reduction or elimination of chemical pesticide applications in agriculture is highly desirable and is only possible with the adoption of integrated disease management. One of the components of integrated management of plant pathogens is biocontrol strategy. One of the most promising biological control means is the application of Trichoderma as a biocontrol agent alone or integrated with minimal fungicide dosage to control plant pathogens [9,19,31]. In order to use both reduced dosage of fungicide and Trichoderma spp. as biocontrol agents (BCA’s) as components of IDM, it is essential to use Trichoderma isolates tolerant to pesticides [34,17,23]. Trichoderma strains with greater biocontrol efficiency should also have better tolerance against pesticides for be used as component in Integrated Pest management (IPM) [18]. Insecticides and fungicides are commonly used by farmers to control insects, pests and diseases respectively in rice [24]. Hence, the knowledge on tolerance of effective antagonistic isolates of Trichoderma against pesticides commonly used is essential for their practical utilization. Hence, the present studies were conducted to study in vitro, the efficiency of collected strains of Trichoderma in inhibiting the sheath blight pathogen of rice, the Rhizoctonia solani Kühn and to assess the effect of pesticides on the mycelial growth of Trichoderma isolates. Material and Methods Isolation of Trichoderma: Trichoderma species were isolated from soil samples collected from rice fields in two districts (Nalgonda and Ranga Reddy districts) of Andhra Pradesh, India and forest soil samples of Uttaranchal (Chamoli district), India. All the isolates were identified up to species level based on phenotypic characters like colony colour and growth; size and shape of conidiophore, phialides and conidia. The cultures were identified using the available literature [5,6,7,25,28,29]. Screening Of Trichoderma Isolates Against R. Solani By Dual Culture Technique: Corresponding Author Sarojini Chakravarthy K, Department of Botany, Post Graduate College of Science, Saifabad, Osmania University, Hyderabad-500 004, India. E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +91 9849 370624 2632 Adv. Environ. Biol., 5(9): 2631-2638, 2011 The biocontrol ability of 26 isolates of Trichoderma spp., isolated was tested against the pathogen Rhizoctonia solani, using dual culture technique [10]. The pathogen Rhizoctonia solani (AG1) was procured from Directorate of Rice Research, Hyderabad, India. The mycelial discs (5 mm diameter) of Trichoderma isolates and R. solani from a four-day-old culture on 2% water agar were placed on PDA plates on one side, 1 cm away from the edge of the plate. The disc of the R. solani was placed on the opposite side 6 cm apart. The plates were incubated at 24 ± 2 C for one week. The radial growth of the pathogen as well as antagonist was observed at regular intervals. The inhibition of sclerotial formation of the pathogen was also noted. The percentage inhibition of growth of pathogen in the presence of biocontrol agent was calculated over control. The average of three replications for each treatment was calculated and presented in the data in all experiments of the study. Evaluation Of Pesticides On The Mycelial Growth Of Trichoderma Isolates: In this study, fungicides and insecticides, commonly used by farmers were selected to assess their effect on the growth of the Trichoderma isolates. The seven pesticides Contaf (Hexaconazole), Bavistin (Carbendazim), Sivic (Tricyclazole), Endosol (Endosulfan), Achook (Azadirachtin), Monodhan (Monocrotophos) and Reeva (λ-cyhalothrin) were tested against the mycelial growth of Trichoderma strains using poisoned food technique [30]. All the fungicides and insecticides were added to the Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) according to the recommended doses that were used by the farmers. The concentrations of pesticides added to the culture medium were: Contaf – 2 ml/l; Bavistin – 1 g/l; Sivic – 0.6 g/l; Endosol – 2 ml/l; Achook – 5 ml/l; Monodhan – 1 ml/l and Reeva - 0.2 ml/l. Petri plates with PDA along with pesticides were inoculated with Trichoderma isolates and incubated at 27±2 C. Radial growth of the colony was measured in millimeters on 3rd, 5th, and 7th days of incubation. Petri plates without pesticides served as control. Three replications were maintained and the experiment was repeated twice. Average of the data was presented. Statistical Analysis: All the data was subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and significance of variance was presented at 5% levels using IRRISTAT windows ver. 4.1. Results and Discussions Isolation of Trichoderma: A total of twenty six isolates of Trichoderma were isolated in this study. Eighteen isolates were from rice cultivated soils and eight from forest soil samples. The isolates from rice cultivated soils belong to T. asperellum (TS, M3M & M4Ps), T. harzianum (TH1, TH2, M10P), T. reesei (TK), T. longibrachiatum (TL2, TL3, M1Ps, M3P, M3Ps, M5Ms, M6Ms, M8Ps, M9Ms), and T. viride (TD2, M1M). Isolates from forest soils were identified as T. aureoviride (TA1, TA2, TA3, TA4), T. longibrachiatum (TL1), T. virens (TV1, TV2) and T. viride (TD1). Screening Of Trichoderma Isolates Against R. Solani By Dual Culture Technique: All the tested isolates of Trichoderma in dual culture significantly inhibited the mycelial growth of Rhizoctonia solani and the inhibition ranged from 62-78% (Table 1). Variation was observed among the species of Trichoderma, in their ability to inhibit radial growth and sclerotia formation by the pathogen. T. harzianum (M10P), T. reesei (TK) and T. aureoviride (TA1) were more aggressive in inhibiting the growth of the pathogen compared to other isolates and they caused a maximum percentage inhibition of 77.7%. The isolates T. harzianum (M10P) and T. reesei (TK) were obtained from rice cultivated soils of Nalgonda district whereas T. aureoviride (TA1) was from forest soil samples. T. aureoviride (TA4), T. longibrachiatum (TL1, M1Ps), and T. virens (TV2) were found to be less effective in inhibiting the pathogen growth. The complete inhibition of the sclerotial formation by the pathogen in the test plates was found with T. reesei (TK) and T. longibrachiatum (M1Ps). Effect Of Fungicides On Trichoderma Growth: Effect Of Insecticides On Trichoderma Growth: The three tested fungicides (hexaconazole, carbendazim, tricyclazole) completely inhibited the growth of all Trichoderma isolates in vitro. However, a few isolates belonging to T. aureoviride (TA1, TA2, TA3), T. longibrachiatum (M1Ps), T. virens (TV1) and T. viride (TD1, M1M) showed slight growth initiation after 10 days, but the growth was very slow. A significant variation was observed on the effect of insecticides on the growth of Trichoderma isolates. The variation was significant between the species and even between the different isolates of same species. However, Trichoderma isolates collected from two sources did not differ in their growth response against pesticides. Azadirachtin, monocrotophos, endosulfan 2633 Adv. Environ. Biol., 5(9): 2631-2638, 2011 significantly reduced the growth of all the isolates of Trichoderma (Table 2, 3). Among insecticides tested endosulfan had greater inhibitory effect on Trichoderma isolates growth. T. harzianum (TH2) and two isolates of T. longibrachiatum (M3Ps, M8Ps) growth was relatively less affected by endosulfan. The inhibition on Trichoderma isolates growth due to endosulfan ranged from 11-80%. Highly significant variation in growth inhibition was observed among different isolates of T. longibrachiatum and T. harzianum. There was a visible morphological distortion and uneven growth pattern in the agar plates treated with insecticides (Fig 1). Greater inhibitory effect of monocrotophos was observed with the isolates of T. harzianum (TH2), T. longibrachiatum (M3Ps) and T. asperellum (M4Ps). Table 1. Effect Of Trichoderma On The Growth Of Rhizoctonia Solani Through Dual Plate Culture Technique Trichoderma species , 2, Isolate % inhibition of R. solani growth Overgrowth of Trichoderma Sclerotial formation T. asperellum1 TS 70 0 10 T. asperellum1 M3M 71.1 14 8 T. asperellum1 M4Ps 72.2 15 6 2 T. aureoviride TA1 77.7 0 5 T. aureoviride2 TA2 71.1 0 7 T. aureoviride2 TA3 72.2 0 6 T. aureoviride2 TA4 62.2 0 11 T. harzianum1 TH1 71.1 0 6 T. harzianum1 TH2 72.2 0 10 T. harzianum1 M10P 77.7 20 15 T. reesei1 TK 77.7 25 0 T. longibrachiatum2 TL1 63.3 0 6 T. longibrachiatum1 TL2 68.8 0 8 T. longibrachiatum1 TL3 65.5 0 4 T. longibrachiatum1 M1Ps 63.3 33 0 T. longibrachiatum1 M3P 75.5 25 6 T. longibrachiatum1 M3Ps 73.3 20 15 T. longibrachiatum1 M5Ms 75.5 27 12 T. longibrachiatum1 M6Ms 76.6 24 9 T. longibrachiatum1 M8Ps 68.8 20 4 T. longibrachiatum1 M9Ms 74.4 20 8 T. virens2 TV1 67.7 0 8 T. virens2 TV2 62.2 0 13 T. viride2 TD1 73.3 0 12 T. viride1 TD2 68.8 0 9 T. viride1 M1M 76.6 22 4 Control - 0 0 40 CD (P ≤ 0.05) - - - - CV (%) - - - - denotes soil used for Trichoderma spp. isolation as 1=Rice cultivated soils and 2=Forest soils respectively. 2634 Adv. Environ. Biol., 5(9): 2631-2638, 2011 Table 2. Effect Of Insecticides At 3rd Day On The Growth (mm) Of Trichoderma Isolates Insecticides Trichoderma Trichoderma species Isolate Azadirachtin Monocrotophos Endosulfan Control T. asperellum TS 54 45 27 78 T. asperellum M3M 51 46 25 82 T. asperellum M4Ps 50 15 19 47 T. aureoviride TA1 55 35 30 89 T. aureoviride TA2 52 35 32 89 T. aureoviride TA3 59 39 35 83 T. aureoviride TA4 57 35 15 74 T. harzianum TH1 55 42 35 89 T. harzianum TH2 44 30 31 89 T. harzianum M10P 59 32 23 89 T. reesei TK 88 81 39 89 T. longibrachiatum TL1 53 33 17 74 T. longibrachiatum TL2 52 38 26 84 T. longibrachiatum TL3 64 45 41 89 T. longibrachiatum M1Ps 41 23 21 49 T. longibrachiatum M3P 55 37 37 71 T. longibrachiatum M3Ps 54 21 25 89 T. longibrachiatum M5Ms 42 20 16 60 T. longibrachiatum M6Ms 41 34 17 77 T. longibrachiatum M8Ps 66 34 70 89 T. longibrachiatum M9Ms 41 26 14 74 T. virens TV1 63 42 23 79 T. virens TV2 63 42 29 75 T. viride TD1 56 45 21 85 T. viride TD2 54 35 26 85 T. viride M1M 59 56 35 70 Table 3. Effect of insecticides at 5th and 7th days on the growth (mm) of Trichoderma isolates Trichoderma Insecticides Trichoderma species Isolate* Azadirachtin 5th day 7th day Monocrotophos 5th day 7th day Endosulfan 5th day 7th day T. asperellum TS 66 83 70 88 58 75 T. asperellum M3M 62 80 72 84 56 78 T. asperellum M4Ps 44 59 21 29 69 90 T. aureoviride TA1 66 77 57 71 69 87 T. aureoviride TA2 57 71 57 73 71 85 T. aureoviride TA3 73 90 53 72 68 90 T. aureoviride TA4 69 78 36 74 74 90 T. harzianum TH1 65 79 61 74 54 75 T. harzianum TH2 55 73 47 70 61 88 T. harzianum M10P 70 88 44 60 65 87 T. reesei TK 90 90 90 90 62 85 T. longibrachiatum TL1 62 74 49 63 57 86 T. longibrachiatum TL2 63 80 57 75 48 74 T. longibrachiatum TL3 75 90 60 81 90 90 T. longibrachiatum M1Ps** 51 67 34 39 37 57 T. longibrachiatum M3P 69 78 56 74 90 90 T. longibrachiatum M3Ps 67 90 37 51 53 90 2635 Adv. Environ. Biol., 5(9): 2631-2638, 2011 T. longibrachiatum M5Ms 50 65 25 45 28 75 T. longibrachiatum M6Ms 51 64 53 66 36 57 T. longibrachiatum M8Ps 78 84 49 70 90 90 T. longibrachiatum M9Ms 46 57 35 46 25 36 T. virens TV1 45 90 63 84 62 90 T. virens TV2 74 82 63 77 60 83 T. viride TD1 72 83 53 72 53 90 T. viride TD2 65 77 52 70 44 65 T. viride CD (P≤ 0.05) CV (%) M1M 72 1.92 1.79 84 2.50 1.94 78 2.00 2.27 85 2.52 2.22 89 2.17 2.21 90 2.22 1.68 * All isolates in control plates reached maximum growth of 90 mm in 4 or 5 days except M1Ps. ** In control M1Ps isolate growth 5th day = 58 mm and 7th day = 74 mm. Fig 1. Effect of endosulfan on the growth of T. reesei (TK) and T. longibrachiatum (M1Ps) Right plate: Test plate, Left Plate: Control plate Azadirachtin had least inhibitory growth effect on all the isolates. Least growth reduction (1.1%) of T. reesei (TK) was recorded with Azadirachtin. The growth inhibition of all other isolates was more than 25% and maximum inhibition was noted in T. longibrachiatum (M9Ms) as well as T. harzianum (TH1, TH2). In contrast to inhibitory effect of other insecticides, λ-cyhalothrin treatment resulted in the enhanced growth in all the isolates (Fig 2). The percentage increase in growth of Trichoderma isolates ranged from 1.5-63%. The percentage increase of growth was highest in T. asperellum (M4Ps) and T. longibrachiatum (M1Ps). Fig. 2. Effect of λ-Cyhalothrin on the growth of Trichoderma isolates Discussion: All twenty six isolates of Trichoderma inhibited the growth of the pathogen, Rhizoctonia solani confirming the observations of [20] who stated that several isolates of Trichoderma were highly antagonistic to this pathogen. The pathogen growth inhibitory ability of different Trichoderma strains of same species and among different species varied significantly. [13] proved that different strains have very different biocontrol capabilities. In dual culture greater numbers of sclerotia were observed in association with isolates of T. viride from forest soils than the isolates from rice cultivated soils. [14] emphasized that Trichoderma species isolated from a given habitat are expected to cause better disease control in that habitats. In this study also, the Trichoderma isolates from rice cultivated soils showed greater antagonistic effect on Rhizoctonia solani than the isolates from the virgin soils i.e., 2636 Adv. Environ. Biol., 5(9): 2631-2638, 2011 forest soils, where the rice was never cultivated. The commercially available fungicides Carbendazim (benzimidazole carbamate), Contaf (hexaconazole), Sivic (tricyclazole) are known to control various plant fungal pathogens [2]. The fungitoxic effects of fungicide resulted in inhibition of Trichoderma isolates tested in this investigation. [27] observed that carbendazim, propiconazole, chlorothalonil and hexaconazole were retarding the fungal growth totally. [4] opined that soil fungi and actinomycetes are not as susceptible to herbicides and insecticides as they are to fungicides. In this study also, Trichoderma spp. showed greater inhibitory effect was observed with fungicides than with herbicides and insecticides. [11] reported the inhibitory growth of the T. asperellum with propamocarb, carbendazim, and diethofencarb in vitro while in vivo it was opposite. Among insecticides tested endosulfan (chlorine compound) had greater growth inhibitory effect on all Trichoderma isolates than monocrotophos (organophosphorus compound). [1,22,36] reported that chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides (endosulfan) are more deleterious than other insecticide groups like organophosphates to the mycopathogen and moreover they were highly detrimental to the fungus. Significant variation showed in response was observed among different Trichoderma species and strains. The pyrethroid insecticide, cyhalothrin caused an increased soil fungal population probably due to stimulation of mineralization processes, respiration and oxidoreductase processes in the soil. This might be due to different metabolic processes that enable utilization of the insecticides as nutrients by different isolates of Trichoderma[36]. In this study, certain isolates of T. harzianum and T. longibrachiatum tolerant against monocrotophos and endosulfan (Table 1) and they may be used as components in integrated pest management. Azadirachtin had a least effect on the growth of Trichoderma isolates when compared with the other insecticides. [15,16] reported that reduced sheath blight incidence with Azadirachtin. Similarly, [35]have found that neem leaf extract reduced the mycelial growth of yam rotting fungus, Alternaria solani. Azadirachtin resistant isolates of Trichoderma identified in this study may be used in Integrated Pest Management (IPM). Stimulatory effect of azadirachtin on the growth of Trichoderma isolates can be attributed to stimulate the mineralization and the availability of C, N and P in soil [32]. Thus, Trichoderma isolates not affected by azadirachtin might have a synergistic effect in controlling plant disease when both are used together at the same time and may serve as low monitory input in integrated sheath blight management of rice. Hence, the isolates of Trichoderma viz., T. reesei (TK), and T. longibrachiatum (M1Ps) which were least affected by azadirachtin may be applied along with azadirachtin to manage both sheath blight and other pests of rice, as these two isolates proved to be highly antagonistic to R. solani in in vitro studies with maximum inhibitory effect on growth and sclerotial formation. λ-cyhalothrin was enhancing the growth of Trichoderma isolates in this study. However, Schuster and Schroder, 1990 reported that it has inhibitory effect. Cyhalothrin is having negative effect on the pathogen growth and positive effect on bioagents in some cases [8]. Thus, cyhalothrin is a better insecticide to use in IPM than any other tested insecticides and it can be recommended to use along with Trichoderma bioagents in IDM. Conclusions: Isolates of T. longibrachiatum (M1Ps) and T. reesei (TK) isolated from rice cultivated soils showed maximum overgrowth on the sheath blight pathogen R. solani than Trichoderma isolates from forest soils. The complete inhibition of sclerotial formation was observed by these isolates due to maximum overgrowth on the pathogen in dual culture. Trichoderma strains identified in this study may be used for biocontrol of sheath blight after their further screening under field condition. Among pesticides, fungicides were highly inhibitory and toxic to all the isolates of Trichoderma followed by insecticides and botanical insecticide. Trichoderma aureoviride, T. longibrachiatum, T. virens, and T. viride strains growth initiation 10 days, after fungicide application indicates that they may be applied 10 days after fungicide application in order to use them in soils for biocontrol. The pyrethroid insecticide, cyhalothrin, significantly enhanced the growth of all Trichoderma isolates suggesting the possibility of integrated use of pyrethroids with Trichoderma in the disease management. Acknowledgements Authors are grateful to University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India for providing financial assistance and the Principal, Post Graduate college of Science, Osmania University, Saifabad, Hyderabad, India for providing laboratory facilities. References 1. 2. 3. Adebayo, T.A., O.A. Ojo and O.A. Olaniran, 2007. Effect of insecticides Karate® and Thiodan® on population dynamics of four different soil microorganisms. Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 2(5): 557-560. Agrios, G.N., 2005. Plant Pathology, 5th edn. USA: Academic Press. Ali, A., G.N. Bhatt and G.S. Singhara, 2002. Management of rice sheath blight and blast in rice through seed treatment. Annals of Plant 2637 Adv. Environ. Biol., 5(9): 2631-2638, 2011 4. Protection Sciences, 10(2): 285-287. Anderson, J.R., 1978. Pesticide effect on nontarget soil microorganisms; in Pesticide Microbiology, Eds., Hill, I.R. and S.J.L. Wright. London: Academic Press, pp: 313-533. 5. Bisset, J., 1991a. A revision of the genus Trichoderma. II. Infragernic classification. Canadian Journal of Botany, 69(11): 2357-2372. 6. Bisset, J., 1991b. A revision of the genus Trichoderma. III. Section Pachybasium. Canadian Journal of Botany, 69(11): 2373-2417. 7. Bisset, J., 1991c. A revision of the genus Trichoderma. IV. Additional notes on section Longibrachiatum. Canadian Journal of Botany, 69(11): 2418-2420. Blandino, M., A. Reyneri, F. Vanara, M. Pascale, M. Haidukowski and M. Saporiti, 2008. Effect of sowing date and insecticide application against European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on fumonisin contamination in maize kernels. Crop Protection, 27(11): 14321436. Brotman, Y, J.G. Kapuganti and A. Viterbo, 2010. Trichoderma; Current Biology. 29(9): R390-R391. Dennis, C. and J. Webster, 1971c. Antagonistic properties of species group of Trichoderma II. Production of volatile antibiotics. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 57(1): 41-48. De Schutter, B., R. Aerts and L. Rombouts, 2002. The influence of fungicides on the growth of Trichoderma asperellum. Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol. Wet., 67(2): 291-298. Hajieghrari, B., M. Torabi-Giglou, M.R. Mohammadi and M. Davari, 2008. Biological potential of some Iranian Trichoderma isolates in the control of soil borne plant pathogenic fungi. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7(8): 967-972. Harman, G.E., 2000. Myths and dogmas of biocontrol. Changes in perceptions derived from research on Trichoderma harzianum T22. Plant Diseases, 84(4): 377-393. Howell, C.R., 2003. Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma spp. in the biological control of plant diseases: the history and evolution of current concepts. Plant Diseases, 87(1): 4-10. Jayaraj, S., 1992. Studies on IPM in rice based cropping systems with emphasis on the use of botanical, their safety and socioeconomic considerations. Proceedings India, IRRI-ADB Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines. Jeyarajan, R., S. Doraiswamy, R. Bhaskaran and S. Jayaraj, 1987. Effect of neem and other plant products in the management of plant diseases in India; in Natural pesticides from the neem tree (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) and other tropical plants, Proceedings of Third International Neem Conference. Eds., Schmutterrer, R., and K.R.S. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Ascher. Eschborn: GTZ Germany, pp: 635-644. 17. Khan, M.O. and S. Shahzad, 2007. Screening of Trichoderma species for tolerance to fungicides. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39(3): 945-951. 18. Kredics, L., L. Manczinger, Z. Antal, Z. Penzes, K. Szekeres, F. Kevel and E. Nagy, 2004. In vitro water activity and pH dependence of mycelial growth and extracellular enzyme activities of Trichoderma strains with biocontrol potential. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 96(3): 491-498. 19. Kubicek, C.P., and G.E. Harman, 1998. Trichoderma and Gliocladium, Vol I & II. United Kingdom, London: Taylor and Francis Ltd. 20. Kucuk, C. and M. Kivanc, 2003. Isolation of Trichoderma spp. and their antifungal, biochemical and physiological features. Turkish Journal of Biology, 27(4): 247-253. 21. Kulkarni, N.S., I.S. Sawant, S.D. Sawant and P.G. Adsule, 2006. Bioefficacy of neem formulations (Azadirachtin 1% and 5%) on important insect pests of grapes and their effect on shelf life. Acta Horticulture (ISHS), 785: 305-312. www.actahort.org/books/785/785_38.htm 22. Li, D.P. and D.G. Holdom, 1994. Effects of pesticides on growth and sporulation of Metarhizium anisopliae (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 63(2): 209-211. 23. Monte, E., 2001. Understanding Trichoderma: between biotechnology and microbial ecology. International Microbiology, 4(1): 1-4. 24. Nagamani, A. and A.N. Rao, 2006. Disease management in rice: An integrated farmer participatory approach. 2nd International Rice Congress, 9-13 October. 26th International Rice Research Conference, New Delhi, India, p 453 (Abs). 25. Nagamani, A., I.K. Kunwar and C. Manoharachary, 2006. Handbook of soil fungi. New Delhi: I K International Pvt. Ltd. 26. Nannipieri, P., 1994. The potential use of soil enzymes as indicators of productivity, sustainability and pollution; in Soil BiotaManagement in Sustainable Farming Systems. Eds., Pankhrust, C.E., B.M. Doube, V.V.S.R. Gupta and P.R. Grace. Australia: CSIRO, pp: 238-244. 27. Rachappa, L., S. Lingappa and R.K. Patil, 2007. Effect of Agrochemicals on growth and sporulation of Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 20(2): 410-413. 28. Samuels, G.J., O. Petrini, K. Kuhls, E. Lieckfeldt and C.P. Kubicek, 1998. The Hypocrea schweinitzii complex and Trichoderma sect. Longibrachiatum. Studies in Mycology, 41: 1-54. 29. Samuels, G.J., S.L. Dodd, B.S. Lu, O. Petrini, 2638 Adv. Environ. Biol., 5(9): 2631-2638, 2011 30. 31. 32. 33. H.J. Schroers and I.S. Druzhinina, 2006. The Trichoderma koningii aggregate species. Studies in Mycology, 56: 67-133. Schmitz, H., 1930. A suggested toximeric method for wood preservatives. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Analytical Edition, 2(4): 361-363. Schuster, A. and M. Schmoll, 2010. Biology and Biotechnology of Trichoderma. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 87(3): 787799. Schuster, E. and D. Schroder, 1990. Side effects of sequentially-applied pesticides on non-target soil microorganisms: Field experiments. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 22(3): 367-373. Sharma, N.N., B.C. Mouli, P. Ravi and M.S. Mithyantha, 2001. Management of rice sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn) disease with fungicide. Pestology, 25(1): 34-35. 34. Srinivas, P. and G. Ramakrishnan, 2002. Use of native microorganisms and commonly recommended fungicides in integrated management of rice seed borne pathogens. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences, 10(2): 260264. 35. Suleiman, M.N., 2010. Fungitoxic activity of neem and pawpaw leaves extracts on Alternaria solani, casual organism of yam rots. Advances in Environmental Biology, 4(2): 159-161. 36. Tiwari, R.K.S, M.L. Rajput, A. Singh and B.S. Thakur, 2004. Non target effect of insecticides on the mycelial growth of Trichoderma harzianum (Rifai). Indian Journal of Plant Protection, 32(1): 140-141.