( NONLINEAR OPTICS PHYC/ECE 568) Homework #4, Due Thu Sept. 24
by user
Comments
Transcript
( NONLINEAR OPTICS PHYC/ECE 568) Homework #4, Due Thu Sept. 24
NONLINEAR OPTICS (PHYC/ECE 568) Fall 2015 - Instructor: M. Sheik-Bahae University of New Mexico Homework #4, Due Thu Sept. 24 Problem 1. SHG in KDP: a. Calculate the type-I phase matching angle for SHG in KDP using 1.06 m output of a Nd:YAG laser. b. For a beam radius w0=500 m, calculate the aperture length defined as la= w0 / where is the Poynting vector walk-off angle. Obtain the aperture length for w0=15 m and discuss the role of additional limitations that may be imposed due to diffraction of the beam. Problem 2. SHG Bandwidth: a. Calculate the bandwidth associated with a phase-matched SHG process in terms of the group velocities vg(1) and vg(21). In the low-depletion approximation, this corresponds to the width of the Sinc2 function which is taken to be (kL)=2 with L denoting the length of the nonlinear crystal. Hint: Use the first-order term in the Taylor series expansion of k(). b. Discuss how your results in (a) explains the limitation on the SHG-efficiency when ultrashort laser pulses are used. Problem 3. Manley-Rowe Relations for Imaginary (2) Repeat the derivation of Manley-Rowe relations (section 2.5, Boyd, 3rd ed.) but assume a purely imaginary (2) (2) =𝑖𝜒𝑖 . Write the new relationship for the three interacting waves involving dIj/dz, and corresponding photon numbers (1/j) dIj/dz (j=1,2,3). Explain the photon number conservation or lack thereof. Problem 3: By taking deff=idi (purely imaginary) and assuming overall permutation symmetry still applies, the coupled amplitude equations in section 2.5 (Boyd, 3rd ed.) can be re-arranged to show that: 𝑑𝐼1 𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝐼2 𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝐼3 𝑑𝑥 = −8𝜀0 𝑑𝑖 𝜔1 𝑅𝑒{𝐴3 𝐴∗2 𝐴1∗ } = −8𝜀0 𝑑𝑖 𝜔2 𝑅𝑒{𝐴3 𝐴∗2 𝐴1∗ } = −8𝜀0 𝑑𝑖 𝜔3 𝑅𝑒{𝐴3 𝐴∗2 𝐴1∗ } This in turn leads to 𝑑𝐼1 𝑑𝑥 + 𝑑𝐼2 𝑑𝑥 − 𝑑𝐼3 𝑑𝑥 =0 or 𝐼1 + 𝐼2 − 𝐼3 = 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 and 𝑑𝐼3 𝜔3 𝑑𝑥 = 𝑑𝐼2 𝜔2 𝑑𝑥 = 𝑑𝐼1 𝜔1 𝑑𝑥 This implies simultaneous absorption of photons from each filed. This is indeed quantum interference of two-photon absorption (1+2=0 at resonance) and one photon absorption at 3=0.