C When should listed companies release audited financial statements?
by user
Comments
Transcript
C When should listed companies release audited financial statements?
July - August 2012:Layout 1 8/17/12 11:02 AM Page 3 FEATURE The Malaysian Accountant 3 Getting the timing right – When should listed companies release audited financial statements? By Pauline Ho and Regina Fikkers, PwC urrently for listed entities, unaudited results are required C in timing between issuance of interim and audited results too to be lodged with Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad great? Or does the timeliness of information outweigh reliability of (“Bursa Malaysia”) 2 months after the end of the financial information? What other safeguards are there for investors? year. These include results for the interim 4th quarter as well as the We are concerned that a 2 months deadline for issuance of annual results for the full year. The annual audited results and full the full audited financial statements pushes the pendulum too far financial statements must later be lodged with Bursa Malaysia at 4 and will impede the reliability of the information. As outlined in our months after year-end. Concerns have been raised over the impact survey below, if we look around at the requirements of other stock on investors if these results vary, coupled with the relevance of exchanges, the deadlines for submitting audited financial financial information if they are not available on a timely basis. statements have reduced over the years and are now usually 3 In responding to investor concerns and to improve months. Often unaudited results are required at 2 months with the governance, Bursa Malaysia has proposed that the timeline for audited full financial statements to follow at 3 months. Sometimes releasing audited financial statements by listed companies be the results announcement can be marked as audited, but this is not reduced from 4 to 2 months. There is always a balance to be mandatory. achieved between timeliness and reliability, thus this is an The exhibits below provide an overview of the statutory important question to be addressed. Consider if a profit is reported requirement on the timeline for announcement of financial in February and later in April it is revised to a loss. What protection statements in some jurisdictions: is there for investors? What information do they rely on? Is the gap High Income Economies Upper Middle Income Economies 2 months+ • United States for companies with a public float of $700 million or more is 60 days • United States <$700m & >$75m is 75 days 3+ months • Australia • Canada • Hong Kong S.A.R • Japan • New Zealand • United States for companies have less than US$75 million public float • Singapore (105 days) 4+ months • France • United Kingdom • • Thailand (if fourth quarter result is submitted) • • • • Indonesia Vietnam Philippines (105 days) Thailand (if fourth quarter result is not submitted) Lower Middle Income Economies w w w. m i c p a . c o m . m y Malaysia July - August 2012 July - August 2012:Layout 1 4 8/17/12 11:02 AM Page 4 FEATURE The Malaysian Accountant We believe reducing the deadline of releasing audited financial have the ability to offer more competitive salaries and better work statements should be determined only after giving due life balance to talented Malaysians. Many of them take up positions consideration to the costs, benefits and other issues that need to overseas as a result. The shortage of professionals impacts the be addressed before the change occurs. resourcing of listed companies. Many preparers of financial reports struggle to have the ideal number of accounting staff to More timely information complete their reporting tasks. While large listed entities are better Undoubtedly, timeliness is an important characteristic of resourced, the medium or smaller listed companies often rely on usefulness of financial information to decision makers. If there is their auditors to assist them when they lack the staff with the undue delay in the reporting of information it may lose its relevance. technical expertise. In reviewing the table above it is clear that for many countries 3 The lack of professionals also available to audit all listed months is seen to be more timely information for listed companies. companies within 2 months cannot be under estimated. The vast For large US companies and some listed companies in Thailand 2 majority of companies have December 31 year-ends, so there is months has been determined to be appropriate. Investor’s already a strain on the profession in the January to April period. If preference is for information to be prepared as soon as possible to the deadline for audited financial statements was reduced then assist in decision-making. something else would need to give way. Without more staff audit firms will either need to audit less listed companies or audit quality Reducing potential for differences between audited and may be impacted. We are concerned this will not result in more unaudited results reliable information. A long delay between unaudited results announcements and the audited financial report can make the audited information less Spreading the audit across the year relevant. It may also reduce investor confidence if there are large Our comparison shows that in high-income countries with a tight differences between the two sets of information. Decisions will deadline, reviews of interim financial information are often required. have been made based on unaudited results, which can’t be For example in the US interim reports are required for quarters 1, 2 reversed if the audited result is inconsistent. Reducing the gap will and 3 only and these are required to be reviewed. In Australia a half undoubtedly reduce this risk. yearly report is required to be reviewed by the auditors. In very systems based audits this may spread the audit workload, but it Listing rules currently require the market to be kept depends on the sophistication of individual companies. Reviews of informed interim financial reports also facilitate discussion and timely Other jurisdictions have also had to grapple with the same problem consideration of issues as they occur in each interim period, and of a gap in timing of the unaudited and audited information. avoid year-end surprises. They also reduce the workload of issues Malaysia and others have dealt with it by “continuous disclosure to be considered at the year-end peak period. In other countries the requirements” where the market must be informed promptly if requirements for audits and reviews are tiered, such that small either the expected results change or a major event happens like a companies do not require an audit, and only listed entities are transaction. Continuous disclosure means there should be “no required to have an interim review. This reduces some of the surprises” in the year-end results. pressure on the profession. Complexity of the new wave of reporting standards Point of view There is a new wave of reporting standards due to apply between 2013 and 2015. While the rules are more complex, they reflect the We believe releasing annual audited financial statements 3 months increased sophistication of doing business. Understanding new after year-ends is an option more in-line with regional markets. A 3- rules takes time and consideration. Time for industry discussion month deadline represents a good balance of timeliness and also promotes greater consistency. Shortening the deadlines may reliability. Bursa Malaysia should also consider a tiered approach in impact the reliability of preparation of financial statements under adopting this tighter timeline with the top tier companies the new rules. implementing this requirement first. For overall improvement in financial information reliability and governance, a review should be Shortage of accounting professionals in the market performed on the half yearly financial results. This requirement Similar to many other countries, the accounting profession is coupled with the continuous disclosure requirements in the current currently under-resourced in Malaysia. Neighbouring countries Listing Rules, will be a positive step towards investor protection. July - August 2012 w w w. m i c p a . c o m . m y