s Progress Update

s
Progress Update
Gateway Cities
Traffic Signal Synchronization and
Bus Speed Improvement Project
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
Project Status Update
June 19, 2003
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Today’s Agenda
•
•
•
•
•
•
Review of Overall Project
Project Status
LCC Recommendations
ATMS Analysis
Communications Analysis
Next Steps
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Original Project Area
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Expanded Project Area
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Project Focus – Implementing the IEN at the Local
Level
COUNTY MANAGEMENT LEVEL
Regional
System
Regional
TMC
• Regional Monitoring
• Incident Response Coordination
CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT
LEVEL
IEN
• Sub-region Monitoring
• Inter-agency timing
coordination
• Incident Response Selection
• Inter-agency coordination
LOCAL CONTROL AND
MONITORING
Traffic
Control Systems
• Traffic Signal Operations
• Traffic Signal Maintenance
• Equipment Monitoring
INTERSECTION
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Relationship with Other Projects
LA County
Sub Regional
TMC
I-105 Corridor Project
I-5/Telegraph Rd
Local
ATMS
Local
ATMS
Local
ATMS
Local
ATMS
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Work Flow Plan
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Project Status
• Web Page
On-Going
• Agency Interviews
Complete
• Field Surveys
Complete
• Operational Objectives and
• City Reports
Complete
• ATMS User Requirements
Complete
• ATMS Functional Requirements Complete
• System Integration Requirements
Complete
• Communication System Requirements Complete
• Final System Requirements
Complete
• High Level Design
Complete
• LCC Recommendations
Complete
• Communications Analysis
• General
In Review
• Location Specific
On Going
• ATMS Analysis (Draft)
In Review
• Conceptual Design
On Going
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Corridor Architecture
County TMC
Sub - Regional TMC
County
Server
Corridor
Server
Communication Network for the IEN
Caltrans
CTNet
Field
Equipment
Caltrans
City of
Commerce
Field
Equipment
Commerce
City of
Santa Fe
Springs
City of
Downey
Field
Equipment
Montebello
Field
Equipment
Downey
City of
Norwalk
County
DPW
Field
Equipment
Field
Equipment
Field
Equipment
Field
Equipment
Field
Equipment
Pico Rivera Santa Fe
Springs
Whittier
Norwalk
La Mirada
County
Field
Equipment
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
LCC Recommendations
• Originally Presented in October, 2002
to PWD Meeting
• Recently updated to incorporate
expanded area
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Commerce LCC Location
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Norwalk LCC Location
LCC Site
Server Location
Remote LCC Site
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Downey Host
Downey LCC
Downey
Equipment
Room
Montebello LCC
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Santa Fe Springs Host
Whittier LCC
Site
Santa Fe Springs LCC Site
Whittier Remote LCC Site
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
La Mirada LCC Location
Remote LCC Site Resource Center
LCC Site (DPW)
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
12'
LCC Area
ATMS Client
Workstation
D
S
D
S
FLAT SCREEN
IEN Client
Workstation
FLAT SCREEN
FLATSCREEN
4'
Telephone
Printer
Rack 1
LCC
Recommendations
Commerce
19"
19"
S
Server Monitor
Rack 2
D
MultiSync 5FGe
Mu lt iS y
nc5F
Ge
D
S
C OM PA Q
1
KVM Switch
2
3
4
SY
STE
MS E L
ECT
IO N
S E G ME
NT 1
3
4
5
x
Pow
e rE d g
e
2 5 0
7
S G ME N
E
T2
8
9
x
x
x
MOD
E 0
MOD
E 1
0
1
x
1
2
1
SE
G ME N
T
3
1
4
1
x
x
x
3
ODE 0
M
ODE 1
M
1 5
MG
MT P O
RT
COMPA Q N
ETELLI GEN T
Field Communication
Device
MD I MD
I -X
ONF
C
I GU
P L
IN K (1 4
)
MD
I -M D IX
1151
3
0 BAS
E- F
L /1 0
B A S E -T R e p
e a te r
56
061
0 0 BA
S E -T
C OMP A Q
w it ch
S
S D
ATMS/IEN
Communication Device
NETELLI GENT
C OMP
ORT
P WR A
1
2
P WR B
T A
S
T US
3
A CT
COL
DI
M
IEN Server
6
Pow
e rE d g
e
2 5 0
6'10"
ATMS Application Server
x
----- ----
x
----- ----
2
x
----- ----
S D
1
MOD
E 0
MOD
E 1
ATMS Database Server
M D I-X
4
A CT
COL
DI
M
M D I-X
5
A CT
COL
DI
M
6
A C
T
COL
M D I-X
DI
M
MD
I -X
A CT
COL
DI
M
CT
A
OL
C
MD
I -X
MD I
D I- X
M
Poe
w rE d g
e
2 5 0
S D
CAT
5
1
ATMS Communications Server
12
13
Firewall
24
Pow
e rE d g
e
2 5 0
Se nso r Zo ne s
GND
1
2
3
4
+12V N C N C N C N C N
OO O O O O O O O
M
M
M
M

1 P robes 2
SD
UPS
AP 9612 Mea sur e-UPS 
s
its
Rack 1 FrontView
I-5/Telegraph
Road Corridor
Rack 2 FrontView
s
Progress Update
8'
LCC Area
IEN Client
Workstation
ATMS Client
Workstation
FLAT SCREEN
4'
Telephone
Printer
LCC
Recommendations
Norwalk
Signal Lab at Maintenance Yard
19"
19"
D
S
Server Monitor
M ultiSy nc 5FG e
Mu
l tiS y
nc 5F
Ge
S D
CO MP AQ
3
4
EL
S
ECT
I O
N
1
2
E GME N
S
T 1
3
4
x
x
x
MO D
E 0
MO E
D 1
5
E GME N T
S
2
8
9
x
x
MD E 0
O
O D E 1
M
1 0
x
1 1
1 2
SEG
ME N T 3
1 3
4
1
x
x
x
MG M
T P O R
T
MD
O E 0
MO
D E 1
5
1
C OMP AQ
NETE LLIGE NT
S D
Field Communication
Device
D I M D I-X
M
C O
N F IG U
P L
I N
K ( 1
4 )
M D I-M D IX
31510
BASE
- FL
/1 0 B A
S E -T R e p e
a te r
D
S
56
0 6 1 0 BAS
E- TS
w i tch
2
3
C T
A
S T
A T
U S
o we
P
r E
d g
e
ATMS/IEN
Communication Device
NETELLI GENT
1
IEN Server
7
x
C O MPA Q
WR A
P
WR B
P
ATMS Application Server
6
o we
P
r E
d g
e
2 5 0
6'10"
ATMS DataBase Server
x
---------
2
SYS
T E
M
---------
1
---------
KVM Switch
D I-X
M
O MP O
C
R T
C T
A
O L
C
MD
I
M D I-X
4
5
A C T
O L
C
MD
I
6
A C T
C O L
MD
I
A C T
C O L
M D I-X
MD
I
M D I-X
A C
T
C O L
MD
I
C O
L
M D I-X
MD I
MD
I -X
2 5 0
S D
CAT
o we
P
r E
d g
e
2 5 0
1
12
3
1
5
Firewall
24
ATMS Communications Server
o we
P
r E
d g
e
2 5 0
Se ns or Z on es
G ND
1
2
N C N
+12V N C
O O O O O
M
M
1 P robes 2
SD
3
4
C N C N
O O O O
M
M

UPS
AP 9612 Me asure-U PS 
s
its
Rack 1 FrontView
Rack 2 FrontView
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
IT Department Equipment
Room at Maintenance Yard
s
Progress Update
15'
LCC Area
IEN Client
Workstation
ATMS Client
Workstation
D
D
S
D
S
FLAT SCREEN
FLAT SCREEN
FLAT SCREEN
LCC
Recommendations
Santa Fe Springs
S
Telephone
4'
Printer
Rack 1
Rack 2
Rack 3
19"
19"
19"
D
S
D
S
Server Monitor
M ul tiS yn c 5FG e
D
S
Server
Monitor
Mu l ti Syn c 5 FGe
Server
Monitor
Mu lt i Syn c 5F Ge
u lt iS
M
y n c
5 FG
e
M u ltiS y n
c 5
F Ge
Mu
l tiS yn c 5
F Ge
S D
D
S
COM PAQ
S D
COM PAQ
KVM Switch
1
2
3
COM PAQ
4
1
2
3
4
KVM Switch
Y S
S
T E
MS E L
E C
T IO N
Y S T
S
E M S
E L
E C
T IO N
ATMS Database Server
2
3
4
KVM Switch
S Y S
T E
M S E
L E
C T
I O
N
P o w
e rE d
g e
2 5 0
ATMS Communication
Server for Whittier
x
M O
D E 0
M O
D E 1
5
x
6
7
S E
GME
NT
2
8
9
x
x
x
M O
D E 0
M O
D E 1
1 0
x
1
2
1
S E
GME
NT 3
1 3
1 4
x
x
x
O D
M
E 0
O D
M
E 1
1 5
M D
I- M
D IX
M G
M T
P O
R T
CO MPA Q NETEL L IG E
NT
Field Comunication
Device for Whittier
D
S
M D
I M D
I -X
C O
N F
IG U P
I N
L
K (1
4 )
1 1
3
5 1
0 B A
S E
- F
L /1 0
B A
S E -T R
e p
e a
t e
r
1
2
E GM
S
E NT
1
3
4
x
x
x
M O
D E 1
0
5
x
6
7
S E
GME
NT
2
8
9
x
x
x
M O
D E 1
0
1 0
x
1
2
1
S E
GME
NT 3
1 3
1 4
x
x
x
O D
M
E 1
0
1 5
M D
I- M
D IX
--------
S GE
E
MN T
1
3
4
x
ATMS Communication
Server for Pico Rivera
o we
P
rE d g
e
2 5 0
--------
2
x
--------
1
--------
ATMS Communication
Server for SFS
--------
6'10"
P o w
e rE d
g e
2 5 0
--------
o we
P
rE d g
e
2 5 0
ATMS Application Server
M G
M T
P O
R T
CO MPA Q NETEL L IG E
N T
Field Comunication Device
for Pico Rivera
D
S
M D
I M D
I -X
C O
N F
IG U P
I N
L
K (1
4 )
1 1
3
5 1
0 B A
S E
- F
L /1 0
B A
S E -T R
e p
e a te
r
P o w
e rE d
g e
2 5 0
5 6
0 6 1
0 0
B A
S E -T S
w itc h
CO MPA Q
D
S
NE T
E L L IG E NT
ATMS / IEN
Communication Device
O M P
C
O R
T
W R
P
A
W R
P
B
S T
A U
S
S E G
ME N
T 1
3
4
M O D
E 0
M O D
E 1
5
x
x
x
6
7
x
x
S E GM
E NT 2
8
9
M O D
E 0
M O D
E 1
0
1
x
x
1
1 2
E GME
S
NT 3
3
1
1 4
x
x
x
M G
M T P
O R
T
O D E
M
0
O D E
M
1
5
1
M D
I- M
D IX
--------
2
x
--------
1
--------
Field Communication
Device for SFS
1
M D
I
1
2
C T
A
O L
C
3
4
A C
T
C O
L
5
A C
T
C O L
C T
A
O L
C
6
A C
T
C O
L
C T
A
O L
C
S D
CO MP AQ NETELLI GENT
M D
I
M D
I- X
D I
M
M D
I -X
D I
M
D I-X
M
M D
I
M D
I- X
D I
M
M D
I -X
M D I
M D
I- X
D I-X
M
C O
N F
IG U P
L IN K
( 1
)
4
3 1 1
5 1 0
BAS
E -F L /1
0 BA
S E -T R e
p e
a te r
D
S
CAT
Firewall
1
12
13
1 2 3 4 5 6
its
1 P robes 2
SD
GND
1
2
3
4
+12 VN C N C N C N C N
O O O O O O O O O
M
M
M
M

s
S ta tu
s
Se
g me n
t
y lo
e
w 1
= 0 p
M b
s
o n
= n
e b
a
le ,d lin
k o
k
r e
g
n =
1 M
0 p
b sf la
sh in
g d
= isa le
b d
/p rtia tio
n
f= n
o
o lin k
x
1
Sensor Z ones
UPS
S D
5
24
AP9612 Measure-U PS
Rack 1 Frontview
(City of Santa Fe Spring)
6 x
7 x
1 2
x
M D
I- M
X D
I M I
7 8 9 1
0 1 1
2
M I
Sensor Zone s
UP E
S
R
T A C
S
K
3 Co
m
f n
o
= tra fic
o
r e
g
n =
t ra
f ic
ye lo
w =
C lo liso n
1 0
0
b p
M
s
0
1
P o
w e
r
M p
b s B a
s e
li
LAN/WAN Switch
S p
u e
rS a
t ck I
e a
n
Du
l p
S e d H
u b
1 Probes 2
SD
GN D
1
2
3
4
+1 2VN C N C N C N C N
O O O O O O O O O
M
M
M
M

Sensor Zon es
UPS
GN D
1
2
3
4
C N C N C N C N
+1 2VN O
O
O O O O O O O
M
M
M
M

AP9612 Meas ure- UPS
Rack 2 FrontView
(Whittier)
1 Probes 2
SD
UPS
AP9612 Meas ure- UPS
Rack 3 FrontView
(Pico Rivera)
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
its
s
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
17'-0"
LCC Area
Telephone
Telephone
Mouse
Mouse
ft
i
h
S
trl
C
l
A
t
A
lt
L
s
p
c
b
`
~
Z
X
C
V
B
N
M
,<
.>
k
c
o
/?
;
W E
Q
S
A
D
F
G
R
T
H
J
Y
K
U
I
L
S
@ #
3
2
F
3
4
5
$
4
F
F
6
7
% ^
5
6
F
F
8
&
7
8
F
*
F
9
9
"
P
0
(
0
1
F
)
1
F
1
[
=
|
r
te
]
C
lt
X
C
V
B
N
M
ift
h
s
p
a
c
o
L
lt
A
,
<
A
k
S
D
F
G
H
J
K
L
\
s
k
c
a
c
a
p
.
>
trl
C
T
e
b
a
~
2
1
F
E
c
s
Q
1
1
F
W E
2
!
3
@
F
2
#
3
F
F
R
4
4
T
5
$
F
Y
6
%
5
F
^
6
7
F
U
7
I
8
&
9
F
O
9
*
8
F
?
S
'"
F
0
[{
=
)
1
ft
i
h
S
trl
E
l
A
Z
ift
h
r
te
n
c
s
E
Q
b
a
T
a
C
A
L
s
p
k
c
o
t
X
C
V
B
N
A
M
lt
,
<
S
D
F
G
H
J
K
.
>
L
trl
C
/
?
;
S
'"
ift
h
n
E
r
te
:
P
0
(
1
F
+
]}
|\
\
|
`
B
k
c
a
a
p
s
e
c
~
2
1
F
D
W E
2
F
1
F
@ #
!
3
2
1
F
3
R
4
F
T
5
$
4
F
Y
6
6
F
F
U
7
% ^
5
8
F
I
8
&
7
*
F
9
O
9
0
1
F
P
0
(
)
1
F
1
[{
=
]}
|\
\
+
|
B
s
k
c
a
c
a
p
e
2
1
F
D
S
S
D
4'-0"
13'-6"
10'-0"
Book Case
E
C
/
;
:
|
`
B
A
Z
S
n
E
}
\
+
trl
ift
h
'
:
O
{
2
F
1
F
!
1
S
N
S
Mouse
trl
C
C
a
C
s
E
a
T
ATMS Workstation 1
Glass Window
IEN
Workstation
W
Glass Window
Printer
ATMS Workstation 2
12'-0"
Plasma TV
Pow er
St atu s
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Col
A ct
IS DN St at usB1
B2
MIC ROCOM
808
Cable Management Device
SD
4'-11 11/16"
LCC Recommendations – Downey 2 nd Floor
s
Progress Update
Progress Update
30'
15'-0"
s
6'-0"
LCC Area
Rack 2
3'-0"
Rack 1
LCC
Recommendations
Downey
19"
19"
D
S
S
Server
Monitor
Server
Monitor
D
Mu l ti S yn c 5 FG e
Mu lt i S yn c 5F Ge
u lti S
M
y n
c 5 F
Ge
Mu
l tiS y
n c 5
F Ge
S
D
S
CO MPAQ
KVM Switch
KVM Switch
2
3
1
2
3
4
4
Y S
S
T E
M S E
L E
C T
I O
N
IEN Server
ATMS Database Server
o w
P
e rE d
g e
2 5 0
o w
P
e rE d
g e
2 5
0
ATMS Communication Server
(Montebello)
ATMS Application Server
x
O D
M
E 1
5
x
6
7
S E
G M E
N T
2
8
9
x
x
x
M O
D E 0
M O
D E 1
0
1
x
1
2
1
E G
S
M E N
T 3
3
1
4
1
x
x
x M D
I -M
D IX
M O
D E
0
M O
D E
1
5
1
- - - - - - - -
E G
S
M E N
T 1
3
4
x
- - - - - - - -
2
x
- - - - - - - -
1
M G
M T
P O
R T
Field Communication Device
(Montebello)
D
S
CO MPAQ NE T E L L IGE NT
M D
I M D
I- X
C O
N F
IG U
P L
I
K (1
N
4
SD
)
3 1 5 1
0 B
A S
E -F L
/ 1
0 B
A S
E -T R e
p e
a te r
D
S
Firewall
P o
w re E
d g
e
5 5
2
0
o w
P
e rE d
g e
2 5
0
O D
M
E 0
Field Communication Device
CA T
1
12
13
5
24
ATMS / IEN
Communication Device
Cisc o 1 00 0 S E RI E S
CI SC OS YSTE MS
PO WER SYST E M
O K
IS DN
IS D N
B1
B2
A N
L
L AN
TX
RX
COL L IS I ON L INK
O K
S
S ta tu s
ATMS Communication Server
(Downey)
LAN / WAN Switch
its
1
x
x
6
7
x
2
1
x
D I-X M
M
D I
y
lo
e
= 1
w
0
M p
s
b
g
re
= 1
n
0
b s
p
M
1
2
3
5
4
6
s
fla
in
h
S U
P E R
S T
A C K
S e
g me
n t
= e
n
o
a
n
le
b
,
d
k
lin
k
o
f is
o
d
=
g
o
n
a
in
le
b
k
/p
d
rti
a
n
tio
7
9
0
1
1
8
I
M
f
tra
fic
r
g
e
y
n =
e
w
lo
tra o
C
fc
lis
n
io
0
1
1
b p
M
s
f= n
o
o
b p
M
s
D
3 C o m
2
1
M I
0
u p
S
r S
e
t a
k I
c
a s
B
e lin e
D a
u lS p
e e
d H
u b
o w
P
e r
o w
P
2 rE
e
0 d
5
g e
S ens or Z ones
GND
1
2
C N C N
+ 12 V N
O O O O O
M
M
UPS
s
D
COMP AQ
Y S T
S
E M S
E L
E C
T IO N
1
Rack 1 (Downey ATMS)
FrontView
3
4
C N C N
O O O O
M
M

1 Pro b e s 2
SD
A P96 1 2 M e a su re -UPS 
Rack 2 (Hosting City)
FrontView
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Corridor Architecture
County TMC
Sub - Regional TMC
County
Server
Corridor
Server
Communication Network for the IEN
Caltrans
CTNet
Field
Equipment
Caltrans
City of
Commerce
Field
Equipment
Commerce
City of
Santa Fe
Springs
City of
Downey
Field
Equipment
Montebello
Field
Equipment
Downey
City of
Norwalk
County
DPW
Field
Equipment
Field
Equipment
Field
Equipment
Field
Equipment
Field
Equipment
Pico Rivera Santa Fe
Springs
Whittier
Norwalk
La Mirada
County
Field
Equipment
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
ATMS Analysis: Starting Point
• A set of requirements (from the ESGV Pilot
Project)
• The County's ATMS selection process (which
currently has eliminated all but two systems).
• Pomona Valley ATMS Alternative Analysis Report
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Project Specific Information
•
An expanded set of requirements which we have prepared for the
I-5/Telegraph Road project which incorporates all of the Pilot
project requirements.
•
An initial systems architecture which identifies the following systems:
(*Indicates no ATMS analysis needed)
*Caltrans: CTNet
*Commerce - BiTrans upgrade
*Montebello (on another System e.g. Downey)
*Pico Rivera (ditto or SF Springs)
Downey
Santa Fe Springs
*La Mirada (on another system - County's)
Norwalk
*Whittier
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Issues
•
Identify a relevant sub-set of the requirements rather than
an exhaustive list for comparison at this stage
•
Additional Requirements that may be key selection criteria:
–
–
–
–
Downey: Multi-jurisdictional
SF Springs Traffic diversions due to rail closures
Commerce: Open protocols?
General:
Integrating CCTV and CMS in the traffic control system.
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
ATMS Analysis Process
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
ATMS Recommendations
City
Commerce
Hosting ATMS Server For
•
Commerce
Controllers to be
supported
•
Recommended ATMS Options*
•
Type 170
•
Upgrade existing QuicNet II
to QuicNet IV
Change out the system to
one of the following:
•
•
•
•
icons™/i2TMS
KITS
TranSuite
Pyramids
Downey
•
•
Downey
Montebello
•
•
Type 170
Type 2070 (Downey
future)
•
•
•
icons™/i2TMS
Pyramids
KITS
Santa Fe Springs
•
•
•
Santa Fe Springs
Pico Rivera
Whittier
•
•
Type 170
Econolite ASC/2
•
•
icons™/i2TMS
TranSuite
Norwalk
•
Norwalk
•
Econolite ASC/2
•
•
icons™/i2TMS
TranSuite
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Communications
Analysis
Progress Update
Collect
Requirements
Define Categories for
Comparison
Allocate Requirements
to Categories
Communications
Analysis
Assess Technologies
against Categories
Identify Recommended
Solutions
Apply Recommendations
to the Project Area
Recommendations
Conceptual
Design
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Physical Communication Architecture
Layer #3
Sub-Regional TMS
IEN as a Virtual Private Network “backbone”
TMC to TMC (IEN) Network
Layer #2
LCC City #1
LCC City #2
LCC City #3
ATMS Connections
Layer #1
CCTV
Controller
Field Devices
City #1
CMS
CCTV
Controller
Field Devices
City #2
CMS
CCTV
Controller
CMS
Field Devices
City #3
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Conclusions:
• Main points:
– IEN as a Virtual Private Network “backbone”
– Individual links (LCC to LCC) may be leased or
agency owned depending upon:
• the logical communications links to be supported on
that physical link
• Geographic situation
– Field Network
• Backbone with last mile circuits
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Field Communication Architecture
TMC
TMC
Legend
Low speed cable-based
or wireless Connections
High Speed Backbone
Connection
HUB
HUB
Field
Devices
Field
Devices
Field
Devices
Field
Devices
Field
Devices
Field
Devices
Field
Devices
Field
Devices
Field
Devices
...
Field
Devices
TMC
...
HUB
...
HUB
HUB
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Recommendations
•
Field to Central Communication (CCTV Video Images)
–
Scenario # 1: Hardwire cable media exists or will be installed
Fiber: Ethernet IP
TWP: DSL
–
Scenario # 2: No existing communication and distance greater than
300 feet
Fiber: Ethernet IP or
DSL (cost issue)
–
Scenario # 3: No existing communication and distance to closest
Hub or LCC is less than 300 feet
Ethernet IP over SSR
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Recommendations
•
Field to Central Communication (controller data, CMS,
and CCTV control)
–
Scenario # 1: Hardwire cable media exists or will be installed
Fiber: Ethernet IP
TWP: Analog modems
–
Scenario # 2: No existing communication and distance greater
than 300 feet
Fiber: Fiber analog (serial devices) or Ethernet IP
Leased analog or wireless IP
–
Scenario # 3: No existing communication and distance to
closest Hub or LCC is less than 300 feet
Ethernet IP over SSR
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Recommendations
•
LCC to LCC (IEN Network) Communication
–
Scenario # 1: High Speed connection (e.g intranet) exists between two
LCC locations
Use if >1.5Mps
–
Scenario # 2: Hardwire cable media exists or will be installed between
two LCC locations
Fiber: Ethernet
TWP: Private DSL
–
Scenario # 3: High Speed Internet connection exists to one or more
LCC locations
Use if >1.5Mps
–
Scenario # 4: Distance between two LCC’s is less than 5 miles and
there is no existing communication infrastructure.
Fiber Ethernet or
Frame Relay
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Communications Analysis (2)
Objective:
• Identify communications technologies specific
to the project components
• Field Communications
• Center-to-Center
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Location Specific
• Starting Point
– Scenario Recommendations from Communications Analysis
Report
– Sub-regional TMC link excluded
• Assumptions
– Field Communications (Data and Video)
– Fiber backbone with tail circuits
– Center-to-Center Communications (Data)
– Frame Relay (if no fiber available)
– Center-to-Center Communications (Video)
– Internet Technology Based
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Field Communication Architecture
TMC
TMC
Legend
Low speed cable-based
or wireless Connections
High Speed Backbone
Connection
HUB
HUB
Field
Devices
Field
Devices
Field
Devices
Field
Devices
Field
Devices
Field
Devices
Field
Devices
Field
Devices
Field
Devices
...
Field
Devices
TMC
...
HUB
...
HUB
HUB
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Design Approach
• Use common fiber cable infrastructure across
jurisdictions
• Provides for redundancy
• Provides path for center-to-center communications
• Anticipated reductions in installation costs
• Communications technology to be selected
per Agency
• Assign individual fiber pairs to each jurisdiction
• Field devices directly interconnected to parent LCCs
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Design Methodology
•
Route fiber-optic cable to CCTV and LCC locations
•
•
•
•
Connect both signals and cameras to fiber at these locations
Maximize number of LCCs connected
Use tail circuits off above fiber to provide
communications to other intersections
For Tail Circuits, use the following selection priority
order:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Existing TWP
SSR for locations with clear line of sight
Wireless data services if service is available
Leased telephone lines
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Design Methodology (Cont.)
• Define two primary technology solutions per LCC
• Serial (Analog)
• Ethernet (Digital)
• Cost out the above two solutions per LCC
• Make recommendations per intersection per LCC
• Connection method recommendation per intersection
• Single technology recommendation per LCC
• Recommendation Criteria
• 10 Year life cycle costs
• Existing/planned infrastructure
• Future expansion
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Proposed Fiber Backbone
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Field Equipment Scenarios
• Serial Analog (Controller Only)
– Fiber
– Copper
– Wireless Serial (SSR)
– Leased Lines Digital
– Leased Wireless (3G Digital)
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Field Equipment Scenarios
• Serial Analog (Controller and CCTV)
– Fiber
– Copper
– Wireless (SSR)
– Leased Line Digital
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Field Equipment Scenarios
• Ethernet (Controller Only)
– Fiber
– Copper
– Wireless (SSR)
– Leased Line Digital
– Leased Wireless (3G Digital)
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Field Equipment Scenarios
• Ethernet (Controller and CCTV)
– Fiber
– Copper
– Wireless (SSR)
– Leased Line Digital
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Next Steps
•
•
•
•
Finalize Device Locations
Complete Communications Analysis
Develop Conceptual Design
Develop Operations and Management
Plan
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor
s
Progress Update
Project Web Page
www.itssiemens.com
s
its
I-5/Telegraph Road Corridor