...

1  Greater Los Angeles County Region   IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal

by user

on
Category: Documents
28

views

Report

Comments

Transcript

1  Greater Los Angeles County Region   IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal
Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1
Authorization and Eligibility Requirements
Attachment 1 Greater Los Angeles County Region
IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal
Authorization and Eligibility Requirements Introduction Attachment1consistsofthefollowingitems:











AuthorizingDocumentation
EligibleApplicantDocumentation
AcknowledgementForm–SubmittalofAdditionalInformation
AdoptedIRWMPlanandProofofFormalAdoption
ProjectConsistencywithanadoptedIRWMPlan
UrbanWaterManagementPlanCompliance
AgriculturalWaterManagementCompliance
SurfaceWaterDiverterCompliance
GroundwaterManagementCompliance
CASGEMCompliance
WaterConservationProgramsandMeasures
Authorizing Documentation The Resolution to Apply for IntegratedRegional Water Management Round 3 Implementation Grant Funds
(Proposition 84) was adopted by the County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors on May 13, 2014 and
authorizestheLosAngelesCountyFloodControlDistrict(LACFCD)tosubmitthisGreaterLosAngelesCounty
Region IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal and execute an agreement with the State of California for
IRWMplanningactivities(seeAppendix1‐1).
Eligible Applicant Documentation This GreaterLos Angeles County IRWM Implementation GrantProposal is beingsubmitted bythe LACFCD.
Per the adopted Memorandum of Understanding for Integrated Regional Water Management Planning and
Implementation(seeAppendix1‐2),theRegionalWaterManagementGroup(RWMG)agreestoabidebythe
Operating Guidelines which determine that the LACFCD shall have overall responsibility for submitting all
applicationstotheStateonbehalfoftheparties(seeAppendix1‐3).LACFCDissubmittingthisgrantproposal
onbehalfofthefollowingRWMGentities:
 LosAngelesDepartmentofWaterandPower(LADWP)
 WaterReplenishmentDistrictofSouthernCalifornia(WRD)
 CityofTorrance
 WestBasinMunicipalWaterDistrict(WBMWD)
 UpperSanGabrielValleyMunicipalWaterDistrict(USGVMWD)
 LasVirgenesMunicipalWaterDistrict(LVMWD)
IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐1 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1
Authorization and Eligibility Requirements
LACFCDisalsosubmittingthisgrantproposalonbehalfofthefollowingnon‐RWMGentities:




CityofBurbankWaterandPower(BWP)
CityofInglewood
CrescentaValleyWaterDistrictCVWD)
PuenteBasinWaterAgency(PBWA)
LACFCD’squalificationsasaneligibleapplicantinaccordancewithIRWMProgramGuidelinesareasfollows:
1.
LACFCD is a local public agency as defined in Appendix B of the IRWM Grant Program Guidelines.
LACFCDprovidesfloodprotection,waterconservation,recreationandaestheticenhancementwithin
itsboundaries.
2.
LACFCD is a flood control district adopted under the Los Angeles County Flood Control Act by the
StateLegislaturein1915(seeAppendix1‐4).
3.
LACFCD has legal authority to enter into a grant agreement with the State of California. Per the
adopted Memorandum of Understanding for Integrated Regional Water Management Planning and
Implementation (see Appendix 1‐2), the RWMG agrees to abide by the Operating Guidelines which
determine that the LACFCD shall have overall responsibility for submitting all applications to the
Stateonbehalfoftheparties(seeAppendix1‐3).TheOperatingGuidelineshaveexpiredbutwillbe
updatedinthenearfuture.TheResolutiontoApplyforIntegratedRegionalWaterManagementRound
3ImplementationGrantFunds(Proposition84)wasadoptedbytheCountyofLosAngelesBoardof
SupervisorsonMay13,2014andauthorizestheLACFCDtosubmitthisGreaterLosAngelesCounty
IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal and execute an agreement with the State of California for
IRWMactivities(seeAppendix1‐1).
4. TheRWMGjointlydevelopedandadoptedaMemorandumofUnderstandingforIntegratedRegional
WaterManagementPlanningandImplementationandOperatingGuidelines(seeAppendix1‐2).This
MOUreplacedthefirstMOU(adoptedDecember2008),andestablishesthatpartiesenteringintothe
MOU “desire to continue to coordinate and share information concerning water resources and
management planning programs and projects and other information for grant funding and IRWMP
implementation, and to improve and maintain overall communication among the Parties. It is
anticipatedthatcoordinationandinformationsharingamongthePartieswillassisttheagenciesin
achieving their respective missions and contribute to the overall well‐being of the GLAC IRWM
Region. It is expected that all Parties will cooperate and coordinate with one another in order to
achievethesegoals”.TheMOUgoesontosaythatcoordinationandcollaborationamongpartieswill
include “(s)olicitation of external funding for implementation of the IRWMP for the GLAC IRWM
Region”. In addition, the RWMG Operating Guidelines (Appendix 1‐3) define the responsibilities of
those taking part in the RWMG, and includes the responsibility of the Leadership Committee to
“(a)dopt as necessary fiscal procedures to administer funds that may be received for purposes of
development, administration and/or implementation of the Plan,” and to “(e)stablish a project
evaluation framework that is consistent across the Region for the purpose of quantifying project
benefits to allow for the categorization and prioritization of projects based on the Water
ManagementAreasandconsistentwiththePlan.”TheLACFCDwasconfirmedastheagencyserving
asChairoftheLeadershipCommitteeattheJanuary23,2013meeting,whichbringswithittherole
ofsubmittinggrantapplicationsonbehalfoftheRegion(seemeetingnotesinAppendix1‐5,p.3). Acknowledgement Form The 2014 IRWM Drought Grant Acknowledgement Form is included in Appendix 1‐6 of this Attachment. A
hardcopy,wetsignaturehasbeenprovidedtoDWRaswell.
IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐2 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1
Authorization and Eligibility Requirements
Adopted Plan and Proof of Formal Adoption The“GreaterLosAngelesCountyIntegratedRegionalWaterManagementPlan”(IRWMPlan)wasupdatedto
beconsistentwiththe2012IRWMPlanStandards,andwasdeemedconsistentwiththePlanStandardsby
theDepartmentofWaterResources(DWR)onJune5,2014.Appendix1‐7containstheDWRletterofreview
andacceptance.
The IRWM Plan was adopted by the RWMG agencies and project proponents as shown in the below table.
Appendix1‐8containstheProofofAdoptionsforeachoftheLeadershipCommittee(RWMGagencies)and
Project Proponents. The following agencies have adopted the IRWM Plan, however, the proof of adoption
documentswerenotavailableatthetimeofthissubmittal,andwillbesenttoDWRbySeptember9,2014:
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and Raymond Basin Management Board. The following
agencies expect to adopt the IRWM Plan and send DWR the proof of adoption documents by September 9,
2014:BurbankWaterandPower,CityofInglewood,andCityofTorrance.
Table 1‐1: Greater Los Angeles County IRWM Plan Update Agency Adoption Information Agency
LeadershipCommittee Memberor
ProjectProponent
BurbankWaterandPower
CityofInglewood
CityofMalibu
CityofTorrance
ProjectProponent
ProjectProponent
LeadershipCommittee
LeadershipCommitteeandProject
Proponent
LeadershipCommittee
CouncilforWatershedHealth
CrescentaValleyWaterDistrict
LasVirgenesMunicipalWaterDistrict
LosAngelesCountyFloodControlDistrict
LosAngelesDepartmentofWaterand
Power
MainSanGabrielBasinWatermaster
MetropolitanWaterDistrictofSouthern
California
MountainsRecreationandConservation
Authority
PuenteBasinWaterAgency
RaymondBasinManagementBoard
SanGabrielBasinWaterQualityAuthority
SanitationDistrictsofLosAngelesCounty
SantaMonicaBayRestorationCommission
UpperSanGabrielValleyMWD
WaterReplenishmentDistrictofSouthern
California
WestBasinMunicipalWaterDistrict
ProjectProponent
LeadershipCommitteeandProject
Proponent
RWMGMember
LeadershipCommitteeandProject
Proponent
LeadershipCommittee
LeadershipCommittee
AdoptionDate
July22,2014
August19,2014
June23,2014
July22,2014
December19,
2013
July8,2014
May13,2014
May20,2014
June17,2014
July2,2014
July8,2014
LeadershipCommittee
July2,2014
ProjectProponent
LeadershipCommittee
LeadershipCommittee
LeadershipCommittee
LeadershipCommittee
ProjectProponent
LeadershipCommitteeandProject
Proponent
LeadershipCommittee
May29,2014
July16,2014
June18,2014
June25,2014
June19,2014
July2,2014
May15,2014
June30,2014
Project Consistency with an Adopted IRWM Plan Projectsincludedwithinthisgrantproposalarepartofthe2013IRWMPlanUpdate.TheIRWMPlanallows
for periodic updates to the list of water management projects or generally for inclusion in the plan via
IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐3 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1
Authorization and Eligibility Requirements
submission through an online database. The GLAC IRWM project list is currently hosted online at:
http://irwm.rmcwater.com/la/. Notes from meetings in which projects were adopted into the 2013 Plan
updateareincludedinAppendix1‐9.Thegeneralprocessusedtosubmit,reviewandselectprojectsforthe
IRWMPlanisasfollows:
1.
Project Submittal: Project proponents submit projects through the GLAC IRWM Region’s online
projectdatabase
2.
Project Review: Projects are reviewed by the respective subregion (smaller watershed‐based
subareasintheGreaterLosAngelesCountyIRWMRegion)toensurethattheymeettheProposition
84GuidelinesandIRWMRegionobjectivesandtargets,andthattheycanbeimplemented.
3.
ProjectSelection:SubregionsselectprojectsforinclusionintheIRWMPlaniftheymeetthecriteria
listedinstep2,andindicatesointheonlineprojectlist.
Urban Water Management Compliance Therearetwelve(12)urbanwatersuppliersincludedasprojectproponentswithinthisProposal,including:
LADWP,CityofTorrance,BurbankWaterandPower,WestBasinMWD,UpperSanGabrielValleyMWD,City
ofInglewood,PuenteBasinWaterAgency,LasVirgenesMWD,andCrescentaValleyWaterDistrict.Table1‐2
lists the agency names, contact names, contact phone numbers and email addresses for each of the urban
watersuppliers.
Table 1‐2: Urban Water Management Plan Contact Information Agency
ProjectName
ContactName
ContactPhone
ContactEmail
BurbankWater
andPower
BeaWaterSaver
Conservation
Program
KapilKulkarni
818‐238‐3792
[email protected]
Cityof
Inglewood
WellNo.2
Rehabilitation
Barmeshwar
Rai
310‐412‐5333
[email protected]
CityofTorrance
Goldsworthy
DesalterExpansion
JohnDettle
310‐618‐3059
[email protected]
Crescenta
ValleyWater
District
RockhavenWell
DavidGould
818‐236‐4119
[email protected]
LasVirgenes
MWD
WaterBudgetBased
RateImplementation
JanDougall
818‐251‐2167
[email protected]
LADWP
LosAngeles‐Burbank
GroundwaterSystem
Interconnection
Chad
Lamacchia
213‐367‐3222
[email protected]
LADWP
MissionWells
Improvement
NohemiRangel
213‐367‐4336
[email protected]
LADWP
ManhattanWell
Improvement
MarkChing
213‐367‐0794
[email protected]
IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐4 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1
Authorization and Eligibility Requirements
Agency
ProjectName
ContactName
ContactPhone
ContactEmail
LADWP
TerminalIsland
WaterReclamation
PlantAdvanced
WaterPurification
Facilityand
DistributionSystem
Expansion
AndrewHan
213‐367‐8753
[email protected]
PuenteBasin
WaterAgency
PomonaBasin
Regional
GroundwaterProject
JoseMartinez
909‐348‐8240
[email protected]
UpperSan
GabrielValley
MWD
RecycledWater
ProgramExpansion
Project
Reymundo
Trejo
626‐443‐2297
[email protected]
WestBasin
MWD
RecycledWaterOn‐
SiteRetrofitProject
LeighanneKirk 310‐660‐6225
[email protected]
Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) Compliance AsrequiredbytheUrbanWaterManagementPlanningAct(CWC§10610etseq.),theagencieslistedinTable
1‐2 have submitted complete 2010 UWMPs to DWR. Per these requirements, these agencies are currently
eligibletoreceivegrantfunds.Documentationthatverifiesthatthe2010UWMPaddressestherequirements
oftheCWCisincludedinAppendix1‐10.
Agricultural Water Management Compliance NoneoftheprojectproponentswhoseprojectsareincludedinthisProposalareagriculturalwatersuppliers.
AB 1420 Compliance AsdefinedintheIRWMGrantProgramGuidelines,urbanwatersuppliersmuchself‐certifycompliancewith
therequirementscontainedinAB1420.Pertheserequirements,eachoftheurbanwatersupplierslistedin
Table1‐2havesubmittedAB1420self‐certificationforms(seeAppendix1‐11forAB1420self‐certification
formswhichhavealsobeenprovidedtoDWRaswetsigned,hardcopies).
Water Meter Compliance AsdefinedintheIRWMGrantProgramGuidelines,CWC§525etseq.requiresurbanwatersuppliersapplying
for IRWM grant funds to demonstrate that they meet the State’s water meter requirements. Per these
requirements,eachoftheurbanwatersupplierslistedinTable1‐2havesubmittedaWaterMetercompliance
form(seeAppendix1‐12)whichhavealsobeenprovidedtoDWRaswetsigned,hardcopies.
Surface Water Diverter Compliance As defined in the IRWM Grant Program Guidelines, CWC §5100 requires surface water diverters to submit
surface water diversion reports to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). LADWP is the only
surface water diverter included in this grant proposal which must comply with the surface water diverter
requirement.Belowistheagencyname,acontactperson,contactphonenumberandemailaddressforeach
surface water diverter’s contact person, as well as compliance status. Appendix 1‐13 contains the SWRCB
verificationdocumentation.
IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐5 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1
Authorization and Eligibility Requirements
Table 1‐3: Surface Water Diverter Contact Information and Compliance Status Agency
Compliance
Status
ContactName
Contact
Phone
ContactEmail
LosAngeles
Department
ofWaterand
Power
Surfacewater
diversionreports
havebeen
submittedas
requiredby
SWRCB
LizbethCalderon
213‐367‐
2501
[email protected]
SaeedJorat
213‐367‐
1119
[email protected]
GWMP Compliance Several projects included in this application may directly affect groundwater levels or quality, and are
included in Table 1‐4, which also includes the status of the applicable GWMP compliance option. Those
projectsthatarenotexpectedtoimpactgroundwaterarelistedinTable1‐5,whichalsoincludesjustification
forthisconclusion.SeeAppendix1‐14forGWMPcomplianceforms,whichhavealsobeenprovidedtoDWR
aswetsigned,hardcopies
Table 1‐4: GWMP Compliance Project
Agency
Implementing
Project
ProjectAgency
ContactName
Project
Agency
Contact
Phone
ProjectAgencyContact
Email
ManhattanWells
Improvement
LADWP
MarkChing
213‐367‐
0794
[email protected]
LA‐Burbank
GroundwaterSystem
Interconnection
LADWP
ChadLamacchia
213‐367‐
3222
[email protected]
om
MissionWells
Improvement
LADWP
NohemiRangel
213‐367‐
4336
[email protected]
om
TerminalIsland
LADWP
WaterReclamation
PlantAdvancedWater
PurificationFacility
andDistribution
SystemExpansion
AndrewHan
213‐367‐
8753
[email protected]
RecycledWater
Turnouts
WRD
JasonWeeks
562‐275‐
4253
[email protected]
WellNo.2
Rehabilitation
CityofInglewood
Barmeshwar
Rai
310‐412‐
5333
[email protected]
g
BeaWaterSaver
Conservation
Program
CityofBurbank
WaterandPower
KapilKulkarni
818‐238‐
3792
[email protected]
v
IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐6 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1
Authorization and Eligibility Requirements
Project
Agency
Implementing
Project
ProjectAgency
ContactName
Project
Agency
Contact
Phone
ProjectAgencyContact
Email
SixBasinsandPuente
BasinIntegrated
WaterSupplyProject
PuenteBasin
WaterAgency
(WalnutValley
WaterDistrict)
MichaelHolmes
909‐594‐
9532
[email protected]
SixBasinsandPuente
BasinIntegrated
WaterSupplyProject
PuenteBasin
WaterAgency
(RowlandWater
District)
KenDeck
562‐697‐
1726
[email protected]
om
GoldsworthyDesalter
Expansion
CityofTorrance
RobertJ.Beste
310‐618‐
6258
[email protected]
RockhavenWell
CrescentaValley
WaterDistrict
DavidGould
818‐236‐
4119
[email protected]
WestCoastBasin
BarrierProjectUnit
12Injectionand
ObservationWells
LosAngelesCounty EricBatman
FloodControl
District
626‐458‐
6137
[email protected].
gov
Table 1‐5: Groundwater Impacts Justification Project
Justificationforprojectnotaffectinggroundwater
WaterBudgetBasedRates
Implementation(LVMWD)
Thisprojectisawateruseefficiencyprojectthataffectswaterdemand
only,andisnotexpectedtodirectlyaffectgroundwaterlevelsorquality.
RecycledWaterOn‐Site
RetrofitProject(WestBasin
MWD)
Thisprojectwillinvolveexpandingtherecycledwatersystemtoserve
additionalnon‐potable,directusedemands.Sincethisprojectwillserve
directdemandsonlyandoffsetimportedwatersupply,itisnotexpected
todirectlyaffectgroundwaterlevelsorquality.
UpperSanGabrielValley
MunicipalWaterDistrict
RecycledWaterProgram
Expansion(USGVMWD)
Thisprojectwillinvolveexpandingtherecycledwatersystemtoserve
additionalnon‐potable,directusedemands.Sincethisprojectwillserve
directdemandsonlyandoffsetimportedwatersupply,itisnotexpected
todirectlyaffectgroundwaterlevelsorquality.
CASGEM Compliance AsdefinedintheIRWMGrantProgramGuidelines,CWC§10933.7statesthatifthegrantapplicantorproject
proponents’ jurisdictions include unmonitored high and medium priority groundwater basins, and they
matchthelistofpotentialmonitoringentitiesidentifiedinCWC§10927,theywillnotbeeligibletoreceive
2014 IRWM Drought Grant funding. Table 1‐6 lists each medium and high priority groundwater basins,
monitoring entities and designation status, overlying applicant or proponent agency name, and overlying
projectswithlatitudeandlongitude.
IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐7 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1
Authorization and Eligibility Requirements
All medium and high priority basins have either been assigned a monitoring entity, or agencies are in the
processofapplyingtobethedesignatedmonitoringentity.Potentialmonitoringentitieswhoseapplications
have not yet been accepted, including the City of Santa Monica and the Antelope Valley State Water
ContractorsAssociation(AVSWCA),areexpectedtobecomethedesignatedmonitoringentitiespriortothe
grantawarddate.Amapshowinggroundwaterbasinpriorities,monitoringentities,applicantandproponent
boundaries, and project locations is shown in Figures 1‐1 The shapefiles of each agency’s boundary and
projectlocationsareincludedasuploadstotheGRanTSwebsite.
Basinsthatdonotyethaveamonitoringentityinclude:
SantaMonicaBasin:TheCityofSantaMonicahasappliedtobethedesignatedmonitoringentityfortheSanta
MonicaBasin,andhasbeenworkingcloselywithDWR’sCASGEMgrouptocompletetheCASGEMcompliance
andnotificationrequirements,andexpectstobeapprovedbyDWRasthemonitoringentitypriortothegrant
contractbeingexecuted.ThefollowingstepswereprovidedtotheCityofSantaMonicabyDWRtocomplete
tobedesignatedthemonitoringentity:
1.
DevelopafiguretoshowtheproposedCASGEMwellmonitoringnetworkandwherethewells
arepositionedwithintheSantaMonicaSub‐basin.
2.
UploadwellstothenotificationontheCASGEMOS.
3.
Finalize the groundwater monitoring plan. Using the monitoring well network map and well
constructioninformation,identifyareaswithintheSantaMonicaSubbasinthathavespatialdata
gaps.Alldatagapsmustbeidentifiedandrecognizedinthegroundwatermonitoringplan.
4.
SubmitanemailtoDWRacknowledgingthattheyhavepermissiontoreleasewellconstruction
information to the Public via the CASGEM Online System (OS). A copy of this email will be
uploadedbyDWRtotheCity’snotificationintheCASGEMOS.
5.
After all required information have been submitted, DWR will complete its final review of the
City’s notification and recommend them for final designation consideration. The CASGEM
programadministratorsinSacramentoareresponsibleforapprovingthefinaldesignation.
6.
Oncedesignated,theCitywillreceiveanofficialfinaldesignationlettersignedbyPaulaLandis,
ChiefofDWR’sDivisionofIntegratedRegionalWaterManagement.
AntelopeValleyBasin:TheAntelopeValleyStateWaterContractorsAssociation(AVSCWA)hasappliedtobe
the designated monitoring entity for the Antelope Valley Basin. and has been working closely with DWR’s
CASGEM group to complete the CASGEM compliance and notification requirements, and expects to be
approved by DWR as the monitoring entity prior to the grant contract being executed. The following steps
wereprovidedtoAVSCWAbyDWRtocompletetobedesignatedthemonitoringentity:
1.
Selectmonitoringwells
2.
DevelopMonitoringPlan
3.
DevelopanMOU
4.
GetBulletin118shapefileanduploadtoCASGEMwebsite
5.
ObtainwellconstructioninformationandGPScoordinates
6.
ObtainpermissionfromUSGStousewells(emailisOK)
7.
DobatchuploadtoDWRwebsite
8.
After all required information have been submitted, DWR will complete its final review of
AVSCWA notification and recommend them for final designation consideration. The CASGEM
programadministratorsinSacramentoareresponsibleforapprovingthefinaldesignation.
9.
Once designated, the AVSWCA will receive an official final designation letter signed by Paula
Landis,ChiefofDWR’sDivisionofIntegratedRegionalWaterManagement.
IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐8 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1
Authorization and Eligibility Requirements
Table 1‐6: Medium and High Priority Groundwater Basins, Monitoring Entities, and Overlying Proponents and Projects GroundwaterBasin
(Prioritization)
MonitoringEntity
Overlyingapplicantor
proponents
OverlyingProjects
(latitudeandlong)
SanFernandoBasin
UpperLosAngeles
RiverArea
Watermaster
LosAngelesCountyFlood
ControlDistrict
MissionWells
ImprovementProject
(34.29201,‐118.45400)
(Medium)
CrescentaValleyWater
District
LosAngelesDepartmentof
WaterandPower
BurbankWaterandPower
RaymondBasin
(Medium)
SanGabrielValley
(High)
RaymondBasin
ManagementBoard
(High)
RockhavenWell
(34.21194,‐118.23917)
LasVirgenesMWD
BeaWaterSaverWater
ConservationProgram
(34.18084,‐118.30897)
LosAngelesCountyFlood
ControlDistrict
None
UpperSanGabrielValley
MWD
MainSanGabrielBasin
Watermaster
LosAngelesCountyFlood
ControlDistrict
SixBasins
Watermaster
PuenteBasinWaterAgency
PuenteBasin
Watermaster
CentralBasin
GroundwaterSystem
InterconnectionProject
(34.15227,‐118.34934)
WaterReplenishment
DistrictofSouthern
California
UpperSanGabrielValley
MWD
RecycledWaterProgram
ExpansionProject
(34.0072,‐118.04936)
PomonaBasinRegional
GroundwaterProject
(34.00998,‐117.86820)
LosAngelesDepartmentof
WaterandPower
LosAngelesCountyFlood
ControlDistrict
LosAngelesDepartmentof
WaterandPower
WestBasinMWD
ManhattanWell
ImprovementsProject
(33.98273,‐118.31124)
RecycledWaterTurnouts
Project(33.98584,‐
118.07717)
CityofInglewood
IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐9 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1
Authorization and Eligibility Requirements
GroundwaterBasin
(Prioritization)
MonitoringEntity
Overlyingapplicantor
proponents
OverlyingProjects
(latitudeandlong)
WestCoastBasin
WaterReplenishment
DistrictofSouthern
California
LosAngelesCountyFlood
ControlDistrict
WellNo.2Rehabilitation
Project
(33.92379,‐118.33134)
(Medium)
CityofTorrance
LosAngelesDepartmentof
WaterandPower
WestBasinMWD
CityofInglewood
On‐SiteRecycledWater
RetrofitsProject
(33.86319,‐118.34230)
GoldsworthyDesalter
ExpansionProject
(33.84475,‐118.34466)
WestCoastBasinBarrier
Project
(33.83714,‐118.37641)
TerminalIslandWRP
AdvancedWater
PurificationFacilityand
DistributionSystem
Expansion(33.74371,‐
118.263319)
SantaMonicaBasin
(Medium)
CityofSantaMonica
(applied)
LosAngelesCountyFlood
ControlDistrict
None
LosAngelesDepartmentof
WaterandPower
WestBasinMWD
CoastalPlainof
OrangeCounty
OrangeCountyWater
District
LosAngelesCountyFlood
ControlDistrict
None
AVSWCA(applied)
LosAngelesCountyFlood
ControlDistrict
None
SantaClaritaValley
Cooperative
Groundwater
MonitoringAssociation
LosAngelesCountyFlood
ControlDistrict
None
(Medium)
AntelopeValley
(High)
SantaClaraRiver
ValleyEast
(High)
IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐10 July 2014 G
Greater Los Anggeles County Re
egion Attaachment 1
Auuthorization an
nd Eligibility Req
quirements
Figure 1‐1: G
Groundwater Basin
n CASGEM Prioritization, Project Locaations and Project Proponent Servicee Areas IIRWM Implementation Grant P
Proposal
P
Proposition 84, Round 3 July 2014 1‐11 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1
Authorization and Eligibility Requirements
Locally not Cost Effective Water Conservation Programs and Measures As defined in the IRWM Grant Program Guidelines, CWC §10631.5(a)(4)(B) states that “not locally cost
effective” means the present value of the local benefits of implementing a water conservation program or
measureislessthanthepresentvalueofthelocalcostsofimplementingthatprogramormeasure.Noneof
the projects included in this Proposal include water conservation programs or measures whose total
annualizedcostexceedsitsannualizedlocalmonetarybenefitsoverthelifeoftheproject.
IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐12 July 2014 
Fly UP