1 Greater Los Angeles County Region IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal
by user
Comments
Transcript
1 Greater Los Angeles County Region IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal
Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1 Authorization and Eligibility Requirements Attachment 1 Greater Los Angeles County Region IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Authorization and Eligibility Requirements Introduction Attachment1consistsofthefollowingitems: AuthorizingDocumentation EligibleApplicantDocumentation AcknowledgementForm–SubmittalofAdditionalInformation AdoptedIRWMPlanandProofofFormalAdoption ProjectConsistencywithanadoptedIRWMPlan UrbanWaterManagementPlanCompliance AgriculturalWaterManagementCompliance SurfaceWaterDiverterCompliance GroundwaterManagementCompliance CASGEMCompliance WaterConservationProgramsandMeasures Authorizing Documentation The Resolution to Apply for IntegratedRegional Water Management Round 3 Implementation Grant Funds (Proposition 84) was adopted by the County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors on May 13, 2014 and authorizestheLosAngelesCountyFloodControlDistrict(LACFCD)tosubmitthisGreaterLosAngelesCounty Region IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal and execute an agreement with the State of California for IRWMplanningactivities(seeAppendix1‐1). Eligible Applicant Documentation This GreaterLos Angeles County IRWM Implementation GrantProposal is beingsubmitted bythe LACFCD. Per the adopted Memorandum of Understanding for Integrated Regional Water Management Planning and Implementation(seeAppendix1‐2),theRegionalWaterManagementGroup(RWMG)agreestoabidebythe Operating Guidelines which determine that the LACFCD shall have overall responsibility for submitting all applicationstotheStateonbehalfoftheparties(seeAppendix1‐3).LACFCDissubmittingthisgrantproposal onbehalfofthefollowingRWMGentities: LosAngelesDepartmentofWaterandPower(LADWP) WaterReplenishmentDistrictofSouthernCalifornia(WRD) CityofTorrance WestBasinMunicipalWaterDistrict(WBMWD) UpperSanGabrielValleyMunicipalWaterDistrict(USGVMWD) LasVirgenesMunicipalWaterDistrict(LVMWD) IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐1 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1 Authorization and Eligibility Requirements LACFCDisalsosubmittingthisgrantproposalonbehalfofthefollowingnon‐RWMGentities: CityofBurbankWaterandPower(BWP) CityofInglewood CrescentaValleyWaterDistrictCVWD) PuenteBasinWaterAgency(PBWA) LACFCD’squalificationsasaneligibleapplicantinaccordancewithIRWMProgramGuidelinesareasfollows: 1. LACFCD is a local public agency as defined in Appendix B of the IRWM Grant Program Guidelines. LACFCDprovidesfloodprotection,waterconservation,recreationandaestheticenhancementwithin itsboundaries. 2. LACFCD is a flood control district adopted under the Los Angeles County Flood Control Act by the StateLegislaturein1915(seeAppendix1‐4). 3. LACFCD has legal authority to enter into a grant agreement with the State of California. Per the adopted Memorandum of Understanding for Integrated Regional Water Management Planning and Implementation (see Appendix 1‐2), the RWMG agrees to abide by the Operating Guidelines which determine that the LACFCD shall have overall responsibility for submitting all applications to the Stateonbehalfoftheparties(seeAppendix1‐3).TheOperatingGuidelineshaveexpiredbutwillbe updatedinthenearfuture.TheResolutiontoApplyforIntegratedRegionalWaterManagementRound 3ImplementationGrantFunds(Proposition84)wasadoptedbytheCountyofLosAngelesBoardof SupervisorsonMay13,2014andauthorizestheLACFCDtosubmitthisGreaterLosAngelesCounty IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal and execute an agreement with the State of California for IRWMactivities(seeAppendix1‐1). 4. TheRWMGjointlydevelopedandadoptedaMemorandumofUnderstandingforIntegratedRegional WaterManagementPlanningandImplementationandOperatingGuidelines(seeAppendix1‐2).This MOUreplacedthefirstMOU(adoptedDecember2008),andestablishesthatpartiesenteringintothe MOU “desire to continue to coordinate and share information concerning water resources and management planning programs and projects and other information for grant funding and IRWMP implementation, and to improve and maintain overall communication among the Parties. It is anticipatedthatcoordinationandinformationsharingamongthePartieswillassisttheagenciesin achieving their respective missions and contribute to the overall well‐being of the GLAC IRWM Region. It is expected that all Parties will cooperate and coordinate with one another in order to achievethesegoals”.TheMOUgoesontosaythatcoordinationandcollaborationamongpartieswill include “(s)olicitation of external funding for implementation of the IRWMP for the GLAC IRWM Region”. In addition, the RWMG Operating Guidelines (Appendix 1‐3) define the responsibilities of those taking part in the RWMG, and includes the responsibility of the Leadership Committee to “(a)dopt as necessary fiscal procedures to administer funds that may be received for purposes of development, administration and/or implementation of the Plan,” and to “(e)stablish a project evaluation framework that is consistent across the Region for the purpose of quantifying project benefits to allow for the categorization and prioritization of projects based on the Water ManagementAreasandconsistentwiththePlan.”TheLACFCDwasconfirmedastheagencyserving asChairoftheLeadershipCommitteeattheJanuary23,2013meeting,whichbringswithittherole ofsubmittinggrantapplicationsonbehalfoftheRegion(seemeetingnotesinAppendix1‐5,p.3). Acknowledgement Form The 2014 IRWM Drought Grant Acknowledgement Form is included in Appendix 1‐6 of this Attachment. A hardcopy,wetsignaturehasbeenprovidedtoDWRaswell. IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐2 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1 Authorization and Eligibility Requirements Adopted Plan and Proof of Formal Adoption The“GreaterLosAngelesCountyIntegratedRegionalWaterManagementPlan”(IRWMPlan)wasupdatedto beconsistentwiththe2012IRWMPlanStandards,andwasdeemedconsistentwiththePlanStandardsby theDepartmentofWaterResources(DWR)onJune5,2014.Appendix1‐7containstheDWRletterofreview andacceptance. The IRWM Plan was adopted by the RWMG agencies and project proponents as shown in the below table. Appendix1‐8containstheProofofAdoptionsforeachoftheLeadershipCommittee(RWMGagencies)and Project Proponents. The following agencies have adopted the IRWM Plan, however, the proof of adoption documentswerenotavailableatthetimeofthissubmittal,andwillbesenttoDWRbySeptember9,2014: Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and Raymond Basin Management Board. The following agencies expect to adopt the IRWM Plan and send DWR the proof of adoption documents by September 9, 2014:BurbankWaterandPower,CityofInglewood,andCityofTorrance. Table 1‐1: Greater Los Angeles County IRWM Plan Update Agency Adoption Information Agency LeadershipCommittee Memberor ProjectProponent BurbankWaterandPower CityofInglewood CityofMalibu CityofTorrance ProjectProponent ProjectProponent LeadershipCommittee LeadershipCommitteeandProject Proponent LeadershipCommittee CouncilforWatershedHealth CrescentaValleyWaterDistrict LasVirgenesMunicipalWaterDistrict LosAngelesCountyFloodControlDistrict LosAngelesDepartmentofWaterand Power MainSanGabrielBasinWatermaster MetropolitanWaterDistrictofSouthern California MountainsRecreationandConservation Authority PuenteBasinWaterAgency RaymondBasinManagementBoard SanGabrielBasinWaterQualityAuthority SanitationDistrictsofLosAngelesCounty SantaMonicaBayRestorationCommission UpperSanGabrielValleyMWD WaterReplenishmentDistrictofSouthern California WestBasinMunicipalWaterDistrict ProjectProponent LeadershipCommitteeandProject Proponent RWMGMember LeadershipCommitteeandProject Proponent LeadershipCommittee LeadershipCommittee AdoptionDate July22,2014 August19,2014 June23,2014 July22,2014 December19, 2013 July8,2014 May13,2014 May20,2014 June17,2014 July2,2014 July8,2014 LeadershipCommittee July2,2014 ProjectProponent LeadershipCommittee LeadershipCommittee LeadershipCommittee LeadershipCommittee ProjectProponent LeadershipCommitteeandProject Proponent LeadershipCommittee May29,2014 July16,2014 June18,2014 June25,2014 June19,2014 July2,2014 May15,2014 June30,2014 Project Consistency with an Adopted IRWM Plan Projectsincludedwithinthisgrantproposalarepartofthe2013IRWMPlanUpdate.TheIRWMPlanallows for periodic updates to the list of water management projects or generally for inclusion in the plan via IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐3 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1 Authorization and Eligibility Requirements submission through an online database. The GLAC IRWM project list is currently hosted online at: http://irwm.rmcwater.com/la/. Notes from meetings in which projects were adopted into the 2013 Plan updateareincludedinAppendix1‐9.Thegeneralprocessusedtosubmit,reviewandselectprojectsforthe IRWMPlanisasfollows: 1. Project Submittal: Project proponents submit projects through the GLAC IRWM Region’s online projectdatabase 2. Project Review: Projects are reviewed by the respective subregion (smaller watershed‐based subareasintheGreaterLosAngelesCountyIRWMRegion)toensurethattheymeettheProposition 84GuidelinesandIRWMRegionobjectivesandtargets,andthattheycanbeimplemented. 3. ProjectSelection:SubregionsselectprojectsforinclusionintheIRWMPlaniftheymeetthecriteria listedinstep2,andindicatesointheonlineprojectlist. Urban Water Management Compliance Therearetwelve(12)urbanwatersuppliersincludedasprojectproponentswithinthisProposal,including: LADWP,CityofTorrance,BurbankWaterandPower,WestBasinMWD,UpperSanGabrielValleyMWD,City ofInglewood,PuenteBasinWaterAgency,LasVirgenesMWD,andCrescentaValleyWaterDistrict.Table1‐2 lists the agency names, contact names, contact phone numbers and email addresses for each of the urban watersuppliers. Table 1‐2: Urban Water Management Plan Contact Information Agency ProjectName ContactName ContactPhone ContactEmail BurbankWater andPower BeaWaterSaver Conservation Program KapilKulkarni 818‐238‐3792 [email protected] Cityof Inglewood WellNo.2 Rehabilitation Barmeshwar Rai 310‐412‐5333 [email protected] CityofTorrance Goldsworthy DesalterExpansion JohnDettle 310‐618‐3059 [email protected] Crescenta ValleyWater District RockhavenWell DavidGould 818‐236‐4119 [email protected] LasVirgenes MWD WaterBudgetBased RateImplementation JanDougall 818‐251‐2167 [email protected] LADWP LosAngeles‐Burbank GroundwaterSystem Interconnection Chad Lamacchia 213‐367‐3222 [email protected] LADWP MissionWells Improvement NohemiRangel 213‐367‐4336 [email protected] LADWP ManhattanWell Improvement MarkChing 213‐367‐0794 [email protected] IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐4 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1 Authorization and Eligibility Requirements Agency ProjectName ContactName ContactPhone ContactEmail LADWP TerminalIsland WaterReclamation PlantAdvanced WaterPurification Facilityand DistributionSystem Expansion AndrewHan 213‐367‐8753 [email protected] PuenteBasin WaterAgency PomonaBasin Regional GroundwaterProject JoseMartinez 909‐348‐8240 [email protected] UpperSan GabrielValley MWD RecycledWater ProgramExpansion Project Reymundo Trejo 626‐443‐2297 [email protected] WestBasin MWD RecycledWaterOn‐ SiteRetrofitProject LeighanneKirk 310‐660‐6225 [email protected] Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) Compliance AsrequiredbytheUrbanWaterManagementPlanningAct(CWC§10610etseq.),theagencieslistedinTable 1‐2 have submitted complete 2010 UWMPs to DWR. Per these requirements, these agencies are currently eligibletoreceivegrantfunds.Documentationthatverifiesthatthe2010UWMPaddressestherequirements oftheCWCisincludedinAppendix1‐10. Agricultural Water Management Compliance NoneoftheprojectproponentswhoseprojectsareincludedinthisProposalareagriculturalwatersuppliers. AB 1420 Compliance AsdefinedintheIRWMGrantProgramGuidelines,urbanwatersuppliersmuchself‐certifycompliancewith therequirementscontainedinAB1420.Pertheserequirements,eachoftheurbanwatersupplierslistedin Table1‐2havesubmittedAB1420self‐certificationforms(seeAppendix1‐11forAB1420self‐certification formswhichhavealsobeenprovidedtoDWRaswetsigned,hardcopies). Water Meter Compliance AsdefinedintheIRWMGrantProgramGuidelines,CWC§525etseq.requiresurbanwatersuppliersapplying for IRWM grant funds to demonstrate that they meet the State’s water meter requirements. Per these requirements,eachoftheurbanwatersupplierslistedinTable1‐2havesubmittedaWaterMetercompliance form(seeAppendix1‐12)whichhavealsobeenprovidedtoDWRaswetsigned,hardcopies. Surface Water Diverter Compliance As defined in the IRWM Grant Program Guidelines, CWC §5100 requires surface water diverters to submit surface water diversion reports to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). LADWP is the only surface water diverter included in this grant proposal which must comply with the surface water diverter requirement.Belowistheagencyname,acontactperson,contactphonenumberandemailaddressforeach surface water diverter’s contact person, as well as compliance status. Appendix 1‐13 contains the SWRCB verificationdocumentation. IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐5 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1 Authorization and Eligibility Requirements Table 1‐3: Surface Water Diverter Contact Information and Compliance Status Agency Compliance Status ContactName Contact Phone ContactEmail LosAngeles Department ofWaterand Power Surfacewater diversionreports havebeen submittedas requiredby SWRCB LizbethCalderon 213‐367‐ 2501 [email protected] SaeedJorat 213‐367‐ 1119 [email protected] GWMP Compliance Several projects included in this application may directly affect groundwater levels or quality, and are included in Table 1‐4, which also includes the status of the applicable GWMP compliance option. Those projectsthatarenotexpectedtoimpactgroundwaterarelistedinTable1‐5,whichalsoincludesjustification forthisconclusion.SeeAppendix1‐14forGWMPcomplianceforms,whichhavealsobeenprovidedtoDWR aswetsigned,hardcopies Table 1‐4: GWMP Compliance Project Agency Implementing Project ProjectAgency ContactName Project Agency Contact Phone ProjectAgencyContact Email ManhattanWells Improvement LADWP MarkChing 213‐367‐ 0794 [email protected] LA‐Burbank GroundwaterSystem Interconnection LADWP ChadLamacchia 213‐367‐ 3222 [email protected] om MissionWells Improvement LADWP NohemiRangel 213‐367‐ 4336 [email protected] om TerminalIsland LADWP WaterReclamation PlantAdvancedWater PurificationFacility andDistribution SystemExpansion AndrewHan 213‐367‐ 8753 [email protected] RecycledWater Turnouts WRD JasonWeeks 562‐275‐ 4253 [email protected] WellNo.2 Rehabilitation CityofInglewood Barmeshwar Rai 310‐412‐ 5333 [email protected] g BeaWaterSaver Conservation Program CityofBurbank WaterandPower KapilKulkarni 818‐238‐ 3792 [email protected] v IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐6 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1 Authorization and Eligibility Requirements Project Agency Implementing Project ProjectAgency ContactName Project Agency Contact Phone ProjectAgencyContact Email SixBasinsandPuente BasinIntegrated WaterSupplyProject PuenteBasin WaterAgency (WalnutValley WaterDistrict) MichaelHolmes 909‐594‐ 9532 [email protected] SixBasinsandPuente BasinIntegrated WaterSupplyProject PuenteBasin WaterAgency (RowlandWater District) KenDeck 562‐697‐ 1726 [email protected] om GoldsworthyDesalter Expansion CityofTorrance RobertJ.Beste 310‐618‐ 6258 [email protected] RockhavenWell CrescentaValley WaterDistrict DavidGould 818‐236‐ 4119 [email protected] WestCoastBasin BarrierProjectUnit 12Injectionand ObservationWells LosAngelesCounty EricBatman FloodControl District 626‐458‐ 6137 [email protected]. gov Table 1‐5: Groundwater Impacts Justification Project Justificationforprojectnotaffectinggroundwater WaterBudgetBasedRates Implementation(LVMWD) Thisprojectisawateruseefficiencyprojectthataffectswaterdemand only,andisnotexpectedtodirectlyaffectgroundwaterlevelsorquality. RecycledWaterOn‐Site RetrofitProject(WestBasin MWD) Thisprojectwillinvolveexpandingtherecycledwatersystemtoserve additionalnon‐potable,directusedemands.Sincethisprojectwillserve directdemandsonlyandoffsetimportedwatersupply,itisnotexpected todirectlyaffectgroundwaterlevelsorquality. UpperSanGabrielValley MunicipalWaterDistrict RecycledWaterProgram Expansion(USGVMWD) Thisprojectwillinvolveexpandingtherecycledwatersystemtoserve additionalnon‐potable,directusedemands.Sincethisprojectwillserve directdemandsonlyandoffsetimportedwatersupply,itisnotexpected todirectlyaffectgroundwaterlevelsorquality. CASGEM Compliance AsdefinedintheIRWMGrantProgramGuidelines,CWC§10933.7statesthatifthegrantapplicantorproject proponents’ jurisdictions include unmonitored high and medium priority groundwater basins, and they matchthelistofpotentialmonitoringentitiesidentifiedinCWC§10927,theywillnotbeeligibletoreceive 2014 IRWM Drought Grant funding. Table 1‐6 lists each medium and high priority groundwater basins, monitoring entities and designation status, overlying applicant or proponent agency name, and overlying projectswithlatitudeandlongitude. IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐7 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1 Authorization and Eligibility Requirements All medium and high priority basins have either been assigned a monitoring entity, or agencies are in the processofapplyingtobethedesignatedmonitoringentity.Potentialmonitoringentitieswhoseapplications have not yet been accepted, including the City of Santa Monica and the Antelope Valley State Water ContractorsAssociation(AVSWCA),areexpectedtobecomethedesignatedmonitoringentitiespriortothe grantawarddate.Amapshowinggroundwaterbasinpriorities,monitoringentities,applicantandproponent boundaries, and project locations is shown in Figures 1‐1 The shapefiles of each agency’s boundary and projectlocationsareincludedasuploadstotheGRanTSwebsite. Basinsthatdonotyethaveamonitoringentityinclude: SantaMonicaBasin:TheCityofSantaMonicahasappliedtobethedesignatedmonitoringentityfortheSanta MonicaBasin,andhasbeenworkingcloselywithDWR’sCASGEMgrouptocompletetheCASGEMcompliance andnotificationrequirements,andexpectstobeapprovedbyDWRasthemonitoringentitypriortothegrant contractbeingexecuted.ThefollowingstepswereprovidedtotheCityofSantaMonicabyDWRtocomplete tobedesignatedthemonitoringentity: 1. DevelopafiguretoshowtheproposedCASGEMwellmonitoringnetworkandwherethewells arepositionedwithintheSantaMonicaSub‐basin. 2. UploadwellstothenotificationontheCASGEMOS. 3. Finalize the groundwater monitoring plan. Using the monitoring well network map and well constructioninformation,identifyareaswithintheSantaMonicaSubbasinthathavespatialdata gaps.Alldatagapsmustbeidentifiedandrecognizedinthegroundwatermonitoringplan. 4. SubmitanemailtoDWRacknowledgingthattheyhavepermissiontoreleasewellconstruction information to the Public via the CASGEM Online System (OS). A copy of this email will be uploadedbyDWRtotheCity’snotificationintheCASGEMOS. 5. After all required information have been submitted, DWR will complete its final review of the City’s notification and recommend them for final designation consideration. The CASGEM programadministratorsinSacramentoareresponsibleforapprovingthefinaldesignation. 6. Oncedesignated,theCitywillreceiveanofficialfinaldesignationlettersignedbyPaulaLandis, ChiefofDWR’sDivisionofIntegratedRegionalWaterManagement. AntelopeValleyBasin:TheAntelopeValleyStateWaterContractorsAssociation(AVSCWA)hasappliedtobe the designated monitoring entity for the Antelope Valley Basin. and has been working closely with DWR’s CASGEM group to complete the CASGEM compliance and notification requirements, and expects to be approved by DWR as the monitoring entity prior to the grant contract being executed. The following steps wereprovidedtoAVSCWAbyDWRtocompletetobedesignatedthemonitoringentity: 1. Selectmonitoringwells 2. DevelopMonitoringPlan 3. DevelopanMOU 4. GetBulletin118shapefileanduploadtoCASGEMwebsite 5. ObtainwellconstructioninformationandGPScoordinates 6. ObtainpermissionfromUSGStousewells(emailisOK) 7. DobatchuploadtoDWRwebsite 8. After all required information have been submitted, DWR will complete its final review of AVSCWA notification and recommend them for final designation consideration. The CASGEM programadministratorsinSacramentoareresponsibleforapprovingthefinaldesignation. 9. Once designated, the AVSWCA will receive an official final designation letter signed by Paula Landis,ChiefofDWR’sDivisionofIntegratedRegionalWaterManagement. IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐8 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1 Authorization and Eligibility Requirements Table 1‐6: Medium and High Priority Groundwater Basins, Monitoring Entities, and Overlying Proponents and Projects GroundwaterBasin (Prioritization) MonitoringEntity Overlyingapplicantor proponents OverlyingProjects (latitudeandlong) SanFernandoBasin UpperLosAngeles RiverArea Watermaster LosAngelesCountyFlood ControlDistrict MissionWells ImprovementProject (34.29201,‐118.45400) (Medium) CrescentaValleyWater District LosAngelesDepartmentof WaterandPower BurbankWaterandPower RaymondBasin (Medium) SanGabrielValley (High) RaymondBasin ManagementBoard (High) RockhavenWell (34.21194,‐118.23917) LasVirgenesMWD BeaWaterSaverWater ConservationProgram (34.18084,‐118.30897) LosAngelesCountyFlood ControlDistrict None UpperSanGabrielValley MWD MainSanGabrielBasin Watermaster LosAngelesCountyFlood ControlDistrict SixBasins Watermaster PuenteBasinWaterAgency PuenteBasin Watermaster CentralBasin GroundwaterSystem InterconnectionProject (34.15227,‐118.34934) WaterReplenishment DistrictofSouthern California UpperSanGabrielValley MWD RecycledWaterProgram ExpansionProject (34.0072,‐118.04936) PomonaBasinRegional GroundwaterProject (34.00998,‐117.86820) LosAngelesDepartmentof WaterandPower LosAngelesCountyFlood ControlDistrict LosAngelesDepartmentof WaterandPower WestBasinMWD ManhattanWell ImprovementsProject (33.98273,‐118.31124) RecycledWaterTurnouts Project(33.98584,‐ 118.07717) CityofInglewood IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐9 July 2014 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1 Authorization and Eligibility Requirements GroundwaterBasin (Prioritization) MonitoringEntity Overlyingapplicantor proponents OverlyingProjects (latitudeandlong) WestCoastBasin WaterReplenishment DistrictofSouthern California LosAngelesCountyFlood ControlDistrict WellNo.2Rehabilitation Project (33.92379,‐118.33134) (Medium) CityofTorrance LosAngelesDepartmentof WaterandPower WestBasinMWD CityofInglewood On‐SiteRecycledWater RetrofitsProject (33.86319,‐118.34230) GoldsworthyDesalter ExpansionProject (33.84475,‐118.34466) WestCoastBasinBarrier Project (33.83714,‐118.37641) TerminalIslandWRP AdvancedWater PurificationFacilityand DistributionSystem Expansion(33.74371,‐ 118.263319) SantaMonicaBasin (Medium) CityofSantaMonica (applied) LosAngelesCountyFlood ControlDistrict None LosAngelesDepartmentof WaterandPower WestBasinMWD CoastalPlainof OrangeCounty OrangeCountyWater District LosAngelesCountyFlood ControlDistrict None AVSWCA(applied) LosAngelesCountyFlood ControlDistrict None SantaClaritaValley Cooperative Groundwater MonitoringAssociation LosAngelesCountyFlood ControlDistrict None (Medium) AntelopeValley (High) SantaClaraRiver ValleyEast (High) IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐10 July 2014 G Greater Los Anggeles County Re egion Attaachment 1 Auuthorization an nd Eligibility Req quirements Figure 1‐1: G Groundwater Basin n CASGEM Prioritization, Project Locaations and Project Proponent Servicee Areas IIRWM Implementation Grant P Proposal P Proposition 84, Round 3 July 2014 1‐11 Greater Los Angeles County Region Attachment 1 Authorization and Eligibility Requirements Locally not Cost Effective Water Conservation Programs and Measures As defined in the IRWM Grant Program Guidelines, CWC §10631.5(a)(4)(B) states that “not locally cost effective” means the present value of the local benefits of implementing a water conservation program or measureislessthanthepresentvalueofthelocalcostsofimplementingthatprogramormeasure.Noneof the projects included in this Proposal include water conservation programs or measures whose total annualizedcostexceedsitsannualizedlocalmonetarybenefitsoverthelifeoftheproject. IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Proposition 84, Round 3 1‐12 July 2014