REDUCING VEHICLE IDLING IN VERMONT: A COMMUNITY BASED
by user
Comments
Transcript
REDUCING VEHICLE IDLING IN VERMONT: A COMMUNITY BASED
REDUCING VEHICLE IDLING IN VERMONT: A COMMUNITY BASED STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION & INTERVENTION PLAN Richard Watts, Assistant Research Professor, CDAE & TRC Robert Fish, Graduate Research Assistant, Transportation Research Center ABSTRACT PAPER # Decreasing idling has important human health, environmental and economic benefits. Regulatory approaches designed to reduce idling have not changed individual behavior. Paper describes alternative approach to automobile idling reduction using community-based social marketing to achieve community-wide sustainability goal. Methodology Review of successful efforts in northern communities, existing efforts in Vermont, the experience of other Vermont organizations in promoting energy efficiency and discussions with community leaders and Vermont citizens. Why Reduce Idling? • Vermont’s transportation sector is the largest contributor of CO2 emissions accounting for 46 percent of all CO2 emissions in 2008. • Drivers idle vehicles between 15 and 20 percent of total driving time. Eliminating this idling could save 0.13 gallons of fuel per day per driver in Vermont, or a total of more than $63 million dollars and 840 million pounds of CO2 emissions per year. • Ground level ozone leads to premature death and contributes to lung and heart conditions. • According to Vermont focus group idling is widespread. Participants idled after starting car, picking up and dropping off passengers, and to keep their car warm or cool. BEST PRACTICES PROPOSED INITIATIVE Community Social Marketing Richmond, VT Campaign Plan Employing Best Practices Community-based Social Marketing campaigns revolve around the idea that initiatives that promote behavioral changes are often most effective when they are carried out at the community level and involve direct contact with people • • • • • • • • • • • • Community Based Initiatives Multifaceted voluntary approaches complemented regulatory approaches by building social norms, generating public support, and reducing barriers to compliance and enforcement. Specific Best Practices • Every community is different. Efforts must be tailored to local concerns and involve local community leaders at all stages. • For change to happen, an individual needs to see, hear, or be exposed to an idea, message, or product at least seven times before they take action. • Commitments were most likely to be effective when made by known community individuals and when accompanied with a public display of the commitment such as a window sticker. • Positive and empowering messaging is more successful than messaging with an accusatory tone. Individual efforts have limited impact compared to community-wide approach. MODEL EFFORT ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Special thanks to Dr. Doug McKenzie-Mohr; Natural Resources Canada; Wayne Michaud, Idle Free Vermont; Erik Filkorn, Town of Richmond Selectboard; Jeff Forward, Mount Mansfield Union School District; Gary Beckwith, Richmond Climate Action Committee; Alison Hollingsworth, Project Manager Efficiency Vermont; and the Vermont Agency of Transportation. Efficiency Vermont built partnerships with local organizations, government, schools and businesses to promote greater levels of energy efficiency. After holding meetings seeking input and ideas, outreach strategies were developed and programs implemented. Multiple media and social marketing methods were also employed. Goals were met or exceeded in each community. UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH CENTER Power map community Develop pledge campaign Stage direct Interventions at idling hot spots Involve elementary school children Develop no-idling curriculum Integrate eco driving message Into driving instruction programs Implement the Richmond Energy Conservation Plan Use local media and opinion-shapers to push no-idling message Use planned traffic disruptions to pursue a no-idling agenda Adjust traffic control devices Conduct additional local outreach Proceed with complementary statewide efforts CONCLUSION In order to achieve actual reductions in vehicle idling, a multifaceted campaign approach that seeks to reach potential idlers through a variety of mediums, at different points in their lives, and through several official and unofficial power brokers in the community is necessary. In essence, an effective plan consists of a series of tactics that completely saturate a single community with a no-idling message. These efforts are most successful when they rely on voluntary measures and comprehensive activities rather than a regulatory enforcement approach. BURLINGTON, VERMONT www.uvm.edu/trc