Spotted wing drosophila in North Carolina 2013 Update Hannah Joy Burrack
by user
Comments
Transcript
Spotted wing drosophila in North Carolina 2013 Update Hannah Joy Burrack
Spotted wing drosophila in North Carolina 2013 Update Hannah Joy Burrack Jesse Hardin Katherine Swoboda Dylan Kraus Doug McPhie Department of Entomology North Carolina host crops 2013 Impacts Significant infestation in caneberries (sprayed or unsprayed). Blueberry infestation developed post harvest for southern highbush but was common during rabbiteye harvest & in processing fruit. No reported infestation in commercially grown spring fruiting strawberries. Large infestation in research station plots. “Soft fruit” reported in day neutrals, SWD confirmed. No reported infestation in commercially grown grapes. Grape berry moth damaged muscadines colonized by other Drosophilidae. North Carolina host crops 2013 Impacts Activities Season-long management programs - Efficacy & Risks Efficacy of unregistered insecticides Effect of spray volume on insecticide efficacy Novel management tactics Effects of cold temperatures on immature SWD Blueberry variety susceptibility Effects of diet on intraspecific competition Local movement & infestation patterns Status – Biology – Impacts - Management Host selection and utilization d Infestation rate differs between raspberry and blackberry varieties when flies have free choice (2010-2012) c a b c The same pattern does not appear to hold for blueberries (2012-2013) or day neutral strawberries (2013) variety: F18,435=2.28, p = 0.0021; date, year random Status – Biology – Impacts - Management Season-long management programs Treatment Number Weekly rotation of Materials 1. Export: Export “friendly”, maximum modes of action (MOA) Imidan phosmet OP (1B) Malathion 8F malathion OP (1B) Delegate spinetoram spinosyn (5) Danitol fenpropathrin pyrethroid (3A) 2. ShortPHI: Short Preharvest Interval (1d PHI) Mustang Max zeta-cypermethrin pyrethroid (3A) Malathion 8F malathion OP (1B) 3. Red.Risk: EPA Reduced Risk/OP Alternatives Delegate spinetoram spinosyn (5) GA: Exirel cyantraniliprole ryanodine (28) NC: Assail acetamiprid neonicotinoid (4A) 4. UTC: Untreated Control Status – Biology – Impacts - Management Study sites programs Season-long management Experimental design Sites Farms Acres Reps. Varieties GA 1 Commercial 1.8 4 Mixed highbush GA 2 Research 3.2 4 Rabbiteye: Brightwell, Climax, Powderblue NC 1 Commercial 12 3 Highbush: Duke NC 2 Commercial 6.4 4 Highbush: Legacy Status – Biology – Impacts - Management Approaches Data collection • Monitor impacts of D. suzukii – Adult trap captures, weekly – Larval infestation, weekly • Pesticide residues, 7DAT – Analysis by GA Dept of Ag • Bioassays: 0DAT & 7DAT – 5m + 5f flies – checked 1, 3, 5d for survival Status – Biology – Impacts - Management Approaches Data collection • Monitor impacts of D. suzukii – Adult trap captures, weekly – Larval infestation, weekly • Pesticide residues, 7DAT – Analysis by GA Dept of Ag • Bioassays: 0DAT & 7DAT – 5m + 5f flies – checked 1, 3, 5d for survival No significant mortality was observed in any treatments when bioassays were collected 7DAT Maximum observed pesticide residues ppm zeta-cypermethrin 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 NC 1 NC 2 GA 1 GA 2 NC 1 NC 2 GA 1 GA 2 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 NC 1 NC 2 GA 1 GA 2 NC 1 NC 2 GA 1 GA 2 spinetoram ppm 8.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 malathion phosmet fenpropathrin 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 NC 1 NC 2 GA 1 GA 2 acetamiprid cyantraniliprole 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.50 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 NC NC 1 2 GA GA 1 2 Season-long management programs Efficacy & Risks Observed infestation (field and laboratory) in 7 SHB and 4 RE varieties No significant differences in infestation in the field No significant differences in oviposition or developmental success in laboratory Season-long management programs Efficacy & Risks NC Site 1 NC Site 2 2.00 2.00 Export ShortPHI Red.Risk 1.20 0.80 UTC 1.60 End of Treatment Larvae/berry 1.60 ShortPHI Red.Risk 1.20 0.80 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.00 UTC End of Treatment Export Status – Biology – Impacts - Management Site Infestation 2 Female Bioassay NC Site 11DAT Season-long management programs NC Site 2 – Female bioassay mortality Status – Biology – Impacts - Management Infestation NC Site 1 Season-long management programs NC Site 2 – Females Export Phosmet **** Spinetoram Malathion **** Malathion *** Phosmet Fenpropathrin * Indicates significant difference between treatment and control Status – Biology – Impacts - Management Infestation NC Site 1 Season-long management programs NC Site 2 – Males Export Phosmet **** Malathion Spinetoram **** Malathion *** **** Fenpropathrin Phosmet * Indicates significant difference between treatment and control Status – Biology – Impacts - Management Site 2Infestation Bioassay Fruit NC Site Infestation 1 Season-long management programs NC Site 2 – Bioassay fruit infestation Acetamiprid Spinetoram Spinetoram Acetamiprid Week 2 3 4 6 Chi-sq 11.72 11.54 9.10 4.18 P 0.0084 0.0091 0.028 0.243 Spray volume effects on efficacy 0 DAT Spray volume effects on efficacy 9 DAT Unregistered material efficacy 0 DAT Unregistered material efficacy 7-10 DAT Effects of diet on intraspecific competition a In artificial diets, performance suffers as density increases ab bc Fdf = 6.253,26, p = 0.0024 c Effects of diet on intraspecific competition b a a c b In artificial diets, performance suffers as density increases b c c Fruit observations Larvae consistently performed better in raspberries despite densities of up to 3.5 eggs/g fruit (40 larvae/10 ml = 3/g diet) Larvae: Fdf = 42.443,25, p <0.0001 Total: Fdf = 32.823,27, p <0.0001 Effects of diet on intraspecific competition 0.8 Survival reduced in poor quality diets Standard diets and raspberry comparable Proportion Survival Competition more acute in low carbohydrate diets 0.7 Diet*Eggs: F9,403= 2.65, p = 0.0054 a ab abc abc abc abc 0.6 0.5 a Raspberry Standard No Yeast No Molasses abc bcd bcdbcd cd cd cde 0.4 de 0.3 0.2 e 0.1 0 5 10 20 40 Effects of diet on intraspecific competition Total Development Time Development time extended in poor quality diets Standard diets and raspberry comparable Raspberry f Standard 16.5 No yeast 16 cde bcde 15.5 Days More acute in low amino acid diets 17 15 ef de de No molasses bcde abcd ab ab ab ab abc abc a a 14.5 14 13.5 13 5 10 20 Egg Density 40 Diet*Eggs: F9,145= 4.08, p = 0.0001