Comments
Description
Transcript
Media and Globalization
Media and Globalization Is it really a small world after all? • The 1960s and optimism about internationalization • Marshall McCluhan: “global village” theory • Disney, “It’s a small world” pavilion at 1964 World’s Fair • What’s happened since? Overview • Media and globalization • Cultural imperialism thesis • Global media consumption • Key Questions: • • • What is globalization and how do media relate to it? Who are the global media companies and how do they deal with globalization? Is globalization Americanization? What Is Globalization? • • Globalization is “the process by which regional economies, societies, and cultures have become integrated through a global network of ideas through communication, transportation, and trade” Stages of Globalization: • 1492 - ~1800: mercantile capitalism “guns, germs, and steel” • 1800 - 1945: European imperialism • 1945 - present: modern globalization Globalization and Interdependence • Crossing the limits of time and space • • Significance of space has been reduced and the barrier of time has been overcome Crossing cultural boundaries • • Exchange and intermingling of cultures around the globe The globalization of music • • • More readily available music from different cultures Exchange of musical elements among different cultures A hybrid form of music Globalization and Media • • Media at the center of globalization Globalization and media • • • Vastly enhanced international communication networks Culture and media contents more accessible to a larger number of people Control over media is dominated by large, for profit global corporations Globalization and Media • McLuhan’s vision: “Global village” • • “We have extended our central nervous system itself in a global embrace. We have become irrevocably involved with, and responsible for, each other” His vision remains largely unfulfilled, or at least more complicated and less uniform than he implied it would be. The Global Media Industry • Global products, centralized ownership • Ownership and control of media production are largely centralized in a few mega corporations • • • • “Big three” dominates the global music industry Dominance of software companies Globalization of reality TV shows The case of News Corporation • A global media company Cultural and Media Imperialism The Cultural Imperialism Debate • Westernization/Americanization thesis • • Products of Western cultures contain messages, values, and ideologies that may erode the unique identities of other nations Western media have substantial budgets whereas most nations do not have the resources to develop the infrastructure necessary to produce high productionvalue media The Cultural Imperialism Debate • The fight to preserve local cultures • Wealthier nations have the resources to produce alternatives to U.S. media • “Cultural exception” in Europe The case of Canadian content regulation • the Broadcasting Act of Canada requires broadcasters air a certain percentage of content that was at least partly written, produced, presented, or otherwise contributed to by persons from Canada • Enforced by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), e.g., requirement that ~35% of broadcast music be Canadian • Justifications are both cultural and economic The Cultural Imperialism Debate • The imperialism thesis: Some complications • It does not distinguish between different types of media • • It assumes passive audience • • U.S. is dominant only in some media sectors Non-Western audiences bring their own filters as they interpret Western media products It underestimates the role played by local media • Bollywood, South Korean film industry, etc. Mursi tribesman, w iPod, Southern Ethiopia The Cultural Imperialism Debate • Media corporations know that there are limits to the appeal of Western culture in other nations • Media corporations’ strategies • • Promotions of Western artists as global stars Accommodate local cultures The Politics of Information Flow • Dominance by Western news services • • “A limited perspective reflecting the economic and cultural interests of the industrialized nations” New World Information and Communication Order • • • A call by poorer nations challenging the Westerndominated model of information flow Giving expression to oppressed people and countries Criticized by Western countries as promoting government censorship Croteau and Hoynes: Media/Society, 5th Edition © 2015 SAGE Publications, Inc. Global Media Consumption • Media are not equally accessible around the globe • • The term “global media” may be misleading The digital divide • Inequalities in media access and use Regulating Global Media • Problems with regulating global media • • • • National governments and international organizations being pressured by private capital Global agreements on trade circumvent national regulations The borderless nature of the Internet Regulatory efforts • • • ICANN Internet Governance Forum (IGF) Citizens’ groups Croteau and Hoynes: Media/Society, 5th Edition © 2015 SAGE Publications, Inc. Five big ideas that organize Soc. 43 I. Structure Matters • Mass media do what they do in society to a large degree because of how they are organized or structured. (The media does NOT just "give people what they want") • Some things that determine structure include: technology, funding and economics, organizations, institutions, and legal regulation • Structural determinants can be can be classified in three interacting layers: 1) Technical, 2) Logical, and 3) Content. II. Culture and the Imagination Matter • The media do not make things, they make signs and symbols • Signs and symbols only work in the context of a shared culture, a shared system of meaning • How people interpret the media is as important as what the media produce III. Ideas Matter • People do what they do, in media and elsewhere, because of what they (often implicitly) believe: e.g., what is authorship? what is intellectual property? is advertising freedom or oppression? (“Agency” matters) • The media are NOT driven just by market or other external forces; therefore, what principles people use to understand the media will shape the way the media are. IV. The Media are Changing • The media have never been that stable, but they are in a period of dramatic flux now • How the media matter in modern society, therefore, will be determined by what the media become in the future, not just by what they are now • How the media change is a matter of political and social choice, not just a matter of technology and money V. Therefore: the media are not just a thing that happens to you; if you're willing to think about it and take some action, the future of the media is (at least partly) up to you.