Lessons learned and priorities ahead Vladimir Popov, UN, DESA
by user
Comments
Transcript
Lessons learned and priorities ahead Vladimir Popov, UN, DESA
Roundtable – A Vision of a Sustainable and Resilient North and Central Asia Lessons learned and priorities ahead Vladimir Popov, UN, DESA 1990s – unique experiment of transition to the market Lessons are relevant not only for transition economies Transformational recession Mortality crisis Increase in inequalities Crime Corruption Deterioration of health care and education 1 GDP change in FSU economies, 1989 = 100% 225 Turkmenistan Uzbekistan 205 Azerbaijan Kazakhstan 185 Belarus 165 Central Europe Tajikistan 145 Estonia Armenia 125 Lithuania Latvia 105 Russia 85 Kyrgyzstan Georgia 65 Ukraine Moldova 45 COUNTRY Yincr07_09 Y2009gr Latvia ‐21.772 ‐18 Estonia ‐17.1924 ‐14.1 Ukraine ‐13.215 ‐15 Lithuania ‐12.45 ‐15 Ireland ‐9.79 ‐7 Zimbabwe ‐9.3662 Armenia ‐8.5792 ‐14.4 Finland ‐6.6936 ‐7.8 Iceland ‐6.5001 ‐7.7 Japan ‐6.3376 ‐5.2 Denmark ‐5.9541 ‐5.1 Italy ‐5.95 ‐5 Hungary ‐5.7378 ‐6.3 Mexico ‐5.2845 ‐6.5 Sweden ‐5.0902 ‐4.9 Barbados ‐4.7318 ‐5.3 Jamaica ‐4.658 ‐3.5 Slovenia ‐4.573 ‐7.8 Luxembou ‐4.5 ‐4.5 United Kin ‐4.43 ‐5 Turkey ‐3.8423 ‐4.7 Germany ‐3.765 ‐5 2012 2013 (forecast) 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 25 COUNTRY Yincr07_09 Y2009gr Croatia ‐3.5392 ‐5.8 Botswana ‐3.274 ‐6 Russian Fe ‐2.7424 ‐7.9 Spain ‐2.7324 ‐3.6 Portugal ‐2.7 ‐2.7 Canada ‐2.2104 ‐2.6 Netherland‐2.08 ‐4 Belgium ‐2.03 ‐3 United Sta ‐2.0096 ‐2.4 Georgia ‐1.978 ‐3.9 France ‐1.8088 ‐2.2 Czech Rep ‐1.805 ‐4.2 Austria ‐1.672 ‐3.6 New Zeala ‐1.3951 ‐.7 Chad ‐1.1042 ‐1.4 Moldova ‐1.0544 ‐7.7 Singapore ‐.922 ‐2 El Salvador‐.575 ‐3 Malta ‐.4525 ‐2.5 Hong Kong‐.3648 ‐2.7 Romania ‐.3183 ‐7.1 Greece ‐.04 ‐2 Source: EBRD Transition Reports for various years. Central Europe is the unweighted average for Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Out of 42 countries that experienced reduction of GDP in 2007-09, 13 were transition economies 2 GDP Grow th Rates in Recent Recession in Trans ition Econom ies, % a year, - top 5, bottom 5 Azerbaijan 10 Turkm enistan Uzbe kistan 5 MACRO ECONOMIC POLICY Tajikistan 0 Be larus Croatia -5 Uk raine Lithuania -10 Estonia -15 Latvia -20 2008 2009 TRANSITION ECONOMIES DID WORSE THAN OTHERS IN 2008-09 RECESSION 2010 GDP Growth Rates in Recent Recession in Transition Economies Years/Countries 2008 2009 2010 2010 GDP as a % of 2007 -18.00 -1.00 77.73 Latvia -4.24 Estonia -5.06 -13.90 2.40 83.70 -14.78 0.50 88.01 Lithuania 2.76 Ukraine 2.10 -15.10 4.00 90.15 Croatia 2.40 -5.80 -1.50 95.01 0.64 -6.32 0.80 95.04 Hungary -8.13 1.10 96.35 Slovenia 3.74 Armenia 6.90 -14.20 4.00 95.39 -7.13 -2.00 97.70 Romania 7.35 2.10 -4.50 2.00 99.46 Georgia 2.46 -4.30 1.70 99.72 Czech Republic Montenegro 7.50 -5.70 -0.60 100.76 Russia 5.20 -7.90 4.40 101.15 6.22 -4.95 0.40 101.37 Bulgaria 6.00 -2.80 0.80 103.86 Bosnia and Herzegovina Serbia 5.50 -3.10 1.60 103.87 FYR Macedonia 4.80 -0.80 0.80 104.79 6.17 -4.66 4.00 105.27 Slovak Republic Kyrgyzstan 8.40 2.30 -3.50 107.01 -6.49 6.90 107.80 Moldova 7.84 Poland 5.13 1.65 3.30 110.39 Kazakhstan 3.2 1.2 6 110.70 Albania 7.7 3.3 3 114.59 Kosovo 5.40 4.00 4.60 114.66 8.9 -1.6 7 114.66 Mongolia 7.90 3.40 5.50 117.70 Tajikistan Belarus 10.00 0.20 6.60 117.49 9.00 8.10 8.20 127.49 Uzbekistan Turkmenistan 10.50 6.10 11.00 130.14 Azerbaijan 10.80 9.30 9.00 132.00 3 Increase in income inequalities in transition economies in the early 1990s 4 Gini coefficient of income distribution in post Soviet states, % 50 45 Russian Federation Georgia Turkm enistan 40 Lithuania Kyrgyz Republic Latvia Estonia 35 Moldova Azerbaijan Tajikistan 30 Arm enia Kazakhstan Ukraine 25 Uzbekistan Belarus 2010 2008 2006 2004 2002 2000 1998 1996 1994 1992 1990 1988 20 5 Mortality rate (per 1000) and average life expectancy, years, in Russia 71 17 70 15 69 14 Life expectancy (right scale) 68 13 67 12 11 66 Mortality (left scale) 10 Average life expectancy, years Moratlity rate, per 1000 inhabitants 16 65 9 64 8 7 63 2010 2007 2004 2001 1998 1995 1992 1989 1986 1983 1980 1977 1974 1971 1968 1965 1962 1959 1956 1953 1950 Murders per 100,000 inhabitants in 1987 and in 2002 (WHO statistics) 35 Murders per 100,000 inhabitants in 2002 Russia 30 y = 1,2507e 0,4158x R2 = 0,6517 25 Kazakhstan 20 Ukraine 15 Turkmenistan 10 Latvia Estonia Belarus Moldova Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan 5 Lithuania Slovenia 0 0 1 45 degrees line Albania Georgia Azerbaijan 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Murders per 100,000 inhabitants in 1987 6 CRIME, MURDERS, SUICIDES IN RUSSIA DURING TRANSITION Crime rate (left scale), murder rates and suicide rate (right scale) per 100,000 inhabitants August 1998 currency crisis 2900 45 2700 40 2500 35 2300 30 2100 25 1900 20 1700 15 1500 Crime rate 1300 Murder rate (crime statistics) 10 Murder rate (death statistics) 5 1100 Suicide rate 900 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 0 Corruption perception indices (Transparency International) 5.5 China 5 Russia 4.5 India 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1980-85 1995 2002 2003 2004 2005 7 LESSONS FOR FUTURE ECONOMIC POLICY State capacity Macroeconomic policy Industrial policy Social Policy Privatization (state enterprises) Financial sector Government capacity Size of the government shrank in most transition economies Fig. 13. Consolidated government revenues as a % of GDP Central European countries 55 50 45 South East Europe countries 40 Baltic states % 35 30 Central Asian countries 25 Caucasian states 20 -China 15 10 1989 RUSSIA 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 8 Fig. 5. Government expenditure, % of GDP 60 U S S R / P O L A N D R U S S IA C H IN A 50 40 Debt service 30 Defence Subsidies 20 Investment 10 "Ordinary government" 0 1985 1989 1995 1978 1985 1994 1989 1996 S o u rc e : (P o p o v , 2 0 0 0 ). Decline in government revenues/ GDP ratio and GDP change in 1989-96 in transition economies (EE, FSU, China, Vietnam, Mongolia) China 200 180 160 Vietnam 140 120 Poland 100 80 Croatia Estonia Belarus Macedonia 60 40 Uzbekistan Turkmenistan Kyrgyzstan Armenia Russia Tajikistan 20 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Decline in government revenues/ GDP ratio from 1989-91 (average) to 199396 (average), p.p. 9 MACROECONOMIC POLICY Government capacity – government spending is inadequate Fighting inflation is not #1 priority (excessively tight monetary policy) Exchange rate is overpriced (Dutch disease) External debts of companies and banks are growing because there is no capital control Industrial policy Resource abundance: A curse or blessing? - DESA Working Paper No. 93, June 2010. CoCo-authored with V. Polterovich and A. Tonis. Tonis. Mechanisms of resource curse, economic policy and growth. NES Working Paper # WP/2008/082 (co(co-authored with V. Polterovich and A.Tonis). A.Tonis). Appropriate Economic Policies at Different Stages of Development. CoCo-authored with V. Polterovich. Polterovich. NES, 2004. Stages of Development, Economic Policies and New World Economic Order (co(co-authored with V. Polterovich). Polterovich). Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Global Development Conference in St. Petersburg, Russia. January 2006. 10 Diversification Dani Rodrik. WHAT’S SO SPECIAL ABOUT CHINA’S EXPORTS? Harvard University, January 2006 Actual sophistication of exports as compared to predicted one (based on GDP per capita) is very informative for explaining variations in growth rates among countries Until recently Chinese import tariffs were extremely high 11 Decrease in cotton production and increase in output of cereals and vegetables Production of som e agricultural goods, thousand tons 8000 Cereals 7000 6000 Vegetables 5000 4000 Cotton 3000 2000 Potatoes 1000 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 0 Manufactures exports, % of m erchandise exports 100 China 90 Georgia 80 Kyrgyz Republic 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Arm enia Afghanistan Russian Federation Kazakhstan Tajikistan Azerbaijan 2011 2009 2007 2005 2003 2001 1999 1997 1995 1993 1991 1989 0 Turkm enistan Source: WDI. 12 In Uzbekistan the share of machinery and equipment and chemical in total industrial output increased Structure of industrial output in 1991, % of total Electric Other energyFuelSteel Food Chemical and Non-ferrous metals petrochemical Machinery and equipment Wood, pulp and Construction paper materials Light Structure of industrial output in 2011, % of total Food Other Light Construction Wood, pulp and Machinery and materials paper equipment Electric energy Fuel Steel Non-ferrous metals Chemical and petrochemical Source: State Committee on Statistics of Uzbekistan (http://www.stat.uz/en/) 13 Export and import, million USD 16000 14000 Export Import 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Source: State Committee on Statistics of Uzbekistan (http://www.stat.uz /en/)) http://www.stat.uz/en/ Source: Trushin, Trushin, Eskender and Francisco G. Carneiro (2013). Changing for the Better: The Path to UpperUpper-MiddleMiddle-Income Status in Uzbekistan. Uzbekistan. Economic Premise, No. 119, June 2013 (http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTPREMNET/Resources/EP119.pdf http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTPREMNET/Resources/EP119.pdf). 14 Export to CIS and other countries, million USD 16000 14000 non-CIS countries 12000 CIS countries 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 0 Source: State Committee on Statistics (http:// www.stat.uz/en/ /en/)) (http://www.stat.uz R&D expenditure in selected countries, % of GDP 5 4.5 Israel Finland 4 Japan 3.5 Korea, Rep. 3 United States 2.5 Germany 2 United Kingdom 1.5 China 1 Russian Federation India 0.5 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 15 Social Policies Inequalities Billionaires Crimes, suicides Mortality HDI Fig. 12. Death rate from external causes (per 100,000 of inhabitants) inhabitants) - Russian Empire, RSFSR, RF, 18701870-2000 (log scale) Source: Demoscope, Demoscope, № 3131-32. August 2727- Sept. 9, 2001 http://demoscope.ru/weekly/031/img/nomer31.jpg). http://demoscope.ru/weekly/031/img/nomer31.jpg). 1- all external causes, 2 - accidents, 33- suicides, 44- murders, 5-unknown, 6 – work related accidents. 16 Hum an Developm ent Index for China, Belarus, Russia and Ukraine 0.83 0.78 0.73 Cuba Belarus Russia 0.68 Ukraine China 0.63 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 Emissions of CO2 per $1 of PPP GDP, kg 2.5 2 China 1.5 Russian Federation 1 India 0.5 United States 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 0 European Union 17 Privatization (state enterprises) China did not privatize until 1996, afterwards – very slowly, but growth rates were high. Financial sector – deregulation is not a sine qua non for growth M2 as a % of GDP Рис. 3. Отношение М2 к ВВП в 1978–2006 гг. в некоторых странах в % 300 Гонконг 250 Япония 200 Китай Швейцария 150 США 100 Польша 50 Россия 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 0 18 Bank credits as a % of GDP Рис. 5. Кредиты банков в % к ВВП в некоторых переходных экономиках в 1990 г. и 1995 г. 100 90 1990 80 1995 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Китай Венгрия Словения Польша Румыния Молдова Эстония Монголия Азербайджан Армения Bank credits (short term and long term) as a % of GDP in Russia Рис. 6. Кредиты банков в % к ВВП в СССР и России в 1985–96 гг. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Долгосрочные Краткосрочные 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 19 Stock exchange in Kyrgyzstan – since 1995 in Tajikistan – no stock exchange Financial sector Market capitalization and bank credits, % of GDP Рис. 10. Кредиты банков и рыночная капитализация компаний в % к ВВП в 1995 г. 300 Малайзия 250 ЮАР 200 Рыночная капитализация > Кредиты банков Сингапур 150 Великобритания Нидерланды США Швеция Филиппины Таиланд Чили 100 50 Гана Кения Швейцария Рыночная капитализация < 1/2(Кредиты) Япония Западная Европа Пакистан 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 Кредиты банков 20 Russia's external debt, billion $ Non-financial enterprises Banks CB (including gov ernment debt to IMF) 0 1 /0 1 /2 0 1 1 0 1 /0 1 /2 0 1 0 0 1 /0 1 /2 0 0 9 0 1 /0 1 /2 0 0 8 0 1 /0 1 /2 0 0 7 0 1 /0 1 /2 0 0 6 1 .0 1 .2 0 0 5 1 .0 1 .2 0 0 4 1 .0 1 .2 0 0 3 1 .0 1 .2 0 0 2 1 .0 1 .2 0 0 1 1 .0 1 .2 0 0 0 1 .0 1 . 1 9 9 9 Gov ernment 1 .0 1 .1 9 9 8 500 460 420 380 340 300 260 220 180 140 100 60 20 -20 LESSONS FOR FUTURE ECONOMIC POLICY State capacity Macroeconomic policy Industrial policy Social Policy Privatization (state enterprises) Financial sector 21