Airfield Pavement Management P R O G R A M

F L O R I D A D E PA R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N
AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
DISTRICT 7 REPORT
JUNE 2015
STATEWIDE
Airfield
Pavement
Management
P R O G R A M
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 1
1.
Introduction ................................................................................................................... 15
2.
Airfield Pavement System Inventory and Network Update ................................ 25
3.
Airfield Pavement Condition Analysis and Evaluation ........................................ 29
4.
Pavement Performance Modeling .......................................................................... 39
5.
Maintenance Level Activities .................................................................................... 45
6.
Major Rehabilitation Needs ....................................................................................... 53
7.
Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 57
LIST OF TABLES
Table I: Condition Summary by Airport ............................................................................ 2
Table II: Runway Condition Summary by Airport............................................................ 3
Table III: District Summary of Area by Use by Airport..................................................... 5
Table IV: Summary of Year 1 Major Rehabilitation Needs ........................................... 8
Table V: Summary of 10-Year Major Rehabilitation Costs by Airport ....................... 10
Table VI: Major Rehabilitation by Condition ................................................................. 11
Table 2-1: Summary of Area by Facility Use by Airport ............................................... 27
Table 3-1: Distress Updates to Reflect ASTM D 5340-12............................................... 31
Table 3-1: Airfield Pavement Distresses for Asphalt Concrete .................................. 32
Table 3-2: Airfield Pavement Distresses for Portland Cement Concrete ................ 33
Table 3-3: District Condition Summary by Airport ........................................................ 35
Table 4-1: Overall Airport Area-Weighted PCI .............................................................. 42
Table 4-2: Airport Runway Area-Weighted PCI ............................................................ 43
Table 4-3: Airport Taxiway Area-Weighted PCI ............................................................ 43
Table 4-4: Airport Apron Area-Weighted PCI................................................................ 44
Table 5-1: Recommended AC, AAC, and APC Maintenance and Repair Policy
................................................................................................................................................ 45
Table 5-2: Recommended PCC Maintenance and Repair Policy .......................... 46
Table 5-3: Critical PCI and FDOT Minimum Level PCI .................................................. 49
Table of Contents | 1
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Table 5-4: Maintenance and Major Rehabilitation Activity Based on PCI............. 49
Table 5-5: Flexible Asphalt Concrete Maintenance Unit Costs ................................ 51
Table 5-6: Rigid Portland Cement Concrete Maintenance Unit Costs ................... 51
Table 5-7: Major Rehabilitation Activities and Unit Costs by Condition .................. 52
Table 5-8: District 10-Year Maintenance and Preservation Needs by Airport ....... 52
Table 6-1: Summary of District Year-1 Major Rehabilitation Needs .......................... 54
Table 6-2: Summary of District 10-Year Major Rehabilitation Needs ........................ 55
Table 6-3: Summary of District 10-Year Major Rehabilitation Needs by Airport..... 55
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure I: Runway Condition ................................................................................................. 3
Figure II: Runway Pavement Condition Index Comparison to FDOT Minimum PCI 4
Figure III: PCI by Pavement Facility Use by Airport ......................................................... 6
Figure IV: Visual Representation of PCI Ratings and Field Conditions Flexible
Asphalt Concrete Pavement ............................................................................................. 7
Figure V: Visual Representation of PCI Ratings and Field Conditions Rigid Portland
Cement Concrete Pavement............................................................................................ 7
Figure 1-1: Pavement Condition Life Cycle................................................................... 21
Figure 1-2: Flexible Pavement, Asphalt Concrete ....................................................... 24
Figure 1-3: Rigid Pavement, Portland Cement Concrete .......................................... 24
Figure 2-1: District Pavement Area by Use .................................................................... 27
Figure 2-2: Pavement Area Use by Airport .................................................................... 28
Figure 3-1: Pavement Condition Index Rating Scale .................................................. 34
Figure 3-2: PCI by Pavement Facility Use by Airport .................................................... 36
Figure 3-3: PCI by Pavement Facility Use ....................................................................... 37
Figure 3-4: PCI by Pavement Surface Type ................................................................... 38
Figure 4-1: Example Pavement Performance Model .................................................. 41
Table of Contents | 2
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
APPENDICES
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Glossary of Terms
District Branch Condition Report
District Section Condition Report
District Airfield Pavement Condition Index Rating Exhibits
District 10- Year Major Rehabilitation Needs
District Airfield Pavement 10-Year Major Rehabilitation
Exhibits
Table of Contents | 3
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Airport airfield pavement infrastructure facilities represent a large capital
investment in the Florida Airport System. Timely and appropriate maintenance
and strategic rehabilitation are essential as repair costs increase significantly in
proportion to deterioration. Airport pavement distresses can also contribute to
the development of loose debris and decreased ride quality, which can be a
safety concern for aircraft operations.
In 2012, the Florida Department of Transportation Aviation and Spaceport Office
selected a Consultant team consisting of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and
their Subconsultants Penuel Consulting, LLC. And Roy D. McQueen and
Associates, LTD. To provide services in support to FDOT in the continuing
evaluation and updating of the existing Statewide Airfield Pavement
Management Program (SAPMP) to be completed over fiscal year 2013 through
2015. Pavement Condition Index surveys were performed for airfield pavement
facilities for the following airports located in District 7.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
BKV, Brooksville – Tampa Bay Regional Airport
CGC, Crystal River Airport
CLW, Clearwater Air Park
INF, Inverness Airport
PCM, Plant City Airport
PIE, St. Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport
SPG, Albert Whitted Airport
TPF, Peter O. Knight Airport
VDF, Tampa Executive Airport
ZPH, Zephyrhills Municipal Airport
Tampa International Airport (TPA), which is managed by the Hillsborough County
Aviation Authority, declined to participate in the FDOT SAPMP update and
therefore was not included in the inspection efforts as part of this program
update.
Since the previous update performed in 2012, significant updates to the ASTM D
5340 Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys have
affected the analysis of the program. These include the separation of Weathering
and Raveling into two distinct flexible pavement distresses, and the addition of
the Alkali-Silica Reaction distress for rigid pavement distresses. Additionally, the
deterioration associated with the rigid pavement distress Scaling/Map Cracking
has been modified. The change in distress classification, as described in ASTM D
Executive Summary | 1
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
5340-12, may result in small variances in the PCI values from the previous
inspection analysis. The update included changes in distress deduction values
that may be less than the previous analysis.
District 7’s overall area-weighted Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is at a 69.95, a
condition rating of “Fair”. Table I: Condition Summary by Airport below
represents of the results of the PCI inspection at each airport within the District.
The overall area-weighted average PCI values for the participating airport
facilities in District 7 ranged from 56 (Fair) to 95 (Good). Specific individual airport
results are identified in the individual Airport Pavement Evaluation Reports
provided to each airport. Table II: Runway Condition Summary by Airport
indicates the PCI value for every runway within the District, grouped by Airport.
Figure I: Runway Condition graphically depicts the percentage of the District’s
Runways below the FDOT Minimum PCI of 75 and Figure II: Runway Pavement
Condition Comparison to FDOT Minimum PCI conveys the PCI’s of the District’s
runway facilities in comparison to the FDOT Minimum PCI of 75.
Table I: Condition Summary by Airport
Network
ID
Area-Weighted Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
Airport
Type
Runway
Taxiway
Apron
Overall Airfield
PCI
PCI Rating
PCI
PCI Rating
PCI
PCI Rating
PCI
PCI Rating
BKV
GA
54
POOR
52
POOR
68
FAIR
56
FAIR
CGC
GA
68
FAIR
87
GOOD
57
FAIR
71
SATISFACTORY
CLW
RL
100
GOOD
93
GOOD
57
FAIR
87
GOOD
INF
GA
97
GOOD
94
GOOD
93
GOOD
95
GOOD
PCM
GA
60
FAIR
71
SATISFACTORY
81
SATISFACTORY
71
SATISFACTORY
PIE
PR
71
SATISFACTORY
73
SATISFACTORY
63
FAIR
70
FAIR
SPG
RL
61
FAIR
60
FAIR
74
SATISFACTORY
65
FAIR
TPF
RL
70
FAIR
75
SATISFACTORY
82
SATISFACTORY
74
SATISFACTORY
VDF
RL
70
FAIR
71
SATISFACTORY
77
SATISFACTORY
73
SATISFACTORY
ZPH
GA
83
SATISFACTORY
55
POOR
67
FAIR
70
FAIR
69
FAIR
68
FAIR
71
SATISFACTORY
69
FAIR
DISTRICT
Executive Summary | 2
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Table II: Runway Condition Summary by Airport
Network ID
Airport
Type
Branch
ID
BKV
GA
RW 3-21
BKV
GA
CGC
Branch Name
Length
(Feet)
Width
(Feet)
AreaWeighted
PCI
PCI
Rating
Below
FDOT
Minimum
PCI of 75
RUNWAY 3-21
5,015
150
54
POOR
X
RW 9-27
RUNWAY 9-27
7,002
150
54
POOR
X
GA
RW 9-27
RUNWAY 9-27
4,557
75
68
FAIR
X
CLW
RL
RW 16-34
RUNWAY 16-34
4,108
75
100
GOOD
INF
GA
RW 1-19
RUNWAY 1-19
5,001
75
97
GOOD
PCM
GA
RW 10-28
RUNWAY 10-28
3,948
75
60
FAIR
X
PIE
PR
RW 18L-36R
RUNWAY 18L-36R
9,730
150
68
FAIR
X
PIE
PR
RW 4-22
RUNWAY 4-22
5,903
150
96
GOOD
PIE
PR
RW 9-27
RUNWAY 9-27
4,712
150
44
POOR
X
SPG
RL
RW 18-36
RUNWAY 18-36
2,864
150
60
FAIR
X
SPG
RL
RW 7-25
RUNWAY 7-25
3,677
75
62
FAIR
X
TPF
RL
RW 18-36
RUNWAY 18-36
2,687
75
85
SATISFACTORY
TPF
RL
RW 4-22
RUNWAY 4-22
3,580
100
62
FAIR
X
VDF
RL
RW 18-36
RUNWAY 18-36
5,000
100
70
FAIR
X
VDF
RL
RW 5-23
RUNWAY 5-23
3,259
75
71
SATISFACTORY
X
ZPH
GA
RW 18-36
RUNWAY 18-36
4,694
100
67
FAIR
X
ZPH
GA
RW 5-23
RUNWAY 5-23
4,999
100
100
GOOD
Figure I: Runway Condition
FDOT District 7 Runway Condition
29%
Runways Below FDOT
Minimum PCI 75
71%
Runways Above FDOT
Minimum PCI 75
Executive Summary | 3
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Figure II: Runway Pavement Condition Index Comparison to FDOT Minimum PCI
Runway Pavement Condition Comparison to FDOT Minimum PCI
100
97
100
100
96
85
71
75
Branch Area-Weighted PCI
68
70
68
60
54
60
62
67
62
54
50
44
25
ZPH - RW 5-23
ZPH - RW 18-36
VDF - RW 5-23
VDF - RW 18-36
TPF - RW 4-22
TPF - RW 18-36
SPG - RW 7-25
SPG - RW 18-36
PIE - RW 9-27
PIE - RW 4-22
PIE - RW 18L-36R
PCM - RW 10-28
INF - RW 1-19
CLW - RW 16-34
CGC - RW 9-27
BKV - RW 9-27
BKV - RW 3-21
0
Individual Runway Facilities
Pavement use has an influence on the pavement condition of each facility. For
example, the amount and type of distresses observed on a primary runway can
vary from a crosswind runway based on the frequency and variety of traffic
loads experienced due to the aircraft fleet mix. In this example, the crosswind
runway would be exposed to less aircraft operational traffic due to wind
coverage. In many cases, the crosswind runway is also shorter than the primary
Executive Summary | 4
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
runway which may cause heavier aircraft traffic, larger jets, to prefer the primary
runway in all but the most severe wind conditions. This would result in the primary
runway experiencing a larger percentage of aircraft passes in frequency and
heavy load applications. Table III: District Summary of Area Use by Airport
provides a breakdown of the airport pavement areas by its facility use. Figure III:
PCI by Pavement Use by Airport graphically depicts the PCI for each pavement
facility use at each airport.
Table III: District Summary of Area by Use by Airport
Network
ID
Airport
Type
BKV
Pavement Area (Square Feet)
Runway
Taxiway
Apron
Overall
GA
1,802,250
1,259,981
784,074
3,846,305
CGC
GA
341,775
310,310
248,870
900,955
CLW
RL
308,025
198,238
161,828
668,091
INF
GA
375,075
260,434
337,924
973,432
PCM
GA
296,402
296,714
313,605
906,721
PIE
PR
3,000,650
2,158,954
1,222,641
6,382,245
SPG
RL
693,066
603,488
688,195
1,984,748
TPF
RL
551,817
518,638
189,710
1,260,164
VDF
RL
743,145
609,551
1,177,905
2,530,601
ZPH
GA
974,437
808,864
515,159
2,298,460
9,086,641
7,025,172
5,639,911
21,751,724
DISTRICT
Executive Summary | 5
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Figure III: PCI by Pavement Facility Use by Airport
83
ZPH
55
67
70
VDF
71
77
70
TPF
75
82
61
SPG
60
74
71
Airport
PIE
73
63
Runway
60
PCM
Taxiway
71
81
Apron
97
INF
94
93
100
CLW
93
57
68
CGC
87
57
54
BKV
52
68
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Pavement Condition Index
PCI
Figure IV: Visual Representation of PCI Ratings and Field Conditions Flexible
Asphalt Concrete Pavement and Figure V: Visual Representation of PCI Ratings
and Field Conditions Rigid Portland Cement Concrete Pavement below provides
a graphical reference of pavement surface characteristics associated with
various ranges of PCIs and Ratings with the FDOT repair activities associated with
each range.
Executive Summary | 6
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Figure IV: Visual Representation of PCI Ratings and Field Conditions Flexible
Asphalt Concrete Pavement
Figure V: Visual Representation of PCI Ratings and Field Conditions Rigid Portland
Cement Concrete Pavement
Executive Summary | 7
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
The immediate Year 1 Major Rehabilitation needs, or repair needs that have
been programmed to be completed in the first year of the 10-year Major
Rehabilitation plan based on an unlimited budget for each airport in the District
are summarized in Table IV: Summary of Year 1 Major Rehabilitation Needs. It is
recommended that each airport put a priority on these pavement facilities,
defined by each Section, as the condition determined from the latest inspection
have been identified to be at or below the Critical PCI of 65. Pavement Sections
with PCI’s at or below the Critical PCI will be at or below the recommended
FDOT Minimum PCI’s. Additional details, such as the identification of the specific
pavement Sections below the Critical PCI or MicroPAVER Minimum PCI, are
provided in each individual report and in Appendix B of this District summary
report.
Table IV: Summary of Year 1 Major Rehabilitation Needs
Network ID
Airport Type
Weighted-Average
PCI
Average Rating
Year-1 Major
Rehabilitation
BKV
GA
56
FAIR
$
33,039,230.56
CGC
GA
71
SATISFACTORY
$
3,471,524.86
CLW
RL
87
GOOD
$
2,601,035.00
INF
GA
95
GOOD
$
756,724.76
PCM
GA
71
SATISFACTORY
$
5,053,100.34
PIE
PR
70
FAIR
$
63,848,112.00
SPG
RL
65
FAIR
$
19,284,698.00
TPF
RL
74
SATISFACTORY
$
8,097,320.00
VDF
RL
73
SATISFACTORY
$
983,780.00
ZPH
GA
70
FAIR
$
9,940,949.42
DISTRICT
69
FAIR
$
147,076,474.94
The identified major rehabilitation project planning costs summarized above are
further explained in each individual airport pavement evaluation report. The
projects, defined at the Section Level, have been identified based on the
Critical PCI (alternatively MicroPAVER Minimum PCI. The criteria establishes the
recommended action based on the pavement Section’s determined PCI as
compared to the Critical PCI of 65. In reviewing the FDOT SAPMP pavement
performance trends and analysis of pavement performance models (by Airport
Type, Facility Use, and Pavement Composition) from historic records it is
recommended that pavement facilities should be considered for major
rehabilitation planning once at or below the Critical PCI of 65.
The FDOT has recommended minimum service level PCI for airports based on
pavement facility use, airport type, and expected loading frequency. This
Executive Summary | 8
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
minimum service level PCI is recommended to ensure the pavement provides a
safe operational surface and efficiently uses maintenance and rehabilitation
budgets. Separately, the Critical PCI is a value based on historic pavement
performance trends and costs. It is at a PCI value of 65 at which major
rehabilitation is recommended over maintenance level efforts.
A forecast of major rehabilitation needs for a 10-year period was developed for
each participating airport based on an assumed ‘Unlimited Budget Scenario’.
The analysis identified both maintenance level activities and major rehabilitation
planning needs during the 10-year period based on the most recent field
inspection results. Maintenance level activities, which are direct extrapolation of
distress quantities and associated maintenance efforts, were developed as a
means to provide a basis for airport planning should major rehabilitation work
not be feasible.
Maintenance level activities refers to the repair and preservation-type activities
that are applied locally to specific distress types on the pavement. These
activities for the SAPMP are considered preventative and corrective in nature
and are highly recommended to help improve pavement performance and
extend pavement life. The SAPMP maintenance policies are based on the FAA
Advisory Circular 150/5380-6C and guidance provided in the FDOT Airfield
Pavement Repair Manual.
The resulting major rehabilitation needs, excluding maintenance level activities,
by airport are provided in Table V: Summary of 10-Year Major Rehabilitation
Costs by Airport. See Table 5-8: District 10-Year Maintenance and Preservation
Needs by Airport for maintenance level activities identified for the 10-Year
Program based on PCI deterioration.
Executive Summary | 9
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Table V: Summary of 10-Year Major Rehabilitation Costs by Airport
10-Year Major
Rehabilitation
Network ID
Airport Type
Weighted-Average
PCI
Average Rating
BKV
GA
56
FAIR
$
39,477,474.42
CGC
GA
71
SATISFACTORY
$
7,093,535.63
CLW
RL
87
GOOD
$
3,006,532.62
INF
GA
95
GOOD
$
756,724.76
PCM
GA
71
SATISFACTORY
$
7,019,282.82
PIE
PR
70
FAIR
$
76,042,870.35
SPG
RL
65
FAIR
$
26,106,272.15
TPF
RL
74
SATISFACTORY
$
8,624,162.92
VDF
RL
73
SATISFACTORY
$
35,822,534.77
ZPH
GA
70
FAIR
$
14,963,643.46
DISTRICT
69
FAIR
$
218,913,033.90
The development of the aforementioned planning level costs are based on
planning level assumptions based on the type of rehabilitation being performed
and historic Florida average bid costs for each type of construction.
FDOT recognizes that although pavement mill and overlay is recommended for
flexible asphalt concrete pavement within a PCI range from 40 to 74, it is
conceivable that airports may not have adequate funding to perform this type
of major rehabilitation. A comprehensive surface treatment as described in FAA
AC 150/5370-10G Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports used as a
maintenance rehabilitation activity can be used in lieu of asphalt concrete
pavement mill and overlay. However, it should be understood that these
measures provide only a short term extension of pavement life. While the cost of
surface treatments are significantly lower than that of pavement mill and
overlay, it is not intended or implied to be a full rehabilitative measure providing
the same long term life as a major rehabilitation.
The objective of the major pavement rehabilitation needs analysis is to provide
planning level projects within an airport’s airfield pavement network. Major
rehabilitation activities are recommended when a pavement section has
deteriorated below the Critical PCI value from a functionality perspective. In
addition, major rehabilitation is also recommended when the Section PCI is
above the Critical PCI but the Section has load-related PCI distresses. This is the
point when maintenance and repair level activities are not considered to be
cost effective.
Executive Summary | 10
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Major rehabilitation is identified within the SAPMP as major construction activity
that would result in an improvement or “resetting” of the pavement section’s
PCI to a value of 100. Such activities could include; mill and hot-mix asphalt
overlay and re-construction. This analysis was conducted with no constraints to
budgets as a means to identify all pavement projects based on Critical PCI for a
10-year duration. It is recommended that this be used as a planning tool for
future project development and prioritization. Table VI: Major Rehabilitation by
Condition summarizes the planning level activities by the associated PCI values,
as established by the FDOT Aviation and Spaceport Office.
Table VI: Major Rehabilitation by Condition
Category
Majority Activity
PCI Range
▪ Mill and Overlay (AC)
Major
Rehabilitation
▪ Concrete Pavement
Restoration (PCC)
▪ Full Depth Pavement
Reconstruction
Cost/SqFt
By Airport Type
Primary
Regional
Reliever
General
Aviation
$13.00
$10.00
$8.00
$18.00
$15.00
$10.00
$23.00
$20.00
$15.00
40 - 74
0 - 39
Additional design level investigation in accordance to the FAA Advisory
Circulars will be required to identify specific areas within each section that are
subject to reconstruction, mill and overlay, and PCC restoration. The work and
budgets identified are intended for the planning level not the design level.
Areas identified as mill and overlay may in fact require select areas of
reconstruction should load-based distresses observed warrant it. It is important
to state that the project specific design level efforts are necessary in determining
the final rehabilitative construction activity and project limits. In certain cases,
adjacent or nearby Sections may not have deteriorated to a PCI level that
would warrant “major rehabilitation” but are deteriorated enough to be
considered for inclusion as a combined project.
Runway projects, based on pavement conditions below the FDOT
recommended minimum service level PCI of 75 and have reached or are below
the Critical PCI of 65, which the District should consider as immediate needs are
listed as follows. These are not all the needs at each participating airport within
the District and may not be the individual airport’s priority, but should be
considered in development of funding programs based on functional PCI.
Executive Summary | 11
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Brooksville – Tampa Bay International Airport (BKV)
J
J
Runway 3-21 (Sections 6205 and 6210)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $7,522,499.64
Runway 9-27 (6105, 6110)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $11,205,250.19
Crystal River Airport (CGC)
J
Runway 9-27 (6120)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $97,500.00
Clearwater Airpark (CLW)
J
No Immediate Runway Major Rehabilitation
J
No Immediate Runway Major Rehabilitation
Inverness Airport (INF)
Plant City Airport (PCM)
J
Runway 10-28 (6103, 6115, 6120)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $2,964,017.36
St. Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport (PIE)
J
J
J
Runway 18L-36R (6155, 6175, 6185, 6197)
o Major Rehabilitation – Structural Distress / Primary Runway
o $13,912,200.00
Runway 9-27 (6315, 6320, 6325, 6335, 6340, 6345, 6350, 6355, 6360, 6365,
6370)
o Major Rehabilitation – Structural Distress
o $14,385,802.00
Runway 4-22 (6230)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $463,450.00
Executive Summary | 12
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Albert Whitted Airport (SPG)
J
J
Runway 7-25 (6210, 6207, 6205)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $3,291,991.00
Runway 18-36 (6105, 6110)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $6,444,002.00
Peter O. Knight Airport (TPF)
J
Runway 4-22 (6105)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $4,657,501.00
Tampa Executive Airport (VDF)
J
No Immediate Runway Major Rehabilitation
Zephyrhills Municipal Airport (ZPH)
J
Runway 18-36 (6205)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $5,022,694.06
Executive Summary | 13
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
1.
INTRODUCTION
Project Background
The State of Florida has more than 100 public airports that are vital to the Florida
economy as well as the economy of the United States. The aviation system in
Florida allows the State to capitalize on an increasingly global marketplace.
Florida’s system of commercial service and general aviation airports are
important to businesses throughout the entire State. Air travel is essential to
tourism, Florida’s number one industry.
There are millions of square feet of pavement infrastructure that consists of
runways, taxiways, aprons, ramps, and other areas of airports that are vital to
the support and safety of aircraft operations. Timely pavement maintenance
Page | 15
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
repair and major rehabilitation of these pavements will support the airport in
operating safely, efficiently, economically and without excessive down time.
Pavement Condition Index surveys were performed for airfield pavement
facilities for the following participating airports located in District 7.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
BKV, Brooksville – Tampa Bay Regional Airport
CGC, Crystal River Airport
CLW, Clearwater Air Park
INF, Inverness Airport
PCM, Plant City Airport
PIE, St. Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport
SPG, Albert Whitted Airport
TPF, Peter O. Knight Airport
VDF, Tampa Executive Airport
ZPH, Zephyrhills Municipal Airport
Tampa International Airport (TPA), which is managed by the Hillsborough County
Aviation Authority, declined to participate in the FDOT SAPMP update and
therefore was not included in the inspection efforts as part of this program
update.
1.1
Purpose of District Pavement Evaluation Report
The primary goal of the FDOT Statewide Airfield Pavement Management
Program (SAPMP) Update is to assist the Florida Airport System airports to be in
compliance with Public Law 103-305 Section 107 with the implementation of an
effective airport pavement maintenance-management program as defined by
the Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular 150/5380-7B Airport
Pavement Management Program and provide maintenance recommendations
based on Advisory Circular 150/5380-6C Guidelines and Procedures for
Maintenance of Airport Pavements. The FDOT SAPMP provides individual airports
with pavement condition ratings as well as recommendations for maintenance
level activities and major rehabilitation planning. The overall goal is to minimize
costs by performing timely pavement projects prior to deteriorating to a level at
which costs increase significantly.
This document is intended to serve as a summary of the District’s participating
airports airfield pavement facility condition and long-term major rehabilitation
needs. Furthermore, the purpose of this District Summary document is to provide:
§
Information on the pavement management principles, objectives, and
methods used to update the existing program;
Page | 16
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
§
§
1.2
Provide the average results of the PCI survey and analysis at each
District’s participating airport.
Provide the results of the maintenance level activities and major
rehabilitation analysis identified for the immediate Year-1 needs and longterm 10-Year project needs on an airport and District-wide basis.
FDOT Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
In 1992, the FDOT implemented the SAPMP to improve the knowledge of
pavement conditions at public airports in the Florida Airports System, identify
maintenance and rehabilitation needs at each airport, automate pavement
infrastructure information management, and establish standards to address
future needs. The 1992 SAPMP implementation provided the FDOT and the
participating airports valuable information for establishing and performing timely
and appropriate pavement rehabilitation.
During the 1992-1993 implementation and again during the 1998-1999 updates;
the SAPMP performed the development with proprietary software for pavement
management system analysis. This development allowed for the creation of
pavement management database file system populated with airport attributes
and condition data. The pavement management database was used to
establish maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation (M&R) policies, M&R budget
costs, and the development of recommendations for performing routine
pavement preservation maintenance. This system, known as AIRPAV, was initially
developed during the 1992-1993 SAPMP implementation for the analysis of
distress data. The AIRPAV system was used again in the 1998-1999 SAPMP
update.
In 2004, the SAPMP update included the review of the AIRPAV software
compared to other industry available non-proprietary software packages. As a
result of this review, MicroPAVER was selected for implementation of the system
update. MicroPAVER was developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Construction Engineering Research Laboratory for the purpose of pavement
management. Data from the 1998-1999 FDOT SAPMP update, which built upon
the initial 1992-1993 implementation of AIRPAV, was reviewed and converted to
be compatible with the MicroPAVER system. This data conversion included all
documented pavement facility, classification, type, history, geometry, PCI
condition data and pertinent attributes gathered from airport feedback at the
time. This information was used to develop the inventory of each participating
airport’s pavement facilities in a consistent format. This was the development of
Airfield Pavement Network Definition Exhibits. These inventory exhibits visually
Page | 17
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
depicted the branch, section, and sample units that were based upon the
pavement construction history and composition information provided by each
airport.
In 2006-2008, the SAPMP was updated again with continued use of the
MicroPAVER system. Based on the distress data collected, a maintenance repair
and major rehabilitation planning program was developed for each airport. As
part of this SAPMP update, the procedures for the inspection and the collection
of the pavement distress data were documented, and an interactive website
(http://www.dot.state.fl.us/aviation/pavement.shtm) was established for input of
data.
In 2010-2012, the SAPMP was updated using new GPS integrated technology to
digitally collect pavement distress data. Interactive GIS map files were
developed from updated Airfield Pavement Network Definition Maps to aid
pavement condition inspectors in the collection of sample distress data. The
data collected was utilized to develop pavement performance models to
predict future pavement PCI values and make recommendations for major
rehabilitation.
Currently, airports participating in the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Grant
Program are required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to develop
and implement a pavement maintenance program to be eligible for funding
(FAA Advisory Circular 150/5380-6C Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance
of Airport Pavements). This program requires detailed inspection of airfield
pavement conditions by trained personnel. The inspections are required to be
performed at least once a year or every three years, if the pavement is
inspected in accordance to the PCI survey procedure (such as ASTM
International D 5340 Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index
Surveys). The previous 2010-2012 SAPMP update utilized the ASTM D 5340-04
released in 2004, in lieu of the 2010/2011 edition, in order to maintain consistent
database integrity and benefit of pavement performance models from previous
inspections.
1.3
Organization
FDOT Central Aviation and Spaceport Office Program Manager
The FDOT Central Office Airport Engineering Manager serves as the Aviation and
Spaceport Office Program Manager (ASO-PM) for the SAPMP. The ASO-PM
monitors the work performed by the Consultant. The ASO-PM has review and
Page | 18
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
approval authority for each program task and manages the day-to-day details
of the SAPMP and the pertinent updates.
The ASO-PM reports updates and milestones to the FDOT State Aviation and
Spaceport Manager and Development Administrator.
Consultant
The Consultant, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and their team consisting of
Penuel Consulting, LLC and Roy D. McQueen & Associates, LTD, provides
technical and administrative assistance to the ASO-PM during the execution of
the update to the SAPMP. The efforts include updating the airport pavement
inventory data, performing the condition survey inspections, evaluating the
airfield pavement conditions and updating the SAPMP based upon procedures
outlined in the FAA Advisory Circular 150/5380-6C Guidelines and Procedures for
Maintenance of Airport Pavements and ASTM D 5340.
Airport Role
The airports are the ultimate beneficiary for each condition survey inspection
performed at their respective airfields as part of the SAPMP. The individual
airports will be provided final deliverables prepared by the Consultant that have
been reviewed and approved by the ASO-PM. The airport should have provided
a current Airport Layout Plan (ALP) to the Consultant and, if they participated in
the previous SAPMP, indicate any construction activity that was performed since
the previous inspections.
FDOT District Offices
The seven FDOT District Offices, specifically the Aviation Representatives, provide
vital support to the SAPMP update and the ASO-PM. Each District supports the
SAPMP’s on-going efforts by providing representative construction trend costs
and practices through the Florida Airports System. Each District Office receives
copies of individual Airfield Pavement Evaluation Reports for the airport facilities
located within their respective districts, as well as this summary District specific
Report.
1.4
Introduction to Pavement Types and Pavement Management
Pavement Basics
A pavement is a prepared surface designed to provide a continuous smooth
ride at all taxi, takeoff, and landing speeds and to support an estimated amount
of traffic loading for a certain number of years. Pavements are composed of a
Page | 19
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
combination of constructed layers of subgrade soils, subbases, base course
material, and surface level courses. There are two primary types of pavements:
§
§
Flexible Pavement, composed of bituminous asphalt concrete (AC)
surface, base, and subbase layers.
Rigid Pavement, composed of Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) surface,
base, and subbase layers.
Both pavement types use a combination of layered materials and thicknesses in
order to support the traffic loads (both magnitude and repeated application)
and protect the underlying subgrade soil. Flexible pavements dissipate applied
loads from layer to layer until the load magnitude is small enough to be
supported by the subgrade soil. In rigid pavements, the PCC layer supports the
majority of the structural load applied, and the base or subbase layer is
constructed to provide a smooth, level, and continuous platform that provides
uniform support for PCC slabs.
A small percentage of airfield pavements within the Florida Airports System are
composed of hybrid ‘composite pavement’ sections that may include both AC
pavement and PCC pavement. The two known composite pavements are AC
surface over PCC (APC) and PCC over AC (White Topping).
Due to the different nature of the pavement types, construction, and their
materials; flexible and rigid pavements have different modes of failure and
fatigue. This results in varying deterioration and distress development.
Understanding the mechanics and modes of failure of the pavement types
assists the engineers in making timely, adequate and consistent observations,
and in recommending economical maintenance repairs and major
rehabilitation to the pavement structures at each airfield.
The Concept of an Airfield Pavement Management System
The SAPMP is a program that provides the Florida Airports System an opportunity
to implement and/or maintain a proactive Airfield Pavement Management
System (APMS) in a consistent manner at a regular schedule. The SAPMP Airfield
Pavement Management System consists of pavement inventory, pavement
construction and history, condition survey inspections, pavement performance
modeling, maintenance recommendations, and major rehabilitation planning.
The various elements of the APMS are used by experienced engineers to identify
critical pavements, make pavement preservation or rehabilitation
recommendations, and approximate pavement performance. The APMS as a
whole is used by an airport’s stakeholders, managing agencies, engineers, and
Page | 20
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
planners as a tool in decision making for future project planning, budgeting, and
scheduling of activities for its airfield pavement infrastructure.
A benefit of an active APMS is it provides an understanding of an airport’s
pavement performance trends for the purpose of project planning. Based on
the performance trend of their pavements, an airport can schedule pavement
maintenance and rehabilitation prior to when the pavement section has
deteriorated to a condition that would require reconstruction. The use of
pavement performance trends will help airports and the local FDOT District
program managers plan maintenance level activities and major rehabilitation
projects in a manner and sequence that maximizes benefit and minimizes costs.
Figure 1-1: Pavement Condition Life Cycle, which is based upon the FAA
Advisory Circular 150/5380-7B Airport Pavement Management Program,
illustrates how pavement generally deteriorates over time and the relative cost
of rehabilitation and reconstruction throughout its life.
Figure 1-1: Pavement Condition Life Cycle
Source: FAA Advisory Circular 150 5380-7B Airport Pavement Management Program
Note that during approximately the first 75% of a pavement’s life, it performs
relatively well. After that, however, it begins to deteriorate rapidly. The number
of years a pavement stays in ‘Good’ and ‘Satisfactory’ conditions depends on
how well it is proactively maintained. As the Figure 1-1 demonstrates, the cost of
maintaining the pavement above critical condition before rapid deterioration
occurs is much less compared to maintaining pavements after substantial
deterioration has occurred.
Page | 21
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Pavements tend to deteriorate at an accelerated rate when actual traffic
loading exceeds the original design assumptions and when limited resources are
available for maintenance and repair (M&R) efforts. Planned maintenance and
rehabilitation, essentially preserving pavements and delaying condition
deterioration, help airport managers, agencies, and engineers maximize the use
of their budgets and prolong the life of their pavements. An APMS provides a
tool to schedule planned maintenance and major rehabilitation efforts based
on a consistent methodology of condition assessment. This consistent
methodology of pavement condition assessment allows for the development of
pavement performance models to help forecast future pavement conditions.
Part of the implementation of the APMS is the clear identification and
inventorying of pavement infrastructure that needs to be managed specifically
within the airport owner, manager, and agency responsibility. Another aspect of
the APMS is development of maintenance, repair, and major rehabilitation
policies that align with the expectations of pavement performance and are
based on ability to fund the types of work identified. Once there is an
understanding of the cause and extent of pavement distresses, appropriate
maintenance and rehabilitation can be planned. By using representative
construction costs based on historic bid trends; planning level budget costs can
be developed on a multiyear duration.
Airfield Pavement Inspection Methodology for the SAPMP
Pavement condition assessment requires the application of professional
judgments regarding the condition of the pavement. The SAPMP airfield
pavement condition survey inspections assess pavement, comparing it to a set
of standards in ASTM D 5340-12 Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement
Condition Index Surveys.
The pavement condition surveys assess the functional condition of the
pavement surface based on surface distresses as defined by the ASTM D 534012. Typically, deficiencies within a pavement structure will eventually reflect to
the pavement surface as distresses described within ASTM D 5340-12. The SAPMP
is specifically a visual evaluation and analysis based on the ASTM D 5340-12. The
structural condition and relative support of the pavement layers can be directly
quantified using non-destructive deflection testing (NDT) as well as other indepth engineering evaluation or sampling and testing methods.
For the SAPMP update, only visual surveys were performed. Further structural and
geotechnical testing should be conducted to determine design level
Page | 22
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
rehabilitation and/or reconstruction needs should the airport proceed to the
design process.
In preparation for the PCI survey inspections, the airfield pavements for each
airport are divided into branches, sections, and sample units as established by
FAA Advisory Circular 150/5380-7B and ASTM D 5340. An Airfield Pavement
Network Definition Exhibit has been prepared for each participating airport that
depicts the inventory system reflected in the SAPMP database system. Each
network definition depicts the latest branch, section, and sample unit definition
used for the PCI surveys.
The sample units to be inspected were determined through a systematic
random sampling technique to provide an unbiased representation of sample
units for each pavement facility. The sample unit locations had been
determined in such a way that they are distributed evenly throughout each
defined pavement section area. In certain cases when no representative
distresses are observed in the field, additional sample units were added.
The distress quantities and severity levels from each inspected sample unit are
used to compute the PCI value and rating for each Section using the ASTM D
5340-12 and MicroPAVER (also known currently as PAVER) software. Figures 1-2
and 1-3 depict graphical representations of the color ranges associated with
PCI values and ranges with a photograph of airfield pavement that exhibited
the conditions for both flexible and rigid pavements respectively.
Page | 23
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Figure 1-2: Flexible Pavement, Asphalt Concrete
Figure 1-3: Rigid Pavement, Portland Cement Concrete
Page | 24
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
2.
AIRFIELD PAVEMENT SYSTEM INVENTORY AND NETWORK UPDATE
2.1
System Inventory Update
A significant element to the development and update of the SAPMP has been
to identify recent and anticipated construction activity that affects the
pavement composition and performance. With cooperation from the airport
personnel, the project team was able to gather airport specific information that
included changes in pavement geometry, new or reconstructed pavements
since the last inspection and anticipated pavement rehabilitation that would
negate the findings of a visual inspection done in the short term. At the
beginning of each phase for this update, FDOT SAPMP participants responded
to the Aviation and Spaceport Office with project specific information on the
recent and anticipated work. In addition to the construction activity, updates to
pavement facility designators (i.e. re-designation, magnetic declination, and/or
decommissioning) were reported. Lastly, the project team leaders performing
field inspections confirm with airport staff on site previous, recent, and
anticipated construction projects that may affect the airfield pavement
facilities.
This information was considered in conjunction with aerial imagery provided by
FDOT during the updating of pavement section areas on each airport’s Airfield
Pavement Network Definition Exhibit. The previous, recent, and anticipated
construction activity information provided by airport staff has been graphically
depicted relative to the branch, section, and sample unit definition on the
Airfield Pavement System Inventory Exhibit for each participating airport. This
information was also included in the MicroPAVER database updates for the
SAPMP.
2.2
Network Definition Update
Branch and Section Identification
Each airport’s airfield pavement network is generally subdivided into separate
Branches (runways, taxiways, aprons/ramps, or others) that have distinctly
different functional identifications and uses. Each Branch is further subdivided
into Sections as defined by pavement location, composition, and construction
history. A Section is typically understood to be a project level subdivision within a
Branch feature. Sections are manageable units to organize data collection and
are treated individually during the maintenance and major rehabilitation
planning process. A pavement rank (primary, secondary, or tertiary) is assigned
Page | 25
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
to each Section based on its importance and type of use to airport operations.
The pavement rankings designated for each section at the participating airports
were defined by the previous SAPMP, unless changes were communicated by
the airport. These Sections are further subdivided into condition survey sample
units based on the methodology described in ASTM D 5340.
The Airfield Pavement System Inventory and Airfield Pavement Network
Definition Exhibits are developed individually for each participating airport.
Based on information requested of and provided by the airport, the airfield
pavements are evaluated on designation updates, and recent or anticipated
pavement construction activity. As mentioned previously, a Section is defined
partially by its construction history of which is factored in the performance and
condition of the pavement section.
Construction activities identified include maintenance and repair activity, major
rehabilitation, and new airfield pavement construction. Maintenance and repair
activity may include; surface treatments, crack sealing, patching, slab
replacement, and others. Both maintenance and rehabilitation activities are
identified at the pavement section level. This type of work may result in an
increase in overall Section PCI since the last inspection. Major rehabilitation
efforts may include; asphalt milling and overlay, and full depth pavement
reconstruction. This type of effort will result in a resetting of the pavement section
PCI value to 100 due to the nature of the work. Lastly, new airfield pavement
construction are accounted for as new inventory and assigned a section PCI of
100. Typically the new pavement sections are not inspected due to its condition;
however these pavements are incorporated into the SAPMP pavement
database.
Due to recent and anticipated construction efforts; pavement area sections
may have been consolidated or created which will affect the total number of
sample units to be inspected based upon the methods described in ASTM D
5340 and from the sampling rate schedule.
Airfield Pavement Network Definition & Geographic Information System (GIS)
As part of this SAPMP update, geographic information system (GIS), global
positioning system (GPS), and digital data collection were integrated into the
Pavement Inspection Methodology at each airport. Using AutoCAD Civil 3D,
ArcMap, ArcPad, and FDOT Survey and Mapping Office Aerial Photography;
digital navigation maps have been developed for each airport to represent the
SAPMP pavement inventory attributes. These navigation maps were used with
field data tablets to assist survey teams as they performed condition inspections
Page | 26
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
by navigating pavement infrastructure and collecting distress data. Additionally,
this information was utilized to develop updates to geometry characteristics for
each of the identified pavement facilities.
The updated areas for the District airports by facility Use are summarized in Table
2-1: Summary of Area by Facility Use by Airport. Separately, Figure 2-1: District
Pavement Area by Use depicts the district airfield pavement areas by facility
use, and Figure 2-2: Pavement Area Use by Airport provides a breakdown of
airfield pavement area by facility use at each participating airport for the
District.
Table 2-1: Summary of Area by Facility Use by Airport
Network
ID
Airport
Type
BKV
Pavement Area (Square Feet)
Runway
Taxiway
Apron
Overall
GA
1,802,250
1,259,981
784,074
3,846,305
CGC
GA
341,775
310,310
248,870
900,955
CLW
RL
308,025
198,238
161,828
668,091
INF
GA
375,075
260,434
337,924
973,432
PCM
GA
296,402
296,714
313,605
906,721
PIE
PR
3,000,650
2,158,954
1,222,641
6,382,245
SPG
RL
693,066
603,488
688,195
1,984,748
TPF
RL
551,817
518,638
189,710
1,260,164
VDF
RL
743,145
609,551
1,177,905
2,530,601
ZPH
GA
DISTRICT
974,437
808,864
515,159
2,298,460
9,086,641
7,025,172
5,639,911
21,751,724
Figure 2-1: District Pavement Area by Use
District 7
9.1
7.0
Runway
Taxiway
5.6
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
Apron
8.0
10.0
Area
(Millions of Sq. Ft)
Page | 27
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Figure 2-2: Pavement Area Use by Airport
ZPH
VDF
TPF
Airport
SPG
PIE
Runway
PCM
Taxiway
Apron
INF
CLW
CGC
BKV
0
1
2
3
4
Pavement Area
(Millions of Sq. Ft)
Page | 28
5
6
7
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
3.
AIRFIELD PAVEMENT CONDITION ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION
Airfield pavement distresses and condition were surveyed in accordance with
the methods outlined in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5380-6C and ASTM D 5340-12.
These procedures define distress type, severity, and quantity for sampling areas
within each defined pavement section area to analyze and determine the PCI
value and condition rating.
3.1
Updates to the ASTM D 5340
As part of this program update, the SAPMP has adopted the changes made in
updates to ASTM D 5340-12 as the previous program had used the ASTM D 534004. These include the separation of Weathering and Raveling into two distinct
flexible pavement distresses, and the addition of the Alkali-Silica Reaction
distress for rigid pavement distresses. Additionally, the deterioration associated
with the rigid pavement distress Scaling/Map Cracking has been modified
which results in moving Map Cracking from Scaling to ASR. In the newest version
of ASTM D 5340-12, there are two kinds of Shrinkage Cracking, Drying Shrinkage
and Plastic Shrinkage. The difference between these two is that the depth of first
one may extend through the entire depth of the slab while the thickness of the
latter one normally does not extend very deep into the pavement’s surface.
Furthermore, the Plastic Shrinkage consists of two subcategories: Plastic
shrinkage (caused by atmosphere) and Plastic shrinkage (caused by
construction). Another kind of Map Cracking is listed under Plastic shrinkage that
is caused by construction, as well as Crazing. This additional type of Shrinkage
change in distress classification, as described in ASTM D 5340-12, may result in
small variances in the PCI values from the previous inspection analysis. Increases
in PCI values in pavement Sections comparison to the previous program
update, that have not been subject to repairs since the last inspection, may be
a result from the updates to the analysis methodology.
Below is a brief description of the changes to the distresses presented in the
ASTM D 5340 methodology and a table summarizing the deduction affected.
a) Flexible Asphalt Concrete Pavement distresses for airfield pavements: The
previous methodology which featured “(52) Weathering and Raveling”
distress has been separated into two distresses “(52) Raveling” and “(57)
Weathering”. Previously, areas that were recorded as “Weathering and
Raveling” were considered as one distress with a high deduction. Based
on the updated methodology, in certain situations where “Weathering”
only exists and does not meet the definition of “Raveling”, the PCI
Page | 29
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
deduction is not as high as the former “Weathering and Raveling”.
Therefore, areas identified only as “(57) Weathering” based on current
ASTM standards, which were previously identified as “(52) Weathering and
Raveling”, may be subject to an improvement in PCI. In instances where
pavement PCI has increased due to this update, it is not due to an
improvement in actual condition, however indicative of the adjusted
distress deterioration effects.
b) Rigid Portland Cement Concrete Pavement distresses for airfield
pavements: The previous methodology defined “(70) Scaling” as a
distress that consisted of surface deterioration caused by construction
defects, material defects, and environmental factors. The distress included
Alkali-Silica Reaction, also known as ASR. The current methodology has
separated Alkali-Silica Reaction as a distress identified as “(76) Alkali-Silica
Reaction / ASR”. As a result the previous “(70) Scaling” numerical
deduction contribution to the PCI has been reduced. Previous inspections
that recorded “(70) Scaling”, and currently do not exhibit “(76) Alkali-Silica
Reactivity / ASR” may potentially see an increase in PCI. Additionally, (73)
Shrinkage Cracks has been redefined as (73) Shrinkage Cracking.
Shrinkage Cracking is characterized in two forms; drying shrinkage and
plastic shrinkage. Drying shrinkage occurs over time as moisture leaves the
pavement, it develops when hardened pavement continues to shrink as
excess water not needed for cement hydration evaporates. It forms when
subsurface resistance to the shrinkage is present and may extend through
the entire depth of the slab. Plastic shrinkage develops when there is rapid
loss of water in the surface of recently placed pavement or can form from
over finishing/overworking of the pavement during construction. These
shrinkage cracks appear as a series of inter-connected hairline cracks, or
pattern cracking, and are often observed throughout the majority of the
slab surface. This condition is also referred to as map cracking or crazing.
Table 3-1: Distress Updates to Reflect ASTM D 5340-12 provides a summary of the
changes due to the update.
Page | 30
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Table 3-1: Distress Updates to Reflect ASTM D 5340-12
Distress Updates to Reflect ASTM D 5340-12
Use and
Surface
Type
AC/AAC/APC
Airfield
PCC
Airfield
3.2
Old 5340-04 Distress
Deduct
Curve
New Distress
(52) Weathering & Raveling - Low
(52) Raveling - Low
No Change
(52) Weathering & Raveling - Medium
(52) Raveling - Medium
No Change
(52) Weathering & Raveling - High
(52) Raveling - High
No Change
N/A
(57) Weathering - Low
New
N/A
(57) Weathering - Medium
New
N/A
(57) Weathering - High
New
(70) Scaling - Low
(70) Scaling - Low
New
(70) Scaling - Medium
(70) Scaling - Medium
New
(70) Scaling - High
(70) Scaling - High
New
N/A
(76) Alkali Silica Reaction – Low
New
N/A
(76) Alkali Silica Reaction –
Medium
New
N/A
(76) Alkali Silica Reaction – High
New
Inspection Methodology
A pavement condition survey inspection is performed by measuring the amount
and severity of defined pavement distresses observed within the boundaries of
sample units. These distresses, as defined by ASTM D 5340, are generally caused
by traffic fatigue loading, exposure to climate and elements, and other airfield
specific factors. This data is collected by field personnel experienced in
pavement condition survey inspection. Data collection is then transferred into
the FDOT MicroPAVER database system. MicroPAVER (also known as PAVER) is
used to calculate PCI values using the methodology described in ASTM D 534012. The values are calculated for each sample and extrapolated on a Section
level to determine an area-weighted PCI value ranging from 0 to 100 and one
of seven condition ratings. Tables 3-2 and 3-3 describe the distresses as defined
by the ASTM D 5340-12 and adopted for the SAPMP procedures.
Page | 31
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Table 3-1: Airfield Pavement Distresses for Asphalt Concrete
Code
Distress
Primary Mechanisms
41
Alligator Cracking
Load / Fatigue Failure
42
Bleeding
Construction Quality/ Mix
Design
43
Block Cracking
Climate / Age
44
Corrugation
Load / Construction Quality
45
Depression
Subgrade Quality
46
Jet Blast
Aircraft
47
Joint Reflection - Cracking
Climate / Prior Pavement
48
Longitudinal/Transverse Cracking
Climate / Age
49
Oil Spillage
Aircraft / Vehicle
50
Patching
Utility / Pavement Repair
51
Polished Aggregate
Repeated Traffic Loading
52
Raveling
Climate / Load
53
Rutting
Repeated Traffic Loading
54
Shoving
PCC Pavement Growth /
Movement
55
Slippage Cracking
Load / Pavement Bond
56
Swelling
Climate / Subgrade Quality
57
Weathering
Climate
Source: U.S. Army CERL, FDOT Airfield Inspection Reference Manual
Page | 32
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Table 3-2: Airfield Pavement Distresses for Portland Cement Concrete
Code
Distress
Primary Mechanisms
61
Blow-up
Climate / Alkali Silica Reaction
62
Corner Break
63
Linear Cracking
64
Durability Cracking
Freeze-Thaw Cycling
65
Joint Seal Damage
Material Deterioration /
Construction Quality
66
Small Patch
Pavement Repair
67
Large Patch/Utility Cut
Utility / Pavement Repair
68
Popout
Freeze-Thaw Cycling
69
Pumping
70
Scaling/Crazing
71
Faulting
72
Shattered Slab
Overloading
73
Shrinkage Cracking
Construction Quality / Load
74
Joint Spalling
75
Corner Spalling
76
Alkali-Silica Reaction
Load Repetition / Curling
Stresses
Load Repetition / Curling
Stresses / Shrinkage Stresses
Load Repetition / Poor Joint
Sealant
Construction Quality / FreezeThaw Cycling
Load Repetition / Subgrade
Quality
Load Repetition / Infiltration of
Incompressible Material
Load Repetition / Infiltration of
Incompressible Material
Construction Quality / Climate
Source: U.S. Army CERL, FDOT Airfield Inspection Reference Manual
3.3
Airfield Pavement Condition Index Analysis Results
The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) results based on the ASTM D 5340 have
been developed by analyzing the specific distress data collection from field
inspections using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers MicroPAVER 6.5 Software (also
known as PAVER). In adherence to the ASTM D 5340-12, the software package
analyzes the distinct pavement distress data in both quantity and severity in
calculating a PCI that ranges from 100 to 0, with corresponding condition ratings
of “Good” to “Failed” respectively. Figure 3-1: Pavement Condition Index Rating
Scale depicts the seven ranges of index and the associated rating used in the
SAPMP.
Page | 33
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Figure 3-1: Pavement Condition Index Rating Scale
The District’s overall PCI is at 69.95, which corresponds to a ‘Fair’ condition. Table
3-3: District Condition Summary by Airport below represents the results of the PCI
inspection at each airport within the District. Specific individual airport results
and evaluation discussions are documented in each individual airport
pavement evaluation report.
Page | 34
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Table 3-3: District Condition Summary by Airport
Network
ID
Area-Weighted Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
Airport
Type
Runway
Taxiway
Apron
Overall Airfield
PCI
PCI Rating
PCI
PCI Rating
PCI
PCI Rating
PCI
PCI Rating
BKV
GA
54
POOR
52
POOR
68
FAIR
56
FAIR
CGC
GA
68
FAIR
87
GOOD
57
FAIR
71
SATISFACTORY
CLW
RL
100
GOOD
93
GOOD
57
FAIR
87
GOOD
INF
GA
97
GOOD
94
GOOD
93
GOOD
95
GOOD
PCM
GA
60
FAIR
71
SATISFACTORY
81
SATISFACTORY
71
SATISFACTORY
PIE
PR
71
SATISFACTORY
73
SATISFACTORY
63
FAIR
70
FAIR
SPG
RL
61
FAIR
60
FAIR
74
SATISFACTORY
65
FAIR
TPF
RL
70
FAIR
75
SATISFACTORY
82
SATISFACTORY
74
SATISFACTORY
VDF
RL
70
FAIR
71
SATISFACTORY
77
SATISFACTORY
73
SATISFACTORY
ZPH
GA
83
SATISFACTORY
55
POOR
67
FAIR
70
FAIR
69
FAIR
68
FAIR
71
SATISFACTORY
69
FAIR
DISTRICT
Pavement Facility Use has an influence on the pavement condition each
facility. For example, the amount and type of distresses observed on a primary
runway can vary from a maintenance apron based on frequency and variety of
traffic loads experienced. Figure 3-2: PCI by Pavement Facility Use by Airport
graphically depicts the PCI for each pavement facility use (Runway, Taxiway,
and Apron) at each participating airport within the District.
Page | 35
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Figure 3-2: PCI by Pavement Facility Use by Airport
83
ZPH
55
67
70
71
VDF
77
70
TPF
75
82
61
60
Airport
SPG
74
71
73
PIE
63
Runway
60
PCM
71
Taxiway
81
Apron
97
INF
94
93
100
CLW
93
57
68
CGC
87
57
54
52
BKV
68
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Pavement Condition Index
PCI
A summary of the District’s area-weighted PCI for each pavement facility use for
all airfield pavement sections throughout the participating airports are shown
below in Figure 3-3: PCI by Pavement Facility Use.
Page | 36
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Figure 3-3: PCI by Pavement Facility Use
Taxiway
68, Fair
Apron
Runway
Runway
69, Fair
Taxiway
Apron
71, Satisfactory
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
Pavement Condition Index
PCI
Pavement facility surface types considered for the SAPMP update consist of the
four common types within the Florida Airport System: Portland Cement Concrete
(PCC), Asphalt Concrete Overlayed on Portland Cement Concrete Pavement
(APC), Asphalt Concrete Pavement (AC), and Asphalt Concrete Overlayed on
Asphalt Concrete (AAC). Figure 3-4: PCI by Pavement Surface Type summarizes
the PCI determined based on the various pavement types within the
participating District airports. Whitetopping, a composite pavement type that
consists of a thin concrete overlay on asphalt concrete pavement exists at
certain airports within the Florida Airport System and are discussed at the
specific individual airport pavement evaluation report document for those
airports.
Page | 37
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Figure 3-4: PCI by Pavement Surface Type
Surface Type
PCC
54, Poor
APC
60, Fair
AAC
AC
AC
73, Satisfactory
APC
PCC
AAC
73, Satisfactory
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Pavement Condition Index
(PCI)
Page | 38
80
90
100
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
4.
PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE MODELING
4.1
Pavement Performance Model Concept
As part of the FDOT SAPMP update, pavement performance models are
developed from the distress data collected at each participating airport facility
within the Florida Airports System. This data is consolidated in a database and
organized by inspection date, pavement type, age, pavement use, and airport
category.
The consolidation of the Florida Airports System’s pavement infrastructure within
the FDOT SAPMP is based on data that has been collected in a consistent
method of measurement. The historic pavement condition, or performance
trend, has been compiled throughout the system with data from the inception
of the SAPMP. This data is processed into models that have been analyzed and
developed into prediction curves based upon pavement characteristics. These
characteristics include; climate, construction material, and operations. Each
model has been developed based on the following criteria:
AIRPORT TYPE (Primary, Regional Reliever, or General Aviation)
>FACILITY USE (Runway, Taxiway, or Apron)
>>FACILITY SURFACE TYPE (AC, AAC, APC, or PCC)
The historic trends of pavement performance at Florida airport facilities for all
performance models are consolidated within the program database. This
information is utilized in the prediction of pavement performance based on the
current PCI determined from the inspections that took place between 2013 and
2015. Major rehabilitation is planned based on the predicted PCI. The intent of
this is for both the individual airport and the FDOT District personnel to be aware
of anticipated major rehabilitation work based on condition.
Each airport’s airfield pavement section condition, for a given inspection year, is
one data point that was used as the basis of each performance trend using a
performance model based on pavements of similar background.
4.2
Performance Model Update
The performance models are developed from the current update data at the
aforementioned facilities combined with the historic FDOT SAPMP Florida Airports
System Database. This data is consolidated in a database system using
MicroPAVER (also known as PAVER) and organized by specific attributes defined
Page | 39
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
by the pavement system inventory. The pavement system inventory includes
inspection data, pavement type, age, pavement use, airport category, FDOT
District and pavement ranking. The pavement performance models are used to
develop broad prediction models, also known as pavement condition
deterioration curves or “Prediction Curves”.
The consolidation of the Florida Airports System’s pavement infrastructure within
the FDOT SAPMP is based on data that has been systematically collected in a
manner consistent with the ASTM D5340 Standard Test Method for Airport
Pavement Condition Surveys. It should be noted that since the inception of the
program, the ASTM D5340 has undergone updates that have modified the
method of inspection based on research.
Example: Taxiways constructed from Asphalt Concrete at a Primary Airport
AIRPORT TYPE (Primary, Regional Reliever, or General Aviation)
>FACILITY USE (Runway, Taxiway, or Apron)
>>FACILITY SURFACE TYPE (AC, AAC, APC, or PCC)
FDOT-SAPMP-PR-TW-AC
A most recent change was observed in ASTM D5340-10 which updated the
methods of identifying and rating the following distresses” Weathering (AC),
Raveling (AC), and Scaling (PCC). The historic pavement condition, or
performance trend, has been compiled based on condition data collected
from the inception of the SAPMP. This data is processed into performance
models that have been analyzed and developed into prediction curves based
upon pavement characteristics. Figure 4-1: Example Pavement Performance
Model depicts an example of a performance model and data points comprised
of historic construction milestones provided by the airports and inspection data
in accordance with the ASTM D 5340.
Page | 40
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Figure 4-1: Example Pavement Performance Model
× PCI Data included in Model
∆ PCI Data excluded in Model
4.3
Prediction Curve Development
The historic trends of pavement performance at Florida airport facilities for all
performance models are consolidated within the program database. This
information is utilized in the prediction of pavement performance based on the
current PCI determined from the inspections that take place between 2013 and
2015. Major rehabilitation is planned based on the predicted PCI. The intent of
this is for both the individual airport and the FDOT District personnel to be aware
of recommended major rehabilitation work based on condition.
The performance models are further refined based on the engineering
judgment of pavement performance and data integrity using statistical filters
and boundaries. The prediction modeling process identifies and groups
pavement sections of similar construction (airport type and pavement type),
that are subjected to similar aircraft fleet mix traffic patterns (airport type and
branch use), weather and other factors that affect pavement performance and
deterioration. The historical data on pavement condition, as entered in the Work
History module of the database, is used to predict the future performance of a
group of pavement sections with similar attributes.
Each pavement section is assigned to a “family” or model grouping. When
predictions about future performance of a pavement are desired, its family
Page | 41
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
model is used to predict future condition. The input of current age of pavement
is applied on the performance model family equation.
The following factors influence the life of a pavement within the performance
model; original construction type/date, maintenance, weather, and traffic. The
performance model and prediction curve process is designed to allow users to
blend unique knowledge about their pavements and measured local condition
information to plan for project development.
There are multiple types of boundaries that can be applied to a performance
mode; Statistical Boundary and Envelope Boundaries. The Envelope Boundaries
filter data based on Age and PCI performance factors. Statistical Boundaries,
red lines, indicate the standard deviation of data points based on the SAPMP
historic records. When these types of boundaries are applied, outlying points are
not considered when the predicted condition function curve is estimated. This
ability within MicroPAVER allows for the filtering of suspicious data points. The
data filtering procedure is used to remove obvious errors in the data using
Envelope Boundaries and Statistical Boundaries. This is critical as pavements with
an unusual performance can have a substantial impact on how the model, or
family, performs. Table 4-1: Overall Airport Area-Weighted PCI summarizes the
area-weighted average PCI for each participating airport’s airfield pavement
performance within the District from 2015 to 2024. The following Tables 4-2
through 4-4 summarize each airport’s airfield pavement performance by
pavement facility use from 2015 to 2024.
Table 4-1: Overall Airport Area-Weighted PCI
Program Year
Overall Airport Area-Weighted PCI
Network ID
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
BKV
54
53
53
52
51
51
51
50
50
50
CGC
69
67
66
64
63
62
61
60
59
58
CLW
84
82
80
78
76
74
73
71
69
67
INF
88
86
83
81
79
77
76
74
72
71
PCM
68
66
65
64
62
61
60
59
58
57
PIE
68
67
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
SPG
64
62
60
58
57
55
53
51
49
48
TPF
73
71
69
67
65
64
62
60
58
56
VDF
73
71
70
68
66
65
63
62
60
58
ZPH
66
64
63
62
60
59
58
57
56
55
DISTRICT
67
66
64
62
61
59
58
56
55
54
Page | 42
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Table 4-2: Airport Runway Area-Weighted PCI
Program Year
Overall Runway Branch Area-Weighted PCI
Network ID
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
BKV
51
50
50
50
49
49
49
49
48
48
CGC
82
80
78
76
74
72
70
68
67
65
CLW
89
87
85
84
82
80
79
77
75
73
INF
89
87
84
82
80
78
76
74
72
71
PCM
68
66
65
64
62
61
60
59
58
57
PIE
73
71
69
67
65
63
61
60
58
56
SPG
59
58
56
54
53
51
49
48
46
45
TPF
74
72
71
69
68
66
64
63
61
59
VDF
70
69
67
66
65
63
62
61
59
58
ZPH
52
51
50
49
48
47
46
45
44
44
DISTRICT
66
65
63
62
61
59
58
57
55
54
Table 4-3: Airport Taxiway Area-Weighted PCI
Program Year
Overall Taxiway Branch Area-Weighted PCI
Network ID
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
BKV
51
50
50
50
49
49
49
49
48
48
CGC
82
80
78
76
74
72
70
68
67
65
CLW
89
87
85
84
82
80
79
77
75
73
INF
89
87
84
82
80
78
76
74
72
71
PCM
68
66
65
64
62
61
60
59
58
57
PIE
73
71
69
67
65
63
61
60
58
56
SPG
59
58
56
54
53
51
49
48
46
45
TPF
74
72
71
69
68
66
64
63
61
59
VDF
70
69
67
66
65
63
62
61
59
58
ZPH
52
51
50
49
48
47
46
45
44
44
DISTRICT
66
65
63
62
61
59
58
57
55
54
Page | 43
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Table 4-4: Airport Apron Area-Weighted PCI
Program Year
Overall Apron Branch Area-Weighted PCI
Network ID
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
BKV
65
64
63
61
60
60
59
58
57
56
CGC
56
56
55
54
53
52
51
50
49
48
CLW
56
54
52
50
48
46
44
42
40
38
INF
83
80
77
75
73
71
69
68
67
66
PCM
75
73
71
70
68
67
66
65
64
63
PIE
61
59
56
54
51
49
46
44
41
38
SPG
72
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
TPF
81
79
77
75
72
70
68
66
64
62
VDF
76
74
72
70
68
66
64
62
60
59
ZPH
63
62
60
59
58
57
56
55
55
54
DISTRICT
69
67
65
63
61
59
58
56
54
53
Page | 44
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
5.
MAINTENANCE LEVEL ACTIVITIES
5.1
Policies
Airfield Pavement Maintenance policies are guidance on pavement
construction methods used to develop, maintain, repair, and rehabilitate
pavement infrastructure based on distresses encountered during the condition
surveys.
Maintenance refers to the repair and preservation-type activities that are
applied locally to specific distress types on the pavement. These activities for the
SAPMP are considered preventative and corrective in nature and are highly
recommended to help improve pavement performance and extend pavement
life. The SAPMP maintenance policies are based on the FAA Advisory Circular
150/5380-6C and guidance provided in the FDOT Airfield Pavement Repair
Manual.
For the purpose of the SAPMP; the maintenance repair needs that are identified
and quantified are based solely on the pavement distresses observed and
recorded at the time of the inspection. Based on a specific distress type and
severity observed, a particular repair work type is recommended and quantified
based on the extrapolated section distresses. The repair program identified is
specific to the current distresses. Future maintenance planning budgets are
based on this initial determination. Tables 5-1 and 5-2 provide the list of
maintenance activities incorporated into the SAPMP MicroPAVER database to
treat specific distress types and severities.
Table 5-1: Recommended AC, AAC, and APC Maintenance and Repair Policy
Flexible Asphalt Concrete
(AC, AAC, APC)
Surface
Type
Distress
Code
Distress Name
Severity
41
Alligator Cracking
L, M, H
42
Bleeding
43
Block Cracking
L
43
Block Cracking
M, H
44
Corrugation
L, M, H
45
Depression
L, M, H
N/A
Maintenance
Work Type
Full Depth
Pavement Patch
Partial Depth
Pavement Patch
Seal Coat
Treatment
Full Depth
Pavement Patch
Full Depth
Pavement Patch
Full Depth
Pavement Patch
Work Unit
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Page | 45
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Surface
Type
Distress
Code
46
47
47
48
Distress Name
Jet Blast Erosion
Joint Reflection
Cracking
Joint Reflection
Cracking
Longitudinal/Transverse
Cracking
Severity
L, M, H
L
M, H
L, M, H
49
Oil Spillage
L, M
49
Oil Spillage
H
50
50
Patch and Utility
Patching
Patch and Utility
Patching
M
H
51
Polished Aggregate
L, M, H
52
Raveling
L, M
52
Raveling
H
53
Rutting
L, M, H
54
Shoving
L, M, H
55
Slippage Cracking
L, M, H
56
Swelling
M, H
57
Weathering
M, H
Maintenance
Work Type
Full Depth
Pavement Patch
Crack Sealing
Full Depth
Pavement Patch
Crack Sealing
Seal Coat
Treatment
Full Depth
Pavement Patch
Full Depth
Pavement Patch
Full Depth
Pavement Patch
Slurry Seal Coat
Treatment
Slurry Seal Coat
Treatment
Partial Depth
Pavement Patch
Full Depth
Pavement Patch
Grinding /
Removal
Full Depth
Pavement Patch
Full Depth
Pavement Patch
Seal Coat
Treatment
Work Unit
Square
Feet
Linear Feet
Square
Feet
Linear Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Table 5-2: Recommended PCC Maintenance and Repair Policy
Distress
Code
Rigid Pavement
(PCC)
Surface
Type
Page | 46
Distress Name
Severity
61
Blowup
L, M, H
62
Corner Break
L, M, H
Maintenance
Work Type
Slab
Replacement
/ Full Depth
Patch
Partial Slab
Full Depth
Patch - PCC
Work Unit
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Surface
Type
Distress
Code
Distress Name
Severity
63
Longitudinal/Transverse/Diagonal
Cracking
H
64
Durability Cracking
M, H
65
Joint Seal Damage
L, M, H
66
Patching, Small
M, H
67
Patching, Large
M, H
69
Pumping
70
Scaling/Map Cracking/Crazing
L, M
70
Scaling/Map Cracking/Crazing
H
71
Settlement / Faulting
L
71
Settlement / Faulting
M, H
72
Shattered Slab
73
Shrinkage Cracks
74
Longitudinal/Transverse Joint
Spalling
L, M, H
75
Corner Spalling
L, M, H
76
Alkali-Silica Reaction
L, M, H
L, M, H
N/A
L
Maintenance
Work Type
Crack
Sealing - PCC
Slab
Replacement
/ Full Depth
Patch
Joint Seal
Repair
(Local)
Partial Slab
Full Depth
Patch – PCC
Partial Slab
Full Depth
Patch – PCC
Slab
Stabilization /
Slab Jacking
Micro-mill
and Seal PCC
Slab
Replacement
/ Full Depth
Patch
Micro-mill
and Seal PCC
Slab
Stabilization /
Slab Jacking
Slab
Replacement
/ Full Depth
Patch
Crack
Sealing - PCC
Partial Patch
- PCC
Partial Patch
- PCC
Seal Coat
Treatment
Work Unit
Linear
Feet
Square
Feet
Linear
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Linear
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Page | 47
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Surface
Type
Distress
Code
Distress Name
Severity
76
Alkali-Silica Reaction
M
76
Alkali-Silica Reaction
H
Maintenance
Work Type
Micro-mill
and Seal PCC
Slab
Replacement
/ Full Depth
Patch
Work Unit
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Though proactive pavement maintenance and preservation is highly
recommended in an APMS; it is recognized that pavement that has
deteriorated below a certain PCI would benefit more from major rehabilitation
rather than localized maintenance and repair work. Major rehabilitation is
recommended when the pavement condition decreases below a critical point
such that the deterioration is extensive or the rate of deterioration is so great
that maintenance repair efforts are no longer cost-efficient. This critical point is
called “Critical PCI”. The critical PCI levels for different pavement and branch
types were established by the FDOT and were used in this update to develop a
maintenance and major rehabilitation plan for the airport. Sections that are
above the “Critical PCI” levels will be recommended for maintenance, repair,
and preservation treatments, assuming there are no significant load-related
distresses. For those Sections below the Critical PCI, the recommended action
will consist of major rehabilitation work. This approach is used for the Section’s
Current PCI value and the predicted PCI value for future rehabilitation.
The FDOT has recommended minimum service level PCI for airports based on
pavement facility use, airport type, and expected loading frequency. This
minimum service level PCI is recommended to ensure the pavement provides a
safe operational surface and efficiently uses maintenance and rehabilitation
budgets. Separately, the Critical PCI is a value based on historic pavement
performance trends and costs. It is at a PCI value of 65 at which major
rehabilitation is recommended over maintenance level efforts. Table 5-3
identifies the FDOT recommended PCI by use and the critical PCI value for the
most important pavements at the airport. This is due to the condition of the
pavement and the cost effectiveness of the work. A very important concept of
a good pavement management system is the proactive preservation of
pavements that are above Critical PCI condition. Conversely, allowing
pavement to deteriorate beyond maintenance and performing “worst first”
major rehabilitation may cost much more over the life of a pavement.
Page | 48
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Table 5-3: Critical PCI and FDOT Minimum Level PCI
Use
FDOT Recommended Minimum Level PCI
Primary Airports
Regional Reliever
General Aviation
Airports
Airports
Critical PCI
Runway
75
75
75
65
Taxiway
70
65
65
65
Apron
65
65
60
65
Based on historic trends of pavement performance and industry standard
practices in pavement maintenance and rehabilitation, the SAPMP included
general guidance on construction activity based on condition PCI, as shown on
Table 5-4. It is recommended that further investigation of underlying pavement
conditions is performed at the design phase.
Table 5-4: Maintenance and Major Rehabilitation Activity Based on PCI
Category
Activity
PCI
Range
▪ Crack Sealing (AC/PCC)
Maintenance
▪ Partial Depth Patching (AC)
▪ Full Depth Patching (AC/PCC)
75 - 90
▪ Surface Treatment (AC)
▪ Mill and Overlay (AC)
Rehabilitation
▪ Concrete Pavement Restoration
(PCC)
▪ Full Depth Pavement
Reconstruction
40 - 74
0 - 39
The PCI standard scale ranges from a value of 0, typically representing a
pavement in a failed condition, to a value of 100 which typically represents a
pavement in new or good condition. Generally, airfield pavement sections with
a PCI of 75 or higher that are not exhibiting distresses due to aircraft loading will
benefit from maintenance activities such as crack sealing, patching, and
surface treatments. Pavement sections with PCI values within the range of 40 to
74 may require major rehabilitation, such as a mill and overlay. Lastly, pavement
sections with a PCI value of 40 or less are recommended to undergo pavement
reconstruction. Generally pavement reconstruction is the only practical means
of restoration due to the substantial distresses observed in the pavement
structure. Since PCI values are based solely on the visual determination of
Page | 49
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
pavement distresses and deterioration, this method does not provide a direct
measure of structural integrity.
5.2
Planning Level Unit Costs
The FDOT SAPMP developed and updated the maintenance and major
rehabilitation costs based on public cost databases for airport and highway
pavement construction. Additionally, cost data collected from FDOT and FAA
sponsored projects in the Florida Airports System were utilized to identify
construction cost trends across the state.
The maintenance, repair, and preservation activity costs have been updated
and developed using readily available construction cost data at the time of this
update. The costs depicted in this report for both maintenance and major
rehabilitation are intended for planning purposes.
FDOT has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or over the
Contractor's methods of determining prices or over competitive bidding or
market conditions. Opinions of probable costs provided herein are based on the
information known to FDOT at this time and represent only the standard
judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. FDOT
cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction
costs will not vary from its opinions of probable costs.
5.3
Maintenance, Repair, and Major Rehabilitation
FDOT recognizes that although pavement mill and overlay is recommended for
flexible asphalt concrete pavement within a PCI range from 40 to 74, it is
conceivable that airports may not have adequate funding to perform this type
of major rehabilitation. A comprehensive surface treatment as described in FAA
AC 150/5370-10G Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports used as a
maintenance rehabilitation activity can be used in lieu of asphalt concrete
pavement mill and overlay. However, it should be understood that these
measures provide only a short term extension of pavement life. While the cost of
surface treatments are significantly lower than that of pavement mill and
overlay, it is not intended or implied to be a full rehabilitative measure for long
term benefit. Table 5-5 and Table 5-6 provide budget costs associated with the
work types shown in the table.
Page | 50
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Table 5-5: Flexible Asphalt Concrete Maintenance Unit Costs
Flexible Asphalt Concrete
(AC, AAC, APC)
Surface
Type
Maintenance Work
Type
Full Depth
Pavement Patch
Partial Depth
Pavement Patch
Seal Coat
Treatment
Cost
$5.00
$3.00
$0.55
Crack Sealing
$2.75
Slurry Seal Coat
Treatment
$0.55
Grinding / Removal
$2.10
Work Unit
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Linear
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Table 5-6: Rigid Portland Cement Concrete Maintenance Unit Costs
Surface
Type
Maintenance Work
Type
Slab Replacement
/ Full Depth Patch
Rigid Pavement
(PCC)
Partial Patch - PCC
Crack Sealing PCC
Joint Seal Repair
(Local)
Slab Stabilization /
Slab Jacking
Micro-mill and Seal
- PCC
Seal Coat
Treatment
Cost
$45.00
$19.10
$4.25
$3.00
$45.00
$1.00
$1.00
Work Unit
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Linear
Feet
Linear
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
Square
Feet
As part of the SAPMP update, the distress data observed at each airport during
the inspection is extrapolated on a section basis to make maintenance
recommendations. These recommendations are a direct result of the distress
types, severities, and quantities observed at the time of inspection. The
maintenance recommendations and planning costs are correlated with the
airport’s airfield pavement network’s overall area weighted PCI and used to
plan future maintenance costs. Future maintenance costs are planning budgets
Page | 51
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
that are not specific to a pavement section, but are estimates for the entire
airfield. Table 5-7 provides budget costs associated with the rehabilitation
activities.
Table 5-7: Major Rehabilitation Activities and Unit Costs by Condition
Category
Majority Activity
PCI Range
▪ Mill and Overlay (AC)
Major
Rehabilitation
Cost/SqFt
By Airport Type
Primary
Regional
Reliever
General
Aviation
$13.00
$10.00
$8.00
$18.00
$15.00
$10.00
$23.00
$20.00
$15.00
40 - 74
▪ Concrete Pavement
Restoration (PCC)
▪ Full Depth Pavement
Reconstruction
0 - 39
NOTE: VALUES ARE ROUNDED FOR PLANNING PURPOSES AT THE STATEWIDE LEVEL
A cost scale has been developed based on PCI to develop planning level
budgets for the airfield pavements. The cost scale is adjusted by project year
based on an assumed inflation rate of 3%.
Table 5-8: District 10-Year Maintenance and Preservation Needs by Airport
depicts the predicted pavement preservation needs based on the overall
airport area-weighted PCI.
Table 5-8: District 10-Year Maintenance and Preservation Needs by Airport
Maintenance and Preservation ($ in Millions)
Network ID
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
BKV
0.21M
0.22M
0.18M
0.19M
0.24M
0.50M
0.74M
1.00M
1.26M
1.27M
-
CGC
0.12M
0.13M
0.14M
0.02M
0.06M
0.10M
0.14M
0.18M
0.23M
0.27M
-
CLW
-
0.01M
0.01M
0.01M
0.01M
0.03M
0.05M
0.08M
0.11M
0.14M
0.18M
INF
0.00M
0.01M
0.04M
0.07M
0.13M
0.18M
0.23M
0.28M
0.33M
0.37M
-
PCM
0.07M
0.08M
0.09M
0.09M
0.12M
0.13M
0.18M
0.20M
0.26M
0.30M
-
PIE
-
0.23M
0.26M
0.29M
0.39M
0.49M
0.65M
0.85M
1.11M
1.30M
1.57M
SPG
-
0.16M
0.13M
0.06M
0.07M
0.08M
0.09M
0.12M
0.19M
0.27M
0.37M
TPF
-
0.08M
0.11M
0.13M
0.15M
0.18M
0.20M
0.25M
0.29M
0.35M
0.40M
VDF
-
0.76M
0.76M
0.82M
0.61M
0.46M
0.13M
0.14M
0.16M
0.19M
0.18M
ZPH
0.23M
0.26M
0.09M
0.15M
0.24M
0.35M
0.47M
0.60M
0.72M
0.83M
-
District
0.64M
1.94M
1.82M
1.83M
2.03M
NOTE: VALUES ARE ROUNDED FOR SUMMARY PURPOSES
2.51M
2.89M
3.72M
4.66M
5.28M
2.70M
Page | 52
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
6.
MAJOR REHABILITATION NEEDS
6.1
Major Rehabilitation Planning
As part of the SAPMP, major pavement rehabilitation planning is developed
based on current and predicted PCI in comparison with the Critical PCI. The
Critical PCI has been determined based on the historic trends of pavement
condition relative to the benefit of maintenance and repair activities. Pavement
sections determined to have a PCI less than that of the Critical PCI are assumed
to have deteriorated to a point at which maintenance and repair level activity
would provide little benefit. Depending on which Phase an airport was
inspected, the program year assumed would be end of FY2013 or end of FY2015
for Phase I and Phase II, respectively.
The development of major rehabilitation projects at the planning level
expressed in this District Summary and in the individual airport pavement
evaluation reports were based on an ‘Unlimited Budget’ or unconstrained
budget scenario. This scenario has been utilized in the SAPMP as a means to
identify project activity based on the condition need. This information is
intended to be utilized as a planning tool to support project determination and
selection based on airport priority, facility use, traffic demand, budget
constraints, and other factors.
The objective of the major pavement rehabilitation needs analysis is to provide
planning level projects within an airport’s airfield pavement network. Major
rehabilitation activities are recommended when a pavement section has
deteriorated below the Critical PCI value from a functionality perspective. In
addition, major rehabilitation is also recommended when the Section PCI is
above the Critical PCI but the Section has load-related PCI distresses. However,
most major rehabilitation work is recommended when the Section PCI is below
the Critical PCI, which is when maintenance and repair level activities are not
considered to be cost effective.
Major rehabilitation is identified within the SAPMP as major construction activity
that would result in an improvement or “resetting” of the pavement section’s
PCI to a value of 100. Such activities could include; mill and hot-mix asphalt
overlay and re-construction. This analysis was conducted with no constraints to
budgets as a means to identify all pavement projects based on Critical PCI for a
10-year duration. It is recommended that the airport use this as a planning tool
for future project development and prioritization.
Page | 53
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Airports should consider the major rehabilitation work types of mill and overlay,
PCC restoration, and reconstruction planning level classifications only.
Additional design level investigation in accordance to the FAA Advisory
Circulars will be required to identify specific areas within each section that are
subject to reconstruction, mill and overlay, and PCC restoration. The work and
budgets identified are intended for the planning level not the design level.
Areas identified as mill and overlay may in fact require select areas of
reconstruction should load-based distresses observed warrant it. Table 6-1:
Summary of District Year-1 Major Rehabilitation Needs identifies the overall
planning level costs for each airport based on the total sections requiring major
rehabilitation due to its PCI being below the Critical PCI of 65 or having
substantial load based distresses.
Table 6-1: Summary of District Year-1 Major Rehabilitation Needs
Network ID
Airport Type
Weighted-Average
PCI
Average Rating
Year-1 Major
Rehabilitation
BKV
GA
56
FAIR
$
33,039,230.56
CGC
GA
71
SATISFACTORY
$
3,471,524.86
CLW
RL
87
GOOD
$
2,601,035.00
INF
GA
95
GOOD
$
756,724.76
PCM
GA
71
SATISFACTORY
$
5,053,100.34
PIE
PR
70
FAIR
$
63,848,112.00
SPG
RL
65
FAIR
$
19,284,698.00
TPF
RL
74
SATISFACTORY
$
8,097,320.00
VDF
RL
73
SATISFACTORY
$
983,780.00
ZPH
GA
70
FAIR
$
9,940,949.42
DISTRICT
69
FAIR
$
147,076,474.94
NOTE: VALUES ARE ROUNDED FOR SUMMARY PURPOSES AND INFLATION APPLIED AT 3% ANNUALLY
Table 6-2: Summary of District 10-Year Major Rehabilitation Needs identifies the
overall planning level costs for each airport based on the total sections requiring
major rehabilitation due to its PCI being below the Critical PCI of 65 as well as
the pavement sections deteriorating below the Critical PCI over the 10-Year
program planning period.
Page | 54
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Table 6-2: Summary of District 10-Year Major Rehabilitation Needs
10-Year Major
Rehabilitation
Network ID
Airport Type
Weighted-Average
PCI
Average Rating
BKV
GA
56
FAIR
$
39,477,474.42
CGC
GA
71
SATISFACTORY
$
7,093,535.63
CLW
RL
87
GOOD
$
3,006,532.62
INF
GA
95
GOOD
$
756,724.76
PCM
GA
71
SATISFACTORY
$
7,019,282.82
PIE
PR
70
FAIR
$
76,042,870.35
SPG
RL
65
FAIR
$
26,106,272.15
TPF
RL
74
SATISFACTORY
$
8,624,162.92
VDF
RL
73
SATISFACTORY
$
35,822,534.77
ZPH
GA
70
FAIR
$
14,963,643.46
DISTRICT
69
FAIR
$
218,913,033.90
NOTE: VALUES ARE ROUNDED FOR SUMMARY PURPOSES AND INFLATION APPLIED AT 3% ANNUALLY
Table 6-3: Summary of District 10-Year Major Rehabilitation Needs by Airport
Major Rehabilitation ($ in Millions)
Network ID
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
BKV
33.04M
0.00M
1.60M
0.89M
0.00M
0.00M
0.00M
CGC
3.47M
0.10M
0.00M
3.52M
0.00M
0.00M
CLW
-
2.60M
0.00M
0.00M
0.41M
INF
0.76M
0.00M
0.00M
0.00M
PCM
5.05M
0.00M
0.00M
PIE
-
63.85M
SPG
-
TPF
2021
2022
2023
2024
0.00M 0.00M
3.95M
-
0.00M
0.00M
0.00M
-
0.00M
0.00M
0.00M 0.00M
0.00M 0.00M
0.00M
0.00M
0.00M
0.00M
0.00M
0.00M
-
0.50M
0.00M
0.90M
0.00M
0.57M 0.00M
0.00M
-
0.07M
0.77M
0.00M
3.04M
1.50M
2.72M
0.22M
3.88M 0.00M
19.28M
1.75M
3.24M
0.12M
0.57M
0.22M
0.92M 0.00M
0.00M 0.00M
-
8.10M
0.00M
0.20M
0.00M
0.00M
0.08M
0.00M
0.13M
0.00M 0.12M
VDF
-
0.98M
1.86M
0.04M
9.75M
6.79M
13.55M
0.46M 0.08M
0.00M 2.30M
ZPH
9.94M
0.00M
5.02M
0.00M
0.00M
0.00M
0.00M
0.00M
0.00M
0.00M
-
District
52.26M
94.92M
10.30M
9.16M
10.28M
11.30M
15.35M
4.67M
0.44M
7.83M
2.41M
0.00M
NOTE: VALUES ARE ROUNDED FOR SUMMARY PURPOSES AND INFLATION APPLIED AT 3% ANNUALLY
Page | 55
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
7.
CONCLUSION
The FDOT Aviation and Spaceport Office has updated the Statewide Airfield
Pavement Management Program through the pavement condition surveys
performed at each participating airport and preparation of M&R planning
information using guidance provided by the FAA Advisory Circular 150/5380-6C.
MicroPAVER software was utilized to determine pavement conditions in
accordance with ASTM D 5340-12 and develop maintenance and rehabilitation
policies consistent with the FDOT Aviation and Spaceport Office policies. These
policies were used to identify pavement rehabilitation projects based on the
condition of the pavement over a 10-year period that are detailed in the
individual airport reports and in Appendix D District 10-Year Major Rehabilitation
Needs and Appendix E District Airfield Pavement 10-Year Major Rehabilitation
Exhibits.
This study was focused on identifying current pavement condition and using a
condition based tool to assist in the evaluation of pavement performance and
identify and prioritize maintenance and rehabilitation needs and costs to
maximize useful pavement life. The methods used to determine pavement
condition for this program update, as with previous updates, have been
performed in accordance with ASTM D 5340 (current version 5340-12). The
process is intended to provide airport sponsors with guidance in planning
pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects and funding agencies with
planning tools for allocation of funds.
A detailed breakdown of pavement condition for each airport is included in
Appendix B District Branch and Section Condition Reports and Appendix C
District Airfield Pavement Condition Index Rating Exhibits. As can be seen in this
report and by comparing pavement conditions on an airport by airport basis,
there is a wide variation in pavement conditions between airports.
Recommended major rehabilitation recommendations for each airport are also
included in Appendix D District 10-Year Major Rehabilitation Needs and
Appendix E District Airfield Pavement 10-Year Major Rehabilitation Exhibits.
7.1
Major Rehabilitation for Runways in District
Runway projects, based on pavement conditions below the FDOT
recommended minimum service level PCI of 75 and have reached or are below
the Critical PCI of 65, which the District should consider as immediate needs are
listed below. These are not all the needs at each participating airport within the
Page | 57
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
District and may not be the individual airport’s priority, but should be considered
in development of funding programs based on functional PCI.
Page | 58
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Brooksville – Tampa Bay International Airport (BKV)
J
J
Runway 3-21 (Sections 6205 and 6210)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $7,522,499.64
Runway 9-27 (6105, 6110)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $11,205,250.19
Crystal River Airport (CGC)
J
Runway 9-27 (6120)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $97,500.00
Clearwater Airpark (CLW)
J
No Immediate Runway Major Rehabilitation
J
No Immediate Runway Major Rehabilitation
Inverness Airport (INF)
Plant City Airport (PCM)
J
Runway 10-28 (6103, 6115, 6120)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $2,964,017.36
St. Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport (PIE)
J
J
J
Runway 18L-36R (6155, 6175, 6185, 6197)
o Major Rehabilitation – Structural Distress / Primary Runway
o $13,912,200.00
Runway 9-27 (6315, 6320, 6325, 6335, 6340, 6345, 6350, 6355, 6360, 6365,
6370)
o Major Rehabilitation – Structural Distress
o $14,385,802.00
Runway 4-22 (6230)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $463,450.00
Page | 59
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Albert Whitted Airport (SPG)
J
J
Runway 7-25 (6210, 6207, 6205)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $3,291,991.00
Runway 18-36 (6105, 6110)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $6,444,002.00
Peter O. Knight Airport (TPF)
J
Runway 4-22 (6105)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $4,657,501.00
Tampa Executive Airport (VDF)
J
No Immediate Runway Major Rehabilitation
Zephyrhills Municipal Airport (ZPH)
J
Runway 18-36 (6205)
o Major Rehabilitation
o $5,022,694.06
Page | 60
APPENDIX A
ž GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Pavement Evaluation Report
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
ASTM D 5340-12
The ASTM D 5340-12 Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index
Surveys by the ASTM International. This test method covers the determination of airport
pavement condition through visual surveys of asphalt-surfaced pavements, including
porous friction course, and plain or reinforced jointed Portland Cement Concrete
pavements, using the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) method of quantifying
pavement condition. The PCI for airport pavements was developed by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers through the funding provided by the U.S. Air Force. It is further
verified and adopted by the FAA, and the U.S. Naval Facilities Engineering Command.
Aviation and Spaceport Office
The Florida Department of Transportation Aviation and Spaceport Office is charged
with responsibility for promoting the safe development of aviation to serve the people
of the State of Florida. The Aviation Office Program Manager (ASO-PM) has review and
approval authority for each program task of the SAPMP.
Branch
A Branch (pavement branch) designates pavements that have common usage and
functionality, such as an entire runway, taxiway, or apron. A pavement branch is an
identifiable part of the pavement network that a single entity and has a distinct
function.
Category
The Category classifies the airport according to the type and volume of aircraft traffic,
as follows:
J
GA – for general aviation or community airports;
J
PR – for primary and/or commercial service airports
J
RL – for regional relievers or small hubs;
The airport Category has been the attribute to aid in the refinement and differentiation
of airport infrastructure as it relates to aircraft fleet mix (type, frequency, and pavement
requirements).
Critical PCI
The PCI value considered to be the threshold for M&R decisions, it is alternatively known
as MicroPAVER Minimum PCI. PCI above the Critical generate economical activities
expected to preserve and prolong acceptable condition. M&R for PCI values less than
Appendix A | 1
Pavement Evaluation Report
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Critical make sense only for reasons of safety or to maintain a pavement in operable
condition. A pavement section is expected to deteriorate very quickly once it reaches
the Critical PCI and the unit cost of repair increases significantly.
Distress Type
A distress type, alternatively pavement distress, is a defined visible defect in pavement
evidenced by cracking, vertical displacement or deterioration of material. Distresses
are external indicators of pavement deterioration caused by loading, environmental
factors, or construction deficiencies, or combination thereof. Typical distresses are
cracks, rutting, and weathering of the pavement surface. Specific distress types as
defined by the ASTM D 5340-12 are required to obtain an accurate PCI value.
FAA
The Federal Aviation Administration. The FDOT Statewide Airfield Pavement
Management Program is sponsored by the FAA. The program has been established and
updated in accordance with FAA Advisory Circulars 150/5380-7B Airport Pavement
Management Program and 150/5380-6C Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance
of Airport Pavements.
FDOT
The Florida Department of Transportation. Florida Department of Transportation was
represented in this project by the Aviation and Space Port Office of the Office of
Freight, Logistics and Passenger Operations.
Localized M&R (Maintenance and Repair)
Alternatively, known as Maintenance or Preservation activities, Localized M&R is a
temporary activity performed on existing pavement to extend its serviceability and/or
to improve rideability. Localized M&R can be applied either as a safety (stop-gap)
measure or preventive measure. Common localized maintenance methods include
crack sealing, joint sealing, and patching.
Major M&R or Major Rehabilitation (e.g. Rehabilitation)
Activities performed over the entire area of a pavement Section that are intended to
restore and/or maintain serviceability. This includes asphalt overlays, milling and
replacing asphalt pavement, reconstruction with asphalt, reconstruction with Portland
Cement Concrete (PCC) pavements, and PCC overlays. For the purpose of the FDOT
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program, Major M&R or Major Rehabilitation,
as indicated by Mill and Overlay, PCC Restoration, and/or Reconstruction are planning
level categories. It is recommended that project level investigation and design in
accordance with the FAA Advisory Circulars be performed.
MicroPAVER (PAVER)
Alternatively known as PAVER, a commercially available software subsidized by FAA
and agencies in the US Department of Defense developed to support engineered
Appendix A | 2
Pavement Evaluation Report
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
management of pavement assets using a condition based approach. This software has
the functionality such that, if properly implemented, maintained, and operated, it
meets the pavement management program requirements described by the FAA in
Advisory Circular 150/5380-7B.
Minimum Condition Level
A threshold PCI value established by FDOT to represent the targeted minimum
pavement condition that is desirable in the Florida Airport System. These values were
established with consideration of pavement function and airport type. For instance,
runways have higher minimum condition levels than aprons, and Primary airports have
higher minimum condition levels than General Aviation airports.
Network Definition
A Network Definition is a Computer-Aided Drafting & Design (CADD) drawing which
shows the airport pavement outline with pavement Branch and pavement Section
boundaries. This drawing also includes the PCI sample units and is used to identify those
sample units to be surveyed, i.e. the sampling plan. Each Network Definition for the
participating airports were developed utilizing information provided by the airport staff,
field conditions, record drawings, schematics, and aerial imagery provided by the FDOT
Surveying and Mapping Office. The Airfield Pavement Network Definition Exhibits are
not intended for construction or design level geometry.
Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
The Pavement Condition Index is a number which represents the condition of a
pavement segment at a specific point in time. It is a numerical rating of the pavement
condition that ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 being the worst possible condition and 100
being the best possible condition. It is based on visual identification and measurement
of specific distress types commonly found in pavement which has been in service for a
period of time. The definitions and procedures for determining the PCI are found in
ASTM D 5340, published by ASTM International.
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
A verbal description of pavement condition as a function of the PCI value. The SAPMP
utilizes the following Pavement Condition Rating.
Appendix A | 3
Pavement Evaluation Report
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
The SAPMP considers seven (7) ranges of condition rating based on the PCI ranges
shown above.
Pavement Evaluation
A systematic approach undertaken by trained and experienced personnel intended for
determination of the condition, serviceability, and best corrective action for pavement.
Techniques to standardize pavement evaluation include the Pavement Condition Index
procedures.
Pavement Management System (PMS)
A Pavement Management System is a broad function that uses pavement evaluation
and pavement performance trends as a basis for planning, programming, financing,
and maintaining a pavement system.
Pavement Surface Type
The surface of pavement is identified as one of four types:
§
§
§
§
§
§
AC – for asphalt concrete surface pavements(Hot-Mix Asphalt, Bituminous
Surface Courses);
PCC – for Portland Cement Concrete pavements;
AAC – for asphalt surface pavements that have had an asphalt overlay at some
point in their construction history;
APC – for composite pavements, which consist of asphalt over Portland Cement
Concrete pavement.
PAC – for composite pavements, which consist of Portland Cement Concrete
over asphalt concrete pavement.
WHT – for composite whitetopping pavements, which typically consists of thin
concrete overlay over asphalt concrete pavement.
Appendix A | 4
Pavement Evaluation Report
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Random Sample
A sample unit of the pavement section selected for inspection by random sampling
techniques, such as a random number table or systematic random procedure. For the
purpose of the SAPMP, random samples were determined by previous iterations of the
SAMP Update and are maintained as inspection sample units unless substantial
changes to section limits have been made due to construction work.
Reconstruction
Reconstruction includes removal of existing pavement, preparation of subgrade, and
construction of new pavement with new or recycled materials. Reconstruction is
indicated when distress types evident at the surface indicate failure in the pavement
structure or subgrade of a type, and to an extent, not correctable by less extensive
construction.
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation represents construction using existing pavement for a foundation.
Rehabilitation most commonly consists of an overlay of existing pavement with a new
asphalt or concrete surface. Recently, technology has expanded the options to
include recycling of existing pavement and incorporating engineering fabrics or thin
layers of elasticized materials to retard reflection of distress types through the new
surface.
Sample Unit
Uniformly sized portions of a Section as defined in ASTM D 5340. Sample units are a
means to reduce the total amount of pavement actually surveyed using statistics to
select and survey enough area to provide a representative measure of Section PCI.
Sample Unit sizes are 5,000 ± 2,000 square feet for AC-surfaced pavements and 20 ± 8
slabs for PCC-surfaced pavements.
Section
Sections subdivide Branches into portions of similar pavement. Sections are prescribed
by pavement structure, age, condition, and use. Sections are identified on the airport
Network Definition. They are the smallest unit used for determining M&R requirements
based on condition.
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program (SAPMP)
The Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program is a program implemented in
1992 by the Florida Department of Transportation to plan, schedule, and design the
maintenance and rehabilitation activities necessary for the airfield pavement on
Florida’s public airports to allow the airports to operate efficiently, economically, and
without excessive down time.
Appendix A | 5
Pavement Evaluation Report
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
System Inventory
A System Inventory is a Computer-Aided Drafting & Design (CADD) drawing which
shows the airport pavement outline and identifies airfield construction activities since
the last inspection.
Use
In MicroPAVER, Use is the term for the function of the pavement area, alternatively
Branch Use, Pavement Use, or Pavement Facility Use. For the SAPMP the facility use
consists of the following: Runway, Taxiway, or Apron for purposes of the SAPMP
program planning.
Appendix A | 6
APPENDIX B
ž DISTRICT BRANCH CONDITION REPORT
ž DISTRICT SECTION CONDITION REPORT
Branch Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
1 of 14
Pavement Database: FDOT NetworkID: BKV
Branch ID
Number of Sum Section Avg Section
Sections
Length
Width
(Ft)
(Ft)
True Area
(SqFt)
Use
Average
PCI
PCI
Standard
Deviation
Weighted
Average
PCI
AP NE (NE APRON)
11
4,850.50
133.82
552,138.02
APRON
55.18
8.81
62.22
AP S (SOUTH APRON)
5
3,161.00
68.40
231,936.40
APRON
74.40
13.22
84.24
RW 3-21 (RUNWAY 3-21)
2
15,000.00
62.50
752,250.00
RUNWAY
54.00
1.00
54.33
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-27)
2
21,000.00
62.50
1,050,000.00
RUNWAY
52.00
6.00
54.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
1
8,650.00
75.00
648,306.61
TAXIWAY
50.00
0.00
50.00
TW A1 (TAXIWAY A1)
3
1,650.00
51.67
92,918.14
TAXIWAY
58.00
13.93
55.86
TW A3 (TAXIWAY A3)
2
813.00
39.00
37,158.85
TAXIWAY
30.50
10.50
26.12
TW A5 (TAXIWAY A5)
1
430.00
75.00
33,046.02
TAXIWAY
59.00
0.00
59.00
TW A6 (TAXIWAY A6)
1
418.00
53.00
31,613.91
TAXIWAY
20.00
0.00
20.00
TW A9 (TAXIWAY A9)
1
440.00
75.00
31,973.01
TAXIWAY
69.00
0.00
69.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
2
4,965.00
35.00
173,973.00
TAXIWAY
52.00
14.00
57.06
TW B1 (TAXIWAY B1)
3
2,545.00
67.00
190,128.02
TAXIWAY
62.67
6.60
63.96
TW B2 (TAXIWAY B2)
1
150.00
35.00
7,308.52
TAXIWAY
38.00
0.00
38.00
TW B3 (TAXIWAY B3)
1
150.00
35.00
7,308.52
TAXIWAY
59.00
0.00
59.00
TW B4 (TAXIWAY B4)
1
150.00
35.00
6,246.24
TAXIWAY
62.00
0.00
62.00
Branch Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
2 of 14
Pavement Database: FDOT NetworkID: CGC
Branch ID
Number of Sum Section Avg Section
Sections
Length
Width
(Ft)
(Ft)
True Area
(SqFt)
Use
Average
PCI
PCI
Standard
Deviation
Weighted
Average
PCI
AP MAIN (MAIN APRON)
2
680.00
256.00
169,476.00
APRON
58.00
4.00
56.47
AP T-HANG (T-HANGARS APRON)
1
405.00
200.00
79,394.00
APRON
61.00
0.00
61.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-27)
4
4,555.00
75.00
341,775.00
RUNWAY
66.75
1.92
68.49
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
9
3,861.00
49.44
217,112.00
TAXIWAY
76.89
21.33
92.61
TW CONN (CONNECTOR TAXIWAY
TO AP)
2
2,000.00
26.00
56,619.00
TAXIWAY
57.00
2.00
57.37
TW HANG (TAXIWAY TO HANGAR)
1
500.00
25.00
36,579.00
TAXIWAY
100.00
0.00
100.00
Branch Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
3 of 14
Pavement Database: FDOT NetworkID: CLW
Branch ID
Number of Sum Section Avg Section
Sections
Length
Width
(Ft)
(Ft)
True Area
(SqFt)
Use
Average
PCI
PCI
Standard
Deviation
Weighted
Average
PCI
AP CENTER (CENTER APRON)
2
745.00
62.50
33,672.74
APRON
46.50
7.50
46.65
AP N (NORTH APRON)
2
250.00
75.00
21,509.00
APRON
77.00
23.00
58.52
AP T-HAN 1 (APRON AT
T-HANGARS 1)
2
1,700.00
35.00
44,575.77
APRON
46.50
10.50
51.09
AP T-HAN 2 (APRON AT
T-HANGARS 2)
1
1,800.00
20.00
37,331.32
APRON
65.00
0.00
65.00
AP T-HAN 3 (APRON AT
T-HANGARS 3)
1
1,200.00
20.00
24,739.20
APRON
71.00
0.00
71.00
RW 16-34 (RUNWAY 16-34)
4
4,097.00
75.00
308,025.00
RUNWAY
100.00
0.00
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
8
8,850.00
30.00
176,330.89
TAXIWAY
94.00
15.87
92.57
TW A-1 (TAXIWAY A-1)
1
100.00
50.00
6,927.79
TAXIWAY
100.00
0.00
100.00
TW A-2 (TAXIWAY A-2)
1
100.00
50.00
6,566.58
TAXIWAY
100.00
0.00
100.00
TW A-3 (TAXIWAY A-3)
1
100.00
50.00
6,967.15
TAXIWAY
100.00
0.00
100.00
TW CONN 34 (TAXIWAY
CONNECTOR TO RUNWAY 34)
1
50.00
30.00
1,445.90
TAXIWAY
51.00
0.00
51.00
Branch Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
4 of 14
Pavement Database: FDOT NetworkID: INF
Branch ID
Number of Sum Section Avg Section
Sections
Length
Width
(Ft)
(Ft)
True Area
(SqFt)
Use
Average
PCI
PCI
Standard
Deviation
Weighted
Average
PCI
AP FBO (FBO APRON)
2
700.00
250.00
203,792.78
APRON
100.00
0.00
100.00
AP GA (GA APRON)
3
1,052.00
131.00
134,130.81
APRON
82.33
16.50
84.86
RW 1-19 (RUNWAY 1-19)
1
5,000.00
75.00
375,074.96
RUNWAY
97.00
0.00
97.00
TW A (TAXIWAY ALPHA)
3
5,354.00
35.00
192,590.46
TAXIWAY
100.00
0.00
100.00
TW A1 (TAXIWAY A1)
1
180.00
35.00
9,071.68
TAXIWAY
94.00
0.00
94.00
TW A2 (TAXIWAY A2)
1
180.00
35.00
9,071.68
TAXIWAY
100.00
0.00
100.00
TW A3 (TAXIWAY A3)
1
180.00
35.00
9,071.68
TAXIWAY
100.00
0.00
100.00
TW GA AP (TAXIWAY TO GA
APRON)
1
1,500.00
30.00
40,628.23
TAXIWAY
63.00
0.00
63.00
Branch Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
5 of 14
Pavement Database: FDOT NetworkID: PCM
Branch ID
Number of Sum Section Avg Section
Sections
Length
Width
(Ft)
(Ft)
True Area
(SqFt)
Use
Average
PCI
PCI
Standard
Deviation
Weighted
Average
PCI
AP (APRON)
6
1,635.00
165.33
313,605.04
APRON
79.17
11.67
81.36
RW 10-28 (RUNWAY 10-28)
3
4,000.61
75.00
296,401.75
RUNWAY
57.67
4.71
60.49
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
9
6,305.00
38.89
194,037.92
TAXIWAY
80.00
21.49
65.54
TW HANG (TAXIWAY TO HANGAR)
1
1,000.00
60.00
53,871.00
TAXIWAY
100.00
0.00
100.00
TW T-HANG (T-HANGARS
TAXIWAY)
4
1,658.00
22.50
48,804.98
TAXIWAY
56.75
12.70
61.19
Branch Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
6 of 14
Pavement Database: FDOT NetworkID: PIE
Branch ID
Number of Sum Section Avg Section
Sections
Length
Width
(Ft)
(Ft)
True Area
(SqFt)
Use
Average
PCI
PCI
Standard
Deviation
Weighted
Average
PCI
AP HOLD (HOLDING APRON AT
TWS M & F)
1
100.00
150.00
15,819.38
APRON
41.00
0.00
41.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
18
12,608.00
151.22
1,170,126.00
APRON
66.28
37.11
63.49
AP RU RW22 (RUN-UP APRON AT
RW 22)
1
150.00
100.00
14,458.50
APRON
37.00
0.00
37.00
FBO CONN (FBO CONNECTOR)
2
977.00
137.50
22,237.00
APRON
100.00
0.00
100.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
18
29,187.00
62.50
1,459,350.00
RUNWAY
74.78
12.08
68.65
RW 4-22 (RUNWAY 4-22)
6
16,875.00
62.50
855,366.81
RUNWAY
81.67
28.87
96.63
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-27)
12
13,742.45
62.50
685,933.00
RUNWAY
48.17
11.58
44.87
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
12
11,791.00
76.50
834,495.29
TAXIWAY
76.75
28.68
88.03
TW A2 (TAXIWAY A2)
1
600.00
100.00
60,458.00
TAXIWAY
100.00
0.00
100.00
TW A3 (TAXIWAY A3)
1
400.00
100.00
60,311.00
TAXIWAY
100.00
0.00
100.00
TW A4 (TAXIWAY A4)
1
400.00
100.00
58,588.00
TAXIWAY
100.00
0.00
100.00
TW A5 (TAXIWAY A5)
1
400.00
100.00
56,987.00
TAXIWAY
100.00
0.00
100.00
TW A6 (TAXIWAY A6)
1
400.00
100.00
58,658.00
TAXIWAY
100.00
0.00
100.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
4
1,480.00
50.00
75,911.14
TAXIWAY
62.00
25.69
50.34
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
1
530.00
75.00
42,705.81
TAXIWAY
36.00
0.00
36.00
TW D (TAXIWAY D)
3
545.00
75.00
47,262.41
TAXIWAY
50.00
2.83
49.94
Branch Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
7 of 14
Pavement Database: FDOT NetworkID: PIE
Branch ID
Number of Sum Section Avg Section
Sections
Length
Width
(Ft)
(Ft)
True Area
(SqFt)
Use
Average
PCI
PCI
Standard
Deviation
Weighted
Average
PCI
TW F (TAXIWAY F)
7
1,770.00
50.00
99,340.14
TAXIWAY
76.29
27.90
76.27
TW H (TAXIWAY H)
2
1,700.00
87.50
122,270.00
TAXIWAY
53.00
47.00
50.42
TW J (TAXIWAY J)
2
520.00
60.00
20,009.00
TAXIWAY
73.00
27.00
68.59
TW K (TAXIWAY K)
5
1,015.00
32.00
47,406.70
TAXIWAY
61.20
12.95
72.15
TW L (TAXIWAY L)
4
2,300.00
75.00
86,607.00
TAXIWAY
83.00
29.44
85.33
TW M (TAXIWAY M)
3
4,640.00
60.00
231,669.00
TAXIWAY
58.33
29.69
44.26
TW P (TAXIWAY P)
2
1,515.00
50.00
80,974.00
TAXIWAY
100.00
0.00
100.00
TW T (APRON TAXIWAY SOUTH
OF MAIN APRON)
1
1,550.00
100.00
175,302.00
TAXIWAY
22.00
0.00
22.00
Branch Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
8 of 14
Pavement Database: FDOT NetworkID: SPG
Branch ID
Number of Sum Section Avg Section
Sections
Length
Width
(Ft)
(Ft)
True Area
(SqFt)
Use
Average
PCI
PCI
Standard
Deviation
Weighted
Average
PCI
AP (APRON)
6
5,650.00
126.67
364,794.56
APRON
64.00
6.61
62.40
AP MID (APRON MIDFIELD)
3
750.00
116.67
107,927.00
APRON
100.00
0.00
100.00
AP NW (APRON NORTHWEST)
2
565.00
225.00
140,852.15
APRON
89.50
0.50
89.23
AP W (WEST APRON)
1
1,300.00
55.00
74,621.08
APRON
67.00
0.00
67.00
RW 18-36 (RUNWAY 18-36)
2
8,592.00
62.50
429,600.00
RUNWAY
60.00
1.00
60.33
RW 7-25 (RUNWAY 7-25)
5
3,437.00
75.00
263,465.55
RUNWAY
66.40
20.14
62.87
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
3
2,450.00
40.00
99,616.68
TAXIWAY
59.00
4.08
61.44
TW A1 (TAXIWAY ALPHA 1)
2
400.00
55.00
22,163.00
TAXIWAY
63.50
36.50
63.73
TW A2 (TAXIWAY A2)
1
100.00
50.00
5,039.47
TAXIWAY
60.00
0.00
60.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
9
2,995.00
45.56
129,999.96
TAXIWAY
55.22
15.42
65.04
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
5
2,150.00
47.00
165,996.03
TAXIWAY
44.40
19.64
45.12
TW D (TAXIWAY DELTA)
6
3,110.00
28.33
82,574.10
TAXIWAY
74.67
11.46
77.07
TW D1 (TAXIWAY D1)
1
75.00
70.00
5,505.23
TAXIWAY
66.00
0.00
66.00
TW N (NORTH TAXIWAY)
4
2,050.00
42.50
92,593.53
TAXIWAY
66.00
4.85
66.61
Branch Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
9 of 14
Pavement Database: FDOT NetworkID: TPF
Branch ID
Number of Sum Section Avg Section
Sections
Length
Width
(Ft)
(Ft)
True Area
(SqFt)
Use
Average
PCI
PCI
Standard
Deviation
Weighted
Average
PCI
AP (APRON)
2
1,700.00
87.50
165,919.16
APRON
73.50
10.50
82.11
AP RU (APRON)
3
247.00
157.67
23,790.53
APRON
79.67
10.34
87.32
RW 18-36 (RUNWAY 18-36)
1
2,500.00
75.00
191,016.57
RUNWAY
85.00
0.00
85.00
RW 4-22 (RUNWAY 4-22)
3
3,608.00
100.00
360,800.00
RUNWAY
80.67
16.05
62.78
T/L HANG (TAXILANE TO EAST
HANGARS)
1
600.00
25.00
29,573.00
TAXIWAY
94.00
0.00
94.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
6
3,372.00
40.83
139,742.93
TAXIWAY
81.00
10.57
66.49
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
2
340.00
45.00
16,466.45
TAXIWAY
75.00
18.00
82.78
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
2
575.00
40.00
24,005.00
TAXIWAY
66.00
11.00
61.57
TW CENTER (TAXIWAY CENTER)
3
1,200.00
48.33
55,839.67
TAXIWAY
86.33
4.50
87.42
TW D (TAXIWAY D)
2
1,075.00
40.00
46,607.85
TAXIWAY
69.50
24.50
88.39
TW E (TAXIWAY E)
4
525.00
45.00
23,901.82
TAXIWAY
81.25
12.89
75.07
TW F (TAXIWAY F)
2
2,600.00
35.00
98,144.00
TAXIWAY
79.00
10.00
87.04
TW G (TAXIWAY G)
1
300.00
30.00
12,333.00
TAXIWAY
94.00
0.00
94.00
TW T-HANG (TAXIWAY TO
T-HANGARS)
1
3,500.00
20.00
72,024.05
TAXIWAY
53.00
0.00
53.00
Branch Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
10 of 14
Pavement Database: FDOT NetworkID: VDF
Branch ID
Number of Sum Section Avg Section
Sections
Length
Width
(Ft)
(Ft)
True Area
(SqFt)
Use
Average
PCI
PCI
Standard
Deviation
Weighted
Average
PCI
AP A - S (SOUTH APRON "A")
3
1,015.00
160.00
196,718.08
APRON
72.67
2.49
71.30
AP B - N (NORTH APRON "B")
2
775.00
300.00
232,479.97
APRON
86.50
13.50
84.71
AP C (APRON C)
2
1,112.00
377.50
495,031.70
APRON
71.50
1.50
70.43
AP RU (RUN-UP APRON)
2
350.00
65.00
28,331.73
APRON
70.00
5.00
73.82
AP T-HANG (T-HANGARS APRON)
2
1,035.00
120.00
159,945.37
APRON
91.50
8.50
98.72
AP W (APRON WEST)
2
1,350.00
106.00
65,398.11
APRON
69.50
4.50
70.10
RW 18-36 (RUNWAY 18-36)
1
3,259.00
75.00
243,145.00
RUNWAY
70.00
0.00
70.00
RW 5-23 (RUNWAY 5-23)
1
5,000.00
100.00
500,000.00
RUNWAY
71.00
0.00
71.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
6
3,615.00
36.67
132,329.36
TAXIWAY
68.67
2.56
66.41
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
2
705.00
30.00
22,553.94
TAXIWAY
33.00
1.00
32.65
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
1
575.00
35.00
21,766.85
TAXIWAY
72.00
0.00
72.00
TW D (TAXIWAY D)
2
975.00
35.00
36,473.64
TAXIWAY
68.00
2.00
69.44
TW E (TW E)
1
4,156.00
35.00
145,753.06
TAXIWAY
79.00
0.00
79.00
TW E1 (TW E-1)
1
235.00
37.00
9,577.05
TAXIWAY
76.00
0.00
76.00
TW E2 (TW E-2)
1
235.00
35.00
9,510.95
TAXIWAY
76.00
0.00
76.00
TW E3 (TW E3)
1
235.00
35.00
9,875.77
TAXIWAY
80.00
0.00
80.00
Branch Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
11 of 14
Pavement Database: FDOT NetworkID: VDF
Branch ID
Number of Sum Section Avg Section
Sections
Length
Width
(Ft)
(Ft)
True Area
(SqFt)
Use
Average
PCI
PCI
Standard
Deviation
Weighted
Average
PCI
TW E4 (TW E-4)
1
235.00
35.00
8,961.31
TAXIWAY
80.00
0.00
80.00
TW F (TW F)
3
2,870.00
41.67
107,660.43
TAXIWAY
72.67
2.49
75.57
TW J (TW J)
3
2,835.00
35.00
105,088.91
TAXIWAY
69.67
0.94
69.23
Branch Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
12 of 14
Pavement Database: FDOT NetworkID: ZPH
Branch ID
Number of Sum Section Avg Section
Sections
Length
Width
(Ft)
(Ft)
True Area
(SqFt)
Use
Average
PCI
PCI
Standard
Deviation
Weighted
Average
PCI
AP E (EAST APRON)
1
600.00
50.00
34,097.36
APRON
12.00
0.00
12.00
AP NE (NORTHEAST APRON)
1
475.00
27.00
27,750.00
APRON
40.00
0.00
40.00
AP NW (NORTHWEST APRON)
3
265.00
66.00
19,802.71
APRON
73.33
16.86
84.36
AP RU 22 (APRON RUN-UP 22)
1
400.00
200.00
47,922.50
APRON
100.00
0.00
100.00
AP T-HANG (APRON T-HANGARS)
1
800.00
30.00
108,938.27
APRON
46.00
0.00
46.00
AP T-HANG2 (APRON T-HANG 2)
1
250.00
300.00
85,817.46
APRON
80.00
0.00
80.00
AP T-HANG3 (APRON T-HANG 3)
1
650.00
250.00
164,471.32
APRON
84.00
0.00
84.00
AP TW D (APRON AT END OF TW
D)
1
430.00
60.00
26,359.62
APRON
51.00
0.00
51.00
RW 18-36 (RUNWAY 18-36)
1
4,750.00
100.00
473,437.11
RUNWAY
67.00
0.00
67.00
RW 5-23 (RUNWAY 5-23)
5
10,376.00
70.00
501,000.00
RUNWAY
100.00
0.00
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
5
7,400.00
50.00
290,360.50
TAXIWAY
77.20
18.66
64.08
TW A-1 (TAXIWAY A-1)
2
650.00
45.00
32,504.00
TAXIWAY
82.00
18.00
80.59
TW A-2 (TAXIWAY A-2)
2
447.00
50.00
35,760.00
TAXIWAY
77.00
23.00
80.28
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
10
8,290.00
52.00
288,040.46
TAXIWAY
51.60
35.27
26.28
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
1
1,200.00
50.00
69,379.41
TAXIWAY
90.00
0.00
90.00
TW C-1 (TAXIWAY C-1)
2
300.00
30.00
10,443.84
TAXIWAY
77.50
15.50
75.19
Branch Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
13 of 14
Pavement Database: FDOT NetworkID: ZPH
Branch ID
Number of Sum Section Avg Section
Sections
Length
Width
(Ft)
(Ft)
True Area
(SqFt)
Use
Average
PCI
PCI
Standard
Deviation
Weighted
Average
PCI
TW D (TAXIWAY D)
1
700.00
35.00
25,063.48
TAXIWAY
54.00
0.00
54.00
TW E (TAXIWAY E)
1
900.00
35.00
32,964.38
TAXIWAY
95.00
0.00
95.00
TW F (TAXIWAY F)
1
665.00
35.00
24,348.01
TAXIWAY
65.00
0.00
65.00
Branch Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
14 of 14
Pavement Database: FDOT
Total
Area
(SqFt)
Arithmetic
Average
PCI
Average
PCI
STD.
Weighted
Average
PCI
Use
Category
Number
of
Sections
APRON
100
5,639,910.64
69.70
23.60
71.89
RUNWAY
71
9,086,640.75
71.13
20.69
69.93
TAXIWAY
215
7,025,172.39
70.73
24.47
68.41
All
386
21,751,723.78
70.54
23.59
69.95
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
1 of 20
NetworkID: BKV
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
AP NE (NE APRON)
4105
01/01/1975
AC
APRON
P
0
29,443.85 06/10/2013
38
48.00
AP NE (NE APRON)
4110
01/01/1975
AC
APRON
P
0
14,591.81 06/10/2013
38
52.00
AP NE (NE APRON)
4115
01/01/1975
AC
APRON
P
0
35,799.62 06/10/2013
38
52.00
AP NE (NE APRON)
4120
01/01/1964
AC
APRON
P
0
53,057.62 06/10/2013
49
53.00
AP NE (NE APRON)
4125
01/01/1975
AAC
APRON
P
0
23,739.53 06/10/2013
38
63.00
AP NE (NE APRON)
4130
01/01/1942
PCC
APRON
P
0
6,146.47 06/10/2013
71
36.00
AP NE (NE APRON)
4135
01/01/1983
AC
APRON
P
0
59,122.43 06/10/2013
30
63.00
AP NE (NE APRON)
4140
01/01/1991
AC
APRON
P
0
222,039.30 06/10/2013
22
72.00
AP NE (NE APRON)
4145
01/01/1991
AC
APRON
P
0
72,809.18 06/10/2013
22
56.00
AP NE (NE APRON)
4147
01/01/1989
AAC
APRON
P
0
7,370.90 06/10/2013
24
55.00
AP NE (NE APRON)
4150
01/01/1991
PCC
APRON
P
0
28,017.31 06/10/2013
22
57.00
AP S (SO UTH APRON)
4205
01/01/1991
AC
APRON
P
0
3,398.47 06/10/2013
22
64.00
AP S (SO UTH APRON)
4210
12/25/1999
AC
APRON
P
0
52,540.81 06/10/2013
14
67.00
AP S (SO UTH APRON)
4215
12/25/1999
AC
APRON
P
0
32,595.35 06/10/2013
14
74.00
AP S (SO UTH APRON)
4220
12/25/1999
AC
APRON
P
0
28,845.35 06/10/2013
14
67.00
AP S (SO UTH APRON)
4225
01/01/2009
AC
APRON
P
0
114,556.42 06/10/2013
4
100.00
RW 3-21 (RUNWAY 3-2 1)
6205
01/01/1942
PCC
RUNWAY
S
0
250,750.00 06/10/2013
71
53.00
RW 3-21 (RUNWAY 3-2 1)
6210
01/01/1942
PCC
RUNWAY
S
0
501,500.00 06/10/2013
71
55.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6105
01/01/1942
PCC
RUNWAY
P
0
350,000.00 06/10/2013
71
46.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6110
01/01/1942
PCC
RUNWAY
P
0
700,000.00 06/10/2013
71
58.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
105
01/01/1942
PCC
TAXIWAY
P
0
648,306.61 06/10/2013
71
50.00
TW A1 (TAXIWAY A1)
110
01/01/1942
PCC
TAXIWAY
P
0
56,894.07 06/10/2013
71
53.00
TW A1 (TAXIWAY A1)
111
01/01/1991
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
17,869.99 06/10/2013
22
77.00
TW A1 (TAXIWAY A1)
112
01/01/1964
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
18,154.08 06/10/2013
49
44.00
TW A3 (TAXIWAY A3)
120
01/01/1942
PCC
TAXIWAY
P
0
10,836.50 06/10/2013
71
41.00
TW A3 (TAXIWAY A3)
125
01/01/1986
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
26,322.35 06/10/2013
27
20.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
2 of 20
NetworkID: BKV
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
TW A5 (TAXIWAY A5)
130
01/01/1942
PCC
TAXIWAY
P
0
33,046.02 06/10/2013
71
59.00
TW A6 (TAXIWAY A6)
135
01/01/1986
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
31,613.91 06/10/2013
27
20.00
TW A9 (TAXIWAY A9)
140
01/01/1942
PCC
TAXIWAY
P
0
31,973.01 06/10/2013
71
69.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
205
01/01/1990
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
55,550.48 06/10/2013
23
38.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
210
01/01/1991
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
118,422.52 06/10/2013
22
66.00
TW B1 (TAXIWAY B1)
145
01/01/1998
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
80,953.55 06/10/2013
15
72.00
TW B1 (TAXIWAY B1)
215
01/01/1942
PCC
TAXIWAY
P
0
63,745.26 06/10/2013
71
58.00
TW B1 (TAXIWAY B1)
216
01/01/1991
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
45,429.21 06/10/2013
22
58.00
TW B2 (TAXIWAY B2)
220
01/01/1990
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
7,308.52 06/10/2013
23
38.00
TW B3 (TAXIWAY B3)
225
01/01/1991
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
7,308.52 06/10/2013
22
59.00
TW B4 (TAXIWAY B4)
230
01/01/1991
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
6,246.24 06/10/2013
22
62.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
3 of 20
NetworkID: CGC
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
AP MAIN (MAIN APRON)
4105
01/01/1998
AAC
APRON
P
0
117,143.00 09/12/2013
15
54.00
AP MAIN (MAIN APRON)
4120
01/01/2005
AC
APRON
P
0
52,333.00 09/12/2013
8
62.00
AP T-HANG (T-HANGARS APRON)
4205
01/01/1998
AC
APRON
T
0
79,394.00 09/12/2013
15
61.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6105
01/01/2001
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
225,000.00 09/12/2013
12
69.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6110
01/01/2001
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
97,275.00 09/12/2013
12
68.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6115
01/01/2001
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
9,750.00 09/12/2013
12
66.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6120
01/01/2001
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
9,750.00 09/12/2013
12
64.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
105
01/01/2009
AC
TAXIWAY
T
0
157,438.00 09/12/2013
4
99.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
109
01/01/2001
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
13,883.00 09/12/2013
12
60.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
115
01/01/1965
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
4,473.00 09/12/2013
48
56.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
116
01/01/2009
AC
TAXIWAY
T
0
8,548.00 09/12/2013
4
99.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
117
01/01/2001
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
7,839.00 09/12/2013
12
89.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
118
01/01/2001
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
4,473.00 09/12/2013
12
40.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
119
01/01/2009
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
5,073.00 09/12/2013
4
89.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
130
01/01/2001
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
6,848.00 09/12/2013
12
61.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
131
01/01/2009
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
8,537.00 09/12/2013
4
99.00
TW CONN (CONNECTOR TAXIWAY TO
AP)
205
01/01/1965
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
33,566.00 09/12/2013
48
59.00
TW CONN (CONNECTOR TAXIWAY TO
AP)
210
01/01/1997
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
23,053.00 09/12/2013
16
55.00
TW HANG (TAXIWAY TO HANGAR)
215
01/01/2011
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
36,579.00 01/01/2011
0
100.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
4 of 20
NetworkID: CLW
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
AP CENTE R (CENTER APRON)
4405
12/25/1999
AC
APRON
P
0
16,498.05 10/06/2014
15
39.00
AP CENTE R (CENTER APRON)
4410
12/15/1999
AC
APRON
P
0
17,174.69 10/06/2014
15
54.00
AP N (NORTH APRON)
4505
01/01/2003
AC
APRON
P
0
19,396.00 10/06/2014
11
54.00
AP N (NORTH APRON)
4605
01/01/2012
AC
APRON
P
0
2,113.00 01/01/2012
0
100.00
AP T-HAN 1 (APRON AT T-HANG ARS 1)
4305
12/25/1999
AC
APRON
P
0
32,026.11 10/06/2014
15
57.00
AP T-HAN 1 (APRON AT T-HANG ARS 1)
4310
12/25/1999
AC
APRON
P
0
12,549.66 10/06/2014
15
36.00
AP T-HAN 2 (APRON AT T-HANG ARS 2)
4105
01/01/1996
AC
APRON
P
0
37,331.32 10/06/2014
18
65.00
AP T-HAN 3 (APRON AT T-HANG ARS 3)
4205
01/01/1996
AC
APRON
P
0
24,739.20 10/06/2014
18
71.00
RW 16-34 (RUNWAY 16 -34)
6105
01/01/2013
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
15,000.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
RW 16-34 (RUNWAY 16 -34)
6110
01/01/2013
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
224,775.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
RW 16-34 (RUNWAY 16 -34)
6120
01/01/2013
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
22,500.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
RW 16-34 (RUNWAY 16 -34)
6130
01/01/2013
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
45,750.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
105
01/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
63,329.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
107
01/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
5,097.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
110
01/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
7,086.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
130
01/01/1996
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
27,297.98 10/06/2014
18
52.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
135
01/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
22,264.83 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
140
01/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
12,540.08 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
145
01/01/2013
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
23,716.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
150
01/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
15,000.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A-1 (TAXIWAY A-1)
115
01/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
6,927.79 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A-2 (TAXIWAY A-2)
120
01/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
6,566.58 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A-3 (TAXIWAY A-3)
125
01/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
6,967.15 01/01/2013
0
100.00
5105
01/01/1991
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
1,445.90 10/06/2014
23
51.00
TW CONN 34 (TAXIWAY CONNECTOR
TO RUNWAY 34)
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
5 of 20
NetworkID: INF
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
AP FBO (FB O APRON)
4205
01/01/2013
AC
APRON
P
0
74,783.03 01/01/2013
0
100.00
AP FBO (FB O APRON)
4210
01/01/2013
AC
APRON
P
0
129,009.75 01/01/2013
0
100.00
AP GA (GA APRON)
4005
01/01/1997
AC
APRON
P
0
35,044.25 06/12/2013
16
59.00
AP GA (GA APRON)
4015
01/01/2011
AC
APRON
P
0
26,879.89 06/12/2013
2
94.00
AP GA (GA APRON)
4020
01/01/2011
AC
APRON
P
0
72,206.67 06/12/2013
2
94.00
RW 1-19 (RUNWAY 1-1 9)
6105
01/01/2010
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
375,074.96 06/12/2013
3
97.00
TW A (TAXIWAY ALPHA)
105
01/01/2010
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
173,772.53 06/12/2013
3
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY ALPHA)
110
01/01/2010
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
7,297.51 06/12/2013
3
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY ALPHA)
130
01/01/2010
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
11,520.42 06/12/2013
3
100.00
TW A1 (TAXIWAY A1)
115
01/01/2010
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
9,071.68 06/12/2013
3
94.00
TW A2 (TAXIWAY A2)
120
01/01/2010
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
9,071.68 06/12/2013
3
100.00
TW A3 (TAXIWAY A3)
125
01/01/2010
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
9,071.68 06/12/2013
3
100.00
TW GA AP (TAXIWAY TO GA AP RON)
205
01/01/1997
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
40,628.23 06/12/2013
16
63.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
6 of 20
NetworkID: PCM
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
AP (APRO N)
4105
03/01/2013
AC
APRON
P
0
112,145.00 03/01/2013
0
100.00
AP (APRO N)
4110
01/01/1992
AAC
APRON
P
0
45,436.72 09/11/2013
21
68.00
AP (APRO N)
4120
01/01/1992
AAC
APRON
P
0
46,434.32 09/11/2013
21
76.00
AP (APRO N)
4130
01/01/1986
AC
APRON
P
0
77,514.00 09/11/2013
27
68.00
AP (APRO N)
4135
01/01/2008
AC
APRON
P
0
29,575.00 09/11/2013
5
74.00
AP (APRO N)
4140
01/01/2010
PCC
APRON
P
0
2,500.00 09/11/2013
3
89.00
RW 10-28 (RUNWAY 10 -28)
6103
01/01/2002
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
15,106.00 09/11/2013
11
51.00
RW 10-28 (RUNWAY 10 -28)
6115
01/01/1983
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
228,795.75 09/11/2013
30
61.00
RW 10-28 (RUNWAY 10 -28)
6120
01/01/2002
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
52,500.00 09/11/2013
11
61.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
110
01/01/2001
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
125,294.35 09/11/2013
12
62.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
115
01/01/2001
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
34,041.02 09/11/2013
12
58.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
120
08/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
6,040.00 08/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
150
01/01/2001
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
4,772.66 09/11/2013
12
50.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
160
01/01/2001
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
5,382.81 09/11/2013
12
55.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
165
03/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
6,228.00 03/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
170
08/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
4,869.58 08/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
174
08/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
4,273.00 08/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
175
01/01/2001
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
3,136.50 09/11/2013
12
95.00
TW HANG (TAXIWAY TO HANGAR)
750
01/01/2011
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
53,871.00 09/11/2013
2
100.00
TW T-HANG (T-HANGARS TAXIWAY)
705
01/01/1992
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
13,043.23 09/11/2013
21
75.00
TW T-HANG (T-HANGARS TAXIWAY)
710
01/01/1986
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
5,895.13 09/11/2013
27
43.00
TW T-HANG (T-HANGARS TAXIWAY)
720
01/01/1986
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
6,460.00 09/11/2013
27
47.00
TW T-HANG (T-HANGARS TAXIWAY)
725
01/01/1997
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
23,406.62 09/11/2013
16
62.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
7 of 20
NetworkID: PIE
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
AP HOLD ( HOLDING A PRON AT TWS M
& F)
4205
01/01/1984
AC
APRON
P
0
15,819.38 01/30/2015
31
41.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4105
01/02/2003
APC
APRON
P
0
396,234.00 01/30/2015
12
55.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4123
01/02/2003
APC
APRON
P
0
43,739.00 01/30/2015
12
53.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4130
12/25/2015
APC
APRON
P
0
9,563.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4155
01/02/2003
AAC
APRON
P
0
80,944.00 01/30/2015
12
62.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4157
12/25/2015
AAC
APRON
P
0
84,447.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4165
01/01/2012
PCC
APRON
P
0
66,409.00 01/01/2012
0
100.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4170
12/25/2015
AAC
APRON
P
0
18,816.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4175
01/01/1942
PCC
APRON
P
0
31,006.00 01/30/2015
73
3.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4176
12/25/1955
AC
APRON
P
0
10,965.00 01/30/2015
60
4.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4177
12/25/2015
APC
APRON
P
0
20,605.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4178
01/01/2013
APC
APRON
P
0
49,146.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4179
10/01/2011
APC
APRON
P
0
70,111.00 10/01/2011
0
100.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4180
01/01/1968
AC
APRON
P
0
126,695.00 01/30/2015
47
25.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4183
01/01/2013
AAC
APRON
P
0
39,947.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4185
01/01/2013
APC
APRON
P
0
12,820.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4190
01/01/1942
PCC
APRON
P
0
18,650.00 01/30/2015
73
28.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4195
01/01/1942
PCC
APRON
P
0
11,250.00 01/30/2015
73
12.00
AP MAIN (APRON)
4199
01/01/2003
PCC
APRON
P
0
78,779.00 01/30/2015
12
51.00
AP RU RW22 (RUN-UP APRON AT RW
22)
4305
01/01/1984
AC
APRON
P
0
14,458.50 01/30/2015
31
37.00
FBO CONN ( FBO CONNE CTOR)
125
12/25/2015
APC
APRON
P
0
9,856.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
FBO CONN ( FBO CONNE CTOR)
127
12/25/2015
APC
APRON
P
0
12,381.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6115
01/02/2003
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
50,000.00 01/30/2015
12
72.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6120
01/02/2003
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
25,000.00 01/30/2015
12
78.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6135
01/02/2003
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
20,000.00 01/30/2015
12
74.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6140
01/02/2003
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
10,000.00 01/30/2015
12
77.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6145
01/02/2003
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
30,000.00 01/30/2015
12
71.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
8 of 20
NetworkID: PIE
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6150
01/02/2003
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
15,000.00 01/30/2015
12
76.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6155
01/02/2003
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
180,000.00 01/30/2015
12
63.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6160
01/02/2003
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
90,000.00 01/30/2015
12
75.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6165
01/02/2003
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
70,000.00 01/30/2015
12
72.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6170
01/02/2003
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
35,000.00 01/30/2015
12
74.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6175
01/02/2003
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
290,000.00 01/30/2015
12
65.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6180
01/02/2003
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
145,000.00 01/30/2015
12
79.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6185
01/02/2003
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
210,000.00 01/30/2015
12
54.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6190
01/02/2003
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
105,000.00 01/30/2015
12
82.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6195
01/01/2013
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
30,000.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6196
01/01/2013
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
15,000.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6197
01/01/2006
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
92,900.00 01/30/2015
9
52.00
RW 18L-36R (RUNWAY 18L-36R)
6198
01/01/2006
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
46,450.00 01/30/2015
9
82.00
RW 4-22 (RUNWAY 4-2 2)
6205
01/01/2012
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
474,872.96 11/01/2012
0
100.00
RW 4-22 (RUNWAY 4-2 2)
6210
01/01/2012
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
237,436.49 01/01/2012
0
100.00
RW 4-22 (RUNWAY 4-2 2)
6215
01/01/2012
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
55,071.57 01/01/2012
0
100.00
RW 4-22 (RUNWAY 4-2 2)
6220
01/01/2012
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
27,535.79 01/01/2012
0
100.00
RW 4-22 (RUNWAY 4-2 2)
6225
01/01/2006
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
40,300.00 01/30/2015
9
67.00
RW 4-22 (RUNWAY 4-2 2)
6230
01/01/2006
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
20,150.00 01/30/2015
9
23.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6315
01/01/1994
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
211,743.00 01/30/2015
21
42.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6320
01/01/1994
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
105,872.00 01/30/2015
21
43.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6325
01/02/2003
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
34,045.00 01/30/2015
12
49.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6330
01/02/2003
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
17,023.00 01/30/2015
12
74.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6335
01/01/1992
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
35,000.00 01/30/2015
23
44.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6340
01/01/1992
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
17,500.00 01/30/2015
23
32.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6345
01/01/1992
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
45,000.00 01/30/2015
23
40.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6350
01/01/1992
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
22,500.00 01/30/2015
23
47.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
9 of 20
NetworkID: PIE
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6355
01/01/1994
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
80,000.00 01/30/2015
21
37.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6360
01/01/1994
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
40,000.00 01/30/2015
21
65.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6365
01/01/1994
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
51,500.00 01/30/2015
21
46.00
RW 9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6370
01/01/1994
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
25,750.00 01/30/2015
21
59.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
112
01/01/1990
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
3,582.70 01/30/2015
25
66.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
114
01/01/1968
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
2,360.73 01/30/2015
47
33.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
115
12/25/2015
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
203,420.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
117
01/01/1990
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
3,109.00 01/30/2015
25
50.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
119
01/01/1968
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
3,423.86 01/30/2015
47
33.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
130
12/25/2015
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
361,676.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
135
12/25/2015
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
40,056.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
140
12/25/2015
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
17,486.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
150
12/25/2015
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
21,882.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
155
12/25/2015
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
7,969.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
158
12/25/2015
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
16,692.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
160
01/01/2006
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
152,838.00 01/30/2015
9
39.00
TW A2 (TAXIWAY A2)
165
12/25/2015
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
60,458.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW A3 (TAXIWAY A3)
168
12/25/2015
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
60,311.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW A4 (TAXIWAY A4)
170
12/25/2015
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
58,588.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW A5 (TAXIWAY A5)
175
12/25/2015
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
56,987.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW A6 (TAXIWAY A6)
180
12/25/2015
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
58,658.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
205
01/01/1958
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
13,950.00 01/30/2015
57
56.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
210
01/01/1992
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
6,353.14 01/30/2015
23
64.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
215
01/01/2012
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
14,952.00 01/01/2012
0
100.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
220
01/01/1965
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
40,656.00 01/30/2015
50
28.00
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
305
01/01/1992
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
42,705.81 01/30/2015
23
36.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
10 of 20
NetworkID: PIE
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
TW D (TAXIWAY D)
405
01/01/1990
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
5,250.00 01/30/2015
25
52.00
TW D (TAXIWAY D)
407
01/01/1996
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
25,816.41 01/30/2015
19
52.00
TW D (TAXIWAY D)
410
01/01/1992
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
16,196.00 01/30/2015
23
46.00
TW F (TAXIWAY F)
605
01/01/1984
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
12,798.00 01/30/2015
31
37.00
TW F (TAXIWAY F)
607
01/01/2012
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
8,127.00 01/01/2012
0
100.00
TW F (TAXIWAY F)
610
01/01/1989
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
7,653.56 01/30/2015
26
41.00
TW F (TAXIWAY F)
615
01/01/1989
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
25,000.00 01/30/2015
26
56.00
TW F (TAXIWAY F)
620
12/25/2015
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
7,752.98 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW F (TAXIWAY F)
626
12/25/2015
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
10,413.60 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW F (TAXIWAY F)
630
12/25/2015
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
27,595.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW H (TAXIWAY H)
810
01/01/1965
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
64,486.00 01/30/2015
50
6.00
TW H (TAXIWAY H)
815
01/01/2015
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
57,784.00 01/01/2015
0
100.00
TW J (TAXIWAY J)
1005
01/01/1984
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
11,640.00 01/30/2015
31
46.00
TW J (TAXIWAY J)
1010
01/01/2012
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
8,369.00 01/01/2012
0
100.00
TW K (TAXIWAY K)
1105
01/01/1970
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
21,520.15 01/30/2015
45
73.00
TW K (TAXIWAY K)
1110
01/01/1984
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
19,512.49 01/30/2015
31
78.00
TW K (TAXIWAY K)
1120
01/01/1984
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
1,969.32 01/30/2015
31
55.00
TW K (TAXIWAY K)
1125
01/01/1984
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
2,136.50 01/30/2015
31
58.00
TW K (TAXIWAY K)
1130
01/01/1984
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
2,268.24 01/30/2015
31
42.00
TW L (TAXIWAY L)
1205
12/25/2015
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
20,812.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW L (TAXIWAY L)
1215
12/25/2015
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
13,483.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW L (TAXIWAY L)
1245
01/01/1986
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
18,679.00 01/30/2015
29
32.00
TW L (TAXIWAY L)
1247
12/25/2015
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
33,633.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW M (TAXIWAY M)
1325
01/01/1984
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
213,248.00 01/30/2015
31
42.00
TW M (TAXIWAY M)
1330
01/01/1984
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
8,134.00 01/30/2015
31
33.00
TW M (TAXIWAY M)
1335
01/01/2012
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
10,287.00 01/01/2012
0
100.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
11 of 20
NetworkID: PIE
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
TW P (TAXIWAY P)
1250
12/25/2015
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
28,635.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW P (TAXIWAY P)
1255
12/25/2015
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
52,339.00 12/25/2015
0
100.00
TW T (APRO N TAXIWA Y SOUTH O F
MAIN APRON)
2050
01/01/1997
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
175,302.00 01/30/2015
18
22.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
12 of 20
NetworkID: SPG
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
AP (APRO N)
4105
01/01/1991
AC
APRON
T
0
44,489.04 10/08/2014
23
69.00
AP (APRO N)
4110
01/01/1993
AC
APRON
P
0
128,902.35 10/08/2014
21
61.00
AP (APRO N)
4120
01/01/2002
AAC
APRON
P
0
73,715.58 10/08/2014
12
55.00
AP (APRO N)
4135
01/01/2002
AAC
APRON
P
0
82,247.00 10/08/2014
12
65.00
AP (APRO N)
4140
01/01/2006
AC
APRON
T
0
21,254.96 10/08/2014
8
75.00
AP (APRO N)
4145
01/01/1965
AC
APRON
P
0
14,185.63 10/08/2014
49
59.00
AP MID (APRON MIDFIELD)
4405
01/01/2013
AC
APRON
P
0
85,370.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
AP MID (APRON MIDFIELD)
4410
01/01/2013
AC
APRON
P
0
15,790.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
AP MID (APRON MIDFIELD)
4415
01/01/2013
AC
APRON
P
0
6,767.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
AP NW (A PRON NORTHWEST)
4310
01/01/2006
AC
APRON
P
0
108,494.77 10/08/2014
8
89.00
AP NW (A PRON NORTHWEST)
4315
01/01/2011
AC
APRON
P
0
32,357.38 10/08/2014
3
90.00
AP W (WE ST APRON)
4210
11/01/2002
AC
APRON
T
0
74,621.08 10/08/2014
12
67.00
RW 18-36 (RUNWAY 18 -36)
6105
01/01/1992
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
286,400.00 10/08/2014
22
61.00
RW 18-36 (RUNWAY 18 -36)
6110
01/01/1992
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
143,200.00 10/08/2014
22
59.00
RW 7-25 (RUNWAY 7-2 5)
6205
01/01/1991
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
18,750.00 10/08/2014
23
62.00
RW 7-25 (RUNWAY 7-2 5)
6207
01/01/1965
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
22,950.00 10/08/2014
49
38.00
RW 7-25 (RUNWAY 7-2 5)
6208
01/01/2012
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
21,525.00 01/01/2012
0
100.00
RW 7-25 (RUNWAY 7-2 5)
6210
01/01/1965
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
170,116.00 10/08/2014
49
60.00
RW 7-25 (RUNWAY 7-2 5)
6215
01/01/1991
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
30,124.55 10/08/2014
23
72.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
105
01/01/1987
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
15,000.00 10/08/2014
27
54.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
110
01/01/1987
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
21,000.00 10/08/2014
27
59.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
115
01/01/1987
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
63,616.68 10/08/2014
27
64.00
TW A1 (TAXIWAY ALPHA 1)
610
01/01/1987
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
11,013.00 10/08/2014
27
27.00
TW A1 (TAXIWAY ALPHA 1)
620
01/01/2013
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
11,150.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A2 (TAXIWAY A2)
410
01/01/1991
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
5,039.47 10/08/2014
23
60.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
205
01/01/1988
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
87,561.00 10/08/2014
26
69.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
13 of 20
NetworkID: SPG
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
210
01/01/1988
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
17,315.07 10/08/2014
26
64.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
215
01/01/1965
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
3,064.65 10/08/2014
49
41.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
250
01/01/1984
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
2,578.25 10/08/2014
30
70.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
251
01/01/1989
APC
TAXIWAY
P
0
3,286.50 10/08/2014
25
37.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
252
01/01/1989
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
6,613.30 10/08/2014
25
59.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
253
01/01/1987
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
3,405.49 10/08/2014
27
26.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
254
01/01/1979
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
3,707.45 10/08/2014
35
61.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
256
01/01/1989
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
2,468.25 10/08/2014
25
70.00
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
301
01/01/1989
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
3,886.03 10/08/2014
25
21.00
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
305
01/01/1950
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
61,204.00 10/08/2014
64
21.00
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
307
01/01/1991
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
34,987.00 10/08/2014
23
58.00
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
308
01/01/1991
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
38,125.00 10/08/2014
23
68.00
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
310
01/01/1987
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
27,794.00 10/08/2014
27
54.00
TW D (TAXIWAY DELTA)
150
01/01/1991
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
7,347.96 10/08/2014
23
64.00
TW D (TAXIWAY DELTA)
155
01/01/1991
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
7,303.60 10/08/2014
23
64.00
TW D (TAXIWAY DELTA)
160
01/01/1991
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
2,171.50 10/08/2014
23
69.00
TW D (TAXIWAY DELTA)
505
01/01/2011
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
8,728.78 10/08/2014
3
89.00
TW D (TAXIWAY DELTA)
510
01/01/2002
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
33,920.07 10/08/2014
12
70.00
TW D (TAXIWAY DELTA)
515
01/01/2011
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
23,102.19 10/08/2014
3
92.00
TW D1 (TAX IWAY D1)
615
01/01/2011
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
5,505.23 10/08/2014
3
66.00
TW N (NORTH TAXIWAY )
710
01/01/2002
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
33,564.14 10/08/2014
12
68.00
TW N (NORTH TAXIWAY )
720
01/01/2002
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
13,336.78 10/08/2014
12
58.00
TW N (NORTH TAXIWAY )
730
01/01/2002
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
12,506.24 10/08/2014
12
71.00
TW N (NORTH TAXIWAY )
740
01/01/2002
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
33,186.37 10/08/2014
12
67.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
14 of 20
NetworkID: TPF
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
AP (APRO N)
4110
01/01/2011
AAC
APRON
P
0
150,952.39 10/06/2014
3
84.00
AP (APRO N)
4140
01/01/1986
AC
APRON
P
0
14,966.77 10/06/2014
28
63.00
AP RU (A PRON)
5105
01/01/2008
AAC
APRON
P
0
3,153.64 10/06/2014
6
70.00
AP RU (A PRON)
5110
01/01/2008
AAC
APRON
P
0
4,385.84 10/06/2014
6
75.00
AP RU (A PRON)
5115
01/01/2007
AC
APRON
P
0
16,251.05 10/06/2014
7
94.00
RW 18-36 (RUNWAY 18 -36)
6205
01/01/2008
AAC
RUNWAY
S
0
191,016.57 10/06/2014
6
85.00
RW 4-22 (RUNWAY 4-2 2)
6103
01/01/2007
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
32,500.00 10/06/2014
7
93.00
RW 4-22 (RUNWAY 4-2 2)
6105
01/01/2001
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
310,500.00 10/06/2014
13
58.00
RW 4-22 (RUNWAY 4-2 2)
6110
01/01/2007
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
17,800.00 10/06/2014
7
91.00
T/L HANG ( TAXILANE TO EAST
HANGARS)
800
01/01/2011
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
29,573.00 10/06/2014
3
94.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
103
01/01/2007
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
5,615.69 10/06/2014
7
84.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
104
01/01/2007
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
9,170.00 10/06/2014
7
80.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
105
01/01/1992
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
103,252.19 10/06/2014
22
60.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
115
01/01/2008
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
11,155.15 10/06/2014
6
88.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
120
01/01/2008
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
5,876.45 10/06/2014
6
80.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
630
01/01/2007
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
4,673.45 10/06/2014
7
94.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
150
01/01/1992
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
4,673.00 10/06/2014
22
57.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
205
01/01/2011
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
11,793.45 10/06/2014
3
93.00
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
305
01/01/2010
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
7,165.00 10/06/2014
4
77.00
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
310
01/01/1965
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
16,840.00 10/06/2014
49
55.00
TW CENTER (TAXIWAY CENTER)
315
01/01/2008
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
11,056.09 10/06/2014
6
80.00
TW CENTER (TAXIWAY CENTER)
320
01/01/2008
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
11,536.12 10/06/2014
6
90.00
TW CENTER (TAXIWAY CENTER)
325
01/01/2008
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
33,247.46 10/06/2014
6
89.00
TW D (TAXIWAY D)
420
01/01/2011
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
41,269.85 10/06/2014
3
94.00
TW D (TAXIWAY D)
425
01/01/1992
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
5,338.00 10/06/2014
22
45.00
TW E (TAXIWAY E)
505
01/01/2005
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
2,353.21 10/06/2014
9
87.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
15 of 20
NetworkID: TPF
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
TW E (TAXIWAY E)
510
01/01/1965
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
11,125.79 10/06/2014
49
59.00
TW E (TAXIWAY E)
515
01/01/2011
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
4,952.00 10/06/2014
3
89.00
TW E (TAXIWAY E)
650
01/01/2008
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
5,470.82 10/06/2014
6
90.00
TW F (TAXIWAY F)
605
01/01/2008
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
88,517.00 10/06/2014
6
89.00
TW F (TAXIWAY F)
610
01/01/2008
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
9,627.00 10/06/2014
6
69.00
TW G (TAXIWAY G)
750
01/01/2011
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
12,333.00 10/06/2014
3
94.00
TW T-HANG (TAXIWAY TO T-HANGA RS)
705
01/01/1964
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
72,024.05 10/06/2014
50
53.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
16 of 20
NetworkID: VDF
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
AP A - S (SOUTH APRON "A")
4105
01/01/1986
AC
APRON
P
0
77,867.94 12/10/2014
28
70.00
AP A - S (SOUTH APRON "A")
4110
01/01/1986
AC
APRON
P
0
114,380.62 12/10/2014
28
72.00
AP A - S (SOUTH APRON "A")
4115
01/01/1986
AC
APRON
P
0
4,469.52 12/10/2014
28
76.00
AP B - N (NORTH APRON "B")
4205
01/01/1991
AC
APRON
P
0
131,692.43 12/10/2014
23
73.00
AP B - N (NORTH APRON "B")
4210
01/01/1986
AC
APRON
P
0
100,787.54 12/10/2014
28
100.00
AP C (APRON C)
4305
01/01/1999
AC
APRON
T
0
424,105.21 12/10/2014
15
70.00
AP C (APRON C)
4405
01/01/1999
AC
APRON
P
0
70,926.49 12/10/2014
15
73.00
AP RU (RUN-UP AP RON)
5105
01/01/1986
AAC
APRON
P
0
24,993.73 12/10/2014
28
75.00
AP RU (RUN-UP AP RON)
5110
01/01/1986
AC
APRON
P
0
3,338.00 12/10/2014
28
65.00
AP T-HANG (T-HANGARS APRON)
4310
01/01/1974
AC
APRON
P
0
147,914.37 12/10/2014
40
100.00
AP T-HANG (T-HANGARS APRON)
4315
12/25/2009
AC
APRON
P
0
12,031.00 12/10/2014
5
83.00
AP W (APRON WEST)
4505
01/01/1999
AC
APRON
P
0
28,314.42 12/10/2014
15
65.00
AP W (APRON WEST)
4510
01/01/1999
AC
APRON
P
0
37,083.69 12/10/2014
15
74.00
RW 18-36 (RUNWAY 18 -36)
6105
01/01/1986
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
243,145.00 12/10/2014
28
70.00
RW 5-23 (RUNWAY 5-2 3)
6205
01/01/1999
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
500,000.00 12/10/2014
15
71.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
105
01/01/1986
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
115,430.00 12/10/2014
28
66.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
120
01/01/1986
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
2,772.00 12/10/2014
28
71.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
140
01/01/1986
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
3,862.00 12/10/2014
28
70.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
160
01/01/1986
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
3,861.00 12/10/2014
28
65.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
180
01/01/1986
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
4,111.00 12/10/2014
28
72.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
205
01/01/1986
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
2,293.36 12/10/2014
28
68.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
210
01/01/1989
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
15,267.65 12/10/2014
25
32.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
250
01/01/1989
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
7,286.29 12/10/2014
25
34.00
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
405
01/01/2001
AC
TAXIWAY
S
0
21,766.85 12/10/2014
13
72.00
TW D (TAXIWAY D)
170
01/01/1986
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
5,063.00 12/10/2014
28
66.00
TW D (TAXIWAY D)
305
01/01/2001
AC
TAXIWAY
T
0
31,410.64 12/10/2014
13
70.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
17 of 20
NetworkID: VDF
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
TW E (TW E)
505
01/01/1999
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
145,753.06 12/10/2014
15
79.00
TW E1 (TW E-1)
510
01/01/1999
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
9,577.05 12/10/2014
15
76.00
TW E2 (TW E-2)
515
01/01/1999
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
9,510.95 12/10/2014
15
76.00
TW E3 (TW E3)
520
01/01/1999
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
9,875.77 12/10/2014
15
80.00
TW E4 (TW E-4)
525
01/01/1999
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
8,961.31 12/10/2014
15
80.00
TW F (TW F)
605
01/01/1999
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
98,237.43 12/10/2014
15
76.00
TW F (TW F)
610
01/01/1999
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
4,871.00 12/10/2014
15
72.00
TW F (TW F)
615
01/01/1999
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
4,552.00 12/10/2014
15
70.00
TW J (TW J)
705
01/01/1999
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
61,282.28 12/10/2014
15
69.00
TW J (TW J)
710
01/01/1999
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
31,786.25 12/10/2014
15
69.00
TW J (TW J)
715
01/01/1999
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
12,020.38 12/10/2014
15
71.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
18 of 20
NetworkID: ZPH
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
AP E (EA ST APRON)
5405
12/25/1999
PCC
APRON
P
0
34,097.36 09/09/2013
14
12.00
AP NE (NORTHEAST APRON)
5105
01/01/1942
AC
APRON
P
0
27,750.00 09/09/2013
71
40.00
AP NW (NORTHWEST A PRON)
4105
01/01/1970
PCC
APRON
P
0
2,160.00 09/09/2013
43
59.00
AP NW (NORTHWEST A PRON)
4110
01/01/1982
AC
APRON
P
0
5,095.36 09/09/2013
31
64.00
AP NW (NORTHWEST A PRON)
4115
01/01/2004
AC
APRON
P
0
12,547.35 09/09/2013
9
97.00
AP RU 22 (APRON RUN-UP 22)
5115
01/01/2013
AC
APRON
P
0
47,922.50 01/01/2013
0
100.00
AP T-HANG (APRON T-HANGARS )
5305
12/25/1999
AC
APRON
P
0
108,938.27 09/09/2013
14
46.00
AP T-HANG 2 (APRON T-HANG 2)
5505
01/01/2008
AC
APRON
P
0
85,817.46 09/09/2013
5
80.00
AP T-HANG 3 (APRON T-HANG 3)
5510
01/01/2008
AC
APRON
P
0
164,471.32 09/09/2013
5
84.00
AP TW D ( APRON AT END OF TW D)
5205
12/25/1999
AC
APRON
P
0
26,359.62 09/09/2013
14
51.00
RW 18-36 (RUNWAY 18 -36)
6205
01/01/2002
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
473,437.11 09/09/2013
11
67.00
RW 5-23 (RUNWAY 5-2 3)
6105
01/01/2013
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
229,400.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
RW 5-23 (RUNWAY 5-2 3)
6107
01/01/2013
AAC
RUNWAY
P
0
229,400.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
RW 5-23 (RUNWAY 5-2 3)
6110
01/01/2013
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
20,600.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
RW 5-23 (RUNWAY 5-2 3)
6115
01/01/2013
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
20,600.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
RW 5-23 (RUNWAY 5-2 3)
6219
01/01/2013
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
1,000.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
105
01/01/1990
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
72,269.00 09/09/2013
23
60.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
106
01/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
11,603.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
107
01/01/1990
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
10,000.00 09/09/2013
23
64.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
110
01/01/1989
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
188,930.00 09/09/2013
24
62.00
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
120
01/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
7,558.50 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A-1 (TAXIWAY A-1)
115
01/01/1996
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
17,528.00 09/09/2013
17
64.00
TW A-1 (TAXIWAY A-1)
117
01/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
14,976.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A-2 (TAXIWAY A-2)
305
01/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
T
0
20,430.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW A-2 (TAXIWAY A-2)
310
01/01/1990
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
15,330.00 09/09/2013
23
54.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
205
01/01/1942
AC
TAXIWAY
T
0
49,464.00 09/09/2013
71
25.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
Pavement Database: FDOT
Branch ID
Section ID
Last
Const.
Date
Surface
Use
19 of 20
NetworkID: ZPH
Rank
Lanes
True Area
(SqFt)
Last
Inspection
Date
Age
At
Inspection
PCI
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
210
01/01/1989
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
17,898.00 09/09/2013
24
33.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
212
01/01/1990
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
17,871.46 09/09/2013
23
59.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
215
01/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
11,738.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
220
01/01/1989
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
133,310.00 09/09/2013
24
5.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
225
01/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
6,848.00 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
230
01/01/1942
PCC
TAXIWAY
P
0
15,000.00 09/09/2013
71
12.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
235
01/01/2013
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
2,233.36 01/01/2013
0
100.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
240
01/01/2002
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
31,377.52 09/09/2013
11
54.00
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
245
01/01/2002
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
2,300.12 09/09/2013
11
28.00
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
320
01/01/2010
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
69,379.41 09/09/2013
3
90.00
TW C-1 (TAX IWAY C-1)
505
01/01/1982
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
6,000.00 09/09/2013
31
62.00
TW C-1 (TAX IWAY C-1)
510
01/01/2010
AAC
TAXIWAY
P
0
4,443.84 09/09/2013
3
93.00
TW D (TAXIWAY D)
405
12/25/1999
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
25,063.48 09/09/2013
14
54.00
TW E (TAXIWAY E)
610
01/01/2002
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
32,964.38 09/09/2013
11
95.00
TW F (TAXIWAY F)
630
01/01/2002
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
24,348.01 09/09/2013
11
65.00
Section Condition Report
Date: 5 /15/2015
20 of 20
Pavement Database: FDOT
Age
Category
Average
Age At
Inspection
Total
Area
(SqFt)
Number
of
Sections
Arithmetic
Average
PCI
PCI
Standard
Deviation
Weighted
Average
PCI
0-02
0.07
4,263,812.10
86
99.86
0.91
99.86
03-05
3.47
1,584,983.18
30
91.07
8.65
92.75
06-10
7.22
1,010,673.62
27
78.30
17.51
72.87
11-15
12.95
5,966,449.82
82
64.68
13.46
65.17
16-20
17.20
430,147.01
10
56.50
13.54
44.80
21-25
22.80
2,896,405.03
61
54.64
14.48
55.25
26-30
27.65
1,457,681.10
34
59.03
17.73
65.58
31-35
31.31
316,787.24
13
50.46
13.49
44.80
36-40
38.40
251,489.18
5
63.00
21.42
80.80
over 40
59.50
3,573,295.50
38
42.45
18.71
49.47
All
17.44
21,751,723.78
386
70.54
23.63
69.95
APPENDIX C
ž DISTRICT AIRFIELD PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX
RATING EXHIBITS
105
PCI = 50
135
PCI = 20
TAXIWAY A
130
PCI = 59
TW A3
TW A5
125
PCI = 20
TW
B1
110
PCI = 53
215
PCI = 58
RW 9-27
TW
9
27
RUNWAY 9-27 150' x 7,002'
6110
PCI = 58
B1
TW A1
TW A6
TW A9
TW A
TAXIWAY A
140
PCI = 69
NORTH
145
PCI = 72
21
TW A
120
PCI = 41
6105
PCI = 46
4150
PCI = 57
216
PCI = 58
TAXIWAY B1
4145
PCI = 56
AP NE
4147
PCI = 55
TA
XIW
AY
B
111
PCI = 77
4140
PCI = 72
4125
PCI = 63
TW
B2
112
PCI = 44
205
PCI = 38
4135
PCI = 63
220
PCI = 38
4120
PCI = 53
4130
PCI = 36
4110
PCI = 52
4105
PCI = 48
4115
PCI = 52
TW
B
RW
3- 2
1
6210
PCI = 55
6205
PCI = 53
TW
225
PCI = 59
3-2
1
1 50
'x
5 ,0
15
'
B3
210
PCI = 66
RU
NW
AY
LEGEND
RW 13-31
TW A
AY
B
AP S
TA
XIW
4225
PCI = 100
TW
B4
4220
PCI = 67
3
4215
PCI = 74
230
PCI = 62
"SECTION NO."
"PCI NO."
AP S
4205
PCI = 64
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
4210
PCI = 67
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
BROOKSVILLE - TAMPA BAY REGIONAL AIRPORT
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2013
HERNANDO COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
NORTH
AP MAIN
4105
PCI = 54
RUNWAY 18-36 100' x 2,666' TURF
AP T-HANG
4205
PCI = 61
210
PCI = 55
TW CONN
4120
PCI = 62
215
PCI = 100
117
PCI = 89
TW HANG
205
PCI = 59
105
PCI = 99
116
PCI = 99
119
PCI = 89
109
PCI = 60
TW A
RUNWAY 9-27 75' x 4,557'
27
9
RW 18-36
131
PCI = 99
130
PCI = 61
LEGEND
RW 9-27
6115
PCI = 66
6105
PCI = 69
115
PCI = 56
RW 13-31
118
PCI = 40
6110
PCI = 68
6120
PCI = 64
TW A
AP S
"SECTION NO."
"PCI NO."
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2013
CRYSTAL RIVER AIRPORT
CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
NO
RT
H
4305
PCI = 57
4105
PCI = 65
4405
PCI = 39
4310
PCI = 36
4205
PCI = 71
4605
PCI = 100
4505
PCI = 54
4410
PCI = 54
130
PCI = 52
AP
N
135
PCI = 100
110
PCI = 100
145
PCI = 100
140
PCI = 100
TW A1
150
PCI = 100
5105
PCI = 51
16
34
105
PCI = 100
TW A2
TW A3
TW A
RUNWAY 16-34 75' x 4,108'
RW 16-34
107
PCI = 100
6130
PCI = 100
6120
PCI = 100
125
PCI = 100
120
PCI = 100
6110
PCI = 100
115
PCI = 100
6105
PCI = 100
LEGEND
RW 13-31
TW A
AP S
"SECTION NO."
"PCI NO."
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2015
CLEARWATER AIRPARK
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
NORTH
6105
PCI = 97
110
PCI = 100
115
PCI = 94
120
PCI = 100
125
PCI =100
130
PCI = 100
205
PCI = 63
4020
PCI = 94
105
PCI = 100
4205
PCI = 100
4005
PCI = 59
4210
PCI = 100
4015
PCI = 94
LEGEND
RW 13-31
TW A
AP S
"SECTION NO."
"PCI NO."
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2013
INVERNESS AIRPORT
CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
NORTH
TAXIWAYS
120
PCI = 100
150
PCI = 50
160
PCI = 55
165
PCI = 100
170
PCI = 100
174
PCI = 100
175
PCI = 95
710
PCI = 43
OTHERS
4120
PCI = 76
4140
PCI = 89
720
PCI = 47
725
PCI = 62
HANGAR
705
PCI = 75
TW T-HANG
HANGAR
4105
PCI = 100
4135
PCI = 74
HANGAR
4110
PCI = 68
HANGAR
HANGAR
750
PCI = 100
HANGAR
AP
HANGAR
HANGAR
HANGAR
TW HANG
6103
PCI = 51
115
PCI = 58
110
PCI = 62
4130
PCI = 68
TW A
TW A
28
10
RUNWAY 10-28 75' x 3,948'
RW 10-28
6115
PCI = 61
LEGEND
6120
PCI = 61
RW 13-31
TW A
AP S
"SECTION NO."
"PCI NO."
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2013
PLANT CITY AIRPORT
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
TW B
NORTH
9
TW
C
RW 9-27
TW
TW T
P
AP MAIN
TW
H
L
TW
AP MAIN
4
TW A
TW
TW A2
F
TW A
RUNWAY 18R-36L 75' x 4,000'
TW A3
TW A4
22
TW A5
4-
TW A6
TW A
D
RW
TW
TW A
RUNWAY 18L-36R 150' x 9,730'
18L
36R
TW
F
TAXIWAYS
114
PCI = 33
115
PCI = 100
117
PCI = 50
119
PCI = 33
125
PCI = 100
127
PCI = 100
130
PCI = 100
135
PCI = 100
140
PCI = 100
150
PCI = 100
155
PCI = 100
158
PCI = 100
160
PCI = 39
165
PCI = 100
168
PCI = 100
170
PCI = 100
175
PCI = 100
180
PCI = 100
205
PCI = 56
210
PCI = 64
215
PCI = 100
220
PCI = 28
305
PCI = 36
405
PCI = 52
407
PCI = 52
410
PCI = 46
605
PCI = 37
607
PCI = 100
610
PCI = 41
615
PCI = 56
620
PCI = 100
626
PCI = 100
630
PCI = 100
810
PCI = 6
815
PCI = 100
1005
PCI = 46
1010
PCI = 100
1105
PCI = 73
1110
PCI = 78
1120
PCI = 55
1125
PCI = 58
1130
PCI = 42
1205
PCI = 100
1215
PCI = 100
1245
PCI = 32
1247
PCI = 100
1250
PCI = 100
1255
PCI = 100
1325
PCI = 42
1330
PCI = 33
1335
PCI = 100
2050
PCI = 22
AP
112
PCI = 66
HO
RUNWAY
9-27 15
0' x 4,712
'
LD
RU
AY
NW
RUWAYS
TW
22
4-
6135
PCI = 74
6140
PCI = 77
6145
PCI = 71
6150
PCI = 76
6155
PCI = 63
6160
PCI = 75
6165
PCI = 72
6170
PCI = 74
6175
PCI = 65
6180
PCI = 79
6185
PCI = 54
6190
PCI = 82
6195
PCI = 100
6196
PCI = 100
6197
PCI = 52
6198
PCI = 82
6205
PCI = 100
6210
PCI = 100
6215
PCI = 100
6220
PCI = 100
6225
PCI = 67
x
6120
PCI = 78
M
0'
15
6115
PCI = 72
3'
90
5,
TW
6320
PCI = 43
6325
PCI = 49
6330
PCI = 74
6350
PCI = 47
6355
PCI = 37
6360
PCI = 65
6365
PCI = 46
6370
PCI = 59
6335
PCI = 44
6340
PCI = 32
6345
PCI = 40
LEGEND
4105
PCI = 55
4123
PCI = 53
4130
PCI = 100
4155
PCI = 62
4157
PCI = 100
4165
PCI = 100
4170
PCI = 100
4175
PCI = 3
4176
PCI = 4
4177
PCI = 100
4178
PCI = 100
4179
PCI = 100
4180
PCI = 25
4183
PCI = 100
4185
PCI = 100
4190
PCI = 28
4195
PCI = 12
4199
PCI = 51
4205
PCI = 41
4305
PCI = 37
RW 13-31
TW A
K
6315
PCI = 42
OTHERS
TW
6230
PCI = 23
J
AP S
27
RW
422
"SECTION NO."
"PCI NO."
22
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2015
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
NORTH
6207
PCI = 38
4310
PCI = 89
6205
PCI = 62
AP NW
4105
PCI = 69
740
PCI = 67
AP
730
PCI = 71
4110
PCI = 61
410
PCI = 60
4140
PCI = 75
6208
PCI = 100
105
PCI = 54
4145
PCI = 59
310
PCI = 54
TAXIWAYS
110
PCI = 59
RW
4210
PCI = 67
115
PCI = 64
308
PCI = 68
505
PCI = 89
620
PCI = 100
5
7-2
6210
PCI = 60
AP
OTHERS
W
4120
PCI = 55
TW
4315
PCI = 90
A
510
PCI = 70
TW
AY
NW
RU
D
-2
07
4410
PCI = 100
610
PCI = 27
5' x
57
4135
PCI = 65
4405
PCI = 100
AP
'
77
3,6
615
PCI = 66
720
PCI = 58
TW A1
307
PCI = 58
710
PCI = 68
305
PCI = 21
TW
4415
PCI = 100
301
PCI = 21
A
205
PCI = 69
N
TW
TW C
251
PCI = 37
252
PCI = 59
515
PCI = 92
LEGEND
210
PCI = 64
215
PCI = 41
160
PCI = 69
RW 13-31
TW A
TW B
250
PCI = 70
256
PCI = 70
36
18
AP S
RUNWAY 18-36 150' x 2,864'
RW 18-36
6105
PCI = 61
6110
PCI = 59
253
PCI = 26
155
PCI = 64
254
PCI = 61
6215
PCI = 72
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
25
150
PCI = 64
"SECTION NO."
"PCI NO."
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2015
ALBERT WHITTED AIRPORT
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
NORTH
18
AP RU
6205
PCI = 85
6110
PCI = 91
RW 18-36
5110
PCI = 75
605
PCI = 89
105
PCI = 60
TW F
22
5115
PCI = 94
610
PCI = 69
120
PCI = 80
4140
PCI = 63
TAXIWAYS
305
PCI = 77
310
PCI = 55
315
PCI = 80
325
PCI = 89
420
PCI = 94
505
PCI = 87
510
PCI = 59
705
PCI = 53
750
PCI = 94
422
205
PCI = 93
320
PCI = 90
RW
115
PCI = 88
425
PCI = 45
TW G
6105
PCI = 58
0
HGR. 680
TW E
GE
TW T-HAN
D
515
PCI = 89
0
HGR. 340
TW
800
PCI = 94
0
HGR. 660
AP
650
PCI = 90
HANGAR
3800
4000
HANGAR
4200
18-36
RUNWAY
HANGAR
'
75' x 2,687
TW T-HANG
150
PCI = 57
422
10
0'
x3
,5
80
'
4400
HANGAR
RU
NW
AY
TW
HANGAR
4600
B
RW 13-31
TW A
36
TW
A
0
HGR. 480
630
PCI = 94
LEGEND
4110
PCI = 84
0
HGR. 540
AP S
AP RU
AP
5105
PCI = 70
6103
PCI = 93
4
103
PCI = 84
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
104
PCI = 80
"SECTION NO."
"PCI NO."
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2015
PETER O. KNIGHT AIRPORT
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
NORTH
TAMPA BY-PASS CANAL
6105
PCI = 70
RUNWAY 18-36 75' x 3,259'
RW 18-36
18
36
120
PCI = 71
TW A
4105
PCI = 70
TW D
HANGAR
105
PCI = 66
305
PCI = 70
AP B-N
TW
E1
HANGAR
HANGAR
HANGAR
HANGAR
HANGAR
HANGAR
HANGAR
HANGAR
AP A-S
SERVICE ROAD
5110
PCI = 65
5
HANGAR
TW A
TW B
4110
PCI = 72
250
PCI = 34
4205
PCI = 73
TW
C
405
PCI = 72
210
PCI = 32
RU
NW
AY
AR
EA
AP
C
FB
O
TW
E2
515
PCI = 76
EUREKA SPRING ROAD
610
PCI = 72
4305
PCI = 70
523
10
0'
x
5,
00
0'
TW
E
615
PCI = 70
4505
PCI = 65
RW
TW
523
F
TW
E3
4510
PCI = 74
TW J
TAXIWAYS
705
PCI = 69
140
PCI = 70
160
PCI = 65
170
PCI = 66
180
PCI = 72
205
PCI = 68
6205
PCI = 71
715
PCI = 71
605
PCI = 76
510
PCI = 76
710
PCI = 69
520
PCI = 80
OTHERS
4310
PCI = 100
4315
PCI = 83
4405
PCI = 73
505
PCI = 79
E4
4210
PCI = 100
TW
4115
PCI = 76
LEGEND
RW 13-31
5105
PCI = 75
525
PCI = 80
TW A
23
AP S
"SECTION NO."
"PCI NO."
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2015
TAMPA EXECUTIVE AIRPORT
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
NO
RT
H
6115
PCI = 100
TAXIWAYS
6219
PCI = 100
120
PCI = 100
5115
PCI = 100
22
AP RU 22
OTHERS
107
PCI = 64
205
PCI = 25
210
PCI = 33
4105
PCI = 59
4110
PCI = 64
212
PCI = 59
215
PCI = 100
305
PCI = 100
310
PCI = 54
5205
PCI = 51
5305
PCI = 46
320
PCI = 90
405
PCI = 54
505
PCI = 62
510
PCI = 93
5105
PCI = 40
18
105
PCI = 60
TW A
6110
PCI = 100
110
PCI = 62
6205
PCI = 67
6107
PCI = 100
R
36
10
0'
x
6
-3
18
18
-
W
RU
NW
AY
115
PCI = 64
4,
95
4'
TW
AP T-HANG 3
TW A-1
610
PCI = 95
E
TW E
6105
PCI = 100
AP
AP T-HANG 2
2 100
RUNWAY 4-2
5505
PCI = 80
630
PCI = 65
RW 4-22
117
PCI = 100
' x 4,999'
5510
PCI = 84
F
235
PCI = 100
220
PCI = 5
AP T-HANG
5405
PCI = 12
225
PCI = 100
TW B
TW B
AP NE
A2
240
PCI = 54
TW
AP NW
230
PCI = 12
36
TW C-1
TW B
4115
PCI = 97
245
PCI = 28
LEGEND
RW 13-31
TW C
TW A
AP
TW
D
TW
D
AP S
4
"SECTION NO."
"PCI NO."
106
PCI = 100
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2013
ZEPHYRHILLS MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
APPENDIX D
ž DISTRICT 10-YEAR MAJOR REHABILITATION NEEDS
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
BKV – 10-YEAR MAJOR REHABILITATION NEEDS
Section
ID
Major M&R
Costs*
PCI Before
M&R
M&R Activity
PCI After
M&R
591,224.27
63
Mill and Overlay
100
$
728,091.77
55
Mill and Overlay
100
4147
$
73,709.00
55
Mill and Overlay
100
AP NE
4150
$
280,173.09
56
PCC Restoration
100
2014
AP NE
4125
$
237,395.29
62
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
AP NE
4110
$
145,918.09
51
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
AP NE
4130
$
92,197.07
35
Reconstruction
100
2014
AP NE
4115
$
357,996.18
51
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
AP NE
4105
$
330,801.57
48
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
AP NE
4120
$
530,576.18
52
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
AP S
4205
$
33,984.70
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
RW 3-21
6210
$ 5,014,999.76
54
PCC Restoration
100
2014
RW 3-21
6205
$ 2,507,499.88
52
PCC Restoration
100
2014
RW 9-27
6105
$ 4,205,250.52
46
PCC Restoration
100
2014
RW 9-27
6110
$ 6,999,999.67
57
PCC Restoration
100
2014
TW A3
125
$
394,835.34
20
Reconstruction
100
2014
TW A
105
$ 6,570,585.63
50
PCC Restoration
100
2014
TW A6
135
$
474,208.76
20
Reconstruction
100
2014
TW B
205
$
833,257.40
38
Reconstruction
100
2014
TW A1
110
$
568,940.67
52
PCC Restoration
100
2014
TW A1
112
$
241,721.64
43
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW A3
120
$
158,483.82
41
PCC Restoration
100
2014
TW A5
130
$
330,460.18
58
PCC Restoration
100
2014
TW B1
215
$
637,452.57
57
PCC Restoration
100
2014
TW B1
216
$
454,292.08
58
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW B2
220
$
109,627.83
38
Reconstruction
100
2014
TW B3
225
$
73,085.20
59
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW B4
230
$
62,462.40
62
Mill and Overlay
100
2016
TW A9
140
$
339,201.65
64
PCC Restoration
100
2016
TW B
210
$ 1,256,344.46
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2017
AP S
4210
$
574,127.59
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2017
AP S
4220
$
315,200.91
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2023
TW B1
145
$ 1,056,260.16
65
Mill and Overlay
100
Year
Branch Name
2014
AP NE
4135
$
2014
AP NE
4145
2014
AP NE
2014
Appendix D | 1
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Year
Branch Name
2023
AP NE
Section
ID
Major M&R
Costs*
PCI Before
M&R
M&R Activity
PCI After
M&R
4140
$ 2,897,109.11
65
Mill and Overlay
100
Total =
$39,477,474.44
* Costs are adjusted for inflation at 3%
Appendix D | 2
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
CGC – 10-YEAR MAJOR REHABILITATION NEEDS
PCI Before
M&R
M&R Activity
PCI After
M&R
97,500.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
$
793,939.96
61
Mill and Overlay
100
4120
$
523,329.98
62
Mill and Overlay
100
AP MAIN
4105
$ 1,171,429.94
54
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW CONN
210
$
230,529.99
55
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW CONN
205
$
335,659.98
59
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW A
130
$
68,480.00
61
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW A
118
$
67,095.02
40
Reconstruction
100
2014
TW A
115
$
44,730.00
56
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW A
109
$
138,829.99
60
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 9-27
6115
$
100,425.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2017
RW 9-27
6110
$ 1,062,950.14
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2017
RW 9-27
6105
$ 2,458,635.63
65
Mill and Overlay
100
Section ID
Major M&R
Costs*
Year
Branch ID
2014
RW 9-27
6120
$
2014
AP T-HANG
4205
2014
AP MAIN
2014
Total =
$ 7,093,535.63
* Costs are adjusted for inflation at 3%
Appendix D | 3
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
CLW – 10-YEAR MAJOR REHABILITATION NEEDS
Year
Branch ID
Section
ID
Major M&R
Costs*
PCI
Before
M&R
M&R Activity
PCI
After
M&R
2015
AP CENTER
4405
$
329,961.00
38
Reconstruction
100
2015
AP CENTER
4410
$
257,620.00
53
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
AP N
4505
$
290,940.00
53
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
AP T-HAN 1
4305
$
480,392.00
56
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
AP T-HAN 1
4310
$
250,993.00
35
Reconstruction
100
2015
AP T-HAN 2
4105
$
559,970.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW A
130
$
409,470.00
51
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW CONN 34
5105
$
21,689.00
50
Mill and Overlay
100
2018
AP T-HAN 3
4205
$
405,498.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
Total =
$ 3,006,533.00
* Costs are adjusted for inflation at 3%
Appendix D | 5
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
INF – 10-YEAR MAJOR REHABILITATION NEEDS
Section
ID
PCI
Before
M&R
M&R Activity
PCI After
M&R
350,442.48
59
Mill and Overlay
100
$
406,282.28
63
Mill and Overlay
100
$
756,724.76
Major M&R
Costs*
Year
Branch ID
2014
AP GA
4005
$
2014
TW GA AP
205
Total =
* Costs are adjusted for inflation at 3%
Appendix D | 7
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
PCM – 10-YEAR MAJOR REHABILITATION NEEDS
Year
Branch ID
Section
ID
Major M&R
Costs*
PCI
Before
M&R
M&R Activity
PCI
After
M&R
2014
RW 10-28
6120
$
524,999.98
61
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
RW 10-28
6115
$ 2,287,957.39
61
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
RW 10-28
6103
$
151,059.99
51
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW T-HANG
725
$
234,066.19
62
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW T-HANG
720
$
75,452.82
47
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW T-HANG
710
$
83,032.92
42
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW A
160
$
53,828.10
55
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW A
150
$
49,349.33
49
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW A
115
$
340,410.18
58
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW A
110
$ 1,252,943.44
62
Mill and Overlay
100
2017
AP
4110
$
496,499.28
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2019
AP
4130
$
898,599.66
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2021
AP
4120
$
571,083.54
65
Mill and Overlay
100
Total =
$ 7,019,282.82
* Costs are adjusted for inflation at 3%
Appendix D | 9
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
PIE– 10-YEAR MAJOR REHABILITATION NEEDS
Year
Branch ID
Section
ID
Major M&R
Costs*
PCI
Before
M&R
M&R Activity
PCI
After
M&R
2015
AP HOLD
4205
$
360,919.00
40
Reconstruction
100
2015
AP MAIN
4105
$
7,132,212.00
54
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
AP MAIN
4123
$
787,302.00
52
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
AP MAIN
4155
$
1,456,992.00
62
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
AP MAIN
4175
$
713,138.00
3
Reconstruction
100
2015
AP MAIN
4176
$
252,195.00
3
Reconstruction
100
2015
AP MAIN
4180
$
2,913,985.00
24
Reconstruction
100
2015
AP MAIN
4190
$
428,950.00
28
Reconstruction
100
2015
AP MAIN
4195
$
258,750.00
12
Reconstruction
100
2015
AP MAIN
4199
$
1,418,022.00
51
PCC Restoration
100
2015
AP RU RW22
4305
$
332,545.00
36
Reconstruction
100
2015
RW 18L-36R
6155
$
3,240,000.00
62
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 18L-36R
6175
$
5,220,000.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 18L-36R
6185
$
3,780,000.00
53
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 18L-36R
6197
$
1,672,200.00
52
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 4-22
6230
$
463,450.00
23
Reconstruction
100
2015
RW 9-27
6315
$
4,730,340.00
41
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 9-27
6320
$
2,312,244.00
42
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 9-27
6325
$
641,408.00
48
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 9-27
6335
$
746,900.00
43
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 9-27
6340
$
402,500.00
31
Reconstruction
100
2015
RW 9-27
6345
$
1,035,000.00
39
Reconstruction
100
2015
RW 9-27
6350
$
446,400.00
46
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 9-27
6355
$
1,840,000.00
36
Reconstruction
100
2015
RW 9-27
6360
$
720,000.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 9-27
6365
$
1,047,510.00
45
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 9-27
6370
$
463,500.00
58
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW A
114
$
54,297.00
33
Reconstruction
100
2015
TW A
117
$
57,112.00
49
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW A
119
$
78,749.00
33
Reconstruction
100
2015
TW A
160
$
3,515,273.00
39
Reconstruction
100
2015
TW B
205
$
251,100.00
56
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW B
210
$
114,357.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
Appendix D | 11
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Year
Branch ID
Section
ID
Major M&R
Costs*
PCI
Before
M&R
M&R Activity
PCI
After
M&R
2015
TW B
220
$
935,088.00
28
Reconstruction
100
2015
TW C
305
$
982,233.00
36
Reconstruction
100
2015
TW D
405
$
94,500.00
51
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW D
407
$
464,695.00
51
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW D
410
$
329,751.00
45
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW F
605
$
294,354.00
37
Reconstruction
100
2015
TW F
610
$
173,468.00
41
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW F
615
$
450,000.00
55
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW H
810
$
1,483,178.00
6
Reconstruction
100
2015
TW J
1005
$
235,710.00
46
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW K
1120
$
35,448.00
55
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW K
1125
$
38,457.00
58
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW K
1130
$
50,468.00
42
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW L
1245
$
429,617.00
32
Reconstruction
100
2015
TW M
1325
$
4,744,768.00
42
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW M
1330
$
187,082.00
33
Reconstruction
100
2015
TW T
2050
$
4,031,945.00
22
Reconstruction
100
2016
TW A
112
$
66,423.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2017
RW 4-22
6225
$
769,577.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2019
RW 18L-36R
6115
$
1,012,958.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2019
RW 18L-36R
6145
$
607,775.00
63
Mill and Overlay
100
2019
RW 18L-36R
6165
$
1,418,141.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2020
RW 18L-36R
6135
$
417,339.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2020
RW 18L-36R
6170
$
730,343.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2020
RW 9-27
6330
$
355,218.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2021
RW 18L-36R
6150
$
322,394.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2021
RW 18L-36R
6160
$
1,934,365.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2021
TW K
1105
$
462,531.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2022
RW 18L-36R
6140
$
221,377.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2023
RW 18L-36R
6120
$
570,047.00
63
Mill and Overlay
100
2023
RW 18L-36R
6180
$
3,306,270.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
Total =
$ 76,042,870.00
* Costs are adjusted for inflation at 3%
Appendix D | 12
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
SPG – 10-YEAR MAJOR REHABILITATION NEEDS
Year
Branch ID
Section
ID
Major M&R
Costs*
PCI
Before
M&R
M&R Activity
PCI
After
M&R
2015
AP
4110
$ 1,933,536.00
60
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
AP
4120
$ 1,105,734.00
54
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
AP
4135
$ 1,233,705.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
AP
4145
$
212,785.00
58
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 18-36
6105
$ 4,296,001.00
60
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 18-36
6110
$ 2,148,001.00
58
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 7-25
6205
$
281,250.00
61
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 7-25
6207
$
459,000.00
37
Reconstruction
100
2015
RW 7-25
6210
$ 2,551,741.00
59
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW A
105
$
225,000.00
53
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW A
110
$
315,000.00
58
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW A
115
$
954,250.00
63
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW A1
610
$
220,260.00
26
Reconstruction
100
2015
TW A2
410
$
75,592.00
59
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW B
210
$
259,726.00
63
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW B
215
$
61,124.00
40
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW B
251
$
65,730.00
36
Reconstruction
100
2015
TW B
252
$
99,200.00
58
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW B
253
$
68,110.00
25
Reconstruction
100
2015
TW B
254
$
55,612.00
60
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW C
301
$
77,721.00
20
Reconstruction
100
2015
TW C
305
$ 1,224,080.00
20
Reconstruction
100
2015
TW C
307
$
524,805.00
57
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW C
310
$
416,910.00
53
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW D
150
$
110,219.00
63
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW D
155
$
109,554.00
63
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW N
720
$
200,052.00
57
Mill and Overlay
100
2016
AP W
4210
$ 1,152,896.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2016
TW D1
615
$
85,056.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2016
TW N
740
$
512,730.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2017
AP
4105
$
707,977.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2017
TW B
205
$ 1,393,402.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2017
TW C
308
$
64
Mill and Overlay
100
606,702.00
Appendix D | 13
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
Year
Branch ID
Section
ID
Major M&R
Costs*
PCI
Before
M&R
M&R Activity
PCI
After
M&R
2017
TW N
710
$
534,123.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2018
TW B
250
$
42,260.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2018
TW B
256
$
40,457.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2018
TW D
160
$
35,593.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2019
TW D
510
$
572,660.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2020
TW N
730
$
217,472.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2021
AP
4140
$
380,693.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2021
RW 7-25
6215
$
539,554.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
Total =
$26,106,273.00
* Costs are adjusted for inflation at 3%
Appendix D | 14
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
TPF – 10-YEAR MAJOR REHABILITATION NEEDS
Year
Branch ID
Section
ID
Major M&R
Costs*
PCI
Before
M&R
M&R Activity
PCI
After
M&R
2015
AP
4140
$
224,502.00
62
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
RW 4-22
6105
$ 4,657,501.00
57
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW A
105
$ 1,548,783.00
59
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW B
150
$
70,095.00
56
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW C
310
$
252,600.00
54
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW D
425
$
96,591.00
44
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW E
510
$
166,887.00
58
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW T-HANG
705
$ 1,080,361.00
52
Mill and Overlay
100
2017
AP RU
5105
$
50,185.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2017
TW F
610
$
153,199.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2020
AP RU
5110
$
76,266.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2022
TW C
305
$
132,181.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2024
TW A
120
$
115,012.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
Total =
$ 8,624,163.00
* Costs are adjusted for inflation at 3%
Appendix D | 15
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
VDF – 10-YEAR MAJOR REHABILITATION NEEDS
Year
Branch ID
Section
ID
Major M&R
Costs*
PCI
Before
M&R
M&R Activity
PCI
After
M&R
2015
AP RU
5110
$
50,070.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
AP W
4505
$
424,716.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW A
160
$
57,915.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2015
TW B
210
$
305,353.00
31
Reconstruction
100
2015
TW B
250
$
145,726.00
33
Reconstruction
100
2016
TW A
105
$ 1,783,394.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2016
TW D
170
$
78,223.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2017
TW A
205
$
36,495.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2018
AP A - S
4105
$ 1,276,326.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2018
AP C
4305
$ 6,951,470.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2018
TW J
705
$ 1,004,472.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2018
TW J
710
$
521,006.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2019
AP A - S
4110
$ 1,931,046.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2019
RW 18-36
6105
$ 4,104,929.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2019
TW A
140
$
65,201.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2019
TW D
305
$
530,294.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2019
TW F
610
$
82,235.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2019
TW F
615
$
76,850.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2020
AP B - N
4205
$ 2,290,015.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2020
AP C
4405
$ 1,233,349.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2020
AP RU
5105
$
434,619.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2020
AP W
4510
$
644,853.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2020
RW 5-23
6205
$ 8,694,558.00
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2020
TW A
120
$
48,203.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2020
TW J
715
$
209,024.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2021
TW A
180
$
73,631.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2021
TW C
405
$
389,861.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2022
AP A - S
4115
$
82,454.00
63
Mill and Overlay
100
2024
TW E1
510
$
187,438.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2024
TW E2
515
$
186,145.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2024
TW F
605
$ 1,922,664.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
Total =
$35,822,535.00
Appendix D | 17
Pavement Evaluation Report –District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
* Costs are adjusted for inflation at 3%
Appendix D | 18
Pavement Evaluation Report – District 7
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
ZPH – 10-YEAR MAJOR REHABILITATION NEEDS
Year
Branch ID
Major M&R
Costs*
Section ID
PCI
Before
M&R
M&R Activity
PCI
After
M&R
2014
AP E
5405
$
511,460.52
12
Reconstruction
100
2014
AP T-HANG
5305
$ 1,320,331.92
46
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
AP TW D
5205
$
263,596.19
51
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
AP NE
5105
$
416,250.10
40
Reconstruction
100
2014
AP NW
4110
$
50,953.60
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
AP NW
4105
$
21,600.00
59
PCC Restoration
100
2014
TW F
630
$
243,480.09
65
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW C-1
505
$
60,000.00
62
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW D
405
$
250,634.79
54
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW A-2
310
$
153,299.99
54
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW B
245
$
34,501.81
27
Reconstruction
100
2014
TW B
240
$
313,775.19
54
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW B
230
$
225,000.05
12
Reconstruction
100
2014
TW B
220
$ 1,999,650.47
4
Reconstruction
100
2014
TW B
212
$
178,714.59
59
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW B
210
$
268,470.06
32
Reconstruction
100
2014
TW B
205
$
741,960.18
25
Reconstruction
100
2014
TW A-1
115
$
175,279.99
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW A
110
$ 1,889,299.91
62
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW A
107
$
100,000.00
64
Mill and Overlay
100
2014
TW A
105
$
722,689.97
60
Mill and Overlay
100
2016
RW 18-36
6205
$ 5,022,694.06
64
Mill and Overlay
100
Total =
$14,963,643.48
* Costs are adjusted for inflation at 3%
Appendix D | 19
APPENDIX E
ž DISTRICT AIRFIELD PAVEMENT 10-YEAR MAJOR
REHABILITATION EXHIBITS
FY 2014
TW A: 105
PCC RESTORATION
$6.57M
FY 2014
TW A1: 110
PCC RESTORATION
$0.57M
TW A
FY 2014
AP NE: 4145
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.73M
TW A3
TAXIWAY A
TW A5
TW A6
TAXIWAY A
TW A9
FY 2014
TW B1: 215
PCC RESTORATION
$0.64M
TW
21
TW A
FY 2023
TW B1: 145
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.06M
B1
FY 2014
TW B1: 216
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.45M
TW
9
27
RUNWAY 9-27 150' x 7,002'
FY 2014
AP NE: 4150
PCC RESTORATION
$0.28M
TW A1
RW 9-27
B1
TAXIWAY B1
FY 2016
TW A9: 140
PCC RESTORATION
$0.34M
FY 2014
RW 9-27: 6110
PCC RESTORATION
$7.00M
FY 2014
RW 9-27: 6105
PCC RESTORATION
$4.21M
FY 2014
TW A6: 135
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.47M
FY 2014
TW A5: 130
PCC RESTORATION
$0.33M
FY 2023
AP NE: 4140
MILL AND OVERLAY
$2.90M
FY 2014
TW A3: 125
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.39M
TA
XIW
AY
B
FY 2014
TW A3: 120
PCC RESTORATION
$0.16M
AP NE
FY 2014
AP NE: 4125
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.24M
FY 2014
TW A1: 112
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.24M
TW
B2
FY 2014
TW B: 205
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.83M
FY 2014
AP NE: 4147
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.07M
FY 2014
AP NE: 4135
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.59M
FY 2014
AP NE: 4130
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.09M
FY 2014
AP NE: 4120
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.53M
FY 2014
RW 3-21: 6210
PCC RESTORATION
$5.01M
3- 2
1
FY 2014
TW B2: 220
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.11M
RW
FY 2014
RW 3-21: 6205
PCC RESTORATION
$2.51M
FY 2014
AP NE: 4115
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.36M
FY 2014
AP NE: 4110
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.15M
TW
B
FY 2014
AP NE: 4105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.33M
TW
FY 2014
TW B3: 225
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.07M
'x
5 ,0
15
'
B3
FY 2016
TW B: 210
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.26M
LEGEND
3-2
1
1 50
RW 13-31
RU
NW
AY
TW A
AP S
TW
B4
TA
XIW
AY
B
PROGRAM YEAR
NORTH
FY 2014
TW B4: 230
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.06M
3
FY 2017
AP S: 4220
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.32M
AP S
FY 2014
AP S: 4205
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.03M
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
"PROGRAM YEAR"
"BRANCH":"SECTION"
"REHAB ACTIVITY"
"EST. COST"
FY 2017
AP S: 4210
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.57M
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
BROOKSVILLE - TAMPA BAY REGIONAL AIRPORT
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2013
HERNANDO COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
NORTH
FY 2014
TW CONN: 210
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.23M
AP MAIN
FY 2014
AP MAIN: 4105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.17M
RUNWAY 18-36 100' x 2,666' TURF
AP T-HANG
FY 2014
AP MAIN: 4120
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.52M
FY 2014
TW CONN: 205
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.34M
TW HANG
TW CONN
FY 2014
AP T-HANG: 4205
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.79M
FY 2014
TW A: 115
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.04M
FY 2014
TW A: 118
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.07M
FY 2014
TW A: 109
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.14M
FY 2014
TW A: 130
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.07M
TW A
RW 13-31
RUNWAY 9-27 75' x 4,557'
27
9
RW 18-36
LEGEND
TW A
RW 9-27
FY 2015
RW 9-27: 6115
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.10M
FY 2017
RW 9-27: 6105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$2.46M
AP S
FY 2017
RW 9-27: 6110
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.06M
PROGRAM YEAR
FY 2014
RW 9-27: 6120
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.10M
"PROGRAM YEAR"
"BRANCH":"SECTION"
"REHAB ACTIVITY"
"EST. COST"
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2013
CRYSTAL RIVER AIRPORT
CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
NO
RT
H
FY 2015
AP T-HAN 1: 4305
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.48M
FY 2015
AP T-HAN 1: 4310
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.25M
FY 2015
AP CENTER: 4405
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.33M
FY 2015
AP T-HAN 2: 4105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.56M
FY 2015
AP CENTER: 4410
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.26M
FY 2018
AP T-HAN 3: 4205
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.41M
AP
N
FY 2015
AP N: 4505
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.29M
16
34
TW A1
TW A3
TW A2
TW A
RW 16-34
RUNWAY 16-34 75' x 4,108'
FY 2015
TW A: 130
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.41M
FY 2015
TW CONN 34: 5105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.02M
LEGEND
RW 13-31
TW A
AP S
PROGRAM YEAR
"PROGRAM YEAR"
"BRANCH":"SECTION"
"REHAB ACTIVITY"
"EST. COST"
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2015
CLEARWATER AIRPARK
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
NORTH
FY 2014
TW GA AP: 205
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.41M
FY 2014
AP GA: 4005
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.35M
LEGEND
RW 13-31
TW A
AP S
PROGRAM YEAR
"PROGRAM YEAR"
"BRANCH":"SECTION"
"REHAB ACTIVITY"
"EST. COST"
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2013
INVERNESS AIRPORT
CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
NORTH
FY 2014
TW T-HANG: 710
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.08M
FY 2014
TW T-HANG: 720
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.08M
FY 2014
TW T-HANG: 725
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.23M
FY 2021
AP: 4120
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.57M
HANGAR
HANGAR
TW T-HANG
HANGAR
HANGAR
HANGAR
FY 2017
AP: 4110
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.50M
HANGAR
AP
TW HANG
FY 2014
TW A: 150
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.05M
HANGAR
FY 2019
AP: 4130
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.90M
HANGAR
HANGAR
FY 2014
TW A: 160
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.05M
FY 2014
TW A: 110
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.25M
FY 2014
TW A: 115
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.34M
TW A
TW A
28
10
LEGEND
RUNWAY 10-28 75' x 3,948'
RW 13-31
RW 10-28
TW A
FY 2014
RW 10-28: 6103
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.15M
FY 2014
RW 10-28: 6115
MILL AND OVERLAY
$2.29M
FY 2014
RW 10-28: 6120
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.52M
AP S
PROGRAM YEAR
"PROGRAM YEAR"
"BRANCH":"SECTION"
"REHAB ACTIVITY"
"EST. COST"
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2013
PLANT CITY AIRPORT
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
TW B
NORTH
9
TW
C
RW 9-27
TW
TW T
P
AP MAIN
TW
H
L
TW
AP MAIN
4
TW A
TW
TW A2
F
TW A
RUNWAY 18R-36L 75' x 4,000'
TW A3
TW A4
22
TW A5
4-
TW A6
TW A
D
RW
TW
TW A
RUNWAY 18L-36R 150' x 9,730'
TW
F
18L
36R
0' x 4,712
'
FY 2015
TW D: 405
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.09M
RUNWAY
9-27 15
FY 2015
TW C: 305
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.98M
TW
0'
15
M
FY 2015
TW B: 220
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.94M
22
4-
FY 2015
TW B: 210
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.11M
LD
FY 2015
TW B: 205
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.25M
HO
FY 2015
TW A: 160
RECONSTRUCTION
$3.52M
AY
NW
FY 2015
TW A: 119
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.08M
RU
FY 2015
TW A: 117
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.06M
AP
FY 2015
TW A: 114
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.05M
x
3'
90
5,
FY 2015
TW D: 407
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.46M
TW
FY 2015
AP MAIN: 4190
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.43M
FY 2015
AP MAIN: 4195
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.26M
FY 2015
AP MAIN: 4199
PCC RESTORATION
$1.42M
FY 2015
AP HOLD: 4205
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.36M
FY 2015
AP RU RW 22: 4305
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.33M
FY 2015
RW 18L-36R: 6155
MILL AND OVERLAY
$3.24M
FY 2015
RW 18L-36R: 6175
MILL AND OVERLAY
$5.22M
FY 2015
RW 18L-36R: 6185
MILL AND OVERLAY
$3.78M
FY 2015
RW 18L-36R: 6197
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.67M
FY 2015
RW 4-22: 6230
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.46M
FY 2015
RW 9-27: 6315
MILL AND OVERLAY
$4.73M
FY 2015
RW 9-27: 6320
MILL AND OVERLAY
$2.31M
FY 2015
RW 9-27: 6325
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.64M
FY 2015
RW 9-27: 6335
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.75M
FY 2015
RW 9-27: 6340
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.40M
FY 2015
RW 9-27: 6345
RECONSTRUCTION
$1.04M
FY 2015
RW 9-27: 6350
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.45M
FY 2015
RW 9-27: 6355
RECONSTRUCTION
$1.84M
FY 2015
RW 9-27: 6360
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.72M
FY 2015
RW 9-27: 6365
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.05M
FY 2015
RW 9-27: 6370
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.46M
LEGEND
RW 13-31
J
TW A
FY 2015
TW F: 605
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.29M
FY 2015
TW F: 610
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.17M
FY 2015
TW F: 615
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.45M
FY 2016
TW A: 112
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.07M
TW
FY 2015
TW D: 410
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.33M
FY 2017
RW 4-22: 6225
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.77M
FY 2019
RW 18L-36R: 6115
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.01M
FY 2019
RW 18L-36R: 6145
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.61M
PROGRAM YEAR
K
FY 2015
TW J: 1005
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.24M
FY 2015
TW K: 1120
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.04M
FY 2015
TW K: 1125
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.04M
FY 2015
TW K: 1130
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.05M
FY 2015
TW L: 1245
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.43M
FY 2015
TW M: 1325
MILL AND OVERLAY
$4.74M
FY 2015
TW M: 1330
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.19M
FY 2015
TW T: 2050
RECONSTRUCTION
$4.03M
FY 2015
AP MAIN: 4105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$7.13M
27
FY 2019
RW 18L-36R: 6165
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.42M
RW
FY 2015
TW H: 810
RECONSTRUCTION
$1.48M
FY 2020
RW 18L-36R: 6135
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.42M
FY 2020
RW 18L-36R: 6170
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.73M
FY 2020
RW 9-27: 6330
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.36M
FY 2021
TW K: 1105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.46M
FY 2021
RW 18L-36R: 6150
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.32M
FY 2021
RW 18L-36R: 6160
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.93M
FY 2022
RW 18L-36R: 6140
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.22M
FY 2023
RW 18L-36R: 6120
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.57M
FY 2023
RW 18L-36R: 6180
MILL AND OVERLAY
$3.31M
422
FY 2015
AP MAIN: 4123
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.79M
FY 2015
AP MAIN: 4155
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.46M
FY 2015
AP MAIN: 4175
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.71M
FY 2015
AP MAIN: 4176
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.25M
AP S
FY 2015
AP MAIN: 4180
RECONSTRUCTION
$2.91M
"PROGRAM YEAR"
"BRANCH":"SECTION"
"REHAB ACTIVITY"
"EST. COST"
22
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2015
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
FY 2015
RW 7-25: 6207
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.46M
FY 2016
TW N: 740
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.51M
AP NW
FY 2017
AP: 4105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.71M
AP
FY 2015
AP: 4110
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.93M
NORTH
FY 2015
RW 7-25: 6205
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.28M
FY 2020
TW N: 730
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.22M
FY 2015
TW C: 310
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.42M
FY 2021
AP: 4140
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.38M
FY 2015
AP: 4145
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.21M
FY 2016
AP W: 4210
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.15M
FY 2015
TW A: 105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.23M
FY 2015
TW A: 110
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.32M
FY 2015
TW A: 115
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.95M
FY 2015
TW B: 253
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.07M
FY 2015
TW A2: 410
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.08M
FY 2016
TW D1: 615
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.09M
FY 2017
TW C: 308
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.61M
FY 2019
TW D: 510
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.57M
RW
5
7-2
AP
FY 2015
AP: 4120
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.11M
FY 2015
RW 7-25: 6210
MILL AND OVERLAY
$2.55M
W
TW
A
TW
AY
NW
RU
D
-2
07
5' x
57
'
77
3,6
AP
FY 2015
AP: 4135
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.23M
FY 2015
TW A1: 610
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.22M
FY 2015
TW N: 720
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.20M
FY 2017
TW N: 710
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.53M
TW A1
FY 2015
TW C: 307
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.52M
FY 2015
TW B: 210
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.26M
TW
N
FY 2015
TW C: 305
RECONSTRUCTION
$1.22M
TW
A
FY 2015
TW C: 301
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.08M
TW C
FY 2017
TW B: 205
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.39M
LEGEND
RW 13-31
TW A
FY 2015
TW B: 251
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.07M
FY 2018
TW B: 250
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.04M
FY 2015
TW B: 252
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.10M
FY 2018
TW D: 160
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.04M
FY 2015
TW B: 215
MILLL AND OVERLAY
$0.06M
PROGRAM YEAR
TW B
FY 2018
TW B: 256
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.04M
18
36
RW 18-36
FY 2015
RW 18-36: 6105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$4.30M
FY 2015
RW 18-36: 6110
MILL AND OVERLAY
$2.15M
RUNWAY 18-36 150' x 2,864'
FY 2015
TW D: 155
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.11M
FY 2015
TW B: 254
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.06M
"PROGRAM YEAR"
"BRANCH":"SECTION"
"REHAB ACTIVITY"
"EST. COST"
25
FY 2021
RW 7-25: 6215
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.54M
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
AP S
FY 2015
TW D: 150
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.11M
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2015
ALBERT WHITTED AIRPORT
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
NORTH
18
FY 2020
AP RU: 5110
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.08M
RW 18-36
AP RU
TW F
22
FY 2017
TW F: 610
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.15M
422
FY 2015
AP: 4140
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.22M
RW
FY 2015
TW D: 425
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.10M
FY 2024
TW A: 120
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.12M
0
HGR. 660
AP
TW G
FY 2015
RW 4-22: 6105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$4.66M
0
HGR. 680
TW E
FY 2015
TW E: 510
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.17M
TW
0
HGR. 340
HANGAR
FY 2022
TW C: 305
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.13M
3800
4000
HANGAR
4200
4400
HANGAR
x3
10
0'
422
RU
NW
AY
TW
HANGAR
LEGEND
18-36
RUNWAY
HANGAR
'
75' x 2,687
TW T-HANG
,5
80
'
FY 2015
TW B: 150
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.07M
GE
TW T-HAN
D
FY 2015
TW C: 310
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.25M
4600
RW 13-31
TW A
AP S
FY 2015
TW T-HANG: 705
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.08M
B
PROGRAM YEAR
36
0
HGR. 480
TW
A
0
HGR. 540
FY 2015
TW A: 105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.55M
4
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
AP RU
AP
FY 2017
AP RU: 5105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.05M
"PROGRAM YEAR"
"BRANCH":"SECTION"
"REHAB ACTIVITY"
"EST. COST"
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2015
PETER O. KNIGHT AIRPORT
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
NORTH
FY 2019
RW 18-36: 6105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$4.10M
TAMPA BY-PASS CANAL
FY 2020
TW A: 120
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.05M
RW 18-36
18
36
RUNWAY 18-36 75' x 3,259'
TW A
FY 2018
AP A-S: 4105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.28M
FY 2015
AP RU: 5110
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.05M
TW D
HANGAR
HANGAR
AP B-N
TW B
TW
E1
HANGAR
HANGAR
HANGAR
HANGAR
HANGAR
HANGAR
HANGAR
AP A-S
SERVICE ROAD
FY 2016
TW A: 105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.78M
5
HANGAR
TW A
FY 2015
TW B: 250
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.15M
FY 2022
AP A-S: 4115
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.08M
FY 2019
AP A-S: 4110
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.93M
C
FY 2019
TW F: 610
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.08M
FY 2021
TW C: 405
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.39M
FY 2024
TW E2: 515
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.19M
FB
O
RU
NW
AY
AR
EA
AP
C
FY 2018
AP C: 4305
MILL AND OVERLAY
$6.95M
TW
E2
FY 2015
TW B: 210
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.31M
TW
FY 2020
AP B-N: 4205
MILL AND OVERLAY
$2.29M
523
EUREKA SPRING ROAD
FY 2020
AP W: 4510
MILL AND OVRLAY
$0.64M
FY 2015
AP W: 4505
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.42M
10
0'
x
5,
00
0'
FY 2020
RW 5-23: 6205
MILL AND OVERLAY
$8.69M
TW
E
RW
TW
523
TW
E3
F
TW J
FY 2018
TW J: 705
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.00M
FY 2020
TW J: 715
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.21M
LEGEND
FY 2024
TW F: 605
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.92M
E4
RW 13-31
TW A
TW
FY 2018
TW J: 710
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.52M
AP S
PROGRAM YEAR
FY 2016
TW D: 170
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.08M
FY 2017
TW A: 205
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.04M
FY 2019
TW A: 140
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.07M
FY 2019
TW F: 615
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.08M
FY 2020
AP C: 4405
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.23M
FY 2021
TW A: 180
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.07M
FY 2024
TW E1: 510
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.19M
FY 2019
TW D: 305
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.53M
23
FY 2015
TW A: 160
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.06M
FY 2020
AP RU: 5105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.43M
"PROGRAM YEAR"
"BRANCH":"SECTION"
"REHAB ACTIVITY"
"EST. COST"
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2015
TAMPA EXECUTIVE AIRPORT
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
RT
H
NO
22
AP RU 22
18
FY 2014
TW A: 110
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.89M
TW A
FY 2016
RW 18-36: 6205
MILL AND OVERLAY
$5.02M
R
36
10
0'
x
6
-3
18
18
-
W
FY 2014
TW A-1: 115
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.18M
RU
NW
AY
4,
95
4'
TW
AP T-HANG 3
F
TW E
E
FY 2014
AP T-HANG: 5305
MILL AND OVERLAY
$1.32M
AP
AP T-HANG 2
FY 2014
TW F: 630
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.24M
RW 4-22
2 100
RUNWAY 4-2
' x 4,999'
TW A-1
FY 2014
TW B: 210
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.27M
AP T-HANG
FY 2014
TW B: 205
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.74M
TW B
LEGEND
TW B
AP NE
A2
FY 2014
TW A: 107
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.10M
TW
FY 2014
AP NW: 4105
PCC RESTORATION
$0.02M
AP NW
36
TW C-1
TW B
FY 2014
AP NE: 5105
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.42M
TW C
FY 2014
TW B: 212
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.18M
TW
D
FY 2014
AP NW: 4110
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.05M
RW 13-31
TW A
AP S
FY 2014
TW B: 220
RECONSTRUCTION
$2.00M
FY 2014
TW B: 240
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.31M
FY 2014
TW B: 230
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.23M
PROGRAM YEAR
FY 2014
TW B: 245
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.03M
AP
FY 2014
TW C-1: 505
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.06M
TW
D
FY 2014
TW A-2: 310
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.15M
FY 2014
AP E: 5405
RECONSTRUCTION
$0.51M
FY 2014
TW A: 105
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.72M
"PROGRAM YEAR"
"BRANCH":"SECTION"
"REHAB ACTIVITY"
"EST. COST"
4
FY 2014
AP TW D: 5205
MILL AND OVRLAY
$0.26M
NUMBER
DATE
DESIGNED:
KHA
FY 2014
TW D: 405
MILL AND OVERLAY
$0.25M
IDENTIFIER
REVISIONS
DRAWN:
KHA
CHECKED:
KHA
DATE:
2013
ZEPHYRHILLS MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE
FDOT DISTRICT
7
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AVIATION AND SPACEPORT OFFICE