Metamaterials and negative refraction index Dipl.-Phys. Stefan Griesing Group seminar 05.05.06
by user
Comments
Transcript
Metamaterials and negative refraction index Dipl.-Phys. Stefan Griesing Group seminar 05.05.06
Metamaterials and negative refraction index Dipl.-Phys. Stefan Griesing Group seminar 05.05.06 Metamaterials Artificial structure Exhibit magnetic and dielectric features not arising in any natural material Classes of metamaterials Pure magnetic metamaterials • Magnetic resonances at high frequencies (ω >>1GHz) • Magnetic permeability µ < 0 Optical metamaterials • Magnetic permeability µ < 0 and dielectric permittivity ε < 0 in the same frequency range Relation between µ, ε and n n = εµ µ>0, ε >0 n>0 µ<0, ε <0 n=? o.B.d.A. µ = ε = −1 ≡ exp(iπ ) n = exp(2iπ ) = exp(iπ ) ≡ −1 ≡ − (−1) ⋅ (−1) Optical metamaterials exhibit a negative index of refraction!!! Meaning of n <0 (first introduced by V. Veselago in 1967) Snell‘s law: sin α 1 n2 = sin α 2 n1 Consequences of negative refraction I k × E = ωµµ0 E k × H = −ωεε 0 E µ > 0, ε > 0 µ < 0, ε < 0 E,H, k right-handed system S E,H, k left-handed system „Left-handed materials“ Consequences of negative refraction II Poyntingvector S ∝ E × H antiparallel to wavevector Inverse Doppler effect Consequences of negative refraction III „Perfect lens“ • Focusing by a flat slab of metamaterial • No aberrations Types of metamaterials Photonic crystals (opt.) Metamaterials consisting of conducting elements (magn./opt.) Photonic crystals I consist of dielectric material Optical bandgap Size of structural elements is comparable to the wavelength Can not be described by macroscopic parameters µ and ε Photonic crystals II Effective refractive index can be deduced by Snell‘s law experiments and can become negative Conducting elements metamaterials „artificial atoms“ Structural elements small against wavelength Description by macroscopic parameters µ and ε Realization of left-handed materials I: ε< 0 Metals: negative permittivity for frequencies below plasma frequency ωp Ne 2 ωp = ≈ 1015 Hz ε 0 meff (N: electron density, meff: effective mass) But: natural magnetic resonances occur below 109Hz Matching problem Realization of left-handed materials II: ε< 0 Decrease N, increase meff ! Arrays of metal slabs with radius r and periodicity a (Pendry, 1996) R~10µm, a~2000µm ωp~109 Hz Magnetic resonances Highest resonance frequency in natural materials: ~1 GHz Need for high-frequency magnetic response split-ring resonators Split-ring resonators I Open metal loop forms LC oscillating circuit Incident elm. Wave induces spin current Magnetic moments „artificial magnetic atoms“ Split-ring resonators II Magnetic response of split-ring structures Magnetic metamaterials • Two-dimensional arrays of split-ringresonators, (Pendry, 1999) • Three-dimensional design also possible Realization of the first optical metamaterial Combination of slabs and split-ring resonators (Shelby et al., 2000) Negative refraction index in the microwave regime Experimental verification of negative refraction index (2001) Snells‘s law experiments at prisms (Teflon vs. LHM) Magnetic resonances: towards to higher frequencies I • Jan. 2005: negative permeability in mid-infrared at 60THz~5µm (Zhang et al.) • New structural design: array of gold staples • LC-circuit is formed by the structure and its image Magnetic resonances: towards to higher frequencies II Nov. 2005: neg. permeability at the telecommunication band around 200 THz~1.5µm (Enkrich et al.) Use of simplified split-ring resonators Breakthrough to optical frequencies (Grigorenko et al., Nov. 2005) • Simplified split-ring structures, consisting of a pair of gold pillars • Excitation of antisymmetric surface plasmons Breakthrough to optical frequencies (Grigorenko e al., Nov. 2005) • Real parts of µ and ε negative for λ=500nm • Big imaginary parts • No negative refraction detectable due to extreme losses Perfect lens I Pendrys predictions (2000) Lenses of metamaterial enhance near-field intensities sub-diffraction limit resolution possible Quasistatic limit: no radiative effects decoupling of el. And magn. fields „poor man‘s perfect lens“: ε < 0 Perfect lens II Sub-diffraction limit resolution due to surface plasmon resonance (Zhang et al., Science 308, 534, 2005) Perfect lens III Magnetic imaging of a subwavelength antenna at 20 MHz Thank you for your attention!! (Let‘s have some coffee and cake!)