Comments
Description
Transcript
Xylella fastidiosa
Invasive Potential of Xylella fastidiosa? Alexander Purcell Dept. Environmental Science, Policy, and Management University of California, Berkeley Does Europe/Asia have the requirements for Xylella to survive from year to year? To cause and sustain crop/forest diseases? Host plants are widespread and common in Europe: Known propagative hosts Known and potential vectors Historical and current importations of live host plants So why no permanently established Xylella fastidiosa in Europe/Asia? the players Photo UC IPM Layers of complexity: environment (e.g. temperature) vector ecology pathogen ecology host plant ecology outcome of various interactions disease management Xylella fastidiosa • Xylem-limited bacterium • Colonizes a wide range of host plants, usually without causing disease • Present throughout the Americas – Causing disease in grape at least since the 1880s – Major crops affected • Grape, alfalfa, peach, etc • Xylem sap-feeding insects are only vectors • Pierce’s Disease in grapes, • Alfalfa dwarf, • Almond leaf scorch • Phony peach disease, Plum leaf scald, • Citrus variegated chlorosis • Elm, oak, sycamore leaf scorch • Oleander leaf scorch * and a very large list of new emerging diseases of crops and ornamentals Pierce’s disease (PD) Photo UC IPM Environmental conditions determine the spatial and temporal spread of Xylellacaused diseases Pierce’s Disease in coastal California (ex.: Napa Valley) Photo J. Clark Main vector = blue-green sharpshooter Breeds in vegetation along streams (riparian); Adults enter vineyards in spring * Disease pattern resembles spring pattern of vector Pierce’s Disease in central California Usually occurs near irrigated crops or canals with grass weeds Main vectors = green and red-headed Sharpshooters; breed in grasses near vineyards Pierce’s Disease in Napa Valley) Photo J. Clark Incidence highest at edge of vineyard Incidence decreases away from edge grape alfalfa Guadalupe Valley, Baja California Bermuda grass sources for redheaded sharpshooter (bare field lost to Pierce’s disease) Vector is a rare visitor to grape Redheaded sharpshooter Bermuda grass sources for red-headed sharpshooter Pierce’s Disease in Napa Valley) Photo J. Clark What causes this pattern? Pierce’s disease: Effects of date of inoculation on recovery 100 Percent recovery 80 Oakville 1998 Davis 1998 Davis 1999 Parlier 1999 Parlier 2000 60 40 20 0 80 100 April 120 140 160 Day of year Feil, et al. 2003 Phytopathology 93:244+ 180 200 220 August 240 Infectious adults (can fly) needed for April-May infections Seasonality component… Hill & Hashim 2006 1. Seasonal acquisition efficiency -low Xylella populations early in the year -threshold population for sharpshooter acquisition -minimal transmission early on? Hill and Purcell 1997 2. Vine recovery -vines lose infection over winter -mechanism not well understood (pruning, infection level) -recovery rate highly dependent on date of original infection Feil & Purcell 2003 Does the lack of overwintering adult vectors prevent the establishment of chronic disease in perennial plants in Europe? Meadow spittle bug (Philaenus spumarius) is abundant and widespread in Europe, as are other potential vectors BUT they overwinter as eggs, NOT ADULTS Winter severity (sub-freezing temperatures) determine the limits of Pierce’s disease? Seasonal and climatic effects “severe” = commercial viticulture is impossible Isotherms (black lines) = average minimum January temperature Texas – PD Risk Ratings Reasons for disappearance of Xylella during winter (winter recovery)? Unknown – thus cannot use climatic criteria for predictions Points to Remember: * Infection alone is not disease (Xylella is NOT a virus) Most infected plants are symptomless * Plants can recover from Xylella infection * There are numerous ways to create and sustain PD epidemics. The proper combinations of vectors, plant communities, climate are especially important. Invasions by new vectors can trigger epidemics BGSS: native vector GWSS: new vector GWSS as a vector in Temecula Valley, CA -3 years after first symptomatic plant- Photo A.H. Purcell Glassy-winged sharpshooter (GWSS) Photo R. Krugner General impact of GWSS introduction into California GWSS large populations More X. fastidiosa-vector encounters ? More successful infections New vector-pathogen associations? or New Xylella strains? Higher disease incidence oleander leaf scorch Strains of Xylella behave differently in different plant hosts Example: Almond group strains (A) do not cause Pierce’s disease (PD+) in grape Grape strains (G) cause disease in both almond (ALS+) and grape (PD+) Hendson et al. 2001 Grape group PD3+ PD+ ALS+ Almond group 1 PD3PD- Almond group 2 PD3+ Grape (G) and almond (A) strains have different media requirements in vitro Almeida and Purcell 2003 Appl. Env. Microbiol. 69:7447 Analysis of strain differences indicate that Xylella evolves by recombination rather than mutation. Refs: Schuentzel et al. 2005. Appl. Environ Microbiol. 71:3832+ Scally et al. 2005. Appl. Environ Microbiol. 71:8491+ Almeida et al. 2008. Appl. Environ Microbiol. 74:3690+ This implies an ability to rapidly evolve adaptations to new hosts, as well as virulence in established hosts. Southern hemisphere strains of Xf (citrus ci and coffee co) compared to northern hemisphere strains (grape G, almond A, oleander Ol, Oak) Almeida et al. AEM 2008 Citrus Variegated Chlorosis (CVC) www.CNR.Berkeley.EDU/xylella/ Photo by Steve Lindow Small fruits cause most damage o by Steve Lindow CVC Citrus variegated chlorosis (CVC) spread is from infected orchards to nearby orchards Movements of trees from commercial nurseries accelerated the spread of CVC throughout Brazil A specific background of natural vegetation or weeds does not seem to be a requirement to sustain CVC epidemics. Citrus alone is sufficient if vectors are present in or near the crop. Numerous vector species occur in Brazil. Many different mixes of vector species seem to facilitate spread of CVC Movement of Xylella within plants and the role of cell signaling in its biology Karyn Newman Steve Lindow UC Berkeley Intravessel movement Lateral movement passive active Steve Lindow X. fastidiosa cells are most commonly found in modest sized micro-colonies within xylem vessels Steve Lindow Most X. fastidiosa communities are relatively small, even in symptomatic leaves Asymptomatic Symptomatic Does X. fastidiosa really benefit from crowing into vessels? Steve Lindow X. fastidiosa cells that cannot escape crowded vessels die Vessel 1 Vessel 2 Vessel 3 Cells in top of vessel 2 are escaping into vessel 1 and are green (live), cells in bottom of vessel 2 are not escaping and are red (dead). Steve Lindow Plant colonization phase Extensive vessel colonization Low cell numbers in most vessels Disease symptoms may not be present Insect acquisition phase Some vessels have high cell numbers Disease symptoms may be present Further multiplication in crowded vessels slows DSF Abundance Expression of adhesins Stickiness to Surfaces Type IV pili Twitching Motility Pgl and Eng expression Pit Membrane Degradation Gum Production Ref.: Annu. Rev. Phytopath. 46: 243-271 Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris rpfA rpfB rpfF 76% rpfC 70% rpfA rpfH 66% orf orf rpfB rpfG 58% // rpfF lysS prfB rpfD orf orf orf rpfI recJ 76% rpfC rpfE greA 55% rpfG lysS prfB recJ rpfE greA Xylella fastidiosa rpfB,F Synthesis of “diffusible signal factor” (DSF) rpfG,C DSF perception and signal transduction leading to virulence trait expression Wang et al. Molec. Microbiol. 51:903-910 (2004) X. fastidiosa Decreases Virulence by Coordinating Virulence Genes in Cell Density-Dependent Fashion Wild type rpfF mutant RpfF- mutants of Xylella fastidiosa are MUCH more virulent to grape than wild-type strains Loss of leaves in needle inoculated grapevines 16 Number of lost leaves 14 12 buffer rpfB- (pKLN 57) rpfF- (pKLN 61) rpfF- (pKLN 62) Temecula 10 8 6 4 2 0 105 114 Days post-inoculation . Over-expression of RpfF in Xylella fastidiosa reduces the movement of the pathogen in the plant and limits disease to site of inoculation Identification of DSF-producing and DSF-interfering bacterial strains Strain Genus Origin Mechanism of DSF Interference A B C D E G H J L I U V W X Y Z Paenibacillus Paenibacillus Pseudomonas Staphylococcus Bacillus Pseudomonas Pseudomonas Pseudomonas Staphylococcus Xanthomonas Xanthomonas Xanthomonas Xanthomonas Xanthomonas Xanthomonas Xanthomonas Grape Grape Cabbage Grape broccoli Cabbage Cabbage Tomato Grape Tomato Broccoli Broccoli Broccoli Broccoli Tomato Grape Unknown inhibition Unknown inhibition Enzymatic digestion Unknown inhibition Enzymatic digestion Enzymatic digestion Enzymatic digestion Enzymatic digestion Unknown inhibition DSF production DSF production DSF production DSF production DSF production DSF production DSF production Proportion of grapevines infected Control of Pierce’s disease of grape by co-inoculating DFS-producing and DSF-degrading strains into grape with Xylella fastidiosa 1.0 0.9 0.8 Pathogen plus DSF Inhibitors Pathogen plus DSF Producers 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Xf U W X Y V I E G C H K Treatment J F Blockage of DSF production in Xanthomonas suppresses its ability to inhibit disease in grape when co-inoculated with X. fastidiosa Over-expression of RpfF in Xylella fastidiosa reduces the movement of the pathogen in the plant and limits disease to site of inoculation Co-inoculating DFS-producing or DSF-degrading strains into grape with Xylella fastidiosa reduce symptoms of Pierce’s disease of grape Blocking DSF production in Xanthomonas suppresses its ability to inhibit disease in grape when co-inoculated with X. fastidiosa Other bacteria can interfere with multiplication and movement of Xylella fastidiosa in grape through effects on signaling Could this explain the difficulties of Xylella establishing in some new regions? hypopharynx Temecula pfB- epipharynx rpfF- Temecula rpfB- Signaling (DSF) from Xylella is required for vector transmission and biofilm formation in vector food canal (Ref Newman et al. PNAS rpfF The density of Xylella within plants determines the density of diffusible signaling factor (DSF). The concentration of DSF profoundly affects the expression levels of genes required for multiplication, attachment to surfaces, movement, vector transmission, and virulence. Nabil Killiny Rodrigo Almeida CCGPVE Almeida Purcell 2006 AESA Newman et al. 2003 AEM Xylella cells during early colonization of insect food canal Nabil Killiny Nabil Killiny Nabil Killiny Hypothesis for insect colonization Nabil Killiny Xylella fastidiosa under in flowing medium in vitro Notice flick motility and “pseudosocial” behavior time Videos from Harvey Hoch Cornell Univ. Why congregate? Mass attack principle? Cooperate in bulding biofilm? (both in plants and insects) Xylella may have to survive in insects for prolonged periods Lawn of Xylella cells Nabil Killiny Attachment Via CBPs and HxfB HxfA Exopolysaccharides protect the biofilm Transition from attached cells from laterally to polarly attached Cell binary division allow double layer biofilm formation Persistent in adults Insect maintains Xf overwinter Another environmental cue might exist in the insect foregut to maintain the adhesive (transmissible) state of X. fastidiosa Xylella eats chitin very efficiently Nabil Killiny Steve Lindow What do we NOT know about the invasive potential of Xylella fastidiosa? A lot!! What governs the survival of Xylella in natural vegetation? How important is this for diseases in crops? Are new strains of Xylella due to rapid evolution or an increase in incidence from “hidden” (rare) to noticeable caused by changes in environmental conditions? Do other microbes (including phage) play a role in the ecology of Xylella? Implications for quarantine Expand thinking to include symptomless hosts New vectors can rapidly change the ecology of Xylella. Proactive approaches are probably warranted because of the huge number of vector species. Acknowledgements Steve Lindow, UC Berkeley Subhadeep Chaterjee Karyn Newman Clelia Bacarri Rodrigo Almeida, UC Berkeley Nabil Killiny Joao Spotti Lopes Purcell Lab, UC Berkeley Rodrigo Almeida Helene Feil Barry Hill Stuart Saunders Tina Wistrom Harvey Hoch, Cornell University