Comments
Description
Transcript
View Document - WOW
Page 1 of 7 WoW Unique Water Purification System No need for filters TM – WoW Proprietary th. March 30 , 2011 Ref: CT/15/2011 Rev. 0 Issue 03-2011 An innovative patented method and technology in water purification named “WoW” Executive summary: “WoW” is an invented method that is able to purify any kind of polluted water without any filter. It eliminates any microbiological element as well as solid and liquid contaminants concentrating them. It was originally developed for humanitarian reasons. A prototype was realized and tested in order to prove method effectiveness. It is a very simple but efficient, unique and performing technology. This device is easy to be designed and produced. This device can be enlarged to a bigger scale and method is scalable to large water treatment plants. A scaled up device could be quickly engineered and produced. Invention patent was registered and it is owned by Cross Technology. We recently performed an harsh test on highly contaminated water. Measured data about contaminants abatement performance are summarized on abstract files at Annex (1) and (2). “WoW” method is more selective and more efficient than other methods/systems. Annex (2) compares in details “WoW” method and molecular sieves methods. A very high metals rejection can be observed on abstract files of Annex (1) and (2). This method could effectively remove all radioactive metals (abatement factor in the range of 100000-400000) and other substances that may include radioactive elements. Physics experts confirmed that, in theory, this method may work even on complex water contaminated by radioactive elements. This method could be suitable to effectively remove all radioactive elements from contaminated water. A specific test could be done with our prototype contaminating water with non-radioactive isotopes of elements such as Cs, I, Zr, Sr. Ing. Adriano Marin, Cross Technology S.r.l., Via Friuli n°4, 35020 Villatora di Saonara (PD), Italy, Tel: (+39) 049 8791330 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Contents of this document and any attachment are property of Cross Technology Srl. These information are confidential and intended for the use of named recipient('s) only. Therefore it is forbidden the copy and diffusion of the content. Page 2 of 7 A. Introduction: A1- Introduction to patented method & technology. A2- History and scope A3- Technical description and specifications of working prototype that proved method. A4- Simple Technology - Description. A5- Scalability. A6- Intellectual property. A1- Introduction to patented method & technology: This method has the capacity for purifying and sterilizing any kind of polluted water, without any filter, obtaining drinkable water. It works selecting and extracting water among other liquids and solids. The method of selecting water is the invention we recorded and deposited and this is not correlated to prototype we made or even to its parts. It eliminates • microbiological elements: bacteria, viruses, protozoan, pathogens, parasites and toxins, • chemical solid contaminants, • chemical liquid contaminants, • and any other water pollution. It works through a multistage thermal treatment principle and without the aid of any filter or chemical substances. It is an unique technological approach. No similar ideas have been developed before. Careful check with patent attorney about all existing patents/literature has been done before patent registration. Result is that our patent is totally new either because it works without any filter either because it uses standard components. A2- History and scope: Idea have been originally developed for dearly important humanitarian reasons. Original intent was to study and develop a simple, cheap and effective method to make drinkable water from any kind of polluted water. Main aim was to allow any user to do small investment for having pure and drinkable water. For this purpose we realized a prototype, in order to verify invented method functionality. A3- Technical description and specifications of working prototype that proved method: In order to study and test this method, an Electro-mechanical prototype has been made. Electrical Power consumption of this prototype is around 800W and it produces 1,2 litres/hour with a very little energy recovery. Currently parameters of this prototype are: Ing. Adriano Marin, Cross Technology S.r.l., Via Friuli n°4, 35020 Villatora di Saonara (PD), Italy, Tel: (+39) 049 8791330 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Contents of this document and any attachment are property of Cross Technology Srl. These information are confidential and intended for the use of named recipient('s) only. Therefore it is forbidden the copy and diffusion of the content. Page 3 of 7 800Wh., 1,20 Litres/h, 634Kcal/h meaning 528Kcal/litre (considering 1 kcal = 4,1868 kJ = 0,0012 kW·h; 1KWh = 833Kcal). This method is scalable. Cost/litre decreases a lot in case this method is used into large water treatment plants. Due to method simplicity we verified almost no maintenance is required. Processing parts have to be only washed after use. Washing process is not critical. It is not required to be severe while contaminants remain concentrated. A4- Simple Technology - Description: Whole process is a combination of 4 water transformations that enable to potabilize any kind of contaminated water without any filter. Contrived water processing method is made by few steps of thermal process. For some steps of this process we applied existing knowledge and/or theories, enhancing thermal process phenomena through original techniques and solutions. For other steps of this process we used existing devices just making them more selective and performing. In a few words prototype is realized by simple technology while this method is based on solid physics theory. This thermal process could apparently be confused with simple distillation process because our method contains it. However our method is more complex and we developed particular solutions in order to solve distillation defects. For instance we avoid drag factor typical of distillation. Moreover “WoW” thermal process is selective. A5- Scalability: Prototype just proved effectiveness of our method. Device can be enlarged to a bigger scale and method is scalable to large water treatment plants with high water flow volumes( ≈20 to 5000l/h). For many reasons the efficiency of a scaled up system could be improved al lot. It can be also improved even considering alternative energy sources than electric source. Considering more efficient heating systems, with energy recovery systems, water treatment cost per litre may change radically. Finally, considering achievable improved efficiency and alternative heating sources, treatment cost per water litre can decrease of ~80-85% if applied on a scaled up treatment system while energy needed per 1 litre could drop off to ~200250Kcal/litre. A6- Intellectual property: Invention patent has been registered in Italy on 2009 after patent search survey. Rights ownership and exploitation are owned by Cross Technology. Author and inventors are Cross Technology shareholders. Engineering team is by Cross Technology. Ing. Adriano Marin, Cross Technology S.r.l., Via Friuli n°4, 35020 Villatora di Saonara (PD), Italy, Tel: (+39) 049 8791330 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Contents of this document and any attachment are property of Cross Technology Srl. These information are confidential and intended for the use of named recipient('s) only. Therefore it is forbidden the copy and diffusion of the content. Page 4 of 7 B. Facts: B1- Performances data analysis and competitive advantages. B2- Opportunities and strenghts. B1- Performances data analysis and competitive advantages: A multinational company asked us to perform validation test on “WoW” device. Its technicians and managers directly delivered to us bacteriological and chemical contaminants to be mixed into water and perform test. Analysis on purified water were very successful. Recently an harsher test has been performed in order to understand prototype and method limits and weak points as well as to improve the device performances. This test was conceived by a National certified laboratory which tainted some water with high quantities of dangerous contaminants such us heavy metals (cadmium, mercury, arsenic, barium, lead etc.) surfactants, aromatic organic compound, organic halogenated volatile compounds etc.. The same laboratory then tested samples of purified water. Contaminants were added into water all together therefore our device had to process and remove all pollutants at the same time. Quantity of contaminants mixed into water were far beyond the local allowed emission limit fixed and regulated from a local law regarding drainage of industrial waste water into sewerage system. Data about contaminants abatement/rejection or selectivity performance that laboratory measured are summarized on abstract file at Annex (1). It has to be considered that this test was performed in the worse condition possible. Moreover sensitivity of used instruments limited test accuracy of low contaminant quantities present into purified water. Competitive analysis on “WoW” compared to existing purifying technologies (Reverse Osmosis Systems used by big and complex plants & systems with multistage filters as well as Reverse Osmosis Systems used by US Army) can be found on abstract file at Annex (2). This abstract summarizes relevant data we extracted from laboratory certificates of chemical analysis. Original certificates of chemical analysis about polluted water and purified water are available on demand. An improvement is under development for ammonia rejection. B2- Opportunity and strenghts: Analysing relevant data summarized on abstracts of Annex (1) and (2) it is easy to evaluate how “WoW” method enhanced water selectivity performances compared to other systems especially considering that validation test has been performed on hand made prototype not yet engineered. Another strength to be pointed out is that our method is scalable and that scaled up device could be quickly engineered and produced. This device was designed and realized using standard raw materials. No critical technology has been used furthermore manufacturing could be quickly done. Ing. Adriano Marin, Cross Technology S.r.l., Via Friuli n°4, 35020 Villatora di Saonara (PD), Italy, Tel: (+39) 049 8791330 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Contents of this document and any attachment are property of Cross Technology Srl. These information are confidential and intended for the use of named recipient('s) only. Therefore it is forbidden the copy and diffusion of the content. Page 5 of 7 Once again this method is simple, low cost (if considered in proportion to efficiency obtained by treatment) and it is very efficient on contaminants treatment. “WoW” method is reliable, strong and resistant. C. Competitive analysis C1- Water treatment systems and their effectiveness C2- Comparison of methods and technology. C1- Water treatment systems and their effectiveness: From performances point of view ultrafiltration, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis (molecular sieves) are all methods similar to each other and are the best technologies currently available. For this reason we compared “WoW” to these technologies. These technologies are able to remove contaminants, even if with not so high rejection ratio, when molecular size <0.0001 μm. This means that some contaminants cannot be effectively removed while others are almost not removed at all. Here below a list of some key notes regarding molecular sieves methods. 1) High purchasing and maintenance cost. 2) Membranes deteriorate rapidly in the presence of petroleum, oils, lubricants (POL) and chlorine. 3) If water is too hard, it may form a deposit that requires immediate cleaning to prevent the development of a pathogens colonization site and to prevent nano pores clogging. 4) It is not a suitable system for purifying particularly filthy water due to its basic components sensitivity. 5) It is required a microbiological analysis of water before each intake of purified water therefore it is often associated with UV purification systems (this is necessary even in the best mobile available system ROWPU (Reverse Osmosis Water Purifying Unit); often, in absence of chemical analysis, it is recommended to use in emergency conditions for 24 to 48 hours only). For outlined above reasons, Reverse Osmosis systems are vulnerable and not effective in 100% of cases. C2- Comparison of methods and technology: Abstracts files on Annex (1) and (2) show in details chemical/technical data in order to compare “WoW” method and molecular sieves methods. Evidences confirmed that “WoW” method is more selective and that contaminant rejection is more efficient than on other methods/systems. Ing. Adriano Marin, Cross Technology S.r.l., Via Friuli n°4, 35020 Villatora di Saonara (PD), Italy, Tel: (+39) 049 8791330 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Contents of this document and any attachment are property of Cross Technology Srl. These information are confidential and intended for the use of named recipient('s) only. Therefore it is forbidden the copy and diffusion of the content. Page 6 of 7 D. Specific case D1- How it could work with radioactive elements. D2- Nuclear Expert Opinions and Endorsements. D3- We are available to perform a specific test with some not radioactive key metals. D1- How it could work with radioactive elements: As stated and described above, “WoW” method can reject all relevant contaminants. A very high rejection about metals can be observed on abstracts files of Annex (1) and (2). These results were achieved even with heavily polluted liquids. This method can effectively remove all radioactive metals (abatement factor in the range of 100000-400000) and other elements that may include radioactive elements (for instance plankton, bacteria, salts, colloidal suspensions, molecules, etc). This means that “WoW” method can remove radioactive elements even from a very complex water, as sea water, avoiding multistage solution. No difference on behavior can be considered between stable elements and radioactive elements. At the same time this method can reject radioactive contaminants concentrating them into a dense mixture that can be easily drained, collected, stocked and preserved. Purified water can be drained without any problem as radioactive elements remain concentrated inside the device. In this case device has to be studied with particular solutions for nuclear application. D2- Expert Opinions and Endorsements: We consulted nuclear physics experts in order to confirm “WoW” effectiveness on radioactive contaminants rejection. After checking Annex (1) and (2) experts confirmed that in theory this method may work even on complex water contaminated by radioactive elements due to its unique metal abatement performances. In particular a physicist specialized in applied research on controlled nuclear fusion, researcher for over 10 years at CNR (Italian National Research Centre) and at ENEA (Italian National Body for Alternative Energies) highlighted high metals abatement factor of “WoW” process compared to existing methods. This performance is essential for purifying water contaminated by nuclear elements. D3- It is possible to perform a specific test with some key metals. It is possible to confirm our opinion performing a specific tests with our prototype, contaminating water with non-radioactive isotopes of elements that are part of decay chains such as Cs, I, Zr, Sr.. Ing. Adriano Marin, Cross Technology S.r.l., Via Friuli n°4, 35020 Villatora di Saonara (PD), Italy, Tel: (+39) 049 8791330 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Contents of this document and any attachment are property of Cross Technology Srl. These information are confidential and intended for the use of named recipient('s) only. Therefore it is forbidden the copy and diffusion of the content. Page 7 of 7 NOTES: Invented process could be used also for other applications and aims. “WoW” method is visibly better than existing treatment methods. Annex (1) and (2) show that “WoW” process is more efficient than other processes (for instance in some cases it is even 4 orders of magnitude better than Reverse Osmosis). ANNEX: (1) ABSTRACT of WOW Pollutants abatement factors. (2) ABSTRACT OF WOW POTABILIZATION vs REVERSE OSMOSIS & ROWPU COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS. Ing. Adriano Marin, Cross Technology S.r.l., Via Friuli n°4, 35020 Villatora di Saonara (PD), Italy, Tel: (+39) 049 8791330 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Contents of this document and any attachment are property of Cross Technology Srl. These information are confidential and intended for the use of named recipient('s) only. Therefore it is forbidden the copy and diffusion of the content. "WoW" POTABILIZATION EFFICIENCY DATA as Result of tests dated 12-02-2011 ACQUA CONTAMINATA PRIMA DEL TEST / POLLUTED WATER BEFORE TEST ACQUA PURIFICATA DOPO IL TEST / DRINKABLE WATER AFTER WOW TEST LAB. TEST REPORT N. 140344 Rev. 0 09/03/2011 LAB. TEST REPORT N. 140346 Rev. 0 09/03/2011 CONTAMINANTI / POLLUTANTS pH Conducibilità elettrica / electrical conductivity QUANTITA' CONTAMINANTI / POLLUTANTS QUANTITY 6,90 Tol./ Note +/-0,1 UNITA' / UNIT QUANTITA' MASSIMA CONSENTITA DAL D.Lo 152/2006 (Allegato 5, Tabella 3) / MAXIMUM ALLOWED LIMIT AS PER IT. LAW 152/2006 (Annex 5, Table 3) [valori limite di emissione di acque reflue industriali in fognatura / emission limit values for industrial waste water into sewerage system] Q.TA' Cont./Q.TA' Limite -- Q.TY CONTAMINANTI / POLLUTANTS Poll./Q.TY Limit QUANTITA' RESIDUA CONTAMINANTI / RESIDUAL POLLUTANTS QUANTITY Tol./ Note UNITA' / UNIT QUANTITA' MASSIMA CONTAMINANTI CONSENTITA PER LA POTABILIZAZIONE DAL D.Lo 31/2001 / MAXIMUM ALLOWED CONTAMINANTS LIMIT FOR PURIFIED WATER AS PER IT. LAW 31/2001 FATTORE DI ABBATTIMENTO DEI CONTAMINANTI / POLLUTANTS ABATEMENT FACTOR -- come risultato del test / as result of test NOTE NUMERICAL % ABATEMENT FACTOR ABATEMENT FACTOR pH 5,5-9,5 2.228 µS cm-1 N.A. 160,00 mg/l 0,60 267 113,00 mg/l 30,00 4 pH 6,0-9,5 209 µS cm-1 N.A. Nitriti (NO2) / Nitrites 0,07 mg/l 0,50 2.286 Ammoniaca (NH4)/Ammonia 38,00 mg/l N.A. 2,97 66,3716814% 1,00 mg/l 250,00 291 99,6563574% pH Conducibilità elettrica / electrical conductivity 8,40 +/-0,1 METALLI / METALS Nitriti (NO2)/Nitrites Ammoniaca (NH4)/Ammonia Cloruri(Cl)/Chlorides Nitrati(No3)/Nitrates Solfati(SO4)/Sulfates Calcio(Ca)/Calcium Magnesio(Mg)/Magnesium Sodio(Na)/Sodium Potassio(K)/Potassium Bromati/Bromates Cloriti(ClO2)/Chlorites Tensioattivi anionici (M.B.A.S.)/Anionic Surfactant Arsenico(As)/Arsenic Bario(Ba)/Barium Cadmio(Cd)/Cadmium Cromo Totale(Cr)/Chrome Total Cromo VI/Chrome VI Ferro (Fe)/Iron Mercurio(Hg)/Mercury Manganese(Mn)/Manganese Piombo(Pb)/Lead 99,9562500% 291,00 +/-29 mg/l 1200,00 0,2425 Cloruri(Cl)/Chlorides 258,00 +/-41 mg/l 30,00 9 Nitrati(No3)/Nitrates < 1,00 mg/l 50,00 258 99,6124031% Solfati(SO4)/Sulfates < 1,00 mg/l 250,00 261 99,6168582% mg/l 100,00 113 99,1142604% + > < 1,00 30,40 +/-4,3 mg/l N.A. N.A. Magnesio(Mg)/Magnesium < 0,50 mg/l N.A. 61 98,3552632% 189,90 +/-24,7 mg/l N.A. N.A. Sodio(Na)/Sodium < 0,50 mg/l 200,00 380 99,7367035% 161,60 +/-11,3 mg/l N.A. N.A. Potassio(K)/Potassium < 0,20 mg/l N.A. 808 111.988,00 µg/l 25,00 4480 Bromati/Bromates < 3,00 µg/l 10,00 37.329 99,9973211% 37.014,00 µg/l N.A. N.A. Cloriti(ClO2)/Chlorites < 100,00 µg/l N.A. 370 99,7298320% >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 107,00 mg/l 0,20 535 Tensioattivi anionici (M.B.A.S.)/Anionic Surfactant < 0,02 mg/l 0,20 5.350 99,9813084% >> 329.000,00 µg/l 500,00 658 Arsenico(As)/Arsenic < 1,00 µg/l 10,00 329.000 99,9996960% 360.000,00 µg/l 20000,00 18 31.000,00 µg/l 20,00 1550 >> >> >> >> >> 261,00 +/-31 mg/l 1000,00 0,26 112,90 +/-16,9 mg/l N.A. N.A. Calcio(Ca)/Calcium 257.000,00 Bario(Ba)/Barium < 5,00 µg/l 1.000,00 72.000 99,9986111% Cadmio(Cd)/Cadmium < 0,20 µg/l 5,00 155.000 99,9993548% 99,9945525% µg/l 4000,00 64 Cromo Totale(Cr)/Chrome Total < mg/l 0,20 800 Cromo VI/Chrome VI < 349.000,00 µg/l 4000,00 87 Ferro (Fe)/Iron 16200 160,00 +/-18 99,8762376% 81.000,00 µg/l 5,00 119.000,00 µg/l 4000,00 30 359.000,00 µg/l 300,00 1197 Piombo(Pb)/Lead 9,00 µg/l Tot. Val. < 10000µg N.A. 5,00 µg/l Tot. Val. < 10000µg N.A. 4,00 µg/l Tot. Val. < 10000µg N.A. 6,00 µg/l Tot. Val. < 10000µg N.A. 3,00 µg/l Tot. Val. < 10000µg N.A. 1.150,00 µg/l Tot. Val. < 10000µg N.A. Benzene Etilbenzene M,p-Xilene O-xilene Stirene Toluene 14,00 0,02 +/-0,005 19,00 Mercurio(Hg)/Mercury < 0,20 Manganese(Mn)/Manganese < 5,00 µg/l 50,00 18.357 mg/l 50,00 9.412 99,9893750% µg/l 200,00 18.368 99,9945559% 1,00 405.000 99,9997531% µg/l µg/l 50,00 23.800 99,9957983% 1,00 +/-0,2 µg/l 10,00 359.000 99,9997214% < 0,3 10,00 30,00 96,6666667% 0,50 µg/l 10,00 10,00 90,0000000% < 0,50 µg/l 10,00 8,00 87,5000000% < 0,50 µg/l 10,00 12,00 91,6666667% < 0,30 *** *** *** *** *** *** µg/l < µg/l 10,00 10,00 90,0000000% µg/l 10,00 1.642,86 99,9391304% **** **** **** **** µg/l 30,00 270 99,6296296% µg/l 30,00 6.570 99,9847793% µg/l 30,00 538 99,8141264% µg/l 30,00 810 99,8765432% >> >> COMPOSTI ORGANICI AROMATICI / AROMATIC ORGANIC COMPOUND Benzene Etilbenzene M,p-Xilene O-xilene Stirene Toluene COMPOSTI ORGANICI ALOGENATI VOLATILI / ORGANIC HALOGENATED VOLATILE COMPOUND Triclorofluorometano/Trichlorofluoro 27,00 µg/l N.A. methane 657,00 µg/l N.A. Freon 269,00 */-118 µg/l N.A. Cloroformio/Chloroform Tetracloroetilene/Tetrachloroethylen 81,00 +/-36 µg/l N.A. e COMPOSTI MICROBIOLOGICI / MICROBIOLOGIC COMPOUND 0,70 N.A. Triclorofluorometano/Trichlorofluorom ethane < 0,10 N.A. Freon < 0,10 N.A. N.A. Cloroformio/Chloroform Tetracloroetilene/Tetrachloroethylene < 0,50 < 0,10 1.000.000.000 99,9999999% Stafilococcus aureus ATCC 9144 1.000.000.000 99,9999999% Enterococcus faecalis CCM 2541 1.000.000.000 99,9999999% Escherichia coli NCTC 13167 1.000.000.000 99,9999999% Virus 1.000.000.000 99,9999999% Protozoi / Protozoans 1.000.000.000 99,9999999% Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 9027 0,00 $$ >> $$ >> $$ >> $$ >> $$ >> $$ $ $ $ $ $ $ NOTE A N N E X (1) Page 1 of 2 (>)Il valore limite dell'ammoniaca è valido solo in Italia. Negli altri paesi non esiste alcun valore limite / Allowed limit for ammonia in valid in Italy country only. In other countries there is no limit value. (>>)Fattore di abbattimento minimo misurato con questo teste e correlato alla sensibilità dello strumento: il fattore di abbattimento reale può risultare molto maggiore / Minimum abatement factor measured with this test and correlated to sensitivity of instrument: real abatement factor could be much better. (+)E' in corso una modifica a WOW per aumentare il fattore di abbattimento mediante strippaggio ad aria / An improvement is in progress in order to increase ammonia abatement stripping it by air insufflation. (***)Limite valore totale composti aromatici < 10µg / Total allowed limit for aromatic compound is < 10µg (****)Limite valore totale dei Trialometani totali < 30µg / Total allowed limit fot total Trihalomethanes compound is < 30µg ($)Valore di abbattimento microbiologico misurato in precedenti test / Microbiological abatement measured and verifed on previous tests ($$)Valore di abbattimento "worst case"; realmente WoW è in grado di offrire un abbattimento molto superiore / Abatement value worst case; really WoW is able to guarantee an abatment value much better. A N N E X (1) Page 2 of 2 WOW vs REVERSE OSMOSIS & ROWPU COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS as Result of WOW tests dated 12-02-11 TEST REFERENCE: LAB. TEST REPORT N. 140346 & 140344 Rev. 0 09/03/2011 MULTI STAGE WOW CONTAMINANTI / POLLUTANTS FATTORE DI ABBATTIMENTO DEI CONTAMINANTI / POLLUTANTS ABATEMENT FACTOR -- come risultato del test / as result of test NUMERICAL ABATEMENT FACTOR NOTE % ABATEMENT FACTOR FATTORE DI REVERSE OSMOSIS MIGLIORAMENTO FATTORE DI FATTORE DI ABBATTIMENTO MIGLIORAMENTO DI WOW vs DEI CONTAMINANTI / REVERSE DI WOW vs ROWPU POLLUTANTS ABATEMENT OSMOSIS / / IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT FACTOR -- come risultato del FACTOR OF WOW test / as result of test FACTOR OF WOW vs REVERSE [ Biblio. 1) & 3) ] vs REVERSE OSMOSIS OSMOSIS NUMERICAL % ABATEMENT FACTOR NUMERICAL ABATEMENT FACTOR ABATEMENT FACTOR METALLI / METALS Nitriti (NO2)/Nitrites Ammoniaca (NH4)/Ammonia Cloruri(Cl)/Chlorides Nitrati(No3)/Nitrates Solfati(SO4)/Sulfates Calcio(Ca)/Calcium Magnesio(Mg)/Magnesium Sodio(Na)/Sodium Potassio(K)/Potassium Bromati/Bromates Cloriti(ClO2)/Chlorites Tensioattivi anionici (M.B.A.S.)/Anionic Surfactant Arsenico(As)/Arsenic Bario(Ba)/Barium Cadmio(Cd)/Cadmium Cromo Totale(Cr)/Chrome Total Cromo VI/Chrome VI Ferro (Fe)/Iron Mercurio(Hg)/Mercury Manganese(Mn)/Manganese Piombo(Pb)/Lead 600-GPH ROWPU (US. Army: main used water purifier) FATTORE DI ABBATTIMENTO DEI CONTAMINANTI / POLLUTANTS ABATEMENT FACTOR -- come risultato del test / as result of test [ Biblio. 2) ] % ABATEMENT FACTOR Range > > > > > > > > 2.285,71 2,97 291,00 258,00 261,00 112,90 60,80 379,80 808,00 37.329,33 370,14 99,9562500% 66,3716814% 99,6563574% 99,6124031% 99,6168582% 99,1142604% 98,3552632% 99,7367035% 99,8762376% 99,9973211% 99,7298320% >+ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 114,29 0,09 0,29 5,16 2,61 3,32 1,79 3,80 35,13 1.493,17 3,70 ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ 20,00 34,00 1.000,00 50,00 100,00 34,00 34,00 100,00 23,00 25,00 100,00 95,0000000% 97,0588235% 99,9000000% 98,0000000% 99,0000000% 97,0588235% 97,0588235% 99,0000000% 95,6521739% 96,0000000% 99,0000000% 67,23 ? 5,82 17,20 ? ? 1,22 7,60 ? ? ? ~ 34,00 97,0588235% ~ ~ 50,00 15,00 98,0000000% 93,3333333% ~ ~ 50,00 50,00 98,0000000% 98,0000000% ~ ~ ~ 100,00 99,0000000% 25,00 96,0000000% 34,00 97,0588235% ~ 2,25 55,5555556% ~ 34,00 97,0588235% > 5.350,00 99,9813084% >> 157,35 ~ 34,00 97,0588235% ? > > 329.000,00 72.000,00 155.000,00 99,9996960% 99,9986111% 99,9993548% 97,0588235% 97,0588235% 97,0588235% ? ? 1.550,00 18.357,14 99,9945525% 34,00 97,0588235% 734,29 > 9.411,76 18.368,42 405.000,00 23.800,00 359.000,00 99,9893750% 99,9945559% 99,9997531% 99,9957983% 99,9997214% ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 34,00 34,00 34,00 > >> >> >> >> >> 9.676,47 2.117,65 4.558,82 34,00 34,00 34,00 34,00 34,00 97,0588235% 97,0588235% 97,0588235% 97,0588235% 97,0588235% 276,82 ? 180.000,00 ? 10.558,82 33,78% 20,00 6,67 5,33 8,00 6,67 1,64 1,50 1,50 1,50 1,50 1,50 1.000,00 33,3333333% 33,3333333% 33,3333333% 33,3333333% 33,3333333% 99,9000000% 20,00 6,67 5,33 8,00 6,67 1.095,24 15-50% 15-50% 15-50% 15-50% 15-50% 15-50% ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1,50 1,50 1,50 1,50 1,50 1,50 33,3333333% 33,3333333% 33,3333333% 33,3333333% 33,3333333% 33,3333333% 3,00 66,6666667% 3,00 3,00 66,6666667% 66,6666667% 2,00 50,0000000% 1.000,00 99,9000000% > > > > >> >> 539,92 276,82 540,25 11.911,76 700,00 10.558,82 COMPOSTI ORGANICI AROMATICI / AROMATIC ORGANIC COMPOUND Benzene Etilbenzene M,p-Xilene O-xilene Stirene Toluene > > > > > 30,00 10,00 8,00 12,00 10,00 1.642,86 96,6666667% 90,0000000% 87,5000000% 91,6666667% 90,0000000% 99,9391304% £ £ £ £ £ $$ $$ $$ $$ $$ COMPOSTI ORGANICI ALOGENATI VOLATILI / ORGANIC HALOGENATED VOLATILE COMPOUND Triclorofluorometano/Trichlorofluor > 270,00 99,6296296% omethane > 6.570,00 99,9847793% Freon > 538,00 99,8141264% Cloroformio/Chloroform Tetracloroetilene/Tetrachloroethyle > 810,00 99,8765432% ne £ £ £ £ $$ $$ $$ $$ 180,00 1,50 33,3333333% 90,00 50-80% 4.380,00 358,67 1,50 1,50 33,3333333% 33,3333333% 2.190,00 179,33 50-80% 50-80% 540,00 1,50 33,3333333% 405,00 15-90% ~ ~ ~ ~ 1.000,00 99,9000000% 1.000.000,00 ? ? BATTERI, PROTOZOI, FUNGUS, VIRUS, TOSSINE ECC. / BACTERIA, PROTOZHOAN, FUNGUS, VIRUSES, TOXINS ETC. QUALSIASI / ANY 1.000.000.000,00 99,9999999% $ 1.000.000,00 > NOTE: -I dati relativi al fattore di abbattimento dell'Osmosi Inversa sopra riportati sono legati a grandi impianti complessi con filtri a multi stadio / The abatement factors of the Reverse Osmosis above listed related to big and complex plants & systems with multi-stage filters. -I dati relativi al fattore di abbattimento dell'Osmosi Inversa sono dati non stabili e talvolta incerti./The abatement factor of the Reverse Osmosis data are not stable and sometimes uncertain. A N N E X (2) Page 1 of 2 -Alcune sostanze disciolte nell'acqua non possono essere rimosse da sistemi ad Osmosi Inversa./Some substances dissolved in water can not be removed by Reverse Osmosis systems. -Il test di Wow si riferisce ad un worst case dato che i livelli di contaminazione degli inquinanti sono assai elevati (molto oltre i limiti di legge delle acque di scarico) e i contaminanti sono stati provati tutti assieme./ Wow test is in a worst case condition since the contamination levels of pollutants are very high (well beyond the legal limits of wastewater) and contaminants are present all together. Il simbolo "?" indica, per mancanza di informazioni, un dato non certo ma presunto / The symbol "?" indicates, due to lack of information, certainly not a given data but presumed data. (£)Dato non dichiarato. I sistemi a Reverse Osmosis non possono eliminare tali contaminanti. Quindi tali dati si riferiscono ad un filtraggo con carboni attivi / Data not declared. Reverse Osmosis systems cannot reject these contaminants. So these data are referred to a filter with activated carbons. [BIBLIOGRAFIA / BIBLIOGRAPHY 1) & 3)] (>)Il valore limite dell'ammoniaca è valido solo in Italia. Negli altri paesi non esiste alcun valore limite / Allowed limit for ammonia in valid in Italy country only. In other countries there is no limit value. [Drinking Water Contaminants US EPA; European_standards_for_drinking-water; Maximum Contaminant Levels - Safe Drinking Water Act] (>>)Fattore di abbattimento minimo misurato con questo test e correlato alla sensibilità dello strumento: il fattore di abbattimento reale può risultare molto maggiore / Minimum abatment factor measured with this test and correlated to sensitivity of instrument: real abatement factor could be much better. (+)E' in corso una modifica a WOW per aumentare il fattore di abbattimento mediante strippaggio ad aria / An improvement is in progress in order to increase ammonia abatement stripping it by air insufflation. ($)Valore di abbattimento microbiologico misurato in precedenti test / Microbiological abatement measured and verifed on previous tests ($$)Valore di abbattimento "worst case"; realmente WoW è in grado di offrire un abbattimento molto superiore / Abatement value worst case; really WoW is able to guarantee an abatment value much better. BIBLIOGRAFIA / BIBLIOGRAPHY: 1) Reverse Osmosis RO Water Filters GUIDE by http://www.reverse-osmosis-water-filter-guide.com/reverse-osmosis-ro-water-filter-systems.html 2) ROWPU tbmed577.pdf by www-nehc.med.navy.mil/downloads/prevmed/Drinking_Water_RA.pdf or http://armypubs.army.mil/med/dr_pubs/dr_a/pdf/tbmed577.pdf 3) Capacità di adsorbimento Carboni Attivi -- SNF FLOEGER GROUP - Prohibited disclosure and for internal use only.pdf ( Absorption capacity of activated carbons by SNF ) Date: 08-03-2011 A N N E X (2) Revision: 0 Issue: 01-2011 Page 2 of 2