Comments
Description
Transcript
S-Bonora
Switch da regimi NN based – l’esperienza dei trial e la clinica Stefano Bonora Università di Torino XIV SIMIT8-11 novembre , Catania STR vs. MTR: US Analysis of Claims Database Real-World ART Persistence with Single Tablet Regimens: Stribild vs Eviplera vs Atripla vs. Multi-Tablet Regimens (MTRs) To evaluate real-world persistence with different backbones (FTC/TDF vs. ABC/3TC) STRs vs. MTRs as initial ART and between STRs (STB vs. EPA vs. ATR) using data from the US Truven MarketScan® claims database between 10/2008 and 03/2014 Treatment Persistence Among Different STRs and MTRs Stribild and Eviplera were associated with the highest rates of persistence throughout 18 months Sweet D, et al. HIV12 2014. Glasgow, UK. Poster #P5 Study 111 Study Design Phase 2b, open-label, multicenter, 48-week study of immediate switch from EFV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TDF in stable, virologically controlled subjects Stable EFV/FTC/TDF for ≥ 3 mos VL <50 c/mL for ≥ 8 wks Switch due to EFV intolerance No resistance to study drugs (N=50) EFV/FTC/TDF STR RPV/FTC/TDF STR 12 week 24 week 48 week Pre-dose PK samples obtained: Wks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 Primary endpoint: • HIV-1 RNA <50c/mL at week 12 after switching Secondary endpoints: • Safety and tolerability of RPV/FTC/TDF STR over 24 & 48 wks • HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at week 24 and week 48 post-switch • Pharmacokinetics of RPV after switching from EFV Mills A, et al. BHIVA 2012. Birmingham, UK. #P186 3 Study 111 Virologic Outcomes through Week 48 - Snapshot Analysis Virologic Non-Suppression (4%) • Maintained in majority of subjects who switched from EFV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TDF thru W48 1) Virologic failure* #1 • VL of 330,000 (W48), 1,890 (W51), and 991 c/mL (W54) • W48: No detectable RPV concentrations • Pan-sensitive virus at W48 & W51 % HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL Virologic Suppression 100 100% 100% 94% 2) Virologic failure #2 • VL of 63 (W36) and 95 c/mL (W48) • W48: Switched back to EFV/FTC/TDF • W51: VL <50 c/mL 80 60 40 No Week 48 Data† (2%) 20 0 3) Lost to follow-up due to incarceration 49/49 49/49 46/49 12 24 48 Weeks Mills A, et al. HIV Clinical Trials 2013;14(5):216–223 n/N * Virologic failure defined as confirmed HIV-1 RNA >50 c/mL at least 2 weeks apart † Wk 48 window spanned 84 days (Days 295 to 379) 4 GS 264-111 Secondary Endpoint: RPV PK after Switching from EFV Mean (95% CI) Rilpivirine (Ctrough) or Efavirenz Concentrations (anytime) EFV Concentration RPV C trough RPV mean C trough in ECHO/THRIVE 2000 100 450 300 150 80 50 60 40 40 30 20 10 RPV IC90 (~12 ng/mL) EFV IC90 (~10 ng/mL) 0 0 2 4 6 8 12 16 24 Weeks Post-Switch (EFV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TDF) 20 0 482 RPV Ctrough (ng/ml) EFV Concentrations (ng/ml) 120 2500 • EFV mean Ctrough above IC90 (~10 ng/ml*) up to ~4 weeks • RPV mean Ctrough within reference range by 2 weeks • No subject had RPV below quantifiable levels at any visit except for 1 nonadherent subject at W48 * Protein-binding adjusted; Corbett JW, et al. J Med. Chem 2000:43;2019-2030 Mills A, et al. HIV Clinical Trials 2013;14(5):216–223 5 Metabolism of EFV produces a highly neurotoxic metabolite (8-OH-EFV) that is capable of damaging neurites at very low concentrations. Thus, cognitive impairments associated with EFV may involve synaptic damage mediated by its major metabolite, 8-OH-EFV 6 UK Study - ATR to EPA Switch due to CNS Toxicity Changes in CNS Adverse Events and Sleep Open-label, multicenter, 24-week study of 40 virologically suppressed subjects with ongoing CNS toxicity at least 12 wks of ATR (median 40 mos)2 switching to EPA 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 p<0.001 p<0.001 Baseline Week 43 Sleep Questionnaire Score Median total sleep score (%) Total CNS score (%) ACTG CNS Toxicity Score Week 12 p<0.001 35 30 25 p<0.001 20 15 10 5 0 Baseline Week 43 Week 24 • Switching ATR to EPA led to significant improvement in CNS toxicity and sleep quality with 100% maintenance of virologic suppression Identification of individuals with efavirenz toxicity is essential as alternative agents lead to improvements in tolerability and toxicity EPA = RPV/FTC/TDF; ATR = EFV/FTC/TDF 1. Rowlands J, et al. ICAAC 2014. Washington, DC. #H1005 2. Rowlands J, et al. BHIVA 2014. Liverpool. Oral #O4 3. Nelson M, et al. ICAAC 2013. Denver, CO. #H-672b 7 UK Study - ATR to EPA Switch due to CNS Toxicity CNS Adverse Events Overall Grade 2-4 CNS adverse events significantly decreased at Week 4, 12 and 24 (p<0.001) P<0.001 Grade 2-4 CNS Adverse Events Baseline Week 4 Week 12 Week 24 100 Proportions (%) P<0.001 80 60 P=0.001 P=0.020 40 P<0.001 P=0.012 P=0.103 20 P=0.021 P<0.001 P=0.004 P=0.999 0 • Eight of 10 CNS adverse events showed statistically significant improvement (P<0.05) Rowlands J, et al. ICAAC 2014. Washington, DC. #H1005 Rowlands J, et al. BHIVA 2014. Liverpool. Oral #O4 8 PRO-STR - Spanish STR Cohort Switching to STR of Eviplera due to Regimen Intolerance Prospective, multicenter study of HIV-infected patients on stable ART for ≥ 3 months who switched to EPA from NNRTI (75%) and PI (25%) due to intolerance of previous regimen (n=122) Reasons for switch: CNS (66%), GI (16%), metabolic (13%), other reasons (8%) Efficacy: 84% patients remained suppressed (<50 c/mL) at Week 16 Patient-reported outcomes: Quality of life, number of symptoms, degree of discomfort, treatment satisfaction (ease and flexibility) were all significantly improved 4 wks post-switch After 4 weeks, >80% of patients felt EPA was slightly to much better than their previous ART ACTG Symptom Index Satisfaction with Treatment Health Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Baseline Baseline Week 4 Week 16 X = P ≤ 0.001 for paired data vs. baseline Switching to an STR of RPV/FTC/TDF resulted in significant improvements of symptoms of prior ART intolerance, quality of life, and treatment satisfaction Podzamczer D, et al. HIV12 2014. Glasgow, UK. Poster #282 ‡ EPA in Switch (Italy) Switch from ATR to EPA Reduces Patient-Reported Symptoms with Improved Quality of Life and Lipids Randomized, single centre study evaluating virologically suppressed patients on stable ATR switching from ATR to EPA immediately (n=44) or after 4 months (n=20) All patients maintained virologic suppression (< 50 c/mL) Significantly improved quality of life 4 months after switch (EQ5D); p = 0.027 Majority (28/32) of patient-reported symptoms improved at Month 4 Total Cholesterol 16% <200 mg/dL (Grade 1) 200 to 239 mg/dL (Grade 2) ≥240 mg/dL (Grade 3) % of Subjects “Switching from ATR to EPA is a safe, well tolerated strategy that improves the overall health status of HIV-treated patients in terms of QoL and self- reported patient oriented outcomes.” ATR - EFV/FTC/TDF, EPA - RPV/FTC/TDF Maggiolo, F. Glasgow, UK 2014, #P266 Author’s Last Name, Conference Name, Year, Presentation # 11 Study 102 and 103 (STB vs. ATR and ATV+RTV+TVD) – Week 144 Median Changes in Fasting Lipids from Baseline STB (n=701) ATR (n=352) ATV+RTV+TVD (n=355) Change From BL at Week 144 (mg/dL ) 1,2 Study 102 Study 1021,2 P =0.007 P =0.007 Study103 103 3 Study 3 P =0.021 4 4 4 No difference in change in TC to HDL ratio in either treatment groups TC: total cholesterol; LDL: low density lipoprotein; HDL: high density lipoprotein; TG: triglycerides 1. Wohl D, et al. JAIDS 2014; 65 (3):e119-121 2. Wohl D, et al. ICAAC 2013. Denver, CO. #H-672a 3. Clumeck N, et al. JAIDS 2014;65 (3):e121-124 4. Data on file. Gilead Sciences, Inc. Study 111 Median Change in Fasting Lipids from Baseline to Wk 48 TC* Median Change in Fasting Lipid Values, mg/dL Baseline (Q1, Q3)†: 177 (159, 210) LDL* 113 (93, 132) HDL TG* 49 (41,58) 114 (86, 147) -2 -8 -17 -26 • TC:HDL ratio decreased by 0.17 (p=0.14) * P < 0.05 from Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test † (Q1, Q3) = 25th percentile, 75th percentile 13 Mills A, et al. HIV Clinical Trials 2013;14(5):216–223 ‡ EPA in Switch (Italy) Switching to EPA in Virologically Suppressed Patients Improves Lipid Profile Retrospective, multicentre, cohort study switching from PI or NNRTI (n=508) • At 6 months, 1.1% VF and 5.5% had discontinued for any reason • Only the number of pre-switch regimens was associated with VF (HR 1.13, p=0.001) • Type of pre-switch regimen was not associated with discontinuation or failure; with no VFs observed with switching off ATR or RAL regimens Total Cholesterol Triglycerides “Switching to EPA in virologically suppressed patients could be a good strategy with low risk of virological failure or treatment discontinuation…with significant improvement in lipid profile.” Pinnetti C, et al. Glasgow 2014, #P280 ‡ NVP to EPA Switch - Netherlands Switching NVP to EPA: Efficacy, Safety, Lipids and Cardiovascular Risk Prospective, open-label, controlled trial in virologically suppressed HIV-1 patients on NVP+FTC/TDF switched EPA (n=50) or continuing NVP regimen (n=139) Total Cholesterol at Week 24 Proportion of Subjects, % Virologic Efficacy (ITT) 19% <200 mg/dL (Grade 1) 200 to 239 mg/dL 6% (Grade 2) ≥240 mg/dL (Grade 3) W12 W48 Week 48 Low VF rate: 6% EPA vs. 8% NVP Low discontinuation due to AEs at Week 48 (n=2) 1 subject discontinued due to nonadherence % of Subjects Significant in subjects achieving TC and LDL goals (+26% & +15%) and ↓ in HDL goal (-19%)* Median Framingham risk score did not change over 24 weeks (-7%, p = 0.029) The systolic blood-pressure decreased 6.0 mmHg (P=.007) A NVP to EPA switch “could be used in HIV-1 patients at risk for CV diseases” Rokx C, et al. HIV12 2014. Glasgow, UK. Poster 257 *National Cholesterol Education Project, ATP III Classification Switching NVP+FTC/TDF to CPA Virologic Outcomes Open-label single center study evaluating efficacy after switching virologically suppressed patients from NVP+FTC/TDF to Complera® (N=32) • 100%, of subjects switching from NVP+FTC/TDF to the CPA maintained virologic suppression through 12 weeks • Meal Questionnaire – No impact on virologic outcome was observed despite 17% of cases (33% with breakfast) meal intake below 399 kcal 240 6000 100 4000 160 120 2000 80 Lower limit of RPV phase 3 mean trough level (50µg/L) 40 0 0 0 1 2 4 Weeks Post Switch NVP plasma concentration (μg/L) RPV plasma concentration (μg/L) RPV and NVP mean plasma concentration after switching from NVP 12 NVP had only a short and limited inductive effect on RPV metabolism, which is not clinically significant CPA = RPV/FTC/TDF Allavena C, et al. ICAAC 2013. Denver, CO. #H-657 16 17 Background • In patients treated with tenofovir-disoproxil fumarate renal tubular toxicity have been reported. • Among risk factors, a role has been recognized for: High TFV plasma concentrations; Impairment in kidney tubular function in patients receiving tenofovir is associated with higher tenofovir plasma concentrations Rodríguez-Nóvoa et al. AIDS 2010; 24: 1064–1066 Boosted PIs use (associated with higher TFV exposure trough intestinal CYP3A4 and p-glycoprotein and tubular MRP4 inhibition) Background •The suggested mechanism is TFV reduced urinary excretion, followed by “entrapment” in proximal tubular cells with consequent mitochondrial toxicity PI/R pTFV TFV MRP2? MRP2 hOAT3 OAT3? ? X CNT2? ? TFV MRP4 MRP4 [TFV] [TFV] Pgp? PROXIMAL TUBULAR CELL MRP7? MRP7 Pgp? Pgp? URINE URINE BLOOD BLOOD hOAT1 OAT1 u/p TFV ratio uTFV Reduced TFV urinary output (low urinary-to-plasma concentration ratio) is associated with signs of tubular damage (Marinaro, ICAR 2014) Background Data on tenofovir plasma exposure when associated with rilpivirine are scarced but it has been reported to be higher than with other NNRTIs Ramanathan CROI 2013 No study has so far investigated tenofovir pharmacokinetics and tubular safety are unknown in patients switching to tenofovir/emtricitabine/rilpivirine. MATERIALI E METODI Studio prospettico di coorte non interventistico presso la Clinica Universitaria Amedeo di Savoia. Pazienti adulti HIV positivi che passavano sia da regimi contenenti tenofovir che tenofovir- free al STR rilpivirina, tenofovir, emtrcitabina con HIV RNA < 50 copie/mL Sono state analizzate le resistenze genotipiche cumulative in quei pazienti che avevano eseguito un test del genotipo virale. Alle settimane 0,12 e 48 abbiamo valutato: – HIV RNA – [TFV] urinarie e plasmatiche a 12 ore dalla somministrazione – Esame completo urine 24 h e creatinina plasmatica – [RBP] U/creatininuria su campione spot ( alle settimane 0 e 12) – Predittori indiretti di danno tubulare (PTH, vitamina D, bALP) (alle settimane 0 e 12) Abbiamo suddiviso i risultati in sottogruppi sulla base del regime assunto prima dello switch CARATTERISTICHE DELLA POPOLAZIONE VARIABILE N assoluto (%) NUMERO DI PAZIENTI ARRUOLATI per EFFICACIA 153 (100) NUMERO DI PAZIENTI ARRUOLATI per SICUREZZA RENALE 92 (100) SESSO RAZZA M 123 (80,4) F 30 (19,6) Caucasica 143 (93,5) Africana 6 (3,9) Latina 4 (2,6) Coinfezione HCV 28 (18,3) Precedente HAART con NNRTI 81 (52,9) Precedente HAART con PI 63 (41,2) Precedente HAART con altre classi 9 (5,9) Resistenze maggiori 11 (7,2) VARIABILE Mediana (IQR) Età 47 (40,4-52,4) BMI 23,44 (20,8225,82) 560 (437-717) Linfociti CD4 49% da ATRIPLA RISULTATI [TFV plasma] Ratio Urine/plasma P>0.05 TDF_plasma da NNRTI 56 vs.77 ng/mL p= 0.009 Ratio U/pl da NNRTI 419 vs. 234 p= 0.015 [TFV urine] RISULTATI Nel sottogruppo dei pazienti da NN non sono state riscontrate variazioni significative nei valori delle urine nelle 24 ore (p> 0.05). BL mediana (IQR) W12 mediana (IQR) W48 mediana (IQR) Creatinina mg/dL 0.93 (0.85-1.05) 1 (0.89-1.08) 0.94 (0.6-1.36) Clearance 100.9 (85.8-127.1) 108.3 (80.3-134.8) 115.8 (51.4-241.6) Glicosuria g/24h 0.06 (0.02-0.08) 0.05 (0.02-0.08) 0.05 (0-0.08) Fosfaturia g/24h 0.89 (0.66-1.17) 0.95 (0.74-1.17) 0.98(0.20-1.70) Calciuria g/24h 0.20 (0.11-0.28) 0.21 (0.13-0.28) 0.21 (0.03-0.58) 165 (118-200) 150 (50-425) 0.620 (0.49-0.77) 0.67 (0.17-1.74) creatinina ml/min Proteinuria mg/ 24h 155 (110-202) Uricuria g/24h 0.635 (0.52-0.79) Escrezione frazionata di acido urico e frazione riassorbita di fosfato entro i range di normalità alla settimana 48 (<0.15 e >0.82) RISULTATI Non variazioni significative di Retinol Binding Protein (RBP)/creatinina su urine nei pazienti provenienti da Atripla 25 DISCUSSIONE RPV pTFV TFV hOAT1 OAT1 MRP2? MRP2 hOAT3 OAT3? ? MRP4 MRP4 Pgp? [TFV] [TFV] = PROXIMAL TUBULAR CELL MRP7? MRP7 Pgp? Pgp? URINE URINE BLOOD BLOOD CNT2? ? TFV = u/p TFV ratio uTFV RPV rispetto a EFV aumenta l’assorbimento intestinale di TFV attraverso la glicoproteina-P, ma non agisce sui trasportatori del tubulo renale deputati alla clearance del farmaco. CONCLUSIONI - Lo switch da ATRIPLA® a EVIPLERA® • Mantenimento della soppressione virologica • Miglioramento del profilo di tollerabilità neuropsichico • Miglioramento dei patient-reported outcomes (soddisfazione, quality of life) • Miglioramento del profilo lipidico • Non impatto significativo sul profilo di tollerabilità renale (tubulopatia) malgrado incremento delle concentrazioni plasmatiche di TFV 27 PK lab Antonio D’Avolio Jessica Cusato Marco Simiele ID Unit Andrea Calcagno Letizia Marinaro Lorena Baietto Alessandra Arialdo Amedeo De Nicolò Laura Trentini Sarah Allegra MCristina Tettoni Debora Pensi Chiara Alcantarini Mauro Sciandra Micol Ferrara Francesca Patti Chiara Montrucchio Ilaria Motta Filippo Lipani Prof Giovanni Di Perri Viro lab Tiziano Allice Maria Grazia Milia Valeria Ghisetti