2006 303(d) List Update Central Valley RB Staff Comments Slide 1
by user
Comments
Transcript
2006 303(d) List Update Central Valley RB Staff Comments Slide 1
2006 303(d) List Update Central Valley RB Staff Comments Slide 1 Overarching Issue z Regional Board should be given first opportunity to interpret its own objectives z Interpreting compliance with objectives has implications for other programs Slide 2 Non-native aquatic species The new pollutants? Channel catfish Mosquito fish RB5 Fisherman w/ largemouth bass Slide 3 Temperature z “Natural” temperature can not be altered unless beneficial uses are not adversely impacted z 21oC criterion used cannot be achieved in most lower elevation streams z Baseline for fishery pre-dates major hydro projects z Upper Sac River example Slide 4 Temperature Upper Sac River Example Sacramento River Above Dunsmuir Slide 5 Temperature (1999) 75 21 degrees C Temperature (deg F) 70 65 Mean Maximum Minimum 60 55 50 45 5/20/99 6/9/99 6/29/99 7/19/99 8/8/99 8/28/99 9/17/99 10/7/99 10/27/99 Date Sacramento River Above Dunsmuir Slide 6 Temperature Upper Sac River Example Sacramento River @ Delta – 2 miles Above Shasta Slide 7 Temperature (1999) 75 21 degrees C Temperature (deg F) 70 65 60 55 Mean Maximum Minimum 50 45 5/20/99 6/9/99 6/29/99 7/19/99 8/8/99 8/28/99 9/17/99 10/7/99 10/27/99 Date Sacramento River @ Delta Slide 8 Standards not Attained z 1 in 3 year allowable exceedance rate applies to toxic pollutants z Additive toxicity of pollutants (diazinon / chlorpyrifos) must be considered z Weight of evidence suggests continued listing Slide 9 Recommendations z Allow Regional Board opportunity to interpret its objectives Do not list exotic species for Delta, Cosumnes River, and San Joaquin River Do not list temperature for N.F. Feather River and Willow Creek z List Sacramento River, Feather River, and Morrison Creek for diazinon Slide 10