...

Gentrify, Gentrifying, Gentrified: The Study of Philadelphia County, PA

by user

on
Category: Documents
32

views

Report

Comments

Transcript

Gentrify, Gentrifying, Gentrified: The Study of Philadelphia County, PA
Gentrify, Gentrifying, Gentrified: The Study of Philadelphia County, PA
By: Cody Carrigan
West Chester University of Pennsylvania: Department of Geography and Planning
Abstract
Residential Vulnerability
This study examined the condition of gentrification
and its associated indicators within the neighborhoods
of Philadelphia County following the guidelines set
forth by Portland’s Bureau of Planning and
Sustainability. The main focus of this study was on
three key indicators of gentrification, which are
Residential Vulnerability, Demographic Change, and
Housing Market Conditions. The results from these
three indicators were then plugged into a
gentrification scale culminating in the neighborhood
typology map.
Philadelphia Neighborhood Map
Ch
Ch
as
e
Philadelphia Neighborhood Map:
Philadelphia County, PA
es
tH
ill
iss
W
nn
yp
ac
Bustleton
kP
ark
Legend
W Torresdale
Neighborhood Boundaries
urst
Rhawnh
Pennypack
Residential Vulnerability Map:
Philadelphia County, PA
Legend
E Oak La
z
ne
nt
Ge
go
ErmGtown
Oxford Cir
an O
Mayfair
Ma
tow
Olney J Lawncrest
na
n
Logan
un
yu
iat
nk
aP
ar
Tacony
alls
k Frankfo
EF
rd
Tioga
Hunting Park e
Alleg
t
heny
a
W
wg
rro
Bridesburg
FairhillHa
t
f
n
Strawberry
Wynnefield
tra
r
a
Mansion N H
Richmond
Central
W
n
rook
Kens
gto
Overb
Brewtwn
Fa
r
di n
a
i
l
n
r
d
mo op
Mill
tow
Ha
unP
Fish
t
Creek Belmont
Powelton
Center Ce
Cobbs Cedar
nter
Uni
City W
Creek
Park
City E
City
Kingses
Schuylkill
sing
Pt
Breeze
Grays Ferry
tes
a
t
Es
S
0 0.5 1
2
ard
Phila
Gir
Roxboro
ug
W Mount
Airy
Pa
h
rk
ns
Ke
µ
in
on
gt
ha
R
rtoiverfro
nt
n
Legend
Non- Residential
Neighborhood Boundaries
0 Factors
Housing Market Condition
1 Factors
Non- Residential
2 Factors
No Condition
3 Factors
Adjacent
4 Factors
Accelerating
µ
0 0.5 1
2
3
Appreciated
4
Miles
µ
By: Cody Carrigan
Data: NCDB (1990,2000,2010)
ACS (2005-2009)
Date: April 22, 2014
0 0.5 1
In order to calculate the residential vulnerability
for a census tract, each census tract is assessed on
four risk factors. The four risk factors associated with
residential vulnerability are population 25+ without a
bachelor’s degree, renter-occupied housing, non-white
population, and median family income. Through this
residential vulnerability evaluation, 159 out of the 357
Philadelphia County residential census tracts qualify
for having a population vulnerable to displacement.
Demographic Change Map:
Philadelphia County, PA
By: Cody Carrigan
Data: NCDB (1990,2000,2010)
ACS (2005-2009)
Date: April 22, 2014
4
Miles
Results:
sp
nn
od
ort
wo
m
Stage
Number
Susceptible
33
Belmont, Brewerytown, Cobbs
Creek, E. Germantown, E. Mount
Airy, E. Oak Lane, Germantown,
Grays Ferry, Kingsessing, Logan,
Mill Creek, N. Central, Olney,
Overbrook, Oxford Circle, Point
Breeze, Poplar, Powelton,
Richmond, S. Philadelphia, Tioga,
W. Kensington, Wynnefieild
Early: Type
1
1
N. Central
Early: Type
2
14
Allegheny West, Belmont, Girard
Estates, Grays Ferry, Kensington,
Macroni Plaza, Mill Creek, Olney,
Oxford Circle, Point Breeze, Poplar
Dynamic
3
N. Central, Point Breeze, Richmond
Late
2
Cedar Park, Poplar
Continued
Loss
7
Fairmount, Fishtown, Germantown,
Pennsport, Schuylkill, Wharton
Neighborhood Boundaries
3
4
Miles
Demographic Change
Neighborhood Typology
Non- Residential
No Change
Eastwick
Experienced Change
Important Information
µ
By: Cody Carrigan
Data: NCDB (1990,2000,2010)
ACS (2005-2009)
Date: April 22, 2014
Neighborhood Typology Map:
Philadelphia County, PA
Neighborhood Boundaries
Susceptible
0 0.5 1
2
3
4
Miles
Ge
rm E
an
Germ
tow
Early: Type 2
Oxford Circle
n
Dynamic
Olney
Logan
Late
Alleg
heny
Mill
Creek
Ce
twn N
Fa
irm
Residential Tracts
Ke
ns
W
Kens n
tow
is
F h
ing Richmond
ton
Non- Residential
µ
ton
t
Belmont
Powelton
Cobbs
Cedar
Creek
Park
Schuylkill
Kingsessin
g
Pt Breeze
Grays
tes
Ferry
sta
E
S
ard
Phila
Gir
sp
nn
Whar
O
Brew
Continued Loss
West
ntr
Wynnefield
ook
verbr
Tioga
Pe
t
or
In order to calculate the demographic change for a
census tract, each census tract is assessed on four key
issues. The four issues associated with demographic
change are owner-occupied homes, white population,
population 25+ with a bachelor’s degree, and median
household income. Through this evaluation of
demographic change, 147 out of the 357 Philadelphia
County residential census tracts qualify for having
experienced demographic change.
Name of Tracts
Early: Type 1
E
Oak Ln
Poplar
Non-residential Census Tracts: all census tracts
not having a hundred residents or fifty homes in any of
the three decades (1990, 2000, or 2009) were removed
from the study
Data: obtained from the NCDB (1990, 2000, and
2010) and the ACS (2005-2009). All NCDB data was
normalized to the 2000 census tracts, and the ACS data
used the 2000 census tract boundaries as well.
Legend
Neighborhood Typology
E Mt
Airy
www.PosterPresentations.com
3
In order to calculate the housing market condition
for a census tract, each census tract was first
designated as having either a low/moderate housing
value in 2010 or a high housing value. Through further
analysis, a census tract could then be labeled as being
part of the three housing market conditions: adjacent,
accelerating, or accelerated. Through this evaluation
of housing market conditions, there were a total of
126 Philadelphia County residential census tracts that
qualified for one of the three categories. There were
93 census tracts in the adjacent category, 10 in the
accelerating, and 23 in the appreciated.
Marconi Plaza
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012
2
By: Cody Carrigan
Data: NCDB (1990,2000,2010)
ACS (2005-2009)
Date: April 22, 2014
In the neighborhood typology map, census tracts
can qualify for these six categories by:
Susceptible- adjacent housing condition, vulnerable
population, and no demographic change
Early: Type 1- accelerating housing condition,
vulnerable population, and no demographic change
Early: Type 2- adjacent housing condition, vulnerable
population, and experienced demographic change
Dynamic- accelerating housing condition, vulnerable
population, and experience demographic change Lateappreciated housing condition, vulnerable population,
and experienced demographic change
Continued Loss- appreciated housing condition, does
not qualify for vulnerable populations, and
experienced demographic change
Legend
Pe
El
W
Housing Market Condition Map:
Philadelphia County, PA
Residential Vulnerability
Demographic Change
Holmesburg
Neighborhood Typology
Neighborhood Boundaries
on
i ck
ah
ok
edarbro W O
ECM
ak
oun
La
t Air
ne
y
Byberry
Pe
Fo
x
tnu
Somerton
Housing Market Conditions
By: Cody Carrigan
Data: NCDB (1990,2000,2010)
ACS (2005-2009)
Date: April 22, 2014
Marconi Plaza
0 0.5 1
2
3
4
Miles
Fly UP