132 Advances in Environmental Biology, 2(3): ... ISSN 1995-0756
by user
Comments
Transcript
132 Advances in Environmental Biology, 2(3): ... ISSN 1995-0756
132 Advances in Environmental Biology, 2(3): 132-136, 2008 ISSN 1995-0756 © 2008, American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information This is a refereed journal and all articles are professionally screened and reviewed O RIGINAL A RTICLE Water Quality of Bodo Creek in the Lower Niger Delta Basin 1 J. Onwugbuta-Enyi, 2N. Zabbey, 2E.S. Erondu 1 Department of Biology, School of Science, Rivers State College of Education, Rumuolumeni, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. 2 Department of Animal Science and Fisheries, University of Port Harcourt, PMB 5323 Choba, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. J. Onwugbuta-Enyi, N. Zabbey, E.S. Erondu, W ater Quality of Bodo Creek in the Lower Niger Delta Basin, Adv. Environ. Biol., 2(3): 132-136, 2008 ABSTRACT The dynamics of some physicochemical parameters of Bodo creek on the upper reaches of the AndoniBonny river system were studied between December 2005 and July 2006. There were significant differences (P<0.05) in Secchi Disc Transparency and salinity, while temperature, pH, Dissolved Oxygen (DO), Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD), phosphate and nitrate concentrations were similar (P>0.05) between the spatial grids. The values recorded ranged from 26.7 to 30.10 C (Temperature); 73-157 cm (Secchi Disc Transparency); 6.5-8.6 (pH); 6.2-22.7% 0 (Salinity); 4.6-11.8 mg/l (DO); 0.7-8.2 mg/l (BOD); 0.047-2.300 mg/l (Phosphate) and 0.013 to 0.873 mg/l nitrate. There were obvious seasonal fluxes in the ecological variables (P<0.05), except nitrate concentrations that were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The usefulness of the results in future monitoring and possible reasons for the observed environmental gradients are discussed. Key words: Bodo Creek, biotopes, environment gradient, monitoring, seasonal flux Introduction Traditionally, Bodo creek has been a strong livelihood support base for the people of the area and beyond. The creek serves for fishing and small-scale aquaculture, transportation, cassava fermentation, fuel wood production and domestic waste disposal. In addition, the tranquility of the mangrove-sheltered waterfronts provides the needed haven for solitude and relaxation. Besides, mangrove canopy and moveable spaces underneath the shade offer the poor locals a benign environment for defecation. Powell et al.[18] reported that the bulk of periwinkle, Tympanotonus fuscatus traded in the markets of Bodo, Bori and Onne communities originate from Bodo creek. The creek had also supported some forms of industrial development, namely, an uncompleted 500 hectares fish farm owned by the Niger Delta Basin Development Authority (NDBDA) and Bodo W est Oilfield. Since then Bodo creek had been precluded from chronic anthropogenic disturbances apart from fishing activities and logging pressure. However, the ongoing Bodo-Bonny road and bridges project awarded by the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) will traverse Bodo creek complex to link Bonny Island. Intensive suction sand dredging has begun at the Dor Nwezor sector of the creek to provide the quantum of sharp sand required for the road embankments. This intense dredging activity has resulted in serious ecological imbalance in the adjoining creek waters as evident from the high water turbidity due to sediment resuspension[10], which is indicative of water quality alteration. Previous studies have shown that water quality affects species composition, assemblages and distribution of plankton[4], benthos[7,11,9] and fish[4,13]. No reliable data exist in published form on the ecology of Bodo creek. Snowden and Ekweozor[20] raised concerns as to the dependency Corresponding Author: J. Onwugbuta-Enyi, Department of Biology, School of Science, Rivers State College of Education, Rumuolumeni, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. E-mail: [email protected] Adv. Environ. Biol., 2(3): 132-136, 2008 on post impact studies data when baseline data for comparison are lacking. Information on Bodo creek, especially on the relatively “near-pristine” Kpador channel would aid in future monitoring programmes. Thus, the present study was aimed at providing preliminary information on the physicochemical characteristics of the Kpador sector of Bodo creek in the lower Niger Delta basin of Rivers State, Nigeria. M aterials and methods Study Area The study was carried out on the Kpador sector of Bodo creek and lies between latitudes 6 o 75¢, 7 o 15¢ N, and longitudes 5 o 31¢ E and 5 o 35¢E with an annual rainfall of between 2000-3000 mm in the Niger Delta. Rainfall decreases sharply as one moves inland. The rainy season spans from April to November (eight months) whereas the short dry season lasts for four months from December to March with occasional rainfal[25]. Bodo creek is a nexus of creeks and creeklets adjoining Bodo Community on the upper reaches of the AndoniBonny river system. Based on the pattern of hydrology, Bodo creek complex could be described as a “mixing sponge” for the waters from the Andoni and Bonny river estuaries. Two major channels: Dor Nwezor and Kpador link Bodo Creek to Opobo channel - an adjunct between Andoni and Bonny rivers - and Bonny River, respectively . Inlet, both channels ramify to form numerous creeklets, some of which end blindly in mangrove swamps while others interconnect causing the mixing of the flood and ebb tidal waters from the dual sources. Sampling Stations A total of four sampling stations were established at approximately one km apart to accommodate different biotopes. Station 1: located upstream where the Kpador main channel tapers to have a link with Goi creek, locally called Dor Vibor. Station 2: (code named Kpador 1): central to the other three stations. Between stations 1 and 2, a gulflike area exists to the left downstream. At low tide, the gulf area is exposed as mudflats dissected by minor channels, all of which unite progressively into a common sub-channel that debouches into station 2. Station 3: (Tekpokuru): sited on a minor channel that radiates from the main channel at station 2. Station 3 channel extends westward to join a first order stream that drains a tropical rainforest. 133 Station 4: (Kpador 11): located downstream on the main channel to other stations. The station was sited close to the mouth of a minor channel that branches to the right, leading to the Bodo W est flowstation. Generally, the marginal vegetation of the sampling stations are mangroves, usually a characteristic of such a brackish water environment in a tropical setting. Red mangroves (Rhizophora spp) predominated the mangal flora of the area. Other macrophytes are the white mangrove (Avicenia africana), mangrove fern (Acrosticum aureum) and a few pockets of nypa palm (Nypa fructicans). The latter was observed only along the vicinity of station 4. Field and laboratory procedures Sampling lasted from December 2005 to July 2006. Dry season samples were collected in the core dry months (December, January, February) while wet season samplings were done from May to July. The monthly sampling was done during high water slacks at midstream of each station. Subsurface water temperature was measured in-situ to the nearest 0.1 o C using a Mercury-inglass thermometer. Transparency was determined with a 30 cm diameter Secchi disc. Samples for other water quality parameters were collected, preserved and transported in an ice-chest according to standard procedures[2]. The pH was determined using a pH meter (Mettler Delta 340). Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and BOD were measured using the modified W inkler method and the 5-day BOD test respectively[2]. Nitrate and Phosphate were measured with brucine and Ascorbic acid methods respectively. Salinity was determined using hand held refractometer (S/mill-E 0-100%0). Data were analysed in a randomised complete block design with four stations (blocks) and six months (treatments). The monthly data were later pooled and analysed as dry and wet seasons to estimate the effects of season on the parameters. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done at P=0.05 and where significant differences were observed, mean separation was done using the least significant difference (LSD) option[23]. Results and discussion Results The physicochemical results of the study area are presented in Tables 1, 2 and 3. Temperature had a range of 26.7 to 30.1 o C among the four stations (Table 1). A maximum mean temperature of 28.7 o C was recorded at station 2, whereas, station 3 had least mean temperature (28.2 o C). Significant variations (P<0.05) in temperature occurred across Adv. Environ. Biol., 2(3): 132-136, 2008 the sampled months, having a peak of 30.0 o C in February (Table 2). Secchi disc transparency fluctuated between 73 and 157 cm. Transparency showed decreasing mean values amongst the spatial grids in the sequence: Station 3 < 1 < 2 < 4. Variations in transparency between months (Table 2) and stations (Table 3) were significant (P<0.05). The parameter (transparency) had a time-series peak in December (mean=142 cm) and spatial peak for station 4. Hydrogen ion concentration (pH) varied from 6.5 to 8.6 (Table 1), while spatial pH (Table 3) variations were not statistically significant (P>0.05). By season, pH values recorded were higher in the wet months (7.8) than in the dry months (7.1) as presented in Table 2. Salinity (%o) differed significantly (P<0.05) between sampled stations and months. Overall, station 1 had the least mean salinity (11.6%0), while a mean salinity maxima (16.1%0) was recorded at station 4 (Table 1). Seasonally, salinity peaked in February with the following trend: February > January > December > June > May = July. The DO variations between months and stations were significant (P<0.05) and ranged from 4.6 to 11.8 mg/L (Table 1), 5.7 to 11.7 mg/L among months (Table 2) and 7.7 to 8.7 mg/L among stations (Table 3). The BOD had a range of 0.3 to 8.2 mg/L (Table 1) with significant differences (P<0.05) between months (Table 2), while the variations between the spatial grids (Table 3) were insignificant (P>0.05). The mean BOD peaked in July (8.2 mg/L), whereas least mean BOD (1.0 mg/L) was recorded in December. The concentration of phosphate varied from 0.075 to 2.300 mg/L (Table 1). Phosphate peaked at station 4 (0.624 mg/L) but the lowest concentration (0.520 mg/L) was recorded in station 3. Phosphate values show significant variation over time. W et season Phosphate contents were generally higher relative to the dry months (Table 2). Nitrate ranged between 0.013 mg/L and 0.462 mg/L (Table 1). The nutritive salt did not vary (P>0.05) between the sampled stations. Nitrate varied (P<0.05) between months with a peak mean value of 0.284 mg/L in May and the least value of 0.057 mg/L in December. Discussion In aquatic ecosystems, variations exist between the different environmental compartments with regard to physical, chemical and biological characteristics. H owever, ecological conditions are mutually reinforcing and to a large extent determine the biotic c o m po nent and structural p atterns. Surfa c e te m p e r a tu r e r a n g e ( 2 6 .7 -3 0 .1 o C ). A ltho ugh insignificant variations were recorded between the spatial grids, the least mean value (28.2 o C) reported 134 for station 3 is normal considering the nature of the biotope. Fresh water from a first order stream draining a tropical rainforest debouches into station 3 channel headwaters. Mixing between the plunging freshwater and inflowing brackishwater leads to a drop in temperature. King and Nkanta[12] attributed low temperature recorded in their studies of Mfangmfang pond to floating leaves of macrophytes which precluded the effects of sun’s radiation. Similarly, Elakhame[20] attributed low temperature recorded in Epie creek floodplain to shade made by overhanging fronds of raffia palms surrounding the location. Transparency values recorded in this study are comparatively higher than those reported on the main Bonny River[24]. No major inland river drains into Bodo creek complex. Thus, it is plausible that finely divided particles in the creek environment leading to cloudiness originate within the creek basin due to the abrasive effects of tidal currents or from inflowing tidal or storm waters. It has been observed that heavier particles settle out of suspension along gradients[14] such as when floodwater from Bonny River ingresses into Bodo creek. Moreover, reduced water currents which characterized the high water slacks at which time sampling was done enhances mud deposition within the upper reaches of estuaries[14]. Seasonally, pH of the area straddles between mild acidity and alkalinity. The pH range (6.5-8.6) recorded agrees with the pH of brackish water bodies reported by Imevbore. The pH values fall within the optimum range of most aquatic organisms and will support rich primary productivity, Shrimp and fish production[13,17,3]. Following theVenice system of salinity classification (Venice, 1959), the studied area remained mesohaline [6.2-13.1%o] throughout the wet months. On the contrary, in the dry season, station 1 was consistently mesohaline, whereas stations 2, 3 and 4 oscillated between meso and polyhaline (13-22.7%0) salinities. Fluctuations in DO and BOD between seemingly physiologically stressful concentrations and relatively high mean DO content than BOD suggests a cleansing effect by the tidal fluxes. These resilient properties of DO and BOD prevent the variables from reaching critical levels. Besides silica, phosphate and nitrogen are regarded as nutrient elements because they must be present as soluble salts for plants to grow[19]. In this study, phosphate was more concentrated than nitrate. A plausible reason underlying the concentration differential is the unique behavior of phosphorus in shallow waters. Phosphorus in its soluble state (phosphate) quickly adsorbs at the surface of mud and re-enters the water column through processes that are not well known[19]. Adv. Environ. Biol., 2(3): 132-136, 2008 135 Table 1: Physicochem ical Param eters in the D ifferent Sam pling Stations (Bodo Creek) Param eters ( o C) Stations ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 2 3 4 Tem perature (o C) 27.0 – 30.0 26.7 – 30.0 27.0 – 30.0 26.8 – 30.1 28.4±0.9 28.7±1.2 28.2±1.0 28.6±1.2 Transparency (cm ) 73 – 140 80 – 150 77 – 120 92 – 157 107±21.6 113±25.5 104±15.7 128±26.1 PH 6.5 – 8.2 6.8 – 8.2 6.5 – 8.6 6.9 – 8.3 7.5±0.7 7.5±0.8 7.4±0.9 7.6±0.6 Salinity (% 0) 6.2 - 16.0 8.0 – 21.6 9.1 – 20.8 10.6 -22.7 11.6±3.1 14.7±5.1 13.5±4.1 16.1±4.8 D O (m g/L) 7.0 – 11.6 4.6 – 11.7 5.4 – 11.5 5.6 – 11.8 8.7±4.5 7.7±2.7 8.2±2.2 7.9±2.2 BO D (m g/L) 1.1 – 8.2 1.8 – 8.2 0.3 – 8.0 0.7 – 8.2 4.6±2.6 4.5±2.2 4.2±2.4 4.2±2.4 3PO 4 (m g/L) 0.200 – 1.980 0.094 – 1.650 0.094 – 1.650 0.075 – 2300 0.593±0.65 0.522±0.61 0.520±0.59 0.624±0.81 N O 3 - (m g/L) 0.027 – 0.400 0.013 – 0.462 0.013 – 0.265 0.013 – 0.168 0.199±0.16 0.181±0.14 0.097±0.09 0.099±0.05 Table 2: Variations in M onthly M ean Physicochem ical Param eters of Bodo Creek M onth Tem pt (o C) Transparency(cm ) pH D O (m g/L) BOD (m g/L) Salinity (% 0) D ecem ber 29.2 b 142 a 6.8 c d d 5.7 1.0 14.7 b January 29.0 b 127 b 7.2 c 6.9 bc 3.5 c 19.0 a a b d February 30.0 124 7.8 5.7 c 3.4 20.1 a M ay 28.0 c 120 b 8.2 a 9.8 b c 3.4 9.3 c June 27.8 c 87 c 8.3 a 8.9 b b 6.8 11.6 c July 26.9 d 81 c 6.8 c 11.7 a 8.2 a 9.3 c M ean 28.5 113 7.5 6.1 4.4 14.0 SEM (df =15) 0.34 4.9 0.12 0.54 0.30 1.06 a-d M eans with sim ilar superscript in the sam e colum n are not significantly different (P>0.05). Table 3: Variations Station 1 2 3 4 M ean SEM (df =15) a-c M ean with sim ilar in Spatial M ean Physicochem ical Param eters of Bodo Creek Tem pt (o C) Transparency(cm ) pH D O (m g/L) BOD (m g/L) Salinity (% ) 28.4 107 b 8.7 11.6 c 7.4 4.6 26.7 113 b 7.7 14.7 ab 7.5 4.5 28.2 104 c 8.2 13.5 b 7.4 4.2 28.6 129 a 7.9 16.1 a 7.6 4.2 2 8.0 113.3 7.5 8.1 4.4 14.0 0.58 8.5 0.22 0.44 0.25 0.87 superscript in the sam e colum n are not significantly different (P>0.05). Generally, phosphate and nitrate concentrations recorded in this study hover around natural contents reported for surface waters[21]. The nutrient quality observed tended to be superior to some results on the Niger Delta[25,6,16]. Even though mangrove wetlands are rated high nutrient environments[15], input of nitrate and phosphate into Bodo creek through runoffs from adjoining agrarian lands cannot be overemphasized. This exogenous claim for the rich nitrate-phosphate status is further strengthened by the fact that the bedrock of the Niger delta is essentially poor in these nutrients[16]. Virtually every island forest within the Bodo creek complex had been converted to functional farmlands. It is not unlikely that fertilizers applied during farming cycles, often times, may be washed by rains and carried in runoff into the creek, thus contributing to the annual nutrient budget. The low concentration of the nutritive ions in the dry season, which ideally, is the period of peak nutrient mineralization, is not unconnected to the fact that phytoplankton proliferation peaks in the dry season. Increases in the micro floral population corresponds with maximum nutrient concentration in surface PO 43-(m g/L) 0.920 b 0.211 c 0.078 c 0.163 c 0.122 c 1.895 a 0.565 0.094 PO 43-(m g/L) 0.593 0.522 0.520 0.624 0.565 0.87 N O 3-(m g/L) 0.057 b 0.106 b 0.109 b 0.284 a 0.218 a 0.090 b 0.144 0.0791 N O 3-(m g/L) 0.199 0.181 0.097 0.099 0.576 0.0646 waters. The general trend of insignificant variations recorded for most of the parameters between spatial grids suggests similarity in the hydro-climatic conditions of the area. Finally, the need to carry out comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment Studies before the commencement of any major developmental project is stressed. This becomes more pertinent when such projects are planned to interfere with sensitive and already over-stretched ecosystems. References 1. 2. 3. Alabaster, J.S. and R. Lloyd, 1986. Water Q u a lity C r ite r ia fo r fr e s h w a te r F is h . Butterworths, London, U.K. American Public Health Association (APHA), AW W A and W PCF. 1998. Standard methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20 th edition. W ashington DC, USA. African Regional Aquaculture Centre (ARAC), 1990. Site Selection Studies for a Shrimp Farm Project at Bodo-Rivers State. Final Report Adv. Environ. Biol., 2(3): 132-136, 2008 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. submitted to Integrated Fish Farm Limited, Lagos, Nigeria. Boney, A.D., 1983. Phytoplankton. Edward Arnold, London, UK. Boyd, C.E., 1981. Water Quality in Warm water Fish Ponds. Auburn University Alabama. Chindah, A.C., 2003. The Physicochemistry, Phytoplankton and Periphyton of a Swamp Forest Stream in the Lower Niger Delta. Scientia Africana , 2(182): 106-116. Dance, K.W . and H.B.N. Hynes, 1980. Some effects of agricultural land use on stream insect communities. Environ. Poll., 22: 19 - 28. Elakhame, L.A.,1995. The Biology and Ecology of fishes in Epie Creek Floodplain with Particular Reference to Odediginni Lake, Niger Delta, Nigeria, PhD Thesis University of Port Harcourt. Hart, A.I. and N. Zabbey, 2005. PhysicChemistry and Benthic Fauna of W oji Creek in the Lower Niger Delta Nigeria. Environ. And Ecol., 23(2): 361-368. Hodgson, G., 1994. The Environmental Impact of Marine Dredging in Hong Kong. Coast. Manag.Trop.Asia (2): 1-8. Jones, A.R., 1987. Temporal Pattern in Macrobenthic Communities of the Hawksbury Estuary, New South W ales, Aus.J. Of Mar. and Freshwater Res., 38: 607-624. King, R.P. and N.A. Nkanta, 1991. The Status and Seasonality in the Physico-chemical hydrology of a Nigerian Rainforest Pond. Japan J.hydrob, 52(1): 1-12. Kutty, M.N., 1987. Site Selection for Aquaculture-Chemical Features of Water. Lecture Paper presented at the African Regional A q uaculture Centre (AR A C ) fo r Senior Aquaculture Course, Aluu, and Port Harcourt. Mclusky, D.S., 1989. Estuarine Ecology. Chapman and Hall, New York, USA. Mitsch, W .J. and J.G. Gosselink, 2000. Wetlands. John W iley and Sons, New York, USA. 136 16. Ogamba, E.N., A.C. Chindah, I.K.E. Ekweozor and J.N. Onwuteaka, 2004. W ater Quality and Phytoplankton Distribution in Elechi Creek Complex of the Niger Delta. J. of Nig. Environ. Soc., 2(2): 121-130. 17. Onuoha, G.C. and F.O. Nwadukwe, 1987. W ater Quality Monitoring. In Proc. Of the Aquaculture Training Programme (ATP) held in the African Regional Aquaculture Centre (ARAC), Aluu, Rivers State, Nigeria. 7 Sept. - 6Oct, pp. 17-24. 18. Powell, C.B., A.I. Hart and S. Deekae, 1985. Market Survey of the Periwinkle Tympanotonus fuscatus in Rivers State: Sizes, Prices and Exploitation levels. In Proc. Of Fisheries Society of Nigeria (FISON) Conference, Port Harcourt, 26 th - 29 th November, 55-61. 19. Royce, W ., 1984. Introduction to the Practice of Fishery Science. Academic Press, London, UK. 20. Snowden, R.J. and Ekweozor, I.K.E 1990. The Littoral Infauna of the W est African Estuary: a baseline Survey for the Monitoring of Oil Pollution. Mar. Biol., 105(1): 51-59. 21. UNESCO/W HO/UNEP, 1992. W ater Quality Assessments - A guide to use of biota, sed im e nts a nd wa te r in E nvironm ental Monitoring. 2 n d edition. 22. Venice System, 1959. Symposium on the Classification of Brackish W aters. Venice. Apr 4-8, 1958. Arch. Oceangr.limnol., 11: 1-248. 23. W ahua, T.A.T., 1999. Applied Statistics for Scientific Studies. Africa-link Books, Ibadan, Nigeria. 24. W okoma-Aleleye, I.P. and S.A. Hart, 1999. The Effect of Industrial Activities on the Primary Productivity in the lower Bonny Estuary, Rivers State, Nigeria. J. Appl. Sc. Environ..mgt., 2: 139-42. 25. Yakubu, A.F., F.D. Sikoki and J.R.M. Horsfall, 1998. An Investigation into the Physicochemical Conditions and Planktonic Organisms of the Lower Reaches of the Nun River, Nigeria. J. Appl.Sc. Environ. Mgt., 1(1): 38-42.