New German regulations on profit allocation to permanent establishments
by user
Comments
Transcript
New German regulations on profit allocation to permanent establishments
Tax Insights from Transfer Pricing Tax Controversy and Dispute Resolution New German regulations on profit allocation to permanent establishments November 3, 2014 In brief The Upper House of the German Parliament (Bundesrat) has consented to the Federal Ministry of Finance’s (Bundesministerium der Finanzen’s [BMF]) final version of its regulations on the application of the arm’s length principle to profit allocations between head office and permanent establishments (PE Regulations) on October 10, 2014. These have been published in the Federal Law Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt [BGBl.]) on October 17, 2014 and are in force now, but will be applied financial years starting after December 31, 2014. The PE Regulations are binding on taxpayers, the tax administration and tax courts. They provide detailed rules on the application of the “Authorized OECD Approach” (AOA) and thus should help taxpayers in applying the AOA in practice. The AOA itself has already been enacted with effect from 2013. In detail International background in brief summary On July 22, 2010, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) published a revised version of its “Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital” (Model Convention or OECD-MTC 2010).1 Within the update process, the OECD especially focused on modifying the principles of profit allocation between permanent establishments and head offices as stipulated in Article 7 of the Model Convention, following the so-called AOA. This approach generally aims at defining international rules on the allocation of profits between head office and permanent establishments, assuming the latter would act as a quasiseparate legal entity. The OECD developed the AOA in the decade following the modification of its commentary on Article 7 of the Model Convention (Model Commentary) in 1994, because this revision did not lead to standardization in the international application and interpretation of Article 7 OECD-MTC 2010. The OECD’s considerations and views were aggregated and published within the OECD’s “Report on the Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments,” released on July 17, 2008,2 before being adopted into both the Model Commentary, in 2008, and the Model Convention, in 2010. Subsequent legal developments in Germany Under German law, Article 7 Paragraph 2 of the Model Convention — as well as analogous regulations in Germany’s (new) double taxation treaties3 — only qualifies as a permissive or limitative regulation, and does not have a “self-executing effect”. As a result, Article 7 OECD-MTC 2010 and, thus, the AOA are not immediately applicable in Germany. The German legislator therefore had to explicitly “transform” this approach into German law. www.pwc.com Tax Insights The originally intended implementation of the AOA through the Annual Tax Act 2013 (Jahressteuergesetz 2013) failed, with the legislator finally implementing it in June 2013 through the Administrative Assistance Directive Implementation Act (AmtshilferichtlinieUmsetzungsgesetz)4 by modifying Section 1 of the Foreign Tax Act (Außensteuergesetz).5 While Section 1 Paragraph 4 of the Foreign Tax Act now treats dealings between headquarters and permanent establishments as business relationships for the purposes of income allocation, Paragraph 5 (in combination with Paragraph 1) contains regulations substantially corresponding to the AOA. Furthermore, Section 1 Paragraph 6 of the Foreign Tax Act allows the BMF to set out detailed regulations to ensure the consistent application of the arm’s length principle in cases of profit allocations between head office and permanent establishments. These regulations require the consent of the German Bundesrat before they can come into force. Permanent establishment regulations by the BMF On August 3, 2013, the Ministry of Finance published a first draft of the regulations — the so-called “Betriebsstättengewinnaufteilungsve rordnung” (BsGaV)6 — containing regulations on several issues related to the application of the arm’s length principle in such cases of profit allocation and offering the possibility to comment on the draft regulations. After a year of discussion and further analysis, a final version of the Ministry’s regulations were provided to the German Bundesrat on August 28, 2014, and have now received 2 consent. The regulations mainly deal with: general principles regarding the identification of significant people functions; general principles regarding the allocation of tangible and intangible assets, opportunities and risks, capital and liabilities as well as external transactions; general principles regarding the determination of dealings; the obligation to prepare ancillary PE accounts to calculate/ determine a permanent establishment’s income (“Hilfsund Nebenrechnung”); specific regulations for certain industries, e.g. banks, insurance companies, building & construction companies, mining companies or mineral oil/ natural gas companies; and specific regulations for dependent agent PEs. The takeaway More than four years after the OECD provided its 2010 update on the Model Convention, presenting a modified version of Article 7, the German legislator has now finalized regulations for implementing the AOA into national tax law. recognition that taxpayers had no guidance as to how they should treat the allocation of profits to PEs under the AOA. However, a tax auditor may decide to estimate the tax base of a permanent establishment in order to assess documentation and latesubmission penalties if the documentation for the years before 2015 does not cover the allocation of people functions, assets, dealings, etc., or is not submitted on time. Multinational enterprises with German operations have to apply the Ministry’s interpretations regarding profit allocation aspects for their permanent establishments. Importantly, taxpayers have to decide on the nature of the activity they want to have between head office and permanent establishments, and document it. If taxpayers do not document their position then if might be expected that the German tax office will take their own views on the nature of the relationship between the head office and permanent establishment, and tax the German end of the transaction accordingly. Taxpayers should therefore prepare for such discussions in future tax audits, as profit allocation issues involving permanents establishments might be expected to be increasingly on the tax agenda for future German tax audits. Whilst the regulations provide taxpayers with detailed guidance on how they should implement the AOA, the new regulations are not legally binding for financial years ending on or before December 31, 2014. As a result it is anticipated that the German tax administration will take a pragmatic approach to the application of the AOA for earlier years in pwc Tax Insights Let’s talk For a deeper discussion of how this issue might affect your business, please contact: Transfer Pricing and Tax Controversy Susann van der Ham, Düsseldorf +49 211 981 7451 [email protected] Dr. Ulf Andresen, Frankfurt +49 69 9585 3551 [email protected] Send Feedback SOLICITATION This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PwC does do not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it. © 2014 PwC. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details. 3 pwc Tax Insights Endnotes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 4 Available under: http://www.oecd.org/tax/treaties/oecd-model-tax-convention-available-products.htm. Available under: http://www.oecd.org/tax/transfer-pricing/41031455.pdf. Among others, Germany’s new double taxation treaties with United Kingdom, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, the Netherlands and Norway. “Gesetz zur Umsetzung der Amtshilferichtlinie sowie zur Änderung steuerlicher Vorschriften (AmtshilferichtlinieUmsetzungsgesetz – AmtshilfeRLUmsG)“, BGBl. I 2013, 1809 “Gesetz über die Besteuerung bei Auslandsbeziehungen (Außensteuergesetz)” (“Foreign Tax Act”), originally published in BGBl. I I 1972, 1713. “Verordnung zur Anwendung des Fremdvergleichsgrundsatzes auf Betriebsstätten nach § 1 Absatz 5 des Außensteuergesetzes (Betriebsstättengewinnaufteilungsverordnung – BsGaV)”, BGBl. I 2014, 1603. pwc