Shipping: navigating the way to calmer waters April 2014 www.pwc.co.uk
by user
Comments
Transcript
Shipping: navigating the way to calmer waters April 2014 www.pwc.co.uk
www.pwc.co.uk April 2014 Shipping: navigating the way to calmer waters Brian Lochead Antonia Robertson Partner +44 (0)113 289 4888 [email protected] Senior Manager +44 (0)20 7212 2789 [email protected] In recent years conditions in the shipping market have been difficult because of depressed demand and structural over-supply. Asset values are at all-time lows: up to 70% below 2007/08 peak market levels, significantly impacting loan-tovalues. The sector is undergoing significant change. The discovery and extraction of shale oil in the US, China shifting from production to consumption, changes in environmental regulation and the growth of alliances in container shipping are all impacting the competitive position of owners and operators. While market dynamics are improving, these structural changes will produce winners and losers depending on the types of vessels and routes operated. Renewed over-ordering of vessels also remains a key risk to recovery across the sector. Forecast change in utilisation (Ppt. change 13-18) Change in utilisation by vessel type, 2007 – 2017 30% 25% 20% 8WLOLVDWLRQ IRUHFDVWWREH ORZHULQ WKDQLQ 8WLOLVDWLRQ IRUHFDVWWREH JUHDWHULQ WKDQLQ +LVWRULFDO GHFOLQH +LVWRULFDO JURZWK Post / Panamax 15% 5% 0% (35%) Clean Tankers Handy / Handymax 10% Cape / VLOC Containers Dirty Tankers (30%) (25%) (20%) (15%) (10%) (5%) 0% Historical change in utilisation (Ppt. change 07-13) Containers Dry Bulk Tankers Bubble size = 2018 capacity Sources: Drewry, Government of Australia, Broker reports, PwC Analysis 1 Lloyd’s List, 16.12.13 2 Bunge Limited media release, 17.10.13 5% Lenders remain concerned about the ability of shipping companies to service their debt and have been looking to exit underperforming assets, including looking at new and more varied options for divestment. The pressure to reduce their exposures is heightened by the impact on capital and liquidity ratios of holding long-term debt and the European Central Bank’s focus on shipping as part of its new Comprehensive Assessments (see chart opposite). Based on our involvement in a number of recent cases, there is no quick and easy solution. Businesses operating in the sector have inherent complexity and volatility, coupled with a diverse stakeholder base, which, necessarily, has meant that it has been challenging to achieve any sort of consensus. Nevertheless, innovative lender solutions have emerged, including Navios Europe’s acquisition of ten vessels from the debtors of HSH Nordbank. In Germany, where loans tend to be structured as KG companies against specific assets, there have been a number of consolidations in loans and assets by lenders looking to maximise efficiencies. There has also been an increasing amount of activity in the debt and equity markets in the sector. In recent months distressed funds have made portfolio purchases (e.g. Commerzbank’s portfolio sale to Oaktree Capital Management1) and operator and equity partnerships have been launched (e.g. the joint venture between Augustea Atlantica, Bunge Limited, and York Capital Management2). However, we question whether the influx of new investors, in itself, will help resolve or exacerbate some of the wider industry issues. Low asset and debt prices make investing in the shipping sector attractive and potentially lucrative if the right type of vessel or operator is chosen. The key challenge is whether longer-term returns will satisfy new investors, and what solutions exist for lenders if not. Enforce and sell asset • Likely to be at a discount (particularly given current asset values) • Off the books and no exposure to possible future downside • Selling at possible low point in the market • Distressed discount would further impact value u it y Lender options Take equity e eq e Enfo sell rce as s Ta k e q u it y and e i m p r o ve per f or m a n ce Ta k tiv A te r n a ns l s o l u ti o • Combining non-performing assets • Strategic alliances with operators ebt ll d d an t e Alernative solutions Se Sell debt • Retain access to future upside • May not have knowledge of running shipping operations Take equity and drive improvement in financial performance • Retain access to future upside • Could maxmise short term cash through operational improvements www.pwc.co.uk This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, its members, employees and agents do not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it. © 2014 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. All rights reserved. In this document, “PwC” refers to the UK member firm, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details. 140424-183810-JS-OS