Comments
Description
Transcript
Diapositiva 1
REDO SURGERY LA CONVERSIONE DA BAND A BY PASS "single step" Restrictive Procedures: long-term break down up to 40% Poor quality of life Psychological intolerance, frequent vomiting, GERD Failure Insufficient weight loss Weight regain Long term complications Gastric pouch dilatation/slippage Intragastric band migration SICOB 2013, Cagliari Gastric Band Brake Down Aim • Achieve sufficient weight loss • Treat complications • Allow good quality of life Technical troubles • Adhesions from previous surgery • Staple line insufficiency, disruption Reasonable morbidity and mortality SICOB 2013, Cagliari SICOB 2013, Cagliari BAND Complication Good weight loss Good quality of life Poor quality of life Re L AGB Conversion GBP / BPD (except band migration) SICOB 2013, Cagliari Poor weight loss Conversion GBP / BPD Sleeve gastrectomy (has though been reported as a potential revisional procedure) Revisional Bariatric Surgery for Inadequate Weight Loss Andrew A. Gumbs, MD; Alfons Pomp, Michel Gagner, MD Obesity Surgery, 17, 2007 SICOB 2013, Cagliari 70 patients, one session in 47 cases Mostly pouch dilatation and insufficient weight loss (94 %) 3 conversions Morbidity 14,3 %, early reoperations 5,7 % No mortality BMI 32,2 after 18 months SICOB 2013, Cagliari Mognol et al, Obes Surg 2004; 14: 1349 218 patients (15 % of all bariatric procedures) Mortality: 0,9 % Serious morbidity: 26 % 94 % conversion to RYGBP Insufficient weight loss: 81 patients 46 % EWL, 78 % satisfaction rate Complications/side-effects: 95 patients 88 resolved, 79 satisfaction rate SICOB 2013, Cagliari Nesset EM et al. SOARD 2007; 3: 25-30 47 patients (62 % for insufficient weight loss) 26 laparoscopic (4 conversions), 21 open No mortality, 19 % morbidity EWL > 50 % in 47 % of patients Van Wageningen B, et al. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 137 SICOB 2013, Cagliari 62 patients, 30 re-banding, 32 conversions to RYGBP Two periods, different indications, short follow-up Both techniques are safe Further weight loss with RYGBP, not with re-banding Weber M, et al. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 827 SICOB 2013, Cagliari 33 patients with pouch dilatation after GB (6,7 %) 16 repositioning / re-banding 9 band removal 8 conversions to RYGBP Patients often gain weight (10 / 16) and are dissatisfied after rebanding All patients converted to RYGBP lost further weight and were extremely satisfied (better food tolerance, no vomiting) Lanthaler M, et al. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 484 SICOB 2013, Cagliari How to approach revisional surgery : Actual and maximal weight loss after first procedure and initial weight before the first procedure Type of complication if present: barium swallow, EGDS Quality of life: o Psychological tolerance o Digestive tolerance : Alimentary comfort Frequency of nausea and vomiting Gastro - oesophagal reflux Surgical team skill Patients wish SICOB 2013, Cagliari GENERAL PRINCIPLES Get the old operative report Be sure that patients are aware of increased risks and lower likelihood of success. Obtain Upper GI contrast study to determine staple line integrity and location of GE Junction. Endoscopy SICOB 2013, Cagliari GENERAL PRINCIPLES Completely comfortable with performing primary procedure (100 cases). Higher complication rate. Lower success rate. Unusual findings. SICOB 2013, Cagliari Literature laparoscopic revision Nbr LEAK Morbidity Mortality GAGNER . M 2002 27 0% 22 % 0% WEBER . M 2003 62 1.6 % 8% 0% WANG . W 2004 29 3.4 % 17 % 3.4 % MOGNOL . Ph 2004 70 0% 14.3 % 0% SUTER . M 2004 49 6% 20 % 0% COHEN . R 2005 62 0% 0% 0% VAN WAGENINSEN 2006 26 4% 23 % 0% SICOB 2013, Cagliari Michel Gagner, Paolo Gentileschi, John de Csepel, Subhash Kini, Obesity Surgery, 12, 2002 Retrospective study •Morbidity : 22% •Mortality : 0% •Conversion : 3.7% •2° revision : 14.8% •Operative time •Hospital stay SICOB 2013, Cagliari TECHNICAL FEATURES Gastro-gastric stitches dissection SICOB 2013, Cagliari TECHNICAL FEATURES “Smaller pouch”in case of slippage. SICOB 2013, Cagliari TECHNICAL FEATURES Avoid fibrotic tissue!! SICOB 2013, Cagliari Technology enables surgeons to use staplers in a broader range of tissue thicknesses than before! • Largest Staple Height • Thickest Tissue Ever SICOB 2013, Cagliari THE PRECISE STAPLE HIGH SICOB 2013, Cagliari Trocars Position 3 1. Optivew: 10 m 3 2. Liver retractor:10 3. Surgeon: 10 mm 2 4. First aid: 10 mm SICOB 2013, Cagliari 1 4 SIMPLIFIED LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRIC BYPASS BILIOPANCREATIC LIMB ALIMENTARY LIMB 60 cm 200 cm SICOB 2013, Cagliari 930 Gastric Bands • EWL < 25% • BMI > 40 Rescue Gastric By Pass 35 patients (2,69%) 33 one step 2 two steps - 1 previously removed in pregnancy for slippage - 1 gastric perforation during band removal SICOB 2013, Cagliari Bariatric and Metabolic Unit Ospedale di Desenzano del Garda 1 YR WEIGHT LOSS AFTER LRYGB FOR LAGB FAILURE (35 PTS) 55 50 Mean BMI 49,2 44,9 45 40 35 32,3 30 Heliogast Rescue By Pass SICOB 2013, Cagliari 12 months BAND → RYGB Pre BMI Post BMI Time of Follow Up Mognol 45 32 18m Sanchez 40 27.6 12m Perathoner 37.4 28.5 12m Perathoner 35.5 27.3 12m Weber 42.0 31.8 10.5m Westling 33.0 28 12m Spivak 42.4 30.7 15.7m Topart 43.1 33.3 18m Van Wageningen 45.8 37.7 12m SICOB 2013, Cagliari Bariatric and Metabolic Unit Ospedale di Desenzano del Garda 2 YRS EWL% AFTER LRYGB FOR LAGB FAILURE (35 PTS) 80 70 60 EWL% 50 40 30 20 10 0 75 63 24,9 0 Heliogast Rescue By Pass SICOB 2013, Cagliari 12 months 24 months Conclusion All restrictive procedure are theoretically associated with long term failure and/or mechanical complications A lifelong multidisciplinary management and surveillance for these patients appears compulsory Bariatric revisional surgery is a major concern RYGBP is a very good rescue procedure after failure of restrictive procedure SICOB 2013, Cagliari Conclusion The laparoscopic conversion of failed gastric bands to Gastric Bypass in “one step” is reported in literature to be safe in high volume centres. In our experience excellent results in term of: Morbidity and mortality: 0% Weight loss :EWL%>70 SICOB 2013, Cagliari Thank You. SICOB 2013, Cagliari