STANDARD REPORTS Compiled From The Files Of The Urban Development Information System

STANDARD REPORTS
Compiled From The Files Of
The Urban Development Information System
•
May, 1975
I
Prepared By:
The Office of Research &•Statisiics
County of Fairfax, Virginia •
'(703) 691-3341
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX
* * * BOARD OF SUPERVISORS * * *
Mrs. Jean R. Packard
Chairman
Mr. Joseph Alexander
Lee 'District
Mrs. Audrey Moore
Annandale District
Mr. Warren I. Cikins
Mt. Vernon District
WS. Martha V. Pennino
Centreville District
Mr. John Herrity
Springfield District
Mr. Rufus Phillips
Dranesville District
Mr. Alan H. Magazine
Mason District
Mr. James M. Scott
Providence District
Robert W. Wilson
County Executive
Douglas Harman
Deputy County Executive
Samuel A. Finz, Director
Office of Research and Statistics
4100 Chain Bridge Road
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
May, 1975
FOREWORD
This volume contains a variety of inventory reports regarding housing,
population, and land uses in Fairfax County, Virginia. The reports are called
Standard Reports because their contents are of continuing general interest and
can serve as reference sources for most agencies and persons interested in Fairfax
County. For this reason these Standard Reports will be updated from time to time
as new information becomes available. In addition, a number of other Standard
Reports will be produced in future months to supplement and to expand on the
reports included in this set of compilations.
The reports are numbered so as to identify both a general subject area and
also a specific report number. Thus, DU-5 identifies Dwelling Unit Report 05,
P-2 refers to Population Report #2, and 1-3 identifies Land Use Report 11 3. The
top of each page will carry the date on which that particular page is published.
This will aid the user in updating his report package as new versions are published.
This series of reports should be kept in a loose leaf binder with dividers to
separate the various subject areas. As additional reports become available
through the Office of Research and Statistics, they can simply be inserted into
the loose leaf binder. As updated reports are received, the superseded report
can be removed from the binder and replaced by the updated version.
Periodic memorandums from the Office of Research and Statistics will accompany new reports and will identify which reports are currently effective and
which ones are superseded. In addition these memorandums will comment as
necessary on the following subjects:
•
•
•
•
Qualification and assumptions regarding the Standard Reports
Analysis of individual reports
How to obtain assistance in using Standard Reports
How to obtain additional or more specific information through the
Office of Research and Statistics.
Additional copies of the Standard Reports, together with revisions and newlyissued reports, are available at cost at the following location:
Fairfax County Administrative Services Office
Fairfax Building
10555 Main Street
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Telephone: 691-2781
UDIS STANDARD REPORTS
Table of Contents
Published May, 1975
Foreword
Table of Contents
Summary Section
Housing Inventory Reports Summary
Construction Activity Reports Summary
Population Reports Summary
Land Use Reports Summary
Housing Inventory Reports
DU-1A
DU-1B
DU-2A
DU-2B
DU-3A
DU-3B
K6U-4A
ZU-4B
1:16-5B
DU-6
\ZrU-7A
1-61J-7B
DU-8
Dwelling Units
Dwelling Units
Dwelling Units by Structural Type
Dwelling Units by Structural Type
Individually Owned Dwelling Units
individually Owned Dwelling Units
Rental Dwelling Units
Rental Dwelling Units
Sales Price Distribution
Sales Price Distribution
Dwelling Units and Population
Vacancy Analysis of Rental Projects
Average Rents in Rental Projects
Condominium Inventory
Supervisor District
Planning District
Supervisor District
Planning District
Supervisor District
Planning District
Supervisor District
Planning District
Supervisor District
Planning District
Subcensus Tract
Countywide
Countywide
Countywide
Construction Activity Reports
`CA-5
`CA-6
Construction Activity Summary
Construction Activity Summary
CA-7 Construction Activity Summary
N-CA-8 Construction Activity by Stage
\€A-1O Committed and Anticipated Growth
CA-11 Housing Units Authorized (1968-1975)
CA-12 Residential\ Units Authorized vs. Units
Started and Units Completed
(January, 1968-January, 1975)
Planning District
Supervisor District
Sewershed
Sewershed
Census Tract
Countywide
Countywide
II
II
II
II
II-
II-
*
*
CA-13 Location of Residential Construction
Activity
CA-14A,
CA-14B Building Permit Activity (Month and
Year )
Sewershed
III-15
Planning District
III-16
Population Reports
P-1A
P-1B
P-1C
P-2
P-3
47-4
vID-5
4376
`FI-7
Current Population
Current Population
Current Population
Components of Future Population
Population: Future Estimates
Current Population Density
Committed Growth
Anticipated Growth
Future Population, Including Committed
and Anticipated
Supervisor District
Planning District
Sewershed
Countywide
Countywide
Census Tract
Census Tract
Census Tract
IV-1
IV-1
IV-1
IV-7
IV-8
IV-10
IV-11
IV-12
Census Tract
IV-13
Planning District
Planning District
V 1
Planning District
Planning District
Subcensus Tract
V-3
V-8
V-11
Land Use Reports
•
L-1
L-2A
L-2B
L-3
L-4
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix E
Appendix F
Appendix G
Appendix H
Acres of Land by Zoning Class
Acres of Vacant Land by Zone
Acres of Vacant/Underutilized Land
by Zone
Acres of Land by Land Use Category
Appraised Valuations
UDIS Residential Monitoring System:
Method, Assumptions and Limitations
Zoning Classification Description
Sewershed Codes
Fairfax County Sewershed Map
Fairfax County Supervisor Districts
(effective through Dec. 31, 1975)
Fairfax County Supervisor Districts
(as of January 1, 1976)
Fairfax County Planning Districts
Housing-to-Population Conversion Factors
Table of Additions and Revisions
* Denotes new report not previously published in Standard Reports prior to May, 1975.
-
V-3
A-1
B-1
C-1
D-1
E-1
E-2
F-1
G-1
H-1
SUMMARY SECTION
Dwelling Unit Reports/ January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 11 7
CURRENT HOUSING INVENTORY
Fairfax County, Virginia
Brief Summary
Approximately 173,000 dwelling units were in Fairfax County's housing
inventory as of January, 1975 (Report DU-1). Reports DU-3 and DU-4 illustrate that 73 percent of the total dwelling units are individually owned units 1
and 27 percent are in rental projects. Single family, detached units account
for nearly 60 percent of the total housing inventory. Townhouses, garden apartments and elevator apartments in rental projects contribute nearly 95 percent
of the total rental housing inventory. Mobile home pads and scattered units
comprise the remainder.
Centreville, the largest Supervisor District, in terms of both dwelling units
and population has over 28,000 housing units. Centreville also has the greatest
number of single family, detached units while Mason District has the largest
share of rental units.
The median sales price of individually owned housing is estimated at $59,000.
Thus, 50 percent of the homes cost less than $59,000 and 50 percent cost more.
About 52 percent of all individually owned units cost less than $60,000 while
nearly five percent or 5,838 units have a market value in excess of $100,000.
Less than ten percent of the individually owned units have an estimated sales
price of less than $35,000.
l lndividually owned units include condominiums, as well as single family
detached and single family attached units not in rental projects.
Construction Activity/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series #7
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
'Fairfax County, Virginia
Brief Summary
Some 60,700 proposed dwelling units were at various stages in the post-zoning
development process as identified in a compilation of construction plans and
rezoning building activity completed in May, 1975. Completion of these units
would increase the County housing inventory by 35 percent. In addition, rezoning
applications entailing nearly 73,000 potential dwelling units now appear among
Fairfax County records.
The proposed new dwelling units, as of January, 1975, fell into the following
stages of development or preliminary planning.
Stage of Completion
Under Construction
Outstanding Building Permits, Not Started
Plans Approved
Plans Under Review
Rezoned Recently
Rezoning:
Likely 1
Likelihood Uncertain
Rezoning:
Rezoning: Unlikely 1
Rezoning: Recently Denied or Withdrawn
TOTAL COUNTY
Number
of Units
8,820
5,105
12,118
27,475
7,155
Percent of
Proposed Units
5,333
7.0
4.0
9.0
21.0
5.0
.0
50.0
.0
4.0
133,551
100.0
67,545
Of the total planned growth, nearly 14,000 units (10%) represent Committed Growth since building permits and sewer taps, where applicable,
already have been issued. Some 39,500 (30%), classified as Anticipated
Growth, either are in the plan review process or have been approved and
are eligible for building permits and/or sewer taps unless located in areas
affected by sewer moratorium.
1
1-2
Due to the ongoing review of new comprehensive plans, no judgements
have been made as to the likelihood of pending rezoning applications
being granted.
Construction Activity/January, 1975
Published, May, 1975/Series 0 7
The collection of proposed construction activity data confirms the trend toward
more townhouse and multifamily housing in Fairfax County. While approximately
60 percent of the present housing inventory is single family detached, only 26
percent of the proposed housing is of this type.
The construction activity reports generally are compiled according to three
basic structural housing types: single family, townhouse and apartment. The
first category refers to single family detached housing. The townhouse category
covers townhouses and various multiplex structures. The apartment category
includes garden apartments, low-rise, mid-rise and high -rise units. The three
structural types are not meant to suggest the tenure of occupancy, i.e., whether
rental or owner occupied.
1-3
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Population Reports/January, 1975
PO PU LATIO N
Fairfax County, Virginia
Brief Summary
The population holding capacity of Fairfax County as of January, 1975,
was over 555,000 1 . This figure represents an increase of less than one percent
over the estimate published in October, 1974, suggesting a January, 1975,
population holding capacity of almost 552,000. The higher population holding
capacity reported now is the result of more residential units being completed
in the last quarter of 1974 than previously was anticipated.
The Office of Research and Statistics determined current household size
factors from a statistical analysis of the 1974 School Census Survey. The
former household size factors, which had been in general use in Fairfax
County since the 1968 Council of Governments Home Interview Survey, compare with the revised factors as shown below:
COMPARISON OF HOUSING-TO-POPULATION
CO NV ERSIO N FACTO RS
Housing Type
Single Famili
Duplex
Multiplex
Townhouse
Garden Apartment
Elevator Apartment
Mobile Home
Overall County Average
Former Average
Household Size
Revised Countywide
Average
Household Size
Percent
Change
- 3.5
-13.0
3.5
3.0
1.8
2.9
3.57
3.22
2.42
2.81
2.50
1.52
2.61
3.5
3.14
-10.5
3.7
.1M■
-19.7
-16.7
-15.6
-10.0
A complete discussion of the demographic trends contributing to the smaller
average household size is included in "Demographic Factors of Growth in
Fairfax County, 1960 - 70," published by the Office of Research and Statistics
and available through the Administrative Services Offices, 10555 Main Street,
Fairfax, Virginia 22030.
1 The term "population holding capacity" is distinct from actual population in
that the first term indicates what the current housing inventory could hold were
there no vacancies and all new units were occupied by an average size household shortly after entering the market. The latter refers to the actual number
of persons residing in the County.
1-4
Population Reports/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series #7
The population holding capacity shows the Centreville Supervisor District
(including Vienna) to be by far the most populous with over 92,000 persons.
Mount Vernon District is the smallest with 58,942 persons (Report P-1A).
Given the population holding capacity of 555,000 as of January, 1975, and
assuming housing completion rates as estimated in Report P-3, the January, 1976,
population holding capacity should be about 572,000.
Report P-2 illustrates that the addition of all currently Committed Growth 2
(building permits outstanding) and Anticipated Growth 2 (site plans or subdivision
plats submitted) could result in a total population holding capacity of over 715,000
persons in the foreseeable future. However, while the Committed Growth component would normally occur within a.year or two, current economic conditions
already indicate a substantial slowdown and hence a longer time frame. It also
should be noted that large amounts of property attributed to the Anticipated
Growth category are uneconomic to develop under current conditions, despite
early intentions as evidenced by subdivision plat submissions (Report P-2).
Reports P-1 through P-7 illustrate the population figures in more detail.
2
Complete definitions appear in Appendix A.
1-5
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Land Use Reports/January, 1975
LAND USE
Fairfax County, Virginia
Brief Summary
Of Fairfax County's 257,000 acres (402 square miles), 239,405 are zoned
predominately in the categories shown in Report L-1. The remaining 17,595
acres are in roads, water and other areas not zoned.
Fifty-four percent (129,434 acres) of the County's zoned land is RE-1 with
the largest single portion (32%) found in Pohick Planning District. An additional
33 percent of land zoned RE-1 is located in the Upper Potomac and Bull Run
Planning Districts. Almost two-thirds of all land in Fairfax is either RE-1 or
RE-2. About two percent is industrial and less than two percent is commercial.
There are 2,902 acres zoned "Public Land", located mainly in Mount Vernon
and Lower Potomac.
Approximately 122,500 acres of all County land is vacant or is considered
to have potential for development. This accounts for over 50 percent of all the
zoned land. The Pohick Planning District has almost 33,000 acres of vacant/underutilized land. The Upper Potomac and Bull Run Planning Districts account for
another 53,000 acres of vacant/underutilized land.
Report L-3 tabulates current land uses by Planning District. Nearly 36
percent of all zoned land is devoted to single family housing. This nearly equals
the 39 percent which is vacant. Military and correctional institutions account
for almost 12,000 acres or nearly five percent of the zoned land.
Report 1-4 reports the total appraised value of all assessed properties in
Fairfax County by subcensus tract. Of the 159,000 land parcels in Fairfax County,
the total appraised value is in excess of $9 billion. Of the total appraised
value, $3.2 billion is attributed to land value and $5.8 billion is appraised
improvement value.
1
According to a complex formula developed by the Office of Comprehensive
Planning, land is considered to have potential for development if: (1) In
any case the appraised improvement value is less than $6,500; or (2) The
parcel is between two and six acres and the appraised improvement value
is between $6,500 and $25,000 or (3) The parcel is over six acres and
the appraised improvement value is less than three times the appraised
land value, then the following formula is used:
(Total Land Area) x
1-6
T
1-
appraised improvement valu e
3(appraised land value)
II. HOUSING
INVENTORY
SECTION II
HOUSING INVENTORY REPORTS'
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Dwelling Unit Report-1A/January, 1975
DWELLING UNITS
Centreville District is the largest Supervisor District in terms of dwelling
units with about 28,000 units, including 4,700 units located in the Town of
Vienna. Providence District has 23,100 units or 13 percent of the total housing
inventory. Combined, the towns of Vienna, Clifton and Herndon have 7,800
units which account for over four percent of the total inventory.
DWELLING UNITS
Summarized By Supervisor District .'
Fairfax County, Virginia
Supervisor
District
Code
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
Supervisor District
Centreville 3
Dranesvi I le 4
Annandale
Lee
Mason
Mount Vernon
Providence
Springfield 5
TOTAL COUNTY (Including
the towns listed below)
Town
Code
10
12
13
Town
Clifton
Herndon
Vienna
TOTAL TOWNS
Dwelling Units 2
Percentaae
28,191
20,929
19,440
20,008
20,807
19,789
23,108
20,697
16.3
12.1
11.2
11.6
12.0
11.4
13.4
12.0
172,969
100.0
Dwelling Units 2
Percentage of
Total Inventory
67
3,019
4,717
0.0
1.7
2.7
7,803
4.4
Source: UDIS Parcel File, January, 1975
1 Supervisor Districts in this report are the current Districts as determined by the
1971 apportionment plan. The present District boundaries will remain in effect
through December 31, 1975, after which these Districts will be reapportioned
according to the plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors on January 4, 1975.
The summary in Report DU-6 illustrates the effect the new apportionment plan
has on the distribution of the January, 1975, dwelling unit inventory and population holding capacity as opposed to the distribution existent under the current
apportionment plan.
2 Dwelling units tabulated in this report include some units under construction.
Such units are sufficiently near completion to warrant their inclusion in the
dwelling unit inventory. Figures exclude housing located on Federal property.
Mobile home sites are included where applicable.
3
Includes Town of Vienna
4 Includes Town of Herndon
5 Includes Town of Clifton
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Dwelling Unit Report-1B/January, 1975
DWELLING UNITS
In terms of dwelling units, the four largest Planning Districts are Mount Vernon
(29,400 units), Annandale (21,300 units), McLean (16,300 units) and Upper
Potomac (16,200 units). Their combined total is in excess of 83,200 units which
is nearly half of the total dwelling unit inventory. In contrast, the Lower Potomac
District has only 1,800 units or about one percent of the County's total inventory
of 173,000 units.
DWELLING UNITS
Summarized by Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginia
Planning
District
Code
Planning District
Dwelling Units 1
Percentage
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
Annandale
Baileys
Bull Run
Fairfax
Jefferson
Lincolnia
Lower Potomac
McLean
Mount Vernon
Pohick 2
Rose Hill
Springfield
Upper Potomac 3
Vienna 4
21,273
12,567
6,623
9,615
13,651
3,906
1,844
16,302
29,423
11,077
6,807
10,162
16,207
13,512
12.3
7.3
3.8
5.6
7.9
2.3
1.1
9.4
17.0
6.4
3.9 .
5.9
9.4
7.8
TOTAL COUNTY
Town
Code
J
M
N
172,969
Town
Clifton
Herndon
Vienna
TOTAL TOWNS
Dwelling Units 1
•
100.0
Percentage of
Total Inventory
67
3,019
4,717
0.0
1.7
2.7 '
7,803
4.4
Source: UDIS Parcel File, January, 1975
1
2
Dwelling units tabulated in this report include some units under construction.
Such units are sufficiently near completion to warrant their inclusion in the
dwelling unit inventor/. Figures exclude housing located on Federal property.
Mobile home sites are included where applicable.
Includes Town of Clifton
3 Includes Town of Herndon
4 Includes Town of Vienna
11-2
Dwelling Unit Reports-2A and 2B/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series #7
DWELLING UNITS BY STRUCTURAL TYPE
There are 102,800 single family dwelling units in Fairfax County, representing nearly 60 percent of the total dwelling unit inventory of 173,000 units.
Centreville is the Supervisor District with the greatest number of single family
units. The chart below illustrates the distribution of the single family units
by Supervisor District.
Distribution of Single Family Units
By Supervisor District
Fairfax Courity, Virginia
January. 1975
Units
17,000
16,000
15,000
14,000
13,000
12,000
11,000
10,000
The McLean, Mount Vernon and Annandale Planning Districts account for
40 percent of the single family dwelling units in Fairfax County. In contrast
11-3
welling Unit Reports-2A and 2B/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
the Lower Potomac and Lincolnia Planning Districts have only 2,400 single
family units. Of the total units in Rose Hill District, 92 percent are single
family. The chart below demonstrates the distribution of single family units
among Planning Districts.
Distribution of Single Family Units
By Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginia
January, 1975
15,000 14,000 13,000 12,000 11,000 10.000 9„000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,0004,0003,000 2,0001,000 0
Of the 1,700 duplex units located in Fairfax County,64 percent are located
in Mount Vernon Supervisor District, while Lee District has an additional
32 percent. The Annandale and Mason Supervisor Districts include few if any
duplex units. Mount Vernon Planning District has the largest number of
duplexes, 1,600 units. The remaining 64 duplex units are located in Jefferson,
Lower Potomac, McLean, Pohick and Vienna Planning Districts.
The 15,721 townhouse units in Fairfax County account for nine percent of
the County's total dwelling unit inventory. Almost 30 percent of the County's
townhouse units are situated in Centreville Supervisor District, including
132 units located in the town of Vienna.
11-4
•
Dwelling Unit Report-2A and 2B/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series #7
The Upper Potomac, Springfield and Pohick Planning Districts combine to
account for 8,605 units or 54.7 percent of the total townhouses in Fairfax
County.
There are 41,807 garden apartments in the County. These units--both rental
and ownership--account for 24 percent of the total County dwelling unit inventory. Providence District is the Supervisor District with the largest number of
garden apartments while Mount Vernon Planning District has the greatest number
of garden apartments of the 14 Planning Districts.
The 5,900 elevator apartment units in Fairfax County are concentrated in
Mount Vernon and Mason Supervisor Districts. These same units fall predominantly in the Baileys and Mount Vernon Planning Districts.
Less than two percent of the dwelling units in Fairfax County are mobile
homes. Over 900 units are situated in Lee Supervisor District while Centreville,
Mount Vernon and Springfield Districts account for the remaining 1,500 units.
Few multiplex units occur in Fairfax County as compared to other structural
types. The majority are located in Centreville and Lee Supervisor Districts.
•
11-5
Dwelling Unit Report-2A/January, 1975
Supervisor
S . -.. .
District
D
Code
Published May, 1975/Serie3•
DWELLING UNITS BY STRUCTURAL TYPE 1
Summarized by Supervisor District 2
Fairfax County, Virginia
.
•
2
5 =Emus • smison== 7 sel.2=MIMIZEt II
... .
Apartment
a•
Family
„
Aoartment
Home
9 =masa
0=ecoesc1
TOTAL
Percentage
SUPERVISOR
DISTRICT
.
Inventory
ol
.=•=7,02ssmoir
a
Centreville
01
16 657
2
4,516
5,669
201
Dranesville 4
02
15,542
4
1.272
3.614
Annandale
03
12,980
1,469
4,517
I
P
04
10,846
1,619
5,040
Mason
05
10,257
881
7,267
2.402
Mount Vernon
06
11,282
1.089
163
3,851
2.520
Providence
07
10,609
4
1,767
10,325
242
Springfield
08
14 623
54
4 034
1 524
548
500
646
28,191
16.3
297
200
20.929
1
218
256
19.440
11.2
976
20.008
11.6
20.807
12.0
149
19,789
11.4
161
23,108
13 4
198
20,697
12.0
979
a
..,.
•
10
II
735
a
13
a•
13
264
16
17
10
19
20
III
19
TOTAL COUNTY (including
Towns listed below):
102,796
1,701
15,721
41.807
5,880
2,478
2.586
172-969
59.4
1.0
9.1
24.2
3.4
1.4
1.5
100.0
20
100.0
21
21
PERCENTAGE-
12
--I
23
2,
iI
21
67
.0
Town of Herndon 12
1,079
511
1,429
3,019
1.7
Town of Vienna
4.047
132
538
4.717
2.7
5.193 _
643
1,967
7,803
4.5
Town of Clifton
10_
13
67
21
31
31
TOTAL TOWNS
31
Source:
UDIS Parcel File, January, 1975
Notes:
1
2
3
4
5
Dwelling units tabulated in this report include some units under construction.
Such units are sufficiently near completion to warrant their inclusion in the
dwelling unit inventory. Figures exclude housing located on Federal property.
Supervisor Districts in this report ore the current Disteicts as determined by the
1971 apportionment plan. The present District boundaries will remain in effect
through December 31, 1975, after which these districts will be reapportioned
according to the plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors on January 4, 1975.
The summary in Report DU-6 illustrates the effect the new apportionment plan
has on the distribution of the January, 1975, dwelling unit inventory and
population holding capacity as opposed to the distribution existent under the
current apportionment plan.
Includes Town of Vienna
Includes Town of Herndon
Includes Town of Clifton
•
•
•
s.
s
s
11-6
,
III
Dwelling Unit Report-2B/January, 1975
DWELLING UNITS BY STRUCTURAL TYPE
- Summarized by Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginia
•
-t=aam
•
3
S
•
-
_
Planning
2
District
Single
Code
Family
Townhouse
Duplex
Garden
Elevator
Apartment
Apartment
•
/3
Plcmnina
Annandale
A
14,624
1,657
4,518
218
BelleY1
_.......--Th
B
4.748
160
5.257
2,402
Bull R
C
4.416
748
_303
5.140
5fl4
2.4z6
291
5,258
553
2.009
Published May, 1975/Series 07
Mobile
pmes
•
TOTAL
1
_Percentooe
Multiole x_PLANNING
DISTRICT
256
1
of Total
Inventory
2L273
12.3
12,567
73
AAA
IS, /OA
AA
in
9,615
5.6
13.651
7.9
3.906
23
1,844
1.1
200'
16.302
9 4
895
29,423
17.0
198
11,077
6.4
s
•
s
510
1
,
I
Fairfax
'°
Jefferson
E
7,858
33
Lincolnia
F
1.264
Lower Potomac
G
1,091
2
308
213
McLean
H
12.858
4
761
2,182
297
"
Mount Vernon
I
13,584
1,637
8.131
2520
2
Pohick 2
J
8,301
52
'
Rose Hill
K
Springfield
"
*
2
942
242
230
1.714
2 , 523
3
6.236
16
555
6,807
3.9
L
6,622
2,027
1.513
10, 162
59
M
5.991
4.055
5,960
N
9,963
4
1,116
2,429
102,796
1.701
15.721
41,807
5,880
2,478
59.4
1.0
9.1
24.2
3.4
1.4
21
/0/ ;:".........".•----,
201
16,207
-
94
11
2.
Vienna 4
/
13,512
7.8
2.586
172,969
100.0
1.5
100 0
20
SO
1
Is
TOTAL COUNTY (including
Towns listed below):
311
1.
PERCENTAGE-
16
S6
S,
SO
10
40
42
Town of Clifton
J
67
0
Town of Herndon
M
1,079
511
1,429
3,019
1.7
Town of Vienna
N
4,047
132
538
4,717
2.7
5.193
643
1,967
7,803
4.5
67
41
44
TOTAL TOWNS
41
46
4/
Source:
UDIS Parcel File, January, 1975
Notes.
1
/Is
4,
.
SO
is
12
2
3
4
Dwelling units tabulated in this report include some units under construction.
Such-units are sufficiently near completion to warrant their inclusion in the
dwelling unit inventory. Figures exclude housing located on Federal property.
Includes Town of Clifton
Includes Town of Herndon
Includes Town of Vienna
S,
1
11.-7
Dwelling Unit Reports 3A and 3B/January, 1975
Published, May,1975/Series 0 7
INDIVIDUALLY OWNED DWELLING UNITS
•
The 126,000 individually owned units in Fairfax County account for
73 percent of the total dwelling unit inventory. The malor portion of
ownership units are single family. Duplex units, townhouses, garden
apartments, elevator apartments and multiplex units make up 19 percent.
Distribution of Individually Owned Units
By Supervisor District
Fairfax County, Virginia
January, 1975
Units
23,000
22,000
21,000
20,000
19,000
18,000
17,000
16,000
15,000
14,000
13,000
12,000
11,000
10,000
Centreville Supervisor District has the largest number of individually
owned units with approximately 23,000, including 4,000 units located in
the Town of Vienna.
•
Dwelling Unit Reports-3A and 3B/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series #7
Distribution of Individually Owned Units
By Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginia
January, 1975
18,000
17,000
16,000
15,000
14,000
13,000
12,000
11,000
10.000
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5.000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
Among planning districts, Mount Vernon with 17,700 has the most individually
owned units. The Annandale and McLean Planning Districts account for an
additional 31,000 units or 25 percent of the total inventory.
The inventory of individually owned units has increased by about 12,000
since July, 1973. Nearly 30 percent of this increase can be attributed to new
single family dwellings. Another 30 percent of the increase has been condominium apartments.
11-9
2
=I
3
,
4
District
Single
Code
Family
District
••■•
v
1 —•—•11 7
1==p
TOTAL
. Supprvisor
Supervisor
•
4111
Published May, 1975/Series '
INDIVIDUALLY OWNED DWELLING UNITS 1
Summarized by Supervisor District 2
Fairfax County, Virginia
Dwellina Unit Report-3A/January, 1975
Duplex
Ownership
Townhouse
Ownership
Multiplex
Ownership
Ownership SUPERVISOR
Garden Apt,
Elevator
•
Percentage
DISTRICT ,
I
Centreville 3
01
16.457 a
2
4.516
646
1,131
23,052
18,3
'
Dranesville 4
02
15,542
4
1,272
200
591
17,609
14.0
'
Annandale
03
12,980
1,318
256
430
14,984
11.9
a
Lee
04
10,846
1,515
976
602
14,487
11.5
1
Mason
05
10,257
470
140
10,867
8.6
149
213
12_,_896
10,2
242
13,373
10.6
18.746
14,9
548
a
21
Mount Vernon
06
11,282
1,089
163
Providence
07
10,609
4
1,767
161
590
Sprinafield 5
08
14.623
54
3,490
198
381
I
I
a
a
a
a
I
19
10
I
TOTAL COUNTY (including
14,511
1,701
102,796
Towns listed below):
2,586
3,825
595
100.0
126,014
21
2
_
21
PERCENTAGE.
11.5
1.3
81.6
2.1
3,0
.5
2
100.0
2
2
13
•
24
23
16
2
27
20
29
30
67
0.1
276
1.866
1.5
1
132
36
4,215
3.3
-2
643
312
6,148
4.9
Town of Clifton
10
67
_
Town of Herndon
12
1,079
511
Town of Vienna
13
4,047
5.193
1
2
31
32
TOTAL TOWNS:
3
33
3.1
A
2
35
36
Source:
UDIS Parcel File, January, 1975
Notes:
1
'
3
2
3
4
5
Dwelling units tabulated in this report include some units under construction.
Such units are sufficiently near completion to warrant their inclusion in the
dwelling unit inventory. Figures exclude housing located on Federal property.
Supervisor Districts in this report are the current Districts as determined by the
1971 apportionment plan. The present District boundaries will remain in effec
through December 31, 1975, after which these districts will be reapportioned
according to the plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors on January 4, 1975.
The summary in Report DU-6 illustrates the effect the new apportionment plan
has on the distribution of the January, 1975, dwelling unit inventory and
population holding capacity as opposed to the distribution existent under the
current apportionment plan.
Includes Town of Vienna
Includes Town of Herndon
Includes Town of Clifton
3
•
•
•
•
4
•
•
s
s
s
-s
5
5
_.
11-10
—
•
■
S
INDIVIDUALLY OWNED DWELLING UNITS 1
Summarized by Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginia
Dwelling Unit Report-3B/January, 1975
•
s
3
.
5
Planning
District
Single
Family
Code
Duplex
Ownership
Ownership
Townhouse
Multiplex
D 1=1:10m1331
10
13
TOTAL
Planning
•
Published May, 1975/Series 17
Ownership
Garden Apt
Ownership
Elevator Ao
PLANNING
Percentage
DISTRICT
16.816
13.3
5,048
4.0
5,810
4.6
6 391
51
8 477
67
1.486
1
1.631
1.3
14,138
11.2
17.769
14.1
11,074
8.8
6,252
5.0
381
8,486
6.7
4,055
1,471
11,517
9.1
4
1,116
36
11,119
8.8
102,796
1,701
14,511
2,586
3,825
595
126,014
100.0
81.6
1.3
11.5
2.1
3.0
.5
100.0
256
430
2
Annandale
A
14,624
1,506
.
s
Bailers
B
4,748
160
°
Bull Run
C
4,416
748
646
Fairfax
D
5.. 140
584
161
Jefferson
E
7.858
" jingsdnia
F
1 364
Lower Potomac
0
1.091
2
308
230
McLean
H
12.858
4
761
200
315
Mount Vernon
I
13.584
1.637
838
895
602
J
8,301
52
2,523
198
Rose Hill
K
6.236
16
Sprinafield
L
6.622
1.483
Upper Potomac
5,991
Vienna
9,963
140
T
506
6
so
2°
2
84
291
242
,
ts
122
13
la
IS
'*
27
"
213
t9
"
Pohick
2
21
23
'.
27
26
36
3 '
32
TOTAL COUNTYfincludin
Towns listed beloy.):
76
"
PERCENTAGE.
SS
SG
St
SO
.
41
4 2
Town of Clifton
J
Town of Herndon
M
N
Town of 'Vienna
_
67
67
.1
1.866
4,215
1.5
132
276
36
3.3
643
312
6,148
4.9
1.079
511
4 047
5.193
43
44
TCit91 TOWNS
45
46
4/
Source:
UDIS Parcel File, January, 1975
Notes:
Dwelling units tabulated in this report include some units under construction.
Suds units are sufficiently near completion to warrant their inclusion in the
dwelling unit inventory. Figures exclude housing located on Federal property.
2 Includes Town of Clifton
Includes Town of Herndon
Includes Town of Vienna
46
46
.
so
St
53
53
•
64
1
5I
Dwelling Unit Reports 4A and 4B/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series #7
RENTAL DWELLING UNITS
The rental unit inventory as of January, 1975, consisted of 46,900 units
including townhouses, garden apartments, elevator apartments and mobile homes.
Rental garden apartments account for over 80 percent.' Rental townhouse units
and elevator apartments total about 6,500 units or 14 percent of the rental inventory. The remaining 2,500 units are classified as mobile home sites.
Providence and Mason Districts, which account for over 40 percent of the
total rental housing inventory, share almost 45 percent of the County's 38,000
rental garden apartments. Of the 5,300 rental elevator apartments nearly 87
percent are situated in Mason and Mount Vernon Districts. Eighty percent of
the County's rental townhouse units are located in Mason and Springfield
Supervisor Districts.
•
The mobile home sites are reported as rental units because, even though the
occupants may own the mobile home, the ground upon which it rests--the mobile
home pad--is most frequently rented. Of the nearly 2,500 mobile homes in the
County almost. 70 percent are located in Mount Vernon Planning District. The
remaining 750 mobile home units are found in the Bull Run and Fairfax Planning
Districts.
1
It should be pointed out that rental garden apartments, in this compilation,
include residential hotels and motels and a number of projects of mixed housing
types which are predominately garden apartments. For this reason, the number
of garden apartments is somewhat inflated, and the number of townhouse and
high rise structures correspondingly deflated when compared to some similar
compilations appearing elsewhere.
11-12
RENTAL DWELLING UNITS 1
Summarized by Supervisor District Fairfax County, Virginia
Dwelling Unit Report 4A/January, 1975
2
2
•
Published May, 1975/Series I °
• =:=Esec 7
5
9 aci4.422c4210ssommo2=0•1124
Supervisor
District
6
District
Code
21■••
TOTAL
Supervisor
Rental
Townhouse
Rental
Multiplex
Rental
Garden Aots
Rental
Elevator Apt
Centreville 4
01
4,438
201
Dranesville 5
02
3 023
Annandale
03
151
4,087
Lee
04
104
4.438
Mason
05
411
7,267
2,262
Mount Vernon
06
3,851
2,307
Providence
07
9,735
Sprinafield 6
08
Mobile
Homes
SUPERVISOR
DISTRICT
Percentage
5 139
10.9
297
3 320
7.1
218
4,456
9.5
5 521
11.8
9.940
21.2
6,893
14.7
9,735
20.7
264
1,951
4.1
2.478
46.955
100.0
500
979
11
12
735
t
5
13
14
1•
t
i
15
1.143
544
t
17
15
20
TOTAL COUNTY (including
37,982
1,210_
5.285
:
Towns listed below):
31
22
PERCENTAGE:
80.9
2.6
11.2
5,3
.
100.0
33
2 ,1
5
25
26
27
2
3
0
0
Town of Clifton
10
Town of Herndon
12
1,153
1,153
2.5
Tow n of Vienna
13
502
502
1.1
1,655
1,655
3.5
TOTAL TOWNS
Source
UDIS Parcel File, January, 1975
Notes:
1
2
3
4
5
6
Dwelling units tabulated in this report include some units under construction.
Such units are sufficiently near completion to warrant their inclusion in the
dwelling unit inventory. Figures exclude housing located on Federal property
"Rental Units" refer primarily to those units occurring in major apartment and
townhouse rental projects. The units surveyed in Report DU-7 are included
among those summarized in this report. Excluded from this tabulation are
individually owned houses and condomium units which are being rented out
by their owners.
Supervisor Districts in this report are the current Districts as determined by the
1971 apportionment plan. The present District boundaries will remain in effec t
through December 31, 1975, after which these districts will be reapportioned
according to the plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors on January 4, 1975.
The summary in Report DU-6 illustrates the effect the new apportionment plan
has on the distribution of the January, 1975, dwelling unit inventory and
population holding capacity as opposed to the distribution existent under the
current apportionment plan.
Includes the Town of Vienna
Includes the Town of Herndon
Includes the Town of Clifton
49
50
51
52
53
5•
11-13
ID
RENTAL DWELLING UNITS 1 2
Summarized by Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginia
Dwelling Unit Report-4B/January, 1975
0.C.1
2
3 401•S•211.1=•
Published May, 1975/Series /7
3=2.111=Misteasze•=13.sa7 =mama • •••■=elost • gmozna=10.1zia:
Planning
Planning
District
10
lem=•••=,11m•
TOTAL
District
Rental
Code
Townhouse
Rental
Rental
Garden Apt
Multiplex
Rental
Elevator Apt
Mobile
Homes
PLANNING
DISTRICT
Percentaae
4,088
218
4,457
9.5
B
5,257
2,262
7 519
16.0
Bull Run
C
303
510
813
1.7
Fairfax
D
2,970
254
3,224
6.9
Jefferson
E
5,174
5,174
11.0
Lincolnia
F
2,009
2,420
5.2
Lower Potomac
G
213
213
.4
McLean
H
1,867
297
2,164
4.6
Mount Vernon
J
7,529
2 307
11,654
24.8
Pohick 3
J
3
3
Rose Hill
K
555
555
1.2
Springfield
L
1,132
1,676
3.6
4,690
10.0
2,393
5.1
100.0
Annandale
A
Baileys
151
50
if
411
13
14
11
17
33
104
•1,714
19
30
0
31
22
23
24
24
Uotter Potomac
544
4
4,489
201
27
25
2,393
Vienna 5
39
30
51
32
TOTAL COUNTY(including
1.210
37,982
5,285
2,478
46,955
2.6
80.9
11.3
5.2
100
0
0
0
Towns listed below):
33
3•
PERCENTAGE:
35
36
37
36
39
• 0
Town of Clifton
J
0
0
1 ,153
1,153
2.5
Town of Vienna
502
502
1.1
TOTAL TOWNS
1,655
1,655
3.5
Town of Herndon
Source:
UD1S Parcel File, January, 1975
Notes:
1
Dwelling units tabulated in this report include some units under construction.
Such units are sufficiently near completion to warrant their inclusion in the
dwelling unit inventory. Figures exclude housing located on Federal property.
2
"Rental Units" refer primarily to those units occurring in major apartment and
townhouse rental projects. The units surveyed in Report DU-7 are included
among those summarized in this report. Excluded from this tabulation are
individually owned houses and condominium units which are being rented out
by their owners.
3
Includes Town of Clifton
4
Includes Town of Herndon
5 Includes Town of Vienna
11-14
Dwelling Unit Reports 5A and 5B/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series #7
DWELLING UNITS BY SALES PRICE DISTRIBUTION
The chart below illustrates the distribution of individually owned units
according to estimated sales price:
Price Range Distribution of
Individually Owned Housing Units
Fairfax County, Virginia
January, 1975
Units
24,000
22,000
2000
,
18,000
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
Sal es Price
30-35
60-70
40-45
50-55
80-90
5 100
(In Thousands <30
35-40
45-50
55-60
70-80
90-100
of Dollars)
Of the 12 sales price range categories, the $60,000 to $70,000 category
has the greatest number of units, while the $30,000 to $35,000 class has the
fewest number of units. Over 40 percent of all individually owned units have an
estimated market value between $50,000 and $70,000. Almost 25 percent have
an approximate sales price of $70,000 to $100,000 and nearly five percent of
the124,700 units reported are estimated to have a market value in excess of
$100,000.
The median sales price is estimated at $59,000. This means that as of
January, 1975, 50 percent of the units reported cost less than $59,000 and 50
percent cost more. The following chart illustrates the estimated median sales
11-15
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Dwelling Unit Reports 5A and 5B/January, 1975
price for each of the eight Supervisor Districts.
Estimated Median Sales Price
By Supervisor District
Fairfax County, Virginia
January, 1975
Bice
Range
$70,000
$67,500
$65,000
$62,500
$60,000
$57,500
$55,000
$52,500
$50,000
$47,500
$45,000
The Dranesville District has the highest estimated median sales price ($70,000)
while Lee District has the lowest with an approximate median sales price of
$50,000. Annandale, Mount Vernon, Springfield and Centreville Districts have
estimated median sales price figures ranging from $59,000 to $65,000.
As with other durable goods the cost of housing has increased steadily from
year to year. In July, 1973, the estimated median sales price was $52,000.
By January, 1974, the median had increased to about $55,000. One year later
it stood at $59,000. The following chart demonstrates the increases in the
estimated median sales price between July, 1973, and January, 1975.
Estimated Median Sales Price
July, 1973 to January, 1975
Fairfax County, Virginia
Vintage of
UDIS Parcel
File
Date of
Standard Report
Publication
July, 1973
Jan., 1974
Jan., 1975
Oct., 1973
May, 1974
May, 1975
Number of
Individually
Owned Units
111,992
119,243
124,739
Median
Sales Price
$52,000
$55,000
$59,000
Dollar Increase
From
Previous File
Average Monthly
Increase From
$3,000
$4,000
$428
$333
fLeviou% Ale
Dwelling Unit Report-BA/January, 1975
Unit
Type
ervisor
District
Centreville 4
Si
le am 1
Poblished May, 1975/Series 07
DWELLING UNITS BY SALES PRICE DISTRIBUTION
(Thousands of Dollars)
2
Summarized by Supervisor District
Fairfax County, Virginia
Less Than
$30-35
180
436
$35-40
540-45
$45-50
$50-55
555-60
560-70
203
658 IMMO
570-80
580-90
M WI M len 1= I!! I
590-100
over $100
26
7
TOTAL 7
UNITS
MINIMIIMRFIMMIPMEMIIMI•MIEMI
858 MIIMIMEMIIMIMIMIIMIIMATIIIIIrri MIMI INEWM11•1111.211=M11
Total:
MIIIIMIIIIMMIIMIPRIIMIMIMINIMIMMIIIIIMINIMIMMI
1 334
885
si de Famil Mrill
or.vi tie 5
*A =111=11 9j il■Winen/Wri
MIMI
•
32
161111
Townhouse 3 ".
02
a illi=iME1
1
47 11.11Millrilli
35
.5
111
1111111511.141.
.
2,513
2,610 Eill
1,068
692
1,060
2,765
1 5, 508
227
1,339
308
Total:
278
3 150
2 375
12 877
1 071
MI
.1
99
13
Si le Famil
7
Annandale
1,574
98
4
271
MIE
14
3
65
Townhouse 3
03
13
430
104
ortment
65
14,881
3.009
=MI
3.650
Total.
7
:0
Sin • le Fami I
Lee
3 039
04
To so ,e 3 11M21111.1MTIMIMMINEMIMIMMWMWEIMMMIMMIMI
602
140
Apartment
462
1 575
14 378
2 230 EN
•AL:
955
1 481
1 087
1 608
I.;
111.111MMIIIIMMIIMIN
1 142
044 Will
:I
796
3.3 MEMIIIINZE
111
Mason
Si le Fangl 111.1
470
.
Townhouse 3
2a
05
19
4
14
28
23
Apartment
214
10 2:53
57 MEM IIINIIIPIINIIII
773
765
138
459
•
11 202
1W.M1111111111,1.11n011.11M1=16/10.1MISTE
Sin. le Family
Mount Vernon
298
1 399
J
1U
Townhouse 3
06
10
517
93
623
213
78
19
22
52
Apartment
12,814
i
995
729
Total:
973
4 . IIINIMMINIPM1111111111MMIN1,1111•111711=11111MINIMMINIMIIIIIIINIMIIMINEll
218
284
Sinale Family
Providence
•
53
7
Townhouse 3
07
Apartment
21
596
8
192
1,821
0
226
655
13.2832
34
Total:
933
1118111/1111111.1
3
Sin le Famil
rin field 6
3.731
•
.
39
5
793
210
•
Townhouse 3
169
374
389
08
162
24
36
23
83
Apartment
879
458
446
18 277
1 262
2 288 IINIMIN
593
638
378
1 007
Total:
67
L
12
8
3
25
5
6
Town of Clifton Single Family
10
ME
1
4
3
2
1
5
6
8
25
12
67
Totol
136
24
9
5
160
219
128
12
29
1 069
98
62
75
Town of Hemdon Single Family
1
1
248
180
31
29
21
12
511
Townhouse 3
43
32
201
A artment
129
9
5 INII
340
250
126
355
328
Total:
5.5. 1
l 006
228
165
92
137
116
71
own of Vienna Sin le Famil
MEM
Townhouse
wn
3
13
36
Apartment
12
4
20
4,168
895
386
239
165
51
263
1.051
666
83
96
137
136
Total.
L
13
17
mawisimmootrumrimoril
PERCENT DISTRIBUTION
CUMULATIVE - UP
CUMULATIV E
- DOWN
7,308
4,256
6,728
7,917
11,148
13,162
14,368
5.9
34
5.4
6.3
8.9
10.4
9
93
14 7
21 0
99
40 5
5 0
100 0
94.1
90.7
85.3
79.0
70.A.
59.5
23.626
16.292
18-9
70.9
1324.0_
9,626
o
12.4
lo
11.9
,a
11.5
17
8.7
••
s•
23
23
10.3
mem
irimmori min
TOTAL COUNTY:
Percentage
12 424 5,031
1 195
4,470 .
5,838
7.7
3-6
4.7
91 7
9 3
1 00.0
I4-0
13-3
4.7
124,739
10 6
1
'
1.5
3.3
•
100.0
•
Source: UDIS Parcel File, January, 1975
Notes:
1
Dwelling units tabulated in this report include
some units under construction. Such units are
sufficiently near completion to warrant their
inclusion in the dwelling unit inventory.
Figures exclude housing located on Federal
property.
Supervisor Districts in this report are the
current Districts as determined by the 1971
apportionment plan. The present District
boundaries will remain in effect through
December 31,1975, after which these districts will be reapportioned according to
the plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors
on January 4,1975. The summary in Report
DU-6 illustrates the effect the new apportionment plan has on the distribution of the
January, 1975, dwelling unit inventory and
population holding capacity as opposed to
11-17
the distribution existent under the current
apportionment plan.
3 Townhouse category includes townhouses,
duplex units, multiplex units, and all
sales type housing other than single family
detached and condornium apartment.
4 Excludes Town of Vienna
5 Excludes Town of Hemdon
6 Excludes Town of Clifton
7 Totals may not agree with Report DU-3A
because some individually owned dwelling
units are excluded here,e.g., two or
snore single family, detached units on a
single parcel.
8 Soles price in this report refers to the estimated market value as of January, 1975.
Market value for each dwelling unit is
derived from the sales price, if any, and
from the most recent too assessment. In
order to estimate the current market value
for all individually owned dwelling units
as of January, 1975, the following "price
increase factors“ have been applied to the
period between the time of sale or assessment and January, 1975:
Year
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1974
1974
1974
1975
Monthly
Rate of
increase
.0058
.0075
.0100
.0125
(1st Quarter) .0075
(2nd Quarter) .0075
(3rd Quarter) .0033
(4th Quarter) .0000
(1st Quarter) .0033
Annual
Rate of
Increase
7%
9%
12%
15%
9%
9%
•
Planning
Unit
Less than
District
Ivo,
$30
Annrevinle
A
6
-
226
123
•
$40 -45
$35 -40
$30 - 35
$50- 55
$45 - 50
423
1,231
1,178
2,836
3.476
2,373
2,149
337
633
114
4
Sinale Family
84
14
3
9
293
271
65
225
104
241
15
149
84
13
244
581
1,608
1,462
3,173
4,109
2.487
2.153
313
115
16,711
124
41
113
207
505
452
551
977
549
443
251
479
4,692
48
112
214
14
28
23
4
338
55
141
230
509
452
599
1,089
549
443
251
479
5,135
307
88
76
150
428
919
1,220
940
84
38
15
87
4,352
38
15
87
5,746
607
418
414
5,076
Sinalciamihe
Townhouse 2
Anartment
Total:
Sinnle Family
2
Townh ouse
Bull Ron
C
Total:
Fairfax
$inale Familv
D
_Townhouse 2
Anortment
E
1
F
144
363
269
442
135
12
232
439
419
870
1,054
1.232
940
122
97
108
118
166
368
497
808
137
348
175
56
274
5
192
8
21
4
2
307
876
126
1,572
324
1.598
876
1,572
1,631
1,164
668
947
533
269
78
86
8,394
92
51
64
65
159
394
156
169
122
49
10
14
1,345
20
24
22
56
92
51
64
65
179
418
178
10
14
1 467
56
55
122
191
53
33
122
72
49
284
225
77
64
23
47
1,077
216
500
109
39
8
57
1
94
130
248
66
119
43
165
76
78
72
64
23
47
539
1,616
119
154
1,227
828
570
554
621
2,179
1,959
1,193
958
2,318
12,680
32
150
19
2
87
87
503
69
13
962
105
35
47
42
43
25
9
4
5
224
189
1,306
1,020
632
581
717
2,270
2,467
1,262
958
2 331
13,957
385
528
805
828
1,069
1,160
997
2,526
718
744
218
420
343
2
300
322
7
1,300
69
617
I 098
514
2,529
61
13,462
3,368
22
19
42
1,997
1,490
1,247
1 ,1 90
1,113
1 , 460
1,319
2,533
2,590
1,369
619
718
17,645
503
95
114
135
426
721
727
267
3,494
1,727
281
187
352
8 246
2,763
S' ale Free; Iv
Feel'1.,
t
Total:
c,1,,0 i,. ce„,;,,,
I
kn, u• 2
ernrsment
K
Upper Potomac
M
358
354
472
489
909
1,147
994
3,548
1,727
281
187
352
11,009
144
250
435
567
932
941
692
1,297
698
139
27
56
6,178
144
250
435
567
932
941
708
j , 297
698
139
27
56
6,194
Single Family
170
87
93
154
594
1,094
1,342
1,750
530
488
244
59
6,605
rnwnhnuu• 2
49
18
25
107
304
339
276
275
45
39
5
1
1,483
Apartment
24
36
23
243
141
141
261
898
1,433
1,618
2,025
575
527
249
60
8,171
284
181
261
335
327
377
828
886
925
534
782
5,882
200
162
236
456
613
506
520
447
749
206
98
17
7
4,055
899
389
116
66
1,383
787
753
789
278
179
205
940
327
11 408
9,806
20
12
4
298
191
209
7,308
4,256
6,728
4
sino le Somily
2
, ,..
Apni.en.r.
Vienna
Teal:
5
N
2
169
Total:
Single Family
T
Total
TOTAL COUNTY
54
1.3
11.2
14.1
8.8
16
16
5.0
83
alk
6.6
1,471
1
9.1
I , 335
1.577
1,646
1.092.
1,725
1.024
1,362
551
761
112
253
478
218
39
9
454
1,364
1,588
2.124
1,943
1,401
770
290
10 959
8.8
11,148
13.162
14.368
23,626
16,292
9.626
4 470
5.838
124.739
100 0
841
446
847
1,252
8
327
7,917
house 2
Aportment
1.2
315
264
Springfield
Total:
122
136
Single Family _
6.7
815
Townkno RCP 2
I.
326
639
Townhouse 2
5.1
291
29
205
704
Sino le Fnmi Iv
Total:
Rose Hill
918
1
.
Townhnu. 2
Ppartm
• Pohirk
J
6.327
7 777
414
86
98
5•ng l
Total:
3
419
78
472
Townkruue 2
I
607
269
3
Total:
Mount Vernon
86
1-353
533
322
I nwer Pntnmac Single Enmity
H
111
864
Apartment
33
4.6
506
95
Townhouse 2
McLean
6Z4_,
581
4.1
745
1
102
Total:
G
Z22.
1.053
1,353
118
32
13.4
160
417
Total:
I inenlnia
430
1,394
29
7
1,762
283
336
21
•
Single Family
Townhouse 2
Total:
Jeffertnn
14 519
115
313
Percentage
'TOTAL
Tomdziam 2
Total:
B
over $100
$90 - 100
$130 - 90
$70e 80
$60 - 70
$55 -60
76
Aporhtlent
illws ,
Published May. 1975/Series #7
DWELLING UNITS BY SALES PRICE DISTRIBUTION
(Thousands of Dollars)
Summarized by Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginia
Dwelling Unit Report-58/January. 1975
290
1,117
36
1
^
•
3.6
4.7
54 0
91 7
95.3
100 0
29 I
16.0
8.3
4.7
11.5
18.9
13
29 9
40.5,
52.0
70.9
79.0
79.1
59.5
48.0
5.9
3.4
5.4
6.3
8.9
CUMULATIVE UP
5.9
9-3
14.7
71.0
100.0
94.1
90.7
85.3
CUMULATIVE DOWN
7.7
10-6
PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUILO_IS
Source
UDIS Parcel File, January, 1975
Notes:
1 Dwelling units tabulated in this report include
sown units under construction. Such units ore
sufficiently near completion to warrant their
inclusion in the dwelling unit inventory.
Figures exclude housing located on Federal
property.
2 Townhouse category includes townhouses,
duplex units, multiplex units, and all
sales type housing other than single family
detached and condornium apartment.
3 Includes Town of Clifton
4 Includes Town of Herndon
5 Includes Town of Vienne
6 Totals may not agree with Report DU-3A
because some individually owned dwelling
,znits are •velurierl here, e.c., two or
more single family, detoched units on a
single parcel.
7 Sales price in this report refers to the estimated market value as of January, 1975.
Market value for end, dwelling unit is
derived from the soles price, if any, and
from the most recent lox ossessment. In
order to estimate the current market value
for all individually owned dwelling units
as of January, 1975, the following "price
increase facto,'" hove bees, applied to the
period between the time of sale or assess-
rnent and January,
X.C-91
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974 (1st Quarter)
1974 (2nd Quarter)
1974 (3rd Quarter)
1974 (4th Quarter)
1975 (1st Quarter)
:
Monthly
Rote of
Increase
.0058
.0075
.0100
.0125
.0075
.0075
.0033
.0300
.0033
Annual
Rote of
Increase
7%
9%
12%
15%
9%
9%
4%
0%
4%
Dwelling Unit Report 6/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series #7
HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION
As of January, 1975, there were approximately 173,000 dwelling units
in Fairfax. Seventy-three percent were individually owned units and 27 percent
were rental units, which included nearly 2,500 mobile homes. This represents
an increase of a little more than one percent compared to the earlier estimate
for that date which appeared in the October, 1975, edition of the Standard
Reports. The number of dwelling units completed during the last quarter of 1974
was slightly higher than earlier expected. The following chart illustrates the
increases in the dwelling unit inventory experienced by Fairfax County over the
past 18 months.
Dwelling Unit Inventory as Estimated From the UDIS Parcel File:
July, 1973, January, 1974, July, 1974 and January, 1975
Fairfax County, Virginia
Number of Units
Vintage of UDIS Date of Standard Total Number of over Previous
Reports Publication
Units Reported File Vintage Date
Parcel File
July, 1973
Jan., 1974
July, 1974
Jan., 1975
Oct., 1973
May, 1974
Oct., 1974
May, 1975
159,592
167,541
170,526
172,969
7,949
2,985
2,443
Monthly Increase
in Dwelling Unit
Inventory Since
Previous Date
1,324
497
407
The January, 1975, population holding capacity is estimated to be approximately 555,000 persons. This means the January, 1975, dwelling unit inventory
of 173,000 units could house 555,000 persons provided there are no vacancies
and all new units are occupied by an average size household shortly after entering
the market. If these conditions were true it could be expected that over 77 percent of the people would live in individually owned units while nearly 20 percent
would be located in rental project dwelling units. The remaining three percent of
the estimated population holding capacity could be found in mobile homes, group
quarters, e.g., nursing homes, orphanages, etc. and on military bases.
On January 4, 1975, the Board of Supervisors voted to re-align the Supervisor District boundaries so as to afford a more precise distribution of population
among the eight Supervisor Districts. All reports summarized by Supervisor
District in this edition of the Standard Reports reflect the current Supervisor
Districts which will remain in effect through December 31, 1975. The
re-districting of the eight Supervisor Districts will effect the distribution of
dwelling units and population as illustrated in the following charts.
11-19
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Dwelling Unit Report 6/January, 1975
The first chart reflects the January, 1975, dwelling unit inventory and estimoted population holding capacity as distributed by the present apportionment
system which is in effect through December 31, 1975. The second chart offers
an approximation of how the January, 1975, dwelling unit inventory and estimated population holding capacity will be distributed under the re-districting plan
as of January 1, 1976.
Dwelling Units and Population of the Supervisor Districts of Fairfax County
Under the Present Apportionment Plan to be Effective
Through December 31, 1975
Supervisor District
Centreville
Dranesville
Annandale
Lee
Mason
Mount Vernon
Providence
Springfield
TOTAL COUNTY
Dwelling Unit
Inventory 1
28,000
21,000
19,000
20,000
21,000
20,000
23,000
21,000
173,000
Population 1
92,000
69,000 "
64,000
68,000
59,000
58,000
68,000
77,000
As a Proportion
of Ideal Size 2
1.33
.99
.92
.98
.85
.84
.98
1.11
555,000
Dwelling Units and Population of the Supervisor Districts of Fairfax County
Under the Adopted Apportionment Plan 3 to Become Effective
on January 1, 1976
Supervisor District
Centreville
Dranesville
Annandale
Lee
Mason
Mount Vernon
Providence
Springfield
TOTAL COUNTY
1
2
Dwelling Unit
Inventory 1
Population 1
20,000
22,000
22,000
22,000
21,000
22,000
22,000
22,000
65,000
70,000
70,000
69,000
67,000
70,000
72,000
72,000
173,000
555,000
As a Proportion
of Ideal Size 2
.94
1.01
1.01
.99
.97
1.01
1.04
1.04
The figures provided here are approximate.
Ideal size for each district would be one-eighth of total County population, or approximately 69,400 persons.
3 The new apportionment plan has been adopted by the' Board of Supervisors
and will go into effect on January 1, 1976.
11-20
•
1.010
t.Vrn
1.020
1.030
3602-
2.010
2.020
2.030
3.010
3.020
3.030
3.040
4.010
4.020
4.030
4.040
5.010
5.020
5.030
6 010
6.020
6.030
6.040
7.010
7 020
7.030
Li
Planning
District
Supervisor
District
Subcensus Tract
03
qa 59-
06
06
06
06
o
06
06
06
s.
06
06
4103
06
e•
06
06
06
06
lig
06
s.
06
06
P
1-11-11
06
06
06
: 1 1
1111EMPBMIIIM,
..
9 010
WW1
06
'
I
06
6
i"i'1i`x
06
06
IIIMIENIEll
06
IIIMMIllirgMIIIIIMIIIrl
I.
06
10,010
1$ 020
10 030
26
27
1-184.1
50
13 010
40
iS
41
42
47
44
46
47
411
49
50
SI
52
111
•
r
fId
HOUSING
Rental Preen Mobile
Homes
Housing
Ownershi
Housi %
t.Vm
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
06
8.010
11111
Published May. 1975/ Series 17
HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION
Summarized by Subcensus Tract
Page 1 of 9
Fairfax County , Virginia
Dwelling Unit Report 6/January, 1975
I
1
386
300
268
.316
18
117
247
44
478
100
527
74
281
95
524
35 0
133
I
I
D81
73
08 L.Potrnac G
G
08
90
PO_PU
Rental Preen
Housin g
Ownership
Hou ing
384
1 2
462
1,001
182
1,492
316
1,510
117
4
lii
Total
Grou Qtrs.
& Military Population
1 289
1,418
235
99
2
1,628
499
12
30
74
283
95
2,651
350
175
685
216
90
170
241
116
249
97
:
600
447
432
427
739
OMR
-!4
MIIIIIIIII
=ME
ZPA
93
5
1,302
78
462
995
3,317
391
268
316
1,510
117
,..4Z
6
334
1 760
100
527
247
943
314
7,349
1 170
584
74
283
95
2,651
350
175
1111111,111111111ffil
Milrfs
2,28
721
301
28
63
2,288
685
784
301
216
90
718
IIEN
249
:
289
811
1 , 02
2.88
4
4
1 , 029
2.888
4
liii
:1:1
2 00
1 49
1,441
2,004
1 492
1,444
600
1,426
2 468
591
427
739
177
Mr
260
1 947
4
73
54
4 842
664
186
3
591
MIER•11111111?
=
_
186.11110.1111111M
Mr
437
Mr!
1 78
. 471
267
533
08
04
471
3'439.
L
• 6
04
267
04 RoseH 11 K
15.010
K
533
04
15,020
V7g CI,
K
04
SRI
K
114
04
202
K
202
04
19
K
•
04
609
K
9
0
K
114
0
17 070
44
K
14110
4 4
0
1
178
1 010
0 IMMIIIIIM1
•
111.11111EMMIl
maW
i
=11111.11.1111..M.11111.Wrr
WIIIMWIIIIMI
TIMW1
.ss
ilEIE
386
1
26
=
'Totol
Housing Unit
MEM
•:
47
100
527
MMig,
EMI
186
T1ON
Mobile
Home
8
266
685
216
90
79
621
289
811
:
600
447
432
427
739
177
I
I
72
Grou Otrs.
T tal
&Wit°
Housing Unit
67
W.
EIEW
111111111
4 842
432
EMITIMER
1,652
437
111=EMEME
952
267
1,886
533
1
IMIMINIIIM
675
202
48
191
6091
114
4
178
42 9
:•
11-21
•
HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION
Summarized by Subcensus Tract
Page 2 of 9
Fairfax County , Virginia
Dwelling Unit Report 6/Januory,1975
S ervi r
Plan • 111.1MPREM
4
Mob le MEM Total
Subcensus Tract6
1117IiiIIIIIriinledkIlii2M1111112=11113=====
111111
11 oMMIIMPIRP.MIMIIMIMMITI•1
06
635
19 020
I
989
=
06
1111.1111,111M
ce
Eil
I MEM
111MEI
2001.
NWEIFEIMINIMINTI
W
04
20 020
397
iliMM
IIIIWMIIIIIIIII
1111111MWEERI
21.010
21 0 •
I g•. .
22 010
MMIIIMIIIIIIIMI
32'1'9
111.=MMEN10
1
I.
Illitirall..1111
IMMIIMMIIIIIMIM
111MirIMME
IIIMIMMIIIIIIIIIM
111111.1111M1111=111
WIIIRWI
. 079
04
04
1 IIW
1 lifil
360
04 FtoseHill K
04
K
225
04
04
iimi 21
K mir.
m
ri
W
555
Ownershi MEM Mobile Gr Qt
Total
Total
111=ERMIZEMIRE:=KailMil PopuloHon Housing Units
illirrallillial
MII
Z
3 610
1,624
574
3
11
173
588
WI
WINIIIIIIMW
IIINSTAW
WWI
II•W
MIMI
MEMIMIIIRM
801
IMMINIEMMI
801
225
WM
si
MIIIIMIWII
9 mia1
r
142
1 141 21
2
K IMIffl
WIE10111M1
RoseHill K MINIMI
K IM51
MIMI
MEI
L NMI
L.Po moc G MOM
0 MI=
0
Wiirii
ME11.111.11111ffl
Mt.Vrn. 1 EMPIIMIIIITI
11.11.11.11=1111.11121
RoseHill K
Mt Vrn
MIIIIIIMIIIIIWIT/I
I MIIMIN111111
IMElliel
L Potmac G
Mt.Vm. I =111/1MI4!ZsI
I 11=11=1112
0 MIIM
04
G 1.111=
5
MIIIIMMIIIIIM
.11.11111MMIIIII
•_ 2,01c
.11111.14WM111.1.
.111Mr.R=111.
4-23Li
IMIIIIIMMIMER
.11118111.1=
910
10 901'9 S. .fld
1.11111MINIM
. 4 • I... Lee
IIIIMMEMMEMMI S lid e MOM
11191M11.111111 Lee
4
G MEN
29 030
fld 08
G
9
Lee
04
29 040
G
443
6
29 050
04
G
1 SiI S lid 08
G IMINE1
19 NM /
.111111111MMEn.
08 airfox D =MI
WI
IIIIIMMIBIIIIIIPITIM
4
.1
111111111111
M
03
D
1103 903
DW
2 01
458
20
08
J
379
3. 030
08
J
121
s s
08
J =PRI
mor
o
1 560
08
13110
08
J
im a
ap-30 WRIIITIIPWI
WIIWINIWW ME•
1111MMEMINEIMMITIIMI1MIIMM
11.111=Mill=0.1311111111MINIMMI
11-22
915
inora25
..1
0321
Published May,1975/Series 17
WI
11111M1
•
111=r1
111111111MM
NEM
1
WO
W
Mii
Illtil
MIMI
MINIM
I
W
421
IMMO
Mr=
MEM
IIMB915
NMI
9
449
19
11111=1
W
imm
1 226
1 226
WI
506
463
4
7
36
W
MIN
MEW
W
mirm36
IMMi
MIIIIIM
09
MEM
1 71
111M1MMIIIIIIIM
4
WIIIIIIIIIM
mmryl
l 283 mmei
844
MIIMMIEWM
2 008
311
in
18
ma
WIIIW
600
223
IIMMINIIIIIM
2 593 Mr
EWE"
IIIIIMINIMIElial
2.555
4 479
1 645
2 127
793
11111.1MMIIMEI
4 548
4 548
6
2 129
2 319
836
2 061
2 079
•
1
3
ming mai
I
24
MOM
11111=VMMIll
1 183
68
16
imr4 muri
WW
MIMI
WI
458
379
121
1 667
1 352
441
matm
mffl
minei
nimem
1,1
9
WI
MIMI
sminh
J•
27
111
2
40
WIll
is
767
160
44
11 WI
m
1 352
441
M5gt
irilri9
L
IIMEM
23
EIMIRIIMIM
32
9
1 199
449
68
l9
1111110
MEM
211
=MEM
MEM
imem ini
WI
44
WI
py
345
34
142
692
1
2
l0
..
379
121
am
560
MEM
1 074
506
7Pd 1
•
HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION
Summarized by Subcensus Tract
Pag e 3 of 9
Fairfax County , Virg inia
Dwelling Unit Report 6/January.1975
..-
Subcensus
Trac,6
District
34.040
34.050
',
35.020
Mason
35.030
Ownership
Housing
Rentol Project
Housing
Mobile
Homes
Group Qtrs.
& Military
A
326
738
1,232
A
190
1_90
623
673.
190
03
A
293
293
1,108
1 108
293
03
A
351
351,
L327
1,327
351
05
Lincolnio F
325
325
1 182
1 192
Armand!
412
1.047,
948
Total
Total
Population 1,-lousing Units
2,180
2 534
738
375_,
3 581
1.330
2 245
732
472
186
277
76
47
14
308
1 022
L332
36.010
05
F
365
367
732
1 322
910
36.020
05
F
10
176
185
36
436
05
F
1
76
76
277
14
52
a
14
14
4
3Z
10
1,665
130
130
37
36
5,343
36
5,343
10
1,665
3,337
217
7,_852
820
10.334
3.337
217
q1 47)3
Vig il
Sprgfld
37 010
08
Pohick
11 ,
37 070
08
J
4,
37.030
08
J
37
37.040
37.050
08
JJ
10
38.010
39.010
5 51 0
08
103'4.li
08
Sprg fd
L
3
1,665
08
L
2,388
217
949
6
R
2,482
820
12
08
L
338
338
1,278
1.278
338
08
L
372
372
1,406
1 406
372
40.010
08
L
384
550
1,353
1 735
550
40.020
08
L
350
350
1,323
1 323
350
70
40.030
08
L
257
477
971
1,477
477
71
08
L
./
435
62
435,
62
143
1,644
222
1 644
222
435
62
22
39.020
39.030
40.040
'35111
6171
220
382
506
08
41.020
08
08
J
J
143
511
511
143
]•
38
38
136
136
38
77
08
08
J
54
54
192
192
54
41.050
J
48
48
172
172
48
41.060
08
J
11
11
39
39
11
41.070
08
J
21
21
75,
75
21
41 080
08
1
80
80
08
J
38
38
285
137
285
41.090
80
38
41.100
08
J
69
69
247
247
69
41.110
08
J..
114
114
408
408
114
41.040
Pohick
166
41.010
41.030
_
137
08
J
66
66
250
250
66
42.010
08
850
850
3,069
3,069
850
42.020
08
J
J
1,791
1,791
6,635
6 635
1,791
42.030
08
Sorg fld
L
775
775
2.836
2.836
, 775
42.040
08
Pohick
J
1 , 168
1,168
3,889
3,889
1,168
08
Sprg fid
41.120
42.050
24 .7Y
161.40
08
43.010
43.020
30 6'
44.010
44.030
08
Mason
44.020
05
Baileys
05
2401
45.010
05
05
Jefersn
L
9
L
229
L
397
9
34
34
9
242
471
866
557
1,423
471
1,400
496
99
496
228
1,628
B
244
244
605
605
244
B
684
684
1,486
1 .„_486
684
8
E
126
3
359
359
1,174
981
556
I
125
310
11
313
126
1,185
359
981
556
300
170
05
E
05
E
300
170
300
170
46.010
05
E
268
268
876
876
268
46.020
05
E
338
338
1.106
1 106
3311
91'1/
05
E
229
229
749
62
811
229
etaileys___B_
388
388
1 , 269
7
1,276
9 5 Si
05
05
13
B
B
311
48
108
897
419
945
1,015
157
268
2,224
6
1,283
2,387
388
419
945
823
1,133
1.013
1,251
7
2 771
1_133]
46
45.020
4,
45.030
48
49
50
46.030
SI
47.010
52
47.020
48.010
S4
Total
Group Qtrs,
& Military Housing Units
F_
36.030
53
District
Mobile
Homes
05
35.040
-
Ownership 'Rental Project
Housing
Housing
Planning
03
Armand! 03
10
35,010
•
POPULATION
HOUSING UNITS
Supervisor
0
Published Ma y , 1975/Series P7
48.020
/1/1
05
05
310
11 7 23
30
37
3.4
•
HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION
Summarized by Subcensus Tract
Pa ge 4 of 9
Fairfax County , Virg inia
Dwelling Unit Report 6/JanuarY, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
POPULATION
USING UNITS
Subcensus Tract 6
. pervisor
y
District
Mason
05
Planning
District
Baileys
48 030
iglgIA%
48.040
4153
05
Jeffersn
%Sill'
05
05
50.010
05
Baileys
50.020
05
49.010
49.020
B
700
_B
72
450
522
235
1,116
1,351
522
E
E
282
292
282
292
922
955
922
955
282
292
B
202
202
661
661
202
B
302
302
987
987
302
101
330
152
51.020
05
B
80
51 030
05
B
05
05
52.020
g6.51
53.010
53.020
5.4 4 2-
330
101
1,668
831
262
80
315
1,716
2,031
788
608
536
1 , 101
1,637
608
406
687
486
1,173
406 .
353
353
1,154
1,154
353
430
430
1,405
1,405
430
05
B
g
214
812
1,026
774
2,014
2,788
_
1, 026
05
B
1.030
1,316
414
1,042
1,508
1.652
2,694
1 316
414
173
630
831
80
262
96
692
788
B
164
444
B
210
196
05
B
05
252
54.010
05
B
IS
54 020
05
B
173
19
05
B
373
3
376
1,357
8
Lincolnio F
402
855
1,257
1,398
2,141
Annandl
457
457
1,664
54,030
;5../40,
55.010
3539
21
56.010
22
56.020
2$
57.010
24
57.020
58.010
25
26
58.020
27
58.030
20
59.010
29
59.020
30
51 5
60.010
22
376
3,539
1,257
1,664
457
388
388
388
1,413
1,413
434
434
1,498
1,498
03
A
05
A
219
288
1,362
288
799
1,048
05
A
433
433
1,574
1,574
lir
Armand! 03
A
365
365
1,161
1,161
365-
05
05
A
409
409
1,489
1,489
409-
A
479
480
1,744
1,842
480
Armand! 03
A
249
249
833
833
249
05
A
486
486
1,561
1,561
486
649
2,342._
2,344
649
3 5 3)
Moran
1,143
1
3
3,634
1,048
95
0
434
AI
'
61.010
Annandl 03
A
648
32
61.020
03
A
83
83
302
302
24
61.030
03
A
436
436
1,587
1,587
SS
61,040
03
A
629
629
2,289
2,289
629
30
61.050
03
A
1 622
1 , 622
5,809
5,809
1,622
2,
61.060
03
A
646
646
2,351
2,351
646
7
03
A
467
1,781
2,248
1,172
4 , 424
5,596
2,248
11
03
A
329
895
1,224
1,084
2,220
3,314
1,224_
03
A
382
382
1,390
1,390
382
03
A
346
346
1,260
1,260
346
1
64.010
03
A
110
110
401
401
110
41
64.020
03
A
570
2,284
790
•2
64.030
03
A
464
1,525
464
03
A
548
551
03
A
280
03
A
1.468
A
855
N
349
20
62.010
24
i 4 t92.
55 44,
63.010
40
63.020
41
63.030
42
41
44
45
64.040
40
64.050
47
5 i(21(
(4t C:4-
65.010
1
2,835
5
173 ,
1,388
A
Mason
9 3'I'1
630
23
A
Mason
3g'3
A
1,508
07
Annandl 03
9-
60.010
21
05
Proydre 07
'30 I- 1.
•
1,416
679
286
414
20
Total
Total
Population Housing Units
1,944
101
52.010
Group Qtrs
& Militar y,
824
B
(11 31'1
Mobile
Homes
1,120
B
51.050
Rental Project
Housin g
700
05
51 040
Ownership
Housin g
332
05
191-g
Homes
Group Qtrs.
Total
& Military Housing Unitl
368
51 010
50.030
Motile
OwnnrshiP _jgntgl
Housin•
Jiousino
220
2
336
10
•
83
3
436
•
790
1,85C‘
464
1,525
3
551
1,660
7
1,667
1
281
993
2
995
281
1,468
5,24Z
5 243
1,468
855
3,232
3,232
855
353
1,275
1,308
353
98
42
65.020
49
66.010
Provdce 07
SO
66.020
07
N
129
129
471
471
129
66.030
07
N
111
111
406
406
111
07
07
07
_N
172
131
482
•
11-24
66.040
66.050
67.010
€4 7"‹
30O
03
Vienna
n
Jefersn
E
4
3
1,311
172
134
1,793 .
530
477
1,154
11
a
3,251
22
530
485
4,405
172
134.
—177, , 3 1
•
HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION
Summarized by Subcensus Tract
Page 5 of 9
Fairfax County, Virginia
Dwelling Unit Report 6/Jonuorv, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 4 7
POPULATION
HOUSING UNITS
Supervisor
District
Subcen us Tract 6
Grow Cltrs
Total
8 Militzry HouringUnits
Ownership R Mal Project
Housing
Housing
Mobile
Herne
Group Otrs
8 Military
Total
Total
Population HousingUnit
Provdce 07
Jefersn
E
539
539
1,746
1,746
07
Fairfax
D
57
57
208
208
57
68.020
68.030
07
D
875
1 222
2,097
3,031
N
308
308
2,657
925
5,688
925
2,097
308
68.040
07
N
447
801
1,248
1,165
1,986
3,151
1,248
68.050
07
N
326
326
1,140
1,147
326
68.060
07
N
117
117
426
426
117
68.070
07
N
159
159
507
507
159
07
N
38
783
821
139
1,958
2 , 097
821
07...J./Lem
L.
887
352
1,239
2,760
874
3 634
1,239
07
E
257
367
624
840
910
1,750
624
70.010
07
E
93
780
873
304
1,934
2,238
873
70 020
07
E
204
150
667
372
1,039
07
E
338
63
354
401
1 105
156
1,261
354
401,
71.010
07
E
71.020
07
07
E
E
240
512
1
512
241
785
1,270
3
1 270
788
512
241
180
24
204
589
60
07
E
386
386
1,262
07
E
298
301
974
07
07
E
E
291
291
952
274
473
747
828
07
E
226
2
738
D
220
228
220
D
1,65
378
1,005
766
3,658
1,179
68.080
Ls 1
Si
07
NI Liq
69.010
69.020
70.030
'51 Is.,/
4151
g
71.030
71.040
1C71//
....„.---
72.010
72.02(1
-
72.030
72.040
73.010
q t,g a
07
73.030
Vienna
Fairfax
07
07
73.020
(.. 5'H
D
3
388
7
539
649
204
1,262
386
987
301
952
291
1,172
2,000
747
5
743
800
228
220
3,658
2,141
1,005
766
7
6
800
962
74.010
07
Jefersn
E
23
295
318
81
731
74.020
07
Fairfax
D
507
1,358
1,865
1,506
3,368
1
812
318
12
4,886
1,865
97
411
257
113
49
2i
8
07
Jefersn
E
8
8
26
07
Fairfax
D
75.010
07
Jefe sn
E
113
49
113
49
411
160
75.020 `"--------
07
E
264
1.104
863
2,946
1 104
75.030
07
E
304
304
994
994
304
75.040
07
E
190
190
621
621
190
75.050
07
07
E
176
176
575
176
E
359
359
1,174
575
1,174
359
07
E
171
1
172
559
3
562
172
M
68
2
70
243
5
248
70
102
102
365
365
102
74.030
74.040
GI 3i,
75.060
75.070
319)
Drnsv'l
76.010
02
U Potom
76.020
02
M
76.030
02
m
68
76.040
02
M
113
78.020
40
78.030
10
78.040
78.050
78.060
78.070
78.080
244
404
3
247
69
404
113
82
82
301
306
82
223
816
816
223
02
H
123
123
450
450
123
02
_H_
46
166
166
46
;3 6}Lor
02
H
111
394
394
111
l
02
76.080
40
69
113
223
02
78.010
I
2.083
H
02
77.010
840
H
7_6_,050
..--2.4.060
76 070
76.090
11
Mobile
Homes
68.010
67.020
10
Ownership Rental Protect
Hous ing
Housing
Mannino
District
A
L
McLean
H
J
92
5
92
316
316
92
02
M
160
160
549
549
160
02
M
162
162
581
581
162
02
M
75
75
258
258
75
02
02
02
02
M
194
194
696
696
194
M
H
H
279
165
279
165
467
994
604
994
604
1,708
279
165
467
02
U Potarn
McLean
M
467
1,708
11-25
HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION
Sunnnarlzed by Subcensus ingot
Page 6 of 9
Fairfax County, Virginia
Dwelling Unit Report 6/Januarv.1975
Published May.1975/Series
POPULATION
HOUSING UNITS
Supervisor
rnstrict
Subcensus Tract 6
r
78.090
51-2g
Drnpril
6
22
189
692
Housirm
Mobile
Homes
Group Qtrs
&Military
Total
Population
2
Total
Housing Unit
22
6
694
189
H
167
167
612
612
167
487
4
1,783
1 783
13
13
487
4
37
,..
135
135
37
330
330
90
1,079
295
02
EL
487
4
02
H
37
80.010
02
El,
90
80.020
02
295
295
1,079
515
515
1,702
1,702
515
2E15
82
285
22
1 042
300
1 1142
300
285
82
3:-Yri-
80 030
02
li.
• H..
80 040
02
H
80.050
02
H
0601
ji16
02
H
47
41
148
148
81.010
81.020
02
H
310
11.,
10
1,083
36
1 083
36
310
02_
310
10
81.030
02
218
218
791
791
210
02
11
H
217
217
794
02
H
420
420
1,537
82 010
02
H
563
563
82 020
02
H
77
77
02
H
257
82.030
1-49 141
Igq1'4)
,
2,059
2,059
563
280
280
77
257
940
940
257_
87
87
319
319
87
388
106
am
845
214-
71
EL
H
106
106
388
83.030
02
H
224
224
820
83.040
02
H
162
83.050
02
H
2
162
2
585
7
83 070
02
H
182
02
H
588
02
H
177
02
FL
722
31 3 6
,
1.517
2
85.010
02
H
273
85 020
02
11-
365
2
85 030
02
H
247
6
85 049
02
H
362
85.050
02
H
192
H
257
85 060
(99 9 4
02
-..
182
521
2.105
1,539
177
648
724
2,517
_
25
585
7
521
3.793
5
273
995
367
1,336
5
904
15
-
253
1
--.4
6
182
5,332
2 105
648
177
2.
724_
29
30
2 528
995
273
1,341
367
919
253
17
1,325
1,325
362
.1
192
703
703
192
14
257
941
941
257
02
H
155
155
507
02
H
208
208
680
86 030
02
H
224
224
732
86.040
02
H
303
303
991
86.050
02
H
245
86.060
02
H
337
02
H
188
188
688
688
1SO
02
H
306
306
1,000
1,000
306
86.070
"4
'3,13
87.010
02
H
59
87.020
02
H
188
87 030
02
H
167
88.010
02
H
396
88.020
02
H
88.030
02
H
88 040
02
245
f
r
677
_
.
,
801
„. 1,101
843
507
155
620
208
732
224
3.
991
303_
3 9.
801
245
40
1,944
677
59
192
192
59
188
615
615
188
167
547
693
1,296
671
671
2,093
254
254
830
H
68
68
223
223
68
02
H
296
89.010
02
02
H
M
108
189
89.020
02
973
353
650
141
294_,
108
189
41
13 5 4
88 050
88.060
1,101
U Potom
41
297
_
27
162
86 020
340
16
411
86.010
86.080
14
217
02
' 84 020
11
420
02
84.010
10 _.
12
794
83.020
4941q-
41,
10
1 537
83.010
83 080
11-26
.
Rental Prolec
EL-
81.050
.
189
Ownership
Housing
02
81.040
■
6
H
Total
HousinglJnit,
02-,
80060
•
H
Group Ohs
8 Military
79.030
79.040
-
McLean
Mobile
Homes
79.020
79 050
-
02
Ownership Rental Pnoiect
Housing
Housing
District
02
79.010
.
Planning
296
108
189 ---41
968
353
650
141
451
90
_
5
547
167
1 747
693
2,183
671
830
254
40
HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION
Summarized by Subcensus Tract
Page 7 of 9
Fairfax County , Virginia
Dwellina Unit Report 6/January. 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 17
POPULATION
HOUSING UNITS
Subcensus Tract 6
89.030
.
Supervisor
District
.1.
gqP° 'Ctrvile
90.010
3'1 SC
91.010
64qi
92.010
Planning
Jawnershio
Housing
District
Rental Proiec
Housin g
Mobile
Homes
Gros:, Girt
& Military
Total
Housing Unit
Ownership
Housing
,
Rental Projec
Housing
M
15
15
51
Herndon 12
M
650_
523
1,173
2,105
1,380
1,216
16
630
1,846
3,830
63
1,663
4,663
567
Ctrvile
92.020
01
U Pokun
12
M
01
01
M
M
01
M
01
M.
1,403
860
92.050
Dmsvile 02
M
62
92 060
Ctrvile
hi
M
930
3,006
15
1,173
6
5,499
63
1,846
16
12
3
6
9 223
3,337
1,085
3
12
4,554
62
227
227
62
490
1,420
2,868
1,235
4,103
1,420
884
3,820)_. -
9,751
2,228
1,934
225
2,640
3,207
11 979
3 890
17
17
61
61
17
02
8i..._
426_
476.
1,743
1 743
476
02
H
38
55
38
55
140
201
140
201
38
55
92.070
11
93.010
Dmrvile 02
12
93 020
IS
93 030
93.040
Ctrvile
51
3,485
li-
10
:,..?&S./q
Total
Housing Unit
3,337
1,085
3
92 030
92.040
01
01
ft --
Total
Group 01rs
& Milita ry , Population
Mobile
Homes
01
McLean
Vienna
30
IS
93.050
01
NL..N
61
61
223
223
61
16
93.060
01
N
129
129
472
472
129 1
16
93.070
01
N_
383
383
1,359
1,359
383
17
93.080
01
NL
369
369
1,347
1,347
369
14
93.090
01
N
489
489
1,790
1,811
489
t`i-,
330
330
1,207
1,207
330
M
435
435
1,303
1,303
435
71
39
86
39
87
134
293
134
296
39
87
71
24
24
81
81
24
24
14
14
48
48
14
if
16
20
93.100
22
01
%RAI
94 010
01
94.020
94.030
01
M
01
MM
26
1
3
27
94.050
01
01
94.060
01
M
71
71
244
244
71
26
94.070
01
M
193
193
664
664
193
27
94.080
01
An
137
137
471
471
24
94.090
01
M
431
431
1,680
1,686
137
431
M
111
171
111
171
399
613
399
613
111
171
30
94.040
2/
U %torn
21
M
6
30
94.100
01
31
94.110
01
r'airfax
D
32
94.120
01
M
62
62
214
214
62
32
J %tom
33
94.130
01
M
132
132
480
480
132
13
34
94.140
01
hot
78
78
279
279
78
36
94.150
36
94.160
37
D
155
155
554
554
155
01
D
137
137
498
498
137
16
95.010
01
D
85
85
311
311
85
37
38
95.020
01
henna
N
619
619
2,266
2,266
619
78
SO
95.030
01
,'01rf0x
D
258
258
924,
924
258
40
95.040
01
N
D
1,019
2,587
3,337
1,019
01
Vienna
Fairfax
719
95.050
64
64
231
232
64
D
55
55
200
200
55
N
710
710
2,563
25
2,588
710
640
01
4 .31,4-/
a ? -0
%W00
300
_
750
42
95.060
43
96.010
25 a 1
44
97.010
.:29•Sig
13
N
630
10
640
2,197
25
66
2,288
98.010
31/40
13
N
742
185
927
2,711
463
22
3,196
927
46
99.010
.5'5q1. 3-
13
2,133
307
2,440
7,779
768
8,547
2,440
47
100.010
Provdce 07
N
D
75
75
274
274
75
40
100.020
07
D
354
354
927
927
354
40
D
104
106
373
398
106
N
110
110
402,
402
110
01
Vienna
13
Vienna
Fairfax
2
5
20
100.030
07
' 20
100.40
07
SI
100.50
07
N
es
88
262
262
98
32
100.060
100.070
101.010
07
N
N
N
27
89
119
27
89
119
99
326
436
99
326
436
—89
SS
'
96 S iS
07
Ctrvile 01
Vienna
27
1191
11-27
13
Dwelling Unit Report 6/January , 1975
HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION
Summarized b y Subcensus Tract
Pag e 8 of 9
Fairfax County , Virginia
Published May, 1975/Series "
HOUSING UNITS
Supervisor
District
Subtensus Tract 6
101.020
437
7,
Ctryi le
Planning
District
Ownershio
Houst a
Rental Proiec
Hou'ina
Mobile
Hornet
POPULAT ON
Group Qtrs
& Military
Total
Housing Unit
Ownership
Housing
Rental Proiec
Housina
Mobile
Homes
Group Qtrs
& Military
Total
Population
Total
Housina Unit
01
Vienna
N
1,030
1,030
3,769
102.010
01
Bull Run
C
8
8
25
25
a
102.020
01
C
10
10
520
34
68
34
10
520
117
3,886
1,030
102.030
01
C
20
102.040
01
C
8
8
24
24
8
102.050
01
255
255
877
877
255
102.060
01
C
C
13
33
41
13
102.070
01
C
11
11
102.080
C
C
25
25
36
86
25
102.090
01
01
36
86
1,180
1 , 180
3,743
3,743
1 , 190
102.100
01
C
39
39
134
134
39
01
C
5
5
16
16
5
co
C
1
I
C
870
870
3
2,904
3
2,904
870
41
41
139
139
41
12
102.110
13
102.120
634*
10
500
3
1 , 305
1,373
8
Il
1 0
14
103.010
01
IS
103.020
01
103.030
01
C,
C
119
3
122.
408
8
416
122
103 040
01
C,.
1 922
151
20Z3.
6.993
374
7 367
2 073
103.050
01
C
D
40
40
146
276
40
35
35
128
128
35
D
122
122
445
445
122
C
19
19
65
65
19
21
39
1
40
131
3
116
40
34
22
34
34
116
144
803
63
1 , 637
214
380
2,017
214
3
1,526
414
27
17
le
103,060
20
103.070
21
104.010
01
104.020
01
C
22
01
Fairfax
01
I i (a-3"i
Bull Run
23
104.030
01
C
34
24
104.040
104.050 95'46
01
C
659
01
C
63
26
105.010
01
C
28
22
105.020
08
C
404
26
106.010
08
J
2t
106.020
08
30
106.030
'106.040
27
1
130
14
le
It
20
23
29
100
414
1,470
41
41
146
146
41
J
227
227
827
827
227
08
08
J
75
75
267
267
75
J
76
76
272
272
76
11
106.050
08
.1
26
26
93
93
32
106.060
26
08
143
143
510
510
143
14
106.070
08
J
J
58
58
207
220
44
106.080
58
08
J
10
10
36
36
10
IS
106.090
08
33
33
11 8,
118
33
14
106,100
08
J
_I
10
10
35
35
10
37
106.110
i 6 99
Spro fld
Pohick
10
103
26
30
13
08
j
6
6
21
21
100.120
08
J
21
21
75
75
106.130
2
08
J
27
27
97
97
27
106.140
08
J
18
18
65
65
106.150
18
08
J
13
13
46
46
13
08
J
6
6
21
21
67
67
239
239
106.160
2349
107.010
239
Clifton
10
_L.
_
26
24
10
•7
67
44
47
TOTAL COUNTY
126 014
44,477
2.478
172.969
430.037
106,305
6 467
12.662
555 471
17
969
11-28
•
1111
HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION
Summarized by Supervisor District 2
Page 9 of 9
Fairfax County, Virginia
"'Dwelling Unit Report 6/January, 1975
•
Supervisor
District
'
Supervisor
District
Code
a a:cm/am
Published May, 1975/Series 17
Ownership
Housing
Renbaliroiec
Housing
Mobile
Homes
.7...=,..
assur3s. 7 sosa•
IO_PULAJIO N
HOUSING UNLTS
Grote:. Qtrs.
Tntal
& Military_
Housing Unit
Ownership
Heusi •
Renhal__Prolec
HOUSilla
30.6•0==.00m.11
3
4
Mobile
Homes
Group Gills:
Taint
Total
& Military Population , Housina Units
Centreville 3
01
23.052
4.639
28,191
78.973
11,478
393
-- 92,449
28.191
Dranesville 4
02
17.609
3-320
20.929
60 533
8.163
139
68,835
20,929
Annandale
Lee
03
4.456
4,542
1.2.440
20,008
53.023
48,867
10.174
108
4 577
63,905
19.440
04
14.984
14,487
67 707
20,008
'
Mason
05
10,867
9,940
20,807
36,716
22,501
217
59,434
20,807
°
Mt. Vernon
06
12,896
6,158
19,789
43,152
13,336
86
58,492
19,789
'
Providence
07
13,373
9,735
23,108
43,377
24,161
164
67,702
23,108
•
Springfield 5
08
18,746
1,687
264
20,697
65,396
4,184
689
6,978
77,247
20,697
'°
II
TOTAL COUNTY (including
Towns listed below):
126,014
44,477
2.478
172.969
430.037
106 305
6 467
12.662
555.471
172.969
,
2
* '
•
500
979
735
11,708
1.305
2,555
1,918
1
13
2
13
1•
13
16
17
so
so
-
Town of Clifton
10
67
67
239
239
67
Town_ of Herndon
12
1)366
1,153
3,019
5,935
3,043
6
8 984
3 019
Town of Vienna
13
4,215
502
4,717
15,250
L 256
113
16,619
4,717
6,148
1,655
7,803
21,424
4,299
119
25,842
7,803
30
21
•
•
a
TOTAL TOWNS
32
3
2
3
Source:
UDIS Parcel File, January, 1975
Notes:
Dwelling units tabulated in this report include
some units under construction. Such units are
sufficiently near completion to warrant their
inclusion in the dwelling unit inventory,
Figures exclude housing located on Federal
property.
2 Supervisor Districts in this report are the
current Districts as determined by the 1971
apportionment plan. The present District
boundaries will remain in effect through
December 31, 1975, after which these dis531C4$ will be reapportioned according to
the plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors
on January 4, 1975. The summary in Report
DU-6 illustrates the effect the new apportionment plan has on the distribution of the
January, 1975, dwelling unit inventory and
population holding capacity as opposed to
the distribution existent under the current
apportionment plan.
3 Includes Town of Vienna
4 Includes Town of Herndon
5 Includes Town of Clifton
6 Subcensus tracts are locally defined subdivisions of United States Census Tracts, developed for purposes of data aggregation.
The number to the left of the decimal point
refers to the United States Census Tract
number as used in 1970 Census. The numbers
to the right refer to the subcensus designation.
2•
5
26
27
35
29
30
31
32
33
3 ,1
35
36
37
35
5
•o
•:
• 2
• 3
••
.5
46
• 7
.
1
7
The factors used to relate housing units estimated population appear in Appendix G.
The weighted countywide overage housingto-population conversion factors are:
6
7
26
3•
Housing Type
Average
Household Size
21
Single Fam. Detached
Duplex
Multiplex
Townhouse
Garden Apartment
Elevator Apartment
Mobile Home
3.57
3.22
2.42
2.81
2.50
1.52
2.61
33
53
5.1
35
3.
33
3.14
COUNTYWIDE-AVERAGE
..---'"
( 8 The term "population holding capacity" is
'-.-- -distinct from actual population in that the first
term indicates what the current housing inventory could hold were there no vacancies and all
new units were occupied by an average size
household shortly after entering the market.
The latter refers to the actual number of persons
residing in the County.
39
• 1
.12
• 3
45
• 11
47
• It
• 9
49
50
50
51
51
57
53
•
33
53
54
54
11-29
Dwelling Unit Report 7A/ January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
VACANCY ANALYSIS OF MAJOR RENTAL APARTMENT
AND TOWNHOUSE PROJECTS
IN FAIRFAX COUNTY
•
Survey Conducted in January, 1975
The vacancy rate for units in major rental apartment and townhouse projects
in Fairfax County in January, 1975, was 4.4 percent. This vacancy rate is based
on the January 1975 survey of 91 percent of the total 43,005 units available
for rent in major projects. The inventory of 43,005 rental housing units includes
40,448 apartments and 2,557 townhouse units. The vacancy rate was 4.5 percent
for apartments and 2.9 percent for townhouse units.
The vacancy analysis of rental housing in major rental projects does not include
3,406 apartment and 36 townhouse units completed during 1974. Generally,
newly completed projects experience a higher vacancy rate than the older,
established projects. The vacancy rate among the 3,442 rental units completed
during 1974 was 9.3 percent according to the survey. None of the 36 townhouses
were vacant.
The inventory of rental apartments in major rental projects includes 33,216
low-rise, 868 mid-rise, and 6,364 high-rise units. Just as in the past two years,
the January vacancy rate was the highest among units in the high-rise structures
(seven stories or higher); 462 of the 5,921, or 7.8 percent of the units surveyed,
were vacant (see Figure 1). The next highest vacancy existed among mid-rise
structures with a vacancy rate of 5.8 percent, followed by 3.9 percent vacancy
among units in low-rise structures (one to three stories). Townhouse units had
the lowest vacancy rate (2.9 percent).
•
Table 1 summarizes the rental housing vacancy rates for units of various
sizes. This year, the vacancy data has been made available in greater detail
than in previous years. The vacancy information concerning apartments has
been expanded to include vacancy rates for units in low-rise, mid-rise and
high-rise structures. In addition, vacancy rates for townhouses have been provided by bedroom size.
The January, 1975, vacancy rate of 4.4 percent represents an increase of
0.8 percent when compared to 3.6 percent of the previous year (see Figure 2).
However, the current vacancy rate is still within the five or six percent range
which could be considered acceptable for the high-turnover Washington area
housing market. Several contributing reasons are offered for this increase in
•
11-30
Dwelling Unit Report 7A/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series #7
vacancy rate: Unfavorable economic conditions along with high rate of unemployment has caused many renters to "double'up" by sharing apartments. The
economy also has forced younger people to delay their departure from the family
home to establish separate households. An indication of this is the relatively
high vacancy rate (7.9 percent) among the efficiency size apartments (see
Figure 3). Perhaps another reason is the competition engendered by the significant number of condominium units owned by individual investors and being rented
out. A competitive edge accrues to new condominium units having additional
appliances such as washer/dryers. Many condo investors have been willing to
temporarily rent out their units at a loss in exchange for tax shelter and the
expectation of high appreciation in the value of the units.
Although the vacancy rate is higher than last year, as predicted in October,
1974, a significant shortage of rental housing can be expected in the near future.
Currently, there are approximately 900 rental apartment units under construction
in the County. These units primarily represent the remainder of the 2,300 that
were under construction during previous years. In addition, about 450 rental
units were authorized in 1974 for construction. This relatively small increase
in new inventory in all probability will be offset by existing projects which will
convert to condominium ownership.
During 1973 and 1974, 1,100 rental housing units were converted to condominium ownership. Builders claim that present economic conditions, rising
operating and construction costs, and the uncertainties of rent contiOI have made
construction and ownership of new rental housing infeasible. In the Washington
area, only 500 rental units were authorized during the first six months of 1974
according to the Washington Center for Metropolitan Studies.
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Dwelling Unit Report 7A/January, 1975
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF RENTAL HOUSING VACANCY RATES
Fairfax County, Virginia
January, 1975 .
Size
Type
Total
No. Units
Units
Vacant
Jan. 75
% Vacant
Jan. 74
% Vacantl
July 73
% Vacantl
Dec.71
% Vacantl
APARTMENTS
Low-Rise
Mid-Rise
High-Rise
Total:
281
25
830
1,136
17
3
70
90
6.0
12.0
8.4
7.9
Low-Rise
Mid-Rise
High-Rise
Told:
10,856
205
3,085
14,146
322
14
237
573
3.0
6.8
7.6
4.1
Low-Rise
Mid-Rise
High-Rise
Total:
16,036
415
1,631
18,082
604
22
125
751
3.8
5.3
7.6
4.2
Low-Rise
Mid-Rise
High-Rise
Total:
2,628
111
375
3,114
195
5
30
230
7.4
4.5
8.0
7.4
Low-Rise
Mid-Rise
High-Rise
Total:
175
0
0
175
20
0
0
215
11.4
0
0
11.4
1 Bedroom
20
0
0
2 Bedroom
1,258
34
2.7
3 Bedroom
767
24
3.1
4 Bedroom
427
14
_
3.3
2,472
72
2.9
29,976
756
5,921
2,472
-39,125
1,158
44
462
72
1,736
3.9
5.8
7.8
2.9
4.4
Efficiency
1 Bedroom
2 Bedroom
3 Bedroom
4 Bedroom
IMMO
ORME
••• ■••
4.2
4.0
2.3
•••••••
3.4
-1.5
••■ •••
1 .5
1.1,•••
3.5
-1.9
•IN.M.
-5.2
....OM
2.9
IND Am,
1.6
-11= MD
2.5
--
1.8
••• ■
NOM.
111••••
0
ME MP
TOWNHOUSES
Total:
COUNTY TOTAL:
Low-Rise
Mid-Rise
High-Rise
Townhouse
--
3.1
0.5
1.8
-111•111■
4•1■
3.1
0.5
1.8
1 The January, 1975 vacancy data has been expanded to include information concerning low-rise,
mid-rise, and high-rise structures. Because of this change, comparison among structural types
of January, 1975 data to earlier years is limited as indicated by the blanks in the table.
11-32
Dwelling Unit Report 7A/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series #7
VACANCY
RATE (%)
8
462
7
44
6
5
-
1736
4
1158
3
72
2
1
-
LOW
RISE
29,976
MID
RISE
HI
RISE
TH
TOTAL
756
5921
2472
39,125
TYPE OF STRUCTURE
FIGURE 1
VACANCY RATES FOR UNITS IN LOW, MEDIUM. AND HIGH-RISE STRUCTURES AND
IN TOWNHOUSE UNITS IN RENTAL PROJECTS IN FAIRFAX COUNTY
JAN. 1975
11-33
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Dwelling Unit Report 7A/January, 1975
VACANCY
RATE (%)
4
3
71
•72
'
73
'74
'75
YEAR
FIGURE 2
VACANCY RATES FOR MAJOR RENTAL APARTMENT AND
TOWNHOUSE PROJECTS IN FAIRFAX COUNTY
I971•1975
76
Dwelling Unit Report 7A/January,1975
Published May, 1975/Series #7
VACANCY
RATE (%)
12
1975 JAN
1974 JAN
1973 JUL
1971 DEC
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
1975 COUNTY AVERAGE
4
3
EFF
1BR
2BR
3BR
4BR
FIGURE 3
VACANCY RATES BY BEDROOM SIZE
FOR APARTMENTS IN MAJOR RENTAL PROJECTS
1971- 1975
11-35
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Dwellino Report 7B/January, 1975
AVERAGE RENTS FOR UNITS IN RENTAL PROJECTS
IN FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA
January, 1975
The current average rent for units in major apartment and townhouse rental
projects in Fairfax County is $236. This information was established by the
January 1975 survey of 91 percent (39,028 units) of the 43,005 units available for rent in major projects. The inventory of 43,005 rental housing
includes 40,448 apartments and 2,557 townhouse units,, Table I below
summarizes the average rents of various size (number of bedrooms) apartments and townhouses in the County.
Table 1: Average Rents for Apartment and Townhouse Units
in Major Rental Projects in Fairfax County, Va.
January 1975
Apartments:
Size of Unit
(No. of Bedrooms)
11-36
Average Rent
January 1975
Efficiency
1 Bedroom
1 Bedroom & Den
2 Bedroom
2 Bedroom & Den
3 Bedroom
3 Bedroom & Den
4 Bedroom
$192
210
235
239
273
299
323
380
Apartment Average
$233
Number of Units
Surveyed
1,040
13,119
2,103
16,369
1,800
2,635
163
23
37,252
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Dwelling Unit Report 7B/January, 1975
Townhouses:
Average Rent
January 1975
Size of Unit
(No. of Bedrooms)
Number of Units
Surveyed
1 Bedroom
2 Bedroom
3 Bedroom
4 Bedroom
$202
266
328
368
20
946
651
159
Townhouse Average
$296
1,776
Overall County Average
(Apartment & Townhouse)
$236
39,028
The sample of 39,028 apartment and townhouse units surveyed does not
include units in projects that have subsidized or low income housing.
Newly completed projects, due to higher construction costs, generally
have higher rent levels than older, established projects. The survey
includes 3,374 of these newer units within rental complexes that were
completed during 1974. The relatively higher rent levels for new
projects is reflected in Table 2 below.
Table 2: Comparison of Rent Levels of Units in Major Rental Project
Completed Prior to and During 1974
Data as of January 1975
Apartments:
Size of Unit
(No. d Bedrooms)
Efficiency
1 Bedroom
1 Bedroom & Den
Average Rent in
Projects Completed
Prior to 1974
$191
207
230
Average Rent in
Projects Completed
During 1974
$219
239
269
Percent
Difference
14.7%
15.5
17.0
Dwelling Unit Report 7B/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series' 0 7
Apartments: (Cont.)
Size of Unit
(No. of Bedrooms)
Average Rent in
Projects Completed
Prior to 1974
All 1 Bedroom
2 Bedroom
2 Bedroom & Den
All 2 Bedrooms
3 Bedroom
3 Bedroom & Den
All 3 Bedrooms
4 Bedroom
Average Rent in
Projects Completed
During 1974
Percent
Difference
$210
235
266
238
297
314
298
384
$245
274
320
282
321
371
327
375
16.7
16.6
20.3
18.5
8;1
18.2.
9.7 .
(2.3)%
Average Apartment Rent • $230
$268
16.5%
Townhouse Units:
1 Bedroom
2 Bedroom
3 Bedroom
4 Bedroom
$202
265
326
358
NA
$330
379
NA
24.5%
16.3
Average Townhouse Rent
$295
$360
22.0%
Overall County Average
Rent (Apartment &
Townhouse)
$233
$269
15.5%
Table 2 shows that rents in newer projects in Fairfax County average 15.5
percent higher than those projects completed prior to 1974. The only
exception to be noted is the rent for 4-bedroom apartments where rent
for the ten newer units surveyed is lower than for older units by 2.3 percent.
The average rents for apartments in rental projects has increased by 9.4
percent since January of 1974. The survey of 37,252 apartment units
disclosed that the highest increase occurred for the 3-bedroom units with
den. The average rent increased from $286 to $323 (an increase of 12.9%)
11-38
.
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Dwelling Unit Report 7B/Jfinuary, 1975
for the 163 units surveyed. Interestingly, the lowest increase in rent
occurred for 3-bedroom units without dens. In that category the
2,635 units surveyed showed an increase of 6.4 percent; the rent increased
from $281 in January 1974 to $299 in January 1975. Table 3 below
summarizes the average rent increase during this period for various size
apartment units.
Table 3: Average Rents for Apartments in Major Rental Projects
in Fairfax County, Va.
1974-1975
January 1975
Average
Units
Rent
Surveyed
Size of Unit
(No. of Bedrooms)
January 1974
Units
Average
Surveyed
Rent
Percent Rent
Change
1974-1975
Efficiency
1 Bedroom
1 Bedroom & Den
2 Bedroom
2 Bedroom & Den
3 Bedroom
3 Bedroom & Den
4 Bedroom
$176
190
214
217
246
281
286
381
1,021
12,208
1,951
16,180
1,536
2,512
166
18
$192
210
235
239
273
299
323
380
1,040
13,119
2,103
16,369
1,800
2,635
163
23
9.1%
10.5
9.8
10.1
11.0
6.4
12.9
(0.3)
Overall County
Average
$213
35,592
$233
37,252
9.4%
11-39
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Dwelling Unit Activity Report 8/June, 1974
CONDOMINIUM UNITS
IN FAIRFAX COUNTY
June, 1974
As of June, 1974 there were 4,219 completed condominium units in Fairfax County.
Slightly over one third (1,463 units) of these units were converted from rental units
to condominiums in the past few years. The present inventory also includes 524 units
which project owners are renting until the units can be sold. These condominium
units plus units being rented by individual owners may have had some bearing on
the increased vacancy rate in rental housing developments this year.
There are 6,770 additional units that are in various stages of construction. When
these units are completed, they will more than double the inventory of condominium units in Fairfax County. However, it is likely that some of these units
will be rented for a time before they are actually sold. The rental of some units
in new condominium projects is anticipated because of the tight money market and
the large number of new units to go on the market in a short span of time. This
could have an effect on existing rental projects of drawing people away to rent
in the more luxurious condominium developments.
The most noticeable feature of condominiums currently under construction is the
decreasing proportion of townhouse units. Currently, townhouse units account
for 46 percent (1,951 units) of the total inventory. Yet only 24 percent (1,605)
of newly-constructed units are townhouses. The majority of units under construction are either garden (42 percent) or elevator (33 percent). The increase of
smaller apartment units may indicate the decreasing household size in Fairfax
County and the growing number of young and single-person households.
SUMMARY OF
CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN FAIRFAX COUNTY
June, 1974
Project Status
Single
Family
Garden
Elevator
Townhouse
Total
Units Curre2tly
Units
Rental
Completed
Convertedl
0
0
1,054
999
0
215
1,702
249
2,756
1,463
299
225
Total Completed
0
2,053
215
1,951
4,219
524
Under Construction 11
2,889
2,265
1,605
6,770
Total Completed &
Under Construction
4,942
2,480
3,556
10,989
NOTES:
11
3
1
Not shown in the table are units which have been converted from rental to
cooperative (406 elevator and townhouse units), or that have been converted
from rental to conventional sale units (334 townhouses). Although these units
are not condominiums, they have been taken off the rental market and converted
to some type of individual ownership.
2
These are units currently rented by the owners of the projects, not individual
owners.
3 0f these units in projects under construction, 986 are actually completed.
11-40
30
554
III. CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY
SECTION III
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
Construction Activity Report 5/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 417
PLANNING DISTRICT SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
The 1975 Residential Builder Plans File identifies nearly 14,000 units
in Fairfax County that have been authorized by the issuance of a building
permit but are not yet completed. These units constitute what is called
Committed Growth. Almost 35 percent of the Committed Growth is located
in Upper Potomac Planning District while another 31 percent is found in
McLean, Mount Vernon and Pohick Planning Districts.
Anticipated Growth includes those units appearing on site plans or
subdivision plats being processed. Also included are approved plans or
plats which have not proceeded to the building permit stage. Of the over
39,000 units considered to be Anticipated Growth, nearly half are single
family units. Anticipated Growth equals nearly 30 percent of the total
planned growth of 133,000 units.
Probable Growth involves approximately 7,000 more potential units
for which zoning has been granted since 1971 and for which site plans or
subdivision plats have not been submitted. Probable Growth accounts for
only a little more than five percent of total planned growth, due partly
to the large backlog of unresolved zoning applications which accumulated
during the PLUS planning process.
Pending rezoning cases and cases that have been denied or withdrawn
since 1972 are referred to as Possible Growth. Possible Growth presently
accounts for nearly 73,000 units or approximately 54 percent of the total
planned growth.
Pohick Planning District contains over 24 percent of the total planned
growth. Bull Run and Upper Potomac Districts together account for another
30 percent of the County's planned growth. Lincolnia District with some
1,700 units has the smallest portion designated for any one Planning District.
The following chart illustrates the distribution of total planned growth of
Fairfax County according to Planning District.
Construction Activity 5/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 47
Total Planned Growth by Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginia
January, 1975
Potential
Dwelling Units
45,000—
42,500—
40,000
37,500 —
35,000 —
32,500—
30,000—
27,500 —
25,000—
22,500 —
20,000
SECTION III
17,500—
15,000 —
12,500—
10,000-7,500 -5,000 -2,500-0
III-2
qC0 NSTRUCTIO N ACTIVITY
PLANNING DISTRICT SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY 1/ 2/ 3
Fairfax County, Virginia
Construction Activity Report 5/JanuarY• 1975
Plannina COMMMED GR• A .
District • . . . ,, 5 • • .
Code FamIl Hous ment
' • • •
District
:5
3
7 ====.
7
ED
C
1 .,
:
632.
Iv,•
D
32.,
1
Lower Potomac
G
24
323
H
465
2
1
4
34
71
1,350
L25
1
1 19
Single Town r. • •rt
Farnil Hous ment Total
1 025
•
2,1451,915
751
185C
.
_824
2
77 2,1850,517
7
110
1
1,572 1,727
1.3
81
9 82520001
15.0
919 7.512 8.504
— —
1 . 77
13,419
10.0
3
7
202
190
6
9
4
18&
107
ercentage
43
1e,
723
9
PS
1
F
NED GRO
L
'0
went jag
111
1
242
Lincolnia
260
1,51
695
T
7
•
940
Kirfax )
GROW- 11
5
rt
S
:• al .
T wn A-1
'n 1
Famil
1
3
:
-
S.
a•
• in•le Town A rt
airily House men, , Total
Published May,1975/Series
2 811 3
,
1
7
597
918 1,515
191
• '
i
3 82
597
918 1,706
1.3 I
604
125
483
123 1,731
1.916
725 3,506
26 I
22
231
357
470 1,058
1,95 / 451
--_—..,
3,538 5,947
45 I
146
146
500
273
969 1 742
1
4 19 7
446
623
602
—
'McLean/
883
1'
,..---•'''
13
46
1 057
1
775
2 3374 305
121
' -
4 03'
1
1
• '
1
s
11111,
I'
1
•
S
r
1.806 6,200
744
Rose Hill
L
d 8
1 121
1 082
1 1917 631
437
4'
312 1 Min
108
r
'
1
39 1
4.15
5.4 '
1 9
-
-- '5-11I
U• •
e''.
Potomac
9
M
10'
tt.
.7051 MN
312
176
5 664
776
MIN
I
53
1
278 MEIN
703 1
8 139 93
1 744
•
350 2 477
20196
-
53
2 295 7 155
1
'
4:
_
1,s
9 853 111=11
1
Towns listed below):
33
34
36
5.4
29.6
10.4
PERCENTAGE
100.0
54.6
36
Town of Clifton
J
Town of Hemdon
M
Town of Vienna
1'14
TOTAL TOY/NS
0
558
730
63
621
451
4
730
s
405
1.739
67
132
457
455 1,806
750
12.
122
213
132,
802
I,
0
10
943
115
52
521
12.
122
Source:
UDIS Residential Builder Plans File
Notes:
I
_
5
213
1,21.
9431
_a
583 2411
4 119
2.0 ,
587 2,730
2.0
1
January, 1975
See Appendix A for Methods, Assumptions and
Limitations,
Data as of January, 1975, except where noted
in Appendix A.
All construction activity and builder plans
(CL-1 through CL-9) are included in this
report.
Data for Herndon and Vienna is incomplete.
Townhouse category includes townhouses,
owned housing units other than single family
detached and condominium apartments.
6 Percentages may not odd due to rounding.
7 Complete definitions of Committed, AnticiDated, Probable and Possible Growth appear
in Appendix A.
8 Includes Town of Clifton.
9 Includes Town of Herndon.
10 Includes Town of Vienna
duplexes, multiplexes and all individually
•
III-3
Construction Activity Report 6/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
SUPERVISOR DISTRICT SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
The May, 1974, Standard Reports pegged total planned growth for
Fairfax County at just over 107,1:100 units. The distribution of units was
evenly divided between single family units, townhouse units and apartment units. In the current revision of Standard Reports the total planned
growth has increased to 133,000 units, the entire increase being due to
the submission of some 160 new zoning applications in September, 1974.
Forty-one percent of this total would be apartment units and over 30
percent would be townhouses.
Last year the Residential Builder Plans File reported over 22,000 units
in the Committed Growth eategory as compared with only about 14,000
units in the current file. This 40 percent decrease vividly illustrates the
slowdown in active residential development, in terms of units under construction or at least having building permits.
A 30 percent increase in units in the site plan and/or subdivision plat
stage suggests that many plans are not moving quickly to the building permit
stage for a variety of reasons. First, general economic conditions have
raised uncertainties with regard to marketability. Also, with a sewer moratorium in effect for much of the County until very recently, the backlog
of site plans and subdivision plats awaiting sewer taps and final approval
has increased over the last year.
Probable Growth, in this compilation, includes potential units in
areas which have been rezoned since 1971 but which have not proceeded
to the site plan/subdivision plat stage. This component currently amounts
to approximately 7,000 potential units. In previous Residential Builder
Plans Files those projects with pending re-zoning applications whose
outcome was uncertain were classified Probable Growth. This year, however,
projects with re-zoning applications with uncertain destinies were categorized as Possible Growth, since policy guidance on these applications
has yet to evolve from new comprehensive plans which presently are under
consideration. Consequently, Possible Growth—ire-zoning cases that are
uncertain, unlikely, denied or withdrawn--has increased from 14,500 units
to almost 73,000 units.
Springfield Supervisor District accounts for almost one-third of the
County's total planned growth, having over 37,000 units or nearly 30
percent of the total. Mason and Annandale Districts each with about
3,900 units of the planned growth have the smallest shares. The following chart illustrates the distribution of the County's total planned growth
according to Supervisor District.
III-4
Construction Activity 6/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series #7
Total Planned Growth by Supervisor District
Fairfax County, Virginia
January, 1975
Potential
Dwelling Units
45,000
42,500
40,000
37,500
35,000
32,500
30,000
27,500
25,000
22,500
20,000
17,500
15,000
12,500
10;000
7,500
C
o
4)
C
6
-
- -0
C
0
C
.:
C
Si
:-.....:::
5,000
2,500
0
III-5
'C
>
.
•
SUPERVISOR DISTRICT SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY 1I
Fairfax County, Virginia
Construction Activity Report 6/January,1975
8
8
Supervisor
Supervisor
Single
,S;ng lc Town 6 Aoart
District
01
12
Dranesville 1
02
1583157111REPIT2
I
Lee
33
1 350
03
83
04
343
Town ?Apart
IIIMIERIMIRE
Centreville
An
ANT CIPATED CAD.WFH
COMMITTFD GROWTH
4 552
97
III
839 1 0
OE
111MIWINIMME!
III
Providence
07
1121M1
08
966
S
in.field
1
19
20
in
105
177
IIIMEINEMMEI
WM!!
16
63211
ME 4 70
5 44 3 58
IINITT
19,222
4 211 5 24 11/1
.
Mill
7
Percenta oe
10 01 10901st
FM 4 lasiMEIN
4 938
ECIINEITIMMIKII
361
684IIME
4301 12-0
93
IIIITMENIEMICIIIEFEll!ffl11111211
123IMIIIIIIIIMPIIIII
Er 121 IIMIIM
1/3 116
Single TowniApart
' amily Hous
706
500
'
FOTAL PLANNED GROWT
MEMEMMERE
III
112•11•11EPEre
19
541
8
POSSIBLE GROWTH
6
Tawn.tAtxtrt
ment Total
MINIIIMIN
ER
MIN] 093 111
06
8
PROBABLE GROWTH
6
ainstle
Total
129 15
Ill
Published May,1975/Series 1 7
■
290MMINE
280
Mount Vernon
M31M
23 4
NETIENIM WM
9 01 TWIRTM711MTIM
11 11111uIUUp15J..
5
133 51
100.0
Towns listed below):
21
22 PERCENTAGE:
29.
10.4
5
544
100.0
7•
111115
Town of Clifton 10
Town of Herndon 12
Town of Vienna
13
0
0
5
5
558
_A;
45 111.7
73
213
I
67
52
73C11
454 1.80E.
457
22
137
122
•
583
0
11
2.0
31
TOTAL TOWNS
621
132
122
80
1,200
587 2.730
2.0
32
33
34
33
I
Source:
UDIS Residential Builder Plans File, January, 1975
Notes:
1
36
37
Supervisor Districts in this report are the current
Districts as determined by the 1971 apportionment plan. The present District boundaries will
remain in effect through December 31, 1975,
after which these Districts will be reapportioned
according to the plan adopted by the Board of
Supervisors on January 4, 1925. The summary
in Report DU-6 illustrates the effect the new
apportionment plan has on the distribution of
the January, 1975, dwelling unit inventory and
population holding capacity as opposed to the
distribution existent under the current apportionmeat plan.
See Appendix A for Methods, Assumptions and
Limitations.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Data as of January, 1975, excepi where noted
in Appendix A.
All construction activity and builder plans
(CL-1 through CL-9) are included in this report.
Data for Herndon and Vienna is incomplete.
Townhouse category includes townhouses,
duplexes, multiplexes and all individually
owned housing units other than single family
detached and condominium apartments.
Percentages may not add due to rounding.
Complete definitions of Committed, Anticipored, Probable and Possible Growth appear
in Appendix A.
Includes Town of Vienna.
Includes Town of Herndon.
Includes Town of Clifton.
33
I
S•
•
•
Construction Activity Report 7/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
SEWERSHED SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
The Lower Potomac Treatment Service Area (Sewershed M-1 through N)
has in excess of 57,000 proposed units of which nearly 60 percent are
located in the Fbhick Sewershed: Currently only about 3,100 units of the
proposed growth for the Lower Potomac Area are under construction or
authorized by building permits. In the next several months, however, the
number of units authorized may increase due to the lifting of the sewer
moratorium in the Lower Potomac Area.
The Blue Plains Service Treatment (Sewershed A-1 through G-4) account
for 20 percent of the total planned growth of 133,000 units. Twenty-six
percent of the proposed units in the Blue Plains Area are attributed to
Committed Growth. Since the Blue Plains Area is under moratorium, those
projects not having sewer capacity or adequate septic conditions will not
go forward until sewer becomes available.
The Upper Occoquan Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant (Sewershed T-1 through T-7) is currently under construction and scheduled for
completion by 1978. Projects in that area currently without sewer capacity and unable to use septic systems are being delayed. The Westgate
Service Area (Sewersheds 1-1 through J-3) is scheduled to receive additional capacity of two million gallons per day in Spring, 1976. The
Dogue Creek and Little Hunting Creek Service Areas (Sewersheds K
through 1) are under no sewer constraints at this time. The 9,500 proposed
units in this area could continue through the development process assuming
that all other factors permit. The remaining Sewersheds (0, P, Q, R
and S) account for approximately 13,000 proposed units, most of which will
be on septic systems.
•
111 7
-
1 2,3
SEVVERSHED SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY 7
Fairfax County, Virginia
II/ Construction Activity Report 7/January,1975
COMMITTED GROWTH '
Sewer
Shed
Code
A-1
•
Sewershed
Horseoen ertek
A-3
Horsepen Cr., F-Branch
B-1
Single Town 5Aoart
Famil, Housl went Total
164
164
60
519
579
Sugarland Run
474
16
490
8-2
Sugorland Run
442
B-3
Sugarland Run
5
8-5
Suaarland Run
530
442
5
546
451
1,527
C-1
Nichols Run
26
26
•
C-2
Pond Branch
29
29
0-1
Colvin Run
90
10
0-2
Colvin Run
Z
43
45i
11
0-3
Difficult Run
720
750
776 2,246
12
E-1
Scotts Run
70
15
E-2
Bull Neck Run
17
14
F
Dead Run
15
0-1
Pimmit
10
0-2
Little Pimmit
17
0-3
Turkey Run
111
G-4
Strohman Run
19
H
Four Mile Run
1-1
Cameron
1-2
Cameron
20
22
1-3
Cameron
23
1-5
Lucky Run
2.1
J-3
Belle Haven
25
K
Little Hunting Creek
26
90
339
409
17
10
1
544,
555
100
1
242
343
14
14
1
32
38
1
74
106
305
343
940
940
2
69
362
94911 .380
Doque Creek
360
105
108
573
M-1
Accotink Creek
3
106
695
804
M-2 Accotink Creek
151
87
238
29
M-3 Accotink Creek
32
30
M-4
21
42
21
M-5 Accotink Creek
3
245
248
742
803
1_545
M-6 Long Branch
32
198
261
33
N
Pohick
34
0-1
Kane
10
10
35
P
Mill Branch
14
14
26
0-1
Occoquan
81
81
R
Popes Head Creek
95
95
S-1
Little Rocky
1
1
S-2
Johnny Moore
5
5
1-1
Cub Run
34
311
• I
4
s
T-2
Cub Run
4
176
18g,
T-3
Cub Run
25
30
55
T-4
Cul, Run
a
1-5
Cub Run
1-7
Bull Run
TOTAL COUNTY
ii...6,...................,,,,
5IMITHIIMIM•11111L9
115
11111111111111P111
iiiimoriiimmounwm.ii ■ usferiiminwrormir
2
3,
.5.
.9
1.4
10
2
IS
251
10
1 6colVIIMIIIIMICAIMMIIIIIMIIIMEITIC!!
8.1
1111111111111111 III 25 4 1
1 619 2 04 1.5
40
11
.1
5
1.0
1
240 ul.rimirmommmrsormerrimwrimmeiiiiii
14
18
L
Accotink Creek
•
OTAL PLANNED GROWT
. ea,
. PROBABLE5 OR. I
POSSLBLE GROWTH
ANTI
5
600 ITMEE#110M1111111*111,17ErtiMMIlaiii .iiiii
Tow
IM
.iimiii4n
iiit awn
611
3I
611
55
518
111
577
1
1
1
760
1 39
7 1111111
7
18
Published May,1975/Series 07
22
.o
%pa
.1
10
0
11 1111111111111111
150.k
WirrIMM=IIIMMEMIIMIIMMIMMISMIIIIIMIERIM
IIIMIIMIEMPM11111111=11MINIM•11111111111=11EM1111111MMIllW
IIVIIIMIEFIMEIMINE=MINIIIMINIIMILMIIITIMP 5 800 Ellff
IIMMEMINNIMI1111111111•111111M
116111DIMMI6IMIMIMMMENIIIIMMW1111/11VONIMIlltiMMOITEN6
ME 703 403 101111MIM=EMBIIIIIIIIMIIIIMEIIIIMMIffl
mirmannFEE1=1111121N2111ME11111111•11Mniti 7 3061111 91 399=1
11
12
IS
16
17
10
.1
2.5
20
o
21
7.1
.7
.1
22
23
2•
2.4
35
6 31
4.7
36
0 409
7.8
3. 7
MIIIMOMPIE=W2=1111111111M11111MIMENIIIMINIFE 4 005 6 098
263 MEMNITIIIIIIIIII•11==111111=M1111111111MIIIMMI11111112!
M71==W=MIIIIII111111111111111MMEIPME 98011•111MIIIIMIE
MINIM EMI MEM =IIIMMIIIMIEMII WI= 1460 REKIIIIIIFET
• 302 111111IMIMINIMMMIll =IMP WM ISTI=11011139•1111112
4.6
tri rmortletrrnmetrommatommimminizem
tranu
4
1111111111111111111
niiimmulilommm.n.
IMINSINT=IliT111121101116
141
6,
22
2
546
546
330 138 582 1 05t
251 1
1
I 12?568
39,5•
73
1.2
)7
7.6
0
95
4 472 4 211 5 242 i39S
1 201 7.667 If
06
1.100 1 6
. 111
rilr ffiluilimmermierm
2
20. 1.201
1
1 93
• I 2 175 3 431
1 205
183
1,894
2
1
17
1 43
ermommerr
825 1 1“
751
2.6
1.3
••
.8
••
3.7
1
MIN
1°
1.2
••
•
••
9 85 27 •
26 c 5,399 72,878_
35,291 .2656
55,604133,55
100.0
.4
PERCENTAGE
0.4
29.6
54.6
100.'
5C
Sou co:
UDIS Residential Builder Plans File, January, 1975
Notes: 1 See Appendix A for Methods, Assumptions and
Limitations.
2 Data as of January, 1 075, except where noted
in Appendix A.
3 All construction activity and builder plans
(CL-1 through CL-9) are included in this report.
4 Data for Herndon and Vienna is incomplete.
5 Townhouse category includes townhouses,
duplexes, multiplexes and all individually
owned rousing units other than smote family
detached and condominium apartments.
6 Percentages may not add due to rounding.
7 Comp lete definitions of Committed, Anticipated, Probable and Bossible Growth appear
in Appendix A.
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY BY STAGE OF COMPLETION 1 / 213
Summarized by Sewershed
Page 1 of 2
Fairfax County, Virginia
Construction Activity 8/January, 1975
6
6
RINI Town 5 FEI
Sewershed
16
17
19
2
01
2
MVP MUM
106
532
64
165
4
451 892
21
22
48
43
1,345
335" 184
1
553
• 315
11
A-3 Horse. -n Creek F.Branc Or 486
48 16
8-1 Su••rland
165
B-2 Su••rland
4
208 233
21
IIMEERNI
22
C-2 Pond Branch
48
n-i Colvin Run
43
D-2 Colvin Run
496
D-3 Difficult Run
E-1 Scotts Run
.
8
1
Dead Run
F
1
72
G-1 Pimmit
11
G-2 Little Pimmit
4
G- T
R
16
1•
11
.1 "NM
15 74
I-I Cameron
•
-2 Come •n
wilmon
Belle
Haven
W
Little Hunting Creek
. Mr
D
Cr
1
M-1 Accotink Creek
M-2 Accotink Creek
riMPIRMIMMINIr
•
M-4 Acre:stink Crousk
M-5 Accotink Creek
M-6 Lo • Branch
Pohick
N
0-1 Kane
J-3
ME
742
S bmt ed
IMEI Town5A rt
Po. 's Head Creek
R
IMIEMIMMEMI
S-2 Johnny Moore
T-1 Cub Run
T-2 Cub Run
5
MT
111.1
11W-
31
13
133
mir
2
I
38
Sill
A
191
1
191
52
., . IWRIMINIIP WE MIMI
MT
MI
NO
11;
284
282
75
IN
1
Ile
725
105
1
271 1,891 3,40
731
78
41
,.243
56
41
245
119
361 1.690
15
all
200 2.251
15
0
3
•
:-..
s.
7
7
80
11
5
7
I
17
III
E,
22 Milli
235 WI 40
Ng
EMMET! KT
34
20
34
20
iti
312
•
:
•
30
26
1
195
INMPIMITIMITI
L
MT?
NM
MMIMMI111
wri
NE s p
ill
MC
111
507
111.11111
111
III
1
36
3
IN2
123
78
155
208
150
629 U1211
296
12
379
rill
520
1.1
358
582
124
r
ELM
3
7
Ed
E. ert 267
EMT
11B
PI
IP
796
ira
56
2
2
II II III
MIMI
IIM
Ini
363
Mir
2
Mr
13
• TOTALS
ratrillEtrell
FE I
146
II
121 1 048 1 225
33
MI
IMEMENEIMII!!
MIMI
97
NI I I PI
140
0
1
22
MI
MI
-,
IF
202 Mr
,A
42
3
Mr
E
:ea,
TIIIIIIM
IMIIIIMIMMIM,
Mr
MI
.
ELM? M
1-4 Cub Run
• 1-5 Cub Run
T-7 Cub Run
III-9
Rezo • . Granted
Ea Town 5Apart
6
261
120
138 II
31
283
133
316
MI
30
WM
Ile
I
117
WIN
11
iiiii 1 lepm..
89
107
1,241
9
11
WM
111.
MT
4
69
1
5
1
5
.......
5
MISIMEMI
IMPRI MIMI IIMMII ..
NE
16
ri
3
• .., . .
p
98 12211
25 1111! 218
32 383 416
204
82
'
IF
ME
58
14
33
426
ip
2,6 ffign
190
lifli
E
•
MR IMF 1•1 IMI
CL-5 6
CL-6 6
CL-7 6
.
Code
Published May, 1975Aeries
836 1 718 12 118
11/11
INE
ME
IIIM
1 0 MEIMMI
10 950 Iffliff
IrM1111111217 155
MEM
371
•
IIII
6
67
Shed
Sewer
Code
Sewershed
67
Rezon no Pendina(Uncerta'
5
Rezontla Pendina(. kelv)
Sewer
•
Published May, 1975/Series 117
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY BY STAGE OF COMPLETION 1,23
Summarized by Sewershed
Page 2 of 2
Fairfax County, Virginia
. Construction Activity Report 8/Januorv.1975
Single TownApm/
Famiho House ment _Total
;mils • • •.- .. .
• L•
A-1
Horsepen Creek
62_
•
A-3
Hoiseoen Creek,F.Branch
25
25
-Rezoning PenslanacUrlikelY
s
Single Imam Ayart
f.su:nily Hausp_tsent Total_
CL-1
6•
CL -1 through CL-9
14,7•0111351 Den_ed/W thdrawn
Total Planner! Growth
5
own Aport
iftunill Homesanesil—Total_INKL1 Horn. 41 11, 11.,4.1
Single TowneAyort
2 4I
Sinai.
611
243
558
1 161
487
1,834
71
1,905
27
1.395
B-1
Sugarland
296
29.
B-2
Suoarland
166..
166
8-3
Corrion4
318
8-5
Suhationd
••
C-1
Nichols Run
251
C-2
Pond Branch
364
D-1
Colvin Ram
D_-2
Colvin Run
D-3
Difficult Run
365
E-1
Scotts Run
152
E-2
Bull Neck Run
F
Dead Run
,0-1
482.,
27
47
262
240
180
807
184
184
18
18
812
318
583 2.007
251
364
1 509
47
179
43
4 301r 071
15
1 556
690
919
3,296 10,76:
1 619 2 04
11
2NLI
72,
1 395
759
408
172
P1mmit
240
611
.14
10
A
119
•/4.•
115
10
446
173
7
1 374
14
119
426
242
1.14
1 808
1
36
2
36
141
G-2 Little (Unlit
If
G-3 Tudtey Run
97
17
0-4 Strohm= Run
28
14
a.
H
162
10
3.368
20
52
64
21
87:2,815
5 :1/ 9 493
1
Four Mile Run
44
1-1
Cameron
1-2
Cameron
1-3
Cameron
Lucky Run
1-5
1
12 029
2.223
4&
45
394
1•
52
77
.1t.
8 2.001
570
647
1
311
2
1
•
22
940
22
3.191
22
7:: 6 318
26
4,4n9
27
9
24
Little Huntina Creek
L
Dopue Creek
M-1
Accotink Creek
M-2
Accotink Creek
,
514.
3.312
M-3 Accotink Creek
M-4 Accotink Creek
9
M-5 Accotink Creek
N
43.4
......
1.0
....;
91
2
2
470
87
1 1
1 1
6
6
153
1.988 14.186 6.18522.359
Pohick
78
70
122_3-66
7, / ,:4
7,03
221
71
M-6 Lona Branch
•-
laZ,
4,
•
223
41
41
21
71
J.Da
log
22
220
696
696
745
637 1.535
499
9
_6
399
• 9P
1.438 4.00 6 098
24
20
276
642
10:
543
.e 1 44:
66:1 319
SO
2
31
• : 1.936
2 304
12
19A91
8.13 33.594
32
34
••
1
.106,_
1.63
5.9
0-1 Kane
4:4
483
P
14
141
.:y_
682 a.
Mill flo,n..4a
Q-1 Occoauan
R
Pope's Head Creek
5-1
Little Rocky
5-2
Johnny Moore
1-1
Cub Run
T-2
Cub Run
297
1.200 , 1.20 7.667
:II
1.2
r
97
1.201
29
20
5
1-3
Cub Run
1. •a,
Cub Run
1:4
1-5
Cub Run
Cub Run
415 1,32 •
27
1,118 1,646
1.100
1.1
5 •
1 593
2 201
3541
1,20
27- 1.433
158
341
1,741
_561
77: 3.364
9
37
24
34
40
',4
183
561
1_574
7.66 10.134
_2
T-4
T-7
39
• ..•
as
1.709
1.100
• 3
751 4,893
••
82
97
••
TOTALS
•
8.736
Source:
UDIS Residential Builder Plans File,January,1975
Notes:
1
2
See Appendix A for Methods, Anverepticne and
Limitations.
Data as of January, 1975, except where noted
3 All construction activity and builder plans
(CL-1 through CL-9) are included in this
report.
-, - 0. • 67-54
4
5
Data for Herndon and Vienna is incomplete.
Townhouse category includes townhouses,
duplexes, multiplexes and all individually
detached and condominium apartments.
6 Complete definitions of the various stages
of completion appear in Appenix A.
_L117 .2 8611.349 -1,33 .Z
7
35,291 42,656 55,601133.551
Due to the backlog of zoning cases and the
incomplete Comprehensive Plans now under
review, no judgements have been made as
.... a.. 1:4•11Innel of nondinn • nninn nnniications being granted. For this reason,
confidence levels 4 and 2 ore blank in
this report.
Construction Activity Report 10/January, 1975
Published May,1975/Series 7
COMMITTED AND ANTICIPATED GROWTH BY CENSUS TRACT
Committed Units are the approximately 14,000 units that are authorized through the issuance of building permits but not yet completed.
These outstanding building permits have declined in number 38% below
the 22,000 level in April, 1974.
Anticipated Units, on the other hand, have increased 23 percent above
the May, 1975, Standard Report figure of 30,800.
The following table summarizes both Committed and Anticipated Growth
by census tract.
•
01111
COMMITTED AND ANTICIPATED GROWTH BY CENSUS TRACT 1.2
Fairfax County , Virg inia
Construction Activity Report 10/January,1975
Total
4
Committed
,M1
Census Tract 3
002
3
004
006
10
Antici
ted
7
2
=Ma
601
63
Census Tract
70
664
058
Z -1.0
059
l og <
061
'it 9
062
2
71
73
118
146
LI
009
17
109
126
3/ L
i''
Units
Antic'••ted
Units
3
Additional
Units
9
if
Mill.1111111
59
/log/
536
536
/(.'33
063
173
4
177
Cc b
064
122
447
569
1
20
21
65
146
211
292
C ta
q 1 1-
066
280
067
244
30
274
013
24
491
515
/6,Iq-
068
400
459
859
440
069
7:
205
283
g S...
ci 4
071
1
14
15
072
1
57
58
1
26
27
016
3
27
30
017
7
57
64
2,01
073
28
297
325
018
39
39
t -IL
074
4
46
50
019
1,343
1,343
LIDO'
075
71
71
1011
44
278
322
12
73
85
20
022
2
349
21
023
201
384
22
024
337
23
025
24
9q-
376
12
015
3
317
cal
1
3g
12
010
021
66p.
2b51gS
411g
1Q 70
154
la 3
3043
ci, OR
50 II
,2 -3•23-
076
57
912
969
1., 1-.
078
115
1,671
1,786
351
tl 0 Z.
079
45
1,551
1,596
585
183+
080
560
181
741
277
614
/9
:1
081
24
69
93
25/-
1,089
1
1,090
3423
082
51
28
79
027
239
1,163
1,402
ler-1°
083
361
772
1,133
029
304
123
427
1341
084
26
171
197
-7 44
3.5-Sg
Gig
/61D.
4..ci'D631
086
16
30
c4
088
2
28
30
53
6 2 7-3
089
442
785
1,227
3g 53
090
953
226
1,179
3.70.1.
091
786
524
1,310
14
5
32
/---/
28
020
31
057
008
70
27
.?1:i
9
007
1
•
T•tal
4
Committed
'
Additional
Units
Units
Units
Published May,1975/Series 17
031
mullIRIIR
034
3
1 98
201
035
1
188
189
037
640
L 549
2.189
038
198
198
33
041
74
L004
Lon
34
042
494
3 262
3 756
75
043
63
209
76
044
3,
045
30
046
SO
047
40
048
41
•7
6
7365-
7
2,172
3,839
/.90•CY
094
918
2,384
3,302
/0
095
82
731
813
15
14
29
91
27
32
59
/85'
311
6
19
60
11 9
12
3g
31;1
,
272
g 5 ij
150
150
13
43
56
43-)
i34
096
5
7
12
32
097
6
6
/ /
098
13
10
11
39
099
12
049
2
2
C•
100
491
3.353
3.844
051
2
2
I.
101
33
43
36g
S'.53
1,0
1-0
135.
052
1
64
65
-2199
102
10
55
1,246
1.301
053
942
483
1 425
q l'OV
103
182
2 300
2 482
45
054
1
8
9
7g
104
2
95
97
?oy
46
055
2
2
105_
7
340
347
1.050
47
056
30
31
6
9•
106
99
997
1 096
13,925
39,593
53,518
1
2
113
1.667
092
11 3.5L/
1
9y
1-3 /3
riql
4
•
50
TOTAL
1 63 ott 4
51
57
Source:
UDIS Residential Builder Plans File, Ma y , 1975
Notes:
See Appendix A for Method, Assumptions and
Limitations.
of January , 1975, except where noted
2 Da b
in Appendix A.
3 The Census Tracts are as defined b y the 1970
5
5
•
1
Census.
Complete definitions of Committed and
Anticipated Growth appear in Appendix A.
5 Data for Hemdon and Vienna is incomplete.
4
111-12
Construction Activity Report 11/Januory, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series #7
HOUSING UNITS AUTHORIZED
1968 - 1975
Year
1968
Jan.
Feb.
March
1st Quarter Total
April
May
June
2nd Quarter Total
July
Aug.
Sept.
3rd Quarter Total
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
4th Quarter Total
Annual Total
MF
SF
139
375
568
1,082
353
405
478
1,236
419
511
709
1,639
488
382
321
1,191
5,148
0
48
274
322
196
0
132
328
0
0
0
0
0
198
216
414
1,064
TOTAL
139
423
842
1,404
549
405
610
1,564
419
511
709
1,639
488
580
537
1,605
6,212
1971
Jan.
Feb.
March
1st Quarter Total
April
May
June
2nd Quarter Total
July
Aug.
Sept.
3rd Quarter Total
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
4th Quarter Total
Annual Total
SF
MF
347
296
883
1,526
910
1,372
538
2,820
575
447
614
1,636
707
568
386
1,661
7,643
940
0
151
1,091
333
754
347
1,434
240
1,439
418
2,097
184
530
600
1,314
5,936
TOTAL
1,287
296
1,034
2,617
1,243
2,126
885
4,254
815
1,886
1,032
3,733
891
1,098
986
2,975
13,579
1974
Jan.
Feb.
March
1st Quarter Total
April
May
June
2nd Quarter Total
July
Aug.
Sept.
3rd Quarter Total
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
4th Quarter Total
Annual Total
SF
170
469
395
1,034
660
161
444
1,265
211
235
63
509
36
42
27
105
2,913
MF
249
771
116
1,136
0
0
12
12
231
0
0
231
312
230
0
542
1,921
Source:
Division of Inspections
Notes:
1
2
3
1969
Jan.
Feb.
March
1st Quarter Total
April
May
June
2nd Quarter Total
July
Aug.
Sept.
3rd Quarter Total
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
4th Quarter Total
Annual Total
MF
SF
TOTAL
0
0
215
215
410
261
106
777
49
74
0
123
384
172
307
863
1,978
202
296
632
1,130
688
626
692
2,006
439
432
376
1,247
359
342
223
924
5,307
202
296
847
1,345
1,098
887
798
2,783
488
506
376
1,370
743
514
530
1 787
7,285
Year
1972
Jan.
Feb.
March
Ist Quarter Total
April
May
June
2nd Quarter Total
July
Aug.
Sept.
3rd Quarter Total
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
4th Quarter Total
Annual Total
,
593
645
1,134
2,372
1,185
1,174
799
3,158
1,657
1,193
185
3,035
1,888
551
841
3,280
11,845
1,293
645
1,385
3,323
1,767
1,513
1,089
4,369
2,894
1,193
835
4,922
2,241
773
1,315
4,329
16,943
700
0
251
951
582
339
290
1,211
1,237
0
650
1,887
353
222
474
1,049
5,098
1970
Jan.
Feb.
March
1st Quarter Total
April
May
June
2nd Quarter Total
July
Aug.
Sept.
3rd Quarter Total
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
4th Quarter Total
Annual Total
SF
MF
41
131
571
743
663
737
573
1,973
439
560
361
1,360
332
133
395
860
4,936
396
0
223
619
144
855
219
1,218
22
215
452
689
653
0
0
653
3,179
TOTAL
437
131
794
1,362
807
1,592
792
3,191
461
775
813
2,049
985
133
395
1,513
8,115
HOUSING UNITS AUTHORIZED
1973
TOTAL
MF
SF
Year
Year
J2ZI
Jan.
Feb.
March
1st Quarter Total
April
May
June
2nd Quarter Total
July
Aug.
Sept.
3rd Quarter Total
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
4th Quarter Total
Annual Total
SF
640
274
1,710
2,624
1,110
460
172
1,742
136
400
1,144
1,680
240
1,127
536
1,903
7,949
MF
200
250
700
1,150
0
722
215
937
282
530
0
812
0
339
319
658
3,557
TOT/AL
840
524
2,410
3,774
1,110
1,182
387
2,679
418
930
1,144
2,492
240
1,466
855
2,561
11,506
HOUSING UNITS AUTHORIZED
1975
HOUSING UNITS AUTHORIZED
1974
Year
Year
HOUSING UNITS AUTHORIZED
1972
HOUSING UNITS AUTHORIZED
1971
Year
HOUSING UNITS AUTHORIZED
1970
HOUSING UNITS AUTHORIZED
1969
HOUSING UNITS AUTHORIZED
1968
TOTAL
419
1,240
511
2,170
660
161
456
1,277
442
235
63
740
348
272
27
647
4,834
Year
SF
1975
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
1st Quarter Total
104
67
101
272
The figures refer to the total number of new housing units
authorized by Building Permits. In a multi-family structure,
each separate dwelling unit counts as a housing unit.
The figures are not meant to denote type of ownership, i.e.
owner-occupied or rental.
SF = Single family and includes townhouses.
MF = Multi-family and includes garden, mid-rise and highrise apartments.
MF
0
274
0
274
4
TOTAL
104
341
101
546
Close comparison of Report CA-11 with Report CA-I4 will
reveal minor discrepancies as to monthly permit issue totals.
This is to be expected since CA-11 reflects the original
unadjusted monthly unit authorizations, while CA-I4 reflects
all adjustments which have been mode since that time. Adjustments include cancellations, expired permits, renewals,
re-issues, and other adjustments.
I
1
Published May,1975/Series 07
Construction Activity Report 12/Januory,1975
RESIDENTIAL UNITS AUTHORIZED VS.
UNITS STARTED AND UNITS COMPLETED
(Quarterly Moving Totals Expressed as an Annual Rate)
January, 1968 - January, 1975
18,000
17,000 16,000 15,000
14,000
13,000
12,000
11,000
10,000
UNITS 9,000 -•
8,000
‘,
7,000 6,000 5,000
4,001:0 -1
3,000 2,000 1,000 OUARTER
YEAR
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 .1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1968
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
Permits Issued
- - Completions
- — - Units Started
Source: Office of Research and Statistics
This chart shows residential building permits issued, residential building
starts and residential building completions from January, 1968, through
January, 1975. This chart illustrates the surge of late 1970 in the number of
permits issued, which is reflected in the number of units started in the same
time frame. This trend continued until the first quarter of 1973 and by the
end of 1973 completions were outnumbering both permits issued 9nd unit starts.
III-14
Published May, -1-975/Series 07
Construction Activity Report 13/January, 1975
Location of Residential Construction Activity
Authorized by Outstanding Building Permits and
IncludingUnits Au
Units in the Site Plan/Subdivision Plat Process Which Either Have
Sanitary Sewer Availability or Have Plans to Use Septic Systems
By Sewershed
January, 1975
REPORT CA-13
10000
Housing
Units
111111 Site Plans/Subdivision Plats on Septi
Site Plans/Subdivision Plats on
Sanitary Sewer
9000
1:1 Building Permits on Septic
II
8000
Building Permits on Sanitary Sewer
7000
6000
5000
Ill
4000
3000
2000
1000
500
Sewershed
1111111
4.<r<444
—
A
H
J
• I
4.
>
Sanitary Sewer Treatment Plant
■AP..
7
.3
§
K
:1
eT
:
x
S
<7
I
to
i
n
Al8Wi
LMNOP
c<
o
co
Ft
Q
DOW04 0,1 .18 M 01
0
QR
ST
Construction Activity Reports 14A and 14B/January,1975
Published May, 1975/Series 07
BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY
Tables CA-14A and CA-14B summarize the housing units authorized by
building permits between 1972 and 1975 for each of the 14 planning districts.
Also reflected are the housing units still not completed as of April, 1975,
along with the dates on which those permits were issued. Tables CA-14A and
CA-14B make note of the estimated population that could result as the potential
outstanding units are in fact built.
Table 14B shows that the number of dwelling units authorized have declined
significantly for each of the planning districts since 1972. Mt. Vernon is the
only exception; annual authorizations have consistently averaged around 1,200
units until the first quarter of 1975 when the rate declined dramatically.
Upper Potomac Planning Distr10 has had the greatest number of units
authorized over the past three years. During 1972, 1973 and 1974, apploxi.
mately 22, 42 and 29 percent of the total units authorized respectively, were
In this Planning District.
The most significant changes in the building permit activity were the
declines in Annandale and ft,hich MAUI% since 1972. During this declining
period in Annandale and Ilshich, the number of dwelling units authorized
In Upper !biomes increased boas 22 to 42 percent of the annual County totals.
In general, the building permit issue pattern followed the availability
of sewer as moratorium conditions changed.
Lincolnia District has had relatively little building permit activity over
the past three years.
Table 14A identifies 14,500 authorized units not yet completed in
Fairfax County as of April 1, 1975. Nearly half or 46 percent of these outstanding units were authorized during 1973. More than a third ore in Upper
Potomac Planning District and an additional 31 percent are in McLean (13%),
Lower Potomac (9%), and Mt. Vernon (90,) Districts.
The potential population that could result if all outstanding units were
completed and occupied is shown in Tables CA-14A and CA-14B. The factors
used to convert housing units into estimated population are summarized elsewhere in this publication.
111-16
Construction Activity Reports 14A and 14B/January,1975
Published May, 1975/Series #7
The following chart depicts graphically'the number of dwelling units
authorized, and the number of units outstanding for each planning district.
Building Permit Activity by Planning District
Dwelling Units Authorized and Dwelling Units Outstanding
Fairfax County, Virginia
April, 1975
Units
10,000—
9,000—
5, 000
4, 000 —
2, 000 —
0
1 , 000—
2
c:e
-5-
0
0
owe r Potoma c
3, 000 —
--r-
-
"
o
number of units authorized between Jan. 1, 1972 and April 1, 1975
Total number
Number of units outstanding as of April 1, 1975
III-17
ill
Planning District
Month
liN1T4S_AUT1lOPJZEJI
1974
1973
1972
16
1
1
12
1
_74
2
2
7
174
7
2
1
6
64
20
9
26
6
146
697
3511
366
17
37
46
10
10
Annandale
93
Baileys
Bull Run
87
In
Jan.
111
Jan.
12
16
18
63
12
13
46
13
1
2
16
40
1
5
1
1
6
8
9
78
31
4
121
4
26
1
36
122
128
434
27
123
330
17
568
1 425
3
17
10
10
40
142
Lower Potomac
37
..'•1
11114r Vernon
ck
16
1
Total Units Eguiv Pop
Outstanding Outstanding
A r. 1,1975 Apr. 1,1975
Jefferson
Jan
Jan
Jan
1975
1
Ian
Jan
UNITS STILL OUTSTANDING AS OF APRIL 1 1975
ACCORDING TO DATE OF PERMIT ISSUE
Prior to 1972
1972
1973
1974
1975
3
Jan.
Jan.
Published May,1975/Series 0 7
BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY
By Month, Year and Planning District
Page 1 of 4
Fairfax County, Virginia
Construction Activity Report 14A/Januory, 1975
68
Rose Hill
Potomac
Vienna
Jan.
7
1
1
1
1_
1
12
114
Jan- Total ._
1,224
831
2
398
91
2
36
349
352
91
830
2 340
20
20
56
Feb-
Annandale
12
117
Feb
Baileys
20
16
Feb
' Bull Run
12_
1111
Feb-
Fairfax
16
Feb.
Jefferson
1
9
18
IS
2
Lower Potomac
1
4
McLean
Mt Vernon
131
9
4
266
22
801
2
Pohick
290
9
12
14
•
111k ,
12
Feb
Feb.
Fob
Rose Hill
YL.noa
1
12
2
1
2
56
143
36
3
341
2_
2
2
7
3
3
4
12
•
Upper Potomac
3
2
9
32
10
7
15
280
2
1
3
11
15
746
2
21
755
75
1 766
4
14
24
84
24
16
57
25
JO
7
10
370
36
1 034
26
280
284
630
12
68
280
2
22
26
21
22
23
27
7$
29
Feb
•
s
•
1
27
2
1
•
:
30
1.1
36
1 512
3 780
1
27
32
111
2
1
3
11
33
2
6
34
4
62
196
35
8
492
1,079
36
31
31
32
Mar
Annandale
3$
Mar.
Baileys
14
Mar.
Mar.
SS
19
20
Feb.
Feb.
,
3
1
Feb
Feb
F4h
16
17
8J
22
2•
1
20_
21
22
14
15
16
22
12
13
15
2•
1 0
36
Mar.
21
Mar
22
Mar.
69
10
Bull Run
66
58
Fairfax
20
109
11
4
485
1
8
eFferson
1
2
51
5
484
37
1
105
1
1
108
299
31
3
2
19
36
14
74
263
30
28
1
11
1
1
2
1
9
45
38
149
505
1
186
1
110
1
1
45
61
43
14
250
130
1
13
5
867
12
Mar.
MCLean
Mar.
Mar.
Mt Vernon
Mar.
Rose Hill
5
1
Mar.
Springfield
9
119
Mar.
Upper Potomac
634
Mar-
Vienna
Pohick
1
1
. • .
Lower Potomac
4
760
38
277
12
30
112
17
2
1,259
2,696
416
103
8
1
473
6
5
19
62
40
4
28
517
1,696
41
1
5
18
42
12
261
2,735
43
258
92
925
49
13
2
65
231
45
1,737
364
103
2,396
6,970
47
44
46
Mar. Total
6
46
•
49
5C
•
•
III-18
BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY
By Month, Year and Planning District
Page 2 of 4
Fairfax County, Virginia
Construction Activity Report 14A/January, 1975
Published May. 1975/Series 1110
UNITS SILL OUTSTANDING AQE AP_RILL 1975
Month
Plann'
Apr
Annandale
Apr.
Baileys
4,
Apr
Bull Run
Aor
Jefferson
District
Fairfax
Apr
Lincolnia
Aar
Lower Potomac
Apr.
4„,,...
11NITC At rrwlei7FD
1973
1974
/2
1975
ACCORDING TO DATE Of PERMIT ISSUE
1972
1973
1974
Prior to 1972,
7
55
1
1
2
2
2.1
109
75
2
19
1
2
_7
2.-
30
1
2
1
1
5
1975
Total Units
Eauiv
Rao
OutstancRna Outstandi
Apr.1,1975 Acr.1.1975
2
7
1
2
7
'
32
90
'
8
28
2
7
•
s
•
1
67
9
3
McLean
320
55
&I
Aar
Mt. Vernon
229
4
66
10
Apr.
Pohick
327
18
82
11
Apr
Rose Hill
12
Apr.
Springfield
13
Apr.
Upper Potomac
14
Apr.
Vienna
3
4_.
7
1
2
7
'
10
30
50
177
•
49
54
151,
CLI
77
271
I°
5
3
7
6
1
206
10
3
1
8
4_
5
18
"
177
185
515
1.
594
242
197
4
18
156
180
358
1,074
1•
89
96
89
6
9
43
84
142
403
••
Is
1,827
521
712
27
55
246
591
919
2 755
••
259
84
25
69
••
36
37
103
1
4
14
15
16
Apr. Total 1
17
17
12
May
Annandale
19
May
Baileys
20
May
Bull Run
21
May
Fairfax
22
May
Jefferson
2
23
May
Lincolnia
3
24
May
May
Lawir Ikftmcts
McLeart
1
26
May
Mt Manson
27
May
Pohick
25
May
Rose Hill
29
May
Sivinnfield
May
Upper Potomac
May
Vienna
25
*
25
20
19
2
113
2
47
1
3
2
1
22
2
2
22
28
382
3
293
2
6
110
446
20
5
63
12
10
127
1
1
6
1
1
279
4
287
27
34
3
9
70
248
•
5
1
126
132
470
'•
3
3
4
2.
64
410
24
69
2°
61
469
1,155
us
1
11
34
31
116
1 067
2,833
33
29
80
33
5
470
5
1 020
18
.6
23
7
11
39
33
573
85
20
3
14
117
2
2
3
7
1,504
1,167
162
33
62
41
1
470
470
5
15
391
7
4
32
May Total 1
856
34
June
Annandale
June
June
Baileys
Bull Run
3
2
1
June
Fairfax
3
5
June
Lincolnia
1
29
2
1
1
••
39
June
Lower Potomac
38
June
McLean
59
279
3
June
Mt. Vernon
June
Pohick
June
Ro<ii Hill
June
June
5Ockla.eld
Upper Potomac
281
June ,.
Vienna
139
-1,026
6
1
2
6
17
••
274
2
279
615
•.
160
16
176
4.46
•2
4
3
11
39
3
9
229
219
16
' 112
71
3
2
2
7
3
2
16
161
1
3
83
7
155
248
817
••
11
77
3
21
5
67
96
324
••
648
751
12
117
480
725
1,334
3,424
•
44
154
43
48
June Total 1
••
50
51
52
53
•
54
50
v
111-19
fla
Published May,1975/Series
BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY
By Month, Year and Planning District
Page 3 of 4
Fairfax County, Virginia
Construction Activity Report 14A/January,1975
UNITS STILL QUISTANDIMO AS CIF Anil L. 1275
Planning District
Month
July
Annandale
July
Baileys
1972
96
UNITS AUTHORIZED
1973
1974
2
2
23
1
5
303
74
1
July
Bull Run
July
Fairfax
July
Jefferson
111
July
Lower Potomac
202
1
July
McLean
516
3
13
July
Mt
8
5
43
152
Vernon
July
Pohick
577
28
July
Rose Hill
1
11
July
Springfield
107
92
12
July
Upper Potomac
250
12
July
Vienna
3
2
2,402
178
235
Equiv. Pop.
Outstandi
Apr 1 1975 '
Apr 1,1975
14
1
4
1
74
1L1
6
91
41
1
1
72
5
1
1
2
4
11
32
3
2
12
18
64
1
1
38
40
91
73
7
142
224
793
8
28
295
692
16
57
637
1-915
9
1
2
Bai I eys
3
Auq
Bull Run
1
39
Aug.
Fairfax
8
4
Aua
Lincolnia
Aug.
Aug
Lower Potomac
McLean
Aug
Mt. Vernon
Aug
Pohick
Aug.
Rose Hill
Aug
25
Aua
29
Au a.
7
6
2
1
4
1
1
2
13
27
41
3
9
1
7
1
4
5
18
1
4
2
7
13
1
21
75
47
27
136
19
8
3
136
166
466
403_
35
5
4
31
1.8
5
58
189
21
2
1
1
2
7
Springfield
389
2
154
574
Upper Potomac
Vienna
138
421
4
65
25
1
41
1
27
3
5
3
36
25
369
32
1 066
114
1 176
576
243
28
232
343
212
816
7300
Ttl
1
184
54
3S
36
40
Sept.
Annandale
Sept
Baileys
Scot.
Bull Run
39
Sept
Fairfax
14
Sept
Lincolnia
1
8
75
1
17
23
1
41
114
18
19
68
3$
Sept.
Lower Potomac
29
Sept.
McLean
40
Sept.
Mt. Vernon
41
Sept
Penick
42
Sept.
Rose Hill
5
43
Sept.
Springfield
1
44
Sept.
Upper Potomac
45
Sept.
Vienna
Sept
Total
33
34
1
20
1
1
1
IS
24
1
72
2
7
4
149
8
162
577
2
51
11
2
64
161
3
4
2
1
7
25
5
5
18
16
182
8
192
51
18
4
1
8
1
3
32
771
14
5
38
7
2
372
1.122
63
4
1
4
493
13
509
1,644
18
5
25
89
696
53
836
2 709
46
•
1
32
32
33
7
in
Annandale
Aug
Ag
Total Units
Outstanding
2
II
55
Aua
31
12
4
9
July Total 1
Prior to 1972
PERMIT ILSUE
1974
1975
2
10
22
1975
ACCORDING TO DATE •
1972
1973
83
HI-20
BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY
By Month, Year and Planning District
Page 4 of 4
Fairfax County, Virginia
Construction Activity Report 14A/Januarv,1 925
ST LL OUTSTAND NG AS OF APRIL 1
UN
Planni • District
Month
UNITS AUTHORIZED
1974
1973
1972
672
1975
Prior to 1972
1972
1974
1973
_
9
Oct
Annandale
Oct
Baileys
Oct
_Bull RIKI
1
Oct
F Wax
12
Oct
Jefferson
Oct
Linoolnia
Oct
Lower Potomac
184
4
•
McLean
151
22
1
•
Oct.
Mt
3
11
8
10
Oct.
Pohidc
870
16
7
11
Oct
Rose Hill
49
13
Oct
Springfield
56
13
Oct
Upper Potomac
45
166
15
20
18
136
Oct
Vienna
81
33
7
2
3
20
2 135
266
831 I
28
189
9
2
•
14
O ct
Vernon
Total
470
1975
3
1
1
E.uiv
Po.
Outstanding Outstandin
A.r 1 1975 A
1 1975 2
15
46
'
470
470
1 020
'
2
7
'
316
691
4
5
15
314
2—
Total Units
6
2
10
9
1975
ACCORDING TO DATE OF PERMIT ISSUE
6
1
Published May, 1975/Serie111110
1
2
1
2
1fi2
1
1
'
16
1
1114
20
soa
2
70
°
1
6
7
14
50
•
211
9
6
228
659
■0
13
46
"
15
189
579
‘
7
32
108
,4
827
1,488
3 800
"
9
187
528
,•
13
IV
551
IS
Nov.
Annandale
It
Nov
Bull Run
22
Nov
Fairfax
12
21
Nov
Jefferson
86
22
Nov
23
Nov
24
Nov.
Mclean
2$
Nov
Mt- Vernon
22
Nov.
Pahick
22
Nov.
Rose Hill
2
Nov
Upper Potomac
89
645
6
2
Nov
Vienna
27
4
3
1
898
1,081
276
6
176
1
2
1
1
1
5
1
1
69
4"
3
11
s•
69
190
o.
1
4
23
24
22
1
27
383
13
3
4
231
94
37
13
3
1
364
13
380
882
1
230
231
50
21
13
36
1
10
1
1
1
7
601
5
618
2,010
25
4
3
B
28
2°
994
274
1,535
4 290
30
31
Nov Total
261
3
Dec.
Annandale
3
Dec.
Baileys
IS
Dec
El II Run
35
Dec..
Fairfax
Dec
Jefferson
Dec
Lower Potomac
Dec.
McLean
4
Dec.
Mt
41
Dec.
Pohick
Dec.
Rose Hill
Dec.
Upper Potomac
Dec.
Vienna
•
•
•
•
'
32
3
'
Vernon
1
90
4
5
15
115
322
00
224
1
169
11
3
109
6
299
1
1
2
6
2
300
652
•
2
3
11
'
1
3
11
1
10
36
•
72
1.
1
8
8
1
3
71
341
5
6
1
341
5
353
783
.0
106
9
6
5
59
5
6
75
217
•■
1
1
2
7
.
67
37
153
2
259
787
•
9
27
82
1
1
557
164
2
54
2
9
6
18
'
••
45
1,195
Dec.Total
382
32
698
615
123
32
1,152
2,921
••
47
48
TOTAL COUNTY
15.613
10.305
5,329
530
571
Source:
UDIS Building Permit File, April 1, 1975
Notes:
1
Close comparisons of Report CA-14A with
Report CA-11 will reveal discrepancies as to
.i_
•
be expected since CA-11 reflects all adjustments which have been made since that time.
Adjustments include cancellations, expired
permits, renewals, re-issues, and other
modi Ii ca tions .
1-237
6-7.01
4.113
530
14.522
9
0
4& 036
'
2
Conversions from housing units to committed
population involved the following average
Famil y, 3.56; Townhouse, 2.75; Apartment, 2.17.
s.
•
illit
BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY
Summarized. by Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginia
ortetruetton Activity Report 148/Januarv.,1975
Plannina District
UNITS STILL OUTSTANDING AS OF ARIL 1. 1975
ACCORDING TO DATE OF PERMIT ISSUE
UNITS AUTHORIZED
1973
1974
1972
Annandale
1975
Prior to 1972
2.022
270
24
63
4
271
6
942
1
2
Bull Run
256
436
85
12
5
Fairfax
307
486
378
10
8
8
303
Jefferson
825
210
Lincolnla
9
1
1
588
134
10
McLean.
1,714
L338
174
17
Mt, Vernon
1,219
1,123
1,328
11
Pollick
3,437
1,177
316
68
Rose Hill
228
283
25
Springfield
717
121
3,406
711
Baileys
Lower Ibtomac
UMW Potomac
Vienna
•
Published May, 1975/Series #7
3
1972
1973
222_
1974
81
2
Total Units
Poo
1975
21
63
391
1 138
042
1
947
2,045
3
143
65
12
228
670
16_
78
142
485
NO
8
809
I 890
3
8
577
1 322
1
2
Ectuiv
Outstandinc. Outstanclinp
Aor.1,1975 Aor.1, 1975 2
206
110
22
27
26
81
21
2
244
4,319
1
4
5
2
323
905
L 134
130
17
1 330
3 506
531
1,239
11
1,888
4,535
430
586
258
68
1,363
4,476
7
31
249
22
2
311
1,107
10
21
178
45
215
10
469
1 228
1,542
36
135
557
3,035
1,344
36
5 107
14 948
354
250
292
22
76
160
228
292
778
2,243
10.305
5.329
530
571
1,907
6, 701
4 , 813
530
14 522
40 , 036
- •
TOTAL COUNTY 1
Si
15.613
Source:
UDIS Building Permit File, April I, 1975
Notes:
Close comparisons of Report CA-14B with
Report CA-11 will reveal discrepancies as to the
total units authorized annually. This is to be
expected since CA-11 reflects oll adjustments
which have been made since that time. Adjustments include cancellation, expired permits
renewals, re-issues, and other isoclines:Hons.
2 Conversions from housing units to committed
population involved the following average
household size contribution factors: Single
Family, 3.56; Townhouse, 2.75; Apartment, 2.17.
■
,
1
1.4
35
2.7
1
1
fa
20
._
36
as
44
,
•
so
111-22
\
IV, POPULATION
SECTION IV
POPULATION
Population Reports 1A, 1B and 1C/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series #7
HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION
Fairfax County's population holding capacity as of January, 1975, is
approximately 555,000. Population holding capacity is the equivalent of
the number of persons that would reside in the dwelling unit inventory provided there were no vacancies and all new units were occupied by an
average size household shortly after entering the market. Over 77 percent
of this population capacity is in individually owned units; nineteen percent
in rental project housing units. The remaining three percent of the population holding capacity is associated with mobile homes, group quarters,
e.g., convalescent homes, etc. and on military bases.
The distribution of the County's population holding capacity among
the eight supervisor districts appears in the following chart.
Population Holding Capacity by Supervisor District
Fairfax County, Virginia
January, 1975
90,000
85,000
80,000
75,000
70,000
65,000
60,00
55,000
50,000
The Board of Supervisors, on January 4, 1975, acted to eliminate the
disproportion among the eight Supervisor Districts. On that date the Board
approved a reapportionment plan to become effective as of January 1, 1976.
(The Summary in Report DU-6 illustrates the effect of the new apportionment
plan on the distribution of the January, 1975, dwelling unit inventory and
population holding capacity.)
s wwwww•••=2 ere.=••=ma 3 ammism•••••,4
ITS 2'
HOUSING
ervisor
ct
Ownership
Code
Published May, 1975/ Series #7
w HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION
Summarized by Supervisor District 1
Fairfax County, Virginia
opulation Report 1A/Jcmuary,1975
Rental Project
Housin
Housin
Mobile
Homes
Group Otrs.
& Milita
5
a=n=e=a
3
aalsna 7 aiSli ■•• a•■••■=s 9 awrogzc=30
POPULATION
Housin
Rental Project
Ownership
• Total
Unit
Housin
Housin
TOTXI.71
w
Mobile
Homes
Group Ohl.
& Milita
TOTAL
HOUSING
POPULATN
UNITS
Si,ru19
28 191
8.163
139
68-835
70_ 929
19.440
53.023
10,774
108
63.905
19 440
20-008
48 167
1 L708
4-577
67.707
20 008
20.807
36.716
22.501
217
59.434
20.807
10
19.789
43 152
13.336
86
58.492
19 789
12
23,108
43.377
24.161
164
67 702
23 108
14
20.697
65 396
4.184
6.978
77.247
20.69
10
1L478
70.979
60.533
4.456
cent...Alla 3
01
23 052
Ekonesvilln 4
02
17 609
1-370
2
92,149
78 973
500
1
343
713.191
4 , 639
1 305
3
5
Annandale
14.984
03
7
Lee
04
14,487
4.542
55
Mason
05
10.867
9.940
15
Mount Vernon
06
12.896
6.158
979
2.555
9
735
1.918
13
S.
Providence
07
13,373
9.735
Springfield 5
oa
18,746
1„687
764
689
if
19
TOTAL COUNTY (Includlna
44,477
126,014
Town, listed below).
2,478
172,969
106,305
430,037
6,467
12,662
555,471
172,969
20
21
22
21
24
15
I
67
1,866
Town of Cliftan 10
Town of Herndon 12
Town of Vienna
13
1,153
67
239
239
67
3,019
5,935
3,043
6
8,984
3,019
27
1.256
113
16,619
4,717
1O
4.299
119
25,842
7,803
30
4 215
502
4.717
15.250
d UR
1 655
_7 803
21,124
29
,
TOTA1 TOWNS
Source: UDIS Parcel File, January, 1975
Notes:
1
2
3
4
5
6
The term "Supervisor Dist ict" reflects the current Supervisor Districts as
determined by the 1971 apportionment plan. The boundaries for the
present Supervisor Districts will remain in effect through December 31,
1975, after which these Districts will be apportioned according to the
plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors on January 4, 1975. The
summary in Report DU-6 illustrates the effect of both the current and
the newly adopted apportionment plan on the distribution of the
January, 1975, dwelling unit inventory and population holding capacity.
Dwelling units in this report include some units under construction.
Such units are sufficiently near completion to warrant their inclusion
in the dwelling unit inventory. Figures exclude housing located on
Federal property.
Includes Town of Vienna
Includes Town of Hemdon
Includes Town of Clifton
In this report "population" refers to the population holding capacity
which is distinct from population In that the second term indicates
what the current housing inventory could hold were there no vacancies and all new units were occupied shortly after entering
the market, whereas population refers to the actual number of
persons in the County.
7
The factors used to relate housing unit counts to the population
holding capacity appear in Appendix G. The weighted countywide average housing-to-population conversion factors are :
Housing Type
Average Household Size
Single Family Detached
Duplex
Multiplex
Townhouse
Garden Apartment
Elevator Apartment
Mobile Home
3.57
3.22
2.42
2.81
2.50
1.52
2.61
Countywide Average
3.14
42
41
44
45
40
,
•
IV-2
Population Reports 1A, 1B and 1C/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Mount Vernon Planning District, with approximately 16 percent of the
January, 1975, population holding capacity, is the most populous planning
district. Of the 6,500 persons that may be housed in mobile homes, 4,500
are located in Mount Vernon District. Baileys District has the highest percent of its population holding capacity among rental project units while
almost 100 percent of the population holding capacity in the Pohick District
is among individually owned units.
Population Holding Capacity by Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginia
January, 1975
Population
Holding Capacity
\
90,000—
80,000--
70,000--
60,000 --
50,000 —
40,000--
30,000--
20,000--
10,000—
IV-3
•
Population Report 1B/January,1975
Published May,1975/Series fy
HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION
Summarized by Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginia
S
HOUSING UNITS
Plannina
District
Code
A z C.
Anna,,dole
3
Bull Rn
,q
1
TOTAL
-TOTAL
Mobile
Homes
5,048
7 519
5,1112_
D3
6.391"
2
Jefferson I
E I. ,
8,477 .?.
5 174
Lincolnia I
FVG
1.486
Lower Potomac q
G C•C
1 6316.1
H 4-0
14.138"
I I L.
17.769 .'1
J g• Z----
11,071.s
3
45
38,171
K 2 • 1-
6,252' 3.
555
20
23 526
2-
HOUSING
RM.
C 4 I
Fairfax
10
B
I
Baileys
Ownership Rental Pro'ec
Housing
Housing
PO
•
10
11
11
12
,I
13
13
14
10
23
15
2-
McLean
17
17
Mount Vernon 4
19
20
19
Pohick
3
'41 11,0
20
21
22
21
Rose Hill
q
'5
11: 6 7
23
24
22
23
Springfield
2 q
L /3
8,486. 4
9
1.676
34,266 3
1?-
10,162
2•
25
26
Upper Potomac 33
M 1°.7-
11.519
Vienna 4 2"
N 3' 1
11,11e
20
7
• 'A
17
2,393
13,512
39,457
280
5,969
45,706
13 12
2•
24
30
30
32
TOTAL COUNTY (includino
32
Towns listed below): 5 3
31
126,014
44,477
172,969
430,037
106,305
6,467
12,662
555,471
z-
69
13
32
Is
34
35
36
3?
Town of Clifton
J
67
67
239
239
67
1; 019
717
Town of Herndon M
1,866
1,153
3,019
5,935
3.043
6
8,984
Town of Vienna
4 215
562
4,717
15,250
1,256
113
16,619
6,148
1,655
7,803
21,424
4,299
119
25,842
N
SS
.3
• 1
TOTAL TOWNS
7,803
• 11
49
SO
51
52
53
54
Source:
UDIS Parcel File, January, 1975
Notes:
1 Dwelling units in this report include some units
under construction. Such units are sufficiently
near completion to warrant their inclusion in
the dwelling unit inventory. Figures exclude
housing located on Federal property.
2 Includes Town of Clifton
3 Includes Town of Herndon
4 Includes Town of Vienna
5 In this report "population" refers to the population holding capacity which is distinct from
population in that the second term indicates
what the current housina inventory could hold
were there no vacancies and all new units
were occupied shortly after entethig_the market, whereas.population refers to the actual
number of persons in the County.
,
4/.2.,
44
6 The factors used to relate housing unit counts
to the population holding capacity appear in
Appendix G. The weighted countywide
average housing-to-population conversion
factors are:
Average
Housing Type
Household Size
Single Fam. Det.
Duplex
Multiplex
Townhouse
Garden Apartment
Elevator Apartment
Mobile Home
3.57
3.22
2.42
2.81
2.50
1.52
2.61
Countywide Average
3.14
• 7
••
49
53
54
AT
•/(
IV-4
Population Reports 1A, 1B and 1C/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 07
The sewersheds combining to make up the Blue Plains Treatment Plant
Service Area have a total population holding capacity of 130,000 persons
or about 23 percent of the County total. The Lower Potomac Treatment Plant
Service Area with 28 percent of the population holding capacity, is the
largest. The following chart illustrates the distribution of the County's total
population holding capacity according to Treatment Plant Service Area.
Population
Holding Capacity
Population Holding Capacity of Fairfax County
by Treatment Plant Service Area
January, 1975
160,000 —
150,000 —
140,000 —
130,000 —
120,000—
110,000—
100,000
70,000 —
60,000 —
50,000 —
40,000—
30,000
20,000—,
10,000
0
IV-5
Mi ddle Cu bRun
80,000 —
Cli fto n (Popes HeadCreekWate rshed)
90,000 —
•
i
.
-
1
3
HOUSING
ewershed
Code
Published May, 1975/Series /1 7
HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION
Summarized by Sewershed
Fairfax County, Virginia
Population Report 1C/Januarv.1975
Ownership
Housing_
'
Horsepen Creek
A-1
389
3
Horsepen Creek E Branch
A-2
247
Horsepen Creek F.Branch
A-3
377
•
Sin:Kirland Run
B-1
589
Rental Proiec
Housing_
Mobile
Homes
UNITS
7
1
Group Otrs
& Milita
'
POPULATION
Total
Housing Uniti
180
250
Ownership
Housing
389
1.360
427
733
377
1,156
839
1,911
Rental Projec
Housing
Z,.3
Mobile
Homes
"
11
TOTAL
TOTAL
Group Qtrs.
& Military
PO PULATN
475
630
HOUSING
UNITS
1 360
389
1,208
427
1 , 156
377
2 541
839
'
Sugarland Run
8-2
259
259
890
890
259
°
Suclarland Run
8-3
98
98
338
338
98
•
Sugarland Run
8-4
3
3
10
10
3
•
,garland Run
8-5
1,688
2,661
5,387
7,961
2,661
5.
Nichols Run
C-1
225
783
225
'"
Pond Branch
C-2
392
" .ziLiirs
t Rn
D-1
1 053
'
Colvin Run
D-2
2 460
'
Difficult Run
D-3
E-1
" Scotts Run
973
2,568
225
783
395
1,406
1 053
3,798
2,159
4,619
7,843
5 , 230
11,344
1,333
12,677
39,824
1,904
1,517
3,421
6,176
254
254
928
1,922
6,840
'
Bull Neck Run
E-2
"
Dead Run
F
1,922
3
6
1,414
395
3 798
1.053
6
13,079
4,619
3,358
162
43,344
12,677
3 , 793
7
9,976
3,421
8
928
254
25
6 , 865
1,922
96
29 , 729
9 , 173
3.055
1,044
G-1
7.512
1,661
9,173
25,514
4.119
"
Little Pimmit
0-2
747
227
1.1144
2 ._604
451
5.5
Turkey Run
G-3
147
147
535
535
147
26
Strohman Run
G-4
319
319
1,168
1,168
319
5
' Pimmit
" Four Mile Run
H
1 416
4.603
6.019
4,546
9,513
18
14,077
6,019
13 398
7,561
20,959
44.503
18.499
418
63 420
20 959
3 725
1,144
115
69,441
22,528
270
74
9
11,195
4 041
22
Cameron
1-1
'
Cameron
1-2
1.143
1
" Common
1-3
15 799
6 639
" Cam s• •
90
70
4,749
13,878
27,991
10,185
3.935
66
42.177
13.878
7.677
3.287
303
20
24,873
7,677
3,565
21.263
7,093
3,036
418
50
10,597
3,565
6.967
18-552
5,567
39-930
19,975
17.2213_
29
57 257
19,975
18 552
1 , 290
7,025
20,520
3,267
23,787
7,025
" Little Hunting Creek
K
8,424
3,946
1,508
" Doque Creek
L
6,282
1,279
116
M-1
2,181
1,224
160
ANccotink Creek M-2
11.585
22
AccotinkCreek
ccotink Creek
41111Accotink Creek
M-3
5,567
M-4
5,735
" Accotink Creek
M-5
623
623
2 166
'' Long Branch
M-6
1,557
1.557
5.348
Fort Belvoir
M-7
25
223
91
. Fort Belvoir
M-8
11
11
39
1a,A22
34,278
309
1,103
468
1,644
486
1.237
1.117
3.660
309
1.085
125
445
551
164
55
3
" EqIiick
3
• Kane
'' Mill Branch
a
•o 0
.' lip
. es Head Creek
N
198
10.122
309
10
P
460
8
0-1
486
0-1
R
104
1,013
''
Little Rocky
S-1
306
62
Johnny Moore
S-2
125
."
Cub Run
T-1
50
235
6,637
2,074
Belle Haven
3
14,500
74
74
1.967
6
3.722
54 591
4-0A1
1-4
J-3
•
1,144
22 528
3
1
500
5,567
2,166
623
9
5.357
1.557
600
223
9,390
9,429
11
27
32
34,337
10,112
1,103
309
21
2,061
3,726
468
509
271
8
3
1.737
486
13
3 944
1 117
130
1,223
309
1,305
445
125
1,472
551
1 032
" rub Run
T-2
1.032
L1132
3-477
_3..477
" Cub Run
T-3
1,488
1,485
4,801
4,801
1,488
' Cub Run
T-4
1,987
151
2,138
7,231
374
7,605
2,138
" Cub Run
1-5
730
148
878
1,875
391
-____2_, 266
878
Bull Run
1-6
38
38
128
'° Cub Run
1-7
152
1
153
520
126.014
44.477
4°
S4 TOTAL COUNTY
2.478
3
172969
6.467
12-662
,
128
38
523
153
555-47]
172.969
•
5.
Source: UD1S Parcel File, January, 1975
Notes:
•
(7
1 Dwelling units in this report include some units
under construction. Such units are sufficiently
near completion to warrant their inclusion in
the dwelling unit inventory. Figures exclude
housing located on Federal property.
2 In this report "population" refers to the population holding capacity which is distinct from
population in that the second term indicates
what the current housing inventory cculd hold
were there no vacancies and all new units
were occupied shortly after entering the market, whereas population refers to the actual
number of persons in the County.
3 The factors used to relate housing unit counts
to the population holding capacity appear in
Appendix G. The weighted countywide
overage housing-to-population conversion
factors are:
Average
Household Size
Housing Type
Single Pam. Des.
Duplex
Multiplex
Townhouse
Garden Apartment
Elevator Apartment
Mobile Home
3.57
3.22
2.42
2.81
2.50
1.52
2.61
Countywide Average
3.14
IV-6
Population Report 2/January, 1975
Published May, I975/Series #7
COMPONENTS OF FUTURE POPULATION
The January, 1975, dwelling unit inventory is approximately 173,000
units. This number would increase to about 187,000 dwelling units if the
14,000 units now under construction or authorized by building permits are
completed and enter the housing market. This could equate to an increase
to the current population holding capacity of approximately 32,000 persons.
The eventual completion of "Anticipated Growth" units (now at site
plan stage) would increase the County's population holding capacity by
about 120,000 persons. Thus, the present population holding capacity plus
"Committed Growth" of some 32,000 persons and "Anticipated Growth" of
some 120,000 persons could result in a future population holding capacity of
nearly 708,000 persons.
The reader should note, however, that it is unlikely that all the
subdivision plats and site plans now under review or approved will be fully
developed as residential communities. Market considerations are likely to
exert a negative influence on a number of projects currently at the subdivision plat stage.
The potential effects of committed and anticipated growth on the
gopulation holding capacity are summarized below.
Components of Future Population Holding Capacity
Current Population Holding Capacity
Plus Committed Growth Plus Anticipated Growth
Fairfax County, Virginia
Component of
Future Population
Current Population Holding Capacity 1
Committed Growth
(CL-8, CL-9) 2
Anticipated Groyth
(CL-6, CL-7)
Total County Population Holding Capacity
(current plus committed plus anticipated) 4
Population
555,471
32,223
120,017
707,711
Source: UDIS Parcel File,: January, 1975
UDIS Residential Builder Plans File, April, 1975
Notes: 1 Population holding capacity refers to the number of persons
the dwelling unit inventory could accomodate provided
there were no vacancies and all new units were occupied
by an average size household shortly after entering the market.
Data as of April, 1975. Committed growth includes dwelling
units under construction and all other outstanding building
permits. Adjusted to reflect nearly 2,800 units (population
equivalent approximately 7,900 persons) which are sufficiently
near completion to be included in current population holding
capacity.
3 Data as of April, 1975. Anticipated growth includes site
plans and subdivision plats which are either approved or
under review.
4 See Appendix A for Method, Assumptions and Limitations in
measuring committed and anticipated growth.
IV-7
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Population Report 3/January, 1975
POPULATION AND HOUSING UNITS
Report P-3 shows population and dwelling unit estimates from the time
of the 1970 Census through January 1, 1978. The projections for 1975 - 1978
are based on an analysis of all known restraints, including sewer moratoria
and general economic conditions.
Date
April 1, 1970
1, 1973
January 1,
January 1, 1974
January 1, 1975
July 1, 1975
January 1, 1976
July 1, 1976
January 1, 1977
July 1, 1977
January 1, 1978
Estimated Fairfax County Population 1 and
Number of Dwelling Units
1970 - 1978
Population Holding
Dwelling Units
Capacity
130,817
155,460
165,400
173,000
175,500 5
178,000 5
180,500 5
183,000 5
185,500 5
188,000 5
455,021 2
523,000
540,000 4
555,500 6
;.3
'''42)
53-4-' 26'61‘) 1 5
564,000 6 (9 ')-, tlu.
572,000 6 6 6(" 3) 1 1‘
-1
, r.q
580,000 6 (-5-64),
6 /c.2001
588,000 6
595,000 6 (,.53-Ci ll "
( 52 '3,
° 41
603,0006 (
1--?-1
1970: Actual Population
1973-1978: Population Holding Capacity (assumes no dwell ing
are vacant)
2 1970 United States Census of Population and Housing
3 Reflects an estimated average household size of 3.3 persons per unit (when
group quarters is excluded from population holding capacity) interpolated
between the 1970 average household size of 3.5 and 1974 average household size of 3.14.
4 Reflects an average household size of 3.17
5 Reflects an average monthly completion of 400 units
6 Reflects an average household size of 3.14 persons per unit
83, 1°Q11 5
L'47D
Published May, 1975/Series #7
Population Report 3/January, 1975
Each population estimate is lower than earlier estimates issued by the
County due to the use of lower and more precise housing-to-population conversion factors as well as a projected slowing of the completion rate over
the next three years. The former household sizes (which had been in general
use in Fairfax County since the 1968 Council of Governments Home Interview
Survey) compare with the revised factors, on a countywide basis, as shown
below:
Comparison of Housing-to-Population
Conversion Factors
Housing Type
Former Average
Household Size
Revised Countywide
Average Household Size
Percent Change
- 3.5
-13.0
-10.5
Single Famil
Duplex
Multiplex
Townhouse
Garden Apartment
Elevator Apartment
Mobile Home
3.7
3.5
3.0
1.8
2.9
3.57
3.22
2.42
2.81
2.50
1.52
2.61
Countywide
3.5
3.14
-19.7
-16.7
-15.6
-10.0
The revised factors are the result of a statistical analysis of the 1974 Fairfax
County School Census Survey. The analysis determined appropriate housing-topopulation conversion factors for each of seven types of housing unit construction in ten areas of the County.
Generally poor economic conditions have been a second influence acting
to reduce the housing and population estimates for 1976 - 1978. The current
construction slowdown has reduced the completion rate and market absorption of new units to significantly below what earlier had been expected.
It should be emphasized that there is relatively uncertain basis at this
time for the assumptions (footnoted in the table) regarding future rates of
housing completions. The primary justification for the indicated increase
in the housing inventory is that some building permits remain outstanding,
and it is reasonable to expect developers to complete those units as economic
and market conditions permit.
IV-9
...
. •:
...
...
;
...
..
..
011 11 114 Ii,
.....
I
!
!
i••!
!
!
• ':
!
*:
I-I
•: !
r
•
.•
i•
•
!
• .• • ..
. .
•
•:
.
::!••
C.:
f.!••
:::::
!•
•
...
...
...
...
Hi
I
ty.
UIIII I I
:.%•.
:***:
2•
:::•.
....... .
...............
. .....
• •
•
•
.
•• •
..
....
.1"
..
..
....
. ..
...... .......
• :: .. .. .
.
•••••••,, ........
-
.'•
.
..
• ......................
7.:
:
• • f•
.•..•
. :***:
E:::
..
...
•.
::
.......
'
::••••
V. LAND USE
SECTION V
LAND USE
Land Use Report 1/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
ACRES OF LAND BY ZONING CLASS
Of the 257,000 acres (402 square miles) in Fairfax County approximately 239,000 acres are zoned predominantly in the classifications
appearing in this report. The remaining 17,600 acres are in roads,
water and other areas not zoned.
There are 4,800 acres zoned for industrial use. Springfield District
has over 1,500 acres zoned for industrial use. About 1,000 acres in
Upper Potomac are zoned industrial. Commercial zonings total nearly
4,200 acres of which 1,100 acres are classified as C-D. Together land
zoned for industrial use and land zoned for commercial use total about
8,950 acres or four percent of all zoned land.
Land zoned residential totals about 222,000 acres or approximately
94 percent of the County's zoned land. Nearly 204,000 acres are zoned
for single family dwellings of which 157,000 acres are zoned either RE-1
or RE-2. Almost 1,900 acres are zoned for townhouses and 2,200 acres
are designated for apartments.
v-1
•
Land Use Report 1/Jantrary, 1975
ACRES OF LAND BY ZONING CLASS
Summarized by Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginia
Lower
.
Zone
Code
Zone Class
'
CLF
Clifton
'
HEN
Herndon
'
•
VIE
010
Vienna
RPC
'
020
PDH
•
030
RM-1
'
040
PAD
•
050
RM-2
•
060
BM-2G
'•
070
RM-2H
"
080
RM-2M
"
100
RM-3
110
"
111
81-10
RI-5
'
112
RTC-10
'•
113
RTC-5
116
8-5
118
00-6
"
120
11-10
"
140
8-12.5
"
141
"
160
"
Annandale
'
A
Bull Run
Bailey
Fzirfzo
D
C
Jefferson
E
15
123
189
202
29
87
14
46
35
6
119
49
55
44
154
1
91
30
27
15
187
3
9
4
55
46
27
41
a
35
1.255
778
211
144
6
136
692
1,557
16
205
270
77
1.038
101
250
7.607
548
RE-1
'
201
RE-1-C
149
'• 220
8E-2
80-2-C
1.084
120
25.952
808
384
50
1.929
263
8-A
"
250
C-0
29
28
10
's
260
C-CL
17
9
1
2
' s 241._,0
25
C-DM
335
PDC
11
108
90
70
9
16
4
10
130
19
Predom, Comm,
' s 350
I-I
" 370
I-S
2
" 390
I-P
31
•• 410
I-L
49
1115
3
1.144
1
14 308
115
67
25
156
1
2.594
1.1
2,391
2,301
1.0
100
3.553
1,458
1,5
.6
15
15
172
153
.1
77
1.219
22
3
21
5
•
24
812
.3
'
114
.0
102
.0
8;110
19
29
70
3
34
9
118
13
22
525
2
171
124
2
57
73
10
159
187
841
.1
.4
13
311
.1
(570
14
0
'
28
3
64
•• 450
Predorn. Ind.
341
.. 470
PL
362
527
433
38
4,865
2.0
'
481
2,707
1,246
156
680
17,170
7.2
.
22
72
1,099
370
44
275
19
3 255
1.4
'.
1,242
1,281
190
241
5
157
5,513
2.3
22
11
346
284
3 704
1.3
"
523
77
184
317
9 201
1 337
17,496
4,810
129,434
54.1
'
389
319
1 111
'
16,296
632
2854
.
5
11.8
283
10
1.145
681
341
_2.709
271
561
214
7,735
403
42,226
_2_
3826
(4.229
181
172
20
13
72
4
7
19
55
77
918
104
327
423
2 921
54
58
32
482
14
41
14
10
1
10
3
1
2
11
3
12
3
17
141
28
80
15
1
29
139
9
16
14
132
'
"
8 682
192
205
.1
"
188
.1
6
76
.0
6
190
.1
27
1 135
3
144
.5
0
469
1
.'
'•
105
199
11
56
18
1
50
17
14
26
8
16
233
.1
"
7
69
154
47
69
179
19
66
1 019
4
••
105
.0
IL
231
153
54
16
49
312
6
55
134
1
5
169
153
15
13
116
89
15
560
153
30
26
132
5
53
7
10
1,071
861
4
73
.0
"
0
.4
"
19
288
70
204
51
85
1,016-
449
470
46
20
111
1 523
6
339
74
765
,3
"
.7
54
33
143
261
30
1,339
.6
"
24
91
269
20
45
2 902
1.2
•°
140
5
'.
.•
23
1
24
6
2
110
8
144
78
144
38
3.6
.1
9
40
74
3,715
1
a
5
346
35
1,941
5
61
"
906
2
7
"
3,104
1
27
1
16
961
19
7
165
'
'
3
288
482
'
1,760
219
1
207
PERCENTAGE
9
98
96
' s 340
.. TOTAL COUNTY
47
13
246
"
25
2
Percentoge
Total
A cres
Vienno
N
14
8-17
C-D
2.979
214
R -12.5C
330
574
354
694
6
200
"
13
5
"
22
6
142
116
C-0M11
C-N
Poenmoc
M
83
82
s.
'. 300
" 310
I.
45
9
42
181
.' 290
353
175
1 760
C-G
102
8
"
270
16
55
1.528
Predom, Res, Cluster
39
157
459
17
Predom. Res.
Springfield
172
644
1,040
240
Rose Hill
K
Pohl&
J
114
5
245
Vernon
I
H
1531
RE-0.5
RE-0.5-C
.•
15
1.560
38
180
M oleon
2.594
351
8-17-C
Unn
ount
Fgtnnrgc
G
156
3.003
259
161
4111221
Linooinio
F
Published May,1975/Series
1 '4
Se
1 0.145
3,495
30,841
12.011
4.2
1 4
12 9
50
5,011
2....L_
1 741
07
74 090
18.1___
16 963
11 996
48 617
8 358
9 184
45 849
II 132
229 403
71
5.0
20 3
35
38
19 2
47
100 0
1090
'
Source: UDIS Parcel File, January, 1975
Notes: 1 Fyne; nal descriptions of zoning close codes
appear in Appendix B.
1 Figure may not odd due to rounding.
3 The balance of the County's 257,000 acres
one in roods, water and other areas not zoned.
4 A new zoning ordinance hos been adopted to
become effective in 1976 on revision of the
zoning maps. At thot time, the zoning classifications appearing in this report will change to
correspond with those in the new ordinance.
V-2
Land Use Reports 2A and 2B/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 47
ACRES OF VACANT OR UNDERUTILIZED LAND BY ZONING CLASS
•
As of January, 1975, over 122,008 acres (51%) of land in Fairfax
County were classified as "underutilized". The majority of this--some
94,000 acres--was entirely vacant. The remaining 28,000 acres is
partly improved but has potential for further development as determined
by a complex criterion developed by the Office of Comprehensive Planning
in March, 1974.
Basically, the criterion considers a parcel to have a development
potential if:
The land parcel has an appraised improvement of less than $6,500;
and there are no site plans or subdivision plans filed on the parcel
Or the parcel has in excess of six acres and a single family dwelling
where the appraised improvement value of the parcel is less than
three times the appraised land value.
Eighty percent of such "underutilized" land is zoned RE-1 or RE-2.
The following charts illustrate the distribution of vacant and "underutilized"
land according to Planning District.
•
•
V-3
Published May, 1975/Series #7
Land Use Report 2A/January, 1975
Acres of Vacant Land
By Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginia
January, 1975
Acres
50,000 —
47,500-45,000h42,500-40,000 -37,500 -35,000
32,500
30,000
27,500
25,000
22,500
20,000
17,500
15,000
12,500
10,00
7,500
C
0
5,000
2,500
.
_
0
C
ra)
-5
tp
C
in
,...•
LI-
1
4
0-
C
0
c..)
V-4
Land Use Report 2B/January,1975
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Acres of Underutilized Land 1
By Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginia
January, 1975
Acres
50,000
47,500
45,0
42,5
40,000
37,500
35,000
32,500
30,000
27,500
25,000
22,500
20,000
17,500
15,000
12,500
10,000
7,500
13
-o
5,000
2,500
c
<c°
c
o
E
✓
>
-...:
0
1 -Includes all the 94,000 vacant acres summarized in the chart on
•
V-5
the previous page, plus approximately 28,000 acres which are
partly improved but have further development potential.
-o
li
47_
a)
c
o
c
E
&
5
:-..,
ACRES OF VACANT LANu or LONING CLASS
Summarized by Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginio
Land Use Report 2P/January, 1975
Published May,1975/Series
...
Annandale
Bailey.
J e fferson
Zone
Code
Zone Class
CIF
Clifton
HEN
Herndon
VIE
010
Vienna
RPC
020
PDH
030
EM-I
040
PAD
050
RM-2
4
18
__059
RM-2G
1
3
17
070
RM-2H
I
1
080
RM-2M
10
•
1•
110
RI-10
111
81-5
117
RTC-10
113
RTC-5
116
118
R-5
120
R-10
1•
IT
IS
140
2•
41
10
1
4
35
15
1.0
15
.0
34
16
86
94
.1
.1
9
105
42
52
7
16
215
1 233
83
311
391
2
11
1
2
20
12
10
92
8
6
8
41
3
20
3
31
16
5
28
6
26
32
51
22
1
194
8
279
2
248
201
RE-0 5
347
Stifl
8E-0 5-C
RF - 1
201
RE-1-C
33
79
393
71
58
2
238
179
101
8
I
4
3
4
186
4
56
8
1
26
6
307
3
4
12 105
155
2 837
1,422
125
162
5
299
.3
'
3
253
.3
'
.0
,
3,309
506
Res
1,338
61
Predorn
545
Predom,Res.Cls
246
R-A
250
C-0
8
15
260
261
C-OL
C-OH
9
4
310
C-N
3
3
3
330
C-D
11
16
16
335
PDC
Predom Comm
350
I-1
370
I-S
I-P
2
4
3
5
7
54
• 5
410
I-L
19
4111
1-0
61
42
3
4
61
1
40
3
57,112
16
186
295
12,817
464
22
2,863
7
5
23,747
2,628
1,650
8,021
1
685
68
97
697
255
51
2 176
694
2
3
2
I
4
11
9
21
95
7
103
7
4
40
II
3
45
35
4
4
21
3
8
5
1
5
ii
31
15
50
42
1
140
42
47
5
4
8
I
114
19
74
4
6
107
35
5
201
21
28
1 4,499
4,142
1.V80
15.4
4.4
1.1
5.01
6
49
109
5.8
.0
9
as
.1
31
.0
6
6
115
.1
341
83
.1
93
.1
6
69
.1
17
13
235
5
7
45
381
68
.1
13
151
5
70
27
18
533
.0
.6
377
1
1
19E
60
821
347
.4
11
247
7
800
.8
53
32
24,
5
5,481
75
I
13.6
165
28
1
3
1
5
11
13
79
23
1
60.5
164
48
1
5
27
4
91
4651
1,334
78
436
62
11
1,429
8,239
151
304
104
15
12
2.6
145
142
4
71
2
•
Predorn Ind
FL
453
2
C-DM
C-RMH
1
300
2,477
46
212
3
103
2
10
34
3
240
39
5
4
430
186
1
13
C-G
340
145
1.3
156
16
44
61
240
1 193
475
139
96
5
6
3. 9
92
054
112
573
40
21
380
323
87
16
3,655
II
42
45
'
27
506
202
'
.2
67
3
7
195
.0
123
7
50
1.2
190
15
3
8
7
181
TOTAL COUNTY
1,178
117
5
190
470
2
Percentone
1.4
3
9
450
Acres
as
0-17-C
RE-2C
Total
N_
965
82
17
10
141
RE - 2
Vienna
1,364
131
71
0- 12 5C
220
Potomac
r.4
190
8-12 .5
221
Springfield
L
Rose Hill
K
Pohick
I
RR-6
390
>I
Vernon
I
Mae=
H
1.178
0-17
290
E
D
B
Potomac
G
68
160
270
.
,
A
Lincolnio
F
Upper\
Mount
Lower
Foirfon
Bull Run
30
14
"N_
5.145
5 158
1,915
26 909
4,251
3.361
22 934
2,529
94,327
5.5
5.5
2.0
28.5
4.5
3.6
24.2
2.7
100.0
.1
.
100.0
52
S3
PERCENTAGE
1.5
54
Sou
UD1S Po eel File, January, 1975
Notes: 1 Pane ionol descriptions of zoning class nodes
oppeor in Appendix B.
2 Figures may not odd due to rounding.
V-6
•
ACRES OF UNDERUTILIZED LAND BY ZONING CODES 1 2
Summarized by Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginia
Land Use Report 2B/Jcrnuarv.1975
J
Lower
Zone
Code
Zone Close
CLF
Clifton
HON
Herndon
VIE
010
Vienna
RPC
020
PHI-1
030
040
R_M-1
PAD
050
RM-2
060
RM-2G
070
RM-2 H
080
RM-2M
110
RT-10
ill11T-5w-__
RTC-10
112
31
a
a
113
RTC-5
116
0-5
118
RR-6
120
43
15_
55
6
1
2
7
4
41
2
18
281
640
182
34
8
3
15
45
16
28
7
16
461
181
200
RE-0 5-C
RE-1
4
172
201
RE-1-C
220
RE-2
606
4
57
479
19.186
4.722
76
9
191
33
8
183
1
22
40
.0
1
20
321
.3
1
3
121
.1
'
64
431
.4
i
4
303
27
2
.0
■
9
.o
16
807
.7
180
10
922
1,378
103
222
128
5,340
4.4
2
361
ii
240
280
26
86
62
16
7
179
310
34
609
2,558
2.1
39
3
695
57
504
138
246
420
24
186
36
381
3,321
2.7
1,863
49
3,439
21
324
1
29,799
2,279
3
13,727
46
2,593
127
80,089
65.3
3,384
24_
1.089
78
11,986
2
341
155
17,508
14.3
103
164
164
313
.1
.3
86
1174
29
46
707
61
3
2
57
434
361
177
2
.0 .
218
3
1,808
51
23
6
54
3
.5
.3
.1
le
.0
67
21
19
19
43
C-OL
o
3
2
C-OH
10
2
C-G
II
14
2
41
18
300
C-RMH
310
C-N
3
2
3
1
11
5
106
11
7
6
330
C-D
13
17
93
3
7
335
PDC
340
Predorn Comm.
'
350
1-1
'
370
I- S
3
'
390
I-P
12
'
410
I-L
34
'
430
I-G
79
'
450
Predorn Ind
'
470
PL
6
27
123
57
8
617
6
6
2
23
I
1
4
40
3
6
142
.1
4
5
14
132
5
11
5
456
140
4
3
190
.2
6
8
113
.1
52
461
.4
77
.1
49
69
.o
23
9
13
13
58
72
21
86
49
15
1
53
25
3
5
166
4
68
7
49
14
118
76
7
17
225
77
81
12
10
5
81
71
952
192
345
25
1,080
.9
375
440
67
1,439
1.2
317
43
554
.5
.0
A, 124
1,216
542
5,746
6,349
2,450
32,810
3,663
4,183
31,446
3,908
52
1.0
04
4.7
5.2
2.0
26.8
3.0
3.4
25.6
3.2
1
1 3
0 4
17 A
Source
. ',fates:
.1
5
3
518
.1
48
14
1_540
r
10
.
7
70
3
132
11
10
47
43
9
1
10
2
3
25
2
20
C-DM
PERCENTAGE
0
72
6
8
4
.7
15
250
224
63
290
,
50
243
8
2
101
1,20
1.2._
833
218
26
67
.2
19
16
9
303
1 .2
228
24
66
53
8
7
REA 5
TOTAL COUNTY
11
34
5_ 51
15
1
89
2
0-17-C
270
4
16
114
4
55
180
261
16
1
3
161
260
17
1
1,481
97
12
5
R-17
C-0
70
3
1
R-12 SC
250
17
Percentage
108
1,505
97
160
R-A
1.385
354
313
82
15
141
Predom Res,S.knit
10
17
i8
39
0-12.5
246
Total
Acres
N
228
0-10
245
Vienna
Potomac
M
Springfield
L
1,481
140
RE-2-C
Predom Res.
Hill
Pohick
108
120
221
240
Upper
Mount
Vernon
McLean
Potomac
G
Lincolnia
F
Jefferson
E
Fairfax
D
Bull Run
C
Baileys
B
Annandale
A
#6611 'hed MaY.1975/Series #7
3
.o
122,562
100.0
100.0
UDIS Parcel File, January, 1975
1 Functional descriptions of zoning class codes
appear in Appendix B.
2 "Underutilized" land includes both vacant
land and land which hos potential for development as determined by criteria established
by the Office of Comprehensive Planning in
March, 1974.
3 Figures moy not add due to rounding.
V-7
•
1
Published May,1975/Series 0 7
Land Use Report 3/January, 1975
ACRES OF LAND BY LAND USE CATEGORY
As of January, 1975, 37% of Fairfax County's land (89,000 acres) was
devoted to residential uses. The large majority of that land is used for
individually owned single family dwelling units with only about three percent used for rental units. 1
The public and quasi-public land use category which includes post
offices, police stations, fire stations, correctional institutions and
military institutions, requires over 13,000 acres. This includes Fort Belvoir
and Lorton Reformatory. An additional 14,800 acres are used for recreational purposes, both public and private.
The following chart demonstrates the distribution of land devoted to
residential use according to Planning District.
Acres of Land Devoted to Residential Use
By Planning District
Fairfax County, Virginia
January, 1975
Acres
20,000—
—
15,000 —
10,000 —
Individually Owned
5,000 —
1 , 00 0Ttev
500-,
Rental
-o
1
0
0-
Upp
03)
-1
Lo
C
47.
a
Individually owned units include condominium townhouses and condomium
apartments.
V-8
25 25
25
a
2
S
25
13
25
25
25
2YR.
1 1
25
25
'2
0
:7,7z 0
a
116
-
•
,
•
gEgE siEi Eig.§56gg E;g0'S "8
g
:
-
•-
.
.
, 74
.
8
25
•
25
•.I
10
o
a
iiiiiioiiiiiiiioiiiiiiuriiiiiiiii - 1111111111111111111111M 11111
IMMEMEMENIMMEMENIMMEMIll
111111111111111111111EMENNENIMMENIMIll
11111E1111111111111111111111111111111111EMINIMMINIIII
III IIIIIUhuiIIIIIiIIIIIIIIHIIOIIIiiIIllIIiIIHhiIIfHuIIIIOhIHHIIIIIIII
11111111111111111111111111111111111111MERMINE1111111111111111
a
=
g
4
Dv
-
ACRES OF LAND BY LAND USE CATEGORY
PLANNING DISTRICT
LAND USE
WATER RELATED
SEtAGE RELATED
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
TELEPHONE 6 TELEGRAPH
IRADIO 6 TELEVISION
ANNAN- BAILpALE
EYS
5
1
1
BULL
RUN
FAIR JEFF- LINCFAX
ERSON OLNIA
16
264
2
I
LOWER kCLEAN
OUNT
POHICK
POTOM
VERNON
63
113
3
OTHER COMMUNICATIONS
NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER
CONVENIENCE CONGLOMERATION
COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER
REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTER
PROMOTIONAL CENTER
TOWN CENTER
BUILDING MATERIAL-HARCWARE
DEPARTMENT STORES
ISCOUNT STORES
VARIETY CR jR DEPT STORE
APPAREL 6 ACCESSORIES
URNITURE
RUG STORES
SUPERMARKET
SUPERMARKET 6 GENERAL MERCH
CONVENIENCE GROCERY
THER FOOD
RESTAURANT WITH ALCOHOL
rESTAURANT WITHOUT ALCOHOL
ARRY OUT KITCHEN
ARRY OUT WITH SEATING
OTHER EATING 6 DRINKING
MOTOR VEHICLE SALES
S 6 SERVICE STATION
AS SALES ONLY
AS SALES 6 CAR WASH
OTHER AUTOMOTIVE
THER RETAIL
OFFICE PARK
ENERAL LOW RISE OFFICE
ED/DENTAL Low RISE OFFICE
OVT LEASED LOW RISE OFFICE
OVT OWNED LOW RISE OFFICE
CONDO OFFICE-LOW RISE
CONDO OFFICE MED/DENT LOW RISE
.E.NERAL-MEDIUM OR HIGH RISE
MED/DENTAL-MEDIUM OR HIGH RISE
pola LEASED-MEDIUM OR HIGH RISE
l7)VT OWNED-MEDIUM CR HIGH RISE
OTHER OFFICES
FINANCE.INSURANCE*REAL ESTATE
b
E..R.S.ONAL__SERVLCE
MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR
OTHER REPAIR SERVICE
VETERINARY HOSPITALS
22
3
46
12
9
6
22
10
30
36
3
21
8
135
17
2
90
1
3
16
30
8
6
1
36
2
14
3
27
19 .
10
78
5
3
2
1
4
1
2
2
9
4
4
3
3
I
2
4
2
9
6
2
1
9
2
I
3
2
1
3
1
1
2
4
1
1
17
1
3
1
19
1
1
27
14
2
2
12
2
12
1
19
22
10
15
2
1
6
12
14
15
1
1
2
8
10
I
6
24
23
2
1
1
4
7
17
26
118
10
7
3
1
14
25
18
14
63
19
25
3
29
17
1
13
2
38
22
13
31
13
10
22
18
2
2
5
20
11
62
4
3
3
3
2
16
6
1
5
3
16
32
9
2
2
13
2
9
I
4
13
15
1
1
3
8
1
3
2
1
1
a
2
1
10
8
34
13
23
2
2
6
2
12
123
1
8
I
1
2
1
9
4
10
11
3
5
14
1
.
855
UPPER VIENNA
POTOM
11
a
1
4
14
39
ROSE 5PRNG
HILL FIELD.
1
2
8
4
2
14
12
4
1
4
23
3
2
25
19
1
6
14
2
3
4
3
1
11
9
4
7
42
7
1
93
1
11
30
3
I
3
1
5
15
2
4
3
32
17
1
12
582
2
11
2
2
1
85
49
2
8
3
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
1
4
1
1
5
I
1
1
5
1
1
I
115
12
6
14
2
6
1
3
2
54
I
1
3
11
2
39
16
7
1
4
10
1
3
1
2
1
TOTAL
ACRES
lo115
562
3
72
52
4
181
140
437
171
77
9
53
21
50
1
10
37
11
13
6
10
13
66
17
I
45
7
105
203
6
11
32
192
11
302
27
20
62
8
5
70
2
86
643
86
89
13
68
5
ACRES OF LAND BY LAND USE CATEGORY
PLANNING DISTRICT
LAND USE
'.
OTHER BUSINESS SERVICES
CEMETERIES
HOSPITAL E. HEALTH FACILITIES
POST OFFICE
POLICE STATIONS
FIRE STATIONS
CORRECTICNAL INSTITUTIONS
MILITARY INSTITUTIONS
OTHER PUBLIC LAND USES
CHURCHES & SYNAGOGUES
CIVIC.SOCIAL,FRATERNAL USES
LIBRARIES
PERMANENT EXHIBITIONS
NURSERY SCHOOLS
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
PRIVATE SCHOOLS
COLLEGES 6 UNIVERSITIES
SPECIA
CH__OOLS
OTHER EDUCATIONAL USES
..., PLACES OF PUBLIC ASSEMBLY
PARKS-PRIVATE
PARKS COMMERCIAL
PARKS-GOVT
■
-
INDOOR REC FACIL-PRIVATE
INDOOR REC FACIL-COMMERCIAL
INDOOR REC FACIL-GOVT
GOLF COURSE-PRIVATE
GOLF COURSE-COMMERCIAL
GOLF COURSE-GOVT
SWIMMING POOLS - OUTDOOR
AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES
HORTICULTURAL ACTIVITIES
QUARRIES
CONSERVATION AREAS
WATER AREAS
VACANT LAND
VACANT LAND W/DILAP STRUCTURE
OTHER NATURAL USES
TOTAL
ANNAN- BAILEYS
DALE
14
14
2
1
BULL
RUN
22
5----.1
4
7
5
5
POHICK
MCLEAN MOUNT
VERNON
3
5
7
41
1
2
95
1
23
52
5
2
7
10
91
109
43
ROSE SPRNG
HILL FIELD
1
12
.
8
6
94
97
1
3
•
5
44
10
2
556
196
20
561
203
4
43
3
14
256
TOTAL
ACRES
UPPER VIENNA
POTOM
20
11
10
1
1
112
66,
4
3
22.,
803
200
85-1-0_0
4
6
2
2
115_
2
6
1.523
1
327
11
227
2
218
17
5
27
3
1
2
2
63.072
R.-111.1.122
162
12.2
1.216.7.-
18
2,
294
1
2,117
76
2
150
219
3
258
34
20
51
106
108
83
1.815
3
2
33
623
1
22
20
4
208
110
a
22
4
1,025
5
1
336
2
1
3
75
1.557
318
1
8
16
IQ
5
4
1
21
26
4,766 1.466
448 13,677
740
1
10.274 3,459 30.762
3,612
307
1.052
14
12.026 4.991
467
1
4.715
376
1
1.735 23.619
4.362
381
116
158
3.141
382
107
90
153
95
33
16
3
157
213
108
_
149
0------14------6
26
1
13
11
485
221
313
9
136
134
1.371
202
1.250
20
21_.
56
1
,
4
98
43
2,576
CU,
637
12_
4
6
27
2
1,137
1
106 '
369
198
3b
4
•
2.991
8.289
37
3
265
11
76
LOWEF
POTO
50
73
4
186
10
5
LINCFAIR.JEFF
ERSON OLNIA
FAX
16.950
10.31
117
13
613
288_
182
SQ.
1
38
472
1.371
277
8
269
1.963 24.862 2.833 3.3 05 116,9A0_2.258___8341512
127
4.655
1.887
184
474
39
104
497
363
133
-
16.953 11.847 47.844 8.357 9,142 45.276 10,910 237.195
'Recently subdivided parcels not yet assigned
land use codes.
Note: Pohick planning district includes land in the Town of Clifton.
Upper Potomac planning district includes land in the Town of Herndon.
Vienna planning district includes land in the Town of Vienna.
Data as of January 1977
116
,
8
oP
.2
,5
g11.4
6.1
Published May,1975/Series 0 7
Land Use Report 4/January, 1975
APPRAISED VALUATIONS
As of January, 1975, Fairfax County's 239,000 acres of zoned land
had an appraised value in excess'of $9.0 billion. Of this, $3.2 billion
(36%) is attributed to land value and $5.8 billion (64%) is improvement
value.
Total Approved Value of Zoned Land
Fairfax County, Virginia
$3.2 Billion
Appraised
Land
Value
$5.8 Billion
Appraised
Improvement
Value
The following tables specify appraised values and acreages for each of
the County's 426 subcensus tracts.
•
APPRAISED VALUATIONS 1
Page 1 of 8
Fairfax County, Virginia
Land Use Report 4/Jonuary,1975
1
SUbeensus Tract 2
APProised
Land
2
3
Appraised
Improvement
0
Appraised
Total
•
Published May,1975/Series 17
7
Value
Value
1,010
8,362,091
17,559,027
25,921,118
158
1.020
7,876,712
13,867,407
21,744,119
241
Value
1.030
3,376,728
8,987,049
12,363,777
90
2.010
2.020
6766827
6,205,259
14 236 338
19,485,990
21003 160
25,691,249
778
138
2.030
1,892,850
5,557,464
7,450,314
48
2.040
462,730
462,730
231
3,464,334
6,810,177
10,274,511
93
3.020
5,179,501
14,883,168
20,062,669
178
10
3.030
3,509,850
9,438,357
12,948,207
68
11
3.040
1,715,226
2,543,438
4,258,664
94
4.010
11,716,278
31,603,534
43,319,812
283
4.020
1,410,600
1,953,369
3,363,969
41
4.030
5,239,834
12,149,878
17,389,712
144
4.040
6,516,416
3,941,335
10,457,751
256
5.010
18,280,150
45,078,996
63,359,146
531
5.020
5.030
6.010
6,522,702
2,515,627
7,921,113
15,575,101
3,127,140
13,905,647
72,097,803
5,642,767
21,826,760
236
93
476
so
6.020
8,498,158
26,166,476
34,664,634
269
21
6.030
2,957,636
7,246,307
10,203,943
122
22
6.040
862,000
2,631,020
3,493,020
27
22
7.010
5,991,140
5,819,381
11,810,571
199
24
7.020
7.030
10,241,685
3,578,538
19,827,779
8,982,803
30,069,464
12,561,341
333
208
•
8.010
11,269,917
28,682,548
39,952,465
580
8.020
9,712,153
14,235,981
23,948,134
599
28
8.030
5,000,000
349,013
5,349,013
29
8.040
2,566,178
4,075,144
6,641,322
500
97
30
9.010
9.020
8,907,576
8,051,125
30,560,067
26,337,013
39,467,643
34,388,138
262
246
32
9.030
6,482,304
17,151,658
23,633,962
238
35
10.010
10.020
5,959,163
12,374,435
15,357,808
35,835,264
21,316,971
48,209,699
152
284
34
25
10.030
4,913,000
7,354,394
12,267,394
269
36
11.010
8,844,899
6,319,090
15,163,989
27
11.020
11.030
1,136,875
10,092,504
2,447,606
21,942,351
3,584,481
32,034,855
423
62
528
21,097,969
28
11.040
8,563,714
12,534,755
12.010
6,216,706
441,065
81
12.020
13.010
4,144,470
6,950,747
4,144,470
1,658
4,325,842
11,276,589
2,488
42
13.020
15,687,829
10,948,628
26,636,457
6,503
44
14 010
14.020
6,469,395
11,148,586
15,060,409
26,655,788
21 , 529 , 804
37,804,374
130
492
15,010
7,566,786
11,030,469
18,597,255
489
15.020
16.010
12.096,252
7,657,436
18,189,158
20,924,827
30,285,410
28,582,263
415
309
16 020
16.030
6,329,294
1,980,513
10,328,350
4,598,866
16,657,644
6,579,379
361
93
16.040
17.010
17.020
3,311,833
7,373,679
2,139,502
5,404,447
20,738,087
4,510,278
8,716,280
28,111,766
6,649,780
151
306
87
17.030
5.925.021
14.828.829
20.753.850
220
42
45
46
88
40
50
31
•
10
350
37
40
6,657,771 ,
10
Tract
3.010
4
• =000C 0
Acreacie Per
Subcensus
2,489
V-12
Land Use Report 4/January,1975
APPRAISED VALUATIONS
Page 2 of 8
Fairfax County, Virginia
Appraised
Subcensus Tract
2
a
s
Appraised
•
s
Appraised
1
Published May, 1975/Se
........8=.637
Land
Value
Improvement
Value
18.010
18.020
2,228,950
2,584,381
5,854,386
6,528,160
8,083,336
9,112,541
41
39
18 030
19.010
6 156 701
8,799,463
14 944 563
21,414,817
21,101,164
30,214,280
172
126
19.020
13,208,282
25,601,841
38,810,123
206
19 030
20.010
2,222,627
21,061,217
3,892,481
31,092,440
6,115,108
52,153,657
35
483
20.020
5,634,634
11,608,157
17,242,791
143
20.030
2,845,960
4,993,655
7,839,615
230
10
20.040
14,489,316
20,202,507
34,691,823
734
11
21.010
9,320,338
19,185,580
28,505,918
790
12
21.020
7,544,260
6,233,453
13,777,713
1,027
13
21.030
2,891,477
7,707,519
10,598,996
167
14
22.010
4,549,440
9,001,877
13,551,317
252
15
22.020
2,470,038
6,650,155
9,120,193
82
16
17
22.030
23.010
6,111,227
10,703,798
10,314,040
9,955,029
16,425,267
20,658,827
280
1,060
16
23.020
5,194,967
9,332,154
14,527,121
892
19
23.030
9,919,089
30,982,941
40,902,030
487
20
23.040
10,575,447
9,512,150
20,087,597
242
21
23.050
1,895,472
914,269
2,809,741
250
22
23.060
589,489
168,851
758,340
131
23
23.070
6,981,999
9,621,090
16,603,089
280
24
23.080
1,728,524
2,527,346
4,255,870
78
25
23.090
24.010
1,015,694
9,562,901
1,831,440
14,649,309
2,847,134
24,212,210
29
383
24.020
24.030
11,321,219
12,488,104
22,298,806
22,346,149
33,620,025
34,834,253
194
261
29
24.040
7,533,273
579,060
8,112,333
1,567
30
25.010
25.020
13,875,518
4,826,482
23,101,057
16,841,200
36,976,575
21,667,682
373
89
25 030
26.010
6,822,289
10,361,176
12,111,683
18,933,972
10,361,176
183
4,144
34
27.010
20,288,332
64,260,580
84,548,912
523
55
27.020
15,327,132
19,789,815
35,116,947
379
36
7,446,700
2,879,937
5,003,894
:5,.:
12,450,594
3,668
37
28.010
29.010
38
29.020
132,288
48,376
180,644
47
29.030
29.040
2,296,213
8,920,500
2,134,184
10,372,668
4,430,397
19,293,168
745
470
29.050
2,601,686
12,097,552
14,699,238
527
29.060
30.010
2,991,012
8,838,671
974,897
15,218,268
3,965,909
24,056,939
449
884
31.010
31.020
7,977,776
2,098,677
19,555,735
1,483,779
27,533,511
3,582,456
514
245
31.030
32.010
17,491,612
6,827,064
40,226,220
16,178,346
57,717,832
23,005,410
1,004
297
32.020
32.030
6 795,237
14,995,509
21,790,746
482
3.676.158
4,113,564
7,789,722
246
32.040
32.050
32.060
33.010
34.010
23,605,295
19,747,138
3,127,052
4,879,151
7,076,925
58,412,235
52,562,596
177,202
12,419,745
17,899,811
82,017,530
72,309,734
3,304,254
17,298,896
24,976,736
1,439
852
358
218
168
26
27
211
31
32
33
5
47
42
49
SO
51
52
53
54
v-13
Total
Value
_
'
_
• a■MONINi
Acreage Per
9 =111112.6. 78=361m•01.8•6•8111=52=11 5a91•0••••=msa.9 2
Stinensus
Tract
.5....
2
2•
25
2•
9
1
3
5
6
2
•
0
•
•
Land Use Report 4/January, 1975
APPRAISED VALUATIONS 1
Page 3 of 8
Fairfax County, Virginia
2
Subcennm Tract 2
___Mgalsed
Land
Value
•
10
11
12
1.
i=3=4=t • 4=4•25
kagmised
Impn,venient
Value
a
■40■3
Value
/ smameamm■• 3
Tract
4
17,469,223
24,964,405
209
7.113.115
20,962,031
112,774,663
39,729,750
201
452
9,467,269
13,862,431
23,329,700
323
6,674,862
9,338,251
13,293,383
21,924,277
19,968,245
31,262,528
251
247
13,465,807
19,216,554
32,682,361
303
3,234,308
3,844,625
2:415,070
7,147,260
5,849,378
10,991,885
191
125
1,851,854
547,303
b.5,6/6
2,399,157
1,J1J,W1
366
7,269,326
1,159
7 495 182
5.661.548
18,767,719
35.020
35.030
35.040
36.010
36.020
36.030
37.010
37.020
.
14
37.030
6,691,966
1;404,566
8,096,532
37.040
1,419,129
322,763
1,741,892
331
IS
37.050
38.010
31,170,110
35,078,538
•60,031,055
116,820,431
,91,201,165
151,898,969
1,582
860
39.010
39.020
3.120.766
5,330,124
7.779,325
12,721,485
10,900,091
118,051,609
161
119
39.030
40.010
5,102,791
5,386,204
14,400.463
16,237,594
119,503,254
21,623,798
362
91
17
10
20
21
22
40.020
4,375,450
11,919,574
16,295,024
75
23
40.030
10,414,220
14,419,083
24,833,303
135
24
40.040
11,417,340
24,686,618
36,103,958
172
41.010
2,960,217
2,735,246
5,695,463
1,213
41.020
4.812.506
1,843,812
2,156,335
2,508,304
5.829.139
1,766,747
1,438,513
1,870,656
10,641,645
3,610,559
3,594,848
4,378,960
1,868
740
773
1,068
2,
2S
20
41.030
41.040
41.050
30
41.060
3,404,358
706,607
4,110,965
1,623
31
41.070
41.080
4,229,706
6,156,787
694,666
3,778,754
4,924,372
9,935,541
2,644
3,638
41.090
2,636,674
707,696
3,344,370
41.100
41.110
3,396,362
2,334,357
1,553,883
1,495,000
4,950,245
3,829,357
41.120
42.010
2,470,818
18,626,116
665,432
28,999,397
3,136,250
47,625,513
1,080
2,082
42.020
42.030
22,537,285
18,558,516
63,655,646
39,487,124
86,192,931
58,045,640
1,085
879
42.040
42.050
18,910,926
15,056,258
57,035,617
17,737,564
1,664
698
16,973,508
548
33,101,868
386
32
31
34
27
43
43.010
6,725,713
38,124,691
2,681,3E4
10,247,795
•3
43.020
13,540,654
19,561,214
•1
43.030
2,409,000
44.010
1,810,982
1,535
,
, 499
3,346,481
•4
44.020
44.030
45.010
3.626,556
4,839,376
_ 7,075 795
4,610,686
10,702,351
9 4 450,062
38
46
5,034,350
_ 8,914,526
13,948,876
81
*0
45.020
3,100,163
_ 7,832,087
10,732,250
74
SO
45.030
1,959,500
3,979,625
5,939,125
68
II
46.010
46.020
46.030
47.010
10.283.044
4.410.177
4.274,126
9 533 957
19 896 954
8.145.306
8.761,345
17 305 529
_30,179,998
12,555,483
13,035,471
26,839,486
205
141
169
193
53
54
•
- --
...,
1,755
1,249
••
$2
,
1,172
1
•S
2,409,000
14.1a2412
441
IS
IS
11•5=c424=s0210.
Acreaas PeC
Subcensus
89
83
11,369,689
9,091,163
34.040
34.050
35.010
5
_Ammaised
Total
16,010,889
12,913,463
4 641 200 .
3,822,300
34.020
34.030
•
=Oa 3
Published May, 1975/Series #7
33
2
803
---11---
V-14
APPRAISED VALUATIONS 1
Page 4 of 8
Fairfax County, Virginia
Land Use Report 4/January, 1975
.== I
Appraised
Subcensus Tract 2
47.020
48.010
Land
Value
2
3 •295c30=Ises
• =is= $
Appraised
Appraised
Improvement
Value
Total
Value
-41
,
6 asamim
Published May,1975/SerI ello
■
7
Subcensus
Tnat
8,045,552
13,180,432
18.879.636
17,243,315
48.020
8,538,642
20,256,399
28,795,041
167
48.030
12,880,095
27,297,562
40,177,661
239
48,040
12,087,604
17,570,265
29,657,869
135
49.010
4,492,915
8,087,349
12,580,264
166
49.020
4,537,014
11,015,925
15,552,939
164
50.010
4,577,312
10,540,936
15,118,249
174
50.020
50.030
9,209,238
2,631,701
14,799,427
5,188,861
24,008,677
7,820,561
229
101
51.010
3,747,13E
14,464,108
18,211,246
65
51.020
1,355,308
3.030,323
4,385,623
29
51.030
5,244,102
1Q, 434,719
15,678,822
88
51.040
6,835,974
10,421,361
17,257,335
109
51.050
52.010
52.020
7,403,825
6,252,112
10,356,477
11,908,014
14,382,887
15,186,111
19,311,835\.
20,635,000
25,542,588
147
167
204
53.010
11,782,166
16,814,473
28,596,639
294
53.020
19,557,095
33,647,051
53,204,146
268
54.010
6,563,694
14,017,724
20,581,418
165
54.020
54.030
2.348.601
5,416,491
6.355.782
14,381,942
8.704.383
19,798,433
138
205
55.010
17,896,883
30,958,551
48,855,434
624
56.010
9,334,117
42,996,587
52,330,704
373
56.020
57.010
7,417,495
8,498,984
20,857,006
14,341,911
28,274, 505
22,840,897
306
431
57.020
12,528,994
26.504,023
39,033,015
263
58.010
4.016.627
9,549,012
13 585 635
118
14.170.510
13,122,473
20.129.192
23,944,355
16,357,828
167
129
127
26,925.188
30,423,748
155
93
29
58 020
5.958.682
30
58.030
59.010
10,821,882
5,004,758
59.020
7,359,44
20,660,582
28,020,022
218
60 010
61.010
21 192 852
9,019,88'
34,511,694
22,864,116
55,704 , 544
31,883,997
492
344
61.020
61.030
1,238,258
7,788,713
1,956,205
21,417,646
3,194,455
29,206,355
64
256
34
32
34
35
36
11,353,070
61.040
13,064,192
38,251,015
51,315,212
429
35
61.050
26,433,288
80,399,432
106,832,712
705
39
61.060
12,739,758
32,964,901
45,704,651
410
40
61.070
62.010
2,888,438
12,653,418
116,346
38,594,101
3,004,796
51,247,515
286
243
42
63.010
13,256,483
23,608,563
36,865,044
197
43
63.020
6,405,017
16,233,121
22,638,138
146
44
63.030
5,271,937
12,140,058
17,411,995
100
45
64.010
2,784,175
4,848,031
7,632,206
134
64.020
64.030
13,107,082
9,540,289
21,787,027
20,592,739
34,894,105
30,133,028
376
224
45
64.040
8,361,507
20,593,572
28,955,075
278
49
64.050
5,479,606
11,924,177
17,403,783
253
SO
65.010
16,914,829
47,454,229
64,369,05E
959
65.020
18,015,986
38,622,532
56,638,51E
374
66.010
66.020
66.030
23,925 940
4.007,297
3,148,17'
20,156,353
5,639,341
3,543,05]
44,082,292
9,646,638
6,691,222
488
255
116
41
46
47
V-15
■•■•■9111
9 alesm9osnoni0x9996mariasallall
Acreage Per
.
.
3 6■■•
_
1
__
___
-
_--
__--
1111/
0
Land Use Report 4/January,1975
APPRAISED VALUATIONS 1
Page 5 of 8
Fairfax County, Virginia
1r
Appraised
Subeensus Tract 2
•
22
23
7 •
3
Appraises!
Improvement
3
coan
appmissd
Total
6
salmon 7
=61.=
Value
Value
Value
Trart
2.984.37
4,796,045
7,905,707
2,623,105
10,890,07k,
7,419,19%
96
245
67.010
19,228,485
33,718,16k
52,946,658
467
67.020
11.157.904
22.693.019
33.850.92'
234
1.721.641
2-583.37i
42
861.73
11 alscliams 9 r
0
2
Acreage Pax
Subcensus
66.040
66.050
68.010
70
Land
2
Published May, 1975/Series 17
_
__
68.020
15 562,82i
42.963.471
58.526.298
345
6
68.030
68.040
68.050
5 770,777\
14,832,00
5,997,827
10,875,549
32,594,399
16,646,326
47,426,408
19,530,904
257
358
223
•
10
13,533,079
68.060
5,035,17E
6,674,270
11,709,44
175
68.070
18 219 088
18,213,304
36,432,384
298
68.080
4,349.03
10.527.119
14,876.15C
93
12
69.010
16,037,95E
33,369,196
49,407,154
623
13
69.070
4.899.674
12,447.54)
17.347.214
108
34
70.010
5,978,962
18,377,506
24,356.465
131
15
70.020
70.030
71.010
71.020
3.342.14:
6,531.90
2,449,294
2,860,574
7,093.249
10,303,370
5,315,440
6,061,039
10.435.392
67
16
16.835.27
7,764,736
8,921,615
101
43
55
17
19
71.030
2,686,658
5,368,638
8,055,28E
76
20
71.040
4,874,924
12,979,893
17,854,815
101
72.010
72.020
4,356,045
3,077,658
8,705,556
7,402,143
13,061,605_
10,479,793
56
63
72.030
7,985,338
12,374,880
20,360,210
166
72.040
73.010
5,558,61
5,583,767
12,916,741
8,722,356
18,475,381
14,306,123
61
423
42,462,645
59,516,826
595
73.020
17,054,18
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
73.030
8,160,795
17,663,974
25,824,769
308
74.010
26,577,122
37,898,719
64,475,841
461
74.020
14,180,418
71,896,793
86,077,211
563
30
74 030
3.397.024
195,806
3,592,832,
154
31
74.040
2,799.542
4,177,776
6,977,318
197
32
75.010
75.020
5,157,15"
9,881,107
1,590,665
26,812,610
6,747,816
36,693,717
313
228
33
75.030
3,644,795
7,404,464
11,049,259
83
35
75 040
75,050
2,967 272
3,397,785
6.723.876
7,543,481
9.691.149
10,941,270
69
115
36
75.060
4.022.524
10.189.352
14.211.918
109
36
75.070
76.010
1.962,724
8,717,545
4,232.581
3,175,-327
6,195,307
11,892,872
61
3,000
39
41
76.020
3,775,137
6,058,149
9,833,286
781
42
76.030
5,756,42E
3,455,207
9,211,635
1,299
47
76.040
76.050
9,062,185
15,056,894
4.404,537
9,202,025
13,466,726
24,258,919
2,124
1,372
43
7.218.79C
13,710,91:
2,063,551
13,174,477
9,891,639
1,952,061
20.393.267
23,602,552
4,015,612
312
805
88
45
4/
76.060
76.070
76.080
411
76.090
14,732,025
9,411,280
24,143,309
446
46
40
77.010
78.010
78.020
11,327,464
70,628,401
81,955,865
653
9
6,425,61E
9,151,658
3,053,322
5,370,307
9,478,940
14,521,957
1,724
2,535
78.030
78.040
78.050
5,334,837
3,713,357
8,015,334.
4,992,240
2,230,698
8,756,883
10,327,077
5,944,055
16,772,215
1,120
785
1,309
44
43
46
SO
31
52
33
54
•
26
29
,
34
37
40
42
44
46
91
52
53
54
V-16
APPRAISED VAWATIONS
Page 6 of 8
Fairfax County, Virginia
Land Use Report 4/January, 1975
Appraised
Subcenun Tract 2
2
Land
Value
'
0f•Taise
711;r01;73= • •'•=••=r
Imonsvanent
Value
Total
Value
•
1
•
Published May, 1975/Series 47
••71•7e0a_
'e
,
P=•
• '
•
•
'••'='•'''' •
11.===mmmuma•mremm.
Subcensus
Tract
78.060
78.070
13.061.795
4,770,955
13.232.627
7,809,620
26.294.422
12,580,57;
2.597
560
78.080
78.090
16,194,20Z
7,985,572
24,867,576
3,945,100
41,061,778
11,930,673
1,852
89
79.010
10,702,678
13,673,224
24,375,902
728
79.020
7,493,485
10,175,332
17,668,821
541
79.030
10,434,566
31,673,940
42,108,506
260
79.040
39,663„442
17,728,896
57,392,33k
627
79.050
20,709,992
46,839,365
67,549,3757
130
80.010
2,138,601
4,111,544
6,250,145
77
80.020
6,066,735
15,111,203
21,177,942
190
80.030
12,621,155
23,927,929
36,549,088
328
80.040
. 4,602,887
11,572,731
16,175,618
142
80.050
2,467,201
3,030,853
5,498,054
73
80.060
7,475,56,4
6,005,755
13,481,315
70
81.010
13,264,362
19,137,744
32,402,106
402
s
---
-
•
52
32
33
81.020
1,076,252
507,039
1,583,291
47
81.030
81.040
10,898,515
5,409,867
15,626,139
11,025,151
26,524,658
16,435,01E
401
200
81.050
8,478,372
19,107,549
27,585,921
274
82.010
16,757,607
35,183,230
51,940,837
377
82,020
82.030
83.010
2.367.232
6,517,766
4,033,59
3,739,964
11,576,601
4,821,363
6,107,196
18,094,367
8,854,954
107
187
212
83.020
3,460,79 7
5,158,166
8,618,957
84
83.030
83.040
3,659,902
5,340,028
8,357,561
6,858,047
12,017,46
12,198,075
103
71
83.050
3,399,102
15,075
3,414,177
79
83.060
5.076-69
11.830,078
16,906,765
62
83.070
83.080
2.450.035
25,556,464
7,915,593
45,037,005
10,365,632
70,593,465
30
332
84.010
84.020
4,005,84
11,551,04
8,089,021
28,628,456
12,094,862
40,179,497
132
309
34
85.010
8,316,544
13,150,036
21,466,58C
157
35
85.020
85.030
85.040
85.050
5,589,614
4,252,975
4,986,654
2,449,83E
13,389,549
8,465,686
13,116,383
5,794,949
18,979,162
12,718,66'
18,103,032
8,244,787
163
148
124
77
80
36
37
38
II
10
85.060
3,289,808
7,702,560
10,992,364
40
86.010
1,542,015
3,171,017
4,713,032
43
•
41
86.020
86.030
1,974,50(
2,132,125
4,549,765
5,015,040
6,524,265
7,147,165
62
68
•
43
86.040
2,749,000
6,074,552
8,823,552
80
44
86.050
86.060
2,219,900
6,394,811
5,013,632
13,975,672
7,233,532
20,370,484
65
149
46
86.070
2,766,462,
8,441,114
11,207,577
78
47
86.080
4,488,75!
10,058,617
14,547,372
182
42
45
V-17
87.010
1,717,914
1,680,897
3,398,805
75
87.020
3 059.590
5,601,595
8,661,185
120
87.030
6,096,21:
9,201,10"
15,297,324
170
88.010
88.020
88.030
88.040
8,312,051
9,616,201
3.302.250
2,723,327
16,354,665
26,381,416
6,726„944,
4,732,761
24,666,717
35,997,618
10.029.196
7,456,088
315
218
73
179
44
•
•
•
APPRAISED VALUATIONS
Page 7 of 8
Fairfax County, Virginia
Land Use Report. 4/January.1975
11=22221==
Appraised
Subcensus Tract 2
•
10
11
12
13
14
Land
Value
?
2
==s
3
1
Published May, 1975/Series F7
=1019.211=som • a:M=5 smonimis If ■1001•1■4 7
Approiwd
Appraised
Improvement
Value
Total
Value
Asnmxle
3,546,451
8,172,607
11,719.058
1,233,300
2,711,607
3,944,907
32
89.010
6e 635.926
4,558,908
13,939r 342
764
89.020
7,303.416
5,701,256
10,260,164
1,288
89.030
4,621.970
446,142
5 068 112
90.010
17,163,737
19,130,999
36,294,736,
1,236
91.010
24.441.727
36,582,738
61.024.465
1.358
92.010
6.188,834
610.867
6.799101
1.250
92.020
2 725 778
211.113
2.936.897
468
92.030
92.040
23.746.185
27,409,268
77.516.502
48,323,238
101.262.687
75,732,506
744
1,634
1
92.050
5 6,11,745
2 709.914
8,354 655
1_159
1
92.060
92.070
23.447.226
68,281,069
72.422.674
122,885,010
95.869.900
191,166,075
1.117
3,646
102
2,206,754
573,903
2,780,657
506
8,618,068
20,439,087
29,057,155
517
17
93 030
4 154 484
6,159,799
10,314,283
428
12
93.040
93.050
4 407 722
1,611,867
1,928,637
1,767,351
6,336,359
3,379,226
1,028
176
93.060
93.070
3.928.280
21,794,677
6.461.824
23,741,871
10.390.104
45,536,548
243
528
22
93.080
9,235,585
18,461,609
27,697,194
1,027
13
93.090
9.880.254
23.925.305
33.805.559
329
24
93.100
94.010
94.020
6,395,224
6,502,370
1,187,738
16,265,939
9,433.479
1,001,385
22,661,16k
15,935,845,
2,189,122
290
349
278
94.030
12,135,313
3,329,905
15,465,218
1,978
94.040
1,594,517
488,342
2,082,859
635
29
94.050
1,469,728
312,779
1,782,507
403
10
94.060
94.070
6,882,875
9,814,327
3,489,220
7,151,960
10,372,091
16,966,287
2,033
908
12
94.080
4,080,488
4,987,648
9,068,136
1,022
73
94.090
9,393,997
19,061,675
28,455,672
998
141
94.100
4,855,071
4,913,146
9,768,217
1,131
1.107
11
. 13
2
962
93.010
IS
1 ■•■■•21.■
88.060
93.020
21
0
88.050
16
20
9
Ssitcentus
Tract
15
19
0
Pa.
1
1
94.110
6.295.864
8.408.909
14.704.772
16
94.120
2,731,631
1,338,042
4,069.673
405
if
94.130
7.680.843
4-389-005,
12.069.848
1.897
12
94.140
3,799,076
2,313,196
6,112,272
912
19
94.150
94.160
3,560,780
3,523,296
5,511,408
3,769,070
9,072,188
7,292,156\
674
629
95.010
95.020
3.487.879
12,247,450
4,387,067
7,874,946
538
43
95.030
9,867,407
30,775,455
10,748,363
43,022,905
20,615,770
573
1,755
44
95.040
17,490,905
45,525,052
63,015,957
914
44
45
95.050
1,606,231
1,808,154
3,414,385
349
•5
46
95.060
3,116,707
1,166,186
4,282,893
319
40
47
96 010
97.010
18,330,877
16,136,898
38,749,777
25,168,925
57,080,654
41,305,822
552
322
98.010
99.010
19,528,071
40,189,594
39,558,684
86,361,714
59,086,755
126,551,308
495
932
100.010
100.020
100.030
100.040
2,311,510
7,666,548
2.105.337
2,756,028
1,940,901
7,600,231
3,282,885%
5,575,393
4,252,411
15,266,779
5,388,222
8,331,421
183
238
167
130
40
41
•2
42
42
SO
I Si
52
53
14
•
4
I
40
42
42
V-18
Land Use Report 4/January,1975
APPRAISED VALUATIONS
Page 8 of 8
Fairfax County, Virginia
Inasia 1 am■lics 2 799■204.4112sa 3
•
Subcensus Tract 2
54
ss
55
.
Land
Value
•• •
1
Published May 19 75/Series 0 7
4 asmoa.....1=. 9
6=o2==.7
• ....
.
Improvement_
Valise
10
.
Total
glins
-5ubcensus_
100 050
2,806,128
6,522,169
9,328,297
159
100.060
4,160,613
1,675,726,_
5,836,339
253
36
100.070
1 246,100
3,396,935
4,643,035
101.010
2,677, 150
5,544,918
8,222,068
90
101.020
43,691,096
102.010
V. 135,685
2,046, 150
61,826.781
2,130,614
451
573
102.020
747.318
174,390
-921,768
430
102.030
6,580.931
1. 400,20$
7.981.139
L233
102.040
5,067,403
699„001
5,766,404
1,603
102.050
102.060
6.270.078
1,011,630
7.256.371
416,578
13.526..449
1 , 428,208
L345
44
102.070
2,015,593
376,241
2,391,834
1,538
12
102.080
5,033,135
332 ,_542
5,365,677
3,559
13
102.090
102.100
15,078,247
1,767,107
34,002.603
713,598
102.110
102.120
2,314,897
1, 744,452
4,059,549
150
16
24,829,801
474,413
25,304,214
2,505
It
103.010
103.020
11,640,920
3,094,202
25,651,887
856,355
37,292 807
3,950,557
1,021
1,210
103.030
2,143,594
2,184,129
4,327 ,722
497
84,464
49-C1
24
10
11
2.472
466
14
15
•
9
20
103.040
21,479,243
73,117,211
94,596,454
1 , 931
21
103.050
1,978,770
842,021
2,820,791
746
22
103.060
103.070
2,114,843
807,984
4,558,801
4,703,543
2,922,82
261
9,262,344
671
104.010
1,299,674
524,893
1,824,567
866
104.020
2,341,561
1,179,406
3,520,967
1,588
104.030
1,263,247
553,394
1,816,641
849
104.040
6,878,568
16,220,070
23,098,638
1,068
104.050
6,127,941
1,447,652
7,575,593
1,952
211
105.010
1,716,393
1,044,925
2,761,318
268
105.020
106.010
8,564,011
2,289,683
9,798,117
460,357
18,362,128
2,750,0.4C
2,325
1,219
106.020
6,682,532
7,745,782
14,428,314
2,165
106.030
2,634,006
2,973,99
5,607,998
989
•
106.040
3.187.086
2.756,898
5,943,984
1,110
35
32
106.050
795,575
896,001
1,691,5813
277
106.060
6.268.341
5,382,873
11,651,214
2,297
106.070
106.080
3,411,701
767,552
1,899,553
323,666
5,311,254
1,091,218
2,544
356
106.090
2,608,816
1,139,875
3,748,691
1,504
106.100
2.625.483
240,579
2,866,062
1,817
106.110
106.120
218.451
677,413
105,765
521,632
324,216
1,199,045
102
295
3
• 5
106.130
106.140
989,060
1,024,690
1,320,202
375,318
2,309,262
1,400,008
308
618
5
40
106.150
504,876
558,216
1,063,092
216
41
106.160
2,221,227
136,878
2,358,101
1,437
45
107.010
946,015
1,317,557
2,263,572
156
TOTALS:
3 220,760.587
5 846,680,954
9 067,441,541
239,405
•1
42
45
44
7
0
3
2
Silures:
Notes: 1 Appraised valuations are as of January 28,
1975.
2 Subcansus tracts are locally defined subdivisions of United States Census Tracts,
developed for purposes of data aggregation. The number to the left of the decimal
V-19
3
UDIS Parcel File, January, 1975
point refers to the United States Census Tract
number as used in the 1970 Census. The
numbers to the right refer to the subcensus
designation.
3 The balance of the County's 257,000 acres are
in roads, water and other areas not zoned.
•
APPENDICES
Published May, 1975/Series 07
Appendix A/January, 1975
APPENDIX A
SUBJECT: UDIS RESIDENTIAL MONITOR SYSTEM: METHOD, ASSUMPTIONS,
AND LIMITATIONS
General:
The design of the "UDIS" Residential Monitor System is based on the
assumption that existing County records, if correctly assemble and
interrelated, can identify the extent, nature and location of residential construction activity over a five-year period with reasonable
accuracy.
Method:
The land development process in Fairfax County has been divided
into nine identifiable check points. Each check point is associated
with a specific County record. In addition the check points indicate progressively higher likelihoods that a given development plan
will ultimately result in completed housing units. For this reason
the nine check points constitute nine "confidence levels" and can
be related to County growth policy alternatives in the following
manner:
Confidence
Level
Check Point
o
o
o
o
A-1
Under Construction
Building Permit issued but
not under construction
Site Plan and/or Subdivision
Plat Approved
Site Plan and/or Subdivision
Plat Submitted
o
o
Rezoning Granted
Rezoning Pending:
o
o
o
Rezoning Pending: Uncertain
Rezoning Pending: Unlikely
Rezoning Denied or Withdrawn
(Since January, 1972)
Likely
Growth Policy
9
Committed Growth
8
Committed Growth
7
Anticipated Growth
6
Anticipated Growth
5
4
Probable Growth
Probable Growth
3
2
Possible Growth
Possible Growth
1
Possible Growth
Appendix A/January, 1975
Files:
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Pertinent County records regarding the nine check points are compiled into the following files:
o
o
o
o
o
Building Permit File (computer)
Footings Inspection File (computer)
Residential Use Permit File (computer)
Rezoning Case File (computer)
Builder Plans Monitor Cards (manual)
Printouts from the various computer files are posted manually to the
Builder Plans Monitor Cards which subsequently are keypunched and
used to create the Master Residential Builder Plans File (computer).
Reports:
The Residential Builder Plans File can be used to produce reports in
dozens of formats involving different combinations of geographic areas,
confidence levels, and methods of tabulation. Initially the following
reports were produced:
o
o
o
o
•
o
o
o
o
Subdivision Summary of Construction Activity
Sewershed Summary of Construction Activity
Map Reference Number Summary of Construction Activity
Subcensus Tract Summary of Construction Activity
Elementary School Summary of Construction Activity
Planning District Summary of Construction Activity
Supervisor District Summary of Construction Activity
Confidence Level Summary of Construction Activity
Committed Growth/Anticipated Growth Summary of Construction
Activity
Assumptions
and
Limitations: The monitoring process, for the sake of consistency, requires a careful statement of the assumptions made and the limitations connected
with the data. The following items pertain to the monitoring compilation completed in April, 1975.
1. Time Period: The compilation or "Forecast" is effective as of
April, 1975. It reflects the following data:
o
o
o
Building Permits and Inspection Data through January, 1975
Site Plan and subdivision plat data through April, 1975
Rezoning case data through April, 1975
A-2
Appendix A/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series #7
2.
Older Subdivisions: In cases of older subdivisions, with some
remaining vacant lots, the compilations include only those
older subdivisions for which some form of building or inspection
activity was recorded since January 1, 1972.
3.
Completion Dates, Start Dates, Permit Issue Dotes:
o
o
o
Completion dates are held to be synonymous with the issue date
of Residential Use Permits (RUP). Where the recordation of
RUP's lags, a similar delay will appear in the record of completions. Thus, many housing units which were substantially
completed in 1972 may not be recorded as completions until
1973, etc. Prior to the advent of the RUP midway through
1972, the electrical inspection date was used as a completion
date.
Footing Inspection Dates are used as Start Dates. It is not
necessary that the footings be approved in order to register a
construction start.
Building Permits are considered to be "outstanding" when the
Permit Application is approved, rather than when the permit
is actually transmitted to the builder. Generally actual
transmittal to the builder occurs within several days of approval
of the application. The permits remain "outstanding" until
final inspection or the issuance of a Residential Use Permit.
4. Rate of Construction:
o
o
The rate of construction in terms of housing units estimated to
be completed in specified future years is based on the particular builder's record in previous projects or on an actual builder
survey. In either case, the estimate considers also the check
point or "confidence level" at which the project stands.
If the clerk has no information upon which to make a judgement regarding the expected rate of construction, the balance
of housing units yet to be built normally will appear in the
"Future Years" column.
5. Confidence Level 7: CL-7's typically show the rate at which
the particular bul kier would be likely to proceed in view of the
market situation and his past performance. This confidence level
also includes scattered lots in older subdivisions which have had
some recent building permit activity. It should be noted that
non-septic tank construction plans having a confidence level of
7 can be delayed by sewer moratorium, but they are unaffected
by the rezoning process.
A-3
Appendix A/January, 1975
6.
Published May, 1975/Series 11 7
Effect of Moratorium on Confidence Levels 8 and 9: In view of
the sewer moratorium and the Interim Development Ordinance,
individual building schedules in the CL-8 and CL-9 levels could
be affected in the following opposite manners:
a) CL-8 and CL-9 construction would be accelerated by builders
who wish to bring their operations in Fairfax County to a close
in order to move to other areas, or to minimize the losses which
they would suffer in continuing to operate at less than full speed.
b) On the other hand, CL-8 and CL-9 construction would be slowed
down by builders who decide to wait out the moratoriums. They
would reduce their construction rate and work force, and concentrate on trying to hold together a viable nucleus organization
to await what they consider to be better times.
7.
Assignment of Confidence Levels to Rezoning Cases: Pending
rezoning cases normally are rated according to their likelihood
of passage in the judgement of several County staff members
working together. When a rezoning case stands up well to sound
planning criteria and the staff members' interpretation of current
Board policy, the case is assigned a confidence level of 4 which
means "Rezoning Likely". On the other hand, when a case is
obviously not in accord with current Board policy or sound planning
principles, the case is assigned a confidence level of 2, meaning
"Rezoning Unlikely". When the staff members feel unable to
estimate the likelihood of rezoning, they assign a confidence level
of 3, meaning "Rezoning Uncertain". Rezoning cases which have
been withdrawn or denied within the past two years carry a confidence level of 1. The theory is that these areas are still actively
under consideration for development. A rezoning case assumes a
confidence level of 5 when it is granted.
Without the guidance of finalized comprehensive plans (which
currently are in the review process), no judgements have been made
in the May, 1975, Standard Reports as to the likelihood of pending
rezoning applications being granted. For this reason, confidence
levels 4 and 2 are blank in Report CA-8.
A-4
Published May, 1975/ Series If7
Appendix B/January, 1975
APPENDIX B 1
ZONING CODES
CODE
ZONING DES.
RESIDENTIAL
010
RPC
(Residential Planned Community)
PDH,
020
(Planned Development Housing)
030
RM-1
(Semi-Det.)
040
PAD
(Planned Apt. Development)
080 (PAD
050
(Apartments)
060
RM-2G
(Apartments - Garden)
070
RM-2H
(Apartments - High-Rise)
RM-2M
(Apartments - Medium- Rise)
100
RM-3
(Mobile Homes)
110
RT-10
(Town Houses - 10 Units per Acre)
111
RT-5
(Town Houses - 5 Units per Acre)
112
RTC-10
(Town House Cluster - 10 Units per Acre)
113
(RTC-5
(Town House Cluster - 5 Units per Acre)
116
JR-5
(Residential Garden Court -6 Houses per Acre)
120
JR-10
(10,000 sq. ft.)
140
A-12.5
(12,500 Sq. ft.)
141
I R- 12 . 5-C
(12,500 Sq. ft. - Alt. Devlp. or Cluster)
160
'R-17
(17,000 Sq. ft.)
161
, R-17-C
(17,000 Sq. ft. - Alt. Devlp. or Cluster)
180
'RE-0.5
s Acre)
'
181
1RE-0.5-C
(1- Acre - Alt. Devil:). or Cluster)
200
/ RE-1
(1 Acre)
.
201
'RE-1-C'
(1 Acre - Alt. Devlp. or Cluster)
220
■ RE-2
(2 Acres)
/RE-2-C
221
(2 Acres - Alt. Devlp. or Cluster)
240
Predominantly residential, but contains other zoning classes or a
combination of residential zoning.
245
Predominantly residential, but contains other zoning classes or a
co'mbination of residential zonings (CLUSTER).
246
R-A' '
'
'
(Residential - Agricultural)
B-1
CODE
ZONING DES. 'COMMERCIAL -
250
260
261
270
290
300
C-0
C-O-L
C-O-H
C-G
C-D-M
C-R M H
(Office)
(Office - Low-Rise)
(Office - High-Rise)
(General)
(Motel)
(Commercial High-Rise - Apartments)
Published May, 1975 /Swift If7
Appendix B/January, 1975
CODE
ZONING DES. COMMERCIAL
310
330
335
340
(Neighborhood)
C-N
(Design Shopping)
C-D
(Planned Development Commercial)
P-D-C
Predominantly commercial, but contains other zoning classes or
a combination of commercial zonings.
CODE
ZONING DES.
350
370
390
410
430
450
(Institutional)
(Specialized)
I-S
I-P
(Park)
(Limited)
I-L
(General)
I-G
Predominantly industrial, but contains other zoning classes or
a combination or industrial zoning.
(Public Lands)
PL
470
INDUSTRIAL
1 A new zoning ordinance has been adopted to become effective in 1976
upon revision of the zoning maps. At that time, the zoning classifications
appearing in this report will change to correspond with those in the new
ordinance.
§=2
Published May, I975/Series f'7
Appendix C/January, 1975
APPENDIX C
SEVVERSHED CODES
CODE
SEWERSHED
SERVICING TREATMENT PLANT
CODE
A-1
A-2
A-3
B-1
B-2
B-3
B-4
B-5
C-1
C-2
D-1
D-2
D-3
E-1
E-2
Horsepen Creek
Horsepen Creek E Branch
Horsepen Creek F Branch
Sugarland Run
Sugarland Rur,
Sugarland Run
Sugarland Run
Sugarland Run
Nichols Run
Pond Branch
Colvin Run
Colvin Run
Difficult Run
Scotts Run
Bull Neck Run
Dead Run
Pimmit
Little Pimmit
Turkey Run
Strohman Run
Four Mile Run
Cameron
Cameron
Cameron
Cameron
Lucky Run
Belle Haven
Little Hunting Creek
Dogue Creek
Accotink Creek
Accotink Creek
Accotink Creek
Accotink Creek
Accotink Creek
Long Branch
Fort Belvoir
Fort Belvoir
Pohick
Kane
Mill Branch
0 ccoquan
Popes Head Creek
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Blue Plains
Arlington
Westgate/Alexandria
Westgate/Alexandria
Westgate/Alexandria
Westgate/Alexandria
Alexandria
Westgate
Little Hunting Creek
Dogue Creek
Lower Potomac
Lower Potomac
Lower Potomac
Lower Potomac
Lower Potomac
Lower Potomac
Fort Belvoir
Fort Belvoir
Lower Potomac
None
None
None
Clifton No Sewer Avail.
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
G-1
G-2
G-3
G-4
1-1
1-2
1-3.
1-4
1-5
J-3
M-1
M-2
M-3
M-4
M-5
M-6
M-7
M-8
0-1
Q-1
C-1
AR
W3/AL
W3/AL
W3/AL
W3/AL
AL
MR3
LH
DC
LP
LP
LP
LP
LP
LP
FB
FB
LP
None
None
None
CL
Appendix C/January, 1975
Published May, I975/Series #7
CODE
SEWERSHED
SERVICING TREATMENT PLANT
CODE
S-1
S-2
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
T-5
1-6
1-7
Little Rocky
Johnny Moore
Cub Run
Cub Run
Cub Run
Cub Run
Cub Run
Bull Run
Cub Run
None
None
Upper Cub Run
Flatlick
Middle Cub Run
Greenbriar
Big Rocky Run
None
None
None
None
UC
FL
MC
GR
BR
None
None
C-2
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
Appendix D/January, 1975
APPENDIX D
C-2 /
6.0:0 0 •.030
B-2
12.030
10.003
MAU 10 IOU
r \
1/4.,
NAM
WV
.1MOM
T-3
C;6
T-7
SEWER SHEDS
NOTE: The codes appearing on
this map are converted
to actual sewershed names
in Appendix C
D-1
:Iwo
/Pi
MSMNIMIIII O. C.
Appendix E/January, 1975
APPENDIX E
Published May, 1975/Series
SUPERVISOR
DISTRICTS
(To continue in effect through
December 31, 1975)
E-1
APPENDIX E
Appendix E/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
piunr ttIP:7■icE
!gri gy4 x
- 4
SPRINGFIELD
MT . VERNON
Approximate boundaries of Fairfax
County districts adopted by the Board
of Supervisors on January 4, 1975.
These boundaries will be in effect' for
the 1975 Supervisors' election and become officially effective on January 1,
1976, with the seating of the new
Board.
Appendix F/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
APPENDIX F
••■•
.11•10.
r;e
.5
,AIINANDALE
SPRINGFIELD
MT. VERNCiii:.;
'1.
PLANNING DISTRICTS
January,1974
F-1
Appendix G/January, 1975
Published May, 1975/Series 0 7
APPENDIX G
HOUSEHOLD SIZE FACTORS BY SUBCENSUS TRACT
'This Appendix itemizes the housing-to-population conversion factors which currently are
in use in Fairfax County. The factors are given for each subcensus tract and for seven
housing construction types. These factors were derived from the 1974 School Census
Survey.
G-1
APPENDIX G
Published May, 1975/Seri e5.
COUNTY
OF FAIFAX
HOUSEHOLD SIZE FACTOr:S BY SUBLENSUS (UDIS-UDSPH344)
PAGE 1 of 9
411
.
SUBCEN
00101
00102
00103
4
00201
00202
00203
00204
00301
00302
00303
00304
00401
00402
00403
00404
00501
00502
00503
00601
00602
00603
00604
411 0701
0702
00703
00801
00802
00803
00804
.00901
00902
00903
01001
01002
01003
01101
01102
01103
04104
01201
01202
01301
01302
01401
01402
01501
'
01502
Ame1601
1,1602
01603
01604
GARDEN ELEVATOR MOBILE
SINGLE
3.340
3.340
3.340
3.340
3.340
3.340
3.340
3.560
3.340
3340
3.340
3.340
3.340
3.340
3.340
3.560
3.340
3.560
3.340
3.340
3.340
3.340
3.560
3.560
3.560
3.560
3.560
3.560
3.560
3.340
3.340
3.340
3.340
3.340
3.340
3.560
3.560
3.560
3.560
3.560
3.560
3.570
3.570
3.780
3.780
3.560
3.560
3.560
3.340
3.340
3.340
DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
36220 3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
2.890
2.890
2.890
2.090
2.390
2.890
APT
APT
2.530
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1,520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
2.530
3.080
2.530
2.930
2.530
.
. ..
2.530
2.530
2.570
2.890
2.890
2.530
2.890
2.890
2.890
2.890
2.890
2.890
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
3.080
2.890
2.570
2.530
3.080
2.890
2.570
2.530
2.890
2.530
2.530
2.530
HOME
'
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
_
MULTIPLEX
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
1.520
2.610
2.420
2,420
1.520
1.520
1.520
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.420
2.420
2.420
1.520
1.520
2.610
2.610
2.420
2.420
2.570
2.570
2.570
2.570
2.570
2.570
2.570
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.570
2.570
2.570
2.570
2.570
2.570
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.790
2.630
2.680
1.520
1.520
2.610
2.610
2.850
2.850
3.080-
2.300
2.300
2.570
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.4207.420
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.890
2.890
3.080
3.080
3.080
3.080
3.080
3.080
3.080
2.890
2.890
2.890
2.890
2.890
2.890
3.080
3.080
3.080
3.080
3.080
3.080
2.790
3.080
2.570
3.080
2.890
2.890
2.570
2.530
2.530
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520'
1.520
1.520
2.890
2.530
1.520
2.610
2.610
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
G-2
APPENDiX G
COUNTY uF FAIRFAX
HOUSEHOLD SIZE FACTORS BY SUBCENSUS
Published May,1975iSeries 4 7
(UDIS
-
UDSRH344)
PAGE 2 of 9
GARDEN
SU8CEN
APT
3.080
3.080
2.570
2.570
1.520
1.520
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.080
2.570
1.520
2.890
2.890
2.890 -
2.530
2.530
2. 530
1.520
1.520
. 50
3.340
3.340
3.340
3.220
3.220
3.220
2.890
2.890
2.890
2.530
2.530
2.530
1.520
1.520
02001
02002
3.780
3.560
3.220
3.220
2.850
3.030
2.300
2.570
02003
3.560
3.220
3.080
2.570
02004
3.780
3.220
2.850
2.300
02101
02102
3.560
3.56C
3.220
3.220
3.08.0
3..080
2.570
2.570
02103
02201
3:560
3.560
3.560
3.220
3.220
3.080
3.080
2.570
2.570
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
3.220
1.520
3.220
3.080
3.080
2.570
3.560
2.570
3.570
3.560
3.560
3.780
3.220
3.220
3.220
2.790
2.680
02302
02303
02304
3.080
3.080
2.570
2.570
3.220
2.850
2.300
02305
02306
02307
3.570
3.570
3.570
2.790
2.790
2.790
2.680
2.680
2.680
02308
2.790
2.680
02309
3.570
3.560
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.080
32401
02402
02403
02404
02501
3.560
3.560
3.560
3.560
3.560
3.220
3.080
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.030
3.080
3.080
2.570
2.570
2.570
2.570
2.570
2.570
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
02502
3.560
3.220
3.080
2.570
1.520
02503
32--601---
3.5o0
3.560 --
3.220
02701
02702
3.560
3.560
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.030
3.080
3.080
02801
02901
3.570
3.570
3.220
3.220
02902
3.570
02903
02904
02905
3.570
3.570
3.570
02906
03001
03101
DUPLEX
01701
01702
3.560
3.560
3.220
3.220
01703
01801
01802
01803
3.560
3.340
3.340
3.340
01901
01902
01903
02202
02203
02301
-
ELEVATOR
APT
SINGLE
:
TOWNHOUSE
3.oao
-
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
2.570
1.520
3.080
2.570
2.570
2.570
1.520
1.520
1.520
2.790
2.790
2.680
2.680
1.520
1.520
3.220
2.790
2.680
1.520
3.220
3.220
3.220
2.790
2.790
2.790
2.680
2.630
2.680
1.520
1.520
1.520
3.220
3.220
3.220
2.790
2.530
2.530
3.220
2.530
2.630
2.480
2.430
2.480
1.520
1.520
03102
3.570
3.640
3.640
3.640
03103
03201
3.640
3.640
3.220
3.220
2.530
2.530
2.480
2.430
1.520
1.520
03202
3.570
3.220
2.790
2.680
1.520
G-3
1.520
1.520
MOBILE
HOME
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2:610
2.610
2.610
2.610
MULTIPLEX
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420 2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
•
•
APPENDIX G
•
SUBCEN
03203
_0_3204
03205
03206
03301
•
03401
03402
03403
03404
03405
03501
03502
03503
33504
03601
03602
03603
03701
03702
03703
03704
03705
03801
03901
03902
03903
04001
04002
'04003
04004 04101
04102
04103
04104
04105
04106
04107
04103
04109 04110
04111
5411 -2- _C4201
04202
04203
04204
•
04205
41004301
04302
04303
04401
•
41,
Published May,1975/Series
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX
HOUSEHOLD SIZE FACTORS BY SUBCENSU5 (UOIS-U0S411344,
PAGE 3 of 9
SINGLE
DUPLEX
3.640
3.220
2.530
3.640
3.220
2.530
2.796
3.570
3.220
3.570
3.226
2.790
3.780
2.550
3.220
2.669'
3.780
3.220
3780
3.220
2.850
3.220
2.850
3.750*
3.220
?.850
3.780
.3.220
3.780
2.850
3.750
3.220
2.850
3.780
3.220
-2 .. 8
3.220
2.530
3.640
3.640
3.226
2.530
3.220
3.640
2.530
3.220
3.640
2.530
3.640
- 3.220
- 2.530
3.220
3.570
2.790
3.570
3.220
2.796
3.570
3.226
. .2.790
3.220
2.790
3 ■ 57g
1.220
3.570
.24 7 9 0
3.730
3.220
*
.2.850
3.780
3.220
. 2.550
3.750
3.220
2.650
3.730 * v 3:220
2.850
3.220
3.78C
2.550
3.780
2.850
3.220
3.786
3.-220
2.850
3.220
3.730
2..650
3.570
2.79 .0
3.220
3.570
3.220
2.- 790
2.790
3.570
3.220
3.570
2.790
3.220
2.79 -0
3.570
3.220
2.790
3.570
3.220
3.570
3.220
2.790
3.220
2.796
3.570
2.790
..3.-570 --- 3.220
._
3.570
2.790
.3.220
.
.2.790
3.570 3.220
-3.780
3.22-0
2.850
3.756
3.220 2.850
3..780
. .3.220
2.550
3.'7 80
3.220
2.850
3.75C
2.850
3.220
3.730 .
- 3.220
2.850 - 3.780
3.220
.2.350
3.760
3.220
2.850
3.730
3.220
2.850 3.270
3.220
2.740
ELEVATOR
APT
GARDEN
APT_
TOWNHOUSE ,
2.480
2.480
1.520 .
4.520
1.520
1.520
1.520"
,2.680
2.680
2.300
.2.300
.2.300
2.610
2.610
2.610
-.7*M07
1.520
/4,520
1.520
-
-
2.480
1.520
1.520
1.520
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.. 680
2.680
2.680
2.680
.2.300
2.300
2.300
,2.300
2.300
-2.300
2.300
2.300
2.680
2.630
2.650
2.680
-. 2.650 2.680
2.680
2.680
2.680
2.680
_2.680.2.300
2.300
- 2.3)0
„2.300
, 24300
. 2..300
2.300
2.300
- 2.300
2.480
70Vciiir
2.420
2.610
2;420,
. 2.610
,2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
447410 -- 2 .420
2.610
24.420
...2.- 616. .- , 2.420
2.640
2.420
2.610
2.420
1.520
2.300
2.300
2.300
2.480
2;420',
2.420
2.420
2.420
2,;i64-6
1.520
2.3.00
MOBILE
HOME MULTIPLEX
2.640
2.420
2.610
1:4.520
1.526
1.520
1 cp520
1.520
4.520
.
2 ; 420 :
2.420
1.520
1.520 •
1 • 52-0
.
.
-
.
.
2.610
;2.42o,
2.61.0
2.420'
2.420
1.520
2.81. 0
2.610
2.610
1 .520
1.520
1.520
2.610'
2.610
2.610
2.420
1.520
1.0520
1.520
2.610
2.610
.2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
1.520
1.520
1.520
.
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.610,
1.520
.
2.610
2.610
2.610
1.520
1.520
1.5-20
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
A.520
1.520
1.520
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.610
2.610
26 10
2.610
2.610
'
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
.2.610
2.610
2.610
.
2.420
'2.420
2.420
2.420
2.4202.420
2.420
G-4
APPENDIX G
Published May,I975/Series
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX
HOUSEHOLD SIZE FACTORS BY SUbCENSUS (UDIS-UDSRH344)
PAGE 4 of 9
SUBCEN
SINGLL
DUPLEX
04402
04403
04501
34502
04503
04601
04602
04603
04701
04702
04801
04802
04803
04304
04901
04902
05001
.05002
05003
.05101
05102
05103
05104
05105
05201
05202
05301
05302
05401
05402
05403
05501
05601
05602
05701
05702
05801
05802
05903
05901
05902
06001
06101
06102
05103
36104
06105
06106
06107
06201
06301
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.276
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3..270
3.270
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.640
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220.
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220 3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220.
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220 3.226
3.220
G-5
•
TOWNHOUSE
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
GARDEN
APT
ELEVATOR
APT
2.480
1.520
1.520
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
1.520
1.520
1.520
2.480 . •
2.480
2.480
i.(j
1.520
1.520
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.430
2.480
1.520
2.480
2.480
2.480
1.520
1.520
1.520
f.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
,1.520
2.480
1.520
2.400
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
2.480
2.480
_2.480
2.480
2,480
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.460
.
1.520
MOBILE
HOME
'
MULTIPLEX
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.810
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.4519 ,
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.61a
2.610
-.
2;
• 420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.6 -10
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610,-2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610 .
-.2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
.2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
tr
APPENDIX G
_ Published
_ May, 1975/Series
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX
HOUSEHOLD SIZE FACTORS clY SU8CENSU6 (UDIS-U0SRH344)
PAGE 5 of 9
SUOCEN
06302
•
06303
06401
06402
06403
.
06404
06405
06501
06502
06601
06602
06603
06604
06605
06701
06702
06801
06802
06803
06804
06805
06806
, 41/96807
06808
06961
06902
07001
07002
07003
07101
07102
07103
J7104
07201
07202
07203
07204
07301
07302
07303
07401
o 74 o 2
.
07403
07404
07501
07502
07503
41,07504
07505
07506
07507
SINGLE
GARDEN ELEVATOR MOBILE
APT
APT
HUME
DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE
3.640
3.220
3.640
3.220
3.640
3.220
3.649
3.220
3.640
- 3.220
3.640
3.226
3.640
3.226
3.780
3.220
3.780
3.226
3.660
3.220
3.6603.220
3.666
3.226
3.660
3.220
3.666
1.220
3.270
3.220
3.270
3.220
3.640 - ' 3.220
3 : 640
3.220
3.646
3.220
-3.640
3.226
3.640
,3.220
3.640
3.220
- 3.660 -- . 3.220
3.600
3.220
3.270
3:220
-3.279
3..220
'
.3.270
3. . 220
3.220
3.276
3.270
3 : 220
3.270
.3.226
. 3.276
1:220
3.270
3.220
3.276
3:220
3.27.0
3.22,0
3:270
' .3.220
3.270
3.226
3.270
.3.220
3.640
'
3.220
,
'3.L 40
3.220
'3 . .64,0
3..22,0
3.64C 3.220
. .3-. 64 -6- ---- ,.T.;03.270
.3.220
:
' 3.640
0 3:220
,3.270
3.270
- 3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.220
3 : 220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
_
2.530
2.530
2.850
2.856
2.740
2.740
2740
. 4_
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2. 5630
2 : 530
2.530
2.530
24530
2.530
2.746
2„740
2.740
2.740
2.749
2.740
2.740
..740
2
-2.740
2.740
2.740
.2.740
" 2.740
.2.740
.24 740
2.530
- 2.530
2.530
2...?-10
2.330
2.740
2.530
2. .740
2.70
2.740
2.740
2„,740
2.740
2.740
.
.
.
MULTIPLEX
-
2.480
1.520
.2.489_
1.529
2.480
1.520
2.480
1.520
2.480
1.520
2.480
. A.626
2.480
1.520
2.300
1.520
2.300
1.320
2.500
1.520
2.500
1.52 . 0
J 4 520
2.500
2.500
1.520
2.513 _1.520
2.490
1.520
2.480
1.520
2.490
1,52 .0
2.480
1- --. -526
2.4.80
1.526
, 2.480
1:520
:
2.490
1.620
2.480
4.520
2.5001.520
2.500
J.320
2.4801 . .520
2.430
1.520
.2.400
J.520
2.480
1.520
2.4ci0
1.520
2.480
1.520
2.480
1.520
2.430
1.520
20,01.,20
:'
2.4(0
1..520
2.4901.620
2.480
2.430
1.520
2.430 0.
1.620.
-., .480
1.520
2.4i.ie
1.520
2
1.520
:-!_.-.--_---._._
1.520
2.480
1.520
2 4 490
1.520
2.4 .1 0
2.410
1.520
.
'
,.
.
2440, 01.520
2.130
1.'620
2.490
1.520
2.480
1.320
2.4±0
1.':i0
2.610
_. 2.610.
2.610
2.61 0
.
_ 2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.510 _
2.610
2.610
_2.61_0
2.610
2.610
_2.640
2.610
2:610
.
2.619
2.610
2.010
2.610
2 .610
2.610
2._6. 1_0
2.610
2.610
22.510
2.610
2.616
2.420
4.420
2.42 . 0
2.420
2.420
2.420
.
.
2.610
2.61.0
2.510
2.610
2.610
2.10
2.610
2.610
2 . .610
2.51C
. 2.610
2.610
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2:420
2. 4 20
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
.
2.420
,2 ..420
2.420
2.420
2:420
2.420
2.420
.2. 420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2..420
2.610
2. 5 1 .0
:2.510
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.010
2.510
2.420
2.420
_2.420
?.423
G-6
Published May, 1 975/Serie5 z
APPENDIX G
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX
HOUSEHOLD SIZE FACTORS
SUIICENSUS
(UDIS-'U0SR$344)
PAGE 6 of 9
GARDEN
SUi3CEN
07601
07602
07603
07604
07605
07606
07607
07608
07609
07701
C7801
07802
07803
07?:.04
.700 ,7-)
07306
!7907
07808
07809
07901
07902
07903
17904
07905
09001
01002
08003
03004
09005
08006
01101
08102
08103
0104
03105
SINGLE
3.580
3.580
3.590
3.580
3.660
3.660
3.660
3._660
3.660
3.660
3 . .440
1.440
3.580
3.440
3.510
3.5750
3.660_
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.661
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.6€0
3.660
3.600
3.660
,
.
_
.
' 0a- 26i .
08202
08207
08301
03802
03303
0930 -4
08305
01306
C2307
9-3308
03401
0402
03501
0^3502
13)3
G-7
-
-
J. -666
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3. .660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
DUPLEX
TOWNHOUSE
APT
3.220
2.500
2.500
3.220
2.500
2.500
3.220
2.500
2.500
3.220
2.500
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
._
3.220
2.740
2. - 06 .
3.220
2.740
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
1.220
2.740
2.500
3.220
2.940
2.640
3.22C .
2.940
2.640
3.220
2.5002.500
3.220
2.940
2.640
2.500
3.220
2.500
3.220
2.500
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
2.740
3.220
2.500
3.220
2.740
'
2.500
2.740
3.220
2.500
2.740
3.220
2.5003.220
2.740
2.500
2.740
3.220
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
3.220
_ 2.740
2.500
2.740
3.220
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
2.740,
3.220
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
__
. _
2.740
3.220
2.500
2.740
3.220
2.500
2.740
3.220
2.500
2.740
3.220
2.510
2.740
3.220
2.500
2.740
3.220 .
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
2.740
3.220
2.500
3.220
2.740
2--.- 500
3.220
2.740
2.500
3.220
2.740
' 2.500
3.220
2.740
2.500
.
-
-
--
ELEVATOR
APT
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
14520-.1.520 1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1 . .520
1.520 .
1.520 .
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.320
MOBILE
HOME
MULTIPLEX
4.'40
24610/ 1 ,2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610'
2.610
2-..420
2.64.0
24-420:.
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2. 420
2 .4202,
2. -6**
2.610,
2.42O
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
-24610
2.420
2.610 ,
2.610
2.420.
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
44.44-9:„
2.610
, 2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.61.0-.' - 2.420
2.4E40*
2.420.
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
: - 2.420
2.610
.2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420 2.610
2.420
2.610
2-64120
2.610
:2.420
2.610
-2.420
2.610
2.420
2.610
2.420
2.420
2.610
2.610
2.420
2.610 •
2.420
2.610
2.420
-
.
2.610
2.420
APPENDIX G
Published May.1975/Seri es
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX
HOUSEHOLD SIZE FACTORS BY SUBCENSUS tuots-upswiama
PAGE 7 of 9
•
SU8CEN%
03504
6
•
08505
03506
09601
•03602
03603
08604
_03609
08606
.03607
08608
03701
08702
08703
06801
08802
03803
03804
08805
03806
13901
06902
06903
1011, 09001
C9101
09201
09202
09203
09204
09205
• ?206
09207
09301
Q9302
09303
04-304
09305
09306
09307
09308
0309
09310
a
09401
__.C9402
.
09403
,
09404
09405
09406
41009407
09408
0,409
-
SINGLE
DUPLEX
- 3.220
3.660
3.660
3.660
.3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.660
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.270
3.440
3.440
3.440
3.440
3•440
3.900
3.900
3.90C
3.900
3.660
3.900
. 3.900
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660
3.660 3.660
3.66C
3.660
3.440
3.440
3.440
3.440 '
3.440
3.4403.440
3.440
3.900
TOWNHOUSE
.2.740
2.740
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.22.0
.
3.220
3..220
.
-
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220.
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.226
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
3.040
3.040
3.040
3.040
2.740
3.040
3.040
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
.
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
3.040
GARDEN
APT
ELEVATOR
APT
MOBILE
HOME MULTIPLEX
2.61
2461
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.480
2.480
1.520
1.520
1.520
2.610
2.610
. 2.610
2.430
7.1;70,744
Aimaw
2.4ao
2.480 .
2.480
2.500
2.480
24480
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
1.520
2.6L0
2.420
1.520
1.520
1.520
: :.1ra5a1)
-
2.610
2.610
2.610
610.
440
2.420
2.420
2.420
,041
1 .520
.1.520
1.520 .
1.520
1.52-0-
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.520
2.520
2.520
2.520
2.500
2.520 .
2.520
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.520
2.420 .
2.420
2.420
•
2.610
2.610
2.610
2‘.4i7o7
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
1.520
1.520
1.520
tr1:16..
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.420
2.420
2.420
.1.520
1.520
.007:
1.520
1.520
2.610
2.420
1.520
2.610
2.420
1.520
2.610
2.420
1.520
2.610 - 1.520
4.6TO
2.420
1.520
2.1610.
-4.420/
1.520
2.610
2.420
1.520
2.610
2.420
1.520
2.610
2.420
1.520
-.. 2.610' .2..42°1.520
-2.610 .
1.520 • 2.610
2:420'
1.520
2.610
26420
1.520
2.610
2.420
1.520
2.610
2.420
1.520
2.610
.2 .4201
1.520
2.610
2.420
2.610
242-0
1.520
2.610
2.420
1.520
2.610
2.420
1.520
2.610
2.420
1.520
2.610
2.420
1.520
2.610
2.420.
1.520
2.610 2.420
1.520
2.610
2.420
APPENDIX G
Published May, 1975/Serie-#'
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX
HOUSEHOLD SIZE FACTORS 319 SU8CENSUS (UDIS-UDSRH344)
PAGE 8 of 9
SUOLEN_
-SINGLE
09410
3.580
00411
3.580
09412
3.440
01413
3.640
09414_
J.580
0 415
3.580
04416
3.640
09501
.3.660
39502
3.660
39503
3.580
09504
1.660
09505
3.640
0)506
3.640
_ 0)601
_
_
3.560
34701
3.650
)9801
3.660
0)901
3.t00
_
10001
3.640
10002
3.640
10003
3.580
10004
3.600
10005
3.64.)0
10006
3.560
_
10007
3.560
1)101
3.600
10102
3.560
10201
3.440
13202
3.440
3.440
10203
10204
3.440
10205
3.440
_1020c-_ _3.440
132 -6
3 -.440 13208
3.440
102)9.
3.440
10210
3.440
13211
3.440
10212
3.440
10301
3.440
10302
3.440
103.03
1.440
10 334
3.640
10305
3.640
10306
3.640
10307
3.E4-0
3.440
10401
10402
3 . .440
10403
3.440
10404
3.440
10405
3.440
1001
3.570
.
.
G-9
.
DOPLEX
TOWNHOUSE
GARDEN
APT
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.223
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
30.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3:220
2.500
2.500
2.940
2.530
2.500
2.500
2.530
2.740
2.740
2.500
2.740
2.530
2.530
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.530
2.530
2.500
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740
2.740.
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.940
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.530
2.940
2.940
72.940
2.940
2.9402.790
2.5.00
2:500
2.540
2.480
2.500
2.500
2.480
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.480
2.480
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.480
2.480
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.640
2.540
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.540
2.540
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.480
2.640
2.640
2.64
2.640
2.640
2.680
ELEVATOR
APT
MOBILE
HOME
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
`1• , ■
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.320
1.320
1.520
1.320
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1:52o
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
.
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610 .,
24;610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
24610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
1.52
1.520
1.520
• 60
2.610
2.610
1.520
2.610
MULTIPLEX
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.4 20
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420.
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
.420
2.420
2.40
2.420
APPENDIX G
Published May, 1975/Series #7
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX
HOUSEHOLD SIZE FACTORS BY SUBCENSUS (UOTS-UDSRH344)
PAGE 9 of 9
SUCEN
10502
10601
10602
10603
10604
10605
10606
10607
10608
10609
10610
10611
10612 •
10613
10614
10615
10616
10701
UNTYWIDE
AVERAGES
SINGLE
DUPLEX
TOWNHOUSE
3.640
3.570
3.640
3.570
3.570
3.570
3.570
3.570
3.570
3.570
3.570
3.570
3.570
3.570
3.570
3.570
3.570
3.570
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3..220
3.220
'34220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
3.220
2.530
2.790
2.530
2.790
2.790
2.790
2.790
2.790
2.790
2.790
2.790
2.790
2.790
2.790
2.790
2.790
2.790
2.790
3.570
3.220
2.810
GARDEN
APT
2.480
2.680
2.430
_
2.680
.2.680
. ..
2.680
2.680
2.680
2.660
2.630
2.630
2.680
2.680
2.680
2.630
2.630
2.680
2.680
2.500
ELEVATOR
APT
1.520
1.520
1.320
1.520
1.520
MOBILE
HOME
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
1.520
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
---._
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610 .
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
2.610
1.520
2.610
1.50
MULTIPLEX
2.420
2.420 2.420
2.420
_2.420 _
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
2.420
G-