Document 2137895

William W. Funderburk (SBN 176244)
Lauren A. Ungs (SBN 273374)
CASTELLON & FUNDERBURK
811 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 623-7515
Facsimile: (213) 532-3984
Attorneys for Petitioner
PACIFIC STATES INDUSTRIES, INC.
BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
No.
In the Matter of California Regional Water
Quality Control Board North Coast Region.
Rescission of Cleanup and Abatement Order
No. 93-111 Former Louisiana-Pacific
Corporation Rounds Lumber Remanufacturing
Plant, 26800 Asti Road, Cloverdale, CA
PETITION FOR REVIEW AND
REQUEST FOR HEARING
REQUEST TO HOLD PETITION
FOR REVIEW IN ABEYANCE
(Cal Water Code § 13320; Cal.
Code Regs.; tit. 23 §§ 2050 et seq.)
INTRODUCTION
Petitioner PACIFIC STATES INDUSTRIES, INC. ("Petitioner") hereby petitions the
State Water Resources Control Board (the "State Board") for review of the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (the "Regional Water Board") Rescission of
Cleanup and Abatement Order 93-111, issued on January 10, 2012, Order No. R1-2012-0020. A
copy of Order No. R1-2012-0020 is attached as Exhibit A.
-1PETITION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING; REQUEST TO HOLD PETITION IN ABEYANCE
This petition for review ("Petition") is brought pursuant to the provisions of Water Code
section 13320 and Title 23 of the California Code of Regulations ("CCR") sections 2050 et seq.
Pursuant to CCR section 2050.5, Petitioner hereby requests that the State Board hold this Petition
in abeyance pending the outcome of further discussions and communications between Petitioner
and the Regional Water Board regarding the rescission of Cleanup and Abatement Order 93-111
("Order").
PETITION FOR REVIEW
I.
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS OF
PETITIONER
Austin Vanderhoof
Executive Vice President, CFO
Pacific States Industries, Inc.
2 West Santa Clara St.
San Jose, CA 95113
Phone: (408) 271-7905
[email protected]
IL
THE SPECIFIC ACTION OR INACTION OF THE REGIONAL WATER
BOARD THAT THE STATE BOARD IS REQUESTED TO REVIEW
Petitioner seeks review of the Regional Water Board's action to rescind the Order
contained in Order No. R1-2012-0020 Rescission of Cleanup and Abatement Order No. 93-111.
A copy of the order dated January 10, 2012 is attached as Exhibit A. This action was taken by
the Regional Water Board Executive Officer without notice, hearing, and opportunity to respond.
III
THE DATE ON WHICH THE REGIONAL BOARD ACTED OR FAILED TO
ACT
The Regional Water Board Executive Officer acted on January 10, 2012, as indicated in
Order No. R1-2012-0020 of that date.
-2PETITION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING; REQUEST TO HOLD PETITION IN ABEYANCE
IV.
A FULL AND COMPLETE STATEMENT OF THE REASONS THE ACTION
OR INACTION WAS INAPPROPRIATE OR IMPROPER
The Regional Water Board's rescission of the Order s inappropriate and improper
because, among other things, this action: (1) was made without notice, hearing, or an opportunity
to respond; (2) is arbitrary and capricious; and (2) is unsupported by technical and scientific
evidence.
V.
THE MANNER IN WHICH PETITIONER IS AGGRIEVED
Petitioner is an aggrieved person within the meaning of California Water Code section
13320 because the Regional Water Board's rescission of the Order contains arbitrary and
capricious findings that are unsupported by the evidence in the record. Moreover, the rescission
of the Order was conducted without proper due process, depriving Petitioner of notice and an
opportunity to comment prior to issuance of the rescission order. The failure to properly
consider whether rescission of the Order was appropriate could greatly reduce the value of
Petitioner's property and ultimately impose considerable costs on Petitioner for potential
penalties for the residual contamination in the future, as well as considerable costs for cleanup.
Furthermore, the rescission of the order leaves Petitioner with contaminated property from no
fault of its own and a potential deed restriction, while the discharger is released from its
obligations under the Order with no harm from the decreased value of 26800 Asti Road,
Cloverdale, California (the "Premises").
VI.
THE SPECIFIC ACTION BY THE STATE OR THE REGIONAL BOARD
THAT PETITIONER REQUESTS
Petitioner respectfully requests that the State Board:
(a) Reinstate the Order, attached as Exhibit B
PETITION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING; REQUEST TO HOLD PETITION IN ABEYANCE
(b) Hold an evidentiary hearing on the Regional Board's challenged actions.
(c) Allow Petitioner to supplement the record with such additional evidence as is or
may become available. Petitioner will identify such additional evidence once the record is
prepared by the Regional Water Board.
(d) Hold this Petition in abeyance pending the outcome of further discussions and
communications between Petitioner and the Regional Board regarding the rescission of the
Order.
(e) Petitioner reserves the right to further request any and all actions authorized in
California Water Code section 13320.
VII.
A STATEMENT OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF LEGAL
ISSUES RAISED IN THE PETITION
The rescission of the Order was improper for procedural and substantive reasons. The
following summarizes the improper actions of which Petitioners complain.
A. Substantive Issues
By rescinding the Order, the Regional Water Board is representing that the cleanup at the
Premises is complete. The Order has been rescinded, yet the matter has not been closed with the
Regional Water Board due to residual contamination Thus, there seems to be no basis for
rescission of the Order. The imposition of a deed restriction has been suggested in order to close
the matter. The possible necessity of a deed restriction clearly demonstrates that cleanup is not
complete. In fact, the Regional Water Board's inability to close the order under the current
conditions suggests it should be doing precisely the opposite, enforcing the Order to ensure
complete cleanup of the Premises.
PETITION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING; REQUEST TO HOLD PETITION IN ABEYANCE
Most importantly, Louisiana - Pacific Corporation has not complied with the Order. The
Order requires "timely cleanup." The Regional Water Board and Louisiana-Pacific
Corporation's reliance on natural attenuation is neither "timely," nor is it "cleanup." There is no
reference as to how long natural attenuation will take until the groundwater will meet
groundwater quality objectives. Furthermore, waiting around for a natural reduction in
contaminates is not a cleanup
a cleanup requires the parties to take action to reduce the
contamination on the Premises to values within the groundwater quality objectives, and eliminate
the threat of future contamination of groundwater.
Neither the threat to the groundwater nor the impact to the groundwater have been fully
resolved. It is clear that contaminants remain on the Premises, including pentachlorophenol
("PCP"), dioxins, mineral spirits, and hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater. Aside from the
current impact on the groundwater, this poses a threat to groundwater in the future. For example,
the extent of dioxins on the Premises is still unknown. Despite previous discoveries of dioxins,
there has been no assurance whether the groundwater levels are consistent with the water quality
objectives as required by the Water Code.
Furthermore, the water quality objectives require cleanup on the entire property, not
merely where it is convenient. The Regional Water Board and Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
have failed to investigate whether further cleanup can and should be conducted on the Property,
despite the existing structures on the property. In the Additional Site Investigation ( "ASI ")
Report of Findings, attached as Exhibit C, SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc.
identified, "the impacted soil is localized... underneath the paved floor of a building." (ASI,
p.8). The known contaminates in soil, in addition to adding pollutants to groundwater, also pose
PETITION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING; REQUEST TO HOLD PETITION IN ABEYANCE
a threat to health of existing workers, future construction workers, and potential future residents.
A human health risk assessment is needed to assess these threats.
It was improper to rescind the Order before cleanup was completed. Rescission of the
Order allows Louisiana-Pacific Corporation to leave the remaining contamination for Petitioner
to cleanup at its own expense at a later date it simply postpones the remediation and passes the
costs of cleanup to Petitioner. It was inappropriate to rescind the Order without conducting a
health/risk assessment, and thus, Petitioner requests that the Order be reinstated.
B. Procedural Issues
Petitioner was not provided notice or a mechanism for comment prior to the rescission of
the Order. This is a clear violation of due process.
Petitioner has owned and operated the property at the Premises since it purchased the
Premises from Louisiana-Pacific Corporation in 1996. In 1993, prior to Petitioner's purchase of
the land, a cleanup and abatement order was issued against Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, a
copy attached as Exhibit B. As the current owner, Petitioner has a property interest in the
Premises and the cleanup conducted thereon. A deed restriction, which can only be implemented
with the consent of Petitioner, has been suggested as a necessity to closure of the matter. Thus,
if the rescission of the Order ultimately results in a potential restriction on the use of Petitioner's
land, Petitioner should have been provided with the protections of due process
notice of the
rescission and an opportunity to comment before the Executive Officer rescinded the Order.
Therefore, Petitioner has requested a hearing regarding the rescission of the Order and
reinstatement of the Order.
-6-
PETITION AND REQUEST FOR REARING; REQUEST TO HOLD PETITION IN ABEYANCE
Notwithstanding Petitioner's objections to the Regional Water Board's rescission of the
Order, Petitioner intends to obtain and further review the administrative record, as well as
discuss the rescission of the Order with the Regional Water Board. Therefore, Petitioner
requests that the State Board hold this Petition in abeyance pending further discussions with the
Regional Water Board regarding the basis for the rescission. Petitioner reserves its right to
submit a detailed and more inclusive statement of points and authorities if these discussions fail
to resolve the issues presented in this Petition. Petitioner will submit an additional statement of
points and authorities once the State Board converts this Petition to active status and the record
in this matter has been prepared.
VIII.
STATEMENT THAT THE PETITION HAS BEEN SENT TO THE
REGIONAL BOARD AND TO THE DISCHARGER, IF NOT THE
PETITIONER
A copy of this Petition has been sent to the Regional Water Board and the discharger,
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation.
IX.
STATEMENT THAT THE SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES OR OBJECTIONS
RAISED IN THE PETITION WERE RAISED BEFORE THE REGIONAL
BOARD, OR AN EXPLANATION OF WHY PETITIONER WAS NOT
REQUIRED OR UNABLE TO RAISE THESE ISSUES
Petitioner was unable to raise these issues before the Regional Water Board because the
rescission of the Order was issued without prior notice and an opportunity for Petitioner to
comment, nor was Petitioner required to raise them. However, Petitioner is the Current owner of
the property located at 26800 Asti Road, Cloverdale, CA 95425. Thus, Petitioner should have
been given notice and an opportunity to comment on the rescission of the Order prior to the
Executive Officer's rescission of the Order, in an interest of due process.
X.
REQUEST FOR PREPARATION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
PETITION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING; REQUEST TO HOLD PETITION IN ABEYANCE
By copy of this Petition to the Executive Officer of the Regional Board, Petitioner hereby
requests the preparation of the administrative record herein.
XI.
REQUEST FOR HEARING
Petitioner requests that the State Board hold a hearing in this matter.
XII.
STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Petitioner requests that it be permitted to supplement the record before the State Board.
Petitioner will advise the State Board more specifically in this regard once the record has been
prepared by the Regional Board, and it knows what matters have not been included by the
Regional Board.
3CIH.
REQUEST TO HOLD PETITION IN ABEYANCE
Pursuant to Title 23, California Code of Regulations section 2050.5(d), Petitioner
requests that the State Board hold this petition in abeyance for a brief period to allow the
Regional Board and Petitioner to attempt to resolve the issues raised in this Petition. Petitioner
will notify the State Board when it is ready to have its Petition considered.
Respectfully Submitted,
Dated: February 9, 2012
CASTELLON & FUNDERBURK
By:
P
k
honer
C STATES INDUSTRIES,
INC.
PETITION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING; REQUEST TO HOLD PETITION IN ABEYANCE
VERIFICATION
I. Austin Vanderhoof, am the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Pacific States industries, Inc.
I have read the foregoing PETITION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING; REQUEST TO
1101.1)PF,TITION IN ABEyANCE lain informed and believe that the facts alleged in the
Petition are true to the best of niy knowledae.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the law of the State of Califtirnia that the
foregoing is true and correct attd that this verification is executed en February 9, 2012, a
J
California.
VERIVICAMON
PROOF OF SERVICE
2
3
I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, I am over the age of 18
and not a party to the within action; my business address is 811 Wilshire B1., Suite 1025, Los
Angeles, California 90017.
4
February 09, 2012 I served the foregoing document(s) described as:
5
6
PETITION FOR REVIEW AND REQUEST FOR HEARING; REQUEST TO HOLD
PETITION FOR REVIEW IN ABAYENCE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
on the interested party(ies) in this action by placing
enclosed in a sealed envelope(s) addressed as follows:
Jeannette L. Bashaw, Legal Analyst
Office of Chief Counsel
State Water Resources Control Board
P.O. Box 100
Sacramento, CA 95812-0100
Fax: (916) 341-5199
[email protected]
the original X a true copy thereof
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
414 Union Street Suite 2000
Nashville TN 37219
U.S. Mail ONLY
14
15
X:
BY MAIL I deposited such envelopes in the mail at Los Angeles, California. The
envelopes were mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid.
16
BY E-MAIL I personally sent a true copy in .pdf format to the e-mail address(es) noted
above.
17
BY FEDERAL EXPRESS: I caused such envelope to be served by Federal Express,
Overnight to the offices of the addressee(s) marked by an asterisk.
18
19
X:
20
VIA FACSIMILE- I caused the above-referenced document to be served by facsimile
transmission to the addresses on the attached Service List.
21
BY PERSONAL DELIVERY: by causing to be hand delivered, a true copy thereof to the
deponent at the address set forth in the accompanying subpoena, if necessary, following
the discussions amongst the parties.
22
23
[X]
(STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
24
February 09, 2012, at Los Angeles, California
25
Skarleht Samayoa
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
2
3
I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, I am over the age of 18
and not a party to the within action; my business address is 811 Wilshire Bl., Suite 1025, Los
Angeles, California 90017.
4
February 09, 2012 I served the foregoing document(s) described as:
5
6
PETITION FOR REVIEW AND REQUEST FOR HEARING; REQUEST TO HOLD
PETITION FOR REVIEW IN ABAYENCE
7
8
on the interested party(ies) in this action by placing
enclosed in a sealed envelope(s) addressed as follows:
the original X a true copy thereof
9
10
11
12
Ms. Janice Goebel
Regional Water Quality Control Board
5550 Skylane Blvd., Suite A
Santa Rosa, CA 95403
[email protected]
13
14
X:
15
BY MAIL: I deposited such envelopes in the mail at Los Angeles, California. The
envelopes were mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid.
BY E-MAIL - I personally sent a true copy in .pdf format to the e-mail address(es) noted
above.
16
17
BY FEDERAL EXPRESS: I caused such envelope to be served by Federal Express,
Overnight to the offices of the addressee(s) marked by an asterisk.
18
VIA FACSIMILE- I caused the above-referenced document to be served by facsimile
transmission to the addresses on the attached Service List.
19
20
BY PERSONAL DELIVERY: by causing to be hand delivered, a true copy thereof to the
deponent at the address set forth in the accompanying subpoena, if necessary, following
the discussions amongst the parties.
21
22
(STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
23
[X]
24
February 09, 2012, at Los Angeles, California
25
Skarleht Samayoa
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE
EXHIBIT A
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
North Coast Region
ORDER NO. R1-2012-0020
RECISION OF CLEANUP AND ABATEMENT
ORDER NO. 93-111
FOR
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION
ROUNDS LUMBER REMANUFACTURING PLANT
26800 Asti Road
Cloverdale, California
Sonoma County
1. On October 22, 1993, the Executive Officer of the North Coast Regional Water
Quality Control Board issued Cleanup and Abatement Order No. 93-111 (CAO
93-111) to Louisiana-Pacific Corporation for the Rounds Remanufacturing
Facility located in Cloverdale, California (Site). CAO 93-111 required the
Discharger to investigate and cleanup the Site from the discharge of wood
treatment chemicals and petroleum hydrocarbons to soil and groundwater.
2. Louisiana-Pacific removed over 1,000 cubic yards of soil contaminated with
pentachlorophenol, and total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel and motor oils in
the early 1990s. In 1996, a soil vapor extraction system was installed and
operated for four years. In addition, an interceptor trench was installed
upgradient of the area to divert groundwater from the area of contamination. In
2000, the soil vapor extraction system was converted to a bioventing system.
3. Louisiana-Pacific Corporation has complied with CAO 93-111, and the Order is
no longer needed.
THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that Cleanup and Abatement Order No. 93-111 is
rescinded.
Ordered by
Original signed by
Catherine Kuhlman
Executive Officer
January 10, 2012
1200202000R
EXHIBIT B
California Regional Water Quality Control. Board
North Coast Region
ABATEMENT ORDER NO.
3-111
FOR
Louis imus- PACIFIC CORPORATION
I PLANT
RDIANUEAC
ROUNDS LUKBER
26810 Asti Road, ClaVerd1le
SOtalla Cattaty
California Regional Water Quality C Inv *
1,
Ths Lenisione
4-
2.
:ie.-
3
4, Earth Coast Region, finds that:
I.:
Cher:
ed a:
:aciftc C c -rat
Dume7.- :ear actrrin '1,
ear, hick is bet lei
59
atpcsc
elft
Hign
discnazter, ores
_h.. 7:1-9 38' Ee' r 111,
...a. and :Le Rut :an E
fatal ..-
v.tt
r
s
122°
of the Ail' of Clove -dale
thrt 3 111)1e8
mare adopted Waste Discharge Reqpinaments
1 .rch It, 1991. This Order contains the fall
The R :1
Rot.
r
No. 91-35 for this
discharge
prohi
A.3
1
13053 c
ire/
of
3.
c 5411]
I
.
disci rge
:ate
ocntaunratien, or nuisance, as defined by Section
[Heal th I t V
1, is prabibi as
12 ti "o' n_ -. Water 'Ore e ( Oat
Ss fat:* Ct
A. B. T
s
palLutim.
.
_
Eters
t
'..ad treat-at.:
-
o gran xt 3
apjltt.
Wad 3
r;-:
lent for u.s ion
sad pen ad-. 3rt-r
tetrachic
applicam i as n ie . a t: a LI
The el
::. water : -p
0.-d:hap
f
r
S.
1oW
data a I th
?qua rant
_
hemicals
:3
is proho:
to &Sing Ltt_l
.
slit g
apprccrarz
Far,
art= fun
'ta
ties to
U.
In a. ti 19
.
ptr
i_ral
-
_rite' ease
i ins cove.
allert
ater
t
8.-_t_ca
a::
the
use
of
ag the
i I it3cons cructerl tar Lob i nixed t - removal of the
assoc:: :ed recycling s
the tirmantling or turvi-g of t
in d p rtment vtu..
1 'T
7 5 lose
-t; Li
rhn iger
SIN Consulting Enginear. and Goaloi sits (SHP) to conduct a
:cr ooteatial ccmtanctne-ticr, :rots regalace: Lod hazardous
site a 3BBI met
Itt2Carch, 1c52, test holes were
mates]. Is pre n_n. -7 to selling the p.ope_t
Lew. _he former spray tank
s_eing
department
awn
:redeem
I :n
e
excal.
JW gla,red surface
0.5
an
1.3
feet
collected
at
y
e
rs
Sr
:11-.E
and s
!Me. 3 m cc -re:Tit-rations of 12 ppm TOR Ent 68 Lan I?. The Department of
-Eves
' ar:_on level for TCP,TCP in SC L- is 3 7
n ic
Healt
rat
.
t
I.
CLEANUP AND AEAT
ORDER NO. 93-111
11.
This en-..r, a a
:non is befrg taken
ezi lb, -efo-_
,
_
Qualit act
Ent-a from fee orcnt
the C. r_ecti _ Lt. Le em-rirmrenent
tons of the Ca :±:rta Envarorna--
it
(_uo_at Resent:. s Cc e, Sect an 2L)cc et see .;
accornaa
A
T: tle
atif_rnia Cade of Regulations!.
"f"
Settex _ 15321., Coapter
=Mat I'
_S URFEY ORDERED trt
rsa t t" Cal-_foreda sten Code Section 13304,
Louisiana-Perifif
Moran 2 Db.
fannf -taring Flant, shall cleanup or
abate the
ste _scat -ges as f hot ;:
1.
flat
with the "Ca.....-er. 13 a Rea ad ectuz
tws.igttcn Wcz-rz Plan'
3 T Consttcg rgiate
t
2.
rs
Ms' real ars lefts
The ;cmject
an'
.o Le deLuve_fuhaut a coil c.
e.
atai 1. qtnlxr
G
103
d
cl
a F
199
los]. And / rc
a2 prepared
Sal; ttad te trE
eE
ts Fnr
ptPe,b4t 23, 1993.
arta bas a tare schedule leedinE.
tie Iisree-ter on December 12, 199k.
_a: "r pore or finalat;s" ta tbe Region. _
az.
gate :
or
ger
.*
Ifl 1r
2 indirns"
clueaor shall
by Lecember 21.
Jai.
Z
_
di
al
fa
.-eat
2.993.
3.
.3 relnane the 're _a-. of
finclinge aid satnait a plan for
a.r_tement of unman eat_ on to the begichal Roars' by Jan
E ;chedale
ea
a c1.
_ y
ng t, the t-"1y c- earn of the content n
nmcutive Officer
October 22, 3.9P3
(LP-
-931
3:
-nut e-ir f or
5. Including
is".
EXHIBIT C
Additional Site Investigation
Report of Findings
Former Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility
26800 Asti Road
Cloverdale, California
Case No. 1NS0040
Prepared for:
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
Consultin En neers & Geologists, Inc.
812 W Wabash Ave.
Eureka, CA 95501-2138
707441-8855
November 2010
095107.209
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS, INC.
812 W Wabash Ave.
Eureka, CA 95501-2138
707-441-8855
FAX: 707-441-8877 [email protected]
Reference: 095107.209
November 15, 2010
Ms. Janice Goebel
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
North Coast Region
5550 Sky lane Boulevard, Suite A
Santa Rosa, CA 95403
Subject:
Additional Site Investigation Report of Findings, Former Louisiana-Pacific
Corporation Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, 26800 Asti Road,
Cloverdale, California; Case No. 1NS0040
Dear Ms. Goebel:
This report of findings describes the activities and results from the subsurface investigation
completed by SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc. (SHN) at the Cloverdale
Remanufacturing Facility, on behalf of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LP). The sampling was
conducted in accordance with the April 27, 2009 work plan and November 20, 2009 work plan
addendum. The work was approved by the RWQCB in an e-mail dated April 30, 2010. The
subsurface investigation activities were conducted at the site on July 22 and 23, 2010. This work
was conducted to address remaining gaps in the soil data to justify closure of the site. No
additional soil investigation is warranted.
If you have any questions, please call me at 707
-8855.
Sincerely,
SHN Consulting Engineers
Geologists, Inc.
Mike Foget, P.P.
Project Manager
JAKE/ RMR:j11
Enclosure:
copy wjertd.:
Report
April Ingram, LP Corp.
Jeff Huhn
\ \ eureka \ Projects \ 1995\ 095107-C1overdaleRounds \ 209\ PUBS\ rpts \ 20101115-51R0E.doc
Reference: 095107.209
Additional Site Investigation
Report of Findings
Former Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility
26800 Asti Road
Cloverdale, California
Case No. 1NS0040
Prepared for:
Louisi
a-Pacific Corporation
Prepared by:
En7
Consulting Engineers & Geologis
812 W. Wabash Ave.
Eureka, CA 95501-2138
707 411-8855
November 2010
QA/ QC :MKF
\ eureka\ Projects \ 1995\ 095107-CloverdaleRaunds \ 209\ PUBS \ rpts \ 20101115-5IROF.doc
Table of Contents
Page
List of Illustrations .....................................
.
Abbreviations and Acronyms
iii
1.0
Introduction
1.1
Background
1.2
Site Remedial History
2.0
Objective
3.0
Scope of Work ...........
3.1
Project Implementation...
3.2
Field Program ___________
3.3
Laboratory Analysis. ....
3.5
Equipment Decontamination Procedures
3.6
Waste Handling
.-..--
4.0
5.0
......
3
3
Hydrogeology
Results of the Investigation-Maintenance Building/ AST
Soil Analytical Results . ... .... .
Groundwater Analytical
Discussion and Recommendations
5.1
5.2
5.3
6.0
Results of the Investigation-Siding Department Area
6.1
Soil Analytical Results
6.2
Discussion and Recommendations
References Cited .
Appendices
A.
B.
C.
\ \ eureka \ Projects \
Historic Data
Field Notes and Boring Logs
Laboratory Analytical Reports
5\
CloverdaleRounds\ 209 \ PUBS \ rpts \ 2010
1
5-SIROF d
....
4
5
. , ..
.. ....
..
.
.
.....
6
List of Ilustrations
Follows Page
es
1.
4.
5.
6.
Site Lot than Map . .
Site Pl.m..
.
..........
Generalized Hviirogeolo,,ic. Cross Sec In A-A
Generalized 1-1ydrogrob %lc Cross beiEun
Summary of Al Idly' h alResults. Maintenance Area, lab 2010
_
.
Soil Analytical Reu is, July 201n
Pioxiii and Furan Content' air, ins in Soil, July 2010
.1
1
.. 4
4
....
es
5
Page
klaintenance Guild]] tg,'AST Area-Soil Analytical Re,ults, luh 22, 2010 ..
mg/ AST Area- Groundwater A.n., 1)/ ik Results, July 22,
Maintenanco
5
2010
6
Siding Department Area -Soil Analytical Results, July 23, 2010, .
......, 7
Siding Di pal burnt Area-Soil Anal) ticil Fey d ts-Dioxin and Furan El Q1, July
23, 20) 0
.
aterouids \2Q9 \PUBS \zgts \201 M ISSIFOr.doc
Abbreviations and Acronyms
mg/ Kg
pg /g
ug/ L
AST
B-#
BGS
BTEX
CHHSL
DOT
EPA
G-P
LP
MCL
MTBE
MW-#
17-#
PCP
PVC
R&K
RWQCB
SHN
SPT
SVE
SVOCs
TCP
TEQ
TPHD
TPHG
TPHMO
TPHSS
VE-#
VOCs
"less than" the stated method reporting limit
Not Analyzed
milligram per Kilogram
picograms per gram
micrograms per Liter
Aboveground Storage Tank
Boring-number
Below Ground Surface
Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and total Xylenes
California Human Health Screening Levels
Department of Transportation
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Georgia-Pacific
Inside Diameter
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
Maximum Contaminant Level
Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether
Monitoring Well-number
Piezometer-number
Pentachlorophenol
Polyvinyl Chloride
Rounds and Kilpatrick Lumber Company
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region
SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc.
Standard Penetration Test
Soil Vapor Extraction
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
Tetrachlorophenol
Toxic Equivalent
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Motor Oil
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Stoddard Solvent
Vapor Extraction well-number
Volatile Organic Compounds
\ \ euraka \ Projects \ 1995
51 7
erdaleRounds \ 209\ PUBS\ rpts 217/10
iii
5-SIROF.doc
1.0
Introduction
This report of findings describes the activities and results from the subsurface investigation
completed by SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc. (SHN) at the Cloverdale
Remanufacturing facility, on behalf of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LP). The sampling was
conducted in accordance with the April 27, 2009 work plan and November 20, 2009 work plan
addendum. The work plan was approved by the RWQCB in an e-mail dated April 30, 2010. The
subsurface investigation activities were conducted at the site on July 22 and 23, 2010.
1.1
Background
The site is located approximately 2 miles south of Cloverdale, east of Highway 101, at 26800 Asti
Road, Cloverdale, Sonoma County, California, Assessor's Parcel numbers 118-010-15 and -34
(Figure 1). Comprised of 42.9 acres, the site is situated within the southwest quarter of Section 28,
and the southeast quarter of Section 29, Township 11 North, Range 10 West, Mount Diablo Base
and Meridian.
Rounds and Kilpatrick Lumber Company (R&K) originally developed this site as a lumber mill in
the late 1940s. In 1948, R&K began using the site for their lumber milling operations. The majority
of the development presently remaining at the site was constructed by R&K. In 1967, R&K sold the
site to Georgia-Pacific (G-P). In 1972, LP acquired the site. Redwood Empire Lumber acquired the
site in 1995 and is the current operator of the facility.
A site plan is included as Figure 2.
1.2
Site Remedial History
The site remedial history includes the following activities:
September 1995: 255 cubic yards of Pentacblorophenol (PCP) and Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons as Stoddard Solvent (TPHSS) contaminated soil were excavated _Flom
the former Siding Department area (Figure 2),
September 1995: 70 cubic yards of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline
(TPHG), as Diesel (TPHD), and as Motor Oil (TPHMO) contaminated soil were
excavated from the maintenance area (Figure 2).
September 1995: 250 cubic yards of PCP and I DHSS contaminated soil were
excavated during the installation of the up-gradient dewatering trench (Figure 2).
September 1996: the Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) system was installed and began
operation. During the operation, an estimated 921 pounds of contaminants were
removed by the system (SHN, 2001).
October 2000: the SVE system was converted to operate in a bioventing mode.
February 2002: the bioventing system was taken off-line.
Groundwater monitoring has occurred at the site since October 1993. Historic data
is included in Appendix A.
\ \ eureka \ Projects \ 1995\ 095107-CloverdaleRoun
209\ PUBS \
2
5-SIROF.doc
SITE LOCATION
SOURCE: CLOVERDALE AND AST/
USGS 7.5 MINUTE
1 ''=200012
QUADRANGLES
Construing Engineers
& Geologists, Inc
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
Cloverdale Remanufacturmg
Cloverdale, California
September 2010
095107-209-5,11T-TXTN
Site Location Map
SHN 095107 209
Figure 1
LW,
ak5
.41
n't
%en,
ei
4, 7 rill,
/I",
01,
R/////
4.
/"./ /1/ Aft,
"
2.0 Objective
The objective of the site work was to fill the remaining gaps in soil data to justify site closure. This
was done by obtaining additional information regarding the vertical and lateral extent of soil
contamination at the fointer Siding Department (in the vicinity of historic soil borings B-104 and B106) and to evaluate site soils for the presence of dioxin/furan compounds. In addition, at the
request of the RWQCB, soil and groundwater samples were collected near the Maintenance
Shop/Above Ground Storage Tank (AST) area, in order to determine any petroleum hydrocarbon
impacts in this area.
3.0
Scope of Work
This scope of work included the following activities:
Conducting project implementation, including permit acquisition, subcontractor
coordination, Underground Service Alert Notification, and agency coordination
Installing five soil borings and collecting soil samples to delineate the vertical and
lateral extent of contaminants of concern in the vicinity of soil borings B-104 and B106 (Siding Department area)
Installing two borings /temporary well points in the Maintenance Building/ AST area
Submitting soil and groundwater samples for laboratory analysis
Preparing this report of findings summarizing the results of the additional
investigation, updating the geologic cross-sections, and providing recommendations
for further activities to move the site towards closure
3.1
Project Implementation
SHN coordinated all activities related to the project, including obtaining all necessary drilling
permits and corresponding with the County of Sonoma Department of Environmental Health. A
review of existing as-built drawings of the facility and notification of Underground Service Alert
was conducted prior to the commencement of field activities.
3.2
Field Program
The field program consisted of completing soil borings in the vicinity of historic soil borings B-104
and B-106. Soil samples were collected from the soil borings and submitted for laboratory analysis.
Two borings/temporary well points were installed in the Maintenance Building/AST area. Field
notes for activities completed during the site investigation are included in Appendix B.
3.3
Laboratory Analysis
Soil samples from the Siding Department area were analyzed for the following:
Dioxins and furans, in general accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Method No. 8290
\ \ eureka \ Projects \ 1995 \ 095107-Cloverdale
ds \ 2D PUBS \ rpts 20101115-SIRORdoc
2
PCP and Tetrachiorophenol (TCP), in general accordance with EPA Method No.
8270D SIM
TPHSS, in general accordance with EPA Method No. 8015M
Soil samples om the Maintenance Building/AST area were analyzed for the following:
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Motor Oil (IPHM0), as Diesel (TPHD), and as
Gasoline (TPHG), in general accordance with EPA Method No. 8015M
Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and total Xylenes (BTEX); and Methyl TertiaryButyl Ether (MTBE), in general accordance with EPA Method No. 8021B
The groundwater sample from the Maintenance Building/AST area was analyzed for the following:
TPHMO, 11 HD, and TPHG, in general accordance with EPA Method No. 8015M
BTEX and MTBE, in general accordance with EPA Method No. 8021B
The dioxin and furan analyses were performed by Frontier Analytical Laboratory located in El
Dorado Hills, California. All other analyses were performed by Friedman & Bruya, Inc, located in
Seattle, Washington.
3.5
Equipment Decontamination Procedures
All small equipment that required on-site cleaning during site investigation activities was cleaned
using the following wash system. The equipment was first washed in a water solution containing
Liquinox® cleaner, followed by two distilled water rinses. All drilling equipment was cleaned prior
to arriving on site, and steam-cleaned between each boring location.
3.6
Waste Handling
Soil generated during drilling activities was contained in 55-gallon Department of Transportation
(DOT) approved drums and stored on site. The contents of the drums were sampled for disposal
characterization, The soil generated during site investigation activities will be disposed of at an
approved facility. Laboratory analytical results from the samples from the drums are included in
Appendix C.
Purge and decontamination water generated during field activities were contained in 55-gallon
DOT drums and stored on-site. The water will be treated by processing through granular activated
carbon.
4.0
Hydrogeology
At elevations ranging between 270 and 350 feet above Mean Sea Level, the project site occupies the
surface of a Quaternary fluvial terrace on the west side of the Russian River, which flows south
through the Alexander Valley. The Alexander Valley is bound on the east by the Maacama fault
zone, and to the west by the Healdsburg fault. Alexander Valley was created by extensional downdropping and en-echelon faulting between the northwest trending, right lateral, strike-slip faults
related to the migration of the Mendocino Triple Junction.
overdaleRounds \ 209 \ PUBS \ rpts 20101115-51ROF.doc
3
Geologic deposits underlying the site consist of two principle units: The Late Jurassic to Late
Cretaceous age Central Belt of the Franciscan Complex, and the Quaternary age alluvium,
colluvium, and terrace deposits (Wagner and Bortugno, 1982).
In the project area, the Franciscan is composed of two principal rock types. The most common rock
is interbedded sedimentary rock consisting of arkose sandstone, siltstone, and claystone. The
subordinate rock type of the Franciscan is serpentinite and intrusive sills of diabase gabbro,
serpentinized peridotite, in addition to glaucopharte and related schists. These sills generally occur
in concordant sheet or tabular dikes within the sandstone and siltstone. Franciscan bedrock
outcrops are present at the southeast and midsections of the property. They are highly fractured,
folded, and sheared. Colluvium derived from the Franciscan bedrock mantles the natural slopes
and low-lying areas at the project site.
A broad, flat, alluvial plain borders the site to the north-northwest. Quaternary alluvium
composed of well-graded silty sand, gravel, sand and silt was encountered northwest of the Siding
Department area These sediments are typical of overbank stream deposits and can be associated
with past periodic flooding of the Russian River.
Groundwater at the site generally flows toward the east-northeast with a gradient of approximately
0.003 feet per foot. Depth-to-groundwater varies significantly across the site and historically has
ranged from approximately 6 to 28 feet Below Ground Surface (BGS). Hydrogeologic cross sections
are included on Figures 3 and 4.
5.0
Results of the Investigation-Maintenance Building/AST Area
On July 22, 2010, SHN supervised Clearheart Drilling in the installation of two soil
borings/temporary well points (B-204 and B-205) for the collection of soil and groundwater samples
in the Maintenance Building/AST area Soil borings were installed using a truck-mounted Deep
Rock drill rig. Borings were extended to a maximum of 40 feet BGS. Soil samples were collected
from selected depths using a California Modified Split Spoon or Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
sampler. Following retrieval of the sampler, the brass sample tubes were removed from the
sampler, and the selected sample aliquot was sealed on both ends with Teflon® tape and plastic
caps. Soils in the remaining sample tubes were used for soil descriptions. Soils were described in
general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System.
Soil samples were labeled with the project name, project number, sample number, sample depth,
and sample time and date. All samples were placed in Ziploc® bags and stored in an iced cooler.
Soil samples were analyzed for constituents described in the Laboratory Analysis section below.
Sample handling, transport, and delivery to the laboratory were documented using chain-ofcustody procedures.
After augering to the desired depth, temporary well points were installed in each borehole. The
well points were constructed using 2-inch Inside Diameter (I.D.) Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) casing
and 0.010-slotted well screen.
Temporary well point B-204 was screened from 3040 feet BGS in silts and weathered sandstone or
siltstone. The well point was dry after sitting for approximately 15 hours. No indications of
\ eurelca Projects \ 1995 \ 095107-floverdaleRounds \ 209 \ PUBS \ rpts 20101115-SIROF.doc
4
-290
a290
285
285
280
10
10
280
275
15
15
275
CD
t 270 m 20
20 m 270
Ui
265
25
255
260
30
260
35
255
40
250
CeLANATION
SILT OR CLAY (FILL OR AMMO
255
35
SL7Y SAND
5/L1570NE
SERPEN77NITE
250
40
F
GR4143. ONOICH & EXCAVATION RACKFILL)
SCREENED INTERVAL
SCALE* 1'' =30'
RANGE OF DORN TO OROUNDWA7ER
? INDICATES WELL IS CHEN DRY
ciii:t492trrs
Lows:Lana-Pacific Corporabon
Clovesdale Rentanufacturwg
Cloverdale, California
Otloba 2010
I
on2-09-Etm
Generalized Hydrowologic
Cro. Sedan A-k
51.1 095107103
Figure 3
0
,-285
P
4,
265
e'
280
280
275
10
10
275
270
15
15
270
20
20
01
8
en
t 265
z0
to
260
to
265
t
LL
25
260
EXPLANATION
255
zz9
30
255
I-35
250
54LT OR aAY (FILL OR NA7710
5/L7Y 5AND
250
35
5/L7Y GRAVEL
Li
SILTSTOME
DRY
SERPEVI7MTE
245
40
245
GRAVEL (EXC4144770N 64C/09g)
DET177/ TO W47E?
SCALE
240
45
A-MEG/ED IN7ERIGIL
45
RANGE OF DEPTH TO GROLINONVER
7 1469/04725 WELL /S OF7EV DRY
Lotus:am-Pacific Corporation
Cloverdale Remanufacturmg
Uoverdale, California
am..
wnwaysEas
H
l'=5% V
240
Genetalssal Hydrogeologic
Cary Section B-13'
10119
I
Figure 4
groundwater were observed in the soil cuttings or soil samples collected. Temporary well point B205 was screened from 25 to 35 feet BGS in mudstone, and water was evident on the soil sampler
when retrieved from 30 feet BGS.
Temporary well point B-205 was purged and sampled using a new disposable bailer The
groundwater sample was decanted directly into laboratory supplied sample containers, labeled
with the project name, project number, sample number, sample time, and date. Sample containers
were placed into an ice-filled cooler, and transported under chain-of-custody documentation to a
State of California- certified analytical laboratory for chemical analysis of constituents described in
the Laboratory Analysis section.
All bore holes were backfilled with cement grout and capped to ma
Field notes and soil boring logs are included in Appendix B.
5.1
e existing surface cover,
Soil Analytical Results
Table 1 presents the analytical results for the soil samples collected from the maintenance
building/AST area during the July 2010 site investigation. A summary of select analytical results
for the maintenance building/AST area are presented in Figure 5. Laboratory analytical reports are
included in Appendix C.
Table 1
Maintenance BuildinWAST Area-Soil Analytical Results, July 22, 2010
Former Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, California
n png/Kg)1
EthylTo
e Location
Tind 02 TPLID2 TPHG2 Benzene3 Toluene3 benzenes Xylene
peel (feet)
B-204@11
B-204@16`
B-204-@211-
B-204@25'
B-204@311
B-204@35'
3.
4.
5.
1105
1705
1
115
14
<10
<10
<2
31
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0.79
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
21
I
<0 06
<0 06
<0 06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<0,06
<0.06
<0.06
<0.06
<01
<01
<01
<01
<0.1
<01
<01
<0.2
400
1,800
<01
<0.2
B-205@fl
<50
<10
<10
<0.2
<0 1
B-205@161
<50
i
<10
<0.2
<0.1
B- 205 @21'
<50
<02
<al
<50
47
B- 205@25'
mg/Kg: milligrams per Kilogram
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Motor Oil (TPHMO), as Diesel (TPHD), and as Gasoline (TPHG) analyzed in
general accordance with EPA Method No. 8015M
Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Total Xylenes, and Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether (MTBE), analyzed in general
accordance with EPA Method No. 80218
<: "less than" the stated method reporting limit
The sample chromatographic pattern does not resemble the fuel standard used for quantification.
B- 205 @5'
1.
2.
<50
<50
<50
MTBE3
I
\ \ eureka \ Projects \ 1995 \ 095107-CloverdaleRouncts \ 209 \ PUBS \rpts \201.01115SIROF.doc
5
i
EXPLANAllON
MW-2 MONI7ORMIC WELL LOCA770N AND
S
DESICA44770N
P-72 P6208LaN LOCATION AND
0
1PE-2
S
DES/CNA170N
SOIL VAPOR EX7RAC770N WELL
LOCAJION AND DESICAATION
8-702 S011 BORING LOCATION AND
DES/GMT/ON
8-204 SOIL BORN4D/WL72. POINT
LOC4770iV AND DES/OAM770IV
SAMPLE WM/ (1-tu SO)
<50
11
14
11
16
21
25
<50
<50
<10
14
<2
<50
<10
<2
<50
11
31
110
65
35
170
100
<2
<2
<2
31
-6
1 600
400
<2
11
<50
<10
<2
7PHO
INV
16
21
<50
<10
<2
<50
510
<2
RESULTS IN mOrg
<50
47
<2
SMW-4
1"=50'
NOM ALL LOCA77ONS ARE APPROXIMA7E
a-P
CI o,eieda,e
Cloyed
Psl
PI
Oar
iybeal Results
Anao, July2010
5.2
Groundwater Analytical Results
Table 2 presents the analytical results for the groundwater sample collected from B-205 during the
July 2010 site investigation. Laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix C.
Table 2
Maintenance Building/AST Area-Groundwater Analytical Results, July 22, 2010
Former Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, California
(in ug/L)s
Sample
Location
TPHMO2 TPHD2 TPHG2 I Benzenes Toluenes
benzenes I Xylenes3
B-205
<1.5
<5
<50
<03
<03
<0.5
<504_1 255
ug /L: micrograms per Liter
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Motor Oil (TPHMO), as Diesel (TPUD)/ and as Gasoline (TPI -IG) analyzed in
general accordance with EPA Method No. 8015M
Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Total Xylenes, and Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether (MTBE), analyzed in general
accordance with EPA Method No. 8021B
I
.
2.
3.
4.
: "less than" the stated method reporting limit
The sample chromate ra chic pattern does not resemble the fuel standard used for cm
5.3
titati
Discussion and Recommendations
Low concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHMO and TPHD) were detected in four of the
six soil samples collected from B -204 Groundwater was not present in the temporary well point in
B-204.
Low concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHMO and TPHD) were detected in two of the
five soil samples collected from B-205. Depth to groundwater was measured at, approximately 30
feet BGS. TPHD was detected in the groundwater sample collected from B-205 at a concentration of
25 micrograms per Liter (ug/L), which is below the water quality objective of 100 ug/L (Marshack,
2004).
Based on the low concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in soils, the lack of significa
groundwater impacts in sample 13-205, and the historic groundwater analytical data from wells VE4 and MW-5, it appears that soil impacts are limited, and groundwater has not been impacted in
this area of the site. SHN is recommending no further action for the Maintenance Building/AST
area.
6.0
Results of the Investigation-Siding Department Area
On July 23, 2010, SHN supervised Clearheart Drilling in the installation of five soil borings in the
Siding Department area. Soil borings were installed using a truck-mounted Deep Rock drill rig.
Borings were extended to a maximum of 25 feet BGS. Soil samples were collected from selected
depths using a California Modified Split Spoon or SPT sampler. Following retrieval of the sampler,
the brass sample tubes were removed from the sampler, and the selected sample aliquot was sealed
on both ends with Teflon® tape and plastic caps. Soils in the remaining sample tubes were used for
soil descriptions. Soils were described in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification
\ \ eureka \ Projects \ 1995 \ 09.5107-CloverdaleRounds \ 209 \ PUBS \ rpts 20101
6
5
OF.doc
<c-i7c_aA.
System. At a few locations, the sampler could not fully penetrate the subsurface materials, and all
soils removed were needed for laboratory analysis. In order to minimize disturbance of the
laboratory samples, the soils could not be fully described.
Soil samples were labeled with the project name, project number, sample number, sample depth,
and sample time and date. All samples were placed in Ziploc® bags and stored in an iced cooler.
Soil samples were analyzed for constituents described in Laboratory Analysis section. Sample
handling, transport, and delivery to the laboratory were documented using chain-of-custody
procedures.
All bore holes were backfilled with bentonite chips capped to match the existing surface cover.
Field notes and soil boring logs are included in Appendix B.
6.1
Soil Analytical Results
Tables 3 and 4 present the analytical results for the soil samples collected in the Siding Department
area during the July 2010 site investigation. Laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix
C.
Table 3
Siding Department Area-Soil Analytical Results, July 23, 2010
Former Cloverdale Remantdacturing Facility, Cloverdale, California
an nedsp
Sample Location
& Depth (feet)
13-
PCP2
<0.14
0.26
[email protected]'
B-106A@191
B-106A@25'
<0.1
B-201@12'
<0.1
B-201@17'
<0.1
B-202@135'
0.915
I
<0.1
B-202@183'
<0.1
[email protected]'
B-203@17
<0.1
mg/Kg: milligrams per Kilogram
2,3,4,6TCP2
<0.1
.
2,3,4,5 +
2,3,5,6-TCP
<0.2
<0.1
<02
<al
<0.2
<0.1
<0
<02
<02
<1
<2
<0.2
i
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1
<0
<0.1
<0.1
f
<02
<02
TIIISS3
P
<10
39
<10
<10
<10
350
<10
<10
<10
Pentachloropheriol (PCP) and. Tetrachlorophenol (TCP), analyzed in general accordance with
EPA Method No. 8270D SIM
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Stoddard Solvent (FPHSS) analyzed in general accordance
with EPA Method No. 8015M
: "less than" the stated method reporting limit
The result is below normal reporting limits. The value reported is an es
\ \ eureka \ Projects \ 1995 \ 095107-Cloverrl *Rounds \ 209 \ PUBS\ rp ts 20101115-SIROF.doc
7
ate
Table 4
Siding Department Area-Soil Analytical Results-Dioxin and Furan
TEQ1, July 23, 2010
Former Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, California
(in p&p
Sample Location & Depth
TEQ
(feet)
B-104A@17'
B-106A@ 9.5'
I
7.10
149
335
B- 06A@25'
B- 201 @12'
0
13-201@l7'
B-202@141
B- 202@19'
48A
557
5.49
L-203
B-20
]
0
0
5
EPA Region 9- Regional Screening
Level, for Industrial Soil-May 2010
ri
TEQ: Toxic Equivalent, World Health Organization 1998
,2
as/z. oicograrts per zram
__.
18.0
Soil analytical results for the Siding Department area are presented on Figures 6 and 7. Dioxin and
furan results were reported as Toxic Equivalents (TEQs). A complete summary of the dioxin and
furan analytical results is included in Appendix A.
6.2
Discussion and Recommendations
Based on the results of this and previous investigations, the extent of soil impacted with PCP, TCP,
and TPHSS has been defined vertically and horizontally in the Siding Department area
Dioxin/furans have been defined to below EPA Regional Screening Levels (Ras) both vertically
and horizontally (except at boring B-201). Drilling conditions were extremely difficult at boring B201, and the boring could not be advanced below 17 feet BGS. Groundwater samples from well VE2 (near W201) were analyzed for dioxins /furans in May 2007, and results from this sample were
below the California Department of Health Services Maximum Contaminant Level (MCI)
(Marshack, 2003) of 30 picograms per Liter (pg/L).
A groundwater monitoring event took place in October 2010, although several wells were dry. A
groundwater monitoring report for this event will be submitted separately. The next groundwater
monitoring event will be performed in January 2011. Groundwater samples will be collected from
wells MW-2, -3, -6, extraction well VE-2, and piezometers P-5, -11, -12, and -17. Following the
January 2011 groundwater monitoring event, a final detailed summary of groundwater conditions
will be prepared with estimates of the timeframe to reach water quality objectives.
This report concludes our soil investigation portion of the data gap analysis. Soil impacts have
been adequately defined. The impacted soil is localized at depth underneath the paved floor of a
building. PCP, TCP, IPHSS, and dioxin / furan compounds are not listed in the California Human
Health Screening Levels (CHHSLs) for indoor air and soil gas, therefore vapor intrusion issues are
\ \ eurelca \ Projects \ 1995 \ 095107-CloverdaleRaunds \ 209 PUBS \ rpts \ 20101115-SLRCEdoc
8
ID<PLANATION
MW-2
S
P-12
PlaDMETER LOCATION AND
W-2
SOIL IMPOR EXTINCTION WELL
LOCATION AND D6/CWAI7ON
9
Zag
MONWORING WELL LOCATION AND
DESIGNATION
B-102
SOIL BORING LOCATION AND
B-204
S
SOIL BORNG/WELL POWLOCATION AND DESVMPON
2-4'
SAMPLE DEPTH (Mu B^S)
DESIGNATION
Da
'10
1n-20
.p33
<0.03
<0.3
<10
<10
TCP
7RESOLTS IN mg/kg
?RISS
- -49
<0 03
(AVE-2
P-11
P8
B-1044
\\ P-15
6 5-7 5'
5003
,03
<00
0
2 -4
<03
e1D
B-201
SVW-7
1
®
1E-3
'10
t9 -20
<0 03
-10,5
<03
<003
sO 3
<10
45 -15
4;9
201
e1
-717T
6-8 -8
<0 03
<0 3
<10
I
<0 03
<0 3
<10
O
P-17
I
<0 03
<0 3
<10
12'
<0.1
<0.1
<10
17
<0.1
<0.1
<10
ti
/
S44W -4
AM ALL LOCATIONS ARE /PPRONMAIE
Soil Analytical Results
Siding Dapa-tmeni Area, July' 010
IHND9eitcao
Figure 6
EXPLANATION
4114-2
440,070RhV8 WELL LOCATION AND
OESIGNAnoN
P-12
14E-2
51
8-102
°Wail
O
0 00
sus BORING/WELL PONT
LOCATION AND DE5I011471ON
9 -20
0.00
3-
00
7.
sal BORING LOCATION AND
DESIGNATION
8-204
=SEIM=
LEM
INEZOMETER LOCATION AND
DESIGNITKW
SOIL SAVOR EVIRAC770N WELL
LOCATION AND DE31GN417011
1
SAMPLE DEPTH 02.41 8057
RESULT IN pg/g
NNE REPORTED AS TOXIC EQUIVALENTS
(W10 1998)
P-10®
0 0673
Anv-s
8-1064
8-20
P-17
°P-5
SA/U -6
8-1044
40411V-7
11 0
0 00
'''
P-15
4-5
< 000
P-4 C)
2-4
55 -6
6-e
8-9
0 103
\C..)
P-15 8-201 \
C)
eP-3
0 70
nfl
eraVE-2
0 00
MUM
11 -1_
1C4
9.51
I
149
, a' 8-204
000
144-45
82
54119-4
14,50'
NOM ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE
CIA1
Cursullin Eng
en
B.Certhila lnc
ban
rmg
mo
Dioxin and Furn.Conem7aftons in Son
Siding Deparunct Alt./July 2910
SliNMV.209
"ay 10
Figur, 7
not a concern (California EPA, 2005). Concentrations of PCP in soil are below the CHHSL for
commercial /industrial land use (13 mg/kg). While a few dioxin/ furan TEQs in soil are above the
EPA Regional Screening Level, the contaminant has not impacted water quality above the MCL.
No further investigation of soil impacts is warranted. A no further action request will be prepared
for the siding department area following the final groundwater monitoring event in January 2011.
References Cited
California Environmental Protection Agency. (2005). Use of California Human Health Screening
Levels (CI EISLs) in Evaluation of Contaminated Properties Sacramento:EPA
. (2005). Use of California human Health Screening Levels (CHHSLs) in Evaluation of
Contaminated Properties Sacramento:EPA
Marshack, J3., (2004). Beneficial Use-Protective Water Quality
Fuels. Sacramento:RVVQCB-Central Valley Region.
s for Components of Petroleum based
--. (August 2003 with tables updated August 2007). A Compilation
Sacramento:Cal-EPA, RWQCB-Central Valley Region.
a
Quality Goals.
SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc. (2001). Cloverdale (Former L-P) Rounds Facility
Retnediation System Performance Summary. Eureka: SHN.
---. (January 11, 2008). Site Investigation Report of Findings and Request for Closure, Louisiana-Pacific
Corporation Former Cloverdale Rounds Facility, Cloverdale, California; Case No. 1NS0040.
Eureka: SHN.
. (April 27, 2009). Additional Site Investigation Work Plan, Former Cloverdale Rounds Facility,
Cloverdale, California; Case No. 1NS0040. Eureka: SHN.
--. (November 20, 2009). Response to RWQCB Letter and Work Plan Addendum dated October 21, 2009,
Former Louisiana-Pacific Corporation Cloverdale, California; Case No 1NS0040. Eureka: SHN.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2010). Region VI Regional Screening Levels.
http:// www.epa.gov/region9/ superfund/prg/
Wagner, D. L. and E. J. Bortugno. (1982). "Geologic Map of the Santa Rosa Quadrangle, California,
Regional Geologic Map Series, Map No. 2A, Sheet 1 of 5, Scale 1:250,000." NR: NR.
\ eureka \ Projects \ 1995 095107-CloverdaleRounds 21)9 \ PUBS rpts
9
01115-SIROF.doc
Appendix A
Historic Data
Table A-1
Monitoring Well Screen Details.
Former Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, California
Well ID
Top of Casing
Elevation
(feet NGVD29)1
MW -2
MW -3
-4
MW-5
MW 6
MW-7
P-3
P-4
P-5
Total Depth
Screened Interval
(feet below grade) (feet below grade)
284 21
278.61
285.15
279.51
283.57
284,31
287.42
286.94
283 93
283 37
P-15
P-16
28131
P- 7
P49
281.27
10 5-25 5
18-28
295
14.5 -29.5
26
30.5
24.5
14-24
10
10
15
17
4 10
15
25
25
25
25
26
26
30
20
25
282.6
283.79
284.89
281 50
279.70
VE-4
279 63
281.05
I. NGVD29. National Geodetc Vertical Datum 1929
VE-1
VE-2
vE_3
eureka \ Proieetsk1995
5107-CloverdaleRounds 209 \ PUBS \ data \
20101115- HistDatazls \well details
10-30
6.5- 16.5
28616
P-11
P-12
28.5
A-1
410
10-15
12-17
10-15
20-25
20-25
20-25
20-25
6-26
6-26
10-30
5-20
10-25
SHN Consulting Engineers
& Geologists, Inc.
Table A-2
Groundwater Elevations
Former LP Cloverdale Remanufactaring Facility,
Monitoring
Point
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW -5
MW-S
MW-7
P -3
Measuring
.
Point
evation
Depth-toWater
10/2411995
284.21
278.61
285.15
279.51
283:57
284 31
287.42
j
94
P
P.8
266.16 6
28542
P -17
3.93
283.37
283.31.
282.61
281.27
P-19
2B 79
P 2
P4%
P-16
o
Point
(2
MW -3
MW-4
MW -5
MW-6
MW-7
27532
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
7
DRY
2
DRY
1JRY
2 a68
254 48
NM
1864
744
4
266 S4
2 616
P-B
28542_
P-11
P-12
283 '37
P -15
283 31
281 27
283.79
e uring
Point
,
Water
P
996
4
278 71
18 26
MW-4
5
MW-5
MW -6
279 51
283 57
982
2812
1514
MW-7
28431
2061
P -3
287 42
7.52
7.77
12.36
DRY
28644
P
286.1.6
P-8
285.42
PP-12
P-15
P -16
29
283 37
P -17
28261
28127
DRY
21.08
20.78
19.88
P-19
283 79
77,11.
28.3 31
\ eureka \12241241451945\ 0951tgaovenias
2010111411.41)25245\21ev
26567
27998
27042_
-2
3
vl
295
Depth -toto-
elevation
1
3158'
18 95
3
17 74
12 22
1
Elevation
1/184996
279 05
274 59
DRY
270 45
7 86
17 57
DRY
ds
NM
27531
259 40
NM
NM
D. Y
NM
984
2911
D
o
279 05
278 02
27394
_
DRY
267.89
DI Y
281.06
260.52
260.04
266 43
17
1736
Depth -to-
995
2/21/1996
2,335
N
18 76
7 61
8 05
265.55
27
278,59
1120
1335
1256
274.96
11 95
18 97
271421
1878
263.83
18 08
17.16
26319
270.41
NM
NM
5M
22.6 k 2
\M
4
Nht
NM
27
2711"
26434
27263
Depth-toWater
Elevation
4'Z11996
Elevation
6/1996
56/
/11996
-1- 81-
266.4
16 95
9.72
261.66
25101
26561
2'14
25237
R
DRY
DRY
28
2x569
28014
275 -2
X74
,
5 61
912
1969
276 '
4T1
219
M1P4
yr
255
-406
267 47
262 80
J
.562
I.
.27544
744
275.43
I
DRY
279.98
?8(143
277 93
7 50
11 92
7 68
279 . 26
8r
274 24
1139
274.77
120'
2 135
I7RY
DRY
DRY
10 84
2
09
14 72
269 21
269 22
IN Y
DRY
DRY
4
4
DRY
DRY
DRY
141,
297 27
1810
263 °S
151,
2,672
1
2,353
14 80
7 16
26617
266
t i. 26
Depth-toWater
.
7/3061996
7/30/1996
265 57
260 33
275 33
22'139
20 30
26191
2015
M.D
2927
253 46
275 12
26843
DR (
263.70
279.90
279.17
273.80
2237
813
857
UM5\d.W5
26 16
1176
27310
DRY
267.64
DRY
262.23
261.83
261.39
266,68
275.67
NM
2728
2217
16 10
Elevation
6/124996
9.48
1258
2( 36
27157
NM
27 e 2
2E5
6
6 46
13.80
7.74
1034.
911
2
Mvl
730
121,1
1588
Elevation
12/27/1995
12/27/1995
26197
Elmation
2/214996
Water
Depth-toWater
Elevation
12/22/1995
NM
22.09
21.23
947...
I
NM
158 96
260.65
DRY
266 01
25 03
26515
2:951
28157
1/18/1996
2x465
Elevation
9
DRY
22.25
269 66
143 03
Water
1556
DRY
261.2
221
3
:
DRY
268.44
274 .08
DRY
21,96
116/1995
4
1140995
Depth-toWater
8.91
12.22
DRY
16.04
14 55
15 58
P-5
Point
963
26421
278 61
P4
sugaring
250.01
Depth -to-
25742
P49
7
19.60
Measuring
Point
Elevation
P -S
P-16
P-17
20.04
1549
1
Elevation
1W244995
verdale, CA
22134
"Y
20, 94
2t 29
278 37
12 45
DRY
275 71
16 91
26702
DRY
DRY
260 63
260 07
259 64
265 53
DRY
2268
2254
21.63
18.24
to
Water
996
9 24
20 30
10 00
29 19
1514
22.44
817
865
1252
Y
1716
DRY
2200
2295
21,85
16 98
264 35
2 90
263
26
Depth-toWater
Elevation
W15/1996
9/4/1996
264.97
258 31.
275.15
250,32
268.43
26167
27925
1
266.77
DRY
261.31
259.66
.
259 42
266,81
494
275.16
29 29
15 75
22.61
8 26
25022
268. 2
DRY
17 33
1DRY
1
2322
2.13
22 10
16 89
51-IN Consultive En
R-2
Elevation
9/44996
258.02
1240
1
262.03
266.90
19.3420 59
874
278.29
273.64
DRY
RY
16227
264.87
2615
279.16
278 2
273.76
DRY
266.6
DRY
260.09
259
259.17
266 90
3
Table A-2
Groundwater Elevations
Former P Cloverdale Remm nfaMUring Facility Cloverdale, CA
Monitoring
Point
2 ..
e
g
Point
Elevation
Depth-toWater
284:21
19.79
19.50
278:61
996
28515
Elevation
10/8/1996
269.42
25 8`81
27.17
-5
N131
2 6 14
28610
28542
28' 91
P
P-5
-
P-8
P-11
P-12
61
P17
_
P-19
Monitoring
Point
MW-2
28(.27
283.79
g
Paint
Elevation
MW -5
MW -6
283157
MW-7
28131
28742
P-3
P-5
P-8
P-11
P -12
P-15
P-16
P -17
P -19
Monitoring
toting
Point
MW-2
MW-3
MW -5
MW -6
MW -7
P-3
P4
260.98.
9 S1
249
250
27
8.61
27833
1184
274.32
11.74
DRY
DRY
269'.03
DR
260:52
260.92
259.99
271.77
DRY
279.88
278.85
274.42
DRY
16.28
26755
DRY
21,58
DRY
261
28!54.
26207
19.76
16.75
211 51
267 04
Depth-toWater
44198
6
Elevation
1/14/1998
260 17
t "7
48
734
.09
Depth -to-
1323
16 9/
-4 9 40
18.76
17.75
15.02
264.10
263:85
263.52
268.77
1673
1524
4-9 08
t5 89
'73 31
Depth-toWater
Elevation
5/14998
21
to-
Elm. ahon
7/271998
289'
25054
12 11
270 11
111 6'-
262
27 i 57
832
1209
_ °7807
24
1271
DRY
14 91
DRY
2x9 02
DRY
1415
2 9 02
2,261
29198
.5
260.92
270.62
2012
1790
769
798
27896
274 37
DRY
4 24
20 56
19'79
19.40
11.74
1/14/1998
284 21
27161
13.74
12.87
285.15
279.51
283.57
284.31
913
2169
NM
1655
28742
28194
6 74
286.16
285,42
1215
28017
27101
DRY
13.60
DRY
270.33
1293
27E44
17.12
16.65
266.19
265.96
DRY
14.49
13 93
8,19
17.25
1529
1454
26598
26925
1165
1616
5/5/1998
7
!
26972
526
t
220275
262k2
261,87
272.05
Depth-toWater
Elevation
Elevation
4/15/1-998
20 70
20 63
0.
13.17
Depth-toWater
5/54998
1744
7
1
262 94
279 40
7.59
Depth -to-
Elevation
5/54998
Water
7
2 877
998
1714
7 07
15.22
6.41
24.69
253 39
15 98
26
27374
i 40
2203
9.19
28.05
NM
NM
27575
25348
NM
267 76
280 68
17.59
6.82
5.70
5 68
280 63
280 47
20.92
7.26
6.95
57
DRY
16.13
DRY
21.40
20.71
19,92
82
26x 72
280.6
281 24
273 68
1248
DR 13
269 44
26944
27512
265 36
264 62
26713
A-3
.79
647
I
12 39
DRY
27'
DPI
15 03
DRY
1768
260 9
DRY
264.12
263 87
263 59
16.92
266 7
19.19
74
27935
DPY
270,47
26E74
276.02
257.82
995 \ 095107-CloverdabRaunds \ 209 \ PtlEbiadata \
1
Water
260 10
275
Depth-toWater
\eiev
DI .Y
2'0 29
2 012
9.75
Y
NM
Pont
283,79
1313Y
13 04
275 2
14 81
9
DRY
9r3
I5 ZY
28261
..28127
274 2
279 61
265.35.
265 53
283,31
114,
18.51
DRY
15 40
28393
28337
28600
18,87
11 79
DR1
6 77
DRY
14.96
DRY
267 79
742
733
25150
779
1/14/1998
123
NI4
16 52
2fi9
11 C3
Elevation
279.24
273.93
DRY
268.97
275.66
259 56
19 05
9 95
28616
2 5 42
Measuring
7.70
26 4
1505
74'
270;14
281)18
NM
I
260 86
275 22
251 90
D7.1
20 25
263 2b
202tr
724
24 52
2701
20
9.49
19.95
27039
27t1
26310
18.8
27580
25499
NM
26551
3.
1382
51
19 33
18.67
6
12/19/1996
268
262.31
Elevation
149/1997
445/1998
253 01
DR
20 15
pth-toWater
1/294997
Elevation
Depth-biWater
12/194996
621
6. 0
4115/1998
26 50
NM
19 75
264
Elevation
Water
286.94
P-11
P-12
P-15
P-16
P-17
\ \ eureka\l'rojec
20901115-Hartar
1763.
27995
27915
27418
283.93
283.37
283.3
282.61
281.27
283.79
267
6.99
816
284.
278 6
285.25
27
ea
11/19/1946
26102
2149
2169
2128
1102
28131
Elevation
11/19/1996
22 29
14.90
DRY
'.337
P4.1.5
Depth-toWater
1888
NM
j
1784
261.96
261,15
265.89
Elevation
7/23/1998
26513
260 36
275 96
25146
NM
263 39
28E16
27E99
273 59
DRY
267.80
DRY
261:91
261 90
261 35
265.95
MIN Consulting Engineers
& Geologists, Inc.
I
Table A-2
Groundwater Elevations
Former LP Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, CA
Monitoring
Point
Measuring
Point
Elevation
2
284 21
MW -3
2'861
-5
MW-6
-7
2
21515
Depth-toWater
10/14/1998
19,06
19.09
8 92
Depth-toWater
Elevation
10/14/1998
Elevation
1/19/1999
1739
263.15
25952.
.276.23
18.24
1
47/1999
/2
2r 6 82
241 28
16.88
17 47
9.27
26.45
12.45
26 3
221 72
Y
21.34
7.12
7.3')
P-4
273 15
272 42
26103
P-1
P-12
P -15
_28193
687
281 27
RY
9
283.79
20.92
18.02
Depth-toWater
onitoring
Point
10/21/1999
P-12
P-15
P-16
P -17
P-19
Monitoring
Point
270;5
03
:7o 91
280 29
7.08
DRY
240 12
263.09
24
262.1
267.4
265.77
16
Depth-toWater
147/2000
Elevation
10/21/1999
Elevation
6
D pth-to
Elevation
4/1W2000
1/17/2000
266 8
20 11
276.04
276.07
4 52
275 51
279.51
250.68
26E47
15.76
2
2
Y
p -toPoint
evat'on
'on
278.61
284.31
287.42
Water
10/25/2000
DRY
DRY
SY
D,i
269.18
0
267 88
265 71
259
275
6.81
280.6
280.30
DRY
DRY
Elevation
267.3
260.91
275.66
251.20
i
949
250 57
\ eureka \ PzujectstylcD5S
2010111DHIstDaaxls\ elev
07-Gove
21.48
ndA
12
28 69
2,2 ..5
47
272_59
Din
2621
227s
26160
19 94
21 17
16 34
260 10
Depth-toWater
Depth-toWater
F R9
IRlT
I AR)
URY
261 90
4/30/2001
16 84
77
l8 82
13 07
DRY
DRY
DRY
27926
268.68
Depth-toWater
VW/20M
Elevation
10/25/2000
7/1W2000
41
263.00
13 11
7/1W2000
Elevation
766
21 10
266P7
Depth-toWater
DRY
266.19
74
DRY
262 58.
17.60
2
279.69
274.88
Elevation
4/30/2001
11 14
74
7/31/2001
20 06
19 56
' 60
2, -3
Elevation
7/31/2001
259 05
275 97
2
DRY
URI
672
280
DRY
DI Y
DRY
DR:
2677E
16.15
DRY
281.27
732
718
5
18.90
19.10
9.37
28.94
DRY
DRY
286.16
20 65
28038
IDRY
17.72
752_0
.04 1
260 "6
61
281 27
283.79
253.29
DRY
264.74
26 22
278 07
2 6.91
P -17
67
27112
21444
18 17
2&3.57
P-5
276.02
17 -3
285.15
279.51
MW-7
913
262.29
284.21
811%,-3
255 88
260.73
287.
P -11
7/30/1999
26
268.45
DRY
DRY
7/30/1999
Elevation
182c
20 03
258.41
286.94
286.16
285.42
283.93
Water
264 14
278 61
285:15
18.74
P-8
7.13
Depth -to-
267 0
I KY
261.30
261.47
P -16
Elevation
4/27/1999
28 57
12-3
Water
1/19/1999
26710
9.13
27.38
Depth o-
79
265.61
Di
20 57
6 48
267 11
A-4
274.54.
272.96,
803
8.32
271
DRY
D
DRY
DRY
DR
162
267.73
DRY
DR
DI
PRY
261.02
DRY
23.66
DRY
2131
259.96
266.27
DRY
18.69
DRY
265
7.21
7.40
13.20
DRY
21921
17 52
511/4 Consulting Engineers
& Geologists, Inc.
Table A-2
Groundwater Elevations
Former LP Cloverdale Iteraannfacturing Facility, Qoverdale, CA
Depth-toWater
Measuring
Point
Elevation
nit
a
Point
MW-2
MW-3
278.61
28515
-5
MW-6.
MW -7
P-3
279.51
283.57
28431
28- 42
P4
c4
P-5
P-8
P-11
P-12
P-15
P-16
P-17
P-19
28416
Elevation
20.13
21.77
10.06
264.08
29
25047
NM
285;42
j
15.73
?:32
26:08
DRY
19.48
7.18
7.39
12.81
DRY
27 &.04
DRY
DRY
855
279.17
8 62
DRY
DRY
Z "8:32
Y
DRY
DRY
DRY
t 6Y
I) 4Y
15 ,1
282 'V
733 31
.26261
1/29/2002
256.
NM
I
Elevation
Water
10/29/2001
10/29/2001
284.21
Depth-to
t4
281. 37
to
4/10/2002
928
27 17
252`31
DP./
29.
DRY
21.85
DI Y
262.46
214 ,5
lt,44
250 2.-1
:10
280.4
2,9 35
279:91.
dl lr,
264 92
18.66
2
1491
2C8:88.
lb 7
2 b 42
1861
26718
Depth-toWater
Elevation
Depth-toWater
Elevatvin
Depth-toWater
Elevation
MW-4
285 t5
-7497
862
265 58
276,53
251 16
DID
2311
7 61
I I'S
2274_
23 ?1
26893
280.28
17.09
6
8.82
12.23
DRY
#
2543257 4'
1/23/2003
1/23/2003
27116
4
262 20
27n 62
^ 14
74
P-8
P-11
6
P42
24 93
_281_'7
I
P-15_
281,31
1
P16
28261
t
P-17
P-19
25127
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
12
"R
NMI_
Nr 1
N1 i
Nvi
DI
12.85
MW-2
-
_4
Measuring
Point
Elevation
2342
Depth-toWater
2
Elevation
264Th
_5913
2
931
24 93
28081
28032
27315
6.30
6.42
12.77
DR
DRY
16,-0
DPY
267 27
DRY
14.29
DRY
7.77
24 25
MW -6
2
DIII.
MW -7
P-3
284.1
16742
22.12
28', 94
0 62
23'16
1
235 42
28 , 93
283.37
283 31
282 61
281 27
283 79
P-5
P-8
P-11
P-12
P- 5
P-16
7
9
631
1
1
1
1
DRY
260.93
NNf
DRY
265 41
NA
18 38
\ 09 07-CloverdaleRau
135\01a
270136
34.[;4
276.06
254.26
269.53
267.22
280.69
1/242004
16.46
15 11
250 24
DR I
2621 9
?70'3
25677
909
2525
2 0 94
1/21/2004
275 C3
25.3
MW-
-
10/8/2003
139a
1746
I
NM
NM
NM
A-5
7/9/2003
5/12/2003
14.12.
1355
17.40.
NM
NM
Depth-toWater
267.75
263.50
275.84
25
269,59
266.86
12
280.52
273.39
I
IM Y
268.03
NM
NYC
26615
2
Monitoring
Point
1213
1615..
26879
16.18
14.58
280.21
274.39
DRY
271.29
271.24.
267.16
77
P-5
DRY
DRY
261 23
16 15
30
P-3
DRY
0123
22 08
NM
21 02
269 15
MW-7
DRY
279 03
27
266 55
5
279 51
279.13.
16 7 2
194r
1018
2935
2835;
.8.29
7.91
269.95
275 61
MW -6
37
13 42
2
2o421
MW -5
264.41)
D
1= 14
DRY
19.68
Y
MW -3
1
8/1512002
275.00
MW-2
Elevation
Elevation
1015
Measuring
Point
Elevation
10/23/2002
8/15/2002
2'526
DRY
264 87
27
Water
4/10/2002
1933.
1691
Monitoring
Point
eVater
Elevation
19.81
17 01
4
ff
267.20
261.68
2W' 48
2t ' 12
2 4'1
13 8
5 41
DRY
24
22
Depth
Water
.1x93
DepthWater
4/27(2004
DIZY
269.64
DRY
265.54
14.51
13.98
17.97
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
252.39
DRY
2"505
6
52
273.66
1487 V
lc 25
( "3
L
I
DRY
267.68
3RY
242 22
i 1. ,
NM
2008
261 19
265.76
15 33
Depth-toWater
21/2004
267.78
2.52
DRY
250 76
D
2 _4
20.87
Elevation
263.32.
275.32
DRY
17.79
6.50
6.51
28.75
DRy
DRY
269.81
269.82
265.91
1529
9.83
250 H5
273.93
16.43
27. 2
26
10.09
28012
267.86
7/9/2003
2c 533
264,03.
NM
NM
N
260.25.
5(21/2009
17
13 79
Elevation
4/21/2004
6504
161I
159 82
275.04
29 23
25R28
dry
dry
26652
280.92
21 57
280.43.
7 57
262 74
28011
279 37
273.64
DRY
269.42
dry
dry
dry
16 57
267 36
26929
24296
NM
N1fi
Nlh
I
731
d-
dry
21 fiS
2,143
NM.
NM
NM
NM
1818
61
SHN Consulting gineers
&Geologists, Inc.
I
Table A-2
Groundwater Elevations
Former LP Cloverdale
doctoring Foci ity,..Cloverdale, CA
Measrring
Point
Monitoring
Point
VE-2
MW-2
MW-3
Depth-toWater
Elevation
6/2004
281 50
284.21
278.61
285.75
i
I
261.50
nos
25856
27438
24997
10.17
279.51
2454
MW -6
28357
28131
2
286 9-
DRY
22 85
8 02
286 16
DRY
DRY
DRY
D
23 23
P4
P-5
P-8
P-D.
P-12
285,42.
28343
261 31
16
17
o
Point
I
Depth-toWater
10/27/2005
28012
7.51
279.43
i 96
DRY
DRY
DRY
42Y
DRY
DRY
MW-6
P4
256 94
P-5
P-8
P-11
2" -16
18
15 ON
Ele3 alien
Depth-toWater
10/27/2005
Elevation
1/10/2006
1/101/2006
279
1401
259 20
275 03
12."7
2
9 51
29 51
-15 33
22 40
2'100
2L43
275 64
258 08
"loo 24
1244
i'0
261 85
279.52
15 01
27859
6 :4
699
1483
28048
835
283 93
P -12
P-is
P -16
Measuring
Elevation
VE-2
06
28121
27861.
2
P -3
287.42
7;90
P'4
286.94
P -5
286 76
826
1312
P-8
25,542
Nlvt
P -11.
283 93
bkY
P -12
28337
5
283 31
DR i
23 47
6
28261
NM
NM
P- 7
P49
281 27
283 79
DRY
DRY
265.40
1
18,39
07-ClovercIaleRo
\PU
NM'
NMI
NM
268.75
17 85
Depth-toWater
Elevation
Depth toWater
21,42
267:50
24
9
8/28/2006
60,08
25002.
29'7
249 /4
269.28
DRY
5
58
DRY
261 77
79 84
NM
NM
770
2 924
11 88
274.28
12 62
1504
267,57
27 ^016
1363
NM
27016
Depth-toWater
Elevation
D
-toWater
7/2607
1/17/2°017
5/9/2007
26231
26697
26116
27519
1466
NM
CM
2(7 39
NMI
282.61
28127
26607
71
-to-
D
Elevation
a er
$/9/2007
7/13/2007
Elevation
7/13/2007
26184
139
260.11
267 89
18,07
266.14
1789
26072
19.60
10 04
275 11
lam
r 29,99
25401
27499
24452
DRY
Inaccessible
.
279 64
16 32
I
I
219
28. 6
21- 5(:5
DRY
DRY
DRY
2032
26399
DRY
20,79
7A
2
741
2X001
278'68
761
273 04
NM
DRY
12 98
27933
27318
NM
NM
15 32
Di.
DRY
268.61
DRY
14.66
DRY
45
20.54
NM
DRY
16.77
26277
NM
2041
DRY
267.02
19.88
15.34
A-6
Elevation
1 92
NM
NM
1741
NM
DRY
261 69
DRY
2o550
1871
26&08
267
DRY
267 94
2006
26797
12
I
15.04
3/13/2006
1
1
NM
15 34
274 94
249 5b
DRY
MW -7
267A4
267.89
17,45
R
27.62
DF.Y
15.87
DRY
21 62
DRY
6 54
9
283.57
1615
AO
27111
17 24
279 51
27R 9
1297
NM
1919
MW-6
27359
NM
NM
NM
^_6461
MWS
279.08
1307
271,83
271.80
25938
21
2y 95
786
274
5m
19c2
2042
281550.
26291
279
1210
1157
15 42
6
7 62
27193
260
NM
250
28033
27925
279 95
70
NM
.
26824
271 21
II 64
1
27496
2913
1533
2140
19 C
D111
Depth-t
Water
10,19
2;5.24
969 2.1
NM
271.71
NM
275,£5
.71
Dill
14(3
261
265.50
26000
271 OS
1222
266.17
20.30
DRY
13.54
3/2006
7/2W2005
7/25/2005
n1
NM
12 "6
26724
NM
9
1203
2
16 69
DRY
17,62
16555
7 .1
2'019
285 4 1
282 79
I
NM
208 75
2n019
265(0
61
1012
onitoring
Point
269.80
267.76
730
205 28
1941..
P-17
P-19
13 77
273.40
NNY
2113.
28421
I
950
2427
15.23
Elevation
Water
26600
26898
3
2 143
Ns4
4/7/2005
26427
25335
DRY
DRY
Dl Y
DRY
Elevation
4P/2005
15.50
275,51
1120
Depth-toWater
DRY
268.80
8111
east.rmg
Point
Elet
28150
VE -2
MW -2
V19/2005
9.64
1-0 06
283 /9
g
1/19/2065
24 16
DRY
DRY
278.61
DRY
DRY
DRY
DR \
Niai
261.2
P-19
Elevation
Water
15.41
14.34
DRY
2
1
Depth -to-
DRY
1971
MW-5
-7
Elevation
10/16/2004
762
26352
I
DRY
Inaccessible
maw.
7.
27432
27553
NM
1290
273'6
Inaccessible
lnaccessabie.
16.03
DRY
267.90
DRY
269 27
DRY
262 37
22.74
260.57
ble
NM
DRY
268.45
27891
8.03
DRY
16.98
In cress
DRY
266 81
SHN Consulting Engineers
& Geologists, Inc.
Table A-2
Groundwater Elevations
Foiaiei LP Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, CA
or g
Point
VE-2
Measuring
281.50
21
278.61
MW-3
MW-6
283.57
284.31
287.42
286.94
286.16
28 2
P-5
10/18/2007
I
I
20.20
25.81
16 27
9'b
Inaccessible.
14. 1 9
209 44
," 3.,
)111-0'
12 95
253 1
DRY
21 50
261 81
282.61
Inaccessible.
Inaccessible
Inaccessible
Inaccessible
28120
DRY
DRY
Elevation
12/2/2008
V2
28730
21.09
MW-2
MW-3
264 2"
1652
_'861
1
28742
25604
76
9.78
29.97
15.10
22 23
7 68
7.76
28"
12.45
285
Inaccessible
2
-2
57
I
-8
2_8393
P -12
t
2v 3 37
2,
P -26
282.61
281.27
283.79
Inaccessible
Measuring
Point
Elevati
Depth-toWater
P -19
donng
mut
VT-2
MW-2
MW-3
ssib le
3/9/2010
2912
Depth-to-
e
5/2W8/20ater09
260.41
267.69
258.85
20 36
16 71
18 72
2791i
768
27171
Inaccessinle
12 59
Inane uble
Inner aimlc
Inaccessible
lnacassable
2139
259881
267 71
DRY
DRY
66.56
.2
Depth-to-
Elevation
258.89
259 39
19 oh
21 26
265 15
__ 2.7) 95
275 24
DRY
272 00
-
29.1.3_
or
DRY
=EMI
anfl
DRY
806
Inaaessible
229 36
DRY
9 09
DRY
Inacu_ssible
DRY
DRY
DRY
Elevatain
Depth-toWater
Elevation
Depth-toWater
Elevation
2616'
6/3/2010
2
271
380.36
280.07
272.07
265.49
271.38
733
6.82
12.07
1339
13.12
19.56
18.58
14.70
DRY
23.89
Inaccessible
DRY
279 96
279.
Ic ccessible
DRY
DRY
1006
DR \
259 97
275 74
4
DRY
7, 8 86
.1834
009
22 61
265 92
3/9/2010
ort
Water
0/15/2009
DRY
283 31
15.78
12.41
259.47
1737
ss1,
alline0
N/Yr
IllEaa
Illnall 272.10
NM Ma
28 . 7
283/9
23 84
Inaccessible
cm
P-5
1
260 80
267.50
2-41
Inacctsaole
25 ' 32
Inners ithle
276.17
Inaccessible'
269.00
=MS
258.90
i
sccessable
DRY
273.73
001
81/2010
/1
13/11/2010
26316
22 62
258 88
18 83
20 95
9.79
2s538
29.99
DRY
22.78
7.95
8.25
12.50
249.52
IIMIIINIOIIMIIIII
DRY
111.1.11.111.1111111
29 57
NM
1192
22 51
Inccressible
L
I
278.69
DRY
Insect sseble
2 it 1
Inaaessa We
27939
Inacces -Able
Inaccessible
26896
27496
26114
27.94
13.95
28261
261.99
279 69
257 5 _
SIMIIII
15 07
DRY
21 50
Inaccessible
2731, k 3
2 4 62
NM
NM.
P-15
P-16
P-17
P-19
250 08
265.70
20 96
8/18/2339
27557
11.86
lo TO
`159.07
274.95
8/18/2009
944
283 93
2688 19
Depth-toWater
276 03
MSC*
6.87
286
16 ra
Ina-a ,s7lile
Elevation
1536'
7.06
Irchassible
16 08
2
287.42
771 15
Inaccessible
.269 55
2667.03
283.57
12 q
263.36
281 511
24.46
12 29
277 25
®
n
250 36
L PY
m1190
279 81
279 "5
272 57
Ina( 7, ssible
Inaccessible
258.95
22.55.
Inaccessible
27025
Inaccessible
Inaccessilile
25949
29 45
DRY
21 41
7 60
260.30
lilac ,e_ssible
9 91
268.47
262.08
279.74
7/30/2008
7/30/2008
803
825
L., ccessible
20
Elevation
/ 67
Dht
22 32
Inaccessible
17 91
14 21
5/14/2008
al
20 az
..26995.
Inaccessible
28R07
Inaccessible
214 21
2 /8 61
913
MW-6
(
14.98
14.41
22.20
P-15
P-17
I
7
Water
P
25 60
Inaccessible
12 37
Inacct ssible
1" /
Depth -to-
P4
DRY
985
Irma i wole
2", e4
Inca i siabla
.
MW-5
MW-6
MW -7
P
275.17
250.04
21.20
17.00
19.54
Depth-toWater
Elevation
5/14/2008
263.82
269.29
262.38
275.30
253.91
7 35
Paint.
1
14 92
16.23
21 7013
7A
it )ccesable
Measuring
Point
1768
26032
2121/2008
3/21/2008
268.41
Depth-toWater
Elevation
Water
261.30
1,173
28
onitoring
Depth -to-
-
7
P -19
Elevation
10/18/2007
212 92
P-11
P-12
P16
P-17
Depth-toWater
Point
Elevation
250 39
280.12
274.09
0
270 54
27025
NM
262 69
26909
nil
a
257 66
111.11.1.1=111111111
27536
261.53
279.47
278.69
Inaccessible
DRY
DRY
23.33
Inaccessible
DRY
17.64
DRY
DRY
1111
9
1111111111.111
ccessible
1.11.1.11
DRY
266.15
NM. NotMcasured..
S
0
A-7
Consulting Engineers
Geologists, Inc.
Table A-3
Groundwater Analytical Data
Former LP Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, CA.
Well ID.
MW-02
PCP1
Date
TPHSS3
(ugn,)
@WO
5.1
12
<505
3.6
<1.0
<50
7/
<0.2
<50
1.9
<0.2
<50
2.5
0.6
<50
0.7
<0.2
<50
0.5
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<02
ril-f
10/12/1993
8/31/1994
12/28/1994
3/21/1995
6/29/1995
4/3/1996
10/8/1996
4/15/1998
10/14/1998
10/21/1999
4/12/2000
10/25/2000
4/30/2001
7/31/2001
4/10/2002
8/15/2002
10/23/2002
1/23/2003
5/12/2003
7/9/2003
10/8/2003
1/21/2004
4/21/2004
7/2/2004
10/16/2004
1/19/2005
4/7/2005
7/25/2005
10/27/2005
1/10/2006
3/14/2006
8/28/2006
10/24/2006
1/17/2007
5/9/2007
7/13/2007
10/18/2007
2/21/2008
5/14/2008
7/30/2008
12/2/2008
\ \ eureka \ Protects \ 1995 \ 095107-Clov
20101115-HistData.xls \ GVV-PCPTCP
TCP1
Alkalinity Nitrate
(ng/04
Sulfate Dissolved Iron
OWL)
-
(mgfr)
-
<02
<02
<50
<50
<50
<50
0.72
<0.2
<50
0.8
<0.2
<50
0.71
<02
0.28
<0.2
<50
<50
-
1.7
045
<50
460
0.23
8.6
1.3
0.23
<50
450
0.24
<50
420
<0.10
<0.10
70
1.3
0.77
<0.2
<50
440
0.58
11.0
0.69
<50
510
0.93
9.9
0.86
<02
<02
0.61
<0.20
<50
..,-
<0.2
1.9
<1.0
<50
2.2
0.43
<50
12
an
<50
1.4
0.35/441
<50
1.1
0.3
4.0
0.4
<50
<250
1.4
0.3
<50
0.06
<0.01
<50
<50
0.7
0.1
1.2
0.2
1.0
0.6
<50
1.4
0.4
<50
1.8
0.5
<50
1.1
0.2
--
0.8
0.2
0.6
0.2
0.7
0.1
0.6
0.1
0.9
0.2
0.5
<1.0
ateRotind
UBS \ data \
A-8
-
-
9.4
--
-
-
-
423
0.224
10.2
--
-
<0.15
SHN Consulting
ti Engineers
& Geologists, Inc.
Well ID.
Table A-3
Groundwater Analytical Data
Former Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, CA
TpHs83
Alkalinity Nitrate Sulfate Dissolved Iron
PCP1
TCP1
Date
m )
(ug/L)
(u
( WO
@TX
)4
MW-02
5/28/2009
0.7
0.1
-
cont'd
8/18/2009
0.7
0.1
<50
10/15/2009
0.5
<01
3/9/2010
6/3/2010
0.6
<01
-
0.5
<0.1
<50
8/11/2010
07
02
2.0
<1 0
<50
<10
<50
<0.2
<50
2/14/1995
1.2
0.6
0.5
<02
<50
3/21/1995
0.7
<0.2
<50
5/4/1995
0.6
<0.2
<50
6/29/1995
8/28/1995
10/24/1995
0.5
<0.2
<50
<22
<22
<0.2
<50
<02
<50
1/19/1996
0.7
<0.2
<50
7/30/1996
<0.2
<0.2
<50
1/28/1997
0.39
<02
<50
4/8/1997
<02
<0.2
<50
7/15/1997
0.38
<50
1/14/1998
0.21
<22
<02
<02
<02
<02
<22
<22
<22
<50
<0.2
MW-0310/12/1993
8/31/1994
12/28/1994
7/23/1998
-
-
-
-
<50
4/27/1999
1/17/2000
0.3
4/12/2000
<22
7/18/2000
<0.2
10/25/2000
1/10/2001
<02
<22
4/30/2001
7/31/2001
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
-
<50
<50
<02
-
10/29/2001
1/29/2002
<0.2
<0.2
-<50
<02
<0.2
<50
4/10/2002
<0.2
<0.2
<50
330
<0.10
41
8/15/2002
034
<02
<50
250
<0.10
56
10/23/2002
0.41
<0.2
<50
230
<0.10
47
1/23/2003
0.31
<0.2
<50
240
<0.10
41
5/12/2003
<0.2
<0.2
<50
<0.10
29
0.38
0.35
0.4
0.45
<0.2
-
320
7/9/2003
<0.20
<50
=
<1.0
-
10/8/2003
1/21/2004
4/21/2004
Project s\ 1995\ 095107-Clove d
5-i-listData.xLs GW-PCPTCP
cl.
--,
-
-
--_,..
-
<020
9P
-
<50
034
249
0.32
1/19/1999
-
SHN Consulting Engineers
A-9
Sr Geologists, Inc.
Table A -3
Groundwater Analytical Data
Former LP Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, CA
Date
Well ID.
MW-03
coad
i
NUAr405
\ \ eureka \
20101115-H D
ace
(ug/02
(ug/L)
7/2/2004
0.37
<0.20
10/16/2004
0.34
<0.20
1/19/2005
0.30
<OA
4/7/2005
<0.3
0.3
aniss3
@WO
Alkalinity
4
Falgig
Nitrate
Sulfate
-
7/25/2005
<0.2
<0.2
-
<0.1
<0.1
-
1/10/2006
0.2
<0.1
3/14/2006
0.3
<0A
0.5
336
8/28/2006
M7
10/24/2006
0.3
<0.1
1/17/2007
0.2
<0.1
5/9/2007
0.2
0.1
<OA
<OA
<50
7/13/2007
10/18/2007
OA
<0.1
<50
2/21/2008
az
<01
<50
0.1
<0.1
<50
0.2
<0.1
<50
12/2/2008
0.2
<0.1
<50
5/28/2009.
OA
<0.1
<50
-7.
<0.200
25.4
<0.15
-
--
62
8/18/2009
O.
<0.1
10/15/2009
0.1
<01
3/9/2010
M2
<0.1
.,
6/3/2010
<al
<0.1
<50
<OA
-
-,.s.
-
8/11/2010
<0.1
10/12/1993
<03
8/31/1994
12/28/1994
3/21/1995
6/29/1995
<0.3
<1.0
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<50
<50
10/24/1995
1.0
<0.2
<50
-
4/10/2002
<0.2
<0.2
<50
720
10/12/1993
<0.3
<1.0
<50
12/28/1994
3/21/1995
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
4/3/1996
1/28/1997
4/8/1997
7/15/1997
4/15/1998
10/14/1998
<0.2
<0.2
<50
<50
<50
<0.2
<0.2
NI'
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<02
110
<50
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
4/27/1999
4/12/2000
4/30/2001
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<50
<50
<50
<50
<0.2
<0.2
<50
995 \ 045107-CloverdakRe
s \ GW-PCPTCP
Dissolved Iron
(nga)
(MO)
10/27/2005
5/14/2008
7/30/2008
MW -04
PCP1
<50
<50<50
-
-
<0.10
370
-
-
-
---
--
SHN Consulting Engineers
UBS \ data \
A-10
& Geologists, Inc.
Table A-3
Groundwater Analytical Data
Former LP Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, CA
Well ID.
MW-05
cont'd
MW-06
MW-07
P-4
P-5
P-11
Date
4/10/2002
8/15/2002
10/23/2002
1/23/2003
10/12/1993
8/31/1994
12/28/1994
3/21/1995
1/28/1997
7/15/1997
4/27/1999
8/15/2002
10/23/2002
1/23/2003
5/12/2003
7/9/2003
1/10/2006
3/14/2006
10/12/1993
8/31/1994
12/28/1994
3/21/1995
6/29/1995
1/28/1997
7/15/1997
4/27/1999
4/12/2000
4/30/2001
4/10/2002
8/15/2002
10/23/2002
1/23/2003
3/14/2006
5/10/2007
1/29/1997
7/15/1997
PCP1
(ug/L)2
TCP1
(n0.)
540
3,300
1,000
520
280
57
15
Dry
Dry
1.3
049
72
660
57
54
64
11
1.2
0.17
0.45
0.44
0.16
50
-
50
48
41
-
57,000
61,000
33,000
4,700
2,600
530
560
0.11
0.32
1.3
-
1.9
638
<0.200
1.72
<1.0
<1.0
<th2
<02
<0.2
0.93
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
-
<0.2
<0.2
01
<0.1
<1.0
<1.0
1.8
0.56
<0.2
3/14/ 2006
0.1
1/29/1997
7/15/1997
4/27/1999
4/30/2001
3/13/2006
37
<50
-
<50
<50
-
<50
178
175
<50
170
<50
<50
<50
<50
-
<50
<50
180
200
-
-
260
250
-
<0 1
<50
<50
420
1.5
6.1
2.2
0.87
2.5
1,400
1,200
980
390
120
Rounds \ 209\ PUBS \ data \
-
-
<0.15
--
<50
<50
<02
(mg/L)
-
-
0.59
0.49
0.2
0;3
<0.2
3.6
<0.2
10
280
<50
0.1
0.1
18
1.7
2.4
(111g10
-
0.4
0.3
<0.2
Sulfate Dissolved Iron
(mg/L)
0.30
<0.20
-
0.44
<0.2
<0.2
Nitrate
7,700
22,000
---
Dry
<02
Alkalinity
(meL)4
310
320
320
Dry
eurekAProjects \ 1995\ 095107-Clo
20101115-1-fistDatails GW-PCPTCP
TPHSS3
(ug/L)
478
0.28
0.36
37
38
-...,
0.52
1 29
22
-
983
<0.15
<0.200
83.7
<0.15
SHN Consulting Engineers
A-11
Sr Geologists, Inc.
Table A-3
Groundwater Analytical Data
Former LP Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, CA
Well ID.
P-12
P-15
P-16
P-17
P-19
20101
PCP1
TCP1
TPHSS3
Alkalinity
Nitrate
Sulfate Dissolved Iron
(uWL)2
NO.)
(vigil.)
(mg/1-)4
(1118/14
IIIIR/L)
Imp)
az
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
1,200
380
7.5
4.4
<0.2
81
<50
<0.400
<0.15
5/10/2007
6/3/2010
1/29/1997
1/14/1998
3/14/2006
1/29/1997
7/15/1997
4/27/1999
4/12/2000
10/12/1993
12/28/1994
3/21/1995
6/29/1995
4/3/1996
1/28/1997
7/15/1997
4/15/1998
3/14/2006
10/12/1993
8/31/1994
12/28/1994
3/21/1995
5/4/1995
6/29/1995
1/19/1996
1/28/1997
7/15/1997
1/14/1998
4/27/1999
1/17/2000
4/12/2000
1/10/2001
4/10/2002
8/15/2002
1/23/2003
3/13/2006
6/3/2010
1/29/1997
7/15/1997
4/12/2000
10/25/2000
P-11
coned
\ \eu
Date
995
95107-CloverdaleRou
P
C
1.1
0.2
--
0.1
<02
<02
<0.2
<0.2
<02
<02
<0.2
<0.2
4.8
5.1
3.3
1.3
2.4
13
71
38
1.9
0.7
3.0
0.6
0.4
0.9
19
10
0.6
0.1
<030
<13
<0.3
<0.2
<1.0
<0.2
LO
<02
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
2.3
0.43
0.97
2.3
1.3
0.35
0.7
<02
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<50
77
79
<50
14,000
170,000
36,000
61,000
100,000
14,000
4,700
1,500
750
-
.-
681
<0.200
3,400
930
3,350
1,300
1,660
1,340
3,260
8,400
1,200
<50
760
-
--
-
-
a22
<02
210
260
220
<0.2
<0.2
97
480
<0.10
7.4
<0.2
0.1
<0.1
<0.2
<0.1
<0.1
110
57
1,200
640
0.31
3.3
0.31
0.29
0.27
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<50
<50
-
Dry
0.56
9P
-
-
-
<50
<50
A-12
SI-LN Consulting Engineers
& Geologists, Inc.
Table A-3
Groundwater Analytical Data
Former LP Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, CA
Wen ID.
P-19
cont'd
VE-1
VE-2
\ \ eureka \
20101115-Hist
Date
4/30/2001
3/13/2006
1/29/1997
7/15/1997
4/27/1999
4/12/2000
10/25/2000
4/30/2001
1/29/1997
7/15/1997
4/27/1999
7/30/1999
4/12/2000
10/25/2000
4/30/2001
1/29/2002
4/10/2002
8/15/2002
10/23/2002
1/23/2003
5/12/2003
7/9/2003
10/8/2003
1/21/2004
4/21/2004
7/2/2004
10/16/2004
4/7/2005
7/25/2005
10/27/2005
1/10/2006
3/14/2006
8/28/2006.
1/17/2007
5/10/2007
7/13/2007
10/18/2007
2/21/2008
5/14/2008
12/2/2008
5/28/2009
TCP1
TPHSS3
Alkalinity
Nitrate
Sulfate Dissolved Iron
(11042
033
@WI)
(TIP
(111W04
(111RX)
011gir-)
<02
<50
0.1
<0.1
<02
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
8.1
0.45
1.9
1.3
<02
41
15
5.0
13,000
8,400
4,200
23,000
37,000
7,900
PCP1
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
6.2
30
6.4
10
1.5
2.3
3.5
8.5
0.91
<0.2
2.3
0.9
1.0
0.22
<0.2
2.8
<ad
<0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4
1.9
0.4
13
1.4
0.3
0.6
0.8
<0.1
14
2.0
0.43
1.3
0.57
2.1
0.21
<0.20
0.41
<0.20
1.0
<0.20
<020
0.58
<0.1
<0.2
<01
0.1
<0.1
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.6
0.7
<0.1
0.3
0.4
0.1
\ 1995 \ 09.5107-CloverdaleRounds \ 209 \ PUBS \ data \
xis \ GW-PCPTCP
Z900
<50
92
270
110
<50
<50
200
74
<50
<50
61
220
<50
70
<50
<50
53
<50
290
98
<50
480
<50
1,100
250
<50
A-13
-
allWL)
-
-
,...4
-
--
580
640
1,200
570
560
<0.10
0.12
0.12
<0.10
<0.10
.....
-
-
50
18
51
14
4.3
-
4.
-
-
SI-IN Consulting Engineers
& Geologists, Inc.
Table A-3
Groundwater Analytical Data
Former LP Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, CA
Welna
PCP1
Date
miss'
Pig/1-)
(ug/L)
0.5
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
280
390
<0.2
<02
<02
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
)2
(
3/9/2010
cont'd
6/3/2010
VE-3
1/29/1997
7/15/1997
7/30/1999
10/25/2000
4/30/2001
4/10/2002
8/15/2002
10/23/2002
1/23/2003
VE-4
4/10/2002
8/15/2002
10/23/2002
1/23/2003
T enc.h-Out 10/11/1995
10/24/1995
11/16/1995
12/27/1995
1/19/1996
3/29/1996
4/3/1996
5/16/1996
6/10/1996
7/30/1996
8/15/1996
9/4/1996
11/19/1996
12/19/1996
8/28/1997
1/14/1998
2/16/1998
3/18/1998
4/15/1998
5/5/1998
6/15/1998
7/23/1998
8/10/1998
10/14/1998
1/19/1999
4/27/1999
7/30/1999
10/21/1999
1/17/2000
VE-2
TCP1
<02
<0.2
<02
<0:2
<0.2
<0,2
<0.2
<02
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
--.-
<02
<02
<0.2
<02
<02
<0.2
<0.2
0.34
<0.2
<02
<0.2
<0.2
<02
<02
<02
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0 2
<02
<02
<02
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<02
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<02
<02
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<02
<02
<02
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<02
<02
<0.2
<0.2
<02
<02
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<02
<0.2
\ eureka; Projects \ 1995 9
-ClovertialeRounds \ 209 \ PUBS \ data \
20101115-HistData
GW-PCPTCP
)
Nitrate
Sulfate Dissolved Iro n
(mg /14
(ingTh
-310
290
280
270
0.99
1.2
250
260
270
280
2.3
<0.10
0.21
<0.10
.
6.9
2.0
(m
-
-61
45
39
38
-
44
34
30
27
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
A-14
-
-
-
SHN Consulting Engineers
& Geologists, Inc.
Table A-3
Groundwater Analytical Data
Former LP Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, CA
We
D.
Date
Trench-Out 4/12/2001
cont'd
7/18/2000
10/25/2000
1/10/2001
4/30/2001
10/29/2001
8/15/2002
10/23/2002
1/23/2003
Trench-In 10/11/1995
10/24/1995
11/16/1995
12/27/1995
1/19/1996
3/29/1996
4/3/1996
5/16/1996
6/10/1996
7/30/1996
8/15/1996
9/4/1996
1/28/1997
2/12/1997
3/18/1997
4/8/1997
PCPs
TCP'
Mg/14.2
(ug/L)
TPHSS3
(ugfL)
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0,2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
190
37
280
9.1
11
<50
3.2
<02
14.4
<0.2
1.2
<0.2
3.6
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<50
<50
<50
0.33
73
0.5
1.9
0.64
0.4
<0.2
<0.2
<0:2
<0,2
<02
<0.2
<0.2
<02
<0.2
<02
<02
<0.2
<50
<50
<50
<50
10,600
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
Alkalinity
(mg/P4
Nitrate
(ng/L)
-
-
Sulfate Dissolved Iron
(mg/L)
(Ingil)
-
-,-
-
-
-
-
1. PCP/ TCP: Pentachlorophenol/Tetrachlorophenol
2. ug/L: micrograms per Liter
3. TPHSS: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Stoddard Solvent
4. mg/L: milligrams per Liter
5. <: "less than the stated method reporting limit
6. -; Not Analyzed
oj
1995 \ 095107-C10
AGW-PCPTCP
da
°undo \ 209 \ PU
A-15
SHN Consulting Engineers
& Geologists, Inc.
Table A-4
Groundwater Analytical Data, Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Former LP Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, CA
(uni s in ug/L)1
Well ID.
Date
TPFIG3
1/29/2002
<3.05
4/10/2002
<3.0
8/15/2002
<3.0
10/23/2002
<3.0
1/23/2003
<3.0
VE-4
4/12/2000
<3.0
1/29/2002
<3.0
4/10/2002
<3.0
8/15/2002
<10
10/23/2002
<3.0
1/23/2003
<3.0
1. ug/L- micrograms per Liter
MW-05
Benzene Toluene
Ethyl
benzene
Th'P-
o-
Xylene
Xylene
<050
<050
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
--6
<050
<050
<50
<50
<50
<50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<030
<050
<050
<050
130
77
2.3
<0.50
13
<030
<050
<50
<50
<50
<50
<050
<050
<050
<050
<050
<1.0
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
1.6
<050
<0.50
<050
<050
<050
<050
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<050
<050
<050
<050
TPHD
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
<50
Motor
Oil
-<170
<170
<170
-<170
<170
-
<170
2. IVIT13E: Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether
1 TPFIG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbaons as Gasoline
4. TPHD: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel
5. < "less than the stated method reporting limit
6. --: not tested
\ eureka \ Projects \ 1995 \ 095107-Cloverd
20101115-1-listDataxIACW-analytical
ou
209 PU
a
A-16
SHN Consulting Engineers
& Geologists, Inc.
Table A-5
Groundwater Analytical Results, Dioxin and Furan Compounds, May 23, 2007
Former LP Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, CA
Constituent
MW-2
(in pg/L) 1
MW-3
VE-2
P-4
ND
P -11
2,3,7,8-TCDD
ND2
ND
ND
1,2,3,7,8-FeCDD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10.7j3
ND
2.53J
1,2,3,7A9-Hxt_ D
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND
ND
264
8.19J
47.9
OCDD
14.3J
2,350
90.8
541
Total TCDD
2.95J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Total PeCDD
ND
ND
12.8J
ND
12 91
Total ENCDD
ND
ND
80.9
ND
31.5
Tot.: HpCDD
ND
ND
435
145j
81.3
2,3,7,8-TCDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,2,3,4,7 8 -HxCDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,2,3,6,7,8-11xCDF
ND
3.641
ND
ND
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND
ND
ND
7A1J
ND
ND
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND
142
2.73J
23.71
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
ND
10.5J
ND
ND
OCDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
633
7.26J
104
Total TCDF
ND
200D,M4' 3
ND
7 SSD,M
Total PeCll'il
ND
ND
ND
271D,M
ND
15 4D,J,M
Total HxCDF
ND
398D,M
1.7J
43.1D,M
Total ITTCDF
ND
ND
ND
582
6.5J
82.5
0.00143
0
6.64
0.119
1.03
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
TEQ° (WHO, 1996)
ND
1. pg/L: picograms per Liter (approximately equivalent to parts per quadrillion)
2. ND: Not Detected
3. J: Analyte Concentration Below Calibration Range
4. D: Presence of Diphenyl Ethers
5. M: Maximum possible concentration
6. TEQ: Toxic Equivalent
Vmreka Pmjects \ 1995 \ 095107-CloverdaleRounds \ 209 \ PUBS \data \
1154-listDatadds GW-diox-May07
A-17
SI-IN Consulting Engineers
& Geologists, Inc.
Table A-6
Soil Physical Properties August 23, 2007
Former Cloverdale Reinanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, California
Gravimetric
Volumetric Moisture
Dry Bulk
Wet Bulk
Calculated
Sample Location @
.
Moisture Content
Content
Density
Density
Porosity
Depth (f4)1
( %, Wg)
B- 102 @ 10:5 -12'
20.6
B-108 @ 17.25-18.5
20.9
2
3
33
elk, C111 /CM )
Wan3..4
j
35.8
1.71
1.
ft . linear feet
4.
2.
g /g: grams per gram
5.
3.
cm3/cm3: cubic centimeters pex cubic centimeter
\ \ etre
20101115-
995 \ 095107
il Ph
\ 209 \ PUBS \ data \
A-18
(
erns)
2.07
Total
Organic
(To)
Carbon PM
38.2
<0.1
022
gicrri3: grams per cubic centimeter
<: "less than" the stated method reporting limit
SHN Consulting Engineers
& Geologists, Inc.
Table A-7
Soil Analytical Results, August 23, 2007
Fortner Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, California
(in mg/kg)'
Sample Location and Depth
(feet)
B-101 @ 2.0-4.0'
B-101 @ 6.0-8.0'
B-102 @ 53-6.0
B-102 @ 8M-9M'
B-103 @ 2.0-3.0'
B-103 @ 9M-10.01
_
1.
Z
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
PCP2
TCP2
TPHSS3
<0.034
<0.03
<10
<10
<0.03
<03
<03
<03
<0M3
<0.3
<0.03
<03
<03
<03
<03
<10
<10
<0M3
B-103 @ 12.0-13.0"
<0.03
B-104 @ 4.0-5.0'
B-104 @ 11M-12.0'
B-105 @ 6.5-7.5'
B-106 @ 9.5-10.25'
B-106 @ 14.5-15.0'
B-107 @ 9.25-1025'
B-107 @ 19M-20.0'
B-108 @ 15M-16.0'
<0M3
B-108 @ 19M-20.0'
<0M3
Remediation Goals
mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram
<15
3.6
<0.03
<0.03
<03
<03
<3
049
<003
<0 .3
<03
<03
<03
<0M3
M3
9M
5
18 000 '
<10
<10
<10
<10
1,100
<10
<10
20
<10
<10
<10
<10
99
6,7
Pentachlorophenol (PCP) and Tetrachlorophenol (TCP), in accordance With E A Method No 8270C SIM
IFFISS: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Stoddard Solvent, in general accordance with EPA Method. No 8015M
<: "less than" the stated method reporting limit
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (2004). Region .9 PRGs 2004 Table for industrial soils.
Source: Screening for Enuironmental Concerns at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater, California
Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Area Region,
November, 2007.
Value is for commercial/industrial sites with deep soils where groundwater is not used as a source of drinking
water TPH (middle distillates) used as surrogate for TPHSS.
eurekAPro)ects\ 1995 \ 095107-CloverdaleRounds \ 209\ PUBS \ data \
20101115-HistDataxlAsoil-PCPTCP
A-19
SHN Consulting Engineers
& Geologists, Inc.
Table A-8
Soil Analytical Data-Dioxin and Furan Compounds, July 2000
Former Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, California
(in Pg/g)1
Dioxin or Furan Compound
43,7,8-TCDD
P-2
P-7
<1.13
1,2,3,7,8
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8 - HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-11pCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-P2CDF
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-11xCDF
_3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2 3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,34,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,941pCDF
OCDF
TEQ 4 (Esk.rld Health Orgatuzaticrd
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sample Identification
<5h
.
32
5,000
1,200
38,000
310,000
<5.7
13
3,500
,
870
33,000
270,000
11
<11
7
<5.7
<5 7
110
29
<5 6
190
70
N-1
TEF2 Factor
<1.1
<5A
8.7
0.1
72
0.1
25
0.1
0.01
1,900
1
21,000
<1 1
<5 4
<5.4
16
<5.4
5:4
0.0001
0.1
0.05
0.5
0.1
01
47
25
58
7,800
380
<54
01
410
20
1,900
0.01
37,000
<5.7
5,500
290
33,000
1,156
878
43
0.1
0 01
0.0001
pg/ f, p cograms per gram
TEE: Toxic Equivalency Factor
<: "less than" the method reporting limit
TEQ: Toxic Equivalent calculated for each sample
--: Not Applicable
\ \ eureka \ Projects \ 19
20101115-HistDetazIA
7-CoverdaleRouncis \ 209 \ PUBS \ data \
100
SHN Consulting Engineers
A-20
& Geologists, Inc.
<0.134
\d
<0 111
103 3
<0177
<0 484
<0.136
<0,108
<0.138
<0422
a782
<0.195
<0.126
<a164
<0.409
0248 3
<0165
1,2;3,7,8,9 -HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1 2, ,4,7,8,9- pCDF
0 1998
000
0.103
\ \ eureka \ Projcd5 \ 1995 \ 095107-CI overdaleRnunds \ 2
20101115- Hieitfla taxis 5oil-dim-Au507
1. Analvte Concentration Below Calibration Range
\
0.00
<0.177
<aled.
3
1.03
<0.138
<0.136
<0a837
0.4453
1. pg/g: picograms per gram
2. <: 'less than' the stated n ethod reporting limit
s
<0.164
Total HpCDF
TE
<0195
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
OCD
o TCDF
<0.129
<0.161
<0106
1,2,3,4,7;8 -HxCDF
0.00
<0327
<0.181
<0.177
<0.124
<0.865
<0237
<0327
<0.1 81
<0107
<0132
<0 153
36
<0118
<0.114
<0 489
<0. 402
<0.166
<0.167
<1 54
<0 489
<0 282
<0402
<0.370
<0.166
<0. 67
9'
<0.0929
<0121
1,2,3,6,7,8 -HxCDF
2 4,6,7, - xCIYI.
,4,7 8-PeCDF
<0.0981
n pg/g)
1
1
'
19.8
3
0.0673
0.842
<0.280
110 3
am()
'<0.153
0.8973
<00880
<0116
<0.0805
<0.0796
<0.179
<0.0808
<0.166
0.849
4.18
3
<0117
0.277 3
3
3
'
'
B -106.@
3
4
A-21
<0176
2,190
10,200
<0361
_<0.194
a707
2.20
<0361
<0.285
<0194
<0.155
<0.141
<0 142
<0764
<00878
<0120
.
,
<0125
<0. 284
<0124
2.69
7.60
<0.764
<0 284
<0.264
00968
<0124
<0242
915-10.25'
fl <0.125
9,990
16 5
79.5
L930
165
19.9
7.16
0 756 3
23.7
<9 0805
3
0 595
8,270
0 901
476
46,000
1.11
5,470
16
1 80
159
<0.196
<00739
12'
i
50.4
4
8,190
21
1,650
62.1
183
144
8.19
13.1
0.6303
0.5223
16,400
<0 0765
12,000
1220
58,200
385
10,400
543
1,820
844
6.89
246
2
,0 165
<0235
0 285
0.00
<0189
<0306
<0.174
<0137
<0. 776
<a306
<0.239
<0.189
<0.137
<0106
<0.107
<016
<0. 74
0.137
0.472
<0115
0544
<0.143
<0.819
<0544
<0472
<0.506
<0488
<0.115
<0.143
15-16'
B-108 @
0.00
<0197
<0207
<0.165
<0107
<0.727
<a207
<0 139
<0197
<0.138
<0116
<0.127
<0.165
<0.107
<0.146
<0.678
a 93
<0.118
<0.123
<a999
<0.393
<0.678
<0316
<0339
<0.118
<0.123
19-20'
B-108 @
& Geologists, Inc.
SHN Consulting Engineers
0.00
<0 209
<0.181
3
<am
<0 624
<0.181
<0.140
<0.209
<0144
<0.107
<0111
<0.185
a 64
<0503
<0a863
<0.484
<a 36
0.284
3
<0.710
0484
<0503
<0.479
<0.434
0.136
<0.0978
19-20'
B-107 @
a293 ,'
<0151
<0146
<0175
<a235
<0224
<0279
<0894
<0.171
<0148
<0.142
<0552
0%0
<0.196
<0.322
<0.936
0.90
<0.8
0.750
<0.196
0322
B-106 @14 B-107 @
15'
9.25-10.25
1,890
<0 279
8,010
000
0.00098
379
0.00
104
4. Presence of Diphenyl Ethers/Maximum possible concentration
5. TEQ: Toxic Equivalent, 1998 World Health. Organization
<0 231
<a176
3.17
<0.337
<0176
<0 143
<0.231
<0.176
<0154
<0.151
<00850
<0145
<0176
<0 244
<0 412
<0186
2.26
<0A59
<0244
237
<0.412
<0382
<0.372
3
-
<0.188
<0.106
5'
<0246
0.3233
<0: 215
<0.0747
<0.117
3'
B -102.@ 8- B-103 @ 2- B-104 @ 4 B -104.@ 11
<0124
<0161
<0177
<0.333
<0 312
<0.0934
<0.111
<0.923
<0.333
<0287
<0312
<0. 254
<0.0735
<0.0716
<0.0849
2
1
<0.0934
<0.
5.5-6.0'
B-102 @
<0.0834
<0.0843
<00689
<0150
<0165
2,3,7,8-TCDF
12,17,8-PeCDF
<0:224
<0.294
Total HpCDD
3
3
<0 504
<0.641
<0.707
<0.274
<0224
<0.294
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-H9CDD
OCDD
<0106
<0.504
<0 274
1,2,3,7,8 9 -HxCDD
0.230
<0.114
<0.455
<0256
2,3,6,7,8-1-TxCDD
0.292
<0.424
<0.232
24,7,8-HxCDD
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
otal HxCDD
<0.114
<alas
2,3,7 -PeCDD
W
<0.0681
4'
B -101.@ 2- B-101 @ 6-
<0. 782
27 CDD
Constituent.
(
Table A-9
Soil Analytical Results, Dioxin and Furan Compounds, August 23, 2007
Former LP Cloverdale Remanufacturmg Facility, C overdale, CA
4E2
<0.262
<0321
0.645
<0339
2;3;4,6,7,8 HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
,23,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
0 998
7.10
3
\ \ eureica \ Profr
\ 1995 \ 095107-C7o erdeleRound0,209 \ PUBS
3. Analyte Concentration Below Calibration Range
20101115-HistDea.xls \ soil-tliox-Jull0
21
5654
<0.408
149
9,150
2, 350 4
5
155
59.2
0.9933
35A 4
0.913'3
4
<0191
2.08
27.9 4
5,700
1,650
4
°
i
7,020
1.880
4
28.34
27.7 4
17.8
97.8
13,900
17,900
6,760
36 4
1.290
E57
22,5
las
12.4
0 909 3
0.705 3
46,000
<0:0823
13,300.
705
3,210
34.0
4.67
0.272
B-202@14
3
2.52 3
1.16
<0.376
0.516
115
5.17 3
162
80.3
134
<1295
<1.18.
<116
<1.04
<0376
<0523
<0344
<0.253
89.9
65.3
<0.110
4.113
1E7
3.383
2.16
0.284
B-202@
A-22
48.4
557
5.49
4. Presence. of Diphenyl Ethers /Maximum possib e concentration.
5. TEQ: Toxicity Equivalents (World Health Organization, 1998)
0
<1 10
<0 698
6.36
28.0
244
6,660
3,390
<0.328
<2.18
<1.49
34:1
1,190.'
1.87
1E5
6.27
10.7
1.04 3
2,180
19,600
<0 0834
<0 391
6 35
68.1
2.573
<0A06
<0.176
228
0
0 "30
<0,516
<0.698
0:48
<0.502
0.4
0.387
<0.747
<0.73
<1.49
<2.64
<0.191
<0.671
<0.496
<3327
B-201@17
2496
<2747
i
I
(in PPM) 1
B- 201 @12°
178 3
180
1.22
10.0
107
0.855
3
1.04
1. pg/g: picograms per gram
2. <: "less than" the stated method reporting limit
5
2.28 5
T
1.42
Total HpCDF
3
<0.239
2599
2,680
8250
16:4
119
9,710
7.73
13.8
<0.24
118
162
822
Total TCD )
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
3.55 3
242
34 8
1,840
0.443'3
'],2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF
iOCDF
0 334
24.0
2/0 3
<0:236
0.548 3
0.5753
<0.0569
<0.226
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
123
740
<0.148
5,210
40,100
<0.0701
123 3
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
137
80.0
,2,3,4,6,7,8-1-1pCDD
136
11.9
<0.626
<00732
<0139
139 3
2,3,789-HxCDD
514
10.5
<0.276
<0.141
<0. 28
1.65
B-106A@25'
06A@ 9.
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
10.9
1,2,3,6,7,8 -HxCDD
141
8.30
7,8-PeCDD
<0.255
- 04A 17'
1,2,3,4,7,8 -HxCDD
,2
2,3,7,8 -TCDD
Constituent
Table A-10
Siding Department Area-Soil Analytical Results-Dioxin and Furan Compounds, July 23, 2010
Former LP Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, CA
0
0.429
SHN Consulting Engineers
& Geologists, Inc.
0
<2508
<0.302
<0.246
<2396
<0.0914
<a 7
.1
0.4
0213
033
<0.429
<1.11
<036
<0.302
<0.256
<0.225
<0.222
<0246
<0241
<0.0914
<2:7
<0395
<11
<OA
<0.366
<033
<02 3
[email protected]°
<0.073
0.257
<0.415
<0.769
<0:132.
<1.28
<0,508
<2298
<0396
<2414
<0.282
<0.266
<2169
<0.769
<2.37
<0.073
<0.175
<0.408
<0.415
<0257
<0376
<0,132
B- 203 @13'
Table A-11
Soil Analytical Results, July 22 & 23, 2010
Former Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility Cloverdale, California
(in maRg)i
2,3,4,5 +
Sample
Location &
Depth (feet)
2,3,4,6-
zS,5,6-
TCP2
TCP2
13-104AGIC 5
<0.15
<0.1
B-106A419'
0.26
B- 06&4
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0 2
<0.1
<0 1
<0 2
0.91?
<1
<2
Y.53
<01
0.44
<0 2
0.2
<0.2
'
3.5
B-20
B-202(013.5
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0
<0.1
<01
<01
8.5'
B-202
13-203©12.
B- 203,2,IT
B -294 i I"
8-204016'
B-204021'
9-294@25'
3-204@31'
B-204(0
'
B- 205@6
(5)
i3-21.7.5i 16'
B- 205 @2P
<0.2 nalMEI
<0.1
<0.1
B-201012'
B-201017
<0.2
<02
MS
MINESMIN
IIIII.MIIIIIIIII
asicsirs
11.1111.11n
IM
M
al.11.11MIS
B-205@25'
miiIi,n-'m5 p
TPHMO3 TPTID3 TFHG3 TPHSS3
11111.1111111.111115111
<10
39
<10
<10
<10
--
ME
MIM
-
<50
114
<50
<50
<50
<10
<10
31
65
100
400
110 9
1709
1,800
<50
<50
<50
<50
710
<10
<10
47
--
14
<2
350
<10
<10
<10
-
B4
T4
E4
X4
Ern
enli
al
El
la
MIMI
11.11111111
MIE
"r
<0 2
<0 2
Irellell
--
<0.2
0.79
21
<01
<0.2
<0.06
<0.06
<0.1
<0.1
-2
<02
<02
<0.2
<0.2
n
<0 2
<0 2
<0 2
<0 2
<0 2
<0.2
<0.2
<006
<0
<0.2
<0 06
<0.1
<0.2
<0 -
aos
<01
<0 2
<0 06
<0 06
<01
<01
<02
<006
<01
<0 2
<0 06
<01
<0 2
<0 06
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
-
<02
02
<0 2
<0.2.
<02
<02
<02
<02
<0 2
2. Pentachlorophenol (PCP) and1
_him ophenol (ry), analyzed in general accordance with EPA Method No. 8270D SIM
Total F. role. m Hydrocarbons as motor C. 1 ETPHM0), as Diesel (TPHD), as Gasoline (TPHG), and as Stoddard Solvent (TPHSS),
analyzed m nemr al accordance nth E." s Method No 8015M
4, Benzene (E), ft _...ene (1), Ethylbenzene ,E), is ttal Xylenes (X), and Methyl Terliary-Butyl Ether (MT13E), analyzed in general accordance.
with EPA , Zethod No. 8021B
<
than" the stated method reporting limit
-: No. final yzed
7. The re s ,. -ts is below normal
of g limits. The value reported is an estimate.
B. Estimated concentration cal n.ls. tea for an analyte response above the valid instrument calibration range. A dilution. is required
to obtain an accurate quart ificat an of the analyte.
4, The
thrOmatograrldc pat em does not resemble the fuel standard used for quantitation_
nreka Prelects \ 1995 \ 0mel O1- Cbre,da
20101115.1-hstData.xls sa
0
A-23
SEEN Consulting Engineers
& Geologists, Inc.
Table A-12
Maintenance Building/AST Area-Groundwater Analytical Results, July 22, 2010
Former Cloverdale Remanufacturing Facility, Cloverdale, California
Oh "WIT
Sample Location &
Depth (feet)
Tramo2
TPHD2
TPHG2
Benzene3 Toluene3
EthylTotal
benzene3 Xylenes3
MTBE3
4
<50
<0.5
<0.5
<1.5
<0.5
1. ug/L: micrograms per Liter
2. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Motor Oil IPHMO), as Diesel (I HD), and as Gasoline (TPHG), analyzed in general
13-205
accordance with. EPA Method No. 8015M
3. Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Total Xylenes, and Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether (MT BE),: analyzed in general
accordance with EPA Method No. 8021B
4. <: 'less than" the stated method reporting limit
5. The sample chromatographic pattern does not resemble the fuel standard used for quantitation.
\ eureka \ ProjectA1995 095107-CloverdaleRoands \ 209 \ PITESViatA
201011154-listDataxist,soil-o -Jull0
A-24
SHN Consulting Engineers
& Geologists, Inc.
Appendix B
Field Notes and Boring Logs
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS, INC.
FAX: 707/441-8877 [email protected]
Eureka, CA 95501-2138 707/441-8855
812 W. Wabash
Job No
Daily Field Report
Page
of
1
Name
0.4.1, km.
0 9M-
Field Personnel
of Work)).
S411
Day of Wee.
Date
ojcct Manager
of WO
,}.
k
Weather
CAMP
f
_
.
nre..err
WI
N
To
r
' 1 Nt311)
S
,K,ov,2_
er
Pi2s
r_pj-J
tit*,
/5, CM
Vgc
1
O
if
chir .5-Paw
Jr, C. 4 t T
-S
G?
nrc Scan.
D
As- Sc.:
- Pot
/D.36.-- I
Cc,Li ecr
"'SO .
PP")
An, ir(
1.-1°L.
-
1336
too
)1106
At
-rr)
1,1 o
Uj(
T
P
%.)
L-J t
t
bI
rn
$.1T A Lk' tM- CR.
-.AOC
crai, tAP,I
1_4111
Aa SP Al co
ce pc tc
)54e. co. 3c77
1-11 oh' -A
tv__ )1- 55
?,,,i9_,:,
.1
)5)
ck WonnsWield F
ly field report-w-lines doe
3,0-
SS
' .57
10,2, ra.k.
5. 4 Pelf' (.0C 1)
t- e2/
-6"
ItS,4,
Ara Ws rth ez,
15-34
if a
0-,L.n1.:
c et,z,
i
-
/A
'I")
r 7 I'S
5.4r) .55
s.
ivy_ c-ct 'r L X...rt 1 _.:
Is&
il-cf;:mi
41
AS-- .-W
ro `7ic-Iii
9 Or
0
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS, INC.
812 W Wabash
Eureka, CA 95501-2138
707/441-8855 - FAX 707/441-8877 [email protected]
Daily Field Report
of
Page
wea
C
S
General Lac
Project Manager
An For
CA
IType of \fork
FinA
y of Week
Dare
7 -A3-1 G
Feld Personnel
00, /c,
R.ro-s&R
5J4MF LIfie
Ai- ser r
TSB - tiO
e-
011 CSC
*"".
co R
r.)-
"Epm_r____Las_14
2 .1)
IIS
p
1-1
irk \r
r^
;
ATEE.
ic
1-2-hCe
JT vhf
1. 7,
C- ry -.4
ti
c
Q
"..)
I
47,
.c ?!T
CCs-SS io B-c
ti CV,
T fl
%0 L-1,o.
flr
as
__PA
Ole
A- ,
A
v,
C=
TO
IS-
C_
An n)
r 4"-
-PT /.../G
no
t r*)
C. a4,
-t
-L
Tfr,
17
5L, ry
'1`2- TO 'C%-.>...02_
a°
0
IP
0
rnip
03)
111/0
-
IN CANS' tE
cl ex I t_ --ca A,
na
c>kc -to?.--.._
1)90.3/A P.,
rt,p-,5,
.73:EDA tie-
ti)-A_)-1-,-)k) Ire_ culi:4_5
1C-PrIC-44 MA,.
C
iTt..1>
3.--,
/
t.
1-N ke../rT..-1)
CO
c.._ R. tf
°A MA" A_E
(n. -5- 140LE4
Lire
- -.7) li 4205 °I '11:::k
r' 3E Cpaiaas
tor-) k 0 a
-7.\3.U7t G rj
1
/
arrstre
HAtbeckerkFonnsWield Forrns\daily field repo
CM' given 10-
\ Fa)444
? it
-S- ij f: 1.9-5 -1-0
'.g5- ea_ .v9cr, rcot.),i (bp,....,,ra. C NM
froLorv,. utvA
i
abt-4, I a,o,s-
F
T mcha- 0.u.3-3
I &ported By:
1
1
s.doc
Ftcov( "1-6)k.
.rn Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc.
ZA 812 West Wabash, Eureka, CA ph. (707) 441 -8855 fax (707) 441-8877
PROJ. NAME: LP Cloverdale
LOCATION: Cloverdale, CA
PROJ. NUMBER:095107209
GROUND ELEVATION:
DRILLER: Clearheart Drilling
DEPTH OF BORING: 17.5 feet BGS
DRILLING METHOD: SFA
DEPTH TO FIRST WATER:- -
SAMPLER TYPE: SPT
DATE: 7/23/10
SOIL BORING LOG
B-104A
LOGGED BY: R. Rueber
SOIL DESCRIPTION
L
Asphalt (-4" thick)
N._
REMARKS
Soil description is based on cuttings
SILT, clayey, trace fine sand, trace gravel, fine, rounded,
stiff, slightly moist, medium brown
10
15
4J
6
100
0
SILT, clayey, trace fine sand, trace gravel, fine, rounded
medium stiff, slightly moist, medium brown
7
Weathered serpentinite, poorly indurated, slightly moist,
greenish grey
Backfilled with bentonite chips
Total depth of boring = 17.5 feet BGS
20
BORING LOG
Page Number 1 of 1
yConsulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc.
812 West Wabash, Eureka, CA ph. (707) 441-8855 fax. (707) 441-8877
PROJ. NAME: LP Cloverdale
LOCATION: Cloverdale, CA
PROJ. NUMBER: 095107 209
GROUND ELEVATION:-
DRILLER: Clearheart Drilling
DRILLER:
DEPTH OF BORING: 25.5 feet BGS
DRILLING METHOD: SFA
DEPTH TO FIRST WATER:-
SAMPLER TYPE: 2-inch Split Spoon/SPT
DATE: 7/23/10
SOIL BORING LOG
LOGGED BY: R. Rueber
SAMPLE
g
>-
ML
SOIL DESCRIPTION
REMARKS
Soil description is based on cuttings
Asphalt (-4" thick)
SILT, clayey, trace fine sand, trace gravel, fine, rounded,
medium stiff, slightly moist, medium brown
Approximate bedrock contact based, on drilling
-10
15
48
20
- 25
75/ 1 111
Weathered serpentinite, poorly to moderately indurated,
slightly moist, greenish grey
6"
100 /I
0
.1, Weathered serpentinite,moderately to
\ greenish grey
Total depth of boring = 25.5 feet BGS
ell indurated, wet
Limited sample
Water in sample tube (SPT)
Backfilled with bentonite chips
30
BORING LOG
Page Number 1 of 1
Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc.
812 West Wabash, Eureka, CA ph. (707)441-8855 fax (707)441-8877
PROJ. NAME: LP Cloverdale
LOCATION: Cloverdale, CA
PROJ. NUMBER:095107.209
GROUND ELEVATION:- -
DRILLER: Clearheart Drilling
DEPTH OF BORING: 17.5 feet BGS
DRILLING METHOD: SFA
DEPTH TO FIRST WATER:
SAMPLER TYPE: SPT
DATE :: 7/23/10
Lu
co
a>
0.1
z
F-
0.
w
0
0
B-201
zec
SAMPLE
. .
SOIL BORING LOG
r<
0
z
5
^
.,( E
us
fl-
re...
0 ej
>
>-
0
Ill
W.
--.
z
Jn
8
0
0
J0
2
SOIL DESCRIPTION
Asphalt (-4" thick)
ML
REMARKS
Soil description is based on cuttings
SILT, clayey, trace fine sand, few gravel, fine, rounded,
stiff, slightly moist, medium brown
80/
2 160
Approximate bedrock contact based on drilling
Hard drilling from 6.0 to 17.0 feet BGS
MUDSTONE or SANDSTONE, silt, fine sand, thy, light
grey, sample pulverized from driving sampler
All soil needed for lab samples
5"
Description from shoe
5
__, iMUDSTONE or SANDSTONE, silt, fine sand, dry, light
100/
10
60
grey, sample pulverized from driving sampler
I-1
Total depth of boring= 17.5 feet BGS
Backfilled with bentonite chips
20
BORING LOG
Page Number 1 of 1
/ Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc.
LI II
812 West Wabash, Eureka, CA ph. (707) 4414855 fax. (707) 441 -8877
PROJ. NAME: LP Cloverdale
LOCATION: Cloverdale, CA
PROJ. NUMBER:095107.209
GROUND ELEVATION:
DRILLER: Clearheart Drilling
DEPTH OF BORING: 19.5 feet BGS
DRILLING METHOD: SFA
DEPTH TO FIRST WATER:
SAMPLER TYPE: 2.0-inch Spilt Spoon
DATE: 7/23/10
SOIL BORING LOG
B-202
LOGGED BY: R. Rueber
AMPL
SOIL DESCRIPTION
ML
Asphalt (-4" thick)
REMARKS
1 Soil description is based on cuttings
SILT, clayey, trace fine sand, trace gravel, fine, rounded
medium stiff, slightly moist, medium brown
-10
Odor in cuttings on augers
40
44
40
370 100 `<.
.."
act
<
Weathered serpentinite, moderately indurated, slightly
moist, mottled greenish grey/reddish brown, strong, odor
15
17
22
17
0
100
Weathered serpentinite, moderately indurated, slightly
moist, greenish grey to dark grey, no odor
Total depth of boring = 19.5 feet BGS
20
BORING LOG
Backfilled with bentonite chips.
Page Number 1 of 1
Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc.
812 West Wabash, Eureka, CA ph. (707) 441 -8855 fax. (707) 441 -8877
PROJ. NAME: LP Cloverdale
LOCATION: Cloverdale, CA
PROJ. NUMBER:095107 209
GROUND ELEVATION:-
DRILLER: Clearheart Drilling
DEPTH OF BORING: 18.0 feet BGS
DRILLING METHOD: SFA
DEPTH. TO FIRST WATER:
SAMPLER TYPE: 2.0-inch Spilt Spoon
DATE: 7/23/10
SOIL BORING LOG
B-203
LOGGED BY: R. Rueber
SAMPLE
z
cc
w
SOIL DESCRIPTION.
REMARKS
0
in
Asphalt (-4" thick)
Soil description is based on cuttings
SILT, clayey, trace tine sand, trace gravel, fine, rounded,
medium stiff, slightly moist, medium brown
Change in drilling, weathered bedrock?
10
20
24
30
Weathered serpentinite, poor to moderately indurated,
slightly moist, greenish grey/brown
100
0
15
40
54
0
"iii-1"
Weathered serpentinite, poor to moderately indurated,
slightly moist, greenish grey/brown
Total depth of boring = 18.0 feet. BGS
Backfilled with bentonite chips
20
BORING LOG
Page Number 1 of 1
Tzarin Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc.
A_,
-)
812 West Wabash, Eureka, CA
ph. (707) 441 -8855
fax (707) 441-8877
WELL POINT LOG
PROJ. NAME: LP Cloverdale
LOCATION: Cloverdale, CA
PROJ. NUMBER: 095107.209
TOC ELEVATION:--
DRILLER: Clearheart Drilling
DEPTH OF BORING/WELL: 40.0 feet BGS
B-204
DRILLING METHOD: HSA
DEPTH TO FIRST WATER: --
SAMPLER TYPE: 2-inch Split Spoon/SPT
SCREEN INTERVAL:
LOGGED BY: R Rueber
DATE: 7/22/10
30-40 feet BGS.
SAMPLE
REMARKS
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WELL POINT CONSTRUCTION
co
5
0
Asphalt (-6" thick)
No sample 0 to 10 feet
BGS
2" SCH 40 PCV Blank
Excavation backfill gravel, 1/2 to 1inch rounded (cuttings)
/
hange In drilling at 7.0 feet BGS
10
10
ML
SILT, clayey, fine sand, trace gravel,
fine, rounded, few roots, very stiff,
slightly moist, greenish grey,
hydrocarbon odor
7
15
ML
SILT, clayey, trace fine sand, trace
gravel, fine, rounded, few roots, hard,
slightly moist, medium to dark brown,
no hydrocarbon odor
2
20
GM
0
GRAVEL, fine, rounded, silty, with fine
to coarse sand, dense, slightly moist,
Lsk reddish-brown
1-4
WELL POINT LOG
Page Number 1 of 2
Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc.
812 West Wabash, Eureka, CA
ph. (707) 441 -8855
fax. (707) 441 -8877
WELL POINT LOG
PROJ. NAME: LP Cloverdale
LOCATION: Cloverdale, CA
PROJ. NUMBER: 095107.209
TOG ELEVATION:
DRILLER: Clearheart Drilling
DEPTH OF BORING/WELL: 40.0 feet BGS
B-204
DRILLING METHOD: HSA
DEPTH TO FIRST WATER: --
SAMPLER TYPE: 2-inch Split Spoon/SPT
SCREEN INTERVAL:
LOGGED BY: R. Rueber
DATE: 7/22/10
30-40 feet BGS
REMARKS
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WELL POINT CONSTRUCTION
Harder drilling at 24 feet
25
BGS
25
100
SILT, with clay, trace fine sand, few
fine gravel, semiangular, hard, slightly
moist, medium brovvn/gmy
Switch to SPT sampler
30
75
35
2" SCH 40 PVC Screen
(0.010 slot)
SILT, with clay, few gravel, fine,
rounded, hard, slightly moist, medium
grey
35
Weathered bedrock?
SILT, micaceous, few small rock
1 fragments (mudstone) to 1 cm, slightly
Imoist, dark grey
Hard drilling from 35 to
40 feet BGS, cuttings
dry/hot
1Sorne sandstone, fine sand, dry,
pulverized from driving sampler
40
401
Total depth of boring
40.0 feet BGS
Dry hole on 7/23110,
backfilled with cement
grout
WELL POINT LOG
PVC End Cap
Page Number 2 of 2
Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc.
812 West Wabash, Eureka, CA
ph. (707) 441 -8855 fax. (707) 441 -8877
WELL POINT LOG
PROJ. NAME: LP Cloverdale
LOCATION: Cloverdale, CA
PROJ. NUMBER: 095107.209
TOC ELEVATION: --
DRILLER: Clearheart Drilling
DEPTH OF BORING/WELL: 35 0 feet BGS
DRILLING METHOD: 1-ISA
DEPTH TO FIRST WATER: --
SAMPLER TYPE: 2-inch Split Spoon
SCREEN INTERVAL:
LOGGED BY: R. Rueber
DATE: 7/22/10
30-40 feet BGS
SAMPLE
a.
0
z
cc
0
REMARKS
SOIL DESCRIPTION
0
a
WELL POINT CONSTRUCTION
0
(0
0.0
Asphalt (4" thick)
Base Rock (-3" thick)
FILL, silt, clayey, with fine sand, with
gravel, fine, rounded, medium stiff,
slightly moist, mottled. medium brown,
reddish brown, dark grey
Hand auger from 0 to
2.0 feet BGS
2' SCH 40 PCV Blank
F2efusal/gravels
5
FILL, silt, clayey, with fine sand, few
fine gravel, rounded, medium stiff,
slightly moist, mottled medium brown,
reddish brown, dark grey
0
10
10
L
15-F15
L
0
SILT, clayey, trace fine sand, very sti ff,
slightly moist, mottled greenish
grey/reddish brown, no mottling at
10.5 feet BGS, few small rock
fragments (coarse sand), small root in
shoe, greenish grey
SILT, clayey, trace fine sand, trace
gravel, fine, rounded, very stiff, slightly
moist, mottled reddish brown/greenish
grey, few organics (roots)
WELL POINT LOG
Page Number 1 of 2
Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc.
812 West Wabash, Eureka, CA
ph. (707)441-8855
fax. (707)441-8877
PROJ. NAME: LP Cloverdale
LOCATION: Cloverdale, CA
PROJ. NUMBER: 095107 209
TOC ELEVATION: --
DRILLER: Clearheart Drilling
DEPTH OF BORING/WELL: 35.0 feet BGS
DRILLING METHOD: HSA
DEPTH TO FIRST WATER:
SAMPLER TYPE: 2-inch Split Spoon
SCREEN INTERVAL:
LOGGED BY: R. Rueber
DATE: 7/22/10
30-40 feet BGS
SAMPLE
a
0
._
z z
,..
0
II-
0
u
lX
iii
0 0
0
.r
la
w
rct
.
.......
i.
u_
20
.
0
,---
E
>
o
re
ta
zn
~
0
-J
0
0
J 7
n
d
(t
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WELL POINT CONSTRUCTION
II-
20
SAND, fine, silty, dense to medium
dense, slightly moist, mottled fight
greenish grey/reddish brown
0
MUDSTONE, moderately indurated,
dark grey, darker on fractures, slightly
moist
25
REMARKS
t
25
01
100
Rx
I
2" SCH 40 PVC Screen
(0.010 slot)
Mudstone as above
Rig chattering from 27
to 30 feet BGS
30
3o
0 1 100
All sample in tube for lablwater on
sampler
Depth to water
approximately 30.9 feet
BGS
35
Set PVC in
borehole/pulled 3
augers
35
PVC End Cap
Total depth of boring = 35.0 ft BGS
Backfilled with grout
WELL POINT LOG
Page Number 2 of 2
Appendix C
Laboratory Analytical Reports
ANALYTICA
ABC RATORY
August 6, 2010
FAL Project ID: 6261
Mr. Roland Rueber
SHN Engineering
812 W. Wabash Avenue
Eureka, CA 95501-2138
Dear Mr. Rueber,
Enclosed are the results for Frontier Analytical Laboratory project 6261. This
corresponds to your LP Cloverdale project and project number 095107.209. Nine soil samples
were received on 7/27/2010 in good condition. These samples were extracted and analyzed by
EPA Method 8290 for tetra through octa chlorinated dibenzo dioxins and furans. The l'PQ for
your samples has been calculated using the 1998 World Health Organization's Toxic Equivalency
Factors. SI1N Engineering requested a turnaround time of fifteen business days for project 6261.
The following report consists of an Analytical Data section and a Sample Receipt section.
The Analytical Data section contains our project-sample tracking log and the analytical results.
The Sample Receipt section contains your original chain of custody, our sample login form and a
sample photo. The attached results are specifically for the samples referenced in this report only
This report, along with Frontier Analytical Laboratory's basic Excel EDD and the Geotracker
EDD, has been sent to you via email. A hardcopy of this report will not be sent to you unless
specifically requested. These results meet all NELAC requirements and shall not be reproduced
except in full
If you have any questions regarding project 6261, please feel free to contact me at
(916) 934-0900. Thank you for choosing Frontier Analytical Laboratory for your analytical
testing needs.
Sincerely,
Bradley
Director of Operations
FRONTIER ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
5172 Hillsdale Circle El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
Tel (916) 934-0900 Fax (916) 9340999
www.ftontieranalyticalcom
000001 of 000011
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
Frontier Analytical Laboratory
Sample Tracking Log
FAL Project ID: 6261
Received on: 0712712010
Project Due:
Cl£81 /2414
Storage:
R1
Se/spring
Thee
Hold Time
Due Date
07/23/2010
0920 am
0824/2010
07/23(2010
09:40 am
08124(2010
EPA 8290 DT
07/2312010
10:20 are
08/24/2010
B-203a13
EPA 8290 DIP
0723/2010
10:55am
38/2412010
LP Cloverdale
6 -20
EPA 8290 DiF
Soil
07123/2010
11:10 am
08/24/2010
0
LP Cloverdale
B- 202 @14'
EPA 6290 DIE
Soil
07/232010
11:50 am
08124(2010
0
LP Cloverdale
13-202@19'
EPA 8290 D/F
Soil
07/23(2010
12:05 pm
08/24/2010
6261-008-SA
0
LP Cloverdale
B-106A©19.3
EPA 8290 D/F
Sell
07/23/2010
01:40 pm
08/2412010
8281-009-SA
0
LP Cloverdale
11-136AM)23
EPA 8290 DIE
Soil
07/232010
02:00 pm
08/24/2010
Client
Project ID
Client
Dup.
Sampte ID.
Requested
Method
01-SA
0
LP Cloverdale
EI-201g12'
EPA 8290 0/F
02-SA
0
LP Cloverdale
8-201@17'
EPA 8290 DiF
6251-003-SA
0
LP Cloverdale
B-104A@1T
6261-C94-SA
0
LP Cloverdale
8261-006-SA
0
6261-008-SA
6261-007-6A
FAL
Sample ID
5172 Hillsdale Circle
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 °Tel (916) 934-0900
Fax (916) 934-0999
www.frontieranatagA14000
EPA Method 8290
PCDD/F
FAL ID: 6261-001-MB
Client ID: Method Blank.
Matrix: Soil
Batch No: X2070
Date Extracted: 07-29-2010
Date Received: NA
Amount 5.00 g
Conc
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
OCDD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.148
0.313
0.428
0.480
0,469
0.788
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCIDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1.2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
OCDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0927
12,3,47,8-HxCDD
1.71
0.246
0.306
0.308
0.355
0.447
0.459
0.512
1.48
% Rec
QC Limits
13C-2,3,7,8-TODD
78.9
65,4
89.7
65.6
63.2
48.8
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
79.2
67.6
66,4
94.4
89.3
84.8
83.4
66.3
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 -135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
722
53.5
40.0'- 135
40.0 - 135
75.1
50.0 -150
130-1,23,7,8-PeCDD
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCIDD
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1304 22,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
13C-OCDD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C- 1,2,3,7,8 -PeCDF
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
130-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-2,3,4,6,7,13-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOF
130-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
130-0CDF
Cleanup Surrogate
37C1-2,3,7,8-TCDD
5172 Hillsdale Circle
Acquired: 07-31-2010
1998 WHO TEQ: 0.00
Conc
DL
MDL
Compound
0.0262
0.0442
0.0486
0.0586
0.0529
0.0954
0.154
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total lixCDD
Total HpCDD
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.148
0.313
0.480
0.788
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0927
0.246
0.447
0.512
Qua!
0.0205
0.0298
0.0313
0.0308
0.0317
0.231
Internal. Standards
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
wmasonarmaiwiatearzel
ICal: PCDDFAL3-5-12-10
GC Column: DB5
Units: p9/9
DL Qua! 1998 WHO Tox
Compound
[
0.0341
0.0387
0.0418
0.0429
0.105
Qua!
Isotopic Labeled Standard outside QC range but
signal to noise ratio is >10:1
B Analyte is present in Method. Blank
C Chemical Interference
D Presence of Diphenyl Ethers
E Analyte concentration is above calibration range
F Analyte confirmation on secondary column
Analyte concentration is below calibration range
M Maximum possible concentration
ND Analyte Not Detected
NP Not Provided
P Pre-filtered through a Whatman 0.7um GF/F filter
S Sample acceptance criteria not met
X Matrix interferences
Result taken from dilution or reinjection
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 Tel (916) 934-0900
Fax
934-0999 www.frontieranaq
Wpaleofr,80001(
EPA Method 8290
PCDD/F
FAL ID: 6261-001-0PR
Client ID: OPR
Matrix: Soil
Batch No: X2070
Date Extracted: 07-29-2010
Date Received: NA
Amount: 5.00 g
Compound
Cone QC Limits
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,23,7,8-PeCDD
12,3,4,7,8 HxCDD
103 7.00- 13.0
1,2,3,6,7,8-HicCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
23,4,75-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,57,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1.2,3,4,6.7.8-HpCDF
50.7
53.5
52.5
50.7
50.0
110
35.0 - 65.0
70.0 - 130
9.61 7.00 - 13.0
49.2 35.0-65 0
48.2. 35.0 65.0
47.2 35.0 - 65.0
35.0 -65.0
OCDF
102
35.0- 65:0
70.0 - 130
Internal Standards
% Rec
QC Limits
13C-1 2,375,9-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
13C-12,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
13C-OCDF
35.0 - 65.0
35.0 - 65.0
35.0 - 65t0
Qual
84.3 40.0 - 135
72.1
95.6 40.0 - 135
90.6 40.0 - 135
634 403 - 135
61.2 40.0 - 135
84 1
72.5
73.3
97.7
96.6
92.6
93.6
73.8
79.2
64.2
86.6
Isotopic Labeled Standard outside QC range but
signal to noise ratio is >10:1
40.0' 135
40.0 - 135
40.0' - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 -135
40.0 -.135
40,0 - 135
405 -135
40.0 -135
40.0 - 135
Cleanup Surrogate
37CI-2,3,7,8-TCDD
Qual
35.0 - 653
12,3,4,7A9,HpCDF
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C-1 2,3,7,8-PeCDF
13C-23,4,7,8-PeCDF
130-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
Acquired: 07-31-2010
1998 WHO. TEQ: NA
ICal: PCDDFAL3-5-12-10
GC Column: 095
Units: ngiml
35.0 - 65.0
35.0 - 65.0
35.0 - 65.0
48.4
47.9
48.8
47.3
47 2
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
130-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
13C-12,3,45,75-1-1pCDD
13C-OCDD
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
B Analyte is present in Method Blank
C Chemical Interference
D Presence of Diphenyl Ethers
E Analyte concentration is above calibration range
F Analyte confirmation on secondary column
Analyte concentration is below calibration range
M Maximum possible concentration
ND Analyte Not Detected
NP Not Provided
P Pre-filtered through a Whatman 0.7um GFIF filter
S Sample acceptance criteria not met
X Matrix interferences
* Result taken from dilution or reinjection
50.0 -150
Analyst
Reviewed By
Daze:
Date:
5172 Hillsdale Circle
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 Tel (9161934- 90
I
Fax (916) 934 -0999
www.frontieranaayat cal.cocc d0001(
EPA Method 8290
PCDD/F
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
MdtalliaMWAMEWMMMEMEME=
Date Extracted: 07-29-2010
Date Received: 07-27-2010
Amount: 5.10 g
% Solids: 93.51
FAL ID: 6261-001-SA
Client ID: B-201@12
Matrix: Soil
Batch No: X2070
Compound
Conc
2,3,7,8-TODD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,2,3,4,7,8-1-bcCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
()ODD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,34,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
,2;3,6,7.8 -HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDP
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCOF
HpCDF
OCDF
DL Qual 1998 WHO Tex
0.327
0.496
0.671
0.747
0.731
1.49
2.64
0.191
9.387
0.408
0.502
0.481
0.536
0 698
0.836
1.10
2,18
% Rae
QC. Limits
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
13C 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
13C 1 2 3 4 6 7 8-HpCDD
13C-OCDD
84.2
70.0
90.7
85.6
68.6
53.9
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8-FeCDF
13C-2,3.4,7,8-PeCOF
80.9
69.9
72.3
88.4
92.0
85.9
82.9
77.4
72.2
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0- 135
40.0.- 135
Internal Standards
13C -1,2, 3,4,
, , 7 8-1-MCDF
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-1-bcCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-FipODF
13C-OCDF
57.1
5172 Hillsdale Circle
Conc
MDL
Compound
0.0262
0.0442
0.0486
0.0586
0.0529
0.0954
0.154
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.328
0.496
0.747
1.49
0.0205
0.0298
0.0313
0.0308
0.0317
0.0341
0.0387
0.0418
0.0429
0.105
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Totatl-NCDF
Total HpCDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.191
0.408
DL
Qual
0.698
1.10
40.0 -135
40.0 -1.35
40.0 -135
40.0- 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 -135
40.0 -135
40.0 -135
Isotopic Labeled Standard outside QC range bu
signal to noise ratio is >10:1
B Analyte Is present in Method Blank
A
C Chemical Interference
D Presence of Diphenyl Ethers
E Analyte concentration is above calibration range
F Analyte confirmation on secondary column
Analyte concentration is below calibration range
Maximum possible concentration
ND Analyte Not Detected
NP Not Provided
P Pre-filtered through a \Nhatman 0.7um GP filter
J.
M
S Sample acceptance criteria not met
X Matrix interferences
*
87.3
Acquired: 08-02-2010
1998 WHO TEQ: 0.00
Qual
Cleanup Surrogate
37CI-2,3,7,8-TCDD
ICal: PCDDFAL3-5-12-10
GC Column: DB5
Units: pgig
Result taken from dilution or reinjection
50.0 150
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 'Tel (916
4-0900
Fax (916) 934 -0999
www.frorltieran
Pal
001(
EPA Method 8290
PCDD/F
FAL ID: 6261-002-SA
Client ID: B-201@17
Matrix: Soil
Batch No: X2070
Date Extracted: 07-29-2010
Date Received: 07-27-2010
Amount: 5.05 g
% Solids: 93.25
DL Qual 1998
ICal: PCDDFAL3-5-12-10
GC Column: DB5
Units: pg/g
Compound
Cone
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8 -PeCDD
1,2,3 4,7,8-1-IxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
OCDD
ND
ND
68.1
6.81
6.35
2180
19600
0.635
21.8
1.96
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
ND
2,3,4,76-PeCDF
1.04
10.7
6:27
16.5
1.87
1190
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,78-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-1-6CDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,76-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
OCDF
-Internal. Standards
13C-2,3,7,6 -TCDD
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-1-IxCDD
13C-1,2,3,67,8-1-1xCDD
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
13C-OCDD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
130-1,2,3,7.8-PeCDF
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
130-1,2,3,67,8-HxCDF
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-1-1xCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
13C-OCDF
J
J
34-1
0.341
0.666
77.9
61.6
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
103
100
40.0- 135
82.2
73A
40.0 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
73.8
40.0 135
65.1
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0- 135
40.0 - 135
406 - 135
40.0 - 135
5172 Hillsdale Circle
69.5
Acquired: 07-31-2010
1998 VVHO TEQ: 48.4
MDL
Compound
Conc
0.0262
0.0442
0.0486
0.0586
0.0529
0.0954
0.154
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
6.36
28.0
244
3390
0.0205
0.0298
0.0313
0.0308
0.0317
0.0341
0.0387
0.0418
0.0429
0.105
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
21.5
56.5
1650
5700
DL
Qual
-
D,M
D,M
D,M
-
Qual
A
Isotopic Labeled Standard outside QC range but
signal to noise ratio is >10:1
B Analyte is present in Method Blank
C Chemical. Interference.
D Presence of Diphenyl Ethers
E Anaiyte concentration is above calibration range
F Analyte confirmation on secondary column
J Analyte concentration is below calibration range
M Maximum possible concentration
ND Analyte Not Detected
NP Not Provided
P Pre-filtered through a VVhatman 0.7um GF/F filter
S Sample acceptance criteria not met
X Matrix interferences
"
Cleanup Surrogate
37CI-2,3,7,8 TCDD
0.520
1.07
0.627
1.65
0.187
11.9
6660
QC Limits
108
102
80.5
83.1
86.6
78.8
76.9
0.257
0.0834
0.394
% Rec
57.8
HO Tox
0.176
0.403
2.57
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY'
Result taken from dilution or reinjection
50.0- 150
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 Tel (916) 934-0900
Fax (916) 934 -0999 www.frontieran&M
1.e&-P001(
0
r
EPA Method 8290
PCDD/F
FAL ID: 6261-003-SA
Client ID: I3-104A@17
Matrix: Soil
Batch. No: X2070
Date Extracted: 07-29-2010
Date Received: 07-27-2010
Amount 5.048
ICal: PCDDFAL3-5-12-10
GC Column: DB5
Units: pg/g
Acquired: 07-31-2010
1998 WHO TEO: 7.10
% Solids: 58.84
Compound
Cone
2,3,7,8-TODD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
ND
1,2,3,78,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
DODD
Internal Standards
13C-2,3,7,8-TODD
130-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
130-1,2,3,4,7,8-FbcCDD
130-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
13C-12,3,4,6,7.8-HpCDD
130-0CDD
13C-2,3,7,8 TCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
130-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
130-1,2,3A,6,7,8-HpCDF
13C- 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 - HpCDF
13C-OCDF
0.255
3.41
8.30
10.9
3.39
137
80.0
0.830
1.09
0.339
1.37
0.00800
ND
ND
ND
ND
12.3,4,7.8-HCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1 2 3 7 8 9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-F1pCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
OCDF
DL Qual 1998 WHO Tox
3.41
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,23,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,78-PeCDF
0.0732
0.139
0.148
0.236
0.0443
J
J
QC Limits-
82.7
69.9
95.0
85.7
75.3
4050 -135
40.0 - 135
40.0 -`135
135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
59.4
80.0
67.2
68.5
95.3
90.9
90.4
91.4
77.6
79.2
61.3
0.00645
0.339
% Rec
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 135
40.0- 135
40.0 -.135
40.0 - 135
40.0- 135
40.0 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 -135'
37CI-2,3,7,8-TCDD
0.0262
0.0442
0.0486
0.0586
0.0529
0.0954
0.154
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
0.0317
0.0341
0.0387
0.0418
0.0429
0,105
0.262
0.321
3.55
Compound
Cone
DL
Qual
242
80.2
118
162
E0308
0.443
ND
ND
0.645
ND
MDL
0.0205
0.0298
0.0313
0.000355
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
1.04
0.913'
J
1.42
2.28
J
J
Qual
Labeled Standard outside QC range but
A Isotopic
signal to noise ratio is '10:1
B Analyte Is present in Method Blank
C Chemical Interference
D Presence of Diphenyl Ethers
E Analyte concentration is above calibration range
F Analyte confirmation on secondary column
J Analyte concentration is below calibration range
M Maximum possible concentration
ND Analyte Not Detected
NP Not Provided
P Pre-filtered through a Whatman 0.7um GF filter
S Sample acceptance criteria not met
X Matrix interferences
Result taken from dilution or reinjection
Cleanup Surrogate
5172 Hillsdale Circle
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
82.2
50.0 150
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 Tel (916) 934-0900
Fax (916) 934-0999
www.frontieran
liign(10001(
EPA Method 8290
PCDD/F
FAL ID: 6261-004-SA
Date Extracted: 07-29-2010
Date Received: 07-27-2010
Amount 4.99 g
% Solids: 63.97
Client ID: 8- 203 @13
Matrix: Soil.
Batch No: X2070
Compound
Conc
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
12,3,4,7,8-HxODD
1,23,6,7,8-HxCDD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2,3,7,8 -TCDF-ND
-
1,2,3,7,8,94-1xCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
OCDD
ND
ND
1,2,3,7,8 -PeCDF
2,3A,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,73-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
OCDF
Internal Standards
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
% Rec
DL
0.132
0.257
0.376
0.415
0.408
0.769
2.37
0.0262
0.0442
0.0486
0.0586
0.0529
0.0954
0.154
Total TODD
Total PeCDD.
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.132
0.257
0.415
0,769
0.0730
0.175
0.169
0,266
0282
0.0205
0.0298
0.0313
0.0308
0,0317
0.298
0.396
0.414
0.508
1.28
0.0341
0.0387
0.0418
0.0429
0.105
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0730
0.175
0.396
0.508
QC. Limits
13C-133,6,73-Hx000
88.7
13C-12,3A,37,8-HpCDD
72.1
40.0 - 135
13C-OCDD
57.5
40.0. 135
130-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
13C-2,3,4,73-PeCDF
130-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,39-HxODF
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
13C- 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF
13C-OCDF
81.5
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40,0
40.0 -135
59.1
40.0 - 135
84.0
50.0 - 150
Dual
Qual
135
Cleanup Surrogate
5172 Hillsdale. Circle
Conc
Compound
40.0. 135
40.0. 135
406 - 135
37CI-2,3,7,8-TCDD
Acquired: 07-31-2010
1998 WHO TED: 0.00
MDL
82.0
80.5
77.3
81.3
96.6
93.6
91.0
89.9
74.5
74.9
!Cat. PCDDFAL3-5-12-10
GC Column: DB5
Units: pg/g
DL Qual 1998 WHO Tox
130-2,3,7,8-TODD
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
13C-1,2,3,4,73-11xCDD
913
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
Isotopic Labeled Standard outside QC range bu
signal to noise ratio is >10:1
B Analyte is present in Method Blank
C Chemical Interference.
D Presence of DIphenyl Ethers
E Analyte concentration is above calibration range
F Analyte confirmation on secondary column
Analyte concentration is below calibration range
M Maximum possible concentration
ND Analyte Not Detected
NP Not Provided
P Pre-filtered through a VVhatman 0.7um OFF filter
S Sample acceptance criteria not met
X Matrix interferences
Result taken from dilution or reinjection
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 Tel (916) 934-0900
Fax ;916)
4-0999 w
009008
ntieranalyticai.c
DOM
EPA Method 8290
PCDD/F
FAL ID: 6261-005-SA
Client ID: [email protected]
Matrix: Soil
Batch No: X2070
Date Extracted: 07-29-2010
Date Received: 07-27-2010
Arnount: 5.01 g
% Solids: 81.07
Compound
Conc
2,3,7,8-TCDD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,227,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,39,7,8-HxCiDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
12.3,4.6,7,8-HpCDD
OCDD
2,3,79-TCDF
1,22,78-PeCDF
2,3A,79-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,79-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,79-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-FixCDF
1,2,367,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3A,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-1-IpCDF
OCDF
Internal Standards
% Rec
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
77.0
69.7
13C-1,227,8-PeCDD
130-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
85.1
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
13C-OCDD
81.7
61.0
43.9
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C-1,2.3,7,8-PeCDF
13C-2,a4,7,8-PeCDF
13C-1,23,4,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,22,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
13C-OCDF
74.0
64.0
66.3
91.3
86.9
81.6
83.4
64.8
66.7
47.6
5172 Hillsdale Circle
ICal: PCDDFAL3-5-12-10
GC Column: DB5
pglg
DL Qual 1998 WHO Tox
DL Qual
Compound
0.213
0.330
0.366
0.400
0.395
1.10
2.70
0.0262
0.0442
0.0486
0.0586
0.0529
0.0954
0.154
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCOD
Total HpCDD
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.213
0.0914
0.0205
0.0298
0.0313
0.0308
0.0317
0.0341
0.0387
0.0418
0.0429
0.105
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0914
0.246
0.302
0.429
0.241
0.246
0.222
0.225
0.256
0.302
0260
0.429
1.11
Cone
0.330
0.400
1.10
Qual
40.0 - 135
40.0 -1'35
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0.- 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0. 135
40.0'- 135
40.0. 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 -135
40.0- 135
40.0 -135
A Isotopic Labeled Standard outside QC range bu
signal to noise ratio is >10:1
B Analyte is present in Method. Blank
C Chemical Interference
D Presence of Diphenyl Ethers
E Analyte concentration is above calibration range
F Analyte confirmation on secondary column
J Analyte concentration is below calibration range
M Maximum possible concentration
ND Analyte Not Detected
NP Not Provided
P Pre-filtered through a VVhatman 0.7urn GF/F filter
S Sample acceptance criteria not met.
Matrix interferences
*
78.5
Acquired: 07-31-2010
1998 WHO TEQ: 0.00
MDL
Cleanup Surrogate
37CI-2,3,7,8-TCDD
ANALYTICAL LABO RATDRY
Result taken from dilution or reinjection
50.0 -150.
El Dorado Hins,CA 95762 Tel (916) 934-0900
Fax (916) 934-0999 wwwfrontieran9OcleSn40001(
EPA Method 8290
PCDD/F
FAL ID: 6261-006-SA
Client ID: B- 202 ©14
Matrix: Soil
Batch No: X2070
'Cal: PCDDFAL3-5-12-10
GC Column: DB5
Amount 5.04 g
% Solids: 88.79
Units:
Cons
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
4.67
ND
1,2 ,3,4,7,8-H xCDD
34.0
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
DODD
3210
705
13300
46000
2,3,7,8-TODF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7E-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxODF
1,2,3,67,8-HxCDF
ND
0.705
0.909
12.4
10.8
22.5
6.57
1290
36.4
6760
1,2,3,4,6,7E-F1pCDF
1,2 ,3,4,7E HpCDF
OCDF
DL Rual
J
0.0352
0.454
1.24
1.08
2.25
0.657
12.9
0.364
0.676
0.0205
0.0298
0.0313
0.0308
0.0317
0.0341
0.0387
0.0418
0.0429
0.105
133
0.0823
13C-2,3,7,8-TODD
130-1.2,3,7,8-PeCDD
130-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
130-1.2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
13C-OCDD
66.6
57.4
74.6
76.9
65.9
46.5
40.0 135
13C-2,3,7.8-TCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeODF
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
130-1,2.3.4,7.8-HxCDF
130-1,2.3,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
130-1 ,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
13C-OCDF
64.7
56.8
46.7
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
62.2
50.0 - 150
40.0 - 135
40.0- 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
Compound
Conc
Total TODD
17.8
97.8
13900
17900
Total Pe=
Total tilirCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
- Total PeCDE
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
27,7
28.3
1880
7020
DL
Qual
D,M
D,M
D,M
Rua'
Isotopic Labeled Standard outside QC range but
signal to noise ratio is >10:1
40.0- 135
Cleanup Surrogate
37CI-2,3,7,8-TODD
4.60
0.0262
0.0442
0.0486
0.0586
0.0529
0.0954
0.154
4.67
3,40
321
RC Limits
54.2
79.7
81.4
59.6
60.6
57.4
54.6
MDL
1998 WHO. Tox
70.5
J
Acquired: 07-31-2010
1998 WHO TER. 557
pg/g
0.272
% Rec
Internal. Standards
1
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
Date: Extracted: 07-29-2010
Date Received: 07-27-2010
Compound
2,34E,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,69-HxCDF
I
8 Analyte is present in Method Blank
Chemical Interference
D Presence of Diphenyl Ethers
E Anal* concentration is above calibration range
F Analyte confirmation on secondary column
J Analyte concentration is below calibration range
aximum possible concentration
ND Analyte Not Detected
NP Not Provided
P Pre filtered through a Whatman 0.7um GF/F filter
S Sample acceptance criteria not met.
X Matrix interferences
* Result taken from dilution or reinjection
5172 Hillsdale Circle - El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 Tel (916)934-0900
Fax (916) 934-0999
vvwvv. o.
ran
paercr,R0601/
[
I
EPA Method 8290
PCDD/F
FAL ID: 6261-007-SA
Client ID: B-202@l9
Matrix: Soil
Batch No: X2070
Date Extracted: 07-29-2010
Date Received: 07-27-2010
Amount: 5.02 g
% Solids: 87.96
Compound
Conc
2,3,7,8-TODD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,84-1pCDD
OCDD
ND
Internal Standards
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
13C-OCDD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
130-1,2,3,4,7,84-NCDF
130-1 ,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
130-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,7,69-HpCDF
13C-OCDF
J
-
4.11
89.9
65.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.17
% Rec
QC Limits
60.7
40.0 - 135
51.1
103
40.0 135
40.0 135
40.0 135
99.8
55.0
21.2
54.6
53.5
39.2
116
109
60.6
67.3
73.7
Compound
Conc
2.16
0.338
1.67
0.411
0.899
0,00653
0.0262
0.0442
0.0486
0.0586
0.0529
0.0954
0.154
Total TCDD
Total PeCDO
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
162
80.3
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
0.516
0.000517
0.0205
0.0298
0.0313
0.0308
0.0317
0.0341
0.0387
0.0418
0.0429
0.105
0.110
0.253
0.376
0,523
0.544
1.04
1,16
1.18
1.95
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
A
40.0 -135
40.0 -135
63.4
50.0 - 150
5172 Hillsdale Circle
134
115
ND
ND
0.376
1.16
2.52
J
signal to noise ratio is >10:1
B Analyte is present in Method Blank
C Chemical Interference
D Presence of Diphenyl Ethers
EI Analyte concentration is above calibration range
F Analyte confirmation on secondary column
J Analyte concentration is below calibration range
M Maximum possible concentration
ND Analyte Not Detected
NP Not Provided
P Pre-filtered through a Whatman 0.7um GF/F filter
S Sample acceptance criteria not met
X Matrix interferences
* Result taken from dilution or reinjection
A
Cleanup Surrogate
37CI-2,3,7,8-TCDD
Qual
Labeled Standard outside QC range bu
A Isotopic
.
40.0 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
DL
Qual
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
55.1
30.1
1
Acquired: 07-31-2010
1998 WHO TEQ: 5.49
MDL
0.284
3.38
16.7
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3
,
4 , 7, 8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
,2,3,6,7,8-Fh(CDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCIDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,47,8,9-HpCDF
OCDF
ICal: PCODFAL3-5-12-10
GC Column: 085
Units: pg/g
DL Qua! 1998 WHO Tox
2A6
H
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 -Tel (9
949
Fax (916) 934-0999
www.frontieran9ed grg0001(
EPA Method 8290
PCDD/F
FAL ID: 6261-008-SA
Client ID: [email protected]
Matrix: Soil
Batch No: X2070
Date Extracted: 07-29-2010
Date Received: 07-27-2010
Amount: 5.01 g
% Solids: 88.18
Compound
Conc
23,7,8-TODD
12,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
ND
1.65
10.5
514
136
5210
1,2,3,7,8,9-11xCDD
12 3 4 6 7 8-HpODD
OCDD
40100
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND
0.575
2,3,47,8-PeCDF
0.548
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,67,8-HxCDF
12,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,22,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
OCDF
13.8
7.73
24.0
2.70
1840
46.2
9710
Internal Standards
0.228
0.0701
J
J
13C-2,3,7,8-TODD
84.1
40.0 - 135
130-1,23,7,8-PeCDD
64.9
93.3
93.8
40.0. 135
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDE
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
13C-12,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
130-1,2,3,78,9-HxCDF
130-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
13C-t2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
13C-OCDF
93.1
102
40.0 -.135
40.0 - 135
40,0 - 135
40.0 - 135
83.7
68.8
64.5
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
101
40.0 -135
40.0 -135
98.9
87.2
89.5
85.6
84.0
90.8
0.0288
0.274
1.38
0.773
2.40
0.270
18.4
0.462
0.971
QC Limits
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxC00
130-1,2,3,4,6,7.8-H pCDD
13C-OCDD
1.65
1.05
51.4
13.6
52.1
4,01
% Rec
13C-1,2,3,4,718-HxCDD
ICal: PCDDFAL3-5-12-10
GC Column: DB5
Units: pg/g
DL Qual 1998 WHO Tox
J
40.0 -135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 -135
Acquired: 07-31-2010
1998 WHO TEO: 149
MDL
Compound
Conc
0.0262
0.0442
0.0486
0.0586
0.0529
0.0954
0.154
Total TODD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
16.4
119
2680
8250
0.0205
0.0298
0.0313
0.0308
0.0317
0.0341
0.0387
0.0418
0.0429
0.105
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
27.9
35.4
DL
Qual
=
D,M
D,M
D,M
=
2350
9150
Qual
Isotopic Labeled Standard outside QC ran
signal to noise ratio is >10:1
B Analyte is present in Method Blank
C Chemical Interference
A
D Presence of Biphenyl Ethers
E Analyte concentration is above calibration range
F Analyte confirmation on secondary column
J Analyte concentration is below calibration range
M Maximum pOssible concentration
ND Analyte Not Detected
NP Not Provided
P Pre-filtered through a Whatman 0.7um GF/F filter
S Sample acceptance criteria not met.
X Matrix interferences
Result taken from dilution or reinjection
Cleanup Surrogate
37CI-2,3,7,8-TCDD
"Mina
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
85.1
50.0
150
Ana lYstt_r
5172 Hillsdale Circle
El Dorado Hills,CA 95762 Tel (916) 934-0900
Fax (916) 934-0999 www ,frontieranaly4Plai.cort01000
EPA Method 8290
PCDD/F
FAL ID: 6261-009-SA
Client ID: B-106A@25
Matrix: Soil.
Batch No: X2070
Date Extracted: 07-29-2010
Date Received: 07-27-2010
Amount: 5.06.g
% Solids: 81.83
Compound
Conc
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1.2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,34,6,7,8-HpCDD
OCDD
ND
ND
ND
11.9
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCOF
Z3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
12,3,46,7,8-H pCDF
1 ,2 3,4,7,8,9-H pCDF
OCDF
Internal Standards
13C-2,3,7,8-TODD
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
130-1,2,3,4,7,84-1xCDD
130-1,2a6,7,0-HxCDD
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
13C-OCDD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
130-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
130-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
13C-1 2 , 3 . 4 7 .8-HxCDF
130-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2, 3,7,8,9-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-1-1pCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,78,9-H pCDF
130-OCDF
DL Qual
J
MDL
Compound
Conc
1.19
0.323
1.23
0.0740
0.0262
0.0442
0.0486
0.0586
0.0529
0.0954
0.154
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
1.22
10.0
107
0.0205
0.0298
0.0313
0.0308
0.0317
0.0341
0.0387
0.0418
0.0429
0.105
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
2 08
0.993
59.2
155
0.0569
0.226
0.241
-
J
0.0599
J
0.0855
0.239
0.334
0.348
0.0178
0.0180
% Rec
QC Limits
81.0
72.6
96.2
92.6
69.7
64.3
40.0 - 135
80.8
69.5
66.2
108
40.0 -135
40.0. 135
40.0 -135
40.0 - 135
99.1
40.0 - 135
84.9
91.0
75.6
80.5
66.2
40.0 135
228
40.0 - 35
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 - 135
40.0 135
135
Isotopic Labeled Standard outside QC range but
signal to noise ratio is >10:1
B Analyte is present in Method Blank
C Chemical Interference
D Presence of Diphenyl Ethers
E Analyte concentration is above calibration range
F Analyte confirmation on secondary column
J Analyte concentration is below calibration range
M Maximum possible concentration
ND Analyte Not Detected
NP Not Provided
P Pre-filtered through a VVhatman 0.7um GAF filter
S Sample acceptance criteria not met
X Matrix interferences
Result taken from dilution or reinjection
Cleanup Surrogate
3701-2,3,7,8-TCDD
DL. Qual
Qual
40.0. 135
40.0
Acquired: 07-31-2010
1998 WHO TEQ: 3.35
998 WHO Tox
0.141
123
740
ND
ND
ND
0.599
ND
0.855
ND
34.8
1.78
180
!Cal: PCDDFAL3-5-12-10
GC Column: DB5
Units: pg/g
0.276
0.626
3.23
ANALYTICAL- LABORATORY
78.7
50.0. 150
Reviewed By:
Date:
5172 Hillsdale Circle
El
Dorado Hills, CA 95762 Te
) 934.0900
Fax (916) 934-0999
WWk
.
01360
uf
ontierana.yucal.com
C
roi
''
- date_
Reline
d
Time
1
-
/
0
se
D ate
Racened ha
0V
1 ime
Itr am It nrinn Linke, other Te, t:eracms have been
\I alas
Email ( pdf including EDDs if iequested)
F
11
.3* (gam/
Time
Si' kat
Date
72)7
Rem
PCDD/F (04-C1s)
2005 WHO
Other
2,3,7,8-TCDDT only
Its
C' l'IO\
1998 WHO
"ONCLI
5'
lIPSH TkVI 1.1 tvdury
1u
D Cc(
of /
2,3,7,8-TCDD only
n.reinn
mire And Pruned Namo
ninthr and e;:ne
in rail only is orefef l
lb ,
C 11 must Klee 'VI
TAT (Leona s
Project _Lifeja
,i=
Pt meet Name
PO #
nooRmA I I ON
Page /
proposals, quotations, and/or the general terms pro ded in the current FAL price schedules is ill be folloas ed.
tee an withhold delivery of reports, if in FAL's sole d ration the terms of the project have been broken.
9 0At
(unwed
D ale
Client understands thatall to
FAL reserves the rights to terminate its
and
Employ=
Sampler
--2_1A 3
Source #
a State Dnnlsing Water Form
Sam de II)
N
CD (.pdf including EDDs if requested)
no
Geotracker
Custom: Contact FA
:LP
tr
e
FAL Quote
Please Print in Pen
PRO [kr
Hardcopy
?7.
Chain of Custody
avav fronneranalytical corn
(Company Name
antis
Contact Name
Address 1111/
f4i,jA1 5 %`'.- Fa 7-, tilicht
rs_z_;)
Phone C25- 7:"A. )Ltil pas
cc^ Pm
Email 48a L Iry
e- a. nfr P
°it LI No
INVOICE IN FORININ I ION Of difroi err hum clmnl Into
Ieurperature
Laboratory
FAAL U.SE ONLY
IV
Fax .2d_211-`
<
_,
FAL Basic
Other:
Via LL.
Ca lifo
System
EDD
th. PO R I' INF(
Report Level
Email
Address SO-.
Phone )0)-
Company Name
Contact Name
Frontier Analytical Laboratory
5172 Hillsdale Circle
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
Tel 916-934-0900
Fax 916-934-0999
0
0
Ear
;
I
I
I
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
Frontier Analytical Laboratory
Sample Login Form
FAL. Project ID: 6261
Client: SHN Engineering
Client Project ID
Date ReceiVed:07/27/2010
Time Received 09:40 am
Received By.KZ
Logged In By KZ
# of Samples Received 9
Duplicates 0
Storage Location R1
Method of Delivery:
Icing Number
Fed-Ex
798885235216
Shipping Container Received Intact
Custody seals(s) present?
stody seals(s) intact?
Yes
No
No
pie Arrival Temperature (C)
Cabling Method
n Of Custody Present?
Ice
Yes
Return Shipping Container To Client
est for residual Chlorine
Yes
tosulfate Added
Earliest Sample Hold Time Expiration
08/24/2010
Adequate Sample Volume
Anomalies or additional comments:
5172 Hillsdale Circle
El Dorado Hills,CA 95762 Tel (916) 934-0900
Yes
Fax (916)
00,015 ofm 0001(
4-0999 .wwvv antieranalytical.co
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
Ch An oft ( thumli
tom
5172 Hillsdale Circle
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 Tel (916) 934-0900
Fax (916) 934-0999
wivivw,fr
ieran2
6r.R000 I (
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA,
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
James E. Bruya, Ph.D.
Charlene Morrow,1VI.S.
Yelena Aravkina, MS.
Bradley T. Benson, B.S.
Kurt Johnson, B.S.
3012 16th Avenue West
Seattle, WA 98119-2029
TEL: (206) 285-8282
FAX: (206) 283-5044
e-mail: [email protected]
August 16, 2010
Roland Rueber, Project Manager
SHN
812 W. Wabash
Eureka, CA 95501
Dear Mr. Rueber:
Included are the results from the testing of material submitted on July 27, 2010 from
the LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007276 project. There are 17 pages included in
this report. Any samples that may remain are currently scheduled for disposal in 30
days. If you would like us to return your samples or arrange for long term storage at
our offices, please contact us as soon as possible.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you
should have any questions.
Sincerely,
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
Michael Erdahl
Project Manager
Enclosures
NAA0816R.DOC
FREEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
CASE NARRATIVE
This case narrative encompasses samples received on July 27, 2010 by Friedman &
Bruya, Inc. from the SHN LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007276 project. Samples
were logged in under the laboratory ID's listed below.
Laboratory ID
007276-01
007276-02
007276-03
007276-04
007276-05
007276-06
007276-07
007276-08
007276-09
007276-10
007276-11
007276-12
007276-13
SHN
B-205@6'
B-205@11'
B- 205@16'
B-205®21'
B-205@25'
B-205®30'
B-204®11'
B-204@16'
B-204@21'
B- 204%25.5'
B-204@31'
B- 204®35'
B-205
All quality cont ol requirements were acceptable.
1
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/16/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007276
Date Extracted: 07/28/10
Date Analyzed: 07/29/10 and 07/30/10
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR MTBE, BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES AND TPH AS GASOLINE
USING EPA METHODS 8021B AND 8015M
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis
Results Reported as mg /kg (ppm)
Sample ID
Ethyl
Total Gasoline
MTBE Benzene Toluene Benzene Xvlenes Range
Laboratory ID
B-205@6'
(Cs-Cio)
Su] t (P
I IA
mit 50-1.32)
<0.1
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.06
<2
95
<0.1
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.06
<2
83
<0.1
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.06
<2
97
<0.1
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.06
<2
88
<0.1
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.06
<2
88
<0.1
<0.02
<0.02
0.79
2.1
14
102
<0.1
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.06
<2
89
<0.1
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.06
<2
90
<0.1
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.06
<2
86
<0.1
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.06
<2
70
007276-02
B-205@16'
007276-03
B-205@21'
007276 -04
B-205@25'
007276-05
B-204@11'
007276-07
B-204@16'
007276 -08
B-204(4)21'
007276-09
[email protected]'
007276-10
B-204@31'
007276-11
2
c
(96 Keen c1 F)
007276-01
B-205@11'
I
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/16/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: T.P Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007276
Date Extracted: 07/28/10
Date Analyzed: 07/29/10 and 07/30/10
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR MTBE, BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES AND TPH AS GASOLINE
USING EPA METHODS 8021B AND 8015M
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis
Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Sample ID
Ethyl
MTBE Benzene Toluene Benzene XvIen
Laboratory ID
Gasoline Surrogate
Range % Rewveivi
(C6- Cm)
(Lath- :i0-1221
<0.1
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.06
<2
79
Method Blank <0.1
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.06
<2
88
B-204@35'
007276-12
00-1123 MB
3
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/16/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007276
Date Extracted: 07/29/10
Date Analyzed: 07/29/10
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES
FOR MTBE, BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES AND TPH AS GASOLINE
USING EPA METHODS 8021B AND 8015M
Results Reported as ug/L (ppla)
Ethyl
Total Gasoline Surrogate
Benzene Toluene Benzene Xylenes Ramon OA Fe coven )
Sample ID
Laboratory ID
B-205
(C6-Cio)
(Limit 32.1211
<5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<1.5
<50
78
<5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<1.5
<50
79
007276-13
Method Blank
00 -1125 MB
4
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/16/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007276
Date Extracted: 08/02/10
Date Analyzed: 08/06/10 and 08/07/10
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS DIESEL
USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis
Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
S u rro,ott
Sample ID
Laboratory ID
B-205@6'
Die-, I Rally
U
Li-
L
)
OCOVC-1 %,1
(Limit 50.150)
400
96
<10
86
<10
97
<10
93
47
97
11 x
87
<10
96
<10
86
31
86
65
88
007276-01
B-205@l1'
007276-02
B-205@16'
007276-03
B-205@21'
007276-04
B- 205 @25'
007276-05
B-204@11'
007276 07
B-204@16'
007276.08
B-204@21'
007276-09
[email protected]'
007276-10
B-204@31'
007276-11
5
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/16/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007276
Date Extracted: 08/02/10
Date Analyzed: 08/06/10 and 08/07/10
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS DIESEL
USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis
Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Sin re4ate
D
Laboratory 1D
B-204@,35'
Die-el Range
(-C2b)
100
(qo Roco eiv)
(Limit 50-150)
92
007276-12
al
Bi
87
FRIEDIVIAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/16/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007276
Date Extracted: 07/27/10
Date Analyzed. 07/28/10
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS DIESEL
USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Results Reported as ug/L (ppb)
Surrogate
SE-11 pie ID
L4,0Enum ED
Diesel Range
(Cm-
B-2(15
007276,11
Method Blank
<10
7
(% Recovery)
(Limit 51-130
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/16/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007276
Date Extracted: 08/02/10
Date Analyzed. 08/06/10, 08/07/10, and 08/11110
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS MOTOR OIL
USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis
Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Surrogate
Sample ID
Laboratory ID
B-205@6'
Motor Oil Range
(% Recovery)
(C25 -Cao)
(Limit 50-150)
1,800
78
<50
55
<50
60
<50
149
<50
75
<50
54
<50
52
<50
150
<50
61
110 x
71
007276-01
B- 205 @11'
007276-02
B-205@16'
007276-03
B-205@21'
007276-04
B-205@25'
007276-05
B-204@11'
007276-07
B-204@16'
007276-08
B-204@21'
007276-09
[email protected]'
007276-10
B-204@31'
007276-11
8
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/16/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007276
Date Extracted: 08/02/10
Date Analyzed: 08/06/10, 08/07/10, and 08/11/10
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS MOTOR OIL
USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis
Results Reported as rag/kg (ppm)
Surrogate
Motor Oil Range
(36 Recovery)
(C2s-C36)
(Limit 50,1150)
170x
B
<50
87
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/16/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007276
Date Extracted: 07/27/10
Date Analyzed: 07/28/10
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS MOTOR OIL
USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Results Reported as p.g/L (ppb)
r
&mule ID
Laboratory ID
13-205
to
Motor Oil Range
34)
(C25-Cso)
0
101
91
Method B
stew
10
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/16/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007276
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR MTBE, BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES, AND TPH AS GASOLINE
USING EPA METHODS 8021B AND 8015M
Laboratory Code: 007276-12 (Duplicate)
(Wet Wt)
Reporting
Sample
Analyte
Units
Result
MTBE
<0.1
mg /kg (ppm)
Benzene
mg/kg (ppm)
<0.02
Toluene
mg/kg (ppm)
<0.02
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg (ppm)
<0.02
Xylenes
mg /kg (ppm)
<0.06
Gasoline
mg/kg (ppm)
<2
(Wet Wt)
Duplicate
Result
Relative Percent
Difference
<0.1
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.06
<2
inn
nm
TIM
nm
nm
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample
Percent
Reporting
Analyte
MTBE
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes
Gasoline
Units
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
Spike
Level
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
10
Recovery Acceptance
LCS
Criteria
105
110
110
103
70-130
66-121
72-128
69-132
69-131
61-153
114
87
11
(Limit 20)
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/16/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F &BI 007276
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF WATER
SAMPLES FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE,
XYLENES, AND TPH AS GASOLINE
USING EPA METHOD 8021B AND NVVTPH-Gx
Laboratory Code: 007244-01 (Duplicate)
Analvte
MTBE
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes
Gasoline
Reporting
Units
Sample
Result
ug/L (ppb)
ug/L (ppb)
ug/L (ppb)
ug/L (ppb)
ug/L (ppb)
ug/L (ppb)
<5
<5
<0.5
<0,5
<0.5
<1,5
<50
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<1.5
<50
Duplicate
Result
Relative Percent
Difference
nm
nm
um
nm
nm
nm
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample
Percent
Reporting
Spike Recovery Acceptance
Analyte
Units
Level
LCS
Criteria
MTBE
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes
Gasoline
ug/L (ppb)
ug/L (ppb)
ug/L (ppb)
ug/L (ppb)
ug/L (ppb)
ug/L (ppb)
50
50
50
50
150
1,000
80
95
101
99
97
92
12
(Limit 20)
50-150
72-119
71-113
72-114
72-113
70-119
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA,
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/16/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007276
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS
DIESEL USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Laboratory Code:
Analyte
Diesel
007276-04
(Matrix Spike)
Reporting
Units
Spike
Level
mg/kg (ppm)
5,000
Acceptance
MS
Percent
Recovery
MSD
92
89
73-135
(Wet wt)
Sample
Percent
Recovery
Result
<50
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample
Percent
Analvte
Diesel
Reporting
Units
mg/kg (ppm)
Spike
Level
Recovery
Acceptance
LOS
Criteria
5,000
101
74-139
13
Criteria
RPD
(Limit 20)
FR1EDIVTAN & BRUM, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/16/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F &BI 007276
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF WATER
SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS
DIESEL USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Laborato ry Code; Laboratory i tintiol Sample
Analvte
Diesel
Reporting
Units
ug/L (ppb)
Spike
Level
2,600
Percent
Percent
Recovery Rem ery Acceptance
LCS
102
.14
LCSD
100
Gila
RID
(Lima '0,
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/16/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007276
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS MOTOR OIL
USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Laboratory Code: 007276-04 (Matrix Spike)
Analvte
Motor Oil
Reporting
Units
mg/kg (ppm)
(Wet wt)
Sample
Result
Percent
Percent
Spike
Level
Recovery
MS
Recovery
MSD
500
<50
109
113
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample
Percent
Analyte
Motor Oil
Reporting
Units
rag/kg (ppm)
Spike
Level
500
Recovery
Acceptance
LOS
103
Criteria
15
70.130
Acceptance
Criteria
50.150
RPD
(Limit 20)
4
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/16/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007276
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF WATER
SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS
MOTOR OIL USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Control Sa
b
Repal-Una
Analytie
/victor fin
Unit
fpllze
Level
tign, cppr.,
24500
xp
romp!.
Recovery
LOS
114
16
Recovery
LOS')
114
Actieptance
RPD
Criteria
7
0
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Data Qualifiers & Definitions
a The analyte was detected at a level less than five times the reporting limit. The RPD results may not
provide reliable information on the variability of the analysis.
Al More than one compound of similar molecule structure was identified with equal probability.
b - The analyte was spiked at a level that was less than five times that present in the sample. Matrix
spike recoveries may not be meaningful.
ca - The calibration results for this range fell outside of acceptance criteria. The value reported is an
estimate.
c - The presence of the analyte indicated may be due to carryover from previous sample injections.
d - The sample was diluted. Detection limits may be raised due to dilution.
ds - The sample was diluted. Detection limits are raised due to dilution and surrogate recoveries may
not be meaningful.
cly - Insufficient sample was available to achieve normal reporting limits and limits are raised
accordingly.
fb - Analyte present in the blank and the sample.
fc
The compound is a common laboratory and field contaminant.
hr - The sample and duplicate were reextracted and reanalyzed. RPD results were still outside of control
limits. The variability is attributed to sample inhomogeneity.
ht - Analysis performed outside the method or client-specified holding time requirement.
ip - Recovery fell outside of normal control limits. Compounds in the sample matrix interfered *th the
quantitation of the analyte.
j The result is below normal reporting limits. The value reported is an estimate.
J - The internal standard associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration is
an estimate.
j1- The analyte result in the laboratory control sample is out of control limits. The reported
concentration should be considered an estimate.
jr The rpd result in laboratory control sample associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The
reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
js The surrogate associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should
be considered an estimate.
lc - The presence of the compound indicated is likely due to laboratory contamination.
L The reported concentration was generated from a library search.
nm - The analyte was not detected in one or more of the duplicate analyses. Therefore,. calculation of the
RPD is not applicable.
pc The sample was received in a container not approved by the method. The value reported should be
considered an estimate.
pr The sample was received with incorrect preservation. The value reported should be considered an
estimate.
ve - Estimated concentration calculated for an analyte response above the valid instrument calibration
range. A dilution is required to obtain an accurate quantification of the analyte.
vo - The value reported fell outside the control limits established for this analyte.
x - The sample chromatographic pattern does not resemble the fuel standard used for quantitation.
17
r
,
Received by
Fax (206) 283-5044
FORMS \COC \COC.DOC
Rlinqui,,hed by
Ph. (206) 285-8282
,
Seattle, WA 98119-2029
-t .)
b.
-
St
t 5-
/ i CC
II
Ic
IC CC'
'
Al
X
?C
°
Cl
oco
,
PO #
CO
'''
a; m
2
F.?.
X,
'
)
-7A9- o
Samples received a
Tie ar
(7*irs1 ii,_)
DATE
iC
TIME
013 0
Notes
SAMPLE DISPOSAL
o Dispose after 30 days
Return samples
ZWill call with instructions
COMPANY
x
>C
X X
X
/\
,
I
of
V/ atv
9 RUSH
Rush charges authorized by:
b
TURNAROUND TIME
EiStandard (2 Weeks)
Me 0 7-/
ANALYSES REQUESTED
P 4...,
PRINT NAME
X
X
A ?c,,,
< .X
...K
)C
X PC
'3'
X
114
c.?
>,
2
-51
cd
Ccl
Tc y.cre,
rcrt4.
a)
c
(
1S A
Ft
n4
. 94
Tio
11.-1 p..c >.ti 671..
"ti>;.:1 L
c 7, cc. C
REMARKS /N.0;4:
PROJECT NAME/NO.
SAMPLERS (signature)
SAMPLE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
# of
Sample Type containers
Sampled
Time
SIGNATURE
Receiv;
b4
i
.A-k- I
Date
Sampled
Relinquished by -^ ^-1,
C
)
ti
1 oz.
0
Lab
ID
'5';.5 Fax # 7C ?" LH
3012 16th Avenue West
Friedman & Bruya,
C::
C IC
,I.; C:.
0 AC1
A
-
Sample ID
Phone # 7
City, State, ZIP
Address S k:)",
Company_-
(
Send Report To
oaf
"9-60
.C.:2 111\-/
)
I
'rCAa
C';:
I
Rclinquishc
Received by
Seattle, WA 98119-2029
Ph. (206) 285-8282
Fax (206) 283-5044
FORMs \COC\COC.DOC
Received by
b)
telinqubhed bv:,
,
SIGNATURE
# of
)
I
L....
..-LAT----
)C.
\
C?
oi
co
C.
a)
,
X
X
0:I
p.,
j'
03
744
XI
1
c.)
y?
oc
gi
o
- Pka-MN
.
PRINT NAME
>4 4)(
/NO.
Sample Type containers
et-{A
i 5 IC
Li g
/JO')
1* X),'It
Time
Sampled
Date
Sampled
REMARKS
Lp
PROJECT NA
PO #
ch
c
'''
P.
N
c°
'
X
is',
,f
'.s-7.
- ..f.
-..,
E RUSH.
a
.,,...
Samples rem
f-e T
2A- \
d
':::")
1(
at 5
76?-7/0
)°>ii:
DATE
( -, Le C: (2
)
TIME
©V 0
i '?0(,)
Notes
SAMPLE DISPOSAL
Dispose after 30 days
-2 Return samples
7 Will call with instructions
Rush charges authorized by:
COMPANY
X
7
X
1
I
--
ra
T ''D
ex3
TURNAROUND TIME
21 Standard (2 Weeks)
fl E 0 1- 1.19- /10
ANALYSES REQ
SAMPLE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
1'ytl/'3f 11
3012 16th Avenue West
13
i 1-
I
Lab
ID
-SAS Fax # 7C
Friedman & Bruya, Inc.
.
2 - H Li
Sample ID
1C
Phone #
City, State, ZIP
Address
Company
Send Retort To
Oo 9-
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
James. E. Bruya, Ph.D.
Charlene Morrow, MS.
Ye lena Aravkina, M.S.
Bradley T. Benson, B.S.
Kurt Johnson, B.S.
3012 16th Avenue West
Seattle, WA 98119-2029
TEL: (206) 285-8282
FAX: (206) 283-5044
e-mail: [email protected]
August 23, 2010
Roland Rueber, Project Manager
SHN
812 W. Wabash
Eureka, CA 95501
Dear Mr. Rueber:
Included are the results from the testing of material submitted on July 27, 2010 from
the LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F &BI 007277 project. There are 16 pages included in
this report Any samples that may remain are currently scheduled for disposal in 30
days. If you would like us to return your samples or arrange for long term storage at
our offices, please contact us as soon as possible.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you
should have any questions.
Sincerely,
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA,
Michael Erdahl
Project Manager
Enclosures
NAA0823RDOC
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
CASE NARRATIVE
This case narrative encompasses samples received on July 27, 2010 by Friedman &
Bruya, Inc. from the SHN LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007277 project, Samples
were logged in under the laboratory ID's listed below.
Laboratory ID
SHN
007277-01
007277-02
007277-03
007277-04
007277-05
007277-06
007277-07
007277-08
B-201@12'
B-201@17'
B- [email protected]'
[email protected]'
B-203@17'
[email protected]'
[email protected]'
B-106A@19'
007277 -09'
B-106A025'
All quality control equirements were acceptable.
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/23/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007277
Date Extracted: 07/29/10
Date Analyzed. 07/30/10 and 08/12/10
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
AS STODDARD SOLVENT
USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis
Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Sample ID
Laboratory ID
B-201@12'
Stoddard Solvent Range
Surrogate
(% RPcoven)
(Ct-en)
(Lima 51.144)
<10
113
<10
111
<10
108
<10
108
<10
108
350
109
<10
107
39
113
<10
108
<10
106
007277 -01
B-201@17'
007277-02
[email protected]'
007277-03
[email protected]'
007277-04
B-203@17'
007277-06
[email protected]'
007277-06
B-202@18,5'
007277-07
B-106M19'
007277-08
B-106A@25'
007277-09
Method Blank
00-1139 MB
FI2IEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis for Semivolatile Phenols By EPA Method 8270D SIM
Client Sample ID:
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Matrix:
Units:
SUN
07/27/10
08/02/10
08/11/10
Soil
Client:
Project:
Lab 1E:
Data File:
Instrument:>
LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007277
007277-01
081107.D
GCMS3
mg/kg (ppm)
Operator:
YA
B- 201 @12'
Surrogate:,
2-Flue! ophruol
Phenol-de
ibrom.ophenel
°A Recover'
uS
69
Lower
Limit:
Upper
10
10
10
178
175
157
Concentration
Compounds:
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 2
Pentachlorophenol
mg/kg (ppm)
<0.1
,6-Tetrachlorophenol <0.2
<0.1
Limit:
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA,INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis for Semivolatile Phenols By EPA Method 8270D SIM
Client Sample ID: B-20172,1
Date Received
07/27/10
Client:
Project:
Date Extracted
SIIN
LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F &BI 007277
007277-02
081108.D
Date A r atvzed
08102/10
08/11/10,
Lab ID:
Data File:
Units,
Soil
mg /kg{ppm
Instrument. GCMS3
YA
Operator
Matit
Surrogate
v
snot
5
Tian omophenol
81
b3
Ra
Lower
Limit:
Upper
Limn:
10
10
10
173
Concenti anon
mg /kg (Ppm)
Compounds:
2,3 I 6-Tetzachlotophonol
<0 1.
2 5,415-Tetrachlm ophtnel + 2,3 5,6-7 etrad-bloaciphem .1 <0.2
<0 1
Pentacliloroplicn, .1
4
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis for Semivolatile Phenols By EPA Method 8270D Sal
Slag
Client Sample ID: [email protected]'
Date Received:
07/27/10
Date Extracted:
08/02/10
Date Analyzed:
08/11/10
Matrix:
Soil
Units:
mg-/kg (ppm)
1.1) Cloverdale 095107.209, T &DI 007277
Lab ED
0(37277.0
081109.1)
Data Ede.
Instrument. ()CMS 3
Operator:
VA
Lower
Surrogates.
O\ ery
2-1'I um °phenol
Phenol-du
2 I 6 Tlibrunaephenel
Compeuodz:
Lima
10
8I
Concentration
mg/kg (ppm)
3.3 4,6 -'Pt t i achlorophenal
<0.1
2 3,4,521A ti achlorophenol 2,3,5,6- Tetrachtorophenol <0 2
Penta bl lophenol
1
Upper
Limit
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis for Semivolathe Phenols By EPA Method 8270D SIM
Client Sample ID; B-2031 = 12
Date Recert ed
07/27/10
Date ExtracmiL
08/02/1.0
D.ah Anal) LC1.1.
Ma:, La
Uinta
.ml-d6
2,4,9-Trill' Limo
SIIN
LP CI, iv* [dale 0
U07277-01
lab
08/11/10
Soil
mg/kg (ppm)
Surrogates
ophen
Client:
Project
Data F'd
.1u8ta ument
Opra a tor;
ecove
71
70
70
081.1
Lowe.'
Tipper
Lima
Liinti
1U
178
10
10
157
C011eentritt
Co impounds
Inekg (1,00.0
2,5,4.6 Ti e achlorophm.
I_ I
2,3.4,5- I etrachlotopben
<-0 2
PentathlorophenoI
'fie tra
<0.1
0
tsP
DeMS 1
107.209, l'&331 007277
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC,
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis for Semivolatile Phenols. By EPA Method 82701) SW
Client Sample ID
Dale Received
Date Extoacted:
Date En slyzed
Client:
Project:
SI IN
07/27/10
08/02.110
L ib 11)-
007277 -05
Dein File
0811131)
Matit
08/11/ 10
Sail
Insliumnitl.
GUMS,)
Units.
mg' kg (P
Operator;
Y1
B-203 Fv t
LP Cloverdale 09310
I owe
Su: 1 ogtteo
2-Fluol 1phenol
Phono1-16
2,4 0-Trillin,noplicnol
e Recovery:
67
73
75
Li in, r .
10
10
Iu
Compounds
2,3,4.6-Tett achlonciphono I
etz achlorophenol + 2
Pentaahlai °phenol
'6-Teta
<0 1
<0.2
<0 1
FRIEDMAN & DRINA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis for Semivolatile Phenols By EPA Method 8270D SINI
Client Sample It)
Date Recen ed.
11-2020 12 5'
( lleni
0712 1110
I role, z
SAN
LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007277
Date Extr. c te%1
08102110
Lab ID:
Date Anal, Lett.
08/11110
Data Pik
Matra
Soil
rag/kg (ppra)
1116trumc at: GCMSS
YA
Op-
Units;
007277-06
081114.D
Lc vver
Surrogal
2-Plaoreplienol
Phenol-d6
2 4,11-Tribromr 'phenol
Comprowds
% Recovery:
Limo
26J
10
10
10
309 J tp
90
Concenta ate n
mg/kg (ppm)
2 3,1.6Tetrachlerepbeni 4
<0.1
'2,3 1 5:1"etrachlerophem I -, 23,5 d-Tr-11.4chlorephene 1
0 t4
Pem Pelalorophenol
1:5 e
Upp: I
Limo
178
176
157
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA,
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEWS IS
Analysis for Semivolatile Phenols By EPA Method 8270D SIM
Client Sample ID: }[email protected]'
Client
SI-IN
Date Received.
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed.:
Matrix:
Units:
Project:
07/27/10
08/02/10
08/13/10
Soil
mg/kg (ppm.)
0072'77-06 1/10
081306.D
Instrument: GCMS3
YA
Operator:
Surrogates:
2-Fluorophonol
Phenol -d6
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007277
Lab ID:
Data File:
142
82
Lower
Limit;
Upper
10
10
10
178
Concentration
Compounds:
mg/kg (ppm)
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
<1
2,3,4,5-Tetracblorophenol + 2,3,5,6-Te rachlorophenol <2
Pentachlorophenol.
0.91 j
9
Limit:
175
157
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA,
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis for Semivolatile Phenols By EPA Method 8270D SIM
Client Sample ID: [email protected]'
Client
SHIN
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Matrix:
Units:
Project:
07/27/10
08/02/10
08/11/10
Soil
Lab ID:
Data File:
Instrument:
Operator:
mg/kg (ppm)
Surrogates:
2-Fluorophenol
Phenolc16
2,4,6-Tuhromophenol
Pai ;my
76
33
YA
Lower
Limit.
Upper
10
10
10
178
176
157
Concentration
rag/kg :ppm)
`,.J111,3wicis
2 3 4,1)-Tetrachloroplit nol
2,3 4, 5-Te trach I roph nol + 2,9,5, 6-Te tra
LP Cloverdale D95107.209, F &131007277
007277.07
081116.D
GCMS3
<0 1
phenol <0.2
l'entachloroph n
=0.1
10
Limit
FRIEDMAN & BRTJYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis fo Semivolatile Phen Is By EPA Method 8270D SIM
Client FampIP ID
Date Received.
B-100A,119'
07127 10
Date Extracted
08,4i2/i 0
Date Anal:rat
08/11/10
Maticv.
tioil
Units
mOkg (ppm)
uexop
2-1'luoropl: dap'
PhenolcM
2 9,6-Ti &rum Jcphenol
Client;
Project:
Lab ID:
Data File:
SIIN
LP Closerdale
Instrument:
Operator;
OC1\133
VA
007277-08
ilS1117 D
Lower
Limit:
% Recov
47
56
33
10
10
10
Concentretion
Co lupe and 4
rngIkg (rum)
<0.1
*2,3,4,6-Te1 raclaloropheraol
2 3,4,5-Terraclalorophenul
Pentachlotophenol
phenol <0.2
0.26
11
07. 209, F BI 007277
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA,
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis for Semivolatile Phenols By EPA Method 8270D SIM
Client Sample ID: H-106A@25'
Date Received:
07/27/10
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Matrix:
Units:
Prejeetz
Lab ID:
Data File:
luau u merit:
Operator:
08/02/10
08/11/10
Soil
mg/kg (ppm)
SUN
LP Cloicidalc 09
007277-05
081111 D
GCMS3
VA
Upped
Sun-agates
2-Fluvroplienel
l'h eno)-d 6
Limit
7t Recovery
92
b9
178
176
157
2 1.6-Tribromophenol
Conceal. ation
mg/k0 (ppm)
dempamils:
2,3,4,6.Tetrachlorophenol
<0.1
2, 3,4,5- Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol <0.2
Pentaehlorophenol
<0.1
12
07.295,
BI 00
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis for Semivolatile Phenols By EPA Method 8270D SIM
Client Sample ID.
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyze&
Matrix:
Units:
Client:
SHN
LP Cloverdale 095107.209,
00.1154 mb
Method Blank
Not Applicable
Project:
08/02/10
08/11/10
Lab ID:
Data Fi le:
Soil
mg/kg (ppra)
Instrument: GCMS3
YA
Operator:
Surrogates:
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-d6
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
84
JO
§9
081106.D
Lower
Limit:
Upper
10
10
10
178
Ctmeentracion
Compound
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol + 2,3,5
Pentachlorophenol
in ;/kg (PPT:1)
<0.1
Tetrachlorophenol
<0.2
<0.1
13
176
157
F&BI 007277
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/23/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007277
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS
STODDARD SOLVENT USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Laboratory Code: 007277-03 (Matrix Spike)
Analyte
Stoddard Solvent
Reporting
Units
Spike
Level
mg/kg (ppm)
5,000
(Wet wt)
Sample
Result
<50
Percent
Percent
Recovery
MS
Recovery
MSD
Acceptance
Criteria
RPD
(Limit 20)
104
102
50-150
2
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample
Percent
Analyte
Stoddard Solvent
Reporting
Units
g/kg {ppm}
Spike
Level
Recovery
LCS
Acceptance
Criteria
5,000
105
70-130
14
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/23/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: LP Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007277
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL
SAMPLES FOR SEMIVOLATILE PHENOLS BY EPA METHOD 8270D SIM
Laboratory Code: 007277-03 (Duplicate)
Reporting
Units
Analyte
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol mg/kg (ppm)
2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol +
2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
Pentachlorophenol
Sample
Result
<0.1
Duplicate
Result
<0.2
<0.2
Relative Percent
Difference
(Limit 20)
nm
<0.1
<al
urn
nm
<al
Laboratory Code: 007277-03 (Matrix Spike)
Reporting
Units
Analvte
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol mg/kg (ppm)
2, 3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol +
2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol mg/kg (ppm)
Pentachlorophenol
mg/kg (ppm)
Acceptance.
Result
Percent
Recovery
MS
0.25
<0.1
75
50-150
0.50
0.25
<0.2
<0.1
79
70
50-150
50-150
Spike
Level
Sample.
Criteria
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample
Reporting Spike
Analyte
Units
Level
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol mg/kg (ppm) 0.25
Percent
Percent
Recovery
Recovery
LCSD
LCS
76
RPD
Acceptance
(Limit 20)
Criteria
80
42=105
6
77
85
47-112
10-200
3
9
2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 4-
2,3,5,6Tetrachlorophenol mg/kg (ppm) 0.50
Pentachlorophenol
mg/kg (ppm) 0.25
75
78
15
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Data Qualifiers & Definitions
a - The analyte was detected at a level less than five times the reporting limit. The RPD results may not
provide reliable information on the variability of the analysis.
Al More than one compound of similar molecule structure was identified with equal probability.
b - The analyte was spiked at a level that was less than five tunes that present in the sample. Matrix
spike recoveries may not be meaningful.
ca - The calibration results for this range fell outside of acceptance criteria. The value reported is an
estimate.
c - The presence of the analyte indicated may be due to carryover from previous sample injections.
d - The sample was diluted Detection limits may be raised due to dilution.
ds - The sample was diluted. Detection limits are raised due to dilution and surrogate recoveries may
not be meaningful.
dv - Insufficient sample was available to achieve normal reporting limits and limits are raised
accordingly.
fb - Analyte present in the blank and the sample.
fc
The compound is a common laboratory and field contaminant.
hr - The sample and duplicate were reextracted and reanalyzed. RPD results were still outside of control
limits. The variability is attributed to sample inhornogeneity.
ht - Analysis performed outside the method or client-specified holding time requirement.
ip - Recovery fell outside of normal control limits, Compounds in the sample matrix interfered with the
quantitation of the analyte.
j
The result is below normal reporting limits. The value reported is an estimate.
J The internal standard associated with the analyte is out of control limits The reported concentration is
an estimate.
jl - The analyte result in the laboratory control sample is out of control limits. The reported
concentration should be considered an estimate.
jr - The rpd result in laboratory control sample associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The
reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
is - The surrogate associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should
be considered an estimate.
lc - The presence of the compound indicated is likely due to laboratory contamination.
L - The reported concentration was generated from a library search.
am - The analyte was not detected in one or more of the duplicate analyse& Therefore calculation of the
RPD is not applicable.
pc The sample was received in a container not approved by the method. The value reported should be
considered an estimate.
pr The sample was received with incorrect preservation. The value reported should be considered an
estimate.
ve - Estimated concentration calculated for an analyte response above the valid instrument calibration
range. A dilution is required to obtain an accurate quantification of the analyte
vo - The value reported fell outside the control limits established for this analyte
x - The sample chromatographic pattern does not resemble the fuel standard used for qua
16
gP
5-
t
DATE
093 0
iicC
TIME
call with instruction
ma samples
PLE DISPOSAL
use after 30 days
lanes authorized by:
FI
lard (2 Weeks)
URNAROUND TIME
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
James E. Bruya, Ph.D.
Charlene Morrow, M.S.
YelenaAravIcina, MS
Bradley T. Benson, B.S.
Kurt Johnson, B.S.
3012 16th Avenue West
Seattle, WA 98119-2029
TEL: (206) 285-8282
FAX: (206) 283-5044
e-mail: [email protected]
August 18, 2010
Roland Rueber, Project Manager
SFIN
812 W. Wabash
Eureka, CA 95501
Dear Mr. Rueber:
Included are the results from the testing of material submitted on July 27, 2010 from
the L.P. Cloverdale, F&BI 007275 project. There are 10 pages included in this report.
Any samples that may remain are currently scheduled for disposal in 30 days. If you
would like us to return your samples or arrange for long term storage at our offices,
please contact us as soon as possible.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you
should have any questions.
Sincerely,
Michael Erdahl
Project Manager
Enclosures
wiminn.noc
FRIEDMAN & BRTJYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
CASE NARRATIVE
This. case narrative encouwasse.:, samples received en July 27, 2010 by Friedman &
Druya, Inc from the SHN L P. Cloverdale, F& 007275 project. Samples wi
logged in under the laboratory ID'e listed below,
SHN
Drum-A
Libm a tory Ill
u07275-01
007275-02
urdity cent/
Drum-J3
q
aeceptalale.
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/18/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale, F&BI 007275
Date Extracted: 07/27/10
Date Analyzed: 07/27/10
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYLBENZENE, AND XYLENES
USING EPA METHOD 8021B
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis
Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Ethyl
Sample ID
Benzene
Toluene
Benzene
Surn gate
enes 04) Re«n en)
Laboratory ID
Drum-A/B
(T4 ntt 10-130i
<0.02
<0.02
0.36
0.28
104
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.06
64
007275 -01102
Method Blank
00-1122MB
2
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis for Semivolatile Phenols By EPA Method 8270D SI
Client Sample TD
Date ReceivedDate EN! met& d.
Date Anr,lyzed
fatrix-
Drum-A/Li
07/27/10
08/02/10
08/11/10 21- t5
Soil
Chem
SHAT
Pro is et
LP. Cloy rciaiei, r&l3I 007275
Lab ID
Data File
crii. timent-
00727-00
081119-D
CCMS3
mg/kg (giai
°pastor.
VA
Surrogates
2- 11 itoi ()phenol
P.Lienul-d6
omopbenol
Upper
Lund
Peeereri.
37
46
40
178
175
157
Comp
2,3A,G-Ten achlaropheruol
2.3.4,5-Tetraehlotolinenol + 2,3
Pentachl I .rdphenol
<0.1
6-Tetraehlorophen
.2
0.60 ve
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis for Semivolatile Phenols By EPA Method 8270D SIM
Client Sample ID:
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Matrix:
Units:
DrumA/B
Sir N
07/27/10
08/02/10
08/11/10 21:00
Soil
Project:
Lab ID
Data File:
mg/kg (ppm)
Operator:
Surroga
2-Fluereplica&
L P 1 loves dale, F
007273-01'02 1/10
0,11.18_D
Instrument CCMS3
Los' or
Upper
Lou;
10
Tonut,
173
111
175
157
Phciol-d6
la °mop
Con enti than
Comm ands
3,4,3-Tet chlorop he nol
213,4,5-Tt t ra chlozop bawd
Pentachloropheiwl
1,5 u Tetrachlaropbeno <2
u,46)
7
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis for Semivolatile Phenols By EPA Method 8270D SIM
Client Sample ID:
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Matrix:
Units:
Method Blank
Not Applicable
08/02/10
08/11/10 14:10
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Data File:
Sail
mg/kg (ppm)
Operator:
SHN
L.P. Cloverdale, F&BI 007275
00-1154 mb
081106.D
Instrument: GCMS3
Surrogates:
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-de
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Lower
Lumt:
Upper
10
178
176
167
10
10
Concentration
Compounds:
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenal
2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol + 2,3,5
Pentachlorophenal
mg /kg (ppm)
<0.1
T
achlorophenol <0.2
<0.1
5
YA
Limit.
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/18/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale, F&BI 007275
Date Extracted: 07/29/10
Date Analyzed: 07/30/10
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
AS STODDARD SOLVENT
USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis
Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Surr. g tte
Method Blank
GrIA It; um
Stoddard Solvent Range
1% R« ov -n-)
(Cs -Cu)
(Luta :i3- I-4.0
120
113
450
106
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/18/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale, F&BI 007275
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR BENZENE, TOLUENE, ETHYL13ENZENE,
AND XYLENES
USING EPA METHOD 8021B
Laboratory Code: 007212-02 (Duplicate)
(Wet Wt)
Reporting
Sample
Analyte
Units
Result
Benzene
mg/kg (ppm)
<0:02
Toluene
mg/kg (ppm):
<0.02
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg (ppm)
<0.02
Xylenes
mg/kg (ppm)
0.15
(Wet Wt)
Duplicate
Result
Relative Percent
Difference
<0.02
<0.02
0.02
0.19
24 a
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample
Percent
Ante
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes
Reporting
Units
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
Spike
Level
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
Recovery Acceptance
LCS
Criteria
80
87
88
87
7
(Limit 20)
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
69-120
70-117
65-123
66-120
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/18/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project :: L.P. Cloverdale, F&BI 007275
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL
SAMPLES FOR SEMIVOLATILE PHENOLS BY EPA METHOD 8270D S M
Laboratory Code: 007277-03 (Duplicate)
Reporting
Units
Analyte
2,3,4,6-Tetrachloiophenol mg/kg (ppm)
2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol +
2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol mg/kg (ppm)
Pentachlorophenol
mg/kg (ppm)
Relative Percent
Difference
Sample
Result
<0.1
Duplicate
Result
<0.1
mn
<0.2
<0.1
<0.2
<0.1
nm
nm
(Limit 20)
Laboratory Code: 007277-03 (Matrix Spike)
Percent
Reporting
Units
Analyte
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol mg/kg (ppm)
2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol +
2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol mg/kg (ppm)
Pentachlorophenol
mg/kg (ppm)
Spike
Level
Sample
Recovery
0.25
<0.1
75
50-160
0.50
<02
025
<0.1
79
70
50-150
50-150
Acceptance
_ Criteria
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample
Percent
AlialVte
Reporting
Units
2,3,4,6 - Tetrachlorophenol mg/kg (ppm)
2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol +
2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol nag/kg (ppm)
Pentachlorophenol
mg/kg (ppm)
Acceptance
LCS
Percent
Recovery
LCSD
Criteria
RPD
(Limit 20)
0.25
75
80
42-105
6
0.50
75
78
77
47-112
10-200
3
Spike
Level
Recovery
025
8
85
9
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/18/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale, F&BI 007275
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS
STODDARD SOLVENT USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Laboratory Code: 007277-03 (Matrix Spike)
Analyte
Stoddard Solvent
Reporting
Units
Spike
Level
mg/kg (ppm)
5,000
(Wet wt)
Sample
Result
<50
Percent
Recovery
Percent
Acceptance
MS
Recovery
MSD
Criteria
RPD
(Limit 20)
104
102
50-160
2
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample
Analyte
Stoddard Solvent
Reporting
Units
mg/kg (ppm)
Spike
Level
5,000
Percent
Recovery
Acceptance
LCS
Criteria
105
70-130
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Data Qualifiers & Definitions
a The analyte was detected at a level less than five times the reporting limit The RPD results may
not provide reliable information on the variability of the analysis.
Al More than one compound of similar molecule structure was identified with equal probability.
b - The analyte was spiked at a level that was less than five times that present in the sample. Matrix
spike recoveries may not be meaningful.
ca - The calibration results for this range fell outside of acceptance criteria. The value reported is an
estimate.
c - The presence of the analyte indicated may be due to carryover from previous sample injections.
d - The sample was diluted. Detection limits may be raised due to dilution.
ds - The sample was diluted. Detection limits are raised due to dilution and surrogate recoveries may
not be meaningful.
dv - Insufficient sample was available to achieve normal reporting limits and limits are raised
accordingly.
fb - Analyte present in the blank and the sample.
fc
The compound is a common Laboratory and field contaminant.
hr - The sample and duplicate were reextracted and reanalyzed. RPD results were still outside of
control limits. The variability is attributed to sample inhomogeneity.
ht - Analysis performed outside the method or client-specified holding time requirement.
ip - Recovery fell outside of normal control limits. Compounds in the sample matrix interfered with
the quantitation of the analyte
The result is below normal reporting limits. The value reported is an estimate.
J - The internal standard associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration is
an estimate.
j
jl - The analyte result in the laboratory control sample is out of control limits. The reported
concentration should be considered an estimate.
- The rpd result in laboratory control sample associated with the analyte is out of control limits.
The reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
is - The surrogate associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration
should be considered an estimate.
lc - The presence of the compound indicated is likely due to laboratory contamination.
L - The reported concentration was generated from a library search.
nra - The analyte was not detected in one or more of the duplicate analyses Therefore, calculation of
the RPD is not applicable.
pc The sample was received in a container not approved by the method. The value reported should
be considered an estimate.
pr The sample was received with incorrect preservation. The value reported should be considered
an estimate.
ve - Estimated concentration calculated for an analyte response above the valid instrument
calibration range. A dilution is required to obtain an accurate quantification of the analyte
vo - The value reported fell outside the control limits established for this analyte
x - The sample chromatographic pattern does not resemble the fuel standard used for quantitation.
10
.5
2
-
\
C;;(1
Received b} by:
Rchnquiahed by:
Received by:
Seattle, WA 98119-2029
Ph. (206) 285-8282
Fax (206) 283-5044
FORMS \ COCNCOC DOG
it It
Time
Sampled
Sr7,
S
)
i-
aLa
0
...,
CI
c(
pa
ct_lt
_
0
-
m
x
,ft"
in
.2:'
PO #
0
il
co
up
r.--
,
'
7-A4/0
DATE
gagtples recetyt rhit_ 5
31e. iiT.
,,
/ C-
or
0130
TIME
>-1. ,tii.:7:
(
Notes
0 Return samples
3 Will call with instruction
SAMPLE DISPOSAL.
0 Dispose. after 30 days
eStanclard (2 Weeks)
RUSH
Rush charges authorized by:
COMPANY
\
C
'
0
TURNAROUND TIME
0 2 ,13, t /CJ
ANALYSES REQUESTED
oco o
4TC
I RI NT NAME
# of
7
ple Type containers
Il:
C-t44A,c)----
SIGNATURE
7-A3 -A.
Date
Sampled
Relinquiehed byi--,...,)
O
0i
ID
Lab
a
3012 16th Avenue West
Friedman & Bruya, Inc.
0-.--,;
Sample ID
Phone #'
City, State, ZIP
CcS
IC
T)..liNS14
Adch
!
C L. e'
PROJECT NAMEINO.
SAMPLERS (signature)
SAMPLE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Company
Send Report To
0 o 7-
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
James E. Bruya, Ph.D.
Charlene Morrow, M.S,
Yelena Aravkina, M.S.
Bradley T. Benson, B.S,
Kurt Johnson, B.S.
3012 16th Avenue West
Seattle, WA 98119-2029
TEL: (206) 285-8282
FAX: (206) 283-5044
e-mail: [email protected]
August 24, 2010
Roland Rueber, Project Manager
SHN
812 W. Wabash
Eureka, CA 95501
Dear Mr. Rueber:
Included are the results from the testing of material submitted on July 27, 2010 from
the L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F &BI 007274 project There are 21 pages included in
this report. Any samples that may remain are currently scheduled for disposal in 30
days. If you would like us to return your samples or arrange for long term storage at
our offices, please contact us as soon as possible.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you
should have any questions.
Sincerely,
Michael Erdahl
Project Manager
Enclosures
NAA082411.DOC
FRIEDMAN & BRI.JYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
CASE NARRATIVE
This case narrative encompasses samples received on July 27, 2010 by Friedman &
Bruya, Inc. from the SHN L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274 project. Samples
were logged in under the laboratory ID's listed below.
Lthorator.. ID
007274-01
007274-02
007274-03
SRN
Drum-1
Drum-2
Drum-3
The 8260C compound 1,3,5 trimethylbenzene failed below the acceptance criteria in the
matrix spike samples. The laboratory control samples met the acceptance criteria,
therefore the data are likely due to sample matrix effect.
All other quality control requirements were acceptable.
1
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/24/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
Date Extracted: 07/27/10
Date Analyzed: 07/27/10
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS GASOLINE
USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis
Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Surrogate
Sample ID
Gasoline Range
(% Recovery)
Laboratory ID
(Ce-Cio)
(Lucre 3o -139)
Drum-Composite
<2
73
<2
64
007274-01/02/03
Method Blank
00-1122 NIB
2
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/24/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
Date Extracted: 08/02/10
Date Analyzed. 08/02/10
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF THE SOIL SAMPLE
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS IR SCAN
USING METHOD 418 MODIFIED
Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Sample ID
IR Result
Laboratory ID
Drum-Composite
<500
007274-01
Method Blank
<500
3
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/24/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
Date Extracted: 08/02/10
Date Analyzed: 08/06/10
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS DIESEL
USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis
Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Sun agate
Sample ID
Laboratory ID
Drum-Composite
Diesel Range
(Cio-C25)
f%
((Jinni
150)
67
95
<10
87
007274-011103
Method Blank
00-1140 MB
4
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/24/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
Date Extracted: 08/02/10
Date Analyzed: 08/06/10
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS MOTOR OIL
USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis
Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Surrogatt
Sample ID
Laboratory ID
Drum-Composite
Motor Oil Range
"(, ReccA err)
(C25-Css)
(tAmil 50-1511)
140
65
<50
87
007274-01//03
Method Blank
00-1140 MB
5
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 200.8
Client ID
Dare Received
Date Extzactcd:
Date Anal) zed.
Matrix.
SEN
Dt um-Composite
Clic nt.
G7127/10
PI ejectLab ID
L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
007274-01-03
007274-01-03.046
Data File:
Instrument: ICPMS1
AP
Operate':
08/02/10
08M.i/10
Soil
mg /kg (P1)111)
Lower
nternal Standard:
Germanium
Indium
Holmium
"him it:
60
60
60
114
b9
97
Concern) atIon
mgflu tom)
!Zinc
Upper
36.0
54,5
89,4
Cadmium
Lead
6
125
125
125
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 200.8
Client II/.
Date Received.
Date E.ctracted
Date Analyzed
M,tlic
Internal Standard:
Germanium
Indium
Holmium
Method Blank
LS oat]
in gilt
Instrument: ICPMS1
AP
Operator:
03. ozao
(ppm)
% &move, y:
pri
tid
9E.
C(Plicentrati on
Auabr.te':
Chromium
Nickel
Zinc
Cadmium
Lead
SHN
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Data File:
NA
mem" (ppm)
L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F &BI 007274
10-408 nab
10-408 mb.030
Lower
Limit:
Upper
60
125
125
125
60
60
IAmit:
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Volatile Compounds By EPA Method 8260C
Client Sample ID: Drum-Composite
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Matrix:
Units:
Client:
Project:
Lab ID.
Data File:
07/27/10
07/28/10
07/28/10
Soil
007274-01/02/03
072812.D
Instrument: GCMS4
mg/kg (ppm)
Surrogates:
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
4-Broraofluorobenzene
SHN
L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
Operator:
% Recovery:
100
100
110
MB
Lower
Limit:
49
44
Upper
38
156
limit:
132
140
Concentration
Compounds:
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
Acetone
1,1-Dichloroethene
Methylene chloride
Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE)
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
2,2-Dichlompropane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloropropene
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
nichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromomethane
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2-Tiichloroethane
2-Hexanone
Concentration
mg/kg (ppm)
Compounds:
<0.5
<0.5
<0.05
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.05
<0.5
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
1,3-Dichloropropane
Tetrachloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
m,p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Styrene
Isopropylbenzene
Bromoform
n-Propylbenzene
Bromobenzene
1, 3,5- Trimethylbenzene
<a5
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
2-Chlorotoluene
4-Chlorotoluene
tert-Butylbenzene
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
sec-Butylbenzene
p-Isopropyltoluene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Ilexachlorobutadiene
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.03
<0.03
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.5
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.5
Naphthalene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
8
mg/kg (ppm)
<0.05
<0.025
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.1
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.5
<0.25
<0.25
<0.05
<0.25
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Volatile Compounds By EPA Method 8260C
Client Sample ID
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Matrix:
Units:
Method Blank
Not Applicable
Client:
Project:
07/27/10
07/28/10
Soil
mg/kg (ppm)
Lab 1D.
Surrogates:
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
4- Bromofluorobenzene
Data File:
SHN
L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
001120 mb
072807.D
Instrument GCMS4
Operator:
MB
Lower
Limit:
49
44
% Recovery:
98
97
103
Upper
Limit:
38
132
140
156
Concentration
Concentration
Compounds:
Diclalorodifluommethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluororaethane
Acetone
1,1-Dichloroetherie
Methylene chloride
Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE)
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
2,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEE)
1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloropropene
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromomethane
4- Methyl -2- pentanone
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
2-Hexanone
Compounds:
mg/kg (ppra)
1,3-Dichloropropane
Tetrachloroethene
Dibmmochbromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
m,p-Xylene
<0.5
<0.5
<0.05
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.05
<0.5
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.5
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.03
<0.03
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.5
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.5
o-Xylene
Styrene
Isopropylbenzene
Bromoform
n- Fropylbenzene
Bromobenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
2-Chlorotoluene
4-Chlorotoluene
tert-Butylbenzene
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
sec-Butylbenzene
p-Isopropyltoluene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo -3-chloropropane
1,2,4-Trichbrobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1,2, 3- Trichlorobenzene
9
mg/kg (ppra)
<0.05
<0.025
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.1
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0,05
<0.05
<0,05
<0.5
<0.25
<0.25
<0.05
<0.25
FRIED1VIAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Semivolatile Compounds By EPA Method 8270D
Client Sample ID: Drum-Composite
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Matrix:
Units:
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Data File:
07/27/10
08/04/10
08/05/10
Soil
007274-01-03
080518.D
Instrument: GCMS3
Operator:
mg/kg (ppm)
Surrogates:
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-d6
Nitrobenzene-d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-d14
SHN
L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
YA
Lower
Limit:
Upper
% Recovery:
94
90
30
30
118
118
180
130
116
144
100
10
94
89
40
16
30
91
Limit:
Concentration
Concentration
Compounds:
Phenol
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
2- Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
2-Methylphenol
Hexachloroethane
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylaraine
3-Methylphenol + 4-Methylphenol
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-claloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlombenzene
Naphthalene
Hexachiorobutadiene
4-Chloroaniline
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2 -Me thylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2, 4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
Dimethyl phthalate
Acenaphthylene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Compounds:
mg/lig (ppm)
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
4-Nitrophenol
Diethyl phthalate
Fluorene
4- Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
N- Nitrosodiphenylamine
4-Nitroaniline
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
<0.3
<0.03
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.3
<0.3
<3
<0.03
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzyl butyl phthalate
Benz(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
<3
<0.3
<0.03
<0.09
<0.3
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
10
mg/kg (ppm)
<0.9
<0.03
<0.9
<0.03
<0.03
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.9
<0.9
<0.03
<0.03
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
0.031
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
FRIEDIVIAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Semivolatile Compounds By EPA Method 8270D
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Matrix:
Units.
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Data File:
Not Applicable
SHN
L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
00-1160 mb
080509.D
08/04/10
08/05/10
Soil
Instrument: GCMS3
mg /kg(ppm)
Operator:
Surrogates:
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-de
Nitrobenzene-d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-d14
% Recovery:
95
93
101
YA
Lower
Limit:
Upper
30
30
118
118
180
130
116
144
Limit:
10
40
97
88
95
16
30
Concentration
Concentration
Compounds:
Phenol
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
2-Metttylphenol
Hexachloroethane
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylaroine
3-Nlethylphenol + 4-1VIethylphenol
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzoic acid
Bis(2- chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
Hexachlorobutadiene
4- Chloroaniline
4- Chloro-3-raethylphenol
2.-Methylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
Dimethyl phthalate
Acenaphthylene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Compounds:
mg/kg (ppm)
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
4-Nitrophenol
Diethyl phthalate
Fluorene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
<0.3
<0.03
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.3
<0.3
<3
<0.03
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<3
<0.3
<0.03
<0.09
<0.3
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
N-Nrtrosocliphenylanaine
4-Nitroaniline
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzyl butyl phthalate
Benz(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Indeno(1,2, 3- cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
11
mg/kg (ppm)
<0.9
<0.03
<0.9
<0.03
<0.03
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.9
<0.9
<0.03
<0.03
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/24/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TPH AS GASOLINE
USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Laboratory Code: 007212-02 (Duplicate)
(Wet Wt)
Reporting
Sample
Analyte
Units
Result
Gasoline
mg/kg (ppm)
12
Laboratory
(Wet Wt)
Duplicate
Result
Relative Percent
Difference
13
17
Code: Laboratory Control Sample
Percent
Analyte
Gasoline
Reporting
Units
mg/kg (ppm)
Spike
Level
20
Recovery Acceptance
LCS
Criteria
95
71-131
12
(Limit 20)
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC:
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/24/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS
DIESEL USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Laboratory Code: 007276-04 (Matrix Spike)
Analyte
Diesel
Reporting
Units
Spike
Level
(Wet wt)
Sample
Result
mg/kg (ppm)
5,000
<50
Percent
Recovery
MS
92
Percent
Recovery
MSD
Acceptance
Criteria
RPD
(Limit 20)
89
73-135
3
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample
Percent
Analyte
Diesel
Reporting
Units
Spike
Level
Recovery
Acceptance
LCS
Criteria
mg/kg (ppm)
5,000
101
74-139
13
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/24/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS MOTOR OIL
USING EPA METHOD 8015M
Laboratory Code: 007276-04 (Matrix Spike)
Analyte
Motor Oil
Reporting
Units
mg/kg (ppm)
(Wet wt)
Sample
Result
Percent
Percent
Spike
Level
Recovery
MS
Recovery
MSD
Acceptance
Criteria
500
<50
109
113
50-150
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample
Percent
Analyte
Motor Oil
Reporting
Units
mg/kg (ppm)
Spike
Level
Recovery
LCS
Acceptance
Criteria
500
103
70-130
14
RPD
(Limit 20)
4
FR1EDIVIAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/24/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS
FOR THE ANALYSTS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL METALS USING EPA METHOD 200.8
Laboratory Code: 007291-06 (Matrix Spike)
Percent
Analyte
Chromium
Nickel
Zinc
Cadmium
Lead
Reporting
Units
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
Spike
Level
50
25
50
10
20
Sample
Result
9.89
Recovery
MS
17.0
16.4
<1
4.79
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample
Percent
Recovery.
Reporting
Spike
Level
LCS
Analyte
Units
50
105
Chromium
mg/kg (ppm)
104
Nickel
25
mg/kg (ppm)
Zinc
Cadmium
Lead
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
50
10
20
101
101
106
15
103
101 b
100 b
104
105 b
Percent
Recovery Acceptance
MSD
Criteria
51-132
106
113 b
33-149
40-135
99 b
105
83-120
105 b
65-126
Acceptance.
Criteria
79-125
84-116
79-120
89-116
81-120
RPD
(Limit 20)
3
11
1
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/24/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR VOLATILES BY EPA METHOD 8260C
Laboratory Code: 007257-01 (Matrix Spike)
Repo/tang
Sluts
Olen
2.5
mg/kg (ppm)
2.5
lie
C
A
Br
-.11 - ltelnane
Spike
Leval
men nran
men (An
15
2.5
tognag BP110
185
r'77 Ariormeria ' s 'one
- cc one
,1-llichloriethene
mg/kg:. tglun
mg /kg (ppm)
mg-9g -(ppm)
12,5
2.5
Methylene chloride
Methyl 1-butyl ether (99TBE)
trans-1,2-Dichlercethene
1,1-Dichlareethane
2,2-Dichloropropane
cis -1,2-Diehloroethene
mnieg topm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (nun)
mgatg {Point
mg/kg Paton
mg /kg (ppm)
mg/kg(ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
2.5
2,5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
12.5
mgAcg inn)
Mein (ppm)
2,5
2.5
2,5
2,5
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MELO
1,2-9chlorenhane (EDO)
1.1.1-Trichlogoethane
1,1-Drildnopeopene
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
Trichloroetb ®e
1,2-Dichlaxopropane
Brommlichloromethatte
Ddriomomethane
unite ppm)
4-Methyl2.pentanone
as-1,3-Dichlompropene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1.1.2-Trichloroethane
mg /kg (ppm)
togatta9OPm)
mg /kg (ppm)
rogAg (IMMO
moan nun
mdrag (ppm?
men Wm)
mg/L1 non)
mg/kg
2-11exanone
mgAg ppm)
mg/kg,. aml
1,8-Dichlerapropane
napox,. ppm)
Dilaromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoothane (EDE)
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbeazene
1,1,1,2.Terachlomethaue
m,rie fppm)
mri,a inn
mptl a Pint
molkg no
m,p-Xylene
o-Xylene
nahrig (PPG ,
Styrene
Isonropylbenzene
mg& (PP
Branton
n-Propylbenzene
Bromobenzene
1,3,6-Trimethylbenzene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloreethene
1,2.3-Trichleropropane
2-Chlorotoluene
4-Chlorotoluene
tert-Bulythenzene
1,2,4-Trimetlaylbenzene
sec-Butylbenzene
p-laopeopyltoluene
1,3-11hcbkrobeamene
1,4-Dtchlarobenaene
1,2-Dichlembenzene
1,2-Dibrorno-AchlorepraPane
1.2,4-Trichlarobenzena
Hexachlorobutediene
Naphthalene
1,2,3-Trir.blorobenzene
raV . fn .i
mt,BPAPP 0
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (nn)
tugArg hAurn
sang (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
olnItg (Pion)
mg/kg (ppm)
Ing/kg (ppm)
mg/kg Unm)
mptig (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
e.g/kg (ppm)
togAg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
tang (ppm)
mg/(kg (ppm)
Percent
Recovery
MS
Recovery
<0.05
<0.5
45
51
55
15
2.r
2,5
2.5
2.5
115
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2,5
2,5
2A
2.5
2.5
49
<OAS
40.05
<005
87
GO
80
6S
77
90
SO
83
89
83
00
72
76
78
71
78
76
72
73
15
74
<0.03
<0.05
74
74
82
87
81
82
87
02
34
88
72
92
85
98
<003
-70.05
<005
<05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
40.05
40.5
4005
<0 025
<0.05
57
75
OD
85
97
85
62
59
53
<0:05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
40.1
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0,05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.5
<0.26
<0.25
<0.05
<0.25
16
79
63
77
<0.05
<0.5
<0.05
<0,05
<0,05
<0.05
5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.6
67
65
SS
49
46
53
59
40
63
55
<OA5
2,5
25
2.5
2,5
2,5
2.5
2.5
2.5
15
2189
21
25
madly 0 ,0,0
mg/kg (ppm)
Percent
Sample
Result
81
54
58
92
"3
62
75
68.
57
61
7
76
63
38w
85
85
73
74
69
70
59
59
88
55
74
308
BB
84
54
74
79
74
94
75
70
F'D
ciii0 Eg
1D-138
10-150
10-150
10-150
19-150
10-160
10-156
36-145
25-137
33-135
10458
41-127
34-140
23-148
28.159
21-151
34-131
10-162
48-130
37-138
47.127
46-142
32-144
0
0
29156
46-133
36-148
39-139
48.129
15-165
46.127
33-127
1
0
3
41441
41-134
50.150
39-141
47-131
37-145
47-124
50-150
60-150
24-154
50-150
50-150
46-124
32 -141
32-191
69
72
64
72
53
67
69
73
96
70
62
75
70
71
75
Acceptance
Criteria
1 A142
10-126
50 -150
50-150
50.150
47-125
50-150
50-150
50-150
46-116
50-150
15-156
47-124
46-127
32-134
45-124
4
3
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/24/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR VOLATILES BY EPA METHOD 8260C
Laboratory Code- Laboratory Control Sample
Percent
Reporting
gua
p, htrr
PIP 0 PPP
Chl) ,
Ion a mar ode
Prom- mg.hane
Culma -game
In hie refiner/ memane
' -atone
1,1-Mthlomethene
Methylene chloride
Methyl [-butyl ether (MTBR)
trons-1,2-Dithloroothene
1,1-Dithloreethane
2,2-Dichloropropane
Us-1,2-Dichloreethene
Clilordomt
2- Butanone (MEI()
1.2.1)ichlomethane (EM)
1,1,1-Trichloroothmie
14Michlorapropene
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
Trichlareethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichlonarnethane
Dibromomethane
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
cis-1.34)ichlonageopene
Toluene
teens- 1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2-1Tichloroethane
2.11exanone
1,3-DiellolotatTane
Tetrachlamethene
Dihromochlaromethane
la-Dibrmneethane (16178)
Clilorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
1.1,1,2-Tetrachlometham
m,p.Xylene
a-Xylem
Styrene
Isopropylbenzene
linanicdorm
n-Propylbenzene
Bromobenzone
1,3A-Trimethylbenzene
1,1,2,24`etrachlornethane
1,2,3-Trichlompropme
2-Chlomtoluene
4-01ilerotoluene
tert-Butylbenzene
1,2.4.Trimethylbenzene
sec-Butylbenzorie
p-Isopropyltoluene
1,3-Dichlogobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobengene
1.2-Dibromm3mblorop
1,2,44Tichlorobenaene
Hoxachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
12,3-Trichlorobenzene
Spike.
ED,. (, 3 pet
to 2 kg /ppm)
make Mit)
=tete q, in)
rigor; ogre)
996 kx (,,a-n)
mt. a; t mu)
rtgrkg (pen)
tugel Lt (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (Ptau)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (pni)
MWIM (ppm)
mg/kg (PPM)
mg/kg (Plam)
mg/kg (Mtn)
mg /kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg gam)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
rang (PPM)
mg/kg (pitm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mgtkg (ppm)
mg/kg (11Pm)
mg/kg (ppm)
nag(ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (3Pm)
mg/45 (pem)
mg/kg (PPm)
meta (Pem)
mg/kg (ppm)
talMtg (ppm)
2.5
2.5
2,5
2.6
2.5
12.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
12.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2,5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
12.5
2.5
2,6
2,6
2.5
12.5
25
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
D184 (ppm)
2.5
augik8 (Pim)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
2A
2.5
nagilag (PPaa)
YaglIC (PPm)
mgne5 (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (pPm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mgtleg {ppm)
91911,9 (ppm)
mg/kg (PPnl)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
matg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (pin)
1996:g (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.6
2,5
2,5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.6
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
17
Recovety
LCS
21
59
69
72
75
89
74
95
96
78
92
85
109
88
87
77
84
88
87
89
86
87
89
95
136
83
95
87
96
87
83
86
87
96
88
89
90
95
92
92
96
84
96
93
91
92
81
82
88
90
91
Percent
89
77
91
105
78
90
84
107
87
87
75
85
87
86
89
86
87
90
98
88
81
98
89
97
86
88
90
91
95
95
94
98
95
97
95
93
93
82
BB
93
95
92
93
88
91
89
92
82
94
91
83
92
79
94
89
84
90
7
ba
59-139
77425
75-122
57-123
74-122
74-125
69-128
67-113
72-121
73-122
72-127
75129
:6-116
45-145
75-136
6.126
2.132
88
89
99
RP11)
flaunt 20)
67427
71424
81
91
92
93
96
96
98
93
Acceptance
Criteria
10-146
27-133
22-139
38-114
10-142
28 -177
52-141
47-128
53-121
63-121
77-114
74.125
74.132
77-111
64.125
69-135
78-122
77-124
74-126
76-127
56-132
74-124
72-122
76-126
56-143
61-137
74-121
75-122
73-180
76-125
71-130
70-132
75-121
74.11.7
76-121
62-137
70-129
50-153
60-125
62-160
0.
FREEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/24/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR SEMIVOLATILES BY EPA METHOD 8270D
Laboratory Code: 008024-01 (Duplicate)
Analyte
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
1,4Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylphenol
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
3-Methylphenol + 4-Methylphenol
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzoic acid
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Hexachlomcyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-THchlorophenol
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2, 4-Dinitrotoluene
4-Nitrophenol
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachbrophenol
Pyrene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Reporting
Units
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppna)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppna)
mg /kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg /kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg /kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
18
Sample
Result
<0.3
<0.3
<0.03
<0.3
<0.03
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.03
<0.3
<0.09
<0.3
<0.3
<0.03
<0.9
<0.03
<0.3
<0.9
<0.03
<0.3
0.13
0.10
Duplicate
Result
<0.3
<0.3
<0.03
<0.3
<0.03
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
<3
<0.3
<0.3
<0.03
<0.3
<0.09
<0.3
<0.3
<0.03
<0.9
<0.03
<0.3
<0.9
<0.03
<0.3
0.19
0.16
RPD
(Limit 20)
rim
nm
rim
nm
rim
rim
nm
rim
nm
nm
nm
nm
rim
nm
rim
nm
nm
rim
nm
nm
nm
37 a
46 a
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/24/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR SEMIVOLATILES BY EPA METHOD 8270D
Laboratory Code: 008024-01 (Matrix Spike)
Analyte
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylphenol
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
3-Methylphenol + 4-Methylphenol
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzoic acid
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4- Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trkhlorophenol
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
4-Nitrophenol
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyrene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Reporting
Units
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg /kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg /kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
19
Spike
Level
2.5
2.5
1.7
2.5
1.7
5.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
1.7
1.7
2.5
1.7
2.5
2.5
1.7
2.5
1.7
2.5
2.5
1.7
2.5
1.7
1.7
Sample
Result
<0.3
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<3
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.9
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.3
<0.03
<0.9
<0.3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
Percent
Recovery Acceptance
MS
Criteria
78
82
88
86
91
86
72
78
0 ip
65
89
91
84
55
22 ip
26 ip
88
0 ip
89
18
1 ip
87
1 ip
86
80
10-129
47-108
39-110
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
44-111
29-120
35-115
50-150
50-150
50-150
60-106
50-150
47-126
10-134
50-150
50-150
31-120
45 -119
28.126
FRIEDIVIAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 08/24/10
Date Received: 07/27/10
Project: L.P. Cloverdale 095107.209, F&BI 007274
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR SEMIVOLATILES BY EPA METHOD 8270D
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample
Analyte
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylphenol
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
3-Methylphenol+ 4-Methylphenol
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzoic acid
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichkrophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
4-Nitrophenol
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachkrophenol
Pyrene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Reporting Spike
Units
Level
mg/kg (ppm) 2.5
mg/kg (ppm) 2.5
1.7
2.5
1.7
5.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
1.7
1.7
2.5
1.7
2.5
2.5
1.7
2.5
1.7
2.5
2.5
1.7
2.5
1.7
1.7
mg /kg (ppm)
mg /kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppra)
mg /kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
rag/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg @pm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
20
Percent
Percent
Recovery
Recovery
LCSD
Acceptance
Criteria
RPD
(Limit 20)
79
93
91
86
88
40 -105
1
LCS
80
90
86
84
88
88
89
93
92
91
89
89
92
84
89
92
88
80
91
89
90
88
97
90
87
88
96
104 vo
85
101
98
96
100
85
92
96
92
74
95
91
90
91
94
96
95
43-106
44-107
49-102
36-116
70-130
53-104
30-103
46-125
53-102
45-109
42-116
42-114
35-121
35-120
51-111
55-105
52-128
43-115
34-125
38-135
40-119
31-125
39-113
44.113
3
6
2
0
0
8
11
8
10
10
8
8
1
3
4
4
8
4
2
0
3
3
6
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Data Qualifiers & Definitions
a - The analyte was detected at a level less than five times the reporting limit. The RPD results may not
provide reliable information on the variability of the analysis.
Al More than one compound of similar molecule structure was identified with equal probability.
b - The analyte was spiked at a level that was less than five times that present in the sample. Matrix
spike recoveries may not be meaningful.
ca - The calibration results for this range fell outside of acceptance criteria. The value reported is an
estimate.
c - The presence of the analyte indicated may be due to carryover from previous sample injections.
d - The sample was diluted. Detection limits may be raised due to dilution.
ds - The sample was diluted. Detection limits are raised due to dilution and surrogate recoveries may
not be meaningful.
dv - Insufficient sample was available to achieve normal reporting limits and limits are raised
accordingly.
fh Analyte present in the blank and the sample.
fe
The compound is a common laboratory and field contaminant.
hr - The sample and duplicate were reextracted and reanalyzed. RPD results were still outside of control
limits. The variability is attributed to sample inhomogeneity.
ht - Analysis performed outside the method or client-specified holding time requirement.
ip - Recovery fell outside of normal control limits. Compounds in the sample matrix interfered with the
quantitation of the analyte
The result is below normal reporting limits. The value reported is an estimate.
J - The internal standard associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration is
an estimate.
31 - The analyte result in the laboratory control sample is out of control limits, The reported
concentration should be considered an estimate.
jr - The rpd result in laboratory control sample associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The
reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
s - The surrogate associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should
be considered an estimate.
lc - The presence of the compound indicated is likely due to laboratory contamination.
L - The reported concentration was generated from a library search.
nm - The analyte was not detected in one or more of the duplicate analyses. Therefore, calculation of the
RPD is not applicable.
pc The sample was received in a container not approved by the method. The value reported should be
considered an estimate.
pr The sample was received with incorrect preservation. The value reported should be considered an
estimate.
ve - Estimated concentration calculated for an analyte response above the valid instrument calibration
range. A dilution is required to obtain an accurate quantification of the analyte
vo - The value reported fell outside the control limits established for this analyte.
x - The sample chromatographic pattern does not resemble the fuel standard used for quantitation.
j
21
,
)
...,.
\
--
..;,..2 0...;\ -
.,
A.
..
'
*IA
\
1-)
t,....
,
Received b
Relinquished by:
Received by:
Ph. (206) 285-8282
Fax (206) 283-5044
FORMS \ COC COODOO
-.
Ili Ct.
..,
7',4.-- C,
'''
SIGNATURE
,'
7...,),)k. iC.
Time
Sampled
) -tit/
Date
Sampled
elinquishedby-
ii3
et
AS
fi 23
0/
Lab
ID
Seattle, WA 98119-2029
3012 16th Avenue West
Friedman & Bruya, Inc
\
.
c-,k
Sample ID
Phone # 767 LiLti-S.*; Fax#
City, State, ZIP
Address FA)-, \J.3
Company
Send Report To
L;
--
I
Sot L--
3.
9
'
Tal
rC
red
'-'
'
.g
co
PA a-n-
- -)
>.
Alec
PO #
Al 6-
2
cn
,>
ci)
o
ci
'
4
I
A
\
1
v
N,
^
.. ,,_
"
Standard (2 Weeks)
Samples recerced at
-,-..c
,,:.-
/?-7Ao
-5- t
9
V A& (?"
DATE
,
.
c ,,
.
0 g_30
nic
TIME
Notes
SAMPLE DISPOSAL
Dispose after 30 days
Return samples
LI Will call with instructions
Rush charges authorized by:
ic
#
of
TURNAROUND TIME
/0
El RUSH
COMPANY
.,
-c-
t-e et-Z-
\,
)
1
* --
"c";
c. ,
7--,
',:"-t
Ci;
-,
-Ne
ANALYSES REQUESTED
-3 7), 1 ct
C)VP
x 0
..,
-T tC;
9
PRINT NAME
Ai A a ii
-7)
.1
/
44.
-
-r sr2a
# of
Sample Type containers
it 1.1
IvIARICS
51(1-7
C
PROJECT NAME/NO,
SAMPLERS (skenature
SAMPLE CHAIN OF CUSTODY