Long Term Adequacy Metrics February 2013 Introduction
by user
Comments
Transcript
Long Term Adequacy Metrics February 2013 Introduction
Long Term Adequacy Metrics February 2013 Introduction The following report provides information on the long term adequacy of the Alberta electric energy market. The report contains metrics that include tables on generation projects under development and generation retirements, an annual reserve margin with a five year forecast period, a two year daily supply cushion, and a two year probabilistic assessment of the AIES. The Long Term Adequacy Metrics provide an assessment and provide information that can be used to facilitate further assessments of long term adequacy. This report is updated quarterly in February, May, August, and November. Inquires on the report can be made at [email protected]. Summary of Changes since Previous Report New Generation and Retirements Metric Projects completed and removed from list: None Generation Projects moved to “Active Construction”: Sunshine – West Ells (24 MW) Generation projects moved to “Regulatory Approval”: None Generation projects that have been added to “Announced, Applied for AESO Interconnection, and/or Applied for Regulatory Approval”: Capital Power – CPEC Phase 1 (400 MW) Capital Power – CPEC Phase 2 (500 MW) Cenovus – Telephone Lake C (50 MW) Long Term Adequacy Metrics – February 2013 Generation projects that have been removed: Blood Tribe – Wild Turnip Hill Wind Project (100 MW) Glenridge – Glenridge Wind development (100 MW) Firebox Energy – John W. Murray Plant (30 MW) Piikani Resources Development – Piikani Wind Project (210 MW) Suncor – Voyageur Upgrader (12.5 MW) TransAlta – Sundance 3 Uprate (15 MW) Naturerner – Prairie Home Wind (9 MW) Other changes to generation projects: Project Change ECB Enviro – Lethbridge Biogas New ISD of Q2-2013 from Dec-2012 Grizzly – Algar New ISD of Q2-2013 from Jan-2013 Imperial Oil – Cold Lake (Nabiye 2) New ISD of Feb-2014 from Jan-2014 Imperial Oil – Kearl New ISD of Dec-2014 from Nov-2014 Joss Wind – Hand Hills New ISD of Jul-2014 from Oct-2013 Greengate Power – Blackspring Ridge New ISD of Dec-2013 from Oct-2013 Maxim Power – HR Milner Expansion New ISD of Nov-2017 from Aug-2015 GTE – Brooks Power Plant New ISD of TBD from Jun-2013 Renewables Energy Services – PC006 Wind New ISD of Jul-2015 from Jul-2013 Suncor – Hand Hills New ISD of Mar-2014 from Dec-2013 Windlab – Bull Creek New Sponsor Windlab from BluEarth Windlab – Bull Creek New ISD of Feb-2014 from Dec-2013 Long Term Adequacy Metrics – February 2013 E.ON – Grizzly Bear New ISD of May-2014 from Oct-2013 E.ON – Vermillion River New ISD of Oct-2014 from Jan-2014 BowArk Energy – Queenstown Power New ISD of Sept-2014 from Aug-2014 Reserve Margin Metric The forecast reserve margin has been updated and now includes 2018. Supply Cushion Metric The forecast supply cushion has been updated to reflect the new time period. Two Year Probability of Supply Adequacy Shortfall Metric New values for the metric have been calculated with Total Energy Not Served increasing to 24 MWh from 21 MWh in the previous report. This new value is below the 1600 MWh threshold. Long Term Adequacy Metrics – February 2013 New Generation Projects and Retirements Metric The New Generation Projects and Retirements Metric is a summary of generation at various stages of development in Alberta and is shown in Tables 1 to 4 below. In Alberta’s deregulated electricity market competitive forces determine the location, magnitude and timing of new generation additions. Information on prospective generation additions and retirements provides context for the future market in Alberta. The information is drawn from a variety of public sources and includes new generation, changes to existing generation and the retirement of generating units. Changes in project in-service dates (ISDs) and regulatory stages occur as projects move forward and/or market conditions change. Current information on connection project ISDs can be found in the AESO Project List and information on power plant applications can be found at the Alberta Utilities Commission website. Table 1: Generation Projects under Construction Sponsor(s) Project Name Fuel Unit Capacity* ISD* ECB Enviro Lethbridge Biogas Biomass 4 Q2-2013 Grizzly Algar Gas 15 Q2-2013 MEG Christina Lake-Phase 2B Gas 85 Aug-2013 NRGreen Power Windfall Compressor Station Gas 16 Aug-2013 Sunshine West Ells Gas 24 Oct-2013 Imperial Oil Cold Lake (Nabiye) 2 Gas 170 Feb-2014 Mustus Energy Mustus Biomass Biomass 41 Sep-2014 Imperial Oil Kearl-Phase 1 Gas 100 Dec-2014 Enmax Shepard Energy Centre Gas 800 May-2015 Total (MW) Unit Capacity – Expected MW capacity; ISD – Estimated in-service date 1,255 Long Term Adequacy Metrics – February 2013 Table 2: Generation Project with Regulatory Approval Project Name Fuel Unit Capacity ISD Alberta Wind Energy Old Man River Wind Farm Wind 47 Nov-2013 Greengate Power Blackspring Ridge Wind Wind 300 Dec-2013 Maxim Power Deerland Peaking 1 Gas 90 Jan-2014 Joss Wind Hand Hills Wind Farm Wind 78 Jul-2014 Naturener Wild Rose 1 Wind 200 Jul-2014 Naturener Wild Rose 2 Wind 200 Jul-2014 Benign Energy Heritage Wind Farm 1 Wind 100 Sep-2014 Geilectric Inc. Welsch Wind Farm Wind 69 May-2015 TransCanada Saddlebrook Gas 350 Jun-2015 Benign Energy Heritage Wind Farm 2 Wind 250 Sep-2015 Nexen Long Lake South Kinosis Gas 85 Dec-2015 Enmax Bonnybrook Gas 168 Jun-2016 Cenovus Christina Lake 1E Gas 95 Dec-2016 Maxim Power HR Milner Expansion Coal 500 Nov-2017 TransAlta Dunvegan Hydro 100 TBD Sponsor(s) Total (MW) 2,632 Table 3: Generation Projects that have been Announced, Applied for AESO Connection, and/or Applied for Regulatory Approval Sponsor(s) Project Name Fuel Unit Capacity ISD* Pteragen Peace Butte Wind 116 Oct-2013 (P) Grand Prairie Gen. Harmattan Energy Center Gas 95 Dec-2013 (P) Windlab Bull Creek Wind 115 Feb-2014 (A) Suncor Hand Hills Wind 80 Mar-2014 (P) Long Term Adequacy Metrics – February 2013 Table 3: Generation Projects that have been Announced, Applied for AESO Connection, and/or Applied for Regulatory Approval Sponsor(s) Project Name Fuel Unit Capacity ISD* BowMont Capital Alberta Newsprint Company WhiteTail Peaking Gas 200 May-2014 (A) Alberta Newsprint Company Gas 65 May-2014 (A) E.ON Grizzly Bear Wind Facility Wind 120 May-2014 (A) BowArk Energy Queenstown Power Plant Gas 141 Sep-2014(A) E.ON Vermillion River Facility Wind 120 Oct-2014 (A) Dundurn Corp. Dundurn Gas 25 Oct-2014 (A) Enel Riverview Wind Farm Wind 115 Oct-2014 (A) Old Man Power Lethbridge Energy Centre Gas 130 Dec-2014 (A) Sprott Power Fort Macleod Wind Facility Wind 60 Dec-2014 (A) Acciona Alberta Wind Energy New Dayton Wind 99 Jan-2015 (A) Windy Point Wind 46.8 Apr-2015 (P) MEG Energy Mainstream Renewable Christina Lake Cogeneration 3A Gas 80 May-2015 (A) Wainwright Wind Project Wind 150 May-2015 (A) Shear Wind Willowridge Wind 100 Jun-2015 (P) Renewable Energy Services PC006 Wind Farm Wind 75 Jul-2015 (A) Sprott Power Fort Macleod Gas 20 Jul-2015 (A) CNRL Horizon – Phase 2 Gas 85 Sept-2015 (C) Swan Hills Synfuels Swan Hills Sagitawah Gas 340 Oct-2015 (P) Total Joslyn Mine Gas 85 Oct-2015 (A) Shear Wind Inc. Coyote Ridge – Phase 1 Wind 120 Dec-2015 (A) Shell Carmon Creek – Gen 1 Gas 200 Jan-2016 (A) Shell Carmon Creek – Gen 2 Gas 200 Jan-2016 (A) Long Term Adequacy Metrics – February 2013 Table 3: Generation Projects that have been Announced, Applied for AESO Connection, and/or Applied for Regulatory Approval Sponsor(s) Project Name Fuel Unit Capacity ISD* Shell Carmon Creek – Gen 3 Gas 200 Jan-2016 (A) MEG Alberta Wind Energy Surmont – Phase 1 Gas 80 May-2016 (A) Old Elm & Pothole Creek Wind 300 Dec-2016 (A) Shear Wind Inc. Coyote Ridge – Phase 2 Wind 380 Dec-2016 (A) Total Joslyn – Phase 2 Gas 85 Jan-2017 (A) Cenovus Narrows Lake – Phase 1A Gas 30 Apr-2017 (A) Capital Power CPEC – Phase 1 Gas 400 May-2017 (C) AOSC Dover North Gas 85 Jun-2017 (A) AOSC MacKay Gas 85 Jun-2017 (A) Cenovus Telephone Lake B Gas 50 Apr-2018 (C) TransAlta Sundance 7 Gas 850 2018 (C) Cenovus Telephone Lake C Gas 50 Apr-2019 (C) Cenovus Foster Creek – Phase H Gas 40 Jun-2019 (C) AOSC Dover West Gas 100 Jul-2019 (A) Capital Power CPEC – Phase 2 Gas 500 May-2020 (C) TransAlta Sundance 8 Gas 700 TBD (C) TransAlta Sundance 9 Gas 700 TBD (C) GTE Brooks Power Plant Solar 15 TBD (C) Total (MW) 1 7,583 * - (P):Power Plant application filed with AUC, (A): AESO application in process, (C): Corporate announcement 1 TransAlta has announced Sundance 7 in-service date could range from 2016-2019. For the LTA metrics, the AESO has included Sundance 7 in the 2018 reserve margin. Long Term Adequacy Metrics – February 2013 Table 4: Generation Projects that have Announced to Retired Sponsor(s) Project Name Fuel Unit Capacity N/A Total (MW) 0 Retire Date Status Long Term Adequacy Metrics – February 2013 Reserve Margin Metric The Reserve Margin Metric, shown in Figure 1, presents a comparison of generation supply and demand in Alberta. It is a calculation of the firm generation capacity at the time of system peak that is in excess of the system annual peak demand, expressed as a percentage of the system peak. Information on the annual peak demand within the reserve margin can be found at Forecasting. Firm generation is defined as installed and future generation capacity, adjusting for seasonal hydro capacity and behind-the-fence demand and generation, and excludes wind capacity. Three forecast reserve margins are presented, each with different future supply additions. The supply additions correspond to the stage of the generation projects in the New Generation Projects and Retirements Metric. The metric is graphed with and without intertie capacity in one reserve margin since full import capability may not always be available at the time of system peak demand. Capacity from Sundance 1 and 2 has been excluded from the 2011 and 2012 reserve margin but included in the forecast reserve margin values. These units are anticipated to return to service in the fall of 2013. Figure 1: Alberta Interconnected Electric System (AIES) Reserve Margin, 2000 - 2018 Long Term Adequacy Metrics – February 2013 Supply Cushion Metric The Supply Cushion Metric provides visibility of the Alberta Interconnected Electric System’s ability to meet peak demand on a daily basis. The supply cushion is the difference between the daily available firm supply minus daily peak demand. Only existing generation and generation under construction are used within the metric. The supply cushion refines the reserve margin calculation by using daily system peak rather than annual and incorporates planned outages. Figure 2 presents the estimated daily supply cushion for the next two years. Figure 3 presents daily peak demand and firm supply by fuel type, as well as interties, wind and back up generation (Rainbow) which are not included in the supply cushion calculation due to the intermittent or uncertain nature of the supply. When the supply cushion is negative in Figure 2, there is an increased level of reliance on interties, wind and back up generation, as indicated in Figure 3. Figure 2: Alberta Interconnected Electric System (AIES) Daily Supply Cushion, February 1, 2012 to January 31, 2015 Long Term Adequacy Metrics – February 2013 Figure 3: Alberta Interconnected Electric System (AIES) Daily Peak Demand and Available Supply, February 1, 2013 to January 31, 2015 Long Term Adequacy Metrics – February 2013 Two Year Probability of Supply Adequacy Shortfall Metric The Two Year Probability of Supply Adequacy Shortfall Metric is a probabilistic assessment of encountering a supply shortfall over the next two years. It builds on the Supply Cushion Metric by incorporating the probability of wind production, forced generation outages and generation derates into the calculation of hourly firm supply. The calculation estimates, on a probabilistic basis, how much load may go without supply over the next two year period. Based on extensive consultation with stakeholders, when this unserved energy exceeds 1,600 MWh in any two year period (equivalent to one hour 800 MW shortfall in each of the two years), the AESO may take certain actions to bridge the temporary supply adequacy gap without impacting investor confidence in the market. The total energy not served shown in Table 5 does not reach the threshold. Table 5: Two Year Probability of Supply Adequacy Shortfall, February 1, 2013 to January 31, 2015 Worst Shortfall Hour (MW) # of Hours in Shortfall Total Energy Not Served (MWh) 9 0 24 Note: Values are rounded and represent average outputs